xpost i'm sorry Kingfish but only Ned is allowed to change the subject using the "Meanwhile: -link-" format.
;)
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 20:27 (eleven years ago) link
i could be wrong but its my understanding theres more they can do xp zs
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 21:07 (eleven years ago) link
this could go on for months w/o causing any problems really
In terms of actually keeping the wheels on, yes. But from a global finance perspective, turning our willingness to pay our debts into a never-ending political fight is all kinds of irresponsible.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 21:10 (eleven years ago) link
ha yeah i think we passed the all kinds of irresponsible threshold a while ago
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 21:11 (eleven years ago) link
well yeah
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 21:13 (eleven years ago) link
Hate these guys:
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/02/16305284-house-gop-blocks-violence-against-women-act?lite
― this will surprise many (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 21:45 (eleven years ago) link
All sorts of wishful thinking 'is Boehner toast' chatter out there now.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:42 (eleven years ago) link
Boehner ain't going anywhere except the bar for a bourbon, one ice cube.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:43 (eleven years ago) link
Meanwhile, some sausage making
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress-legacy/the-gop-s-failed-plan-o-inside-the-fiscal-cliff-saga-20130102
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:45 (eleven years ago) link
xpost re: house GOP block of VAWA
But House Republicans insisted the bill is too supportive of immigrants, the LGBT community, and Native Americans -- and they'd rather let the law expire than approve a slightly expanded proposal.
jeeeez. maybe the article is missing some sort of argument the GOP made against the bill (expansion of govt. spending or some other bullshit?). did they have any excuse to block the bill other than "we hate immigrants, the LGBT community, and Native Americans"?
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:54 (eleven years ago) link
if there are any groups that get too much support in this country it's immigrants, LGBT folks, and native americans.
― If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:55 (eleven years ago) link
I mean geez we already let them have CASINOS wtf else do they want
We need more LGBT casinos
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:58 (eleven years ago) link
we need more LGBT immigrants imo
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:58 (eleven years ago) link
looking into a bit more (also via maddowblog), the breaking point for the GOP (cantor in particular) was protections for Native American women. The LGBT and immigrant stuff he could "bend" on, but protecting Native American women? ENOUGH IS ENOUGH FOR ERIC CANTOR. *barf*
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/12/07/15751333-gop-eyes-violence-against-women-act-changes?lite
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 23:07 (eleven years ago) link
these fucking fucking fucking peoplehttp://mediamatters.org/video/2012/12/05/perinos-advice-to-women-who-are-victims-of-viol/191702
― jazbay crostata (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 23:09 (eleven years ago) link
no one even batted an eye at that.
― pplains, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 23:18 (eleven years ago) link
they were all too busy contemplating the other guy's claim that it was a fact that "millions" of people had protected themselves with guns, and that her personally knew "many" people who had protected their homes with guns, or whatever
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 23:29 (eleven years ago) link
b/w not voting on Sandy relief and the Violence Against Women Act ... this is pure sand-in-their-pussies spitefulness.
fuck them all to Hell, seriously.
― 롤이 엿 번역 시간을 낭비 (Eisbaer), Thursday, 3 January 2013 00:18 (eleven years ago) link
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:07 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
manifest cantor
― lag∞n, Thursday, 3 January 2013 01:22 (eleven years ago) link
caveat cantor
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 3 January 2013 03:01 (eleven years ago) link
eric "richard 'dick' tomato pizza" cantor
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 3 January 2013 03:10 (eleven years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, January 2, 2013 2:45 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
“You get nothing. I get that for free," said Obama
― autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Thursday, 3 January 2013 04:06 (eleven years ago) link
Rules Committee ranking Democrat Louise Slaughter of New York summed up the events: “Today’s legislation is far from perfect, and the process that led us here has been an utter disgrace.”
solitary posts...
― lag∞n, Thursday, 3 January 2013 05:10 (eleven years ago) link
5) Subsidies for Goldman Sachs Headquarters – Sec. 328 extends “tax exempt financing for York Liberty Zone,” which was a program to provide post-9/11 recovery funds. Rather than going to small businesses affected, however, this was, according to Bloomberg, “little more than a subsidy for fancy Manhattan apartments and office towers for Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Corp.” Michael Bloomberg himself actually thought the program was excessive, so that’s saying something. According to David Cay Johnston’s The Fine Print, Goldman got $1.6 billion in tax free financing for its new massive headquarters through Liberty Bonds.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/01/eight-corporate-subsidies-in-the-fiscal-cliff-bill-from-goldman-sachs-to-disney-to-nascar.html
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 3 January 2013 15:09 (eleven years ago) link
Just a lonely guy eating Cheetos:
“If this is how we end the 112th Congress, it will disappoint every member of the class,” said freshman Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., as he munched on Cheetos and walking alone after a GOP conference meeting on Tuesday. “This is exactly what we came to change, problems like this.… We came here to make big bold changes, and at the end of the day, for whatever reason, we frittered away most of the energy that sent us to here in 2010.”
Pobrecito.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 January 2013 15:25 (eleven years ago) link
keep eating those Cheetos, Tim, and you'll see big bold changes soon enough.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 January 2013 15:30 (eleven years ago) link
sounds like the kinda guy who sees a doctor because his dick is turning orange.
― pplains, Thursday, 3 January 2013 15:53 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.lolbrary.com/content/200/the-worst-part-about-eating-cheetos-is-all-the-crap-you-get-on-your-fingers-27200.jpg
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 January 2013 15:54 (eleven years ago) link
Bleurgh.
― karl lagerlout (suzy), Thursday, 3 January 2013 15:59 (eleven years ago) link
Huelskamp a media Cheetos glutton.
http://www.morningsun.net/newsnow/x65622948/INSIGHT-KANSAS-Huelskamp-a-media-glutton
Dude is one of the more punchable asshats on news shows imo.
― Rocking Disco Santa (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:00 (eleven years ago) link
is that one of the guys who got famous for being 'purged'?
― goole, Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:25 (eleven years ago) link
of Cheetos?
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:26 (eleven years ago) link
"We've replaced Tim Huelskamp's committee appointments with a bag of Cheetos; let's see if he noti- What? They're gone already?"
my 2013 resolution is to Custos the fuck out of any and all political threads btw
― GIMME SOME REGGAE (DJP), Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:29 (eleven years ago) link
a chilling resolution
― too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:42 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/01/03/you_ll_have_to_wait_19_days_for_a_filibuster_reform_vote.html
― Mordy, Thursday, 3 January 2013 16:44 (eleven years ago) link
Tumulty and Wallsten's framing of this is straight BS, even if they answer their own dumb question. can't keep the DC press away from 'bipartisan' catnip
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/has-the-fiscal-cliff-fight-changed-how-washington-works/2013/01/02/ee832fb0-5510-11e2-a613-ec8d394535c6_story.html
As ugly as they were, the “fiscal cliff” negotiations produced something Washington hadn’t seen in a long time: strongly bipartisan votes in the House and the Senate on a big, contentious issue.
The question now is whether that victory of pragmatism over ideology offers a new model of governing as President Obama approaches his second term and the shattered Republican Party tries to regroup
The answer: probably not, though it may have helped define the terms of engagement for the battles to come.
― goole, Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:20 (eleven years ago) link
lol, reading further: huelskamp really does need to ditch the cheetohs
“I know a lot of folks walked out with a real bad taste in their mouths,” said Rep. Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), a freshman who has emerged as a leading critic of Boehner’s since the speaker removed him from a plum committee assignment last month. “It wasn’t Republicans clapping and cheering. It was Democrats.”
― goole, Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:22 (eleven years ago) link
*eats Cheetos furiously thinking of battles to come*
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:22 (eleven years ago) link
a picture of said Cheetos muncher:
http://images.politico.com/global/news/110215_huelskamp_cuts_ap_605.jpg
― 롤이 엿 번역 시간을 낭비 (Eisbaer), Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:24 (eleven years ago) link
where's that hand been, Rep Huelskamp?
http://pods.wibwradio.com/feeds/media/01268_Tim_Huelskamp_2.jpg
― 롤이 엿 번역 시간을 낭비 (Eisbaer), Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:25 (eleven years ago) link
upthread someone asked why anyone would want the speakership. one reason is having the power to give or take away plum committee assignements. just because boehner has been remarkably ineffective as speaker doesn't mean the position isn't the third most powerful office in DC, just behind the potus and the fed chair.
― Aimless, Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:28 (eleven years ago) link
I guess some people still like him
― If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 January 2013 19:41 (eleven years ago) link
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dcccteapartymembercard2.jpg
this was sent from the DCCC to the 35 freshmen GOP represenatives today.
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 3 January 2013 20:41 (eleven years ago) link
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/1/3/9/enhanced-buzz-1532-1357223513-0.jpg
this was sent from the NRCC to freshmen democrats last Thursday.
― "reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 3 January 2013 20:43 (eleven years ago) link
pelosi should be telling democrats how to vote more often than not
― fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 January 2013 21:07 (eleven years ago) link
has the party in power ever split votes enough so the minority leader was elected speaker?
― fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 January 2013 21:12 (eleven years ago) link
Yeah, I have no problem with that
― "It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Thursday, 3 January 2013 21:13 (eleven years ago) link
jaymc to thread!
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 January 2013 21:13 (eleven years ago) link
did he answer that on jeopardy or something
― fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 January 2013 21:16 (eleven years ago) link