A clear statement about mod actions on 77

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (234 of them)

I Love Meta would be such a useful board - all posters would know their one stop shop for potential shit talk. there could even be labels so you wouldn't have to scan all threads to see if someone re-posted one of your challenging opinions

jordy (J0rdan S.), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link

"What happens if I'm talking about a zebra and there happens to be a poster I've never heard of called A Zebra who isn't on 77 and I get banned forever for meta?"

Matt DC, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link

can we talk shit about suspected trolls?

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link

good point matt - are we or are we not allowed to post pictures of puppies on 77 now?

jordy (J0rdan S.), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link

also, for clarification, is there any wiggle room here at all? if a burt_stanton or captain lorax jr. shows up next week and isn't added too 77 are we not allowed to re-post to something like "this fucking guy"?

― jordy (J0rdan S.), Monday, February 2, 2009 8:44 PM (4 minutes ago)

no. this is totally 100% clear, and all the examples in the world are not going to change from this same answer.

xposts yeah like all the other examples you gave while i typed this are also completely clear and dont really need to get discussed.

CLAPSOCK (John Justen), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago) link

okay now that we are in the stupdi trolling portion of this thread, are we done with conversation or does anyone have something pertinent or new to say

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago) link

why don't you dudes just get on some non ilx sponsored forum to talk about ilx people

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link

narutoforums.com

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link

hey mod folx i appreciate that youre really annoyed by all these tedious meta threads, but what were trying to do here is warn you guys that this kind of hard-line stance involving perma banning etc is only going to lead to more tedious meta threads

max, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I think what we're warning you about back is that creating more meta threads is a surefire way to lose 77.

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah i guess im just not really sure why thats worth it to anyone

max, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:54 (fifteen years ago) link

no, because this "hard-line" stance is very clear and precise, and as a result, there won't be any long meta threads, because there is nothing at all that is an exception to the rule here, and the rule is something that every ilx user has at their disposal in the search menu like i indicated right up there at the top of the page. therefore, there wont need to be a discussion, because if you post about someone not on 77 who posts on ilx, you get banned from 77 permanently. this is a simple distinction. xposts

CLAPSOCK (John Justen), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:56 (fifteen years ago) link

why don't you dudes just get on some non ilx sponsored forum to talk about ilx people

― cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, February 2, 2009 9:52 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

some staunch critics of the british 77ers have certainly done this before.

display name fatigue (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Guys just go and bitch about everyone on AIM chat like you all used to, its not that hard; my god this is the most boring and stunted-growth argument I think I have ever read on this board in the 6 years I have been here by a long mile.

Trayce, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link

let's say for a moment that you've been talking smack about someone who wasn't on ilx and then starts posting on ilx and you continue to talk smack, unaware that they are posting. wiggle room y/n

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link

how about anyone who bitches about the mods around here for more than like three posts gets thrown in a dungeon with gabbneb, a lightsabre, dr. morbius and bruce springsteen

Mr. Que, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Tom Brady can't read, Omar. xp

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the only thing i like more than long ass meta threads are the people who feel compelled to come post on the meta threads to tell us all how bored they are by said threads

max, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:03 (fifteen years ago) link

max just wait 6 years

jordy (J0rdan S.), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:06 (fifteen years ago) link

not a rickroll but I still wouldn't click on it

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:08 (fifteen years ago) link

is a "meta thread" just made up of inside jokes? never mind...

(Que, I'm decent company in a dungeon)

Dr Morbius, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago) link

love this drama, thanks guys

green to white technology (jeff), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link

There's no fake bombshells or buffy blackmail, raise your standards.

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:20 (fifteen years ago) link

a clear statement about mod actions on 77

BATTER UP, OBVYOUS IMG JOEK

http://patrickmackenzie.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/thejam.jpg

System Jr. (Mackro Mackro), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:20 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the only thing i like more than long ass meta threads are the people who feel compelled to come post on the meta threads to tell us all how bored they are by said threads

1) post statement
2) lock thread
3) enforce policy

that's how i'd roll as a mod, but i'd probably ban people left and right when in a pissy mood too

bnw, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:26 (fifteen years ago) link

hey mods, cats always fuck up these kinds of threads about mod actions with 'trolling' and 'board lawyering' because there's no point in taking mod mandates seriously as an internally consistent rulebook. y'all move the goalposts every other day and make shit up as you go along, which is fine to an extent, better to respond to new problems with new solutions and all, but doing the exasperated schoolmaster act every time is just going to make certain 77ers act like bratty 7th graders even more. as far as i can tell there is no real maturity level or moral standard that separates those with mod privileges from those that don't, it's just some haves vs. have nots bullshit.

some dude, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:29 (fifteen years ago) link

god this is so retarded. mods, just let people post about whatever the fuck they want unless its spam or personal information. who the fuck cares? what harm does it really do? stop your lame dick waving.

also does anyone else think its weird that the two most vocal mods telling us how to post are:

a) a dude that posts racist/homophobic attacks on other posters (tombot)

b) a dude that posts about being an admitted statutory rapist (john justen)

why are these sicko douchebags even mods?

stevie blue, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:34 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry, Alex, you were saying...?

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:36 (fifteen years ago) link

!

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:38 (fifteen years ago) link

lol

some dude, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I do have to say I am glad I was actually off having fun while all of this shit was going on. Disneyland > ILX meta bullshit

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:40 (fifteen years ago) link

sure thing, chak-- i mean dan

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:42 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^ are user names like omar's grounds for dismissal

s1ocki, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:43 (fifteen years ago) link

if they are then I'm in trouble

chak-- i mean dan (some dude), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:45 (fifteen years ago) link

BTW, for those keeping score, not a rapist, statutory or otherwise.

CLAPSOCK (John Justen), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:48 (fifteen years ago) link

you just fucked up my ILX rapist bingo card, dog.

chak-- i mean dan (some dude), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:49 (fifteen years ago) link

which i considered using as a new username, but i can only successfully googlebomb myself so much, ya know xpost

CLAPSOCK (John Justen), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:49 (fifteen years ago) link

hey mods, cats always fuck up these kinds of threads about mod actions with 'trolling' and 'board lawyering' because there's no point in taking mod mandates seriously as an internally consistent rulebook. y'all move the goalposts every other day and make shit up as you go along, which is fine to an extent, better to respond to new problems with new solutions and all, but doing the exasperated schoolmaster act every time is just going to make certain 77ers act like bratty 7th graders even more. as far as i can tell there is no real maturity level or moral standard that separates those with mod privileges from those that don't, it's just some haves vs. have nots bullshit.

― some dude, Monday, February 2, 2009 4:29 PM

http://gammablog.com/gammablablog/images/5-03/5-4/truth2.jpg

eman, Monday, 2 February 2009 21:55 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah of course, but when you're playing at someone's house and they're being a dick, do you keep going over and just start yelling all the time or do you just kinda shrug cause they got nintendo and it's worth the hassle?

angry pro-microwave vegetarian (forksclovetofu), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:59 (fifteen years ago) link

cause i like nintendo

angry pro-microwave vegetarian (forksclovetofu), Monday, 2 February 2009 21:59 (fifteen years ago) link

test

forksclovestfu (eman), Monday, 2 February 2009 22:00 (fifteen years ago) link

that depends; do you let them win at every game and say nothing just so they never get mad and kick you out?

xpost

some dude, Monday, 2 February 2009 22:01 (fifteen years ago) link

stevie, we hardly knew ye

velko, Monday, 2 February 2009 22:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually, I ended up buying my own nintendo.

eman: it's been done.

angry pro-microwave vegetarian (forksclovetofu), Monday, 2 February 2009 22:04 (fifteen years ago) link

There's no fake bombshells or buffy blackmail, raise your standards.

― Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, February 2, 2009 4:20 PM (30 minutes ago)

nicole and trayce otm, by the way. i think most people who see this long meta thread are going to read it and be interested, assuming some shit has really gone down, only to read it and be like, 'wtf, this is the shit you guys were arguing about?'...illustrating the "who fucking cares" POV. i was shit talked about plenty when i first got here and still probably am some on boards/threads i dont read, but it's cool. for the record, i respect yr authority and all and plan to play by the rules you laid out above, im just sayin'.

k3vin k., Monday, 2 February 2009 22:05 (fifteen years ago) link

and you are....

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 22:08 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost also, I would never let you win at nintendo.
Or more to the point, I think the only mod harassment I've faced in the FUCK five years FUCK I've been here is when Jon kicked me off noise board or when Aja/Dante got shut down. Neither of which really broke my heart; though the loss of A/D was a bummer and one that I'd rather not see happen to 77... and as I recall, A/D got got because of precisely this kinda thread only it was estepato doin' the borad lawyerin' then.

angry pro-microwave vegetarian (forksclovetofu), Monday, 2 February 2009 22:09 (fifteen years ago) link

btw who was stevie blue??

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 22:09 (fifteen years ago) link

o shit i just revealed the secret racist agenda of 77 on ile :O - damn u site new answers

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link

i too am appalled

n00bian princess (some dude), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.