X-Men: Days of Future Past random info dump thread

sorry for calling movie by its name please forgive so sorry

Saw it a few months ago for the first time since theaters and X2 has aged very, very poorly. If Singer wasn't in on the ground floor with this series, I'm sure he'd be looked at in the same way as any other Len Wiseman/John Moore/etc. studio hack

You guys are gross

bruh i just want a movie with rad sentinels and i do not trust Singer to give me that

Sorry Raymund Cummings

That said this movie could be awesome

There's some really good stuff in the second X-Men movie, and I imagine without it and its success we wouldn't have gotten the more successful subsequent Marvel reboots. Then again, you could also say that without the silly failures of Ang Lee's "Hulk" and Singer's "Stuporman" we might not have gotten the more successful reboots, either.

Man, can't believe Singer is almost 50.

I don't think Singer gets the same thing out of comics that I do

x2 sucked

X1 and X2 were close in quality

'90s X-Men cartoon is the only adaptation you need.

I think Ang Lee's Hulk is better than its rep. I'd rather see more comics adaptations by him than anything by Singer.

No.

X1-3 have always felt about the same, quality-wise, to me. I actually like First Class the least.

i havent seen X2 since it came out but i thought it was pretty sick back then.

Compared to the excitement surrounding the other Marvel universe, this is all a bit old hat

Yeah, this is otm. The Marvel Studios movies have done a great job of putting a lot of the fun stuff from the comics on-screen and creating a sense of a shared universe. The X-Men movies, on the other hand, have seemed increasingly like box-ticking exercises to ensure the movie rights didn't revert back to Marvel.

I did enjoy First Class, mainly for Fassbender and McAvoy's performances, but the idea of a flashback movie must surely have come because they had painted themselves into a stupid corner at the end of X3 and couldn't think of an alternative. I have similar reservations about the thinking behind bringing back McKellen and Stewart.

the 3rd x-men movie is like a surprisingly entertaining bill mantlo fill-in after the ponderous len weinesque first two

I liked the first two fine but I always kind of tried too hard to like them because that was as good as it got at the time. Glad that Marvel is finally putting out movies that I enjoy unreservedly (Lee's Hulk was stylistically annoying, and I never got what people saw in the Spider-flicks).

xp Haha, I'd never thought of it like that before but you're right. It certainly has all the Mantlo hallmarks of being hastily hashed-together at the last minute to cover a blown deadline. In fact, wasn't X3 rushed into production to meet a predetermined release date?

I have similar reservations about the thinking behind bringing back McKellen and Stewart.

― bizarro gazzara, Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:28 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i bet they won't be in it that much

yeah. matthew vaughn was the original director of X3 and he bailed because he didnt like the release date, which is how ratner came to fill in for him.

he didn't like the fact that they didn't have a script or finished production design but that the release date meant that shooting started in a week or three, iirc

I was high on pain medication and sleep deprived when I watched X3 so I remember LOVING it. If I watched it now it would probably be terrible, but at the time it was hilarious and entertaining.

X3 is terrible, but it is also hilarious and entertaining

I did enjoy First Class, mainly for Fassbender and McAvoy's performances, but the idea of a flashback movie must surely have come because they had painted themselves into a stupid corner at the end of X3 and couldn't think of an alternative.

Or... they are taking the second-most popular X-Men story and adapting it for the big screen after taking the most popular X-Men story (Dark Phoenix) and adapting it for the big screen

he means First Class was a flashback movie

Of course that's what they're doing, DJP - it just seems to me that the fact they needed to quietly reboot with a shift to the sixties instead of just continuing on to do Days of Future Past as a direct sequel to X3 suggests they ran out of narrative steam with the third movie.

i havent seen X2 since it came out but i thought it was pretty sick back then.

― turds (Hungry4Ass)

It was pretty good, but I spent most of it thinking 'Why does this not have Sentinels in it?'

the 3rd x-men movie is like a surprisingly entertaining bill mantlo fill-in after the ponderous len weinesque first two

― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:30 AM

nerd lolz.

It was pretty good, but I spent most of it thinking 'Why does this not have Sentinels in it?'

― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:22 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

it sucked how they pussed out on sentinels in x3 because avi arad hates giant humanoids or something

Galactus say hi to you
http://www.voalte.com/uploads/images/doodle-525-cloud.jpeg

X2 seemed really cool at the time, definitely better than the first one and in hindsight leagues ahead of the terrible third one. But they all started to feel hokey and made-for-TV once the general caliber of superhero movies started rising with stuff like Spider-Man 1 and 2.

I liked it so much I remember thinking s1ocki was a jerk for disliking it (I really have no excuse for this other than him being relatively new at the time). Then I watched it on tv a couple of years ago and realized it was pretty meh.

http://i.qkme.me/3ppljj.jpg

sorry, I had just woken up when I wrote that previous post

It had a cool plot, more going on in it than the first one by far, some nice shoutouts to bits of continuity that you wouldn't think they'd use, the cool Wolverine/Deathstrike fight, the whole Magneto-recruiting-Pyro thing which was cool...but just overall not compelling. I assume it's better than the Fantastic Four movies (which I've only seen bits of).

Probably wouldn't turn it off if I was home for the holidays and it was on in the afternoon.

oh man, EVERYTHING is better than the Fantastic Four movie, including oral surgery

https://josephmallozzi.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/cap-super-slapfight.jpg

http://www.customaniacs.org/forum/CM_show_preview.php?attachmentid=80318

http://omnipotent-film-critic.com/img-2005/elektra-2.jpg

^^^ qualified oral surgeons

i've enjoyed every x movie (even wolverine). the "young kid learns their disability is a virtue" thing always tugs at my heartstrings and super powers are nifty.

granted i'm not sure i've ever seen any of them twice

realizing i remember exactly nothing about any of the x-men movies

The first X-Men movie was the point where I had to confront the fact that while I really adore watching her on screen, Halle Berry actually is a horrible actress.

no one could have delivered that "do you know what happens to a toad" line credibly tbf

Her line reading was incredibly wooden, even though the line is bad.

maybe Angela Bassett or Gina Torres?

I loved the way Halle Berry had a terrible faux-African accent in the first one which she just decided to dispense with altogether for the second and third ones.

She did???? I don't remember that at all!

halle's perf in the first x-men is oscarworthy next to january jones in first class

to be fair NO ONE could deliver chris claremont-derived dialogue with any conviction