while dying their roots blond, quoting lawrence of arabia
― diamanda ram dass (Edward III), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:49 (eleven years ago) link
Critics are afraid of talking about movies IRL with IRL people.
― The Eric and Re Show (Eric H.), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:49 (eleven years ago) link
and getting some fools killed
― Convert simple JEEZ to BDSMcode (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:51 (eleven years ago) link
IN A WORLD WHERE PEOPLE WATCH ONLY GOOD MOVIES AND ENJOY THEM ...
― the late great, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:51 (eleven years ago) link
scans from the "art of" book
http://prometheusfrance.forumdefans.com/t36-le-livre-officiel-informations-officielles
Check out this intrepid little guy
http://i42.servimg.com/u/f42/16/22/94/10/p19210.jpg
― Number None, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:52 (eleven years ago) link
ONE BITTER FILM CRITIC WAS DAYS AWAY FROM RETIREMENT
― Convert simple JEEZ to BDSMcode (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:52 (eleven years ago) link
that jogging alien is the dumbest looking thing
― the late great, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:54 (eleven years ago) link
from GIS of "dumbest looking thing"
http://grfx.cstv.com/schools/ucsb/graphics/auto/olepromo.jpg
― Convert simple JEEZ to BDSMcode (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:58 (eleven years ago) link
https://encrypted-tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQiSUOoBwYg4CeIZobXOLyOhQQ0RuTmqNlpfFG7lU3s_b3jp_br
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 19:58 (eleven years ago) link
microsoft introduces its new virtual concierge for windows 8, squishy the spermicle
― diamanda ram dass (Edward III), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:01 (eleven years ago) link
that alien is dumber than that dumbest thing
― the late great, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:07 (eleven years ago) link
To be fair, if you just looked at the art book pictures without understanding the French text you could probably put together a pretty terrific narrative that's far better than the movie.
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:07 (eleven years ago) link
xxxposts jon I can confirm Charles Band is still very much alive - he runs a little studio called Full Moon Pictures and is currently in production on Zombies Vs Strippers :D
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:08 (eleven years ago) link
has anyone seen his rubber suit monster movies? are those any fun?
― Convert simple JEEZ to BDSMcode (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:12 (eleven years ago) link
More book tidbits/photos/background stories:
http://io9.com/5917639/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-design-of-prometheus
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:13 (eleven years ago) link
This review piles it on, but this part nails my dislike...
As in any Ridley Scott attempt to grapple with “big themes,” the ideas in Prometheus get handled with utter heavy-handedness in those few moments where they aren’t being ignored entirely in favor of empty bombast. Take the “questions of faith” Scott boldly explores here. Elizabeth, shown to be religious from childhood in a dreamscape flashback, and Charlie, who bears a cross tattoo on his arm, are the film’s standard-bearers for belief; they’re convinced their quest will lead to final answers. On the opposite side are the ship’s pragmatic, universe-weary captain Janek (Idris Elba), stern Weiland representative Meredith (Charlize Theron), and geologist Fifield (Sean Harris), all of whom seem far less concerned with the identity of their creator than making money and continuing to live. Somewhere in the middle is the ship’s android steward David (Michael Fassbender, providing the film’s only true signs of life); his motives in relation to the overall mission are opaque, but he does take any chance he can to remind the humans of his own created-ness at the hands of man. This confluence of characters should be the basis for some meaty narrative conflict, but you won’t learn much more about Sir Ridley’s thoughts on these weighty matters beyond the brief description I’ve just provided. Why explore the elements of your films, when it’s just so easy to merely introduce lots of stuff and hope that audiences will do the work for you?Though science fiction often seems uniquely positioned to ponder the most massive of ontological questions, one can forgive when well-crafted futuristic fictions skimp on the thematic heft; Alien is remarkable for just how little it seemed to care about anything beyond great scares and thrills. It didn’t try to be 2001, unlike its new prequel. However, the real problem with Prometheus isn’t that its pretension can’t masks its ultimate empty-headedness; it’s that on a very basic level the movie just doesn’t really make any sense. (Not to mention that its creation myth completely contradicts everything we learned about our prehistory from Alien vs. Predator!) Plot threads begin, but are never resolved. Others happen in inexplicable vacuums: Elizabeth, accidentally impregnated with alien DNA, aborts the deadly fetus with the help of some kind of surgery machine pod, yet somehow no one else on the ship seems to know or hear anything about it. Major events are completely unlinked from consequence or are raised and resolved with impressive velocity: when Charlie, infected by the same DNA, is torched to death a few scenes later by a flamethrower wielding Meredith, the rest of the team reacts with little more than a “whatevs.” Others simply baffle: when the remaining members of the group find Powder’s similarly albino cousin and wake him from his eons-long slumber, what does the creature do but immediately recommence the mission to destroy all life on Earth that was begun thousands of years prior? Couldn’t this highly advanced race of beings just have sent another ship and killed off the human race at any time? Why wait until a bunch of knuckle-dragging cave dwellers learned the art of interstellar travel and came to find their “engineers” (the film’s ridiculous parlance, not mine)? This list could easily extend. It’s fine for movies to be simple of mind, but it’s unacceptable for them to treat their audiences as if they are as well.Roger Ebert argued in his wildly positive review of Prometheus that it is “all the more intriguing because it raises questions about the origin of human life and doesn’t have the answers.” This is a quite stupid thing to say in relation to a film like Prometheus for any number of reasons, not least of which is that it is clearly a film so utterly underconceived that it couldn’t even be said to be actively withholding the answers it obnoxiously never provides. It’s a lovely thing to look at—a feast of silvery grays and murky browns—but Scott’s been the master of lushly brainless imagery since at least as far back as 1492: Conquest of Paradise. Why do we exist? Prometheus will never tell—it’s not even curious enough to guess.
Though science fiction often seems uniquely positioned to ponder the most massive of ontological questions, one can forgive when well-crafted futuristic fictions skimp on the thematic heft; Alien is remarkable for just how little it seemed to care about anything beyond great scares and thrills. It didn’t try to be 2001, unlike its new prequel. However, the real problem with Prometheus isn’t that its pretension can’t masks its ultimate empty-headedness; it’s that on a very basic level the movie just doesn’t really make any sense. (Not to mention that its creation myth completely contradicts everything we learned about our prehistory from Alien vs. Predator!) Plot threads begin, but are never resolved. Others happen in inexplicable vacuums: Elizabeth, accidentally impregnated with alien DNA, aborts the deadly fetus with the help of some kind of surgery machine pod, yet somehow no one else on the ship seems to know or hear anything about it. Major events are completely unlinked from consequence or are raised and resolved with impressive velocity: when Charlie, infected by the same DNA, is torched to death a few scenes later by a flamethrower wielding Meredith, the rest of the team reacts with little more than a “whatevs.” Others simply baffle: when the remaining members of the group find Powder’s similarly albino cousin and wake him from his eons-long slumber, what does the creature do but immediately recommence the mission to destroy all life on Earth that was begun thousands of years prior? Couldn’t this highly advanced race of beings just have sent another ship and killed off the human race at any time? Why wait until a bunch of knuckle-dragging cave dwellers learned the art of interstellar travel and came to find their “engineers” (the film’s ridiculous parlance, not mine)? This list could easily extend. It’s fine for movies to be simple of mind, but it’s unacceptable for them to treat their audiences as if they are as well.
Roger Ebert argued in his wildly positive review of Prometheus that it is “all the more intriguing because it raises questions about the origin of human life and doesn’t have the answers.” This is a quite stupid thing to say in relation to a film like Prometheus for any number of reasons, not least of which is that it is clearly a film so utterly underconceived that it couldn’t even be said to be actively withholding the answers it obnoxiously never provides. It’s a lovely thing to look at—a feast of silvery grays and murky browns—but Scott’s been the master of lushly brainless imagery since at least as far back as 1492: Conquest of Paradise. Why do we exist? Prometheus will never tell—it’s not even curious enough to guess.
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:32 (eleven years ago) link
tbh would totally watch a series of webisodes featuring widdlest xenomorph just checkin things out
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:33 (eleven years ago) link
(xpost)
people on facebook/twitter/here keep posting about people complaining about this movie while not seeing "good movies"/artsy independent films - if you can recommend any good smaller/obscure movies that are out right now, please feel free to do so, because all the ones i read about sound shitty
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:37 (eleven years ago) link
like i guess i should have spent my $11 on quirky indie romcom lola versus? or quirky indie rom com safety not guaranteed?
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:38 (eleven years ago) link
stern Weiland representative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzVgIop0f0Y
― diamanda ram dass (Edward III), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:41 (eleven years ago) link
Bernie was funny
I bet the new Cronenberg is worth seeing
― a dense custard of infinity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:49 (eleven years ago) link
is that the weekend at bernie's prequel
― the late great, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:50 (eleven years ago) link
yes, it answers (and raises) a lot of fascinating questions only hinted at in the original film
― a dense custard of infinity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:57 (eleven years ago) link
like, who was that one guy at the party? and was he related to Jesus?
eh i guess the problem is getting motivated to see any of those movies in the theater vs. at home - like what is "bernie" going to gain from being seen on the big screen? question for another thread i guess.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:58 (eleven years ago) link
every kind of movie is better in a theater
― Hamburger Hitler (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:06 (eleven years ago) link
well yeah Bernie is not in 3D Imax and doesn't FLY AT U FACE, on the other hand you might relish spending an enjoyable evening in the company of gay couples and old people, if my experience is any indicator lol
― a dense custard of infinity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:08 (eleven years ago) link
lol
― Hamburger Hitler (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:14 (eleven years ago) link
Couldn’t this highly advanced race of beings just have sent another ship and killed off the human race at any time?
This is kind of recurring - why couldn't "the company" just fly a spaceship to the original planet and pick up a nice big box of the eggs, instead of continually sending random punters off to be eaten.
― Keith, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:15 (eleven years ago) link
huh?
― brony ver (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:17 (eleven years ago) link
Well, the idea in "Aliens" was basically that the colonists were sent there specifically to be eaten and hatch aliens, right?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:17 (eleven years ago) link
not really?
― brony ver (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:18 (eleven years ago) link
The idea was that Paul Reiser needed to be eaten.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:19 (eleven years ago) link
if only
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:20 (eleven years ago) link
you know what would have been better, is if Paul Reiser's character had been played by Helen Hunt
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:21 (eleven years ago) link
you know what would have been better, is if Paul Reiser's character had been eaten by Helen Hunt
― the late great, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:21 (eleven years ago) link
Yeah but they did it 57 years after the company's first attempt to get the eggs/aliens. Why the gap?
― Keith, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:22 (eleven years ago) link
you what woudl have been best, is if paul reiser had really been eaten
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:22 (eleven years ago) link
along with Helen Hunt
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:23 (eleven years ago) link
"Aliens" : Some nice effects, but actually kind've a crap film.
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:23 (eleven years ago) link
(apparently I have "Mad About You" PTSD)
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:24 (eleven years ago) link
― Keith, Tuesday, June 12, 2012 5:22 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
they're not there in the first movie in an "attempt to get the eggs/aliens," they run into them on their way to somewhere else. and the company only finds out about it once they find ripley.
― brony ver (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:25 (eleven years ago) link
In Aliens I think it's explicitly so that they get an alien inside someone through customs.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:25 (eleven years ago) link
But doesn't the computer say that the main priority is to return the organism - crew expendible, with the robot in on the story?
― Keith, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:26 (eleven years ago) link
you guys have terrible memories
― a dense custard of infinity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:27 (eleven years ago) link
but that was once Mother was told about the discovery - that wasn't their original mission iirc?
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:27 (eleven years ago) link
mission is to bring tiny underpants to space
I assumed this was all in classic 1970s government conspiracy-type stuff, where they were placed in a seemingly random situation, but that the government/company knew all about what they were doing.
― Keith, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:28 (eleven years ago) link
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, June 12, 2012 1:38 PM (20 seconds ago)
i saw a good swiss/french documentary about a pair of seasonally itinerant shephards the other day: winter nomads
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 21:32 (eleven years ago) link