no it was a critique of tenured faculty at TEACHING universities, huge distinction
― Euler, Sunday, 1 April 2012 00:51 (twelve years ago) link
Those faculty members still need to publish though, right? Or are there bachelor's degree-granting institutions where there are tenured faculty positions that strictly involve teaching, like the European 'lecturer' position?
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Sunday, 1 April 2012 02:27 (twelve years ago) link
At the last place where I taught, one of the reasons the union went on strike was that the uni was trying to bring in positions like that.
no, faculty at teaching institutions (in the USA) needn't publish to get tenure or even to get promoted to full. zero pubs will get you full.
― Euler, Sunday, 1 April 2012 02:32 (twelve years ago) link
That's the case e.g. at most every regional state uni, like the Cal States or your "Western X"s
Well, reappointment and promotion at my UG institution (a SLAC) was contingent on faculty's performance in teaching, scholarship/art, and service to the institution.
I think it's just an article by a guy who has no idea how much work college faculty do even at non-R1-type institutions, and thus just cranky.
― Nicholas Pokémon (silby), Sunday, 1 April 2012 02:33 (twelve years ago) link
Cal State tt faculty teach 3-3-3 loads fwiw (on quarters)
― Euler, Sunday, 1 April 2012 02:33 (twelve years ago) link
So I guess there's a difference depending on what kind of teaching-oriented position you're in. selfxp
― Nicholas Pokémon (silby), Sunday, 1 April 2012 02:34 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/esquire-magazine-writer-wanted-to-help-convert-class-war-into-generational-war-no-skills-required-pays-top-dollar
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 1 April 2012 06:15 (twelve years ago) link
kind of lol but mostly sad
― Lamp, Sunday, 1 April 2012 06:24 (twelve years ago) link
dean baker's a cool dude and there def is some hyperbole in the original piece which was very obviously not written by an economist - but the 'coup of the 1%' didn't just happen while nobody was looking - the reagan/dubya tax cuts and a large % of the piece by piece policy shifts - were sold by appealing to self-interest. boomers have been a demographic plurality during this period - as I mentioned upthread the generation before them prob doesn't get enough credit for starting a lot of these waves. but the 'americans don't deserve any responsibility because the plutocracy runs things' narrative is also misleading.
the original author does confuse wealth and income, but baker's going for hyperbole himself when he uses a harvard mba w/ $150,000 in debt as a counterexample. maybe a tiny bit not representative of the median 20-something w/ debt? the underinvestment in public higher education / lack of concern about cost inflation wasn't a conspiracy by the 1%, it's something that people watched happen and helped happen because of a cultural shift that saw education as a personal-investment and not a public-investment.
basically baker's point is 'look at the boomers, they're not so well off either' - which is true, but its true for the same reason, which is that the country - primarily under the political and technical control of the boomers and the previous gen - stopped making long-term social investments and started focusing on short-term personal consumption. there was nothing secret about the coup of the 1%, it happened because people wanted bigger tvs, cars and houses more than they wanted equitable tax policies, universal health care / higher ed.
and 'people' isn't limited to boomers, but they were the demographic plurality during this period and were the technocrats in charge during the 90s/00s.
― iatee, Sunday, 1 April 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.people-press.org/2011/11/03/the-generation-gap-and-the-2012-election-3/11-3-11-17/
this is interesting I think - the boomers who grew up under nixon (56 to 61 year olds) remained scarred by the experience and leaned dem over the years. it's the gen before them + (esp) the younger boomers and the older half of gen x who have been consistently right-wing. there's actually a substantial margin between 50-55 year olds and 56-61 year olds and it's all thanks to nixon.
― iatee, Sunday, 1 April 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago) link
but what that chart really says is 'let's blame 37 to 84 year olds'
― iatee, Sunday, 1 April 2012 18:45 (twelve years ago) link
a friend of mine wrote this on facebook in response to that riposte:
"The calculation the n subtracts liabilities: mortgage debt..."..."This means that if we add up the home equity of the typical household over age 65, their 401(k) and all other savings, the value of their car and any other possessions they might have, it comes to just over $170,000. This is a bit more than the price of the median home.
In other words, if the typical household over age 65 took all of their wealth, they would have enough money to pay off their mortgage. "
The article notes that 65+ has wealth over 170k, but rather deceptively frames it like that would barely cover their debts, which is not true at all. On average, they have that much in assets left over after all debts are accounted for. The article is being blatantly dishonest with those statements.
But I digress, it's framing in such a way as to miss the entire point. Younger people generally depend more on wages, whereas older people generally get more income from investments, pensions and social security--- the tax structure is heavily in favor of the people getting money from the latter. Not counted among the "assets" of the elderly are the value of Medicare, Rx drug benefits and Social Security. The article is also wrong in saying that they "paid" for any of these benefits with the possible exception of Social Security.
Esquire is right on pointing out the disparity between how much we spend on Medicare and on health programs for youth, especially when (a cursory glance at a US population pyramid suggests) the 0-18 population is radically larger than the Medicare eligible population, not to mention they are getting huge government benefits despite sitting on significant wealth.
The article is right in saying we shouldn't lose track of the fact that we are being royally screwed by the rich. And old people SHOULD have security and health care in their old age. And I think it's good to suspect that intergenerational conflict could be fostered to divert attention from legitimate class inequities. So when someone rightfully points out that the last generation had access to affordable education, now students have to get crippling loans and do internships, the appropriate response is not to stick it to the elderly, but to work on getting affordable education back. We wouldn't be agonizing about whether Medicare was unfair to young people if we had universal health care in this country, like a real civilization. Esquire could have also pointed out the astronomical growth in military spending, or the war on drugs. Etc. I'm rambling now
― stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Sunday, 1 April 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago) link
medicare is part of the reason we don't have universal health care in this country tho
― iatee, Sunday, 1 April 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago) link
OK, if people are getting tenure and associate prof salaries strictly for teaching 3 undergrad courses/semester that they've already taught before, their workload very well may be a little light.
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Monday, 2 April 2012 00:23 (twelve years ago) link
yes
― Euler, Monday, 2 April 2012 00:34 (twelve years ago) link
Clearly, I need to find one of those jobs.
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Monday, 2 April 2012 04:21 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.thenation.com/article/167142/colleges-withhold-transcripts-grads-loan-default
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago) link
“It’s worse than indentured servitude,”
SMDH
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago) link
NYU Professor
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago) link
actually he seems like a decent dude, nyu is really a terrible institution tho
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago) link
colonial homeland!
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 16:51 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/stop-smiling-parents-sold-article-1.1057524
― iatee, Monday, 9 April 2012 14:09 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/177_63/us-bank-student-lending-cfpb-1048016-1.html
― s.clover, Monday, 9 April 2012 15:32 (twelve years ago) link
withholding transcripts is nothing new! a lot of state schools in the western US will withhold information abt. any completed credits/coursework if students are in any way non-compliant/not current with their bills. a friend of mine basically ~ completed ~ a degree to which she has no access b/c she cannot pay for some back credits, and the university "sold" them to a collection agency that settled w/ a family member of hers.
― fka snush (remy bean), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago) link
She left school and is now working full time for $13,000 a year.
Um, wouldn't this be nearly impossible? She'd have to be making minimum wage in either Arkansas or Wyoming.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._minimum_wages#State
― i don't believe in zimmerman (Hurting 2), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:28 (twelve years ago) link
um, that is about what i make working full time
― fka snush (remy bean), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago) link
freelance?
― i don't believe in zimmerman (Hurting 2), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:30 (twelve years ago) link
contract plus per diem
― fka snush (remy bean), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:30 (twelve years ago) link
sucks
in any case, I think the current press narrative about the cost of college is kind of a double-edged sword. On one hand, yes, we need to make people more wary of taking on student debt. On the other hand, there's a risk of people just throwing up their hands and giving up when college education still is, at the right price, a means of economic betterment. Like it would be sad to see a young person who actually has a lower cost alternative just give up on the whole thing out of frustration.
― i don't believe in zimmerman (Hurting 2), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago) link
yeah. a lot of this may have to do with fact that a four year degree is TOTAL OVERKILL for most jobs, and a two year professional/associate's degree (more practical, less expensive) is somehow devalued.
― fka snush (remy bean), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago) link
well there is overkill in the 'the skills gained in the process are not necessary to do the job well' but a 4y degree might not be overkill in a market flooded w/ 4y degrees
― iatee, Monday, 9 April 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago) link
true. as a longer trend (if i had my druthers...) i'd see a (paid-for) two year degree return as the prerequisite to most entry-level positions, and a four year as entry to professional fields.
― fka snush (remy bean), Monday, 9 April 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago) link
the problem is there's not really a way to say 'hey everyone in the country, start hiring 2-year degree people' - as long as there is no drawback to hiring someone w/ the most education possible. there is no central bank to fight credentials inflation.
― iatee, Monday, 9 April 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago) link
no comment. http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-me/it-happened-me-i-was-rejected-food-stamps
― s.clover, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago) link
she hasn't crossed the border of true poverty in the USA, yet. if she does, she'll be in deep, horrified shock at how poor she is.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:35 (twelve years ago) link
well depending on how many student loans she has, she might in some ways be 'more poor' than a lot of 'poor' people
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago) link
it happened me i was rejected food stamps
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago) link
I like how the comments degenerate rapidly into a discussion of the relative merits of various iphone plans and carriers.
― s.clover, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:54 (twelve years ago) link
yeah if you want to make 'don't have a smartphone' a requirement for food stamps that is prob going to affect more people than white hipsters
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago) link
xp
Her article mentions her accountant, and her savings account, and her eating food prepared outside her own kitchen. But the truth is, she should reapply at once, because one of the charming ways our government discourages poor people from seeking government handouts is to reject their applications on any pretext.
I'm not saying she's wrong to expect better, only that she is learning what poverty is like in this country, and it is not easy or pretty, or even-handed. Our safety net is designed to be mean-spirited, close-fisted, punitive and degrading. She's being put in her place for having the gall to ask for help. Soon this treatment at the hands of the government will cease to amaze her.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:02 (twelve years ago) link
yeah and this would be totally lol if she were a hardcore republican or something, but I'm pretty sure she didn't need convincing that this is a shitty country for poor people?
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago) link
it isn't that she needs it, but it is what she's going to get regardless
― Aimless, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:06 (twelve years ago) link
well yeah there's just no need for clover's 'I'm not saying anything but I'm secretly happy that it's hard for a white girl w/ an iphone to get govt benefits of any sort'
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:09 (twelve years ago) link
I didn't say that. Don't be an ass.
― s.clover, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago) link
the way everything in that is phrased, it's not very sympathetic
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:26 (twelve years ago) link
seriously, i feel bad that she has very little money, and i wish her the best in improving her income and caloric intake. happy, cap'n save-a-blogger?
― s.clover, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago) link
yeah if you want to make 'don't have a smartphone' a requirement for food stamps that is prob going to affect more people than white hipsters― iatee, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:56 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― iatee, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:56 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
how have old people not figured out yet that plenty of homeless kids have smartphones as their only link to the world outside the underbelly of the overpass
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago) link
sure that just didn't seem like your original tone dude
look these types of articles come off badly because there is some element of 'I'm poor..but I'm college educated but white, so is this okay?' when their argument should really be 'I'm poor, fin'. if she convinced some other poor person to go try and get money for vegetables than yeah, I don't think it matters if the tone of the article is a bit off.
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago) link