hint: it's the posts about poop
― dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:34 (twelve years ago) link
can somebody wake up NV and tell him about this
― dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:35 (twelve years ago) link
I'm just manually sb'ing now by shouting "suggest ban!" at the screen
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:45 (twelve years ago) link
Yeah, it's not the same innit
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:47 (twelve years ago) link
I don't know it's got a visceral appeal
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:49 (twelve years ago) link
can somebody wake up momus and tell him about this
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:49 (twelve years ago) link
I'll get the legendary horn of waking +4
― gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:51 (twelve years ago) link
if not plenty of us could work up versions of the "this is but the terror of suggest ban cloaked in beguiling attire" schtick that'd be his inevitable take on the matter
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link
gotta say i'm not really digging this
― flopson, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link
flopson declares flag post a flop
― dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link
flop gast
you guys have seen the actual flag the mods wave haven't you?
― Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:53 (twelve years ago) link
http://moonstruckky.com/images/lunicornflag.JPG
― Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:54 (twelve years ago) link
what do you press if you just want someone banned for who they are tho
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:56 (twelve years ago) link
i feel like this is going to change by reading habits, like rather than breezing through threads casually sb'ing every other poster at whim i'm going to start scouring threads for actual reprehensible posts
― flopson, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:57 (twelve years ago) link
http://users.tkk.fi/~mmlankin/SB/SB_flag.jpg
― Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:58 (twelve years ago) link
only thing i'm hopin for outta all this is that we get 65 'flag post is a gross violation of my imaginary rights' threads
― flags post o fu (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:01 (twelve years ago) link
l-r: ilxors in their natural habitat
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:02 (twelve years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMuRWRqpQXQ
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago) link
this function works really well btw
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago) link
classic video imo
― markers, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:16 (twelve years ago) link
markers knows <3
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:33 (twelve years ago) link
Not to ruin the festivities and all but I do want to make it clear that this is a well thought out semantic change, but doesn't change anything about the actual functionality that used to be called suggest ban.
― so long! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:36 (twelve years ago) link
Man I should really not post from my iPhone when I'm trying to be clear.
― so long! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:37 (twelve years ago) link
okie dokie crazy pants
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:39 (twelve years ago) link
semantic changes are the most powerful changes
― dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:41 (twelve years ago) link
can we suggest flag?
― frogbs, stills, and nash (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:41 (twelve years ago) link
can we flag double posts or bbcode errors instead of posting in MRF?
― tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:46 (twelve years ago) link
I do want to make it clear that this is a well thought out semantic change, but doesn't change anything about the actual functionality that used to be called suggest ban.
It gives me a headache that you have to even point this out, tbh. Its like everyone's caught the dumb.
― thanks to denial, I'm immortal! (Trayce), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:47 (twelve years ago) link
can't spell flopson w/o fp
― buzza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:47 (twelve years ago) link
really bummed i missed a SB clusterfuck on sandbox-- can someone link meh?
― ⚓ (gr8080), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:48 (twelve years ago) link
― tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:46 PM (1 minute ago)
no, please keep on going to MRF with that sort of stuff -- janitorial stuff, if you will
― Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:59 (twelve years ago) link
just realized this wasnt a joke thread and noticed the change in links--this is a good thing imo, thanks stet/mods
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:12 (twelve years ago) link
so OK, you can flag multiple posts by the same poster (assuming those posts are being flagged for different reasons or on different occasions/threads), and each time that action will be paid some attention by mods, but otherwise the rules remain the same about 51-unique-posters being the 'total'?
― lana del rey: everythang's workin' (some dude), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:13 (twelve years ago) link
well that prob was the case w/ sb too
― iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:15 (twelve years ago) link
yeah i guess i never really was clear on that, whether each SB was actually looked at or just could be looked at it if a mod felt like it, and if a 2nd SB from one poster to another even registered
― lana del rey: everythang's workin' (some dude), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:19 (twelve years ago) link
can we make it so nobody gets banned?
just want to toss that idea out there
― ⚓ (gr8080), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:20 (twelve years ago) link
it would make ilx a lot cooler, think abt it
it would definitely lead to a gift of gabb
― dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:21 (twelve years ago) link
^^^^
(Or just save banning for serious NewGod-type cases.)
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago) link
― dayo
idk why but i laughed
― markers, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago) link
I know this is a tired old saw from me, and will likely be quoted on a lol thread etc., etc., but: I genuinely believe that if somebody is endangering the, um, spirit of community, sense of trust, or safety or privacy of ILX at large it is in the best interest of the board that there be a mechanism to (at least temporarily) separate them from the system
― gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:27 (twelve years ago) link
tbh the spirit of the community is kind of mean and funny, most of the time
http://tcritic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/theshunning.jpg
― gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:29 (twelve years ago) link
otm, anyone who isn't mean and funny enough should be separated from ilx
― iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:29 (twelve years ago) link
all hail president morbs
― gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:31 (twelve years ago) link
No, this isn't how it works and it wasn't how it worked before today. If you SB'd someone yesterday and FP'd the same poster (different post) tonight, that FP doesn't show up to mods. I think it would be good if it did, though -- stet, could a separate report be rigged up for that?
― Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:32 (twelve years ago) link
― gnome (remy bean), Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:27 PM (5 minutes ago)
ok thomas jefferson
grady and christine otm
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:34 (twelve years ago) link
yeah some dude raises a good point (xp thanks wmc) - if ppl can flag multiple posts by the same user that kind of messes with the numbers
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:36 (twelve years ago) link
The thing is, the number of sb-banned posters < the number of genuinely disruptive posters.
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:37 (twelve years ago) link