Flag Post

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1124 of them)

hint: it's the posts about poop

dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:34 (twelve years ago) link

can somebody wake up NV and tell him about this

dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

I'm just manually sb'ing now by shouting "suggest ban!" at the screen

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:45 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah, it's not the same innit

future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:47 (twelve years ago) link

I don't know it's got a visceral appeal

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:49 (twelve years ago) link

can somebody wake up momus and tell him about this

mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:49 (twelve years ago) link

I'll get the legendary horn of waking +4

gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:51 (twelve years ago) link

if not plenty of us could work up versions of the "this is but the terror of suggest ban cloaked in beguiling attire" schtick that'd be his inevitable take on the matter

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link

gotta say i'm not really digging this

flopson, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link

flopson declares flag post a flop

dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link

flop gast

dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link

you guys have seen the actual flag the mods wave haven't you?

Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:53 (twelve years ago) link

http://moonstruckky.com/images/lunicornflag.JPG

Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:54 (twelve years ago) link

what do you press if you just want someone banned for who they are tho

teaky frigger (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:56 (twelve years ago) link

i feel like this is going to change by reading habits, like rather than breezing through threads casually sb'ing every other poster at whim i'm going to start scouring threads for actual reprehensible posts

flopson, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:57 (twelve years ago) link

http://users.tkk.fi/~mmlankin/SB/SB_flag.jpg

Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:58 (twelve years ago) link

only thing i'm hopin for outta all this is that we get 65 'flag post is a gross violation of my imaginary rights' threads

flags post o fu (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:01 (twelve years ago) link

l-r: ilxors in their natural habitat

future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:02 (twelve years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMuRWRqpQXQ

l-r: ilxors in their natural habitat

future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago) link

this function works really well btw

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago) link

classic video imo

markers, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:16 (twelve years ago) link

markers knows <3

future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:33 (twelve years ago) link

Not to ruin the festivities and all but I do want to make it clear that this is a well thought out semantic change, but doesn't change anything about the actual functionality that used to be called suggest ban.

so long! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:36 (twelve years ago) link

Man I should really not post from my iPhone when I'm trying to be clear.

so long! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:37 (twelve years ago) link

okie dokie crazy pants

tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:39 (twelve years ago) link

semantic changes are the most powerful changes

dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:41 (twelve years ago) link

can we suggest flag?

frogbs, stills, and nash (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:41 (twelve years ago) link

can we flag double posts or bbcode errors instead of posting in MRF?

tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:46 (twelve years ago) link

I do want to make it clear that this is a well thought out semantic change, but doesn't change anything about the actual functionality that used to be called suggest ban.

It gives me a headache that you have to even point this out, tbh. Its like everyone's caught the dumb.

thanks to denial, I'm immortal! (Trayce), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:47 (twelve years ago) link

can't spell flopson w/o fp

buzza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:47 (twelve years ago) link

really bummed i missed a SB clusterfuck on sandbox-- can someone link meh?

⚓ (gr8080), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:48 (twelve years ago) link

can we flag double posts or bbcode errors instead of posting in MRF?

― tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:46 PM (1 minute ago)

no, please keep on going to MRF with that sort of stuff -- janitorial stuff, if you will

Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:59 (twelve years ago) link

just realized this wasnt a joke thread and noticed the change in links--this is a good thing imo, thanks stet/mods

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:12 (twelve years ago) link

so OK, you can flag multiple posts by the same poster (assuming those posts are being flagged for different reasons or on different occasions/threads), and each time that action will be paid some attention by mods, but otherwise the rules remain the same about 51-unique-posters being the 'total'?

lana del rey: everythang's workin' (some dude), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:13 (twelve years ago) link

well that prob was the case w/ sb too

iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:15 (twelve years ago) link

yeah i guess i never really was clear on that, whether each SB was actually looked at or just could be looked at it if a mod felt like it, and if a 2nd SB from one poster to another even registered

lana del rey: everythang's workin' (some dude), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:19 (twelve years ago) link

can we make it so nobody gets banned?

just want to toss that idea out there

⚓ (gr8080), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:20 (twelve years ago) link

it would make ilx a lot cooler, think abt it

⚓ (gr8080), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:20 (twelve years ago) link

it would definitely lead to a gift of gabb

dayo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:21 (twelve years ago) link

^^^^

(Or just save banning for serious NewGod-type cases.)

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago) link

semantic changes are the most powerful changes

― dayo

idk why but i laughed

markers, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago) link

I know this is a tired old saw from me, and will likely be quoted on a lol thread etc., etc., but: I genuinely believe that if somebody is endangering the, um, spirit of community, sense of trust, or safety or privacy of ILX at large it is in the best interest of the board that there be a mechanism to (at least temporarily) separate them from the system

gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:27 (twelve years ago) link

tbh the spirit of the community is kind of mean and funny, most of the time

gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:27 (twelve years ago) link

http://tcritic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/theshunning.jpg

gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:29 (twelve years ago) link

otm, anyone who isn't mean and funny enough should be separated from ilx

iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:29 (twelve years ago) link

all hail president morbs

gnome (remy bean), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:31 (twelve years ago) link

so OK, you can flag multiple posts by the same poster (assuming those posts are being flagged for different reasons or on different occasions/threads), and each time that action will be paid some attention by mods, but otherwise the rules remain the same about 51-unique-posters being the 'total'?

No, this isn't how it works and it wasn't how it worked before today. If you SB'd someone yesterday and FP'd the same poster (different post) tonight, that FP doesn't show up to mods. I think it would be good if it did, though -- stet, could a separate report be rigged up for that?

Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:32 (twelve years ago) link

I know this is a tired old saw from me, and will likely be quoted on a lol thread etc., etc., but: I genuinely believe that if somebody is endangering the, um, spirit of community, sense of trust, or safety or privacy of ILX at large it is in the best interest of the board that there be a mechanism to (at least temporarily) separate them from the system

― gnome (remy bean), Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:27 PM (5 minutes ago)

ok thomas jefferson

grady and christine otm

tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:34 (twelve years ago) link

yeah some dude raises a good point (xp thanks wmc) - if ppl can flag multiple posts by the same user that kind of messes with the numbers

tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:36 (twelve years ago) link

The thing is, the number of sb-banned posters < the number of genuinely disruptive posters.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:37 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.