and no Joe Biden too
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:30 (twelve years ago) link
I already know you're not Daniel, lag∞n, but sometimes I swear you are.
― clemenza, Wednesday, January 4, 2012 11:28 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
sb
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago) link
oh jesus
― Much Ado About Nuttin (DJP), Wednesday, January 4, 2012 3:57 PM (32 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
it's really blown my mind following the back-and-forth on twitter from rightists who say paul ISN'T A REAL REPUBLICAN
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago) link
Meant as a compliment--I'm a fan!
― clemenza, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago) link
w/e man
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago) link
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, January 4, 2012 11:33 AM (58 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
eh he has a number of heterodox opinions
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago) link
hey, the GOP is the Big Tent party
it's just that when you let in too many people, things get crowded and someone inevitably jostles you and you spill yr vodka martini; the tent is more about elbow room than inclusiveness
― Much Ado About Nuttin (DJP), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago) link
the big spacious tent party
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago) link
MA gov romney is prob further from the 'gop median' than 2011 ron paul. no?
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago) link
Jon King supposedly has a source that Perry's staying in (if I heard the TV in the background correctly).
― clemenza, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago) link
Oh those smoke filled rooms:
A group of movement conservatives has called an emergency meeting in Texas next weekend to find a “consensus” Republican presidential hopeful, POLITICO has learned.“You and your spouse are cordially invited to a private meeting with national conservative leaders of faith at the ranch of Paul and Nancy Pressler near Brenham, Texas, with the purpose of attempting to unite and to come to a consensus on which Republican Presidential candidate or candidates to support, or which not to support,” read an invitation that is making its way into in-boxes Wednesday morning.The meeting is being hosted by such prominent conservative figures as James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family; Don Wildmon, one-time chairman of the American Family Association; and Gary Bauer, himself a former presidential candidate.
“You and your spouse are cordially invited to a private meeting with national conservative leaders of faith at the ranch of Paul and Nancy Pressler near Brenham, Texas, with the purpose of attempting to unite and to come to a consensus on which Republican Presidential candidate or candidates to support, or which not to support,” read an invitation that is making its way into in-boxes Wednesday morning.
The meeting is being hosted by such prominent conservative figures as James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family; Don Wildmon, one-time chairman of the American Family Association; and Gary Bauer, himself a former presidential candidate.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago) link
ehh, I'm pretty sure the average Republican voter is more likely to vote for Romney than Paul.
― nah (crüt), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago) link
wasnt it Frothymix who complained that Paul was "to the left of Obama on national security"? as if there was any room there, huh.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago) link
its nice to know that in 2012 big deal republicans still implicitly word their invites to read 'no jews'
― sulks (Lamp), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago) link
A group of movement conservatives has called an emergency meeting in Texas next weekend to find a “consensus” Republican presidential hopeful, POLITICO has learned.
Good luck USA!
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago) link
― iatee, Wednesday, January 4, 2012 11:39 AM (30 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
naw pauls stances on foreign policy / criminal justice / economics are p much the oposite of the gop establishment - romney is just somewhat moderate - i mean its wroth repeating that he pushed for 'romneycare' because it was a major republican concept at the time - he did it because he thought it would help him get elected president! lol
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMcaRMSjk70
― clemenza, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago) link
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2011/12/newt-gingrich-gradient-cropped-proto-custom_28.jpg
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago) link
what if a candidate looks like a smoke-filled room in human form
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago) link
Interesting that those Texans are inviting the usual Dobson, Wildmon et al. A Republican caller this morning on CSPAN said, pretty accurately I thought, that the "family values" issues that Santorum is likely to press if his success were to continue would alienate enough moderate R's to guarantee Obama another four years.
― Dan Peterson, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago) link
GOP treats the fundies like Dems treat progressives: "Where ya gonna go?"
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago) link
tbf the gop gives way more lip service to its fundies, they just rarely enact actual legislation
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago) link
the GOP treats the fundies better than the Dems treat progressives!
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:00 (twelve years ago) link
that's because they make up a substantial % of gop voters and (these days) gop politicians
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago) link
yerp
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago) link
because fundies have a lot of money.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:10 (twelve years ago) link
^^^this. how is this even debatable.
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:11 (twelve years ago) link
crazy pro-life shit, crazy pro-Israeli shit - they throw plenty of meat to the fundies (it's just that, of course, they always want MORE)
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:12 (twelve years ago) link
crazy pro-life shit, crazy pro-Israeli shit
which party are you talking about lololollzolzozlzolzzzz
― goole, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago) link
http://images2.fanpop.com/image/answers/841000/841439_1281274003656.07res_450_300.jpg
"I want MOOOOOOOORRRRRE!"
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago) link
Bachmann’s OutBy Katrina TrinkoJanuary 4, 2012 11:58 A.M. Comments0West Des Moines, Iowa – Announcing the end of her presidential campaign, flanked by her family and close associates, Michele Bachmann made it clear that she had enjoyed the ride.
“I have no regrets. None whatsoever,” she said.
Explaining her decision, Bachmann said that Iowans had sent a message “with a very clear voice” last night.
She also made a plea for Republicans to unite around the eventual nominee. “I believe if we are going to repeal Obamacare, turn our country around, and take back our country, we must do so united,” she said. “And I believe that we must rally around the person that our country and our party and our people select to be that standard bearer.”
sorry, I think the 'fundie' pols are mostly poseurs, esp the gay ones.
I think we are thoroughly a bipartisan crazy-pro-Israeli circus.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago) link
this isn't a 1-1 comparison, fundies outnumber progressives and if that weren't enough our electoral structures benefit them too
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago) link
who knew Ariel was in Sisters of Mercy
― Much Ado About Nuttin (DJP), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago) link
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/1/4/11/enhanced-buzz-wide-5467-1325695972-36.jpg
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:15 (twelve years ago) link
u mans far right
aww man michele's gone. RIP lady whose pronunciation of the word "Obama" took nasal to previously undreamt-of sonic heights
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:17 (twelve years ago) link
ah, the backlash
who was president sterling?
xp
― goole, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago) link
Newt Gingrich is hitting back after Ron Paul called him a “chicken-hawk.”“What (Paul) just said has about the same amount of accuracy as the newsletters he denies he wrote.”
“What (Paul) just said has about the same amount of accuracy as the newsletters he denies he wrote.”
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:19 (twelve years ago) link
I do tend to laugh at how effective Gingrich's mean zings are.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:20 (twelve years ago) link
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:12 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
compared to what theyre continually promised the fundies get almost nothing, pro life stuff is incremental at best and Israel isnt a major or a primarily fundy concern, gop establishments been playing them for years
while the gop is for sure more solicitous, for demographic reasons mostly, of their less moderate members than the dems, if you look at how those respective cohorts feel abt how theyre being treated its p much a mirror image, both think their party is hopelessly defeatist and cowardly always giving into the well oiled tactically ingenious malevolent other party, and that they would surely win if they only stood up and fought for their true righteous views
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago) link
if you look at how those respective cohorts feel abt how theyre being treated its p much a mirror image
yeah this is definitely true
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago) link
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2012/01/kevin-drums-peak-crazy-republican-presidential-poll-share-graph.html
i really like brad delong but man he's interpreting this absolutely backwards
― goole, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago) link
Dem and Repug pols are sep'd mostly by rhetoric. They steer the ship together onto the beach.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago) link
hmm ive never heard that point from you before morbs
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:27 (twelve years ago) link
pro life stuff is incremental at best
please don't minimize the actual effect that these "incremental" setbacks are having on real people's lives every day in states where abortion access is now hindered, limited, or, as in Kansas and elsewhere, effectively illegal
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:28 (twelve years ago) link
im not, just speaking as far as what they want
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:29 (twelve years ago) link
just like every progressive calls obamacare watered down
which btw is an area where you can't actually argue much party difference - these "incremental" setbacks are signed-off on by Democrats, who then talk about the rights the didn't sign away, which they then classify as gains - "we gave up x, but they wanted to take y!" which is just the saddest
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:30 (twelve years ago) link
they are actually getting what they want via incremental setback. that's the ground plan, it's the whole plan, there isn't any plan to REVERSE ROE V. WADE no matter how they talk, the plan is to gradually restrict access to abortion via local & state measures. the big game they talk translates into a series of plays down the field. these are the plays Democrats ought to be pushing back against, not some fantasy "they're going to appeal this case to the Supreme Court" scenario.
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago) link