Batman Begins: The Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1171 of them)
Ha - DID.

I was gonna ask the same question as Jordan re: the death scene, but was gonna be really rude about it, as is my wont. From what I recall (and don't mind me if I remember things a bit slanted):

Burton - slow-mo echoed horsecrap, almost pantomimed, leering sinister crooks, and OF COURSE that crook becomes the Joker (oh the pathos!)

Nolan - in real-time, actual interaction between the criminal and the victim, actual TENSION (cf. when the wallet drops), crook as lost befuddled desperate soul driven to such depths (apparent even w/out all the depression discussion), actual Bruce-parent interaction prior to that so viewers give a crap when the parents get popped, the insertion of Bruce's guilt into the scenario (cf. wanting to leave the opera house), and the lack of romanticized foofah when the gun goes off (tho, in hindsight, Mr. Wayne getting off that one line is a bit hokey, but, @ the same time, it dovetails nicely w/ what preceded it).

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 17 June 2005 13:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh and BEWARE SPOILERS FOR FUG'S SAKE!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 17 June 2005 13:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Um, Did = Ned. Somehow. Don't ask, I'm just getting my fucking coffee now, okay? Fuckers.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 17 June 2005 13:40 (eighteen years ago) link

do people who write this kind of thing know what 'auteur' means, where the idea comes from? as it happens howard hawks and alfred hitchcock worked once in a while with the world's biggest entertainment conglomerates.

Yeah, yeah, but maybe I didn't put fine enough a point on it. Batman is not just any filmic property, he's a fucking brand, and a pretty big one. For the last 20 years, Batman has been the biggest (and nearly ONLY at times) moneymaker from DC Comics. On the one hand, yeah, Batman is a modern myth, an operatic iteration of the post-Depression urbanization, but on the other hand, Batman is Ronald McDonald.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 13:55 (eighteen years ago) link

ERGO: Studio/Corporate brass be hands-on all the fucking way.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 13:56 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually, the Joker is Ronald McDonald. Batman is the Hamburglar.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 17 June 2005 13:56 (eighteen years ago) link

Is that why he always calls out, "Robin, Robin"

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Good ol' Did. Never thought he'd get far.

I admit I actually liked the creepy sense of slow motion/unsettled music in the Burton depiction, at least as the scene begins. With this version, I suspect part of me may well have just been *impatient* -- like a, "Look, we know, okay?" Which for those that don't know is admittedly unfair. But also I thought the conclusion of the scene -- kid slumped to his knees, folks sprawling out on either side -- was a little too self-consciously staged in a movie where most such scenes are done with plot-derived intent (the multiple ninja scene in the monastery, for instance, or Falcone spreadeagled on the searchlight).

Also, frankly, I was a bit dulled by the young Bruce's reaction to it all. I suppose it's really hard to convey near instant shock and make it seem like something as compelling as "I've got a splinter in my foot. Ouch. I think I'll vaguely sniffle." The fact that it's immediately followed by Oldman's first appearance trying to figure out *how* to convey sympathy/assistance to young Bruce -- you can sense him trying to find the right words/attitude/etc., like you suspect just about anyone else would in that situation -- kicks the acting up a notch and has more of an impact in my mind.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, you two.

xpost

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, that kid is no Jake Lloyd.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Hahaha.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:10 (eighteen years ago) link

zing!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Huk-L, I kiss you.

I guess I can see where Burton's self-aware staging of the event is less cloying than Nolan's "less artistic" attempt at verisimilitude, but at the same time, Ned, you're on crack, and you like Star Wars, so SHAVE THOSE SIDEBURNS HIPPY!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Wait, wait, you're asking me to *shave* my sideburns? You don't really know me that well, do you?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:27 (eighteen years ago) link

SHAVE HIPPY!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:28 (eighteen years ago) link

"CONVERT TO CATHOLICISM, POPE!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:28 (eighteen years ago) link

"TURN BLUE, SKY!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:29 (eighteen years ago) link

"SHIT IN WOODS, BEAR!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:29 (eighteen years ago) link

TAKE A BATH TOO!

Off-topic: did anyone get the long Charlie & the Chocolate Factory trailer? W/ the usual Burtonesque weirdness and the strange "hey, it's a KID'S MOVIE!" vibe? What the hell?!?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:30 (eighteen years ago) link

I prefer showers.

The trailer I got was pretty much the same as the one I had seen with a couple of different camera shots.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:31 (eighteen years ago) link

I came in late and just missed the Charlie Trailer, but I did see the Fantastic Four trailer (which I saw at Star Wars--speaking of which, the new SW Ep 3 ad in the paper has Darth Vader and the tagline "Who's Your Daddy?" GROSS) and it looks shitty, but Johnny Storm looks good.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:32 (eighteen years ago) link

The Fantastic Four trailer = horrid.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:34 (eighteen years ago) link

It really is. There's no way that movie won't suck.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:39 (eighteen years ago) link

i look forward to it as the piece-of-shit, dollar cinema or drive-in movie of the summer!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Sky High looks marginally worse, at least.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:41 (eighteen years ago) link

And what is Sky High? (Right now I'm just singing the mid-seventies song to myself.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Batman's dad had a bit of the 'molestor' vibe about him.

Linus Roache was so good as a child molestor in Priest that he's given off that creepy vibe in every movie I've seen him in since.

Puddin' (Arthur), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:43 (eighteen years ago) link

Is that who that was? Didn't recognize the name at all! Heh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:43 (eighteen years ago) link

It's about a high school for the scions of superheroes, a la Spy Kids but with less imagination and more Kurt Russell.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:43 (eighteen years ago) link

sky high = real-life the incredibles

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:44 (eighteen years ago) link

Okay, now you have made me hate.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:44 (eighteen years ago) link

Besides I thought Fantastic Four was real-life Incredibles ho ho I kill me thanks officer I'll come quietly...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh BTW what's the name of that film that the dude who did Jumanji is doing which is essentially Jumanji in Space? Saw THAT trailer two months back, garg.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Apparently, after the producers of FanFour saw the Incredibles, they reshot a bunch of scenes. Regardless, The Incredibles has entirely negated the need for a FanFour movie, except that I like to look at J.Alba, which makes the fact that she's the Invisible Woman such a cruel cosmic joke.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Jumanji Goes Bananas?

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:48 (eighteen years ago) link

Apparently, after the producers of FanFour saw the Incredibles, they reshot a bunch of scenes

SCENE: THING looks across a dinner table at INVISIBLE WOMAN

CUT TO: THING looking much different

THING: "I had a wonderful time contemplating things."

CUT TO: INVISIBLE WOMAN looking somehow older.

I.W.: "I think there are bad things."

HUMAN TORCH is seen in high chair smearing food over his face.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:51 (eighteen years ago) link

The Charlie & the Chocolate Factory trailer didn't look very good. Did anyone get a vibe of Michael Jacksonness from Depp's weird man-child delivery and "only one of this children can win his HEART" etc.?

Sky High may not look "good", but it had Dave Foley, Kevin MacDonald and Bruce Campbell so I'll give it a shot.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Jumanji: Fully Reloaded

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, Kevin MacDonald with a GIANT BRAIN can't be all-bad.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Bruce Campbell, eh? Forget the movie, I'd just love to sit around on set with him and Russell during lunch hearing them B.S. about everyone and everything. They should just release the DVD commentary track and forget about the movie!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:52 (eighteen years ago) link

otm!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Bruce Campbell is the only good thing about the Spider-Man 2 video game.

Huk-L, Friday, 17 June 2005 14:54 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually, that would be great, a theatrical release of a film in two versions, with commentary track and without, so you can choose at your leisure.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 14:56 (eighteen years ago) link

I know FF will suck, but I am seeing it anyway because of this guy:

http://vondoom.free.fr/Images/Interviews/Paul%20Ryan/byrne2.jpg

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Friday, 17 June 2005 15:00 (eighteen years ago) link

As played by Leonardo DiCaprio. Er, wait.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 15:01 (eighteen years ago) link

ned i've done that! we have a short film that we show twice, the 2nd time with live commentary!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 17 June 2005 15:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Hooray! You rule!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 June 2005 15:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Hated it.

L'Histoire d'Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 18 June 2005 06:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Loved it. Best Batfilm, as far as I'm concerned. And (wait for it) I saw the original in the theater no less than seven times. I'll basically echo everything Ned said earlier: Oldman's fan-fucking-tastic. I always liked Scarecrow and I'm glad that they used him AND that he got away (although, his only trick EVER was to poison water supplies). I'm on the fence w/r/t the Joker thing at the end. Bringing in Ras Al Ghul (sp?) was cool. The sound was too loud. Sky High looks like suck. I'm secretly looking forward to Willy Wonka. Katie Holmes only uses the right side of her mouth. Ned OTM about the no-credits until the end thing. I'd been thinking about a Gotham Central style Batman movie and I haven't even heard of Gotham Central (it would've made the dock scene even sweeter). I'm STILL wondering what this would have been like if Aronofsky had directed it. Katie Holmes' nipples.

giboyeux (skowly), Saturday, 18 June 2005 06:51 (eighteen years ago) link

I saw it last night and it was OK but pretty disappointing. Some random thoughts without having read the whole thread yet: Liam Neeson(sp?) with that little goatee could make an interesting Dr. Strange. The bad trip effects were great. I think Christian Bale is great and he was a perfect Bruce Wayne but he looked pretty dopey as Batman. Something about his face or the design of the mask didn't work well together.

I feel kind of embarassed about it but I liked Constantine WAY better than this movie. Batman Begins should have been better with the amazing cast but Constantine was just so much more fresh and different. Batman Begins was a little too good and by-the-books and ultimately just predictable and dull. The criticisms of the mind-numbing action close-ups are OTM. Katie Holmes was pretty bad.

I think it's insane that anyone would genuinely argue that this was a better movie than the first Burton Batman. Perhaps too much time has passed and people are forgetting the impact of seeing that first Batman for the first time.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 18 June 2005 16:45 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.