2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

that's a drink tag, come on

xp

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

ban john kerry

deej, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

You can't shuck and jive at a press conference. All those moves you can make with the press don't work when you're in someone's living room.

- new york attorney general and hillary supporter andrew cuomo offering his deep analysis of obama

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

uh...

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

ughhhh

m bison, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck i was hoping this wouldn't get totally insane with racial politics, but between donna brazile and jesse jackson jr.'s statements over the past few days + shit like that, this is gonna get bumpy

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/andrewcuomo-small.jpg

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

brazile...? what did she say?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

the congestion pricing thing totally fell apart though didn't it?

yeah. as maybe it should have, it was an interesting idea but in some ways it would have functioned as manhattan imposing a tax on queens and brooklyn (anyone who knows more about it feel free to correct me on this if I'm rong)

dmr, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0108/Brazile_on_Bill_Depressing.html

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

david brooks said on pbs last night obama has the educated, elitist, "bill bradley voters" AND the black vote so he still has a shot.

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

what did mark shields say

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

"jesus christ why am i sitting anywhere near you, you fucking halfwit"

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

he didn't agree, but his comments weren't as memorable as brooks'

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yeah...he said the african american vote is important and in play in southern states

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

the phrase "i found my voice" bugged me the moment i heard it... and the more i think about Bill's politicking in NH the angrier i get: this is the 'fairytale' comment, which was a response to a question about mark penn's judgement:

Second, it is wrong that Senator Obama got to go through 15 debates trumpeting his superior judgment and how he had been against the war in every year, numerating the years, and never got asked one time, not once, ‘Well, how could you say, that when you said in 2004 you didn’t know how you would have voted on the resolution? You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war and you took that speech you’re now running on off your website in 2004 and there’s no difference in your voting record and Hillary’s ever since?’ Give me a break. “This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen…So you can talk about Mark Penn all you want.

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

another classic brooks paraphrase, this time on edwards: 60 % of americans dont like big government and only 20% don't like corporations so he doesn't give a shit about edwards

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

thats the classic republican move of creating the illusion that big government and big, multinational corporations are somehow seperate, distinct entities

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill is totally misrepresenting Obama there, no surprise

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

ugh why is this party so dysfunctional

m bison, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

the hilary camp keeps using that tact w/obama. hilary has said a number of times that obama voted for the patriot act and war funding too.

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

trying to crush everyone's hope for change?

artdamages, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

My impression of Obama is that he probably would have voted for the Iraq war resolution if he had been in the US Senate at that time. It's one thing to give a speech opposing the war when you're a state senator, it's quite another to vote against a resolution that enjoys high public support and is being presented as necessary in order for the country to take a hard-line against a dictator on a matter of national security when you're on the national stage. This is all speculation, of course, but I think that his centrist instincts would have probably trumped his anti-war skepticism.

o. nate, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

you're probably right

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

when will the obama campaign bring up the fact that he's held elected office longer than HRC?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

This is all speculation, of course, but I think that his centrist instincts would have probably trumped his anti-war skepticism.

totally unfair speculation - stick to the facts. Obama was against the war at the outset. Hillary voted for it and parrotted Dubya's talking points justifying it.

There were actual principled senators that voted against the resolution, you know.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

xxxpost, what the hell does that have to do with anything? what's important is that he came out against it when it was in vogue to support it.

m bison, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Mikulski, Feingold, etc.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

(x-post)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

yah he prob wouldve voted for it wtf is this based on besides "centrist instincts"

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm just going by what he says about national security now. He's willing to keep the use of force on the table for dealing with Pakistan - so why wouldn't he have wanted to keep it on the table for dealing with Saddam?

o. nate, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

gee, I dunno cuz we have ACTUAL ENEMIES in Pakistan? and Saddam posed no threat (as any non-idiot in 2002 could've told you?)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

the context of obama's statement that he did not know how he would have voted on the war resolution comes from an interview at the DNC by a reporter trying to find inconsistency with his endorsement of john kerry and their differing stances on the war, in case anyone forgot

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean lolz @ muslim countries they're all the same, lets bomb 'em amirite

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

WAHT THE DIF BETWEEN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ ITS ALL ALQUEDA RIGHT DUUUUUHH

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

"I said then that I certainly do not oppose all wars, but dumb wars -- rash wars."

dmr, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

the 'use of force in pakistan' issue looks dangerous on its face but it's of a piece with criticizing the bush approach to foreign policy, where every decision is warped around the black hole of iraq: scrimp on afghanistan, talk shit about iran, effectively ignore al qaeda everywhere outside of baghdad, and make a devil's bargain with musharraf (who we then have to babysit no matter what)

lol xps

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

gee, I dunno cuz we have ACTUAL ENEMIES in Pakistan? and Saddam posed no threat (as any non-idiot in 2002 could've told you?)

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:41 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

um what the fuck. this is some roadrunner amnesia shit.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

So you're saying that the difference at Obama vs. Hillary is not that he's more reluctant to use force in general, or that he has a better appreciation for the virtues of diplomacy versus military action - but just that he is better at reading intelligence reports and deciding who the real enemies are?

o. nate, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

GO WAY

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry o nate that's bullshit

"i bet if he were hillary, he would have voted for it"

deej, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

the possible difference between obama and hillary is that he's more skeptical (it would probably be sexist to say he has better instincts or is smarter) than she is. like a lot of us, but perhaps unlike many senators, it just smelled wrong to him.

the context of obama's statement that he did not know how he would have voted on the war resolution comes from an interview at the DNC by a reporter trying to find inconsistency with his endorsement of john kerry and their differing stances on the war, in case anyone forgot

he's explained, as was obvious anyway, that his statement was intended to protect the nominee, but there isn't really any question how he would have voted

gabbneb, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

there isn't really any question how he would have voted

would he be in the position he's in now if he'd been a senator then and voted against?

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sayin it looks to me like Obama has better judgment and is less likely to be complicit in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people for the sake of political expediency or because of incredible gullibility

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

well his claim is that he'll do what's right on the merits, rather than deciding based on GOP talking points domestic political calculus.

whether that will be true, yeah who knows. HRC's record in this regard is not good... the whole country's was not good in 02! 80% bush approval, remember that? seems like a billion years ago

gff, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

would he be in the position he's in now if he'd been a senator then and voted against?

number of senators voted out of office cuz they voted against the war = 0

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_01/012874.php

gabbneb, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Apparently Obama has also voiced support for missile strikes against Iran if necessary to prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons:

Democrats and Iran: Look Who Supports Bush's Next War

o. nate, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary'd have this thing locked if she'd voted no - of course she wouldnt be hillery then

jhøshea, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

contrary-to-fact hypothetical situations are really the worst, least revealing questions a reporter could ask. anyway, as far as i know, hillary hasn't been very vocal expressing any regret about her vote authorizing force.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.