― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 13 March 2007 14:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 14 March 2007 07:29 (nineteen years ago)
"internegative" of Barry Lyndon this weekend in NYC:
http://www.filmlinc.com/wrt/onsale/barrylyndon.html
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
Marisa Berenson was hot in that movie, Time was right
― Dominique, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
she was supposed to show at above screenings, just Leon Vitali now, apparently.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
I are jealous. that thing's gonna look sumptuous. wonder if they're projecting at 1.37 or 1.66...
― Edward III, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
from DVDbeaver:
Warner Home Video Director's Series: Stanley Kubrick Collection on 23rd October 2007. 2001: A Space Odyssey (2-Disc Special Edition), A Clockwork Orange (2-Disc Special Edition), Eyes Wide Shut (2-Disc Special Edition), The Shining (2-Disc Special Edition WIDESCREEN), Barry Lyndon and Lolita A Deluxe Edition of Full Metal Jacket will also be released in Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD
― C. Grisso/McCain, Friday, 27 July 2007 02:14 (eighteen years ago)
The Shining (2-Disc Special Edition WIDESCREEN)
ooh...
― pisces, Friday, 27 July 2007 02:20 (eighteen years ago)
yeah... bit of a misnomer. kubrick wasn't a big fan of wide formats, 'specially for home viewing.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:42 (eighteen years ago)
ok between this and blade runner i'm going to be geeked out this year
― latebloomer, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)
any chance of a commentary on these from kubrick?
― latebloomer, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:44 (eighteen years ago)
this is pretty fuckin' typical -- i finally got a stack o' kubrick dvds earlier this year. very cheaply though. i wonder what will be on them.
xpost
no, he died in 1999.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:45 (eighteen years ago)
i know that
― latebloomer, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:46 (eighteen years ago)
do i have to put a ";-)" after everything?
― latebloomer, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:47 (eighteen years ago)
i know you knew, i sort of zinging. it's early.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:48 (eighteen years ago)
there are definitely loads of deleted scenes from '2001'. 'strangelove' (which isn't warner i guess so not included here) has an alt ending.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)
"kubrick wasn't a big fan of wide formats, 'specially for home viewing."
but we have big flat wall-hung TV's now and we didnt then.
i wonder if the making of 2001 doc will be included in that disc.
― jed_, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:51 (eighteen years ago)
i mean i actually have an ancient 13 inch portable.
― jed_, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:54 (eighteen years ago)
i think he actually shot academy ratio on everything post-2001 -- even 'barry lyndon'.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 27 July 2007 08:56 (eighteen years ago)
'strangelove' (which isn't warner i guess so not included here) has an alt ending.
Do you mean the pie fight scene? If I remember correctly, there isn't any footage surviving from that.
― Tuomas, Friday, 27 July 2007 09:35 (eighteen years ago)
ah.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 27 July 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)
more details on the new DVDs (and Eyes Wide Shut will be the uncensored Euro version):
http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/warning-to-kubrick-fanatics-start-saving-your-pennies/
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 23 August 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)
Uh, so they fucked with the aspect ratios of the films to suit new televisions, and there's no release in a hi def format, and this new box will lack Dr. Strangelove.
Looks like I'm sticking with my current box set, thanks.
― mh, Thursday, 23 August 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
TMC has Fail-Safe on and so far it's quite a bit more entertaining than Strangelove, although as pointed out by the presenter this would have been a rather improbable opinion to formulate, much less defend, in 1964.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 5 October 2007 02:05 (eighteen years ago)
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/oscars/77th_academy_awards_ceremony_photos/_group_photos/sidney_lumet15.jpg
― gabbneb, Friday, 5 October 2007 02:39 (eighteen years ago)
this would have been a rather improbable opinion to formulate, much less defend, in 1964.
Still is! It's from an era when George C Scott was allowed to be funnier than Walter Matthau.
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 5 October 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)
But where did George get with Yvonne De Carlo?
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 5 October 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)
Oh wait.
?
Ken, we should really go to the movies sometime.
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 5 October 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)
I got Walter mixed up with Tony Curtis for a second. Yeah, I might be able to get away in the near future. You and Ian going to see that Ian Curtis thing?
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 5 October 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)
Stanley Kubrick: a Life in Pictures is finally releasing on Netflix this week. I've been waiting seven years to see this.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0278736/
― Darin, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 22:46 (eighteen years ago)
3 minute short doc on Kubrick: http://www.aantranikian.com/kubrick.html
The 18 minute interview with Tony Kaye they made: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa9DD_q0CM8
― caek, Friday, 4 July 2008 21:07 (seventeen years ago)
i like the font where they have written KUBRICK on the first link. do you have any idea what it is?
― jed_, Friday, 4 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.aantranikian.com/images/banner_kubrick.jpg
also, this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jul/03/channel4.kubrick
jesus, how much did that cost?!
― jed_, Friday, 4 July 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5739282975440441779
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 13 December 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)
awesome
― very very serious (gabbneb), Saturday, 13 December 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
subtitle: i was a paralegal for stanley kubrick
argh almost worked on that :(
― Just Johnson (special guest stars mark bronson), Saturday, 13 December 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)
Anthony Harvey on editing Strangelove:
http://www.theauteurs.com/notebook/posts/787
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 01:03 (sixteen years ago)
Great link. Thanks.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
Still no blu-rays of Lolita and Barry Lyndon :(
I've never been totally clear on the whole aspect ratio issue with Kubrick's films- correct me if I'm wrong, but it was my understanding that Kubrick's problem was with letterboxing on 4:3 screens more than widescreen itself, yes? I mean, I can't imagine watching 2001 cropped, and weren't his post-2001 films shot for widescreen theatrical showings? I'm sure Kubrick had enough clout that he could've had them shown in a narrower ratio if he thought it was necessary...
― Telephone thing, Wednesday, 1 July 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I think his beef was about showing the films on TVs, but with TVs being widescreen mostly nowadays, it's not such an issue.
― Keith, Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
he would make two versions, shooting more vertical so that the tv version would not be cropped.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
wait, they wd be different takes?
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:08 (sixteen years ago)
or just made 2 versions in post?
same take, but ya, cropped later.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:10 (sixteen years ago)
it is cause for an ENDLESS debate among kubrick heads and aspect ratio trainspotters tho.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
well I think they shd be seen the way they were in theaters, now that letterboxing is commonplace. Why debate?
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)
some people make the argument that he preferred a squarer frame, just in general. he was definitely opposed to letterboxing on 4:3 TVs but now that most TVs are widescreen that seems moot. the main issue seems to be that he never clearly named his preference.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)