A Thread about the film JFK

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (909 of them)
"Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left..."

Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 04:38 (twenty years ago) link

Clearly Stone needs to remake It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World!

(Okay, I forgot about that one. I'd have to see it again, though.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 04:45 (twenty years ago) link

JFK is wonderfully messed up as a movie, but isn't all that great as a JFK assassination movie. I seem to recall that one of Apocalypse Culture volumes had a list of the subliminal scenes in the movie.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:03 (twenty years ago) link

What's great as a JFK assassination movie? Winter Kills?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:05 (twenty years ago) link

Norma Jean and Marilyn

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:06 (twenty years ago) link

Here it is: subliminal scenes in Oliver Stone's JFK

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:06 (twenty years ago) link

The best JFK assassination movie: Executive Action

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, Radio would be great as a JFK assassination movie. As would be Finding Nemo.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link

ET, have you seen Winter Kills?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:09 (twenty years ago) link

I thought you had linked to Executive Decision for a second there.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:10 (twenty years ago) link

Also check out Interview With The Assassin

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:12 (twenty years ago) link

As history JFK is questionable to say the least, though supposedly so is the Warren Report. As viseral cinema it is phenomenal in its energy and detail, examples that previous posts by Slutsky and Girolama point out. The Lee Harvey Oswald bio montage, opening Bay of Pigs newsreel overture, and the aforementioned Sutherland monologue are key examples of why Stone was nearly unmatched as a filmmaker in 1990s Hollywood.
Executive Action has the hilarious closing V.O., which is stangely eerie, about how one witness to the assasination was killed by a "karate chop to the neck".
The more intellectually thoughtful artistic works to be inspired by the Kennedy assasination include Don Delillo's fictionalized Oswald bio "Libra", which theorizes a series of events that are scarily realistic with respect to human nature. And Bruce Conner's short film REPORT uses footage taped off of television to give a powerfully expressive montage account of what (I imagine) it was like to experience the event as a television viewer. Conner uses repetition brilliantly in the piece.

theodore fogelsanger, Wednesday, 15 October 2003 16:38 (twenty years ago) link

i dreamt last night that the cause of jfk's assassination was bob-a-job week

sadly this important historical revelation is nowhere reflected in stone's film

"the parallax effect" and "three days of the condor" are two pretty good 70s 12-ft-lizard movies abt assassination politics

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 16:52 (twenty years ago) link

'parallax view' you mean i think . terrified me aged about 13 that.

JFK is *made* by that mr. x/sutherland sequence,but yep those techniques of multi-film stock/editing craziness etc seemed brilliant/insane/eye-popping in '92. nobody else had done anything like that.
in fact 'nbk' was just re-hashing most of them shot for shot and
no-one noticed as they hadn't seen jfk in the 1st place. it was a seriously under-watched film at the time, but at 2 hrs 20 minutes
even in it's original non-director's cut that isn't surprising.

stone never ever ever said anything about it being the whole truth.
it was well known that x was based on prouty, although
obviously the waters are yet more muddied around the conspiracy by the fact that he goes too far the other way in trying to convince us of his version, but hey it asked a lot of questions, and it made people ask more questions etc etc.
empire magazine gave it some kind of weird 'inspiration' award about 5 years ago for some reason and stone showed up, gave a speech looking genuinely touched, moved etc.

there was an *astonishing* episode of DISPATCHES (channel 4, uk)
which i had seen early 90's ('91 ?) not long before seeing the movie,
and that was all facts no theory, it definitely helped to see something like that beforehand.

sutherland's fave bit of all his 80's/90's work he says.
3 months prep for 1 days' acting by all accnts. one day !

" does that sound like a bunch of coincidences to you mr garrison ? ...not for one moment"

piscesboy, Thursday, 16 October 2003 13:14 (twenty years ago) link

man, donald sutherland's voice is one of the greatest things about the 20th century

s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 16 October 2003 14:53 (twenty years ago) link

canadians already rule the world = the REAL conspiracy here!!

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 16 October 2003 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

I should note that when I talk about manipulative and misleading bullshit I'm not just talking about the JFK conspiracy stuff. I'm also talking about stuff like the closing summation from Costner that didn't exist in real life cuz Garrison's assistant actually gave the closing speech. I'm more complaining about the way Hollywood (and Stone is DEFINITELY Hollywood, sorry) always bleaches movies based on real life. A Beautiful Mind being a classic example. It always seems to me that the real story is more interesting, cuz, well THAT'S WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED in real life. Stone's "alternative myth" is such a case of two wrongs not making a right, though I'm even more grossed out by Nixon, where his visual style became much more random and simplistic.

Of course, Alexander will be when he stops blaming the gays and ethnics for everything that's wrong with the world. Naturally. I should really see Salvador. It's got James Woods and it's not a revisionist take on American history. Whew.

Yes, Sutherland was great. Though I really wish they'd given John Candy more scenes.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 16 October 2003 15:16 (twenty years ago) link

That's kind of the problem with all movies ever.

s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 16 October 2003 18:40 (twenty years ago) link

Except for "Who's Harry Crumb?"

NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 16 October 2003 19:01 (twenty years ago) link

They better not touch that scene where he's lying flat against that big skylight.

s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 16 October 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link

I hope someone actually get the cash to make James Ellroy's books "American Tabloid" and "The Cold Six Thousand" into a miniseries. Those two books are much, much further over the top, ugly and entertaining than either "JFK" or "Libra".

That documentary "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" and the follow up are also worth watching if you are interested in the Kennedy assassination. I think Stone nicked more from it than he would want to admit.


earlnash, Friday, 17 October 2003 00:35 (twenty years ago) link

JFK is really massively entertaining and beautifully put together, but of course total bullshit. I saw it around the same time I read a handful of conspiracy books by the likes of Jim Marrs, Gerald Posner, and some others. Posner's was the most convincing, and he thinks Oswald did it. And if you've ever met some of these astonishingly influential conspiracy theorists (I worked on a bad cable TV show that had a couple of them on...Marrs and the guy who wrote Best Evidence), you can see how loony they are. Marrs also believes that UFOs attacked Los Angeles in the '40s. Logic just doesn't prevail in the case of JFK....

still a really good movie!

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 17 October 2003 05:00 (twenty years ago) link

It always seems to me that the real story is more interesting, cuz, well THAT'S WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED in real life.

That's what I always say, too.

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 October 2003 05:06 (twenty years ago) link

We need more films this insane!! Stoney shd do the Florida election in the same style. Gay Cubans agogo, neo-con cabals in smoky rooms, lurking Ay-rab terrorists... k-classic.

This pitch is copyright, btw.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:50 (twenty years ago) link

Too bad you can't copyright ideas... ;)

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 17 October 2003 14:08 (twenty years ago) link

You sure about that? It's written, anyway.

(I must have time on my hands)

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

if only stone had based jfk on this theory

(posner quotes ballistics expert donahue to refute criticism of the "magic bullet" theory but gets his name wrong)

(ps my friend adair's decisive refutation of posner's book: "Jesus, look at that man's HAIR OIL!!") (this shd also have been in stone's film)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:19 (twenty years ago) link

WTF? Witnesses? I like ballistics, they are fun. But -- well, are there not easier ways of finding out here? Man stands up with sub-machine gun? In plain sight? And says 'I wan you to meet my liddle fren'

Knoll Edmonds (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:26 (twenty years ago) link

the description of hickey's movements on the web-page is inaccurate: the book suggests he fell BACKWARDS when the cars speeded up, and so wd not particularly have LOOKED as if he was firing a (single acc.theory) shot, just as if he was falling over backwards

it claims the secret servicemen surrounding him DID know, but covered it up as it was an accident and oswald had already shot jfk fatally and why introduce irrelevancies which wd damage an innocent if clumsy colleague's career needlessly blah blah

the witnesses on the verge etc were anyway notoriously all over the place as to where the various shots came from in terms of puffs of smoke, drifts of smoke and sounds of shots complete w.echoes, plus already looking all directions away from the cars bcz oswald had already fired twice (missed car altogether first time, hit kennedy AND connaly second time)

hickey WAS armed with this gun: that's historically attested to, and visible in some of the photos, esp.the later ones where the motorcade is speeding to the hospital and he's holding it pointed upwards

plus also there's photographic studies of what direction a pumpkin wrapped in masking tape will lurch if you fire a gun into it

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:42 (twenty years ago) link

More details - just arrived.

Blimey Mark. Full-on shit there. Er, I'll go with it, but LHO managed a fatal shot? Or maybe he *would* have if CIA guy hadn't? I'm well outta my depth, my Dad was mad into it and I was all yeah yeah: classic conspiracy scene: Annie Hall.

The motorcade sped on...

Steinski (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:53 (twenty years ago) link

haha i tried to find one of the pix in question but found myself on a page where some loony was claiming, based on a photo blown up so large you couldn't make out ANYTHING AT ALL, that one of kennedy's SS-men is "grinning in an evil way" hence etc etc

i think oswald did it end-of-story, but if you want a good conspiracy, menninger's is my favourite on aesthetix-of-slapstick grounds

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 15:08 (twenty years ago) link

If you've ever been to the School Book Depository and gotten a look from up there, you'd have no doubt that it's an easy shot, for the most part. As for the whole "he didn't have enough time" thing, they don't take into account that the first shot fired was a complete miss. One in the trees, one in Kennedy and Connolly, one in Kennedy's head.

Or just read Posner's book.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 17 October 2003 15:08 (twenty years ago) link

People believe this conspiracy shit now for the same reasons they think Saddam partially orchestrated 9/11: they don't know jack about the case, the circumstances, the evidence, and how illogical it is that a shooting like that would be carried out with the shooters (who allegedly weren't of the Sirhan Sirhan "I just don't give a fuck" school of thinking, but wanted to get away) mere feet away from dozens of people, cameras everywhere, etc.

Quite honestly though the most despicable thing about JFK the film is that it names and implicates Clay Shaw as being involved in the killing, when in reality he was just a businessman with an extremely tenuous connection to the CIA. Garrison was a scumbag, really. Tried to indict a guy from Cali in the JFK plot, because he once wrote him the prez a threatening letter.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 18 October 2003 03:19 (twenty years ago) link

if stone had based the movie on the slapstick theory then it would have been nowhere near as exciting of course.

I have a friend who always gets pretty mad at historical inaccuracies in movies (esp regarding world war II movies).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 19 October 2003 17:59 (twenty years ago) link

no but it wd be funny, which is better than exciting

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 October 2003 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

what about something that's funny and exciting? like your beloved spaceballs!

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 20 October 2003 01:24 (twenty years ago) link

death isn't funny mark ;)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 20 October 2003 09:32 (twenty years ago) link

i rewatched Winter Kills last night and it is still quite bad

jones (actual), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 20:35 (twenty years ago) link

two years pass...
this movie is hilarious! if you watch it like a comedy, the stuff gets funnier. like the incongruous bit during one of those crazy Cuban + sociopathic gays meetings, when tommy lee jones makes note of his own erection and says, "more champagne!"

gear (gear), Sunday, 23 October 2005 22:14 (eighteen years ago) link

i adore this movie and its absolute unbridled INSANITY. it's also brillantly done, in terms of editing technique and all that shit. the over-acting, complete lack of subtlety etc. brings it into a whole new level. i actually like kevin costner in this, i think he anchors the movie quite well despite his accent.

obviously JFK complete and utter bunk as history, though of course donald sutherland makes the craziness seem almost plausible for a split second. one GOOD thing the movie did do was inspire the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act that got out a lot of previously classified documents and historical information about the era.

and i agree with gear the movie is hilarious.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 23 October 2005 22:43 (eighteen years ago) link

"I have a friend who always gets pretty mad at historical inaccuracies in movies (esp regarding world war II movies)."

people like that shouldn't watch movies!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 23 October 2005 22:45 (eighteen years ago) link

I get mad at historical innaccuracies in movies, but I get more mad at blatant bold-faced lying. This movie has both in spades, but I might still have been okay it if not for the fact that Costner and Spacek are so god-awfully unwatchable and that the whole film plays out without one iota of suspense.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 23 October 2005 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

my favorite "inaccuracy" in a WW2 film is in The Longest Day, when Robert Mitchum leads the charge across the beach, just running across with his soldiers, pistol in hand, ducking the pesky gunfire from the lightly armed Germans.

gear (gear), Sunday, 23 October 2005 22:59 (eighteen years ago) link

favorite Costner line delivery in the movie: when he flings open the door and stands in the hallway shouting after Sissy Spacek, "Well so am I, goddammit!"

gear (gear), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:00 (eighteen years ago) link

my favorite: "he'd have about as much use for russians as a cat needs pajamas!"

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:05 (eighteen years ago) link

"that's like saying Touchdown here isn't very smart because he beat me only 2 games out of 5 at chess"

"oh go back to sleep, Jim"

"Dammit Liz, I been sleepin for three ye-ahs"

gear (gear), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:11 (eighteen years ago) link

roffle!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:19 (eighteen years ago) link

"I didn't think much about it at the time. Just bullshit, y'know, everybody likes to make themselves out to be something more than they are. 'Specially in the homosexual underworld. But when they got him I got real scared. And that's when I got popped."

gear (gear), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:24 (eighteen years ago) link

"You don't know shit 'cause you've never been fucked in the ass!"

gear (gear), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:24 (eighteen years ago) link

I wonder if this is the macho Showgirls. (This assumes Road House is not macho, but I'm not really sure WHAT Road House is besides being genius.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:28 (eighteen years ago) link

Or the shrug with which he delivers the line, "I knew Allen Dulles very well, I used to debrief him..."

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 June 2024 20:03 (three months ago) link

This specific stretch, as John Williams’ score swells, gets me every time:

Now this is significant, because it
is standard operating procedure,
especially in a known hostile city
like Dallas, to supplement the Secret
Service. Even if we had not allowed
the bubbletop to be removed from the
limousine, we'd've put at least 100
to 200 agents on the sidewalks,
without question! There'd already
been several attempts on de Gaulle's
life in France. Only a month before
in Dallas UN Ambassador Adlai
Stevenson had been spit on and hit.
We'd have arrived days ahead of time,
studied the route, checked all the
buildings...
We never would've allowed all those
wide-open empty windows overlooking
Dealey... never... We would have
had our own snipers covering the
area. The moment a window went up
they'd have been on the radio. We
would've been watching the crowds -
packages, rolled up newspapers, a
coat over an arm, never would have
let a man open an umbrella along the
way - Never would've allowed that
limousine to slow down to 10 miles
per hour, much less take that unusual
curve at Houston and Elm.

Rich E. (Eric H.), Thursday, 20 June 2024 22:59 (three months ago) link

Gonna pour a glass of wine and watch this scene.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 June 2024 23:20 (three months ago) link

The reason the performance works so well is just the pure authority of his tale, coupled with the weary bemused air of, "look this is what happened, it's true, take it or leave it, I care only this much, but I DO care." He sells it so well. The pure sanity of that character. He grounds the entire thing, and single-handedly sells it.

omar little, Thursday, 20 June 2024 23:25 (three months ago) link

yeah, he sells a character who still has shreds of humanity and actually hopes Garrison could crack the case -- until those precious few seconds when he sizes him up and says, dead-eyed, "I just hope you get a break."

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 June 2024 23:28 (three months ago) link

He gave the best performance of the Ordinary People quartet: this big clumsy lummox who wants to love but can't.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 June 2024 23:33 (three months ago) link

We would have arrived days ahead, studied the route, checked all the buildings. Never would have allowed all those wide-open windows overlooking Dealy Plaza, never!

We would have had our own snipers covering the area the minute a window went up! They would have been on the radio.

We would have been watching the building, checking for baggage, coat under the arms... Never would have allowed a man to open an umbrella along the way!

Never would have allowed the car to slow down to 11 miles an hour, much less take that unusual curve at Houston and Elm!

You would have felt an army presence on the streets that day. But none of this happened. It was a violation of the most basic protection code we have, and it's an indication of a massive plot based in Dallas.

<3 <3 <3

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 21 June 2024 01:40 (two months ago) link

oops sorry i didnt realize it had already been posted

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 21 June 2024 01:40 (two months ago) link

army intel had a “harvey lee oswald” on file… but all those files have been destroyed.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 June 2024 07:34 (two months ago) link

well?

― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 June 2024 bookmarkflaglink

Still good

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 June 2024 08:22 (two months ago) link

Or the shrug with which he delivers the line, "I knew Allen Dulles very well, I used to debrief him..."

― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 June 2024 bookmarkflaglink

In his house, many a time..

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 June 2024 08:23 (two months ago) link

you know how many helicopters have been lost in vietnam? about five thousand. who makes them? bell helicopter. who owns bell? well, bell was nearly bankrupt when the first national bank of boston asked the cia to develop a helicopter for indochina use. how about the f-111 fighter? general dynamics, fort worth, texas. who owns that? find out the defense budget since the war began. seventy-five, going on a hundred billion. nearly two hundred billion will be spent before it's over. in 1949 it was ten billion. no war. no money.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 June 2024 08:35 (two months ago) link

The organizing principle of any society, Mr. Garrison...is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers.

Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call off the moon race and cooperate with the Soviets. He signed a treaty to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962. He set out to withdraw from Vietnam.

But all that ended on the 22nd of November, 1963.

Since 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to war in Southeast Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies. Something's underway, but it has no face. Yet, everybody in the loop knows.

omar little, Friday, 21 June 2024 08:49 (two months ago) link

watched that scene again this morning, i mean his eyes, his face, where he's looking, when

masterful

close encounters of the third knid (darraghmac), Friday, 21 June 2024 08:52 (two months ago) link

everything is cellularized. no one has said, "he must die." there's been no vote; nothing's on paper. there's no one to blame. it's as old as the... crucifixion. a military firing squad: five bullets, one blank, no one's guilty. because everyone in the power structure who knows anything has plausible deniability. there are no compromising connections except at the most secret point.

but what's paramount! is that it must succeed. no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side, and never subject to prosecution for anything, by anyone. that is a coup d'etat.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 June 2024 09:07 (two months ago) link

-- i can't believe it. they killed him-- because he wanted-- to change things.

-- ...

-- in our time.

-- well they've been doing it all through history--

-- in our country.

-- kings are killed, mr. garrison! politics is power! nothing more!

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 June 2024 09:09 (two months ago) link

Those of us who'd been in secret ops since the beginning knew the Warren Commission was fiction, but there was something...deeper. Uglier.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 June 2024 09:16 (two months ago) link

-- i knew allen dulles very well; i briefed him many a time in his house. but i can't for the life of me understand why dulles was appointed to investigate kennedy's death: the man who'd fired him. dulles, by the way, was general y's benefactor. i got out in '64. resigned my commission.

-- i never realized kennedy was so dangerous to the establishment.

-- ...

-- is that y?

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 June 2024 09:24 (two months ago) link

"it's as old as the... crucifixion"

It sure the is!

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 June 2024 09:43 (two months ago) link

You liberal, you don't know shit 'cause you never been fucked in the ass.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 21 June 2024 11:35 (two months ago) link

one month passes...

I always lock my files!

― Eggs Benedick (Eric H.), Monday, May 23, 2022 10:33 AM

for some reason this line has had me rofling all morning

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:12 (one month ago) link

whaddaya mean you're gonna write a book

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:15 (one month ago) link

I'd ask Guy. We were friendly. Heart attack?

omar little, Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:18 (one month ago) link

Well, he likes to work near his old pals.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:20 (one month ago) link

We are standing in the heart of the US government's intelligence community in New Orleans. That's the FBI. That's the CIA. That's the Secret Service. That's the ONI. Isn't this a strange place for a Communist to spend his spare time?

omar little, Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:23 (one month ago) link

Didn't Hoover say something about that? The leaves had fallen off in November?

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:25 (one month ago) link

yeah, hell yeah, i mean everybody knewabuh… everybody! yknow, they were all part of the netwoik!

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:38 (one month ago) link

You are so naive.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:39 (one month ago) link

oswald?

yeah.

yeah what—

he was there too.

he was there—

[sudden no-big-deal voice] yeah, he was there!

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:44 (one month ago) link

One guy. I don't know who. Big. White hair. I saw him in the office once. He looked out of place. You know, a society guy. Can't remember his name, but Oswald was with him. He had something to do with money, because Banister never kissed ass...but he kissed his. Clay something. That was his name. Clay....

omar little, Wednesday, 24 July 2024 16:47 (one month ago) link

four weeks pass...

The "three shots in 5 and a half seconds" is on the face of it(*) one of the most convincing and objective problems with the lone gunman theory. But in the film when Garrison times the test shooting and he says it takes "between 6, 7 seconds" - if you time it it's actually under five and half seconds for all three shots! And under six seconds even if you count from when Garrison says "go".

(*) if the first or third shots missed then it's no longer a problem.

ledge, Thursday, 22 August 2024 12:32 (four weeks ago) link

FBI tried two sets of tests. Not one sharpshooter could match Oswald's performance. Not one.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 August 2024 12:47 (four weeks ago) link

this presumes he was even aiming for that motorcade tbf

tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Thursday, 22 August 2024 13:44 (four weeks ago) link

this is why the babushka lady never came forward

mark s, Thursday, 22 August 2024 14:11 (four weeks ago) link

Counter-arguments: Dealey Plaza is much smaller in person than you think it is. Also even if you're a mediocre Goldeneye player, I'm certain you can make the low-speed headshot in JFK Reloaded. Hell, I made it and I didn't even grow up around firearms.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 24 August 2024 23:23 (three weeks ago) link

If ya believe what ya read in the papahs.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 25 August 2024 10:54 (three weeks ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.