2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

basically bill clinton u mad

m bison, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

what's going on with mccain?

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

oh um cnn.com confused me plz ignore

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

wow yea what was up with that bill video? he sounds horrible, and not very coherent.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, his plans ever since January of 2001 have been to live in the White House again one day and now, after a year of being convinced it would be a sure thing, he now has to fuss and squirm like a grumpy little baby who isn't getting his way.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i think he might just be sick?

remy bean, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:45 (sixteen years ago) link

SICK OF THE 22ND AMENDMENT

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

terrifying graph of candidates' net worth

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

omg

dan m, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

he's like the jolly greenback giant

HO HO HO
MITT ROMNEY

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

that's just as scary as romney_fudge.jpg

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

elmo can you tinypic that? bandwidth exceeded

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

xposta at the net worth thin - lol! b/c i am at work i'm on this huge widescreen monitor - flipped vertically, so i rarely have to scroll up or down. i just get this huge 16-inch smiling romney!

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

damn it. here's the link to the andrew sullivan post with the graph:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/the-candidates.html

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:52 (sixteen years ago) link

uh oh dr edward tufte to thread! shitty misleading graph!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Another fun graph!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Damn, Romney should have just paid off our deficit and said "Look bitches. Vote for me" and it would have worked.

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't understand Obama's 2nd place showing in the Sicko graph, given the campaign's claim that he's not taking any lobbyist/PAC money.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

also wicked bad job shopping those heads on - totes fun tho lol heug romney!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Contributions from the Health Industry - 2008 Election Cycle
HMOs, pharmaceutical companies, physicians and other health professionals. is key, i think.

remy bean, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

so, doctors basically

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

seeing as how unions, corporations, and banks can't contribute

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link

if a nurse gives obama money, it presumably goes on the chart. just like if a first-year analyst at an investment bank gives him money, it's a 'corporate contribution'.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

and hey wow the two candidates raising the most cash raised the most from "the health industry"

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

astronomical turnout today, some polling stations are requesting additional ballots (particularly democratic primary ballots)

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

amazing how they give the most money to the people they think have the best chance of winning

gabbneb, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

yah the problem w/trying to divine too much from presidential contributions is corporate money tends to go toward the front runners regardless - unlike congressional campaigns where some candidates are explicitly owned by certain industries.

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there anyway I can see the lolhueg Romney graph in larger form?

The Reverend, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

is there anyway i can get my romney in lol life-size cutout form?

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there anyway I can buy Romney?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

if u can make him president of the united states of america he'll do whatever u want

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I finally figured out who Romney reminds me of, and I think it's fudge.jpg that did it: Judge Doom from Who Framed Roger Rabbit?

The Reverend, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

GiantRomney is kind of hysterical!

HI DERE, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

http://modeshift.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/romney.jpg

gabbneb, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

He looks a bit like Vince McMahon, I never noticed that before.

Nicole, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

that pic makes mitt look like an action figure, with little toy microphone and karate chopping hand

m bison, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

ASK A MITT ROMNEY

gabbneb, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

it is just because he's currently outside of the "clinton falters while obama surges" storyline, or has john edwards been that much less visible in the past few days? after he sided with obama at the debates, he just got swept under the rug, didn't he?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder what that net worth chart would look like with Bloomberg on it.

o. nate, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Elmo, read Glenn Greenwald on the Edwards "disappearance."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards is so suckling on the Obama VP nipple.

but you know, them is frat boys.

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 20:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Is anyone else as worried as I am about what the Clintons are going to do after tonight's blowout if they don't decide to quietly back out over the course of the weeks leading up the February 5th? I wouldn't put it past them to go all out anti-Obama and risk the General Election for the Democratic Party, just to settle what they seem to see as a personal feud with Obama. I'd like to think they're too smart to go down that road, but...

Hatch, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz I wouldn't think they're "too smart" about anything at this point

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

God I hope not, what a completely useless thing to worry about.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Just like Bill was too smart not to campaign for Gore in the South the week before the '04 election?

otoh, it's likely Hil will want to keep her powder dry for 2012. Nixonlike.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

otoh, it's likely Hil will want to keep her powder dry for 2012. Nixonlike.

this seems more likely to me

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

after McCain keeps us in Iraq.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

if hillary tanks, bill is gonna waste no time becoming obama's new best friend. i'd expect to see him stumping for him in the fall.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards is so suckling on the Obama VP nipple.

Edwards wants Hillary out of the race so that he can get attention as the alternative and votes as the (older) white guy.

but you know, them is frat boys.

not actually true

gabbneb, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.