2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

haha

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Irrelevant, but it should be posted:

http://memosphere.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/fancyfred.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i7.tinypic.com/6l9lxde.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

From an online biography of Frederick Douglass:

Black voters came out strongly for the Republicans in the 1868 elections, helping Grant win the presidency. With Grant in office, the Fifteenth Amendment passed through Congress and was submitted to the states for ratification. This amendment guaranteed all citizens the right to vote, regardless of their race. Douglass's push for state approval of the amendment caused a breach between him and the woman suffragists, who were upset that the measure did not include voting rights for woman. Old friends such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton accused Douglass of abandoning the cause of women's rights. At the annual meeting of the Equal Rights Association in May 1869, Douglass tried to persuade the woman suffragists that voting rights for blacks must be won immediately, while women could afford to wait. "When women because they are women are dragged from their homes and hung upon lampposts, .....then they will have the urgency to obtain the ballot," said Douglass. One of the women in the crowd cried out, "Is that not also true about black women?" "Yes, yes," Douglass replied, "but not because she is a woman but because she is black." The women in the audience were not convinced by Douglass's argument, and some of them even spoke out against black suffrage. Douglass's relationship with the woman suffragists eventually healed, but women would not receive the right to vote until 1920.

o. nate, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Woodrow Wilson: "Why would women want the vote? Aren't they supposed to be smarter than us?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Epic Turnout would be a nice drag name

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Care to dispute this timeline?

Well, of course not. I am a feminist, I just think the whole "see? even BLACK PEOPLE have more rights than women now!!!" routine is a bit weird. And it's usually brought up (as it was in this case) when comparing the two is really unnecessary.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

nate since you seem to be a robot, yes, i know black men voted during reconstruction.

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm pretty sure both you and gloria steinem know about poll taxes, literacy tests, the grandfather clause, that kind of thing.

linking any of this up to obama beating clinton twice is just noxious

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not denying Jim Crow, or the fact that black men in many states still faced big obstacles to voting after they had been granted suffrage by Constitutional amendment - though I also couldn't deny that having a right to vote albeit with obstacles in certain regions is still probably better than not having the right at all.

o. nate, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

gosh I wonder why Steinem doesn't mention that there's been 35 women in the senate, and only 5 african americans.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Gloria gets it right. Normal, decent people are loath to acknowledge it, but they are crypto-sexists through and through. Once they get a chance to put a dagger in any aspiring woman’s back, they gleely take it. Now, I’m not one to condemn them for that (turf wars are part of human nature), but for any clear-eyed person not to see this obvious matter of fact is truly astonishing.

Jeb, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

or 243 congresswomen vs 121 african american representatives (how she would parse black women in congress I have no idea)

Jeb Hillary is not every woman

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway there was already some discussion of fave women in public office above (hillary is not at top of list)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

as with Obama's race, there's no doubt that Clinton's gender is a contributing factor to her perception and strategy on the campiagn trail, but treating tracking polls like a referendum on the state of U.S. prejudices is just retarded.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

jeb that is most rong thing i've read today

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

and i've read that 'sexy indie sirens' thread too.

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

did some western states like wyoming have woman's suffrage 40 or 50 years before th 19th amendment?

artdamages, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

(didn't)

artdamages, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm w/o my fact checker AND typist today

artdamages, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, I think that's right - although I think the purpose in the earliest states to grant women suffrage was to get enough population to achieve statehood.

At the same time, how long was it that black men had the right to vote, but were counted as 3/5 of a person?

Sara R-C, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

(I can't figure out if Steinem's argument is deliberately disingenuous or just blatantly stupid)

Sara R-C, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

the headline sez it all

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

did some western states like wyoming have woman's suffrage 40 or 50 years before th 19th amendment?

Hmm, yes, it appears they did. Interesting.

xpost

By the end of the nineteenth century, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming had enfranchised women after an extreme amount of effort by the suffrage associations at the state level.

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_suffrage

o. nate, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

jeb are you seriously stating that people are choosing not to vote for HRC because they are secretly indulging in some submerged woman hatin'? what the fuck. that's not an "obvious matter of fact" so much as just... asinine.

why has everything i've read about either race or gender in this race seemed out and out creepy, at best? "omg the one guy is BLACK and the woman is a WOMAN holy shit there's something going on here has anyone noticed this??"

i'm about to discount everyone who's ever mentioned either at this point

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

but cynthia mckinney is black and a woman so she wins i guess

artdamages, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Interesting fundraising news on the Obama front... a funraising event was planned two weeks ago. This was the email sent out:

Dear Friends,

At this very time last year, I was asking many of you to participate in Senator Obama's first Presidential fundraiser here in New York. I want to ask for your help again, to Welcome Back Barack! Senator Obama will come straight from New Hampshire on Wednesday, January 9th to spend an evening with New York supporters at the Grand Hyatt. Last night, Iowans proved that America is ready for Change We Can Believe In. Be a part of the Obama movement so we can continue to spread the message, build the campaign, and fend off Republican attacks in the very near future. If you join the Sponsor reception, I will gladly introduce you to the next President of the United States, Senator Barack Obama, there will be a photo line there as well. Details can be found below and please click the link to contribute. See you on Wednesday!

https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/nyhyatt?custom1=Arthur%20...

$500: General Reception
$1000: Question and Answer Reception
$2300: Photo and Chat Reception

All the very best,

Arthur

This was followed up by the following email today, indicating an surplus of big-money donors:

http://www.observer.com/files/imagecache/article/files/OBAMAEMAIL.JPG

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

can we discuss how graceless Bill Clinton looks when facing impending doom?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

those wwe pictures, otm, i keep expecting hhh to bust from behind the curtains in that video

m bison, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

basically bill clinton u mad

m bison, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

what's going on with mccain?

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

oh um cnn.com confused me plz ignore

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

wow yea what was up with that bill video? he sounds horrible, and not very coherent.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, his plans ever since January of 2001 have been to live in the White House again one day and now, after a year of being convinced it would be a sure thing, he now has to fuss and squirm like a grumpy little baby who isn't getting his way.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i think he might just be sick?

remy bean, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:45 (sixteen years ago) link

SICK OF THE 22ND AMENDMENT

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

terrifying graph of candidates' net worth

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

omg

dan m, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

he's like the jolly greenback giant

HO HO HO
MITT ROMNEY

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

that's just as scary as romney_fudge.jpg

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

elmo can you tinypic that? bandwidth exceeded

gff, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

xposta at the net worth thin - lol! b/c i am at work i'm on this huge widescreen monitor - flipped vertically, so i rarely have to scroll up or down. i just get this huge 16-inch smiling romney!

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

damn it. here's the link to the andrew sullivan post with the graph:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/the-candidates.html

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:52 (sixteen years ago) link

uh oh dr edward tufte to thread! shitty misleading graph!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Another fun graph!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Damn, Romney should have just paid off our deficit and said "Look bitches. Vote for me" and it would have worked.

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't understand Obama's 2nd place showing in the Sicko graph, given the campaign's claim that he's not taking any lobbyist/PAC money.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

also wicked bad job shopping those heads on - totes fun tho lol heug romney!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Contributions from the Health Industry - 2008 Election Cycle
HMOs, pharmaceutical companies, physicians and other health professionals. is key, i think.

remy bean, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.