My question is: what causes a composer to choose, in this case, to make a Lento piece quick by using 2/4 with 1/8th and 1/16th notes, rather than using 1/4 and 1/8th notes and designating it Andante or Moderato? ..I understand (I think) that one might use time signature for rhythmic, and pace considerations but I'm afraid I don't understand the other.
― chaki, Sunday, 28 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Joe, Monday, 29 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Jordan, Monday, 29 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― dave q, Monday, 29 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Phil, Monday, 29 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Dan Perry, Monday, 29 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
i'm usually pretty good at identifying time signatures, but i'm having trouble with this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrP1bspW7jQ
i have thoughts, but i'll wait til others weigh in
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link
For some reason I can't play this video, so Sund4r to thread.
― pen pineapple apple pen (Turrican), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link
now it seems obvious, actually, and i feel foolish for even asking. but there was a longish facebook thread among friends with many varying opinions.
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link
sounds like you've got it, but it's 6/8. it fucks with you because that 'beep bee' part that is foregrounded in the beginning is a quarter-note triplet, based on the 6/8 pulse.
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link
Yeah agree with Jordan, although I'm tempted to call it 12/8 just because of the way the rhythmic phrase works out
like this record btw, best Shadow since Private Press imo
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link
cool track. good job DJ Shadow!
i hear what you're saying about the phrase, but for some reason i never want to call anything 12/8. if it's kick-2-3-snare-2-3, then i always feel it as two phrases of 6/8. not like it matters what you call anything in terms of 2/4 vs 4/4 or 6/8 vs 12/8 imo.
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link
which apparently is what i said FOURTEEN YEARS AGO. jesus.
yeah it's something about how the kick is syncopated in the second half of it that makes me hear it as 12/8, but as you say it really doesn't matter
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link
i ended up at 6/8 as well (and also was tempted to call it 12/8), but for some reason at first i heard it as a really loose 4/4, 16th-based note groove, with an added 16th note of space added at the very beginning of each phrase (or the very end). i was somewhat confident about that and was praising dj shadow for coming up with something so fucking weird but without sounding too proggy, and then suddenly realized it was 6/8 and could never heard it the other way again.
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link
2 x 6/8 vs. 1 x 12/8 is a feel thing for me.
― pen pineapple apple pen (Turrican), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link
wait is everyone talking about "Mambo" here? Hearing 9/8 (or 9/16) on this, basically like a 4/4 beat with one extra 8th note on the last beat. Unless I have the wrong song playing because my phone does weird things...
― Dominique, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link
Hearing 9/8 (or 9/16) on this, basically like a 4/4 beat with one extra 8th note on the last beat.
that's exactly how i heard it at first! for a while i was looking up 18/8 time signature on wikipedia to see if it resembled what i was hearing. now i can only hear it as 6/8.
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link
Yeah. Sorry Dominique, but if you're listening to the right track, you're hearing it wrong. Better to drop in at the end, like 2:38, and get the key to the track. The intro is just designed to be deceptive.
I couldn't get it from the intro either.
xp
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link
wish we could have a skype on this.
I will have to work to hear this in 6/8 -- there are parts where a snare is laying down 8ths (or 16ths if I say 9/16), and the kick and main backbeat snare are landing on downbeats in 9. I can do this throughout, so still not sure how to hear in 6
― Dominique, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link
If you're talking about the build about a minute it (before "ready, mambo"), that snare pattern is triplets over the 6/8 (so 9 hits per bar, or 18 if you're doing 12/8). same for most of the arpeggiated synth patterns.
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link
I got you now -- basically, if I group all the things I'm hearing as 8ths into threes, it comes out like an even groove, maybe similar to that famous Bonham/Porcaro break groove. I just wasn't hearing them as triplets, but as straight 8ths
― Dominique, Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link
exactly!
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Wednesday, 5 October 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link
"I Should Live in Salt" by the National might be the weirdest time signature for the simplest song. Like, 17/8 or something. What's the Mahavishnu Orchestra track with the unfathomable time signatures? Yeah, this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5XoNlcLEfw
I read that Billy Cobham used to practice drums by suspending coins on the wall with tight rolls.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link
https://theeconomyofmeaning.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/difficult-times.png
― the tune was space, Thursday, 6 October 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link
the mario kart 64 victory music time signature is unexpectedly complicated (i think it's in eleven).
― a confederacy of lampreys (rushomancy), Thursday, 6 October 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link
9/8 isn't difficult. (xpost)
― everything, Thursday, 6 October 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link
ya i play a few tunes in 9/8
sounds very jazzy
― F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 6 October 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link
Back in the day I wrote a couple of songs in 9/8 by ripping off the first bit of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za2zHDM6g08
― everything, Thursday, 6 October 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link
here's a track with a sick deceptive intro. it's just in 4/4 with a mostly triplet-based feel, but the first 40 seconds are hard to feel if you don't know what you're looking for.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF_1LiZEm1w
it sound straightfoward to me now but i remember being thrown on first listen.
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Thursday, 6 October 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link
xp i ripped off a bert jansch track! who probably in turn ripped off davey graham?
― F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 6 October 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link
"Turn It On Again" by Genesis is another stupidly simple song in a weird signature. "Eleven" by Primus, "The Eleven" by the Grateful Dead and "Take Five" by Brubeck all on the nose.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 6 October 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link
Uh, what?
― (SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 October 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link
Misread that as Billy Corgan for a second.
― Berberian Begins at Home (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 6 October 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link
i didn't get the tight rolled suspended coins thing either
i thought tight rolls were what you did to your pants? and by that i mean you, reading this. i think you tight rolled your pants.
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Thursday, 6 October 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link
Oh man, that Mahavishnu track and "Turn It On Again" were important tracks to me as a teenage drummer.
The Mahavishnu track is in 19/16. Really, you can think of it (and, for most of the song, the band plays it) as a good ol' 4/4 with three extra sixteenth notes tacked on at the end.
"Turn It On Again"... well, I've never seen sheet music for it. I always thought of it as having a thirteen-beat kernel, but 13/4 is far too long for a time signature. Call it a bar of 6/4 and a bar of 7/4, going back and forth, until the "I can show you" bit, when it goes into 4/4 like it's been there all along.
― SlimAndSlam, Friday, 7 October 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link
xpost Billy Cobham would do a press roll on a quarter against the wall, fast and hard enough to keep it pressed flat against a wall.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 October 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link
That is, do a press roll against the wall. Now imagine where the sticks are hitting there is a quarter or coin, and that the roll is keeping it against the wall.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 October 2016 02:13 (seven years ago) link
Oh, I gotcha. Dang!
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Friday, 7 October 2016 04:20 (seven years ago) link
Ah! (Had to google press roll though)
― (SNIFFING AND INDISTINCT SOBBING) (Tom D.), Friday, 7 October 2016 08:57 (seven years ago) link
Just saw something yesterday about Mahavishnu final tour.
― Easy, Spooky Action! (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 7 October 2016 10:06 (seven years ago) link
^got excited for a second, but it turns out it doesn't involve Cobham or any of the original lineup, just McLaughlin's current band.
i wanna try the coin thing at home but don't want to mess up my wall.
― sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Friday, 7 October 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link