they make me feel christmassy inside y'know ?
'those eyes, that mouth' - my vote for their all-time classic.
how is it that they aren't as loved as, say,new order, or the smiths, or whoever ?is it because the back catalogue is so hard to find ?is it the vocals ?
why doesn't everyone adore this band ?
― piscesboy, Saturday, 26 October 2002 10:42 (10 years ago) Permalink
― your null fame (yournullfame), Saturday, 26 October 2002 11:34 (10 years ago) Permalink
Btw, on a track on "Victorialand" ( I could never remember which album track was which) does she really sing "Roddy Frame is losing hair" ? It sure sounds like it.
― darren, Saturday, 26 October 2002 12:21 (10 years ago) Permalink
http://www.mcilwaine12.utvinternet.com/ctuk/lyrics/
with some genuine looking lyrics (mostly from the later stuffbut god knows where they got them fromas they're not published)and some not so real looking ones(4ad era.) is she really singing'we'll be soaked and ruddy' on 'pearly dewdrops' drops' ?
still, one actual transcriptionby liz confirms after all these years thatthe full 'whales tails' lyric *does* actually run
'cim keel makilagh teluxa sulomegh yeilick vola-vola coco la fulla menag'
i thought as much.
― piscesboy, Saturday, 26 October 2002 13:35 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 October 2002 13:39 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Paul (scifisoul), Saturday, 26 October 2002 15:05 (10 years ago) Permalink
― DavidM (DavidM), Saturday, 26 October 2002 15:36 (10 years ago) Permalink
― paul cox (paul cox), Sunday, 27 October 2002 03:48 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 27 October 2002 04:24 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Keith McD (Keith McD), Sunday, 27 October 2002 04:31 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 27 October 2002 05:27 (10 years ago) Permalink
;)!
― Keith McD (Keith McD), Sunday, 27 October 2002 07:50 (10 years ago) Permalink
I've want my absent copy of 'Heaven or Las Vegas' back rather badly recently.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 27 October 2002 08:02 (10 years ago) Permalink
The big 80s drum sound is the one irksome thing about 'Treasure'.
― Keith McD (Keith McD), Sunday, 27 October 2002 10:16 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Daniel (dancity), Sunday, 27 October 2002 12:11 (10 years ago) Permalink
Most wise.
DM didn't really get good until 'Black Celebration' shorely.
Dan Perry to thread and all that. I'll allow you CTA, but Some Great Reward is genius without parallel.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 27 October 2002 14:47 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 27 October 2002 15:18 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 27 October 2002 15:55 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Sunday, 27 October 2002 16:27 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 27 October 2002 17:20 (10 years ago) Permalink
― piscesboy, Sunday, 27 October 2002 19:23 (10 years ago) Permalink
My faves, though, remain "the Spangle Maker," "Crushed" and "Summerhead,"....the latter of which can practically induce tears at its sheer gorgeosness.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 27 October 2002 21:11 (10 years ago) Permalink
― gareth (gareth), Sunday, 27 October 2002 21:31 (10 years ago) Permalink
― keith (keithmcl), Sunday, 27 October 2002 21:38 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 28 October 2002 10:26 (10 years ago) Permalink
And Julio, I don't know what the double cd comp is that you heard, but Victorialand is nowhere near their best album, nor even in their top 5. It does not stand as even a decent indication of their sound on the whole. 'Heaven...' is their best, or at least has had the most staying power for me....give it a spin if you get a chance.
― Trace, Monday, 28 October 2002 20:23 (10 years ago) Permalink
_Construction Time Again_ is a fantastic album, partially because it's the last chance you get to hear Alan Wilder sing on a DM album and partially because "Everything Counts" and "Love In Itself" are great singles and "Shame" is one of their best songs.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 28 October 2002 20:33 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ernest P., Monday, 28 October 2002 20:48 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 October 2002 20:59 (10 years ago) Permalink
Ok then. the comp was reelased on 4AD a couple of years ago. tracks from their career really. again, it was OK but hardly a knockout.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 12:23 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 12:31 (10 years ago) Permalink
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 12:42 (10 years ago) Permalink
Maybe start with Heaven or Las Vegas, which is both the sweetest-sounding release they did (it seems to just ooze sugary vanilla and cherry flavour in some spots) or try something like The Pink Opaque, which is an earlier compilation which still seems to work just fine as an album, and has some of their best tracks, including "Pearly Dewdrops' Drops". Knowing what I know of your tastes, I have a feeling you might actually like Garlands, too, because it's a lot more dissonant and dark.
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 14:25 (10 years ago) Permalink
yeah, that was it!
''Maybe start with Heaven or Las Vegas, which is both the sweetest-sounding release they did (it seems to just ooze sugary vanilla and cherry flavour in some spots) or try something like The Pink Opaque, which is an earlier compilation which still seems to work just fine as an album, and has some of their best tracks, including "Pearly Dewdrops' Drops". Knowing what I know of your tastes, I have a feeling you might actually like Garlands, too, because it's a lot more dissonant and dark.''
Ok i'll have to try garlands. might pick it up tonight if i'm quick enough.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 16:24 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 16:28 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 16:35 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 16:55 (10 years ago) Permalink
Staving off a pavement-cracking hangover and cursing my job as I woke -- BEFORE THE BABY (this is practically unheard of) this Sunday morning to put in pre-election week double duty here at the Newsdesk, I walked outside to find an unseasonably glorious Autumn day and toggled up ye olde Cocteau Twins on the iPod for a stroll to midtown. In no time at all, my petty complaints and visceral disdain for my fellow man were temporarily put on the back burner of an entirely different stove and I glid down the leaf-strewn, sunsplashed avenues of this fair metropolis as if buoyed by a giggley coterie of silk-winged cherubim and robustly voluptious, flaxen-locked centaurettes.
I honestly cannot think of any other music that can replicate this effect.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 31 October 2004 17:15 (8 years ago) Permalink
I think some of their best work was released on the EPs; I'd encourage anyone who is just starting to explore their work to hunt down the older import "The Pink Opaque" or more recent "Stars and Topsoil" compilations. Or just buy the EP box set. Songs like "Spangle Maker", "Aikea Guinea" and "Pink Orange Red" are some of CT's finest and shouldn't be missed.
― jeffery (jeffery), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:17 (8 years ago) Permalink
I love the big, ringing sound of the "Love's Easy Tears" ep. "Orange Appled" is one of my top three favourite CT tracks.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:28 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Andy K (Andy K), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:36 (8 years ago) Permalink
x-post
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:38 (8 years ago) Permalink
An amazing set ... and their best EP's (the "Twinlights"/"Otherness" twinbill) were still to come!
I may have written this on another thread: "Twinlights" and "Otherness", taken together, would be easily the best CT album.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:45 (8 years ago) Permalink
*caution*!! the japanese version (which has the cds in actualjewel cases as opposed to cd-single cases) is the one u want,but the trax are the same.
there's still one on the shelf in KINGBEE RECORDS manchester (about half a mile from my house).
― piscesboy, Monday, 1 November 2004 12:49 (8 years ago) Permalink
the US version was like this as well. Is there a UK version that is different? Is the box thinner?
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 16:59 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:07 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:11 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:12 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:17 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:20 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:25 (8 years ago) Permalink
you don't mean the frosty the snowman thing right? heckfire, well i consider myself a cocteaus peak-period trainspotterbut that's foxed me. tell u what the NME COMPELTE DISCOGRAPHY from 1993, which had EVERYTHING listed on it (dates, prices, trax, cat numbers) never mentioned anything called 'SNOW'.
enlighten me please alex, kyle et al.
― piscesboy, Monday, 1 November 2004 17:49 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 November 2004 17:50 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 18:20 (8 years ago) Permalink
it was called Snow
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 18:22 (8 years ago) Permalink
― jeffery (jeffery), Monday, 1 November 2004 18:22 (8 years ago) Permalink
― piscesboy, Monday, 1 November 2004 18:25 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Hill (Chris Hill), Monday, 1 November 2004 19:10 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 19:10 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 1 November 2004 19:11 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 20:36 (8 years ago) Permalink
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 November 2004 20:37 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Seb (Seb), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 04:56 (8 years ago) Permalink
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Tuesday, 2 November 2004 05:35 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:09 (8 years ago) Permalink
One of the joys of the BBC album is that Guthrie didn't produce it.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:50 (8 years ago) Permalink
Oh, definitely. It's still a transition album as such, and consisted only of Guthrie and Fraser, Raymonde hadn't joined yet. But it's got some absolutely crackerjack numbers, and they also do a few things throughout that they didn't try much again (the overt jazz-scat nods on "Multifoiled," for instance). Still had a lot of early hyperdourness but was channeled into different directions -- the glowering guitar and doom beats on "When Mama Was Moth" and then the explosion/cascade of the concluding "Musette and Drums," which is a monster and a half.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:53 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:54 (8 years ago) Permalink
-- Alex in NYC (vassif...), November 1st, 2004 7:11 PM. (vassifer) (later)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 14:28 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:06 (8 years ago) Permalink
There's a big "BUT" however, which is that the sound on this pre-remaster CD is absolutely atrocious, it sounds like it was recorded using a dictaphone from three rooms down the hall. I suspect this may be a big barrier to my enjoyment, as it certainly clouds a lot of the sonic intricacies at work. My copy of Treasure sounds startingly clear by comparison.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 7 November 2004 00:29 (8 years ago) Permalink
It occurred to me that a good band doing a version of "Musette and Drums" via a huge sound system would be genius.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 November 2004 01:30 (8 years ago) Permalink
i almost agree, but can't completely because of the overwhelming sadness (to my ears anyway) on those eps. they are wonderful though. and quite a solid package together too. i wrote a random phone number on the case to "twinlights" and i curse that damn number everytime i look at the case.
every once in awhile i'll pull out blue bell knoll or four calendar cafe and bliss out. "spanglemaker" is my favorite though. i can't imagine treasure without those big fake drums either.
― tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 7 November 2004 01:35 (8 years ago) Permalink
The whole EP is perhaps a perfect summation of that period of the band, but yeah, the song itself...man. A friend, many years ago, said she envisioned the song almost like a green slip of material, a scarf or something silken, twirling through a dark cavern that suddenly at the end came forward and enveloped you and took you somewhere else. It was a striking and strictly visual metaphor for the song that has never left me.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 November 2004 02:21 (8 years ago) Permalink
And there's no new album to promote so that leaves the set lists wiiiiiiide open.
http://www.nme.com/news/111427.htm
― piscesboy, Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:51 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:59 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:28 (8 years ago) Permalink
― piscesboy, Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:46 (8 years ago) Permalink
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:47 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:08 (7 years ago) Permalink
― joseph (joseph), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:23 (7 years ago) Permalink
..and last night.
so the box set then. in february it's coming out in 2 seperate volumes (for like, a tenner each) usefully bisecting their career into 'the amazing 4ad bits 82 - 90' and 'the boring fontana biot onwards'. which is very nice.
― piscesboy, Thursday, 12 January 2006 17:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:24 (6 years ago) Permalink
Their music was such an important part of my old life (which is why I've been reluctant to write much about them) and for years I couldn't listen to them - it was too painful - but now, in my new life, I can.
Now that's magic.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:29 (6 years ago) Permalink
Charlie, I recommend following your Cocteau purchases in one direction or the other -- I mean, I'd push like Treasure or at least Blue Bell Knoll on you, but if you want to head in their hot-milky-bath direction, start the other way!
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:53 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Friendly Tree (688), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:55 (6 years ago) Permalink
having just uncovered this powerful band quite recently, i'm suddenly confronted with the delightful chore of navigating their back catalogue, and i find myself treading a little carefully so as to not overdose on all the riches at once. i think i'll go with 'treasure' next, and then take it step by step from there. :)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:11 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Treblekicker (treblekicker), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:23 (6 years ago) Permalink
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:37 (6 years ago) Permalink
― hank (hank s), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:42 (6 years ago) Permalink
i'll suss out that ep. collection tomorrow i think. particularly since the material is strong.
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 14:48 (6 years ago) Permalink
i know it's been said many times many ways but my god what a band.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 02:32 (4 years ago) Permalink
You betcha.
― Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 04:39 (4 years ago) Permalink
damn I haven't listened to the Cocteau Twins in like a year now, time for another obsessed dive
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 04:42 (4 years ago) Permalink
I'm not as big a fan as many around here, but some of their singles -- e.g., Pearly-Dewdrops' Drops -- are near perfect pop songs.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 August 2008 04:53 (4 years ago) Permalink
crikey (no sadly not a reunion before anyone gets their hopes up)http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/01/cocteau-twins-elizabeth-fraser-meltdown
― piscesx, Tuesday, 1 May 2012 02:46 (1 year ago) Permalink
Shitting kittens!
interesting phrase!
― suburban buttshaven cannibal (electricsound), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 02:51 (1 year ago) Permalink
Fraser has quietly assembled almost an album's worth of new material, which will form the basis of a 75-minute set with a band including Reece, multi-instrumentalist Thighspaulsandra from experimental band Coil and ex-Spiritualized bassist Sean Cook. Ex-Genesis guitarist Steve Hackett may also feature.
I demand a recording of this as soon as this set is performed.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 1 May 2012 02:56 (1 year ago) Permalink
Yeah, okay, that url made me think the story was about something altogether unpleasant. But good on her!
― O Aquaman (Deric W. Haircare), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 04:16 (1 year ago) Permalink
Meanwhile in the last sentence...
Also appearing at Meltdown will be Marc Almond, Diamanda Galas and Laurie Anderson, with other major names still to be announced
Damn.. This might be something to go to...
― Reality Check Cashing Services (Elvis Telecom), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 04:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
Jesus crow. I just saw this pop up on the 4ad FB group and Im all a fluster. If I could rely on it to actually HAPPEN I would be going into hock for tickets to the UK right now, but I cant risk her piking.
― fix it with like some music glue (Trayce), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 10:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
And Steve Hackett! wtf. I have to tell my ex, he is going to go mental.
― fix it with like some music glue (Trayce), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 10:02 (1 year ago) Permalink
If I could rely on it to actually HAPPEN I would be going into hock for tickets to the UK right now, but I cant risk her piking
It'll happen. Contracts and all that will have been signed. Plus, from the interview she sounds pretty upbeat about it.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 11:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
I'd say "hooray" because it's not a 'reunion'
Because a 'reunion' is one gig then everyone disappears.
Whereas this seems like a new album/gig, so more likely a beginning of something.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 1 May 2012 11:42 (1 year ago) Permalink
Shitting kittens!interesting phrase!― suburban buttshaven cannibal (electricsound), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 02:51 (8 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― suburban buttshaven cannibal (electricsound), Tuesday, 1 May 2012 02:51 (8 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
t'was the original title of "Sugar Hiccup" you know..
― Mark G, Tuesday, 1 May 2012 11:45 (1 year ago) Permalink
nice piece with Robin from a Xmas special edition of MOJO last year.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7026/6791081375_2d669f5e8a_o.jpg
― piscesx, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 21:54 (10 months ago) Permalink
just got tickets to the Bath gig
― kinder, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 22:36 (10 months ago) Permalink
Are you saying they're doing a reunion show??
― LeRooLeRoo, Wednesday, 27 June 2012 21:58 (10 months ago) Permalink
sorry, no, just Liz
― kinder, Wednesday, 27 June 2012 22:32 (10 months ago) Permalink
yeah she might do a few CT tracks it looks like. short gig otherwise i'd wager.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 27 June 2012 23:14 (10 months ago) Permalink
Thanks for posting the Mojo piece.
My Bloody Valentine? They were just another little indie band to begin with. Lush interested me more because they could actually write songs and had ideas.
He sounds like he's too insecure to admit how good My Bloody Valentine are. Which - if the case - is sad, considering how satisfied he should be with his own body of work. It wouldn't diminish his band in any way. Then again, maybe that mix of insecurity and competitiveness helped him reach the heights he did with CT?...
The only Cocteaus records that make me cringe are the Twinlights and Otherness EPs (from 1995). Twinlights is acoustic and has violins and shite like that, and Otherness is pointless remixes.
I kind of agree with him about Twinlights; I think the instrumentation wasn't up to par. An intriguing exercise - I don't think it's a failure, by any means... But I consider the Otherness EP to be an essential final jewel in their crown. Just listen to the direction that that EP took their live set in; it was yet another breathtaking step in their evolution.
Example 1: The way it drops out at around 3:20 and resurfaces in remix form is a thing of beauty.
Example 2: Definitely NOT a pointless remix.
― azaera, Thursday, 28 June 2012 06:40 (10 months ago) Permalink
Oops, video #2 is supposed to be this:
― azaera, Thursday, 28 June 2012 06:41 (10 months ago) Permalink
Argh. Technical ineptitude. Sorry. It's supposed to be a video of Aloysius live from 1996. Definitely worth checking out if you haven't already done so.
― azaera, Thursday, 28 June 2012 06:43 (10 months ago) Permalink
No, it's because RG was one of that group of people who actually remember MBV as this shambolic live band stumbling round the London scene in the mid to late 80s. As opposed to people who just heard these amazing records coming out of nowhere and presumed they were always that brilliant.
(And I say that as someone who was part of that latter group. But I know quite a few people who remember MBV as an early band, and their later success was, shall we say, unexpected.)
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 28 June 2012 08:33 (10 months ago) Permalink