_Avatar_, directed by James Cameron

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The hype begins.

"Avatar," with a screenplay by Cameron, will mark the director's return to the sci-fi action-adventure genre. He first wrote an 80-page treatment 11 years ago. The film centers on a wounded ex-Marine who is unwillingly sent to settle and exploit the faraway planet Pandora. He gets caught up in a battle for survival by the planet's inhabitants, called Na'vis, and falls in love with one of them. "Not only is this groundbreaking technologically, but it's an intimate story set against an epic canvas," Rothman said. "That's what Jim does. You can't compare it to anything out there. Its biggest upside, besides its revolutionary technology, is its newness. It's not a sequel to anything."

Cameron had been developing another sci-fi adventure, the comic book adaptation "Battle Angel Alita," but when Laeta Kalogridis' script for that project didn't come together after many drafts, he dusted off "Avatar," which he hadn't touched for five years. He started designing the movie in May 2005, he said.

...

For the film's lead role, the 22-year-old planetary adventurer Jack Sully, Cameron sought a new face. After global screen tests to satisfy the studio, he selected his first choice, Australian actor Sam Worthington, who has starred in "Somersault" and "Dirty Deeds" and had been considered to play James Bond. "He's got the weight, he's a tough guy -- a young Russell Crowe. They grow them differently over there," Cameron said.

Zoe Saldana, who appeared in "The Terminal" and "Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl," will portray Sully's love interest, one of the planet's primitive aliens. She will be a CG character, while Sully will exist in human (live action) and biological "avatar" (CG) form. As an avatar, the human Sully is able to project his consciousness into an alien body.

Both actors have signed on for possible future installments as well because Cameron and Fox see "Avatar" as a potential franchise. "If we make money, I guarantee there will be more," Cameron said. "If we don't, we'll pretend it never happened." Other casting will be announced shortly.

Hrm.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway, so they grow them differently over there.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 13:53 (seventeen years ago) link

The Battle Angel Alita film might've been cool, this, I dunno.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 13:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Hrm? His royal madness?

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 14:01 (seventeen years ago) link

It's not a sequel to anything.

the man knows how to write a strapline.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 14:03 (seventeen years ago) link

The film centers on a wounded ex-Marine who is unwillingly sent to settle and exploit the faraway planet Pandora.

We chose this planet because you indicated you like planets with varied inhabitants, a consistent temperature, rocky terrain, and sci-fi influences.

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 14:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Didn't Cameron say sometime in the 9 years since Titaniche was gonna make low-tech, low-budget films from now on? wahaha

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Titanic In Space then?

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

"My Spaceship Will Go On"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Kinda mystified that a distant planet full of hot, lonely female aliens is considered a non-hilarious subject for a science-fiction film.

Adam Beales (Pye Poudre), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Sounds a lot like Fallen Dragon by Peter F. Hamilton (which is less than 11 years ago, so I'm not accusing big Jim of plagarism or anything).

chap (chap), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Kinda mystified that a distant planet full of hot, lonely female aliens is considered a non-hilarious subject for a science-fiction film.

Earth Girls Are Easy...? Anyone...?

If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:47 (seventeen years ago) link

It sounds more like Queen of Outer Space
Which, I think, is some of Zsa Zsa Gabor's best work...

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm just waiting on Orson Scott Card's novelization.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:48 (seventeen years ago) link

"Not only is this groundbreaking technologically, but it's an intimate story set against an epic canvas,"...

Wait is this about Avatar or The Fountain, and which one will history smile on more?

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway, when I read this thread title, I thought for one self-shitting second that James Cameron was going to direct an Avatar: The Last Airbender movie.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

And not self-shitting in a good way.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Sounds like Aquaman.

Eazy (Eazy), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link

ok weirdly enough m night shyamalan ALSO announced he's making a movie called avatar today

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:12 (seventeen years ago) link

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link

That is the most bummerest of bummer things I have ever seen. I weep.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:28 (seventeen years ago) link

LIVE-ACTION. WRITTEN DIRECTED AND PRODUCED BY SHMAMLAMAN. DO. NOT. WANT.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:29 (seventeen years ago) link

So this is like Enemy Mine, but not gay?

milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes. Unfortunately, it is the not gay, not interracial Enemy Mine.

That said, it's still better than Emnacht fucking up the only TV show I can think of that I actually like. (Not that I ever watch it or anything, but the point still stands.)

Adam Beales (Pye Poudre), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Comets on Fire should sue both of 'em.

rock and roll for the rock and roll soul (nate_patrin), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Because
James Cameron also is about to film a new project titled "Avatar," the films could end up in a showdown over their titles. Cameron's camp said he began his "Avatar" screenplay 12 years ago. Both camps say they have registered the title with the Motion Picture Assn. of America.

I look forward to a highlander stylee battle between Cameron and Shymalan.

N.i.c.o.l.e (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Knowing Shyamalan he will end up submitting and calling his something atrocious and puke-worthy like Boy Of The Clouds.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:03 (seventeen years ago) link

No no, wait, Unbendable.*

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:03 (seventeen years ago) link

*this is funnier if you watch the show, I promise

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:04 (seventeen years ago) link

I look forward to a highlander stylee battle between Cameron and Shymalan.

I would pay money.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:11 (seventeen years ago) link

The best thing about it is that at least one of them dies!

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Comets on Fire should sue both of 'em.

Avatar... the Nickelodeon show has been on since Feb 05. Dibs.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:30 (seventeen years ago) link

The best thing about it is that at least one of them dies!

We can do better than that.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:34 (seventeen years ago) link

two years pass...

I had forgotten I'd started this thread. Which article of ultrahype/'will change movies forever!' has amused you most?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 19 June 2009 16:21 (fourteen years ago) link

This movie will change the way I view 3-D James Cameron movies entitled Avatar, that I'm sure of.

dorkus malorkus (latebloomer), Friday, 26 June 2009 04:05 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm off the Sam Worthington train if this is terrible

wilter, Friday, 26 June 2009 04:25 (fourteen years ago) link

four weeks pass...

Comic-Con bits:

The audience, many of whom camped alongside the “Twilight” fans for the privilege, were treated to a sequence of scenes condensing the tale: Jake Sully is a paralyzed Marine who volunteers to become an Avatar -- a genetically engineered human/Na’vi hybrid. He suffers several brushes with some dinosaur-types, a violent flirtation with a Na’vi princess, and an even more violent Na’vi rite of initiation.

Cameron will get to test-run the film on an even bigger crowd on Aug. 21, which he’s declared "Avatar Day." The filmmaker announced he’ll be taking over IMAX and 3-D theaters around the world to screen 15 minutes of the film for moviegoers for free.

In introducing the film, Cameron said it was made “for the 14-year-old boy that is very alive and well in the back of my mind.”

But don’t expect a film for kids. In fact, I'd wager “Avatar” is going to be kind of heavy.

“I don’t want to say it’s important, because then it sounds like you’re making a documentary,” Cameron said. But it’s “something with a conscience. In the enjoying of [the film], it maybe makes you think about the way you interact with nature and your fellow man.”

After the screening, it was clear cast members Sigourney Weaver, Zoe Saldana and Stephen Lang had become as immersed and invested in Pandora as the filmmaker himself, speaking of the Na’vi as though they were a historical fact.

A professor at USC worked two years on develop their language, and Saldana said all the actors had to take movement classes to “de-humanize” themselves. She also trained in Wushu, horseback riding, archery and weightlifting to play Na’vi princess Neytiri.

Said Cameron: “We know the oncology and composition of the atmosphere, the geography and species of plants, the culture and the history of the Na’vi people.”

Dehumanize yourself, via all these human activities.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 July 2009 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Plus more geekery via Nikki Finke's cohorts.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 July 2009 04:54 (fourteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

TRAILER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYBRFJ9RArc

Alba, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd go.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatard

velko, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

A bit disappointing, really.

J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Lulz at "Avetar"...

Bill A, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:36 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/avatar/hd/

maybe corny

Spencer Chow, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:25 (fourteen years ago) link

the cgi blue "people" look pretty cgi

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:27 (fourteen years ago) link

duh i guess. some nice visuals otherwise.

funny how District 9 which cost maybe a 10th of what this cost still has better looking cgi characters.

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

cgi cgi cgi

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

So much for the "revolutionary" CGI. Looks like one big video game cut-scene

Number None, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

AVATAR takes us to a spectacular new world beyond our imagination, where a reluctant hero embarks on a journey of redemption and discovery, as he leads a heroic battle to save a civilization. The film was first conceived by Cameron 14 years ago, when the means to realize his vision did not yet exist. Now, after four years of actual production work, AVATAR delivers a fully immersive cinematic experience of a new kind, where the revolutionary technology invented to make the film, disappears into the emotion of the characters and the sweep of the story.

velko, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Every time I see this title I think it's that Bruce Willis Second Life spoof.

Dom J. Palladino (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:34 (fourteen years ago) link

cue ishtar joke?

wow does this ever (unexpectedly) look like one of those cheap direct-to-video super-scifi cheap CGI thingies.

no sign of the "whole new world of real-feeling characters thing". seems way more Polar Express than gollum...

sean gramophone, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:35 (fourteen years ago) link

will the .1 of 5.1 be used to immerse us in this bold, new vision???

Fox Force Five Punchline (sexyDancer), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Kind of gives off a Matrix sequels vibe too. Maybe it's the dreadlocks

Number None, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9LW53BBFuek/So2komr4tlI/AAAAAAAAAag/evAEh5rADxI/s400/Avatar001.png

lol roger dean

velko, Friday, 21 August 2009 03:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Best summary of the trailer I've read so far: "Ferngully with guns."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 August 2009 03:05 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahaha otm

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 03:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Preview reminds me of the slow build-up that worked so well in Aliens and (yes) Titanic. Second half looks like a '69 Nam hookah trip.

Q. Tarantino Presents: Popeye (Eazy), Friday, 21 August 2009 05:38 (fourteen years ago) link

This ... looks terrible.

irreconcilable aesthetic criteria (Eric H.), Friday, 21 August 2009 05:44 (fourteen years ago) link

The preview is unpromising, but I wouldn't mind being proved wrong. At least it seems ambitious, which after a long summer of nothing-but-sequels as far as mainstream Hollywood big budget, high concept stuff goes, is kind of refreshing.

ken tynan's spanking buddy (sciolism), Friday, 21 August 2009 05:55 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm with you on that, sciolism - watched the trailer quite a few times and I've gone from initial "meh", to thinking this might actually be pretty cool. It also feels a bit premature to dismiss it from a 2 minute trailer on a 19" computer monitor when it's been made to be watched in IMAX 3D.

Bill A, Friday, 21 August 2009 07:36 (fourteen years ago) link

i just hate the quasi-furry design of the characters..gross gross gross

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:39 (fourteen years ago) link

like the part where the main dude is grinning in the lab says "this is great"...it's ugh ugh ugh uncanny valley creepy to the max (plus mongoloid eyes and stupid fantasy kangaroo ears)

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:47 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, I could easily torrent some old shitty Thundercats episodes if I had some burning need to see anthropomorphic tiger-people shoot bows and arrows at each other.

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron's done some cool stuff with creatures...the aliens in The Abyss were neat!

Why does this shit have to look so much like a lame-ass fantasy novel cover?

Bleaurgh.

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 08:02 (fourteen years ago) link

Bleaurgh.

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 08:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Bleaurgh!

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 08:07 (fourteen years ago) link

"If we make money, I guarantee there will be more," Cameron said. "If we don't, we'll pretend it never happened."

it may be two years old, but I still love this touching display of pride in yr work.

Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Friday, 21 August 2009 09:31 (fourteen years ago) link

http://img.denihilation.com/delgovatar.html

Tracer Hand, Friday, 21 August 2009 09:39 (fourteen years ago) link

what the hell is delgo

a narwhal done gored my sister nell (cankles), Friday, 21 August 2009 09:42 (fourteen years ago) link

i think your question answers your question

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 09:45 (fourteen years ago) link

they do reminds me of the Mission To Mars alien a bit :[

unban dictionary (blueski), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:08 (fourteen years ago) link

the second half of the trailer looks like an ad for herbal tea

fleetwood (max), Friday, 21 August 2009 13:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Worst thing imo is the font, absolutely hideous.

J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Friday, 21 August 2009 13:27 (fourteen years ago) link

thought they would write it

/\ \/ /\ + /\ R

unban dictionary (blueski), Friday, 21 August 2009 13:34 (fourteen years ago) link

And this didn't look cheesy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaHXIIyd8nM

Q. Tarantino Presents: Popeye (Eazy), Friday, 21 August 2009 13:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar isn't a kids film tho

unban dictionary (blueski), Friday, 21 August 2009 14:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Well hey, they already released the videogame tie-in:

http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2009-08/48772041.jpg

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 August 2009 17:11 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.avclub.com/articles/floppiest-flop-case-file-126-delgo,16751/

abanana, Friday, 21 August 2009 17:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Bender the Magnificent

23 Dec. 2008 | 5:04 PM CST

You're a mindless idiot.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 August 2009 17:27 (fourteen years ago) link

The steadily mounting reactions from an apparent Israeli screening of some "Avatar" footage has been resoundingly negative. FWIW:

https://twitter.com/cinemascopian

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

^from that "we might have another Speed Racer on our hands here".

I AM NOW PSYCHED!

DavidM, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Looks stupid.

Alex in SF, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

That looks JUST A BIT Kincade in space.

gossip and complaints (suzy), Friday, 21 August 2009 21:16 (fourteen years ago) link

what a horrifying reveal. The guy who made such cold, dark science fiction is now making a garish, tacky fantasy starring furries.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 21 August 2009 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link

How come there are giant rocks that can hover but the guy is stuck in a wheelchair?

Also, Papyrus font has been a no no for at least ten years now.

Nate Carson, Saturday, 22 August 2009 01:52 (fourteen years ago) link

How come there are giant rocks that can hover but the guy is stuck in a wheelchair?

― Nate Carson, Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:52 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

How can we can we take someone's mind and put it in the body of an alien, but the guy is stuck in a wheelchair?

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 22 August 2009 02:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Okay, so I saw the preview before Inglourious Basterds earlier tonight..still looks kinda dopey and the blue tiger people look awful but overall it definitely makes more sense and looks better on the big screen.

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:04 (fourteen years ago) link

dude... lb... i feel u on wanting this to be good so bad but...

no.

just... no.

fleetwood (max), Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:05 (fourteen years ago) link

i just meant it looked better on the big screen! didn't say it was gonna be good!

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:09 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah and i meant

no.

just... no.

fleetwood (max), Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:10 (fourteen years ago) link

hey, max is giving us permission to hate something, it's been a while so let's savor the moment

velko, Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:14 (fourteen years ago) link

fwiw I thought Waterworld worked ok on the big screen what do I know hahaha

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I sincerely hope Avatar opens with the Terminator guy pissing into a filter and drinking it...in 3D

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:24 (fourteen years ago) link

waterworld's trailer was way better.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 22 August 2009 04:05 (fourteen years ago) link

i agree

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 04:16 (fourteen years ago) link

so was the trailer for the new john travolta/robin williams abortion

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 04:39 (fourteen years ago) link

no mechs though

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 04:39 (fourteen years ago) link

why is robin williams still getting starring roles

abanana, Saturday, 22 August 2009 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link

he's a genie!

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 04:52 (fourteen years ago) link

The trailer looks like it's cutting back and forth between 2 different movies altogether.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Saturday, 22 August 2009 07:48 (fourteen years ago) link

this shit is for furries imo

Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 22 August 2009 08:26 (fourteen years ago) link

it's like blue tiger ppl fuck this

Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 22 August 2009 08:27 (fourteen years ago) link

http://images.elfwood.com/art/v/m/vmegami/kiitygirl.jpg

Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 22 August 2009 08:29 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar story board exclusive
http://fanart.lionking.org/Artists/Mithril/BanjoForBlueJay.jpg

Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 22 August 2009 08:30 (fourteen years ago) link

I haven't managed to watch the trailer, but saw a bit on TV. First thoughts were "ugh/lol, furries" and "roger dean/patrick woodroffe should sue" but WTF I imagine on a big screen, in 3D, it would be an entertaining enough spectacle. I agree w/whoever it was who said it looks like a game cutscene.

\/*|_*/-\*|) (Pashmina), Saturday, 22 August 2009 10:20 (fourteen years ago) link

The 7 Eeriest Parallels Between Avatar and Delgo

depressed is a hugoholic (sciolism), Saturday, 22 August 2009 11:27 (fourteen years ago) link

Damage Control via io9:

Avatar Day has come and gone, poised to convert people disappointed by the trailer or confirm their worst fears. Make no mistake, though, Avatar will be a unique visual experience, but one that should probably only be experienced in 3D.

I will admit that I was thrown off by the negative reactions to the trailer. I was blown away by the footage I saw at Comic Con, but I was beginning to worry that I hadn't seen the movie I thought I'd seen. But after seeing the footage again and watching the trailer a dozen more times, I'm convinced that Avatar is an evil plot by James Cameron to force people to watch their movies in the theater if they want to enjoy the full experience.

The Avatar Day footage is more or less the same footage shown at Comic Con, although some scenes were truncated and a brief moment was added. They give you a taste of the immersive experience Avatar is. When a creature chases Sully in his Avatar form through the jungle, it's a visceral experience that simply wouldn't be the same in two dimensions. And when we get to stand still and really look at the background, there's the sense that you're really a visitor to Pandora, drinking in all the details of a fantastical world. Cameron and his fellows have infused these clips with an incredible amount of detail, from the way the Na'Vi ears twitch and move to a few stray moths in the background. Especially in the bioluminescent scene, Pandora feels like a real and breathing world, one with all the natural chaos of fluttering leaves and errant insects.

There are certainly design choices that could attract criticism from CG enthusiasts. Na'Vi skin is opaque, rather than slightly translucent like human skin, and of the animals we've seen so far, none have fur (there are also some wearying instances of Zack Snyder-style slowed-down action). But where Cameron chooses to focus his attention, the detail is remarkable. Rocks on Pandora look like rocks; hair comes in individual strands (though it is often bound up in braids) and falls naturally; and, while the animals don't have fur, their muscles pump and pulse beneath their flesh. Even the colors are richer when seen inside the theater.

All of the footage shown comes from the first half of the movie, so we don't get a very good sense of how the story will unfold. But the method behind Avatar's marketing madness is becoming clearer; no footage on your computer or TV can live up to the experience of seeing it in the theater, and Fox is hoping that Avatar Day word of mouth can sell tickets to the movie in a way no promo clips or trailer ever could.

Id rather dig ditches than pull another dudes string (Pancakes Hackman), Saturday, 22 August 2009 12:02 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron stans beginning to pedal hard.

Hey, hopefully it will live up to all this big talk - if only on the cinema screen. From here though it looks like the "revolution" is off.

DavidM, Saturday, 22 August 2009 12:59 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb50GMmY5nk

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 22 August 2009 13:46 (fourteen years ago) link

this looks like something i would have drawn in my notebook during history class

chip dumstorf, Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:15 (fourteen years ago) link

but with smaller boobs

chip dumstorf, Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:15 (fourteen years ago) link

pics or we don't believe you.

DavidM, Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:16 (fourteen years ago) link

i stopped drawing that shit after a girl sitting next to me saw it and asked to be moved to a different assigned seat.

story of my life.

chip dumstorf, Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm convinced that Avatar is an evil plot by James Cameron to force people to watch their movies in the theater if they want to enjoy the full experience

What is with this crap. If the story looks stupid then it ain't gonna fly.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:34 (fourteen years ago) link

James Cameron...Freemason?

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:38 (fourteen years ago) link

i stopped drawing that shit after a girl sitting next to me saw it and asked to be moved to a different assigned seat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5y-66M4G9E

Id rather dig ditches than pull another dudes string (Pancakes Hackman), Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:47 (fourteen years ago) link

that might as well be a documentary, just replace boobs with spikey nipples for dicks

chip dumstorf, Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:54 (fourteen years ago) link

How long ago did Final Fantasy come out? This trailer really defines 'meh'.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 23 August 2009 17:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Shit, there was a Magic Roundabout movie?

When two tribes go to war, he always gets picked last (James Morrison), Monday, 24 August 2009 00:55 (fourteen years ago) link

With Whoopi Goldberg doing a voice? What the fucking fuck?

When two tribes go to war, he always gets picked last (James Morrison), Monday, 24 August 2009 00:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Please do yourself a favor and read the Avatar article in the new Entertainment Weekly. They're discussing the likelihood of the movie's success based on near-universal praise from the fan community. Choice quote:

While some naysayers called the dialogue cheesy, other audience members were blown away: "My eyeballs were raped" was a common sentiment on Ain't It Cool News. (In fanboy-speak, that's a good thing.)

Uh.

I HEART CREEPY MENS (Deric W. Haircare), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 14:38 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahahahaha talk about spin

crappy, use her name (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 14:50 (fourteen years ago) link

preliminary digging on AICN (which btw: gross) shows that EW did actually get that correct

a fact-checker with The New Yorker magazine (HI DERE), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 14:53 (fourteen years ago) link

EWw

crappy, use her name (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 14:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Seeing the trailer the other day waiting for Inglourious Basterds did it no favors on the big screen.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 1 September 2009 15:07 (fourteen years ago) link

it's weird to me how dead the blue people's eyes look...you get the feeling that the character designers purposely made their eyes almost anime-size to try to get a more lifelike effect, but it just doesn't work

tony dayo (dyao), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 15:10 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

According to Titanic star Bill Paxton, the word "no" gives James Cameron an erection.

Many things about this sentence raise questions.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 19 October 2009 19:32 (fourteen years ago) link

But where Cameron chooses to focus his attention, the detail is remarkable. Rocks on Pandora look like rocks; hair comes in individual strands (though it is often bound up in braids) and falls naturally; and, while the animals don't have fur, their muscles pump and pulse beneath their flesh. Even the colors are richer when seen inside the theater.

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Monday, 19 October 2009 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link

i cant wait to see a movie where rocks look like rocks... FINALLY

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Monday, 19 October 2009 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link

and hair. HAIR!

access flap (omar little), Monday, 19 October 2009 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Rocks and Hair, coming this holiday season.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 19 October 2009 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link

hair that comes in individual strands... what would the lumiere brothers think

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Monday, 19 October 2009 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

• Something James Cameron actually shouted to Arnold Schwarzenegger on the set of True Lies: "Do you want Paul Verhoeven to finish this motherfucker?"

well pull down my pants and call me swamp thing (latebloomer), Monday, 19 October 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

god, true lies would have been an awesome verhoeven.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 19 October 2009 21:31 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah totally

well pull down my pants and call me swamp thing (latebloomer), Monday, 19 October 2009 21:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Paul Verhoeven's Titanic

Ned Raggett, Monday, 19 October 2009 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Rocks and Hair, coming this holiday season.

― Ned Raggett, Monday, October 19, 2009 12:52 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol.

schwantz, Monday, 19 October 2009 22:42 (fourteen years ago) link

The NY article makes you admire Cameron, and really, really wish he had decided to make something other than Avatar.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 00:57 (fourteen years ago) link

thats it exactly isnt it

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 02:06 (fourteen years ago) link

its like you're dedicating decades and millions of dollars and your genius to...

http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/409/555656-furry2_super.jpg

THIS??

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 02:07 (fourteen years ago) link

That New Yorker article is amazing. I've only read the first paragraph!

“Watching him light is like watching two monkeys fuck a football.”

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 03:42 (fourteen years ago) link

in their pursuit of a precious superconductor called Unobtanium, are beginning to do the same to Pandora.

wait is James Cameron aiming to make a serious movie involving a material called Unobtanium?

dyao, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 06:37 (fourteen years ago) link

that is Lucas-level bullshit right there

well pull down my pants and call me swamp thing (latebloomer), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 06:43 (fourteen years ago) link

"It’s a two-fingered inverted draw past the head, like a Samurai,” he said, tracing the shape in the air over his left shoulder. “The archery instructor came and said, ‘Do you want me to teach them archery or do you want me to teach them this? This would never work.’ I said, ‘See that bush?’ It was a hundred and fifty feet away. I nailed it.”

James Cameron = the IT guy from The Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geZoES9KQ-Q

dyao, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 07:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I love this bit:

After he finished making “True Lies,” Cameron called Kubrick, by then a recluse, and invited himself over. They spent a day, in the basement of Kubrick’s house in the English countryside, watching “True Lies” at Kubrick’s flatbed editing station. Cameron went over the shots—Schwarzenegger in a Harrier jet firing a missile, with the villain attached to it, through an office building and into a helicopter: boom!—so that Kubrick could learn how the effects were done.

Sounds like the best friend from hell.

surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 09:06 (fourteen years ago) link

i like that he apparently went over to kubrick's house with a 16mm or even 35mm print of his own movie.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 09:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Kubrick was thinking "Man, I wish we were watching the new Verhoeven instead."

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 09:42 (fourteen years ago) link

“We made it in the papers once, for a U.F.O. sighting over a hot-air balloon that we built and launched at night that was powered by candles.”

loooooooooool

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 15:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Right, screw Avatar, I want to read his memoirs!

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 21:41 (fourteen years ago) link

My friend has funny stories about James Cameron's - such as his band of ex Mossad commandos coming the rescue of his boss' house during some Malibu wildfires. Also has an anecdote about Cameron comparing the budget of Avatar to the budget of the Manhattan Project.

mayor jingleberries, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 23:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Sam Worthington: not a cartoon (he says)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 15:41 (fourteen years ago) link

the new yorker article is so amazing.

this paragraph is incredible:

The meeting ended on a boisterous note. “That fuckin’ rocks!” Cameron called out in response to an image of a snarling maw of thin blue-veined tissue, the mouth of the pterodactyl-like banshee that Jake’s avatar domesticates for his ride. “Look at the gill-like membrane on the side of the mouth, its transmission of light, all the secondary color saturation on the tongue, and that maxilla bone. I love what you did with the translucence on the teeth, and the way the quadrate bone racks the teeth forward. It’s a sharky thing. As wacky as this creature is, it looks completely real. Maybe I’m getting high on my own supply.” He was practically out of breath. “The banshee lives! He’s a fierce-looking sonuvabitch.”

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

saw the preview for this before paranormal activity and some guy a few rows back said "that looks terrible"

am0n, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:15 (fourteen years ago) link

If Paranormal Activity ends up being a bigger success than Avatar I am so going to laugh. (In terms of budget vs. return it's already the winner of the decade.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:16 (fourteen years ago) link

I basically don't know a single thing about this movie other than what's in that New Yorker profile (hadn't heard of it before), but the article did make me want to see it.

M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:22 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1_JBMrrYw8

am0n, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:22 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPyipuT-Jg

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:23 (fourteen years ago) link

trailer i saw had a lot more (awful) dialogue

am0n, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

john why did that article make you interested? this seems like the exact opposite of the types of movies you usually like

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:26 (fourteen years ago) link

welcome to pandora!

http://winnipeg.cityguide.ca/images/cats.jpg

am0n, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:26 (fourteen years ago) link

I didn't know someone made a stage version of Thundercats!

Tuomas, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:31 (fourteen years ago) link

john why did that article make you interested? this seems like the exact opposite of the types of movies you usually like

Well, I'll admit I was greatly put off by this: "The third act of “Avatar” contains what Jon Landau, the producer, calls “the mother of all movie battles.”" But I think the movie seems like it could be a visual wonderland, especially in 3D. And I like high-concept sci-fi like A.I.

M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah I loved that article but did not come away feeling like i would want to be in proximity to james cameron under any circumstances.

Durian Durian (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Maybe I’m getting high on my own supply.” He was practically out of breath. “The banshee lives! He’s a fierce-looking sonuvabitch.”

― banned, on the run (s1ocki), Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:10 PM

ahaha fuck lol

am0n, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:42 (fourteen years ago) link

"Maybe I’m getting high on my own supply.” He was practically out of breath. “The banshee lives! I am the reason LARPERS sing 'The goddess wears a thong!'"

Dynamic Leia Dress (kingkongvsgodzilla), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:44 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/images/avatar-header2.jpg

am0n, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 16:50 (fourteen years ago) link

“the mother of all movie battles.”"

CGI-driven gigantic battle scenes are usually pretty boring IMHO.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 28 October 2009 18:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Exactly.

M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 19:30 (fourteen years ago) link

New trailer

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 October 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

And various reactions to same.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 October 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Everything about that just makes me think Cameron woke up one morning and decided "You know I liked the technology in the forest bits in The Phantom Menace and Revenge of the Sith, why didn't George make a full movie out of it?"

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 October 2009 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

it's pretty amazing how a guy who was once, like, the toughest mfer when it came to writing and directing action films has turned into such a weirdo furry.

jØrdån (omar little), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Creatures and "jungle wonders" still look cheezy as hell, and the sawed-off jarhead dialogue sounds worse, but the new trailer does make it look like an entertaining (and perhaps even moving) Aliens/Abyss-style military adventure flick. In, yeah, a weirdo furry kinda way.

from alcoholism to fleshly concerns (contenderizer), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:09 (fourteen years ago) link

CGI-driven gigantic battle scenes are usually pretty boring IMHO

modescalator (blueski), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

xxp Well it was always there. See the The Abyss.

We call them "meat hemorrhoids" (Alex in SF), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

at least i think i got tired of it after 2003 xp

modescalator (blueski), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:12 (fourteen years ago) link

It would be so, so awesome if everything we've seen/heard about "Avatar" was actually restricted to the first 30 minutes of the movie, and the rest was all, like, talk. Sort of like the opposite of "Aliens."

I say with tongue obviously in cheek, because a) this would never happen and b) Cameron is actually a pretty weak writer, classic line-or two and bits of "The Abyss" aside. "Avatar" just seems like such an obviously, well, obvious allegory - and lo and beyond, the primitive other has lessons to teach us all! - that it would take a really clever, perceptive screenwriter to transform it from spectacle to anything substantive. Giant blue Thunder-Ewoks don't help matters.

That author of that b.s. "New Yorker" profile, by the way, clearly had seen little to no more of the film than any of us plebes have. Either that or he was legally obligated to keep it confidential.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 October 2009 18:27 (fourteen years ago) link

"Should I talk about the bit where they -- "

"Shut up, you."

"Sorry."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 October 2009 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh, by the way - what fucking bureaucrat would call the planet Pandora? That's just asking for trouble! What were the runner-ups? Pompeii? Krakatoa? Hades?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 October 2009 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Titanic, Hindenburg and Lusitania were also under consideration.

(oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Also, Last.fm.

(ba dum bump)

Bears Are Alive! (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

"we're headin' to the planet warsaw ghetto..."

jØrdån (omar little), Friday, 30 October 2009 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

New trailer

― Ned Raggett, Friday, October 30, 2009 1:51 PM

ha yeah thats the one i saw

am0n, Friday, 30 October 2009 18:59 (fourteen years ago) link

lol giovanni ribisi

am0n, Friday, 30 October 2009 19:00 (fourteen years ago) link

That’s a great trailer. Anyone who H8s on this is dead inside and should move on to another career.
Comment by Movie Fan — October 29, 2009 @ 12:03 pm Reply to this post

Okay, is it me or does this sound like a James Cameron sock-puppet?
Comment by G. Lira — October 29, 2009 @ 2:13 pm Reply to this post

am0n, Friday, 30 October 2009 19:05 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm the king of the world woo

da croupier, Friday, 30 October 2009 19:06 (fourteen years ago) link

The design of this whole thing, right down to the title font is just atrocious. It's like his aesthetics just woke up from cryosleep.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 30 October 2009 19:21 (fourteen years ago) link

district 9 meets ferngully

am0n, Friday, 30 October 2009 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

I read that thing in the New Yorker last week. His hyper-detailed approach to everything (getting special cameras made, special underwater techniques on The Abyss, etc. etc.) EXCEPT the actual writing is quite astonishing. "We can hire an entire division of an aeronautics company to make us a special camera plane but we can't hire ONE. SINGLE. FUCKING. ACTUAL. WRITER. Nor do we think writers actually do their jobs very well or we would have hired one."

Cunt.

fields of salmon, Friday, 30 October 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link

uhh, that's because he writes.

Would you prefer he hire dozens of script doctors like they did for the first Charlie's Angels movie?

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 30 October 2009 22:07 (fourteen years ago) link

ANd what's with that Woody Allen not passing along work to some screenwriters anyway?

Bears Are Alive! (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 30 October 2009 22:18 (fourteen years ago) link

James Cameron's Interiors

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 October 2009 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link

That author of that b.s. "New Yorker" profile, by the way, clearly had seen little to no more of the film than any of us plebes have. Either that or he was legally obligated to keep it confidential.

― Josh in Chicago, Friday, October 30, 2009 2:27 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

what's your point?

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Friday, 30 October 2009 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link

it's a great fuckin' profile!!

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Friday, 30 October 2009 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link

this looks sorta awesome u_u

ice cr?m, Friday, 30 October 2009 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link

I think a lot of folks are failing to view this trailer/film thru the eyes of a naive 11-year-old sci-fi geek. Seems like that's who it's aimed squarely at, and on that level, carping about the font seems ridiculous. "The Little Mermaid was charming, but that font!"

from alcoholism to fleshly concerns (contenderizer), Friday, 30 October 2009 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link

but this doesn't look charming at all

da croupier, Friday, 30 October 2009 23:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Aye, this just looks gash.

krakow, Friday, 30 October 2009 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

is this a sudan allegory btw

ice cr?m, Friday, 30 October 2009 23:32 (fourteen years ago) link

nah brazil

am0n, Friday, 30 October 2009 23:42 (fourteen years ago) link

the movie or

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 00:46 (fourteen years ago) link

or?

am0n, Saturday, 31 October 2009 00:59 (fourteen years ago) link

so this has nothing to do with airbending right

how rad bandit (gbx), Saturday, 31 October 2009 01:59 (fourteen years ago) link

http://i40.tinypic.com/rubuah.gif

This revisionist bible is delicious (reddening), Saturday, 31 October 2009 03:59 (fourteen years ago) link

I wasn't carping about the font inasmuch as it seems to punctuate the awful look of this movie's design and overall aesthetics--as far as looking at it from the POV of an 11 year old... I was 11 when Terminator came out--that shit looked scary and cool.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Saturday, 31 October 2009 06:44 (fourteen years ago) link

could see this being a movie where a surprisingly wide range of non nerds are all that was cool

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 06:47 (fourteen years ago) link

all that was cool in an effed up world.

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 07:17 (fourteen years ago) link

... in 3D!!!

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 16:12 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post It's totally a great profile. My point was that all the audacity on display in the piece perhaps needed a bit more counterbalance than the single graf related to the negative reaction to the teaser.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 16:33 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, Cameron=jerk is not news.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 16:33 (fourteen years ago) link

he lets him hang himself with his own rope dude... what did you want, an anti-james-cameron expert to give the opposing view?

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 16:58 (fourteen years ago) link

won't be as good as 2012 fuiud

coz (webinar), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:07 (fourteen years ago) link

someone needs to take cameron's $$$ away and force him to work with a small budget again, like with Aliens and the Terminator.

also bring back michael biehn and lance henrikson.

i ain't no daggum son of a gun (latebloomer), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:20 (fourteen years ago) link

I really think lower budgets force people like Cameron or George Lucas to be more inventive.

i ain't no daggum son of a gun (latebloomer), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:23 (fourteen years ago) link

hard to say, cuz the only time they had them was so long ago...

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:27 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm not sure Aliens counts as low budget. $20 mil in 1986? That's about twice as much as "RoboCop" the next year.

x-post If Avatar is a huge hit and every bit as technologically successful as he's promised, then we're all the dupes. He's arrogant, that's for sure, but it's only hang-yourself hubris if he's wrong. It would have been nice had the author been privy to a bit more and been able to come to some conclusions, but my guess is at the time of the piece's filing the movie wasn't anywhere close to done, at least not enough to really show off.

Personally, I would have rather read a balanced Michael Bay profile in the New Yorker a la the Michael Savage piece. At least we know what Bay's been up to. Cameron, on the other hand, has been more or less off the grid for a decade, so the piece doesn't advance his particular story very well; there's simply too much of his reputation riding on "Avatar" for them to have given the author the access he needed to transform the profile into more than a on-the-go with James Cameron behind the scenes piece. Brody's Wes Anderson profile (and the Haneke piece - lots of directors in the New Yorker these days!) parallels the Cameron one, but took a firmer critical stance and made room for more analysis.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link

Invention isn't the goal. Making the most money you can is the goal. Telling a story is merely the means to that end.

Aimless, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Except that Cameron himself has called "Avatar" a game-changer, so unless he means he expects it to make more money than "Titanic," surely he has a different goal in mind.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link

"If we make money, I guarantee there will be more," Cameron said. "If we don't, we'll pretend it never happened."

Aimless, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:36 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post If Avatar is a huge hit and every bit as technologically successful as he's promised, then we're all the dupes. He's arrogant, that's for sure, but it's only hang-yourself hubris if he's wrong. It would have been nice had the author been privy to a bit more and been able to come to some conclusions, but my guess is at the time of the piece's filing the movie wasn't anywhere close to done, at least not enough to really show off.

Personally, I would have rather read a balanced Michael Bay profile in the New Yorker a la the Michael Savage piece. At least we know what Bay's been up to. Cameron, on the other hand, has been more or less off the grid for a decade, so the piece doesn't advance his particular story very well; there's simply too much of his reputation riding on "Avatar" for them to have given the author the access he needed to transform the profile into more than a on-the-go with James Cameron behind the scenes piece. Brody's Wes Anderson profile (and the Haneke piece - lots of directors in the New Yorker these days!) parallels the Cameron one, but took a firmer critical stance and made room for more analysis.

― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:28 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

having the author weigh in on the movie itself would have made it a very different KIND of story... this was a process piece and i found it pretty fascinating. it will of course be easy to draw conclusions once we all see the movie.

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:43 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean if the movie sucks it would be a LOL james cameron piece and if it's great it would be james cameron is a genius piece... not sure who really needs that.

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

i actually think it's a lot like the michael savage story... an interested and slightly detached look at a huge and contradictory personality.

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

Invention isn't the goal. Making the most money you can is the goal. Telling a story is merely the means to that end.

― Aimless, Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:32 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

do you really think, after reading that piece, that james cameron thinks of himself purely as a businessman?

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:45 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean congratulations on realizing that HOLLYWOOD LIKES MONEY but there's more to it than that which is why we're still talking about this dude

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron is playing with other people's money. He is not in sole charge of the project. However he may think of himself, he is a businessman among businessmen. He will always sell his project on the basis of anticipated profits, and his backers will view his inventiveness or lack of it, and not coincidentally set the size of his budget, in terms of anticipated profits.

That is why Cameron's personal goals are only tangentially related to the goal of the movie. An inventive artist who makes money is a Hollywood success story. One who loses money is a loser, pure and simple.

Aimless, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:05 (fourteen years ago) link

yes and?

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link

dont u see the system maaaan

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:16 (fourteen years ago) link

and so... "Invention isn't the goal. Making the most money you can is the goal. Telling a story is merely the means to that end"... still stands as correct.

Aimless, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

and so the statement stands, another ilx story told in the service of cynical reductionism. THE END

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:25 (fourteen years ago) link

so you're saying hollywood designs its products to make money? hmm, never thought of it that way before

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:27 (fourteen years ago) link

As a theory for explaining what appears on 99% of movie screens worldwide, it has powerful elucidary qualities which the auteur theory lacks. However, when a simplifying theory comes along which undermines the importance of what critics, fanboys and other groupies all love to chatter about, it meets brutal resistance.

Aimless, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:33 (fourteen years ago) link

it true, i just brutally suggest bannd u

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:36 (fourteen years ago) link

**bows cynically to the right and left, exits stage**

Aimless, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:37 (fourteen years ago) link

"technologically successful"?

luol deng (am0n), Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

sweet fx bra

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:45 (fourteen years ago) link

oh right if the efx are really cool then we are the dupes. the efx will have duped us into liking a shitty film

luol deng (am0n), Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

"bows cynically" ?

luol deng (am0n), Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link

yes if the effects are well executed and convincing you are an asshole

ice cr?m, Saturday, 31 October 2009 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link

my entire profession was just undermined brutally and i do not know what to do

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

all critical discourse around movies has been debunked for all time :(

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

http://4.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kse65vii2Z1qzdv8uo1_400.jpg

Starring The Guy Who Didn't Get To Be James Bond!

StanM, Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:05 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post Um, Cameron has stated specifically that the effects will be groundbreaking, "a game changer." He has not called the script a game changer, or the amount of money the movie will make a game changer. Pretty obvious that if he delivers on the FX front, then the former's deficiencies will be negated and the $$$ will be massive enough to justify the bravado. Whether people will be dressed as these blue things next Halloween is another matter.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

uhh just saw trailer (thx world series!) and this looks like a trailer for halo and the font for the movie's name looks like papyrus.

call all destroyer, Monday, 2 November 2009 02:58 (fourteen years ago) link

seeing the trailer for this on tv while not paying much attention makes it look just like some dippy video game. digital effects very much included. tho obviously my tv is not 3-d.

xpost! haha

STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Monday, 2 November 2009 03:15 (fourteen years ago) link

Pretty obvious that if he delivers on the FX front, then the former's deficiencies will be negated and the $$$ will be massive enough to justify the bravado

If anything, it'll scrub the memory of Transformers 2 out of our brains.

Ugh, I still hate that fucking Papyrus font.

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 09:29 (fourteen years ago) link

real talk

modescalator (blueski), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 11:38 (fourteen years ago) link

True fax.

Chewshabadoo, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 11:51 (fourteen years ago) link

nothing will scrub t2

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 14:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Saw the trailer at the cinema, blimey, it looks a bit ropey.

hey it's (jel --), Saturday, 7 November 2009 16:02 (fourteen years ago) link

PLAYBOY: We seem to need fantasy icons like Lara Croft and Wonder Woman, despite knowing they mess with our heads.
CAMERON: Most of men's problems with women probably have to do with realizing women are real and most of them don't look or act like Vampirella. A big recalibration happens when we're forced to deal with real women, and there's a certain geek population that would much rather deal with fantasy women than real women. Let's face it: Real women are complicated. You can try your whole life and not understand them.

PLAYBOY: How much did you get into calibrating your movie heroine's hotness?
CAMERON: Right from the beginning I said, "She's got to have tits," even though that makes no sense because her race, the Na'vi, aren't placental mammals. I designed her costumes based on a taparrabo, a loincloth thing worn by Mayan Indians. We go to another planet in this movie, so it would be stupid if she ran around in a Brazilian thong or a fur bikini like Raquel Welch in One Million Years B.C.

PLAYBOY: Are her breasts on view?
CAMERON: I came up with this free-floating, lion's-mane-like array of feathers, and we strategically lit and angled shots to not draw attention to her breasts, but they're right there. The animation uses a physics-based sim that takes into consideration gravity, air movement and the momentum of her hair, her top. We had a shot in which Neytiri falls into a specific position, and because she is lit by orange firelight, it lights up the nipples. That was good, except we're going for a PG-13 rating, so we wound up having to fix it. We'll have to put it on the special edition DVD; it will be a collector's item. A Neytiri Playboy Centerfold would have been a good idea.

PLAYBOY: So you're okay with arousing PG-13 chubbies?
CAMERON: If such a thing should ­happen—and I'm not saying it will—that would be fine.

windy = white, carl = black (polyphonic), Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:52 (fourteen years ago) link

okay so that is just wrong

a Barbie-like nub where he provates should be (HI DERE), Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:53 (fourteen years ago) link

When did this thread have sex with the Idolator one?

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link

god gross

goole, Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link

We had a shot in which Neytiri falls into a specific position, and because she is lit by orange firelight, it lights up the nipples.

well okay then

a Barbie-like nub where he provates should be (HI DERE), Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Guys, this was how Von Sternberg shot Marlene Dietrich.

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:58 (fourteen years ago) link

shot her with light-up nipples

a Barbie-like nub where he provates should be (HI DERE), Thursday, 12 November 2009 22:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Most of men's problems with women probably have to do with realizing women are real and most of them don't look or act like Vampirella. A big recalibration happens when we're forced to deal with real women, and there's a certain geek population that would much rather deal with fantasy women than real women. Right from the beginning I said, "She's got to have tits," even though that makes no sense because her race, the Na'vi, aren't placental mammals.

goole, Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:05 (fourteen years ago) link

<3

caek, Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Now imagine the AvaTwilight crossover slashfic. Being made by somebody, somewhere, right now.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Right from the beginning I said, "She's got to have tits,"

great quote

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:19 (fourteen years ago) link

he is amazing.

If Planes Could Fly This Place Would Be an Airport (s1ocki), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:22 (fourteen years ago) link

that makes no sense because her race, the Na'vi, aren't placental mammals.

^^ man, no pill worries or anything

goole, Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:23 (fourteen years ago) link

it makes sense on another planet to be dressed like 12th century mayan but not like a 21st century brazilian

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:26 (fourteen years ago) link

kinda lol mostly sad

mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link

megalolz at this useless fuckwad's quest for "realism"

hoth as fuck (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link

a non-placental mammal having tits = hey that's okay, but wearing a brazilian thong?!?! THAT'S CRAZY

hoth as fuck (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:29 (fourteen years ago) link

it makes sense to be a tall blue person

ice cr?m, Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:29 (fourteen years ago) link

megalolz at everything to do with this film.

mu-mu (Pashmina), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:32 (fourteen years ago) link

I think I want this to be a huge embarrassment now. Except it will still rake in the cash.

George Mucus (ledge), Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:43 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw on the quidities thread that he watches cgi blue alien mayan-style pr0n on his iphone in public

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Friday, 13 November 2009 00:02 (fourteen years ago) link

i am actually doing that right now

lots of jerks (gbx), Friday, 13 November 2009 00:04 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/images/2007/07/27/ekk4.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 13 November 2009 00:58 (fourteen years ago) link

"chubbies"

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 13 November 2009 00:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Yet another sneak peek story? Yeah they're getting nervous:

Inside a dark mixing stage at 20th Century Fox a few weeks ago, writer-director James Cameron, surrounded by nearly a dozen colleagues, stared at a clip from his upcoming movie, "Avatar," unhappy with the look of the precipitous peaks on the horizon.

Circling the summits with a red laser pointer and speaking to his computer-effects team at Weta Digital in New Zealand via videoconference, Cameron came up with a Muhammad-like solution: Shift the mountains to the left.

"Moving a mountain," the 55-year-old filmmaker said, laughing, "is nothing."

...

As part of his research and development, Cameron directed the 3-D documentaries "Aliens of the Deep" and "Ghosts of the Abyss," which visited the Titanic's underwater wreckage. To overcome what many critics regard as the great flaw of motion-capture animation, the "dead-eye" appearance of characters, Cameron mounted tiny cameras above the faces of his "Avatar" actors, recording their smallest facial expressions and most intimate eye movements.

"What had been missing in motion capture was the 'E' -- the emotion," said "Avatar" producer Jon Landau.

The real test of this hybrid technology, the filmmakers acknowledge, will not be in the 3-D illusion of sending a rocket hurtling toward the audience, but in whether it enhances the tale's emotional resonance.

Hath not a blue alien lifelike eyes?

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 15 November 2009 15:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh and:

In August, the studio declared "Avatar Day," showing 16 minutes of the movie for free at 130 IMAX theaters around the globe, seen by 50,000 to 60,000 people, according to Fox estimates. Initial fanboy reaction wasn't all positive. "If Cameron thinks a film that looks like an Xbox game is the future of cinema . . . then he's mental," said one Web critic.

"I thought anyone who saw the early footage would be a convert," Cameron said of the IMAX previews. "It just seemed that everyone who had seen the footage wanted more."

Dude...

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 15 November 2009 15:20 (fourteen years ago) link

What had been missing in motion capture was the 'E'

aha

Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:57 (fourteen years ago) link

motion captur?

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

if you give audiences the 'E' -- the drug ecstasy -- before screening the response is overwhelmingly positive

ice cr?m, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:01 (fourteen years ago) link

They have shirts of this movie for sale at Hot Topic, but only in the girls' section.

milliband (Abbott), Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

didn't you read in that new yorker profile how cameron only shops for clothes in the girl's section of hot topic?

Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link

South Park offers some anticipatory criticism

Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 November 2009 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link

that was actually kind of hilarious, something this season of South Park has not had too much of

a Barbie-like nub where he provates should be (HI DERE), Monday, 16 November 2009 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link

he "dead-eye" appearance of characters

it's funny cause his models have some of the deadest looking eyes in computer animation - hint you don't compensate for this by making their eyes bigger

囧 (dyao), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 04:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh boy, the game!

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 17 November 2009 22:57 (fourteen years ago) link

gotta say the film might actually be reasonably okay looking if he simply chose to have these aliens be something other than aggressive smurfs

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 23:11 (fourteen years ago) link

sexy smurvs

SMH (ice cr?m), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 23:24 (fourteen years ago) link

i played the game in 3D.

it kinda gave me a headache/eye twitchy feeling

mr. que, covering up the vital parts, lest he embarrass the ladi (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 00:35 (fourteen years ago) link

That's called a 'boner' in smurf world M@tt.

five minutes of iguana time (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 00:38 (fourteen years ago) link

james cameron gargameled my boner for life

mr. que, covering up the vital parts, lest he embarrass the ladi (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 00:43 (fourteen years ago) link

gotta say the film might actually be reasonably okay looking if he simply chose to have these aliens be something other than aggressive smurfs

the disney smurfiness feels especially grating and out of date after District 9

da croupier, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 02:46 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe the smurfs get all pukey tho

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 02:47 (fourteen years ago) link

Soundtrack tracklisting revealed plot spoilers blah blah. The "My Heart Will Go On" of this thing is called "I See You." Uh.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:11 (fourteen years ago) link

last track:

"death of all the avatars and our lead villain"

jØrdån (omar little), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

remember when the "single" from the attack of the clones soundtrack was "qui-gon's funeral"

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

NICE PLAY SHAKESPEARE

max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Gotta love the titles of the first seven bits:

1. “You Don’t Dream in Cryo…”
2. Jake Enters His Avatar World
3. Pure Spirits of the Forest
4. The Bioluminescence of the Night
5. Becoming One of “The People”
Becoming One With Neytiri
6. Climbing Up – “Iknimaya – The Path to Heaven”

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Six bits, seven bits, WHATEVER.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

"Tell me of your homeworld, Jake."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

The "My Heart Will Go On" of this thing is called "I See You."

If it's the Juliana Hatfield song that might be kind of fun.

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

I was hoping it was short for this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbdYmFSfrcU

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Becoming One With Neytiri = sexin smurfette

SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:23 (fourteen years ago) link

You know, this will be totally ridiculous, but I still wanna see it.

YOUR MOMS SPOT HERON WITH NO HANDS I'M SMACKIN HER (Beatrix Kiddo), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 21:44 (fourteen years ago) link

probably best to treat it like Cameron made it ten years ago but you never got around to seeing it. "smurfs, wtf, well it was 1999."

da croupier, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 21:46 (fourteen years ago) link

probably best to not see it at all

Jack Kirby's Orangutan Surfing Civilization (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link

obv i'm referring to the titanic fans who can't resist

da croupier, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 21:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't know if it's just the smurfiness of it or what but it just seems like th most horrible movie ever made to me. I would sit through a Uwe Bolle film festival before I'd watch this.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 21:59 (fourteen years ago) link

1. “You Don’t Dream in Cryo…”
2. Jake Enters His Avatar World
3. Pure Spirits of the Forest
4. The Bioluminescence of the Night
5. Becoming One of “The People”
Becoming One With Neytiri
6. Climbing Up – “Iknimaya – The Path to Heaven”

this makes me want to see it more than ever

half of these ought to have ": sounds of the rainforest" appended to the end

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 02:48 (fourteen years ago) link

the disney smurfiness feels especially grating and out of date after District 9

― da croupier, Wednesday, November 18, 2009 2:46 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark

otm.

fel (latebloomer), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:25 (fourteen years ago) link

(not that district 9 was a perfect masterpiece or anything)

fel (latebloomer), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Guys I gotta put in that James Horner did turn out some k-awes film scores back in the day (not so much since he got fat off Titanic though). Wrath Of Khan, Brainstorm, Something Wicked This Way Comes, Land Before Time, Sneakers, those were all awesome scores.

That said, my intuition tells me this isn't gonna be his most inspired music.

five minutes of iguana time (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:31 (fourteen years ago) link

this is gonna be such a trainwreck on so many many levels

fifteen minutes of iguana time famous (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link

i wanna see james cameron's house if he has a wax pope under his stairs

luol deng (am0n), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:45 (fourteen years ago) link

No way is his house as cool as Emmerich's, let's be real.

windy = white, carl = black (polyphonic), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link

seriously.

fel (latebloomer), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:47 (fourteen years ago) link

it could be if its a smurf cottage

luol deng (am0n), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:50 (fourteen years ago) link

if cameron really lived up to his persona he would be living in a submarine

fel (latebloomer), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:55 (fourteen years ago) link

I wonder if Avatar is about smurf frottage.

windy = white, carl = black (polyphonic), Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:56 (fourteen years ago) link

cameron has the prop machine guns from aliens mounted on the walls of his house that shoots foam in case of fire. true story.

mayor jingleberries, Thursday, 19 November 2009 23:00 (fourteen years ago) link

has the avatar downfall/hitler rant thingy been posted in here? that's kind of lol.

wilter, Friday, 20 November 2009 02:28 (fourteen years ago) link

http://uk.movies.ign.com/dor/objects/800318/avatar/videos/avatar_hardware.html

DavidM, Saturday, 21 November 2009 10:52 (fourteen years ago) link

This is very Aliens - except this time the aliens are the good guys!

DavidM, Saturday, 21 November 2009 10:57 (fourteen years ago) link

60 Minutes has a piece on Avatar tonight, fyi.

windy = white, carl = black (polyphonic), Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Pushing this so hard at the cinema tonight. They've had plastic credit card-like Avatar gift cards printed up so you can "give the gift of Avatar" tickets as Christmas presents, too.

stet, Monday, 23 November 2009 04:47 (fourteen years ago) link

saw the 60 minutes piece on a nice HDTV at a restaurant tonight.... and I kind of enjoyed just zoning out and watching the scenery.

I imagine it will be 2 hours of "that looks kinda cool" that will be quickly forgotten and never watched again.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 23 November 2009 08:47 (fourteen years ago) link

And now it's the interactive trailer! (As proudly linked on the bottom of the page.) And it's important, see:

The "Avatar" Interactive trailer is actually more of a program or application than your usual run-of-the-mill teaser. With Cameron's film taking years to complete, the trailer even took a while to develop, too, with a four-month creation time.

"We kind of look at it as the next generation of movie trailers because it allows users to interact and delve deeper into the content of the movie," says Fox's Jeffrey Godsick, executive vice president of marketing and digital content.

Built on Adobe AIR software, the application not only plays trailers, but also helps you keep track of news about "Avatar" through all kinds of social media. Like the Virtual Echo desktop for "Dollhouse" (RIP), AIR also can be made portable and not browser-based. Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube all contribute to the feed that will fill up your entire screen if you choose.

With all of that, the trailer is the centerpiece, and with it are other video pieces that give the user more insight into the creation of the movie. "Hot spots" during the trailer allow users to see vignettes about creature and technological designs and hear character profiles from many of the film's stars.

It can be a bit overwhelming when you first see it cover your whole screen, and for fans who are really anticipating the movie, the officialavatar tweeter pops up with updates even when the program is minimized. It's all a cool interaction, but I wondered how much input Cameron, the tech godling, had in the program's development.

"The incorporation of technology has always been really important to (Cameron). He's really been supportive of the idea because it's cool, but also because it really does allow people to get involved in this world. He and Lightstorm have actually been involved in the creation of some of the content pieces," says Godsick.

The program will continue to be updated as the movie nears. It was also mentioned that Cameron's Lightstorm is developing a Pandorapedia to launch in December that will give an even more in-depth look at the world "Avatar" has created.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm seriously waiting for the interactive MMS from Cameron himself to everyone in the world telling us to go see it or he'll cry.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:58 (fourteen years ago) link

I imagine it will be 2 hours of "that looks kinda cool" that will be quickly forgotten and never watched again.

^^^^^ on this. I want to see it, but I'm not in any particular hurry.

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 02:07 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah but in 3-D

fel (latebloomer), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 02:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Wired has a series of stories out:
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/11/ff_avatar_cameron/all/1
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/11/ff_avatar_5steps/

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 02:13 (fourteen years ago) link

"Godsick" : what a great surname. love to know the history on how that came about.

mark e, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah I was thinking, "Okay how did a nu-metal band miss that one."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 16:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron kept a razor blade on his editing desk with a note: Use only if film sucks.

moullet, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:07 (fourteen years ago) link

I realise this makes me a disgusting savage, but I tried to book advance tickets for this at local IMAX and the first week is already *completely* sold out. Looks like it's going to make mad loot.

Bill A, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe at imax, people will watch any goddamn thing on those screens. this is like captain eo 2 and perfect for that format.
i dunno about normal theaters.

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

aren't most new imax releases sold out for the first week way before hand? this is before the first reviews/ the first week of people who actually seeing it saying how bad it is to their friends.

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:59 (fourteen years ago) link

PROCTOLOGIST: A Journey through Jim Cameron
AN IMAX EXCLUSIVE

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:02 (fourteen years ago) link

My kid is getting psyched up for this. We were at the movies the other day and he spent a minute or two staring at the Avatar poster, which is lenticular.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:02 (fourteen years ago) link

i doubt this will make its money back ($500 million!) but just because us snarky internet types think it's gonna be this huge gigantic flop doesn't mean a lot of people aren't gonna go see this.

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:08 (fourteen years ago) link

its not just snarky internet types though. plenty of people i know have commented on how fucking stupid it looks. the other day i was walking through whsmiths with my nan and even she commented on 'why are they putting the smurfs in a film' when she saw the cover of empire/other-film-mag/whatever-had-it-on-the-cover. know absolutely no-one who is excited about it (although ok i don't know any 7 year olds). just looks dull.

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:11 (fourteen years ago) link

ok it will still make at least 100m and open pretty big but after the initial impact it doesn't look good. and the longer people talk about how bad it looks/will flop, the more likely its gonna be.

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:12 (fourteen years ago) link

it's probably going to explode internationally, here i'd expect the numbers to be "underwhelming" but not catastrophic. the real shocker would be if it shows a quarter of the legs that Titanic did.

xpost

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:13 (fourteen years ago) link

if it bombs, get ready for Terminator Vs. Aliens.

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link

straight to video shocker

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

don't underestimate the secret furry demographic.

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

vs. predator vs friday the 13 vs freddy vs

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

straight to six flags would be cooler. "fuck it, let's just make it a ride."

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, it will make bank internationally, and probably recoup loads in DVD sales, etc.

like wouldn't be surprised if it was the sort of thing that got bundled into blu-ray/tv deals at best buy or w/e (it's just so *visual*)

crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

planet 'tar

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:17 (fourteen years ago) link

straight to six flags would be cooler. "fuck it, let's just make it a ride."

― da croupier, Wednesday, December 2, 2009 7:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

“Yes,” Cameron said flatly. “They have to have tails.”

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

“Yes,” Cameron said flatly. “They have to have tails.”

http://www.wired.com/magazine/wp-content/images/17-12/ff_avatar_cameron1_f.jpg

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, it will make bank internationally, and probably recoup loads in DVD sales, etc.

I dunno, dog, this movie reportedly cost $500 mil, which is about equal to the Dark Knight's domestic gross

ess-tee-oh-pee (some dude), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:34 (fourteen years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/20091201_avatar_190x190.jpg

"YEAH!"

*barf sounds*

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:37 (fourteen years ago) link

no lie, if someone took me to an amusement park where the rollercoaster cars looked like the flying things from the "Avatar" previews, I would never leave

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:39 (fourteen years ago) link

this is like captain eo 2 and perfect for that format.

I really wish Cameron had made a sequel to Captain Eo instead of this.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:39 (fourteen years ago) link

Fox apparently just did a big promo image dump. Scrounge for laughs.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769368876.jpg

"So your mission is to CLIMB THIS TREE, MAGGOT."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Is the whole movie going to be the scenes from Endor? I don't know if these smurf wannabes are preferable to the ewoks.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:43 (fourteen years ago) link

ewoks are great.

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:44 (fourteen years ago) link

on rye

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:45 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769362620.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I like the ewoks, but they seem to be almost universally hated.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:46 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769364819.jpg

"Tell me of your homewor--"

"I already DID."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Meanwhile on the set of CSI: Pandora:

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769365518.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

"Tsu'tey"

see this is why I sometimes hate fantasy

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769362620.jpg

A mishap in the teleporter spliced together Marilyn Manson's backing band, a couple of Thundercats, and the Blue Man group and sent them to Skull Island

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Star Trek's future has the Beastie Boys, Avatar's got Harleys:

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769352808.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Okay this one, all you need's the actual caption:

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769358046.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

"epic battle" is just like "romantic comedy" for me now

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12573815464295.jpg

this looks like the precursor to an anime pr0n scene

xp: Ned the first thing that came to mind with that pic was "... and pull your knees in tiiiight"

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahahah nice.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Why is Sam Worthington? He seems like a big charisma vacuum.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Why is movie

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

JAKE SULLY

jØrdån (omar little), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

A mishap in the teleporter spliced together Marilyn Manson's backing band, a couple of Thundercats, and the Blue Man group and sent them to Skull Island

― tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:48 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^^sounds like a great film i'd enjoy and pay to see, unlike avatar

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

OMG Michele Rodriguez is in this...she is my personal stamp of C-grade entertainment that works in spite of itself ever since "Blue Crush."

mascara and ties (Abbott), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:55 (fourteen years ago) link

U know, they should have made the aliens disgusting jellyfish creatures who live in clouds of methane. Wouldn't that be awesome?

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

See, look, tails!

http://cinemablend.com/images/reviews/2043/_12597769368975.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Plus rocks and hair.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

So I assume Giovanni Ribisi:Avatar::Paul Reiser:Aliens.

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

"So Sigourney, your motivation in this scene is--"

"Yeah, thanks, got it."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

"He Poos Blue"

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Maybe there's some secret scene at the end and Arnie comes in in Terminator drag and kills everyone.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

U know, they should have made the aliens disgusting jellyfish creatures who live in clouds of methane. Wouldn't that be awesome?

Cameron would still be adamant that they had to have breasts

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Ender's Nowhere Near as Interesting War

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

I wish this was the theme song:

http://www.hulu.com/watch/102975/saturday-night-live-what-up-with-that

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Which makes me wonder why the hell he didn't just get Paul Reiser. I imagine he's just sitting at home watching Food Network or something.

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Imagine how awesome this movie would be if they replaced Sam Worthington with Kenan Thompson.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Isn't Paul Reiser now bald and fat? From what I recall, that pretty much precludes him from ever being in a James Cameron movie again.

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

this really looks like Aliens and Titanic's secret deformed lovechild that was hidden away for ten years then finally was allowed to see daylight

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

they should have made the aliens disgusting jellyfish creatures who live in clouds of methane

U really shouldn't talk about Andy Sturmer that way.

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Paul Reiser in 2005:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Paulreiser05.jpg/200px-Paulreiser05.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

For the 'unusual details' thread:

Atlanta (Centers on a man and a woman who meet at a funeral and can't seem to stay away from each other)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

James Horner is not out to unground the film

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link

Paul Reiser had an inexplicable cameo in Funny People; why didn't Apatow ask him to reprise Burke?

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost is it me or is there a slight similarity in the proportions / width of the eyes / between Jake-tard and Pattinson?

twice boiled cabbage is death, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahah how appropriate:

'Avatar' to close Dubai film festival

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

Maybe this whole thing is a plot just to wrap this decade up in one convenient place and sink it in the bottom of the ocean.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

You know, the game cover image is ten thousand times better than the actual stills because this really DOES look like a cover of a game from 1986 or something:

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/gamelife/2009/11/avatar_game_box_350.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link

All I ask schadenfreude-wise is that this movie make less (at least in the US) than Alvin & The Chipmunks 2: The Squeakel.

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link

James Cameron's JOUST: THE MOVIE

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:10 (fourteen years ago) link

...actually why hasn't that been done yet? Seems a logical choice these days.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

http://img.youtube.com/vi/f8KUB-Ufric/0.jpg

“Yes,” Cameron said flatly. “They have to have tails.”

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:15 (fourteen years ago) link

surely it should be The Squeakening

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:16 (fourteen years ago) link

'Munkment Day

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:16 (fourteen years ago) link

Revenge of the Alvin

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Tailiens

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link

All I ask schadenfreude-wise is that this movie make less (at least in the US) than Alvin & The Chipmunks 2: The Squeakel.

― da croupier, Wednesday, December 2, 2009 4:09 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

just what we need, another unnecessary squeakquel

ankles (s1ocki), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link

2 Alvin 2 Chipmunks

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link

A Chip Off The Old Munk

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

28 Squeaks Later

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Actually, going back to my first post on this whole thing:

Both actors have signed on for possible future installments as well because Cameron and Fox see "Avatar" as a potential franchise.

Fear.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Alvatar

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar 2: Avatarly

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

more like AVATARDED

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Avaturd

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatars On Vacation

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar 2: Avatarder

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Weekend At Na'vis

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Flight of the Na'vigator

tectonic p (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link

The Avartark Knight

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

"Na'vi 5 is alive."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatarmageddon -- directed by Michael Bay

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:26 (fourteen years ago) link

Pearl Avatar

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:27 (fourteen years ago) link

"Sir we've seen the breasts. They're the size of Texas." xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:27 (fourteen years ago) link

Another old quote from way up near the start:

Said Cameron: “We know the oncology and composition of the atmosphere, the geography and species of plants, the culture and the history of the Na’vi people.”

...and all we got were these lousy furries.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Ishavatar

xpost i can always tell when directors haven't figured out the oncology in a sci-fi movie

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:30 (fourteen years ago) link

“Yes,” Cameron said flatly. “The atmosphere has to have an appropriate mix of nitrogen and oxygen in the troposphere to ensure that vertebrates who don't have gills can develop via accepted evolution-based theories.”

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:34 (fourteen years ago) link

also i'm guesssssing he meant ecology unless there's a cancer subplot

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:34 (fourteen years ago) link

are they only showing one type of terrain (jungle+floating rocks) of this planet? presumably there would also be ice wastes, deserts etc. if no reason to show them

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:35 (fourteen years ago) link

"We also know, like on earth, that there's only one intelligent species, and that they all look and talk alike and possess the same language."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:36 (fourteen years ago) link

$50 million was spent on Na'Vi research

da croupier, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:37 (fourteen years ago) link

Can't wait for that DVD extra.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

and about 1 million on ontological research; bad prioritites

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh hey, read the book!:

A field guide to Pandora—the mesmerizing world of James Cameron's Avatar.

Four years in the making—and 15 years since its conception—Avatar is a live action film with a new generation of special effects, delivering a fully immersive cinematic experience of a new kind, where the revolutionary technology invented to make the film disappears into the emotion of the characters and the sweep of the story.

In Avatar: A Confidential Report on the Biological and Social History of Pandora we are introduced to Pandora—a pristine and beautiful moon in a distant solar system—its exotic ecosystems, and the indigenous race called the Na'vi. By piecing together photographs, scientific field notes, and research data, citizens on Earth have collected the information in this field guide as a way to highlight the lessons Pandora can teach the people of Earth, who have struggled to survive as their planet's critical resources are depleted.

Though Pandora has proven to be an exceedingly profitable source of natural resources, the environment—from its gravity-defying floating mountains to the small but venomous hellfire wasps and the gigantic carnivorous thanator—poses continual dangers to RDA. Catalogued with unparalleled precision and access, this field guide provides highly detailed descriptions of the unique creatures and plants found on Pandora, the culture, language, and physiology of the native population, as well as RDA technology and weapons.

Eager to save the Earth, the activists have culled this information in hopes to expose the corporate greed and disregard for the native inhabitants and their environment that governs RDA's presence on the foreign moon.

This is the evidence in their case to save Pandora—and themselves.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

You can kinda hear the "DUN-DUN-DUNNNNNN!" after that conclusion.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

if only they had the board lawyer power of ILX

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Wait:

Pandora—a pristine and beautiful moon

It IS Endor!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Kinda appreciate how the aliens are giving us the finger here:

http://www.harpercollins.com/harperimages/isbn/large/0/9780061896750.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link

David Lynch had like 5 movies in the 90s for which he couldn't drum up enough money (10-20m).

but 500m for 3d furry porn is doable.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link

"When the monkeyfurrycatpeople die, everybody gonna cry."

twice boiled cabbage is death, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:43 (fourteen years ago) link

and that they all look and talk alike and possess the same language

arrrgh fuck off

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link

:-D

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:48 (fourteen years ago) link

it looks like they are in the big womb things that keanu wakes up in during teh matrix

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 3 December 2009 00:03 (fourteen years ago) link

hate this movie solely for ruining my ability to appreciate this shade of blue ever again

囧 (dyao), Thursday, 3 December 2009 01:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Future bargain bin finds xp

Meatcat (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 3 December 2009 02:00 (fourteen years ago) link

So is the audience meant to take the side of nine foot tall furries over humans?

Cosmic Ugg (S-), Thursday, 3 December 2009 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Let's see, it's been 24 hours, there should be a slew of stupid new quotes and behold:

Cameron, whose filmmaking has always been notable for its technological innovations, explained it simply: “I basically sat down and put everything in this that I ever wanted to see in a movie – and that’s why it’s such a grab-bag of visual concepts.”

With a cup of coffee in hand and looking relaxed and in a pair of jeans and casual shirt, he was talking in his private projection room after screening 30 minutes of Avatar to a small invited group. It is impossible not to be fascinated and enthralled by his action-filled 3D vision of adventure and battles in an iridescent jungle on an alien planet, where hideous, dragon-like creatures appear to leap off the screen, flora and fauna wave in the air and a heroic avatar does battle with a pterodactyl-like beast before subduing it and soaring off on its back.

“It came from all the science-fiction books I read when I was a kid and it just gestated over time,” he said. “I did a lot of fantasy art and I had drawers full of drawings of creatures, characters, robots, spaceships and all that sort of thing. So for me I was just going back to my roots.”

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

And what's today, kids?!?!

http://www.mtv.com/shared/promoimages/movies/a/avatar/live_stream/448x252.jpg

The time is here folks. Stop reading and proceed directly to the MTV Movies home page. Why? Don't you know by now?!!?!?!? "Avatar" director James Cameron, along with stars Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana are answering questions from fans -- submitted on MTV.com or via the Facebook event page -- about the movie in a special MTV live stream event.

What are you still doing here? Go watch (starting at 3pm EST/12pm PST)!!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il_NAXpDHZ4

“Yes,” Cameron said flatly. “They have to have tails.”

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

for someone whos hair is on fire, she doesn't seem fazed. she does have boobs tho

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh wait, another one from that first link:

“We’re telling the story of what happens when a technologically superior culture comes into a place with a technologically inferior indigenous culture and there are resources there that they want,” said Cameron. “It never ends well.

“It’s also a love story about an awakening of perception through the other person. That person must teach him something and there has to be a greater reason for him to be in love with her other than she’s a hot blue alien chick.”

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

I hope this means an introductory scene where they tell Sam Worthington's character they picked him because of his hot blue chick fetish.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

If you have such an unfortunate fetish, this movie must be a godsend. "Finally, something for ME."

mascara and ties (Abbott), Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,390,000 for smurf fetish. (0.55 seconds)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

oh god no

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Hey, we had the corner on blue-skin fetishes first!

http://www.trekp.com/posters/gw051-andorians.jpg

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 3 December 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link

bonus points to whoever can rustle up the first porn cartoons of these smug blue motherfuckers

max, Thursday, 3 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Based on that quote from Cameron, he already did those cartoons when he was 15.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

andorians?

mascara and pies (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 3 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

The more you know... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andorian

In the Deep Space Nine relaunch novels, four-person Andorian marriages were extrapolated into four sexes--the two roughly male thaan and chan, and the two female-like shen and zhen. The novels imply that the rarity of compatible foursomes produced extremely low reproduction rates which, in tandem with genetic weaknesses, led to the species' near extinction.

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 3 December 2009 21:10 (fourteen years ago) link

"That person must teach him something and there has to be a greater reason for him to be in love with her other than she’s a hot blue alien chick"

You are one sick puppy, Mr. Cameron.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 3 December 2009 21:46 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.wired.com/magazine/wp-content/images/17-12/ff_avatar_cameron2_f.jpg

You think for the amount of money Cameron has to play with he could afford something a bit nicer than a friggin' Behringer Eurorack mixer.

Cosmic Ugg (S-), Friday, 4 December 2009 01:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Sigourney doesn't look all that into 3d smurfs.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 4 December 2009 03:19 (fourteen years ago) link

A clip of Sigourney and Giovanni that will make your brain bleed:

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=12414

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 03:21 (fourteen years ago) link

omg i want this to fail so badly
i normally don't have these feelings
but i'm going to say i want this to fail
that clip is so bad

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 December 2009 03:56 (fourteen years ago) link

so you can pick up unobtainium, but you can't sit it on a desk, it has to hover on a special levitation coaster?

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 4 December 2009 05:09 (fourteen years ago) link

and who the fuck calls them oral hygienists? Isn't the term dental hygienist?

Or is it different in the FUTURE?

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 4 December 2009 05:10 (fourteen years ago) link

really can't get over him saying 'unobtainium' with a straight face

囧 (dyao), Friday, 4 December 2009 06:36 (fourteen years ago) link

omg i want this to fail so badly
i normally don't have these feelings
but i'm going to say i want this to fail

^^ this! I have been actively wishing for this film's complete crash and burn ever since I saw the first trailer, and the feeling only gets stronger every day.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 4 December 2009 06:42 (fourteen years ago) link

unobtainium

omar little, Friday, 4 December 2009 06:51 (fourteen years ago) link

People have been gunning so hard for this to fail that it almost makes me want to see it succeed.

But then I glance back at those screen shots and I'm all "fuck this shit"

unified theory of objectionable thoughts (latebloomer), Friday, 4 December 2009 07:01 (fourteen years ago) link

“It came from all the science-fiction books I read when I was a kid and it just gestated over time,” he said. “I did a lot of fantasy art and I had drawers full of drawings of creatures, characters, robots, spaceships and all that sort of thing. So for me I was just going back to my roots.”

To be fair that is EXACTLY what this movie looks like: a bored 6th grade kid's notebook doodlings.

unified theory of objectionable thoughts (latebloomer), Friday, 4 December 2009 07:03 (fourteen years ago) link

I seriously want someone to ask Cameron about the unobtainium hover coasters, since every element of this film is so painstakingly reasoned and all.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 4 December 2009 09:43 (fourteen years ago) link

Why did the aliens all go to the English language school if they don't get on with the humans?

Disco Stfu (Raw Patrick), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:25 (fourteen years ago) link

why did indians go to the English language school if they didn't like the colonialists?

Wee xx (a hoy hoy), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:31 (fourteen years ago) link

this is just gonna be a hardcore cliché snoozefest once i stop laffing at how bad it is (in 10 years time when it is telly, as i will refuse to pay to see it)

Wee xx (a hoy hoy), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:32 (fourteen years ago) link

it's been dubbed obviously

mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:38 (fourteen years ago) link

avatat

SKATAAAAAAAAAAA (cozwn), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:50 (fourteen years ago) link

SPOILERS, if anyone cares

Over time, Jake integrates himself into the Na'vi clan, and begins to fall in love with Neytiri. As a result, Jake finds himself caught between the military-industrial forces of Earth and the Na’vi, forcing him to choose sides in an epic battle that will decide the fate of Pandora and the Na'vi.

Which side will he choose, I REALLY CANNOT GUESS.

Communi-Bear Silo State (chap), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:52 (fourteen years ago) link

his best friend is a talking pie

mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 4 December 2009 13:53 (fourteen years ago) link

wow there are some moments in that clip that almost reach dr. tongue levels of 3d-shown-in-2d posing

da croupier, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:10 (fourteen years ago) link

when he held up the rock i was sure he'd start waving it back and forth

da croupier, Friday, 4 December 2009 14:11 (fourteen years ago) link

when the audience stands up and starts throwing toast at the midnight showings of this, you gonna be sorry you dissed it.

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:21 (fourteen years ago) link

They're more likely to initiate furry sex.

ô_o (Nicole), Friday, 4 December 2009 14:25 (fourteen years ago) link

The pelvic thrust really will drive them insane...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:23 (fourteen years ago) link

*throws toast*

mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 4 December 2009 15:26 (fourteen years ago) link

unobtainium

EZ Snappin, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:29 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post -- Terrible euphemism.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:29 (fourteen years ago) link

I just feel that needs repeating every ten post or so. Unobtainium - get some if you can.

EZ Snappin, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:29 (fourteen years ago) link

I was thinking that there Cameron goes on about the atmosphere and culture and etc. and I'm thinking, "Okay sure it wasn't a setting you originally devised but in Aliens you just threw in some gunk about terraforming for two seconds and that's all anyone needed and anyone WANTED."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 15:30 (fourteen years ago) link

WE HAVE THEME SONG:

http://www.popeater.com/2009/12/04/leona-lewis-avatar-theme-i-see-you/

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

For the first few seconds I'm all "Imogen Heap?"

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link

"Okay sure it wasn't a setting you originally devised but in Aliens you just threw in some gunk about terraforming for two seconds and that's all anyone needed and anyone WANTED."

Patton Oswalt's "I don't want to know where the stuff I love comes from, I just want the stuff I love" re: the star wars prequels would seem to apply here

da croupier, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Yup.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:51 (fourteen years ago) link

I cannot put my finger on who Leona Lewis sounds like on this song because it sounds like she's pastiching every single big solo female pop vocalist of the past 20 years.

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Friday, 4 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unobtainium

omar little, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

(Sometimes referred to as "Unaffordium")

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

As for song:

Of the creative process, Lewis says, "James and I spoke about the meaning and emotion of the song. He showed me clips from the film, which gave me insight into the characters and this whole other world that he had created. The song represents the feelings shared between Jake [Sam Worthington] and Neytiri [Zoe Saldana]; it's very powerful and beautiful."

Even the press release is a pastiche etc.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 18:55 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh I want this film to be good. Not sure why, but there it is.

At the very least it could be the most WTF SF feature since Zardoz.

Bring me Sanka or Tetley (Jon Lewis), Friday, 4 December 2009 19:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Zardoz is a crap film with a lot of weird ideas in it. This is a crap film with no ideas.

unobtaintium (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 4 December 2009 19:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Haha now imagine James Cameron's bouncing head at the start of the film making fun of us all.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 19:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Unobtainium also featured heavily in the movie The Core (the vessel they used to travel to the earth's core was made of it) so Jimmy is at least following in the footsteps of some great examples of hard sci fi.

methanietanner, Friday, 4 December 2009 19:09 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL7ljBKqJdw

methanietanner, Friday, 4 December 2009 19:10 (fourteen years ago) link

id love for this film to be good. i want all films to be good. but when they so obviously arent and the people behind it act like confusing arseholes, then i can easily sit back and appreciate the lols when it flops

Wee xx (a hoy hoy), Friday, 4 December 2009 20:37 (fourteen years ago) link

Fuck you, synergy.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 December 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link

wow

unobtaintium (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 4 December 2009 21:11 (fourteen years ago) link

looooooooool

Wee xx (a hoy hoy), Friday, 4 December 2009 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link

reminds me of the Three's Company episode where Jack keeps holding up a copy of I'm In You by Peter Frampton he bought for whichever blonde roommate was on at the time.

da croupier, Friday, 4 December 2009 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

"Lance? Very phallic name you've got there."
how can you NOT want this movie to fail

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 December 2009 21:29 (fourteen years ago) link

finally a sexy sci-fi movie for the sexing

da croupier, Friday, 4 December 2009 21:29 (fourteen years ago) link

it corrupts whatever it touches.
Leona sounding very enya at first and then very bad tina after

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 December 2009 21:29 (fourteen years ago) link

ugh, then just bad leona

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 December 2009 21:30 (fourteen years ago) link

mcguffinanium

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 December 2009 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link

For Abbott -- Michelle Rodriguez talks about things.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 7 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

The only reason I might ever watch this is for Michelle Rodriguez, but I doubt that's enough.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 7 December 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Only if Michael shows up and shoots her.

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 7 December 2009 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link

we can only hope that the movie is at least funny

I'm losing my Vitamin C (CaptainLorax), Monday, 7 December 2009 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh man Ned thanking you so much.

mascara and ties (Abbott), Monday, 7 December 2009 23:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Eckhart gives a slight chuckle of disbelief upon hearing the name Unobtanium. There will be no such chuckles in Avatar. I have a feeling it will be filled with chuckles of a whole other nature (a gimme for the 30 Rock fans in our audience).

Pooping And Crying (Deric W. Haircare), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 00:50 (fourteen years ago) link

And in today's news:

'Coke Zero hopes to ride ‘Avatar' hype':

“Our Coke Zero drinkers go to the movies all of the time,” York said.

Mm.

More amusing, though, is this. Consider:

What is 20th Century Fox thinking? Have you seen the marketing for Avatar? As one colleague recently ruminated, “Fox has never known how to sell a good movie.” Sad but true. They do know how to sell the living hell out of bad ones like this summer’s remake of Universal Soldier, titled X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Their tactic is simple: Oversaturate the market so people cannot possibly miss knowing when the opening weekend is, then cross your fingers and pray the negative buzz doesn’t overwhelm the advertising. But this time around, someone has set a bunch of monkeys with typewriters loose in the staff room, turning out incredibly terrible ideas like rebranding a popular soda can with the name "AVTR" and running embarrassing, completely nonsensical pieces of footage at highly questionable times.

Well then.

Later on in this, ah, interesting piece:

After all, this is this year’s Lord of the Rings, the season’s Harry Potter; its Star Wars. A ton of money went into this thing, regardless of which estimate you believe, and the film lacks the one component all of those properties have in common: brand recognition. People know what Lord of the Rings is. They know Harry Potter. They don’t know what the heck an Avatar is supposed to be. They have no idea what to expect – unless, of course, Fox rams the ideas down their throat so hard that once it is in theaters people need to run and see it just to find out what all the fuss is about, like they did in droves for Harry Potter, The Dark Knight and Twilight. Once there, the film can speak for itself, and on that front I am acutely aware that the studio is confident.

Fox, well known for keeping the Internet press at arm’s length, this time is giving the the full court press. For years I have been on a banned list from seeing their films at screenings, but now I’m receiving invites for interviews and an invite to an early, press-only, no-friends screening. Studios only hold “no +1” screenings when they are very, very confident that everyone will want to pay to see it and that press will pay to see it again with friends and family.

So is the bad advertising indicative of a bad film? I think not. The studio isn't worried about what the alpha filmgoers think about their advertising. They know your ticket is as good as sold, especially once you hear positive reviews. This is for a different crowd entirely. And since those filmgoers are beginning to ask us critics “Will this be any good?” I’m starting to question whether it is really bad advertising at all.

Perhaps.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

all of the time!!!

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Zardoz is a crap film with a lot of weird ideas in it. This is a crap film with no ideas.

― unobtaintium (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, December 4, 2009 2:07 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

when did u see it shakey??

mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:12 (fourteen years ago) link

I am fairly certain "I wanna bone blue chicks" is going to be a central theme to this movie.

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:12 (fourteen years ago) link

But will it play in Peoria Sheboygan?

Advance ticket sales for the midnight shows were pulled sometime over the weekend, and the Sheboygan Marcus Theater confirmed Tuesday the midnight shows have been canceled.

No reason was immediately given for the cancellation.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

"Not enough Coke Zero drinkers in this town, sir."

"Ah, screw 'em."

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

id love for this film to be good. i want all films to be good. but when they so obviously arent and the people behind it act like confusing arseholes, then i can easily sit back and appreciate the lols when it flops

― Wee xx (a hoy hoy), Friday, December 4, 2009 3:37 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this, kinda. i mean, this movie looks terrible. but i'm like, not excited about how bad it's gonna be. i'd always rather something turn out good... and i'll wait till i see it before i judge it (or pronounce that it has "no ideas")

mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

Advance ticket sales for the midnight shows were pulled sometime over the weekend, and the Sheboygan Marcus Theater confirmed Tuesday the midnight shows have been canceled.
No reason was immediately given for the cancellation.

― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, December 8, 2009 3:14 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ned u are following this story way too closely

mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

'Coke Zero hopes to ride ‘Avatar' hype'

I think of Avatar as the Crystal Pepsi of film.

ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

ned u are following this story way too closely

Well, yes. But I'm just amused at what comes up in Google News.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Oftentimes a film can be very bad but, if it meets my expectations of what I am looking for in terms of entertainment, I will enjoy it immensely (see: "Catwoman", "Ultraviolet").

Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Sigourney Weaver as Dr. Grace Augustine, a botanist who mentors Jake Sully.[13] Weaver dyed her hair red for the part.[14] Her character was named "Shipley" at one point.

omar little, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

ned is taking the bullet for us, so we can just come here and lol with him

adorable cheese inscription (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/090303/david-cross-blue_l.jpg

n'avi nude

da croupier, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Sigourney Weaver as Dr. Grace Augustine, a botanist who mentors Jake Sully.[13] Weaver dyed her hair red for the part.[14] Her character was named "Shipley" at one point.

― omar little, Tuesday, December 8, 2009 3:18 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

OH MAN... THIS IS GONNA BE ROUGH

mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

too much time on ilx

omar little, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

The movie was named "Shitanic" at one point

da croupier, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

some ripley

Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

good to see stephen lang getting a good or at least sizable role

omar little, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link

"What are the differences that we can deal with, without it becoming a barrier? Skin color is great, and it's also great thematically, because skin color is obviously such a big issue on our planet. All the warm tones — from pallid Canadian pink, to beautiful warm browns, and, well, pallid Australian pink — were all taken. So, we were down to blue and green basically — and green had been taken by all those Martian movies with the little green men. So, we have big blue women, not little green men." —James Cameron on why Avatar aliens are blue

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link

The movie was named "Shitanic" at one point

― da croupier, Tuesday, December 8, 2009 3:21 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol

mod only knows who i'd ban without u (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link

pallid Australian pink

Worst Crayola color ever.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

seeing this tomorrow morning and am stupid excited abt it tbh, like, excited enough to wake up early and walk through over a foot of new snow excited

lol it's true, cameron is pallid canadian pink

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:38 (fourteen years ago) link

So, we were down to blue and green basically — and green had been taken by all those Martian movies with the little green men. So, we have big blue women, not little green men

is this his keen scientific mind in action

mr. strawman spotter (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

I would be more excited about seeing this movie if it featured Zoe Saldana in a tight costume as opposed to a gangly blue cat creature voiced by Zoe Saldana.

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

for someone who is seemingly driven by the "SHOW EM THE TITTIES!" rule of filmmaking, dude seems remarkably hell-bent on bogarting all the titties

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

seeing this tomorrow morning and am stupid excited abt it tbh, like, excited enough to wake up early and walk through over a foot of new snow excited

lol it's true, cameron is pallid canadian pink

― paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Wednesday, December 9, 2009 1:38 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

see u there :D

sharty is a shit (s1ocki), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:50 (fourteen years ago) link

whoo!
btw i am going to cry for sure. and laugh, obv.

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:53 (fourteen years ago) link

fu mtl insiders

Simon H., Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:29 (fourteen years ago) link

(And I'm going to the London premiere; such is the nature of my job, I've now seen it multiple times, but not yet on a big bloody screen in 3D. This thread has been hugely entertaining).

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Holding out on us! So is it any good?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:37 (fourteen years ago) link

is it a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:39 (fourteen years ago) link

did it change blue people porn forever

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:43 (fourteen years ago) link

we're not actually "allowed" to say anything directly/publicly about it until Dec 18 (at least in canada)
xposts

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:44 (fourteen years ago) link

but we're not in Canada!

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:44 (fourteen years ago) link

Non-disclosure agreement, guys. It's like the Dr Who threads - I just have to sit on my hands, shaking my head slowly.

Everything everyone has said upthread is factually correct.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:44 (fourteen years ago) link

this, my dears, is the internet!

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:45 (fourteen years ago) link

Rrrobyn, take a boat to the middle of Lake Ontario and broadcast the news in the great land of freedom of speech.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I shall report back on the Prem, yeah? Without mentioning the xxxmin we spend all facing the same way.

(xxx = I'm probably not even allowed to say how long it is).

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:47 (fourteen years ago) link

I would just like to point out that this question was posted before MJones's penultimate post:

is it a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation

so I am assuming the answer is an emphatic "YES"

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:48 (fourteen years ago) link

james cameron is watching the internet
AND he's canadian! ooooeeeooo

xpost
it is the americans who make these embargos re: hollywood movies in the first place!

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Fine, blame us.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:51 (fourteen years ago) link

then TELL US

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

You know it sucks.

really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

well yes, but precisely HOW does it suck

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:54 (fourteen years ago) link

thanking youuuuu Dan

a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Yes, we want to count the ways. xp

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 23:56 (fourteen years ago) link

shall i compare thee to a miserable day

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Actually, not being able to contribute to this thread in any substantial way has been nothing like as excruciating as last summer's The Happening thread. Oh, boy. I really was bursting to tell people about that.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:01 (fourteen years ago) link

So it doesn't suck but isn't very good.

really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:02 (fourteen years ago) link

wink twice if it sucks

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:05 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost once if it doesn't

really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:06 (fourteen years ago) link

You should go see it when it comes out. You all should.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Maybe it's a movie that plays better in French.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:09 (fourteen years ago) link

oh come on I'm not giving James Cameron any of my money

x-post

a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:10 (fourteen years ago) link

You should go see it when it comes out. You all should.

Don't you see, the embargo WANTS you to say things like this!

really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:10 (fourteen years ago) link

what happens if you do have an opinion btw? hunted down by a terminator? someone blows up goodison park? all your friends and family are subjected to torture via blue furry porno?

adorable cheese inscription (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Shot thru a building on the end of a missile IIRC

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:14 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm pretty sure that movie publicists are in fact terminators

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:44 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm download this because floating rocks and blue tits look better at low bitrate - more left to the imagination. hopefully i'll find a foreign language version with english subtitles to really enhance the magic.

mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Can you say if it's better than Delgo?

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 10 December 2009 01:06 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw this.
and feel a need to share that completely neutral fact delivered in an emotion-free and criticism-devoid tone.
back dec 18.

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 December 2009 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link

LOL i signed a non-disclosure thing once before a test screening of Natural Born Criminals in Seattle but I hated it so goddamn much I wrote a review in The Stranger the next week...

vadnais heights is cougartown (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 10 December 2009 22:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Obv I had no plans to be a movie reviewer tho

vadnais heights is cougartown (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 10 December 2009 22:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Various Twitter responses posted here.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 December 2009 22:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Sorry, Natural Born Killers, duh

fucking piece of shit.

vadnais heights is cougartown (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 10 December 2009 22:51 (fourteen years ago) link

well, unless those are all socks I guess my optimism was at least a wee bit justified?

vadnais heights is cougartown (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:02 (fourteen years ago) link

thanks for making my hollywoodlaw-abiding ways even more painful to me, ned

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:03 (fourteen years ago) link

i dont think they mind when you effusively OMFG!!!! yr twitter, right?

wanna draft an agreement that you can positively review avatar whenever, otherwise u gotta stfu forever.

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:08 (fourteen years ago) link

"You have officially been to your last Con in which blue people, spoken Navi and the word "hometree" were absent."

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:11 (fourteen years ago) link

there's this bullshit on the guardian tonight: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/dec/10/james-cameron-avatar-preview

i assume most of the british tabloids will have a 100 words on the film itself in their celeb section report of the premiere tomorrow too. the sun already has some stuff, i think.

caek, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:12 (fourteen years ago) link

haha yeah i guess in the age of the internet they totally expect a breach tbh

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:18 (fourteen years ago) link

'You have officially been to your last Con in which blue people, spoken Navi and the word "hometree" were absent.'

This is extremely useful because it clearly demarcate who will want to see this movie.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

The near-impossibility of faithfully bootlegging a 3D polarized movie must have been a huge selling point for the movie execs.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

I hope 'hometree' is Avatar's attempt at inventing hipster slang.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:36 (fourteen years ago) link

All I can is, when they all lined up on stage, Ms Weaver was tallest. Then we watched a film.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Ms Weaver is so awesome
i mean, generally, obv

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Friday, 11 December 2009 02:40 (fourteen years ago) link

lol embargo

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/avatar-film-review-1004052868.story

caek, Friday, 11 December 2009 07:51 (fourteen years ago) link

161 minutes...

Simon H., Friday, 11 December 2009 07:56 (fourteen years ago) link

It's every fairy tale about flying dragons, magic plants, weirdly hypnotic creepy-crawlies and feral dogs rolled up into a rain forest with a highly advanced spiritual design.

James Mitchell, Friday, 11 December 2009 08:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Should be on the poster, that.

James Mitchell, Friday, 11 December 2009 08:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Ned, is there an IMAX in Irvine?

caek, Friday, 11 December 2009 09:50 (fourteen years ago) link

How long until we have AI-CGI, generative movies that essentially make themselves? That seems to be where we're heading.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 13:04 (fourteen years ago) link

but who would be there to tell the computer that the characters need boobs, and if they already have them, they should be bigger?

adorable cheese inscription (a hoy hoy), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:07 (fourteen years ago) link

are the trade papers powerful enough to where the studios won't enforce an embargo on them? Variety

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:09 (fourteen years ago) link

we already have that; it's called world of warcraft xxp

囧 (dyao), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:12 (fourteen years ago) link

i totally saw this already but i'm a class act and won't break the embargo even after it's released.

Smokey and the S'Banned It (history mayne), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:23 (fourteen years ago) link

I didn't realize so many ILXors are film critics!

Tuomas, Friday, 11 December 2009 13:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Read a film thread and see.

really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Ned, is there an IMAX in Irvine?

Yup, down at the Spectrum.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 11 December 2009 13:35 (fourteen years ago) link

I've read them, but I thought people were just enthusiastic about movies.

Tuomas, Friday, 11 December 2009 13:35 (fourteen years ago) link

no they are film critics

mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:43 (fourteen years ago) link

Violating an embargo will *at most* earn you a nuisance lawsuit that gets thrown out but leaves you with a legal bill for having to go that far (not against the law, tbh), and will *at least* get you blackballed by an annoyed publicist who has already negotiated exclusives across the media. For some publications/people, a flout is a snide way of saying 'actually we don't need you or your cheesy clients'.

special vixens unit (suzy), Friday, 11 December 2009 14:14 (fourteen years ago) link

In his months with the Na'vi, Jake experiences their life as the "true world" and that inside his crippled body locked in a coffin-like transponding device, where he can control his avatar, is as the "dream." The switch to the other side is gradual for his body remains with the human colony while his consciousness is sometimes elsewhere.

^^^^^ review written by cameron's groundbreakin ProlixRobotix AI movie reviewing technology. no humans or writers necessary.

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Friday, 11 December 2009 15:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Really looking forward to this tbh. Today I bought tickets for two showings.

The word is good:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/6786507/Avatar-The-first-reviews.html

5 stars from both Empire and Total Film as well, which was to be expected really. Even so...

DavidM, Friday, 11 December 2009 15:42 (fourteen years ago) link

So, this is like The Matrix, right?

NotEnough, Friday, 11 December 2009 15:49 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm not a critic, I just have a very low status job within the film & TV industry, somewhere between mucking out Trigger's stables and ironing Gok Wan's shirts. I worked pretty hard (in my own tiny way) on this film, hence the prem invite.

Michael Jones, Friday, 11 December 2009 15:57 (fourteen years ago) link

interesting on the reviews...two dudes i work with saw about 1/2 hour of it at E3 and were raving about it, but i have been arguing with them ever since saying they were just being fan boys and shit cuzza the 3D and all. but who knows? maybe it is good.

eight woofers in the trunk sb'n down the block (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 11 December 2009 16:23 (fourteen years ago) link

mmmmMMRFMFFFMmmm.

donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Friday, 11 December 2009 16:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Play some loud evil music, s1ocki. It'll distract you.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 11 December 2009 16:26 (fourteen years ago) link

i feel like sigourney weaver in aliens where she's trapped in the lab by burke and she's banging on the glass and nobody can hear her tbh

donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Friday, 11 December 2009 16:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Rupert Murdoch turns off the monitor...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 11 December 2009 16:30 (fourteen years ago) link

bang 'em on the glass

(sorry)

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Friday, 11 December 2009 16:31 (fourteen years ago) link

in a 3d IMAX theater noone can hear you scream iirc

囧 (dyao), Friday, 11 December 2009 16:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Pardon my dubiousness at suggestions I "...make sure you can say you were there when the future of cinema began." The real game-changers - from "Jaws" and "Star Wars" to "The Matrix" and even "Terminator 2" and "Titanic," to some degree - arrived without this kind of carefully managed hype.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Haters to the rear!

Action Orientation (Eazy), Friday, 11 December 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Haha, "Star Wars" started the whole practice of selling your event movie at sci-fi/comic conventions!

james cameron gargameled my boner for life (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 11 December 2009 17:48 (fourteen years ago) link

The real game-changers - from "Jaws" and "Star Wars" to "The Matrix" and even "Terminator 2" and "Titanic," to some degree - arrived without this kind of carefully managed hype.

i wasn't alive for "jaws" or "star wars", though i know that they had near-unprecedentedly large simultaneous releases (oi-oi), but dude you have got to be shitting me on the last three. they had the shit hyped outta them. if they felt "less present" it's mainly because they were pre-mass-uptake-of-the-internet so you didn't have them in your face at your work-station. but "titanic" was the most expensive film of all time (inflation possibly not adjusted) and "the matrix" was hailed *as a gamechanger* and so, really, was "terminator 2" for its effects work.

Smokey and the S'Banned It (history mayne), Friday, 11 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

ya it's not like titanic quietly slipped into theaters and modestly blew everyone's minds

donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Friday, 11 December 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

T2 was EVERYWHERE for awhile; I remember seeing it in the theaters on opening and then like six times more and the place was always packed
^HS SFX nerd

that is a whole discussion within itself that is worth debating (forksclovetofu), Friday, 11 December 2009 17:54 (fourteen years ago) link

3 of those 5 movies are horrible

a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 11 December 2009 17:55 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar more like ashitr

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm too young to really remember the ad hype around "Jaws" or "Star Wars" but I do remember taking them as given facets of existence, like kitchens and driveways, so I infer from that that there was a significant amount of hype around both of them if it could reach through the consciousness of a 2/4-year-old living off of a gravel road out in the country.

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link

can't believe your parents made you eat gravel

a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

times were tough, we (literally) scraped by

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

what a rockin post

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

it made me grit my teeth

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

I hate my job

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

pebble

that is a whole discussion within itself that is worth debating (forksclovetofu), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:09 (fourteen years ago) link

I was gonna make a joke about drinking a mr. pibb in france but then I just couldn't do it

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link

"joke"

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link

there's a pile of reviews on AICN now, so I'd say the embargo is effectively over.

Simon H., Friday, 11 December 2009 18:16 (fourteen years ago) link

wonderfully formed embargo

that is a whole discussion within itself that is worth debating (forksclovetofu), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link

reviews are everywhere now

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

might as well spill the beans

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

It's like being one of Tiger's mistresses and not talking to the media.

ô_o (Nicole), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I know sexy

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

xposts - i'm technically an 'arts & culture' critic but have done my fair share of film stuff. glad not to be a full-on film critic tbh.
yeah lol embargo
in my unprofessional opinion: i am going to see this again next week just to make sure i wasn't high because it was AWESOME (and yet some things abt it could've been better)

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:56 (fourteen years ago) link

The thing I keep forgetting re: this movie is that I tend to really really really like James Cameron movies (although some, like "Titanic", have the shine wear off of them really really quickly).

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Friday, 11 December 2009 18:59 (fourteen years ago) link

You'll laugh, you'll cry etc.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:01 (fourteen years ago) link

while watching you're really not gonna be thinking abt the shine wearing off

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Wonder what the first film will be where its embargo just trundles on forever, never to end?

James Mitchell, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:07 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post to a bunch of people

No one talked about the game-changing special effects of "T2" for months in advance. Same with "The Matrix," which, like "Titanic," actually only did modestly at the box office when it first opened ($37 million opening for "The Matrix," $28 million opening weekend for "Titanic" - for some scale, albeit not totally analogous, "Spider-Man" opened with $115 mil; maybe more illustrative, Tim Burton's Batman" opened around $43 million ten years before "The Matrix"). As for "Star Wars" and "Jaws," no one knew what they had until they had it. They were all "game-changers" in retrospect. Cameron called "Avatar" a game-changer MONTHS ago.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

reviews are everywhere now

Let's see some! I don't know where to look..

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:21 (fourteen years ago) link

to start with:

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avatar/

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

I have no idea what you are talking about re: "The Matrix" considering that entire half hours of entertainment news television programs were dedicated to talking about the filming techniques and wire work that went into the making of it.

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

My memory could be wrong, but (and I saw the movie opening night, mostly by chance) I don't recall months of anticipation for and lead-up to "The Matrix" and do recall it taking a lot of people by surprise, which in turn lead to all the making-of features. That's why I cited its opening box office - it was no out-of-the-gate hype-baby hit. Sites like aintitcool were up and running back then, weren't they? Were they going nuts? (Honest question; I've been trying to dig up that site's contemporaneous reviews).

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:39 (fourteen years ago) link

the matrix was one of those films that once the commercials hit people were like "whoa" (lol), but unlike some of these other flicks it wasn't something that was hotly anticipated. i mean keanu reeves/laurence fishburne sci-fi from the directors of 'bound' could have been anticipated as 'johnny mnemonic 2'

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

I recall nothing but mountains of hype aimed mostly at sci-fi/comic book geeks in the months leading up to its release.

wtf?!? just randomly started crying! (HI DERE), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

*anticipated before people started to see the ads, i mean

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Original AICN "Matrix" review (for reference): http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=3353

Doesn't read like something he'd been looking forward to for months, seems like it sort of took him by surprise, too, etc.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link

Wow, the Matrix. I remember downloading my first ever cam of that. After I saw it in the theaters, of course! It took a couple weeks I think....

Matrix definitely took me by surprise, and I was a pretty big scifi movie nerd in HS.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 11 December 2009 19:45 (fourteen years ago) link

The Matrix was not in anyway overly hyped when it came out. It was shunted off into a spring release because there wasn't much faith in it from the studio. There adverts for it, but not really any media saturation. It surprised a lot of people, both in its qualities and in its financial success.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:57 (fourteen years ago) link

pretty sure T2 was hyped to all hell though.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^yep. see: GnR video

a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 11 December 2009 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, but of all the films I mentioned, it was also the only sequel. And sequels, by definition, get hyped and anticipated. But c. that GNR video, no one knew T2 would change movies and make "morph" a household word.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

i did! and i tried to tell everyone! and i got shoved into a toilet for my troubles....

that is a whole discussion within itself that is worth debating (forksclovetofu), Friday, 11 December 2009 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, I mean, I did, too, but I was under embargo at the time.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

T2 et al didn't have special effects in every single frame, though.

Action Orientation (Eazy), Friday, 11 December 2009 20:38 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, those movies were absolutely packed with effects, regardless. Heck, half of "The Hangover" appears to have been shot against green screen. As far as all-effects arbiters go, "Phantom Menace" was all FX, all the time, and that was ten years ago.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

And Cameron and his artists succeed at the difficult challenge of making Neytiri a blue-skinned giantess with golden eyes and a long, supple tail, and yet--I'll be damned. Sexy.

krampus activities (latebloomer), Saturday, 12 December 2009 04:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Glenn Kenny

RIP Embargo I guess

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Saturday, 12 December 2009 13:45 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah all the cool kids are saying PWN.

Smokey and the S'Banned It (history mayne), Saturday, 12 December 2009 13:51 (fourteen years ago) link

i think he's joking?

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Saturday, 12 December 2009 13:55 (fourteen years ago) link

feeling more and more like i'm gonna be a lonely voice in the wilderness on this one.

um, not that i'm expressing any of my reactions to this movie.

donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Saturday, 12 December 2009 18:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Titanic was hailed by a huge number of critics as a masterpiece when it came out, and I'd like to see how many have changed their minds. I think people are just wrapped up in it. Or, more likely, once the embargo is officially lifted, there will be a healthy number of naysayers.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Saturday, 12 December 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean, it ain't the phantom menace, but this is getting ridiculous.

donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Saturday, 12 December 2009 19:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron's Twitter is terrible. Decrying 'best of decade' lists before people have seen Avatar.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Saturday, 12 December 2009 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah even i think these initial reactions are kinda over the top, and i'm on board

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Saturday, 12 December 2009 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

never underestimate the super geekdom of film critics i guess

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Saturday, 12 December 2009 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

but damn if i'm not seeing this again asap

paragon of incalescence (rrrobyn), Saturday, 12 December 2009 19:39 (fourteen years ago) link

i think these initial reactions are kinda over the top

Yeah, it makes the months of internet chucklehead snarking look sober by comparison. What am I saying, no it doesn't.

DavidM, Saturday, 12 December 2009 19:45 (fourteen years ago) link

i think the embargo is in place bcuz avatar marketing ppl will know that the only people to break the embargo are the people w/ positive reviews bcuz those people know they won't get bitchslapped in the future by said marketing team. therefore early word of mouf is all positive and momentum builds, etc...

someone up thread may have already suggested this.

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 12 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

http://io9.com/5424663/the-public-explains-the-plot-of-james-camerons-avatar

StanM, Sunday, 13 December 2009 14:08 (fourteen years ago) link

great punchline

adorable cheese inscription (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 13 December 2009 14:25 (fourteen years ago) link

So the embargo is lifted today, right? Can those who have seen it here give us their thoughts?

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Monday, 14 December 2009 18:43 (fourteen years ago) link

not till thursday im afraid

donde está mia farrow, fa la la la la, la la la la (s1ocki), Monday, 14 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Gah. Thursday daytime is the only time I can go see it before next week. Can anyone at least signal whether I should bother to make the effort or just wait until next week?

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Monday, 14 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

interest for this film (712 posts) is as bemusing to me as the tiger woods story is confusing; shrug.gif

(9/9/8/9) (cozwn), Monday, 14 December 2009 18:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar is the corniest movie ever made about the white man’s need to lose his identity and assuage racial, political, sexual and historical guilt.

Only children—including adult-children—will see Avatar as simply an adventure film; their own love of technology has co-opted their ability to comprehend narrative detail. Cameron offers sci-fi dazzle, yet bungles the good part: the meaning. His undeniably pretty Pandora—a phosphorescent Maxfield Parrish paradise with bird-like lizards, moving plant life and floating mountains—distracts from the inherent contradiction of a reported $300-$500 million Hollywood enterprise that casually berates America’s industrial complex.

http://www.nypress.com/article-20710-blue-in-the-face.html

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Leave it to Armond to attack this from the "boo white people abandoning their culture" angle

I am a big question mark (HI DERE), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron emulates the boy-plus-car symbiosis of Transformers—but with pulsing loins, veins and orifices.

luv ya Armond don't ever change

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:22 (fourteen years ago) link

While technically impressive, Avatar’s basically a daft version of the Transformer movies’ sci-fi, techno fantasy.

I mean, this is way more of an indictment of the movie than the "contradiction" that his central thesis or the "white man's guilt" sidestep.

I am a big question mark (HI DERE), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:23 (fourteen years ago) link

always lolsome when he brings out Transformers 2, but he's really upped the stakes with his 'Gamer is avant-garde' claims.

moron oil (Gukbe), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:25 (fourteen years ago) link

i feel free breaking the embargo to say that this movie is a shitty dumb piece of shit

max, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:25 (fourteen years ago) link

nb i havent seen it

max, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar, however, invents an alternate world to make the airy-fairy pronouncement: “There’s a network of energy that flows through all living things.” Alien-girl Neytiri (Zoe Saldana) teaches Sully how to bond with a tie-dyed, eagle-like creature by docking his wriggly tail into it.

wait, waht

I am a big question mark (HI DERE), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:26 (fourteen years ago) link

no doubts now. seeing this on Thursday.

moron oil (Gukbe), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:27 (fourteen years ago) link

bond with a tie-dyed, eagle-like creature by docking his wriggly tail into it.

Cronenberg should've made this movie

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:28 (fourteen years ago) link

lololololololololol of course there's also a positive Joseph Conrad reference in there

I am a big question mark (HI DERE), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:31 (fourteen years ago) link

man the space ghost ad for this!

the terius of a goon (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

lol gawker w/the mea culpa http://gawker.com/5427160/apologia--avatar-amazingly-does-not-suck

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

btw was i the 1st on this to predict the awesomeness of avatar

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

you and i are now locked in an eternal death struggle over whether or not this movie is good

max, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

i recommend that neither of us actually see it--that will be the best way to continue our blood feud

max, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

s1ocki's rapturously positive review is what will end up making me see this

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

wouldve thought youd already have yr imax tickets xp

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

i object to this movie on moral grounds

max, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

"i, max object to this movie on moral grounds"

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron's going to spend twenty more years making a film just to win you over and he's going to call it "2 THE MAX"

the terius of a goon (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

2 the max in imax this fall

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link

tbf this is a year where 2012 got some critical props

da croupier, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link

you max, me blue box office killing alien

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link

gotta admit, after seeing Nine I'm a little more invested in seeing that fail miserably

da croupier, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Guido guido guido!

ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link

starring Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson as MAX; the common man who could take no more

the terius of a goon (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link

a friend saw yesterday and said it is easily the worst film of the decade, fwiw

akm, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:33 (fourteen years ago) link

gawker apologia is so pathetic ("all that stuff you thought was gonna suck about it is um in there, but its AWESOME TRUST US!" = yeah, whatever)

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:40 (fourteen years ago) link

unfortunately the hype for this has been so carefully and exquisitely managed no way is this going to bomb

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:40 (fourteen years ago) link

These are the schmucks who spoiled the Top Chef finale, so I hope the whole gawker office has an orgy with Joe Lieberman and they all die from some slow painful std.

ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:42 (fourteen years ago) link

oh armond

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:00 (fourteen years ago) link

i am seeing this tonight - worried

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link

do you have a phone you can liveblog from?

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link

a friend saw yesterday and said it is easily the worst film of the decade, fwiw

― akm, Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:33 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

no way this is worse than transformers 2

krampus activities (latebloomer), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link

you'd pray, but turning megan fox into a cgi smurf seems a step further into the dark side and I can imagine missing Bay's crudity (when not in its presence).

da croupier, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 00:24 (fourteen years ago) link

ok so this was way way better than expected

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:18 (fourteen years ago) link

pro tip: see in 3d, see in imax or similar

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:18 (fourteen years ago) link

i should clarify, the value of this film is not in the script, but yer eyes will prob fall out of your head a few times

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:28 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXCpYgd338U

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:38 (fourteen years ago) link

lol

krampus activities (latebloomer), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:42 (fourteen years ago) link

wanna say anything more about it? was the dialogue not as stiff as expected? the reverse colonialism cliche plot not as cliche as initially assumed? the furry porn not as blatent as the hype makes it seem? or does it just look really cool and thats enough?

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:28 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBjKubN6zhU

caek, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 12:38 (fourteen years ago) link

if the film works at least on a laserium level (which everybody's saying it does) then I kind of want it to do better than the star wars prequels, even if i can't muster much enthusiasm to see it myself

da croupier, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 12:45 (fourteen years ago) link

wait why would anyone see this *not* in 3D? that shouldn't even be an option. glasses go on at start and stay on until a quarter through credits.

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:13 (fourteen years ago) link

-------wait why would anyone see this

there you go!

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:30 (fourteen years ago) link

very uninterested in a film that's sole virtue is that it "looks pretty"

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:28 (fourteen years ago) link

that's nice

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:29 (fourteen years ago) link

dude its so far beyond "looks pretty" its srsly a fucking quantum leap in CGI and 3d. tbh they should never have shown previews, because they look like crap but the real thing is just O_O

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:31 (fourteen years ago) link

totally do not give a shit about technological advances, remember how "awesome" the Star Wars prequels or the Matrix or whatever were advertised as and those films suck because they have no ideas. I like ideas and acting and dialogue and content and stuff like that. call me crazy!

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:33 (fourteen years ago) link

and also the script is prob on par with or better than your usual BIG ACTION MOVIE, which is still to say not a good script, but it has only a few howlingly bad moments, which compared to most of the blockbuster shit shoveled out there is pretty good.

xpost

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

dont know that crazy is what id call you

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

its srsly a fucking quantum leap in CGI and 3d

I'm all fine with this being the ultimate demo reel for Weta, since they're going to be working with Guillermo del Toro for The Hobbit -- and Smaug will be spectacular.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, think i'm just going to wait till a film takes the new technology and actually does something good with it.

good storytelling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical innovation.

if we were still in b&w but making films as good as the third man, i wouldn't give a toss about how i'd have to use my own imagination to imagine smurf porn.

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

whole lot of morbsin' going on in this thread

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:40 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, think i'm just going to wait till a film takes the new technology and actually does something good with it.

hmm, yes, like the _the hobbit_, that's obviously not going to suck.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:41 (fourteen years ago) link

(tbf I guess the Matrix has ideas, just a lot of stolen ones badly smashed together)

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Ha, I meant in like 10 years time when I can finally afford a blu ray player.

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:43 (fourteen years ago) link

because they have no ideas

they clearly have fucking ideas, just not particularly interesting ones.

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

lotta first year film studenting going on in this thread morelike

moron oil (Gukbe), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

ya srsly let yr mindspace percolate fools, movies is not just one thing

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

hmm, yes, like the _the hobbit_, that's obviously not going to suck

Haha. Was gonna say - ppl hatin on this are sitting on their thumbs waiting for THE HOBBIT??

...

DavidM, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link

hee hee hee

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link

james cameron has really soldout since his dogme start

nostragaaaawddamnus (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:48 (fourteen years ago) link

i am surprised to not hear more comparisons with district 9 in the reviews i've been reading - both are about evil corporations mistreating aliens and the unlikely humans who go native and basically turn into aliens themselves, then turn against their former corporate masters

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

and both feature dudes in robo-suits

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I have no problem seeing this movie for its visuals. Of course it would be great if it had a good script too, but a not-so-crappy script is fine by me, if it looks cool enough to make me forget the flaws in it. Movies are an visual medium, "good storytelling" is only half of the equation. None of the classic movies are classic only because of their story.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

district 9, no boobs

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

robo-suits are likely to paper over a certain amount of bad script tbh

moron oil (Gukbe), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron should've cut a boobs included version too, so's we can really judge the tech

You treat your step-mother with respect, Pantera (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

tuomas- ok but name 5 classic movies that dont depend on a great story

its ok, i'm gonna stop morbzin soon.

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:53 (fourteen years ago) link

ya just stop it plz

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:54 (fourteen years ago) link

you need both.

The End

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron should've cut a boobs included version too, so's we can really judge the tech

Who's to say he hasn't?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh I'm sure it's out there

You treat your step-mother with respect, Pantera (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:55 (fourteen years ago) link

gentlemen, calm down, there are moments of sideboob.

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar (American Pie Unrated Edition)

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Special edition Caligula-style DVD

You treat your step-mother with respect, Pantera (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

tuomas- ok but name 5 classic movies that dont depend on a great story

That's why I said "only because of their stories" - most classic movies both look good and have a good story. I'm not expecting Avatar to be a classic movie, but if it's visuals have the sort of sense of wonder and awe I expect them to have, I think I'll be satisfied enough. If you expect every movie to have both great visuals and a great script, you're gonna get disappointed often.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:57 (fourteen years ago) link

My boy is gonna see this tonight, I will query him on his return

You treat your step-mother with respect, Pantera (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar (American Pie Unrated Edition)

"This one time, on Pandora..."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

you need both.

The End

s1ocki OTM

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

this is reminding me that I never had my "pretty looking movies with terrible stories" film festival (centered around "Sky Captain" and "The Spirit")

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah basically what tuoma said movies achieve their potency through crazy technology - tho it often takes a narrative to activate their power movies are not people sitting around a campfire telling each other stories - so while pedantic message bord posters and non tv owners everywhere can be all im interested in believable characterization movies are using science to fuck w/their tiny minds

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Wait, did you actually see The Spirit, Dan?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:59 (fourteen years ago) link

ice cr?m droppin cgi

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:59 (fourteen years ago) link

this is reminding me that I never had my "pretty looking movies with terrible stories" film festival (centered around "Sky Captain" and "The Spirit")

― Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:58 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

WTF was pretty about THE SPIRIT

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:00 (fourteen years ago) link

WTF was pretty about THE SPIRIT

Knowing Dan I think the answer will have something to do with airbrushed cleavage.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:00 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe i'm just blinded by how spectacularly shitty that movie was

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I really like look of plastic all-CGI movies that look more like cartoons with people walking through them than actual movies.

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

i think i would rather see avatar before i see the spirit
sky captain is in my netflix queue at like 179.
these days, when i want to watch escapist power trip eye candy, i just play video games

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

intrigued by all the 'next-level fx wau' talk. previews look a bit meh cgi-wise, save that shot of the heli-things blowing the shit out of that floating island.

moron oil (Gukbe), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

Of course if Avatar truly had a terrible script, that might distract from watching the pretty visuals. But I think Cameron is competent enough as a filmmaker that he can make this sort of clichéd story run smoothly enough not to distract from getting sucked into the world of the movie.

Take Titanic, for example: of course the script in it is kinda clichéd, but it's the sort of clichéd script that works well enough that when bad things start to happen, you still care about the characters, even they're not particularly original as characters.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

Titanic is kind of unwatchable last time i checked in on it.

moron oil (Gukbe), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Also tits

You treat your step-mother with respect, Pantera (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Okay, if you think Titanic is unwatchable, then you probably shouldn't see Avatar. I thought it did what it set out to do very well: it's not a particularly original movie, but it's a great spectacle.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:09 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think I've ever sat through more than 15 minutes of Titanic. excruciating.

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Of course if Avatar truly had a terrible script, that might distract from watching the pretty visuals. But I think Cameron is competent enough as a filmmaker that he can make this sort of clichéd story run smoothly enough not to distract from getting sucked into the world of the movie.

― Tuomas, Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:05 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^

also as far as a purely visual experience the imax theater at the boston museum of science had a trailer that theyd show before every movie when i was a kid that had a helicopter shot flying over the city that was always so much better than anything in whatever animal/space doc they were screening - you were flying over beacon hill and then the camera tilts forward and u feel like youre gonna fall out yr seat - amazing

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

I called Titanic a Diet Coke movie in that I spent 3.5 hours watching it totally enthralled and left the movie theater raving about how great it was, but as I remembered scenes they became more and more irritating until, within an hour and a half, I pretty much hated the entire thing. It's almost as if the movie was designed to be watched but not remembered.

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:12 (fourteen years ago) link

the whole sinking sequence is pretty rad imo

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link

and by that i mean the feeling u get when u realize u just praised titanic in print

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

haha

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/threadcount/cameron.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:16 (fourteen years ago) link

"BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBS!"

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Kathryn Bigelow, James Cameron, Lee Daniels, Peter Jackson, Jason Reitman, and Quentin Tarantino sit down together

Tarantino: The only time I ever had a situation like that -- and it worked out fantastic -- was on "Kill Bill" because we were trying to do some action sequences that really had never been done before. I was trying to do them Hong Kong-style, not the American style of shooting, and -- these guys can tell you -- to do some of the best action you're ever going to see, it takes time. It just takes time. You need to be there. It takes days. And you don't know you're done until you're done. You can try and put it on a schedule, but if you ain't done you ain't fucking done! If it's not getting you off, it ain't done, so that means it just takes time. You can make up time with story points but on the action it's going to take it's own rhythm.

Cameron: Don't get worked up about it. I've been wrong by more than that entire budget. (Laughs.)

Reitman: That's the line of the morning.

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:23 (fourteen years ago) link

at least one of those things is not like the others...

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:36 (fourteen years ago) link

THR: The director Renoir made a lot of films and then stopped to write novels. Is there anything you'd consider doing instead of directing?

Tarantino: I intend to quit at 60. And I'm going to do exactly what he did. I'm going to write novels and cinema literature, stuff like that.

Bigelow: You have a plan?

Daniels: And he's very serious about it.

Tarantino: Well, she brought up exactly what I plan to do.

Cameron: I want to die directing. But I took my hiatus already because I figured I can still be directing when I'm 80 but I can't be doing the deep ocean expeditions, riding around in a zodiac on a 20-foot sea when I'm 80, I'll break my neck.

Tarantino: I would add more to that. If it actually gets to the place where you can't show 35mm film in theaters any more and everything is digital projection, I won't even make it to 60.

Cameron: Oh. Nobody's told you? (Reaches out hand.)

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:45 (fourteen years ago) link

lols

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahahah. I can sense Morbs not knowing who to back there.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron: I'd like to answer his question for him.

responses very much in character

max, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha

krampus activities (latebloomer), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh i find reitman more annoying than cameron

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

sky captain is in my netflix queue at like 179.

No, bump it up, it's a trip. If only to hear Angelina Jolie wearing an eyepatch say "Alert the amphibious squadron!"

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah skipped over the multi-paragraph conversation the two of them had about "instinct" thx guys

max, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

xp

max, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

rather have digital smurfs rape my retina than sit through juno again that's for sure

krampus activities (latebloomer), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

also lol @ tarantino having like perfect memory of the abyss

max, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

knowing the exact differences btw the LASERDISC and the THEATRICAL versions of the abyss

max, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

what a NERD

max, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh i find reitman more annoying than cameron

Everything Reitman said made me me want him to stfu, way more annoying than Cameron.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah really

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:29 (fourteen years ago) link

watching that vid i thought tarantino was going to accidentally nail bigelow in the face with one of his cocaine hand shapes

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

also as far as a purely visual experience the imax theater at the boston museum of science had a trailer that theyd show before every movie when i was a kid that had a helicopter shot flying over the city that was always so much better than anything in whatever animal/space doc they were screening - you were flying over beacon hill and then the camera tilts forward and u feel like youre gonna fall out yr seat - amazing

― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:11 PM

the imax @ dc air and space museum has a movie thats pretty much that all the way through. saw it so many times

http://www.nasm.si.edu/visit/theaters/shows.cfm#tofly

Watch the Earth drop away beneath you on an 1800s balloon ascent; rocket across the Arizona skies with the U.S. Navy's Blue Angels; soar on a hang glider off the coast of Hawaii; and blast off into space on a Saturn rocket.

shartin jort (am0n), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:38 (fourteen years ago) link

haven't seen the vid but the interview reads like Reitman is young and intimidated. Almost as though he's the youngest dude in the room.

Simon H., Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

reitman is a fucking terrible douche and tarantino as gasbag hasbeen.

cameron is a funny guy tho, even though he hasn't done a decent movie in twenty years. i sort of warm to anyone who wears a HMFIC baseball cap.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:49 (fourteen years ago) link

whatevs i heard him on the radio last week and was like stfu stfu
made me not want to see 'up in the air', though people seem to like it... that said, to quote cameron:
"I'd just as soon not meet people and talk about the movie. And I don't mean that in some disdainful way, it's just the movie should be the movie."

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

that was an xpost, my 'whatevs'

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

also as far as a purely visual experience the imax theater at the boston museum of science had a trailer that theyd show before every movie when i was a kid that had a helicopter shot flying over the city that was always so much better than anything in whatever animal/space doc they were screening - you were flying over beacon hill and then the camera tilts forward and u feel like youre gonna fall out yr seat - amazing

― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:11 PM

the imax @ dc air and space museum has a movie thats pretty much that all the way through. saw it so many times

http://www.nasm.si.edu/visit/theaters/shows.cfm#tofly

Watch the Earth drop away beneath you on an 1800s balloon ascent; rocket across the Arizona skies with the U.S. Navy's Blue Angels; soar on a hang glider off the coast of Hawaii; and blast off into space on a Saturn rocket.

― shartin jort (am0n), Wednesday, December 16, 2009 3:38 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

WANT

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

love that 100+ years later, the state of the art is still just a variation on the U R THERE thrills of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc7wWOmEGGY

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahaha I mentioned that movie when I was explaining Avatar to my Dad tonight

You treat your step-mother with respect, Pantera (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

EVRBODY RUN THE FKIN TRAINS COMIN OUTTTA THE SCSREEEEEN!!!!!

Thulsa Doob (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:43 (fourteen years ago) link

I didn't see the setup for this when I saw it on TV, and as I result I TRIPPED BALLS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TchPvBBSLKM

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link

lol u thought terry was up in avatar

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link

the imax @ dc air and space museum has a movie thats pretty much that all the way through. saw it so many times

me too! only lived in DC for abt 4 years as a kid, but i saw "to fly" as many times as i possibly could over that period. remember getting a weird intimation of age the first time my stomach didn't flip on the big drops.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Philly IMAX had a scene where you bungee jumped off a skyscraper; was awesome

囧 (dyao), Thursday, 17 December 2009 00:43 (fourteen years ago) link

speaking of pretty films with shitty stories, is this better looking than that final fantasy movie? cause that's kinda like my baseline reference point for what I will tolerate to see some awesome cgi boobs

囧 (dyao), Thursday, 17 December 2009 00:44 (fourteen years ago) link

A-MAZING!

moullet, Thursday, 17 December 2009 05:09 (fourteen years ago) link

lindy west @ the stranger, who's an dependably bullshit-free appreciator of cheap pop trash, loved the blue furry dogshit out it. which may or may not be worth a ten-penny damn, but i'm encouraged.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Thursday, 17 December 2009 05:57 (fourteen years ago) link

My boy went straight to bed when he got home last night but he said it was the greatest film ever on the way thru. This applies to 12 year-old boys only, obv.

Challop You Face (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 December 2009 08:35 (fourteen years ago) link

James who? You remember -- unassuming chap, made a modest flick about the Titanic 12 years ago. His new movie, Avatar, is a computer-generated 3-D science-fiction eco-tract which arrives with marginally more fanfare than Christmas. It's also the first veiled critique of the West's foreign policy to cost almost as much as the US defence budget. (Plus you get Leona Lewis singing over the end credits. At least I think she was singing. The possibility remains that she caught her foot in the car door and the composer James Horner merely set her distress to music.)
http://www.newstatesman.com/film/2009/12/ben-humpday-avatar-sex-andrew

James Mitchell, Thursday, 17 December 2009 12:01 (fourteen years ago) link

It's also the first veiled critique of the West's foreign policy to cost almost as much as the US defence budget.

Ha! But to tell you the truth, after months of hating I'm actually looking forward to this. I can't remember the last "event" movie that felt like an actual event. I suppose "Lord of the Rings?"

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:07 (fourteen years ago) link

W this amt of controlled publicity Waterworld would've worked. Dunno if that's good or bad, tho.

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Fern Gully meets Warhammer 40k.

exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:16 (fourteen years ago) link

but was it any good?

stop grieving, it's only a chicken (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Watchmen seemed like the last big film with a ton of publicity that made up for the fact that noone knew the comic, the actors and it was a 3 hour long piece of bullshit... oh.

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Doesn't matter anymore man, it's Chinatown

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:23 (fourteen years ago) link

daaaaaaaaaaamn@this movie

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:52 (fourteen years ago) link

WHY ARE SMART PEOPLE GOING TO IT

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:53 (fourteen years ago) link

to piss you off

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 15:59 (fourteen years ago) link

the tech is phenomenal; this is the first 3D movie I've seen so I dunno if this is new stuff or what but it's pretty mindblowingly good

it is a bit tiring tho and hard to focus in places but worth it

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 16:05 (fourteen years ago) link

big female ferngully had some natty oakleys for rollin' in her banshee

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 16:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Imagine how much money it cost Cameron to create a well-timed promotional planet.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 December 2009 16:54 (fourteen years ago) link

ayo my review is up so

http://www.montrealmirror.com/2009/121709/film2.html

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:29 (fourteen years ago) link

IOW looked pretty cool but i hated the blue dudes and its way too long imo

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:30 (fourteen years ago) link

and some of the eco-fantasy "the planet is a giant wikipedia page" shit is unbearable. there's a scene where they like hook into the master gaia forest computer and you can hear like soft echoes of children laughing and shit

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:31 (fourteen years ago) link

I love this line:

The Na’Vi are remarkably lifelike, but to me that doesn’t change the fact that they look like big, blue dorks.

ô_o (Nicole), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

i can't say i hated it, but i was rollin my damn eyes at a lot of it and the rapturous praise it's getting from all quarters is kinda baffling to me

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

"the planet is a giant wikipedia page" lol why wasn't this in ur (very fair) review?

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:35 (fourteen years ago) link

haha i thought of it after deadline :(

another thing i didnt have space for = sam worthington is so effing boring, esp compared to previous cameron heroes and heroines

kinda wish he had just let sigourney weaver be the actual star again

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:35 (fourteen years ago) link

He was so boring in the Terminator movie, I am sort of scratching my head over how he is suddenly being cast in a lot of movies.

ô_o (Nicole), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

thought sig. weaver's final act was pretty demeaning for one of america's greatest living actresses

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

"As for the 3D, it’s neat enough, although not really necessary—to me, it would play about the same without it (Michelle Rodriguez’s tank top is the best reason for it, to be honest)."

i am surprised you have not posted this to WS

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:43 (fourteen years ago) link

she is really insanely foxy in this movie's final act

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

3-D pix or it didn't happen

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

What was the audience reaction like at the showings you've seen? I mean, mine was the premiere and half the audience were involved in the making of the film in some way (people whooping as certain sections of the credit crawl scrolled past), so it was hardly a good sample - but people were cheering. But when I saw Titanic at a cinema in Baltimore shortly after it came out, people stood and applauded at the end. As Dan said upthread, that film was pretty engrossing for its duration on the big screen, but withered quickly in the memory. This one has a similar trajectory, I think. But I can't tell whether people are going queue round the block for this in the way they seemed to for the Yosser Hughes vs the Iceberg.

Pretty much all that was left for me by the time I did see it was the 3D high-def fireworks, as I'd seen it several times at various qualities (low-contrast, heavily-spoilered rough cut with no music/effects audio track, low bit-rate encrypted 15fps, then a decent telecined MPEG), read the script, blah blah blah. So I knew all its shortcomings.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron in setting out to create giant 3-D spectacle and achieving it shockah!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:19 (fourteen years ago) link

has no one ever seen a 3-D film before? this technology has been around forever, I'm surprised at people getting all SUPERJAZZED about it all of a sudden. oh, but its 3-D CGI this time!?! whoopdefuckindoo

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:20 (fourteen years ago) link

there, there.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:22 (fourteen years ago) link

ya i dunno, i can take it or leave it w/r/t 3D

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:23 (fourteen years ago) link

oh so you're a CUTE FUCKING kitten? LAH DE DAH with your whiskers and pretty grey fur. FUCK YOU

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:23 (fourteen years ago) link

remember Jaws 3-D that was so awesome when the dude's arm was like floating right in front of your face. or Captain Eo, dude that was so mindblowing

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:25 (fourteen years ago) link

I remember "Metalstorm: The Destruction of Jared Sin" (or however you spell it short of me looking it up).

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^arrgh was totally trying to remember the title of that meself!

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

pretty sure it's jared-syn and if I'm right I feel deep shame

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link

deep shame ensues

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:35 (fourteen years ago) link

movie anthologists are the art of pretend contrition

like having an eternal kazoo in your underwear (acoleuthic), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:36 (fourteen years ago) link

ts: metalstorm the destruction of jared-syn vs. megaforce

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:38 (fourteen years ago) link

has no one ever seen a 3-D film before? this technology has been around forever, I'm surprised at people getting all SUPERJAZZED about it all of a sudden. oh, but its 3-D CGI this time!?! whoopdefuckindoo

― Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, December 17, 2009 6:20 PM (21 minutes ago)

yeah dude ive seen plenty of 3d in various forms and the point you are missing is that the 3d in this movie works like a bagazillion times better and looks immersive, not gimmicky.

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

shakey mo thought the wire ws like the movie traffic

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

sorry

srsly tho the 3D is pretty good

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:51 (fourteen years ago) link

in the wire or

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

wd pay $$$$ for wire remastered w/THX & 3D

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:53 (fourteen years ago) link

and mcnulty as a tall blue dood

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

CAMERON: Right from the beginning I said, "McNulty's got to have tits"

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:58 (fourteen years ago) link

shakey mo thought the wire ws like the movie traffic

oh come on you have to admit there are some superficial similarities.

by contrast, jj thought Inglorious Basterds was "horrible" but stans for this bullshit

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:03 (fourteen years ago) link

ts: metalstorm the destruction of jared-syn vs. megaforce

vs. Warriors Of The Wasteland

Thulsa Doob (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:05 (fourteen years ago) link

the problem here is that i have actually seen both movies which makes that whole opinion having mechanic work a lot better

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:08 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:09 (fourteen years ago) link

fair enough but I don't have to jump off a cliff to know it's not a good idea

x-post

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link

also you should get a new mechanic

Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link

can't talk for jj obv (and I thought inglorious basts ws great) but I didn't think he was stanning; merely pointing out tht the 3D in this is v.v.good, which it is, and difft from what's come before

ribisi doing his best j.piven impersonation throughout this btw

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:17 (fourteen years ago) link

you know, if there are two activities that are directly analogous, it's going to a movie and jumping off of a cliff

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

you can now do both in 3D

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

hang on, u could always go see a movie in 3D

cozwn, Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

but cliff-jumping is so much better than it used to be

This part of the sentence is even dumber. (lukas), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link

jesus shakey, stop being such a morbs.

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean seriously, i'm hardly this movie's #1 defender, but if you're going to have an opinion—a strong one that you're going to spend your time pompously trotting out and defending—on a movie you might as well fucking see it.

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:23 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe he's afraid he'll like it ;-)

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

I saw "Avatar"
And I liked it
The flash of the pyrotechnics
I saw "Avatar"
Just to try it
Hope my film friends don't mind it
It felt so wrong
It felt so right
Don't mean I'll miss
Foreign Film Night
I saw "Avatar"
And I liked it
I liked it

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

(if all I've done is get Katy Perry stuck in people's heads, I'll consider that a success)

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

a stanning that dare not speak its name

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

oh u dick xpost

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

SUCCESS

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

I can see Shatner reciting that.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

London just spat out its dinner. >_<

special vixens unit (suzy), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:32 (fourteen years ago) link

sheep's heart, liver, and lungs all over the keyboard

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:36 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.chronicart.com/cinema/chronique.php?id=11577

«Vingt ans qui déboucheront sur ce space-opera écolo un film-monstre où le rapport de force humain / digital se renverse en un plan, celui du premier contact : en 1989, c'est l'alien qui se reflétait sur le casque du plongeur ; en 2009, c'est le visage du soldat qui se réfléchit sur le corps de son avatar. Un signe des temps.»

moullet, Thursday, 17 December 2009 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

The only film I've ever been to where the audience stood up and applauded (normal cinema goers) was, ummm, Fahrenheit 9/11... I was well confused when it happened, even if I did enjoy it.

xpost.

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 17 December 2009 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

la dargis:

He hasn’t changed cinema, but with blue people and pink blooms he has confirmed its wonder.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Friday, 18 December 2009 01:42 (fourteen years ago) link

how does this compare to, say, Beowulf 3D

囧 (dyao), Friday, 18 December 2009 03:04 (fourteen years ago) link

Angelina Jolie's boobs weren't nearly as immersive.

Zoo Snickers (Deric W. Haircare), Friday, 18 December 2009 03:20 (fourteen years ago) link

This "confirming cinema's wonder" type argument really STICKS IN MY CRAW. Go on a fuckin motionmaster or something if you want ooh wow it looks so cool type crap, man. Or take some drugs, I dunno. I could be entirely wrong, it just seems silly to think that the wonder of cinema consists of special effects w no decent context (haven't heard anyone standing up for the plot etc so far, after all)

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Friday, 18 December 2009 03:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Most of the positive reviews I've read are basically 'eh the movie mostly sucks but FUCKIN A 3-D'

mayor jingleberries, Friday, 18 December 2009 04:00 (fourteen years ago) link

yes, this makes sense, the future of hollywood should be 300 million dollar productions

avatar brothers (Tape Store), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:12 (fourteen years ago) link

the "confirming cinema's wonder" argument depends on more than just eye appeal. it depends on the film's ability to immerse (that word) you in the its universe and moment, so the eye candy becomes real to you, becomes a better-than-real world. it works best on kids, and that's why people who were kids in the late 70s will always be the biggest star wars fans. the measure of avatar probably isn't how adult critics react to it in the here and now, but how young adults remember it a decade or two down the line.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Like the way kids who are 26 now think fondly of Titanic?

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:32 (fourteen years ago) link

I wasn't born when Star Wars came out and I love it, tho

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:38 (fourteen years ago) link

in terms of pure escapism video games have had movies beat for the past 10 years or so

囧 (dyao), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:40 (fourteen years ago) link

uhhh

avatar brothers (Tape Store), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Dude, that's the thing! Why're movies competing w a medium they can't beat? Unless you can tell the characters what to do etc, this is a stupid principle to be acting off

xopost

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Friday, 18 December 2009 04:41 (fourteen years ago) link

except, most ppl don't play video games on cinema screens, with cinema sound systems.

jabba hands, Friday, 18 December 2009 04:55 (fourteen years ago) link

immersiveness is a false grail imo

any good art should be immersive

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 05:03 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, when i want this kind of jolt, i just play a game

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 06:06 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^think this is going to be indicative of the HARD JOURNALISM directed at this for the next 48 hours

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 06:08 (fourteen years ago) link

really cannot believe in this day and age people are still talking abt movies and video games as if they do the same things

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:12 (fourteen years ago) link

seems silly to think that the wonder of cinema consists of special effects w no decent context

Kinda agree there, but on the second hand I also think a lot of movies these days hinge wholly on plots that are so unbelievable and half-assed the suspension of disbelief is getting worn out. Maybe some big budget eye candy with no narrative would be a cool future for cinema.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:20 (fourteen years ago) link

pretty sure this movie would do roughly the same thing for me as playing uncharted 2

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 06:24 (fourteen years ago) link

just not in all EYEPOPPING 3-D but i will trade you that for being in a theater on opening night any day

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 06:24 (fourteen years ago) link

I might be more receptive to the idea of "all spectacle" if the spectacle wasn't so blandly unimaginative.

I'm sure it'll be a fun 3 hours and whatnot, but it still looks like Delgo with a bigger budget. Which is really just removing half of what was lame about Delgo.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:26 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah cause movies are always filled w/scenes of u trying to jump over a pit and falling on spikes repeatedly for two hours - movies and video games are less similar than wikipedia and a novel - they both compete for yr entertainment time but past that xp

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:29 (fourteen years ago) link

That's a terribly poor point

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Friday, 18 December 2009 07:01 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah cause movies are always filled w/scenes of u trying to jump over a pit and falling on spikes repeatedly for two hours

don't give lars von trier any ideas.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Friday, 18 December 2009 07:12 (fourteen years ago) link

as someone who's done his fair share of both, movies and video games do NOTHING like the same thing to me... even so-called cinematic ones like uncharted. i've never, ever been emotionally invested in anything that happens in a video game (or any character), never wondered how the story was going to develop... they are barely in the same universe for me

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:00 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw this today. i won't say much 'til people have had a chance to download it or wahtever, but it was better than i thought it would be.

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:10 (fourteen years ago) link

i just came back from it. basically slocki otm BUT

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:12 (fourteen years ago) link

...

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:14 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i agreed with slocki's review, though the blue people didn't bother me as much. thing about them that i admired was that i it really didn't take too long for me to think of them as "people". there was no uncanny valley distraction (which is good because this movie would have failed utterly if it had, since the movie depends on the audience empathizing with them to work on any level).

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:16 (fourteen years ago) link

it is TOTALLY ferngully with guns btw

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:18 (fourteen years ago) link

...in a good way, mostly!

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:18 (fourteen years ago) link

the earth mother gaia hooey does get to be a bit much after a while

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:21 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, and some of the more sentimental scenes sort of made me cringe. the two things i found the most annoying were the music and the accents. just this sort of generic indistinct ethnic otherness.

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:25 (fourteen years ago) link

thing about them that i admired was that i it really didn't take too long for me to think of them as "people". there was no uncanny valley distraction

yeah, i was impressed the most by this. overall the f/x were great. they generally had a nice tangible, physical feel to them despite not being 100% photoreal.

also nice to see action sequences that had clear geography and were easy to follow. don't know why that's so rare in modern movies.

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:41 (fourteen years ago) link

anyway that's not to excuse the film's flaws, just to say that it does the spectacle part very very well.

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 09:05 (fourteen years ago) link

i will paste this everywhere

http://img.slate.com/media/1/122939/2207695/2237022/2238895/CA_091217_avatar.jpg

moullet, Friday, 18 December 2009 10:25 (fourteen years ago) link

as someone who's done his fair share of both, movies and video games do NOTHING like the same thing to me... even so-called cinematic ones like uncharted. i've never, ever been emotionally invested in anything that happens in a video game (or any character), never wondered how the story was going to develop... they are barely in the same universe for me

― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 08:00 (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^yes

cozwn, Friday, 18 December 2009 10:41 (fourteen years ago) link

well, see, no in my case. I've had some emotional involvement and intellectual curiosity about plot development with games and it feels about as properly placed as if I had same with a cameron film.
obvs this is personal so i don't feel the need to really argue a point here, but I will say that I don't need to see a big visual spectacular with no plot anymore and it ain't that I'm above it or something; it's just less likely to leave me really engaged. I've seen a gazillion lush gorgeous films and i'd rather do yimou than bay i guess; I gotta have some meat in the plot and characterizations OR i gotta be able to have physical control of the characters themselves or my mind wanders.

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 11:31 (fourteen years ago) link

lol I'm not saying games = movies; I'm just saying in terms of spectacle/worldbuilding games do it better, and so far avatars big draw is how much of a spectacle it presents

囧 (dyao), Friday, 18 December 2009 11:58 (fourteen years ago) link

I'll also freely admit that the last game I played was modern warfare 2 so that probably colors my viewpoint

囧 (dyao), Friday, 18 December 2009 12:02 (fourteen years ago) link

as an aside, I see the PS3 can handle 3D apparently but we'll all need another telly upgrade or alternatively expensive glasses to use it

cozwn, Friday, 18 December 2009 12:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Flick was fun. Definitely some Starcraft moments (a friend said it was Terrans + Night Elves, so a cross-property Blizzard affair).

Mordy, Friday, 18 December 2009 12:06 (fourteen years ago) link

desplechin = video games
cameron = cinema

moullet, Friday, 18 December 2009 12:47 (fourteen years ago) link

cameron = cinema
desplechin = video games life

queen frostine (Eric H.), Friday, 18 December 2009 12:59 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't need to see a big visual spectacular with no plot anymore and it ain't that I'm above it or something; it's just less likely to leave me really engaged.

^This, basically. And the thing is, that isn't really how Cameron used to be. The reason why his older stuff (Aliens, The Abyss, the Terminators) worked is because it wasn't all spectacle. There was also an engaging (if somewhat facile) featuring characters you cared about somewhat. From everything that's been said about Avatar thus far, the story appears to be pretty weak, so if it's all just Arnie rampin' off an overpass in 3-D, I can prolly just wait for the home theater showroom demo at the Best Buy.

Zoo Snickers (Deric W. Haircare), Friday, 18 December 2009 13:56 (fourteen years ago) link

"engaging (if somewhat facile) story", I meant.

Zoo Snickers (Deric W. Haircare), Friday, 18 December 2009 13:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Deric otm! It's so disappointing because we have proof the guy was a great storyteller; he just didn't seem to care anymore when he could instead be playing with 3d blue titties.

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Friday, 18 December 2009 14:04 (fourteen years ago) link

also nice to see action sequences that had clear geography and were easy to follow. don't know why that's so rare in modern movies.

― krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, December 18, 2009 7:41 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

this line alone makes me want to see it! we should do a thread on 00s action sequences that manage this

jabba hands, Friday, 18 December 2009 14:09 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah cause movies are always filled w/scenes of u trying to jump over a pit and falling on spikes repeatedly for two hours - movies and video games are less similar than wikipedia and a novel - they both compete for yr entertainment time but past that xp

― ice cr?m, Friday, December 18, 2009 1:29 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

That's a terribly poor point

― The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Friday, December 18, 2009 2:01 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

you are a terribly poor point

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 14:51 (fourteen years ago) link

this guy

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 18 December 2009 14:57 (fourteen years ago) link

but I will say that I don't need to see a big visual spectacular with no plot anymore

the movie's problem is not lack of a story or plot. it's that the story is disappointingly conventional.

krampus activities (latebloomer), Friday, 18 December 2009 14:59 (fourteen years ago) link

sub "no plot" with "no interesting plot" then.
bottom line is that if I'm going to spend two hours plus watching grandeur and neat-o shit i can totally get down with that, but i can more or less do that hanging out in times square. it's just colder. just as many furries tho

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 15:59 (fourteen years ago) link

the worst moment in this movie is when they hook up to the forest internet and you can hear the sound of children laughing faintly in the distance as they experience all the na'vi's memories

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:13 (fourteen years ago) link

from the local mpls paper review lol:

The Na'vi use a kind of organic USB cord to hook into the minds of their steeds, controlling them by mental osmosis. Watching "Avatar," I felt that Cameron had hooked into my mental circuitry, downloading gigabytes of pure moviegoing bliss.

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

item!

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:27 (fourteen years ago) link

wait, so cameron was downloading gigs of pure moviegoing bliss from this guy? does he mean uploading?

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:29 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:31 (fourteen years ago) link

gimme back my bliss maaan

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 16:31 (fourteen years ago) link

this really IS a new sort of moviegoing

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:33 (fourteen years ago) link

anyway its obvs forks et al will eventually see this and be all it was pretty rad in its own way and no one will really care anymore

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 16:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Has Ursula Le Guin complained about how the plot of this is very similar to The Word for World Is Forest? She did have the better title.

with hidden noise, Friday, 18 December 2009 16:44 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm actually gonna completely abstain, but in essence I agree with you mr cram

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:49 (fourteen years ago) link

*~that is a terribly poor point~~~~*

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Friday, 18 December 2009 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link

the worst moment in this movie is when they hook up to the forest internet and you can hear the sound of children laughing faintly in the distance as they experience all the na'vi's memories

i must be a sap, but i have to say that even though i cringed at the whole children laughing thing, afterward i was like "noooo don't let them bulldoze the ancestor internet hub!"

on another subject, is this the most unabashedly liberal big budget sci-fi action flick of all time, or did i miss the point?

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:32 (fourteen years ago) link

ya in a sense, i guess, though it is basically a "let's save the community center from the mean developer" movie and that's not really a huge breakthrough iirc

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

this is our time down here

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 17:35 (fourteen years ago) link

so this is an incredibly expensive remake of Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo with an azure color code?

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

reboot

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:39 (fourteen years ago) link

reloaded

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 17:40 (fourteen years ago) link

xp well i saw it as more of a 'indigenous people in the way of massive fossil fuel reserve' (saved by a community organizer!).

i mean you probably could have made a historical fiction drama from the same screenplay, with Native Americans (or any other type of aboriginal populations) as stand-ins for the Na'vi, but nobody would have wanted to see it. the environmental message of the movie was not subtle, either. i wouldn't be surprised to read conservatives bitching about the liberal brainwashing in the next few days.

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Does Pandora have legal, readily-available abortions?

Thulsa Doob (Jon Lewis), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:48 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean you probably could have made a historical fiction drama from the same screenplay, with Native Americans (or any other type of aboriginal populations) as stand-ins for the Na'vi, but nobody would have wanted to see it. the environmental message of the movie was not subtle, either. i wouldn't be surprised to read conservatives bitching about the liberal brainwashing in the next few days.

― richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, December 18, 2009 12:46 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

wasnt that called dances with wolves and everybody wanted to see it?

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

it honestly kind of reminded me of that 90s tv special where bette midler played the ailing mother earth

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

xxp

Human-to-Na'vi avatars made possible by stem cells.

James Mitchell, Friday, 18 December 2009 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

so this is like fern gully

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 18 December 2009 17:57 (fourteen years ago) link

slocks, i remember that! Bette was all like "i will survive.. but you... you the humans... it is YOU who will die... and i weep for you"

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 18:00 (fourteen years ago) link

wasnt that called dances with wolves and everybody wanted to see it?

dunno. never saw it.

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 18:01 (fourteen years ago) link

point taken, though.

richie aprile (rockapads), Friday, 18 December 2009 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

i guess someone's already made/quoted "world's largest screensaver" zing

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 December 2009 18:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Is watching this movie in 3-D Imax pretty much the same as sitting onstage in the midst of an ecologically-themed Blue Man Group/Cirque du Soliel mashup?

Zoo Snickers (Deric W. Haircare), Friday, 18 December 2009 19:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Has anyone linked to this New Yorker Cameron profile yet:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/26/091026fa_fact_goodyear

From this I learned the surprising (to me) fact that Cameron and Kathryn Bigelow used to be married.

o. nate, Friday, 18 December 2009 19:17 (fourteen years ago) link

from what i have seen of the two of them in interviews, it kinda doesn't make any sense.

you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Friday, 18 December 2009 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link

James Cameron always seems like a good idea at the time. It's only upon reflection that we begin to see the error of our ways.

Zoo Snickers (Deric W. Haircare), Friday, 18 December 2009 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

to be fair he has married a lot of ladies.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Friday, 18 December 2009 19:30 (fourteen years ago) link

he is the king of the world so

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

From that roundtable above, it seems that pretty much all directors are insufferable egotists, but Cameron more than most.

o. nate, Friday, 18 December 2009 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

near, far, wherever he are

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Thinking of going to catch this in a few minutes, since I haven't really been able to do anything today yet and I could use massive visual and caffeine-based stimulation

kingfish, Friday, 18 December 2009 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

it seems that pretty much all directors are insufferable egotists, but Cameron more than most.

He'd still be more fun to talk to than Reitman, though.

ô_o (Nicole), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

That probably falls into the "faint praise" category, but still.

ô_o (Nicole), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

it is TOTALLY ferngully with guns btw

Who is the TONE LOC of Avatar?

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link

cameron is a hilarious cartoon egomaniac, at least from a distance

ice cr?m, Friday, 18 December 2009 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Fern Gully had a lot of questionable rapping, incl. from Robin Williams.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

wait, waht

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtuKoD1Wbvg

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:30 (fourteen years ago) link

"Batty Rap"

...

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

From the grand tradition of putting the word "rap" in the title so you know they are, in fact, rapping.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Whereas Tone Loc's song in the same movie does not have the word "rap" in the title (otoh it is not good (otooh if is frigging Fern Gully)).

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:33 (fourteen years ago) link

what the

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:34 (fourteen years ago) link

okay I am going back to listening to songs based on WoW samples

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:36 (fourteen years ago) link

wow the lead chick in fern gully totally anticipates zooey deschanel

Simon H., Friday, 18 December 2009 20:39 (fourteen years ago) link

"This movie makes me emo. Thinking about it makes my nose do that chloriney thing you get right before you start crying. I am SO GAY for this movie that I can’t stand it. And you know what? Having finally seen it, I don't even care what the haters have to say. I am a happy meniscus that your spite sauce slides off of. I'm lifted."
http://www.theawl.com/2009/12/flicked-off-with-mary-hk-choi-avatar
(kinda digging the awl lately)
comments are fun too

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:39 (fourteen years ago) link

xp drowned in a gulley

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Ha Simon I was thinking Fairuza Balk.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

that review i just posted was the first one that made me actually want to see this thing

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Friday, 18 December 2009 20:42 (fourteen years ago) link

"Avatar" is staggering. It’s seismic. Evolutionarily speaking it is cladogenesis in a thunderclap. Punctuating the balls outta equilibrium. Think about it: You can’t bit torrent this shit. And even if some very industrious pillager cops the glasses and figures out how to do it in the way it was intended to be seen, that person is a hope rapist that should be shot in the face for dream treason because James Cameron and a gang of wizards made this beautiful, beautiful thing for us—in 2009 of all years. We should ALL hold hands about it.

is this lady brent dicrescenzo?

cozwn, Friday, 18 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahah

Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 December 2009 20:55 (fourteen years ago) link

dream treason

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 18 December 2009 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

hope rapise!!

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 18 December 2009 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

t

what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 18 December 2009 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

the planet's gone mad.

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Friday, 18 December 2009 21:33 (fourteen years ago) link

i kind of want to see this dumb thing now

akm, Friday, 18 December 2009 23:20 (fourteen years ago) link

@coryischaki: 10 word Avatar review: Space marines vs Roger Dean painting set to Enya.

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 18 December 2009 23:53 (fourteen years ago) link

pretty much. whether that's a bad thing depends on you.

krampus activities (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 00:04 (fourteen years ago) link

I liked this.

kingfish, Saturday, 19 December 2009 00:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I watched this at an IMAX theater and thought it was very good. If I happened to be 8, I think it might have fucking blown my mind.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Saturday, 19 December 2009 01:38 (fourteen years ago) link

^^

I'm still learning how to read 3d. There are bits where the depth of field is v. shallow, and my eyes are roaming, trying to focus on things that will never come into focus. Recipe for watery eyes, that.

stet, Saturday, 19 December 2009 02:15 (fourteen years ago) link

If I happened to be 8, I think it might have fucking blown my mind.

This is how I feel about Kung Fu Shuffle, and that's far from an insult.

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 02:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Somehow I doubt this is the same level of awesome, tho.

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 02:24 (fourteen years ago) link

stet - when u do can u code ilx in 3d - shd only take u 10 mins

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Saturday, 19 December 2009 02:30 (fourteen years ago) link

birthday sundae in 3d, it's what we've all been waiting for

囧 (dyao), Saturday, 19 December 2009 02:34 (fourteen years ago) link

stet - when u do can u code ilx in 3d - shd only take u 10 mins

The valuing of the tech over the art is a bit of problem, no?

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 02:48 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/avtr-4181.jpg

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 07:16 (fourteen years ago) link

oops wrong pic

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 07:16 (fourteen years ago) link

is it just me or was the other avatar driver totally shaggy from scooby doo

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 07:23 (fourteen years ago) link

that's not very flattering to sigourney

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 07:31 (fourteen years ago) link

other avatar guy was from the exact same hampshire college hacky sack matthew lillard care bear cousins family as the sidekick driver from speed racer, just another way in which this shit failed to live up to my beloved gold standard of long dumb cgi action epics

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:11 (fourteen years ago) link

well i guess tbf i have no serious preference between the two scrawny doofs except that i don't think the guy in speed racer had a hacky sack goatee and also that archetype becomes more annoying the further away we move from 2000, however:

lead guy: that shitty guy <<<< emile hirsch
the girl: i like saldana & i guess she had more character but i grew up w/xtina ricci in the 90s, so
color palette: blacklight posters, lisa frank, money grab nature museum rainforest exhibits from 1994 < photoshop color selector, paper rad, seizures, dumb shit
slimy corporate villain: 'go' star giovanni ribisi < that guy who looks like chris hitchens
old lady crush: sigourney > sarandon (this is like mentioning that God the Creator could outrun usain bolt or some shit though)
was john goodman in it: no < yes
did anyone say 'get that weak sh*t off my track' in it: no <<<< yes
u r sexually attractive but god as my witness i will never watch another episode of lost: michelle williams = matthew fox
questionable stylistic bugaboo: papyrus <<<<<<<<<<<<< rotating head wipes

avatar sux

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:20 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw this at 3:30 pm & went for happy meals at 1230 am and could not accurately identify my toy's character

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:21 (fourteen years ago) link

'go' star giovanni ribisi

if you mean the film with tom cruise's wife and tail diggs, then ribisi wasn't in it.

speed racer is the nuts. avatar doesn't look like it comes close.

that said, with a lot of you guys being all cptn save-a-smurf, i'm now starting to ponder whether to see this...

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:24 (fourteen years ago) link

don't post your review until you've had the happy meal and taken that into account

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:28 (fourteen years ago) link

oh weird, i have no idea what i confused go with other than 1999 in general

i was surprised by how much i liked ribisi though! when he first showed up i was wondering what kind of weirdo scientology challenge he completed to get put in a wide release movie at the end of this decade but he was p enjoyable

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:29 (fourteen years ago) link

i got cat zoe saldana but i thought it was supposed to be her dad. her face lights up when you wave your head in front of it, sometimes

this reminds me that i still thought the alien romance was kind of weird

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:30 (fourteen years ago) link

do they do a vege happy meal these days?

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:30 (fourteen years ago) link

who will mint more furries per capita between cat saldana and kristofferson the fox

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:30 (fourteen years ago) link

whoever said ribisi is playing jeremy piven was otm

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:36 (fourteen years ago) link

i was thinking chibi vince vaughn but pivs is way closer

A B C, Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:36 (fourteen years ago) link

XD

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:09 (fourteen years ago) link

http://s2.thisnext.com/media/230x230/Im-Afraid-I-Just-Blue-Myself_1F0591CB.jpg

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Saw this at the IMAX - PHENOMENAL.

I thoroughly enjoyed this. Sorry.

Okay, on a technical level, Cameron has been completely vindicated imo - this really is some next next next level stuff. I was fucking agog at how beautiful some of this was.

Story wise, it did the job. It is such a nuts-and-bolts, A->B job though. Rigidly 3-act structure, hitting every beat (er, inciting incident - half commitment - midpoint reversal - enemy closes in - darkest decision - confrontation). I was gonna say screenwriting 101 but it doesn't even have any subplots.
It really could have done with something to shake things up a bit. A betrayal, a character reveal, anything. But no. Saying that, though it was all terribly predictable I was drawn in, I went along. It was cornballs but I didn't much care, it still got me rooting for the big blue guys.

The Na'vi are yer basic noble savage, it's true. Apart from sexy alien girl who is sexy, none of them had fleshed out characters. Though I did like how they looked, the design of them w/ev. I know some had a problem with the Na'vi for some reason. I thought they looked good.

Cameron's dialogue is still Cameron's dialogue. You know. His strength has always been memorable one-liners, even when they were examples of how cheesy his writing can be ("Hasta la Vista, baby"?). I don't think there was anything particularly memorable here though. Maybe in time.

Did I say how much I really, really enjoyed this as a moviegoing experience? Such a good thing to be carried away by on a bitterly cold, dark winter's night. This is my favourite sci-fi film of the year - and this year, that's actually saying something! - and I can't wait till I go and see it again next Wednesday. So there.

i09 have some good articles about Avatar. Their review of the film is fair imo: http://io9.com/5427555/avatar-wont-make-you-go-native

DavidM, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:36 (fourteen years ago) link

Bit of a ramble, that.

DavidM, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:37 (fourteen years ago) link

Rigidly 3-act structure, hitting every beat

Rigid or not, this still sounds like praise to me. Think: "Alien3".

Ok, shit. I guess I'll see it. Or else stop bitching.

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:39 (fourteen years ago) link

Have managed to avoid all hype for this and got to see it tonight. I'm always against justifying a lame story with pretty visuals, LOTR did nothing for me - but this is on another level. You can really lose yourself in it. Don't even think about watching it on a computer screen.

The story is decent, I suppose, although once you've seen half of it you can predict every element of the rest of it (sadly - can't they throw in a few surprises once in a while?). I expected it to be fairly snappy from the opening - I had no idea how fantasy-like it was going to be; and thought the premise could have delivered a better story with a few less cliches - maybe from the science side of things - but this just fizzled out.

If anything spoiled it, it was the dialogue. It could have been a great movie, but man. OK, it was fine in places, but when it was bad, it was really bad. It absolutely baffles me how movies this expensive can just get away with this kind of writing.
Disclaimer: I've mainly been watching the Wire and not much else these past few weeks, so have been completely spoiled, writing-wise.

xpost - above review pretty much OTM, particularly about how it could have done with a shake-up somewhere.

Not the real Village People, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:42 (fourteen years ago) link

This is my favourite sci-fi film of the year - and this year, that's actually saying something!

Was this a watershed sci-fi year and I just slept through it or something?

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:45 (fourteen years ago) link

Ok, Moon was good. I'll give it that.

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:46 (fourteen years ago) link

moon star trek and district 9 were well received by sci-fi movie fans

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:53 (fourteen years ago) link

generally speaking

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 09:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Star Trek was awesome. But if that's sci-fi... ok, I don't mean to sound sanctimonious, at least not more than usual, but you see where I'm going here.

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 10:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Isn't Avatar pretty solidly in the fantasy genre, anyway?

kenan, Saturday, 19 December 2009 10:15 (fourteen years ago) link

it's sci-fi fantasy. i mean there's some quasi-scientific explanations for stuff. no actual magic or anything like that. but yeah, humanoid aliens, etc.

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 10:26 (fourteen years ago) link

So I went and saw it tonight too.... And yeah, the technical achievement is a game-changer. I'm sure every single nut, bolt, tree, leaf, computer display, cloud, floating jellyfish-looking thing, spaceship, etc. was blueprinted and argued over for weeks, but in the end it looks like Cameron and crew flew out to some weird Gaia planet and simply filmed on location. There's a few self-referential "look at me I'm 3D!" moments towards the beginning, but the 3D was never intrusive and in the way. Seeing this in a theater is an absolute requirement.

The movie itself is straight-up Edgar Rice Burroughs with a little Harry Harrison thrown in (esp. the first Deathworld book). Totally ridiculous and heavy-handed but no worse than, say, the original Stargate movie or The Fifth Element. My only wish that the supporting cast wasn't quite so anonymous. Unlike Aliens, where you knew every single marine and had some emotional investment with them, the rest of the Avatar cast were just kinda there.

Certainly not the best movie I've seen this year, but well-worth seeing.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 19 December 2009 10:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Also, I think several dozen new xeno-prefixed words need to be coined now. Xenophile, xenophobe, and xenomorph don't seem adequate enough to describe this thing.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 19 December 2009 10:44 (fourteen years ago) link

a b c's review is a++++++++++++++++++

max, Saturday, 19 December 2009 11:03 (fourteen years ago) link

reserved tickets for an imax showing on monday - can't wait

=皿= (dyao), Saturday, 19 December 2009 11:19 (fourteen years ago) link

There's a few self-referential "look at me I'm 3D!" moments towards the beginning...

yeah, the golf ball rolling into the cup, the coffin being slid into the drawer... if anything I thought these obviously gimmicky shots were the ones which least showed off the impressiveness of the tech

I agree with stet tho tht it can be hard to read the 3D a lot of the time and can be v.tiring to watch

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 12:12 (fourteen years ago) link

dunno where my nearest imax is. probably that london.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Saturday, 19 December 2009 12:57 (fourteen years ago) link

whoever said ribisi is playing jeremy piven was otm
― tiger's wood (latebloomer), Saturday, 19 December 2009 08:36 (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

even had more hair thn normal I though

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 13:05 (fourteen years ago) link

I gotta admit, every time I read another 'game-changer/will change the way you think about movies' bit, no matter how qualified otherwise...it kinda makes me want to hit someone. (Not you guys, that'd be rude.)

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 December 2009 13:18 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i still haven't seen anything that looks above and beyond a final fantasy cutscene (it was ff10 that had the blue warrior types right?)

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 13:20 (fourteen years ago) link

http://content2.myyearbook.com/zenhex/images/quiz4/16697/16697_res8.jpg

voiced by bender! :) the more you know

"can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 13:22 (fourteen years ago) link

man this movie was pretty bad

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar: came close to losing my shit. Happy to join the crowd and clap in appreciation after our collective minds were blown away (somewhat).

Yeah the plot and dialogue are rudimentary, shit was GREAT!!!! to look at at, and the action was good enough.

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

i think the impressive visuals did a really good job of making me feel like my time watching this was worthwhile, but they didnt really make up for some pretty hilariously bad parts

SPOILERZ!!!!!!

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

ok so fern gully: the next generation has some pretty crappy cameron-style dialogue, that i can deal with. im willing to put up w/ cardboard bad guys -- some of the best movies have these things, & it COULD be, like part & parcel of the film's style. i dont demand complex bad dudes per se.

but as a statement about, like, life and stuff? pretty awful. the deus ex machina resolution??

what is he saying about our current problems today -- that the corporations tearing down the rainforest are bad? umm well duh ... apparently the solution is that mother nature has to go hitchcock's the birds on everybody, because thats the only thing that will help noble savages fight the oncoming tide of modernization. the fact that the main character basically throws this entire race of ppl into the path of oncoming guns was so gross ....

and its not even that creative a movie when it needs to be!! like ... when they were like "our people know these mountains well ... the oncoming invaders just have guns and explosives" i was expecting the people to use some clever traps or something design out of wildlife, i.e. ensnaring these guys in vines or setting up traps w/ boulders, something clever & creative ... instead they somehow find a few guns themselves, and just go for straight-up violence? Just throw themselves into the path of a bunch of dudes with machine guns? then they get torn to shit. then, luckily, mother earth (or whatever) heard this dude praying through his hair & sends a bunch of wildlife to overwhelm them w/ sheer numbers? is that the lesson here, that if only mother earth was a cognizant being everything would work out?

also, i cant believe they used that LOL romcom cliche where the guy is forced into the situation, doesnt love the chick at first but grows to love her over time, she discovers they were forced to be together & gets mad, then forgives him. soooo lazy!!

he sets up this plot like obvious past historical brutalities, but he has nothing to say about any of it ... like, bad people r bad? ok.

i dont get how this is a 'future of cinema' type film. my bro mentioned how in 'alien' apparently ridley scott couldn't afford a full sized ship so he got creative & put his kids in kid-sized space suits to make the ship look larger on camera ... there is none of that kind of innovative thinking here, cameron's response to a problem like that is "throw more money at it till we CAN do it" --- ooh, floating islands? really? thats the best he comes up with? fake rhinos? pterodactyls still exist? so totally unimaginative.

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

that said, parts of it look really beautiful & i do enjoy that almost puff daddy level of "if i throw enough money around, it'll at least be impressive if nothing else"

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

SPOILERZ FURTHER

even if u take it as being about, like, the title, about falling in love thru an avatar or whatever ... even that is philosophically undercut by the fact that he can turn into the avatar with the right prayers to god!! its so afraid to actually confront the ethical scenarios that he sets up on an honest level, everything is cheat saved by divine intervention

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

*is a cheat

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Deej, i agree with all of that. And in some small way, yes paying to see this will give only give creedance to bolster Cameron's "cause" / counter your arguements (at least in a $$$ = justified film experience).... but if he can do a Terminator quality idea/ploy/script with Avatar quality techology as his next project, I figure its worth getting behind Avatar.

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

plus I entered the cinema intending not too think too deeply about the "Message", just gawp at pretty things and allow myself to flinch / recoil at shit being blown up in my augmented "direction"

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

the other thing that had me rolling my eyes was when that one pilot chick was all "this is not what i signed up for!!!" & stops firing missiles ... what?? do you really think theyd get wishy-washy ppl like that on a mission like this in the military?? i mean think of how much effort the right wing went into in this country to get ppl on board for iraq ... you have to have some kind of propaganda thing where ppl are convinced about the justness of their cause, or the righteousness of their victory, if she's that easily swayed ... at least district 9 show the dehumanizing elements to justify ppl's cruelty towards the aliens, know what i mean?

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

plus I entered the cinema intending not too think too deeply about the "Message", just gawp at pretty things and allow myself to flinch / recoil at shit being blown up in my augmented "direction"

― Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, December 19, 2009 2:59 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

its not like i was looking to criticize this stuff!! it was pretty surface-level obvious

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost: not specifically aimed my post at you, deej.

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

xp deej i agree with you about the lack of military tactics - i was also disappointed by that. though the nature's revenge angle was ok with me, i was hoping for some guerilla style stuff.

the other thing that had me rolling my eyes was when that one pilot chick was all "this is not what i signed up for!!!" & stops firing missiles ... what?? do you really think theyd get wishy-washy ppl like that on a mission like this in the military?? i mean think of how much effort the right wing went into in this country to get ppl on board for iraq ...

there were plenty of conscientious objectors in Iraq. plus, this wasn't the military, it was a Blackwater-like security company working for a corporation which is a big distinction in terms of loyalty imo. my main problem with that scene was that her character wasn't really fleshed out at all prior to that, so it was really out of the blue. and wouldn't she have done that the first time they attack the na'vi? i think maybe it would have been better if they had taken a few minutes to show how disgusted she was after that first attack (i don't recall them even showing her during the first major attack), but there were just too many characters in the movie to flesh anyone out very much. maybe in the inevitable 4-hour special blu-ray edition...

richie aprile (rockapads), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:27 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i guess i mean that it seemed like the only reason to have her do that was so she could rescue them from prison later on & get the main character moved to the tree. so they were like, uhhhh i guess she'll have a crisis of confidence in the mission? lets throw that in.

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:32 (fourteen years ago) link

deej thank you for helping me decide to not ever pay to see this film.

zombie bobby 4 mod (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:41 (fourteen years ago) link

<3 u deej

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link

also

I gotta admit, every time I read another 'game-changer/will change the way you think about movies' bit, no matter how qualified otherwise...it kinda makes me want to hit someone. (Not you guys, that'd be rude.)

― Ned Raggett, Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:18 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

totally agree with this. everybody needs to just CALM THE FUCK DOWN about this movie for a minute.

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link

camera can go eat a brick for all I care, put this tech that he's developed in someone actually capable's hands and then we're talking

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

cameron

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:04 (fourteen years ago) link

like who?

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:06 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost: I vote Ridley Scott

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:07 (fourteen years ago) link

werner

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Coens

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:09 (fourteen years ago) link

neveldine/taylor

CRANK 3D!!

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link

as spectacle, enjoyable, as cinema, offensive to yr intelligence.

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, not to discredit cameron's achievement here: it would have been so easy for the spectacle to fall flat but he carried it off very well, and it was nice to have some action shots that weren't shot ultra-close and ultra-quick for once but I can't wait till someone marries the spectacle and the cinema a bit more capably

cozwn, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:12 (fourteen years ago) link

^agree.

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link

ebert's star wars comparison is way off -- there is nothing here nearly as iconic as the characters from that

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost: I vote Ridley Scott

― Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, December 19, 2009 5:07 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

are you shitting me, have you seen what that dude has done lately

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:17 (fourteen years ago) link

haha so im reading this thread for the first time now:

district 9 meets ferngully

― am0n, Friday, October 30, 2009 2:31 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark

otm

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:17 (fourteen years ago) link

ebert's star wars comparison is way off -- there is nothing here nearly as iconic as the characters from that

― unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, December 19, 2009 5:13 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

seriously. main character here is such a dud - i mean luke was too but he was surrounded by pretty great characters and he was a believable hick kid, not a muscly hollywood action lookin dude

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i think i said it upthread, but it is really the exact same plot as d9

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar is the corniest movie ever made about the white man’s need to lose his identity and assuage racial, political, sexual and historical guilt.

haha this is pretty otm

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:22 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost: I vote Ridley Scott

― Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, December 19, 2009 5:07 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

are you shitting me, have you seen what that dude has done lately

― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, December 19, 2009 4:17 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

A Good Year 2: The IMAX Experience

Dif Juz Guys (Deric W. Haircare), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:24 (fourteen years ago) link

as cinema, offensive to yr intelligence.

didn't offend mine. i liked this movie the way i like a lot of Pixar & Pixar-type movies. i guess i feel like the movie was intended for a slightly younger, slightly less jaded audience than i belong to, and i can find very few things wrong with it that wasn't a matter of aesthetic preference. for the type of movie it was, it succeeded. i doubt that i will go out of my way to watch it again, but i know several people who will and they aren't people anyone would consider dumb.

richie aprile (rockapads), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:27 (fourteen years ago) link

Does Pandora have legal, readily-available abortions?

― Thulsa Doob (Jon Lewis), Friday, December 18, 2009 11:48 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is the kind of ethical dilemma that could never exist on pandora -- pretty sure god wouldnt enforce premarital celibacy but once you've gotten laid by god's tree im pretty sure its shotgun wedding time

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link

for the type of movie it was, it succeeded. i doubt that i will go out of my way to watch it again, but i know several people who will and they aren't people anyone would consider dumb.

― richie aprile (rockapads), Saturday, December 19, 2009 4:27 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

i dont see how anyone could think there's anything remotely interesting being said in this film

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link

rockapads: are you saying that pixar films don't show intelligent storytelling as its main selling point? i personally couldn't give a toss how they look when there are stories as good as wall-e and finding nemo.

zombie bobby 4 mod (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:40 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i mean i loved wall e, it was sorta borderline w/ the hollywood liberal environmentalism stuff but it never overwhelmed the love story or anything. you cared more about the characters

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:43 (fourteen years ago) link

wall e the floating ipod is more iconic than the blue dorks (c)s1ocki of avatar

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:43 (fourteen years ago) link

seriously this movie could have been saved if the main char. used his knowledge of humans to figure out how to use the natural world to defeat the humans. instead he just martyred a bunch of them, then god saved everybody. ughguhgugh

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link

"spoilers"^^^

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:47 (fourteen years ago) link

pretty sure the solution to environmental catastrophe is praying, then. james cameron is the dude on a street corner w/ a 'world is ending' sign & a bigger bank account

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:47 (fourteen years ago) link

character and plotting go hand in hand

/mckee

zombie bobby 4 mod (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:53 (fourteen years ago) link

I think I gotta see this just to have a justified opinion.

poster x (ledge), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:53 (fourteen years ago) link

its almost like he thinks he can buy creativity.

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:57 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost: I vote Ridley Scott

― Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, December 19, 2009 5:07 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

are you shitting me, have you seen what that dude has done lately

― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, December 19, 2009 4:17 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

A Good Year 2: The IMAX Experience

― Dif Juz Guys (Deric W. Haircare), Saturday, 19 December 2009 22:24 (16 minutes ago) Bookmark

was thinking more of Alien and Bladerunner Ridley Scott w/ a dash of Gladiator

Tannenbaum Schmidt, Saturday, 19 December 2009 23:02 (fourteen years ago) link

why don't you just wish cameron handed the technology off to aliens james cameron while we're in time travel land

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 23:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Terrence Malick

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 19 December 2009 23:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Agree with most criticisms but the stuff about the 'God' is explained (a bit) as being not religious per se but physically tangible (or at least as 'mystical' as the Force in Star Wars).

They want to protect the physical properties of the planet (which are the basis of their culture) rather than defending a "religion" based on faith. So the criticisms of them praying to God to save them or whatever don't really hold up. (Yeah I hated the swaying scenes too).

Not the real Village People, Saturday, 19 December 2009 23:35 (fourteen years ago) link

no, they still hold up. is it science in the ten commandments because in the universe of the movie god is provably real??

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Saturday, 19 December 2009 23:40 (fourteen years ago) link

they describe the planet as being a nervous system. not very religious imo.

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:04 (fourteen years ago) link

so the movie hinges on a character so huge as to make other plot developments irrelevant ... sweet

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Deej's concerns encapsulate my misgivings. However, even though I only saw this in 2-D, I was pretty stunned.

Awesome bits:

Final battle is simply a feast for the eyes, pwns LOTR, man in robot-suit fighting with a knife = XD
Really, really blunt about Iraq war parallels = XD
Really, really blunt about global warming parallels = XD

It's a really blunt film. Everything is hyperrealised then turned up a few notches. The dialogue made me roll my eyes about 40-50 times at a conservative estimate and the characterisation wasn't strong (not to mention the story being rote and yes overly militaristic, although I think maybe the point was that they lost with war, but won with nature?) but I found myself absorbed by the scale and swoop of it all. Also, too many near-misses w.r.t. death for it to be anything other than a fantastical allegory.

Monogamy-only society = dud

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:08 (fourteen years ago) link

rockapads: are you saying that pixar films don't show intelligent storytelling as its main selling point?

i'm saying some of the Pixar movies have really basic, unsurprising, crowdpleasing plots and i like them in spite of/because of that. wasn't meant to be negative about Pixar movies, since i liked Avatar. i was careful not to say "all" Pixar movies - Toy Story 1 & 2 and Wall-e were fairly unconventional, i thought. i went into Avatar expecting a movie meant to appeal to kids and adults alike, and that's what i got. i'm not saying it couldn't have been a little bit more nuanced and still appealed to kids, either, though.

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:09 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, I don't think I'll still be thinking about this film in 2 days hours, but it was a pretty rad experience. Shame it cost all that money.

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:09 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i had fun watching it, but i can't imagine that i'll be buying it or anything.

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:12 (fourteen years ago) link

The huge battle worked because it combined the fantasy grace of the Na'vi with some genuinely lo-fi grungy gunplay. I think this is what Cameron is best at. Floating islands and swaying prayer scenes were p-ridiculous. When they say 'I see you' to each other in that climactic man-on-smurf romance scene at the end I had 'shake a little ass' in my head immediately.

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:19 (fourteen years ago) link

hahah yeah. every time they did the swaying thing with the lion king music playing, i wanted to crawl headfirst into my theater seat with my hands over my ears.

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:21 (fourteen years ago) link

i haven't covered my eyes for a love-scene in YEARS but when they first got together it was unbearable

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Also, I hate pan-pipes.

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:23 (fourteen years ago) link

OH, and the characterisation of that corporate rat driving everything on from the safety of the control-room was utterly ludicrous. I know he started to show signs of remorse towards the end (you could see it in his face - oh the stories of regret he'd have to tell to the folks back home!) but given how totally evil he'd been he probably deserved to suffer more. He was pretty much written out of the story once the battles began! I guess that might have been a good thing given how bad he was.

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:25 (fourteen years ago) link

James Horner is Cameron's biggest liability.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:26 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, of the external ones, I mean.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:26 (fourteen years ago) link

HOWEVER, none of these things were the worst thing about the film.

Oh no.

The worst thing about the film was Noah.

I knew I'd seen Noah before, somewhere.

Then it dawned on me. The horror became manifest.

I'd last seen him playing the single most repulsive male lead in cinema history in a certain Paris Hilton vehicle. A movie regularly trumpeted as one of the worst movies ever. With good reason. And a movie in which, amazingly, he'd been the most abject character. Yeah, he even made Paris seem merely terrible.

Joel Moore, why do they cast thee?

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:28 (fourteen years ago) link

James Horner is Cameron's biggest liability.

― queen frostine (Eric H.), Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:26 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Well, of the external ones, I mean.

― queen frostine (Eric H.), Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:26 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

treat the disease not the symptom dude.

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link

If loving Titanic is wrong, I don't wanna be right, et al.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Sunday, 20 December 2009 01:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Cozwn otm. Now that this isn't a flop will be gd to see where this tech can take properly good stories.

I think the plot of this lost a ton in the cutting though.

SPOILERS

Sigourney said on radio 4 that her whole romance subplot had been cut, along with a big science substrand. There's no sign of the former. There's only a hint of the latter in the really weird scene jammed in after they've sent the bulldozers in and she's stomping about going "but that was their router! You killed their file server ... you monster!"

I think if that stuff had been given additional time it might have seemed less ludicrously gaia ex machina at the end. But if the cut dialogue was more of that stuff, it's probably best that it went.

stet, Sunday, 20 December 2009 02:37 (fourteen years ago) link

SPOILERS

also weird gun-in-the-first-act when she puts him in the taped-up pod and goes "this is the least glitchy". In a movie so rigidly plotted the line might as well have been "this will break at an inopportune moment and you will fall from lazerbeak and bruise yr tail" but then it just didn't happen.

It's almost like a plot twist, that, in this film.

stet, Sunday, 20 December 2009 02:40 (fourteen years ago) link

was sigourney going to hook up w/tsu'tey?

cozwn, Sunday, 20 December 2009 02:45 (fourteen years ago) link

She didn't say bt that was my guess

stet, Sunday, 20 December 2009 03:05 (fourteen years ago) link

Hi everyone, long time reader, first time poster

I liked how there was a point in this thread where the consensus became "this is going to be the shittiest movie ever". Then after the reviews started coming in, there is 1 or 2 people who claim the movie to be shit and the rest all thought it was okay, good or better.

Before I went to the movie my sister was complaining that she didn't want to go but we had already bought her a ticket. She said something like "they are all dumb looking blue people". I told her she was being prejudiced and racist. She also said something like the movie is just going to look like a video game and that kind of animation is just going to be stupid.

After the movie everyone in my family said it was B- or B+. And yes, the animation was probably the biggest asset.

Here is my brief review:

SPOILERS: The plot was better in the first half. I would have liked a huge twist at the end. A couple of the sensual moments made turn in my seat ("I see you" (which was okay the first time I heard it) and the human navi touch scene near the end (even though I realize that it probably did need to be in the movie). Overall, whenever there was scenes that explored new scenery or showed creatures - those were the coolest parts. Whenever the big action scenes started I was pumped for them. As they we're ending I was getting halfway bored with them even though all the action scenes were cool in their own right. I think the suspense just sort of died off near the end of the movie (there was no more exploration for one) and a lot of the plot was predictable.
Overall I give the movie a B
also I hate the Titanic.

the not as great, lesser known gatsby (CaptainLorax), Sunday, 20 December 2009 05:35 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm kinda more interested in the gross for this in a purely sportsmanlike way: http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2631&p=.htm
27 mill opening day puts it at "about the same as Star Trek from earlier this year" which i guess is good for a new IP but not quite worldbeater status

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 20 December 2009 06:18 (fourteen years ago) link

i haven't covered my eyes for a love-scene in YEARS but when they first got together it was unbearable

About half the audience in my theater either busted out laughing or giggled during this.

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 20 December 2009 06:25 (fourteen years ago) link

I got turned on

born loser (CaptainLorax), Sunday, 20 December 2009 06:27 (fourteen years ago) link

posts v much in character

unicorn strapped with a unabomb (deej), Sunday, 20 December 2009 10:09 (fourteen years ago) link

saw this tonight. fucking GREAT movie. one of only a few front-to-back great movies i've seen this year, and of those, by far the most consistent in tone and skillful in storytelling.

there's been a lot of negative talk on this thread about the breakthrough effects and their relationship to cinematic "wonder". and about the relationship of effects-driven wonder to real cinematic storytelling. i was surprised, therefore, by how solid the (very basic) story was and how well cameron controlled the potentially unwieldy narrative. it was exciting, moving, romantic and awe-inspiring - and not in a cheap, michael bay-style, action overdose sense. the film develops its setting, characters, themes and story arcs in a careful, thoughtful and intuitively satisfying manner. whatever i think of cameron as a person/professional doofus, he's a brilliant cinematic tale-spinner. avatar doesn't use its visuals as crutch to cover narrative weakness any more than, say, star wars or finding nemo. and it holds up just fine to such comparison.

when i say "storytelling" i'm not talking about the plot itself, which was childishly simple and sentimental. i'm talking about the way that plot becomes a tale, an act of human communication. most myths and family-appropriate adventure stories are, after all, rather simple in their conflicts, themes and plotting. simplicity allows mythic exaggeration to resonate with human experience. and cameron is clearly trying here, in the manner of star wars, to create an explicatory myth for humans in our era. i think he succeeds marvelously. i loved the depiction of the na'vi and their spiritual culture, the "don't mess with mother nature" theme & conclusion, and the brutally clear gulf war parallels.

that's not to say that it's without faults. the acting was mostly fine, but as others have said, a bit flat (though i totally stand up for sam worthington as sully - he's excellent). it felt a little long in the transition from the 2nd to 3rd act. and the rather one-dimensional portrayal of military madness and evil was, well, rather one-dimensional. but none of this bothered me much. the movie as a whole is far to good to be undone by a handful of minor missteps.

wanna say so much more, but i'll cut myself off. it's four in the fucking morning! one closing thought is that i see this movie as an invitation as much as anything else. an invitation to other filmmakers to come play with the toys offered, to make movies that in the past would have been all but impossible. fucking ringworld, dude.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 12:00 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm kinda more interested in the gross for this in a purely sportsmanlike way: http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2631&p=.htm
27 mill opening day puts it at "about the same as Star Trek from earlier this year" which i guess is good for a new IP but not quite worldbeater status

― fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:18 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark

it's longer than 'star trek' and also it's winter. otoh, 3d tickets are more expensive than 2d.

i doubt this cost 1/2 a billi like the nyt said. it still cost A LOT, but i really would not be surprised if it does open the door to 3d -- for blockbusters anyway -- which is a win of a different kind for hollywood.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Sunday, 20 December 2009 12:12 (fourteen years ago) link

also, i didn't see it in 3D. so the gee-whiz factor was probably significantly diminished. and i still loved it to death.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 12:15 (fourteen years ago) link

i doubt this cost 1/2 a billi like the nyt said. it still cost A LOT, but i really would not be surprised if it does open the door to 3d -- for blockbusters anyway -- which is a win of a different kind for hollywood.

― Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Sunday, December 20, 2009 4:12 AM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark

even if it did, given the investment of time & tech development resources, i imagine that a lot of that cost is overhead not for this film specifically, but for films of this type going forward. would guess that a comparable follow-up could be produced much more cheaply and quickly.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 12:44 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar 2: in the na'vi

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Sunday, 20 December 2009 12:45 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar 2: gaia harder

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 12:49 (fourteen years ago) link

anyone wanna actually say another about the 'game changing effects' other than 'no uncanny valley feel'?

zombie bobby 4 mod (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 20 December 2009 13:13 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar 2: tsu'tey call

cozwn, Sunday, 20 December 2009 13:25 (fourteen years ago) link

s1ock I finally saw this yesterday and I am totally with you on it.

Hopefully this helps to kill off the multi-hundred-million-dollar behemoth and usher in the age of the tighter, leaner blockbuster ([eg District 9, which is not a great movie but makes mincemeat of this one.)

Simon H., Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:27 (fourteen years ago) link

any of youse who really liked this movie, would you say you really connected with the characters? is jake sully now like a classic all-time character for you? or neytiri?

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

looooooooooooool after all my posting last night this movie has actually left my head, as predicted

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

i empathized with the rhino things

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

if there's one thing i can't get over it's the casting of that menk from the hottie and the nottie

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

nobody waits til the second weekend, huh

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link

if there's one thing i can't get over it's the casting of that menk from the hottie and the nottie

― dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:47 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

i think this says more about anyone who saw the hottie and the nottie than it does about the casting of said dude

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:51 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah seriously.

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

the hottie and the bluie

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

nobody waits til the second weekend, huh

― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Sunday, December 20, 2009 1:48 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i have no idea what you're complaining about any more

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

morbs it's ok this movie was enjoyable but it wasn't so much a movie experience as a cinema experience - it was valid (even pretty rad) as cinema but a bit lacking as a movie, hence not dwelling deeply on it any longer than it took for the cinema buzz to lessen

latebloomer it was late and my best friend and i found a cable tv channel showing it and it really was of noteworthy awfulness - but in all seriousness it was the worst and most repulsive acting performance i've ever seen and now he is in avatar o_O but i find it more amusing than anything so let's chill tbh

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Sunday, 20 December 2009 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah as someone who has seen tiptoes more than once, watching shitty movies for the lols isn't really the worst thing ever.

SORRY ASS IMPRESSIONS (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Joel David Moore starred in Hatchet, therefore he blows.

Simon H., Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:06 (fourteen years ago) link

any of youse who really liked this movie, would you say you really connected with the characters? is jake sully now like a classic all-time character for you? or neytiri?

no they weren't classic characters or anything but they were sympathetic enough. i thought worthington carried the movie ok. certainly more than in the terminator movie.

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:21 (fourteen years ago) link

i can't really think of any movies i think of as "classics" where the characters aren't the most memorable thing, or at least in the top tier of memorability.

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

i didnt even see this movie and i know that it sucks i cant believe that people who actually spent twelve bucks on it are still defending it

max, Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:27 (fourteen years ago) link

oh jeez

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

$15.50 cdn in digital, non-IMAX 3d!

Simon H., Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:32 (fourteen years ago) link

i can't really think of any movies i think of as "classics" where the characters aren't the most memorable thing, or at least in the top tier of memorability.

― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, December 20, 2009 7:24 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

don't know if anyone here is arguing that it's a classic. i'm not.

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:32 (fourteen years ago) link

yes u are

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

jk

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link

$18 is pretty steep

leave garbage snickers eat snickers leave garbage (jeff), Sunday, 20 December 2009 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link

This avoids all the old I-love-the-smell-of-Napalm-in-the-morning tropes and instead takes an approach that's far, far more relevant to the era of drone warfare.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 03:44 (fourteen years ago) link

It's not about character any more than The Thin Red Line is. It's about bugs and birds and animals and civilization and war.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 03:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, folks in Langley dropping bombs on tribal weddings in Pakistan aren't thinking about the personalities of the people on the ground.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 03:46 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, that's what I took "I see you" to mean at the end.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 03:53 (fourteen years ago) link

even after my critical-yet-generous assessment of this, the deadpan consensus among majority of everyone i know is 'yeah i'm going to see this hiiigh'
avatar in takin us all back win i guess

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Monday, 21 December 2009 04:13 (fourteen years ago) link

lol that's exactly what i said to some ilxors irl last night iirc

jabba hands, Monday, 21 December 2009 04:15 (fourteen years ago) link

It's not about character any more than The Thin Red Line is. It's about bugs and birds and animals and civilization and war.

― The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 03:45 (55 minutes ago) Permalink

TTRL is very character-driven. I don't follow you here.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 21 December 2009 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link

the problem is that this film's ideas about animals and civilization & war are dishonest & juvenile & not well considered

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 04:43 (fourteen years ago) link

seriously with all the animals six-legged the na'vi happen to be the only tetrapods? i call bullshit!

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 04:45 (fourteen years ago) link

;-)

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 04:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm amused when I run across (not here fortunately) editorials gushing about how District 9 was so much superior to this. Umm guys, *both* movies are obvious, hamfisted, and regressive.

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 21 December 2009 04:53 (fourteen years ago) link

District 9 seemed to be way more confused as to what it was about. But of course that makes it a much more interesting movie.

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 05:09 (fourteen years ago) link

To be clear: I meant that D9 is interesting because it is more contradictory and complex, not because being confused is interesting in itself.

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 06:14 (fourteen years ago) link

the problem is that this film's ideas about animals and civilization & war are dishonest & juvenile & not well considered

― deej, Sunday, December 20, 2009 8:43 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

i don't think so, no more so than star wars is "dishonest & juvenile" about good & evil & the harmonies of the cosmos. it presents a fair portrait of certain realities, and also a fantasy about how things ought to be, how evil might be defeated. the fundamental messages about the sanctity of life & the value of a compassionate sense of interconnection - and about the way humans excuse their own greed & arrogance - were, i thought, right on. i'd go so far as to consider it an honest and thoughtful adventure film, though one intentionally aimed at young people & a "family audience".

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 06:53 (fourteen years ago) link

i'll defend the characters, too. stephen lang as quaritch & zoe saldana as smurfette were especially vivid & memorable, and it's true that these were the film's most colorful and exaggerated characters - and that the rest were relatively bland. but i don't see that as a fault. though he was not an especially colorful presence, sam worthington was excellent as sully. i empathized with and liked the character, and would call it a quietly soulful performance rather than a bland one. human-sully's low presence, emotional fragility and weakness/disability became extremely poignant in the film's final act. (thinking of the emphasis of the physical differences between quaritch and sully in sully's "dark night of the soul" moment, and on neytiri's cradling of sully's tiny body.)

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 07:05 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/NO.gif

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 08:42 (fourteen years ago) link

well okay then

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 08:48 (fourteen years ago) link

http://i38.tinypic.com/21oymab.gif

cozwn, Monday, 21 December 2009 08:50 (fourteen years ago) link

i don't think so, no more so than star wars is "dishonest & juvenile" about good & evil & the harmonies of the cosmos. it presents a fair portrait of certain realities, and also a fantasy about how things ought to be, how evil might be defeated. the fundamental messages about the sanctity of life & the value of a compassionate sense of interconnection - and about the way humans excuse their own greed & arrogance - were, i thought, right on. i'd go so far as to consider it an honest and thoughtful adventure film, though one intentionally aimed at young people & a "family audience".

― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, December 21, 2009 12:53 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it doesnt present a fair portrait at all:

1) its not 'fair' to draw parallels w/ this world, as if you're saying something about the state of this world, and then have those dilemmas resolved by 'god.'

2) i think its pretty dishonest to set up a framework w/ an ostensible nature/tradition vs. technology/progress fight, then undercut any meaning it could have or significance by giving the guys on the side of 'nature' a bunch of guns and not allowing them to use nature to fight. how are you gonna give the na'vi guns?? if this is a grand dramatic battle between two opposing philosophies you cant have the forces of 'nature' cheating like that! those guns were developed by the forces of progress & industrialization & mining. the na'vi should have fought w/ the tools at their disposal -- im not just mad that they dont explain how they even get these guns in the first place, but that by using them the story undercuts the idea that these are not just two warring groups randomly thrown together, but that there are philosophies underlining this battle.

3) why does the main character become their leader & convince them to martyr themselves? what did he think he was doing for them, and what was the purpose of their fight? its set up like hes got some grand plan, and instead he throws them all at a bunch of guys armed with missiles and guns, where they're torn to shreds (the only way the ending could be 'happy' was that god had to interfere!)

4) He displays this battle in a dishonest fashion -- suddenly, arrows are piercing cockpit windows, and theres a point at which the battle shows one person getting arrowed for everyone one person getting shot, as if the pitched battle is 'close' at first, and despite bravery they are barely overcome ... this is so manipulative considering the framework the film sets up. i dont care if theyre eight feet tall riding six-legged horses, a bunch of dudes with machine guns are going to just annihilate them.

5) why is any parallel w/ 'differences' between groups of people undercut by allowing the main character to fully transform into a na'vi person at the end? this is a CHEAT to let the audience feel like we have a happy ending that once again undercuts any dilemma the film sets up -- its yet another dishonest resolution.

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 08:55 (fourteen years ago) link

why does the main character become their leader & convince them to martyr themselves?

because he nails his INSANE MOVE

tbh i feel bad for his o.g. dragon thing, fancy getting dumped like that, barely even got to know the guy

dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Monday, 21 December 2009 08:57 (fourteen years ago) link

the reason star wars works is it sets up a system where the dark side appears more powerful & is more alluring, but ends up corrupting the person who tries to use it. this isnt undercut because luke refuses to kill his father in the end; the philosophies presented in a consistent (albeit simplistic) way, and the characters' behavior reflects these philosophies.

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 09:01 (fourteen years ago) link

im not even dealing w/ the second paragraph because your argument seems to be "they are memorable because they are memorable" & i just dont agree i think they are the opposite of iconic. even your writing seems pretty sheepishly defensive ("hes not bland! hes ... 'quietly soulful'!")

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 09:11 (fourteen years ago) link

various deej points:

1) i don't see how the deus-ex-machina was "unfair". actually, it was set up & executed pretty honorably as such things go. and i don't see why we should be troubled that the film draws parallels to but does not exactly match real world situations. as far as i'm concerned, cameron made his socio-political points, but allowed the story to develop & conclude on its own, fantastical terms. and that's fair play.

2) i was a bit surprised by the na'vi's recourse to guns, but it made sense in character. their home had been annihilated and they were being driven to exile & possibly worse. why wouldn't they use whatever tools they had at their disposal? and i think it's pretty reasonable to assume that what few guns they did have were provided by sully @ co, from what was available in the chopper & the remote base. after all, that's who was shown using the guns for the most part - the scientists in avatar form. didn't think that the use of guns compromised the basic clash of philosophies, anyway. the two groups' philosopical/spiritual differences seemed to run much deeper than that.

3) sully became the leader because he had to, and because he's the hero protagonist. and he threw them into hopeless battle because it was all he could think to do - as it turns out he thought wrong. perhaps he hoped that more na'vi would arrive in time to overwhelm the soldiers (something the soldiers themselves seemed to fear, regardless of their seemingly superior killing tech).

4) i'm with you on the arrows-piercing-windows bit. we'd been shown previously that this was impossible, laughable. maybe range was the issue, but this should have been handled better, i'll give you that. agree also that the film "changes the frame" with regard to the power balance between the na'vi and the soldiers. early in the film, it is made clear that the na'vi are viewed by the soldiers as dangerous but eradicable. suddenly at the end, the battle is presented as an open question. this shift, however, was better explained than the suddenly pregnable cockpit glass: the "toruk makto" unified\s the local tribes, suddenly altering the balance of power.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 09:21 (fourteen years ago) link

the reason star wars works is it sets up a system where the dark side appears more powerful & is more alluring, but ends up corrupting the person who tries to use it. this isnt undercut because luke refuses to kill his father in the end; the philosophies presented in a consistent (albeit simplistic) way, and the characters' behavior reflects these philosophies.

― deej, Monday, December 21, 2009 1:01 AM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark

i actually thought that avatar did a much better job than star wars when it came to honestly communicating the appeal of the "dark side" - and in hinging an emotional payoff on the hero's choice between darkness and light. the opening of the film very effectively conveys quaritch's POV and appeal to sully. his strength and capability in comparison to sully's disability. his appeal to sully's honor, loyalty and calling, as well as to the memory of sully's more accomplished older brother. his ability to offer a return to full physical capacity, etc.

in both films, of course, we never really doubt the hero's dedication to the side of good, but i thought avatar did a great job with the appeal of darkness.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 09:31 (fourteen years ago) link

1) i don't see how the deus-ex-machina was "unfair". actually, it was set up & executed pretty honorably as such things go. and i don't see why we should be troubled that the film draws parallels to but does not exactly match real world situations. as far as i'm concerned, cameron made his socio-political points, but allowed the story to develop & conclude on its own, fantastical terms. and that's fair play.

can you tell me what those points are.

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 09:42 (fourteen years ago) link

im sorry dude i just tend not to enjoy 'fantastical worlds' where the consequences don't hinge in any way on the characters' actions

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 09:43 (fourteen years ago) link

the real problem with the oncoming onslaught of modernization/industrialization/white dudes taking over worlds thing is that the natural world is not a match for it. when the europeans invaded north america, guns vs. bows and arrows, they conquered. they might have lost a few battles early on, but the reality of modernization/industrialization is a dilemma of 'how do you deal with this expanding, invasive population without killing the native people or damaging the natural environment.' the film's answer to this question was, 'fight back, die, then have god save you.' it set up a huge conflict & has to cheat to resolve it in a way that makes people feel good when they leave the theater -- if it wanted to be about how invading humans are assholes, it needed to deal with the solution in a way that felt true & honest ... and it failed at this

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 10:08 (fourteen years ago) link

wHICH IS SOMETHING THAT dISTRICT 9 oops caps does, despite having a different dynamic set-up.

exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 21 December 2009 11:33 (fourteen years ago) link

i think yr misconstruing the film's intent & methods, deej. and i don't accept that it needs to conclude with a real-world solution to or consequence of imperialist conquest/capitalist exploitation in order to be satisfying and "true" wr2 the issues it raises. for me, the conclusion was all the more poignant and powerful for its wish-fulfillment UNreality - because in our world, native peoples have no all-powerful gaia spirit to summon for aid, and thus are all-too-easily displaced if not slaughtered outright. we know this, and the contrast between the improbably happy ending offered in the film's fantasy world and the tragic ending that so often ensues in our own is, imo, quite moving.

suspect that we're just never gonna see eye-to-eye on this...

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 12:18 (fourteen years ago) link

i don't think so, no more so than star wars is "dishonest & juvenile" about good & evil

i must admit: lol

Tracer Hand, Monday, 21 December 2009 12:26 (fourteen years ago) link

district 9's not a fair comparison either, as it doesn't really conclude, but simply pauses in media res. we don't know in that film's case what the ultimate resolution will be. it's perhaps implied that a big ol deus ex machina is waiting out there in space to come and rain some retributive (and, wr2 the real-world parallels raised, quite improbable) revenge down on the human overseers. but i guess we have to wait and see.

main difference i see between the two is that avatar is basically a kid's flick, and it aims to inspire (while raising some very troubling and difficult issues), while district 9 is a rather grim, brutal and despairing film made for an adult audience. therefore, there's bound to be a bit more sugar in the former, but i don't think there's anything wrong with that.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 12:28 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post ha ;)

well of course it is, but not in a contemptible way

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 12:28 (fourteen years ago) link

i think yr misconstruing the film's intent & methods, deej. and i don't accept that it needs to conclude with a real-world solution to or consequence of imperialist conquest/capitalist exploitation in order to be satisfying and "true" wr2 the issues it raises. for me, the conclusion was all the more poignant and powerful for its wish-fulfillment UNreality - because in our world, native peoples have no all-powerful gaia spirit to summon for aid, and thus are all-too-easily displaced if not slaughtered outright. we know this, and the contrast between the improbably happy ending offered in the film's fantasy world and the tragic ending that so often ensues in our own is, imo, quite moving.

suspect that we're just never gonna see eye-to-eye on this...

― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, December 21, 2009 6:18 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

argh dude i wasnt saying it needs to have a 'real world solution' but just that if you're going to set up a system, u have to have things behave w/in that system in an honest way & i dont think this film was remotely close to doing that. i guess if yr cool with films about wish fulfillment alternate realities you can dig this, but to me it rang entirely false. i dont buy the "its powerful because instead of being tragic, it made us happy" & it feels like yr writing paragraphs of exposition to explain fairly simple ideas as if you can write your way into believing it yourself

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 14:51 (fourteen years ago) link

the real problem with the oncoming onslaught of modernization/industrialization/white dudes taking over worlds thing is that the natural world is not a match for it.

Boxcutters, though...

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 15:30 (fourteen years ago) link

oh man a 3D Jackass might cause fainting

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 December 2009 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link

"We're going to take the same 3D technology James Cameron used in AVATAR and stick it up Steve O's butt."

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Monday, 21 December 2009 15:58 (fourteen years ago) link

I bet within a few years there'll be a Ronin/Bourne-type movie with this technology. Maybe the next Bond?

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 16:00 (fourteen years ago) link

i hate 3d

max, Monday, 21 December 2009 16:05 (fourteen years ago) link

btw can anyone confirm there are battle scenes in this scored to CARMINA BURANA? If true, how original!

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 December 2009 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

So, is this worth going to in 2D? My wife insists 3D movies make her nauseated.

Thulsa Doob (Jon Lewis), Monday, 21 December 2009 16:17 (fourteen years ago) link

btw can anyone confirm there are battle scenes in this scored to CARMINA BURANA? If true, how original!

Nah, the first assault on Hometree is accompanied by Takemitsu's "A Flock Descends Into The Pentagonal Garden" and the climactic battle is some kinda Meredith Monk / Laurie Anderson mash-up.

Michael Jones, Monday, 21 December 2009 16:20 (fourteen years ago) link

man this movie was awesome

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:00 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh i feel bad for his o.g. dragon thing, fancy getting dumped like that, barely even got to know the guy

― dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Monday, December 21, 2009 3:57 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

A+

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:33 (fourteen years ago) link

I will have more to say tomorrow but I gotta lol at people attacking this from the perch of the morals and ethics of star wars

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

han silo saving the day certainly feels more honest than rhinos, yes

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:36 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie shouldn't be surprising at all to anyone who has seen the abyss

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:40 (fourteen years ago) link

i hear the fifth avatar is love

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link

general 3-d discussion thred:

3D

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link

is the thread in 3d?

akira goldsman (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:49 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh i feel bad for his o.g. dragon thing, fancy getting dumped like that, barely even got to know the guy

― dyao know what i mean (acoleuthic), Monday, December 21, 2009 3:57 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

A+

― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 17:33 (28 minutes ago)

oh yeah totally that was sad. you know homeboy probably found a sweet lady dragon (or boy dragon, if that's his thing) soon after though.

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

i hear the fifth avatar is love

― fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Monday, December 21, 2009 5:42 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark

^ lol

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

So, is this worth going to in 2D? My wife insists 3D movies make her nauseated.

due to weird eye problems, i can't see 3D. i still enjoyed the movie (and actually did manage to see a tiny bit of the 3D which really tripped me out because it's never worked for me in my life)

this 3D is different from any 3D i've seen. even the glasses aren't those cheap red and blue things.

richie aprile (rockapads), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:08 (fourteen years ago) link

how do the new 3d glasses work if you *already wear glasses*?

Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

they act as an avatar for your old glasses

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link

they were big, i just put them over mine. if i would have known the movie was going to be in 3D i would have put my contacts in, but i wasn't paying enough attention to the hype.

richie aprile (rockapads), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link

how do the new 3d glasses work if you *already wear glasses*?

― Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Monday, December 21, 2009 1:11 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

somewhere james cameron realizes this and his head explodes

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i just wore the 3d glasses over my regular glasses

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:18 (fourteen years ago) link

*head explodes*

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:18 (fourteen years ago) link

If you put 3-D glasses over regular glasses, is the movie in 4-D?

I thought this flick was a blast. Couple of questions, for the spoiler set:

1) Who was underfunding this whole expedition? They make a point of saying it's not military, strictly mercenary, but then again, there's an awful lot of Marine talk/talk of Marines. Who's giving the orders? The government? Which government? The Company? Under whose jurisdiction? Giovanni Ribisi? It's totally unclear. There's motivation out the wazoo, but it's unclear who exactly is the one being motivated back on earth.

2) Why go through even the pretense/expense of making nice to the natives when they were clearly going to steamroll it from the very start? (I mean, don't people in the movies ever watch movies?)

3) If it takes five years to get to Pandora from Earth, how was unobtainium (heh) ever discovered on Pandora in the first place?

4) Michelle Rodriguez totally deserts/breaks ranks/disobeys orders in plain sight, then pops up on the base ship a few scenes later to free the good guys, as if nothing happened. What's up with that?

5) Where, exactly, were the vast riches of unobtainium? Under the home tree or under the fiber optics tree? I'm unclear why they bulldozed the tree.

6) Not a question, but I thought the OG dragon totally got the shaft, too, especially after they made such a point of him and it being BFF. Poor dragon! :(

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 December 2009 18:22 (fourteen years ago) link

http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/11952611/Jim+Martin+51215_1208437900.jpg

DavidM, Monday, 21 December 2009 18:24 (fourteen years ago) link

I always suspected the guy from Faith No More could see in 4-D.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 December 2009 18:25 (fourteen years ago) link

u want it avatar but u can't have it

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:25 (fourteen years ago) link

I like how every animal on this planet has a USB cable

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:31 (fourteen years ago) link

xp to Josh

more spoilers etc

1) my understanding is that it was like a Chevron type corporation with Ribisi as its Pandora representative. the 'military' was a Blackwater type private security company staffed with a bunch of ex-Marines. i sort of cringed reading Ebert's review that he got this wrong and assumed it was the government.

2) it's standard procedure in the third world, isn't it? try to buy them first, keep it all on the d-low and all that. not sure why they were so worried, though; i didn't see any media on the planet.

3) who knows?

4) maybe she was waiting for her article 15. i have no idea - you make a good point. how did they not know she was going to steal a ship and all that.

5) seemed to be under the home tree. they were trying to destroy the network hub to demoralize them and disrupt their communications or something - as more of a shock and awe reaction against the huge massing of troops from around the planet. made sense to me, i guess.

6) well he let the big dragon go at the end, so maybe he brought old dragon some flowers and candy and apologized like hell.

richie aprile (rockapads), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:36 (fourteen years ago) link

he probably fed the old dragon to the new one

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link

the circle of life!

tiger's wood (latebloomer), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link

the one plot point that REALLY bugs me is the fact that sully was the only one to break thru to the navis because of a mystical prophecy type shit - ie the bugs landing on him - rather than any of his actions. i hate that stuff.

also did u find that the movie sort of tipped that shaggy would be jealous of him and go bad or betray him somehow but it never happened?

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

i agree about the bug things landing on him. that was lame. every other 'mystical' thing i can remember was explained by physical shit.

i was glad that the jealous prince storyline didn't go anywhere. there were enough rehashed clichés in the movie - it didn't need another.

richie aprile (rockapads), Monday, 21 December 2009 18:55 (fourteen years ago) link

I did notice that tech-head Cameron couldn't resist tossing in not one, not two but I think three gags where head jarhead holds his breath rather than grabs an oxygen mask to save time in asskicking. Clearly Cameron's deep sea diving gave him some ideas (and not just because Pandora looks like a big aquarium).

Also, I wonder if the $300 mil spent on the movie could have built him one of those giant robot exoskeletons he so clearly fetishizes? I think by now everyone knows what to chip in and buy Jim for Christmas.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 December 2009 19:13 (fourteen years ago) link

ya i didnt want that but i found it weird it was sort of implied xp

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 19:13 (fourteen years ago) link

it feels like yr writing paragraphs of exposition to explain fairly simple ideas as if you can write your way into believing it yourself

― deej, Monday, December 21, 2009 6:51 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark

i just write the way i think, deej. wandering, convoluted, whatever. at this point i'm happy just agreeing to disagree.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

im not actually as down on this as i sound in this thread, but the imbalanced amount of "wow this film is the new star wars"-consensus-stuff really pushes the obvious kajlueanfekunflaeiunflaiud aspects out yknow??

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 21:40 (fourteen years ago) link

ya deej i'm kind of the same way, the sheer fucking insanity of the praise this is getting (and the way it's being pushed like an agenda) is gonna end up radicalizing me

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:43 (fourteen years ago) link

liked the way the final fight inverted the end of aliens, wr2 the character in an robo-suit/mini gundam.

I did notice that tech-head Cameron couldn't resist tossing in not one, not two but I think three gags where head jarhead holds his breath rather than grabs an oxygen mask to save time in asskicking. Clearly Cameron's deep sea diving gave him some ideas (and not just because Pandora looks like a big aquarium).

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, December 21, 2009 11:13 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

this reminded me of the abyss in a lot of ways (aliens, too - the dropship scene in the beginning was almost shot-for-shot aliens), especially in the breath-holding and immersion imagery. cameron's auteurist tics.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:43 (fourteen years ago) link

also re: the abandoned first dragon

don't we assume that he want back to his original ride after releasing the toruk at the end?

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link

original ride was like oh hell no

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link

the movie this reminds me of the most is 300, where its an impressive technical feat marred by objectionable philosophies

deej, Monday, 21 December 2009 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link

to me it's a technical feat marred by doofy aesthetic choices

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link

and poor writing

Simon H., Monday, 21 December 2009 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, shit, hundreds of millions and they couldn't throw in a Darabont or something to polish 'er up a bit?

Simon H., Monday, 21 December 2009 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link

also did u find that the movie sort of tipped that shaggy would be jealous of him and go bad or betray him somehow but it never happened?

― the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, December 21, 2009 10:46 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

sully mentions this in his video log, said he was glad that the tension between himself and spellman was abating (or words to that effect). thought this was a nice if underdeveloped bit of character business. it was probably extraneous, but added a tiny bit of depth to spellman. did expect it to lead to something more dramatic, though.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link

didn't lucas hire darabont to polish up ep 1 x[

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:57 (fourteen years ago) link

oh god i forgot about the video blogging

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 21:58 (fourteen years ago) link

well ok not Darabont nec. but you know what I mean.

Simon H., Monday, 21 December 2009 21:59 (fourteen years ago) link

This thread got a whole heap less fun once people started seeing and enjoying the film.

Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Monday, 21 December 2009 22:27 (fourteen years ago) link

oh it's pretty fun if you haven't seen the movie and have no plans to do so

congratulations (n/a), Monday, 21 December 2009 22:28 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahah, it's true!

fictional, homosexual, Baltimore hoodlum (forksclovetofu), Monday, 21 December 2009 22:34 (fourteen years ago) link

I actually didn't have much problem with the script/dialogue. Considering all Cameron had to get across, I thought the number of groan inducing "I'm going to jam as much exposition into this spare five seconds as I can" moments were pretty minimal, as far as these kinds of things go. If you think about the sheer amount of info (visual or otherwise) crammed into here, it's pretty impressive. I mean, writing has always been Cameron's weakest link, but the groaners in "Avatar" are <<<<< the groaners in "Titanic," and he was also working with top notch leads in that one.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 December 2009 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link

well if there's one thing i value in storytelling, it's the ability to cram as much information as possible into a short period of time

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 22:57 (fourteen years ago) link

actually, that would have made more sense if this movie wasn't 3 hours long

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, 21 December 2009 22:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I actually didn't have much problem with the script/dialogue. Considering all Cameron had to get across, I thought the number of groan inducing "I'm going to jam as much exposition into this spare five seconds as I can" moments were pretty minimal, as far as these kinds of things go.

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, December 21, 2009 2:37 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark

^^^^ this

and a lot of the most blatant groaners, as quoted by critics mocking the film's dialogue ("you're not in kansas anymore; you're on pandora!"), were ludicrous in character. most were delivered by quaritch, to emphasize his goonish, action-movie manliness.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 21 December 2009 23:04 (fourteen years ago) link

ludicrous as it might be, i could totally imagine dudes like him saying those types of things. there was so much clichéd dialog in basic training...

richie aprile (rockapads), Monday, 21 December 2009 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Exactly.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Monday, 21 December 2009 23:27 (fourteen years ago) link

and a lot of the most blatant groaners, as quoted by critics mocking the film's dialogue ("you're not in kansas anymore; you're on pandora!"), were ludicrous in character. most were delivered by quaritch, to emphasize his goonish, action-movie manliness.

― a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, December 21, 2009 5:04 PM (59 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/images/nick-griffin-apologist.gif

deej, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 00:04 (fourteen years ago) link

wham i always apologizin for these nazis?

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 00:13 (fourteen years ago) link

its set up like hes got some grand plan, and instead he throws them all at a bunch of guys armed with missiles and gunstie fighters, where they're torn to shreds (the only way the ending could be 'happy' was that godhan solo had to interfere!)

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:21 (fourteen years ago) link

The worst thing about this is that you KNOW Michael Bay is going to use this 3D tech on whatever abortion he has planned next.

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:29 (fourteen years ago) link

And now you too can truly know what it's like to be right under a pair of giant robot balls.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:33 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^But they still can't show us how they taste

.gif of the magpie (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:34 (fourteen years ago) link

ok guise by this time wednesday ill be an avatar imax 3d vet!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:39 (fourteen years ago) link

be back to share my important impressions!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:40 (fourteen years ago) link

preview: *_*

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:41 (fourteen years ago) link

By this time wednesday I will only be a 2D vet.

I have prepared myself by watchin Waterworld on Netflix Watch Instantly last night o_O

.gif of the magpie (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:44 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.emofaces.com/en/emoticons/3/3d-glasses-emoticon.gif

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:44 (fourteen years ago) link

loved the bioluminescent jungle floor - it was the 3d movie equivalent of that room in stoner's houses with all the blacklight posters

I am a galactic activation portal...enter me (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 03:48 (fourteen years ago) link

in fact i feel like this movie is that room of the house if the house is the movie industry

xpost oh man i am totally eating shrooms next time i see this

I am a galactic activation portal...enter me (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 03:52 (fourteen years ago) link

The worst thing about this is that you KNOW Michael Bay is going to use this 3D tech on whatever abortion he has planned next.

― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 02:29 (2 hours ago) Permalink

2nd worst thing: Russ Meyer didn't live to make use of this technology.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:44 (fourteen years ago) link

in an ideal world james cameron would've used this technology to make an avatar the last airbender movie and m night shyamalan would be doing the live-action ferngully movie

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 04:50 (fourteen years ago) link

its set up like hes got some grand plan, and instead he throws them all at a bunch of guys armed with missiles and guns tie fighters, where they're torn to shreds (the only way the ending could be 'happy' was that godhan solo had to interfere!)

― =皿= (dyao), Monday, December 21, 2009 8:21 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

u think xwings are the star wars equivilent of na'vi flying on fighting birds using bows & arrows

deej, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 13:44 (fourteen years ago) link

just pointing out it's kinda silly to be scoring points off of avatar using star wars

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 13:53 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah im saying that doesnt make sense -- they had a battle tactic wherein outnumbered x wings could still win -- i.e. destroy the death star -- it made some strategic sense, where in avatar they're just throwing themselves in the path of dudes with guns

deej, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:09 (fourteen years ago) link

where in avatarreturn of the jedi they're just throwing themselvesewoks in the path of dudesstormtroopers with gunslasers

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:18 (fourteen years ago) link

i dont think u are following me. they have lasers too. also they are called blasters /nerd

deej, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:21 (fourteen years ago) link

just don't get what gets your goat about this umpteenth iteration of the charge of the light brigade on film

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:25 (fourteen years ago) link

nature only acted because it felt sorry for the na'vi...enough martyrdom and hammerhead buffalo will ride 2 ur aid

Don't bring a gun to a snowball fight! (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:27 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe nature just wanted to see if her bros would really ride for her

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:29 (fourteen years ago) link

haha

deej, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Nature acted because nature has a vested interest in a sequel.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Tho to be fair, nature really should have seen it coming.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:40 (fourteen years ago) link

ya i agree that the thing about SW is that the rebels had a cogent plan (fly here, shoot into this thing—they used their smarts to find a flaw in the empire's military machine) and i find that more compelling than the "hey let's all get together and put on a show!" thing avatar did

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:45 (fourteen years ago) link

This movie was great!! Trippy visuals! Flying mushroom jellyfish-looking things!! George W. Bush as the main bad guy!! Flying psychedelic dragon-pterodactyls!!

Mr. Snrub, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 14:47 (fourteen years ago) link

You know, I got the impression the ground "forces" (as such) were mostly just a distraction so that the air forces (with the true element of surprise, since they didn't show on the radar) could take out all the flying machines (which they did, pretty quickly). Once the air assault began, the ground forces, er, turned tail and ran away.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 15:20 (fourteen years ago) link

i would have liked to see some guerrilla tactics on the ground. throw shit from the trees, dig a hole, something.

richie aprile (rockapads), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:06 (fourteen years ago) link

hey how is the music in this thing--i guess there are some unreleased Grateful Dead songs on the soundtrack?

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:13 (fourteen years ago) link

clearly soundtrack should be by YES

If COMETS had horoscope they would have the SUN conjunct URANUS (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:18 (fourteen years ago) link

the soundtrack was on some generic tribal shit + meaningful celtic titanic music

deej, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:22 (fourteen years ago) link

it was like enya but with more pan-pipes and offended me slightly iirc

uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:23 (fourteen years ago) link

but when this comes out on dvd imma synch up the battle scene w/ gates of delirium and it is gonna rock so hard

uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

so it sounds like the Grateful Dead were going in a new direction. . . thanks, everyone. . . i'll have to check it out

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Their strategy sounded like Tora Bora -- get the folks with guns into an area where they know the terrain and the opponents don't. Still, they did charge head-on.

Oh, also re the second half being the inverse of Aliens, I thought the first half was the inverse of Aliens, as far as that one being "you all are heading to the most hostile place in the universe" and it was, versus "you all are heading to the most hostile place in the universe" and it's not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLrTPrp-fW8

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:27 (fourteen years ago) link

the whole thing is an inversion of aliens i even said so in my review yall!!!!!!

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:42 (fourteen years ago) link

my problem is I don't see why they don't nuke the mother tree from orbit, just to be sure

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:46 (fourteen years ago) link

The inverse of "Aliens" would have been a handful of blue people and a bazillion soldiers.

Man, I hated the score. And as I told someone else, that Leona Lewis song seems designed specifically to send you out of the theater unable to bask in the afterglow so that you're forced to see the movie again to re-experience those feelings.

i would have liked to see some guerrilla tactics on the ground. throw shit from the trees, dig a hole, something.

You're talking Ewok style. The blue people just don't roll that way.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 16:57 (fourteen years ago) link

wow this is sort of a compelling concept re uses for motion capture

Cameron: The other thing that people aren't talking about, you can take an actor of a given age, and you can transform their age. Additive makeup can age somebody, but it's hard to make someone younger. Let's say you have a novelistic storyline where you cast an actor in their 40s, but the first time you see them they're 15 years old and the last time you see them they're 80. This is the Benjamin Button idea. Clint Eastwood could do another Dirty Harry movie and look the way he looked in the '70s. He would still be making all the performance choices. It would be his voice. We'd just make him 30 years younger.

http://www.slate.com/id/2239171/pagenum/all

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:21 (fourteen years ago) link

they should have made IEDs out of some kind of weird exploding Pandora jungle nuts.

richie aprile (rockapads), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:23 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost the score is not good Horner, no. I downloaded it yesterday and it's just a puree of various longtime Horner tropes, not deployed appealingly or memorably.

I'm not a Horner hater though, he's done some A+ work in his time.

.gif of the magpie (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:27 (fourteen years ago) link

i heartily support the suggestion that this soundtrack should have been full of Yes epics.

richie aprile (rockapads), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Man, I hate Horner. I can't think of any score I've really liked of his besides "Aliens." As far hacks go I think I prefer Zimmer, but then again, I can't recall much of his moody bombast, either (aside from the "Thin Red Line" score, which I love, and "The Lion King").

Yes would have been awesome (if not quite awe-inspiring). Vincent Gallo was right!!!!

http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi1102840089/

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Young Horner did some awesome shit:

Wrath Of Khan
Something Wicked This Way Comes
Brainstorm
Sneakers
Land Before Time

His stuff got really glutinous and lazy after his Titanic bonanza though.

.gif of the magpie (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, dude got a huge hunk of that Dion dough, didn't he?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 18:07 (fourteen years ago) link

And since then, every score he's involved with has to have an end titles song sung by fillintheblank.

.gif of the magpie (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 18:26 (fourteen years ago) link

when sully got on the tarduk or whatever i wanted to shout 'i have ridden the mighty dune worm!' but figured it would be kind of disrespectful

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

re: na'vi tactics

i was thinking they were gonna hide out on the floating mountains and like dump giant boulders onto the flying machines. but not. deej is right that there were a lot of missed opportunities for actual/interesting battle tactics in that final fight (which was surprisingly rushed for the battle-action climax of a contemporary adventure film).

and i dunno where s1ocki's review ran, but it's true abt the inversion of aliens thing. seemed very obviously intentional on cameron's part.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

there were these kids sitting in front of me that were too young (in the 4-6 range) and they kept turning to their dad asking 'is that guy gonna be okay?'. i wish i had brought my flask and made a drinking game of it.

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

re: final battle & disappointment

for one thing they said they rode out on the 4 winds or whatever, i thought that meant we would get at least 4 different types of mounts. also there should've been some even bigger badasser thing they could've ridden into battle, i paid 12.50 for this shit, where's my fucking wormsign?

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 20:54 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/id/2239171/pagenum/all

this remark from Cameron to Peter "LOTR" Jackson made me tense:

Cameron: But they've also lost the courage to make, frankly, a movie like Avatar, which is a blockbuster-scaled movie not based on prior arc. All the blockbusters of the last four years, like Transformers, Harry Potter, Spider-Man—they're all films based on other films or part of a franchise

Dominique, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link

such a red herring, that argument. who gives a shit about original material as long as the end result is good.

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link

god forbit we cultivate enduring, multifaceted myths within the culture

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

forbit? what the fuck is that

forbid

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

god forbit we cultivate enduring, multifaceted myths within the culture

― larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:08 PM (13 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

you're holding up NORBIT as an example of that?

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

btw i caught a typo - u wrote forbit instead of norbit

the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link

i loved this movie but PLEASE don't let there be a sequel

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

hoping for a prequel, are you?

tylerw, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Norbit 3-D

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

"We're going to take the same 3D technology James Cameron used in AVATAR and stick it up Eddie Murphy's butt."

DON'T PASS ON A SUGEBAN 4 FORKSCLOVETOFUALS I'M GRUNDLE (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

They should do, like, little serialized 20 minute sequels to stick in front of future 3-D features. It'd be cheaper and shorter. Blue people gather nuts and berries. Blue people plan a surprise party. Blue kids' first day at school. Like Berenstain Bears or something. They lived in a tree, too, right?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:32 (fourteen years ago) link

there weren't any blue people in norbit!

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Tuesday, 22 December 2009 21:58 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar_papyrus.jpg

deej, Wednesday, 23 December 2009 01:37 (fourteen years ago) link

Are those Rush lyrics?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 23 December 2009 01:39 (fourteen years ago) link

when sully got on the tarduk or whatever i wanted to shout 'i have ridden the mighty dune worm!' but figured it would be kind of disrespectful
― did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious)

yeah, something like that

the shit's tits (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:16 (fourteen years ago) link

re: final battle & disappointment

for one thing they said they rode out on the 4 winds or whatever, i thought that meant we would get at least 4 different types of mounts. also there should've been some even bigger badasser thing they could've ridden into battle, i paid 12.50 for this shit, where's my fucking wormsign?

― did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious)

http://z.hubpages.com/u/284678_f520.jpg

the shit's tits (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:18 (fourteen years ago) link

the estimable Godfrey Ch^shire sez

AVATAR = THE LION KING meets THE HURT LOCKER

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:19 (fourteen years ago) link

kinda

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:42 (fourteen years ago) link

slocki have you passed by the revamped bar on the corner of bernard & st-laurent? i think it's based on avatar's 90s hippie-rave colour scheme but with more decorative cocaine

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:46 (fourteen years ago) link

haha no

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:49 (fourteen years ago) link

any hot na'vi in there

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:50 (fourteen years ago) link

anyone do the feliz na'vidad joke yet or

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:50 (fourteen years ago) link

animated gif greeting card waiting to happen

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:56 (fourteen years ago) link

im just glad the word "reali-tree" was never used in this movie

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 03:58 (fourteen years ago) link

ahahaa
i'm pretty sure half my brain went into auto shutdown 10 min into this movie btw. but i still like its spectacle tho
even if i can't pass that bar without picturing dorky na'vi drinking some kind of sub-star-trek glowing purple booze

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 04:00 (fourteen years ago) link

'the reali-tree' is the afterschool cartoon kids series btw
like The ewoks

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 04:03 (fourteen years ago) link

they totally should of had a na'vi bar scene

shouldn't I be in on the inside jokes about (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 04:29 (fourteen years ago) link

a cripple, a na'vi, and an army major walk into a bar...

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 04:32 (fourteen years ago) link

ouch, ouch (in papyrus), ouch!

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 04:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Papyrus was so lols. I could not fucking believe it. Also how in 3D that the subtitles just kind of float there & are sometimes not in the foreground.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 04:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Papyrus is the font of day spas run by women who have no formal business training.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:00 (fourteen years ago) link

papyrus is the font the ancient egyptians wrote in, on papyrus

max, Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:01 (fourteen years ago) link

The rosetta stone was a document detailing how it is no longer profitable to keep running Sandy's day spa.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:03 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.papyruswatch.com/ has been around for awhile. Predates Avatar too!

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 23 December 2009 07:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Papyrus is the font of day spas run by women who have no formal business training.

^^truthbomb, also home jewelery businesses

Euclidian pizza mathematics (reddening), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 07:28 (fourteen years ago) link

homejewelry businessbomb

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 07:37 (fourteen years ago) link

lol people watched this moview

shartin jort (am0n), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 07:43 (fourteen years ago) link

impressive with plenty of lame bits and aspects

conrad, Wednesday, 23 December 2009 13:11 (fourteen years ago) link

heard the linguist who created the na'vi language on the radio the other day and thought, oh dude, you wish you'd been at that late-nite dinner where someone lost a drunk bet on font choice..

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 14:10 (fourteen years ago) link

anyone do the feliz na'vidad joke yet or

Or Blue Christmas at the very least.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 14:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Papyrus is the font of day spas run by women who have no formal business training.

http://bitsandpieces.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/imageshand_20job_small.jpg

$hatner's Bassoon (Pillbox), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 20:44 (fourteen years ago) link

ha

feliz Na'vi dud (latebloomer), Thursday, 24 December 2009 01:57 (fourteen years ago) link

pandora, 20 years later

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:19 (fourteen years ago) link

guise this movie changed me, anyone who doesnt want to make infinite cosmic love to AVATAR IMAX 3D will be forced to leave the planet

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:29 (fourteen years ago) link

BY ME

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:29 (fourteen years ago) link

^ dude who knows whats up

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:30 (fourteen years ago) link

But if you left you could go to Pandora, and feel like you were really there.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:31 (fourteen years ago) link

im removing all fonts from my computer except PAPYRUS

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:31 (fourteen years ago) link

requesting that someone smart make ilx.navi.papyrus stylesheet asap

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 December 2009 02:33 (fourteen years ago) link

and then mail everyone special glasses so that the posts are in the foreground with the ashes of dead hometree

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:39 (fourteen years ago) link

thinkin about seeing this again in a dolby 3d theater - biggest problem about IMAX 3d is that the brightness level sucked cause of the polarization. apparently dolby 3d doesn't have this problem.

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Just got out of a IMAX 3D theater a couple hours ago. It wasn't nearly as bad as I feared from the trailer and previous experiences with green-screen/cgi hybrid films. The plot is not terribly original, as everyone knows, but there was no egregiously bad dialog, and the design work and facial motion-capture was amazingly good throughout. I consider it $13.50 very well spent.

Overwhelming exquisite feeling (Derelict), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:55 (fourteen years ago) link

just saw this, my sci-fi nerd dad was all excited and had to take me and my brother. maybe it was just my lowered expectations, but it was pretty nice! the dialogue/plotting was more competent than i'd prepared myself for, some cool beasties. basically surpassed my expectation that it would be like a slightly better looking Phantom Menace. (xpost haha)

forkslovecraftcthulhu (some dude), Thursday, 24 December 2009 03:57 (fourteen years ago) link

haha ya it's definitely NOT the phantom menace.

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 04:00 (fourteen years ago) link

oh this might actually be a good Dad movie for the holidays, huh

deej--nuts, butthurt, and yelly (gbx), Thursday, 24 December 2009 04:02 (fourteen years ago) link

my dad definitely called for my $.02 about it

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 04:05 (fourteen years ago) link

dad just called to say he loved it and now he needs to drive 1.5 hours to see it in 3d

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link

tell him to take off the glasses first

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link

dude he doesnt want to drive all the way to burlington in 2d thats so last paradigm - if u want to maintian yr critical relevancey youre really gonna have to keep up - jeez

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:56 (fourteen years ago) link

i didnt realize avatar had pushed the envelope that far - apologies

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

smh

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link

i dont drive dude how was i supposed to know

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Nobody drives anymore now that we all have our own personal dragon bug things.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:02 (fourteen years ago) link

posting to this thread via ponytail btw

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

fuck I'm connected too via ponytail; how come I can't feel you

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

pause

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 24 December 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

i see u man

ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 December 2009 22:07 (fourteen years ago) link

WEDNESDAY BOX OFFICE
1. Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel $18,801,277
2. Avatar $16,445,291

abanana, Friday, 25 December 2009 02:47 (fourteen years ago) link

psyched for avatar the squeakquel

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Friday, 25 December 2009 07:40 (fourteen years ago) link

the sequoial

uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Friday, 25 December 2009 07:42 (fourteen years ago) link

lol

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:47 (fourteen years ago) link

i guess itd be more of a treequel tbh

j/k and the fa™an (s1ocki), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:47 (fourteen years ago) link

haha yeah

uttery cuntery (acoleuthic), Friday, 25 December 2009 08:53 (fourteen years ago) link

that's not true about alvin & the chipmunks is it??!!!

did you mean: fart blasters? (nickalicious), Friday, 25 December 2009 14:11 (fourteen years ago) link

http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/

just sayin, Friday, 25 December 2009 14:32 (fourteen years ago) link

it's not gonna happen but if the chipmunks squeakel outgrossed Avatar that would be some all-time lols

ea™e (latebloomer), Friday, 25 December 2009 14:35 (fourteen years ago) link

23/12 was Alvin 2's opening day, whereas Avatar has been out for a week, but still... Didn't have to sign an NDA for Alvin, funnily enough.

Avatar's opening weekend wasn't all that amazing, was it?

Michael Jones, Friday, 25 December 2009 15:50 (fourteen years ago) link

it was good but not great and needs to continue to perform to be a lol hueg blockbuster - people seem to like it so i could see that happening i guess

http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2632&p=.htm

ice cr?m, Friday, 25 December 2009 16:04 (fourteen years ago) link

"dude he doesnt want to drive all the way to burlington in 2d thats so last paradigm"
he's gonna love the way it looks

forks©lovetofu (forksclovetofu), Friday, 25 December 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

okay, so i liked this. grade A+++ hokum imo. kicks all kinds of jurassic park's ass.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:27 (fourteen years ago) link

chipmunks is doing well because school is out and aside from Princess and the Frog, which as been out for almost a month, it's the only kid's movie in theaters for some reason (christmas carol I guess, which also stupidly opened ages ago)

akm, Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:38 (fourteen years ago) link

cameons films all start out slow at the box office I think

=皿= (dyao), Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:54 (fourteen years ago) link

chipmunks is doing well because it is going to change the face of cinema

max, Saturday, 26 December 2009 03:27 (fourteen years ago) link

"We're going to take the same 3D technology James Cameron used in AVATAR and stick it up Jason Lee's butt."

forks©lovetofu (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 26 December 2009 03:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Somewhere I read (and maybe you did too) is that studios are now going to try re-releasing 3-D Raiders, etc., etc., etc.

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Saturday, 26 December 2009 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link

there's nerd shit and there's dork shit.

like raiders of the lost ark and ghostbusters are cool nerd shit, but like babylon 5 and dressing up like sailor moon are like lame dork shit.

Avatar was like a lame dork sandwich of furry-phile "anthropomorphic art" mixed with Ferngully.

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 07:32 (fourteen years ago) link

it was really pretty tho and some of the animals were cool, peace out

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 07:33 (fourteen years ago) link

dialogue was like something on an EPCOT ride come on now

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 07:42 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie was retarded as hell, beyond belief actually

it also looked fucking amazing - kind of unbelievable

stupid fruity crazy jag (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 08:02 (fourteen years ago) link

hell = retarded >>>> belief

deej, Saturday, 26 December 2009 12:48 (fourteen years ago) link

avatarded

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link

giovanni ribisi's charachter should have been played by paul giamatti

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:04 (fourteen years ago) link

how much does this movie have to make to not be a flop btw? can it lose 200m and still be a... success doesn't seem like the right word but success?

eagle tears was a popular drink and it still is (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:04 (fourteen years ago) link

love all the magazine articles about the "hidden messages" in avatar, aka the ones it was hitting you over the head with for 3 hours.

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:07 (fourteen years ago) link

also, wtf @ "get it done" five times from every retard character

SUBTLE CULTURAL COMMENTARY!

kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:08 (fourteen years ago) link

giovanni ribisi's charachter should have been played by paul giamatti reiser

abanana, Saturday, 26 December 2009 16:55 (fourteen years ago) link

okay, so i liked this. grade A+++ hokum imo. kicks all kinds of jurassic park's ass.

― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 02:27 (15 hours ago) Bookmark

no

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

lj in displaying arbitrary preference for "vintage" hokum shocker

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 17:55 (fourteen years ago) link

arbitrary preference for film that semi-defined my childhood of movie fandom, a film that has razor-sharp scripting, great characterisation and genuinely gripping action sequences, a film that is full of bits I can remember despite not having seen it for about 10 years (maybe exaggerated) and a film that feels like a film rather than a presentation

and hey I LIKED avatar! i mean your post is OTM until you mention jurassic park

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 17:59 (fourteen years ago) link

i dunno about the razor sharp scripting. avatar is very very broad, but it's impeccably lean. people over 10 might like more nuance, but there's really no waste at all in the script. pretty impressive imo.

the only real dire moment was the bride of kong stuff.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

and hell, i'll stan for star wars but there's just no question that for today's seven year old this is going to be mindblowing, fandom-defining stuff. eh, maybe you gotta see it in 3D.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

if it makes sense, i think in trying to be very plain about things, it produces quite a lot of dialogue that is worthy of eye-rolling. it likes a cliche, and it likes a Big Statement. other problems come from things being skipped over, or geared exclusively towards massive and unrealistic events. insane moves. jurassic park feels way more organic, if that makes sense.

ooh zing! 2D is perfectly enough for me cheers :P

(i mean, my problems with the movie wouldn't have been helped by 3D!)

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link

jurassic park is also not very po-faced and has jeff goldblum as its voice of reason, not preachy earth-mother na'vi types, sorry 2 b grinch who stole xmas

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

complaining about the dialogue in this movie is like complaining about the melody in james brown

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:36 (fourteen years ago) link

2D is perfectly enough for me cheers

okay but this is like saying "i saw the jazz singer without sound and it was eh"

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:40 (fourteen years ago) link

i think that particular false dichotomy was discussed upthread.

i was dazzled by this film visually and am confident i would have been yet more dazzled in 3D but i don't think extra dazzlement would have rectified my misgivings. a movie is more than a picture. it's also a narrative

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 18:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Obviously the narrative was a bit of an afterthought and not exceptional in any way, but I imagine that you knew that going in, so why not let the movie play to its strengths? For the same reason I don't want to go to IMAX to watch a really great narrative film that was shot on Handicam, you know?

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

because i was watching it with a friend having met him in a very impromptu style, and the only convenient screening was at the tottenham court road which didn't have 3D capability

then 2 days later the rest of my family saw it in 3D x_x

HELLO MY NAME IS TWILIGHT AND I AM A DRACULA (acoleuthic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 19:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I gotta bad feeling about this

=皿= (dyao), Saturday, 26 December 2009 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

use the force, luke

=皿= (dyao), Saturday, 26 December 2009 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

"You can waste time with your friends when your chores are done."

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link

there's nerd shit and there's dork shit.

white people drive like this, but black people drive like this.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Saturday, 26 December 2009 22:36 (fourteen years ago) link

You want it to be one way, but it's the other way.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 26 December 2009 22:36 (fourteen years ago) link

there's things i like, and things i don't like

reagan & sarah (s1ocki), Saturday, 26 December 2009 23:11 (fourteen years ago) link

you say po-tay-toe

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:15 (fourteen years ago) link

giovanni ribisi's charachter should have been played by paul giamatti

― kelis navidad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, December 26, 2009 4:04 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

It's the type of character that would normally be played by Paul Giamatti but Ribisi plays it like he's playing Jeremy Piven in Entourage.

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Paul Reiser of all people did a much more believable smarmy corporate type in Aliens. Way more insidious.

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:28 (fourteen years ago) link

Shit like that and all the cool space military hardware and critters made me wish I was watching an Aliens 3D movie.

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:37 (fourteen years ago) link

Actually Cameron should have made this an Alien sequel where a space marine falls in love with one of the Aliens

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:40 (fourteen years ago) link

Last time, it was Resurrection. This time, it's a Love Connection!

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:44 (fourteen years ago) link

LOL!

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link

aliens vs eharmony

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:47 (fourteen years ago) link

likes: dismembering, parasitic colonization of the universe, literally scaring the shit out of you hehe
dislikes: flamethrowers, swearing, being hungry - i get crazy, for real lol! ;)

dragon movies (rrrobyn), Sunday, 27 December 2009 02:05 (fourteen years ago) link

how about that commercial where the guy bought a shitty lg phone so he can project the avatar trailer on the wall for his coworkers

shartin jort (am0n), Sunday, 27 December 2009 02:56 (fourteen years ago) link

what about this coke zero ad where GIROGIO FUCKING MORODER is watching from the wall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APQ2OxgCNzE

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 08:14 (fourteen years ago) link

very interesting piece about an earlier version of the movie's story:

http://chud.com/articles/articles/21969/1/PROJECT-880-THE-AVATAR-THAT-ALMOST-WAS/Page1.html

ea™e (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 10:39 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah I feel Cameron played it safe w much if not all of the final movie, probably because you only get one shot at animating those scenes... you can't really shoot and reshoot scenes in the normal sense

=皿= (dyao), Sunday, 27 December 2009 11:10 (fourteen years ago) link

plot q: was it the upsidaisium that kept the mountains floating?

abanana, Sunday, 27 December 2009 11:39 (fourteen years ago) link

Saw it at Leicester Square in 3d last night.

I'm not sure it's a good film, but the overall experience was very pleasant - something like a weekend abroad, with new sights to stimulate and refresh the visual cortex.

Bob Six, Sunday, 27 December 2009 11:47 (fourteen years ago) link

>probably because you only get one shot at animating those scenes...

I don't know about that - unless Cameron works with CGI very differently than other (big budget action film) directors then he's got almost infinite control over the shots before they go through the final rendering process.

(I didn't read the whole of l'bloomer's link so may be missing the point here, though)

Bill A, Sunday, 27 December 2009 12:17 (fourteen years ago) link

I was reading that with the camera/tech/whatever he's got, he could film the actors in the empty space and through the viewfinder see an xbox-quality rendering of the fx of whatever he was pointing at.

boy that wasn't explained well at all.

moron oil (Gukbe), Sunday, 27 December 2009 16:06 (fourteen years ago) link

no, no. made perfect sense and it's true.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Sunday, 27 December 2009 17:30 (fourteen years ago) link

i have purchased my ticket for an 11 pm 3d/imax avatarification. big blue people better bring it.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 27 December 2009 17:35 (fourteen years ago) link

some of the stuff in that article def does seem like it would have made for a better movie. but a lot of it, you can tell why it was changed.

reagan & sarah (s1ocki), Sunday, 27 December 2009 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar 2: tsu'tey tang

cozwn, Sunday, 27 December 2009 18:19 (fourteen years ago) link

estimated 2nd weekend gross: $75M, down from $77M. usually blockbusters will almost halve their box office in the second week. in comparison titanic made more on its second week than its first (largely because it opened on the same day as a bond movie).

it will definitely make its money back.

abanana, Sunday, 27 December 2009 19:02 (fourteen years ago) link

i now cannot escape papyrus.

straightola, Sunday, 27 December 2009 23:40 (fourteen years ago) link

do you think cameron will point at the audience and say "i see you" during his acceptance speech?

This part of the sentence is even dumber. (lukas), Sunday, 27 December 2009 23:51 (fourteen years ago) link

followed swiftly by him raising his oscar and ululating

hear shart attack (latebloomer), Sunday, 27 December 2009 23:59 (fourteen years ago) link

well, that wasn't bad ... but it did ultimately make me feel guilty for spending $13.50 on an imax movie instead of, like, trekking in patagonia or the amazon or something. or hell, even being outside.

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 December 2009 00:48 (fourteen years ago) link

i guess i was really feeling the ecomessages maaaaaaan

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 December 2009 00:48 (fourteen years ago) link

dud my imax ticket cost $17.50

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 02:54 (fourteen years ago) link

chew on that 4 a min

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 02:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Is it only when people are at death's door that the Na'vi all have to sit around the tree and spin and hold each others' shoulders and chant? If you had to do that every time someone got, say, a major injury, that would be a real pain in the ass.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Monday, 28 December 2009 04:00 (fourteen years ago) link

^^ this qn should be part of the health care debate

reagan & sarah (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 04:28 (fourteen years ago) link

this was a good time and the story/dialogue is really not worse than hollywood norms. tons of movies have plots at least as ridiculous, and almost none of them ever make me feel like i'm dodging missiles on dragonback. and all the gaia worship stuff is hokey as hell but hokey gaia worship isn't really like a moral flaw imo. plus i liked how the whole planet seemed designed to be seen under a black light. i think cameron is kind of a suburban-basement stoner at heart.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 28 December 2009 08:02 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i kinda liked the hippy-dippy roger dean look of a lot of it.

hear shart attack (latebloomer), Monday, 28 December 2009 08:30 (fourteen years ago) link

The whole biolumescent look of Pandoran was inspired by the coral sea beds he witnessed during all the scuba dives he took between Titanic and this, wasn't it?

DavidM, Monday, 28 December 2009 08:46 (fourteen years ago) link

those videos are confusing

=皿= (dyao), Monday, 28 December 2009 09:27 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knH_rf0UxMU

shartin jort (am0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:43 (fourteen years ago) link

promising young vlogger

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 18:51 (fourteen years ago) link

*bookmarks youtube channel*

my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

*buys james cameron directed happy meal*

shartin jort (am0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

*records vlog response based on own impressions of happy meal*

my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

http://i45.tinypic.com/wlb1ud.jpg

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 19:01 (fourteen years ago) link

*creates happy meal action figure of vlogger that lights up when u vlog*

shartin jort (am0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 19:02 (fourteen years ago) link

*acquires rights to amon's prototype*

my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 19:10 (fourteen years ago) link

dude sounds like a remix

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Monday, 28 December 2009 19:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Did it freak anyone else out how much Na'vi Sigourney Weaver looked like human Sigourney Weaver? The others it was like 'oh yeah I can see how that's an avatar of him' and Sigourney's was like 'oh my fucking god Sigourney what did they do to your face did we learn nothing from ANTZ.'

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

i lold repeatedly @ blue sigourney

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

like big hearty barrel laughs whenever she was on screen?

my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

giggling more like - particularly @ her scrunched up smiley face when jake graduated to alien manhood

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

is barrel laugh a thing or did i mean belly laugh

my girl wants to sharty all the time (s1ocki), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

it freaked me out more that Sam W looked like Ben Affleck at times

mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

xp a belly of laughs

mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link

the whole experience was a belly full of monkeys imo

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:23 (fourteen years ago) link

also lold @ her cutoffs n stanford croptop look

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

blueski the Ben Affleck thing freaked me out too, when his hair was not buzzed & he had a few days of beard on him.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Monday, 28 December 2009 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

do a barrel lol

abanana, Monday, 28 December 2009 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm gonna chime in to say that i totally agree with deej upthread. no props to jake sully for talking the na'vi into a suicide mission.

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 December 2009 22:12 (fourteen years ago) link

tried to see this today at 1PM...shit was sold out!!

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 28 December 2009 22:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Maybe if you did two cam shots using the tripod in the exact same place both times, and shot it through one lense at a time on those 3d glasses they gave you. It's easy to combine two video images in AE to get an anaglyph 3d (red-blue). Would be dark as hell but i bet you could do it!

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 00:48 (fourteen years ago) link

lo-fi 3D for owls is the next big thing

I X Love (Abbott), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 00:50 (fourteen years ago) link

farts

doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 12:55 (fourteen years ago) link

sorry just testing

doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 12:56 (fourteen years ago) link

its weird but the more distance i get from this the more i like it. saw it in imax 3d on saturday (it owned) (some of the decisions probably make more sense in this format, like the abundance of aerial scenes - the sense of height is dizzying at times), usually the further i get from seeing a movie the more i pick it apart, my initial reaction was 'glad i went but i won't be rushing to see it again' but right now i'd really like to see it again. the quality of the facial animation was probably the most startling thing effects-wise, that was some next level shit imo

my other initial reaction was that one of cameron's bigger gambles (getting people to care about the navi and all the new age hokum about the spirit of the planet) failed, but again in retrospect it kinda works. still i wished there were more moments like the one where the floaty jellyfish seeds are swarming around sully and he swats one away - that got the biggest laugh of the movie.

still wondering how the hell those floating islands had waterfalls

also michelle rodriguez has some fine-ass titties

ribisi & weaver owned tho like jsbhorglb i was str8 gigglin at blue sigourney

doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 12:57 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah Michelle rodriguez was syperhot. lol tomboy crush

=皿= (dyao), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 13:00 (fourteen years ago) link

her in a tanktop was definitely one of the best uses of the 3d

De Suggestivistban (some dude), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 14:20 (fourteen years ago) link

3DD

shartin jort (am0n), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 14:27 (fourteen years ago) link

her in a tanktop was definitely one of the best uses of the 3d

― De Suggestivistban (some dude), Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:20 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i totally said this in my review haha!!

who sharted?! (s1ocki), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 16:03 (fourteen years ago) link

you should see your faces

hear shart attack (latebloomer), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 17:10 (fourteen years ago) link

"How come there are giant rocks that can hover but the guy is stuck in a wheelchair?

Also, Papyrus font has been a no no for at least ten years now.

― Nate Carson, Friday, August 21, 2009 6:52 PM (4 months ago)"

I stand by this. I enjoyed the hell out of the visual aspect of this movie (the plot was entirely forgettable). But I just can't believe that 150 years from now, no matter how bad the economy is, NO ONE will be pushing themselves around in manual wheelchairs.

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 22:06 (fourteen years ago) link

still wondering how the hell those floating islands had waterfalls

the mist evaporates as it falls into the air, then drifts up and recoalesces as tiny rainclouds that rain down on the island, providing a perpetual waterfall.

http://www.cotf.edu/ete/images/modules/msese/earthsysflr/EFCycleP3.gif

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 22:23 (fourteen years ago) link

The giant rocks hover, as far as I can tell, because they are filled with very expensive floating rocks, but high-priced technology is not likely to be spent on some crippled army grunt. Anyway, they already bought him a big blue metabody.

I bet fifty years ago people would've said that there's no way people would still be pushing themselves around on fixed gear bicycles or using crutches or etc. in 2010, but here we are.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 22:26 (fourteen years ago) link

robots ride m fixie for me

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 22:45 (fourteen years ago) link

lolol

gey tuposy so ure saying the islands have little stormclouds following them around at all times? I Reject You're Thesis sire.

doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 22:48 (fourteen years ago) link

do not question my science

http://filmonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/sigourney-weaver-avatar.jpg

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 22:53 (fourteen years ago) link

CHUD on the Project 880 script - the early version of Avatar

For those who don't want to read this all, some bullet points. Read the entire piece for in-depth description and analysis, but these bullet points are the main, stark differences between Project 880 and Avatar:

- Earth and its environmental problems are explored
- We see Josh Sully's Avatar being born
- It's revealed the Avatar program exists to train Na'vi to be an indigenous workforce for the Corporation, since it's so expensive to send human workers
- There are more humans, including a bioethics officer on the take, a video journalist, a head of the Avatar program and a second military dickwad
- There is an Avatar controller who is burnt out because his Avatar died with him in it. He committed Avatar suicide because he had fallen in love with a Na'vi girl who had been killed by the military
- The Avatars have a Na'vi guide named N'Deh, who is sleeping with Grace
- Grace survives the soul transfer
- Josh Sully gains the Na'vi trust by being a member of the community. He also excels in a major hunt
- Josh Sully shows his leadership not by taming a dragon but by leading a raid on Hell's Gate to rescue prisoners
- Josh Sully isn't the only Na'vi to ride a big dragon
- Pandora is a living entity and it sees the humans as a virus; it has been mobilizing the plants and animals to attack all along because it wanted to force the humans out
- There is no unobtainium beneath Hometree. The military just wants to wipe out the local Na'vi to send a message to all the tribes that they must be obeyed.
- Some of the humans and the Avatar controllers rise up in the final big battle
- Josh Sully tells the Earth that Pandora will give any humans that return a disease that will wipe out humanity

also

Cameron fills the approach to Pandora with tons of jargon and science fact; I'm not sure how much any of it would have made it in any version of this movie, but there are a lot of interesting facts presented, including a description of just why those floating mountains float. It's actually a description that would have been welcome in the film, as it ties into unobtainium. In the script it's mentioned that unobtainium was the joke name for the metal, which happened to stick; unobtainium is a room-temperature super-conductor, pretty much the only reason the expense of a Pandora trip is worthwhile. It's also what makes up much of the floating mountains; Pandora, while as big as a planet, is a moon of Polyphemis, a huge gas giant with a super magnetic field. The unobtanium levitates in a high magnetic field (Cameron really explains all the science in the scriptment), and thus the mountains. Which, by the way, are very holy to Na'vi.

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 23:35 (fourteen years ago) link

I thought not explaining why Unobtanium is so valuable was a major flaw. Maybe an extended DVD cut will correct this.

Also: why does Hometree obstruct scanners and communications, but not the Avatar link?

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 01:38 (fourteen years ago) link

it floats!

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 01:45 (fourteen years ago) link

no not explaining unobtanium is a plus! it makes the allegory more ~deeper~ and ~symbolic~

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 03:00 (fourteen years ago) link

oh yeah! I misunderstood this because it was so deep and I'm just another stupid American consumer.

Thanks for clarifying! ;)

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 04:35 (fourteen years ago) link

not explaining lots of stuff is one of the good things abt the movie - exposition overkill is generally one of the sucky things abt scifi

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 04:37 (fourteen years ago) link

btw someone just defriended me for pointing out that hes a republican in a comment following his status saying this movie had the omg stupidest plot ever - was jus sayin a republican is prob gonna find a liberal polemic stupid jeez

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 04:40 (fourteen years ago) link

not explaining lots of stuff is one of the good things abt the movie - exposition overkill is generally one of the sucky things abt scifi

― ice cr?m, Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:37 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

totally

De Suggestivistban (some dude), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link

also I thought the fact that this guy rolls around in a manual wheelchair was meant to show how ~tough~ this ~ex-Marine~ was

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 04:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Also: why does Hometree obstruct scanners and communications, but not the Avatar link?

hometree didn't obstruct scanners, did it? i thought that was just the flux vortex, where the tree of souls was. that's why the military dudes had no trouble flying in and taking out hometree.

anyway, the avatar link worked in the flux vortex because ... you know ... the connection was so deep. and stuff.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:14 (fourteen years ago) link

all your questions will be answered in the novelization as well as by numerous products set in the Avatar Expanded Universe which will be available to you at reasonable prices soon

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:26 (fourteen years ago) link

honestly as much as people reflexively eyeroll at the possibility of sequels and spinoffs, it could really be a good thing if they take the technology and general concept here and let maybe some writers and directors other than Cameron run w/ them and come up with their own ideas of what to do with it.

De Suggestivistban (some dude), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:34 (fourteen years ago) link

not explaining lots of stuff is one of the good things abt the movie - exposition overkill is generally one of the sucky things abt scifi

― ice cr?m, Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:37 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

totally

― De Suggestivistban (some dude), Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:42 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i agree too. what would some dumb made-up explanation have added to the movie

who sharted?! (s1ocki), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:40 (fourteen years ago) link

honestly as much as people reflexively eyeroll at the possibility of sequels and spinoffs, it could really be a good thing if they take the technology and general concept here and let maybe some writers and directors other than Cameron run w/ them and come up with their own ideas of what to do with it.

― De Suggestivistban (some dude), Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:34 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

so basically u want fan fiction about blue dudes and ladies in a magical forest

who sharted?! (s1ocki), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:41 (fourteen years ago) link

How could there not already be too much slashfic about that.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Pick a story, any story

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:43 (fourteen years ago) link

cameron in 2006:

Both the "Avatar" and "Battle Angel" series, he added, will begin with self-contained debut movies along the lines of the original "Star Wars" trilogy. "The films have to play as individual films, but they have a greater story arc that goes over the three-film cycle," he insisted, saying he isn't a big fan of "The Matrix Reloaded"-like cliffhangers between chapters. "I think that's how it works the best. I don't think you want to just run people off the cliff after the second film."

abanana, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:44 (fourteen years ago) link

http://haal9000.com/dvd2002-3/coming/return_blue_lagoon.jpg

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:47 (fourteen years ago) link

thinking this franchise wouldn't be a bad way for more promising younger sci-fi action directors (of now or of a few years from now or w/e) to get their hands on big crazy special effects budgets isn't really the same as welcoming a flood of creepy slash fic websites.

De Suggestivistban (some dude), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:50 (fourteen years ago) link

2nd move should be the navi attacking earth

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:54 (fourteen years ago) link

that's district 10

who sharted?! (s1ocki), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:55 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar gt

AAAAAAH YAH ITS FUSION (Lamp), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:55 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe the sequel should be the navi using human avatars

I regret choosing this bland user name (peter in montreal), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:56 (fourteen years ago) link

2 Ava 2 Tar

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:56 (fourteen years ago) link

navatar

who sharted?! (s1ocki), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:56 (fourteen years ago) link

sock puppetar

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:57 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar: heaven's blue fury

AAAAAAH YAH ITS FUSION (Lamp), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:58 (fourteen years ago) link

in this movie an internet message board community is trolled by a bored navi controlling a human avatar

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:58 (fourteen years ago) link

heaven's blue furry

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:58 (fourteen years ago) link

E. Tar

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 05:59 (fourteen years ago) link

AvaTarBaby

(controversial racial allegory)

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 06:00 (fourteen years ago) link

ava2ar

abanana, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 06:33 (fourteen years ago) link

so this was fun

I'd forgotten that 3D movies give me massive headaches, though.

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 06:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Navi vs Predator

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 30 December 2009 07:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Just saw this, have not read whole thread yet (totes intend to tho) but i *DID* ctrl-f "mononoke" and was pretty flabbergasted that there has been no mention of the heavy debt to it, esp. the forest scenes.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 23:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar 2-D

The Hood Won't Jump (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 December 2009 23:36 (fourteen years ago) link

hmm haven't seen it in a long time but mononoke feels like a good call. also nausicaa! doesn't she control some giant nature bugs in the end?

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 31 December 2009 01:41 (fourteen years ago) link

okay, half way done with thread.

1) slocki y u hardmanning shakey mo for doing exactly what 99% of everyone in this thread was doing for the first half of the thread?

2) also slock w/r/t: "did we really need separate scenes of Worthington learning to ride a) an alien horse, b) an alien bird and c) a bigger alien bird?" 1c did not occur in the cut that i watched! it was like "yo matalk yogurto will never expect me to jump his ass from above" (cut to black... then the hero returns)

3) the CGI WTA hype is real, on first view this is way better than LOTR/Kong/Star Trek.

4) this is not high cinema, but if you enjoyed The Matrix and Dances With Wolves and Princess Mononoke/Nausicaa and would like to see them mashed-up in a CGI 3D fantasy world, you should check this out.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost!

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link

i will venture to guess the director's cut of this will be much better, you can tell when they were just ffwding along to get to the ending.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 01:49 (fourteen years ago) link

dont got on 3d glasses @ home :(

ice cr?m, Thursday, 31 December 2009 01:50 (fourteen years ago) link

also saw this on 9:45am (!!!) on a wednesday morning matinee (lol $12pp)... sold out packed theater in the largest imax theater in norcal (aka: computer nerd center of the world)

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 01:59 (fourteen years ago) link

dont got on 3d glasses @ home :(

― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:50 PM (9 minutes ago)

they put all 3 of the LOTR dircuts in the theaters on v. short term limited release iirc...

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:00 (fourteen years ago) link

any of youse who really liked this movie, would you say you really connected with the characters? is jake sully now like a classic all-time character for you? or neytiri?

― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Sunday, December 20, 2009 10:44 AM

i'd rate the movie about 7.5 out of 10 (entertaining, would def recommend for fans of genre) and was 100% not expecting high-drama BUT the film absolutely did it's job of taking me into its world and entertaining me (aside from the few groanworthy moments) for nearly 3 hours and i didn't look at my phone-clock once!

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Joel David Moore is a dead ringer for Tom Green, either that or i forget what Tom Green looks like.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:06 (fourteen years ago) link

the one plot point that REALLY bugs me is the fact that sully was the only one to break thru to the navis because of a mystical prophecy type shit - ie the bugs landing on him - rather than any of his actions. i hate that stuff.

― the finest of display name homies (s1ocki), Monday, December 21, 2009 10:46 AM (1 week ago)

this is flawed. the enya (?) seed stayed his smurfette's bow when she was gonna kill him. none of them were impressed UNTIL he did all the physical stuff (riding the horses, banshees) BUT THEN he betrayed them when it was revealed that he was aware of the colonists plan all along and never warned them until the 11th hour. He was a pariah UNTIL he tamed the dragonthingy (again, off-camera in my cut!) and brought him back to prove that he was in fact the Kwisatz Haderach.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4M9Tp6c0bs

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:22 (fourteen years ago) link

http://bitsandpieces.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/imageshand_20job_small.jpg

lol this is my friends' biz swear to gawd! i'm typing this from 1/2 block away tbh.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:31 (fourteen years ago) link

also tbh was kinda letdown the "mating" ritual didn't involve a symbolic locking of the ponytail USBs... too obvs?

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:33 (fourteen years ago) link

hated sigourney's stanford sweatshirt 94/7 wtf is up with that? like gurl, change your avatar's clothesies you're like almost 60y/o beezy.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:38 (fourteen years ago) link

lol people living in the past

=皿= (dyao), Thursday, 31 December 2009 02:55 (fourteen years ago) link

also tbh was kinda letdown the "mating" ritual didn't involve a symbolic locking of the ponytail USBs... too obvs?

― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta)

yeah was looking fwd to this bit and it never happened! don't think 'too obvs' would have been a problem for this film. also in general i was expecting freakier jungle shit, like plants that attack you, nasty creepy crawlies, etc. all the potentially threatening plants and insects just turned out to be beautiful and harmless! all they had was giant dogs, dino-rhinos and big lizard-birds? kind of lame.

jabba hands, Thursday, 31 December 2009 03:05 (fourteen years ago) link

but i guess it's for children so there wasn't going to be too much bio-horror stuff. which actually suits me fine cos that stuff grosses me out! in fact i don't know what i'm complaining about.

jabba hands, Thursday, 31 December 2009 03:09 (fourteen years ago) link

1) slocki y u hardmanning shakey mo for doing exactly what 99% of everyone in this thread was doing for the first half of the thread?

it was annoying when they did it too!

super mario bros. (s1ocki), Thursday, 31 December 2009 04:54 (fourteen years ago) link

i will venture to guess the director's cut of this will be much better, you can tell when they were just ffwding along to get to the ending.

― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, December 30, 2009 8:49 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

thank god, if there had been 45 minutes more rainforest babble i seriously would not have been able to take it

super mario bros. (s1ocki), Thursday, 31 December 2009 04:55 (fourteen years ago) link

also in general i was expecting freakier jungle shit, like plants that attack you, nasty creepy crawlies, etc. all the potentially threatening plants and insects just turned out to be beautiful and harmless!

agreed, my biggest complaint

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 31 December 2009 05:53 (fourteen years ago) link

I want to see this again at Imax but every show is sold out and I'd really rather wait til it's died down a bit.

Nate Carson, Friday, 1 January 2010 00:57 (fourteen years ago) link

boxofficemojo has worldwide gross through dec. 30 at $745 million. i guess cameron gets to toast the new year with a big bottle of told-you-so.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Friday, 1 January 2010 01:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Shit. I should probably dust off my old 3D resume. It's gonna be a growth industry again...

Nate Carson, Friday, 1 January 2010 01:52 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw it 3d, no imax, and was not impressed. glad to see i was not alone in perving over michelle rodriguez in 3d :O

bnw, Friday, 1 January 2010 01:55 (fourteen years ago) link

actually the best part was when we walked out and there was this 7 ft tall guy coming into the theater. my dad saw him first was like "holy shit!"

bnw, Friday, 1 January 2010 01:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Thursday
12/31

AVATAR

$14,925,000

SQUEAKQUEL

$8,750,000

HOLMES

$8,720,000

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:46 (fourteen years ago) link

should cross $300 million tomorrow

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:47 (fourteen years ago) link

which is prob abt how much it actually cost

ice cr?m, Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:50 (fourteen years ago) link

That sounds about right. I remember reading somewhere (maybe earlier in this thread?) that it cost $300 million to film, and another $150 million for advertising.

Quiet, I'm making my Youtube Star Wars Review (Z S), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:51 (fourteen years ago) link

$500 million is a more realistic estimate

doomed... to fart (cankles), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:51 (fourteen years ago) link

ur a more realistic estimate

ice cr?m, Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh. Well, this Vanity Fair article cites estimates from $230 to $500 million, and says that $280 million (for production costs alone) is probably the closest.

Quiet, I'm making my Youtube Star Wars Review (Z S), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:54 (fourteen years ago) link

i think cameron was under some kind of contract clause to keep production costs under $300 m, so somehow he'll figure out a way to make it look like that whatever the real story is.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:55 (fourteen years ago) link

this was unmitigated shit

the shart of noise (history mayne), Saturday, 2 January 2010 23:58 (fourteen years ago) link

ie, another Best Picture speech on the way! ka-ching

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 3 January 2010 00:24 (fourteen years ago) link

the 3-d is annoying and distracting. would probably need to know about perceptual psychology to say why, but imo in most instances it does nothing interesting and draws attention to irrelevant things. more damagingly it splits the image, quite brutally, into separate panes. why do this? it also dulls the colours.

it was long and boring. the lead character had negative charisma, and he along with everyone else had to work with a completely terrible script. 'the abyss' isn't perfect, but it has an emotional core and characters you give an f about. the central relationship here was furry-friendly crap. it can't be that hard to write stock characters like ribisi's, lang's, and weaver's, and yet all three are paper-thin.

plot was basic but still didn't make sense. do the blue people "get" what avatars are? this doesn't seem to be explained: the avatars are clearly marked out by their clothing. worthington carries a gun. and saldana almost kills him for no reason.

all of the tree-hugging stuff is obviously an embarrassment and it takes up probably a third of the movie.

was not expecting a masterpiece but the easy ride this has received from critics is shameful shit.

the shart of noise (history mayne), Sunday, 3 January 2010 00:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh. Well, this Vanity Fair article cites estimates from $230 to $500 million, and says that $280 million (for production costs alone) is probably the closest.

― Quiet, I'm making my Youtube Star Wars Review (Z S), Saturday, 2 January 2010 00:54 (Yesterday) Permalink

But it also says that the 280 doesn't include the R&D involved in making the cameras, the 3d tech etc. I can't understand how anyone wouldn't consider that a production cost...

So it needs to make about a billion, which I guess it will. I question whether people will be interested in two more Ferngully 3Ds though. I guess the sequels will be cheaper?

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 3 January 2010 02:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Considering that probably a lot of the budget went into developing technology and character designs that would be re-used in any sequels, I'm sure they wouldn't cost as much.

some dude, Sunday, 3 January 2010 02:44 (fourteen years ago) link

But it also says that the 280 doesn't include the R&D involved in making the cameras, the 3d tech etc. I can't understand how anyone wouldn't consider that a production cost...

Yeah, I had the same thought. But I imagine that finding outside funding for R&D would be easier, because any new technological "developments" (har har) would be useful for others, not just the Avatar team. So I would guess that R&D isn't included as a production cost because other outside, non-Avatar interests helped to pay for it.

chicken sandwich CARL!! (Z S), Sunday, 3 January 2010 02:46 (fourteen years ago) link

finally saw this, it was easily an hour too long and the last hour was the most boring thing ever. the tree-hugging stuff got tired but not as tired as the relentless blowing up of shit at the end which was just mind-numbing, and by that point the novelty of both the cgi and the 3d was completely taken for granted. also, miliatary dude drinking coffee while blowing crap up easily the worst character in any movie I've seen in ages. both led guy and weaver were awful except when cgi, maybe this was intended in order to breathe more life into the cgi characters. all that said, it was still okay.

akm, Sunday, 3 January 2010 15:30 (fourteen years ago) link

also voice over was awful

there were so many things bad about this I'm not sure why I still kind of liked it. starved for entertainment I guess

akm, Sunday, 3 January 2010 15:40 (fourteen years ago) link

u liked it because it was AWESOME

duh

ice cr?m, Sunday, 3 January 2010 15:41 (fourteen years ago) link

this wasn't as entertaining as My Bloody Valentine in 3-D

Ward Fowler, Sunday, 3 January 2010 19:26 (fourteen years ago) link

this is unmitigated shit, and yet i still had a good-ass time watchin it in IMAX 3D after a day at the zoo.

as a tech demo, it's pretty fukkin amazing. am cautiously optimistic that we get a crop of dope sci fi movies in the next few years that can marry it to scripts that aren't woeful

dome plow (gbx), Sunday, 3 January 2010 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

this would have been fine if all the excesses had been tamed (plot excesses that is, like over-the-top miliary boneheads, over-the-top tree hugging, over-the-top relentless neverending battle)

akm, Sunday, 3 January 2010 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

will it take the dvd release for everyone to realize how crappy this movie is?

Simon H., Sunday, 3 January 2010 20:55 (fourteen years ago) link

For sure. I have yet to see a 3-D movie - any 3-D movie - that was remotely watchable at home in 2-D. Well, maybe "Coraline" excepted. Then again, "Coraline" was well written. "Avatar" - I enjoyed the hell of it, but damned if I can't recall a single character's name outside of the lead. If it has anything going for it, it's that it's not totally steeped in portent like the "Lord of the Rings" flicks. But its very dopiness will make any potential post-Oscar excitement crash like, well, "Crash." I mean, I've seen "The Hurt Locker" a couple of times now, and the second viewing was even richer than the first. A second viewing of "Avatar" would likely totally deflate any enjoyment I had of it the first time around. I'd concentrated even more on the pretty foliage and ignore anything that talks.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 3 January 2010 21:36 (fourteen years ago) link

movie reminded me of this passage from John Crowley's Engine Summer, in that as much as I wanted to just enjoy the few good things it had to offer, in the end this fucking movie is definitely a part of the problem

the mechanical dreams the angels made with great labor and inconceivable ingenuity, dreams broadcast on the air like milkweed seeds, all day long, passing invisibly through the air, through walls, through stone walls, through the very bodies of the angels themselves as they sat to await them, and appearing through every angel simultaneously, to warn and to instruct, one dream dreamed by all so they could act in concert, until it was discovered that the dreams passing through their bodies were poisonous to them somehow, don't ask me how, and millions were sickening and dying young and unable to bear children, but unable to stop the dreaming even when the dreams themselves warned them that the dreams were poisoning them, unable or afraid to wake and find themselves alone

Milton Parker, Monday, 4 January 2010 03:25 (fourteen years ago) link

milton, john crowley's review of avatar ~
Yes, I went out and made history, seeing Avatar on the day after Christmas. I found it delightful all through -- I was never bored and often thrilled and elated. That was by the astonishing and convincing 3D effects, the care and attention lavished on every detail of every moment -- the 300M that Cameron spent was all on show. The scenes in the Floating Mountains (whose gravitational oddity was never explained; maybe something ot do with the huge planet around which the moon Pandora revolves? Nemmine: Lots wasn't explained, and much was unexplainable).
there's more here
http://crowleycrow.livejournal.com/

kamerad, Monday, 4 January 2010 03:49 (fourteen years ago) link

ha, wow

he's a little kinder on it than I felt overall

Milton Parker, Monday, 4 January 2010 04:14 (fourteen years ago) link

lool

ice cr?m, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:27 (fourteen years ago) link

saw it this weekend....

well, it's certainly pretty corny in a lot of ways...

seemed like something written by a gifted 15 year old sci-fi fan.

but that said, the visuals and 3D etc were really cool to see, the na'vi were way cooler in the context than i thought they would be.

it's a lot to look at and genuinely sorta awe inspiring at points.

plotline was boiler plate sci-fi/fantasy jizz, but it did make me realize just how convoluted and poorly ploted a lot of current blockbuster efx epics are - thinking transformers, the new star wars movies, pirates of the carribean, etc..

like it was almost refreshing to have a plot that established the main characters, the villains, and a main conflict in a sensible way, then actually went about a textbook a-to-b resolution of the plot.

not that that should be something to PRAISE, but in the current times i guess it is...like going back to the student thing, it seemed like someone had paid attention to a freshman film writing class and tried to follow the "rules" at least....which is a lot more than you can say about the other films i mentioned.

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 4 January 2010 18:38 (fourteen years ago) link

this wasn't as entertaining as My Bloody Valentine in 3-D

― Ward Fowler, Sunday, January 3, 2010 7:26 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

can't believe i missed the possible I WISH THEY'D GIVEN OUT EARPLUGS FOR AVATAR joek here.

the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 18:42 (fourteen years ago) link

plotline was boiler plate sci-fi/fantasy jizz, but it did make me realize just how convoluted and poorly ploted a lot of current blockbuster efx epics are - thinking transformers, the new star wars movies, pirates of the carribean, etc..

like it was almost refreshing to have a plot that established the main characters, the villains, and a main conflict in a sensible way, then actually went about a textbook a-to-b resolution of the plot.

not that that should be something to PRAISE, but in the current times i guess it is...like going back to the student thing, it seemed like someone had paid attention to a freshman film writing class and tried to follow the "rules" at least....which is a lot more than you can say about the other films i mentioned.

I think this is very OTM

Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 16:33 (fourteen years ago) link

ppl pissed at Sigourney Weaver smoking, get a life

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahaha waht

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/business/04smoke.html?scp=2&sq=avatar%20smoking&st=cse

"For the record, apart from the 3-D tobacco use, Mr. Glantz said he found “Avatar” to be “a great movie.”"

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

... and that he was happy to give them a bit of free publicity.

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah M@tt otm, the straightforward storytelling was in a weird way one of its strengths, as much as it could've benefitted from some more fleshed out characters of a goddamn subplot

some dude, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

or characters that were interesting or engaging in any way at all imo

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

It was a very good thing IMO that the world itself was so enthralling that it didn't matter very much that every character besides Jake and Neytiri was wafer thin.

I think that blindly devouring tons and tons of pulpy, terrible sceince fiction and fantasy novels have made me ultra-receptive to movies like this.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

btw i cannot see this winning best picture

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Right now, I don't even know what is going to end up being nominated, last year was generally terrible for me re: seeing movies.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I think that blindly devouring tons and tons of pulpy, terrible sceince fiction and fantasy novels have made me ultra-receptive to movies like this.

― i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, January 5, 2010 3:00 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

posts v much in character and also otm for me.

like, it was objectively BAD (plot/dialogue) but i loved watching it

dome plow (gbx), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, pretty much true for me too. though i didn't LOVE it on any level.

hairylaser micropenis pavilion (latebloomer), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

I was very surprised at how well the actors dealt with the dialogue.

I can't support the argument that the plot was bad. It was very simple, but that helped the overall movie; trying to graft psychological headfuckery onto those visuals likely would have detracted from both.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

well it was bad because it was cookie-cutter

dome plow (gbx), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:13 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't like equating "bad" with "predictable". I pretty much knew exactly what was going to happen at all times but that didn't affect my enjoyment of the movie.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link

this will be nominated for best picture but it ain't winning it
gonna get a shit ton of technical awards though.

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

It should!

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah duh

dome plow (gbx), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

kind of love how terrible the videogame looks in comparison to the movie

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

if UP IN THE AIR takes Best Screenplay over this it's a crime

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

i definitely like Children Of Men's version of future tech but the way tech is handled in Avatar is very well done, doesn't seem as forced as Minority Report's virtual pilates.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

The virtual tech was probably the most effective use of the 3D IMO.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

childhood gbx was thrilled to see mecha suits

dome plow (gbx), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

the video blogging was so horrible

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

vlog of the future

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

holy xpost

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Why was it horrible? It made sense to me.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link

it was as corny and awkward a plot device as having every scene start with "dear diary, today was another crazy day here on pandora..."

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:52 (fourteen years ago) link

*looks down, rubs forehead*

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:52 (fourteen years ago) link

The videoblogging was kind of hilarious and fit entirely into the trashy science fiction I've spent the last 3 decades of my life reading; also, Jake's resigned "they're never going to leave Hometree" vlog was effective acting.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link

my so called av

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link

the vlogging was super convenient for steve lang to just GUI in on some errant terminal and be all "AHA U SAID IT HERE @STARLOG 2051 etc NOW U PREPARE TO DIE" which is a common plot device in almost all the great film classics.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:58 (fourteen years ago) link

corny and awkward plot device

Diaries are de rigueur for any exploration story, partly because virtually every explorer in history has kept one. I guess I could see taking issue with it being video rather than written or audio, but given that we live in a world that already has video logs, I don't see why it would be out of place in the future.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:22 (fourteen years ago) link

how long have you all been posting on forums

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:25 (fourteen years ago) link

i think movies that are supposed to visually innovative and stunning leaps forward in storytelling should tell the story through images and actions, not thru having the main character talk into the camera

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:26 (fourteen years ago) link

I've been posting for years

super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Um, the movie was a stunning leap forward in CGI technology and how that can impact the way people present stories, not a stunning leap forward in how to tell a story, particularly since it was allegedly written when Cameron was 15 years old. I have no idea where you got "stunning leap forward in storytelling" from wrt this movie.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:29 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm saying it's not a stunning leap forward in storytelling - i believe i have read raves to that effect, but that is really secondary to my point

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link

don't call it a comeback xp

slock: which is precisely why so many movies don't have voice overs or have the characters break the 4th wall?

don't get me wrong all are dirt-cheap plot devices which turn me off majorly, but i can undoubtedly forgive them in massive blockbusters.

do you hate when kirk blogs in star trek too y/n

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link

kirk doesnt stare at the camera like hes on bloggingheads.tv

not a poster but i ilx a lot (deej), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:34 (fourteen years ago) link

I guess you guys prefer people do their video diaries in profile or somethin.

Or off-camera for a spooky ghost effect.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link

i would have liked to see sully give last rites to the big baddie at the end. i mean they even foreshadowed it.

abanana, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 23:19 (fourteen years ago) link

re. plot's simplicity -- in a weird way it isn't. i'm still v unclear on: do the blue people understand what avatars are? if not, how do they account for signourney wearing a crop top?

also if they're all so nice and cuddly why does the main chick almost kill terminator 4 when they first meet?

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 00:09 (fourteen years ago) link

well they call them dreamwalkers and know that sigourney the human is the same entity/personality whatever as sogoruney the big blue stanford grad, so

dome plow (gbx), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 00:11 (fourteen years ago) link

that's... kind of impressive, really, that they understand. though it begs the question "what is the point of avatar'ing up?" if they don't need to be covert.

that said, ribisi claims they've given them medicine n shit. he is kind of right that everything is a fucking sacred site for them.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 00:16 (fourteen years ago) link

For such a big giant (sentient) planet, we're barely given a glimpse of Na'viland. It's unclear how big Pandora even is. Do we ever learn how long Earth has been meddling with Pandora (it takes five years to get there, they say - have humans been there for decades?)? Do we ever learn why they even bothered with the Avatar program, when they brought along all those hulking forest clearers and other WMD hardware just in the, oh, off chance they wanted to bulldoze the planet anyway? Do we ever learn how T4 became paraplegic? Does it matter? The movie just glosses over most of the questions/issues it opts to raise. Saving it all for the sequel, I suppose. In 4-D smell-o-vision.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 03:12 (fourteen years ago) link

narration can be used really well. in this case i thought it was sucky and felt cheap. thats all im saying.

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 03:24 (fourteen years ago) link

I really couldn't be bothered to worry about cheap narration when there was a GIANT FOUR EYED DRAGON FLYING IN 3D on the screen

=皿= (dyao), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 03:26 (fourteen years ago) link

if UP IN THE AIR takes Best Screenplay over this it's a crime

They are in different categories; UitA is adapted from a novel. This is "original," and would lose to the oh-so "original" Quentin Tarantino if it was nominated, which it won't be.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 03:30 (fourteen years ago) link

what was the least original thing about the tarantino script, in your opinion?

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 03:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Do we ever learn how long Earth has been meddling with Pandora (it takes five years to get there, they say - have humans been there for decades?)?

Not that I recall.

Do we ever learn why they even bothered with the Avatar program, when they brought along all those hulking forest clearers and other WMD hardware just in the, oh, off chance they wanted to bulldoze the planet anyway?

They were trying diplomatic means initially for PR/token "trying not to look like dicks" reasons.

Do we ever learn how T4 became paraplegic? Does it matter?

No, but considering that it happened before the events of this story it doesn't really matter. The only reason he's a paraplegic is so that he can experience the joy of walking again when he jumps into the avatar and therefore has an excuse for running around like a coked-up 3-year-old.

The movie just glosses over most of the questions/issues it opts to raise.

Most of the questions you're asking would have been irritating unnecessary padding had the movie tried to answer them and it was already 2 hr 40 min long.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 05:29 (fourteen years ago) link

So was it a Predator ship?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 05:33 (fourteen years ago) link

NED WINS LOCK THREAD

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 05:45 (fourteen years ago) link

please

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 05:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, some of those questions matter. Like, what does T4 have to lose by rebelling? What's at stake for him? For that matter, why does he begin by helping out head Marine? It's not military jurisdiction, so ... why? Just to be nice? Ex-Marine pride? If he lost his legs, say, not fighting, or in some non-war accident, then mentally it would provide extra psychological incentive for participation, I suppose.

By "matter," of course, I mean matter in making it a better movie. It was fine as is, but "OMG, it's 160 minutes long already!" is no excuse. "Lawrence of Arabia"=227, "Godfather II"=200. "Heat"=170. Etc. Each of those is far richer, both visually and narrative-wise, than "Avatar," and none feels a second too long or padded. But of course, none of them are in 3-D, either, so I suppose there's that.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 16:05 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie sucked

max, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 16:11 (fourteen years ago) link

oh idk "Heat" seemed pretty padded and interminable to me so YMMV i guess xpost

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 16:13 (fourteen years ago) link

what does T4 have to lose by rebelling? What's at stake for him?

If he doesn't help, a world and woman he has come to love get brutalized. If he does, he can't go home again. I didn't think this was particularly ambiguous or subtle.

For that matter, why does he begin by helping out head Marine?

You missed the massive "once a Marine, always a Marine" vibes the movie was bludgeoning the audience with up until he fell in love?

If he lost his legs, say, not fighting, or in some non-war accident, then mentally it would provide extra psychological incentive for participation, I suppose.

Actually I have remembered that they do say in passing how he lost his ability to walk; it was in the massive firefight the colonel mentions when they are doing their Marine bonding bit over their war injuries (I believe it was also referenced in the opening voiceover but don't remember because it wasn't very important to the story or his motivations; obviously not being able to walk does not stop him from identifying more with the Marines than the scientists).

My point in mentioning the length was that stuffing it with the things you're asking about would have served no point. Sometimes things can be taken at face-value an no everything is particularly deep or profound. The story choices in this movie are perfectly adequate for what it is; an extraordinarily pretty story about a dude who falls in love with a planet and a girl.

i accidentally touched the nub and it was squishy (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 16:23 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie sucked

― max, Wednesday, January 6, 2010 4:11 PM (43 minutes ago) Bookmark

qft

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 16:55 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie blew lol

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 16:56 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie blew lol

― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, January 6, 2010 11:56 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

otm

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:08 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie blue, lol!

hairylaser micropenis pavilion (latebloomer), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:16 (fourteen years ago) link

extraordinarily pretty story

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Also, no money/family/legs is not an equal counter-balance to 12-feet tall, blue, ripped and engaged to a hot blue girlfriend in a tribe that has adopted you as family. And where the only humans with half a heart tend to show up to visit all the time, anyway. The deck, as they say, was stacked. Ergo, he had no incentive *not* to rebel. That's why he's there to begin with, in part. Nothing to lose. At least, so we presume, because there's not much to know about the guy except that for some reason Mother Pandora really likes him. (Also, of course, if he didn't rebel there wouldn't be a movie.)

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:22 (fourteen years ago) link

why the fuck

is this movie being discussed in relation to 'Best Screenplay'

has everybody lost their fucking mind

(p.s. IN THE LOOP should be a lock for that particular award)

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:24 (fourteen years ago) link

why the fuck

is this movie being discussed in relation to 'Best Screenplay'

because imagine the lols/wails if it wins

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:25 (fourteen years ago) link

since when has the Oscars been a deliberate trolling exercise

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:26 (fourteen years ago) link

.... since always???

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:27 (fourteen years ago) link

this would take the cookie jar

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:30 (fourteen years ago) link

why the fuck

is this movie being discussed in relation to 'Best Screenplay'

― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Because "best screenplay" /= "best dialogue" or even "best story"

As CRAFT, this screenplay is airtight and worthy of consideration.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

efficiency is not a criterion of value. and anyway, this film is way too long to be called that. as for airtight -- no more or less than any other hollywood film released last year. 'best screenplay' *does* imply that the story is good or original (which this certainly isn't) and usually good dialogue.

i don't think it is that airtight really, but ymmv.

speaking of airtight -- how will the humans who stay on pandora survive long-term?

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:53 (fourteen years ago) link

I guess the screenplay is pretty good by sci-fi action movie standards, but that doesn't actually make it good

I regret choosing this bland user name (peter in montreal), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:55 (fourteen years ago) link

it's less good than 'star trek' or 'district 9'; about level with '2012'.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

"Star Trek" was way better than this, yes. I still have not managed to see "District 9" despite it being another movie I am guaranteed to love.

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i mean i'm on board w/avatar but screenplay come the fuck on?

it's not in the same league as district 9.

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:00 (fourteen years ago) link

efficiency is not a criterion of value. and anyway, this film is way too long to be called that. as for airtight -- no more or less than any other hollywood film released last year.

false on both counts but I'm not gonna bother. unlike other technical categories, everyone's got an opinion about screenplay and it often does win on the basis of perceived middlebrow artiness cred but you know what: LOST IN TRANSLATION sucked.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:01 (fourteen years ago) link

am not really gonna dispute that. but if avatar wins best screenplay then every screenwriter in hollywood needs to slash their wrists

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link

shittier movies have won oscars for best screenplay/picture

hairylaser micropenis pavilion (latebloomer), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

not every film with a cracking screenplay is middlebrow and arty fwiw

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

(the god-internet decides to get into it and kill the humans? why, that is watertight.)

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

am not really gonna dispute that. but if avatar wins best screenplay then every screenwriter in hollywood needs to slash their wrists

if AVATAR wins best screenplay a lot of aspiring screenwriters might gnash their teeth but most working screenwriters would be delighted to see that over tired pseudorelevant "sophisticated" fare like UP IN THE AIR.

not every film with a cracking screenplay is middlebrow and arty fwiw

True dat. But most of the ones that win Best Original Screenplay are.

2008 - MILK
2007 - JUNO
2006 - LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE
2005 - CRASH
2004 - ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND
2003 - LOST IN TRANSLATION
2002 - TALK TO HER
2001 - GOSFORD PARK
2000 - ALMOST FAMOUS

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:11 (fourteen years ago) link

after crash, everything is denouement

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Best Original Screenplay aka Things White People Like

(okay ETERNAL SUNSHINE is grebt but come on)

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link

protip: Pixar always gets nominated, never wins

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

comparing Avatar to one shitty movie does not make it a worthy winner. there's a helluva lot of other stuff out there that didn't have me cringing approximately once every two minutes

urgh that is a kinda revolting list, but most of those are NOT very arty, and eternal sunshine was surely NOT that middlebrow? it was an art-movie that kinda transcended its origins? maybe?

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

who cares about the stupid oscars

latebloomer, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:15 (fourteen years ago) link

(gosford park was pretty good altho when you work out whodunnit it stops being particularly exciting, although it's not about suspense it's about CLASS obv)

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:15 (fourteen years ago) link

dude i have no idea what your definition of "arty" is, but that list is like 1000% fitting my description (ok maybe not almost famous)

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link

who cares about the stupid oscars

― latebloomer, Wednesday, January 6, 2010 12:15 PM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

otm. problem no. 1 with the oscars is that people pay attention to them and put credence in them. they should be more like emmys or grammys where no one gives a shit and they are meaningless.

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link

LJ I agree on ETERNAL SUNSHINE. I remember reading a draft of CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND back in 1998 and thinking "this is the best thing I have ever read and it will never get made" so yes I am a big Charlie Kaufman stan but seriously a moving piece of meticulous craft like RATATOUILLE kicks all kinds of JUNO's oh look at my kicky dialogue ass. And I like kicky dialogue!

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:18 (fourteen years ago) link

i am 100% sure ratatouille does this! but there's a difference between well-crafted, well-paced screenplays such as that and clanky platitude-filled cringefests such as the script of avatar. and there's a difference between irritating hyperactive knowing dialogue and, say, bringing up baby

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:21 (fourteen years ago) link

or network! now THERE'S a motherfucking SCREENPLAY.

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:22 (fourteen years ago) link

anybody starts talking smack about bringing up baby and i will CUT YOU

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:23 (fourteen years ago) link

nearly all of those screenplay winners listed are way better than Avatar.

Simon H., Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:25 (fourteen years ago) link

I had forgotten that Titanic wasn't even nominated for Best Screenplay. Guess I was thinking of Return of the King (which won adap).

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:26 (fourteen years ago) link

i am saying that it has one of the all-time greatest screenplays, please parse my words better

looking down the 'best screenplay' list it is amazing just how many shoddy crowd-pleasing winners there have been. and fuck me 'four weddings and a funeral' was nominated o_O

but 'Network' won and that is all that matters

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:27 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahaha Amélie was nominated too, wd everyone

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link

btw my point in all this is less that AVATAR deserves Best Original Screenplay Evar than that is deserves a nom (hell, GLADIATOR got a nom) and that ignoring the craft element fundamentally misunderstands the purpose of a screenplay.

obv the best screenplays transcend craft (e.g. CASABLANCA is a classic piece of hackwork... and yet!), but no screenplay that fails in its craft should be held up as a model for the youth of athens.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

If there's one thing all those above films have in common it's that they're still mostly just people sitting around talking (in varying settings). Scanning past winners, I don't see a single one with extensive action/gun battle sequences (which, if well-done, are the epitome of "craft" ... which is why they have technical awards; "Avatar" editing/sound is a lock!). Best Original Screenplay is not the same as Best Story or Best Storytelling. It's often really just the Most/Cleverist/Showiest Talking award, which is why "In the Loop" deserves this one.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:36 (fourteen years ago) link

My Dinner With Na'vi

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link

action/gun battle sequences get honored in Best Screenplay, Adapted

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:43 (fourteen years ago) link

loooool true

In The Loop deserves it most of all for being one of the 3 or 4 funniest British movies ever made. Not saying much, I know, but it brought enormous lols in the '09.

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:44 (fourteen years ago) link

Tarantino beats the Coens for that award; killing Natzees makes old Jews less nervous than pot mitzvahs and unhelpful rabbis.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:45 (fourteen years ago) link

yah i knew you werent talking shit about bringing up baby lj, i was just warning other contrarian mofackeys

xxxxxxxposts

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Tarantino beats the Coens for that award; killing Natzees makes old Jews less nervous than pot mitzvahs and unhelpful rabbis.

― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, January 6, 2010 1:45 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ya hollywood has always been famously terrified of marijuana use

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 18:58 (fourteen years ago) link

"Avatar" editing/sound is a lock!

probably, but it isn't on a par with 'hurt locker'. i don't get rogermexico's point because this film had a shitty screenplay and it's plot was just pochahontas. it's not a great achievement to use a well-worn plot only with shitty and obvious war on terror references and lines like "YOU'RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE... YOU'RE ON PANDORA" plus add completely stupid bits of business like michelle rodriguez firing on her own side. watertight? more like WATERWORLD.

keep forgetting, but 'duplicity' would be my best orig screenplay after 'a serious man'.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 19:33 (fourteen years ago) link

who agrees that Enemy Mine was dope at least?

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 19:39 (fourteen years ago) link

The Dennis Quaid/Iron Eagle guy joint?

Having seen "The Hurt Locker" three times now, I'm pretty much in agreement with the blurb on the box cover that calls it a near-perfect movie. Even a distracting Ralph Fiennes cn't bring it down, and the last shot is like a recruitment film flipped on its head into an ironic tragedy. Even that I'm inferring, because this may be the first war film I've ever seen that never quite says "war - bah!" or "war - yeah!" It just shows war, or at least one facet of it, and one can infer what one wants. Also, seriously gotta love Bigelow's rebirth as a scrappy indie auteur! I wonder if Cameron is even capable of making a small movie anymore, or if he ever was? Dream big, I guess.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link

my main point is that you're misweighting the criteria for evaluating a screenplay, so that's probably why the not-getting.

my corollary is that "stock" =/= cliché and "broad" =/= "dumb" and "doesn't lose the 7 year olds" trumps "keeps the sophisticates amused" when it comes to pictures that need to make a billi

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

Roger, I think you're confusing the criteria for making a good movie and making a billion dollars. Sure, there are certain beats one should/must hit to make bank. But those are not the same beats one needs to hit to tell a strong story with strong characters. Which is why all the top grossing films ever are pretty lacking in the depth department. And I say that as a 7-year old.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:12 (fourteen years ago) link

With a couple of outliers, of course:

Rank Title Worldwide Box Office
1. Titanic (1997) $1,835,300,000
2. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) $1,129,219,252
3. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) $1,060,332,628
4. Avatar (2009) $1,030,409,452
5. The Dark Knight (2008) $1,001,921,825
6. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) $968,657,891
7. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (2007) $958,404,152
8. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) $937,000,866
9. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) $933,956,980
10. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $922,379,000
11. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) $921,600,000
12. Jurassic Park (1993) $919,700,000
13. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) $892,194,397
14. Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs (2009) $887,073,705
15. Spider-Man 3 (2007) $885,430,303
16. Shrek 2 (2004) $880,871,036
17. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) $866,300,000
18. Finding Nemo (2003) $865,000,000
19. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) $860,700,000
20. Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) $848,462,555

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

another thing the avatar screenplay fails to do is create compelling characters -- that's surely a traditional criterion? and also one used by other blockbusters. im not sure if you mean im misweighing evaluative criteria in general, or not getting those used by the oscars, but 'eternal sunshine' for my money was a worthy winner. i don't like many of the other picks but they are at least solid jobs of work. avatar is barely that.

even if you think it's well structured, the mid-section in particular is very tedious because no-one gives 1x fuck about sam worthington.

xpost

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

that list is essentially meaningless due to inflation.

If the Best Picture is not seen as a legit screenplay contender, the award usu goes to something considered clever (eg Woody Allen, Et Sunshine, The Usual Suspects, Pulp Fiction).

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, the lack of memorable characters is definitely the movie / screenplay's biggest flaw. That, and the utter dopeyness of the Na'vi. xp

Simon H., Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

that list is essentially meaningless due to inflation

Yeah, and so is "Avatar"'s tally, since about $150-$200 mil of it has been 3-D surcharge. That's cheating! But I'd wager that list isn't, like, massively wrong, and that even accounting for inflation, the biggest box office hits globally have been FX-heavy action flicks.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

It is super unlikely this is going to win a screenplay award but let's not kid ourselves; high-grossing movies win Academy awards.

"Titanic" won 11 out of 14 noms, "Lord of the Rings: Return of the Kings" swept all 11 categories it was nominated in, "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" won 1 out of 4, "The Dark Knight" won 2 out of 8... you have to get to the Harry Potter movies before you start hitting ones that didn't win and the first one was nominated for 3 awards (and the #11 movie, "LOTR: The Two Towers", won 2 out of 6 nominations); hell, even "The Phantom Menace" was nominated for 3 Academy awards.

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:23 (fourteen years ago) link

haha, how do you guys feel about 2xLPs on the best selling records of all time lists?

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:23 (fourteen years ago) link

It's kinda crazy to think that I've seen only 6 of the top 20 highest grossing films (unadjusted) ever.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha I have seen 19 of them

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

I've seen 10. Mind you I'll be seeing all the Potters soon enough.

Simon H., Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

time to get adjusted

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, the only one I'm missing is the newest Potter and that's just because I was able to successfully distract my wife from noticing when it was in theaters.

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

seen four, but star wars part one was a pirated vhs so doesn't entirely count.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

Actually I don't think I've seen the entirety of "Ice Age" so 18.5

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw em all

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

a cool 9. jurassic park WINS the snap jagger poll

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Before the current age of sound and fury, and after The Sound of Music and The Godfather -- something of a freak case since it was considered as a sort of art film in addition to being a pop smash -- the Academy shied away from giving Best Picture to huge hits until Titanic. eg, Annie Hall beat Star Wars, Chariots of Fire beat Raiders of the Lost Ark, Gandhi beat ET etc.

You guys know this is over $1 billion worldwide, yes?

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Conceding that the list is meaningless without inflation adjustment, it's worth noting that out of the 20 top grossers, exactly 3 were not based on existing properties. Those three:

TITANIC (nom'd for seemingly everything except Best Original Screenplay)
AVATAR
FINDING NEMO (nom'd for Best Original Screenplay)

Pretty impressive achievement, no?

btw i do NOT agree that the 3D surcharge is cheating - people were willing to pay it to see this movie as it was meant to be seen. In fact, I'd much rather pay $17 to see this in 3D/IMAX than $11 to see it on a normal screen. Without 3D/IMAX it would be a much less enjoyable movie.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

top 100 box office all time...adjusted for inflation:
1 Gone with the Wind MGM $1,485,028,000 $198,676,459 1939^
2 Star Wars Fox $1,309,179,000 $460,998,007 1977^
3 The Sound of Music Fox $1,046,753,000 $158,671,368 1965
4 E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial Uni. $1,042,629,400 $435,110,554 1982^
5 The Ten Commandments Par. $962,850,000 $65,500,000 1956
6 Titanic Par. $943,342,300 $600,788,188 1997
7 Jaws Uni. $941,379,300 $260,000,000 1975
8 Doctor Zhivago MGM $912,395,600 $111,721,910 1965
9 The Exorcist WB $812,679,700 $232,671,011 1973^
10 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Dis. $801,150,000 $184,925,486 1937^
11 101 Dalmatians Dis. $734,391,800 $144,880,014 1961^
12 The Empire Strikes Back Fox $721,627,700 $290,475,067 1980^
13 Ben-Hur MGM $720,300,000 $74,000,000 1959
14 Return of the Jedi Fox $691,336,700 $309,306,177 1983^
15 The Sting Uni. $655,200,000 $156,000,000 1973
16 Raiders of the Lost Ark Par. $647,842,600 $242,374,454 1981^
17 Jurassic Park Uni. $633,612,900 $357,067,947 1993
18 The Graduate AVCO $628,949,700 $104,901,839 1967^
19 Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace Fox $623,469,700 $431,088,301 1999
20 Fantasia Dis. $610,369,600 $76,408,097 1941^
21 The Godfather Par. $580,080,900 $134,966,411 1972^
22 Forrest Gump Par. $577,310,300 $329,694,499 1994
23 Mary Poppins Dis. $574,636,400 $102,272,727 1964^
24 The Lion King BV $567,653,700 $328,541,776 1994^
25 Grease Par. $565,374,900 $188,389,888 1978^
26 Thunderball UA $549,780,000 $63,595,658 1965
27 The Dark Knight WB $545,973,300 $533,345,358 2008
28 The Jungle Book Dis. $541,547,400 $141,843,612 1967^
29 Sleeping Beauty Dis. $534,169,000 $51,600,000 1959^
30 Shrek 2 DW $522,224,300 $441,226,247 2004
31 Ghostbusters Col. $519,870,000 $238,632,124 1984^
32 Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid Fox $518,600,200 $102,308,889 1969
33 Love Story Par. $514,486,400 $106,397,186 1970
34 Spider-Man Sony $510,712,900 $403,706,375 2002
35 Independence Day Fox $509,126,200 $306,169,268 1996
36 Home Alone Fox $497,846,400 $285,761,243 1990
37 Pinocchio Dis. $495,414,500 $84,254,167 1940^
38 Cleopatra (1963) Fox $493,798,400 $57,777,778 1963
39 Beverly Hills Cop Par. $493,552,600 $234,760,478 1984
40 Goldfinger UA $487,305,000 $51,081,062 1964
41 Airport Uni. $485,917,900 $100,489,151 1970
42 American Graffiti Uni. $483,000,000 $115,000,000 1973
43 The Robe Fox $481,090,900 $36,000,000 1953
44 Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest BV $475,018,500 $423,315,812 2006
45 Around the World in 80 Days UA $474,923,100 $42,000,000 1956
46 Bambi RKO $468,286,500 $102,247,150 1942^
47 Blazing Saddles WB $464,722,200 $119,500,000 1974
48 Batman WB $462,716,400 $251,188,924 1989
49 The Bells of St. Mary's RKO $461,176,500 $21,333,333 1945
50 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King NL $452,305,300 $377,027,325 2003
51 The Towering Inferno Fox $451,111,100 $116,000,000 1974
52 Spider-Man 2 Sony $442,166,800 $373,585,825 2004
53 My Fair Lady WB $441,000,000 $72,000,000 1964
54 The Greatest Show on Earth Par. $441,000,000 $36,000,000 1952
55 National Lampoon's Animal House Uni. $440,193,500 $141,600,000 1978^
56 The Passion of the Christ NM $438,830,600 $370,782,930 2004^
57 Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Fox $436,035,700 $380,270,577 2005
58 Back to the Future Uni. $434,022,300 $210,609,762 1985
59 The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers NL $423,583,600 $341,786,758 2002^
60 The Sixth Sense BV $423,206,600 $293,506,292 1999
61 Superman WB $421,582,200 $134,218,018 1978
62 Tootsie Col. $418,244,000 $177,200,000 1982
63 Smokey and the Bandit Uni. $417,722,000 $126,737,428 1977
64 Finding Nemo BV $414,080,400 $339,714,978 2003
65 Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen P/DW $411,632,600 $402,111,870 2009
66 West Side Story MGM $411,381,600 $43,656,822 1961
67 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone WB $410,960,400 $317,575,550 2001
68 Lady and the Tramp Dis. $409,651,400 $93,602,326 1955^
69 Close Encounters of the Third Kind Col. $408,480,200 $132,088,635 1977^
70 Lawrence of Arabia Col. $407,069,100 $44,824,144 1962^
71 The Rocky Horror Picture Show Fox $404,760,300 $112,892,319 1975
72 Rocky UA $404,543,800 $117,235,147 1976
73 The Best Years of Our Lives RKO $404,250,000 $23,650,000 1946
74 The Poseidon Adventure Fox $403,529,400 $84,563,118 1972
75 The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring NL $402,073,800 $314,776,170 2001^
76 Twister WB $401,957,700 $241,721,524 1996
77 Men in Black Sony $401,432,600 $250,690,539 1997
78 The Bridge on the River Kwai Col. $399,840,000 $27,200,000 1957
79 It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World MGM $395,984,300 $46,332,858 1963
80 Swiss Family Robinson Dis. $395,488,800 $40,356,000 1960
81 One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest UA $394,587,400 $108,981,275 1975
82 M.A.S.H. Fox $394,578,900 $81,600,000 1970
83 Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom Par. $393,466,200 $179,870,271 1984
84 Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones Fox $392,993,300 $310,676,740 2002^
85 Mrs. Doubtfire Fox $387,230,200 $219,195,243 1993
86 Aladdin BV $385,451,300 $217,350,219 1992
87 Ghost Par. $378,269,400 $217,631,306 1990
88 Duel in the Sun Selz. $375,000,000 $20,408,163 1946
89 Avatar Fox $374,252,000 $367,536,685 2009
90 Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl BV $372,269,400 $305,413,918 2003
91 House of Wax WB $371,409,600 $23,750,000 1953
92 Rear Window Par. $370,107,400 $36,764,313 1954^
93 The Lost World: Jurassic Park Uni. $366,838,100 $229,086,679 1997
94 Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade Par. $363,211,200 $197,171,806 1989
95 Spider-Man 3 Sony $359,520,000 $336,530,303 2007
96 Terminator 2: Judgment Day TriS $357,624,400 $204,843,345 1991
97 Sergeant York WB $353,705,500 $16,361,885 1941
98 How the Grinch Stole Christmas Uni. $353,585,200 $260,044,825 2000
99 Toy Story 2 BV $351,598,400 $245,852,179 1999^
100 Top Gun Par. $350,237,800 $176,786,701 1986
undefined

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar at 89....basically nothing will ever beat gone with the wind

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

they don't have hard figures for 'birth of a nation'. various chaplins must have made insane bank just because they were played over and over again for a decade. iirc.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:44 (fourteen years ago) link

Is "Ghostbusters" the highest-grossing movie on here that wasn't nominated for an Oscar????

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:45 (fourteen years ago) link

ghostbusters won best ghost iirc

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:46 (fourteen years ago) link

haha nope, that was nominated for Best Visual Effects and Best Song

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

can someone adjust this list for inflation pls

http://www.amazon.com/Every-Movie-Award-BEST-winner/lm/R1OBZ6R04C9VBC

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

really folx, nobody cares about Oscars except the "top 3" categories. Esp these types of films, the Academy feels bound to throw tech noms at em.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

the top 3 = best ghost, best kiss and what else?

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

yes, those are the awards that Pirates of the Caribbean shit deserves

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Unless I've missed something, "National Lampoon's Animal House" is the first movie on this list that wasn't nominated for an Oscar.

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

biggest suprise on the adjusted list: The Sting at 15!

didn't know that was so huge, love it

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Unless I've missed something, "National Lampoon's Animal House" is the first movie on this list that wasn't nominated for an Oscar.

― ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Wednesday, January 6, 2010 3:53 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

best animals

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

The Sting is kind of a windup toy of a movie. I remember seeing Robert Altman ridicule it on "60 Minutes." "There were no people in it," or some such.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

this from the dude who made O.C. and Stiggs

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

morbs made OC and Stiggs?

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

how is avatar already adjusted for inflation?

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i was going to say

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

inflation happens

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

more like deflation amirite?

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

inflation is just economic poppage

jealous ones sb (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

buck-want

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahaaa

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think I've ever made it more than halfway through "Gone with the Wind." Are re-releases accounted for in that adjusted list?

What I'd really like to see is a list of number of tickets sold, if only as a vital reminder that the vast majority of the world couldn't give a fuck what an "Avatar" is.

The 3-D surcharge is only cheating because it's "competing" against films that didn't have that financial leg up (and like I said, it's so far between $150 and $200 mil bonus - minus the 3-D cash it wouldn't be in the top 20 grossers yet). I couldn't fathom sitting through "Avatar" in 2-D any more than I could watch the (equally awesome in 3-D) "Beowulf" in 2-D (and I tried that shit but could barely make it 15 minutes into a movie I enjoyed immensely in theaters). Supposedly a huge number of the global ticket sales are for 2-D screenings, FWIW. What a bunch of suckers.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 January 2010 00:52 (fourteen years ago) link

couldn't give a shit about the 3d it was the IMAX that made it for me

dome plow (gbx), Thursday, 7 January 2010 00:58 (fourteen years ago) link

What I'd really like to see is a list of number of tickets sold, if only as a vital reminder that the vast majority of the world couldn't give a fuck what an "Avatar" is.

So far int'l gross is 2x domestic. Or am I missing something?

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:05 (fourteen years ago) link

Conceding that the list is meaningless without inflation adjustment, it's worth noting that out of the 20 top grossers, exactly 3 were not based on existing properties. Those three:

TITANIC (nom'd for seemingly everything except Best Original Screenplay)
AVATAR
FINDING NEMO (nom'd for Best Original Screenplay)

tb totally fair "titanic" is kind of an existing property

max, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:06 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i was gonna say

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:07 (fourteen years ago) link

though it only exists now in the briney deep, holding close to her bosom those 1522 poor souls

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:07 (fourteen years ago) link

So far int'l gross is 2x domestic. Or am I missing something?

I just meant that of the 300 million people in the US (for example), how many will see "Avatar?" And globally as well, a fraction of a fraction, and that includes the film's apparently massive success in China!

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118013377.html?categoryid=3599&cs=1&nid=4758

$4.8 million opening day record, y'all!

Anyway, just some perspective that by talking about gross we always gloss over how few people (relatively speaking) even bother flocking to the movies. I've always wondered how many people (not how much money) it takes to make something a seemingly huge hit.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:12 (fourteen years ago) link

it's just a way to make the movies seem like bigger hits than they actually are, to an extent. which is why movies deal with $$$ when talking about success as opposed to people talking about how many people bought a copy of an album.

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:18 (fourteen years ago) link

2007 - JUNO
2006 - LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE
2005 - CRASH

u all r arguing abt this fn award - im confiscating yr 3d glasses

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:23 (fourteen years ago) link

actually max, the two major Titanic productions from Hollywood before Cameron didn't think of adding teenage puppylove as the crucial ingredient. So it WAS original.

The reason GWTW will never be caught in tickets sold is that practically everyone DID go to the movies then.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:27 (fourteen years ago) link

*~now we're alone at last~*

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:29 (fourteen years ago) link

i meant less that it had been made before than that its kind of a story that everyone knows already so calling it "original" is a little bit of a stretch u know

max, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:31 (fourteen years ago) link

There are about six basic plots, young one.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:36 (fourteen years ago) link

The reason GWTW will never be caught in tickets sold is that practically everyone DID go to the movies then.

― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, January 6, 2010 8:27 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i wonder how this formulation looks w/emerging economies added and population growth figured - a much smaller percentage americans go to the movies than in 1939 but many more asians and south americans must be going right - and there are just so many more people now

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:44 (fourteen years ago) link

was thinking max meant the boat the titanic was the original property myself

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:45 (fourteen years ago) link

max is misunderstood

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:45 (fourteen years ago) link

like the Ark of the Covenant? xp

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:48 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah indiana jones is a real guy right

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:51 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah sorry let me be clear: "titanic" is not really an orig. property in the same way that "avatar" or "finding nemo" are

max, Thursday, 7 January 2010 01:58 (fourteen years ago) link

because it is named after a boat

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:01 (fourteen years ago) link

and another thing do movie tickets cost the same in inflation adjusted dollars as they used to - how abt foreign tickets hows that work

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I may have to disagree with you, max, since I am overhearing ordinary joes say that Avatar is a routine Western.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:05 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar is nothing short of a revolution in movie magic fyi

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:06 (fourteen years ago) link

i hope the blue ppl of pandora see it and are inspired to incite a ~real~ revolution

dome plow (gbx), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:07 (fourteen years ago) link

titanic was a boat

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:35 (fourteen years ago) link

that sounds a boat right

ice cr?m, Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:36 (fourteen years ago) link

get outta here with that ship

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:37 (fourteen years ago) link

*gets sinking feeling*

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:38 (fourteen years ago) link

there was such a drastic split in titanic, the first half sank pretty quickly, the second half stayed afloat better

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:40 (fourteen years ago) link

*grosses 1.2 billion adjusted dollars*

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:40 (fourteen years ago) link

take it to the poop deck

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Thursday, 7 January 2010 02:40 (fourteen years ago) link

nrq upthread:

the 3-d is annoying and distracting. would probably need to know about perceptual psychology to say why, but imo in most instances it does nothing interesting and draws attention to irrelevant things. more damagingly it splits the image, quite brutally, into separate panes. why do this? it also dulls the colours.

wtf? what does "splits the image into separate panes" even mean?

fwiw i'm ambivalent about the 3d. It makes shit look real, totally real! I felt I could just reach out and touch things in the film. But movies don't need to look totally real to be good, so it's still a gimmick, albeit a great one.

CATBEAST 7777 (ledge), Thursday, 7 January 2010 10:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I think he means the focal plane but I'm not sure

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:16 (fourteen years ago) link

nrq upthread:

the 3-d is annoying and distracting. would probably need to know about perceptual psychology to say why, but imo in most instances it does nothing interesting and draws attention to irrelevant things. more damagingly it splits the image, quite brutally, into separate panes. why do this? it also dulls the colours.

wtf? what does "splits the image into separate panes" even mean?

fwiw i'm ambivalent about the 3d. It makes shit look real, totally real! I felt I could just reach out and touch things in the film. But movies don't need to look totally real to be good, so it's still a gimmick, albeit a great one.

― CATBEAST 7777 (ledge), Thursday, January 7, 2010 10:50 AM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark

say there are three people in the shot, one closest to us, one behind, one further back. shoot this in 2d and (i reckon) yer brain will basically see this as it would irl, i.e. in 3d. in 'avatar', though, i felt that the effect of the 3-d technology was to put three people in three definite planes, in a weird way flattening them out. it felt abstract and jarring to me but ymmv.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:31 (fourteen years ago) link

still read that as a latin 'yummy'

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:33 (fourteen years ago) link

i felt that the effect of the 3-d technology was to put three people in three definite planes, in a weird way flattening them out. it felt abstract and jarring to me but ymmv.

Yes, I found this quite distracting - bit of a dime-store* stereoscopic effect.

(* obviously I don't really know what I mean by dime-store)

Michael Jones, Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:37 (fourteen years ago) link

right-wing cunt who dines out on having gone to university with boris johnson and david cameron defends it from his awful friends:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/columnists/all/5686568/if-were-going-to-rage-against-cultural-atrocities-lets-make-sure-we-target-the-right-ones.thtml

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:40 (fourteen years ago) link

I can't believe I read the whole thing. BARF.

This stands out: the irritation of seeing their kids drip-fed Mary-Seacole-global-warming-and-Eid studies. Christ on fire.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:46 (fourteen years ago) link

bit of a dime-store* stereoscopic effect.

it's the same effect you get with binoculars, isn't it? each object looks flattened out like the scene is made of cardboard cutouts positioned at different distances. don't understand the optics of it: assume w/ binoculars it's because telephoto lenses flatten perspective - is it just cos they film mostly w/ telephotos?

joe, Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:02 (fourteen years ago) link

you do get it to an extent with other visual media, and the jarringness is, im sure, partly the shock of the new.

just not clear what the 3d adds to the experience of a simple three-shot. there were some shots, like the first of the long chamber full of sleeping marines, that i thought were superb.

but all in all this was basically the abyss + strange days + aliens divided by shit.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Is shit a negative number or a fraction?

partly the shock of the new

Could be. The perspective-flattening thing with long lenses is something everyone is now used to in still photography and 2D film/video but perhaps it wasn't always the case. The 3D depth of field stuff was often so jarring that it made me think that some shots (like in the helicopter with two chars + background) were composed, not with a long lens and a wide aperture, but with some sort of Photoshop blur mask, hence the sharp edges to the foreground characters. I don't know really. The cryosleep chambers were well done though.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:23 (fourteen years ago) link

roflofloflmao

just not clear what the 3d adds to the experience of a simple three-shot. there were some shots, like the first of the long chamber full of sleeping marines, that i thought were superb.

yeah i'm kinda with you there. but it's all or nothing.

CATBEAST 7777 (ledge), Thursday, 7 January 2010 13:43 (fourteen years ago) link

i kinda agree about the depth of field thing, it makes it look like some sort of paper puppet theater and really pulls me out of it

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Thursday, 7 January 2010 15:18 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm kind of glad 3D doesn't work for me. the only scene it worked in was when there was some ash falling after a battle, and i found it extremely jarring and distrcting. my gf loved the 3D, though.

richie aprile (rockapads), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:03 (fourteen years ago) link

titanic was a boat

― meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Wednesday, January 6, 2010 6:35 PM

a pred boat?

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:04 (fourteen years ago) link

does the 3D have a different effect than the 3D Imax? (it really shouldn't i'd imagine) wasn't really distracted by the 3D...

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:05 (fourteen years ago) link

They should glue, like, four Imax screens together and make a Super Imax screen, then charge $100 a ticket. That would be very awesome, or, barring that, at least very big.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:19 (fourteen years ago) link

otm it would be huge

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:22 (fourteen years ago) link

this was the first 'narrative' film i've seen in IMAX, and the first time i've been to an IMAX in basically a decade, i'd forgotten how lol hueg they are

dome plow (gbx), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

(i don't get the predator boats/ships jokes. it seems to be a zing directed at a certain kind of hater?)

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:35 (fourteen years ago) link

it's a long running nerd debate as to whether or not the ship in alien was a predator ship

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

referred to at LONG LENGTH in an ilx thread i'm too lazy to find

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

so iow yes

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

the Most hilarious fanboy message board debate of all time

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:43 (fourteen years ago) link

woah that was a long time ago.

(was it a pred boat, in the end?)

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

^ For your sake and the sake of the people you are exposed to every day, I hope that post was a joke, because if it wasn't, the astonishing ignorance of that post says something really scary about you.

And if it was a joke, it wasn't funny, not even accidentally.

Now, pay attention, and tell me if you can understand this (I'll use smaller words if you need me to) -- there was no such thing as "Predator" back in 1979 when Ridley Scott made ALIEN. So, no, it is not a Predator ship.

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

LeBrainBoy, ladies and gentlemen.

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

But what if the Predators had time travel abilities? Ever think about that!?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

every single day of my life

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:21 (fourteen years ago) link

I would call the sequel "Time Predators."

"This time ... they're hunting through time!"

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:23 (fourteen years ago) link

tbh predators taking on t-rexes would be pretty fun

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

charlamagne vs predator

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

ghenghis khan vs predator vs beethoven vs freud vs joan of arc vs napolean vs socrates

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

san dimas high school football rules

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link

no bill and ted = no credibility

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:37 (fourteen years ago) link

i don't want them to get hurt

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

WHO WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Thursday, 7 January 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

ghenghis khan vs predator vs beethoven vs freud vs joan of arc vs napolean vs socrates

My first thought was Beethoven the movie dog.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 January 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

haha well certainly he's invited if he wants to join the carnage

latebloomer, Thursday, 7 January 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

My friend (a chef who works nights and has days off) posted on FB that all daytime showings of Avatar 3D IMAX in his area are sold out until next Tuesday... yes 5 days sold out in advance.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:02 (fourteen years ago) link

ya but even u admit he's a chef

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:07 (fourteen years ago) link

his post was illustrating his frustration about going to the theater today and not being able to get tix to the film even outside of peak hours on not just on a random weekday (which is usually not a problem for people who work nights)... but at a 5 day leadtime! my point in posting that is to suggest that the film may be gaining box office momentum which is pretty frightening.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah I want to see it at Imax but I'm waiting until there's actually empty seats in the theater. Sheesh.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Too good to sit in a stranger's lap, are you?

girl moves (Abbott), Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:55 (fourteen years ago) link

BTW it's now the 2nd highest grossing film of all time. And it's only been out for 20 days. Jesus.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:56 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost - I prefer to provide the lap, thank you very much.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:56 (fourteen years ago) link

best get there early then

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Thursday, 7 January 2010 23:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I am not going to see this film.

Radio Birdman Rally (King Boy Pato), Friday, 8 January 2010 00:35 (fourteen years ago) link

The only Sam Worthington you ever need to see in your life btw was his performance in a rubbish Australian reimagating of Macbeth. Specifically his whispery delivery of "is that a dagger I see before me...(lengthy pause)...or a dagger of the mind?"

Radio Birdman Rally (King Boy Pato), Friday, 8 January 2010 00:38 (fourteen years ago) link

IMAX show I went to was hell of sold out, on the way out i saw them turning away actual dozens of ppl

into the young coconuts (gbx), Friday, 8 January 2010 01:03 (fourteen years ago) link

I had to sit on the far left/up front for my IMAX viewing :|

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Friday, 8 January 2010 02:30 (fourteen years ago) link

I like that my local imax theater has assigned seating, I was able to actually pick my seats when buying tickets

I regret choosing this bland user name (peter in montreal), Friday, 8 January 2010 15:09 (fourteen years ago) link

still feel no desire to see this, but the figures are beginning to wear me down tbh

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Friday, 8 January 2010 15:13 (fourteen years ago) link

I've been worn down, finally going to see this next weekend. We had to buy our tickets for the IMAX a week in advance.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 8 January 2010 15:15 (fourteen years ago) link

the sweet spot in my local IMAX (ie centre area of the back three rows) is the only assigned seating bit, and has been sold out for every showing since this opened. I've finally got tickets for next Wednesday. When we were in the same cinema to see another film last Saturday at 2.00pm all Avatar showings in IMAX and other screens were already sold out - I know there's some discussion upthread about how this "couldn't fail" with the marketing $$$ behind it, but it does seem like word of mouth after the opening week has given this huge momentum as well.

Bill A, Friday, 8 January 2010 15:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I figure this is still gonna play to packed IMAX theatres for probably a couple more months, long after it's stopped playing at regular theatres

I regret choosing this bland user name (peter in montreal), Friday, 8 January 2010 15:21 (fourteen years ago) link

To quote Crow T. Robot from a while back: "It's even better with the 3-D glasses on -- I feel like I'm really here!"

Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 January 2010 15:24 (fourteen years ago) link

sign of the apocalypse?

Kenneth Turan, thefairly negative film crit for the LA Times who infamously panned Titanic not just once but several tims and repeatedly drew the ire of Cameron, actually LIKED this!

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 8 January 2010 15:26 (fourteen years ago) link

david brooks did not like the jar jar binksness
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/opinion/08brooks.html?th&emc=th
he forgets to point out how cameron colonializes yes album covers too

kamerad, Friday, 8 January 2010 15:39 (fourteen years ago) link

rollin' my eyes at that URL xp

meryl streep post-brazilian (s1ocki), Friday, 8 January 2010 15:40 (fourteen years ago) link

+my god, mark - your username... ARG - MY BRANE!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 8 January 2010 17:06 (fourteen years ago) link

rollin' my eyes at that URL xp

otfm

da croupier, Friday, 8 January 2010 17:09 (fourteen years ago) link

still waiting till this plays on a rollercoaster at six flags

da croupier, Friday, 8 January 2010 17:10 (fourteen years ago) link

you guys are just too jaded to enjoy true wonder!

latebloomer, Friday, 8 January 2010 17:27 (fourteen years ago) link

This was horrible and half-baked on so many levels, all of which I'm sure have been pointed out somewhere on this thread, but it is far too long to read all the way through and I want to vent.

I could not understand why, if they wanted the stupid resource so bad, they didn't just nuke the fucking tree in the first couple of minutes rather than bothering with the whole rigmarole of growing a massively expensive pseudo-Navii to infiltrate the tribe (that incidentally was demonstrated to be a completely pointless exercise as the Navii could tell straightaway that the avatar wasn't really one of them). I mean if it takes 6 years to travel there then it presumably takes at least that long to send a message so who cares about the media - by the time you've wiped out the indigineous population no one back on Earth is going to give a fuck.

Why did the scientists go along with it at all when it was clearly obvious from the first scene with Giovani Ribisi that the organisation they were working for could care less what happened to the natives? It would have been nice to have any external context to what was going on, motivations etc, instead of endless cgi "training" scenes.

Also why the obsession with stupid "mecha" robots? I guarantee these things would never be developed by any future military - they are completely stupid; unwieldy, inefficient and they present an obvious target - the trend is surely towards lighter, streamlined fighting vehicles with a minimal silhouette not greating hulking things that are slow and expose their operators to more danger.

The "War on Terror" theme was hamfisted and obvious - "we need to use terror against terror" "time to deploy shock and awe" etc etc *yawn*. And then some nonsense trying to justify suicide bombing or something. Pathetic.

And to cap it all there was the atrocious hippy dippy gaia ecology bullshit that underpinned the movie. Horrible wishful thinking - "if only we were nice to nature we could live in trippy neon harmony with it and one day evolve symbiotic genitalia and love each other etc". I'm in the Lovecraft/Herzog/Alien (oh the fuckiing irony - and I realise this film was a particularly heavy-handed inversion of Aliens) camp - the universe gives not one jot whether we live or die; a planet-flattening asteroid could be punching its way through the atmosphere as I type this.

The real shame is that they fucked up a classic story-telling trope. It would have been better and more effective as a satire if Earth had simply been straightforwardly at war with these furry motherfuckers a la Forever War and the central character had gradually changed allegiance over the course of the film from being the typical gung-ho marine. Cut out all the science garbage. Opportunity lost.

ears are wounds, Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:28 (fourteen years ago) link

"we need to use terror against terror"

this was quite awesome in its bluntness but your points are generally sound i'd say

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:30 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost: why the obsession with 'mecha robots'? because they're next-level ALIENS power loaders, and I want one.

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link

only downside is not seeing Sigourney strap one of those badboys on.

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link

only read your last post and had a moment

Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:48 (fourteen years ago) link

lol

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:49 (fourteen years ago) link

i loved the fact that the mecha robots had the "not a step" sticker that the aliens loader queen-beater-upper thing had. great attention to detail in this movie visually, whatever else you think about it.

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Saturday, 9 January 2010 02:02 (fourteen years ago) link

whatevers else u think abt it is prob stupid unless it includes "avatar is super rad"

ice cr?m, Saturday, 9 January 2010 02:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I just loved how it was The Abyss, Aliens, Terminator Titanic and Ferngully all shoved in a blender. I went in totally suspicious and ready to be bored and jaded...and I was totally sucked in. The thing that had me completely transfixed was the Pandorum scenery, the real-life looking parts. I want to know how they did that. Did they just get cameras and go zooming through every kickass rainforest they could find?

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 9 January 2010 02:44 (fourteen years ago) link

ears are wounds is o t fucking m.

Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Saturday, 9 January 2010 03:18 (fourteen years ago) link

so tired of yr guys textbook views on what every movie needs to be compelling and hatred for mall hippie black light posters - im totally hanging out in the house w/the black light posters over the one w/the screenwriting textbooks

ice cr?m, Saturday, 9 January 2010 03:29 (fourteen years ago) link

otm. and I'll bet the house with the black light posters has a working power loader. AND flying stingray dragon things. textbook house can sit around waiting for the asteroid to crash into earth.

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 9 January 2010 03:42 (fourteen years ago) link

imo blacklight posters looked better in batman forever when batman fought the glowstick gang

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Saturday, 9 January 2010 04:01 (fourteen years ago) link

ice cr?m otm; you guys are not feeling the ~power of cinema~

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Saturday, 9 January 2010 04:47 (fourteen years ago) link

Why did the scientists go along with it at all when it was clearly obvious from the first scene with Giovani Ribisi that the organisation they were working for could care less what happened to the natives?

A sizable number of academics will take funding from Satan himself because it's, well, funding.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 9 January 2010 05:43 (fourteen years ago) link

besides every movie scientist worth a damn knows that you get your standoff at the end to show how secretly conflicted they really were...meantime, let's drive these cool blue people and do kickass science stuff!

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 9 January 2010 05:46 (fourteen years ago) link

mall hippie black light posters

^What does this mean??

ears are wounds, Saturday, 9 January 2010 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

ps yes power loaders are cool but there was a reason why the Marines in Aliens used them for loading stuff rather than combat. Ha don't know why these mecha things bug me so much though, I guess as far as issues with the film go its pretty lowdown on the list. Just a nerd I guess.

To be fair seeing it in 3D at the IMAX was pretty great whatever other faults I felt there were with the movie. But overall I don't see what it has over the Star Wars prequels.

ears are wounds, Saturday, 9 January 2010 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I could not understand why, if they wanted the stupid resource so bad, they didn't just nuke the fucking tree in the first couple of minutes rather than bothering with the whole rigmarole of growing a massively expensive pseudo-Navii to infiltrate the tribe (that incidentally was demonstrated to be a completely pointless exercise as the Navii could tell straightaway that the avatar wasn't really one of them).

the anthropologists and missionaries all come first, no? my impression was that the scientists were doing research and eventually reported the energy shit back to the main corporation, who then sent troops. the main character was on a ship with a bunch of new troops, yes? the build-up was happening as the story began. they used the avatars to get close to the Navi, and probably to be safer from the crazy ass jungle creatures, since they were like giants and stuff. i had the impression that the Navi knew what they were up to from whatever Sigourney's character did to cause her falling out with the tribe.

richie aprile (rockapads), Saturday, 9 January 2010 18:16 (fourteen years ago) link

the whole idea that they had the technology to create the avatars, but were still using mechas with machine guns on them was pretty dumb, but whatever. I am guilty of making loads of excuses and rationalizations to justify enjoying a big sci-fi/fantasy spectacle every few years.

richie aprile (rockapads), Saturday, 9 January 2010 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost

My impression was that the military were perfectly well aware of where the unobotanium or whatever fuck was located right from the beginning. I didn't think Sigourney Weaver was interested in that aspect of the planet at all - it was quite separate to the organic internet garbage. The military's main interest in a Navii infiltrator from what I gleaned from the endless montages was to find out the structure of the tree itself because they couldn't scan it from orbit or something. Which if correct doesn't make any sense if they could just obliterate the whole thing at any point. To be honest, the film is already sliding out of my mind less than 24 hours later so I could have misunderstood all of this.

Thing is I am perfectly willing to overlook the conceits of science fiction and fantasy movies/literature, if they can deliver elsewhere, but when an SF film has an incredibly paper thin plot, half-arsed characerisation, formulaic dialogue etc it makes you less willing to swallow all the plot holes.

ears are wounds, Saturday, 9 January 2010 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

My impression was that the military were perfectly well aware of where the unobotanium or whatever fuck was located right from the beginning.

yep. lang said that the unobtanium trade was what paid for the weave's science.

jive bunny and the masterilxers (history mayne), Saturday, 9 January 2010 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link

were still using mechas with machine guns on them

mechas with machine guns AND BACK-UP KNIVES in case something happened to the machine gun.

hooray we disabled the robot's machine gun!

OH SHIT IT HAS A KNIFE

Al Gore invented the internet to house the bitterness of humanity (reddening), Sunday, 10 January 2010 11:08 (fourteen years ago) link

this movie was so goddamn boring btw, i thought the visuals would be worth it but they weren't

Al Gore invented the internet to house the bitterness of humanity (reddening), Sunday, 10 January 2010 11:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Glimpses of blue nipples made me ignore a lot of the plot holes.

Nate Carson, Sunday, 10 January 2010 12:37 (fourteen years ago) link

hahah

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 10 January 2010 16:45 (fourteen years ago) link

lol my friends email:

"Saw avatar in IMAX 3d last night high on pot brownies. Was literally
most overwhelming experience of my life. Had about five panic attacks."

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Sunday, 10 January 2010 21:27 (fourteen years ago) link

i think the thing that bothered me most was the name - "unobotanium". seriously.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Sunday, 10 January 2010 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Very stupid. But as explained up thread, "Unobtainium" was a jokey working title for the substance that ended up sticking :(

Nate Carson, Sunday, 10 January 2010 23:03 (fourteen years ago) link

i actually liked the name unobtainium

fella, cutie (s1ocki), Monday, 11 January 2010 01:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Unobtanium has a long, long sci-fi history, as stupid as the name may be.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 11 January 2010 03:09 (fourteen years ago) link

this was amazing and stupid

chartres (goole), Monday, 11 January 2010 04:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Unobtanium has a long, long sci-fi history, as stupid as the name may be.

are you serious?!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 11 January 2010 04:26 (fourteen years ago) link

cameron guilty of utilizing ancient sci-fi tropes shockah

latebloomer, Monday, 11 January 2010 04:37 (fourteen years ago) link

he didn't even bother coming up with a new name! it'd be like calling a dude in your mystery movie "macguffin"

chartres (goole), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:05 (fourteen years ago) link

i kinda wishe'd done that. also should have named the protagonist gyro goodman

latebloomer, Monday, 11 January 2010 05:07 (fourteen years ago) link

hey i guessed right! wayne barlow did do "creature design" on this.

roger dean needs his credit tho

xp lol

chartres (goole), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:08 (fourteen years ago) link

what the fuck is going on with this movie. i went to go see buy a ticket yesterday and there was a lineup zigzagging through the entire theater, through the adjacent tim horton's, and out the door into the freezing cold then around the corner. hasn't it been out for a month already?

samosa gibreel, Monday, 11 January 2010 05:12 (fourteen years ago) link

oh and james horner is still horrible

chartres (goole), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:14 (fourteen years ago) link

and i thought this movie would be the go-to punchline to jokes about box office failures for the next few years.

richie aprile (rockapads), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:16 (fourteen years ago) link

wonder if cameron found a wish-granting mermaid on one of his deep sea dives

latebloomer, Monday, 11 January 2010 05:19 (fourteen years ago) link

he was probably blue and eight feet long

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:23 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean she

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:23 (fourteen years ago) link

O_O

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Monday, 11 January 2010 05:24 (fourteen years ago) link

i see you

kamerad, Monday, 11 January 2010 07:05 (fourteen years ago) link

he didn't even bother coming up with a new name! it'd be like calling a dude in your mystery movie "macguffin"

― chartres (goole), Sunday, January 10, 2010 11:05 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest

lol word for word my brother said that when we came out of the theater

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Monday, 11 January 2010 10:55 (fourteen years ago) link

A PDF of the Avatar script (I think official?):

http://www.foxscreenings.com/media/pdf/JamesCameronAVATAR.pdf

Al Gore invented the internet to house the bitterness of humanity (reddening), Monday, 11 January 2010 11:42 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm starting to feel really bad for the avatar last airbender people that they didn't get their movie out first, those guys are fucked now

some dude, Monday, 11 January 2010 13:58 (fourteen years ago) link

they're just calling it "the last airbender" now. anyway it's being directed by m. night shyamalan so it was fucked to begin with.

Al Gore invented the internet to house the bitterness of humanity (reddening), Monday, 11 January 2010 14:03 (fourteen years ago) link

oh well good/bad for them.

some dude, Monday, 11 January 2010 14:16 (fourteen years ago) link

Who the fuck let Shyamalalalananan direct another film?!

exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:33 (fourteen years ago) link

The twist ending will be that it really IS a remake of Avatar.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:37 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^^^ this. How much longer can he ride The Sixth Sense to make shitty film after shitty film? I'm assuming thats the only one of his movies that did enough box office bank to keep allowing this to happen.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:38 (fourteen years ago) link

i actually liked the name unobtainium

― fella, cutie (s1ocki), Monday, 11 January 2010 01:53 (13 hours ago)

yeah ditto, it felt a bit Futurama tho

mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:38 (fourteen years ago) link

not to turn this into a Shyamalan thread, but Signs made a ton of money too and as directors go he's still probably one of the more consistently profitable ones out there, regardless of how divisive he is

some dude, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:42 (fourteen years ago) link

I forgot about Signs, but I was under the impression that his last couple had really tanked.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 11 January 2010 15:46 (fourteen years ago) link

nah happening was a minor hit US-wise and did well internationally, lady in the water is his only real stink bomb (with The Village actually doing pretty good for a movie with no stars about scared quakers in the woods or wtfever, really)

da croupier, Monday, 11 January 2010 15:58 (fourteen years ago) link

SBing the next person to make lol shyamalan last name joke, c'mon ppl

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 16:07 (fourteen years ago) link

a movie with no stars

Poor William Hurt.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 January 2010 16:13 (fourteen years ago) link

A post by a user called Elequin expresses an almost obsessive relationship with the film.

"That's all I have been doing as of late, searching the Internet for more info about 'Avatar.' I guess that helps. It's so hard I can't force myself to think that it's just a movie, and to get over it, that living like the Na'vi will never happen. I think I need a rebound movie," Elequin posted.

actually what you need is called "therapy"

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 18:59 (fourteen years ago) link

headinhands.jpg in a major way

speakerbarxxx / the dog below (s1ocki), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:00 (fourteen years ago) link

also possibly "a smack"

ah ah oh ooh ooh oh ah ah ah ah ah oh ah ah aha ooh (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Other fans have expressed feelings of disgust with the human race

Given this story, you don't even need to be a fan to feel that.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 January 2010 19:09 (fourteen years ago) link

reads like an Onion article

Roz, Monday, 11 January 2010 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

Who would have ever guessed that Hollywood's problem was not that blockbusters were too big, but that they weren't BIG ENOUGH! Now's the time for you aspiring filmmakers to pitch your own $500 million movies.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 11 January 2010 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

seriously, reactions to this movie are making me hate it way more than the movie itself ever could

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:16 (fourteen years ago) link

it is the merriweather post na'vilion of movies

Inspiration for the sex robot sprang from the September 11 attacks (acoleuthic), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Haha, that article. lol@ furries.

stegosaurus (Pashmina), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

the person who wants to commit suicide in order to be reborn on Pandora is no mere furry

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link

by the middle of this week Avatar will be #4 on the All Time Domestic Gross $, top 40 All Time Adjusted Gross $, and #2 on All Time Worldwide Gross $.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Who would have ever guessed that Hollywood's problem was not that blockbusters were too big, but that they weren't BIG ENOUGH! Now's the time for you aspiring filmmakers to pitch your own $500 million movies.

LOL ^^^^

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 11 January 2010 19:53 (fourteen years ago) link

My movie pitch would be along the lines of "picture giving me $500 million dollars, then breathlessly watch your inbox for my script"

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:53 (fourteen years ago) link

dan can i create a property based on that concept

Who Makes the Na'Vis? (s1ocki), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:54 (fourteen years ago) link

yes, imagine kids eagerly looking at holiday presents that maight contain the greatest movie tie-in toy in the world

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:57 (fourteen years ago) link

imagine a sequel that turns everything you loved about the original movie up to 11

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:57 (fourteen years ago) link

now imagine a prequel that shatters all of your preconceived notions of what fantastic movie making is really all about

now, sign that check

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

a movie that truly harnesses the power of the imagination

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^^^ EXACTLY

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link

now that i've seen this movie, i'm depressed that i live in a world where this movie didn't tank

chartres (goole), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link

a movie experience so immersive you'll think you're drowning...in BLISS

Inspiration for the sex robot sprang from the September 11 attacks (acoleuthic), Monday, 11 January 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link

so tired of people (including my mom?!? wtf) telling me I HAVE TO SEE THIS

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:00 (fourteen years ago) link

someone hasn't been following the Senate hearings too closely!

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:00 (fourteen years ago) link

(fyi the last Franken bill was actually a government mandate requiring people to either see "Avatar" or pay taxes at a 80% rate)

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

the movie the US Supreme Court called "heartwarming... and MANDATORY"

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:02 (fourteen years ago) link

btw, as someone who enjoyed this movie, I thought is was remarkably cold and disconnected and I kind of don't get how others found it "heartwarming"; I just thought it was incredibly pretty and the story was solid enough for me to not feel like I was wasting my time by watching it

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

It's like, there's a love story, but it's the most facile love story ever and therefore doesn't seem convincing, like a relationship in the Real World house.

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:05 (fourteen years ago) link

HEY FAT NERDS ITS CALLED CAMPING LOOK INTO IT

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean LOeffinL at gamers getting depressed about the decline of the nat'l environment, a place they have never once showed interest

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

(i'm generalizing, of course, but ffs)

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

Can we talk about the bigger issue here? In that people are actually creating "news" stories centered entirely around stupid shit people post on internet forums? Ffs, this is like that old Something Awful feature.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

A post by a user called you gone float up with it expresses an almost obsessive relationship with the media.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 January 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

HEY FAT NERDS ITS CALLED CAMPING LOOK INTO IT

― everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, January 11, 2010 8:15 PM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i mean LOeffinL at gamers getting depressed about the decline of the nat'l environment, a place they have never once showed interest

― everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, January 11, 2010 8:16 PM Bookmark

QFTruth Bombs

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 11 January 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

Ned wins thread.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:23 (fourteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, there are angry people out there, and people who talk about angry people:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2010/01/right-wingers-launch-new-attack-on-avatar.html

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 January 2010 20:30 (fourteen years ago) link

even the two middle-aged male kneejerk conservatives/libertarians i know were like 'well yeah it's a little left-wing, but w/e it's a kids movie!"

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:35 (fourteen years ago) link

"and i thought this movie would be the go-to punchline to jokes about box office failures for the next few years."

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:39 (fourteen years ago) link

"Why drive to the movies, pay for tickets and spend hours in a dark room when you can just as easily read Noam Chomsky or the speeches of Hugo Chavez in the comfort of your own home and couch? Same difference."

I regret choosing this bland user name (peter in montreal), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

the ideas at work in avatar are vaguely lefty and definitely stupid, so i'm not surprised that the anti-hollywood crowd is doing their song and dance about it

chartres (goole), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

totally unsurprising, but still i think (WARNING: GENDER NORM) dude conservatives are like "whatever, it was kinda cool"

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:43 (fourteen years ago) link

Mila Kunis and John C. McGinley look TERRIBLE

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

that's because they painted their faces blue

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Monday, 11 January 2010 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Jim Cameron, blue fans outside avatar screening PHOTOS

da croupier, Monday, 11 January 2010 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link

looooooooooooooool

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Monday, 11 January 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

This film might have been better if it had any character development whatsoever

mh, Monday, 11 January 2010 22:02 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/jan/11/mawkish-maybe-avatar-profound-important

annoying uber-green guy likes it.

reminded me of one thing i thought of -- generally the european settlers were able to make allies and employ divide-and-rule tactics in the places they settled. good opportunity for dramatic conflict, ducked. instead imo the film is kind of saying the natives are basically like animals (only animals that all get on), which is lil bit racist? wv.

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:46 (fourteen years ago) link

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/11/avatar.movie.blues/t1larg.avatar.blues.gi.jpg

cnn plz exlplain to me why this photo has a camera in it

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Most of that front row appears to have had part of their jaws removed.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:02 (fourteen years ago) link

JAW-REMOVINGLY SPECTACULAR SPECIAL FX!
-cnn

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:07 (fourteen years ago) link

one guy has pizza

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:07 (fourteen years ago) link

tall goatee seems to be asleep

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm hoping pizza guy has the box balanced on his belly.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:09 (fourteen years ago) link

nerds have been doing this for time immemorial tho - there's no difference between wanting to be reborn in avatar vs. wanting to be reborn in final fantasy or the matrix

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:59 (fourteen years ago) link

vs Pink Flamingoes vs Salo vs Out of Africa vs...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:10 (fourteen years ago) link

EASY TARGET. SMOKE MORE WEED.

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:28 (fourteen years ago) link

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/01/500x_navisex.jpg

latebloomer, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:07 (fourteen years ago) link

*yiff*

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:09 (fourteen years ago) link

The ultimate intimacy

touch me i'm acoleuthic (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Fucking cracks me up that those words are in the script but not in dialogue

touch me i'm acoleuthic (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:25 (fourteen years ago) link

my theater was fidgety and uncomfortable enough with just the hot na'vi makeouts. i can only imagine how all the dudebros in the audience would've reacted to actual peer-to-peer networking right there onscreen.

Al Gore invented the internet to house the bitterness of humanity (reddening), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:56 (fourteen years ago) link

hey do u want to sync with me y/n

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 07:36 (fourteen years ago) link

Ways to cope with the depression of the dream of Pandora being intangible

Dino-linguist Noam Chompsky (Pillbox), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 08:18 (fourteen years ago) link

my theater was fidgety and uncomfortable enough with just the hot na'vi makeouts.

heh... My theater starting laughing at it.

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 09:14 (fourteen years ago) link

whoaboy

The tendrils INTERTWINE with gentle undulations. (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 10:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Meanwhile in non-surprise of the year story:

http://www.jgc.org/blog/2010/01/cnncom-jumps-shark-by-writing-story.html

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:18 (fourteen years ago) link

More bad reviews pouring from Europe:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100112/ap_on_en_mo/eu_vatican_avatar

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:42 (fourteen years ago) link

"So much stupefying, enchanting technology, but few genuine emotions," said L'Osservatore Romano, which devoted three articles to "Avatar" in its Sunday editions.
L'Osservatore Romano said the movie's plot is unoriginal and its message not new. It faulted Cameron for taking a "bland approach."

pope OTM

nutrition na'vi (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:44 (fourteen years ago) link

The Vatican newspaper and radio station have called the film "Avatar" simplistic, and criticized it for flirting with modern doctrines that promote the worship of nature as a substitute for religion.

i dunno about avatar, vatican dudes, but nature>>>>>religion

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

"modern doctrines"

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:52 (fourteen years ago) link

hahaha

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

"TWO BLESSINGS!"

- Cacciavillan & Bertone At The Movies

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:54 (fourteen years ago) link

eh, the movie doesn't really support paganism, since the supersmurfs REALLY ARE mentally connected to a living super-being. this is not really very much like any non-european or non-technological culture on earth, who i'm pretty sure, weren't. doesn't look like the vatican nor james cameron thought that thru very well tbh

chartres (goole), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:12 (fourteen years ago) link

it's a freakin' metaphor

nutrition na'vi (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link

the supersmurfs REALLY ARE mentally connected to a living super-being. this is not really very much like any non-european or non-technological culture on earth,

O RLY shamanic cultures would tend to disagree with you

shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

shakey aren't you an atheist?

metaphor for what?

chartres (goole), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

I am definitely not an atheist!

shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link

good day, sir!

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link

xp oh, ok.

chartres (goole), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link

also if they're really connected to a super being that can ~command all creatures~ why didn't they ask for its help BEFORE the humans blew up their damn tree

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Because they convinced themselves it wouldn't answer? Didn't Jake have this exact conversation with CCH Pounder in the movie?

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:26 (fourteen years ago) link

i don't remember, and i left my ponytail at home otherwise i'd look it up

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link

Erik Davis on Avatar, ayahuasca, etc

shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:32 (fourteen years ago) link

probably because the tree will only listen to a badass who flies on a giant red dragon

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 01:18 (fourteen years ago) link

avatar 2: the tree whisperer

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 01:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Shakey Mo, Erik Davis writes very badly. What was his point?

Aimless, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 01:33 (fourteen years ago) link

O RLY shamanic cultures would tend to disagree with you

to paraphrase an old philosophy lecturer of mine, the shamanic cultures are JUST WRONG.

CATBEAST 7777 (ledge), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 09:47 (fourteen years ago) link

criticized it for flirting with modern doctrines that promote the worship of nature as a substitute for religion

religion is a modern substitute for the worship of nature.

maybe the issue is the 'flirting', the pope's never been too hot on that.

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 10:10 (fourteen years ago) link

the shamanic cultures are JUST WRONG.

otm. nature is not in harmony. it is just as hobbes said imo.

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 10:16 (fourteen years ago) link

and the life of man, solitary, poore, na'vi, brutish, and short

(҉) (dyao), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 10:18 (fourteen years ago) link

shart I mean

(҉) (dyao), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 10:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Boris Strugatsky (of the Brothers Strugatsky, of Stalker fame) is evidently accusing James Cameron of ripping him off?

with hidden noise, Friday, 15 January 2010 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Finally saw this today, in IMAX 3D. The story was kind of worse than I expected actually, totally predictable and laughable at times. But I'll be damned if the visuals didn't keep my eyes glued to the screen every second. I pretty much have no desire to ever see it again, but I'm glad that I saw it in the big format.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 17 January 2010 00:12 (fourteen years ago) link

having a funny convo w/ a friend who agrees with me about everything except that he loved it

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Sunday, 17 January 2010 04:05 (fourteen years ago) link

*****: the pivotal scene in avatar
*****: is the one where america launches a 9/11 attack on sioux jerusalem
me: lmao
*****: and it only gets more convoluted from there
*****: i love it

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Sunday, 17 January 2010 04:06 (fourteen years ago) link

*****: the heroes are afro-arab pacifist treehugger warhawk jihadist 9/11 victim aztecs
*****: i just love that they are animist buddhists at peace with nature, but also mongol human meat grinders

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Sunday, 17 January 2010 04:07 (fourteen years ago) link

What was convoluted about the movie? It was pretty fucking straightforward.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 17 January 2010 04:07 (fourteen years ago) link

i think what he means is pretty clearly conveyed in the above quotes

not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Sunday, 17 January 2010 04:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Goddammit I want to go see it in Imax 3d but those shows are still totally selling out and I want to be in a theater that is half full at best.

Nate Carson, Sunday, 17 January 2010 09:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Being a peasant I don't think I've been to see a 3D movie before and I was astonished by this. However, although I quite enjoyed all the running round the jungle the story was pretty excruciating. I think, regardless of whether you find the

it's the embarrassment of watching a film which is all about the peace and love but whose narrative and aesthetic is almost entirely 'we need american football style jocks and nubile big-eyed scantily clad maidens (although with blue buttcheeks) to make out and we need a massive fight with a big baddie at the end who won't die' ie the opposite of the whole aesthetic. Cowboys and indians (almost literally) but in a mantle of second-hand spiritual stuff.

Yep, that's what's going to save earth.

Also, I know he's supposed to be a moron, but really - 'She told me how everything was interconnected, I think I'm beginning to understand.'

Of course I wasn't thinking that at the time, I was just wincing and pulling a face every now and then, but in retrospect I think that was at the root of most the wincing and face pulling.

Did anyone else's eyes hurt after seeing it? I wear glasses anyway, so I was wondering if it was that, but then I wondered whether it was a result of trying to focus on things that you couldn't really focus on.

'virgin' should be 'wizard' (GamalielRatsey), Sunday, 17 January 2010 11:29 (fourteen years ago) link

3D was impressive. One eye watered a little towards the beginning, & the glasses gave me a head/toothache somewhere in the middle, but that went when I fiddled with them a bit.

Was most impressed by the solid, dirty, real-looking machines towards the beginning. Forgot how good Cameron was at military-industrial SF. More in awe at that than the Whirl-y-gig stuff.

Carried me along. Only got bored during some tribal life bits, smelt a bit of Consultant Anthropologist.

Parenthetic hound (woofwoofwoof), Sunday, 17 January 2010 11:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Whoops, unfinished sentence.

Was clearly supposed to read 'regardless of whether you find the EYWA'.

'virgin' should be 'wizard' (GamalielRatsey), Sunday, 17 January 2010 12:03 (fourteen years ago) link

I suspect watching the movie with 3D glasses over my normal glasses was responsible for the headache I got a few hours after leaving the theater. I am one person who doesn't give a shit about 3D.

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 17 January 2010 17:13 (fourteen years ago) link

I finally saw this, with a few friends, and it was cool whenever something psychedelic was on the screen we'd look at each other and smile about how cool it was to see a 3D blacklight forest. The movie looks amazing but I've seen a RealD movie before and to tell you the truth the realism in the CGI was more impressive than the 3D in most instances. Still worth seeing though.

The story was ok, but the execution of everything was so contrived and 90s Hollywood that it really took me out of the world they were building with all the cool 3D and fantasy visuals. I hated the setting up of that one military bad guy to be indestructible and so OTT evil, it was worse than the end of District 9. It was so contrived and obvious. At one point there is slow motion Na'Vi running from fire and crying and stuff and it shows the bad guy and he just says "Die!" and I cracked up at that point. Ridiculous.

There were so many cool fantasy ideas and imagery they could have developed that were undermined by the dumbed-down Hollywood Action Movie nature. Specifically dialog like this, introduced early on in the forest as spoken by an Avatar, which is like something a 16-year old boy would say while playing WOW:

Ha, ha! Yeah, come on! Show what you've got! Oh yeah, who's bad? That's right. Yeah, that's what I'm talking about bitch. That's right, get your punk ass back to mommy. Yeah, you've got nothing. You keep running. Why don't you bring some of your friends, huh?

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 17 January 2010 17:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, that dialogue was effective at doing what it intended, which was to make Sully look like an ignorant fratty jarhead, and to set up the comic moment of the hammerhead appearing and scaring the shit out of him.

But, you know, I'm sure you'd make very good movies too.

counter-clockwise (lukas), Sunday, 17 January 2010 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Sorry, that was a little bitchy.

counter-clockwise (lukas), Sunday, 17 January 2010 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Specifically dialog like this, introduced early on in the forest as spoken by an Avatar, which is like something a 16-year old boy would say while playing WOW:

I thought it was funny and very much how a lot of dudes would react to the situation (I have been known to act that way in competitive activities). also agree with lukas that it set up a good gag when the hammerhead thing came busting through right after and scaring him. I actually really thought the guy who played Sully nailed the character. I can't find fault with his performance.

richie aprile (rockapads), Sunday, 17 January 2010 18:07 (fourteen years ago) link

I was impressed with how tiny and spindly Sully's legs were. Did he just pump up the rest of his body and ignore his legs, or was there some further CGI trickery there?

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 17 January 2010 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

guessing the latter

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Sunday, 17 January 2010 18:16 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah that was the single effect that impressed me most, actually.

counter-clockwise (lukas), Sunday, 17 January 2010 18:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, that dialogue was effective at doing what it intended, which was to make Sully look like an ignorant fratty jarhead, and to set up the comic moment of the hammerhead appearing and scaring the shit out of him.

But, you know, I'm sure you'd make very good movies too.

― counter-clockwise (lukas), Sunday, January 17, 2010 5:50 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

the dialogue in this movie was terrible
the dialogue in this movie was terrible
the dialogue in this movie was terrible
the dialogue in this movie was terrible
the dialogue in this movie was terrible

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Sunday, 17 January 2010 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

ok, but criticize it for the right reasons (it's hackneyed) rather than the wrong reasons (complaining about stupid characters saying stupid things.)

counter-clockwise (lukas), Sunday, 17 January 2010 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

ok, but criticize it for the right reasons (it's hackneyed) rather than the wrong reasons (complaining about stupid characters saying stupid things.)
ok, but criticize it for the right reasons (it's hackneyed) rather than the wrong reasons (complaining about stupid characters saying stupid things.)

ok lol I am actually with you in general but how is hackneyed distinguished from stupid characters saying stupid things? /pedant

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Sunday, 17 January 2010 19:57 (fourteen years ago) link

well, in the example above, the character is saying stupid shit because the character is stupid, not because the director thinks it's actually a k3wl thing for the character to say. like, there are actual howlers in the dialogue, pick on those!

counter-clockwise (lukas), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:02 (fourteen years ago) link

My main problem with that dialog was that it was so out-of-place in relation to the rest of the story it worked against whatever 'immersive' 3D VR movie experience I felt Avatar was trying to sell me on. There was plenty of silly/stupid dialog in that I ignored because at the moment it didn't break the spell.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:05 (fourteen years ago) link

just realized if you crossed apocalypto w/avatar imax 3d itd be the fucking pinnacle

supra-max (ice cr?m), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:08 (fourteen years ago) link

real talk right there

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Article in EW says his spindly legs were prosthetic and modeled after a real paraplegic's legs. And his real legs often hidden with practical effects, too.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

Ah, thanks for that. Makes sense.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

I did forget to mention that there was a couple sitting next to us in their mid to late 20s and the girl sitting immediately to my left literally squealed with delight about fifteen to twenty times. It was fairly off-putting.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

h8 delight

supra-max (ice cr?m), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:43 (fourteen years ago) link

The success of this movie is finally giving me an appreciation for what Titanic dissenters went through 12 years ago.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

I should really see Apocalypto one of these days.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:56 (fourteen years ago) link

u really should

supra-max (ice cr?m), Sunday, 17 January 2010 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

imagine what the people who didn't like star wars felt/feel like!

this corpse is reatardo montalban (latebloomer), Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:51 (fourteen years ago) link

superior, is how we feel.

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

you know you have a special place in movie buff heaven

this corpse is reatardo montalban (latebloomer), Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

I should really do that Star Wars vs. Close Encounters poll.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Monday, 18 January 2010 00:06 (fourteen years ago) link

anyone who doesn't like star wars is a savage

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Monday, 18 January 2010 00:08 (fourteen years ago) link

A savage Venus.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Monday, 18 January 2010 00:11 (fourteen years ago) link

“If Tom Cruise left instructions for his estate that it was okay to use his likeness in Mission Impossible movies for the next 500 years, I would say that would be fine,” says Cameron.

dyao, Monday, 18 January 2010 02:51 (fourteen years ago) link

^^re: using avatar's cgi tech to make old actors young again

dyao, Monday, 18 January 2010 02:52 (fourteen years ago) link

500 Years of Tom Cruise

dyao, Monday, 18 January 2010 02:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Interview with the Not Quite Dead Vampire

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 January 2010 03:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Goddammit I want to go see it in Imax 3d but those shows are still totally selling out and I want to be in a theater that is half full at best.

I went at 11am this morning in times square and there were (a few) empty seats. but yeah you're not gonna find half full

liked it ok

dmr, Monday, 18 January 2010 03:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Specifically dialog like this, introduced early on in the forest as spoken by an Avatar, which is like something a 16-year old boy would say while playing WOW

true but i think this is called knowing your demographic. that $1.6 billion global take (so far) is not coming primarily from ilx readers. we're just bonus dollars.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 18 January 2010 03:22 (fourteen years ago) link

untrue! ive seen it 100m times so far

supra-max (ice cr?m), Monday, 18 January 2010 03:40 (fourteen years ago) link

So I'm assuming this is going to win the Best Picture Golden Globe, no point in watching to see if QT pulls it out.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 18 January 2010 04:03 (fourteen years ago) link

had he announced plans to pull it out during his acceptance speech if he wins?

HOTT LUNCH II HARDEEZ (some dude), Monday, 18 January 2010 04:05 (fourteen years ago) link

I went to see this in IMAX 3D and the 3D broke so they showed it in 2D. There is no fucking way I'm going to sit through this dreck again to watch it in 3D. That part of my life is wasted.

Jeff, Monday, 18 January 2010 04:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Yes he did.

You know what I meant.

(xpost)

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 18 January 2010 04:06 (fourteen years ago) link

is he going to pull it out in 3D?

cogito, ergo some dude (dyao), Monday, 18 January 2010 04:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Got my glasses at the ready, just in case.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 18 January 2010 04:11 (fourteen years ago) link

I found those RealD glasses at thrift stores a few years ago and went through a phase of wearing them around. One day King Khan was in town and he was wearing them as well. He pointed out that they give off a pretty good Bo Diddley vibe!

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 18 January 2010 05:06 (fourteen years ago) link

the 3D broke so they showed it in 2D

oh man. that blows.

dmr, Monday, 18 January 2010 18:45 (fourteen years ago) link

must be weird for Kathryn Bigelow that The Hurt Locker is probably gonna lose every major award to a movie her ex-husband made

I figure if Avatar got the Golden Globe it's gonna really clean up at the Oscars

dmr, Monday, 18 January 2010 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link

possibly the best 3D effect of the whole experience was the Cheshire cat in the Alice in Wonderland trailer even though there's no way I'm actually gonna go see that movie. I'll totally see that NASA Hubble movie tho.

dmr, Monday, 18 January 2010 18:52 (fourteen years ago) link

wait this won best picture over the hurt locker????

jesus fucking christ

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 18 January 2010 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

Golden Globes, people. Golden Globes. Move along, nothing to see here.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 January 2010 19:23 (fourteen years ago) link

I loved "Avatar" but Cameron's acceptance speech is really making me reconsider.

real bears playing hockey (polyphonic), Monday, 18 January 2010 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

China pulls Avatar

cogito, ergo some dude (dyao), Tuesday, 19 January 2010 03:28 (fourteen years ago) link

things chinese people and na'vi have in common: they are both 8 feet tall and blue

cogito, ergo some dude (dyao), Tuesday, 19 January 2010 03:29 (fourteen years ago) link

they are both 3-d

max, Tuesday, 19 January 2010 03:37 (fourteen years ago) link

s1ocki and nrq otm about the 3d bullshit. ice cr?m right about everything else though.

caek, Tuesday, 19 January 2010 12:41 (fourteen years ago) link

http://abadah.ytmnd.com/

♖♕♖ (am0n), Friday, 22 January 2010 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

lol

manichean ramen (latebloomer), Friday, 22 January 2010 19:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Step aside Titanic

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 25 January 2010 05:20 (fourteen years ago) link

ha remember when everyone was all lolhahaha dis gonna bomb dis gonna bomb? u just know cameron had to have made a pact with some kind of weird underwater spirit or something

manichean ramen (latebloomer), Monday, 25 January 2010 07:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I GIVE MY SOUL TO THE DEEP, IN EXCHANGE FOR 100 BAZILLION DOLLARS

manichean ramen (latebloomer), Monday, 25 January 2010 07:02 (fourteen years ago) link

i still really don't get it, but he also arranged for me to be laid off apparently so BOW DOWN BEFORE THE ONE YOU SERVE

forksclovetofu, Monday, 25 January 2010 07:05 (fourteen years ago) link

but he also arranged for me to be laid off

you were part of the staff on Pandora?

manichean ramen (latebloomer), Monday, 25 January 2010 07:07 (fourteen years ago) link

(le fikshunal planit)

manichean ramen (latebloomer), Monday, 25 January 2010 07:09 (fourteen years ago) link

nah, i just mean he spoke with the powers that be and had me put on the dole to teach me a lesson

forksclovetofu, Monday, 25 January 2010 07:15 (fourteen years ago) link

what did you do?

randy e. bugler (jeff), Monday, 25 January 2010 07:16 (fourteen years ago) link

what the hell

waka shame (J0rdan S.), Monday, 25 January 2010 07:44 (fourteen years ago) link

he has a billion dollars folks
i am suggesting he is using it to crush those that doubt him
i am explaining a joke

forksclovetofu, Monday, 25 January 2010 07:50 (fourteen years ago) link

it was well formed

forksclovetofu, Monday, 25 January 2010 07:50 (fourteen years ago) link

sorry to hear that

my best to your family

randy e. bugler (jeff), Monday, 25 January 2010 08:15 (fourteen years ago) link

they're working in the furry mines now

forksclovetofu, Monday, 25 January 2010 15:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar is also just like Titanic in that I don't personally know anyone who has been to see it, and yet it's the hugest movie in the world. I smell conspiracies!

Do they ever do these charts in terms of tickets sold rather than highest gross? Because, yeah, a big movie that a lot of people are going to see in IMAX at 2010 ticket prices is naturally going to gross an assload of cash. But I'd really be interested to see how many individual people paid money to see it.

SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 19:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar is also just like Titanic in that I don't personally know anyone who has been to see it

You just aren't asking.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 19:06 (fourteen years ago) link

I know boxofficemojo tracks domestic rankings adjusted for inflation (Avatar is currently #26, Titanic #6, Gone with the Wind #1), but I don't see anything based on number of tickets.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 19:07 (fourteen years ago) link

boxofficemojo has an estimated tickets page, altho it's the same as their adjusted gross page and doesn't take avatar's high ticket price into account.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm?adjust_yr=1&p=.htm

if you added $3 to the average price of avatar's tickets, it would have around (7.35/10.35 * 76.8M =) 54.5 million tickets sold, placing it around #78.

abanana, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, that sounds more like it. I know no one is claiming this, but I really have a hard time believing that Avatar is totally kicking the box office world's ass in terms of breaking ticket sale records.

SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar 2 is being produced with a new filmmaking technology that will allow theater owners to project it against the nighttime sky! Of course, you're going to have to shell out an extra $4,000 for the disposable jetpack that will allow you to see it with the clarity with which it was meant to be seen...

Oh, look at that! We've broken another box office record!

SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:09 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean its making mad dollars but compare 3-d price today to reg tick price in 97

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:09 (fourteen years ago) link

(the boxofficemojo page also ignores roadshow prices, doesn't adjust rereleased movies correctly, and probably a bunch of other things. i highly doubt fantasia was that popular.)

abanana, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:11 (fourteen years ago) link

I think I remember reading that Fantasia was hugely popular. Disney and feature-length animation were very new at that point, and a feature-length animated Disney film that wasn't aimed solely at kids in 1940(?) would've surely been a big draw.

SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Hugely popular in its first run, I mean.

SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link

in Britannia the 3D glasses are a one time cost. Avatar costs as much as any other non-3D movie. Though yeah in general the gross is inflated because of that. not that Fox gives a flying shitting fuck.

Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

Wikipedia:
Fantasia was originally released by Walt Disney Productions itself rather than RKO Radio Pictures, which normally distributed the Disney films, and exhibited as a two-hour and twenty minute roadshow film (counting the intermission) with reserved-seat engagements. The film opened to mixed critical reaction and failed to generate a large commercial audience, which left Disney in financial straits.

da croupier, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

apparently the film didn't really pay off until 1969

da croupier, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, i think it was a serious gamble that never really paid off until it hit rerelease xp

forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, that shut me up. Ha ha.

SNEEZED GOING DOWN STEPS, PAIN WHEN PUTTING SOCKS ON (Deric W. Haircare), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Fantasia + pot = profit

queen frostine (Eric H.), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

If only stoned kids had been around in the '40s to save it.

vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

haha xp

vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

http://media.photobucket.com/image/%25252760s%20fantasia%20poster/angral/fant.jpg

Avatar should have had a poster like this.

vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Fox said 72 percent of worldwide sales for “Avatar” came from 3-D screens. If Mr. Dergarabedian’s estimates are correct, the movie has accounted for roughly 56 million admissions in domestic theaters to date.

That is about the same number of tickets that “Titanic” had sold at this point in its theatrical run, he said.

But “Titanic” played and played, remaining in theaters until September 1998 and racking up about 128 million admissions. “Avatar” still needs a very long tail to surpass the number of viewers who saw “Titanic.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/movies/awardsseason/27record.html

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar Will Take Ya Far!

da croupier, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

On Tuesday Tom Rothman, a chairman of the Fox film operation, said the global success of “Avatar” carried a lesson beyond economics. “It tells you all of us on the planet have more things in common than we have dividing us,” Mr. Rothman said.

randomized what nots (latebloomer), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

man, it's like the end of Return Of The Jedi over there, aint it

da croupier, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:32 (fourteen years ago) link

I shudder trying to imagine what the Fox executive equivalent of "Yub Nub" is

randomized what nots (latebloomer), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Indigo & Ivory

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:34 (fourteen years ago) link

http://queserasara.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/scrooge-mcduck.jpg

It tells you all of us on the planet have more things in common than we have dividing us

da croupier, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Fantasia + pot = profit

Still love the release poster for the 1969 run

http://www.judasposters.com/images/posters/Fantasia.jpg

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

i never read the NYer piece but what i wanna know is: did Cameron/WETA license/patent/whatever any of the technology used in this thing? because it seems to me that the investment strategy for this thing probably had more to do with how it might change ~movie-making~ not just how well it might do at the box office.

because as a technological proof of concept it's pretty fucking impressive, and i can't help but believe that SOMEone stands to make a ton of money from all the tech they developed to make it happen

his power told him (about the fish) (gbx), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I remember reading that the 3D cameras were invented by Cameron

i'm with stupid ☞ (dyao), Thursday, 28 January 2010 00:00 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm sure that what's patentable has been patented, but as with ILM just developing the expertise is a significant asset. the team will fan out over the years but for now, basically, if you want to do something like this, you'll need to talk to someone who worked on avatar, and if you want to get your picture made this decade it's going to make more sense to pay them to do the work in a feasible timeframe than to have your team learn on the job.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 28 January 2010 00:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Or you could just book Weta and relax.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 January 2010 00:28 (fourteen years ago) link

wait isn't that what i just said?

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 28 January 2010 00:31 (fourteen years ago) link

This is two years old now, but a good read iirc (I just pulled it out of my bookmarks and haven't reread it, so apologies if is sucks): http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117983864.html?categoryid=2868&cs=1

caek, Thursday, 28 January 2010 13:26 (fourteen years ago) link

You know what I think.

-- Jim out

caek, Thursday, 28 January 2010 13:27 (fourteen years ago) link

A 3-D film immerses you in the scene, with a greatly enhanced sense of physical presence and participation.

ORLY

I believe that a functional-MRI study of brain activity would show that more neurons are actively engaged in processing a 3-D movie than the same film seen in 2-D.

well hey why don't you actually do a study 'cause tbh i don't give a shit what you believe.

take me to your lemur (ledge), Thursday, 28 January 2010 14:35 (fourteen years ago) link

wait isn't that what i just said?

Well yeah but I was just giving the short version. :-D

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 January 2010 15:43 (fourteen years ago) link

I believe that a functional-MRI study of brain activity would show that more neurons are actively engaged in processing a 3-D movie than the same film seen in 2-D.

This must be why JC made the plot/story/acting so dumb and unsubtle, because the 3D takes extra brainwork.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 28 January 2010 15:49 (fourteen years ago) link

quiet I'm busy processing 3d blue tits

i'm with stupid ☞ (dyao), Thursday, 28 January 2010 15:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Well yeah but I was just giving the short version.

I do go on... just wanted to make sure I hadn't accidentally said the opposite or something ;-)

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 28 January 2010 16:46 (fourteen years ago) link

claimin if you adjust for inflation and include foreign box office avatar is #4 all tyme http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/02/is_avatar_the_all_time_box_off.html

admittedly crude methodology but im glad someone is addressing this important question

1. Gone With the Wind, $2.984 billion
2. Titanic, $2.896 billion
3. Star Wars, $2.199 billion
4. Avatar, $2.039 billion
5. E.T. The Extra Terrestrial, $1.897 billion
6. Jaws, $1.703 billion
7. The Sound of Music, $1.646 billion
8. Jurassic Park, $1.622 billion
9. The Ten Commandments, $1.544 billion
10: Doctor Zhivago, $1.463 billion

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 04:33 (fourteen years ago) link

The guy who did the epic 70-minute Phantom Menace review did a shorter one for Avatar:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA

Al Gore invented the internet to house the bitterness of humanity (reddening), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 07:32 (fourteen years ago) link

I liked Avatar, but I gotta admit this guy is pretty much spot on. The Carbage Pail Kids bit in part 2 made me lose my shit!

Tuomas, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 11:00 (fourteen years ago) link

I think the only IMAX films i've seen were at the Smithsonian Air/Space museum. Is Avatar IMAX in a diff aspect ratio? I'm thinking I want to go to widescreen 3D.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 15:32 (fourteen years ago) link

generally multiplex imax screens are smaller than those big museum standalone screens. and yeah they're widescreen (not sure how the actual ratios compare).

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Interesting question. From what I've seen Avatar in IMAX is 1.78:1, but the regular 3D screenings are 2.35:1. It was definitely shot in 1.78 so I think the frame is matted for regular 3D.

With that said, my local IMAX is much squarer looking than 1.78, I cannot remember if they projected it "full frame" onto this. I'd say it's worth seeing at a "proper" IMAX screen if only for the sheer size.

Bill A, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

probably will go to the Lincoln Square, tipz.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

fwiw, my experience of IMAX is that they sound system is also much better than a regular screen, so with all the kaboomings in Avatar it's worth it. Shame there's no facility to mute out Horner's dreadful score though.

Bill A, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:13 (fourteen years ago) link

I also read in places like the Jeff Wells blog about real vs 'fake' IMAX and have no idea what he means.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:15 (fourteen years ago) link

my understanding is fake imax is just a really large screen, real imax is a giant screen + an IMAX resolution film projector or digital equivalent.

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:17 (fourteen years ago) link

imax sound is amazing - went the harold sq one - the screen was sorta square and not thaat big

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i saw dark knight on the BFI imax. the action scenes there were true imax which is pretty square but they were just big. but there were some cityscapes that were truly breathtaking because of the combination of big and crystal clear.

i guess avatar doesn't do that thing where all the live action dialoge is shot 35mm and widescreen and so it's really obvious when something exciting is going to happen because they fill in the bottom third of the squarish screen?

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I only like square screens at old movies.

So do I ask ticketseller "Is this fake IMAX? It's not 1.35, is it?"

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:20 (fourteen years ago) link

the action scenes there were true imax which is pretty square but they were just big. but there were some cityscapes that were truly breathtaking because of the combination of big and crystal clear.

sorry this makes no sense. what i was trying to say is something like transformers would not benefit much from true imax, but stuff with grand vistas would.

lincoln square seems to be legit

http://i.ehow.com/images/GlobalPhoto/Articles/5023788/screencompa-main_Full.jpg

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:25 (fourteen years ago) link

well, I can't do that. Missing too much image.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:35 (fourteen years ago) link

They don't crop it ime. They don't use the full screen if the film is delivered in an aspect ratio that doesn't match the screen.

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:37 (fourteen years ago) link

e.g. at dark knight imax they used the top 2/3 for the bits of the film in traditional widescreen.

if you saw that film in a regular cinema _then_ you got a cropped image (but only in the action scenes shot on 70mm IMAX film).

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:38 (fourteen years ago) link

conclusion: you will see the full image at the lincoln center in the way james cameron intended you to see it, and that is where you should go.

(the 3D is another matter, and is distracting and dulling wherever you see it, but there are no decent screens showing vanilla avatar as far as i can tell.)

-- caek out.

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:40 (fourteen years ago) link

oh OK! thx.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:41 (fourteen years ago) link

you will seethe for 3 hours during this movie by the way.

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:42 (fourteen years ago) link

man i knew the empire 25 was smaller than lincoln, but not that much. totally should've gone to lincoln square. now i feel gypped.

xpost: there will def. be morbz-seethe. i look forward to the vitriol.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:43 (fourteen years ago) link

internet saying 34th st screen is bogus too - no sweet 6ft man graphic tho

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:45 (fourteen years ago) link

you can usually google the size of a screen, but a graphic like that really makes the point that twice the length is four times the area

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:49 (fourteen years ago) link

that graphic is making me sad

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link

on the other hand no sure how psyched id be abt a 6ft man standing in front of the screen while im tryina be immersed in sweet avatar imax 3d

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:52 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think I'm that predictable; I've never hated any of Cameron's other films (except maybe Strange Days, which he only wrote and produced) while recognizing their bogus elements.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:53 (fourteen years ago) link

no one will care, but i just looked this up so: in the UK, the BFI IMAX is 65'x 85' and Bradford is 48' x 65'. all the others here are modified traditional rooms with correspondingly smaller screens, shallower seat pitches and no IMAX film projector (but double digital projectors for IMAX, so it's not total bullshit).

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:57 (fourteen years ago) link

any particular reason you've waited this long to see it?

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:58 (fourteen years ago) link

@ 34th st they made a big deal abt how THIS IS REAL IMAX - in the previews they were even all FYI THIS IS NOT IMAX YET

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:58 (fourteen years ago) link

xp, OK, that's not true. the manchester and newcastle IMAXes are big screens and proper IMAX rooms:

http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guides/p2035529/imax.jpg

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:00 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think I'm that predictable; I've never hated any of Cameron's other films

Looking forward to yr viewing anyway.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:02 (fourteen years ago) link

joe, if you ever want to see imax without a 6ft man in front of the screen then you are welcome to come to england

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:03 (fourteen years ago) link

the biggest screen in the world won't stop this film sucking

the highest per-vote vag so far (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:04 (fourteen years ago) link

you saying over and over that the film sucks won't stop a bazillion other people from enjoying it

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:05 (fourteen years ago) link

any particular reason you've waited this long to see it?

cuz it wasn't going anywhere, it's long, and I was busy doing decade-in-film-review for publication, looking for work, etc.

and I hate crowds.

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:06 (fourteen years ago) link

We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us: so long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him. We burn all evil and all illusion out of him; we bring him over to our side, not in appearance, but genuinely, heart and soul. We make him one of ourselves before we kill him. [...] we make the brain perfect before we blow it out.

the highest per-vote vag so far (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:07 (fourteen years ago) link

g2k that i saw it on a screen the size of the Odeon Manchester (@ SF Metreon fwiw)

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

ook forward to the vitriol.

― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, February 3, 2010 10:43 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

can't wait tbh

and Watt (gbx), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

joe, if you ever want to see imax without a 6ft man in front of the screen then you are welcome to come to england

― caek, Wednesday, February 3, 2010 12:03 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ty!

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link

xp, OK, that's not true. the manchester and newcastle IMAXes are big screens and proper IMAX rooms

yeah, I saw it at M/cr IMAX, I read somewhere else that it's the 3rd biggest in Europe or some such. Whatever, it's fucking enormous. Good cinema in general that Odeon, even the smallest screens are a very decent size and they make at least some attempts to get the more arthouse type films on (saw Fish Tank there and will do same for Ponyo hopefully).

Be interested to know your thoughts once you've seen this, Morbs.

Bill A, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:07 (fourteen years ago) link

i think the bradford one was the first one in europe. saw some nonsense with sharks or helicopters or something there when i was about 5. good times.

caek, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh yeah, one other thing for anyone who might ever get to the IMAX in M/cr, there's a cool window on one of the corridors which gives a view into the projection room so you can see the projectors and colossal film reels in use.

Bill A, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Saw it in Atlanta and the first trailer was for Piranha 3D, and it had some spring break bikini babes jumping on trampolines at the very start.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 3 February 2010 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link

William Castle lives!

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 February 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

So will we be seeing giant sandworms roaming the spice planet Dune (Arrakis) with wild Fremen on their backs in 3D?

"I'd love it to be 3D, of course," he said. "It's the kind of movie that has the scope to be 3D. Will they do it in 3D? I'd push for that, but I don't know. As a viewer, I've just been watching Avatar with my kids twice in the theatre already and had a blast. It's an amazing experience."

http://sffmedia.com/films/science-fiction-films/471-dune-remake-starting-again-giant-sandworms-in-3d.html

dyao, Thursday, 4 February 2010 01:02 (fourteen years ago) link

baron harkonnen flies around the room...in 3D

dyao, Thursday, 4 February 2010 01:04 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.tensegrity.hellblazer.com/media/third-stage-guild-navigator.jpg

IN 3D!

dyao, Thursday, 4 February 2010 01:05 (fourteen years ago) link

We have just folded space from Ix...many machines on Ix. New machines.

Bill A, Thursday, 4 February 2010 08:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Sold out of IMAX, saw standard 3D.

Sorry to disappoint you guys, but I totally didn't loathe this. (Except for most of everything after the destruction of Onetree or whatever the fuck it was called, which is where I would have ended it.)

Capsule review: It's always about the white folks.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 03:46 (fourteen years ago) link

So you loathed like the last 45-60 mins, then?

Simon H., Monday, 8 February 2010 03:48 (fourteen years ago) link

I wonder if Morbs is slowly becoming Armond White.

Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Monday, 8 February 2010 03:49 (fourteen years ago) link

about half o' that. xp

Actually surprised the rightwing Klan types havent gone more batshit over this film.

I'd also say, Cameron, put the fucking subtitles in a readable font, but I'm not expecting to see any of the sequels.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 03:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Armond White hated this film; I did not.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 03:54 (fourteen years ago) link

It makes an alright 3D experience, but no way in hell I will watch this movie in 2D. Not worth it.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 February 2010 03:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Since I saw it, I've felt that I should watch it again in 2D, because I think I might appreciate it more. 3D is kind of balls.

Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Monday, 8 February 2010 03:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Morbius, what did you like about it?

Your body is a spiderland (polyphonic), Monday, 8 February 2010 07:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Since I saw it, I've felt that I should watch it again in 2D, because I think I might appreciate it more. 3D is kind of balls.

seconded. saw this yesterday (non-IMAX) and for the most part the 3D looked like complete shit - a load of visual gimmickry trying to force the eye and ending up looking like a confusing, distracting mess, albeit an intermittently very pretty one. seriously, it was nigh-on unwatchable.

maybe this is due to a bad projector, a duff pair of glasses or encroaching blindness... but for me, at least, it just didn't really work.

m the g, Monday, 8 February 2010 09:23 (fourteen years ago) link

I like many of the beasties, Sam Worthington (esp Na'Vi-enhanced), the anti-Americanism, some of the echoes of decades of Westerns, Sig Weaver's Hawksian tough-dame turn (but she warmed up too fast), a few instances of the Vietnam War iconography.

3D gave me kind of a headache (esp since I had to sit in the third row).

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 12:05 (fourteen years ago) link

im really not surprised that u liked this morbius

wallomangina (s1ocki), Monday, 8 February 2010 14:03 (fourteen years ago) link

more cred if you'd said so before!

Everytime I see Stephen Lang (Colonel Hardass) in a film these days, it doesn't register with me at all that he was the pudgy young actor I saw playing Happy in Death of a Salesman on Broadway opposite Hoffman and Malkovich.

http://www.nndb.com/people/815/000069608/stephen-lang-1-sized.jpg

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 14:52 (fourteen years ago) link

So when they show the 3D in non-IMAX is it not in RealD with the polarized glasses? Do they do the red/cyan anaglyph glasses?

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 February 2010 15:47 (fourteen years ago) link

They're the same glasses, no red/cyan.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:52 (fourteen years ago) link

I wonder if Morbs is slowly becoming Armond White.

Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:52 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't know quite as much about Tupac.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Cameron talks messages, right-wing complaints, etc.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 8 February 2010 20:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Palestinian protestors go blue (slideshow link at left):

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ml_israel_palestinians_avatar;_ylt=AubSzrTeU4Y6sijGn3y4CiR0fNdF

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 13 February 2010 15:55 (fourteen years ago) link

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s236/mezxspectrum/avatarlost.jpg

DavidM, Saturday, 13 February 2010 16:03 (fourteen years ago) link

OK, I am not the swiftest rider on the culture express, but I saw Avatar a couple of days ago with my wife. I will now add my pebble to the 2000+ pile in this thread.

The storyline and characters were nothing remarkable, but were sturdy enough to carry the audience through the film without any noteworthy moments of boredom or puzzlement. The script and actors did their job just fine.

As I expected, the star of the show was the visual design. Cameron hired some very talented artists to imagine Pandora and obviously spent a HUGE amount of time refining that vision and all its details. The planet makes the movie. No question.

Re: the 3D effects:

I saw it at a very new theater (non-IMAX) and the projection equipment was up to the job. The 3D was pretty well done, not often obtrusive, and added about 50% to the overall attractiveness of the movie design, imo.

BTW, the trailers for upcoming movies were all in 3D, too. Hollywood has clearly gone bonkers for the $$-making possibilities of 3D. However, the trailers's 3D effects were so crappy, so poorly done and so cheap that they were practically unwatchable. Any movie done like that would have given me a headache inside of 20 minutes and I would have walked out. Doesn't bode well for the first big wave of 3D product.

Aimless, Monday, 15 February 2010 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

um.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 01:30 (fourteen years ago) link

(cue 4,000 dissertations on the political appropriation of popular culture.)

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 01:30 (fourteen years ago) link

cue annual convention of avatar fans and memorabilia

am0n, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 01:33 (fourteen years ago) link

I saw this again (3d/imax) and loved it. haters on this can eat my mangravy fwiw.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 02:02 (fourteen years ago) link

Has anyone seen this movie in 2-D? I just want to know how silly the clips will look during the Oscar broadcast.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 02:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I keep meaning to see it in 2-D. I think I'd prefer it that way.

Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 02:55 (fourteen years ago) link

LARPING IN 3D!

http://tinyurl.com/y9p5gfu

El GarBage (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 17:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Portrait of The Na'vi People of Hometree Wisconsin.

o rly

sheryl crow but with a very long butt (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 17:23 (fourteen years ago) link

this and chat roulette are signs of the apocalypse

forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 18:09 (fourteen years ago) link

oh, it's a joke. nevermind.

forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Because you, the people, wanted it:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/feb/18/james-cameron-avatar-prequel-novel

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 February 2010 15:18 (fourteen years ago) link

http://FunnyOrDie.com/m/3mqc

Avatar... with Babies

nitzer ENBB (latebloomer), Saturday, 20 February 2010 04:36 (fourteen years ago) link

I have no problem seeing this movie for its visuals. Of course it would be great if it had a good script too, but a not-so-crappy script is fine by me, if it looks cool enough to make me forget the flaws in it. Movies are an visual medium, "good storytelling" is only half of the equation. None of the classic movies are classic only because of their story.

― Tuomas

Tuomas OTM! Scads of fun-haters in this thread.

hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 21 February 2010 22:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, I have to say, I just saw this last night, and I liked it way more than I thought I would, and that's almost entirely because of the visuals. The characters are stock, the storyline is silly and culturally problematic, but damn, there are some sumptuous textures on Pandora. Loved Sully and Neytiri just flying through the mountains on their ikran.

dylan's craggy larynx (jaymc), Tuesday, 2 March 2010 14:30 (fourteen years ago) link

The New York Review of Books weighs in.

can it compete with the wagon wheel (Eazy), Friday, 5 March 2010 16:54 (fourteen years ago) link

good read
thx

nitzer ebbebe (gbx), Friday, 5 March 2010 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link

basically agree with jaymc. the flaws with this movie are obvious to anyone who is not 5 years old but still feel that if you didn't at least enjoy this in 3d you kinda hate fun.

sonderangerbot, Friday, 5 March 2010 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link

"if you didn't at least enjoy this in 3d you kinda hate fun."

I haven't seen it, but I get the feeling Hurt Locker 3D with Andrew WK would be more fun than Avatar. Can anyone who has seen both confirm?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 5 March 2010 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

that nybr piece was terrible.

"The message of what is now James Cameron's most popular movie thus far, and the biggest-grossing movie in history—like the message of so much else in mass culture just now—is, by contrast, that "reality" is dispensable altogether; or, at the very least, whatever you care to make of it, provided you have the right gadgets. In this fantasy of a lusciously colorful trip over the rainbow, you don't have to wake up. There's no need for home. Whatever its futuristic setting, and whatever its debt to the past, Avatar is very much a movie for our time."

groan

mandible corrective (latebloomer), Friday, 5 March 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

can someone muster SOMETHING original to say about this movie?

mandible corrective (latebloomer), Friday, 5 March 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link

I still haven't seen this movie but never say na'vi!

(how's that?)

da croupier, Friday, 5 March 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

admittedly the film doesn't give you much to work with in that regard, but still.

x-post

lol

mandible corrective (latebloomer), Friday, 5 March 2010 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link

not really buyin this "avatars intellectually incoherent cause the navi are acivilized and hypercivilized" argument

noted schloar (dyao), Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:04 (fourteen years ago) link

escapist movie is escapist is not really a strong zing either

noted schloar (dyao), Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:06 (fourteen years ago) link

i would never bother to argue over the intellectual merits of avatar i was just bored. maybe if it didn't look like a tie-dye dolphin t-shirt

A B C, Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar was the shit. people who don't like Avatar can go listen to their Jack Wagner cassingles...

Ballistic, Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:12 (fourteen years ago) link

"Sacha Baron Cohen has been ditched as an Oscars presenter for fear he would upset Avatar director James Cameron.

Instead, producers had lined him up to appear a comedy sketch, in which he would play one of Avatar's female blue-skinned aliens, known as Na'vi, alongside Ben Stiller as a translator.

Cohen’s character would eventually claim she was pregnant with James Cameron's love child – and demand a Jerry Springer-style confrontation with the director.

A spokesperson for Baron Cohen reportedly said he would not be performing at Sunday night’s Oscars ceremony because of ‘creative differences’ but insisting it was ‘nothing acrimonious’."

http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2010/03/04/10620/cohen_dropped_from_oscars_%96_again

DavidM, Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:32 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, i didn't like this movie, sorry.

by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:39 (fourteen years ago) link

that sketch sounds like caca but i blame stiller. like i think he might be a crazy person & not in an interesting way

A B C, Saturday, 6 March 2010 01:42 (fourteen years ago) link

all you need is just a little more time....to be SURE

Ballistic, Saturday, 6 March 2010 02:03 (fourteen years ago) link

"maybe if it didn't look like a tie-dye dolphin t-shirt"

one of the things i liked about the movie, actually. it was unashamed to be so fruity. just wish the actual story had been more interesting.

mandible corrective (latebloomer), Saturday, 6 March 2010 03:06 (fourteen years ago) link

so this movie was pretty dope, gonna just add to the chorus here

how is "babby" horribly formed????? (k3vin k.), Sunday, 7 March 2010 03:35 (fourteen years ago) link

i didn't even see it in 3d and it was still amazing to look at. the main character was kind of a loser, but i loved being beat over the head with "imperialism sucks!" while marveling at visuals made by a guy with wayyyy too much money.

how is "babby" horribly formed????? (k3vin k.), Sunday, 7 March 2010 03:38 (fourteen years ago) link

not seeing this in 3d is like being offered a blowjob and going "ehhh the hand is fine"

jizzchin (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 7 March 2010 03:40 (fourteen years ago) link

i wanted 3d badly but our theatres dont have the 3d one anymore, just the normal. i am definitely seeing it in 3d when i get a chance

how is "babby" horribly formed????? (k3vin k.), Sunday, 7 March 2010 03:44 (fourteen years ago) link

One day someone is going to figure out how to make 3D movies that don't require glasses and that person is going to be insanely rich.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 7 March 2010 19:13 (fourteen years ago) link

after seeing it in 3-D, I actually felt disoriented for a half an hour, like I actually had to leave the world I was just in. I'm just glad nobody stepped on my sneakers on the way out or I may have hissed and speared them through the chest.

Ballistic, Sunday, 7 March 2010 19:16 (fourteen years ago) link

This movie has pleasure;, expecting it to hold up "intellectually" sounds worse than the bullshit that Inglourious Basterds is about "language" and epistemology.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 March 2010 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

pleasures, i meant

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 March 2010 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link

yea I didn't see anybody whining about the lack of monologues about 'nature versus nuture' during Terminator. this is a fun action film with a familiar story and groundbreaking graphics people!

Ballistic, Sunday, 7 March 2010 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link

morbs not hating this kinda warms my heart tbh

how is "babby" horribly formed????? (k3vin k.), Sunday, 7 March 2010 20:30 (fourteen years ago) link

It did mine too, until I noticed he still had to toss in an IB blast.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 7 March 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

avaterds

am0n, Sunday, 7 March 2010 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

nyah nyah!!

Kevin John Bozelka, Monday, 8 March 2010 06:10 (fourteen years ago) link

"ava-tards" = much better

by another name (amateurist), Monday, 8 March 2010 06:18 (fourteen years ago) link

bigelowned

('_') (omar little), Monday, 8 March 2010 06:24 (fourteen years ago) link

^

generosity and necrophilia (latebloomer), Monday, 8 March 2010 07:02 (fourteen years ago) link

morbs not hating this kinda warms my heart tbh
It did mine too, until I noticed he still had to toss in an IB blast.

The one follows the other like the day is followed by the night.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Monday, 8 March 2010 07:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Avatar is kinda 40% shit

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 March 2010 07:15 (fourteen years ago) link

oh i don't really disagree with that

how is "babby" horribly formed????? (k3vin k.), Monday, 8 March 2010 16:41 (fourteen years ago) link

i decided that i really shouldn't have an opinion on this movie since it just wasn't made for me. just nothing about it pushes my buttons. but that doesn't mean it's bad.

by another name (amateurist), Monday, 8 March 2010 17:02 (fourteen years ago) link

its bad fuck yall

average dump from average gangsters (deej), Tuesday, 9 March 2010 01:25 (fourteen years ago) link

although now that it didnt win any major oscars i feel better abt the whole thing

average dump from average gangsters (deej), Tuesday, 9 March 2010 01:25 (fourteen years ago) link

the academy really dropped the ball on a great opportunity to troll deej

noted schloar (dyao), Tuesday, 9 March 2010 01:27 (fourteen years ago) link

as much as i didn't like any of this and it looked like a wildberry pop tart, i gotta say it made a much less satisfying oscar villain than up in the air

A B C, Tuesday, 9 March 2010 02:03 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

#12

abanana, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:21 (thirteen years ago) link

Pretty funny & kinda ironic that Rupert Murdoch is making a shitload of money from this movie.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:52 (thirteen years ago) link

Top Gun still hangs onto the #100 spot by a fingernail.

Aimless, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:56 (thirteen years ago) link

Any of you foo's even try watching this on DVD in 2-D?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:59 (thirteen years ago) link

Won't catch me doing that.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:10 (thirteen years ago) link

caught it on blu ray for the first time the other day, very impressed. i'm not normally into this kind of fantasy stuff but i was bowled over. at some points i liked to sit real close to the tv just to admire the pretty colours in hd

bracken free ditch (Ste), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:17 (thirteen years ago) link

Does anybody think there is an emerging critical backlash on this movie in which many people are holding Avatar to the same standards of, say, The Battle of Algiers?

Heroin Kills (Brad Nowell's Soiled Undergarments), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:12 (thirteen years ago) link

The biggest problem for me is how dumb it gets certain points, peaking right around when the military is destroying hometree. BAD GUYS BAD GOOD GUYS GOOD. Shot of poor native cowering behind tree stump. Shot of evil military guy laughing with a cigar. Shot of Na'avi child running for his life & mom going "Nooooo!". Shot of military guy saying "Die! Die!". Etc. Etc.

Sam Worthington is an absolute, total bore as an actor, God knows what kind of deal he made w the devil to be in all these big budget hollywood films these days. Thankfully he's an unrecognizable alien for most of it. I loved the stranger parts of the movie, where they are exploring the Na'avi homeland and stuff, but the heavy-handed politics and DO YOU REALIZE message -- not the message itself but how it's portrayed -- turns me off. It makes me think of 80s movies aimed at children where you have the big bad gov't and the cute helpless alien. Not that those were bad movies, but they also weren't over 2 1/2 hours long. And didn't take themselves quite so seriously.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 10 May 2010 15:44 (thirteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

Papyrus is the font of day spas run by women who have no formal business training.

― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:00 (5 months ago)

ilx posts with a permanent impact on my worldview

A B C, Friday, 28 May 2010 21:20 (thirteen years ago) link

i will never purchase specialty oils from you. you have demonstrated that we do not share certain core values.

A B C, Friday, 28 May 2010 21:21 (thirteen years ago) link

Watched it at cinema with this amazing new 3D business and thought it looked pretty, so managed to sit through it.
Tried watching it on DVD, only got 20 mins in and completely lost interest. It's a film you barely need to see once.

Are these rumours of Worthington being next Bond true? Seen a few articles mentioning it, but you know, it is the net!

not_goodwin, Friday, 28 May 2010 23:36 (thirteen years ago) link

two months pass...

i was just reading a thing and... this film was about the mining of UNOBTAINIUM

unobtainium

unchill english bro (history mayne), Friday, 6 August 2010 18:41 (thirteen years ago) link

y

pies. (gbx), Friday, 6 August 2010 18:43 (thirteen years ago) link

which has in the past been used by scientists/engineers/gear dorks to describe anything made from a v rare substance, and by Oakley for w/e their frames are made from

pies. (gbx), Friday, 6 August 2010 18:44 (thirteen years ago) link

it's totally stupid

pies. (gbx), Friday, 6 August 2010 18:44 (thirteen years ago) link

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Unobtainium

I can see thinking that this is a lame aspect of science fiction in general, but there really isn't anything unusual about it.

no gut busting joke can change history (polyphonic), Friday, 6 August 2010 18:49 (thirteen years ago) link

I enjoyed this much more in 2D blu-ray at home. That said, the annoying parts are more obvious too.

Also tried out 3D tv with glasses at best buy and it was horrible.

Spencer Chow, Friday, 6 August 2010 19:26 (thirteen years ago) link

Also tried out 3D tv with glasses at best buy and it was horrible.

― Spencer Chow, Friday, August 6, 2010 7:26 PM (51 seconds ago) Bookmark

Yes wtf. They're rolling this out too early.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 6 August 2010 19:28 (thirteen years ago) link

I've noted it before, but kids are the canary in the coal mine. "Avatar" is an outlier. Most 3-D movies are aimed at kids. Kids hate 3-D. It's uncomfortable for them. Parents hate taking them to 3-D, because it's more expensive and they have to make sure their kids keep their glasses on, lest they watch a blurry screen. I took my daughter to see "Toy Story 3" a second time, in 2-D, and she greatly preferred it flat over 3-D. Heard numerous similar stories from other parents.

They are indeed rushing this shit, backwards, rolling out the technology before they have enough product that will truly benefit. If they can get 3-D sports to take off, good for them, but what kind of lame Super Bowl party requires you to sit in one spot with $100 goggles on?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 6 August 2010 19:42 (thirteen years ago) link

four months pass...

i saw this

welp, pretty damn good tbh, at least structurally and visually and in terms of action scenes. however the villains were just too evil and some of the dialogue bits which were clearly equating this with our recent misadventures overseas were a little on the nose.

also i liked how michelle rodriguez apparently spent about an hour putting on warpaint, then got in her helicopter and promptly bought it after some ineffectual dogfighting.

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 18:26 (thirteen years ago) link

haha yeah, that was actually one of my favorite parts of the movie

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:30 (thirteen years ago) link

still don't get what's so visually stunning about this.

The referee was perfect (Chris), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:34 (thirteen years ago) link

omar otm - esp about the structure. i think cameron actually gets underrated as a writer because his dialogue's so wooden, but his movies are always very fluidly paced. evil villains is a valid complaint but i didnt mind it so much because i thought ribisi and lang were awesome with some pretty wooden roles.

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 18:38 (thirteen years ago) link

just used wooden twice, thinkin about boners i guess

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link

or ucla~

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link

hard not to when they pop up, amirite?

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:40 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah i get complaints about dialogue and what not but cameron has really never made a film which had anything other than a tight structure, even the films that 4 days long. well, true lies always seemed a bit sloppy. that one still seems incongruous to me.

stephen lang has kinda always owned the parts he's played.

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 18:41 (thirteen years ago) link

watched a bit of this at home on blu-ray and actualyl liked the way it looked a lot more for some reason. i think i just hate 3D

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:45 (thirteen years ago) link

seriously tho all that mystical rainforest giggling children shit is horrible, horrible

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:45 (thirteen years ago) link

still don't get what's so visually stunning about this.

The animation was much, much better than anything I have ever seen in a movie. Ever.

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:46 (thirteen years ago) link

what abotu stephen king's sleepwalkers

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:47 (thirteen years ago) link

I haven't seen that! *runs to Netflix*

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 18:49 (thirteen years ago) link

the wikipedia description for sleepwalkers makes it sound pretty amazing~

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 18:59 (thirteen years ago) link

it's got were-cat incest

latebloomer, Monday, 6 December 2010 19:07 (thirteen years ago) link

u'd know

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 19:14 (thirteen years ago) link

A pinch of mystical rainforest giggling children shit never hurts the box office. I'm waiting for more random lolcat content to get dropped into Hollywood movies.

Aimless, Monday, 6 December 2010 19:23 (thirteen years ago) link

Aliens is a structural mess, a pacing nightmare, yet somehow successful despite it. Also, his most quotable dialogue. But Cameron still mostly sticks to a gee whiz level of comic book dialogue, which is clunky if effective and admittedly miles better than Lucas's version of the same.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:02 (thirteen years ago) link

how is aliens a pacing nightmare??

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:16 (thirteen years ago) link

well, once they're in that tunnel and the aliens are chasing them, that's pretty nightmarish

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:17 (thirteen years ago) link

i guess the aliens keep up a pretty steady pace, that would be a nightmare

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:18 (thirteen years ago) link

still don't get what's so visually stunning about this.

The animation was much, much better than anything I have ever seen in a movie. Ever.

Yup. Every time before this, whenever I've seen movies that try to create something unreal with CGI, like an alien planet or fantasy creatures or something, a part of me has always noticed the artificial, constructed nature of it, and it has taken some suspension of disbelief to forget I'm looking at CGI, because it's always been obvious it is CGI. Avatar was the first movie I've seen where this sort of cognitive processing wasn't needed, where everything felt immediately real and not "just CGI", as if they'd actually shot the movie on another planet. I'm not sure if this works as well on the small screen, but in the cinema it was helluva experience, no matter what flaws the script may have had.

Tuomas, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:19 (thirteen years ago) link

aliens is just so good, it's basically the most ideal sequel i can think of in terms of being a standalone film while also playing off familiarity with first film in some awesome ways.

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:25 (thirteen years ago) link

In Avatar the point when I figured out the bad guys were evil was when a slow-motion shot of helpless Na'vi running away & being blown up cut to a shot of cigar-chomping soldier shooting at them and yelling "Die! Die!!"

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:25 (thirteen years ago) link

rong that is terminator 2, but aliens is obviously great xp

caek, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:25 (thirteen years ago) link

"Terminator 2" feels like the exact opposite of a standalone film

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:27 (thirteen years ago) link

good point. i actually just like talking about t2. (not joke.)

caek, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:28 (thirteen years ago) link

t2 is a dope film but made lesser by the terminator trying to get in touch with his feelings and generally any scene where edward furlong is trying to teach him about the ways of sullen teens.

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:28 (thirteen years ago) link

x-post

The special edition of Aliens (which for some reason has been the version is def. quite draggy and slow when compared to the theatrical cut.

The theatrical version is so much better, almost perfectly structured to be a roller coaster ride.

latebloomer, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:29 (thirteen years ago) link

well, they're not his long suit, but those scenes are better than the emo scenes in avatar xp

caek, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:30 (thirteen years ago) link

x-post

argh that was supposed to read:

(which for some reason has been the version they show on tv for years now)

latebloomer, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:30 (thirteen years ago) link

Aliens is a masterpiece. But even in the theatrical version, keep an eye on the clock: there's a ton of exposition and set-up before we even meet the Marines. 45 minutes? And then after the first attack there's another huge hunk of time - another 20 minutes, maybe more? - before the next fight. Of course, it's a testament to Cameron's talents that even the "boring" stuff is not boring, but it's amazing how slow this "non-stop action" flick is compared to contemporary non-stop action flicks. Plus, the end of Aliens is indeed so much non-stop action that you quickly forget about all the inaction.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:33 (thirteen years ago) link

Then again, maybe it's been a while since I saw the theatrical version.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:34 (thirteen years ago) link

x-posts. couldn't get past the shocking script/acting/story, so the fact it might have looked quite nice was lost on me. the moment i realised it was pocahontas it dragged and i lost interest.

The referee was perfect (Chris), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:35 (thirteen years ago) link

it's a slow build-up to a couple of big climaxes, i don't think that's nightmarish so much as... actual GOOD pacing

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:37 (thirteen years ago) link

what was wrong with the acting? aside from Worthington (debatable) everyone was pretty good

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:39 (thirteen years ago) link

t2 is a dope film but made lesser by the terminator trying to get in touch with his feelings and generally any scene where edward furlong is trying to teach him about the ways of sullen teens.

OTOH: milk carton

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:39 (thirteen years ago) link

worthington is boooooooring compared to anyone else who has ever starred in a JC movie

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:40 (thirteen years ago) link

well part of that is because his character is a sullen cipher and the other part is because Worthington is actually a wooden marionette

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:41 (thirteen years ago) link

i generally like worthington but i won't necessarily go to bat for him in this... it's hard to tell if the character's underwritten or if he was wrong for the part or idk what

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:42 (thirteen years ago) link

I said it upthread but the vlog where he is all weary and sad because they are going to bulldoze his pretty pretty princess is kind of great

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:43 (thirteen years ago) link

x-post I guess it's just splitting hairs, but in "Aliens," it's not a slow *suspenseful* build-up. Both battles happen pretty suddenly. There's just an awful lot of talk, is all, by action movie standards. Nothing wrong with that. I like talk. But I bet that movie (as is) could not have been released today. For long stretches it's practically an art film, pacing-wise.

I mean, compare it to, say, Ebert's (positive) contemporaneous take:

The movie is so intense that it creates a problem for me as a reviewer: Do I praise its craftsmanship, or do I tell you it left me feeling wrung out and unhappy? It has been a week since I saw it, so the emotions have faded a little, leaving with me an appreciation of the movie's technical qualities. But when I walked out of the theater, there were knots in my stomach from the film's roller-coaster ride of violence. This is not the kind of movie where it means anything to say you "enjoyed" it.

That reads like a review of "Irreversible."

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:45 (thirteen years ago) link

does taking time to establish characters, relationships and setting really make something an art film

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:47 (thirteen years ago) link

ebert's weird sometimes. i dunno, i think a palpable sense of dread is built up throughout the film and the genius of the film really is in the structure. i think some films would have a quick minor battle up front and then everyone would load up and get ready for the big one, but this one has this terrifying epic massacre of 3/4ths of the marines and then everyone else is trapped and just waiting for the other shoe to drop and not knowing how, when, or where it's going to happen.

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:48 (thirteen years ago) link

like that art film jaws

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:49 (thirteen years ago) link

ebert's weird sometimes. i dunno, i think a palpable sense of dread is built up throughout the film and the genius of the film really is in the structure. i think some films would have a quick minor battle up front and then everyone would load up and get ready for the big one, but this one has this terrifying epic massacre of 3/4ths of the marines and then everyone else is trapped and just waiting for the other shoe to drop and not knowing how, when, or where it's going to happen.

― omar little, Monday, December 6, 2010 4:48 PM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark

i think "alien 1" is the "battle up front" - the advantage of the sequel

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:49 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah but even accounting for that i think most filmmakers would maybe just build the film in a more predictable manner, i think one of the strengths of aliens is that what happens to the marines at the beginning is kind of unpredictable maybe.

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:51 (thirteen years ago) link

x-post For sure. Like I said, it's a masterpiece. But I think its deviation from form, including its (at times) leisurely pace, is what makes it so memorable/intense. It's like a classic stuck in a foxhole on the front war film. "Slow" is not a pejorative in this case. Maybe "deliberate pacing" is a better description? It's certainly in no hurry.

There's really no comparing Jaws and Aliens, other than to say both are great. But I'd argue Jaws is a perfectly, almost classically-so, structured film.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 21:55 (thirteen years ago) link

but you said it was a NIGHTMARE isnt that pejorative

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:58 (thirteen years ago) link

I love nightmares

oh wait no I don't, nightmares are terrible

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 21:59 (thirteen years ago) link

Dude, that was hyperbole. Just on paper, and in practice, there's an awful lot of inaction for an action movie is all. Like, conspicuously so.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:00 (thirteen years ago) link

But I wasn't all OMG ALIENS WAS SO SLOW IT GAVE ME NIGHTMARES!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link

The pacing in Aliens is masterful. And Ripley's hallucination near the beginning is actually 10x scarier than the chest-burst in the first one.

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:03 (thirteen years ago) link

Aliens is a structural mess, a pacing nightmare, yet somehow successful despite it.

hard to see how anyone could take this as a face-value negative criticism of the movie

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:04 (thirteen years ago) link

i take issue with the idea that it is a mess, instead of just unconventionally structured

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:06 (thirteen years ago) link

Yes, mess is too strong. Subtract points from my tally.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:13 (thirteen years ago) link

YES! BOOYA!!!!

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:20 (thirteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdCrZfTkG1c

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:22 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.horrordvds.com/reviews/a-m/aliens/aliens_shot5l.jpg

(l-r: josh in chicago, me)

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:25 (thirteen years ago) link

Ha, doesn't that make me Ripley?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:29 (thirteen years ago) link

(Gloating made you sloppy!)

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:29 (thirteen years ago) link

aliens is just so good, it's basically the most ideal sequel i can think of in terms of being a standalone film while also playing off familiarity with first film in some awesome ways.

omar and I are the Tommy Lee Jones and Kevin Bacon of ILX film crits.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:31 (thirteen years ago) link

Is that a JFK reference??

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:35 (thirteen years ago) link

Ha, doesn't that make me Ripley?

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, December 6, 2010 5:29 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

(Gloating made you sloppy!)

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, December 6, 2010 5:29 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

uh... um.... i was taking the long view, what with the whole events in alien 3

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:37 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.jfk-online.com/jones.jpg

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:47 (thirteen years ago) link

so has anyone here seen the new Aliens blu-ray? supposedly it looks great!

latebloomer, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:48 (thirteen years ago) link

i have
it does

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

and you're our aliens checkin cuz

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 22:54 (thirteen years ago) link

nice.

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:56 (thirteen years ago) link

anyway i watched the avatar blu the same night as the last airbender and despite my mixed-to-negative feelings about this movie, holy shit does every single moment of it blow that stinker out of the water, not even teh same league

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 22:57 (thirteen years ago) link

at the time were you thinking "goddammit i will watch something called avatar: the last airbender even if i have to put it together myself!!"

literally the worst thing that ever happened on this planet (reddening), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:04 (thirteen years ago) link

haha i actually used that as the peg for my column that week

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:05 (thirteen years ago) link

shymalan just seems incapable of making a film with any forward momentum whatsoever

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:06 (thirteen years ago) link

cameron works better when his villains are not people

goole, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:07 (thirteen years ago) link

stunning insight i know

goole, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:07 (thirteen years ago) link

that's a true lie

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:07 (thirteen years ago) link

i never saw that! the villain was an old telephone, right?

goole, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:08 (thirteen years ago) link

this movie and the Lost finale are my two "never forgive, never forget" media experiences of recent memory. hype hype hype and then soul-crushingly bad writing.

literally the worst thing that ever happened on this planet (reddening), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:08 (thirteen years ago) link

but still, robot knife fight.

literally the worst thing that ever happened on this planet (reddening), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:10 (thirteen years ago) link

i never saw that! the villain was an old telephone, right?

― goole, Monday, December 6, 2010 6:08 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

it was a plane

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:15 (thirteen years ago) link

you're fired

kanellos (gbx), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:17 (thirteen years ago) link

i distinctly remember a telephone hitting arnold in the face

goole, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:17 (thirteen years ago) link

the plane commanded it

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:23 (thirteen years ago) link

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51N99F2W3DL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

are you sure it was a plane

goole, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:24 (thirteen years ago) link

avatar didn't totally work for me for various reasons but i gotta say i'm glad cameron is making these types of films, though when i say "making" and "films" i guess it should be noted that he's only made two in 16 years but still...

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:24 (thirteen years ago) link

i think the word 'still' should have been in quotes too

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:25 (thirteen years ago) link

i should have put "films" in in double quotes

omar little, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:27 (thirteen years ago) link

tbh i think titanic still holds up

Princess TamTam, Monday, 6 December 2010 23:36 (thirteen years ago) link

kinda the same structure as aliens

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:44 (thirteen years ago) link

But with the disadvantage that you didn't want to know more about any of the people going on the boat

buildings with goats on the roof (James Morrison), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 02:38 (thirteen years ago) link

I know Paul Reiser. You, Billy Zane, are no Paul Reiser.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 03:46 (thirteen years ago) link

billy zane owns dude

Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 03:50 (thirteen years ago) link

owns A dude

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 03:52 (thirteen years ago) link

are you saying he's a slave owner or

Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 03:52 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm not saying... I'm just

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 03:53 (thirteen years ago) link

omg @ terror train

At a college pre-med student fraternity New Year's Eve party, a reluctant Alana Maxwell is coerced into participating in a prank: she lures the shy and awkward pledge Kenny Hampson into a darkened room on the promise of a sexual liaison. However some other students have placed a woman's corpse in the bed.

steendriver DUMB BIG, his HOOS got HOOS (dayo), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:12 (thirteen years ago) link

where does the train come in

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:16 (thirteen years ago) link

maybe they run a train on the corpse

Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:16 (thirteen years ago) link

that joke was hugely appreciated by me

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:17 (thirteen years ago) link

i think i actually guffawed

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:17 (thirteen years ago) link

http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-tiphat.gif

Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:25 (thirteen years ago) link

i irl guffawed

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 05:47 (thirteen years ago) link

joke of the day

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 06:03 (thirteen years ago) link

run a ham on em

steendriver DUMB BIG, his HOOS got HOOS (dayo), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 06:05 (thirteen years ago) link

the right man in the right thread at the right time apparently

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 06:08 (thirteen years ago) link

so has anyone here seen the new Aliens blu-ray? supposedly it looks great!

― latebloomer, Monday, December 6, 2010 10:48 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i have
it does

― shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, December 6, 2010 10:52 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

and you're our aliens checkin cuz

― omar little, Monday, December 6, 2010 10:54 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

this made me grin like idiot

latebloomer, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:45 (thirteen years ago) link

funny make me grin like idiot

latebloomer, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:45 (thirteen years ago) link

grin like BEAR

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:46 (thirteen years ago) link

it was a tough opp to pass up

omar little, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 17:39 (thirteen years ago) link

too tough

omar little, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 17:39 (thirteen years ago) link

nine months pass...

Huh.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:32 (twelve years ago) link

I hope it's a "flight simulator" type ride and not a "fornicate with your horse via your tail simulator" type ride

the tax avocado (DJP), Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:34 (twelve years ago) link

That ever elusive next level.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:36 (twelve years ago) link

fornicate-with-your-horse-via-your-tail simulator, in case that was unclear, although I guess a tail simulator would be a by-product of any such ride anyway

the tax avocado (DJP), Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:36 (twelve years ago) link

bleh.

am0n, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:37 (twelve years ago) link

So, when does this movie come out?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:46 (twelve years ago) link

Supposed to be a big deal, right?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:46 (twelve years ago) link

3-D or something?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:46 (twelve years ago) link

amon: that Airbender ride has since been rebranded to Snoopy: Surf Dog.

smelly's wife (rustic italian flatbread), Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:51 (twelve years ago) link

I am fairly certain "I wanna bone blue chicks" is going to be a central theme to this movie.

― Huckabee Jesus lifeline (HI DERE), Tuesday, December 8, 2009 3:12 PM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I would like to point out that I was OTM on this thread

the tax avocado (DJP), Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:52 (twelve years ago) link

Nah, there was just one blue chick, and it was LOVE.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 06:56 (twelve years ago) link

I hope it's a "flight simulator" type ride and not a "fornicate with your horse via your tail simulator" type ride

Whatever it is, get ready to smell it:

“I definitely want to do a flight attraction of some kind,” the director said, citing the “Soarin’ Over California” flying ride at Disney’s California Adventure Park in Anaheim as a personal favorite. “Flying is a big part of the movie. One of the things people liked the most at test screenings was going up into the floating mountains in the flying sequences. We may have banshees, Leonopteryxes, maybe some other flying creatures that don’t make their appearance until the second and third films.”

Disney’s Imagineers will also be tasked with bringing Na’vi culture and the natural world of Pandora to life, along with creating “a general sense of the future,” Cameron said.

“It all needs to be one fabric,” he said. “As long as it’s thematically consistent, as long as it looks and feels and smells the way you imagine it, then we’ve succeeded.”

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:35 (twelve years ago) link

desperately restating plz plz plz DO NOT INCLUDE SPACE HORSE FUCKING IN THIS SMELLONANZA

the tax avocado (DJP), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:36 (twelve years ago) link

"Bonin' Over Pandora"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:37 (twelve years ago) link

if this asinine bullshit comes anywhere near anaheim i swear to god

FLAWLESS STANCE, ATHLETIC BEAST, WINNER'S POSTURE (reddening), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 17:10 (twelve years ago) link

We may have banshees, Leonopteryxes

no one knows what the fuck these things are because no one gives a fuck about avatar beyond "blue cat people boning"

FLAWLESS STANCE, ATHLETIC BEAST, WINNER'S POSTURE (reddening), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 17:11 (twelve years ago) link

man i can't wait to see if they make an animatronic version of...oh that's right the characters are all boring cliches whose names no one remembers

FLAWLESS STANCE, ATHLETIC BEAST, WINNER'S POSTURE (reddening), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 17:18 (twelve years ago) link

six months pass...

was discussing this w/ friends today, but I'm kind of bothered at what I perceive as the hypocritical posturing of cinemagoing laypersons against Avatar. Like they don't just dislike it, they wear it as a badge of honor, to demonstrate that they are 'above' such material.

I wouldn't attach such a label to the posters here, because hell you all know way more about movies than I do, but I mean I get kind of sick of arguing with friends in public who just got back from some equally vacuous second-tier tearjerker drama Oscar-bait that happens to pull all the right strings that somehow believe that these pieces are inherently superior to Avatar.

I mean Avatar's plot was threadbare, pedestrian, and didn't have any subtext at ALL, but it was at least functional and didn't get in the way of the visuals (much like a mediocre rapper could have a hit song if he has a killer beat and 'doesn't get in the way' of it). Many of the people who slagged Avatar were fans of "The Town" which had a plot that was equally cookie cutter, no?

idk...I mean doesn't even Morbs like this movie? I loved it and still do.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago) link

I mean Avatar's plot was threadbare, pedestrian, and didn't have any subtext at ALL,

You're pretty liberal with your "love." So you can actually sit through this at home?

Many of the people who slagged Avatar were fans of "The Town" which had a plot that was equally cookie cutter, no?

Why would you or anyone equate some massive monocultural event with some random Boston heist movie? I've never heard these brought up in the same sentence. In fact, I've never heard anyone bring up "The Town," ever. In any context.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago) link

so you don't know people then?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago) link

ie the point was movies with equally generic plot points often get free passes whereas Avatar gets shit on because it's not The Battle of Algiers with blue people

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago) link

I just never thought of the two films being remotely comparable, but I get it. Anyway, I think the reason people might hypothetically like "The Town" more than "Avatar," despite the former's boilerplate tendencies, is that it has good acting and writing going for it (right?). But "Avatar," minus such apparent disposables as plot and subtext, doesn't have acting to fall back on, and does in fact have 10 foot tall blue people running around.

But really, you've seen "Avatar" multiple times, and I assume in 2-D at home as well? And it holds up for you? Genuinely curious, because I can't imagine sitting through it ever again, whether I liked it or not. Same with "Titanic." Like, pretty sure it would shrink in my estimation.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:15 (twelve years ago) link

I actually haven't seen it multiple times, no. just the one theatre sitting.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:16 (twelve years ago) link

I don't really think that is fair though as a comparison point though because up until three months ago, my home entertainment system was a piece of shit 5 year old TV and the built-in speakers that came with it.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago) link

So you've only seen it once, years ago, and you can honestly say you love "Avatar?"

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago) link

See it again and get back to us.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago) link

I didn't realize love for films was based on the number of times you saw the movie?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago) link

pls let me know how many more times I need to watch k thx

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago) link

still never saw this, do not wear that as a badge of honor, just don't give a fuck either way

Lil T the Bowed Jet (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago) link

can respect dat

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago) link

I don't understand why people didn't have the uncanny valley problem with this movie.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:15 (twelve years ago) link

i love some movies that i've only seen once, but i would definitely watch them again is the difference

less of the same (darraghmac), Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago) link

Too busy hating cigar-chomping, racist, marine figurehead as he yells "Die! Die!" while shooting poor natives.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago) link

i don't full-on love avatar, but i like it a lot. saw it twice in the theater, and have seen it once on big-screen blu-ray since. by the third time through, it was starting to wear a little thin (and long), and absent the 3D, the wow factor drops a bit, but i still enjoyed it and would/will watch it again. and rewatchability isn't the ultimate cinematic virtue anyway. i probably won't watch tarkovsky's solaris too many times in my life, but that takes nothing away from the fact that i love it. anyway, the performances of both leads were quite good, and i loved the "10 foot tall blue people". it's a science fiction movie, and i'm a science fiction fan. giant blue cat people are an unambiguous plus.

i agree that the plot is routine, but cameron's sense of how to construct a narrative is still impeccable. avatar builds effectively, compresses and expands just where it needs to, and pulls of its emotional effects with masterful aplomb. i found both the love story and the popular uprising quite moving. though troublesome with regard to its use of the very tired "white savior" trope, i was also very impressed by the film's political message and commitment. few popular action-adventure movies deal so directly and bravely with contemporary political reality. finally, i think it did a great job of metaphorically telling the awful story of western imperial conquest. that it gave that story a happy ending, that did nothing to blunt its communication of the tragic truth. cameron's poignant fantasy only drives home the differences between the world he imagines and our own. we know that, in real life, countless indigenous peoples annihilated in the process. as a result, i found it a very bittersweet film.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago) link

I've been thinking about this movie recently, in regards to its huge success versus John Carter's abysmal failure (box office wise). They both have silly names dotted throughout and CGI alien people on alien worlds, and maybe the jungle paradise of Pandora with its fluorescent floating jellyfish is more appealing, but I would have thought the corny mother-Gaia vibes would have turned a lot of people off. My only real guess is that people say "James Cameron!" and then see Mech Warriors and are like "oh shit, bad ass".

I didn't care for Avatar when I saw in the cinema. I liked some of the visuals and the action scenes more when I saw it in 2D at home, but all the other bits were even worse.

The Town is a sub-Heat crime drama with a terrible ending, but I know a number of 'plebs' who rate it as one of the best movies in recent years because it's about as 'serious drama' as they'll likely see. Also, Renner's Cagney > Everything in Avatar tbh.

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago) link

yeah, i was surprised that "john carter" wasn't sold as an avatar type sci-fi romance. the two films are similar in many respects, and avatar did quite well at the box office.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago) link

it was actually; when disney started full on freaking out, the ad campaign was "See the story that inspired STAR WARS and AVATAR"

Lil T the Bowed Jet (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago) link

and then people saw the title John Carter and thought it was a biopic about a controversial school administrator from the 80s

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:10 (twelve years ago) link

as opposed to when people saw the title Avatar, and thought it was about lj icons.

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:32 (twelve years ago) link

it kinda was

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:34 (twelve years ago) link

"They blew up the Hometree!"

Mood: SAD

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago) link

yeah, that's generally the case when sad things happen in films

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:40 (twelve years ago) link

(whoosh!)

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 20:23 (twelve years ago) link

No badge to this, people can watch what they like and however many times they feel the need to get they want from it. I didn't get around bcz I usually have 10 films (old or new) I want to see every month and I only get round to about 3-4.

This is being premiered on UK TV tomorrow. Alas, I am instead attending a screening of a doc about an Iraqi Women's basketball team at the Human Rights festival.

But I'll have to check up on how indigeneous people were brutally destroyed by imperialist aggressors sometime. I'll get a bk out of the library or something.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 24 March 2012 20:59 (twelve years ago) link

it's a family-friendly adventure film, ffs. just hitting the basics of something like that is impressive enough.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:03 (twelve years ago) link

jeez, just reread my defense from two hours back. so so so many dropped words and shitty constructions. yikes. not doing myself any favors there. and i think i used the word "very" like five times.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago) link

I don't really think the pro-indigenous/anti-imperialist-consumerist thing is THAT rare in Hollywood tbh. Ewoks weren't CEOs of the treehouse when the righteous Empire came marching in with their hybrid AT-STs.

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:21 (twelve years ago) link

hubristic edit, apologies in advance:

I don't full-on love avatar, but I do like it a lot. I saw it twice in the theater, in both 2 and 3D, and have seen it once on big-screen blu-ray since. By the third time through, it was starting to wear a bit thin (and long), but I still enjoyed it and will likely watch it again at some point. Rewatchability isn't the ultimate cinematic virtue, though. I probably won't feel compelled to watch Tarkovsky's Solyaris too many times in my life, but that takes nothing away from my admiration of the film. Anyway, the performances of Avatar's two leads were both quite good, I thought, and I loved the "10 foot tall blue people". it's a science fiction movie, and I'm an unrepentant science fiction fan. Giant blue cat people will always be a plus.

I agree that the plot is routine, but Cameron's sense of narrative flow and timing are still impeccable. Avatar builds effectively, compresses and expands just where it needs to, and pulls of its emotional effects with masterful aplomb. I found both the love story and the climactic popular uprising quite moving. Though it's troublesome with regard to its use of the "white savior" trope, I was impressed by the film's political message and commitment. Few popular action-adventure movies deal so directly and bravely with divisive political realities. Finally, i think Avatar does a great job of metaphorically telling the awful story of Western imperial conquest, and of giving that story the appropriate emotional and moral weight. That Cameron indulges himself in a crowd-pleasing happy ending does nothing to blunt Avatar's communication of the tragic truth. The fantastical elements of the story only drive home the differences between this imagined world and our own, where Gaia doesn't rise up at the end to repel technologically advanced invaders. As a result, i found it a very bittersweet film.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:23 (twelve years ago) link

this movie might have been good if the lead character wasn't such a boring lump, it's aliens without ripley, the terminator without the terminator OR linda hamilton

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:24 (twelve years ago) link

also there's scenes involving mystical forest children laughing

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:24 (twelve years ago) link

Ewoks weren't CEOs of the treehouse when the righteous Empire came marching in with their hybrid AT-STs.

yeah, but ewoks do not so clearly stand for the victims of real-life genocide. and revenge of the jedi does not so bluntly drive home the message that the "evil empire" is us.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago) link

so what you're saying basically is that avatar is good because it ~makes u think~

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:27 (twelve years ago) link

I'm saying I appreciated its willingness to deal bluntly with some pretty heavy and divisive shit, both contemporary and historical. And I found the telling of the story involving and even moving. And it kicked ass, even with the laughing forest babies, white savior and shitty fonts.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:30 (twelve years ago) link

Last Samurai and Dances with Wolves are just two examples of crappy movies that call out the US as the "evil empire".

As far as Gaia not rising up, I guess they can't all by Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.

xpost

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago) link

so what you're saying basically is that avatar is good because it ~makes u think~

i think what you're saying basically is "u liked avatar lol", which is cool, cuz i did

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:33 (twelve years ago) link

Last Samurai and Dances with Wolves are just two examples of crappy movies that call out the US as the "evil empire".

never seen last samurai. the similarities btwn avatar and dances with wolves are definitely there, and have been hashed to death besides. i liked dances with wolves at the time, but it's been ages, and i was rather young. no giant blue cat people, iirc.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:35 (twelve years ago) link

also, Star Wars has its roots in coming up with a story from the perspective of the Vietcong fighting American Imperialism.

Avatar's message isn't bad, and I'm glad it's not a pean to the US Military-Industrial Complex the way the Transformers films are, but I don't think its bucking any trends. Hollywood roots for the underdogs.

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:36 (twelve years ago) link

also, i don't think that either the last samurai (rated R) or dances with wolves were quite as kid-friendly as avatar. in terms of the audience reached, the star wars films are a better comparison, imo.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:38 (twelve years ago) link

My feelings are similar to Contenderizer's. I liked Avatar a hell of a lot. There's all kinds of things it doesn't do, but the things it does do are so abundant and wonderful. Ornament can be substance sometimes.

Axolotl with an Atlatl (Jon Lewis), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:39 (twelve years ago) link

Maybe I missed it, but it seems shocking that certain elements of the Right didn't go after Avatar the way they've gone after The Muppets or The Lorax.

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:40 (twelve years ago) link

also, Star Wars has its roots in coming up with a story from the perspective of the Vietcong fighting American Imperialism.

Avatar's message isn't bad, and I'm glad it's not a pean to the US Military-Industrial Complex the way the Transformers films are, but I don't think its bucking any trends. Hollywood roots for the underdogs.

fine, but "rooting for the underdog" is not quite the same as making an explicitly political film about specific historical and contemporary issues. the fact that avatar tied the US invasions of iraq and afghanistan to the genocide of native peoples in the Americas, and opposed these things by unambiguously celebrating what might by some be called a "terrorist uprising" seems pretty impressive to me.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:41 (twelve years ago) link

yes, pretty impressive for a hollywood movie to express liberal sentiments

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:42 (twelve years ago) link

oh, come on. they're not just "liberal sentiments". and it's not just a "hollywood movie". it's a family friendly summertime action-adventure sci-fi blockbuster. hardly the sort of place you typically find pointed critiques of american policy throughout history.

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:44 (twelve years ago) link

War of the Worlds has Tom Cruise actually grab an explosive and hurl himself into the belly an invading machine.

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:45 (twelve years ago) link

uh, okay...

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:46 (twelve years ago) link

i think that's a bit more subtle, but sure

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 21:46 (twelve years ago) link

"Avatar" was released during the respite when the American right was more or less cowed into brief submission, iirc. They had "lost." It wasn't until the summer of 2010 that they got their mojo back via the Tea Party, and by then we had all moved on from "Avatar" and onto something else. Health care reform?

I honestly enjoyed "Avatar" fine the one time I saw it, enough that I recommended it to the rest of my family ("you have to see it in 3-D!"), who between the three of them run the political gamut. They all came back from the theater with these accusatory glares, like I tricked them into seeing it. Anyway, along with, again, "Titanic," or "John Carter," or "The Hunger Games," I liked it fine and had no desire to see it again, and sense that if I did see it again, what I once appreciated wouldn't carry me through a second viewing. But this could be a generational thing. Are there some now grown folks who think back on and quote "Titanic" the way my generation may quote "Aliens?" Do kids who saw "Avatar" three years ago think of it the way some think of "Star Wars?" I want to say no, but I have no idea. It wasn't until a few years after the fact that I realized what effect the "Star Wars" prequels had on pre-teens in my neighborhood.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago) link

i admire the construction of the film and everything cameron achieved technically, but i wish it was a more interesting movie - something with more of an edge and less of a please-every-audience 4 quadrant mentality.

when i saw this was bumped, i assumed people were going to be talking about the fact that cameron is heading to the bottom of challenger fucking deep next week, in a submersible of his own design:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mBG0LbAoqk

http://www.bendbulletin.com/article/20120322/NEWS0107/203220366/
http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/22/a-giant-dive-for-mankind/

avatar 2's gonna be set in the oceans. i hope ed harris is in it!

these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:28 (twelve years ago) link

best part of avatar (and the only 3d thing i've ever been like @_@ at) was the scene where they wake up in that big ol room in the spaceship

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago) link

it's a family friendly summertime action-adventure sci-fi blockbuster.

<pedant>

Release date(s) December 10, 2009 (London premiere)
December 18, 2009 (United States)
</pedant>

jpattzlovevampz 2 hours ago (Phil D.), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:50 (twelve years ago) link

BOO-ya!! contenderizer is 100% wrong!!!

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago) link

yeah I totally saw it right before Xmas that year

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago) link

*crosses arms, smiles smugly*

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago) link

Pedantry 101

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago) link

in australia it was summertime tbf

less of the same (darraghmac), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:55 (twelve years ago) link

*uncrosses arms, frowns earnestly*

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 22:59 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah, but it was Christmas on Pandora. GAME, SET, MATCH.

jpattzlovevampz 2 hours ago (Phil D.), Saturday, 24 March 2012 23:06 (twelve years ago) link

*flails arms confusedly, face contorting into wild grimaces*

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 24 March 2012 23:17 (twelve years ago) link

whoa had no idea cameron was headed for challenger deep, that is mega dope

catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 24 March 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago) link

ha that cameron sub teaser is pretty funny, hes got some super hi tech stuff to do something thats only been done once before fifty years ago, but they didnt get pictures well actually some pictures have been taken since then, but james cameron might DIE which admittedly would be p compelling

lag∞n, Saturday, 24 March 2012 23:29 (twelve years ago) link

<pedant>

Release date(s) December 10, 2009 (London premiere)
December 18, 2009 (United States)
</pedant>

lol, got me there

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 23:45 (twelve years ago) link

Movie is so gay

PSOD (Ste), Sunday, 25 March 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago) link

not gonna let my kids see it due to bestiality with those flying things

stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Sunday, 25 March 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago) link

This was on TV this evening and I unintentionally gave it another three hours of my time, so I begrudgingly admit it must have some power to captivate and entertain. The early forest scenes look far more cartoony in 2d though (oh shit have I inadvertently made an argument for 3d? my bad); and the finale with the most absurdly gung-ho military commander in movie history jumping out of an exploding plane in a giant exoskeleton and having a knife fight with jake (while still in exoskeleton) is RIDICULOUS.

ledge, Sunday, 25 March 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago) link

don't bring a knife to a spearfight

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 25 March 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago) link

the finale with the most absurdly gung-ho military commander in movie history jumping out of an exploding plane in a giant exoskeleton and having a knife fight with jake (while still in exoskeleton) is RIDICULOUS.

in the best possible way!

Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Sunday, 25 March 2012 23:30 (twelve years ago) link

Cameron is at the bottom of the ocean btw

catbus otm (gbx), Monday, 26 March 2012 00:27 (twelve years ago) link

thank god

lag∞n, Monday, 26 March 2012 00:39 (twelve years ago) link

layup

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Monday, 26 March 2012 00:48 (twelve years ago) link

"james cameron might DIE which admittedly would be p compelling"
^

Lil T the Bowed Jet (forksclovetofu), Monday, 26 March 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago) link

Surely this dude has a 3-D cabin cam running, no? They could insert him as a bumper into "Titanic 3-D."

"Are you ready to go back to "Titanic" ... with me?"

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 March 2012 21:52 (twelve years ago) link

am i the only one that thinks it's actually p rad that james cameron went to the bottom of the ocean in a bright green submarine? i guess i kinda like holding onto the idea that not everything that happens involving a famous person is necessarily despicable. the ocean is tremendous!

catbus otm (gbx), Monday, 26 March 2012 23:08 (twelve years ago) link

Was reading a book about big disastrous movie productions recently, and it included Abyss. Cameron's a trained physicist, among other things, which surprised me (though it fits with the attention to detail he gives to _most_ of his special effects stuff, in terms of making it look/feel right. Boobs on egg-layers aside, of course.)

Not only dermatologists hate her (James Morrison), Monday, 26 March 2012 23:42 (twelve years ago) link

no, it is really cool. i cant wait to see the footage

these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 00:45 (twelve years ago) link

Cameron's a trained physicist, among other things

― Not only dermatologists hate her (James Morrison), Monday, March 26, 2012 7:42 PM (1 hour ago)

Cameron enrolled at Fullerton College, a 2-year community college, in 1973 to study physics. He switched to English, then dropped out before the start of the fall 1974 semester.[18]

dont think that really qualifies, sort of like when metal dudes claim to be classically trained, going to the bottom of the sea is sweet but hes not doing it for anything but his own amusement, i mean theres a reason people went there first 50 years ago and didnt go back, theres nothing a guy can do that a lil robot or a camera on a string or w/e cant, camerons nerdly seriousness re being an explorer or physicist or w/e is so v lol

lag∞n, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago) link

Going places is cool though.

polyphonic, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 01:12 (twelve years ago) link

Instead of going to work tomorrow I'm gonna just send in a lil robot.

polyphonic, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 01:13 (twelve years ago) link

I'm sending a string

catbus otm (gbx), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 01:36 (twelve years ago) link

tying one around my finger to remind myself to go

Lil T the Bowed Jet (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 02:29 (twelve years ago) link

:( my book mislead me

Not only dermatologists hate her (James Morrison), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago) link

Cameron is totally self-taught when it comes to science stuff and in particular undersea exploration, but I want to say he's been a significant contributor to the field, not just financially but (obviously) directly as well.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 04:43 (twelve years ago) link

directorly u mean?

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 04:53 (twelve years ago) link

Directorly, too, but also directly (as in, he designs submarines and cameras and tech and goes diving all the time). But he also films what he does.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 12:49 (twelve years ago) link

one month passes...

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/james-cameron-on-chinese-filmmakers-censorship-and-potential-co-productions/

From now on Cameron will be dedicating his time to diving and making Avatar sequels. That's it.

"I’ve divided my time over the last 16 years over deep ocean exploration and filmmaking. I’ve made two movies in 16 years, and I’ve done eight expeditions. Last year I basically completely disbanded my production company’s development arm. So I’m not interested in developing anything. I’m in the “Avatar” business. Period. That’s it. I’m making “Avatar 2,” “Avatar 3,” maybe “Avatar 4,” and I’m not going to produce other people’s movies for them. I’m not interested in taking scripts. And that all sounds I suppose a little bit restricted, but the point is I think within the “Avatar” landscape I can say everything I need to say that I think needs to be said, in terms of the state of the world and what I think we need to be doing about it. And doing it in an entertaining way."

He is also "in awe" of Zack Snyder, the only new filmmaker that blows him away.

DavidM, Monday, 7 May 2012 20:56 (eleven years ago) link

this fuckin guy
thank god he's not working for DC or marvel i guess

(Name Withheld to Avoid Hassle) (forksclovetofu), Monday, 7 May 2012 21:25 (eleven years ago) link

watched avatar again a few weeks ago

still sucks

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Monday, 7 May 2012 22:01 (eleven years ago) link

he is the only person alive who is still stuck in that universe

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Monday, 7 May 2012 22:08 (eleven years ago) link

Avatar sucks

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 7 May 2012 22:09 (eleven years ago) link

i can see exactly why Cameron would love Zack Snyder

i have yet to rewatch Avatar. i know i will cringe throughout even though i enjoyed it as theatre spectacle.
i sort of hope the 2nd movie will be really good, a la Empire Strikes Back or Aliens, though i have a feeling it could easily be worse than Temple of Doom...

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 7 May 2012 22:10 (eleven years ago) link

Loved the shit out of Avatar in the theater. Have not rewatched since then.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Monday, 7 May 2012 22:19 (eleven years ago) link

maybe “Avatar 4,”

*prays*

lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 00:23 (eleven years ago) link

cameron is so fucking hate-able

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 01:09 (eleven years ago) link

for the most popular movie of all time its kind of amazing how a year or two later it has zero cultural currency at all... am i wrong about that?

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 07:11 (eleven years ago) link

i kind of felt that way two weeks after it came out!

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 07:19 (eleven years ago) link

it's the "jolson sings again" of 2009

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 07:20 (eleven years ago) link

to be fair i kind of like "jolson sings again"

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 07:21 (eleven years ago) link

cameron is so fucking hate-able

― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, May 7, 2012 6:09 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

for the most popular movie of all time its kind of amazing how a year or two later it has zero cultural currency at all... am i wrong about that?

― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, May 8, 2012 12:11 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

cameron is eminently, definitively hateable, and yeah, avatar's currency did evaporate pretty much upon issuance. i did dig it though, and am looking forward to the sequel. pity me if you must.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 07:28 (eleven years ago) link

"am looking forward to the sequelsequels. pity me if you must."

I've asked this before, but did this movie make an impression on the most impressionable? On 11 and 12 year old kids? Do kids play Avatar? Do they dress in Avatar costumes?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 11:47 (eleven years ago) link

I mean, I'm sure Cameron does, but other than him?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 11:47 (eleven years ago) link

thats what im saying

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 14:54 (eleven years ago) link

I dunno I mean as far as major_pop_culture_events no one talks about ANYTHING after it's been out a few months do they?

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 14:59 (eleven years ago) link

yes

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:02 (eleven years ago) link

There is still a considerable cultural footprint for (EG) Aliens, Terminator and Titanic. There's still things you can do to reference them in a joke and be certain people* will get the reference. Avatar, not so much.

*of an appropriate age

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:06 (eleven years ago) link

There was that avatar hair sex joke on 30 rock this season.

Touché Gödel (ledge), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:06 (eleven years ago) link

ya or titanic, which was the big record holder before

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:07 (eleven years ago) link

avatar is more like a ride© than a movie

© copyright dr morbs

lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:30 (eleven years ago) link

"Avatar" didn't introduce 3D to the world either, I saw "Beowulf" in 2007. And it had a 3D naked Angelina Jolie demon.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:31 (eleven years ago) link

how is that different than just naked angelina jolie HAHAHAHA BRAD PITT

lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:34 (eleven years ago) link

B.R.A.D. P.I.T.T.

lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:34 (eleven years ago) link

duders 3D goes back like many decades

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:43 (eleven years ago) link

i think it's ~interesting~ how little this matters now

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:44 (eleven years ago) link

Yes, but actually good 3D is a relatively new thing. As a massive and vicious generalisation, Avatar wouldn't have made this much if you still couldn't use 3D and regular glasses :)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:48 (eleven years ago) link

old 3D was much better than new 3D, tho - greater dimensional depth, greater clarity of image, more impact etc etc

Ward Fowler, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:50 (eleven years ago) link

good 3d does not exist

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:51 (eleven years ago) link

3d is kinda counter productive, except in avatar

lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:53 (eleven years ago) link

good 3d does not exist

CORALINE

the minister of RAILWAYS (reddening), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:01 (eleven years ago) link

yeah, disagree that good 3D does not exist. great 3D may be in short supply, but there's plenty of good stuff.

There is still a considerable cultural footprint for (EG) Aliens, Terminator and Titanic.

the extent to which avatar has dropped off the map is kind of funny/weird. i mean, compare with pixar's cars, which is still alive and kicking, minting money hand over fist - and was even before the sequel. kids glommed onto that and never let go. much more so than they did with wall-e, which got all the critical love, and certainly more than they did with avatar. if you want proof that pop culture event films can linger long in the cultural mind, you don't have to look any farther than star wars.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:09 (eleven years ago) link

i don't think it's funny/weird, the movie is really stupid and bad and everybody knew it at the time.

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:13 (eleven years ago) link

more interesting that it was such a successful spectacle upon release, but that's not that hard to figure out either i guess

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:14 (eleven years ago) link

If ever you feel the need to enlighten us...

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:19 (eleven years ago) link

Successful marketing, hype, etc. It was the most-hyped movie since The Phantom Menace.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:21 (eleven years ago) link

the phantom menace was so bad

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:28 (eleven years ago) link

i just rewatched all the 'new' star wars movies and that one is just the worst.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:29 (eleven years ago) link

Hype doesn't bring in the repeat business, though, or the (sorry) long tail. It still pulled in a million dollars on week 17.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:29 (eleven years ago) link

no way, the second one is the worst, by far. with all that terrible "romantic" dialogue. awful. at least phantom menace had the podrace setpiece.

(xpost)

heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:30 (eleven years ago) link

if James Cameron wants to go far with his crazy vision and really franchise Avatar, he should build Avatar World. because for sure it's a better ride than a movie.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:31 (eleven years ago) link

There's this earnestness in Avatar that just rubs me the wrong way. You can watch the Star Wars prequels and know they are trash, wooden acting, stupid plots, etc. I think everything awful about SW prequels is pretty easy to enjoy in a Bad Movie kind of way.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:33 (eleven years ago) link

(I have to admit that it's kind of hard for me to judge The Phantom Menace objectively, because I tried so hard to love it and so I probably rate it higher than II and III, which are pretty indefensible. Still Liam Neeson's Sanjuro impersonation raises it bove them, IMHO)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:37 (eleven years ago) link

podracing was great, that's true.
but almost nullified by way too many "cute" attempts to appeal to kids (jarjar, etc), which make me cringe more than romance stuff. yeah, maybe it's the earnestness in that but more the transparent marketing-department interference.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:37 (eleven years ago) link

at any rate, i will take George Lucas's inflated ego over Cameron's any day

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:40 (eleven years ago) link

How do these compare to John carter? There's a good essay to be written for crappy alien worldbuilding spectacular overwrought sci-fi actionfests

et tu, twinkletoes? (remy bean), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:40 (eleven years ago) link

Cameron should just make his version of Terminator 3 and make it 3D. He could even just call it Terminator 3D.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:42 (eleven years ago) link

i don't think it's funny/weird, the movie is really stupid and bad and everybody knew it at the time.

i don't think that's true at all. avatar received near-unanimous critical praise, and not just for the spectacle (though, yeah, that was a big part of it). that's what's funny to me about it's disappearance from the pop cultural viewscreen/mind. it was loved in its moment, loved by critics and fans alike. people went to see it over and over again, wept in their seats, made fan pages about wanting na'vi body mods, avatar-themed weddings, to live on a virtual pandora if possible. think pieces were written about how it was damaging people's souls by presenting a fantasy that reality could never live up to.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:45 (eleven years ago) link

for the most popular movie of all time its kind of amazing how a year or two later it has zero cultural currency at all...

As someone who doesn't give a shit about cultural currency, I don't think Cameron has ever approached Aliens since, but Avatar was a defensible time-waster and I'd rather rewatch it than all the "relevant" Marvel wanks and spaghetti western tributes.

People were lusting for a fantasy that included, y'know, genocide? I missed that.

Also pretty sure Gone With the Wind is still the most popular movie of all time ($18 tix and history-blind industry hype still suck).

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:46 (eleven years ago) link

i saw it as a critic in fact and loved it and cried even and then a few hours after it was over i felt like i was coming out of a drugged-out haze! i think it has teh subliminal messages

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:48 (eleven years ago) link

i 98% loved it for its spectacle though

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:49 (eleven years ago) link

Am I the only person who found it Just Plain Boring from the first minute until the present? Not bad, good, embarrassing or anything except dull?

et tu, twinkletoes? (remy bean), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:50 (eleven years ago) link

Hah, two of my friends were fascinated by that whole subculture, and started jokingly announcing to each other that they'd had a shit day in work via "I could really feel my tail today".

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:50 (eleven years ago) link

i recognize its flaws but think it's a solid and even admirable sci-fi adventure flick (of the family-friendly variety). defended it at length upthread, and don't wanna go through that again.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:52 (eleven years ago) link

thought it looked stupid from the start and never saw it. hate Cameron for the most part.

Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:53 (eleven years ago) link

watching it again, the only times i thought it was okay was when there were metal things onscreen

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:55 (eleven years ago) link

honestly, i think it's a victim of backlash as much as anything. the combination of familiar plotting, gaudy spectacle, wanton heartstring-yanking and massive hype somehow made it too big to not-hate (for most film buffs, or so it seems). cameron being a total dick bag didn't help, either.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:58 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah i thought it was boring. BORING! It was like every second of the film was market-tested or something, like they were trying sooooo hard to make the Perfect Movie. Maybe people just love being pandered to. I'll take a messy, ridiculous, nearly incomprehensible Phantom Menace over this any day.

it was loved in its moment, loved by critics and fans alike. people went to see it over and over again, wept in their seats, made fan pages about wanting na'vi body mods, avatar-themed weddings, to live on a virtual pandora if possible. think pieces were written about how it was damaging people's souls by presenting a fantasy that reality could never live up to.

We're living in an age where the most extreme get a bigger representation in the media and thus the cultural narrative. The Tea Party Era. I don't doubt there are extreme fans weeping in their seats throughout the history of films, it's just now that you can blog about it, it gets passed around, people re-post it for LOLs, it ends up on Facebook.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:03 (eleven years ago) link

i don't think it's funny/weird, the movie is really stupid and bad and everybody knew it at the time.

fair amount of people on this very thread prove otherwise

xp

Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:05 (eleven years ago) link

ya even when it was raking in the cash it wasnt like there was na'vi mania in the streets or anything

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:05 (eleven years ago) link

it's 2012 and you guys are talking about avatar

dayo, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:06 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah i thought it was boring. BORING!

upthread you say it looked great and was worth seeing fyi

Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:07 (eleven years ago) link

Just call me Mitt Romney.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:08 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah i thought it was boring. BORING! It was like every second of the film was market-tested or something, like they were trying sooooo hard to make the Perfect Movie. Maybe people just love being pandered to. I'll take a messy, ridiculous, nearly incomprehensible Phantom Menace over this any day.

this was exactly my gripe with the movie. I didn't think it was necessarily "bad", but I still wound up hating it because it didn't really take any risks whatsoever besides having a monster budget. Basically the same thing I thought about stuff like Seven Pounds or whatever Will Smith does

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:10 (eleven years ago) link

We're living in an age where the most extreme get a bigger representation in the media and thus the cultural narrative. The Tea Party Era. I don't doubt there are extreme fans weeping in their seats throughout the history of films, it's just now that you can blog about it, it gets passed around, people re-post it for LOLs, it ends up on Facebook.

that last may be true in general, but i don't know that it says anything particularly useful about avatar. setting aside the most "extreme" fan reactions as outliers doesn't change the fact that avatar was a very big deal in its moment - embraced not just by needy supergeeks, but by critics and mainstream audiences alike. and super-hardcore fandom isn't irrelevant. that kind of extremity helped make star trek and star wars such enduring cultural landmarks over the years.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:11 (eleven years ago) link

Xposting nu star wars was made to attract a new audience, cars was made specifically to give Disney something to market to boys. that's one big difference. And Beowulf totally started the new 3d fad. Avatar made it an event. But really, it was no more than that.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:11 (eleven years ago) link

it didn't really take any risks whatsoever besides having a monster budget.

given that it was released in the midst of the iraq/afghanistan war, i'd say it too some pretty substantial risks

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:12 (eleven years ago) link

"too" = "took", it took some pretty substantial risks

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:12 (eleven years ago) link

I remember liking this at the time. I don't remember why I liked it though.

silverfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:13 (eleven years ago) link

I guess seeing something on a huge Imax screen affects my enjoyment of a movie more than I'd like to admit.

silverfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:14 (eleven years ago) link

i hope that Avatar 3 is tailor made to only be watched in under-water theatres while wearing scuba gear and 3D facemasks

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:16 (eleven years ago) link

and surround-sound headphones!

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:17 (eleven years ago) link

given that it was released in the midst of the iraq/afghanistan war, i'd say it too some pretty substantial risks

how so? this kind of dumb pseudo-commentary has been going around for years

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:17 (eleven years ago) link

avatar's 'super hardcore fandom' isnt comparable to star wars or star trek - like im sure someone has cosplayed as John Postman from kevin costner's sci fi epic The Postman before, but that doesnt mean it has a real fanbase

these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:18 (eleven years ago) link

All big tech heavy action films like this do more to recruit than any other films, I bet. I bet people saw the space marines get their assess kicked in aliens and thought, hey, I want to be a space marine!

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:20 (eleven years ago) link

given that it was released in the midst of the iraq/afghanistan war, i'd say it too some pretty substantial risks
how so? this kind of dumb pseudo-commentary has been going around for years

avatar is a very pointed and obvious metaphor for the genocidal consequences (agenda) of specifically western imperialism. and it presents "terroristic" responses to an invasion by what looks suspiciously like the US military as unambiguous heroism. for a funtimes, family-friendly summer action blockbuster, that's pretty remarkable.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:21 (eleven years ago) link

avatar's 'super hardcore fandom' isnt comparable to star wars or star trek - like im sure someone has cosplayed as John Postman from kevin costner's sci fi epic The Postman before, but that doesnt mean it has a real fanbase

star trek had a tiny fanbase in its day. it failed on TV, and its memory was kept alive for decades not by popular acclaim but by its importance to a small but dedicated minority.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:22 (eleven years ago) link

contenderizer that is bog-standard hollywood liberalism with a 'save the planet' gloss, absolutely risk-free

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:23 (eleven years ago) link

it presents "terroristic" responses to an invasion by what looks suspiciously like the US military as unambiguous heroism. for a funtimes, family-friendly summer action blockbuster, that's pretty remarkable.

to expand on this: for a funtimes, family-friendly summer action blockbuster made during wartime, while america was collectively losing its mind in fear of terrorism, that's pretty remarkable.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:25 (eleven years ago) link

contenderizer that is bog-standard hollywood liberalism with a 'save the planet' gloss, absolutely risk-free

i don't think that's true at all. i can't think of another major, family-friendly action blockbuster made in the last 10 years that stakes anywhere near so radical a position.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:27 (eleven years ago) link

oops, it was a holiday release. i always forget that (second time itt).

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:28 (eleven years ago) link

i thought x-men was all about being a gay misfit

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:33 (eleven years ago) link

"while america was collectively losing its mind in fear of terrorism"

come on, it was '09 not '03

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:34 (eleven years ago) link

it is, but it doesn't swing anywhere near as hard at that target as avatar. maybe if you threw in some scenes of obviously gay populations being annihilated before rising up to completely smash the state.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:35 (eleven years ago) link

well we can say that brian singer is a touch more subtle than james cameron

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:36 (eleven years ago) link

contenderizer that is bog-standard hollywood liberalism

Bullshit, especially now, when George Clooney is disappointed in progressives/Dems who are disappointed in mass-murdering warlord Obama.

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:38 (eleven years ago) link

To the electric chair with them all.

jungleous butterflies strange birds (Eric H.), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:39 (eleven years ago) link

come on, it was '09 not '03

fair point, but that doesn't make its obvious allegorical implication and explicit anti-war/anti-military stance* any less remarkable, especially in a film of its type.

* conflicted, of course, by cameron's obvious hard-on for combat, tough-guy tropes and military tech

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:41 (eleven years ago) link

corporations bad, fighting good. noble savages better than a mean soldier or a kid with an MBA.

really arresting stuff here, never seen its like

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:41 (eleven years ago) link

re: lack of cultural currency, i waited until a few weeks after it came out, and then tapped a friend on the shoulder, looked deeply into their eyes, and whispered "I see you". and nothing happened. at that very moment i said to myself "this film really isn't going to have much cultural currency". i even whispered "I see you" to someone else later that month, and nothing. what a ripoff.

Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:42 (eleven years ago) link

i admit, as always, that it's possible that no one knew wtf i was talking about

Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:42 (eleven years ago) link

i hear you

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:43 (eleven years ago) link

corporations bad, fighting good. noble savages better than a mean soldier or a kid with an MBA.

really arresting stuff here, never seen its like

sure, but context is everything. try to think of another big, family-friendly action blockbuster of the post-9/11 era that makes a similar statement.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:44 (eleven years ago) link

Wait until Step Up Revolution sees the light of day and this will all be moot.

jungleous butterflies strange birds (Eric H.), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:45 (eleven years ago) link

the bourne movies?

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:46 (eleven years ago) link

or like the daring stance against big oil in the muppets

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:48 (eleven years ago) link

Most noble savages films don't actually end up with a tick in the win column for said savages.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:48 (eleven years ago) link

the lorax!

er, xp

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:49 (eleven years ago) link

I wouldn't overestimate the size of the super fandom right now (though we'll see what happens if we get movies every 5 years for the next decade or two), but it was definitely a real, weird, thing at the time.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:53 (eleven years ago) link

ravey

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:59 (eleven years ago) link

just wait til Django Unchained takes on racist-imperial foot fetishism

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:02 (eleven years ago) link

the bourne movies?

― goole

or like the daring stance against big oil in the muppets

― a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies)

i don't think those compare to avatar's heroicization of armed resistance by native "terrorists" to what appears to be an invasion by the US military - made during wartime, when the US military was actually invading foreign countries and demonizing resistance as terrorism.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:02 (eleven years ago) link

goole & AP's day to troll

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:04 (eleven years ago) link

ha. maybe that's fair in my case, but Morbius do you really believe that James Cameron's Avatar is too radical for Clooney?

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:09 (eleven years ago) link

avatar is a very pointed and obvious metaphor for the genocidal consequences (agenda) of specifically western imperialism. and it presents "terroristic" responses to an invasion by what looks suspiciously like the US military as unambiguous heroism. for a funtimes, family-friendly summer action blockbuster, that's pretty remarkable.

well, I do admit it's remarkable how incredibly hamfisted the message is, even for Hollywood. but I don't really consider this too important because that's not really the reason why it became a Blockbuster.

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:14 (eleven years ago) link

to expand on this: for a funtimes, family-friendly summer action blockbuster made during wartime, while america was collectively losing its mind in fear of terrorism, that's pretty remarkable.

this came out during the Obama administration, right?

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:15 (eleven years ago) link

hamfisted = clear. and i wasn't aware the movie had to pass some kind of message = selling point test for the message to count.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:15 (eleven years ago) link

this came out during the Obama administration, right?

but before CHANGE

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:17 (eleven years ago) link

this came out during the Obama administration, right?

it was conceived and made during he bush admin (shot in 2007/8), but yes, it was released during the first year of the obama admin

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:18 (eleven years ago) link

tbf I think Cameron started working on it during the Korean war

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:19 (eleven years ago) link

well, yeah, if you count the childhood daydreaming/crayon illustrated part

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:21 (eleven years ago) link

Development of Avatar began in 1994, when Cameron wrote an 80-page treatment for the film.[12][13] Filming was supposed to take place after the completion of Cameron's 1997 film Titanic, for a planned release in 1999,[14] but according to Cameron, the necessary technology was not yet available to achieve his vision of the film.

I think 1994 was when we intervened in Haiti under Clinton

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:22 (eleven years ago) link

star trek had a tiny fanbase in its day. it failed on TV, and its memory was kept alive for decades not by popular acclaim but by its importance to a small but dedicated minority.

and syndication

fit and working again, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

well, I do admit it's remarkable how incredibly hamfisted the message is, even for Hollywood. but I don't really consider this too important because that's not really the reason why it became a Blockbuster.

Right, but the original context for this discussion is not that it was The Anti-War March of Asses on Seats, but that it must have looked a little risky (even as the next film from that man who made all that money).

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:25 (eleven years ago) link

then i'm not sure what's risky about it, the movie was going to be a blockbuster regardless of how liberal or hamfisted it was, it just kind of boils down (for me) as "James Cameron is kind of a shitty dude"

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:36 (eleven years ago) link

political "message" of this film did not resonate/register with the general public at all afaict. they just liked shiny things that explode. also blue boobs.

Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:38 (eleven years ago) link

exactly, unless people talk about "reasons why I fucking hated this film"

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:41 (eleven years ago) link

then i'm not sure what's risky about it, the movie was going to be a blockbuster regardless of how liberal or hamfisted it was

i'm not claiming that making avatar was particularly "risky", though i think it was (taking any strong political stance is always risky, even when you think the zeitgeist is with you). my point is that the film has a clear and strong message - more than one, really. it's not just "empty spectacle" as is so often lazily claimed. the fact that its messages are so "hamfisted" only strengthens this point.

nor am i claiming that avatar is a great film. while entertaining and admirable in its aims, it's got a lot of problems. it's derivative, maudlin, and simplistic. and overlong. and burdened with a tiresome "white saviour" theme. in my opinion, it's merely good - something of a triumph, given its many flaws. but i do credit it for the force and clarity with which it makes its moral and political points.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:01 (eleven years ago) link

political "message" of this film did not resonate/register with the general public at all afaict. they just liked shiny things that explode. also blue boobs.

based on what? there was a lot of talk of the film's politics at the time of its release.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:02 (eleven years ago) link

yes we know the Great Unwashed are too fucking stupid to get anything, look around

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:07 (eleven years ago) link

based on what? there was a lot of talk of the film's politics at the time of its release.

maybe I was just reading the wrong reviews? this is the first time I've ever heard anyone take the film's political content even vaguely seriously

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:10 (eleven years ago) link

Really, come on - the message of "Avatar," like that of most action movies (bless 'em) is that things look cool when they explode. I can barely name any non World War X action flick that does not depict military authority in a negative light, as duplicitous and manipulative. You see it in "Aliens," you see it in "Rambo," you see it "Avengers." Any message "Avatar" had was negated the second those 3D glasses went on. It was spectacle, and the fact that it pushed gently in an environmental direction meant nothing. Was it even protested by the Christian right? Because that's the gold standard response to having a message.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:11 (eleven years ago) link

there was also a fair amount of criticism of Avatar for being racist
xp

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:12 (eleven years ago) link

PS I have never seen Avatar. Should I watch y/n?

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:13 (eleven years ago) link

I think I will just wait until discount theatres get 3d.

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:13 (eleven years ago) link

Was it even protested by the Christian right? Because that's the gold standard response to having a message.

It was protested by at least one right media-watchdog group.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:14 (eleven years ago) link

maybe I was just reading the wrong reviews? this is the first time I've ever heard anyone take the film's political content even vaguely seriously

jeez, go to rotten tomatoes and check the linked "full reviews" from "top critics". most concentrate on the movie's visual splendor, but there's also quite a bit of praise of the film's moral and political agenda.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:20 (eleven years ago) link

Was it even protested by the Christian right? Because that's the gold standard response to having a message.

usually to a "club em over the head" DO U SEE message

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:25 (eleven years ago) link

jeez, go to rotten tomatoes and check the linked "full reviews" from "top critics". most concentrate on the movie's visual splendor, but there's also quite a bit of praise of the film's moral and political agenda.

typically those aren't the critics that I read, and I guess I see where you're coming from, y'know I'm sure lots of people praised Bruce Almighty's strong Christian message too

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:26 (eleven years ago) link

Really, come on - the message of "Avatar," like that of most action movies (bless 'em) is that things look cool when they explode. I can barely name any non World War X action flick that does not depict military authority in a negative light, as duplicitous and manipulative. You see it in "Aliens," you see it in "Rambo," you see it "Avengers." Any message "Avatar" had was negated the second those 3D glasses went on. It was spectacle, and the fact that it pushed gently in an environmental direction meant nothing. Was it even protested by the Christian right? Because that's the gold standard response to having a message.

i don't think that aliens, rambo or the avengers are anywhere near as brave as avatar wr2 the message(s) presented. in aliens, brave soldiers are betrayed by a corrupt corporation. in rambo, vets are abandoned by the military. in the avengers, covert gov't/military organizations are duplicitous and craven. all SOP relative to avatar's wartime celebration of violent revolt against what basically equals the invading US military.

the film's environmental themes are hardly it's primary message. it's much more prominently an impassioned condemnation of imperialist genocide (easy target, sure), and a fantasy of deus-ex-machina justice overcoming the "inevitable" forward march of historical progress. it's also a pointedly specific anti-irag/afghanistan-invasion flick. sully subtly compares the invasion of pandora to war for oil. quaritch is much less subtle: "our only security lies in preemptive attack. we will fight terror with terror."

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:33 (eleven years ago) link

typically those aren't the critics that I read

who are the critics you read? do they typically spend a lot of time engaging with the politics of fantasy adventure flicks?

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:34 (eleven years ago) link

y'know I'm sure lots of people praised Bruce Almighty's strong Christian message too

i don't imagine any of the critics in that group had a single nice thing to say about bruce almighty's christian message

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:35 (eleven years ago) link

who are the critics you read? do they typically spend a lot of time engaging with the politics of fantasy adventure flicks?

mostly 'independant' ones, but no, they don't, because thats the part of the movie that almost always bogs it down

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:36 (eleven years ago) link

iyo

no surprise that reviewers who don't care about thematic content writing for an audience that doesn't care about thematic content do not spend much time analyzing thematic content

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:41 (eleven years ago) link

again, i'm just saying in my experience nobody really gave a shit about the political content, calling it "dumb" at best. the fact that yes some paid reviewers for big magazines decided to harp on about it (likely because they knew they had to write a good review) doesn't really change my opinion

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:47 (eleven years ago) link

god DAMN some ilxorz be wilfully obtuse itt

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:51 (eleven years ago) link

Was it even protested by the Christian right? Because that's the gold standard response to having a message.

the point was made upthread (can't remember by whom) that avatar was released in a moment of defeat and disarray for the american right. would be funny if the right's failure to mount a sufficient froth of outrage in response to avatar in turn caused it to be dismissed by leftists to whom its messages would ordinarily appeal. like it can't matter unless the right (wrong) people say it matters.

anyway, i remember a lot of online outrage about the film's demonization of the military.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:53 (eleven years ago) link

god DAMN some frogbs be wilfully obtuse itt

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:54 (eleven years ago) link

hey jon. we've been here before, iirc.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:55 (eleven years ago) link

yep. I don't have the juice to do it again. And I think I like the movie more than you!

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:56 (eleven years ago) link

okay contenderizer. you win! *fucks off*

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:58 (eleven years ago) link

contendo i'm honestly thinking you do not remember a thing about 2009 sry

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:08 (eleven years ago) link

not my observation, just passing it along. and it may be that i remember 2009 differently than you do. stranger things have happened...

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:11 (eleven years ago) link

also it is not surprising at all that this movie had absolutely no cultural currency (and it didn't, no argument)

it was lauded for being an incredible 'experience'. it did not have a compelling story or compelling characters. there's no cultural resonance for a movie without at least one of those things. no one was ever going to give a fuck about jake sulee and the noble blue people, and no one was going to go nuts over the story from fern gully and dances with wolves and a billion other movies.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:13 (eleven years ago) link

xp the only people that were still shitting their pants over terrorism in 2009 was the same fringe right-wingers that are shitting their pants about it now. and EVERYTHING is controversial to them and they don't matter.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:14 (eleven years ago) link

also the incredible experience of seeing avatar is pretty stunted when you're not watching it on a giant 3D screen. that's 98% of the replay appeal of the movie down the drain unless you're sitting painfully close to a big screen television.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:16 (eleven years ago) link

that's stated as though no one might ever disagree, but (surprise), i do. the characters and story may be simple and familiar, but that doesn't prevent them from being compelling. i would say that avatar has both a compelling story and compelling characters (mostly among the na'vi). it lacks a strong, iconic villain and too many of its supporting players are dull. those are real problems, but they don't cripple the film, imo.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:17 (eleven years ago) link

that's stated as though no one might ever disagree, but (surprise), i do.

hes right, you're wrong.

these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:17 (eleven years ago) link

the only impact this movie had was compelling the studios to convert all their releases to 3D

Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:18 (eleven years ago) link

compelled me... to have a wicked headache!!

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:20 (eleven years ago) link

hes right, you're wrong.

i'm sorry, but that's just stupid. there is no such thing. when it comes to this kind of thing, there are only arguments made well and arguments made poorly. you may think i'm failing to make my case, but no surprise, we disagree there too.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:22 (eleven years ago) link

lol, y'all are arguing about avatar
culturally important in '12

(Name Withheld to Avoid Hassle) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:24 (eleven years ago) link

the only impact this movie had was compelling the studios to convert all their releases to 3D

it did do that, but i'm okay with it's legacy in that regard, as i like nu-3D. adds a lot when its successful, and when it isn't, the films still tend to work just fine in 2D (up, coraline, how to train your dragon, etc).

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:25 (eleven years ago) link

just saw the avengers in 3D, for instance. was lots of fun.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:25 (eleven years ago) link

xp yes, but do you at least see how that opinion is not shared with the majority of the population that saw the movie in 09? you are a fan of the movie but you're not really accepting the fact that you're in the small minority of people who saw it and actually remember the main character's name. when people were talking about its cultural currency, they weren't talking about whether it deserves to be a part of our cultural canon, they're talking about exactly why it isn't.

really one of the easiest indicators has to be how well people know the names of characters. i think i saw it twice when it came out and i don't remember a single proper noun outside of "jake sulee", "na'vi" and "pandora." and those three terms aren't ever really referenced as it is. i have no idea what anyone's character looked like besides jake sulee and that's because he looks like a stock image of a marine. i didn't even remember that there WAS a bad guy until you mentioned him. and he has that one female ally, right? i don't remember a thing about her other than that.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:29 (eleven years ago) link

With the previously-noted caveat that I have not seen Avatar since seeing it twice during its theatrical run, IMO its immersive effects and world building make it great, and pretty much sweep its familiar plot and clunky script up onto the crest of a wave. Is it only great while you're actually watching it? Maybe. So what?

Let me introduce the example of grand opera and superhero comics. In the former, you are routinely confronted with not just hackneyed but totally implausable plots, insufficiently motivated characters, and inept verbiage. When done right, the musical element makes the plot plausible, the characters motivated, the verbiage profound. For superhero comics, substitute visual-sequential for musical. Thus Avatar. That's why some ppl cried while watching this ridiculous story.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:30 (eleven years ago) link

zachylon you are being ridic

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:30 (eleven years ago) link

i think the most salient point here is zachlyon's—the characters in this movie sucked, no one is ever going to remember "jake sully" like they did, say, ripley or sarah connor. that's not a little DRAWBACK, there is NO MOVIE without characters. that's another thing the new star wars movies got wrong. you need interesting/memorable/lovable/fascinating characters to make a movie. it's the most important thing. fail at that, and your movie fails, period.

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:33 (eleven years ago) link

if you liked avatar that's your business

but if you think the film has remained a part of the mainstream culture since 2009 you're out of touch with mainstream culture

i also cannot believe i'm arguing about avatar in 2012, that's the point

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:34 (eleven years ago) link

all you're really saying, zachylon, is that the movie didn't do anything for you. which is cool, i'm not an evangelist. you go on to make sweeping claims about the views of "the majority of the population that saw the movie in 09", but i don't know what you base that on or why i should take such claims seriously.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:36 (eleven years ago) link

I don't care whether its relevant in 2012, y'all are just being rly weird about your recollections of 2009.

2009 timeline, fyi:

--LOLOL mega budget, blue ppl, Cameron douche, this will be awful and biggest flop in history (basically same pre-press scuttle as John Carter)
--Hmm ppl who saw the screenings were rly into it?
--Damn even the NYer likes it
--whoa that was amazing
--hmm yeah I grant you the story was p dumb and white savior archetype smdh
--shit I have to see it again

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:37 (eleven years ago) link

Like do you guys srsly not remember the mega-schadenfreude in the lead up to this thing and then the wave of goodwill when ppl actually saw it?

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:38 (eleven years ago) link

it's not about me!

i have been interacting with a wide variety of real human beings as far back as 2010, AT LEAST, and i don't think the film "avatar" has ever come up in discussion, once, in those years. organically or inorganically. no one gives a shit about it anymore dude.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:39 (eleven years ago) link

who is disputing that this movie was successful? it won a bunch of oscars and stuff! and made all the money! but who gives a shit about it now? contenderizer! and no one else!

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:39 (eleven years ago) link

also, jake is a stronger character than you and s1ocki seem to think. he's not a flashy or flamboyant hero, but i think sam worthington brought a lot of depth to the role.

i'm not arguing, by the way, that the film has a great deal of cultural currency - merely that it's more substantial and worthwhile than some claimed upthread. imo, of course...

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:40 (eleven years ago) link

i think the most salient point here is zachlyon's—the characters in this movie sucked, no one is ever going to remember "jake sully" like they did, say, ripley or sarah connor. that's not a little DRAWBACK, there is NO MOVIE without characters. that's another thing the new star wars movies got wrong. you need interesting/memorable/lovable/fascinating characters to make a movie. it's the most important thing. fail at that, and your movie fails, period.

Well, no? I mean that's what interesting about this movie IMO. It fails at those things and yet? You can call it a 'theme park ride' pejoratively or you can call it an 'environment' non-pejoratively...

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:40 (eleven years ago) link

yo i'm not sure the people who were stdhs about the white savior/noble savage shit were generally the same ones saying 'i need to see this again' but sure

no one's saying it didn't make a lot of money and distract people for a month in late 2009

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:41 (eleven years ago) link

you seemed to be saying that? 'you don't remember 2009' were your words.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:42 (eleven years ago) link

People trying to pretend Jon Lewis's version of events never actually happened are invited to consider the 'show all messages' button at the top of this thread.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:43 (eleven years ago) link

who is disputing that this movie was successful? it won a bunch of oscars and stuff! and made all the money! but who gives a shit about it now? contenderizer! and no one else!

― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki)

i don't think i care about it any more than anyone else itt. i'm certainly using fewer exclamation points than you. a bunch of people on ILX seem to hate it A LOT and will make that point in no uncertain terms if given the opportunity. that's "caring about" of a sort. otoh, a few of us like it to some degree or another. i do like it, but i don't think it's a great movie or anything.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:43 (eleven years ago) link

I do think it's a great movie, I'll take the arrows.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:45 (eleven years ago) link

*realizes the only reason he doesn't like avatar so much is because he's head-over-heels in love with it*

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:45 (eleven years ago) link

LOL

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:46 (eleven years ago) link

again contendo i'm not actually disagreeing with you about like, jake sulee having hidden depth. i don't care enough to even think about it and not many others do. you're a fan of the movie, you're willing to spend time thinking about it and considering different angles. i'm not saying your opinions are wrong, i'm saying very few people treat the movie similarly. it isn't on the public's radar and it doesn't have any formidable nerd/cult following.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:47 (eleven years ago) link

Literally no-one is claiming that it does.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:47 (eleven years ago) link

you seemed to be saying that? 'you don't remember 2009' were your words.

this was a reference to contenderizer saying the movie was controversial in 2009 bc of the war, nothing else

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:48 (eleven years ago) link

Literally no-one is claiming that it does.

all you're really saying, zachylon, is that the movie didn't do anything for you. which is cool, i'm not an evangelist. you go on to make sweeping claims about the views of "the majority of the population that saw the movie in 09", but i don't know what you base that on or why i should take such claims seriously.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:49 (eleven years ago) link

that's just agnosticism, not a positive claim about anything

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:50 (eleven years ago) link

I do think it's a great movie, I'll take the arrows.

would have agreed after i first saw it (2D). and after i saw it again (imax 3D). but i got bored watching the blu-ray on a nice big hi-def TV. as you say, it creates a wonderful environment, and i really do get caught up in the story, but like a lot of modern adventure flicks, it's just too damn long.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:50 (eleven years ago) link

"having no cultural relevancy, 3 years after it was released" is a pretty big knock against such a huge blockbuster, basically putting it in the same category as the Transformers movies (which IMO is where it belongs, though I give Avatar credit for *trying* to be much more)

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:51 (eleven years ago) link

i really did go into re-watching it with an open mind, i was hoping i would like it this time

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:51 (eleven years ago) link

Did you mean to quote something else there, Zach?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:51 (eleven years ago) link

he's not a flashy or flamboyant hero, but i think sam worthington brought a lot of depth to the role.

controllerizer

these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:52 (eleven years ago) link

People trying to pretend Jon Lewis's version of events never actually happened are invited to consider the 'show all messages' button at the top of this thread.

^^^this

Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:53 (eleven years ago) link

this was a reference to contenderizer saying the movie was controversial in 2009 bc of the war, nothing else

i was saying that it was (perhaps surprisingly) uncontroversial, at least on a mainstream level. few if any major conservative organizations took up arms against it. whatever controversy it stirred up was restricted to grousing on boards and in comment boxes.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:54 (eleven years ago) link

Did you mean to quote something else there, Zach?

no? you said no one is claiming that avatar is still culturally relevant, i quoted contenderizer at least being 'agnostic' about my assertion that it isn't; i'm not sure why he would post that other than to imply that it might still be relevant, which... it isn't.

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:57 (eleven years ago) link

dear lord it's almost 5 PM

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 20:58 (eleven years ago) link

few if any major conservative organizations took up arms against it.

There was definitely at least one. I am having trouble remembering whether it was over fundamentalist concerns (movie is animist/pagan) or nationalist ones (movie likes terrorism)

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:00 (eleven years ago) link

you said no one is claiming that avatar is still culturally relevant, i quoted contenderizer at least being 'agnostic' about my assertion that it isn't; i'm not sure why he would post that other than to imply that it might still be relevant, which... it isn't.

― JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, May 8, 2012 1:57 PM (41 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i voiced my "agnostic" doubts simply to make the point that unfounded claims are unfounded. i quibble with the unsupported blanket assertion that the film never meant anything to anyone.

i agree, fwiw, that avatar has dropped precipitously off the cultural radar. i came into this round of the discussion agreeing on that point and haven't changed my position.

beyond that, i've only defended what i see as the film's strengths, primarily thematic but also cinematic.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:04 (eleven years ago) link

dear lord it's almost 5 PM

we ALL win.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:06 (eleven years ago) link

no? you said no one is claiming that avatar is still culturally relevant, i quoted contenderizer at least being 'agnostic' about my assertion that it isn't; i'm not sure why he would post that other than to imply that it might still be relevant, which... it isn't.

Your assertion, if I've traced it back right, is that the film had no cultural currency, that it was garbage from the start, that no-one connected to it. This seems like the same argument as goole/Adam earlier, that people only went to it for the hype. If I've got you/contenderiser wrong sorry about that, but I don't think he's arguing what you think he is.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:07 (eleven years ago) link

i quibble with the unsupported blanket assertion that the film never meant anything to anyone.

i quibble w ur strawman tbh

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:08 (eleven years ago) link

y'all

"the general mainstream" is not synonymous with "everyone, ever"

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:08 (eleven years ago) link

So we're looking at the world's biggest cult hit?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:11 (eleven years ago) link

it's the opposite of a cult hit! everybody saw it but nobody cared about it much after a while.

goole, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:12 (eleven years ago) link

^^^^^^^^^^^

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:15 (eleven years ago) link

Right, but still we get back to $1,000,000 gross on week 17.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:15 (eleven years ago) link

to be fair that's about $28 without 3D

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:17 (eleven years ago) link

Not to mention the $4,000,000 on 800 screens when it was re-released four months after that - that's what fascinating, that there were still people who couldn't get enough of this film that's faded from cultural view since.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:18 (eleven years ago) link

I think the porn industry usually has the answers here

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:20 (eleven years ago) link

i quibble w ur strawman tbh

no one was ever going to give a fuck about jake sulee and the noble blue people, and no one was going to go nuts over the story from fern gully and dances with wolves and a billion other movies.
i don't think i'm exaggerating your dismissal of the idea that anyone might ever have cared about the film. you've claimed that the film meant nothing substantial to its audience even at the time, and that it certainly doesn't matter to anyone now. i disagree, personally (i genuinely liked the film then and still do, and i know that i'm not alone in this), and i have my doubts as a general assessment of popular opinion.

i do agree that the film has lost its pop cultural currency. that's it.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:22 (eleven years ago) link

ok great semantics i'm out

JIM THOMETHEUS (zachlyon), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:24 (eleven years ago) link

Not to mention the $4,000,000 on 800 screens when it was re-released four months after that - that's what fascinating, that there were still people who couldn't get enough of this film that's faded from cultural view since.

― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, May 8, 2012 2:18 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm. the fade is fascinating, imo. it doesn't necessarily prove anything specific about the film or its place in the long-term cultural memory, what posterity will say, but it does raise a lot if interesting questions.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:25 (eleven years ago) link

People forget there was "mega-schadenfreude" that preceded "Titanic," too. Which of course had its own horrible script, etc., but it at least had characters you cared about. And it was totally all about class, maaaaaan. At a time of great economic prosperity! Subversive, man, subversive.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:29 (eleven years ago) link

Is there usually mega-schadenfreude whenever a film is too long in production and known to be way over budget, or does the director have to be sort of widely-resented first?

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:58 (eleven years ago) link

I think there needs to be some degree of hubris and/or ambition involved, sure. But I'm not sure mega-schadenfreude became a thing until the "Heaven's Gate" to "Ishtar" era, when over-budget Hollywood career/studio-killing disasters became a big punchline.

I will say that, pre-"Titanic," I don't think Cameron was resented, though he was ambitious. Post "Titanic," sure, he made a nice target. But then, if "10-foot tall blue people in 3-D" doesn't bring the advance LOLs ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 22:25 (eleven years ago) link

Don't forget Liz's Cleopatra though...

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 22:41 (eleven years ago) link

While it was in theatres: "It's a lot better than you think." "The 3d is amazing."

As soon as it was out of theatres: "Should I see this through Netflix?" "See what? Oh, probably not."

I think it has the cultural relevance of the halloween blizzard of '91. If you're from the midwest, you know what I mean. If not, don't worry about it.

I guess it has relevance in that it helped to hasten the switch from film to digital, generate a buzz around 3D, and forced a lot of early adapters to spend a lot of money.

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 13:54 (eleven years ago) link

otm. 50 years from now it'll be like "the robe"-- "wait, THAT was the move that put digital projection and 3D on the map? and a zillion people went to see it? um, alright."

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:08 (eleven years ago) link

that's assuming our civilization is still intact in 50 years

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:08 (eleven years ago) link

it'll become a gnostic gospel in our post-civilization forest society

et tu, twinkletoes? (remy bean), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:13 (eleven years ago) link

Titanic used class the way countless romances have, except the template is usually poor girl-rich boy.

"10-foot tall blue people in 3-D" doesn't bring the advance LOLs

/racist

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:24 (eleven years ago) link

"culturally irrelevant" until hype for avatar 2 starts & ppl pretend forget that the 1st one was shit, paint selves blue

johnny crunch, Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:25 (eleven years ago) link

...And the 'poorish' girl-rich boy thing is there, but it's to stomp on snarling Billy Zane.

xp

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:26 (eleven years ago) link

Billy Zane. I don't know why, but that dude puts me off.

He's sick of the Swiss. He don't like em. (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:31 (eleven years ago) link

mean

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 17:04 (eleven years ago) link

I hate Zane too. Total movie-killer.

Hierophantiasis (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 17:39 (eleven years ago) link

You know which movie's incredibly high place on the adjusted B.O. gross list always shocks me? The Sting. Now there's a movie with a seemingly limited cultural cachet.

http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm

jungleous butterflies strange birds (Eric H.), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 17:49 (eleven years ago) link

Unless that just represented the perfect storm apex of '70s nostalgia.

jungleous butterflies strange birds (Eric H.), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 17:49 (eleven years ago) link

the sting rules

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 18:43 (eleven years ago) link

^ otm

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:22 (eleven years ago) link

"culturally irrelevant" until hype for avatar 2 starts & ppl pretend forget that the 1st one was shit, paint selves blue

― johnny crunch, Wednesday, May 9, 2012 7:25 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

have been thinking about that throughout this discussion. cameron's supposedly got two sequels in the pipeline. if they're hits on anything like avatar's scale, then i suspect that all this "culturally irrelevant" talk will seem a little silly in hindsight. "invisible in the moment, from where i'm standing" isn't precisely the same as "irrelevant", after all.

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:35 (eleven years ago) link

This movie didn't come across anti-war, it came across more pro-one dimensional woodland tribal innocents vs. one dimensional US military racists. Maybe slightly more anti-war than Star Wars in that the idyllic Navi is far more hippie than the rebels. But still, total time showing military technology, lingering on awesome attack helicopters, glorifying explosions, etc. Still felt like it glorified war, only in a context that made it way easy for left wingers to want one side to win.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:41 (eleven years ago) link

yeah, i wouldn't call avatar anti-war in general. any antiwar reading is stymied by cameron's obsession with heroic combat and military tech. hell, it's pro-war if anything.

it does take a strong stance against imperialist aggression (lol safe targets) and not-so-subtly critiques america's military "adventurism" in the middle east (esp in just-post-bush-era context).

10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:50 (eleven years ago) link

have been thinking about that throughout this discussion. cameron's supposedly got two sequels in the pipeline. if they're hits on anything like avatar's scale, then i suspect that all this "culturally irrelevant" talk will seem a little silly in hindsight. "invisible in the moment, from where i'm standing" isn't precisely the same as "irrelevant", after all.

― 10. “Pour Some Sugar On Me” – Tom Cruise (contenderizer), Wednesday, May 9, 2012 4:35 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

or they could be like the star wars prequels and make a shit-ton of money without anybody really being that enthusiastic about them.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:54 (eleven years ago) link

honestly re. the question of whether avatar is anti-imperialism or anti-bush or something just solicits a "who cares?" from me. the stakes are pretty much nil.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:55 (eleven years ago) link

loving how the matrix: revolutions is still culturally relevant in 2012, it's a popular cultural touchstone among my friends

dayo, Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:56 (eleven years ago) link

People who left the movie wishing they could be a blue person vs. people who left the movie wishing they could ride in one of those high-tech military body suits.

or they could be like the star wars prequels and make a shit-ton of money without anybody really being that enthusiastic about them.

Stressing again, little kids LOVED these. That is, I have never heard a little kid play Luke. They all want to be Anakin, for play, for Halloween, for whatever. Mission accomplished, Lucas.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:56 (eleven years ago) link

"Matrix" sequels remain undeniably relevant as examples of "what not to do."

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:57 (eleven years ago) link

"Matrix" sequels remain undeniably relevant as examples of "what not to do."

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, May 9, 2012 4:57 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah, these are some of the worst studio pictures of the last 20 years.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 22:01 (eleven years ago) link

one year passes...

Awesome

i didn't even give much of a fuck that you were mod (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 30 June 2013 14:34 (ten years ago) link

Why now?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 30 June 2013 14:48 (ten years ago) link

Did Dean check his email for the first time in five years?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 30 June 2013 14:48 (ten years ago) link

lol roger dean

― velko, Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:00 PM (3 years ago)

I haven't managed to watch the trailer, but saw a bit on TV. First thoughts were "ugh/lol, furries" and "roger dean/patrick woodroffe should sue" but WTF I imagine on a big screen, in 3D, it would be an entertaining enough spectacle. I agree w/whoever it was who said it looks like a game cutscene.

― \/*|_*/-\*|) (Pashmina), Saturday, August 22, 2009 3:20 AM (3 years ago)

@coryischaki: 10 word Avatar review: Space marines vs Roger Dean painting set to Enya.
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, December 18, 2009 3:53 PM (3 years ago)

yeah i kinda liked the hippy-dippy roger dean look of a lot of it.

― hear shart attack (latebloomer), Monday, December 28, 2009 12:30 AM (3 years ago)

hey i guessed right! wayne barlow did do "creature design" on this.

roger dean needs his credit tho

xp lol

― chartres (goole), Sunday, January 10, 2010 9:08 PM (3 years ago)

Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Sunday, 30 June 2013 15:28 (ten years ago) link

LOL Roger Dean.
http://www.english.imjnet.org.il/media/Uploads/Magritte-Rene-The-castle-of.jpg

Anyway, fluorescent corals and anemone were a bigger influence on the look of Avatar than prog rock covers.

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/p480x480/72655_497161960331524_795960090_n.jpg

Me So Hormetic (Sanpaku), Sunday, 30 June 2013 16:59 (ten years ago) link

Laputa looks very small in that painting.

Aimless, Sunday, 30 June 2013 17:45 (ten years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23790877

Hollywood director James Cameron says all forms of entertainment will eventually be 3D - because "that's how we see the world."

and they will take place experientially and over multiple decades because that's how we experience the world

YOU FOOLS PAY OVER $2.50 for a comic book (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 22 August 2013 14:58 (ten years ago) link

I hope the sequels are in 4D.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 August 2013 15:10 (ten years ago) link

http://media.avclub.com/images/371/371134/16x9/627.jpg?6426

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 August 2013 15:11 (ten years ago) link

Haha, JiC wants the extra D.

Domo Arigato, Demi Lovato (Phil D.), Thursday, 22 August 2013 15:11 (ten years ago) link

You can never get enough D.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 August 2013 15:18 (ten years ago) link

Avatar 4 in 4D sponsored by Sunny D.

(I still love this movie btw)

Spot Lange (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 22 August 2013 17:19 (ten years ago) link

two years pass...

Is this a movie that anyone regular revisits? Came out in 2009, but feels like it came out 20 years ago. The first of the sequels pops up in 2017. If someone was, say, 10 when the first one came out, they'd be finishing up high school by then. Will they be excited to revisit such a huge part of their childhood? Will they be heading straight to the Avatar park going up at Disney? Will they be buying tickets to the sequel months in advance like some people our/my age do for Star Wars?

More to the point, has anyone, ever, seen someone in an Avatar costume for Halloween?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 28 November 2015 04:21 (eight years ago) link

yearh this film seems to not have left the sort of mark on the culture that you might expect of the highest-grossing film of all time (of course, much of that is because of the 3-D upcharge). but i don't travel in circles with a lot of kids, so maybe i'm not perceiving it.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 28 November 2015 04:32 (eight years ago) link

has anyone, ever, seen someone in an Avatar costume for Halloween?

None of the characters in Avatar are even slightly memorable. The lovingly crafted visual look of the planet and the 3D effects were the real stars of the show. Everything else in this movie was just a an inch or two above mediocrity.

Aimless, Saturday, 28 November 2015 04:34 (eight years ago) link

On the other hand, it's prescient as a movie about drone warfare.

my harp and me (Eazy), Saturday, 28 November 2015 06:41 (eight years ago) link

The whole enterprise is rife with ironies - the top grossing film of all time is more or less forgotten, but at the same time belatedly serving as anchor for two, maybe three more huge sequels that no one seemed to be asking for, plus a whole section of a Disney amusement park, but specifically the park (Animal Kingdom) dedicated to real things, not fanciful Yes covers come to life.

I dunno. Maybe the movies will pull a reverse Matrix and get better as they go along. I do find it hard to believe that spectacle alone will propel the sequels. Lack of compelling/memorable characters/story in the original makes for shakey tent-pole support.

http://www.latimes.com/travel/themeparks/la-trb-avatar-land-disney-animal-kingdom-20150707-story.html

James Cameron, who directed, wrote and produced the original science fiction epic, promises Avatar Land will let visitors "live, eat, breathe and smell Pandora."

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 28 November 2015 14:52 (eight years ago) link

Only two comments, telling:

Deborah Musselman
I loved Avatar. This new attraction just might get me to Florida.

4 months ago 

raidermatt
Couldn't be less interested. Avatar is a bad movie. Much of its popularity was due to special effects and it being the first modern movie to successfully implement 3D. Other than that, it's awful. Nobody cares about it anymore.

4 months ago

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 28 November 2015 14:54 (eight years ago) link

Avatar sucked. Have no desire to ever see it again. Will ignore the sequels.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 28 November 2015 16:31 (eight years ago) link

"... will let visitors "live, eat, breathe and smell Pandora."

Cameron seems to understand where the attraction lies. The original movie was really a theme park ride in disguise.

Aimless, Saturday, 28 November 2015 16:58 (eight years ago) link

The Jurassic Park world at Universal feels basically like a misused,unpopular afterthought and that movie is way more iconic than Avatar

bricc baby hitlo (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 28 November 2015 17:18 (eight years ago) link

highest-grossing film of all time (of course, much of that is because of the 3-D upcharge)

this guy estimates avatar to be ranked 24th in US ticket sales.

new noise, Saturday, 28 November 2015 18:11 (eight years ago) link

I can say with the utmost degree of certainty that the teal-and-purple film of this generation is Frozen, not Avatar.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 28 November 2015 20:04 (eight years ago) link

I have never seen Avatar socks, Avatar backpacks, Avatar LEGO sets, Avatar leggings, Avatar hoodies, Avatar lunchboxes, or Avatar fold-up play castles, or even Avatar funko pop figures, and they make funko pops for fucking everything. I have, however, paid cash money for Frozen-themed all of the above.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 28 November 2015 20:09 (eight years ago) link

We bought a toy of one of the dragon creatures (google tells me "Mountain Banshee" okaaay) that they fly on. We've got lots of different dragon toys but this is an odd duck that always gets chucked back in the toy box.

http://www.cooltoyreview.com/Mattel/Avatar/JakesBanshee/header.jpg

how's life, Saturday, 28 November 2015 20:21 (eight years ago) link

The only times I remember Avatar are when I see people with ponytails and think is like to pull on them and say "I see you"

Karl Malone, Saturday, 28 November 2015 20:31 (eight years ago) link

two months pass...

Watched this last night with the kids -- their suggestion, they'd never seen it. I was surprised how well it held up, even on a 32-inch screen. The kids were enthralled from the jump and stayed with it straight thru all 160 minutes. All the things that were bad and dumb about it when it came out still are, but even without 3D it really is an immersive movie. It's just fun to watch, and if Cameron can't write to save his life, he's a genius at pacing. Pretty sure my kids will now want to see the sequels. And probably go to that Disney thing, too.

Substantively, the one thing I still give it credit for is being such a naked Iraq war parable. "This is how you do it -- when people are living on top of something you want, you turn them into the enemy and then you can destroy them."

A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 21 February 2016 13:56 (eight years ago) link

And by naked, I mean naked and blue, with a tail.

A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 21 February 2016 13:57 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, lotta hot blue ass for a kids' movie.

Kids: born naked, usually

Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Sunday, 21 February 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

counterpoint: if kids are either hot or blue, you're doing it wrong

somewhere btwn Gabriel Garcia Marquez and early Evel Knievel guy (contenderizer), Thursday, 25 February 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

what was up with all those blue guys

ciderpress, Thursday, 25 February 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

Asphxiation

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Friday, 26 February 2016 05:56 (eight years ago) link

one month passes...

http://io9.gizmodo.com/james-cameron-just-announced-another-avatar-sequel-tha-1771026188

Well, now we have an idea why James Cameron has continued to delay his Avatar sequels. The director came to CinemaCon 2016 to announce that his vision for the world has expanded beyond the previously announced four films. Now there will be five.

Avatar 5 will be released Christmas 2023, following Avatar 2 at Christmas 2018, Avatar 3 at Christmas 2020, and Avatar 4 at Christmas 2022.

Each film will stand alone but also tell a complete story in this epic saga, Cameron said.

nomar, Thursday, 14 April 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

someone stop giving James Cameron mushrooms

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 14 April 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

coincidentally the villains in the next film are sentient mushrooms

nomar, Thursday, 14 April 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

Jesus, why bother? It's like he's designing the series specifically to shed light on each previous installment's inferior FX.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 April 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

two years pass...

Fiiiinally saw this over the weekend. As a proof-of-concept for the ride I will riding at WDW next month, it was overlong but definitely got me jazzed to experience the excitement first-hand. As a movie, it wasn't quite as bad as I'd expected but if anything I'm even more incredulous about the notion of a sequel (let alone seventeen or however many Cameron has planned at this point). Like there were barely enough ideas to sustain a single feature. I scoffed at the idea of an Avatar Land in the Disney parks when it was first announced but that actually seems like where he should've put all his energy, a 360-degree sensurround spectacular that doesn't rely in the slightest upon a compelling narrative.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 March 2019 23:45 (five years ago) link

I like avatar. Do with that what you will.

valet doberman (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 7 March 2019 13:50 (five years ago) link

avatar shows pretty clearly that cameron's 12 years (TWELVE YEARS ffs) away from directing features post-titanic did nothing to dull his ability to put together action sequences with a tremendous sense of space, but the script is... not good

it's incredible that sam worthington is gonna have a career on the big screen until at least 2025 thanks to his lumpen presence guaranteed in the sequels tho

invited to an unexpected ninja presentation (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 7 March 2019 14:09 (five years ago) link

still haven't seen this, but i'm figuring if it gets some kind of tenth-anniversary theatrical run this year, i'd give it a whirl

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 7 March 2019 14:43 (five years ago) link

I figured that Cameron was actively making the sequels in an 'I'm an obscenely-wealthy man tinkering around with a massive project whose half-finished carcass my kids will have to figure out how to move out of the garage when I croak' sorta way but it looks like the next one is actually scheduled for release next year, huh. Hmm. Well.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 14:50 (five years ago) link

and then one a year until 2025, it's gonna be lit

invited to an unexpected ninja presentation (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 7 March 2019 14:53 (five years ago) link

I hope the bad guy in the next one will wear a t-shirt that says 'VILLAIN' in a dripping blood font because I was very unclear who the antagonist was meant to be in the initial installment.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 14:57 (five years ago) link

i somehow managed to miss that kate winslet is in the sequels until now

and david thewlis! who is almost certainly gonna be playing a villain because... thewlis

invited to an unexpected ninja presentation (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:00 (five years ago) link

I wonder what it's like to be under contract with Cameron, to set out on a weekend excursion with your family only to get a call asking you to come strap in to your mocap duds asap because James needs some footage for the sequel to a film you forgot even making because the first go-round was two presidents ago.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:14 (five years ago) link

Like every time Worthington had a shot at the superstardom we all know he deserves and were so sure he'd achieve, his pager started buzzing and he had to put the pen down before he could sign up to take on the James Bond reins or thrill us with the adventures of Luke Skywalker, Jr. 'Sorry, guys, it's Jim. I gotta go.'

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:18 (five years ago) link

i'm pretty sure sam worthington just sits motionless staring at the wall at all times until he's required in front of the camera

then he kicks into high gear and stands motionless staring at the wall until the director says 'cut'

invited to an unexpected ninja presentation (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:21 (five years ago) link

I enjoyed the arc of his character, from utterly charmless and charisma-free to ever-so-slightly less charmless and yet still a complete sucking void of charisma.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:26 (five years ago) link

How best to employ an actor who is almost literally an inert side of beef, oh yes motion capture that's how.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:28 (five years ago) link

that actually seems like where he should've put all his energy, a 360-degree sensurround spectacular that doesn't rely in the slightest upon a compelling narrative.

this is exactly how to enjoy the film btw, for some reason i didn't find it that hard to just write off the plot + script and dig the 'experience'. Surely anyone who has enjoyed, for example, any 19th century opera, can relate. The story is absurd but the music carries it.

valet doberman (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:51 (five years ago) link

in avatar's case "music" = the whole sensory schmear

valet doberman (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:52 (five years ago) link

While watching it on the couch, I was comparing it in my head with Gravity, which (unlike Avatar) I did see in its optimal big screen presentation and which I've always assumed would lose a lot of its oomph when scaled down to living room dimensions. Except then there's the thing where much of the experience of Gravity from several years back is still irrevocably burned into my memory because it was a good movie which also happened to be good spectacle, whereas I'm struggling to remember much more than the broadest swaths of the cotton candy Avatar which apparently dissolved the instant it hit my tongue.

Gary Ornmigh, Heywood's son (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 March 2019 16:02 (five years ago) link

The Disney ride really made me want to like this movie/universe, it's pretty much the best ride I've ever been on. But that movie doesn't hold up (enjoyed it as a really long tech demo at the time) and the fact that there are 4 upcoming movies makes me actively cringe. I should laugh but I actually feel preemptively bad for everyone involved in those movies. Somebody should have really told James Cameron that making 4 of these at once is probably a bad idea.

silverfish, Thursday, 7 March 2019 18:36 (five years ago) link

avatar shows pretty clearly that cameron's 12 years (TWELVE YEARS ffs) away from directing features post-titanic did nothing to dull his ability to put together action sequences with a tremendous sense of space, but the script is... not good


I stand by my defense of the script upthread. It’s extremely efficient, and no one over the age of four will have trouble following the story, no matter what language it’s translated into.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 9 March 2019 18:51 (five years ago) link

It’s a movie that evaporates as soon as you’re done with it, but the one take-away I had was that Cameron still can do action sequences better than most anyone. Almost want to revisit to see how it stacks up against the weightless Marvel cartoon slugfests.

circa1916, Saturday, 9 March 2019 21:48 (five years ago) link

one year passes...

2028! There will be people who were conceived, born, raised, and able to cast their votes in a presidential election between Avatar 1 and Avatar 5. https://t.co/bcTgL0zc8R

— Jon Lovett (@jonlovett) July 23, 2020

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 23 July 2020 22:26 (three years ago) link

a story in two parts pic.twitter.com/CEiNYJDiok

— jamieloftus 🏂 (@jamieloftusHELP) July 23, 2020

peace, man, Thursday, 23 July 2020 22:42 (three years ago) link

four months pass...

it would be a wild social experiment if you could somehow delete all the copies in existence to tell people this movie doesn’t actually exist and any impressions you have of it are owing to an elaborate marketing ploy. I guarantee you could sell it to 95% of the world https://t.co/FU8uSnsO5b

— kilgore trout, tiny desk carpenter (@KT_So_It_Goes) December 13, 2020

"what are you DOING to fleetwood mac??" (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 13 December 2020 19:59 (three years ago) link

To dream a dream.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 13 December 2020 20:19 (three years ago) link

so do these sequels just come out on disney plus now or do they keep them until 2022? I've learned never to bet against the tandem of Jim Cameron/the stupidity of consumers but i gotta feel like there is NO WAY Avatar 2 through 6 are viable in a post-covid movie industry.

the serious avant-garde universalist right now (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 13 December 2020 23:52 (three years ago) link

sorry, keep until "202X" was what i was going for; I saw the reschedule announcement. I just don't buy it.

the serious avant-garde universalist right now (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 13 December 2020 23:53 (three years ago) link

I rewatched Avatar last night and it is both totally captivating and such egregious horseshit

DJP, Monday, 14 December 2020 00:01 (three years ago) link

^^ i've already said my piece all over this thread but this. it's also still the most effective example of theatrical 3D to date

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Monday, 14 December 2020 19:38 (three years ago) link

It still cracks me up that the primary theme of the movie is "got a problem? CONNECT IT TO YOUR SPACE DICK"

DJP, Monday, 14 December 2020 19:52 (three years ago) link

Hahahahaha

Everything's Blue In This Whorl (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 14 December 2020 20:09 (three years ago) link

I'm still expecting him (or someone) to just pull the plug on the whole misbegotten adventure and simply chop up these sequels into a Disney+ series.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 December 2020 22:15 (three years ago) link

still never seen this and i feel good about it

the serious avant-garde universalist right now (forksclovetofu), Monday, 14 December 2020 23:01 (three years ago) link

it was fun, dammit!!!

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Monday, 14 December 2020 23:06 (three years ago) link

you get to see Sam Worthington's entire career arc in one film

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Monday, 14 December 2020 23:06 (three years ago) link

My favorite part of watching this with our 9 year-old a few months ago (hey, quarantine means we have to dig deep to entertain him and it kept popping up on Disney+), was him going "unobtainium, dad, that's dumb".

soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 14 December 2020 23:09 (three years ago) link

Worthington was good in his Terminator, iirc.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 December 2020 23:16 (three years ago) link

No he wasn’t

DJP, Tuesday, 15 December 2020 03:04 (three years ago) link

nobody was good in that terminator

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 15 December 2020 03:07 (three years ago) link

DJP you actually put it best years ago

ftr this movie was a diseased dick

― Vajazzle My Nazzle (HI DERE), Friday, January 22, 2010 2:12 PM bookmarkflaglink

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 15 December 2020 03:07 (three years ago) link

My lack of depth perception cancelled out the only reason I've ever heard to watch this.

onlyfans.com/hunterb (milo z), Tuesday, 15 December 2020 03:16 (three years ago) link

hardtofindium

You will notice a small sink where your sofa once was. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 December 2020 03:33 (three years ago) link

I don't remember that Terminator movie being particularly good or memorable, but I don't recall it being bad because of him.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 December 2020 04:33 (three years ago) link

it was shit because of McG.

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 15 December 2020 04:53 (three years ago) link

two months pass...

It’s 2021 and ‘Avatar’ Is About to Overtake ‘Avengers: Endgame’ as Highest-Grossing Movie of All Time https://t.co/HbjUKpdvkt pic.twitter.com/SsYaZZQK4i

— Variety_Film (@Variety_Film) March 12, 2021

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 12 March 2021 21:25 (three years ago) link

one year passes...

not enough versions

Breaking AVATAR 2 news: NATO chief John Fithian in press session with #CinemaCon media just said that James Cameron's sequel "will have more versions" than any movie in history: IMAX, 3D, PLF, high-res, high frames-per-second rate, variable sound systems, in 160 languages, etc.

— Barry Hertz (@HertzBarry) April 26, 2022

mark s, Wednesday, 27 April 2022 10:08 (one year ago) link

lol the earliest "avatar 2" thread is older than many ilxors

mark s, Wednesday, 27 April 2022 10:09 (one year ago) link

“Avatar 2 (Version)”

Eric B. Mash Up the Resident (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 27 April 2022 10:22 (one year ago) link

I wanna see the 160 language version

circa1916, Wednesday, 27 April 2022 14:49 (one year ago) link

Dogme 95 version

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 April 2022 15:19 (one year ago) link

More NATO aggression

jmm, Wednesday, 27 April 2022 15:28 (one year ago) link

"will have more versions than any movie in history" is a selling point on par with "from the producers of"

Avatar 31 will star Freddie Prinze, VI

Deez NFTs (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 27 April 2022 17:53 (one year ago) link

Dogme 95 lol

Cow_Art, Wednesday, 27 April 2022 18:24 (one year ago) link

Never in the history of art!

Eric B. Mash Up the Resident (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 27 April 2022 18:26 (one year ago) link

Lol, Neanderthal.

Eric B. Mash Up the Resident (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 27 April 2022 18:26 (one year ago) link

did roger dean ever get paid for any of this?

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/znJTFDTemj3st5vMC9KxnB-1024-80.jpg

mark s, Thursday, 28 April 2022 13:19 (one year ago) link

ans = no: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/james-cameron-vanquishes-artist-in-avatar-copyright-lawsuit-111514

this shd be the next ALAB podcast

mark s, Thursday, 28 April 2022 13:21 (one year ago) link

These sequels will never come out, won’t they?

DAMAGED by Black Flat (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 28 April 2022 14:04 (one year ago) link

They've just announced the release date of the first (December 16th), which is why anyone's talking about them - and the trailer will be in cinemas with the Doctor Strange movie next week

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 28 April 2022 14:07 (one year ago) link

maybe they can combine it with the movie Anvil and make it Anviltar

Deez NFTs (Neanderthal), Thursday, 28 April 2022 14:21 (one year ago) link

james cameron give the (trans) people what they want... a battle angel sequel

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Thursday, 28 April 2022 15:22 (one year ago) link

I would watch the heck out of Anviltar tbh

Legalize Suburban Benches (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 29 April 2022 11:22 (one year ago) link

And I’ll probably watch these sequels, actually

Legalize Suburban Benches (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 29 April 2022 11:23 (one year ago) link

So you're the guy

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 April 2022 14:15 (one year ago) link

two months pass...

it took me what, 13 years to see this? idk why except that ppl were like “it’s an incredible spectacle with pretty much nothing beneath it” and i was like “i don’t need another cameron film like that”

but at this point i’m pretty down with a movie that suggests we need to connect to the lifeforce that binds us to the earth and to each other to destroy all colonists

gimme avatar 2

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Friday, 8 July 2022 18:45 (one year ago) link

I love avatar unabashedly

covidsbundlertanze op. 6 (Jon not Jon), Friday, 8 July 2022 19:08 (one year ago) link

me too. some folks I know IRL (who think Wes Anderson is the GOAT and sneered at this film) did a lot of mental gymnastics to hold this film to different standards than other action movie spectacles.

(the discourse was much better ITT). also lol at jjjusten takedown of Shakey and Dan rejoinder upthread.

I refuse to believe any of you are excited about this. I mean, I believe it, but at the same time, I refuse. Love me some Cameron, hate that he's wasted his time with these Smurfs.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 8 July 2022 20:22 (one year ago) link

I'm excited for the new one too but I can look at enormous CGI trees and characters jumping on floating rocks all day. I understand 200% why people would get nothing out of this franchise

Vinnie, Saturday, 9 July 2022 01:58 (one year ago) link

I enjoyed the first one fine at the time but have barely thought about it since and can’t imagine spending an entire career on this thinly imagined nonsense.

Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Saturday, 9 July 2022 02:29 (one year ago) link

the coded racial stuff felt v icky & outdated to me in 2009, its hard for me to imagine it playing any better in 2022

nobody like my rap (One Eye Open), Saturday, 9 July 2022 03:04 (one year ago) link

My wife hadn’t seen Avatar and we started watching it together recently. After an hour she didn’t understand why she was watching a boring film that looks like a video game without the fun of being able to play it and decided to stop watching – and I totally got her point.

Chewshabadoo, Saturday, 9 July 2022 14:30 (one year ago) link

xp

I mean it’s not particularly sophisticated in its deployment, but ‘industrialized colonists v. naturist natives’ is kind of an archetype and I’m not sure what coded racial stuff is in there that’s particularly icky? Seemed intentionally broad. Unless you’re referring to something specific that I’m forgetting.

I liked Avatar. I mean a lot’s been written about how it made a bazillion dollars yet made absolutely minimal cultural impact considering. It did evaporate off of me almost immediately. But, y’know, had fun seeing it in IMAX, good spectacle, action set pieces were solid.

I’m actually kinda stoked for Part 2. I’m a sucker for underwater shit.

circa1916, Sunday, 10 July 2022 00:37 (one year ago) link

I rode the 3D Avatar ride at Disney World in February and it was awesome. It made me want to see another Avatar movie. (Because it would be a lot cheaper than going to Disney World again.)

three months pass...

Avatar: The Way Of Holding Your Water:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/avatar-way-of-water-runtime-1235251391/

Ned Raggett, Monday, 31 October 2022 18:17 (one year ago) link

one month passes...

Film expert Gregg Turkington (as seen on AMC) just called this the greatest movie of all time

frogbs, Thursday, 15 December 2022 19:34 (one year ago) link

nonsense. that would have to be either The Greatest Show on Earth or The Greatest Story Ever Told.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 15 December 2022 19:59 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.