"Aliens" : Some nice effects, but actually kind've a crap film.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.musicman.com/mp/aliens.gif

It's on TNT at the moment. Some nice effects and an effectively gloomy atmosphere, but the writing's pretty damn thin. Ripley's character is insufferably earnest, utterly humorless and wooden. Bill Paxton is a cartoon character. The rest of the entirely too hokey space marines are all two-dimensional. Newt couldn't possibly be more annoying ("they mostleeee come at night. mostleeeee). The big, bad, gooey beasties are nice, but that's it. Really, it's bad. The original Alien still holds up, but this.....meh.

Prove me wrong.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i think this is a fantastic film!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)

NYC: I said that when it came out and people laughed at me.

Sexual Air Supply (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Aliens is a white-knuckle James Cameron military action picture. Very effective.

You want bad, watch the third one. I always like to point out the moment when the first act ends and the third act begins.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)

and why? because it's one of the best-directed action movies i've ever seen, it's scary, it's working the awesome alien aesthetic, i think bill paxton is great, and the music is terrific!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

motion sensor guns!!!

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

GAME OVER MAN

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously alex the scene where they're holed up and the aliens are getting closer (the whole "20 metres... 19 metres..." etc scene), i mean, you can't really beat that.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

and then the aliens are in the ceiling!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

i gotta say i really find bill paxton incredibly entertaining in this movie.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Paul Reisor (sp?) as "the evil corporate slug". Do verily giveth me a break.

because it's one of the best-directed action movies i've ever seen

See, that's just it:
Alien = a horror film
Aliens = stoopid action movie

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, you can't watch it on TNT, man. That's your whole problem right there.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Suspense! It has to build! Mood maintained! You can't go from Aliens to thinking about buying some packaged cookies, than back to Aliens.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I find myself cheering when the slithery ones abduct fuckin' Newt. If only they'd shish kebab her then and there.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

yes what harold said! and alex are you really dismissing this movie because of its genre?! that's like dismissing goodfellas because it's a gangster movie!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Aliens = stoopid action movie

No, ass-kicking action movie. If you don't like actions movies, we can't help you.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah why is a good horror movie objectively better than a good action movie?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I love that conceit where they have the heart monitors on the Marines, which flatline as they get taken out at the beginning.

and as an action movie, one of the best of its kind!

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

has anybody read david thomson's book on the aliens series??

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously alex the scene where they're holed up and the aliens are getting closer (the whole "20 metres... 19 metres..." etc scene), i mean, you can't really beat that.

Yeah, I guess that is a good scene. But, it's only one scene.

Also, what up? One beast goes slam-dancing all around the Nostromo without so much as a fuckin' scratch in the first one, meanwhile in this one, they drop like flies. Inconsistent!

No, ass-kicking action movie. If you don't like actions movies, we can't help you.

Bad writing is bad writing, regardless of genre, and that's what damns this film.

Why couldn't Tom Skerrit have survived the first one instead of Ripley? (I'll tellya why: because no one wanted to see Tom Skerrit in his underwear fight the beast at the end).

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)

alien was better simply b/c of that one scene w/ sigourney's bare ass & ass-crack.

sigourney also got significantly LESS hot from aliens on. before, she was DEFINITELY hit-able.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex, you're making totally irrelevant points.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah why is a good horror movie objectively better than a good action movie?

Ah, but I don't consider this a good action movie. i consider it, unfortunately, a rather stoopid action movie.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

because ripley was so much cooler?

and that scene i mentioned was an example, one of many!

also if you force me to be a nerd, they didn't have big guns in the first ones (the crew of the nostromo were just working joes, not heavily-armed marines)

(xxp)

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"they mostleeee come at night. mostleeeee"

this line is like a rejected billy corgan lyric, or something.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

alex what do you consider a good action movie?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:12 (twenty-one years ago)

or a goddamn tagline from one of the posters for The Village

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm just disapointed with it. I remember digging the hell out of it at the time, but it just seems dumb now.

Alex, you're making totally irrelevant points

I'm just making observations, Harold, don't get your pants wet.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i think harold has a point though alex, see it widescreen w/o commercials and you may change your mind

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

seeing movies on tv has a way of making them seem much worse.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

or a goddamn tagline from one of the posters for The Village

totally irrelevant, but m night shamalyan (or whatever the fuck his name is) is such a putz.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

especially action movies, where the frame is cropped and the sound (all-important in these movies in particular) is compressed all to hell (xp)

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm just making observations, Harold, don't get your pants wet.

Ok. But I still think your arguments are silly given the topic at hand. An action movie is this: establishment of premise. Build. Payoff. That's it, man. "Writing"? Pfft. I don't understand what it is you're expecting of this movie, or why.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i actually think aliens is pretty well-scripted! i mean the dialogue is a bit corny but that's ok with me. it's a very well-structured movie.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Newt couldn't possibly be more annoying ("they mostleeee come at night. mostleeeee)

yeah but she allows sigourney to express her maternal ass-kicking instincts when she fights the ALIEN MOTHER.

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

xp

Well-executed formula -- I agree. I think Alex is objecting to character development and dialogue.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

and there are a lot of very imaginative scenes, stuff that had never been done before and that's been copied badly so many times

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean name me another action movie that has that weird maternal subtext!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread got lots of posts fast.

Alex OTM. I love Alien but the rest are rubbish. Whenever I say I don't like Aliens people always go "But it's got cool guns". Yeah, well.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

yes that's exactly what we've been saying on this thread! it's got cool guns and that's the only reason i like it

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Let's not forget that the first Alien was nothing more than a well-executed horror movie.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i think harold has a point though alex, see it widescreen w/o commercials and you may change your mind

Oh, I've seen it properly before (in a theatre, actually). And yes, TV doesn't do justice to many films. I just don't think it's that well written. It's predecessor, meanwhile, was.


I don't understand what it is you're expecting of this movie, or why.

Well, I just don't think, in retrospect, it lives up to the promise of the first one.

I think Alex is objecting to character development and dialogue.

....or lack of it.


By the way, there are certainly worse films out there, for what it's worth.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

that maternal subtext is HUGE and significantly complicates the subtext of the first (ripley defending her womanhood against the asexual rapaciousness of the alien and the asexual murderous logic of the android)

the sexual subtexts are easily the best thing about the alien movies - why else have giger design the shit? - hell, and scifi and horror movies in general, too, as opposed to scifi and horror novels - and the 2nd movie expands on those subtexts in a way that "alien: resurrection" just don't (now there's a shit movie).

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

i see nobody cares for this highfalutin lit crit shit

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Let's not forget that the first Alien was nothing more than a well-executed horror movie.

I would argue that it's a great deal more difficult to make an effectively scary, suspenseful horror film than an action movie (wherein all you really need to please certain folks, as noted, are "cool guns").

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

why else have giger design the shit?

Was HR Giger involved with the films that followed the second one?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:21 (twenty-one years ago)

he was only involved with the first

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

and vahid i'm with you totally!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

But surely the studio had the rights to his designs. So, kind-of.

Also, vahid OTM.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Although to be fair, the highfalutin lit crit shit happens after the fact, and neither adds nor detracts from the shit-yr-pants suspense.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Vahid's made some nice points re: Ripley's maternal role in the second one (the sexual elements in the first one, I believe, have more to do with Giger's actual design...could the monster look any more priapic?) But paired with the popcorn dialogue ("game over, man, game over!" "get your hands off her, you bitch!"), the subtext vahid alludes to seems muted.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

come on, the subtext there is totally obvious, you can't say that it's just some lit-critters reading in the maternal aspect

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

and alex that is why they call it SUBtext

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Seems to me, at least, the first one was genuinely suspenseful and NOT FOR EVERYONE , whereas this one went for the wider audience buck. That seems kinda crass to me.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Cripes, I look away and a thread breaks out on one of my fave films of all time (sorry Alex).

S: the theatrical cut
D: *only* being able to have the extended cut on DVD for a long time, but that's thankfully now corrected

Alien and Aliens are different takes on standard tropes that were successful precisely Scott and crew on the one hand and Cameron and crew on the other were able to hotwire them into something which was so ridiculously successful -- commercially and in terms of effective filmmaking -- that each in their own single-handedly established a slew of new cliches. Which may seem a strange thing to credit them for, but *how* many films since then have essentially tried to be one or the other, borrowing set pieces, concepts, dialogue practically and more? And none are nearly as good as these two.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

...but damnit, Cameron's at the top of his game here. He defines his job -- "This movie will be about a bunch of lovable Army meatheads that will be put into terrible danger" -- and then he does it better, arguably, than he has ever done any other job.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

xp

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)

The mother confrontation is on right now. Whatever problems I have with the film -- this is very stylishly done, I must say.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

ahhhh!!! you love it

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

alex loves aliens!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

how about the music at the end there? (bum-ba-dum-ba-dum, bum-ba-dum-ba-dum etc) that must've been used in almost every post-aliens action trailer ever

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm rooting for the aliens, if that's what you mean.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

and what an ending! the surprise alien mother attack at the end (when ripley gets into the exoskeleton), i mean come on man. come. on.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, the whole "running through the ship before it goes kablooey" ship....didn't we cover that in the last film?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

You're back to arguing against the obviously formulaic, which will ruin your appreciation of the movie every time.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm rooting for the aliens, if that's what you mean.

that's pretty much the subtext of EVERY ilxor post you've ever written, alex!

:-)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, when the Queen Beastie gets sucked out into deep space, but only manages to slip away with Ripley's fetching Reebok pump (or whatever she was wearing). Weak.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)

come on, you can't go wrong with a self-destruct climax

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, when the Queen Beastie gets sucked out into deep space, but only manages to slip away with Ripley's fetching Reebok pump (or whatever she was wearing).

Brilliantly parodied in the MST3K movie. So I will have nothing said against the original.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)

If only Newt had been flayed alive and chopped into mcnuggets, this film would be way better.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I really need to get this DVD

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

What was the name of the cat in the first one?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

The only "marines battling aliens" film I like more is Starship Troopers, which has another kind of subtext entirely.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)

The third and fourth installments really did suck a big space bone, though, can we all agree on that?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Jonesy the cat.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

definitely, but go into any movie chatroom worldwide and Fincher bonesmokers will tell you it's the best in the series.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

bonesmokers!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)

On another matter entirely, why can't they leave The Exorcist alone? Why another abortive sequel?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:46 (twenty-one years ago)

xxpost

It's certainly the best-*looking*.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Ebert: "one of the best-looking bad movies I have ever seen."

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I will watch the Paul Schrader cut.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that an actual quote, Harold?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

It is.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Bishop just took one for the team. Milky vomit. Time for the robot loader battled...which is dumb/

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)

hmmm... for some reason I can't find that Ebert review online.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:50 (twenty-one years ago)

but there's this one:

http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/greatmovies/alien.html

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Why would an industrial forklift loader -- presumably designed to lift bulky stuff -- come with built in flame-throwers?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I believe you, Harold, don't sweat it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)

xp

Because he's a COOL ROBOT!

Oh, there's no talking to you.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)

The whole sucked outta the airlock scene is shit. I'm sorry.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Here we go... an excerpt.

"ALIEN 3 is one of the best-looking bad movies I have ever seen. It is a triumph of art direction and a disaster of screenwriting, and the eyes appreciate it more than the mind. Watching it in the moment, we are absorbed. After it's over, we are disappointed, because what actually happens in the movie is so much less interesting than where it happens and how it looks while it's happening."

http://www.scifimoviepage.com/alien_20.html

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

It is a triumph of art direction and a disaster of screenwriting

The fat man nails it!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

GOD I HATE NEWT!!!!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Why would an industrial forklift loader -- presumably designed to lift bulky stuff -- come with built in flame-throwers?

you can't tell me those flamethrowers weren't useful

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

this is the thread where alex watches aliens and we try to convince him to like it

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't dispute that alien > aliens >> alien 3 >>>>>>>>>>> alien resurrection

vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

More recently, I'm guessing...

http://www.planetavp.com/amr/films/a2/carriehennat22.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.djfl.de/entertainment/djfl/1015/101540b2.jpg

Doesn't this picture make you just want to root for the aliens?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

aliens 3 and 4 were pretty turdy, and let's not even get into aliens vs predator

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that Adam Ant?

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:59 (twenty-one years ago)

adam ant vs predator

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)

you can't tell me those flamethrowers weren't useful

Of course they were useful. Flame-throwers are damn useful tools. Hell, I could certainly use one right now. But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one? That's my question.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I kind of liked #4 when it came out, I guess because my expectations were so low, and it seemed like kind of a clever twist on some of the conventions of the series. But then I saw it a little while ago on TV, and yeah, it's pretty lame-o.

(Winona is at her loveliest in that movie, though.)

morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)

you never know when an angry alien mama might come a-knockin'! (xp)

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but the manufacturers of Space Age John Deere equpiment (or whomever) probably wouldn't have anticipated such an instance.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)

But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one?

Space-age palette wrapping is a motherfucker.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)

for welding shit! lift big heavy shit and weld it, it's a design miracle really.

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, the stupidest part about #4: how they crash a spaceship at the end, causing a gigantic explosion that probably destroyed an entire country and created a dust cloud that'll kill millions of people (as, it is said, even a small asteroid impact would do in real life) -- and they're all, "You did it! You saved the Earth!!"

morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

...othewise you'd have to lift stuff hold it while another guy came with like a footstool and the torch, totally inefficient

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahahahahahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

btw i saw eurotrip tonight which was pretty funny. slocki do you like EUROTRIP??

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

also i drank a lot of wine

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)

the last time I smoked weed was when I saw O Brother Where Art Thou? in the theater and I loved it!

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I noticed this earlier, but didn't have time to respond since the thread was moving so fast.

I would argue that it's a great deal more difficult to make an effectively scary, suspenseful horror film than an action movie (wherein all you really need to please certain folks, as noted, are "cool guns").

I would argue that that's bollocks. While we're being reductive, we could just as easily boil horror movies down to "sexual guilt." Formulas are formulas, and they exist because they work on a base level. Your base level may be different than mine, but I wouldn't hold horror movies up as a higher art then action movies. In fact, just typing that seemed silly to me. Really... come on.

Then there's this:

Seems to me, at least, the first one was genuinely suspenseful and NOT FOR EVERYONE , whereas this one went for the wider audience buck. That seems kinda crass to me.

Alien was the third highest-grossing movie of 1979, right between Star Trek: The Motion Picture and The Muppet Movie. Don't argue that the second movie sold out. DON'T TRY IT.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, this site reports it as the 4th highest-grossing movie of 1979.

http://www.fact-index.com/1/19/1979_in_film.html#Top%20Grossing%20Films%20of%201979

My point remains the same.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you suggesting that both films were suitable for all audiences?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien = intelligent, well-written, genuinely suspenseful horror film made for adults.

Aliens = Flimsy, cliche-ridden, poorly patched together whizz-bang blam-o action pic designed to sell popcorn. Bring the kids, hey, it'll be fun!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you arguing that the second Alien movbie *was* suitable for everyone? Keep in mind, you just watched it on TNT.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I bet a lot of fucked up parents brought their kids to both films. Don't be that parent, Alex!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Compared to the first film -- which was very definitely not a kid-friendly movie.

I remember sitting infront of a father who brought his FIVE YEAR OLD SON to "Natural Born Killers". WHAT PART OF THE TITLE, "NATURAL BORN KILLERS", MADE YOU THINK THIS FILM WAS SUITABLE FOR YOUR FIVE-YEAR OLD?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused. You still seem to be saying that the first Alien movie was "not for everyone," because... it's horror by genre? And the second one was more for... fun? The second movie is scarier and more traumatizing in many ways.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Again, I turn to my man Rog:

The ads for "Aliens" claim that this movie will frighten you as few movies have, and, for once, the ads don't lie. The movie is so intense that it creates a problem for me as a reviewer: Do I praise its craftsmanship, or do I tell you it left me feeling wrung out and unhappy?

It has been a week since I saw it, so the emotions have faded a little, leaving with me an appreciation of the movie's technical qualities. But when I walked out of the theater, there were knots in my stomach from the film's roller-coaster ride of violence. This is not the kind of movie where it means anything to say you "enjoyed" it. ..

I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment. Yet I have to be accurate about this movie: It is a superb example of filmmaking craft.

If it does this to a man who has seen 20,000 movies, what will it do to the average filmgoer? Or to CHILDREN?

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

If it does that to a man who wrote a script for Russ Mayer, even.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)

which was very definitely not a kid-friendly movie

Which made these (released prior to the second film) even more mysterious:

ihttp://www.toyzine.com/magazine/articles/alien/alien+box_lg.jpg

I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused. You still seem to be saying that the first Alien movie was "not for everyone," because... it's horror by genre? And the second one was more for... fun? The second movie is scarier and more traumatizing in many ways.

The first film was more of a classic horror film written with a degree of sophistication and unflinching, realistic gore (relatively speaking) that was inarguably not child friendly. The second one, though still violent and gorey, reads more like a western shoot'em up. It's not exactly Spongbob Squarepants but it's easier on the sense than the first one.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The first movie is slower and more boring to children. That's all I'll give you.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:04 (twenty-one years ago)

boring to children

http://www.filmfodder.com/movies/reviews/alien/images/alien.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)

The second movie is every ounce as violent! What ARE you arguing?!

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

It's still violent, but the tone is different.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)

No, I got that, but why do you think that matters? To what end?

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

In the same way that violence in cartoons isn't perceived as traumatic. The violence in the first one was just more shocking. In the second one, it's more of a roller coaster ride. The violence isn't taken quite as seriously.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not too worried about its suitability to children. That was a tangent. I'm curious as to why you think this tone makes it a more worthy film.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I feel the need to be more accessible to a wider audience with the second film comprimised the intriguing tone of paranoia and fear of the first film. The second film was an adventure, where the first was a nightmare.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Nightmares (when effectively done) are simply more interesting than adventures...which are a dime a dozen (especially when poorly written and rife with cliche like Aliens).

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I feel the need to be more accessible to a wider audience with the second film comprimised the intriguing tone of paranoia and fear of the first film. The second film was an adventure, where the first was a nightmare.

I don't think this is a particularly good argument, but I must pause to say that I like the first film better, easily. I like the pacing and the dialogue better. I like the tone better. I just don't think that that's a good jumping-off point to argue that the second film is bad.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:25 (twenty-one years ago)

We're going to have to agree to disagree on that point, then.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)

The second film is a nightmare though. I mean maybe it would have been better if there was only one alien and the marines were armed with pithy existential quotes but then you wouldn't have had the scene where Ripley pisses the queen mum the fuck off by machine-gunning and then torching her unborn spawn.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I have to answer my own question above:

If it does this to a man who has seen 20,000 movies, what will it do to the average filmgoer?

Answer: thrill the shit out of them.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Gear OTM, plus everyone calling Aliens clichéd seems to have forgotten that many of these "clichés" weren't in fact all that overused back then -- the '80s was the decade for goofy one-liners, and this movie was just one of many to fall in line that way. I like the two movies equally, in different ways -- in the horrible, claustrophobic horror movie way, and in the horrible, claustrophobic action movie way...

(also, Newt was traumatised,FFS. What were you expecting, Alex, some nice, likeable, well-adjusted kid? Of course she wasn't fucking likeable...)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)

(actually, the 80s just set up the 90s nicely for goofy one-liners, really)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:58 (twenty-one years ago)

(wow, my tone was a lot harsher there than I intended. I'm just saying, have you ever encountered kids with post-traumatic stress? in other words)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I find myself agreeing with alex here. I remember seeing this at the cinema when it came out, and being thrilled mightily by it. Last time I saw it on tv, the dialogue... ugh!!! It just killed it for me. That "get away from her you bitch" (or whatever) line especially - in the cinema, people were actually cheering! When I last saw it I was like, "oh, for FUCK's sake!1" So corny!!

The actress who plays vasquez, I forget what she's called, she was in "near dark" and IIRC terminator 2 as well? K-ROWR!!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 20 August 2004 07:08 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread made interesting reading until someone, rather amusingly, thought the welding torch on the loader was a flame thrower !?

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)

ALEX WHAT FUCKING CLICHES ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Haven't read the thread, but yes Aliens is the most disappointing movie I've ever seen.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)

it owns.

foolish elvens.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)

cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah what a boring scene

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, but was that a predator ship?

())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Friday, 20 August 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah i mean before Aliens it was done *soooo* many times

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)

i was so sick of confrontations between angry maternal types in exoskeletons and huge mother aliens by that point

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i know it was getting beyond a joke wasn't it.

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)

er, more like the "oh goody baddies are dead let's go home oh wait they're still here *bang* now they're dead seeyalater chzthxbye" kind of lazy cliche seen in every horror movie ever.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)

yes but at the time of the release of the film it wasn't really a cliche was it, especially in the setting and the specifics of the scene (ie alien coming out of bottom of ship sticks tail in android and rips him in two)

you can't say that thats a cliche can you?

The trouble is films since Aliens have robbed it to fuck and now admittedly watching it again it some parts seem cliched but you have to realise it was unique at the time and was, and remains to be, an absoloute classic

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Speaking of cliches, did Alien invent the Shock the Audience with a Cat and Seperate the Group with a Cat tricks?

Anyway:
Alien: claustrophobic atmosphere, good script, suspense, nasty shocks, superb design

Aliens: Suspense, nasty shocks, superb design and GUNS GUNS GUNS! LOTSA GUNS!

I declare a tie.

robster (robster), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Complaining that a Hollywood action movie contains a couple of cliches is like complaining that a 60s French film has too much smoking in it. Like, what the fuck did you expect?

Alien 3 is underrated, by the way.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Also applause request for Camerons use of Bishop and the will-he-won't-he factor carried on from the first films Ash character. A brilliant bit of film making which was abused to an extent in the third film and another reason why this thread should be renamed "Alien3 - Some nice effects, but actually kind've a crap film"

haha xpost

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

(applause)

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the idea of a franchise sci-fi universe revolving around the conflict between the Predator, Alien and Human species has a great deal of potential, if only producers would stop looking ONLY at flash cinematography (which the baseline art design offers in spades anyway) and try getting a decent STORY out of it for ONCE.

Alien: haven't seen it! wtf
Aliens: That's the clumsiest exoskeleton I've ever seen, HOMO SNAPIES U HAVE NO CHANCE 2 SURVIVE MAKE UR TIME, also kind of an injustice to the Aliens that they keep getting killed so easily, yes I understand the guns are big but seriously people, this is the most dangerous species in the galaxy, they don't need numbers to win
Alien 3: I have tried to watch this like 5 times and have been unable to figure out what is going on enough to bother sitting through the giger cave bukkake
Alien Resurrection: Am I the only person who thinks this would have been better standalone, without trying to tie in to the Alien franchise? Ron Perlman!!! Whoop

TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien: haven't seen it! wtf

Heavens! This is the best of the lot.

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien Resurrection is fabulous, yes. It wouldn't have made a lot of sense eliminating the Ripley-clone/Alien elements, though. Sigourney Weaver is actually hotter in A:R than in the original, too.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

kind've?????

Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

ron perlman, dan hedaya doing his bug-eyes thing, the pervy scientists, ron perlman, michael wincott (i love this guy!), the really gross fleshy alien child-of-ripley at the end. not even winona ryder as a robot as winona ryder can hurt this one.

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"The trouble is films since Aliens have robbed it to fuck and now admittedly watching it again it some parts seem cliched but you have to realise it was unique at the time and was, and remains to be, an absoloute classic "

OTM.

i can't really participate in this thread objectively, as i'm an alien/aliens obsessive. but Alex, you ARE SO FUCKING WRONG!

ripley's character "humorless and wooden"? echhh. she is traumatized, she narrowly escaped being killed by a space monster. she is the only one who realizes how much of a threat the alien really represents, and she is exasperated by the marines and the company's incompetence. to her this is serious shit, the stakes are just too high if the aliens spread. and i think sigourney weaver nails this perfectly.

newt annoying? i've always thought that newt was one of the least annoying child characters in a movie like this. she doesn't even have that many lines!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't belive TOMBOT has never seein Alien. Remedy that, post-haste.

btw everybody I saw Sigourney at the Belmont last year and she's still SUPREMELY BEAUTIFUL at like 56 or whatever.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

as i'm an alien/aliens obsessive. but Alex, you ARE SO FUCKING WRONG!

No I'm not, actually. You're just a fanboy in denial.

she doesn't even have that many lines!

One doesn't need lots of lines to be annoying.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Sigourney Weaver's hottest moments are inarguably in The Year of Living Dangerously, with tiny Linda Hunt and Mel Gibson.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)

"No I'm not, actually. You're just a fanboy in denial."

why did i become a fanboy in the first place then, hmm?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Sigourney's hottest moments are, like, every moment she's taken a breath while being alive on this planet.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

She wasn't that hot with '80s hair in Ghostbusters.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

SO WRONG.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

http://sfstory.free.fr/images/Alien4/20.jpg

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

http://sfstory.free.fr/images/Alien4/20.jpg

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Heartbreakers would have been so much better if it turned into an Alien movie halfway through.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah she looks hottt in that pic, woohoo!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i actually think this is a really canny film. i mean it's not the kind of thing i will watch 50 times and find something new each time, but it's pretty provocative and exciting the first few times. i think the script is very well-constructed even if it's not the most literate or even believeable thing on a line-by-line level. i think james cameron has a good story sense.

amateur!!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

alien3 is the sequel to dune.

amateur!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

OTM.

"But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one?"

welding?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

ps. tiny pedantry from earlier - the new Exorcist movie is a prequel.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Heavens! This is the best of the lot.

I was about to say! Tom, trust me, it's worth it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

why did i become a fanboy in the first place then, hmm?

Perhaps, like I was, you were intrigued by the first film. Unlike me, however, your blind devotion to the promise of the first one makes you overlook the flaws of the second.

ps. tiny pedantry from earlier - the new Exorcist movie is a prequel. ?

Duly noted, Stence. But why do we need one of those either?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

because the Max von Sydow character is cool?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

actually i've never seen any of the alien films.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

(psych)

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

i will concede that the first alien is the best, though.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't even read all of this thread b/c the need to say:
Aliens is great, I love Aliens! is too much to hold in. I've even watched it on tv *dubbed in French* and loved it. Um. Yeah.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

because the Max von Sydow character is cool?

True, but von Sydow isn't playing said character. I believe the guy playing him is the advanced-Calculus genius from Eastern Europe with the fancy scarf that pals around with Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting. To which I say: why?

The Exorcist is fine where it is. Leave it there.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

The other day I was talking about self-destruct mechanisms and how everything in action films has one. Yet I believe most fighterplanes, boats, cars and computers don't actually have them... So, why the hell would a space-mining ship have a self-destruct mechanism? Certainly there are answers, but they don't matter because: it's a big huge suspense/action film about virtually unkillable aliens!

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

submarines had them

())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

True, but von Sydow isn't playing said character. I believe the guy playing him is the advanced-Calculus genius from Eastern Europe with the fancy scarf that pals around with Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting. To which I say: why?

because von Sydow is 80billyion years old and this is supposed to be about him as a young priest, duh!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

"I can't believe River Phoenix played a young Indiana Jones! Why didn't they get Harrison Ford to play him?"

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Aliens is one of the best movies ever - military action in a totally realized and believable future, with the aforementioned gender trouble subtexts, etc etc. The dropship, apc, pulse rifles, machine guns are all exquisitly designed too.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Spencer I think I disagree with all but about 5 words of that post and none of them are nouns. If the art design in Aliens had been worth a piss, besides the Aliens themselves, I would have loved it, been a fanboy from the start. Seriously, man, years and years in the future and the coolest weapon is a machinegun with a red LED counter on it to tell you how many bullets are left? Fuckin' eat me. The exoskeleton was stupid too. How the fuck do you build an android like Bishop and then everything else is so utterly dumb and retro? Believable my ass, the future of "Aliens" is a wad of unimaginative shit. God. I think you hit a nerve.

TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

um, bladerunner to thread.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Bladerunner had flying cars with gullwing doors, hello.

TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

the art design of the 2nd one pales in comparison to the first, but i still think the story is better. i mean the mechanics of the thing.

i do not quite understand the profound awe that blade runner inspires in so many people.

amateur!!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Bladerunner: set in Los Angeles
Aliens: not

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Hell, Starship Troopers to thread while we're at it then

TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

It looks and feels fantastic while still allowing for an exploration of a central Philip K. Dick theme, for a start.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)

BR is fantastic but comparing it to Aliens, esp. in terms of set design, is silly!

ps. in the future all ships will have flimsy subway-grate floors and people will still use those hanging lamps that mechanics use to look at your engine when the hood's up.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

haha - gullwing doors of the future!
I like the idea that super-high-tech androids can exist in a world that is still dirty and bleak. Y'know, you could say "if there are androids, why is there garbage?" etc. It doesn't matter; that's how it is.
xpost

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

has anybody read david thomson's book on the aliens series??
-- vahid (vfoz...), August 20th, 2004.

Weirdly enough, I've read this. And I also have nothing to add to this thread kthxbye!

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I have to say, tho, in Aliens 4 the scene with Sigourney playing Basketball is funny as hell. I mean doesn't she even spin the b-ball on the end of her finger like in a "whoa, i'm a ROBOT AND I DEFY GRAVITY" kind of way?

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

needs more slocki.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, slocki would kick some alien butt.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

alex in nyc first.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

But Mandee, she's not a robot - she was grown from Ripley's and alien DNA - and, as we know, Aliens are the stars of the Intergalactic Gl0betr0tters League.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

alien 4 directed by jean-pierre jeunet.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

http://scanprofil.no/images/Aliens/ABAstor.gif

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

so was amelie.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the art direction of alien 1 and 2 a lot, and i've always dug the movies' vision of the future as being totally corporatized, which i think is pretty prescient

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

because von Sydow is 80billyion years old and this is supposed to be about him as a young priest, duh!

No, dick, my question is why are they doing it at all?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

aliens is better than die hard.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

he's not a dick and they're doing it for the $$$

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

hollywood in squeezing every last dollar out of a franchise shockah

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

he's not a dick and they're doing it for the $$$

he's a dick for attaching the "duh!" to his post.

And really....for the money? It ain't like Exorcist II: the Heretic and/or Exorcist III really cleaned up at the box office.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

no that's not different at all.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

hollywood in squeezing every last dollar out of a franchise shockah

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

if I'm a dick you're a doof, doofy.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

let's reduce it to schoolyard-style, that would great.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

grate.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

exorcist prequel original director: PAUL SCHRADER!!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously tho I think I read something where the dude who wrote it wanted the prequel because the original movie didn't have as much backstory as the novel?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I really like Stellan Skarsgard.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah william peter blatty, who is a real weirdo

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

also there's this very interesting piece from L.A. Weekly last week regarding this Exorcist prequel.

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/38/features-foundas.php

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry Tom, the design in Aliens rings very true for me and it's actually one of my favorite ever sci-fi visions. I have absolutely no problem with it at all, especially since it was coming from 1986 (you are a bit younger than I am and maybe this is an interesting example of sci-fi expectation). I really like how most of the stuff was just a slight update on current technology. This served the story well as it means we could identify with the Space Marines (and be reminded of Vietnam etc) and with the rest of the technology. I happen to firmly believe that the future will not look very different from the one presented in Aliens (although it will probably be tackier). The same goes for Alien (except for the 'mother' computer room which is terrible now).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

oooh ooooh good Vietnam analogy!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, it's also explicitly stated I think on some of the dvd bonus features. I've actually built a drop-ship model kit and had a miniature APC. I considered buying a 1/1 scale pulse rifle too - but thought that might look weird.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I flipped past Aliens on TNT last night myself and of course had to watch like half an hour of it, but what struck me was how it looked like every sci-fi shoot-em-up video game from the past ten years. If you want to talk influentiality. And neologisms.

wickerbocker please (hammy), Friday, 20 August 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

there would be no doom or halo as we know them without aliens, that's for sure.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

No Super Soakers, either.

sexyDancer, Friday, 20 August 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex in NYC is LeBrain Boy

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 20 August 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Ballsy thing about "Aliens:" there's something like 45 minutes of nothing before anything really happens, at least in the theatrical version. It's like, OK, this is going to be slow, like "Alien." Then, blam, all the shooting starts. Nice misdirection on Cameron's part.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 20 August 2004 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

The actress who plays vasquez... K-ROWR!!!

Were you as entranced when she did that salute with the gun when they were getting ready to drop onto the planet? That was a sexy piece.

Alien: Resurrection is the funniest of the lot.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 20 August 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien: Resurrection is the best one by far. 2 and 3 just sucked.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Why is it the best? BASKETBALL.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Also: Alien Monkey! Come on guys! Alien Monkey!

Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I really enjoyed Alien: Resurrection (even more than '3' which I still liked but found too depressing). Resurrection really continues to delve into the gender/sex aspects but with the cloning twist - the whole series is a feast for psychoanalysis fans.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Dominique Pinon as the paraplegic whose unfeeling legs keep getting injured. I don't know if I'm remembering right, but I think there was a scene where one of the other space pirates (space pirates!) sort of casually throws a knife into his leg and he doesn't notice for a minute, and when he does his reaction is like "oh man, why'd you do that!?"

Dan I., Friday, 20 August 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus the underwater scene, the scene with the other failed Ripley clones, and that one where the alien gets into the transport full of safety-belted marines/soldiers so the officer-guy just rolls a grenade in there. So good, this movie.

Dan I., Friday, 20 August 2004 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

It sucks that Warwick form CSI dies som needlesslyy. I watched it last week ansd was suprised by how much it didn't suckas much as the firstbtiem O watched it.

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Friday, 20 August 2004 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Aliens is utterlyu great, fucka ll teh haters.

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Friday, 20 August 2004 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't like any of the alien movies, not sure why.

teeny (teeny), Friday, 20 August 2004 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien 3 at least tried to put a new spin on things, i I remember correctly (and took the "big guns" element away, no? Wasn't it in some space prison without weapons....and hair?) That said, the ridiculously overwrought symbolism of Ripley's sacrifice at the end left me as cold and clammy as the set looked. Alien Resurrection? I gave up expecting anything by then. I remember being significantly creeped out by the botched clone element and the hybridized alien-human baby thing, but the whole thing didn't win me over. I remember her being in it, but I can't for the life of me remember what Winona brought to the table of any substance, if anything.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 21 August 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't like any of the alien movies, not sure why.

What type of goth are you! You're fired.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 21 August 2004 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex, you should seek out that other version of Alien 3. Is it good? No, not really, but it's better than what was released. Many of the stupid things the studio imposed are gone, and it's closer to what Fincher originally envisioned.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Saturday, 21 August 2004 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)

but I can't for the life of me remember what Winona brought to the table of any substance, if anything.

-- Alex in NYC (vassife...) (webmail), August 20th, 2004 8:48 PM. (vassifer) (later) (link)


additional hottness?

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 21 August 2004 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)

No, she brought nothing. The movie was great, but it would have been exactly as great without her. Her role was a total void. She did nothing. I think pretty much the only plot point that hinged on her character was where she had to hook herself into the ship's computer for some stupid contrived reason, like to open some doors or something.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 21 August 2004 07:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh there might have also been some "Oh no! Ripley has 'issues' with droids (or whatever they called them in those movies)! Look out!" stuff.

Ooh and also as a sort of waypoint on Ripley's movie-long seething lesbian lust rampage until it came to rest on the Queen alien.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 21 August 2004 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)

ok so i watched this again (thank you alex for reminding me of this terrific movie!) and when it was over i am slightly embarrassed to say that i exclaimed loudly to no one in particular, "rockin' good times!"

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

also to clear up any controversy, when riply activates the torch on the loader she presses a button marked "welder"!

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

also some of the marines stuff is a bit corny but i loved it anyway

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

slocki I love you.

cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)

also i think regardless this is a very well-written movie. vahid i think mentioned the bishop/ash thing, and how that carried over from the first movie; it's a good example of how relationships between characters in this movie are very well-mapped out, and how they change over the course of the film (vasquez and the shaky lieutenant is another example)

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)

the bishop - vasquez axis is so fucking great and I'm not explaining it.

cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)

also i cannot express enough my love for bill paxton in this movie

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)

fuck I mean vasquez - um not apone yeah 'shaky lieutenant' relationship. this is only three glasses of wine!

x-post

otm! "GAME OVER MAN!" (no comma!)

cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i forget the lieutenant's name. but he's not apone, that's the sarge who gets killed in that wicked first firefight in the nest (the use of the portable video cameras & life-sign monitors in that scene is pretty virtuosic btw)

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

gorman.

cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

yes!!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

and can i say for the record that paul reiser is totally good in this movie! he does a great 80s corporate scumbag smoothie

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)

... edged with reticence and shady doubt.

cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Disgusting self-serving yuppie dick-licking that you can believe!

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

t i exclaimed loudly to no one in particular, "rockin' good times!"

Hahahahahahahaha. I love that.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"Al-yens = crap"
"OMG. No."
"Yes."
"But, like, no."
"Yes."
"Still, though...no, eh?"
"Yes."
"NO!"
"Yes."
"No, damn you."
"Yes."
"But like, look at this here - no."
"Yes."
"Still, um, well, wouldn't it be like -"
"Yes."

Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)

did you highfive yourself after you wrote that girolamo?

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Nah, I just shook my own hand.

Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Dudes who don't like Aliens be cool-levelheaded, don't give a fuck types, whilst dudes who do like Aliens be spaztic, easily excitable dweebs.

Reverse the roles for Alien, though.

Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 22 August 2004 03:54 (twenty-one years ago)

The portable video-camera and life sign monitor bit is great, yes. I'd forgotten about that.

I watched Sigourney Weaver in "Galaxy Quest" last night, btw!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 22 August 2004 08:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Dudes who don't like Aliens be cool-levelheaded, don't give a fuck types, whilst dudes who do like Aliens be spaztic, easily excitable dweebs.
Reverse the roles for Alien, though.

-- Gear! (drink_to_remembe...), August 22nd, 2004.

i take offense at that, ALIENS IS TEH BEST MOOVIE EVER YOU SATANIC HEATHENITE MARTIAN FUXOR

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 22 August 2004 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)

AND IA IN'T EASILY EXCITATITABALE OR WHATEVERS

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 22 August 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

the extras on disc 2 are very good, real aliens-production-porn

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 22 August 2004 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Dominique Pinon as the paraplegic whose unfeeling legs keep getting injured. I don't know if I'm remembering right, but I think there was a scene where one of the other space pirates (space pirates!) sort of casually throws a knife into his leg and he doesn't notice for a minute, and when he does his reaction is like "oh man, why'd you do that!?"

Ron Perlman (aforementioned knife-wielder) should be in every movie.

The Space Pirate Captain is almost as great (and he was hands-down my favorite actor as a kid, for his performance in Robin Hood) - "She is... severely fuckable, isn't she?"

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 22 August 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw yeah he's the bad guy from The Crow isn't he? Damn, Alien 4 had the best cast too!

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 23 August 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael Wincott is his name i believe.

Alien Resurrection is entertaining by itself, but for me it was just too jokey and tongue in cheek to work as an Alien movie.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 23 August 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I do like Alien 3 a lot, though.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 23 August 2004 01:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael Wincott is his name i believe.

His role in "Dead Man" is hilarious.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Resurrection is fine you complaining complainers

jones (actual), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i have never seen Resurrection after the original viewing in the theaters, the day after it was released in 1997.

not sure why.

also have never seen Alien 3 all the way thru since originally seeing it twice in the theaters...

Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Thursday, 26 August 2004 01:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i just watched like every special feature on the aliens double-disc as well as the long version of the movie as well as the commentary this week and it is all thanks to alex!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

You're welcome.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)

god, i tried to watch two different dvd commentaries last weekend and failed each time. on "the rules of the game" peter bogdanovich talks sooo fast, like the micromachines guy, such that there is no emphasis anywhere and you can't follow it at all without getting a splitting headache. then i tried to watch a donald ritchie commentary on some kurosawa film but after about 10 minutes you can tell he was just winging it, "uh, here kurosawa is filming a house, er, houses were very common in the japan of the edo era, er."

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 26 August 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

see? welder, i told you.

g--ff (gcannon), Thursday, 26 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i was thinking about watching that bogdanovich commentary! his citizen kane one is notoriously bad though

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)

That's for damned sure.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 August 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

he didn't write the "rules of the game" commentary but he reads it, at about 150 words per minute.

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

you know, objectively, peter bogdanovich seems like a decent guy, but my gut reaction is one of disgust. maybe it's the ascots?

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

his ascent to 'film expert' or whatever he is was pretty sneaky

jones (actual), Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

he was always a self-proclaimed film expert! even before he was a filmmaker!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

it's kinda weird that he's just reading another person's commentary tho. i don't like non-scene-specific commentaries

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

things that are good about this film: check out burke's suit jacket when they're still aboard the nostromo (the lapels are down, but the collar up!); the marine names, we used to play 'soldiers' and pretend to be them (vasquez, drake, crowe, wiersbowski, hudson, hicks, apone, frost, gorman); the sounds (the tracker's bleep, the elephant-noise alien death, the pulse rifle fire wow); everything is so well designed (ok yeah the alien architecture but the guns are soo cool, everyone wanted one as a kid, the apc, even the dropship); the hudson & hicks (alliterative-associative?) relationship; 'game over, man! game over!'; 'stop your grinnin' an' drop your linen!'; the bit where ripley's all protestant work ethic puritan abt hanging around so asks fr work, does some flashy stuff in the loader and apone, chewing his cigar, the way he says it, says 'bay 12, please.'

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

also: all the other stuff.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

bay 12 please is the best line in the movie.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

it's cool that you mention the design though--cameron says one of the main things that appealed to him about the movie was all the cool designing he'd get to do. (they had a couple of prod designers but he did a lot of the initial sketches, for the apc lander and a bunch of other stuff)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not badly written at all, btw.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i totally agree

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, you're both wrong. So celebrate.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

alex i'm sorry dude but you missed the boat on this one.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

i still think you should see it properly (ie letterboxed w/good sound, proper theatrical cut etc etc) before passing final judgment.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahahahahahaha. That's a boat I have no interest in boarding. Bon voyage!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

also on the infamous day when you watched it you started in the middle right?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

you're being a bit ripley.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw it when it came out, youngster. I've seen it in its proper entirety probably more times than I'd prefer. In retrospect, it's simply not as great a film as it is credited as being. It's not awful, but it's not especially good. It's predecessor was vastly superior.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

you know what else is cool (and has to do with burke's collars)? they decided to follow ridley scott's lead and not give everyone futuristic outfits, which i like, very few sci-fi films ever did that before alien & aliens. (james cameron talks about how he liked how they wore hawaiian shirts in the first one... "they're basically truck drivers, there's no one aroudn to tell them how to dress")

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i know i'll never win you over, alex, but i've had my enthusiasm for this film so rekindled i can't help but try!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

alex, I'd share a grenade with you. x x

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I do like the point about the upturned collars, though. That was a nice little flourish.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

tht kinda makes me gorman though : /

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

you always were an asshole, gorman

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

anytime, anywhere.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked how that dopey lieutenant(?) got bonked on the head.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 26 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"it's cool that you mention the design though--cameron says one of the main things that appealed to him about the movie was all the cool designing he'd get to do. (they had a couple of prod designers but he did a lot of the initial sketches, for the apc lander and a bunch of other stuff)"

he also designed the alien queen himself (h.r. giger wasn't involved)!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 27 August 2004 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah he says he maybe regrets not involving giger but that it was kind of an ego thing for him!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 August 2004 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I LIKE ALIENS, GUYS!!!!!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 August 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Doesn't "you didn't see it properly, big screen, nice sound" = bad film? Presumably the attraction of the film cannot be dialigue, characters etc? Of course, if you are fine with that, good. Pleas don't vote for it in best movie polls though.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 27 August 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

whatev

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 August 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know if this has been said enough on this thread but sigourney weaver is awesome in this film with her almost asymptotal acting - always to the edge of things ('out of breath, unmade up &c.') - earning the film its dramatic danger. thomson says she is 'lofty, droll, ready for surprise, smart, attractive, and plainly desperate comedy, sigourney weaver has a robust reasonableness worth bearing in mind when other actresses kill themselves, ascend the olympus of vanity, or disgrace the human race' (haha woah tiger!). this film ws always weaver vs. 'the bitch' and never about the marines anyway. she's an underrated actress with a careful (?), short filmography full of understated (trans: aggresively reasonable) but liminally dangerous ('like something underwater turning ten fathoms deep, and swimming after you and me...') performances.

cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

that formatting error is going to bug me sooo much.

cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I LIKE ALIENS, GUYS!!!!!!

cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw both Alien and Aliens in the theater recently and I like both movies less than I did originally - Alien much more so.

Alex NYC was critical of Aliens dialogue, well Alien is just as dopey, cartoonish, and two-dimensional as Aliens only instead of war movie cliches, it's full of horror movie cliches. Alien's suspense is really just shock-value: the alien goes "boo" and chows down on a crew member. Once you know the story, Alien has very little repeat-viewing worth except as a filmed H.R. Giger sketchbook. The new director's cut does flow better, but I could have done without the infamous "Dallas cocoon scene". On the plus side, the new digital sound is just amazing and worth it alone to see in a decent theater.

The original cut of Aliens was great, I wish that Cameron had just left it alone - really the only thing that needed to be included was the scene with the massed alien attack on the remote guns. Couple of scenes in here are just spectacular - the initial drop ship scene is amazingly well done and everything from "looks like they're having a goddamn town meeting" to "ease down - you've blown the transaxle. you're just grinding metal".

Thin writing or not, I defy anyone to repeat dialog from the original Alien without looking.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

One thing in Aliens that will bug me forever - the horrible blue screen backdrop during the drop ship crash.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)

rear projection.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

actually i thought that always looked rather good myself.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, different strokes for different folks, different xenomorphs for different...well you get the point.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah "aliens" as reconfigured WWII combat movie is a big part of what i think is interesting about it.

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

cameron insists it's a reconfigured nam movie! (actually, how many nam movies were there to reconfigure then? maybe it's wwii-as-nam-as-outerspace)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

My family's not religious at all but the dialogue from Aliens might be the closest thing we have to a Bible or prayer at dinner. Certain lines have been used in everyday conversation since I was in grade school.

"Is this going to be a stand-up fight, sir, or another bug hunt?"

"It was a bad call, Ripley--a bad call."

"One express elevator to Hell .. Going down!"

"Hey maybe you haven't been keeping up on current events but we just got our asses kicked, pal!"

I could go on...

Richard K (Richard K), Monday, 6 September 2004 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Jesus. Like the alien in the first (and vastly superior) film, this thread SIMPLY WILL NOT DIE.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

YOU STARTED IT!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 6 September 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahahahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

saw the first film again, the art direction is really magnificent isn't it? way better than the second in that respect anyway

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Aliens has too much of the cheap-o look of The Terminator.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

i still like the look, it's just not nearly as beautiful as the first

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Fair enough.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

and fuck, it always blows my mind that aliens was shot for only EIGHTEEN MILLION dollars!! can you believe that shit?

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

it certainly looks way more expensive than that. jesus, where does all the money go these days?

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

catering

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

'aliens: resurrection' is pretty good, I think. it's obv. why they picked someone like jeunnet (that strong design sense of his, those yellows and browns). ripley's smile is as 'opposite of plain' as ever, here. I think maybe where the film suffers is in jeunnet's casting though - his films have always had a caricatured-bent and he seems to pick people who're able to pull off strong cartoons... the psychological frightener perhaps not the best genre fr cartoon work and it makes weaver's (sizzlingly flat) performance all the more stand-out (she had to be cast &c.).

one bum note though: I didn't like the fact that the aliens communicated in this one - part of the fear and allure of the first few films' aliens, what made them seem so dangerous and efficient, was their seeming elimination of any necessity of a membrane of communication. that is, they were perfect killing machines, effortlessly, simultaneously and constantly in sync with their surroundings and each other.

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

also: jeunnet has his aliens play the game of human intelligence (pressing buttons, opening doors / escaping) whereas the old aliens' intelligence ws a logic of war & killing, honed to an assassin's expertise and selfishness. it ws a stubbornly isolated technology of destruction and all the more cinematically (dramatically) powerful for it.

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

do those posts make any sense at all?

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

'earth' in the future in jeunnet is always shitty and not somewhere you want to be, great thing abt alien franchise j-man gets to play this up with a nice twist: 'earth', that name, we never hear it, just as another co-ordinate (2000: america, costa rica, maui, wherever; 2200: earth, mars, lv 1241) on the (200 years into the future) newly emerged map: the universe. it's a nice comic turn: everyone's disgust at the prospect of having to deal with returning to earth as well as the 12 meat hungry aliens that are after them. funny.

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Remember that these aren't the same aliens as in the first movies. They cloned them using DNA from Ripley, so it's likely that they have as much human in them as she seems to have alien in her. It's the theme of the whole movie. The freaky ape-alien at the end is like a perfect half-and-half.
(I could be confused about all this)

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)

The aliens, even the ones that look like regular aliens, in A:R always seem a little more anthropomorphic than the ones in earlier movies.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

They need to make another Alien movie directed by Jodorowsky.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Man, I still can't see why everyone else can't see that A:R is by far the best one. IT'S SO OBVIOUS

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd like to revise my judgement from 'good' to 'ok'.

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)

when antonioni is cloned he shd make a silent aliens movie.

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

With the old on-screen cue cards for dramatic moments:

"Oh no! Slimy slobbery alien!"

"He's fucked!"

"We now pause from the action to enjoy a moment of relationship subtext!"

"More subtext"

"Hooray for guns!"

"Welcome to Ripley, bitch!"

"The end (now with added subtext)."

"Credits: Predator ship designed by..."

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

haha ripley to winona: "they programmed you to be an asshole?"

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"you're the new asshole model?"

"I'm finding a lot of things funny nowadays. I don't think they are."

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

the end of this movie is kinda fucked up.

cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"Millions died, Earth saved, wanna go out to a lesbian bar and get baked on hash brownies later?"

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

i liked resurrection a lot when it came out.

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 12 September 2004 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien Resurrection - it doesn't really work for me. I like the psycho-sexual undertones (i would kill to see Cronenberg do an Alien movie) and the is she on our side or not? thing going with Ripley.

The design/creatures/effects are pretty good for the most paart, though the spaceship shots are a bit perfunctory and bland.

But overall the film was just too cartonish for me.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i did read the screenplay before it came out though (it was a lot better), so that might have affected my perception of the movie.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm only half way through last night's resurrection but the one thing that jumped out at me was why they put aliens in cages that their blood could eat through. like duh!

koogs (koogs), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:50 (twenty-one years ago)

the end of this movie is kinda fucked up.
-- cºzen (skiplevel...), September 12th, 2004.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Millions died, Earth saved, wanna go out to a lesbian bar and get baked on hash brownies later?"
-- B.A.R.M.S. (b4rim4_...), September 12th, 2004.

OTM.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

fuck, it was way more gory than the other 3 was it not? or have i got squeamisher?

Dead Man, Monday, 13 September 2004 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I want a new Alien move to be made on the same principle that 'Return of the Living Dead' used, ie "Hey remember that film 'Alien'? Well it was based on a true story, no shit, we still got a frozen egg down in the basement"

xpost - gory a good film does not make.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

(unless that's what you like I spose)

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
I don't know if this has been said enough on this thread but sigourney weaver is awesome in this film with her almost asymptotal acting - always to the edge of things ('out of breath, unmade up &c.') - earning the film its dramatic danger. thomson says she is 'lofty, droll, ready for surprise, smart, attractive, and plainly desperate comedy, sigourney weaver has a robust reasonableness worth bearing in mind when other actresses kill themselves, ascend the olympus of vanity, or disgrace the human race' (haha woah tiger!). this film ws always weaver vs. 'the bitch' and never about the marines anyway. she's an underrated actress with a careful (?), short filmography full of understated (trans: aggresively reasonable) but liminally dangerous ('like something underwater turning ten fathoms deep, and swimming after you and me...') performances.

Sigourney Weaver is marvelous. I'm still amazed that the Academy, with its distate for genre pictures, managed to nominate her for Best Actress. It's her best movie.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 17 March 2006 02:44 (twenty years ago)

A fine revive. Good thread, actually, though Alex in NYC is still nuts on the core point. (That said, Elvis T.'s takes I've since taken on board slightly but not fully.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 March 2006 02:56 (twenty years ago)

Alex is nuts, but as usual, his grouchiness is charming and has a modicum of truth.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 17 March 2006 03:15 (twenty years ago)

god this movie rules so hard. still cameron's finest hour.

latebloomer aka rembrandt, the fifth ninja turtle (latebloomer), Friday, 17 March 2006 09:07 (twenty years ago)

Alex is full of shit tbh.

teh_kit! (g-kit), Friday, 17 March 2006 10:44 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
latebloomer otm

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 12 April 2007 23:55 (nineteen years ago)

harry dean stanton and yaphet kotto will always beat anything ever, especially if the anything includes a freakin annoying child actress

Tracer Hand, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:25 (nineteen years ago)

and the effects in the original alien are breathtaking, and all of them recycled for part deux - the shaky heads-up display action, especially. approaching and entering the alien ship in the first one makes the skin on the back of my head tighten up just thinking about it. it is truly insane that it was made in 1979 and looked that good.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:27 (nineteen years ago)

harry dean stanton and yaphet kotto will always beat anything ever, especially if the anything includes a freakin annoying child actress


Don't forget Ian Holm.

However: "GAME OVER MAN!"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:39 (nineteen years ago)

i love this movie so much!!

rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:04 (nineteen years ago)

so awesome. so is alien 1 of course. i don't like to compare them because they are both BALLS OUT WICKEDNESS OF ALL RADNESS in their own unique ways.

s1ocki, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:24 (nineteen years ago)

Tracer OTM

milo z, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:27 (nineteen years ago)

I don't get the complaints that Newt is a fiendish moppet who deserves a pulse gun shot up her rear. I'm usually suspicious of child actors, but this one doesn't have very many lines, and she does numbed horror very well.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

I stand by my comments above, unsurprisingly. It's been years since I've seen Alien and Aliens, though -- I should rectify that. But I'm in no rush, absence makes the heart grow fonder, etc.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:47 (nineteen years ago)

And of course I had to think of this film because of Grindhouse. I will always remember Biehn for this more than for The Terminator, actually.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:48 (nineteen years ago)

I'll even take Resurrection over Aliens.

milo z, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:56 (nineteen years ago)

I will always remember Biehn for this more than for The Terminator, actually.


He's actually kind of hot.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:58 (nineteen years ago)

I'll even take Resurrection over Aliens.


Freak.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 02:18 (nineteen years ago)

yeah milo you're insane.

i like biehn better in this too!!

s1ocki, Friday, 13 April 2007 02:39 (nineteen years ago)

The best part about Aliens is that the bad guys are the military subcontractors, and the good guys are the marine's weapons. Gosh, wonder who manufactured those?

shieldforyoureyes, Friday, 13 April 2007 04:12 (nineteen years ago)

the best part about Aliens is the aliens and fighting and the yelling and suspense and terror and vastness of the universe

rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 04:17 (nineteen years ago)

Seriously, it's the silence of the base when the Marines first land. Just chilling.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 04:18 (nineteen years ago)

i really like how this film actually takes its time building up before all the main action starts. it's genuinely like a roller coaster in that respect: there's a long, tense wind-up, followed by an insane rush of energy followed by some false stops and starts before revving up once again for one last go....and then it's over...but omg it's not!...and then it's finally actually over.

latebloomer, Friday, 13 April 2007 05:03 (nineteen years ago)

Alien 3 i sthe best film Fincher will ever direct and I suspect, if ever we see the 40 or so minutes cut, the best of the lot.

i, grey, Friday, 13 April 2007 06:31 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah this film blows goats.

the next grozart, Friday, 13 April 2007 09:24 (nineteen years ago)

What the fuck's wrong with these people who don't like Aliens?

('Alien 3 is actually pretty good' sentiment seconded)

chap, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

Alien 1 had an awesome set design, I love Ridley Scotts random realistic junkness in his scenes. It's like these places really exist, and all the stuff you see has a history behind it. Not just plastic coverings built in a props factory.

Ste, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

okay, so way upthread, in the past, slocki asked what kind of action movies alex-in-nyc did like then if he didn't like this one, but there was no answer.

do those who don't like Aliens not like action movies, or what kind of action movies do you like? or, maybe what i'm really wondering, so i can understand this better, is what's an AWESOME MOVIE to you? or would you never use the phrase AWESOME MOVIE in the first place and stick with something like "excellent film"?

rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

(i have said both of these things re: films i like - i don't mean it as a judgment thing)

rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

I don't understand people who did not love this movie. Unless you are an octogenarian who is uncomfortable with harsh language and sudden noises, I refuse to give haters any slack. It's one of the best action/thriller movies ever made.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:20 (nineteen years ago)

FB OTM

g-kit, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

It's also better than a lot of other Vietnam movies.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

three months pass...

ALIENS RPG is coming! Done by Gearbox/Obsidian!

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)

and FPS

i wish they'd make an aliens game that couldn't be summed up with three initials

:(

Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

this is apparently the thread where we take sides about the first Alien sequel. I am firmly for it.

kenan, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

Ebert is great on it, actually... he gave it 3 1/2 stars and says it left him feeling wrung out and stressed and kind of upset. That's a sterling recommendation!

kenan, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, but most game genre names are now reduced to shorthand, same as everything else in modern culture. FPS/RPG/MMORPG/RTS/sim/etc.

What would you do in a Lucasarts-type adventure game, or an Aliens cart racer?

xp

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

anyone remember the first alien game? great tension and the most incredible feature of having the characters sometimes not respond to your commands - due them being in a biff wiv u

Ste, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

kingfish my point is that Alien was a new kind of movie - the game should be a new kind of game

Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jg27paw4/yr13/yr13_49c.gif

Ste, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

looks like nethack

Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

Never actually played the first AvP. Did play the Aliens game put out by Activision on the Apple ][.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_%28video_game%29

Holy shit, there was an Alien game for the 2600

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a5/Alien_1982_atari_2600.gif

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

But how was Alien a new kind of movie, tho? Just due to the nature of the Giger alien and the societal fears that each film could play off of? The first two films were a synthesis of a lot of different bits floating around; with the first one, you had the 70s blue-collar "truckers in space" thing, along with the "shit technology that looks lived-in and actually used" look that Ridley Scott admits that he borrowed from Star Wars, along with a more graphic horror look that Carpenter and everybody else was working on.

The 2nd one had the Reagan-era send-in-the-marines vibe with bits from Starship Troopers and the 80s corporate shill in the form of Paul Reiser of all people. (and no cat).

Still, inventing a new kind of game for a licensed property is a pretty damn tall order. Aspects of the experience that the consumer of the original properties/brands/texts/films/etc enjoyed have to transfer over, or the new thing doesn't ring true, and the vibe ain't there. It's like that 2600 game, or the Final Fantasy movie. The nature of the original experience dictates certain aspects of any other media claiming to be its descendent.

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

The alien in Aliens = Qaddafi

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

trust me kingfish, the "vibe" is not gonna be there for me if i play an alien RPG (experience points, "new skills" yada yada - i don't like RPGs in general though). i'll admit that an FPS is very very close to some of the most breath-catching scenes in alien, but it's not the whole movie! both alien and aliens consist of set pieces, each of which has to be solved/blasted through on its own terms, which makes me think more of a sui generis game like metal gear solid, which asks the player to confront entirely new situations - and use new controls - with each stage.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:25 (eighteen years ago)

Well, probably not, but again, one of the fun aspects of each flick(like science fiction in any media can be) is that they reflect their times, and the various fears and hang-ups of different eras, from AIDS to cloning to whatever.

(i'm excepting the stupid AvP flick for this, even tho their a sequel coming out already)

xp

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

Dig it: Square even put out a game in 1987, with music from Nobuo Uematsu

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Alienssquare_screenshot_1.png

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)

is that a naked woman with an electric guitar? Fucking sweet.

kenan, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)

stop it

ghost rider, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)

Dig it: Square even put out a game in 1987, with music from Nobuo Uematsu

!!!

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

what the fuck is "kind've"

max, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

there used to be this fps online ALIENS game where you were either a marine or an alien and played like 500 people online at the same time. it cost like 7.95 a month and totally kicked ass. i got totally stoned and played that many a night.

chaki, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)

game over, man, game over

hstencil, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)

Alien 3 i sthe best film Fincher will ever direct and I suspect, if ever we see the 40 or so minutes cut, the best of the lot.
-- i, grey, Friday, April 13, 2007 7:31 AM (3 months ago) Bookmark Link

A++ contrarianism, would be shocked to the core again

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)

still prefer Resurrection over Aliens

milo z, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)

chaki, are you thinking of Aliens Online?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/80/Aliens_Online.jpg

kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)

yah that was it. i played the fuck out of that game. can't believe that was almost 10 yrs ago :( :( :(

chaki, Monday, 16 July 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

so what was the latest AVP multiplayer game like? Any good?

Ste, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 08:48 (eighteen years ago)

what the fuck is "kind've"

something Alex shouldn't of written.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

Watched this again yesterday for what has to be the fifth or sixth time in my life. I don't know if Alex In NYC is right or if I've just seen it too many times - it was good, but no longer great somehow. I was noticing all the sequences that go on a little long rather than just grooving on them, and oddly I wanted to see more of the aliens. Definitely too many false climaxes. But still, it holds my attention, and the sheer number of images it's burned into my brain really do make a case for classic status. A few things I'd like to call out for special praise:

* Hicks poking his head up into the ceiling, pointing his flashlight around, somehow not noticing the horde of aliens until the camera flips around and we see them just SWARMING forward, fabulous

* all of Hudson's other lines (especially his response to Ripley's pep talk about how Newt has survived all this time by herself with no weapons and no training: "Why don't you put her in charge?!")

* Bishop wedging his way down a pipe, with that great wide-angle shot of just his face

* ALL the beeping tracking devices, from the "see who's dead now" console in the tank to the "six meters...five meters!" radar to the "how close are we to Newt" gizmo - simple, dumb, brilliant way of amping up suspense. It must suck to work in the future where every utilitarian thing is sound-designed to make you more stressed out

* the emphasis on the acid-for-blood problem. I dunno, I just like the way they make it so that constantly, even blowing up an alien can mean killing off your own guys. Nice.

* "You always were an asshole, Gorman."

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 17 November 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/5714/aliensfm4.jpg

kingfish, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:03 (eighteen years ago)

no, i do not know these people

latebloomer, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:13 (eighteen years ago)

LIES

kingfish, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:17 (eighteen years ago)

Those homemade Smart Guns are *magnificent*!

Bill A, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:49 (eighteen years ago)

they are pretty impressively craf---HEY WAIT A MINUTE!

latebloomer, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)

How exactly did I come up with "kind've"? 2004 -- dark times.

Alex in NYC, Monday, 19 November 2007 13:00 (eighteen years ago)

oooh look sega

DG, Monday, 19 November 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)

It must suck to work in the future where every utilitarian thing is sound-designed to make you more stressed out

hee

Tracer Hand, Monday, 19 November 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)

seven months pass...

This looks very interesting: Rejected Alien 3 script by William Gibson. I haven't read it yet.

chap, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:06 (seventeen years ago)

that does look interesting. 'might have gone this way' scripts are fascinating. have just started on the rejected indiana jones 4 frank darabont number.

nari, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)

classic Challops in NYC thread

some dude, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

i've just been reading some of the v early star wars drafts, they are lol-tastic.

RANGER: The Bogan force is too strong upon us. Our spirit is broken.
...
DEAK:
You're feeling the Bogan's despair. Be strong, Tyree, drive it from your thoughts.
...
TROOPS: The Bogan! The Bogan!
...
VADER: You will come to know such suffering as only the Master of the Bogan Force can provide.

ledge, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:34 (seventeen years ago)

It's still mostly the best of the series. Mostly.

Terrible Cold, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)

where's the indy script at?

Jordan, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)

i wld never in a million years dress up like any character of the cast of any of my favourite movies or any movie in fact and then pose for a picture with other people dressed up like the other characters

for the record

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)

^^secret stormtrooper

omar little, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

except maybe this guy
but only if it was the end of the world and no one else was dressed up like other characters
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1356/548998656_6c09eea55f.jpg

XPOST!!

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

xxp found indy here

http://dl.free.fr/getfile.pl?file=/Bxkz0sDW/Indiana_Jones_and_the_City_of_the_Gods.pdf

nari, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)

thought bogan was some kind of Australian insult

nari, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, it's the aussie equivalent of chav/redneck.

chap, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:47 (seventeen years ago)

Joss Whedon's Alien: Resurrection script.

DavidM, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, it's the aussie equivalent of chav/redneck.

-- chap, Wednesday, July 9, 2008 1:47 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

is this meant to imply chav = redneck

and what, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:02 (seventeen years ago)

i read that script before the movie came out. there was this junk sale/knick knack convention at the mall and this dude was selling bootlegged scripts. i liked the script ok. certainly better than the final product.

latebloomer, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

x-post

latebloomer, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:04 (seventeen years ago)

It must suck to work in the future where every utilitarian thing is sound-designed to make you more stressed out

still kills me

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)

lololol

s1ocki, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:43 (seventeen years ago)

In Space Everyone Can Hear Those Eerie Steam Pipes

omar little, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)

all of the unused alien3 scripts are rubbish :(

DG, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)

is "kind've" an accepted contraction?

n/a, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)

"game over, man! scary-sounding game over!"

and what, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)

that rig sure did have a load of those steam pipes.

carne asada, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)

lots o'scripts: http://home.online.no/~bhundlan/scripts/alien3/

DG, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 92,600 for "kind've". (0.22 seconds)

From what I can see, a lot of people use it, but completely incorrectly. Logic dictates that it's a contraction of "kind have":

"Want some gum?"
"What kind've you got?"

Everyone appears to be using it in place of "kind of," which makes no sense at all:

Kind’ve like candy…
Kind've frustrated.
It's kind've ironic that the image posted for this article
What kind've rims are these?

People be stupid.

Pancakes Hackman, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)

language be flexible

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)

i'm all about the fluidity of language, but "kind've" doesn't save you any syllables when spoken or any keystrokes when typed, which is typically the purpose of a contraction, plus it just looks weird and wrong

n/a, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)

i wld take out the apostrophe

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)

This is why god gave us kinda.

milo z, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)

i'm all about the fluidity of language, but "kind've" doesn't save you any syllables when spoken or any keystrokes when typed, which is typically the purpose of a contraction, plus it just looks weird and wrong

It doesn't save you any syllables but it sure is nice not having to reach back for that voiceless glottal fricative between two frontally-articulated consonants. Whether it should be reflected in spelling as a contraction, I don't know. The fact that it sounds so much like "would've" and "could've" is probably a big factor in making people wanna do this.

f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)

Between two frontally-articulated voiced consonants even.

f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)

I love Aliens!

f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:04 (seventeen years ago)

five months pass...

You can all kind've blow me.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:09 (seventeen years ago)

"kind have"?

marlon brando baby tiger (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:11 (seventeen years ago)

Read the thread.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:12 (seventeen years ago)

no.

marlon brando baby tiger (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:12 (seventeen years ago)

YESSSS

El Tomboto, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:58 (seventeen years ago)

sigh

8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:59 (seventeen years ago)

alex in nyc getting upset about corny one liners is pretty o_O

bnw, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:05 (seventeen years ago)

I'd say it's kind've o_O, kind've OTM.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:07 (seventeen years ago)

lmao this fucken thread

i. superb trolling by alex in nyc, a+++
ii. slocki's finest moment????

㋡ (cankles), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:22 (seventeen years ago)

ok so i watched this again (thank you alex for reminding me of this terrific movie!) and when it was over i am slightly embarrassed to say that i exclaimed loudly to no one in particular, "rockin' good times!"

― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, August 21, 2004 4:02 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

㋡ (cankles), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:23 (seventeen years ago)

LOL

s1ocki, Saturday, 3 January 2009 00:19 (seventeen years ago)

Newt ruins this movie just like Short Round ruined The Temple of Doom.

thirdalternative, Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:48 (seventeen years ago)

Kinda vs. Kind've = the "o" sounds vs the "f" sound in the word "of", no? Would prob explain the confusion about usage anyway.

ryan, Saturday, 3 January 2009 23:21 (seventeen years ago)

five months pass...

Watching it again right now. Not as bad as I remembered.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:15 (sixteen years ago)

Next up -- "Destiny's Child: hey, not bad!"

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:17 (sixteen years ago)

Watching movie on TNT vs. on Bluray/DVD

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:23 (sixteen years ago)

Ha. Seriously, when I composed this thread, it was 4am. I was doing the Friday night overnight shift at the TIME Magazine news desk (where I worked for over a decade). I was invariably tired, hungry and - thus -- wholly cranky and contrarian. That might explain a LOT of my posts between 2001 and the latter end of 2005, actually.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)

TNT's okay as long as the animated graphic ads in the lower third are kept to a minimum.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)

I did raise some decent -- or at least entertaining -- points here, though.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:29 (sixteen years ago)

I bet a lot of fucked up parents brought their kids to both films. Don't be that parent, Alex!
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, August 20, 2004 6:48 AM (4 years ago)

Hah, my mother took me to see "Alien" in the movie theater when I was 8 years old. My first R movie. Loved it then, and still do. Sure, it was scary, but I knew it was make-believe. Being scared by choice when you can't really get hurt = fun.

thirdalternative, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:37 (sixteen years ago)

my dad took me to alien 3 when i was 9, and nothing came of it.

latebloomer, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:41 (sixteen years ago)

...or did it

latebloomer, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:41 (sixteen years ago)

Airlock scene at the climax is still a towering stack of crap, though.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:57 (sixteen years ago)

four months pass...

My new favorite part of this movie is when Burke is like "Hold on hold on, you're talking about nuking a very expensive installation here!" and Ripley goes "They can BILL me!" Somehow sums up the attitude of the whole thing perfectly. Much prefer pissed-off, working-class human Ripley to creepy, detached pseudo-alien Ripley of the latter two films.

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 14 November 2009 07:39 (sixteen years ago)

What about the officious, middle-class Ripley of the first film?

DavidM, Saturday, 14 November 2009 09:49 (sixteen years ago)

Like.

These are all on sale at my local used book/DVD place. Despite them all being run on TV continually, I'm tempted to shell out and watch them again properly without commercial breaks/"formatted for your TV screen"/etc. etc.

fields of salmon, Saturday, 14 November 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

"I'm tempted to shell out and watch them again properly without commercial breaks/"formatted for your TV screen"

I've been enjoying re-watching all of my favorite films widescreen with a projector. It's insane when you think that you've only seen 2/3 of most of your favorite movies.

Nate Carson, Sunday, 15 November 2009 10:57 (sixteen years ago)

If you can find the Alien Quadrilogy box set cheap it's worth investing, it has lots of goodness including alternative
cuts of the movies, including the original cut of Alien3.

MaresNest, Sunday, 15 November 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)

I quite like Alien 3, does anyone else?

I am flesh and blood. You are software and circuitry. (chap), Sunday, 15 November 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)

It's flawed but I like it a lot!

fel (latebloomer), Sunday, 15 November 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)

god the premise of this thread is rongness at its rongest

Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

One of the rejected scripts for Alien 3 sounds very cool:

The story by Vincent Ward[8] and the screenplay with co-writer John Fasano had Ripley's escape pod crash landing on a monastery-like satellite, which had parts of its interior, both wooden and archaic in design. The Alien³ special features disc set, Alien Quadrilogy[9] explains how Ward came about creating the story for this partially wooden satellite also as a place of refuge for Luddite-like monks. The story begins with a monk who sees a "star in the East” (Ripley's escape pod)[10] and at first believes this to be a good sign. Upon arrival of Ripley, and with increasing suggestions of the Alien presence, the monk inhabitants believe it to be some sort of religious trial for their misdemeanors, punishable by the creature that haunts them. By having a woman in their monastery, they wonder if their trial is partially caused by sexual temptation, as Ripley is the only woman to be amongst an all male community in ten years. To avoid this and (hopefully) the much grimmer reality of what she has brought with her, the Monks of the "wooden satellite" lock Ripley into a dungeon-like sewer and ignore her advice on the true nature of the beast.[11] The monks believe that the Alien is in fact the Devil[12]. Primarily though, this story was about Ripley's own soul searching complicated by the seeding of the Alien within her and further hampered her largely solo attempts to defeat it. The Alien Quadrilogy DVD set features scenes and illustrations that show this ‘Wooden Planet’. Aspects of the monastery and monks of these drafts were later utilised in the final production of the film by having the male inmates participating in an apocalyptic religion that forbid sexual relations. Primarily it was the plot of Alien 3 that was borrowed from this story but little of this world remained in the film. Despite his credit [13], Ward noted that the things he liked best about the story and those that he believed would have made it work were not used. The screenplay featured scenes set in different locations on the one-mile wide wooden planetoid, ranging from wheat fields, through a grisly but darkly comic scene in the monks’ communal toilets, to furnaces and a glass works (also used in the finished film). Empire Magazine described Ward’s ‘Wooden Planet’ concept as ‘undeniably attractive – it would have been visually arresting and at the very least, could have made for some astonishing action sequences. In the same article, Norman Reynolds - Production Designer originally hired by Ward, remembers an early design idea for “a wooden library shaft. You looked at the books on this wooden platform that went up and down”. ‘Imagine the kind of vertical jeopardy sequence that could have been staged here – the Alien clambering up these impossibly high bookshelves as desperate monks work the platform’[14]. Sigourney Weaver described Ward’s overall concept as “very original and arresting.”[15]

I am flesh and blood. You are software and circuitry. (chap), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

Search out the Lebbeus Woods sketches for the monk habitations.

mh, Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

It's flawed but I like it a lot!

― fel (latebloomer), Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:05 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ditto!

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

The wooden planet idea was ludicrous and was never going to work.

DavidM, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

http://talentedapps.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/kijinnmaru-inconceivable.jpg

Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

i don't know why i love this so much:

cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 08:46 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah what a boring scene
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 08:48 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Doctor Casino, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

wooden planet could have been cool though - certainly something more distinctive than the flames-and-steam-factory planet we actually got.

Doctor Casino, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

yer man ebert's review gets mentioned a bunch upthread from years back. he's talking about here = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMtv1WfgJFA

piscesx, Sunday, 15 November 2009 23:19 (sixteen years ago)

slocki is such a fuckin' hero in this thread

fel (latebloomer), Monday, 16 November 2009 00:22 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/arvo/Legodreams/Alien/alien_01.jpg

kingfish, Monday, 16 November 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)

slocki is such a fuckin' hero in this every ILX film thread

cough syrup in coke cans (Eric H.), Monday, 16 November 2009 02:19 (sixteen years ago)

i wonder if they had a wooden spacecraft, that 'wooden' go !

Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Monday, 16 November 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)

alien3 improves as it ages and slopes out from under the towering shadow of Aliens, imho.

Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Monday, 16 November 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)

lol @ the alien resurrection defenders itt

omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

Alien Resurrection suffers from being not quite distinctive and necessary enough to justify being made, but not nearly faceless and boring enough to be the kind of dull, bean-counting franchise junk that AvP was. Basically all credit to Jeunet and the cast - the story is just not there and neither are the scares.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 16 November 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

AvP2 totally redeems the franchise, tho.

mh, Monday, 16 November 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

resurrection was admittedly on to an interesting idea but it got buried in actual boring action movie cliches and some of the worst dialogue i've ever heard.

omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

not to mention the turd

http://photos.bravenet.com/272/478/925/3/5CBF206132.jpg

George Mucus (ledge), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

Can't remember the Geiger quote but he says something like "they made [the alien] shit, literally into a piece of shit", lol

George Mucus (ledge), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

lol @

Alien 3 i sthe best film Fincher will ever direct and I suspect, if ever we see the 40 or so minutes cut, the best of the lot.
-- i, grey, Friday, April 13, 2007 7:31 AM (3 months ago) Bookmark Link

A++ contrarianism, would be shocked to the core again

― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, July 16, 2007 3:16 PM

luol deng (am0n), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

(Just for the record, though, I would never turn off Alien Resurrection if I came across it on TV. The over-the-top acting and saturated colors and the underwater scene collectively kind of make it work for me.)

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 17 November 2009 03:09 (sixteen years ago)

two months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcLTaMpRl2o

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 07:40 (sixteen years ago)

Surely it's some dude from Goldie Lookin Chain behind that? If not, he sounds exactly like him. Whatever, good stuff and it makes me want to watch Aliens right now, rather than be in work.

Bill A, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 08:33 (sixteen years ago)

Some nice lines in there.

krakow, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 10:54 (sixteen years ago)

Gotta give them an A for effort on the kind of dorky project I would talk about but never actually do. I also like how thoroughly it covers all the minor twists and suspense-jacking moments, and then Alien 3 is done in like fifteen seconds.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

ten months pass...

Watched this again last night and it was as wonderful as ever. One of my top 5 movies of all time.

krakow, Sunday, 26 December 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

five months pass...

Bay twelve - please!

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 8 June 2011 03:19 (fourteen years ago)

lol @ the thread premise

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 03:22 (fourteen years ago)

that kenan-alex debate is one for the ages

(kenan otm btw)

my downeaster ilxor (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 11:20 (fourteen years ago)

nine months pass...

Roffle.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 16:29 (fourteen years ago)

There's something endearing about that level of SF nerdiness in a director, that he's constructed such a detailed backstory for everything under the sun.

You can't go from Aliens to thinking about buying some packaged cookies, than back to Aliens.

kenan otm seven years ago. in a ghost story control over mood and pace is U&K.

Aimless, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:27 (fourteen years ago)

one month passes...

I just watched Alien again last night. As fantastic as the sequel is I just don't see how you can improve on Yaphet Kotto and Harry Dean Stanton futzing around with the ship like a couple of shade-tree mechanics trying to bash an old Ford into shape.

Also pretty much everything that happens in Aliens is just a slight re-do of what happened in Alien. Newt = the cat; "you bitch" = "you bitch"; etc

Speaking of Jonesy, that cat is a DAMN GOOD ACTOR.

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:38 (fourteen years ago)

the cat from alien vs. the dog from the thing

Hungry4Ass, Friday, 25 May 2012 15:41 (fourteen years ago)

The cat makes an appearance in the 8-bit video game of Alien too, you have to bag it before you escape.

PSOD (Ste), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:52 (fourteen years ago)

you have to WHAT

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:54 (fourteen years ago)

oh

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:54 (fourteen years ago)

i feel like aliens is very different in story and tone from alien.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

ya i mean it's almost a cliche that they're two totally different kinds of movies

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

Totally - I mean the great thing is watching four "name" directors take the same generic material and run it through four different mills. Of course they all have Sigourney Weaver, an alien, and things that have to be rescued, but that's like saying "all these covers of 'Hey Jude' include the word 'na' somewhere."

Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 May 2012 16:04 (fourteen years ago)

The across-the-board quality of the actors involved in the first one is just o_O

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:07 (fourteen years ago)

"i can't lie to you about your chances...but...you have my sympathies."

me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)

ice cold.

me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)

The scene that made me realize that was just after Dallas dies and they're arguing about what to do. Weaver's struggling to assert her authority and Yaphet Kotto is over in the corner, in the background, just out of focus, not. giving. her. an. inch. It's two people struggling with each other, reacting instinctively to each other, undercutting each other, using every ounce of power in the words they have to try to impose their will on the situation. The quality of the acting in that half minute or so is on par with anything you'd see on any stage anywhere.

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)

^ The best and most believable part of Alien (come to think of it, Carpenter's The Thing also does this well) is how tense and irritable everyone one is toward each other. Feels like a real workplace.

bark ruffalo (latebloomer), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:18 (fourteen years ago)

btw dudes the entire making-of doc from one of the special editions is in its entirety on youtube and worth a watch if you have a free afternoon

http://www.youtube.com/user/alien1979themaking

the entire aliens making-of doc is too but watching too much james cameron as talking head bums me out

me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:19 (fourteen years ago)

Tracer and latebloomer OTM about the acting. Was it on ILX or somewhere else that someone made the case for the cast based on their age as well? Like, first of all it just feels realer in the sense of looking like a workplace where these people really do this for a living and have been doing it for ages. And it also means that they're more experienced actors with better chops and all that stuff.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 May 2012 16:24 (fourteen years ago)

yeah the casting and age of the actors and the "workplace realism" of alien seems to be the remnants of 70s genre filmmaking in alien. a few years later it probably would have been full of beautiful quippy young people on loan from john hughes movies.

me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:25 (fourteen years ago)

ya if they made it today they'd all be 22

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:26 (fourteen years ago)

haven't seen prometheus, but the alien series as a whole hasn't cast a lot of beautiful quippy young people (maybe winona?)

Philip Nunez, Friday, 25 May 2012 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

"Will you LISTEN TO ME, PARKER? SHUT UP!"

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:32 (fourteen years ago)

^^^^

"As long as that means killing it."
"OBVIOUSLY it means killing it."

Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:40 (fourteen years ago)

latebloomer so otm - that's the thing that grabbed me so much about Alien from the first time I saw it. The future is dirty and greasy and broken-down, and the people working on the ship are all irritable mechanics beaten down by the man. It's like belowdecks on a battle cruiser after years at sea. It feels like a real place, in a real time. And for a change, it's not a nice place.

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:45 (fourteen years ago)

That milieu against the whole rapey sex/reproduction angle makes me wonder why I didn't actually give it a few points on the horror poll. Not that it needed any.

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:47 (fourteen years ago)

i thought harry dean stanton's hawaiian shirts were pretty festive. the future can't be that bad -- they have hawaiian shirts! presumably hawaii still exists!

Philip Nunez, Friday, 25 May 2012 18:01 (fourteen years ago)

Ridley Scott mentioned once that seeing the scuffed-up production design of a lot of Star Wars gave him the internal go-ahead to commit to the vibe of "space truckers". Where you didn't have military or sciencey types in clean, sleek starships, you had working stiffs shuffling about in long-haul freighters

Blue-collar / working-class Sci-fi flicks: List them here

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:04 (fourteen years ago)

oh here's a neat bit, focusing on the costume design:

http://hellotailor.blogspot.com/2012/03/movie-costumes-i-have-loved-alien-part.html

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DvzIdKKMHwk/T1Kl3FkB0UI/AAAAAAAABIA/ow5wuyVdgjI/s1600/alienbrett.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XXlLOIYx5S0/T1Jpu0Y5rNI/AAAAAAAABGo/056ski5rXJ0/s1600/aliencrew.jpg

I like how there are now multiple places online where you can get Nostomo or Weyland-Yutani crew patches. I kind of want a W-Y logo decal to put on my hardhat, see if anybody notices it amongst the other ones.

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:12 (fourteen years ago)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-baKobTewysY/T1J3seBPZnI/AAAAAAAABG4/npr5yvsH0aM/s1600/alienlambert.jpg

boots!

Also, between this and the 70s Body Snatchers, Veronica Cartwright could play the terrified screaming blonde with the best of them.

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:13 (fourteen years ago)

all youse guys otm about the performance quality in & workplace realism of alien, something that's largely absent in aliens, replaced by enjoyable but rather cartoonish miltary action characterizations. from the blade runner vs. alien thread, some three years back:

the corporate stuff in alien is great!! i'd never seen the future look so... privatized

― s1ocki, Tuesday, December 30, 2008 7:36 PM (3 years ago)

Slocki OTM. Or so working-class. Alien nails this feeling of lived (and labored) in-ness like no other science fiction movie I've ever seen. You get a sense that you're not seeing the totality of the characters' lives, but just this one, small corner. In part it's the quality of the actors, in part it's the Altman-like approach to dialogue: fragmented, naturalistic, delivered with no regard to cameras or microphones. Especially true during the build-up to the chest-burster gag (perhaps, less so elsewhere in the film). Anyway, it fascinated me as a kid, and it still seems unique and compelling.

― served by boot-face (contenderizer), Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:31 PM (3 years ago)

next on "discussion generator," contenderizer vs slocki in who can have the last word about how they appreciated the art design, altman-esque dialogue, and which sfx are a bit wack in ridley scott's 1979 space-horra opus Alien

― El Tomboto, Friday, January 2, 2009 12:39 PM (3 years ago)

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)

So many cargo pants. The movie took place in an Old Navy c. 1998.

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:22 (fourteen years ago)

It's a film out of time; the pants and the high-tops vie for true temporal localization.

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:31 (fourteen years ago)

Growing up in the 80s, it was always weird to go back and see Tom Skerritt's various pre-moustache experiments in facial hair throughout the years.

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:32 (fourteen years ago)

The first time I saw MASH and saw Skerritt w/o facial hair I was like WHAAAAAAAA?

Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:41 (fourteen years ago)

It's funny, even in MASH Skerritt never seemed like a "young" dude -- he was always a dude who'd SEEN stuff, ornery and kinda out there. Love him

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:44 (fourteen years ago)

He was 37 by then.

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:46 (fourteen years ago)

I think he was 21 when he was born

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:50 (fourteen years ago)

We need a poll of his changing style

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:54 (fourteen years ago)

He is Benjamin Button IIRC

Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:54 (fourteen years ago)

He's so fkn funny in Steel Magnolias (I know this not the thread for that)

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:57 (fourteen years ago)

So many cargo pants in Steel Magnolias.

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:00 (fourteen years ago)

coulda done with a few more chestbursters imo

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:02 (fourteen years ago)

I think that one had at least two too many.

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)

are we talking about Dolly Parton y/n

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)

Olympia Dukakis

Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:04 (fourteen years ago)

ok i've started the special edition of aliens (life intervened) and am struck by details that seem lifted right out of "gateway" by frederik pohl.. the family doing "exploring" and getting excited that they've struck it rich by discovering an unknown alien artifact; our hero getting a flunkie job at the spaceport in the cargo bay; the "company" which controls everything; kids running around

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:13 (fourteen years ago)

it's all scene-setting for the militarized reboot of the main action obv but still

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:14 (fourteen years ago)

Hm that is a v interesting point of influence, and one that might enhance my liking for Aliens...

but he go's to a resturang and then die in a toilet (Jon Lewis), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:47 (fourteen years ago)

ok i've started the special edition of aliens (life intervened) and am struck by details that seem lifted right out of "gateway" by frederik pohl.. the family doing "exploring" and getting excited that they've struck it rich by discovering an unknown alien artifact; our hero getting a flunkie job at the spaceport in the cargo bay; the "company" which controls everything; kids running around

― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, May 25, 2012 3:13 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

super true... which reminds me to reread those books, i really like the just scraping by vibe of them, felt new for scifi

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 20:24 (fourteen years ago)

added to (very long) reading list, thanks!

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:18 (fourteen years ago)

its pure scifi so if thats not your thing it might not be yhour thing.

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:41 (fourteen years ago)

i can dig it

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)

in case you were wondering i mean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-OYKd8SVrI

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6oSCng12xQ

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:45 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXxs4vE4-oA

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:48 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyX_xwh2yPY

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:48 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMJwtMvesWA

Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 May 2012 22:35 (fourteen years ago)

working class scifi is kind of a boring norm by now i think

the late great, Friday, 25 May 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)

not if you're watching ALIEN

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:06 (fourteen years ago)

I strongly disagree; 30+ years later and it still ain't.

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

no-one's done it better. Battlestar came close but Alien still does the best job of making every aspect of the 'working-class-ness" of the ship tangible and real.

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:13 (fourteen years ago)

what else counts

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:32 (fourteen years ago)

i'm not saying "working class scifi" from the 70s/80s isn't great, but at this point "lived in" "gritty" sci-fi environments are sorta ... yawn

for example give me the shiny banal apple store dystopia of minority report or gattaca over the burning trashcans and smudged faces of children of men anyday

the late great, Friday, 25 May 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)

sure, but i think it's a mistake to equate burning trashcans and smudged faces with working class sci-fi. star wars, for instance, inspired alien and clearly presents an clunky, industrial, lived-in future - but i'd hardly call its overall sensibility, story and setting "working class". of the major characters, luke is the only one who clearly comes from a working-class background (probably han too, but it's hard to say) and we see only a little of that before he's whisked off across the galaxy to battle dark lords and rescue princesses. other than the disposable stormtroopers, we rarely see anybody actually working for a living in the original trilogy.

repo men is pretty working-class (and distinctly class-conscious), but it's also a train wreck.

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:21 (fourteen years ago)

I would say Dark Star is good working class sci-fi. Plus it's great.

EZ Snappin, Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)

I should specify that I'm talking about space opera, or thereabouts, I guess. The deliberate juxtaposition of the highest and most optimistic dreams of post-war spaceflight contrasted with the far more-realistic earthbound workaday concerns of actual people doing actual unglamorous schlub work in those environments of hardshelled tubs floating about in low-grav.

In film, this never would have been possible to portray were it not for the changes in the Hollywood studio system of the late 60s/early 70s.

This kinda stuff has been in fiction since before the war, but I don't think it ever elevated to multimillion dollar 35mm until like 35-40 years ago. Flicks like 2001 made spaceflight far more realistic, stuff like Silent Running and Dark Star brought it to the enlisted level, if you will.

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:32 (fourteen years ago)

yeah and red dwarf and mst3k too but now that everything in sci fi is super gritty and unglamorous i wouldn't mind seeing a new look

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:48 (fourteen years ago)

i would rather see john carter on mars than another gritty 00s sci fi movie

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:49 (fourteen years ago)

i would rather see a thoughtful depiction of actual working lives in a visionary far-future context than either "grit" or idealized fantasy

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:05 (fourteen years ago)

like "wall-e"

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:11 (fourteen years ago)

lol, yeah, sure

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:19 (fourteen years ago)

Pluto Nash

bark ruffalo (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:27 (fourteen years ago)

"moon"

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:29 (fourteen years ago)

weird to use minority report as an example of a shiny future as one thing that movie really got right was interleaving the futuristic buildings/tech with older houses, neighbourhoods etc, it def felt way more lived in than most scifi these days

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:44 (fourteen years ago)

"Moon" was dead-on; we are shown the day-to-day dreariness of a workaday stiff doing wage drudgery.

I separate this from, say, Sunshine, which was a scientific crew

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Saturday, 26 May 2012 02:41 (fourteen years ago)

there were tonal problems with the future in minority report -- the whole thing would have been much better as a backdrop to back to the future 2 where the incessant product placement and concept car futurism would have worked for rather than against the movie.

Philip Nunez, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:18 (fourteen years ago)

serenity is working class sci fi but i did not like that film at all; haven't seen the TV series.

moon is awesome and a perfect example of this.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:18 (fourteen years ago)

serenity is dire

moon was tedious and predictable, occasionally beautiful

district 9 showed the weariness of a workaday stiff

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:28 (fourteen years ago)

war of the worlds had a deadbeat dad

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:29 (fourteen years ago)

the road dude was just a doctor

the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:29 (fourteen years ago)

late great you can show yerself to the door at any time

Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Saturday, 26 May 2012 05:47 (fourteen years ago)

Huh, when did Tombot leave, I didn't know he was still around in 2009.

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 26 May 2012 10:10 (fourteen years ago)

tombot is still around now isn't he?

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 26 May 2012 12:02 (fourteen years ago)

Well, holy fuck.

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 26 May 2012 12:16 (fourteen years ago)

moon wasnt that great imho

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 26 May 2012 16:03 (fourteen years ago)

one month passes...

On film 4 right now. I guess it's the director's cut, there's stuff I've never seen before - Newt's family discovering the derelict!

ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:26 (thirteen years ago)

Might switch over to hot tub time machine in half an hour though.

ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:29 (thirteen years ago)

Gorman sticking a cigar in his mouth the moment he wakes up might be the best shot in this.

ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:39 (thirteen years ago)

I mean Apone. Sorry Apone.

ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:51 (thirteen years ago)

three months pass...

http://i.imgur.com/0Mh6G.jpg

Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Monday, 29 October 2012 01:15 (thirteen years ago)

:D

let's keep this board about feet, please. (latebloomer), Monday, 29 October 2012 02:01 (thirteen years ago)

wow.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 29 October 2012 02:19 (thirteen years ago)

kind of suverts the film's politics of motherhood though, don't it?

return of the repressed IIRC.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 29 October 2012 02:20 (thirteen years ago)

three months pass...

one of the great things about this film is the palpable sense of actual dread at the fate that will befall the characters if they don't escape, and how cameron keeps you with them 100% of the time. barely any wide cutaways or swooping cameras, just claustrophobic terror. even in most horror films the actual fate of everyone isn't something to get worked up over in a queasy manner but even after characters get shuffled offscreen in this one we're still given reminders of the unfathomable tortures they're going through and you're like 'you guys holy shit get the hell out of there you guys'

christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:54 (thirteen years ago)

i feel like that is a pretty rare tone to set for a film, even horror flicks. 'no country for old men' and 'silence of the lambs' had some of the same unsettling grim atmosphere but esp in the case of the latter it never feels so helpless. love the lack of a slow turnaround, the marines go from cocky kill mode to shitting themselves for the rest of the film in two minutes flat.

christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:57 (thirteen years ago)

^^^ i dig all this - maybe accounts for why I've had more bad dreams about this movie than any other probably - the dread is thick even when the pulse-pounding stuff is going on, which is sort of the exact head-space that nightmares hit.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:28 (thirteen years ago)

I dunno. The dread seemed more unpredictable and unsettling in the first one, which had the extra fun suggestions of ugh sexual violations.

Zero Dark 33⅓: The Final Insult (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:30 (thirteen years ago)

love the lack of a slow turnaround, the marines go from cocky kill mode to shitting themselves for the rest of the film in two minutes flat.

p sure i've said this somewhere else but i really like this movie's depiction of Total System Failure -- the way you're introduced to these very prepared and well-armed marines (in contrast to the hapless truckers of the first one) and then a single weakness, the deactivation of the weapons in the reactor room, like a hairline crack, spiders outward so rapidly and totally shatters the upper hand they've got. this is also (some of) why i like jurassic park and the decent parts of 28 weeks later.

the dread might be less predictable in the first one but its predictability in this one is part of what makes it so dreadful. the nightmare just goes on and on and on and they're in constant terrifying danger for like two straight hours. like the tagline says, it's a war movie where the first one was a horror movie.

a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:40 (thirteen years ago)

Jurassic Park is an interesting example - pretty sure it was the explicit theme of the book, as in Crichton had just discovered chaos stuff and was really interested in the idea of the minor thing that snowballs in lightning speed to become the total catastrophe. Thus the "you can't play God!" stuff was more "it's just not conceivable to control nature because there are too many variables you will overlook and SOMETHING will go off the rails." Neither the book nor the movie is half as bleak as Aliens though, in the sense of "Jesus, these people are just fucked."

Love the sense the movie gives of temperature/humidity too. The whole "it's a dry heat!" gag - you're aware of the setting throughout as being close, bad air, just muggy and sweaty and icky which also feels very much like a nightmare....

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:47 (thirteen years ago)

Aliens: Colonial Marines, which is designed to be a direct sequel for this, gets released next week.

It's done by the Borderlands guys.

The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:39 (thirteen years ago)

xp yeah, it's the crichton half of the movie. leavened (+ improved) by the spielberg half, which is all "they do move in herds" and sam neill splayed in joy across a triceratops and laura dern not noticing the brontosaurus because the ferns are mindblowing enough. that's the half that weighs more, the awe-of-discovery half; it's like one of the james mason jules verne movies. the tone even when the raptors are barking is basically joy. aliens meanwhile is like the pacific theatre. good date movie though; you hold on to each other the whole time.

a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:41 (thirteen years ago)

Spielburg does give the movie some scare though - the big T-Rex scene and the raptors-in-the-kitchen bit have more to do with Jaws than they do with Crichton I think. Or there's some overlap there. But yeah - Aliens is a meat-grinder. My new lady acquaintance hasn't seen any of the series and is interested in trying them out; I'm sure she'd be into it but I'm not sure I'm quite ready to go through them again. Something exhausting about the prospect, much as I do love the series. Maybe it's all the fault of Prometheus...

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:53 (thirteen years ago)

er...Spielberg. Clearly I was thinking of Quest For Glory.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:53 (thirteen years ago)

oh yeah the raptors are def jaws descendants -- even the way everybody talks about them for two hours but you don't see them. but even that strain of the movie gets resolved by the t-rex taking them out while we cheer and a huge WHEN DINOSAURS RULED THE EARTH banner flutters down from the rafters.

aliens is one of the most exhausting movies ever made i think. i like the ebert review, which is 3.5 stars out of 4 ("because it does the job it says it will do") but not exactly a rave:

I have never seen a movie that maintains such a pitch of intensity for so long; it's like being on some kind of hair-raising carnival ride that never stops.

I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment.

a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:03 (thirteen years ago)

so yeah, absolutely something exhausting about the prospect.

a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:05 (thirteen years ago)

If you think the film is full of dread, you should have tried the Amstrad CPC 464 computer game version

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 13:14 (thirteen years ago)

haha that is a great review

乒乓, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 13:15 (thirteen years ago)

I have never seen a movie that maintains such a pitch of intensity for so long; it's like being on some kind of hair-raising carnival ride that never stops.

I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment.

this passage from the Ebert review almost perfectly describes my feelings about the two Dark Knight films. I don't think Aliens achieves that same queasy intensity, but then, I didn't see it in theaters at the original release; dated effects+home viewing bring goofiness to the forefront while softening some of the dread.

fiscal cliff racer (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:00 (thirteen years ago)

Well, first of all, "Aliens" has some prolonged quiet moments where they're just waiting around. To die, maybe, which is more dread, but at least they give you a break. But second, the action at the end of "Aliens" is a huge release. Even the fight scenes in Batman are full of portent. "Aliens" may be the rare exception where wall to wall machine gun fire is satisfying in and of itself.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:07 (thirteen years ago)

ya that's true--my thinking w/r/t the parallax in Ebert's review is that maybe "wall to wall machine gun fire" reads as more 'dreadful' and less 'satisfying' in 1986 than it does in 20xx.

fiscal cliff racer (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:25 (thirteen years ago)

Isn't the auto machine guns only in the Directors cut? If you mean the firefights in the plant or towards the end, I remember them being deeply steeped in "Ofuckofuckofuck"

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

There's definitely a sense of release when they finally get to open up the guns against the aliens at the end, but they're so clearly outnumbered and doomed that the dread doesn't dissipate one bit. Plus: red light! Stressful noise! Burke is locking the door behind him! Etc.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:48 (thirteen years ago)

two years pass...

http://i.imgur.com/C7VqGiJ.gif

pplains, Sunday, 20 September 2015 20:26 (ten years ago)

omg

deejerk reactions (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 September 2015 20:40 (ten years ago)

hahahahaha

Gorefest Frump (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 September 2015 20:59 (ten years ago)

aces

Meta Forksclove-Liebeskind (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 20 September 2015 21:02 (ten years ago)

love it so much

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 21 September 2015 05:37 (ten years ago)

Amazing.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 21 September 2015 12:25 (ten years ago)

great

Drop soap, not bombs (Ste), Tuesday, 22 September 2015 13:02 (ten years ago)

Meh

Norse Jung (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 September 2015 13:18 (ten years ago)

some nice effects but kind of a crap gif

a silly gif of awkward larping (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 22 September 2015 18:50 (ten years ago)

Every time it reappears this thread title shits me

as verbose and purple as a Peter Ustinov made of plums (James Morrison), Wednesday, 23 September 2015 02:25 (ten years ago)

one month passes...

http://38.media.tumblr.com/17747f28c917e6668884864cae2b2e26/tumblr_nd26s6bzwn1toxnu4o1_400.gif

i made a scope for my laser musket out of some (forksclovetofu), Friday, 13 November 2015 06:54 (ten years ago)

Brilliant!

as verbose and purple as a Peter Ustinov made of plums (James Morrison), Friday, 13 November 2015 09:08 (ten years ago)

two months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4QY5Z8LBEo

ulysses, Monday, 25 January 2016 00:05 (ten years ago)

loooool

how's life, Monday, 25 January 2016 00:47 (ten years ago)

one year passes...

And then an alien pops out of the cake and

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 22:56 (nine years ago)

Awwwww, tho. :(

tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:21 (nine years ago)

cool that all three of those blokes were in Terminator as well

PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:48 (nine years ago)

Trying to gauge your level of surprise at that or not

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:48 (nine years ago)

Actors Lance Henriksen (Prince of the City), Michael Biehn (Tombstone), and Bill Paxton (Traveler) help schoolteacher Carrie Henn celebrate her birthday.

nomar, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:51 (nine years ago)

xp not surprised, more a general aww feeling

PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:56 (nine years ago)

Traveller. Ha!

pplains, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 01:06 (nine years ago)

Hadn't thought of that movie in years.

http://i.imgur.com/DTw8EMF.jpg

pplains, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 01:06 (nine years ago)

Pleased to discover Newt did not become a child star tragedy (Aliens is her only film credit), and is now a 4th grade teacher.

Sanpaku, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:34 (nine years ago)

She mostly teaches math. Mostly.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:58 (nine years ago)

:D

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 14:52 (nine years ago)

ok how cool would it be to see ALIENS in high school or whatever and then learning that Newt was your fourth-grade teacher? that is amazing.

also, from Wired:

“I wasn’t nervous about being on set, because I knew everybody, and they were very friendly,” Henn said during a recent stop at the WIRED Cafe during Comic-Con International, where the film is celebrating its 30th anniversary. “The aliens were all my friends, wearing suits. I was actually most nervous about going to the cafeteria for lunch, because I had to go in-character as Newt, and I thought everybody would be staring at me. I didn’t have any concept that everybody else was going to be dressed up, too. My tutor actually gave me a big pair of sunglasses to wear when I went in. But it turned out not to be such a big thing.”

Henn had gotten the part after a meeting with Weaver, who’d flown on the Concorde to London to test out their on-screen chemistry. “I was excited, because I was like, “She was in Ghostbusters! How cool is this?”, Henn remembered. (...) According to Henn, who still keeps in touch with Weaver, the two actress’ bond was evident from the get-go. “Immediately, we hit it off,” she said. “She took me under her wings when we were filming, because I was so inexperienced. I can’t describe my relationship with her, because she’s more than just a friend—what you see on screen is genuinely how we feel about each other.”

Even though Henn was only 10 when Aliens was released, she has a vivid recall of her days on the set. Her favorite scene to shoot? The one in which Newt, stuck chest-high in water, is snatched up by a towering alien—a terrifying sequence, and one that gave most other 10-year-olds nightmares for years to come. But for Henn, it was mostly a chance to goof around. “The first assistant director had actually had someone stay there overnight, to make sure the water stayed warm,” she said. “But it was actually too warm for me, so I would sit up on bars on the side, and the alien and I would stay up there, kicking our feet in the water.”

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3

tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:16 (nine years ago)

So genius.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:31 (nine years ago)

Do we have a thread for actors with a one-and-done film career? Meaning they had their big/notable role and then that was it -- they didn't die, it didn't turn tragic, they were just all 'that's good' and went on and enjoyed life?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:32 (nine years ago)

this one? Actors who only appeared in one movie

willem, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:34 (nine years ago)

Actors Lance Henriksen (Prince of the City), Michael Biehn (Tombstone), and Bill Paxton (Traveler) help schoolteacher Carrie Henn celebrate her birthday.

― nomar, Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:51 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That's apparently Carrie's stunt-double, Louise Head.

how's life, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:47 (nine years ago)

three months pass...

Officially an action figure. Never been prouder.#aliens #blessthevest pic.twitter.com/xRDRGYAU1D

— Paul Reiser (@PaulReiser) June 29, 2017

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 June 2017 16:11 (eight years ago)

I've always been curious, how did Reiser ever land that role?

PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Monday, 3 July 2017 09:37 (eight years ago)

they needed a smarmy shitweasel for the part and he was perfect for it

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 11:32 (eight years ago)

^^^

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 3 July 2017 11:34 (eight years ago)

haha

PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Monday, 3 July 2017 11:44 (eight years ago)

Watched it again last night. Still better than Alien.

chap, Monday, 3 July 2017 12:01 (eight years ago)

IDK, I guess you could argue its more fun, but the mood, production design, and general aesthetics of Alien always made me rank it as the superior film.

circa1916, Monday, 3 July 2017 12:18 (eight years ago)

Yep the production design is better in the first, but Aliens is just way more entertaining, and the characters and plotting are stronger. Depends what you look for in a film I suppose.

chap, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:06 (eight years ago)

Rewatched Alien fairly recently as well, and the scene I found most compelling was Ash's reveal/destruction.

chap, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:10 (eight years ago)

imho the characters are wayyyy stronger in the first but agreed that they scratch different itches and I am very very happy to spend time with the bolder and cartoonier characters in the second.

﴿→ ☺ (Doctor Casino), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:11 (eight years ago)

i think that's legit the scariest scene in the film tbh - giger's glistening biosextech aesthetic is a bit overfamiliar now but ash's breakdown and assault on ripley is genuinely unsettling

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:14 (eight years ago)

xp to chap obv

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:14 (eight years ago)

I don't really compare the two. Alien is my favorite horror movie and Aliens is one of my favorite action/war movies.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:15 (eight years ago)

(and of course ash's assault foregrounds the queasy sexual undertones of the movie in an alarmingly literal fountain of robojizz)

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)

Now we just need a Helen Hunt action figure.

jmm, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:20 (eight years ago)

greg evigan or gtfo imo

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:23 (eight years ago)

Don't forget Ash literally tries to ram a girlie magazine down Ripley's throat!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:25 (eight years ago)

well, yeah

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:29 (eight years ago)

the utter lack of subtlety is part of what makes it so unsettling, i think

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:31 (eight years ago)

I remember as a teenager I had a poster on my wall which featured the speech that Ash gives when he's just a jizz covered head on the table. Love that scene.

PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:37 (eight years ago)

I don't really compare the two. Alien is my favorite horror movie and Aliens is one of my favorite action/war movies.

― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, July 3, 2017 9:15 AM (four hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The differentiation between Alien and Aliens is usually rightly chalked up to the fact they're different subgenres within action science fiction. The other main factor that changes is the role of the Corporation as an entity. In Alien you think there's a person who is acting without regard for human life, that they have a direct representative on the ship that's to blame, but it's revealed they're still completely anonymous and offscreen. Ash is mechanical and has no emotional stake in his actions. The line between the characters we know and the shadowy entity is kept intact. Maybe it's malevolent, maybe it's just a computer on the other end doing the risk/reward calculation of losing a crew in order to capture a new lifeform.

The further into the franchise you get, the more the role of the other end is expanded. That's probably the main failure of Alien 3, all things considered: the role is dialed back, and when the human face is revealed, it's in the very last act and not that threatening.

Alien: Resurrection turns the formula on its end, and every corporate or military character has some ridiculous set of craven motivations. It's malevolence as farce, played against a still-threatening xenomorph. So there are three parallel tracks that play out: alien versus protagonists (Ripley and Call, with the mercenaries being relatively disposable), alien versus corp/military which is farcical, and protagonists versus corp/military which becomes more mechanical in the end when you realize that the real triumph of their research wasn't the weaponized alien, but Ripley as post-human who walks off at the end

mh, Monday, 3 July 2017 18:55 (eight years ago)

good post

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 19:57 (eight years ago)

yeah that's a cool reading!

﴿→ ☺ (Doctor Casino), Monday, 3 July 2017 21:55 (eight years ago)

fwiw this isn't my full or really a well thought-out take, I just love spitballing on ilx. pretty obvious when you see how badly I need to copy edit. need a blog, I guess.

mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 00:52 (eight years ago)

do it!

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 01:06 (eight years ago)

actually watching Aliens again now, and I'm remembering how Cameron does his ensemble films well, but in a way that always kind of irritates me. it's by-the-numbers, but in a way where the stock characters are just a little too punchy

mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 01:32 (eight years ago)

"The further into the franchise you get, the more the role of the other end is expanded"

What I like about Burke as the face of corporate evil is that even if he's kind of an 80s yuppie archetype he feels utterly contemporary. The news has never been more full of Burkes.

The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:27 (eight years ago)

for sure, half of the time Rippey says something and he's like "oh shit you're right!"
dude has no due diligence skills, he's just such a puppet

mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:41 (eight years ago)

watching Aliens now and he's literally explaining to Ripley about how they need to get a specimen through quarantine because of the profit potential
and justifying his bad call for letting the colonists just investigate the planet after he'd already talked to Ripley

the best part is Bishop becomes the good guy because he has one directive that has higher priority than following the company's orders: protecting human life. Burke's only rebuttal is "yeah, but..."

mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:44 (eight years ago)

"I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid"

mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:46 (eight years ago)

Great performance from Hendriksen.

chap, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 08:47 (eight years ago)

it's such a simple reversal of the first movie that the android turns out to be an invaluable ally but it's so effective. what a great character, and what a fantastic performance

i wish we could somehow see the version of the terminator that cameron originally envisaged, with henriksen as the everyman-infiltrator terminator

i love that guy's face, it's one of cinema's great ugly/handsome visages. you know he was illiterate until he was 30? he needs to write an autobiography, i'd be first in line for a copy

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:25 (eight years ago)

oh wait, he has written a memoir! brb gonna get a copy - what an oversight on my part

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:26 (eight years ago)

£87 for a copy on amazon, fuck

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:29 (eight years ago)

Henriksen did a "Random Roles" interview on The AV Club last week and apparently once got out of a speeding ticket when the trooper walked up to his car, looked through the window and said "Bishop!"

Old Lynch's Sex Paragraph (Phil D.), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 12:29 (eight years ago)

it's such a simple reversal of the first movie that the android turns out to be an invaluable ally but it's so effective. what a great character, and what a fantastic performance

It is. One of the many ways the further sequels bungle things is with the androids. Like, what do they have to offer, besides sometimes going nuts? Especially in the most recent movies, when the humans just stupidly land on planets and take off their helmets anyway. It's similar to the Terminator twist: first Arnie is a bad guy, then suddenly he's a good guy, which is a cool twist. But in all the other movies the Terminator is just another killer robot from the future.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:52 (eight years ago)

i'd argue that fassbot and winona ryder as android were the stronger parts of their respective movies

i should probably rewatch resurrection before saying that but oh well

ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:58 (eight years ago)

They were, without a doubt, but that's partly because unlike Alien and Aliens the humans are without a doubt the worst, most cartoonishly poorly written and conceived characters in those films.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:00 (eight years ago)

it's been a long time since i've seen resurrection but i remember thinking winona was awful in it

maybe i should rescreen

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:12 (eight years ago)

i should probably rewatch resurrection

maybe i should rescreen

guys please don't do this to yourselves

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:18 (eight years ago)

funnily enough the making-of doc on the resurrection blu-ray is the best of the ones on the (ahem) 'quadrilogy' box-set iirc, maybe i should just watch that again

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:21 (eight years ago)

the underwater sequence in resurrection is pretty good, maybe i'll just watch it on youtube

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:22 (eight years ago)

Resurrection is so tonally different from the others that people hate it, and it has some narrative problems, but I enjoy it. You lose the somber tone of the previous films and get two competing styles: a goofy French science fiction bit that, more than anything, reminds me of some of the near-slapstick of The Fifth Element (which came out the same year, so they're drawing from some common base and not each other) and the Ripley/Call end-run of idiots trying to manipulate and monetize the alien creatures with genetic experimentation. The mother/daughter theme returns and it's somehow put into the same characters as the human/android theme (wtf), and there's the almost meta-commentary angle of whether we can really have Ripley without the alien, and vice versa. Because Ripley and the alien are the same.

mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 15:01 (eight years ago)

thread title should read "Alien" (singular) or "Raiders of the Lost Ark"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 15:11 (eight years ago)

mh otm about resurrection

ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 15:25 (eight years ago)

thread title should read 'kind of' tbrr

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 16:36 (eight years ago)

mh is right, there is interesting stuff in resurrection but iirc it was an undercooked script when they started shooting and tinkering with it on-set didn't help

🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 16:38 (eight years ago)

I disagree about there being anything interesting about the fourth film, which sets the stage for future "what does it all mean?!" BS. Third movie, had it been done right, would have been a fitting end to the series.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)

^^^

Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Wednesday, 5 July 2017 02:02 (eight years ago)

Alien was a fitting beginning _and_ end but no one really knows when to stop

mh, Wednesday, 5 July 2017 02:40 (eight years ago)

Henriksen did a "Random Roles" interview on The AV Club last week and apparently once got out of a speeding ticket when the trooper walked up to his car, looked through the window and said "Bishop!"

Pretty certain there's a similar story on the Near Dark DVD extras, expect this time he's wearing his vampire clothes and covered with blood

nate woolls, Wednesday, 5 July 2017 09:08 (eight years ago)

three months pass...

Going to watch "Aliens" with my daughter tonight (she's already seen "Alien"). So: do I show her the theatrical or director's cut? The DC has some stuff going for it that makes it richer (daughter stuff), weaker (colony stuff, imo) and, well, just longer (robo guns killing aliens). Theatrical ... prolly the way to go, right? At least just because it's shorter?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)

I think the theatrical, because I don't like the movie playing its hand regarding the colony so early. Having your first glimpse of it be the apparently-abandoned buildings when the Marines arrive is a better way to go.

Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:56 (eight years ago)

we had a discussion about the two cuts in the cameron thread but yeah: theatrical

ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:57 (eight years ago)

directors, but fast-forward through the colony stuff

What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:58 (eight years ago)

Watched the DC recently and it's totally not slow or anything despite being quite long. They colony bits were fine, but unecessary.

chap, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:00 (eight years ago)

i think there's probably a much better version that incorporates about half the added scenes in the Special Edition and loses the rest. my most hated bit of dialogue for some reason is:

Christ ! Some honch in a cushy office on Earth says go look at a grid reference. We look. They don't say why, and I don't ask. I don't ask because it takes two weeks to get an answer out here, and the answer is always "Don't ask."

it's some weak-ass "ha ha you know how office politics are!" crap

drejelire, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:02 (eight years ago)

i still watch it for the added bits i do like (sentry guns, a bit more of Ripley's return, bonus Reiser)

drejelire, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:03 (eight years ago)

Colonists hurt the suspense/reveal a bit (despite the movie already being a sequel called "Aliens").

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:03 (eight years ago)

theatrical, but rewind to watch paul reiser bite it twice

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:04 (eight years ago)

theatrical all the way. if she loves the film she can check out the deleted scenes. as I was saying on the other thread, the extra 17 minutes really drag down the pace and either spoil surprises or make the themes way too obvious.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:08 (eight years ago)

That's my instinct as well.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:14 (eight years ago)

makes it richer (daughter stuff)

Wait so the stuff about Ripley's daughter growing old and dying is not in the theatrical? Cos that really ties the film together thematically.

chap, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:36 (eight years ago)

Nope, cut then put back in later.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:37 (eight years ago)

i didn't mind that so much but some podcast or something made the argument that it overloads the substitue/surrogate aspect of her relationship with newt, sapping the integrity of it as its own things. plus she does not need to have an actual lost daughter scene for us to empathize with the more general situation of everyone she ever knew being old/dead, and to grasp what the relationships with hicks and newt might mean to her.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:44 (eight years ago)

it does expand on the mother vs. mother alien as rival fight.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:49 (eight years ago)

that's all there anyway, though, because ripley has a nurturing mother-like relationship with newt. i just think it resonates more powerfully as subtext and that cutting the scene reflects a smart show-don't-tell thought process.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:56 (eight years ago)

Theatrical worked like a charm. I've seen this a million times, the first when I was 12 or 13 in the theaters with my dad - my older daughter is, coincidentally, the same age now - but I still have some fresh thoughts, having watched it with fresh eyes with someone who has never seen it:

1) Sigourney Weaver really is so great in this. As is Carrie Henn. If either of them faltered, this might have fallen apart. (Clearly the whole cast is perfect, particularly Reiser and Paxton and Biehn.)
2) The blue screen (why did the color change to green?) largely holds up, give or take, as do the models, though I never bought the vehicle they crashing around in, which seemed poorly designed for a combat ATV.
3) Was this the first militaristic machine gun sci-fi film? 30 years later it's still the marines 'n' monsters standard. And obviously constantly ripped off and referenced.
4) Speaking of which, the action scenes are just so specularly well storyboarded. Ever notice there are virtually no scenes where the aliens and people actually share a shot? And yet it never feels like people reacting to things that aren't there.
5) Man, I simply can't believe Bill Paxton is dead. I hung with him once, and he was every bit Bill Paxton. Michael Biehn, btw, I want to say has a second career now as a porn producer (!).
6) This is like the least coked up mid-'80s action film imaginable.
7) I do think Ripley learning she had a daughter who lived and died without her wouldn't have hurt. Sets up the maternal rivalry with the queen, particularly when they first meet, and obviously all the stuff with Newt, not to mention the explicit parallels with alien impregnation. Doesn't need it, but it's the only of the extra material that enhances the film rather than simply extends it. (Forgot that Newt actually hugs her and calls her mommy when she finally kills the Queen).
8) How in the world is it that we managed Segweys but we still haven't designed cool-ass exoskeletons? Screw flying cars, this seemed well within reach 30 years ago.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 02:15 (eight years ago)

(Should note that my daughter was kind of so-so on it. Liked it, but not blown away, and predicted a couple of the big beats. Kids today ... )

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 02:16 (eight years ago)

The blue screen (why did the color change to green?)

It didn't.

blue is better for night / dark sequences, where any blue bleed is less noticeable.
green is better for day.
Obviously if any of one or the other color is IN the scene, preference is to use the other.
Also, green works better with digital, blue is better for film.

I just looked all the up btw. JtM would know best probably.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 4 November 2017 02:27 (eight years ago)

Hmm, I never really thought about it before, but that makes sense. I just could have sworn, anecdotally, that any bts stuff I saw growing up was always blue screen, but when things went digital they went green. Which yeah, green works better with digital, but I didn't know they still did blue.

9) One last observation, the sound design is just incredible. From the guns firing to the almost elephant-like shriek of the aliens to the sound of the nuclear power generator melting down, just so many iconic sounds.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 03:10 (eight years ago)

Yeah, I guess I just wasn't paying attention. This is my favorite ever blue/green screen demo, and it's night and uses blue:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaPQHbexaCo

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 03:12 (eight years ago)

Bishop's crawl down that tunnel is still damn terrifying, even in its scarcity in terms of screen time.

"I may be synthetic but I'm not stupid" is one of those great throwaway lines delivered just so perfectly.

drejelire, Saturday, 4 November 2017 03:15 (eight years ago)

because lance henriksen is fkn gold

ALIENS is still kind've a crap film though

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 4 November 2017 08:19 (eight years ago)

It definitely has a weird structure, but I don't know how anyone can call it crap, not least because for point of comparison there have been a half-dozen crap Alien films that followed it.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:12 (eight years ago)

The structure's not that weird? Bit of a slow burn for an action movie I guess, but very three act-y.

chap, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:17 (eight years ago)

Long stretch of no action - 45 minutes till first battle, right? - then long stretch of no action, then long stretch of action. It's just kind of lopsided. Not bad, though.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:19 (eight years ago)

I'd say that's a pacing issue rather than a structural one.

chap, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:22 (eight years ago)

Works for me though.

chap, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:22 (eight years ago)

Sure, maybe that's more pacing, but that may be just splitting hairs, because that is how the story is built. That's another thing I always liked about it, though. The quiet no action parts are really quiet, for an otherwise loud action movie with machine guns.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:24 (eight years ago)

Was this the first militaristic machine gun sci-fi film?

The first one that springs to mind is Predator, which was filming when this came out.

Speaking of which, the action scenes are just so specularly well storyboarded. Ever notice there are virtually no scenes where the aliens and people actually share a shot? And yet it never feels like people reacting to things that aren't there.

This is a really good point, and not something I'd noticed.

Michael Biehn, btw, I want to say has a second career now as a porn producer

I'm not sure you should say this - it isn't in any sense true.

How in the world is it that we managed Segweys but we still haven't designed cool-ass exoskeletons?

There's a few, but less than you'd expect alright. One of things that I thought the film shared with Alien is the impression that these were not exactly cutting edge on the industrial or military sides, it wasn't a crack teched-up team, these were just standard grunts either way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V87lSB5XWVs

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:48 (eight years ago)

I think they are meant to be a pretty well-equipped team, maybe not some super-elite unit but the spiels about their gear suggest they think they've got the good toys. It's just a future where the best way to kill people is still bullets and the best way to transmit live footage is still a crappy analog signal. Obviously it all helps secure the Vietnam vibe as well.

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:54 (eight years ago)

Michael Biehn, btw, I want to say has a second career now as a porn producer

I'm not sure you should say this - it isn't in any sense true.

It's the weirdest thing, I could have sworn I used to get press releases touting his involvement in some adult video line. My mistake if not. Sorry Michael Biehn!

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:58 (eight years ago)

Another thing I thought of upon re-viewing, is this movie really set the template for a lot of first person shooters, right? With the helmet cams and vitals and whatnot. I'm not much of a gamer, but that really reminds me of how a lot of games are set up. At the least it set the template for "Contra," or so I assume. "Contra" was 1987.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:01 (eight years ago)

yeah contra is heavily ripped from this, including a lot of the boss visuals and stuff. and it reaches FPSes almost immediately if without such 1:1 connections in DOOM, whose creators had obviously seen this about ten times each.

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:05 (eight years ago)

(OK, xpost, but I guess Biehn and his wife Jennifer Blanc were producing a line of grind house films? Maybe I saw a press release for one of the more salacious titles and got the wrong idea?)

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:08 (eight years ago)

A lot of the movies lines were nicked and appeared in various FPS games.

Ste, Monday, 6 November 2017 12:45 (eight years ago)

the box art for contra stole the alien design but the main dude on the cover was clearly modelled on schwarzenegger (based i think on a still from predator?)

http://www.mobygames.com/images/covers/l/32879-contra-nes-front-cover.jpg

meanwhile artwork for the first metal gear game was clearly modelled on michael biehn in aliens

http://78.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l839lvg6Oc1qbn1vmo1_1280.png

What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 6 November 2017 12:53 (eight years ago)

is that Aliens or Terminator?

Ste, Monday, 6 November 2017 13:04 (eight years ago)

oh yeah, you're right, it is terminator

What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 6 November 2017 13:05 (eight years ago)

Love it

Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 6 November 2017 14:45 (eight years ago)

Alien Vs. Predator Vs. Rambo.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:59 (eight years ago)

Like, a dance-off or something? Because...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxQmFw565_8

how's life, Monday, 6 November 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)

what the fuck @NECA_TOYS pic.twitter.com/zQqrAEolEV

— BenDavid Grabinski (@bdgrabinski) November 7, 2017

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:02 (eight years ago)

looks like david harbour's character from stranger things in the middle of a fatal stroke

with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:08 (eight years ago)

two months pass...

Eleanor Ripley
Flushing a Xenomorph into the vacuum of space
They hug your face

— Alex Hannon (@Liffonmelsmork) January 12, 2018

j., Sunday, 14 January 2018 02:22 (eight years ago)

They hug @ u face

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 14 January 2018 03:04 (eight years ago)

one year passes...

I'm ready, man. Check it out. I am the ultimate badass! State-of-the-badass-art! You do not wanna fuck with me. Check it out. Hey, Ripley, don't worry. Me and my squad of ultimate badasses will protect you!

omar little, Thursday, 14 March 2019 05:00 (seven years ago)

It's a fantastic film, though I question how many of the story beats are innovative, rather than just Cameron displaying a screenwriting ease packing in beats from other films. I feel like its a summation of cinematic action that came before, and a huge weight on what could come after. If any franchise needed a Rian Johnson to confound expectations, it was the Alien franchise after 1986.

contains pieces the size of a child's esophagus (Sanpaku), Thursday, 14 March 2019 05:55 (seven years ago)

you mean like making a sequel where no one has any weapons?

Number None, Thursday, 14 March 2019 07:55 (seven years ago)

ah yes, rian johnson, the most expectation-confounding filmmaker of our generation

kiss me dadly (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 14 March 2019 11:26 (seven years ago)

wtf are 'innovative story beats' btw? aliens tells a gripping story, it expands significantly on the world established in the first movie and takes it in new directions, and it deepens our understanding of ripley's character and motivations in surprising new ways, i don't think knocking it because it fails to revolutionise hollywood storytelling conventions really works

kiss me dadly (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 14 March 2019 11:29 (seven years ago)

I think, maybe, the only innovation (if it can be called that) of this movie is its really awkward, unbalanced structure: it remains an action movie exemplar despite two looooooong stretches with no action. That attests to the sheer quality of said action but also to the quality of the characters, or at least the colorful snappiness of their dialogue.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 March 2019 11:42 (seven years ago)

From 2019, "give the kick-ass woman issues about whether she's a good mother" doesn't really count as surprising.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 14 March 2019 12:41 (seven years ago)

it wasnt made in 2019 i mean cmon

~mine own~ bitcoin (darraghmac), Thursday, 14 March 2019 13:31 (seven years ago)

Speaking of years, I do appreciate that Alien/Aliens were set in what is still now the distant future.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 March 2019 13:33 (seven years ago)

xp, I know but 'surprise' isn't a reaction that takes the timestamp into consideration.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 14 March 2019 14:21 (seven years ago)

i always forget there's such a long period between the initial arrival of the Marines and the point where shit goes bad; the film keeps up its momentum so well that it flies by.

Cameron's skill with narrative structure and atmosphere has always been impressive, and w/the latter the film's early use of helmet-mounted cameras and motion sensors and heart monitors for each marine (when they flatline it just makes everything more final and chilling*) is just an astonishingly effective way to ante up the dread and oppressiveness.

(*flatlining in cinema is usually a whatever moment, an easy out, and to see it used in this way is a minor testimony to Cameron's directorial abilities.)

omar little, Thursday, 14 March 2019 18:28 (seven years ago)

I get the criticism about the story beats not being innovative - the bones of it are an off-the-rack 'go on a mission, find the key to your character at the end of it'. All that's missing is a bit at the end where the Queen looks at Ripley and says "we're not so different, you and I..."

One Eye Open, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:09 (seven years ago)

cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, August 20, 2004 8:46 AMBookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah what a boring scene

― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, August 20, 2004 8:48 AMBookmark Flag Post Permalink

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:17 (seven years ago)

All that's missing is a bit at the end where the Queen looks at Ripley and says "we're not so different, you and I..."

haha this isn't even missing

(prob the joke)

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:45 (seven years ago)

Another thing I thought of upon re-viewing, is this movie really set the template for a lot of first person shooters, right? With the helmet cams and vitals and whatnot. I'm not much of a gamer, but that really reminds me of how a lot of games are set up. At the least it set the template for "Contra," or so I assume. "Contra" was 1987.

― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:01 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah contra is heavily ripped from this, including a lot of the boss visuals and stuff. and it reaches FPSes almost immediately if without such 1:1 connections in DOOM, whose creators had obviously seen this about ten times each.

― Doctor Casino, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:05 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

(OK, xpost, but I guess Biehn and his wife Jennifer Blanc were producing a line of grind house films? Maybe I saw a press release for one of the more salacious titles and got the wrong idea?)

― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:08 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A lot of the movies lines were nicked and appeared in various FPS games.

― Ste, Monday, November 6, 2017 2:45 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

not to mention starcraft

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:48 (seven years ago)

The way Weaver looks at the Queen without saying a word before threatening to incinerate the eggs and the Queen's momentary ceding ground = classic.

I'm amazed that in 1986 the Academy saw through its blinders during the staidest decade of its existence to date and gave a Best Actress nomination to a genre piece.

Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:49 (seven years ago)

Anyone who doesn't like this film needs a good thrashing.

Having said that, probably these will all turn out to be balls: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alien-celebrating-40th-anniversary-6-short-films-1193923

Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Thursday, 14 March 2019 23:44 (seven years ago)

James otm on both counts

Besmirch this movie at your peril

https://68.media.tumblr.com/1b4731564aee8ba541588f50604f9cbe/tumblr_nrnh0x9xR81u2ragso2_500.gif

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 05:13 (seven years ago)

the effects/sets in this movie look better than any cgi movie

na (NA), Friday, 15 March 2019 14:14 (seven years ago)

1982 - 1986 was the apogee of film special effects

Number None, Friday, 15 March 2019 14:27 (seven years ago)

I think this film has a bit of the Jaws effect. The creature effects are totally superb but it seems likely that in order to hide a bit of the awkwardness of the aliens’ movements Cameron had to keep them in shadow and keep glimpses of them to a minimum, up until we see the queen at the end. It creates this real sense of terror and a scene like Hicks popping up into the ceiling to have a look and his flashlight panning across dozens of these things crawling at him is one of the more nightmarish visuals i recall from my childhood. that and Vasquez/Gorman being cornered in the ventilation shaft gave me some bad dreams as a teen.

omar little, Friday, 15 March 2019 15:30 (seven years ago)

Yeah, possibly the only flawed shot in the movie is when the queen's two goons sort of awkwardly shuffle in and out of the scene. For the most part though he just shows you a second or two of various slithering and awful motions, and your brain fills in how the aliens probably walk and attack - - - much scarier and more fluid than anything they could create by having someone in a rubber suit walk across the set. It's amazing how many of the bargain-basement direct-to-video knock-offs (which of course also have even cheaper rubber suits, etc.) manage to screw this up.

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:11 (seven years ago)

same type of quick show/cut used to the same horrifying effect in matrix rave scene

~mine own~ bitcoin (darraghmac), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:27 (seven years ago)

Omar otm

I think because Cameron leans so hard into the meathead action-horror genre it feels like it’s just a dumb alien movie. And in a way it kind of is. But as Omar notes, Cameron makes really good choices in terms of dialing up tension, finessing the action, or playing up the horror moments - the kind of attention to detail that makes it really enjoyable to watch. Mainly because that kind of care & finesse stands out when you’re in a B-movie kinda world.

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:37 (seven years ago)

i think the very unusual Ebert review of this is pretty spot-on, even if in some sense i disagree with it. He admits it's amazing but also admits he didn't enjoy it because of its intensity and constant dread, whereas i totally enjoy it every time. but i understand what he means. i think as far as a film depicting people finding themselves trapped in a desperate situation with no easy way out, it's almost unparalleled. the best thing about it is while there are characters who are not especially bright, none of them do anything especially stupid. they're flawed in recognizable ways. Hudson is an idiot but he doesn't make any dumb tactical errors, he freaks out but never in moments of action, just in moments of downtime. Gorman is in over his head but he's not a craven coward, he just freezes up. Burke flees into a bad spot towards the end, but i mean who the hell wouldn't make a run for it? etc etc...lots of the character types are cliches but their behavior and decision-making makes perfect sense for each one and unlike lesser films they don't behave in ways to artificially change the narrative and story, they're always reacting to what's happening at the moment.

the only thing i question is Burke still thinking about the Company and getting the samples back through quarantine at a time when the survival of the entire team seems pretty unlikely. But Reiser's extremely '80s nervous nice dude comedy style works surprisingly well for the character of an ambitious, sociopathic creep, so it mostly works for me despite that, and i suppose he also figured his survival was a mutually exclusive issue alongside the issue of the alien samples.

omar little, Friday, 15 March 2019 16:53 (seven years ago)

agreed

omar otm again, as always

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 17:23 (seven years ago)

co-sign

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 15 March 2019 17:43 (seven years ago)

'kind've'

mookieproof, Friday, 15 March 2019 17:48 (seven years ago)

two months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFmq2gDwXpo

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (seven years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFmq2gDwXpo

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (seven years ago)

hmmm

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (seven years ago)

three years pass...

Man, those AI generated images of Aliens: The Musical

https://preview.redd.it/ksydb2ec0jwa1.png

https://preview.redd.it/kgrzw2ec0jwa1.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/131dhju/aliens_the_musical/

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:40 (three years ago)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fu20G4faQAYcgeT?format=jpg&name=medium

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:43 (three years ago)

lol beautiful

Ste, Saturday, 29 April 2023 19:49 (three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.