It's on TNT at the moment. Some nice effects and an effectively gloomy atmosphere, but the writing's pretty damn thin. Ripley's character is insufferably earnest, utterly humorless and wooden. Bill Paxton is a cartoon character. The rest of the entirely too hokey space marines are all two-dimensional. Newt couldn't possibly be more annoying ("they mostleeee come at night. mostleeeee). The big, bad, gooey beasties are nice, but that's it. Really, it's bad. The original Alien still holds up, but this.....meh.
Prove me wrong.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sexual Air Supply (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)
You want bad, watch the third one. I always like to point out the moment when the first act ends and the third act begins.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)
because it's one of the best-directed action movies i've ever seen
See, that's just it: Alien = a horror filmAliens = stoopid action movie
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)
No, ass-kicking action movie. If you don't like actions movies, we can't help you.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)
and as an action movie, one of the best of its kind!
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, I guess that is a good scene. But, it's only one scene.
Also, what up? One beast goes slam-dancing all around the Nostromo without so much as a fuckin' scratch in the first one, meanwhile in this one, they drop like flies. Inconsistent!
Bad writing is bad writing, regardless of genre, and that's what damns this film.
Why couldn't Tom Skerrit have survived the first one instead of Ripley? (I'll tellya why: because no one wanted to see Tom Skerrit in his underwear fight the beast at the end).
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)
sigourney also got significantly LESS hot from aliens on. before, she was DEFINITELY hit-able.
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)
Ah, but I don't consider this a good action movie. i consider it, unfortunately, a rather stoopid action movie.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)
and that scene i mentioned was an example, one of many!
also if you force me to be a nerd, they didn't have big guns in the first ones (the crew of the nostromo were just working joes, not heavily-armed marines)
(xxp)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)
this line is like a rejected billy corgan lyric, or something.
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:12 (twenty-one years ago)
Alex, you're making totally irrelevant points
I'm just making observations, Harold, don't get your pants wet.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
totally irrelevant, but m night shamalyan (or whatever the fuck his name is) is such a putz.
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
Ok. But I still think your arguments are silly given the topic at hand. An action movie is this: establishment of premise. Build. Payoff. That's it, man. "Writing"? Pfft. I don't understand what it is you're expecting of this movie, or why.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)
yeah but she allows sigourney to express her maternal ass-kicking instincts when she fights the ALIEN MOTHER.
― vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Well-executed formula -- I agree. I think Alex is objecting to character development and dialogue.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)
Alex OTM. I love Alien but the rest are rubbish. Whenever I say I don't like Aliens people always go "But it's got cool guns". Yeah, well.
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh, I've seen it properly before (in a theatre, actually). And yes, TV doesn't do justice to many films. I just don't think it's that well written. It's predecessor, meanwhile, was.
I don't understand what it is you're expecting of this movie, or why.
Well, I just don't think, in retrospect, it lives up to the promise of the first one.
I think Alex is objecting to character development and dialogue.
....or lack of it.
By the way, there are certainly worse films out there, for what it's worth.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)
the sexual subtexts are easily the best thing about the alien movies - why else have giger design the shit? - hell, and scifi and horror movies in general, too, as opposed to scifi and horror novels - and the 2nd movie expands on those subtexts in a way that "alien: resurrection" just don't (now there's a shit movie).
― vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)
I would argue that it's a great deal more difficult to make an effectively scary, suspenseful horror film than an action movie (wherein all you really need to please certain folks, as noted, are "cool guns").
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Was HR Giger involved with the films that followed the second one?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, vahid OTM.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)
S: the theatrical cutD: *only* being able to have the extended cut on DVD for a long time, but that's thankfully now corrected
Alien and Aliens are different takes on standard tropes that were successful precisely Scott and crew on the one hand and Cameron and crew on the other were able to hotwire them into something which was so ridiculously successful -- commercially and in terms of effective filmmaking -- that each in their own single-handedly established a slew of new cliches. Which may seem a strange thing to credit them for, but *how* many films since then have essentially tried to be one or the other, borrowing set pieces, concepts, dialogue practically and more? And none are nearly as good as these two.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)
that's pretty much the subtext of EVERY ilxor post you've ever written, alex!
:-)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Brilliantly parodied in the MST3K movie. So I will have nothing said against the original.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:46 (twenty-one years ago)
It's certainly the best-*looking*.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:50 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/greatmovies/alien.html
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Because he's a COOL ROBOT!
Oh, there's no talking to you.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)
"ALIEN 3 is one of the best-looking bad movies I have ever seen. It is a triumph of art direction and a disaster of screenwriting, and the eyes appreciate it more than the mind. Watching it in the moment, we are absorbed. After it's over, we are disappointed, because what actually happens in the movie is so much less interesting than where it happens and how it looks while it's happening."
http://www.scifimoviepage.com/alien_20.html
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)
The fat man nails it!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)
you can't tell me those flamethrowers weren't useful
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.planetavp.com/amr/films/a2/carriehennat22.jpg
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)
Doesn't this picture make you just want to root for the aliens?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 04:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)
Of course they were useful. Flame-throwers are damn useful tools. Hell, I could certainly use one right now. But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one? That's my question.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)
(Winona is at her loveliest in that movie, though.)
― morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Space-age palette wrapping is a motherfucker.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:28 (twenty-one years ago)
I would argue that that's bollocks. While we're being reductive, we could just as easily boil horror movies down to "sexual guilt." Formulas are formulas, and they exist because they work on a base level. Your base level may be different than mine, but I wouldn't hold horror movies up as a higher art then action movies. In fact, just typing that seemed silly to me. Really... come on.
Then there's this:
Seems to me, at least, the first one was genuinely suspenseful and NOT FOR EVERYONE , whereas this one went for the wider audience buck. That seems kinda crass to me.
Alien was the third highest-grossing movie of 1979, right between Star Trek: The Motion Picture and The Muppet Movie. Don't argue that the second movie sold out. DON'T TRY IT.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:38 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.fact-index.com/1/19/1979_in_film.html#Top%20Grossing%20Films%20of%201979
My point remains the same.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)
Aliens = Flimsy, cliche-ridden, poorly patched together whizz-bang blam-o action pic designed to sell popcorn. Bring the kids, hey, it'll be fun!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)
I remember sitting infront of a father who brought his FIVE YEAR OLD SON to "Natural Born Killers". WHAT PART OF THE TITLE, "NATURAL BORN KILLERS", MADE YOU THINK THIS FILM WAS SUITABLE FOR YOUR FIVE-YEAR OLD?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)
The ads for "Aliens" claim that this movie will frighten you as few movies have, and, for once, the ads don't lie. The movie is so intense that it creates a problem for me as a reviewer: Do I praise its craftsmanship, or do I tell you it left me feeling wrung out and unhappy?It has been a week since I saw it, so the emotions have faded a little, leaving with me an appreciation of the movie's technical qualities. But when I walked out of the theater, there were knots in my stomach from the film's roller-coaster ride of violence. This is not the kind of movie where it means anything to say you "enjoyed" it. .. I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment. Yet I have to be accurate about this movie: It is a superb example of filmmaking craft.
It has been a week since I saw it, so the emotions have faded a little, leaving with me an appreciation of the movie's technical qualities. But when I walked out of the theater, there were knots in my stomach from the film's roller-coaster ride of violence. This is not the kind of movie where it means anything to say you "enjoyed" it. ..
I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment. Yet I have to be accurate about this movie: It is a superb example of filmmaking craft.
If it does this to a man who has seen 20,000 movies, what will it do to the average filmgoer? Or to CHILDREN?
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)
Which made these (released prior to the second film) even more mysterious:
ihttp://www.toyzine.com/magazine/articles/alien/alien+box_lg.jpg
I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused. You still seem to be saying that the first Alien movie was "not for everyone," because... it's horror by genre? And the second one was more for... fun? The second movie is scarier and more traumatizing in many ways.
The first film was more of a classic horror film written with a degree of sophistication and unflinching, realistic gore (relatively speaking) that was inarguably not child friendly. The second one, though still violent and gorey, reads more like a western shoot'em up. It's not exactly Spongbob Squarepants but it's easier on the sense than the first one.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:04 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.filmfodder.com/movies/reviews/alien/images/alien.jpg
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't think this is a particularly good argument, but I must pause to say that I like the first film better, easily. I like the pacing and the dialogue better. I like the tone better. I just don't think that that's a good jumping-off point to argue that the second film is bad.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)
If it does this to a man who has seen 20,000 movies, what will it do to the average filmgoer?
Answer: thrill the shit out of them.
― Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:50 (twenty-one years ago)
(also, Newt was traumatised,FFS. What were you expecting, Alex, some nice, likeable, well-adjusted kid? Of course she wasn't fucking likeable...)
― David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)
The actress who plays vasquez, I forget what she's called, she was in "near dark" and IIRC terminator 2 as well? K-ROWR!!!
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 20 August 2004 07:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)
foolish elvens.
― g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Friday, 20 August 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
you can't say that thats a cliche can you?
The trouble is films since Aliens have robbed it to fuck and now admittedly watching it again it some parts seem cliched but you have to realise it was unique at the time and was, and remains to be, an absoloute classic
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Anyway:Alien: claustrophobic atmosphere, good script, suspense, nasty shocks, superb design
Aliens: Suspense, nasty shocks, superb design and GUNS GUNS GUNS! LOTSA GUNS!
I declare a tie.
― robster (robster), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Alien 3 is underrated, by the way.
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)
haha xpost
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Alien: haven't seen it! wtfAliens: That's the clumsiest exoskeleton I've ever seen, HOMO SNAPIES U HAVE NO CHANCE 2 SURVIVE MAKE UR TIME, also kind of an injustice to the Aliens that they keep getting killed so easily, yes I understand the guns are big but seriously people, this is the most dangerous species in the galaxy, they don't need numbers to winAlien 3: I have tried to watch this like 5 times and have been unable to figure out what is going on enough to bother sitting through the giger cave bukkakeAlien Resurrection: Am I the only person who thinks this would have been better standalone, without trying to tie in to the Alien franchise? Ron Perlman!!! Whoop
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Heavens! This is the best of the lot.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM.
i can't really participate in this thread objectively, as i'm an alien/aliens obsessive. but Alex, you ARE SO FUCKING WRONG!
ripley's character "humorless and wooden"? echhh. she is traumatized, she narrowly escaped being killed by a space monster. she is the only one who realizes how much of a threat the alien really represents, and she is exasperated by the marines and the company's incompetence. to her this is serious shit, the stakes are just too high if the aliens spread. and i think sigourney weaver nails this perfectly.
newt annoying? i've always thought that newt was one of the least annoying child characters in a movie like this. she doesn't even have that many lines!
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)
btw everybody I saw Sigourney at the Belmont last year and she's still SUPREMELY BEAUTIFUL at like 56 or whatever.
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)
No I'm not, actually. You're just a fanboy in denial.
she doesn't even have that many lines!
One doesn't need lots of lines to be annoying.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)
why did i become a fanboy in the first place then, hmm?
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
"But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one?"
welding?
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)
I was about to say! Tom, trust me, it's worth it.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Perhaps, like I was, you were intrigued by the first film. Unlike me, however, your blind devotion to the promise of the first one makes you overlook the flaws of the second. ps. tiny pedantry from earlier - the new Exorcist movie is a prequel. ?
Duly noted, Stence. But why do we need one of those either?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
True, but von Sydow isn't playing said character. I believe the guy playing him is the advanced-Calculus genius from Eastern Europe with the fancy scarf that pals around with Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting. To which I say: why?
The Exorcist is fine where it is. Leave it there.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― ())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
because von Sydow is 80billyion years old and this is supposed to be about him as a young priest, duh!
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
i do not quite understand the profound awe that blade runner inspires in so many people.
― amateur!!!st, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 20 August 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 August 2004 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)
ps. in the future all ships will have flimsy subway-grate floors and people will still use those hanging lamps that mechanics use to look at your engine when the hood's up.
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Weirdly enough, I've read this. And I also have nothing to add to this thread kthxbye!
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)
No, dick, my question is why are they doing it at all?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
he's a dick for attaching the "duh!" to his post.
And really....for the money? It ain't like Exorcist II: the Heretic and/or Exorcist III really cleaned up at the box office.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/38/features-foundas.php
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― wickerbocker please (hammy), Friday, 20 August 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 20 August 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― sexyDancer, Friday, 20 August 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 20 August 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 20 August 2004 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Were you as entranced when she did that salute with the gun when they were getting ready to drop onto the planet? That was a sexy piece.
Alien: Resurrection is the funniest of the lot.
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 20 August 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I., Friday, 20 August 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I., Friday, 20 August 2004 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― R.I.M.A. (Barima), Friday, 20 August 2004 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― R.I.M.A. (Barima), Friday, 20 August 2004 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Friday, 20 August 2004 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 21 August 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)
What type of goth are you! You're fired.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 21 August 2004 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Saturday, 21 August 2004 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)
-- Alex in NYC (vassife...) (webmail), August 20th, 2004 8:48 PM. (vassifer) (later) (link)
additional hottness?
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 21 August 2004 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 21 August 2004 07:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Ooh and also as a sort of waypoint on Ripley's movie-long seething lesbian lust rampage until it came to rest on the Queen alien.
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 21 August 2004 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)
x-post
otm! "GAME OVER MAN!" (no comma!)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― R.I.M.A. (Barima), Saturday, 21 August 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Hahahahahahahaha. I love that.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 22 August 2004 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)
Reverse the roles for Alien, though.
― Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 22 August 2004 03:54 (twenty-one years ago)
I watched Sigourney Weaver in "Galaxy Quest" last night, btw!
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 22 August 2004 08:08 (twenty-one years ago)
-- Gear! (drink_to_remembe...), August 22nd, 2004.
i take offense at that, ALIENS IS TEH BEST MOOVIE EVER YOU SATANIC HEATHENITE MARTIAN FUXOR
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 22 August 2004 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 22 August 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 22 August 2004 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Ron Perlman (aforementioned knife-wielder) should be in every movie.
The Space Pirate Captain is almost as great (and he was hands-down my favorite actor as a kid, for his performance in Robin Hood) - "She is... severely fuckable, isn't she?"
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 22 August 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 23 August 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Alien Resurrection is entertaining by itself, but for me it was just too jokey and tongue in cheek to work as an Alien movie.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 23 August 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 23 August 2004 01:34 (twenty-one years ago)
His role in "Dead Man" is hilarious.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― jones (actual), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)
not sure why.
also have never seen Alien 3 all the way thru since originally seeing it twice in the theaters...
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Thursday, 26 August 2004 01:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 26 August 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Thursday, 26 August 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 August 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― jones (actual), Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 26 August 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 26 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)
he also designed the alien queen himself (h.r. giger wasn't involved)!
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 27 August 2004 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 August 2004 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 August 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 27 August 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 August 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Alex NYC was critical of Aliens dialogue, well Alien is just as dopey, cartoonish, and two-dimensional as Aliens only instead of war movie cliches, it's full of horror movie cliches. Alien's suspense is really just shock-value: the alien goes "boo" and chows down on a crew member. Once you know the story, Alien has very little repeat-viewing worth except as a filmed H.R. Giger sketchbook. The new director's cut does flow better, but I could have done without the infamous "Dallas cocoon scene". On the plus side, the new digital sound is just amazing and worth it alone to see in a decent theater.
The original cut of Aliens was great, I wish that Cameron had just left it alone - really the only thing that needed to be included was the scene with the massed alien attack on the remote guns. Couple of scenes in here are just spectacular - the initial drop ship scene is amazingly well done and everything from "looks like they're having a goddamn town meeting" to "ease down - you've blown the transaxle. you're just grinding metal".
Thin writing or not, I defy anyone to repeat dialog from the original Alien without looking.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)
"Is this going to be a stand-up fight, sir, or another bug hunt?"
"It was a bad call, Ripley--a bad call."
"One express elevator to Hell .. Going down!"
"Hey maybe you haven't been keeping up on current events but we just got our asses kicked, pal!"
I could go on...
― Richard K (Richard K), Monday, 6 September 2004 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 6 September 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 6 September 2004 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)
one bum note though: I didn't like the fact that the aliens communicated in this one - part of the fear and allure of the first few films' aliens, what made them seem so dangerous and efficient, was their seeming elimination of any necessity of a membrane of communication. that is, they were perfect killing machines, effortlessly, simultaneously and constantly in sync with their surroundings and each other.
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
"Oh no! Slimy slobbery alien!"
"He's fucked!"
"We now pause from the action to enjoy a moment of relationship subtext!"
"More subtext"
"Hooray for guns!"
"Welcome to Ripley, bitch!"
"The end (now with added subtext)."
"Credits: Predator ship designed by..."
― B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)
"I'm finding a lot of things funny nowadays. I don't think they are."
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Sunday, 12 September 2004 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 12 September 2004 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
The design/creatures/effects are pretty good for the most paart, though the spaceship shots are a bit perfunctory and bland.
But overall the film was just too cartonish for me.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:50 (twenty-one years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Millions died, Earth saved, wanna go out to a lesbian bar and get baked on hash brownies later?" -- B.A.R.M.S. (b4rim4_...), September 12th, 2004.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 13 September 2004 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dead Man, Monday, 13 September 2004 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost - gory a good film does not make.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Sigourney Weaver is marvelous. I'm still amazed that the Academy, with its distate for genre pictures, managed to nominate her for Best Actress. It's her best movie.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 17 March 2006 02:44 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 17 March 2006 02:56 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 17 March 2006 03:15 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer aka rembrandt, the fifth ninja turtle (latebloomer), Friday, 17 March 2006 09:07 (twenty years ago)
― teh_kit! (g-kit), Friday, 17 March 2006 10:44 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 12 April 2007 23:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:39 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:04 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:24 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:48 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:58 (nineteen years ago)
I'll even take Resurrection over Aliens.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 02:18 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki, Friday, 13 April 2007 02:39 (nineteen years ago)
― shieldforyoureyes, Friday, 13 April 2007 04:12 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 04:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 April 2007 04:18 (nineteen years ago)
― latebloomer, Friday, 13 April 2007 05:03 (nineteen years ago)
― i, grey, Friday, 13 April 2007 06:31 (nineteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Friday, 13 April 2007 09:24 (nineteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Ste, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)
― rrrobyn, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
― g-kit, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 13 April 2007 15:52 (nineteen years ago)
ALIENS RPG is coming! Done by Gearbox/Obsidian!
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)
and FPS
i wish they'd make an aliens game that couldn't be summed up with three initials
:(
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
this is apparently the thread where we take sides about the first Alien sequel. I am firmly for it.
― kenan, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
Ebert is great on it, actually... he gave it 3 1/2 stars and says it left him feeling wrung out and stressed and kind of upset. That's a sterling recommendation!
― kenan, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, but most game genre names are now reduced to shorthand, same as everything else in modern culture. FPS/RPG/MMORPG/RTS/sim/etc.
What would you do in a Lucasarts-type adventure game, or an Aliens cart racer?
xp
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
anyone remember the first alien game? great tension and the most incredible feature of having the characters sometimes not respond to your commands - due them being in a biff wiv u
― Ste, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
kingfish my point is that Alien was a new kind of movie - the game should be a new kind of game
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jg27paw4/yr13/yr13_49c.gif
― Ste, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
looks like nethack
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
Never actually played the first AvP. Did play the Aliens game put out by Activision on the Apple ][.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_%28video_game%29
Holy shit, there was an Alien game for the 2600
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a5/Alien_1982_atari_2600.gif
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
But how was Alien a new kind of movie, tho? Just due to the nature of the Giger alien and the societal fears that each film could play off of? The first two films were a synthesis of a lot of different bits floating around; with the first one, you had the 70s blue-collar "truckers in space" thing, along with the "shit technology that looks lived-in and actually used" look that Ridley Scott admits that he borrowed from Star Wars, along with a more graphic horror look that Carpenter and everybody else was working on.
The 2nd one had the Reagan-era send-in-the-marines vibe with bits from Starship Troopers and the 80s corporate shill in the form of Paul Reiser of all people. (and no cat).
Still, inventing a new kind of game for a licensed property is a pretty damn tall order. Aspects of the experience that the consumer of the original properties/brands/texts/films/etc enjoyed have to transfer over, or the new thing doesn't ring true, and the vibe ain't there. It's like that 2600 game, or the Final Fantasy movie. The nature of the original experience dictates certain aspects of any other media claiming to be its descendent.
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)
The alien in Aliens = Qaddafi
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)
trust me kingfish, the "vibe" is not gonna be there for me if i play an alien RPG (experience points, "new skills" yada yada - i don't like RPGs in general though). i'll admit that an FPS is very very close to some of the most breath-catching scenes in alien, but it's not the whole movie! both alien and aliens consist of set pieces, each of which has to be solved/blasted through on its own terms, which makes me think more of a sui generis game like metal gear solid, which asks the player to confront entirely new situations - and use new controls - with each stage.
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:25 (eighteen years ago)
Well, probably not, but again, one of the fun aspects of each flick(like science fiction in any media can be) is that they reflect their times, and the various fears and hang-ups of different eras, from AIDS to cloning to whatever.
(i'm excepting the stupid AvP flick for this, even tho their a sequel coming out already)
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)
Dig it: Square even put out a game in 1987, with music from Nobuo Uematsu
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Alienssquare_screenshot_1.png
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
is that a naked woman with an electric guitar? Fucking sweet.
― kenan, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
stop it
― ghost rider, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)
!!!
― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
what the fuck is "kind've"
― max, Monday, 16 July 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
there used to be this fps online ALIENS game where you were either a marine or an alien and played like 500 people online at the same time. it cost like 7.95 a month and totally kicked ass. i got totally stoned and played that many a night.
― chaki, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
game over, man, game over
― hstencil, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
Alien 3 i sthe best film Fincher will ever direct and I suspect, if ever we see the 40 or so minutes cut, the best of the lot. -- i, grey, Friday, April 13, 2007 7:31 AM (3 months ago) Bookmark Link
A++ contrarianism, would be shocked to the core again
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)
still prefer Resurrection over Aliens
― milo z, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)
chaki, are you thinking of Aliens Online?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/80/Aliens_Online.jpg
― kingfish, Monday, 16 July 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)
yah that was it. i played the fuck out of that game. can't believe that was almost 10 yrs ago :( :( :(
― chaki, Monday, 16 July 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
so what was the latest AVP multiplayer game like? Any good?
― Ste, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 08:48 (eighteen years ago)
something Alex shouldn't of written.
― Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)
Watched this again yesterday for what has to be the fifth or sixth time in my life. I don't know if Alex In NYC is right or if I've just seen it too many times - it was good, but no longer great somehow. I was noticing all the sequences that go on a little long rather than just grooving on them, and oddly I wanted to see more of the aliens. Definitely too many false climaxes. But still, it holds my attention, and the sheer number of images it's burned into my brain really do make a case for classic status. A few things I'd like to call out for special praise:
* Hicks poking his head up into the ceiling, pointing his flashlight around, somehow not noticing the horde of aliens until the camera flips around and we see them just SWARMING forward, fabulous
* all of Hudson's other lines (especially his response to Ripley's pep talk about how Newt has survived all this time by herself with no weapons and no training: "Why don't you put her in charge?!")
* Bishop wedging his way down a pipe, with that great wide-angle shot of just his face
* ALL the beeping tracking devices, from the "see who's dead now" console in the tank to the "six meters...five meters!" radar to the "how close are we to Newt" gizmo - simple, dumb, brilliant way of amping up suspense. It must suck to work in the future where every utilitarian thing is sound-designed to make you more stressed out
* the emphasis on the acid-for-blood problem. I dunno, I just like the way they make it so that constantly, even blowing up an alien can mean killing off your own guys. Nice.
* "You always were an asshole, Gorman."
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 17 November 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)
http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/5714/aliensfm4.jpg
― kingfish, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:03 (eighteen years ago)
no, i do not know these people
― latebloomer, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:13 (eighteen years ago)
LIES
― kingfish, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:17 (eighteen years ago)
Those homemade Smart Guns are *magnificent*!
― Bill A, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:49 (eighteen years ago)
they are pretty impressively craf---HEY WAIT A MINUTE!
― latebloomer, Monday, 19 November 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)
How exactly did I come up with "kind've"? 2004 -- dark times.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 19 November 2007 13:00 (eighteen years ago)
oooh look sega
― DG, Monday, 19 November 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)
It must suck to work in the future where every utilitarian thing is sound-designed to make you more stressed out
hee
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 19 November 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)
This looks very interesting: Rejected Alien 3 script by William Gibson. I haven't read it yet.
― chap, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:06 (seventeen years ago)
that does look interesting. 'might have gone this way' scripts are fascinating. have just started on the rejected indiana jones 4 frank darabont number.
― nari, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
classic Challops in NYC thread
― some dude, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
i've just been reading some of the v early star wars drafts, they are lol-tastic.
RANGER: The Bogan force is too strong upon us. Our spirit is broken. ... DEAK: You're feeling the Bogan's despair. Be strong, Tyree, drive it from your thoughts. ... TROOPS: The Bogan! The Bogan! ... VADER: You will come to know such suffering as only the Master of the Bogan Force can provide.
― ledge, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:34 (seventeen years ago)
It's still mostly the best of the series. Mostly.
― Terrible Cold, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
where's the indy script at?
― Jordan, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
i wld never in a million years dress up like any character of the cast of any of my favourite movies or any movie in fact and then pose for a picture with other people dressed up like the other characters
for the record
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
^^secret stormtrooper
― omar little, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
except maybe this guy but only if it was the end of the world and no one else was dressed up like other characters http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1356/548998656_6c09eea55f.jpg
XPOST!!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
xxp found indy here
http://dl.free.fr/getfile.pl?file=/Bxkz0sDW/Indiana_Jones_and_the_City_of_the_Gods.pdf
― nari, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
thought bogan was some kind of Australian insult
― nari, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, it's the aussie equivalent of chav/redneck.
― chap, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:47 (seventeen years ago)
Joss Whedon's Alien: Resurrection script.
― DavidM, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
-- chap, Wednesday, July 9, 2008 1:47 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
is this meant to imply chav = redneck
― and what, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:02 (seventeen years ago)
i read that script before the movie came out. there was this junk sale/knick knack convention at the mall and this dude was selling bootlegged scripts. i liked the script ok. certainly better than the final product.
― latebloomer, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)
― latebloomer, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
still kills me
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
lololol
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
In Space Everyone Can Hear Those Eerie Steam Pipes
― omar little, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
all of the unused alien3 scripts are rubbish :(
― DG, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
is "kind've" an accepted contraction?
― n/a, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)
"game over, man! scary-sounding game over!"
― and what, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)
that rig sure did have a load of those steam pipes.
― carne asada, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
lots o'scripts: http://home.online.no/~bhundlan/scripts/alien3/
― DG, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
Results 1 - 10 of about 92,600 for "kind've". (0.22 seconds)
From what I can see, a lot of people use it, but completely incorrectly. Logic dictates that it's a contraction of "kind have":
"Want some gum?" "What kind've you got?"
Everyone appears to be using it in place of "kind of," which makes no sense at all:
Kind’ve like candy… Kind've frustrated. It's kind've ironic that the image posted for this article What kind've rims are these?
People be stupid.
― Pancakes Hackman, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
language be flexible
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
i'm all about the fluidity of language, but "kind've" doesn't save you any syllables when spoken or any keystrokes when typed, which is typically the purpose of a contraction, plus it just looks weird and wrong
― n/a, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
i wld take out the apostrophe
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)
This is why god gave us kinda.
― milo z, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)
It doesn't save you any syllables but it sure is nice not having to reach back for that voiceless glottal fricative between two frontally-articulated consonants. Whether it should be reflected in spelling as a contraction, I don't know. The fact that it sounds so much like "would've" and "could've" is probably a big factor in making people wanna do this.
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
Between two frontally-articulated voiced consonants even.
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
I love Aliens!
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 20:04 (seventeen years ago)
You can all kind've blow me.
― Alex in NYC, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:09 (seventeen years ago)
"kind have"?
― marlon brando baby tiger (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:11 (seventeen years ago)
Read the thread.
― Alex in NYC, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
no.
― marlon brando baby tiger (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
YESSSS
― El Tomboto, Friday, 2 January 2009 21:58 (seventeen years ago)
sigh
― 8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Friday, 2 January 2009 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
alex in nyc getting upset about corny one liners is pretty o_O
― bnw, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:05 (seventeen years ago)
I'd say it's kind've o_O, kind've OTM.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:07 (seventeen years ago)
lmao this fucken thread
i. superb trolling by alex in nyc, a+++ii. slocki's finest moment????
― ㋡ (cankles), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:22 (seventeen years ago)
ok so i watched this again (thank you alex for reminding me of this terrific movie!) and when it was over i am slightly embarrassed to say that i exclaimed loudly to no one in particular, "rockin' good times!"
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, August 21, 2004 4:02 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― ㋡ (cankles), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:23 (seventeen years ago)
LOL
― s1ocki, Saturday, 3 January 2009 00:19 (seventeen years ago)
Newt ruins this movie just like Short Round ruined The Temple of Doom.
― thirdalternative, Saturday, 3 January 2009 22:48 (seventeen years ago)
Kinda vs. Kind've = the "o" sounds vs the "f" sound in the word "of", no? Would prob explain the confusion about usage anyway.
― ryan, Saturday, 3 January 2009 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
Watching it again right now. Not as bad as I remembered.
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:15 (sixteen years ago)
Next up -- "Destiny's Child: hey, not bad!"
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:17 (sixteen years ago)
Watching movie on TNT vs. on Bluray/DVD
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:23 (sixteen years ago)
Ha. Seriously, when I composed this thread, it was 4am. I was doing the Friday night overnight shift at the TIME Magazine news desk (where I worked for over a decade). I was invariably tired, hungry and - thus -- wholly cranky and contrarian. That might explain a LOT of my posts between 2001 and the latter end of 2005, actually.
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)
TNT's okay as long as the animated graphic ads in the lower third are kept to a minimum.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)
I did raise some decent -- or at least entertaining -- points here, though.
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:29 (sixteen years ago)
I bet a lot of fucked up parents brought their kids to both films. Don't be that parent, Alex!― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, August 20, 2004 6:48 AM (4 years ago)
Hah, my mother took me to see "Alien" in the movie theater when I was 8 years old. My first R movie. Loved it then, and still do. Sure, it was scary, but I knew it was make-believe. Being scared by choice when you can't really get hurt = fun.
― thirdalternative, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:37 (sixteen years ago)
my dad took me to alien 3 when i was 9, and nothing came of it.
― latebloomer, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:41 (sixteen years ago)
...or did it
Airlock scene at the climax is still a towering stack of crap, though.
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 June 2009 02:57 (sixteen years ago)
My new favorite part of this movie is when Burke is like "Hold on hold on, you're talking about nuking a very expensive installation here!" and Ripley goes "They can BILL me!" Somehow sums up the attitude of the whole thing perfectly. Much prefer pissed-off, working-class human Ripley to creepy, detached pseudo-alien Ripley of the latter two films.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 14 November 2009 07:39 (sixteen years ago)
What about the officious, middle-class Ripley of the first film?
― DavidM, Saturday, 14 November 2009 09:49 (sixteen years ago)
Like.
These are all on sale at my local used book/DVD place. Despite them all being run on TV continually, I'm tempted to shell out and watch them again properly without commercial breaks/"formatted for your TV screen"/etc. etc.
― fields of salmon, Saturday, 14 November 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)
"I'm tempted to shell out and watch them again properly without commercial breaks/"formatted for your TV screen"
I've been enjoying re-watching all of my favorite films widescreen with a projector. It's insane when you think that you've only seen 2/3 of most of your favorite movies.
― Nate Carson, Sunday, 15 November 2009 10:57 (sixteen years ago)
If you can find the Alien Quadrilogy box set cheap it's worth investing, it has lots of goodness including alternative cuts of the movies, including the original cut of Alien3.
― MaresNest, Sunday, 15 November 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)
I quite like Alien 3, does anyone else?
― I am flesh and blood. You are software and circuitry. (chap), Sunday, 15 November 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)
It's flawed but I like it a lot!
― fel (latebloomer), Sunday, 15 November 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
god the premise of this thread is rongness at its rongest
― Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)
One of the rejected scripts for Alien 3 sounds very cool:
The story by Vincent Ward[8] and the screenplay with co-writer John Fasano had Ripley's escape pod crash landing on a monastery-like satellite, which had parts of its interior, both wooden and archaic in design. The Alien³ special features disc set, Alien Quadrilogy[9] explains how Ward came about creating the story for this partially wooden satellite also as a place of refuge for Luddite-like monks. The story begins with a monk who sees a "star in the East” (Ripley's escape pod)[10] and at first believes this to be a good sign. Upon arrival of Ripley, and with increasing suggestions of the Alien presence, the monk inhabitants believe it to be some sort of religious trial for their misdemeanors, punishable by the creature that haunts them. By having a woman in their monastery, they wonder if their trial is partially caused by sexual temptation, as Ripley is the only woman to be amongst an all male community in ten years. To avoid this and (hopefully) the much grimmer reality of what she has brought with her, the Monks of the "wooden satellite" lock Ripley into a dungeon-like sewer and ignore her advice on the true nature of the beast.[11] The monks believe that the Alien is in fact the Devil[12]. Primarily though, this story was about Ripley's own soul searching complicated by the seeding of the Alien within her and further hampered her largely solo attempts to defeat it. The Alien Quadrilogy DVD set features scenes and illustrations that show this ‘Wooden Planet’. Aspects of the monastery and monks of these drafts were later utilised in the final production of the film by having the male inmates participating in an apocalyptic religion that forbid sexual relations. Primarily it was the plot of Alien 3 that was borrowed from this story but little of this world remained in the film. Despite his credit [13], Ward noted that the things he liked best about the story and those that he believed would have made it work were not used. The screenplay featured scenes set in different locations on the one-mile wide wooden planetoid, ranging from wheat fields, through a grisly but darkly comic scene in the monks’ communal toilets, to furnaces and a glass works (also used in the finished film). Empire Magazine described Ward’s ‘Wooden Planet’ concept as ‘undeniably attractive – it would have been visually arresting and at the very least, could have made for some astonishing action sequences. In the same article, Norman Reynolds - Production Designer originally hired by Ward, remembers an early design idea for “a wooden library shaft. You looked at the books on this wooden platform that went up and down”. ‘Imagine the kind of vertical jeopardy sequence that could have been staged here – the Alien clambering up these impossibly high bookshelves as desperate monks work the platform’[14]. Sigourney Weaver described Ward’s overall concept as “very original and arresting.”[15]
― I am flesh and blood. You are software and circuitry. (chap), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)
Search out the Lebbeus Woods sketches for the monk habitations.
― mh, Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)
It's flawed but I like it a lot!― fel (latebloomer), Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:05 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― fel (latebloomer), Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:05 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
ditto!
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Sunday, 15 November 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)
The wooden planet idea was ludicrous and was never going to work.
― DavidM, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)
http://talentedapps.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/kijinnmaru-inconceivable.jpg
― Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
i don't know why i love this so much:
cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 08:46 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalinkyeah what a boring scene― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 08:48 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah what a boring scene― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 08:48 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)
wooden planet could have been cool though - certainly something more distinctive than the flames-and-steam-factory planet we actually got.
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 15 November 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)
yer man ebert's review gets mentioned a bunch upthread from years back. he's talking about here = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMtv1WfgJFA
― piscesx, Sunday, 15 November 2009 23:19 (sixteen years ago)
slocki is such a fuckin' hero in this thread
― fel (latebloomer), Monday, 16 November 2009 00:22 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/arvo/Legodreams/Alien/alien_01.jpg
― kingfish, Monday, 16 November 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)
slocki is such a fuckin' hero in this every ILX film thread
― cough syrup in coke cans (Eric H.), Monday, 16 November 2009 02:19 (sixteen years ago)
i wonder if they had a wooden spacecraft, that 'wooden' go !
― Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Monday, 16 November 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)
alien3 improves as it ages and slopes out from under the towering shadow of Aliens, imho.
― Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Monday, 16 November 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)
lol @ the alien resurrection defenders itt
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)
Alien Resurrection suffers from being not quite distinctive and necessary enough to justify being made, but not nearly faceless and boring enough to be the kind of dull, bean-counting franchise junk that AvP was. Basically all credit to Jeunet and the cast - the story is just not there and neither are the scares.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 16 November 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
AvP2 totally redeems the franchise, tho.
― mh, Monday, 16 November 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
resurrection was admittedly on to an interesting idea but it got buried in actual boring action movie cliches and some of the worst dialogue i've ever heard.
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
not to mention the turd
http://photos.bravenet.com/272/478/925/3/5CBF206132.jpg
― George Mucus (ledge), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
Can't remember the Geiger quote but he says something like "they made [the alien] shit, literally into a piece of shit", lol
― George Mucus (ledge), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
lol @
Alien 3 i sthe best film Fincher will ever direct and I suspect, if ever we see the 40 or so minutes cut, the best of the lot.-- i, grey, Friday, April 13, 2007 7:31 AM (3 months ago) Bookmark Link
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, July 16, 2007 3:16 PM
― luol deng (am0n), Monday, 16 November 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
(Just for the record, though, I would never turn off Alien Resurrection if I came across it on TV. The over-the-top acting and saturated colors and the underwater scene collectively kind of make it work for me.)
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 17 November 2009 03:09 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcLTaMpRl2o
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 07:40 (sixteen years ago)
Surely it's some dude from Goldie Lookin Chain behind that? If not, he sounds exactly like him. Whatever, good stuff and it makes me want to watch Aliens right now, rather than be in work.
― Bill A, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 08:33 (sixteen years ago)
Some nice lines in there.
― krakow, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 10:54 (sixteen years ago)
Gotta give them an A for effort on the kind of dorky project I would talk about but never actually do. I also like how thoroughly it covers all the minor twists and suspense-jacking moments, and then Alien 3 is done in like fifteen seconds.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
Watched this again last night and it was as wonderful as ever. One of my top 5 movies of all time.
― krakow, Sunday, 26 December 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)
Bay twelve - please!
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 8 June 2011 03:19 (fourteen years ago)
lol @ the thread premise
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 03:22 (fourteen years ago)
that kenan-alex debate is one for the ages
(kenan otm btw)
― my downeaster ilxor (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 11:20 (fourteen years ago)
Roffle.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 16:29 (fourteen years ago)
There's something endearing about that level of SF nerdiness in a director, that he's constructed such a detailed backstory for everything under the sun.
You can't go from Aliens to thinking about buying some packaged cookies, than back to Aliens.
kenan otm seven years ago. in a ghost story control over mood and pace is U&K.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:27 (fourteen years ago)
I just watched Alien again last night. As fantastic as the sequel is I just don't see how you can improve on Yaphet Kotto and Harry Dean Stanton futzing around with the ship like a couple of shade-tree mechanics trying to bash an old Ford into shape.
Also pretty much everything that happens in Aliens is just a slight re-do of what happened in Alien. Newt = the cat; "you bitch" = "you bitch"; etc
Speaking of Jonesy, that cat is a DAMN GOOD ACTOR.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:38 (fourteen years ago)
the cat from alien vs. the dog from the thing
― Hungry4Ass, Friday, 25 May 2012 15:41 (fourteen years ago)
The cat makes an appearance in the 8-bit video game of Alien too, you have to bag it before you escape.
― PSOD (Ste), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
you have to WHAT
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
oh
i feel like aliens is very different in story and tone from alien.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
ya i mean it's almost a cliche that they're two totally different kinds of movies
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
Totally - I mean the great thing is watching four "name" directors take the same generic material and run it through four different mills. Of course they all have Sigourney Weaver, an alien, and things that have to be rescued, but that's like saying "all these covers of 'Hey Jude' include the word 'na' somewhere."
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 May 2012 16:04 (fourteen years ago)
The across-the-board quality of the actors involved in the first one is just o_O
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:07 (fourteen years ago)
"i can't lie to you about your chances...but...you have my sympathies."
― me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)
ice cold.
The scene that made me realize that was just after Dallas dies and they're arguing about what to do. Weaver's struggling to assert her authority and Yaphet Kotto is over in the corner, in the background, just out of focus, not. giving. her. an. inch. It's two people struggling with each other, reacting instinctively to each other, undercutting each other, using every ounce of power in the words they have to try to impose their will on the situation. The quality of the acting in that half minute or so is on par with anything you'd see on any stage anywhere.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)
^ The best and most believable part of Alien (come to think of it, Carpenter's The Thing also does this well) is how tense and irritable everyone one is toward each other. Feels like a real workplace.
― bark ruffalo (latebloomer), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:18 (fourteen years ago)
btw dudes the entire making-of doc from one of the special editions is in its entirety on youtube and worth a watch if you have a free afternoon
http://www.youtube.com/user/alien1979themaking
the entire aliens making-of doc is too but watching too much james cameron as talking head bums me out
― me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:19 (fourteen years ago)
Tracer and latebloomer OTM about the acting. Was it on ILX or somewhere else that someone made the case for the cast based on their age as well? Like, first of all it just feels realer in the sense of looking like a workplace where these people really do this for a living and have been doing it for ages. And it also means that they're more experienced actors with better chops and all that stuff.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 May 2012 16:24 (fourteen years ago)
yeah the casting and age of the actors and the "workplace realism" of alien seems to be the remnants of 70s genre filmmaking in alien. a few years later it probably would have been full of beautiful quippy young people on loan from john hughes movies.
― me so fat (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:25 (fourteen years ago)
ya if they made it today they'd all be 22
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 16:26 (fourteen years ago)
haven't seen prometheus, but the alien series as a whole hasn't cast a lot of beautiful quippy young people (maybe winona?)
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 25 May 2012 17:05 (fourteen years ago)
"Will you LISTEN TO ME, PARKER? SHUT UP!"
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:32 (fourteen years ago)
^^^^
"As long as that means killing it.""OBVIOUSLY it means killing it."
― Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:40 (fourteen years ago)
latebloomer so otm - that's the thing that grabbed me so much about Alien from the first time I saw it. The future is dirty and greasy and broken-down, and the people working on the ship are all irritable mechanics beaten down by the man. It's like belowdecks on a battle cruiser after years at sea. It feels like a real place, in a real time. And for a change, it's not a nice place.
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:45 (fourteen years ago)
That milieu against the whole rapey sex/reproduction angle makes me wonder why I didn't actually give it a few points on the horror poll. Not that it needed any.
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 17:47 (fourteen years ago)
i thought harry dean stanton's hawaiian shirts were pretty festive. the future can't be that bad -- they have hawaiian shirts! presumably hawaii still exists!
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 25 May 2012 18:01 (fourteen years ago)
Ridley Scott mentioned once that seeing the scuffed-up production design of a lot of Star Wars gave him the internal go-ahead to commit to the vibe of "space truckers". Where you didn't have military or sciencey types in clean, sleek starships, you had working stiffs shuffling about in long-haul freighters
Blue-collar / working-class Sci-fi flicks: List them here
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:04 (fourteen years ago)
oh here's a neat bit, focusing on the costume design:
http://hellotailor.blogspot.com/2012/03/movie-costumes-i-have-loved-alien-part.html
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DvzIdKKMHwk/T1Kl3FkB0UI/AAAAAAAABIA/ow5wuyVdgjI/s1600/alienbrett.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XXlLOIYx5S0/T1Jpu0Y5rNI/AAAAAAAABGo/056ski5rXJ0/s1600/aliencrew.jpg
I like how there are now multiple places online where you can get Nostomo or Weyland-Yutani crew patches. I kind of want a W-Y logo decal to put on my hardhat, see if anybody notices it amongst the other ones.
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:12 (fourteen years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-baKobTewysY/T1J3seBPZnI/AAAAAAAABG4/npr5yvsH0aM/s1600/alienlambert.jpg
boots!
Also, between this and the 70s Body Snatchers, Veronica Cartwright could play the terrified screaming blonde with the best of them.
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:13 (fourteen years ago)
all youse guys otm about the performance quality in & workplace realism of alien, something that's largely absent in aliens, replaced by enjoyable but rather cartoonish miltary action characterizations. from the blade runner vs. alien thread, some three years back:
the corporate stuff in alien is great!! i'd never seen the future look so... privatized― s1ocki, Tuesday, December 30, 2008 7:36 PM (3 years ago)Slocki OTM. Or so working-class. Alien nails this feeling of lived (and labored) in-ness like no other science fiction movie I've ever seen. You get a sense that you're not seeing the totality of the characters' lives, but just this one, small corner. In part it's the quality of the actors, in part it's the Altman-like approach to dialogue: fragmented, naturalistic, delivered with no regard to cameras or microphones. Especially true during the build-up to the chest-burster gag (perhaps, less so elsewhere in the film). Anyway, it fascinated me as a kid, and it still seems unique and compelling.― served by boot-face (contenderizer), Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:31 PM (3 years ago)next on "discussion generator," contenderizer vs slocki in who can have the last word about how they appreciated the art design, altman-esque dialogue, and which sfx are a bit wack in ridley scott's 1979 space-horra opus Alien― El Tomboto, Friday, January 2, 2009 12:39 PM (3 years ago)
― s1ocki, Tuesday, December 30, 2008 7:36 PM (3 years ago)
Slocki OTM. Or so working-class. Alien nails this feeling of lived (and labored) in-ness like no other science fiction movie I've ever seen. You get a sense that you're not seeing the totality of the characters' lives, but just this one, small corner. In part it's the quality of the actors, in part it's the Altman-like approach to dialogue: fragmented, naturalistic, delivered with no regard to cameras or microphones. Especially true during the build-up to the chest-burster gag (perhaps, less so elsewhere in the film). Anyway, it fascinated me as a kid, and it still seems unique and compelling.
― served by boot-face (contenderizer), Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:31 PM (3 years ago)
next on "discussion generator," contenderizer vs slocki in who can have the last word about how they appreciated the art design, altman-esque dialogue, and which sfx are a bit wack in ridley scott's 1979 space-horra opus Alien
― El Tomboto, Friday, January 2, 2009 12:39 PM (3 years ago)
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)
So many cargo pants. The movie took place in an Old Navy c. 1998.
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:22 (fourteen years ago)
It's a film out of time; the pants and the high-tops vie for true temporal localization.
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:31 (fourteen years ago)
Growing up in the 80s, it was always weird to go back and see Tom Skerritt's various pre-moustache experiments in facial hair throughout the years.
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:32 (fourteen years ago)
The first time I saw MASH and saw Skerritt w/o facial hair I was like WHAAAAAAAA?
― Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
It's funny, even in MASH Skerritt never seemed like a "young" dude -- he was always a dude who'd SEEN stuff, ornery and kinda out there. Love him
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:44 (fourteen years ago)
He was 37 by then.
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:46 (fourteen years ago)
I think he was 21 when he was born
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:50 (fourteen years ago)
We need a poll of his changing style
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:54 (fourteen years ago)
He is Benjamin Button IIRC
― Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:54 (fourteen years ago)
He's so fkn funny in Steel Magnolias (I know this not the thread for that)
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 18:57 (fourteen years ago)
So many cargo pants in Steel Magnolias.
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:00 (fourteen years ago)
coulda done with a few more chestbursters imo
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:02 (fourteen years ago)
I think that one had at least two too many.
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)
are we talking about Dolly Parton y/n
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)
Olympia Dukakis
― Count-Dracula-Down (Eric H.), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:04 (fourteen years ago)
ok i've started the special edition of aliens (life intervened) and am struck by details that seem lifted right out of "gateway" by frederik pohl.. the family doing "exploring" and getting excited that they've struck it rich by discovering an unknown alien artifact; our hero getting a flunkie job at the spaceport in the cargo bay; the "company" which controls everything; kids running around
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:13 (fourteen years ago)
it's all scene-setting for the militarized reboot of the main action obv but still
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:14 (fourteen years ago)
Hm that is a v interesting point of influence, and one that might enhance my liking for Aliens...
― but he go's to a resturang and then die in a toilet (Jon Lewis), Friday, 25 May 2012 19:47 (fourteen years ago)
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, May 25, 2012 3:13 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
super true... which reminds me to reread those books, i really like the just scraping by vibe of them, felt new for scifi
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 20:24 (fourteen years ago)
added to (very long) reading list, thanks!
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:18 (fourteen years ago)
its pure scifi so if thats not your thing it might not be yhour thing.
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:41 (fourteen years ago)
i can dig it
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)
in case you were wondering i mean
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-OYKd8SVrI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6oSCng12xQ
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:45 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXxs4vE4-oA
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyX_xwh2yPY
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMJwtMvesWA
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 25 May 2012 22:35 (fourteen years ago)
working class scifi is kind of a boring norm by now i think
― the late great, Friday, 25 May 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
not if you're watching ALIEN
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:06 (fourteen years ago)
I strongly disagree; 30+ years later and it still ain't.
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)
no-one's done it better. Battlestar came close but Alien still does the best job of making every aspect of the 'working-class-ness" of the ship tangible and real.
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:13 (fourteen years ago)
what else counts
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 25 May 2012 23:32 (fourteen years ago)
i'm not saying "working class scifi" from the 70s/80s isn't great, but at this point "lived in" "gritty" sci-fi environments are sorta ... yawn
for example give me the shiny banal apple store dystopia of minority report or gattaca over the burning trashcans and smudged faces of children of men anyday
― the late great, Friday, 25 May 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)
sure, but i think it's a mistake to equate burning trashcans and smudged faces with working class sci-fi. star wars, for instance, inspired alien and clearly presents an clunky, industrial, lived-in future - but i'd hardly call its overall sensibility, story and setting "working class". of the major characters, luke is the only one who clearly comes from a working-class background (probably han too, but it's hard to say) and we see only a little of that before he's whisked off across the galaxy to battle dark lords and rescue princesses. other than the disposable stormtroopers, we rarely see anybody actually working for a living in the original trilogy.
repo men is pretty working-class (and distinctly class-conscious), but it's also a train wreck.
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:21 (fourteen years ago)
I would say Dark Star is good working class sci-fi. Plus it's great.
― EZ Snappin, Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
I should specify that I'm talking about space opera, or thereabouts, I guess. The deliberate juxtaposition of the highest and most optimistic dreams of post-war spaceflight contrasted with the far more-realistic earthbound workaday concerns of actual people doing actual unglamorous schlub work in those environments of hardshelled tubs floating about in low-grav.
In film, this never would have been possible to portray were it not for the changes in the Hollywood studio system of the late 60s/early 70s.
This kinda stuff has been in fiction since before the war, but I don't think it ever elevated to multimillion dollar 35mm until like 35-40 years ago. Flicks like 2001 made spaceflight far more realistic, stuff like Silent Running and Dark Star brought it to the enlisted level, if you will.
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:32 (fourteen years ago)
yeah and red dwarf and mst3k too but now that everything in sci fi is super gritty and unglamorous i wouldn't mind seeing a new look
― the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:48 (fourteen years ago)
i would rather see john carter on mars than another gritty 00s sci fi movie
― the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 00:49 (fourteen years ago)
i would rather see a thoughtful depiction of actual working lives in a visionary far-future context than either "grit" or idealized fantasy
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:05 (fourteen years ago)
like "wall-e"
― the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:11 (fourteen years ago)
lol, yeah, sure
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:19 (fourteen years ago)
Pluto Nash
― bark ruffalo (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:27 (fourteen years ago)
"moon"
― the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:29 (fourteen years ago)
weird to use minority report as an example of a shiny future as one thing that movie really got right was interleaving the futuristic buildings/tech with older houses, neighbourhoods etc, it def felt way more lived in than most scifi these days
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:44 (fourteen years ago)
"Moon" was dead-on; we are shown the day-to-day dreariness of a workaday stiff doing wage drudgery.
I separate this from, say, Sunshine, which was a scientific crew
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Saturday, 26 May 2012 02:41 (fourteen years ago)
there were tonal problems with the future in minority report -- the whole thing would have been much better as a backdrop to back to the future 2 where the incessant product placement and concept car futurism would have worked for rather than against the movie.
― Philip Nunez, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:18 (fourteen years ago)
serenity is working class sci fi but i did not like that film at all; haven't seen the TV series.
moon is awesome and a perfect example of this.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:18 (fourteen years ago)
serenity is dire
moon was tedious and predictable, occasionally beautiful
district 9 showed the weariness of a workaday stiff
― the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:28 (fourteen years ago)
war of the worlds had a deadbeat dad
― the late great, Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:29 (fourteen years ago)
the road dude was just a doctor
late great you can show yerself to the door at any time
― Choad of Choad Hall (kingfish), Saturday, 26 May 2012 05:47 (fourteen years ago)
Huh, when did Tombot leave, I didn't know he was still around in 2009.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 26 May 2012 10:10 (fourteen years ago)
tombot is still around now isn't he?
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 26 May 2012 12:02 (fourteen years ago)
Well, holy fuck.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 26 May 2012 12:16 (fourteen years ago)
moon wasnt that great imho
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Saturday, 26 May 2012 16:03 (fourteen years ago)
On film 4 right now. I guess it's the director's cut, there's stuff I've never seen before - Newt's family discovering the derelict!
― ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:26 (thirteen years ago)
Might switch over to hot tub time machine in half an hour though.
― ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:29 (thirteen years ago)
Gorman sticking a cigar in his mouth the moment he wakes up might be the best shot in this.
― ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:39 (thirteen years ago)
I mean Apone. Sorry Apone.
― ledge, Sunday, 15 July 2012 20:51 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/0Mh6G.jpg
― Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Monday, 29 October 2012 01:15 (thirteen years ago)
:D
― let's keep this board about feet, please. (latebloomer), Monday, 29 October 2012 02:01 (thirteen years ago)
wow.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 29 October 2012 02:19 (thirteen years ago)
kind of suverts the film's politics of motherhood though, don't it?
return of the repressed IIRC.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 29 October 2012 02:20 (thirteen years ago)
one of the great things about this film is the palpable sense of actual dread at the fate that will befall the characters if they don't escape, and how cameron keeps you with them 100% of the time. barely any wide cutaways or swooping cameras, just claustrophobic terror. even in most horror films the actual fate of everyone isn't something to get worked up over in a queasy manner but even after characters get shuffled offscreen in this one we're still given reminders of the unfathomable tortures they're going through and you're like 'you guys holy shit get the hell out of there you guys'
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:54 (thirteen years ago)
i feel like that is a pretty rare tone to set for a film, even horror flicks. 'no country for old men' and 'silence of the lambs' had some of the same unsettling grim atmosphere but esp in the case of the latter it never feels so helpless. love the lack of a slow turnaround, the marines go from cocky kill mode to shitting themselves for the rest of the film in two minutes flat.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:57 (thirteen years ago)
^^^ i dig all this - maybe accounts for why I've had more bad dreams about this movie than any other probably - the dread is thick even when the pulse-pounding stuff is going on, which is sort of the exact head-space that nightmares hit.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:28 (thirteen years ago)
I dunno. The dread seemed more unpredictable and unsettling in the first one, which had the extra fun suggestions of ugh sexual violations.
― Zero Dark 33⅓: The Final Insult (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:30 (thirteen years ago)
love the lack of a slow turnaround, the marines go from cocky kill mode to shitting themselves for the rest of the film in two minutes flat.
p sure i've said this somewhere else but i really like this movie's depiction of Total System Failure -- the way you're introduced to these very prepared and well-armed marines (in contrast to the hapless truckers of the first one) and then a single weakness, the deactivation of the weapons in the reactor room, like a hairline crack, spiders outward so rapidly and totally shatters the upper hand they've got. this is also (some of) why i like jurassic park and the decent parts of 28 weeks later.
the dread might be less predictable in the first one but its predictability in this one is part of what makes it so dreadful. the nightmare just goes on and on and on and they're in constant terrifying danger for like two straight hours. like the tagline says, it's a war movie where the first one was a horror movie.
― a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:40 (thirteen years ago)
Jurassic Park is an interesting example - pretty sure it was the explicit theme of the book, as in Crichton had just discovered chaos stuff and was really interested in the idea of the minor thing that snowballs in lightning speed to become the total catastrophe. Thus the "you can't play God!" stuff was more "it's just not conceivable to control nature because there are too many variables you will overlook and SOMETHING will go off the rails." Neither the book nor the movie is half as bleak as Aliens though, in the sense of "Jesus, these people are just fucked."
Love the sense the movie gives of temperature/humidity too. The whole "it's a dry heat!" gag - you're aware of the setting throughout as being close, bad air, just muggy and sweaty and icky which also feels very much like a nightmare....
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:47 (thirteen years ago)
Aliens: Colonial Marines, which is designed to be a direct sequel for this, gets released next week.
It's done by the Borderlands guys.
― The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:39 (thirteen years ago)
xp yeah, it's the crichton half of the movie. leavened (+ improved) by the spielberg half, which is all "they do move in herds" and sam neill splayed in joy across a triceratops and laura dern not noticing the brontosaurus because the ferns are mindblowing enough. that's the half that weighs more, the awe-of-discovery half; it's like one of the james mason jules verne movies. the tone even when the raptors are barking is basically joy. aliens meanwhile is like the pacific theatre. good date movie though; you hold on to each other the whole time.
― a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:41 (thirteen years ago)
Spielburg does give the movie some scare though - the big T-Rex scene and the raptors-in-the-kitchen bit have more to do with Jaws than they do with Crichton I think. Or there's some overlap there. But yeah - Aliens is a meat-grinder. My new lady acquaintance hasn't seen any of the series and is interested in trying them out; I'm sure she'd be into it but I'm not sure I'm quite ready to go through them again. Something exhausting about the prospect, much as I do love the series. Maybe it's all the fault of Prometheus...
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:53 (thirteen years ago)
er...Spielberg. Clearly I was thinking of Quest For Glory.
oh yeah the raptors are def jaws descendants -- even the way everybody talks about them for two hours but you don't see them. but even that strain of the movie gets resolved by the t-rex taking them out while we cheer and a huge WHEN DINOSAURS RULED THE EARTH banner flutters down from the rafters.
aliens is one of the most exhausting movies ever made i think. i like the ebert review, which is 3.5 stars out of 4 ("because it does the job it says it will do") but not exactly a rave:
I have never seen a movie that maintains such a pitch of intensity for so long; it's like being on some kind of hair-raising carnival ride that never stops.I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment.
I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment.
― a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:03 (thirteen years ago)
so yeah, absolutely something exhausting about the prospect.
― a permanent mental health break (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:05 (thirteen years ago)
If you think the film is full of dread, you should have tried the Amstrad CPC 464 computer game version
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 13:14 (thirteen years ago)
haha that is a great review
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 13:15 (thirteen years ago)
this passage from the Ebert review almost perfectly describes my feelings about the two Dark Knight films. I don't think Aliens achieves that same queasy intensity, but then, I didn't see it in theaters at the original release; dated effects+home viewing bring goofiness to the forefront while softening some of the dread.
― fiscal cliff racer (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:00 (thirteen years ago)
Well, first of all, "Aliens" has some prolonged quiet moments where they're just waiting around. To die, maybe, which is more dread, but at least they give you a break. But second, the action at the end of "Aliens" is a huge release. Even the fight scenes in Batman are full of portent. "Aliens" may be the rare exception where wall to wall machine gun fire is satisfying in and of itself.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:07 (thirteen years ago)
ya that's true--my thinking w/r/t the parallax in Ebert's review is that maybe "wall to wall machine gun fire" reads as more 'dreadful' and less 'satisfying' in 1986 than it does in 20xx.
― fiscal cliff racer (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:25 (thirteen years ago)
Isn't the auto machine guns only in the Directors cut? If you mean the firefights in the plant or towards the end, I remember them being deeply steeped in "Ofuckofuckofuck"
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:34 (thirteen years ago)
There's definitely a sense of release when they finally get to open up the guns against the aliens at the end, but they're so clearly outnumbered and doomed that the dread doesn't dissipate one bit. Plus: red light! Stressful noise! Burke is locking the door behind him! Etc.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:48 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/C7VqGiJ.gif
― pplains, Sunday, 20 September 2015 20:26 (ten years ago)
omg
― deejerk reactions (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 September 2015 20:40 (ten years ago)
hahahahaha
― Gorefest Frump (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 September 2015 20:59 (ten years ago)
aces
― Meta Forksclove-Liebeskind (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 20 September 2015 21:02 (ten years ago)
love it so much
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 21 September 2015 05:37 (ten years ago)
Amazing.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 21 September 2015 12:25 (ten years ago)
great
― Drop soap, not bombs (Ste), Tuesday, 22 September 2015 13:02 (ten years ago)
Meh
― Norse Jung (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 September 2015 13:18 (ten years ago)
some nice effects but kind of a crap gif
― a silly gif of awkward larping (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 22 September 2015 18:50 (ten years ago)
Every time it reappears this thread title shits me
― as verbose and purple as a Peter Ustinov made of plums (James Morrison), Wednesday, 23 September 2015 02:25 (ten years ago)
http://38.media.tumblr.com/17747f28c917e6668884864cae2b2e26/tumblr_nd26s6bzwn1toxnu4o1_400.gif
― i made a scope for my laser musket out of some (forksclovetofu), Friday, 13 November 2015 06:54 (ten years ago)
Brilliant!
― as verbose and purple as a Peter Ustinov made of plums (James Morrison), Friday, 13 November 2015 09:08 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4QY5Z8LBEo
― ulysses, Monday, 25 January 2016 00:05 (ten years ago)
loooool
― how's life, Monday, 25 January 2016 00:47 (ten years ago)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/50/b9/39/50b939a13f86fa5043e3f2a8d23083de.jpg
― nomar, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 22:45 (nine years ago)
And then an alien pops out of the cake and
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 22:56 (nine years ago)
Awwwww, tho. :(
― tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:21 (nine years ago)
cool that all three of those blokes were in Terminator as well
― PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:48 (nine years ago)
Trying to gauge your level of surprise at that or not
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:48 (nine years ago)
Actors Lance Henriksen (Prince of the City), Michael Biehn (Tombstone), and Bill Paxton (Traveler) help schoolteacher Carrie Henn celebrate her birthday.
― nomar, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:51 (nine years ago)
xp not surprised, more a general aww feeling
― PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:56 (nine years ago)
Traveller. Ha!
― pplains, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 01:06 (nine years ago)
Hadn't thought of that movie in years.
http://i.imgur.com/DTw8EMF.jpg
Pleased to discover Newt did not become a child star tragedy (Aliens is her only film credit), and is now a 4th grade teacher.
― Sanpaku, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:34 (nine years ago)
She mostly teaches math. Mostly.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:58 (nine years ago)
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 14:52 (nine years ago)
ok how cool would it be to see ALIENS in high school or whatever and then learning that Newt was your fourth-grade teacher? that is amazing.
also, from Wired:
“I wasn’t nervous about being on set, because I knew everybody, and they were very friendly,” Henn said during a recent stop at the WIRED Cafe during Comic-Con International, where the film is celebrating its 30th anniversary. “The aliens were all my friends, wearing suits. I was actually most nervous about going to the cafeteria for lunch, because I had to go in-character as Newt, and I thought everybody would be staring at me. I didn’t have any concept that everybody else was going to be dressed up, too. My tutor actually gave me a big pair of sunglasses to wear when I went in. But it turned out not to be such a big thing.”Henn had gotten the part after a meeting with Weaver, who’d flown on the Concorde to London to test out their on-screen chemistry. “I was excited, because I was like, “She was in Ghostbusters! How cool is this?”, Henn remembered. (...) According to Henn, who still keeps in touch with Weaver, the two actress’ bond was evident from the get-go. “Immediately, we hit it off,” she said. “She took me under her wings when we were filming, because I was so inexperienced. I can’t describe my relationship with her, because she’s more than just a friend—what you see on screen is genuinely how we feel about each other.”Even though Henn was only 10 when Aliens was released, she has a vivid recall of her days on the set. Her favorite scene to shoot? The one in which Newt, stuck chest-high in water, is snatched up by a towering alien—a terrifying sequence, and one that gave most other 10-year-olds nightmares for years to come. But for Henn, it was mostly a chance to goof around. “The first assistant director had actually had someone stay there overnight, to make sure the water stayed warm,” she said. “But it was actually too warm for me, so I would sit up on bars on the side, and the alien and I would stay up there, kicking our feet in the water.”
Henn had gotten the part after a meeting with Weaver, who’d flown on the Concorde to London to test out their on-screen chemistry. “I was excited, because I was like, “She was in Ghostbusters! How cool is this?”, Henn remembered. (...) According to Henn, who still keeps in touch with Weaver, the two actress’ bond was evident from the get-go. “Immediately, we hit it off,” she said. “She took me under her wings when we were filming, because I was so inexperienced. I can’t describe my relationship with her, because she’s more than just a friend—what you see on screen is genuinely how we feel about each other.”
Even though Henn was only 10 when Aliens was released, she has a vivid recall of her days on the set. Her favorite scene to shoot? The one in which Newt, stuck chest-high in water, is snatched up by a towering alien—a terrifying sequence, and one that gave most other 10-year-olds nightmares for years to come. But for Henn, it was mostly a chance to goof around. “The first assistant director had actually had someone stay there overnight, to make sure the water stayed warm,” she said. “But it was actually too warm for me, so I would sit up on bars on the side, and the alien and I would stay up there, kicking our feet in the water.”
<3 <3 <3 <3 <3
― tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:16 (nine years ago)
So genius.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:31 (nine years ago)
Do we have a thread for actors with a one-and-done film career? Meaning they had their big/notable role and then that was it -- they didn't die, it didn't turn tragic, they were just all 'that's good' and went on and enjoyed life?
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:32 (nine years ago)
this one? Actors who only appeared in one movie
― willem, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:34 (nine years ago)
Actors Lance Henriksen (Prince of the City), Michael Biehn (Tombstone), and Bill Paxton (Traveler) help schoolteacher Carrie Henn celebrate her birthday.― nomar, Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:51 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― nomar, Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:51 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
That's apparently Carrie's stunt-double, Louise Head.
― how's life, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:47 (nine years ago)
Officially an action figure. Never been prouder.#aliens #blessthevest pic.twitter.com/xRDRGYAU1D— Paul Reiser (@PaulReiser) June 29, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 June 2017 16:11 (eight years ago)
I've always been curious, how did Reiser ever land that role?
― PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Monday, 3 July 2017 09:37 (eight years ago)
they needed a smarmy shitweasel for the part and he was perfect for it
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 11:32 (eight years ago)
^^^
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 3 July 2017 11:34 (eight years ago)
haha
― PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Monday, 3 July 2017 11:44 (eight years ago)
Watched it again last night. Still better than Alien.
― chap, Monday, 3 July 2017 12:01 (eight years ago)
IDK, I guess you could argue its more fun, but the mood, production design, and general aesthetics of Alien always made me rank it as the superior film.
― circa1916, Monday, 3 July 2017 12:18 (eight years ago)
Yep the production design is better in the first, but Aliens is just way more entertaining, and the characters and plotting are stronger. Depends what you look for in a film I suppose.
― chap, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:06 (eight years ago)
Rewatched Alien fairly recently as well, and the scene I found most compelling was Ash's reveal/destruction.
― chap, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:10 (eight years ago)
imho the characters are wayyyy stronger in the first but agreed that they scratch different itches and I am very very happy to spend time with the bolder and cartoonier characters in the second.
― ﴿→ ☺ (Doctor Casino), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:11 (eight years ago)
i think that's legit the scariest scene in the film tbh - giger's glistening biosextech aesthetic is a bit overfamiliar now but ash's breakdown and assault on ripley is genuinely unsettling
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:14 (eight years ago)
xp to chap obv
I don't really compare the two. Alien is my favorite horror movie and Aliens is one of my favorite action/war movies.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:15 (eight years ago)
(and of course ash's assault foregrounds the queasy sexual undertones of the movie in an alarmingly literal fountain of robojizz)
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)
Now we just need a Helen Hunt action figure.
― jmm, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:20 (eight years ago)
greg evigan or gtfo imo
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:23 (eight years ago)
Don't forget Ash literally tries to ram a girlie magazine down Ripley's throat!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 July 2017 14:25 (eight years ago)
well, yeah
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:29 (eight years ago)
the utter lack of subtlety is part of what makes it so unsettling, i think
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:31 (eight years ago)
I remember as a teenager I had a poster on my wall which featured the speech that Ash gives when he's just a jizz covered head on the table. Love that scene.
― PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Monday, 3 July 2017 14:37 (eight years ago)
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, July 3, 2017 9:15 AM (four hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The differentiation between Alien and Aliens is usually rightly chalked up to the fact they're different subgenres within action science fiction. The other main factor that changes is the role of the Corporation as an entity. In Alien you think there's a person who is acting without regard for human life, that they have a direct representative on the ship that's to blame, but it's revealed they're still completely anonymous and offscreen. Ash is mechanical and has no emotional stake in his actions. The line between the characters we know and the shadowy entity is kept intact. Maybe it's malevolent, maybe it's just a computer on the other end doing the risk/reward calculation of losing a crew in order to capture a new lifeform.
The further into the franchise you get, the more the role of the other end is expanded. That's probably the main failure of Alien 3, all things considered: the role is dialed back, and when the human face is revealed, it's in the very last act and not that threatening.
Alien: Resurrection turns the formula on its end, and every corporate or military character has some ridiculous set of craven motivations. It's malevolence as farce, played against a still-threatening xenomorph. So there are three parallel tracks that play out: alien versus protagonists (Ripley and Call, with the mercenaries being relatively disposable), alien versus corp/military which is farcical, and protagonists versus corp/military which becomes more mechanical in the end when you realize that the real triumph of their research wasn't the weaponized alien, but Ripley as post-human who walks off at the end
― mh, Monday, 3 July 2017 18:55 (eight years ago)
good post
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 July 2017 19:57 (eight years ago)
yeah that's a cool reading!
― ﴿→ ☺ (Doctor Casino), Monday, 3 July 2017 21:55 (eight years ago)
fwiw this isn't my full or really a well thought-out take, I just love spitballing on ilx. pretty obvious when you see how badly I need to copy edit. need a blog, I guess.
― mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 00:52 (eight years ago)
do it!
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 01:06 (eight years ago)
actually watching Aliens again now, and I'm remembering how Cameron does his ensemble films well, but in a way that always kind of irritates me. it's by-the-numbers, but in a way where the stock characters are just a little too punchy
― mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 01:32 (eight years ago)
"The further into the franchise you get, the more the role of the other end is expanded"
What I like about Burke as the face of corporate evil is that even if he's kind of an 80s yuppie archetype he feels utterly contemporary. The news has never been more full of Burkes.
― The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:27 (eight years ago)
for sure, half of the time Rippey says something and he's like "oh shit you're right!"dude has no due diligence skills, he's just such a puppet
― mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:41 (eight years ago)
watching Aliens now and he's literally explaining to Ripley about how they need to get a specimen through quarantine because of the profit potentialand justifying his bad call for letting the colonists just investigate the planet after he'd already talked to Ripley
the best part is Bishop becomes the good guy because he has one directive that has higher priority than following the company's orders: protecting human life. Burke's only rebuttal is "yeah, but..."
― mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:44 (eight years ago)
"I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid"
― mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 02:46 (eight years ago)
Great performance from Hendriksen.
― chap, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 08:47 (eight years ago)
it's such a simple reversal of the first movie that the android turns out to be an invaluable ally but it's so effective. what a great character, and what a fantastic performance
i wish we could somehow see the version of the terminator that cameron originally envisaged, with henriksen as the everyman-infiltrator terminator
i love that guy's face, it's one of cinema's great ugly/handsome visages. you know he was illiterate until he was 30? he needs to write an autobiography, i'd be first in line for a copy
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:25 (eight years ago)
oh wait, he has written a memoir! brb gonna get a copy - what an oversight on my part
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:26 (eight years ago)
£87 for a copy on amazon, fuck
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:29 (eight years ago)
Henriksen did a "Random Roles" interview on The AV Club last week and apparently once got out of a speeding ticket when the trooper walked up to his car, looked through the window and said "Bishop!"
― Old Lynch's Sex Paragraph (Phil D.), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 12:29 (eight years ago)
It is. One of the many ways the further sequels bungle things is with the androids. Like, what do they have to offer, besides sometimes going nuts? Especially in the most recent movies, when the humans just stupidly land on planets and take off their helmets anyway. It's similar to the Terminator twist: first Arnie is a bad guy, then suddenly he's a good guy, which is a cool twist. But in all the other movies the Terminator is just another killer robot from the future.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:52 (eight years ago)
i'd argue that fassbot and winona ryder as android were the stronger parts of their respective movies
i should probably rewatch resurrection before saying that but oh well
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:58 (eight years ago)
They were, without a doubt, but that's partly because unlike Alien and Aliens the humans are without a doubt the worst, most cartoonishly poorly written and conceived characters in those films.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:00 (eight years ago)
it's been a long time since i've seen resurrection but i remember thinking winona was awful in it
maybe i should rescreen
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:12 (eight years ago)
i should probably rewatch resurrection
guys please don't do this to yourselves
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:18 (eight years ago)
funnily enough the making-of doc on the resurrection blu-ray is the best of the ones on the (ahem) 'quadrilogy' box-set iirc, maybe i should just watch that again
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:21 (eight years ago)
the underwater sequence in resurrection is pretty good, maybe i'll just watch it on youtube
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:22 (eight years ago)
Resurrection is so tonally different from the others that people hate it, and it has some narrative problems, but I enjoy it. You lose the somber tone of the previous films and get two competing styles: a goofy French science fiction bit that, more than anything, reminds me of some of the near-slapstick of The Fifth Element (which came out the same year, so they're drawing from some common base and not each other) and the Ripley/Call end-run of idiots trying to manipulate and monetize the alien creatures with genetic experimentation. The mother/daughter theme returns and it's somehow put into the same characters as the human/android theme (wtf), and there's the almost meta-commentary angle of whether we can really have Ripley without the alien, and vice versa. Because Ripley and the alien are the same.
― mh, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 15:01 (eight years ago)
thread title should read "Alien" (singular) or "Raiders of the Lost Ark"
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 15:11 (eight years ago)
mh otm about resurrection
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 15:25 (eight years ago)
thread title should read 'kind of' tbrr
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 16:36 (eight years ago)
mh is right, there is interesting stuff in resurrection but iirc it was an undercooked script when they started shooting and tinkering with it on-set didn't help
― 🎵oooh, kevin has a place in perth🎵 (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 4 July 2017 16:38 (eight years ago)
I disagree about there being anything interesting about the fourth film, which sets the stage for future "what does it all mean?!" BS. Third movie, had it been done right, would have been a fitting end to the series.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 July 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Wednesday, 5 July 2017 02:02 (eight years ago)
Alien was a fitting beginning _and_ end but no one really knows when to stop
― mh, Wednesday, 5 July 2017 02:40 (eight years ago)
Pretty certain there's a similar story on the Near Dark DVD extras, expect this time he's wearing his vampire clothes and covered with blood
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 5 July 2017 09:08 (eight years ago)
Going to watch "Aliens" with my daughter tonight (she's already seen "Alien"). So: do I show her the theatrical or director's cut? The DC has some stuff going for it that makes it richer (daughter stuff), weaker (colony stuff, imo) and, well, just longer (robo guns killing aliens). Theatrical ... prolly the way to go, right? At least just because it's shorter?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
I think the theatrical, because I don't like the movie playing its hand regarding the colony so early. Having your first glimpse of it be the apparently-abandoned buildings when the Marines arrive is a better way to go.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:56 (eight years ago)
we had a discussion about the two cuts in the cameron thread but yeah: theatrical
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:57 (eight years ago)
directors, but fast-forward through the colony stuff
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:58 (eight years ago)
Watched the DC recently and it's totally not slow or anything despite being quite long. They colony bits were fine, but unecessary.
― chap, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:00 (eight years ago)
i think there's probably a much better version that incorporates about half the added scenes in the Special Edition and loses the rest. my most hated bit of dialogue for some reason is:
Christ ! Some honch in a cushy office on Earth says go look at a grid reference. We look. They don't say why, and I don't ask. I don't ask because it takes two weeks to get an answer out here, and the answer is always "Don't ask."
it's some weak-ass "ha ha you know how office politics are!" crap
― drejelire, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:02 (eight years ago)
i still watch it for the added bits i do like (sentry guns, a bit more of Ripley's return, bonus Reiser)
― drejelire, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:03 (eight years ago)
Colonists hurt the suspense/reveal a bit (despite the movie already being a sequel called "Aliens").
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:03 (eight years ago)
theatrical, but rewind to watch paul reiser bite it twice
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:04 (eight years ago)
theatrical all the way. if she loves the film she can check out the deleted scenes. as I was saying on the other thread, the extra 17 minutes really drag down the pace and either spoil surprises or make the themes way too obvious.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:08 (eight years ago)
That's my instinct as well.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:14 (eight years ago)
makes it richer (daughter stuff)
Wait so the stuff about Ripley's daughter growing old and dying is not in the theatrical? Cos that really ties the film together thematically.
― chap, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:36 (eight years ago)
Nope, cut then put back in later.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:37 (eight years ago)
i didn't mind that so much but some podcast or something made the argument that it overloads the substitue/surrogate aspect of her relationship with newt, sapping the integrity of it as its own things. plus she does not need to have an actual lost daughter scene for us to empathize with the more general situation of everyone she ever knew being old/dead, and to grasp what the relationships with hicks and newt might mean to her.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:44 (eight years ago)
it does expand on the mother vs. mother alien as rival fight.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:49 (eight years ago)
that's all there anyway, though, because ripley has a nurturing mother-like relationship with newt. i just think it resonates more powerfully as subtext and that cutting the scene reflects a smart show-don't-tell thought process.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:56 (eight years ago)
Theatrical worked like a charm. I've seen this a million times, the first when I was 12 or 13 in the theaters with my dad - my older daughter is, coincidentally, the same age now - but I still have some fresh thoughts, having watched it with fresh eyes with someone who has never seen it:
1) Sigourney Weaver really is so great in this. As is Carrie Henn. If either of them faltered, this might have fallen apart. (Clearly the whole cast is perfect, particularly Reiser and Paxton and Biehn.) 2) The blue screen (why did the color change to green?) largely holds up, give or take, as do the models, though I never bought the vehicle they crashing around in, which seemed poorly designed for a combat ATV. 3) Was this the first militaristic machine gun sci-fi film? 30 years later it's still the marines 'n' monsters standard. And obviously constantly ripped off and referenced. 4) Speaking of which, the action scenes are just so specularly well storyboarded. Ever notice there are virtually no scenes where the aliens and people actually share a shot? And yet it never feels like people reacting to things that aren't there. 5) Man, I simply can't believe Bill Paxton is dead. I hung with him once, and he was every bit Bill Paxton. Michael Biehn, btw, I want to say has a second career now as a porn producer (!). 6) This is like the least coked up mid-'80s action film imaginable. 7) I do think Ripley learning she had a daughter who lived and died without her wouldn't have hurt. Sets up the maternal rivalry with the queen, particularly when they first meet, and obviously all the stuff with Newt, not to mention the explicit parallels with alien impregnation. Doesn't need it, but it's the only of the extra material that enhances the film rather than simply extends it. (Forgot that Newt actually hugs her and calls her mommy when she finally kills the Queen). 8) How in the world is it that we managed Segweys but we still haven't designed cool-ass exoskeletons? Screw flying cars, this seemed well within reach 30 years ago.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 02:15 (eight years ago)
(Should note that my daughter was kind of so-so on it. Liked it, but not blown away, and predicted a couple of the big beats. Kids today ... )
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 02:16 (eight years ago)
The blue screen (why did the color change to green?)
It didn't.
blue is better for night / dark sequences, where any blue bleed is less noticeable. green is better for day. Obviously if any of one or the other color is IN the scene, preference is to use the other.Also, green works better with digital, blue is better for film.
I just looked all the up btw. JtM would know best probably.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 4 November 2017 02:27 (eight years ago)
Hmm, I never really thought about it before, but that makes sense. I just could have sworn, anecdotally, that any bts stuff I saw growing up was always blue screen, but when things went digital they went green. Which yeah, green works better with digital, but I didn't know they still did blue.
9) One last observation, the sound design is just incredible. From the guns firing to the almost elephant-like shriek of the aliens to the sound of the nuclear power generator melting down, just so many iconic sounds.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 03:10 (eight years ago)
Yeah, I guess I just wasn't paying attention. This is my favorite ever blue/green screen demo, and it's night and uses blue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaPQHbexaCo
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 03:12 (eight years ago)
Bishop's crawl down that tunnel is still damn terrifying, even in its scarcity in terms of screen time.
"I may be synthetic but I'm not stupid" is one of those great throwaway lines delivered just so perfectly.
― drejelire, Saturday, 4 November 2017 03:15 (eight years ago)
because lance henriksen is fkn gold
ALIENS is still kind've a crap film though
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 4 November 2017 08:19 (eight years ago)
It definitely has a weird structure, but I don't know how anyone can call it crap, not least because for point of comparison there have been a half-dozen crap Alien films that followed it.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:12 (eight years ago)
The structure's not that weird? Bit of a slow burn for an action movie I guess, but very three act-y.
― chap, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:17 (eight years ago)
Long stretch of no action - 45 minutes till first battle, right? - then long stretch of no action, then long stretch of action. It's just kind of lopsided. Not bad, though.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:19 (eight years ago)
I'd say that's a pacing issue rather than a structural one.
― chap, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:22 (eight years ago)
Works for me though.
Sure, maybe that's more pacing, but that may be just splitting hairs, because that is how the story is built. That's another thing I always liked about it, though. The quiet no action parts are really quiet, for an otherwise loud action movie with machine guns.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:24 (eight years ago)
Was this the first militaristic machine gun sci-fi film?
The first one that springs to mind is Predator, which was filming when this came out.
Speaking of which, the action scenes are just so specularly well storyboarded. Ever notice there are virtually no scenes where the aliens and people actually share a shot? And yet it never feels like people reacting to things that aren't there.
This is a really good point, and not something I'd noticed.
Michael Biehn, btw, I want to say has a second career now as a porn producer
I'm not sure you should say this - it isn't in any sense true.
How in the world is it that we managed Segweys but we still haven't designed cool-ass exoskeletons?
There's a few, but less than you'd expect alright. One of things that I thought the film shared with Alien is the impression that these were not exactly cutting edge on the industrial or military sides, it wasn't a crack teched-up team, these were just standard grunts either way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V87lSB5XWVs
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:48 (eight years ago)
I think they are meant to be a pretty well-equipped team, maybe not some super-elite unit but the spiels about their gear suggest they think they've got the good toys. It's just a future where the best way to kill people is still bullets and the best way to transmit live footage is still a crappy analog signal. Obviously it all helps secure the Vietnam vibe as well.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:54 (eight years ago)
Michael Biehn, btw, I want to say has a second career now as a porn producerI'm not sure you should say this - it isn't in any sense true.
It's the weirdest thing, I could have sworn I used to get press releases touting his involvement in some adult video line. My mistake if not. Sorry Michael Biehn!
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:58 (eight years ago)
Another thing I thought of upon re-viewing, is this movie really set the template for a lot of first person shooters, right? With the helmet cams and vitals and whatnot. I'm not much of a gamer, but that really reminds me of how a lot of games are set up. At the least it set the template for "Contra," or so I assume. "Contra" was 1987.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:01 (eight years ago)
yeah contra is heavily ripped from this, including a lot of the boss visuals and stuff. and it reaches FPSes almost immediately if without such 1:1 connections in DOOM, whose creators had obviously seen this about ten times each.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:05 (eight years ago)
(OK, xpost, but I guess Biehn and his wife Jennifer Blanc were producing a line of grind house films? Maybe I saw a press release for one of the more salacious titles and got the wrong idea?)
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 14:08 (eight years ago)
A lot of the movies lines were nicked and appeared in various FPS games.
― Ste, Monday, 6 November 2017 12:45 (eight years ago)
the box art for contra stole the alien design but the main dude on the cover was clearly modelled on schwarzenegger (based i think on a still from predator?)
http://www.mobygames.com/images/covers/l/32879-contra-nes-front-cover.jpg
meanwhile artwork for the first metal gear game was clearly modelled on michael biehn in aliens
http://78.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l839lvg6Oc1qbn1vmo1_1280.png
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 6 November 2017 12:53 (eight years ago)
is that Aliens or Terminator?
― Ste, Monday, 6 November 2017 13:04 (eight years ago)
oh yeah, you're right, it is terminator
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 6 November 2017 13:05 (eight years ago)
http://loyalkng.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sylvester-stallone-arnold-schwarzenegger-contra-konami-alien-predator.gif
― Number None, Monday, 6 November 2017 13:09 (eight years ago)
Love it
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 6 November 2017 14:45 (eight years ago)
Alien Vs. Predator Vs. Rambo.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:59 (eight years ago)
Like, a dance-off or something? Because...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxQmFw565_8
― how's life, Monday, 6 November 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
what the fuck @NECA_TOYS pic.twitter.com/zQqrAEolEV— BenDavid Grabinski (@bdgrabinski) November 7, 2017
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:02 (eight years ago)
looks like david harbour's character from stranger things in the middle of a fatal stroke
― with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:08 (eight years ago)
Eleanor RipleyFlushing a Xenomorph into the vacuum of spaceThey hug your face— Alex Hannon (@Liffonmelsmork) January 12, 2018
― j., Sunday, 14 January 2018 02:22 (eight years ago)
They hug @ u face
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 14 January 2018 03:04 (eight years ago)
I'm ready, man. Check it out. I am the ultimate badass! State-of-the-badass-art! You do not wanna fuck with me. Check it out. Hey, Ripley, don't worry. Me and my squad of ultimate badasses will protect you!
― omar little, Thursday, 14 March 2019 05:00 (seven years ago)
It's a fantastic film, though I question how many of the story beats are innovative, rather than just Cameron displaying a screenwriting ease packing in beats from other films. I feel like its a summation of cinematic action that came before, and a huge weight on what could come after. If any franchise needed a Rian Johnson to confound expectations, it was the Alien franchise after 1986.
― contains pieces the size of a child's esophagus (Sanpaku), Thursday, 14 March 2019 05:55 (seven years ago)
you mean like making a sequel where no one has any weapons?
― Number None, Thursday, 14 March 2019 07:55 (seven years ago)
ah yes, rian johnson, the most expectation-confounding filmmaker of our generation
― kiss me dadly (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 14 March 2019 11:26 (seven years ago)
wtf are 'innovative story beats' btw? aliens tells a gripping story, it expands significantly on the world established in the first movie and takes it in new directions, and it deepens our understanding of ripley's character and motivations in surprising new ways, i don't think knocking it because it fails to revolutionise hollywood storytelling conventions really works
― kiss me dadly (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 14 March 2019 11:29 (seven years ago)
I think, maybe, the only innovation (if it can be called that) of this movie is its really awkward, unbalanced structure: it remains an action movie exemplar despite two looooooong stretches with no action. That attests to the sheer quality of said action but also to the quality of the characters, or at least the colorful snappiness of their dialogue.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 March 2019 11:42 (seven years ago)
From 2019, "give the kick-ass woman issues about whether she's a good mother" doesn't really count as surprising.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 14 March 2019 12:41 (seven years ago)
it wasnt made in 2019 i mean cmon
― ~mine own~ bitcoin (darraghmac), Thursday, 14 March 2019 13:31 (seven years ago)
Speaking of years, I do appreciate that Alien/Aliens were set in what is still now the distant future.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 March 2019 13:33 (seven years ago)
xp, I know but 'surprise' isn't a reaction that takes the timestamp into consideration.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 14 March 2019 14:21 (seven years ago)
i always forget there's such a long period between the initial arrival of the Marines and the point where shit goes bad; the film keeps up its momentum so well that it flies by.
Cameron's skill with narrative structure and atmosphere has always been impressive, and w/the latter the film's early use of helmet-mounted cameras and motion sensors and heart monitors for each marine (when they flatline it just makes everything more final and chilling*) is just an astonishingly effective way to ante up the dread and oppressiveness.
(*flatlining in cinema is usually a whatever moment, an easy out, and to see it used in this way is a minor testimony to Cameron's directorial abilities.)
― omar little, Thursday, 14 March 2019 18:28 (seven years ago)
I get the criticism about the story beats not being innovative - the bones of it are an off-the-rack 'go on a mission, find the key to your character at the end of it'. All that's missing is a bit at the end where the Queen looks at Ripley and says "we're not so different, you and I..."
― One Eye Open, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:09 (seven years ago)
cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, August 20, 2004 8:46 AMBookmark Flag Post Permalinkyeah what a boring scene― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, August 20, 2004 8:48 AMBookmark Flag Post Permalink
― |Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:17 (seven years ago)
All that's missing is a bit at the end where the Queen looks at Ripley and says "we're not so different, you and I..."
haha this isn't even missing
(prob the joke)
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:45 (seven years ago)
Another thing I thought of upon re-viewing, is this movie really set the template for a lot of first person shooters, right? With the helmet cams and vitals and whatnot. I'm not much of a gamer, but that really reminds me of how a lot of games are set up. At the least it set the template for "Contra," or so I assume. "Contra" was 1987.― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:01 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalinkyeah contra is heavily ripped from this, including a lot of the boss visuals and stuff. and it reaches FPSes almost immediately if without such 1:1 connections in DOOM, whose creators had obviously seen this about ten times each.― Doctor Casino, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:05 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink(OK, xpost, but I guess Biehn and his wife Jennifer Blanc were producing a line of grind house films? Maybe I saw a press release for one of the more salacious titles and got the wrong idea?)― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:08 AM Bookmark Flag Post PermalinkA lot of the movies lines were nicked and appeared in various FPS games.― Ste, Monday, November 6, 2017 2:45 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:01 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:05 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 4, 2017 4:08 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Ste, Monday, November 6, 2017 2:45 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
not to mention starcraft
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:48 (seven years ago)
The way Weaver looks at the Queen without saying a word before threatening to incinerate the eggs and the Queen's momentary ceding ground = classic.
I'm amazed that in 1986 the Academy saw through its blinders during the staidest decade of its existence to date and gave a Best Actress nomination to a genre piece.
― Let's have sensible centrist armageddon (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 14 March 2019 20:49 (seven years ago)
Anyone who doesn't like this film needs a good thrashing.
Having said that, probably these will all turn out to be balls: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/alien-celebrating-40th-anniversary-6-short-films-1193923
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Thursday, 14 March 2019 23:44 (seven years ago)
James otm on both counts
Besmirch this movie at your peril
https://68.media.tumblr.com/1b4731564aee8ba541588f50604f9cbe/tumblr_nrnh0x9xR81u2ragso2_500.gif
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 05:13 (seven years ago)
the effects/sets in this movie look better than any cgi movie
― na (NA), Friday, 15 March 2019 14:14 (seven years ago)
1982 - 1986 was the apogee of film special effects
― Number None, Friday, 15 March 2019 14:27 (seven years ago)
I think this film has a bit of the Jaws effect. The creature effects are totally superb but it seems likely that in order to hide a bit of the awkwardness of the aliens’ movements Cameron had to keep them in shadow and keep glimpses of them to a minimum, up until we see the queen at the end. It creates this real sense of terror and a scene like Hicks popping up into the ceiling to have a look and his flashlight panning across dozens of these things crawling at him is one of the more nightmarish visuals i recall from my childhood. that and Vasquez/Gorman being cornered in the ventilation shaft gave me some bad dreams as a teen.
― omar little, Friday, 15 March 2019 15:30 (seven years ago)
Yeah, possibly the only flawed shot in the movie is when the queen's two goons sort of awkwardly shuffle in and out of the scene. For the most part though he just shows you a second or two of various slithering and awful motions, and your brain fills in how the aliens probably walk and attack - - - much scarier and more fluid than anything they could create by having someone in a rubber suit walk across the set. It's amazing how many of the bargain-basement direct-to-video knock-offs (which of course also have even cheaper rubber suits, etc.) manage to screw this up.
― |Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:11 (seven years ago)
same type of quick show/cut used to the same horrifying effect in matrix rave scene
― ~mine own~ bitcoin (darraghmac), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:27 (seven years ago)
Omar otmI think because Cameron leans so hard into the meathead action-horror genre it feels like it’s just a dumb alien movie. And in a way it kind of is. But as Omar notes, Cameron makes really good choices in terms of dialing up tension, finessing the action, or playing up the horror moments - the kind of attention to detail that makes it really enjoyable to watch. Mainly because that kind of care & finesse stands out when you’re in a B-movie kinda world.
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 16:37 (seven years ago)
i think the very unusual Ebert review of this is pretty spot-on, even if in some sense i disagree with it. He admits it's amazing but also admits he didn't enjoy it because of its intensity and constant dread, whereas i totally enjoy it every time. but i understand what he means. i think as far as a film depicting people finding themselves trapped in a desperate situation with no easy way out, it's almost unparalleled. the best thing about it is while there are characters who are not especially bright, none of them do anything especially stupid. they're flawed in recognizable ways. Hudson is an idiot but he doesn't make any dumb tactical errors, he freaks out but never in moments of action, just in moments of downtime. Gorman is in over his head but he's not a craven coward, he just freezes up. Burke flees into a bad spot towards the end, but i mean who the hell wouldn't make a run for it? etc etc...lots of the character types are cliches but their behavior and decision-making makes perfect sense for each one and unlike lesser films they don't behave in ways to artificially change the narrative and story, they're always reacting to what's happening at the moment.
the only thing i question is Burke still thinking about the Company and getting the samples back through quarantine at a time when the survival of the entire team seems pretty unlikely. But Reiser's extremely '80s nervous nice dude comedy style works surprisingly well for the character of an ambitious, sociopathic creep, so it mostly works for me despite that, and i suppose he also figured his survival was a mutually exclusive issue alongside the issue of the alien samples.
― omar little, Friday, 15 March 2019 16:53 (seven years ago)
agreedomar otm again, as always
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 March 2019 17:23 (seven years ago)
co-sign
― |Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 15 March 2019 17:43 (seven years ago)
'kind've'
― mookieproof, Friday, 15 March 2019 17:48 (seven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFmq2gDwXpo
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 25 May 2019 00:35 (seven years ago)
hmmm
Man, those AI generated images of Aliens: The Musical
https://preview.redd.it/ksydb2ec0jwa1.png
https://preview.redd.it/kgrzw2ec0jwa1.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/131dhju/aliens_the_musical/
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:40 (three years ago)
Dammithttps://preview.redd.it/kgrzw2ec0jwa1.png?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=96b8c5cb406a4f99bb8e52d99e47fc24fbfef1fa
https://preview.redd.it/44q0kddc0jwa1.png?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=2f7d648bac46f30dfc30318b2ae48b0fb14305a7
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:42 (three years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fu20G4faQAYcgeT?format=jpg&name=medium
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 29 April 2023 12:43 (three years ago)
lol beautiful
― Ste, Saturday, 29 April 2023 19:49 (three years ago)