Mourning in America - Trump Year One: November '16 to

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Fuck this guy and everything he stands for. Fuck him for making me feel uncomfortable in every community. Fuck him for everyone who is going to die and be lost in the inevitable backwash.

Let us keep track of the low points and the victories; let's find some small support from our own community and for god's sake let's be kind. I grew up in the Reagan '80's. I imagine this is gonna be worse. Let us be kind but let us be vigilant. Let us stand up and work harder.

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

i'm feeling pumped up to fight back today.

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

it's a wonder what sleep can do

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

at least for this gay man of color

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

thx for kicking off.

every day feels so weirdly dissociative right now.

i hope in orbit will hang out in this thread because i feel like she's already got the hang of some things I'm gonna need to learn in re doing things that matter in BK.

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

Campus police at San Diego State University are looking for two suspects who allegedly made comments about President-elect Donald Trump and Muslims before stealing a student's belongings and possibly her car.

In a safety alert sent to students and staff, police said they're investigating the incident as a hate crime. In a statement, President Elliot Hirshman disclosed the woman is, in fact, Muslim and was wearing a hijab.

Police say the student was walking to her car in parking structure 12 around 2:30 p.m. when two males made what police believe was an anti-Muslim comment and grabbed her purse and backpack. "They removed her car keys before fleeing the area," the report says. "The victim left the area to contact to police. When police arrived on scene, her vehicle was missing. She was uninjured."

Hirshman said the university is "pursuing all possible measures to apprehend the suspects." One is described as a 5-foot-9-inch white male with blond or brown hair and light eyes wearing a white t-shirt and jeans. The second is described as a 6-foot-2-inch Hispanic male with dark hair wearing a gray hoodie and dark pants.

"We condemn this hateful act and urge all members of our community to join us in condemning such hateful acts," Hirshman said in a statement. "Hate crimes are destructive to the spirit of our campus and we urge all members of our community to stand together in rejecting hate."

mizzell, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

honestly the first crushing low to navigate will also be one of the most florid -- his assemblage of what will surely be one of the most grotesque cabainets since the Mutter Museum

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

xpost jfc!

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

small things i did:
-donated to ACLU
-joined Democratic Socialists of America
-made it through desperately sad third day at new job at an org that will be targeted hardcore
-got a good night's sleep

we can do this

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

Some good stuff in this series of tweets - white Midwesterners need to understand the "coastal elites" just as much as vice versa.
https://twitter.com/pwthornton/status/796355506759671808

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

I gave to a bunch of minority protection and legal defense charities yesterday, set up a monthly donation to Planned Parenthood and contacted them about becoming a volunteer.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

i'm feeling pumped up to fight back today.

― global tetrahedron, Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:04 AM

OTM!!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

connecting with people is good. laying off the internet/twitter/facebook

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

one thing I want to do to augment my cognitive equipment for what's coming is read something good and unflinching about Berlusconism in Italy. Can anyone recommend any book on that subject

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

I plan to rely on this thread for news for the forseeable future. Trying to make a clean break with Twitter and cable news for as long as humanly possible. My wife put on Maddow last night but at least she was covering the protests. I'm 100% done with all this "What are the optics?" type bullshit though.

evol j, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

I plan to rely on this thread for news for the forseeable future. Trying to make a clean break with Twitter and cable news for as long as humanly possible. My wife put on Maddow last night but at least she was covering the protests. I'm 100% done with all this "What are the optics?" type bullshit though.

― evol j, Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:16 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

I had this setup to do before the election but it's particularly intense now: i'm serving lunch to holocaust survivors at 1 today. I will also be trying to have some real conversations and asking for wisdom. will report back.

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

Called up my Trump supporting friend last night and tried to heal the divide between us. Going forward with love in the heart. Best wishes to you all.

Ross, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

that kind of humanity is the spirit we need xp

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

Collapse the current seven tax brackets, which range from 10 to 39.6 percent, into three brackets of 10, 20, and 25percent.

Three fucking brackets? Are you KIDDING ME?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

it's a wonder what sleep can do

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:05 AM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

at least for this gay man of color

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:05 AM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea i feel better today too. yesterday was .... awful. desperate. i still feel so angry and defeated about this though.

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

btw:

Russian government officials had contacts with members of Donald Trump’s campaign team, a senior Russian diplomat said Thursday, in a disclosure that could reopen scrutiny over the Kremlin’s role in the president-elect’s bitter race against Hillary Clinton....

[snip]

.“Obviously, we know most of the people from his entourage,” Rybakov said. “Those people have always been in the limelight in the United States and have occupied high-ranking positions. I cannot say that all of them but quite a few have been staying in touch with Russian representatives.”

“We have just begun to consider ways of building dialogue with the future Donald Trump administration and channels we will be using for those purposes,” Ryabkov was quoted as saying.

There were no further details given on the claimed contacts, including names in the Trump campaign or other specifics.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Serious q: what's the worst thing that could happen with detente with Russia? In a realpolitik way not moral way.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Ask some Latvians et al.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

Realignment toward Russia is the least disconcerting thing to me. Putin is no worse than plenty of foreign leaders we make nice with.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

Our student media editor in chief wrote this. I don't often post their work but I got a lump in my throat.I watched Clinton's concession speech w/her, a black female student. She was crying. When I asked what was wrong she said, "Do you know what it's like to be a woman and not being able to show emotion, to not cry because if you do you'll get dismissed with, 'Well, you're a woman'?"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

so is it true that the Dow is actually up today?

really feeling thankful for these threads b/c I just cannot handle TV in any way right now

sleeve, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

Letting Russia do whatever they want in Syria, and some of Europe?

curmudgeon, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

one thing I want to do to augment my cognitive equipment for what's coming is read something good and unflinching about Berlusconism in Italy. Can anyone recommend any book on that subject

― his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon)

Haven't read it yet myself, but reviews have led me to Paul Ginsborg's Silvio Berlusconi: Television, Power and Patrimony (2004). Looks promising, and I'll be picking it up at the library today.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

thank you!

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

A good corrective here to some of the postelection handwringing.

https://twitter.com/pwthornton/status/796356934643437569

Mike Pence shakes his head and mouths the word ‘no’ (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

I just posted it on a bud's wall.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

I posted that on the other thread too, I think. I definitely read and retweeted, since it's so similar to my own experience as a rural Ohioan. (I went to a 100% white high school, after spending my entire life prior to 6th grade in integrated schools as an Army brat, so it was quite shocking to me.)

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/texas-state-university-police-looking-into-trump-vigilante-fliers/jhWSmmhNxxuTXZaQJiYhNI/

"Now that our man Trump is elected and Republicans own both the Senate and the House -- time to organize tar & feather vigilante squads and go arrest and torture those deviant university leaders spouting off all this diversity garbage," at least one of the fliers reads, according to a photo that the university community is sharing.

a full playlist of presidential apocalypse jams (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

: |

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

My sister moved from Chicago area to rural Wisoconsin. Hanging in Lake Wisco one day, a local says to me "Isn't this just gorgeous? This is the most beautiful place in the country!". Mainly to make conversation, I asked where else she'd been, what other parts of the country had she seen. "Oh I haven't really left the state much. Been to Florida a couple of times". She was in her 50s! Same story with most of the other locals I met or heard about: basically had only been to Florida or the "WHOOO PARTY!!" parts of Mexico (both are locales where they are assured to be around a ton of other tourists very similar to themselves!)

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

I'm here, lurking! And just trying to live. My job takes an enormous emotional toll (and has some nontraditional/extra hours) so I can't do as much community work as I would like to, or activism or campaigning either b/c I can't risk arrest anymore. But I will be thrilled to talk about anything you want!

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

i grew up only an hour outside of chicago (mchenry co) and tbh never really interacted with anyone who wasn't white. it's a pretty red county, or it was. not sure about now. but racism as a "thing" was there. my best friend in kindergarten tried and failed to start a local chapter of the KKK (he managed to get two other members.) after i left that school and ended up in rockford, it was a whole new world. and i mean that's just 30 miles down a country road. but there are people even just outside major cities, or diverse cities, who since they don't interact on a day to day basis with people unlike them, only view them through the lens of the media. and as the media has become more specifically targeted and as you can pick and choose very specific viewpoints about groups of people you've never met, you're going to get an even more poisoned mind than you would have a couple decades ago.

nomar, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

I just posted this to the last, miserable election thread, but I probably should have posted it here:

Okay yeah, so, it's important to recognize that it is not unprecedented to have Republicans in both houses, with a dipshit Republican president rubber-stamping things, and the Bush era WAS awful and 2004 WAS until yesterday the worst post-election morning of my lifetime. The big difference to me is the emergence of the Tea Party/Freedom Caucus types during the Obama administration. All their feuding with Boehner/Ryan goes away without a Democratic president they're trying to strategize around, and you're left with a huge swath of dipshit Republicans for roll-call votes, and leadership cadres that are now MUCH further right than they were in the Clinton and W eras. It's going to be rubber-stamping of absolutely demonic shit, the kind of draconian nightmare Republican government we've all been fearing for a long time unless some of them break ranks (doubtful) or that trying to gut Social Security along with the rest of the federal government just takes so long that a really well-organized opposition can make gains back in the midterms (yeah right).

And in the meantime, Trump is following Reagan in appointing to his cabinet and all the executive agencies people who are either his corrupt and incompetent old real estate crony friends, or right-wing true believers who are also sycophants good at making him feel smart, and whose main goal in running these agencies is to make them nonfunctional. That's terrifying whether it's an Anne Gorsuch type at the EPA in the face of climate-change disaster, or fucking Rudy Giuliani controlling the Justice Department and rolling back even the baby steps towards investigating police departments and trying to prosecute brutality cases. And a million other things.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

i like to think that during the years i was surrounded only by white people that i wasn't particularly awful and i don't think i was, but i was certainly still ignorant. it's a good thing i always liked exploring music and film from other cultures, because i think that really helped. no joke, it was important to not just listen to public enemy or blues music or cypress hill or whatever but to also try to get into the mindset of other cultures, it's a good education for those who live in places where you're not exposed to non-white people except through mainstream media or targeted news channels.

nomar, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

It took people knocking me over the head over and over, figuratively, to get me to reconsider the acculturated racism I had. It took work, but I appreciate it now, I was a real dumbass when I was younger.

larry appleton, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

Just watched the Houston episode of Bourdain's show on the bus to work, tearing up and sniffling. Gave me hope, though. Seek it out.

schwantz, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/joshledermanAP/status/796769992603815936

WASHINGTON (AP) — Obama says he was 'encouraged' by conversation with Trump, calls Oval Office meeting 'excellent' and wide-ranging

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

I can't fit into my head the thought of Obama meeting with (President-Elect!) Donald J. Trump

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

good post from a Veteran in my timeline:

Hey, Army (and military in general). What was the point of those incessant power points we had to go over four times a year. Something about not sexually harassing/assaulting people and something about racial discrimination being unacceptable, right? Enjoy your new commander-in-chief. Do as daddy says not as daddy do. #grabbedamericabythepussy

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

"WASHINGTON (AP) — Obama says he was 'encouraged' by conversation with Trump, calls Oval Office meeting 'excellent' and wide-ranging"

wtf's he going to say, honestly

hopefully he goes back into hsi office and recess appoints Garland.

akm, Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

recess appoints Garland.

he'd spark white riots, which we can't call riots, but you get the idea

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Is the West Experiencing a Right-Wing Drift? [Started by Mordy in May 2015, last updated one second ago by If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit) on I Love Everything] 89 new answers
U.S. Supreme Court: Post-Nino Edition [Started by The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn) in March 2016, last updated fifty-six seconds ago by marcos on I Love Everything] 4 new answers
Wow. Whoa. That is some group of people. Thousands. - US Election Day 2016 [Started by Creames Fartpoop in November 2016, last updated two minutes ago by ¶ (DJP) on I Love Everything] 2690 new answers
what parts of obama's legacy are safe? [Started by k3vin k. in November 2016, last updated three minutes ago by ¶ (DJP) on I Love Everything] 6 new answers
Mourning in America - Trump Year One: November '16 to [Started by the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses) in November 2016, last updated four minutes ago by a little too mature to be cute (Aimless) on I Love Everything] 48 new answers
Soundtrack the Trumpocalypse in 100 songs [Started by Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy) in November 2016, last updated six minutes ago by AdamVania (Adam Bruneau) on I Love Music] 92 new answers

this blows huh

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

Vote to consolidate everything to a I Hate Trump board.

Jeff, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

xxp also a constitutional crisis, which with a divided court would be p. chill

j., Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

ive been wracking my brane for ways to be helpful out here in rural vermont, and have thus far come up empty handed

however, a friend of mine in new mexico could always use support (http://www.santafedreamersproject.org/what-we-do/), and a recent thread on her FB raised an interesting idea. for those of you in sanctuary cities/counties/states, encourage your local leaders to make a public declaration of support for immigrants. it might not seem like much, but ppl are pretty scared right now, and letting them know that their community supports/protects them might provide a not insignificant amount of comfort

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

one of trump's "first 100 days" actions is to revoke all federal funding for sanctuary cities

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

i have no idea how/whether that would be possible but hey

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

oh jesus i missed that

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

I don't even know if there's a way for Congress to do that -- federal funding for cities comes through a zillion different programs. But I suppose they can try.

Mike Pence shakes his head and mouths the word ‘no’ (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Nixon decided it was in his power to sequester money allocated by Congress by simply choosing not to spend it. I can't recall offhand if he got away with this gambit, but he had a hostile Congress to contend with who fought back. Trump would have a compliant Congress, more than happy to set this craven precedent in return for scoring some political brownie points with their base.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

based on my (cursory) look into it, it would seem that some places (eg Cali, New Mex) are sanctuaries at the state level, and others (Portland, ME) are at the city level.

also, "sanctuary city" seems to be pretty vaguely defined, and my guess is that it would be very, very difficult for congress to limit federal funding in any meaningful way

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw60UTzVEAA0reF.jpg

christ

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

also, "sanctuary city" seems to be pretty vaguely defined, and my guess is that it would be very, very difficult for congress to limit federal funding in any meaningful way

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:23 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that's reassuring. i wasn't sure at all

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

christ antichrist

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it would happen, but...I live in Seattle, we're a sanctuary city, overdue for a huge earthquake. What then?

(The response that comes to mind is that middle-class whites will know what Katrina felt like but of course it's going to be the poor, minorities, people without resources who suffer the most.)

JoeStork, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

The other, distant fear is that four years from now, if everyone works like hell and turnout rises and we elect someone decent, who says these people are going to want to give the country back to the blacks and the queers and the immigrants?

JoeStork, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Xp that is reassuring, lessens terror a few percentage points

JoeStork, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

the election was so close, i'm confident the Democrats can take back the WH in 4 years. obv depends on how Trump pans out, and who the Dems nominate...

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Nufanglenesse/status/796643621529325568

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

Trump wasn't elected by an overwhelming majority- he doesn't have a mandate bc he didn't cross 300 EV's and lost the popular vote. God help us if 2020 is a repeat of 2004/1984

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

i can't imagine who will pull ahead as a contender in 4 years. sanders? he'll be a bit old. Warren? I like Warren but she talks to everyone like they are in preschool. Surely there must be someone else.

akm, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

rupaul?

akm, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:43 (seven years ago) link

just thinking of reality show stars

akm, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:43 (seven years ago) link

no one really considered clinton and obama four years previous to their wins, at least not ahead of a bunch of other possibilities.

nomar, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:43 (seven years ago) link

can we close this thread, please?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:43 (seven years ago) link

why?

akm, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

The other, distant fear is that four years from now, if everyone works like hell and turnout rises and we elect someone decent, who says these people are going to want to give the country back to the blacks and the queers and the immigrants?

― JoeStork, Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:31 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea the collapse of the rust belt "blue wall" states is so disheartening. WI, MI, PA no longer being reliably blue is pretty grim

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

why?

― akm, Thursday, November 10, 2016

lol wrong thread

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

Do you think Trump or anyone he appoints or is advised by cares one iota about a mandate? I don't understand how the mandate thing is relevant ever (at anything other than a superficial, narrative level), but esp now.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

Do you think Trump or anyone he appoints or is advised by cares one iota about a mandate? I don't understand how the mandate thing is relevant ever (at anything other than a superficial, narrative level), but esp now.

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:45 PM (twenty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm, GOP has presidency, house, senate. pretty much the only "mandate" that matters.

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

i can't imagine who will pull ahead as a contender in 4 years. sanders? he'll be a bit old. Warren? I like Warren but she talks to everyone like they are in preschool. Surely there must be someone else.

― akm, Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:42 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

keith ellison imo

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

Tulsi Gabbard, god help us all

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

the modern right has been shown to have no morals, just an all-consuming thirst for power. and now we've elected a president who has been shown to have no morals, just an all-consuming thirst for power. they have no reason to compromise with anyone or throw a bone to the 1/2 of the country that votes against them, nor do they have the moral decency to feel a compulsion to do so.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

Do you think Trump or anyone he appoints or is advised by cares one iota about a mandate? I don't understand how the mandate thing is relevant ever (at anything other than a superficial, narrative level), but esp now.

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:45 PM (twenty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm, GOP has presidency, house, senate. pretty much the only "mandate" that matters.

― marcos, Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:47 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

also if hilary had won she had literally 0.1 more of the vote than trump, that's not really much of a mandate either

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

Look for Kamala Harris to do the Obama fast track to the presidency thing.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

i can't imagine who will pull ahead as a contender in 4 years. sanders? he'll be a bit old. Warren? I like Warren but she talks to everyone like they are in preschool. Surely there must be someone else.

― akm, Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:42 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

keith ellison imo

― jason waterfalls (gbx)

in terms of generating enthusiasm among democrats and liberals over the last 2 years, i would say bernie sanders, elizabeth warren, and the obamas were at the top. with HRC a tier below. bernie's not running again. michelle obama could probably do really well at some point but it won't happen in 2020. i'd personally be really happy to see elizabeth warren run, despite, er, how much better she is in the senate, apparently

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

I would like an "if you are related by blood or marriage to anyone who was been President in the last 30 years you aren't allowed to run" Constitutional amendment ASAP.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

do we have a second, crappier White House for President Toiletlord to take over instead?

i hate the thought of that human dumpster setting up shop in the irl Oval

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 10 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

The White House will become the Gilded House.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

Is there any indication he will even live in the White House? Is it required?

The dickhead's been elected, literally the least he could do right now would be to make a statement telling the more racist elements of his supporters to chill the fuck out.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

Warren is giving a speech at AFL-CIO about the Democratic agenda right now

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

she's not pulling punches

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

kobach is in.

Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state and an ardent opponent of immigration, has been added to Mr. Trump’s transition team, according to local news reports.

Mr. Kobach, who provided guidance on immigration policy to Mr. Trump during the campaign, will help the president-elect in the weeks before he takes office, according to the Wichita Eagle.

He told the paper he did not expect to get an offer to serve in the Trump administration, but just having him in a formal role in the New Washington could send shudders through the nation’s immigrants. Mr. Kobach has been one of the loudest anti-immigration voices in the Republican Party for years. He added Mr. Trump’s call for a border wall along the southern tier into the Republican Party platform over the summer.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

i'm taking some smal, inevitably temporaryl solace in how deeply terrified trump appears to be rn

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--UUv79Xyk--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/z5vhjrvamwgfwkdykcig.jpg

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

This probably belongs in a "9/11: Forbidden Thoughts"-esque thread about Trump winning, but i'd rather not start that thread, just wanted to share that two nights ago as I was falling asleep at ~4am I thought about Kate McKinnon and got really sad.

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

Trump said he will be meeting with O in future "for counsel"

Clintonholes planning to run Cuomo in 2020 btw

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

Trump has a glitzy new hotel just two blocks away, why stay in that creaky old house that is insufficiently adorned with gilded diarrhea?

And I don't think we need to know the name of our 2020 nominee rn; let's let that play out instead of pre-deciding whose turn it is. I love Warren and Bernie and Michelle and Tulsi; I would like to think we could do it via a primary election. You know, the usual way.

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

call them whatever you want. but calling them idiots and then expecting them to vote for your candidate is a pretty idiot move.

If you do anything at all in life based on what complete strangers on the internet call you, you may, in fact, be an idiot.

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, November 10, 2016

Like all those "progressives" who abandoned Sanders bcz of BERNIEBROS ON TWITTER, no?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

i understand why people are thinking to 2020 but really the big upcoming test is 2018 and i don't know about any of you but i'm not confident that dems can flip the senate and house back in two years

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

xp Fuck off.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

I would like an "if you are related by blood or marriage to anyone who was been President in the last 30 years you aren't allowed to run" Constitutional amendment ASAP.

I am 100% opposed to this.

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

I'm not either. I've been telling students who want to Get Organized to worry about 2018 before 2020.

Things looked bleak in November 2004, I remember. First, we have an awful lot of nadir to endure.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

in terms of generating enthusiasm among democrats and liberals over the last 2 years, i would say bernie sanders, elizabeth warren, and the obamas were at the top. with HRC a tier below. bernie's not running again. michelle obama could probably do really well at some point but it won't happen in 2020. i'd personally be really happy to see elizabeth warren run, despite, er, how much better she is in the senate, apparently

― Karl Malone, Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:56 PM (nineteen minutes ago)

really can't be said enough how much better it is that elizabeth warren is in the senate

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

When you end up with Pres. Jenna Bush in 2024 don't come crying to me.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

xps to Dan

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

kinda wish i'd gone to law school, tbh -- feel like a lot of ppl are gonna need good lawyers in the coming years

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

Michelle Obama hates politics btw, which you might know if you've read a single profile of her.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

I won't because we aren't going to have Pres. Jenna Bush in 2024.

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

First, we have an awful lot of nadir to endure.

I'm not even sure we'll know if or when we've hit a nadir. I think we're truly in an era of how low can you go, and the sky is the limit for the depths we may sink to. Gonna be exhausting.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

I mean maybe she'll suddenly decide that The Today Show-style newscasting isn't her bag but there is literally nothing about her profile that shows any interest in governing or legislating beyond her family's last name.

It's also a bullshit window of exclusion that basically just says "someone get a Kennedy to run"

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure the post was made in jest, dan

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

I want Warren in the Senate.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

excuse me if I'm not a fucking barrel of laughs right now

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

Did someone post this yet?
https://twitter.com/i/moments/796417517157830656

schwantz, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

Obama White House staffers watching Trump and his staff arrive for today's meeting: https://twitter.com/ColeLedford11/status/796777653432971264

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

just went out to lunch and the TV was showing trump & pence meeting w/ everyone. obama, paul ryan, walking around the capitol and white house. i can't handle this.

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Phil D. i believe those are from yesterday not today xp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

but still

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

xp Fuck off.

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, November 10, 2016 2:23 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

don't post with hate in your heart

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

‏@AP
Israeli official: renewed wave of settlement construction now that Trump signals end to US opposition to settlements

https://www.apnews.com/318c64cb14a94a0985d56758057c1bd8/The-Latest:-Israel-minister:-New-settlement-push-with-Trump

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

I am sincerely worried about how I will react when/if I witness any of the racist shit that's going down. Just reading about it is filling me with fury.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

Spent an hour this morning staring daggers at a really smug and creepy looking white dude on the train who kept looking like he was about to say some shit to the POC on either side of him.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

Israeli official: renewed wave of settlement construction now that Trump signals end to US opposition to settlements

inevitable. i was talking to koplow about this a little bit + he agrees that Bibi benefited greatly from having Obama to "hold him back" as an excuse since he's so conservative he really does not see value in annexation/major settlement. with trump though he really has nothing to tell Bennett. it'll be interesting how he plays it.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

if there's going to be a bulwark it's not going to come from the so-called "international community" which i think as of today is basically done as a source of global ethical leadership or authority. it'll have to come from the israeli electorate. generally speaking i think they're apathetic at this pt but who knows. i don't see how bibi can hold off forever when the president of the united states is telling him that annexation is a-go.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

Obama White House staffers watching Trump and his staff arrive for today's meeting: https://twitter.com/ColeLedford11/status/796777653432971264

I want to hug all these people esp the ones LITERALLY CRYING in these shots. </3

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

i wonder whether the UN will still be in NY 4 years from now. seems like a lot of good reasons to think it might not be? Republicans hate it, Trump seems to hate it...

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

I was also thinking that Trump barely owes anyone since his own party gave him so little support but you know who stood by him through thick and thin? this goblin:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Sheldon_Adelson_crop.jpg/440px-Sheldon_Adelson_crop.jpg

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

i'm taking some smal, inevitably temporaryl solace in how deeply terrified trump appears to be rn

I prefer this one
http://i.imgur.com/MOcVtDH.jpg

Devilock, Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

i'm taking some smal, inevitably temporaryl solace in how deeply terrified trump appears to be

I noticed this too. It confirms he didn't know what he was getting into

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

why would trump be terrified? dude is thrilled. i never understood people saying "he doesn't really want to be president"

so many people saying "he has no idea how hard this job is", he doesn't give a shit. like he has any respect for the seriousness or demands of the role?

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

it's not his job, it's pence's job

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

I'm imagining Trump saying, "So what, you come in in the morning, put your feet up, flip on MSNBC, wait for your staff to bring you all the clips that mention you, spend a little time on Twitter . . ." and Obama being like, "No, I . . . I work, all day. Every day. Seven days a week sometimes. It's really hard work."

Knowing how the Presidency ages people, there's some comfort in knowing that by 2020 he'll be just a pile of loosely-organized dust.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

why do you think he would submit himself to the hard work required by the role?

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

he wont

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

he doesn't give a fuck about that shit

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

yeah i'm sure he's happy to play the figurehead while pence and his staff run the day-to-day duties

ciderpress, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

he will surround himself with sycophantic imbeciles, he won't invest time in reading the memos and listening to the briefings. let pence handle this. Trump is every other dead eyed corporate dude who finds himself running a large governmental organization - he will provide the bullshit "vision" while letting his underlings do the real work. he will pop in every once in a while to blurt out whatever his very first thought is, authoritatively and scaring the shit out of everyone else in the room, ruining many plans simultaneously. he will spend his time being the face of the organization, enjoying the perks, and figuring out ways to benefit those that are loyal to him.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

yeah I agree Trump looks absolutely petrified, and i got that sense during his acceptance speech, which as someone said in the election day thread, was this "delirious utopian fantasy," as if he were reading the lyrics of Lennon's Imagine. I fully believe he did not expect to win, has no plan, and Pence will effectively be leading the country. which is even more of a nightmare than Trump imo

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

Lol @ "ruining many plans simultaneously"

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

exactly, he'll run the presidency like a business owner since that's all he knows

ciderpress, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

i know i posted this upthread, but letting the VP run the country - domestic and foreign policy - is explicitly what Trump Jr offered to John Kasich when they were trying to woo him, on behalf of his father

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

lol he doesn't "look petrified" you guys are reading into it exactly what you want. otoh yes pence will do most of the hard work, that was the plan all along, cf that NYT story

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

I am sincerely worried about how I will react when/if I witness any of the racist shit that's going down. Just reading about it is filling me with fury.

Now, imagine worrying about how you will react when some of the racist shit that's going down happens to you. Ponder how that feels for a while. It's not a very good feeling.

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

check out this bird! this bird is TERRIFIED!

http://i.imgur.com/385EVn9.jpg

the bird is like "get me out of here guys i don't know wtf i'm doing"

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

lol he doesn't "look petrified" you guys are reading into it exactly what you want. otoh yes pence will do most of the hard work, that was the plan all along, cf that NYT story

― k3vin k., Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:10 PM (

I said he looks petrified and that's that

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

haha that stupid fucking bird that i definitely did not vote for looks very dumb and scared!

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Smug fuckin bird

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

actually the more i look at the picture the more i think the bird is hiding something. wtf did you do, bird?? and don't keep staring back blankly like you don't understand what i'm saying, i know you do.

ok i'm sounding like john oliver now, i'm sorry for that.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

i'm going to post a rant from SETH MEYERS on my Facebook wall right now!

nomar, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

im just reading the election day thread posts from tuesday night to kind of get a handle on what point things started getting really scary and i saw this post:

Lol what a bunch of nervous nellies you guys are

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, November 8, 2016 9:24 PM (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

come back shakey where are you

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

fuck that bird

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Shakey's usually good with reassurances (and accurate). His pollsters were wrong too?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

He's taking a break.

schwantz, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

bummed that Shakey checked out right when things started to turn. hope he's ok and comes back soon.

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

on the radio earlier (bbc radio 5) they talked about how there would be the usual PR happy smiles for the camera/media during the meeting etc.
but no .. not one single grin.
having watched that i now need to turn up the heating.

mark e, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

why would trump be terrified? dude is thrilled. i never understood people saying "he doesn't really want to be president"

so many people saying "he has no idea how hard this job is", he doesn't give a shit. like he has any respect for the seriousness or demands of the role?

― marcos, Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:01 PM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

People are always desperately reading into images to fit some ideal narrative they want to be true. I could freeze a damning frame out of even the most positive, happy speeches or other footage of a politician/whoever without much effort.

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

Oh, what you all said above.

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

I think some people get paid decent money to do just that, actually

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

People are always desperately reading into images to fit some ideal narrative they want to be true. I could freeze a damning frame out of even the most positive, happy speeches or other footage of a politician/whoever without much effort.

― Evan, Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:26 PM

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c9/fb/4b/c9fb4b3d485802fb61fe04db67910783.jpg

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

Tabloid articles are the best evidence of this

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

I feel for Shakey. I was right there with him, trying to quell heightened fears about the sky falling. And then the sky fell. Like, who even knew it could do that? I wasn't at all prepared when it happened so I've been madly trying to gather my wits and stay positive and constructive give that mad howling void of terror as wide a berth as possible.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

shakey seems like a pretty well put together dude i'm sure he's fine

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.752212

Non-Orthodox Jews supported Clinton at higher rates than Orthodox Jews, but the Democratic candidate came out ahead even in this sub-group. According to the poll, 76 percent of Reform Jews voted for Clinton, as opposed to 21 percent for Trump; 71 percent of Conservative Jews voted for Clinton, as opposed to 25 percent for Trump; and 56 percent of Orthodox Jews voted for Clinton, as opposed to 39 percent for Trump. Among those who identified as merely “just Jewish,” 67 percent voted for Clinton, as opposed to 26 percent for Trump.

small comfort but it does move me that Trump lost even among Orthodox Jews.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

I can't speak to how Shakey is/was feeling, but as someone who had a similar outlook, I can say that watching my strongly held assumptions crumble before my eyes was pretty traumatic.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

The photo of Obama and Trump is so damn heartbreaking. Dude literally spent his entire life shitting all over everybody and making up conspiracy theories about them and never once had to pay the price.

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

alright not "literally". you know what I mean.

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

xxp yea same here. my more cynical friends/family who have been predicting a trump win for months are not as crushed. even in 2004 it really felt like a toss-up in the weeks before

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I texted with Shakey. He's ok (as ok as you can be in this horrible new world, I guess). Taking a break from the internet.

schwantz, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

at the end of the obama meeting Trump calls Obama 'a very good man' many times, which gives me some early hope that Trump doesn't actually stand for anything and just wants the ultimate businessman gig

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

the fact that he doesn't stand for anything scares me the most because those around him stand for a whole bunch of terrible shit.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

^^^

JoeStork, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

trump backtracking already:

Trump had said during the election campaign he would be willing to withdraw U.S. military stationed in South Korea unless Seoul paid a greater share of the cost of the U.S. deployment, but an adviser to the president-elect played down such comments on Thursday.

...

South Korea's presidential Blue House said Trump agreed with Park and it quoted Trump as saying: "We will be steadfast and strong with respect to working with you to protect against the instability in North Korea."

...

"He has moved on to talk about non-proliferation in a way that you would hear from any Republican president," he said.

"We are very much committed to both non-proliferation and assuring the allies that not only will they continue to be under the nuclear umbrella, but that we are going to be strengthening our missile defence in ways that alleviate some of their concerns about North Korea."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-election-southkorea-idUKKBN135099

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

"He has moved on to talk about non-proliferation in a way that you would hear from any Republican president," he said.

oh well I'm reassured whew

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

at the end of the obama meeting Trump calls Obama 'a very good man' many times, which gives me some early hope that Trump doesn't actually stand for anything and just wants the ultimate businessman gig

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:49 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fuck's sake, can we get rid of this bullshit about trump being an empty vessel? have you fucking heard anything this dude has been talking about for years?

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

and as everyone else notes, the people surrounding him are no better.

That's a terrible part of the reaction - the idea that Kasich or Cruz or whatever would be okay. The GOP as a whole is only marginally less white nationalist-friendly than Trump, if at all - he just came out and said it.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

"He has moved on to talk about non-proliferation in a way that you would hear from any Republican president," he said.

oh well I'm reassured whew

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:57 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

what you're expecting him to be sanders

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

I would expect Sanders to talk about non-proliferation in a way that you would hear from any president.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

idealism vs reality i guess

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

I guess that's what's gotten me so frustrated about this election in general. Trump and his supporters have painted a picture this entire time of him being an outsider, someone who was fighting a rigged system, who the media despised for "telling the truth", who didn't have the support of "establishment" politicians, who often implied that some mysterious "they" was trying to hold him back. Not a single part of that is true. The media helped propel him to the White House by covering every single thing he did, refusing to talk about anything Hillary said unless she specifically mentioned Trump. They painted her email "scandal" as somehow being more disqualifying than all his actions combined. The FBI actively and blatantly meddled in the election to toss it in his favor. Russians hacked the DNC and Wikileaks strategically released thousands of private emails at the most damaging times possible. He lied about nearly everything and almost never got called out for it. He got away with not having to release his tax returns. He insulted Republicans nonstop in remarkably personal ways, and got to watch as nearly all of them wound up endorsing him anyway. He lost the popular vote but won the White House because of the electoral college (which he previously called a "disgrace"). All the vote rigging and voter suppression seemed to be in his favor. It is difficult to imagine a candidate getting more lucky breaks or being more privileged than he was. And yet he pushed the "rigged" narrative harder than anybody ever has. It's infuriating.

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

"Some people were born on 3rd base and go through life believing they hit a triple." Could not be more fucking apt about this man.

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

So Palin, Carson, Guiliani and Gingrich are all up as candidates? Good grief...

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

I guess that's what's gotten me so frustrated about this election in general. Trump and his supporters have painted a picture this entire time of him being an outsider, someone who was fighting a rigged system, who the media despised for "telling the truth", who didn't have the support of "establishment" politicians, who often implied that some mysterious "they" was trying to hold him back. Not a single part of that is true. The media helped propel him to the White House by covering every single thing he did, refusing to talk about anything Hillary said unless she specifically mentioned Trump. They painted her email "scandal" as somehow being more disqualifying than all his actions combined. The FBI actively and blatantly meddled in the election to toss it in his favor. Russians hacked the DNC and Wikileaks strategically released thousands of private emails at the most damaging times possible. He lied about nearly everything and almost never got called out for it. He got away with not having to release his tax returns. He insulted Republicans nonstop in remarkably personal ways, and got to watch as nearly all of them wound up endorsing him anyway. He lost the popular vote but won the White House because of the electoral college (which he previously called a "disgrace"). All the vote rigging and voter suppression seemed to be in his favor. It is difficult to imagine a candidate getting more lucky breaks or being more privileged than he was. And yet he pushed the "rigged" narrative harder than anybody ever has. It's infuriating.

― frogbs, Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:09 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

goes right in line w/ his white voters believing they an oppressed minority

marcos, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

or his image as a "self-made billionaire" despite having built entirely off Daddy's money

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

Hey, folks, I don't really know much about California, so could some of you help explain the flaws in my thinking?

Specifically, a lot of people who I take to be knowledgeable are immediately dismissive of the talk about California seceding. In the context of California political procedures and the stuff we've seen happen so far this year, why is this delusional crazy talk?

Because it seems to me, and maybe I'm wrong, that in California it's pretty easy to get a referendum on the ballot on just about any topic. Why couldn't secession be raised as one of those ballot referendums?

Thanks in advance.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

how many states do you know that have successfully seceded from the union?

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

how many states do you know that have successfully seceded from the union?

― k3vin k

I'm sorry, but I don't find "It's never been done before" to be a very convincing argument in the light of this year's events.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/30/reagan-alumni-for-trump-remind-america-that-gop-didnt-start-making-things-up-in-2016/

Ed Meese is still around and on the "Reagan Alumni for Trump" council

curmudgeon, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't California get a ton of its water from Colorado?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

Specifically, a lot of people who I take to be knowledgeable are immediately dismissive of the talk about California seceding. In the context of California political procedures and the stuff we've seen happen so far this year, why is this delusional crazy talk?

bc most of us are not interested in re-litigating 1860 r u 4 real?

Mordy, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

there's a good reason there is no provision for states seceding in the u.s. constitution.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't California get a ton of its water from Colorado?

― Kiarostami bag (milo z)

Maybe, but how's California's artisanal tea industry?

I want to be clear, I'm not advocating for it. I'm not saying it would be a good idea or that it would make sense. I'm just wondering if there's a reason beyond common sense and historical precedent why it couldn't happen.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

not entirely opposed to another civil war at this point tbh, as long as nukes don't get involved it might be a net positive for the rest of the world

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

there's a good reason there is no provision for states seceding in the u.s. constitution.

― harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver)

And marijuana is an illegal schedule I drug on the federal level.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

Is there any indication he will even live in the White House?

I've been wondering this too

electric wight dorkestra (crüt), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

not entirely opposed to another civil war at this point tbh

christ.

electric wight dorkestra (crüt), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

even two terms of Trump couldn't destroy as many American lives and essential infrastructure as a civil war. let's be real here.

electric wight dorkestra (crüt), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

Oh God I really don't want to get into some military nerd fantasy football about the logistics of a 2018 American Civil War. Please forgive me.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

Well if one side used muskets...

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

How is he going to handle his business interests while he's in office? Is he legally required to disclose everything now? Are we ever going to find out who he owes money to? Like...how the hell is this going to work?

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

I would love for the tax returns to come back up and for there to be some reason they're made public

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

Against his will

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

the kids are going to run the business. totally separate. big league.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

And then he is shocked this happens and chokes to death on the bite he took of a taco bowl

Evan, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

At some point I was saying "at least if Trump wins, we'll finally get to see his tax return". Can't remember why I said that

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

I'm sorry, but I don't find "It's never been done before" to be a very convincing argument in the light of this year's events.

― xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy),

You should visit Appomattox Courthouse sometime

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

can we poll these

Secretary of Education Ben Carson

Attorney General Pam Bondi

Secretary of Energy Harold Hamm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

was hoping to see Carson as Surgeon General w/ epaulets

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Don't forget EPA chief Myron Ebell

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

if you feel like getting your heart ripped out today

http://jezebel.com/what-do-i-say-stories-from-the-classroom-after-electi-1788781296

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

I had one little boy who was clearly affected, I just talked to him and said, I can tell you’re upset, and he looked at me and said, ‘Well, my mom lives in Mexico’—I think he means she’s from Mexico, she lives here—‘and she says if Donald Trump wins she’s going back to Mexico.’ Which was heartbreaking, because the way he was saying it, it was clear that he was afraid she was going to leave him, which I don’t believe is true, but it’s clearly what’s going on in his head; I had to find a way to talk to him and try and make him feel like it’s going to be okay, whereas in my own mind, I don’t feel like it’s going to be okay, like, I can’t actually make that promise.

frogbs, Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

Re: Berlusconi upthread. This news piece from 2010.

Exasperated by Berlusconi's pro-Russian behaviour, American embassy staff detail allegations circulating in Rome that the Italian leader has been promised a cut of huge energy contracts. The two men are known to be personally close, but this is the first time allegations of a financial link have surfaced.

Hillary Clinton's state department in Washington sent a special request to the Rome embassy this year, asking for extra intelligence-gathering on the allegations about the men: "What personal investments, if any, do they have that might drive their foreign or economic policies?".

The US ambassador in Rome, Ronald Spogli, first reported the claims in a series of dispatches in 2008-09. He said the prime minister had taken "single-handed" control of Italy's dealings with Moscow, with the over-riding aim of pleasing the Russian leader. Berlusconi acted as a "mouthpiece" for Putin, he reported, supporting him in public when Russia was being criticised.

Perhaps the next time Gazprom squeezes Europe, at least some of the proceeds will be coming to these shores.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

Y'all should read this.

A few days after the release of the tape, which was followed by a string of accusations from women saying they had been sexually harassed and assaulted by Trump, I checked back in with Tracie St. Martin to see if she still supported him. She was working on a new gas plant in Middletown, a working-class town near Dayton that was the setting of the recent best-selling memoir “Hillbilly Elegy.” Here’s what she wrote back in a text message: “I still appreciate the honesty in some of his comments. Most of his comments. I still favor what he says he may be able to do. I am voting against Hillary, come what may with Trump. It’s important to me that ‘we the people’ actually have political power. And electing Trump will prove that. I am AMAZED at the number of people voting for him. The corruption is disgusting in the press. Yes, as of right now I am voting FOR Trump.” She was sure he would win, she said: "His support is crazy! The polls have to be wrong. Have to be fixed.”

And she shared an anecdote that reflected how differently Trump’s comments had been received in some places than others. “I’m setting steel for this new gas plant…I’m operating a rough terrain forklift,” she wrote. “So today, I kept thinking about the debate and the audio was released … And I got underneath a load of steel and was moving it…I was laughing and laughing and one of the iron workers asked ‘what are u laughing at.’ I said ‘I grabbed that load right by the pussy’ and laughed some more…And said ‘when you’re an operator you can do that ya know’, laughed all fucking day."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

"politicians are corrupt"-->"so let's elect a Prez who's a (failed) NY/NJ real-estate/casino mogul and reality TV star=1/2 this country really too dumb to be allowed to vote.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

he literally lives inside a 24k gold room at the top of a tower in manhattan that has his name on it in huge letters

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

"politicians are corrupt"-->"so let's elect a Prez who's a (failed) NY/NJ real-estate/casino mogul and reality TV star=1/2 this country really too dumb to be allowed to vote.

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, November 10, 2016 5:25 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes, the answer to somebody who you consider is destroying democracy is to take votes away from people yes this is good logic i like it

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

you know what's really woke, testing people before they can vote.

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

yes, the answer to somebody who you consider is destroying democracy is to take votes away from people yes this is good logic i like it

― the klosterman weekend (s.clover)

burning the left for wanting to "destroy democracy" is like voting against hillary for wanting to "destroy the coal industry"

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

I'm usually not bothered by such stuff, but it is kind of sickening to hear CNN go on about Trump being gracious, Trump "hitting the right notes," etc. It really is kind of meaningless after the past 15 months.

clemenza, Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

he's who they wanted all along anyway. the next four years are going to be great for the news networks ratings wise

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

oh barf, had not considered that

sleeve, Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

s.clover if you really think I'm for real wanting to take away voting rights from anyone you're even more of an idiot than I already thought

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

Fuck CNN in every one of its miserable holes

Xpost

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

Worth re-reading again: Donald Trump Reportedly Plans to Delegate All Domestic and Foreign Power to his VP

(alternate interpretation: promise everything to this creep and allow him nothing)

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 10 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

and I don't consider them to be destroying democracy. democracy needs an intelligent citizenry. we do not have one atm.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

s.clover if you really think I'm for real wanting to take away voting rights from anyone you're even more of an idiot than I already thought

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, November 10, 2016 5:58 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

maybe don't say you think people shouldn't be allowed to vote if you don't mean it? idk, just thinking aloud here

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

"democracy needs an intelligent citizenry."

spoken like a true patrician scion of jefferson davis

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

yeah I forgot about the dipshits like you who take every single thing literally, good lord.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

unilateral state secession is illegal, per the supreme court: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._White

also a bad idea from a democratic perspective, see lincoln's first inaugural

also morally wrong, because a liberal state with a huge population leaving the union leaves trump and his fellow cretins stronger than ever

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

otm x3

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Can the District of Columbia secede? We're not a state.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

but people who want their blue state to secede don't actually want to improve the lives of the oppressed, they just want to make the problem someone else's responsibility

electric wight dorkestra (crüt), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

which is why the idea coming from California doesn't surprise me. Who would be president -- Zuckerberg?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

if you think your state should be independently governed from the rest of the union go vote for a fucking states'-rights libertarian

electric wight dorkestra (crüt), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

It's frustrating, though, because even though we have the hugest population and GDP, our voices matter basically not at all in national elections. In the primaries, we vote so late that it usually doesn't matter. In the general election, we are reliably blue, which means we are basically ignored.

I guess the scary part for the rest of the country would be that if CA left, 55 blue votes would disappear.

schwantz, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

if u think president trump would allow secession of any us state without military intervention i think u might need to reevaluate ur premises

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

I'm fairly sure he'd let states go. "Let'em go. LOSER!"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

yeah its the large scale version of running away to canada

ciderpress, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

And so the real hatred starts and of course it has to be in my home state
http://www.statesman.com/news/local/texas-state-university-police-looking-into-trump-vigilante-fliers/jhWSmmhNxxuTXZaQJiYhNI/

JacobSanders, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

from last thread

talk me off the ledge folks
― wizzz! (amateurist)
honestly? it's every bit as bad as you say it is. that's no reason to jump.

it is a good reason, if the alternatives are eventually dieing in a nuclear holocaust or witnessing this country turn into a fascist police state.
people saying all these folks will "show up" for democrats in the future dismiss the likelihood that trump will sign (and the supreme court will approve) all manner of vote-suppressing measures.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Yesterday and today the spirit at the office has been higher than usually, everyone happy with Trump's win. Everyone unhappy about getting called racist, sexist, bigots etc. I never talk about my personal political views at work but everyone knows my wife is hispanic and I don't tolerate certain talk around me. I do ask people questions about their own views. I'm rarely even in the office but these last two days I had meetings. Everyone was talking about budgets, expansions, and projects, and I had to speak before executives and these guys from Norway. All I could think about was two hours away my wife is at home crying and afraid, while taking care of our sick daughter. I have felt like a jerk because I didn't want Hilary, but I certainly didn't want Trump, didn't even think Trump was possible. But I do work in regulation of oil and gas and my company is very pleased with our new president(with a certain trepidation). I feel guilty. I feel awful for telling my wife how I don't let racism bother me because I don't give their words power. I've never walked in a her shoes and I do try to understand, but I often fail. I just feel awful, guilty and want to cry.

JacobSanders, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

<3 u Jacob

sleeve, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

I'd really like to think the enormity and magnitude of the job will make a difference on the man. I mean, this makes running a billion dollar casino/real estate empire look like kids' play (which, let's be fair, a casino/real estate empire sort of is). We're talking hundreds of millions of lives, trillions of dollars, vast global repercussions for mistakes and victories alike. Every president talks about those facts settling in. What will it mean to selfish, narcissistic person for whom all that stuff has thus far been more or less meaningless? For someone whose idea of power has been like the nouveau riche's idea of wealth? Really curious about this. Also wondering if some of his more cartoonish, incompetent appointments will get laughed out of DC like Harriet Miers.

Beyond that, what will security be like at his countless properties? Will they have to be protected 24/7? What about employees there? What about his kids and their respective hand me down empires? What about his ex-wives and their families? Vacation properties? And, thinking ahead a bit, if a ghoul like Giuliani becomes AG, who hires the special prosecutor?

My mom, she is worried he will have a heart attack in office. How heavy was peak Bubba? And he was a lot younger then than Trump is now.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

ffs, Jacob, man, this shit should not be happening.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

Makes so angry the misery this worthless cunt Trump is ALREADY causing.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmdN1F4Uwv0

sleeve, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

My wife just shared this with me, sorry to bring things down even more https://medium.com/@seanokane/day-1-in-trumps-america-9e4d58381001#.e4wy6jvhw

JacobSanders, Thursday, 10 November 2016 23:53 (seven years ago) link

but people who want their blue state to secede don't actually want to improve the lives of the oppressed, they just want to make the problem someone else's responsibility

― electric wight dorkestra (crüt)

so you're saying that california has a responsibility to make america great again?

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

and I don't consider them to be destroying democracy. democracy needs an intelligent citizenry. we do not have one atm.

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger)

"intelligence" is not a good word to use here. voting for trump is a basic moral failure.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:09 (seven years ago) link

it is a good reason, if the alternatives are eventually dieing in a nuclear holocaust or witnessing this country turn into a fascist police state.
people saying all these folks will "show up" for democrats in the future dismiss the likelihood that trump will sign (and the supreme court will approve) all manner of vote-suppressing measures.

― wizzz! (amateurist)

i'm not a mental health professional, but if you're saying it's better to die in despair than to live in fear, i'm not super on board with that. i'm not counting on any trump voters "showing up" for democrats, but we will be able to get a lot more done if we stand up instead of hiding. you may not be able to do that right now, but at least maybe see if you can work towards it as a goal.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:12 (seven years ago) link

"I have lived in autocracies most of my life, and have spent much of my career writing about Vladimir Putin’s Russia. I have learned a few rules for surviving in an autocracy and salvaging your sanity and self-respect. It might be worth considering them now:" - http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/11/10/trump-election-autocracy-rules-for-survival/

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 11 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

"intelligence" is not a good word to use here. voting for trump is a basic moral failure.

I don't think the majority of Trump voters lack morals. I think they lack the intelligence/critical-thinking skills to either recognize a sociopathic con man, or to comprehend the consequences of electing one (ie I hear many of them saying yes he's awful, but this won't affect his ability to get shit done).

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:20 (seven years ago) link

I don't think the majority of Trump voters lack morals. I think they lack the intelligence/critical-thinking skills to either recognize a sociopathic con man, or to comprehend the consequences of electing one (ie I hear many of them saying yes he's awful, but this won't affect his ability to get shit done).

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger)

i never said that they lacked morals. i know (ok, knew) trump voters. most of them were highly intelligent. they were also to appearances moral. however, they made a decision that was grossly inconsistent with their professed moral principles, and this is the moral failure.

the trump voters i knew were not ignorant of what trump is, of who trump is. many of them loathe him deeply, believe that he is categorically unfit to hold the presidency. and they voted for him anyway.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

From Sarah Kendzior, If you are thinking about 2020, or even 2018, you are doing it wrong. This is not normal. Checks and balances will be gone. Laws rewritten.

https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/796869863067308032

mick signals, Friday, 11 November 2016 00:41 (seven years ago) link

so you're saying that california has a responsibility to make america great again?

― xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, November 10, 2016 7:08 PM (thirty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i'm saying that california abandoning this country is a morally indefensible dick move

qop (crüt), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:43 (seven years ago) link

I think a lot of these dire predictions are possible (and I plan to prepare for them and believe everyone else should too) but these worst case scenario arguments don't seem likely to me atm. Maybe like the NYRB article says I've just been lulled into believing so because of Obama and Clinton and faith in institutions, but my eyes are open and I'm looking for signs and I'm prepared to act on them if I see them. But I don't see how all these doomsday articles are good for my mental/emotional health.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

i'm saying that california abandoning this country is a morally indefensible dick move

― qop (crüt)

yes, they should stay and be oppressed along with the rest of us. how selfish of them!

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

i'm sure they would face no oppression under President of California Peter Thiel

qop (crüt), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

for one thing the majority of americans voted against trump and i don't get the impression that the majority of trump voters voted for him to be a fascist dictator. i think a lot of them thought his rhetoric was mostly for show and that he would behave and if he started doing horrific domestic things i'd like to think that there would be substantial resistance. i don't believe he has co-opted the military which is essential for full domestic repression and though the FBI and police seem to like him I don't have the impression that the police are en masse prepared to start suppressing widespread dissent. i think there will likely be deaths - it won't be the first time in US history that protesters are killed. but what some of these articles are talking about is a level of repression it is very hard for me to imagine.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 00:49 (seven years ago) link

i think it's idiotic but lots of friends are sharing it on fb

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

The whole California/Oregon/Washington secession idea is so maddening to me

Especially because it allows Orange County, all of the State of Jefferson idiots and every other racist wackjob region to come right along as well
How is that a good idea?

aside from the fact that secession is ludicrous, cowardly and fuckin STUPID

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 11 November 2016 00:55 (seven years ago) link

Of course it's idiotic. The EC is idiotic. The fact that only 24 states have laws binding their electors' votes is idiotic.

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 00:55 (seven years ago) link

state of jefferson votes have *passed* on local ballots in regions not far outside Sacramento
in fact i just checked: ***21*** northern cali counties have declared their intentions to secede

go hang with those nutjobs for a day & see if you still want to secede

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

I think a lot of these dire predictions are possible (and I plan to prepare for them and believe everyone else should too) but these worst case scenario arguments don't seem likely to me atm. Maybe like the NYRB article says I've just been lulled into believing so because of Obama and Clinton and faith in institutions, but my eyes are open and I'm looking for signs and I'm prepared to act on them if I see them. But I don't see how all these doomsday articles are good for my mental/emotional health.

― Mordy

i agree with you on the likelihood issue, and "don't panic" is as good advice now as it's ever been, but so many unlikely things have happened this year that i'm not going to discount anything on the grounds that it seems unlikely.

i've seen a lot of my friends talking about nuclear apocalypse. to me that seems ludicrous. at the same time, i'm not in a position to argue that it's not going to happen. a man who has amply demonstrated himself to be profoundly emotionally unstable is going to have the legal ability to launch a pre-emptive nuclear attack.

now, i'm not going to worry about it, because what the fuck would be the point? if it happens it happens. our best opportunity to keep it from happening was on tuesday. there are plenty of other things we can and should do.

for me, the value of reading the dire articles (and writing my share of dire stuff) is because humans are extraordinarily resilient creatures. we are just amazingly, amazingly adaptable to all sorts of changes. we may have a couple sleepless nights, but by and large, we roll with them.

i feel like it would be comparatively easy for me to allow trump's america to become a new normal. to bitch and complain about trump as if he were any other shitty politician. to talk about the ground game instead of about beliefs and values.

i'm more afraid of this than i am of anything trump might do.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

even if the worst came to pass and trump was our last president because he demolishes US democracy... i still spend more time worrying about my kids living in a post-civilizational scorched wasteland which just got more likely.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

http://billmoyers.com/story/farewell-america/

Democracy can’t cope with extremism. Only violence and time can defeat it. The first is unacceptable, the second takes too long. Though Trump is an extremist, I have a feeling that he will be a very popular president and one likely to be re-elected by a substantial margin, no matter what he does or fails to do. That’s because ever since the days of Ronald Reagan, rhetoric has obviated action, speechifying has superseded governing.

Trump was absolutely correct when he bragged that he could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and his supporters wouldn’t care. It was a dictator’s ugly vaunt, but one that recognized this election never was about policy or economics or the “right path/wrong path,” or even values. It was about venting. So long as Trump vented their grievances, his all-white supporters didn’t care about anything else. He is smart enough to know that won’t change in the presidency. In fact, it is only likely to intensify. White America, Trump’s America, just wants to hear its anger bellowed. This is one time when the Bully Pulpit will be literal.

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:06 (seven years ago) link

Bernie Sanders Can Still Win This Election. Here's How

qop (crüt), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

by neal gabler btw i was momentarily confused at such extreme words coming from moyers himself

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

there are brief moments when I can cheer up but I'm so depressed, so scared, so sad. my heart goes out to all of you. I love you all. I see no cause for hope anywhere, this is something we can only defend ourselves from, not actively fight for good, just less bad. it's going to be so bad. worse than Reagan 80s.

flopson, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

I'm starting to think I will need to see a therapist. this happened in the middle of a vacation, and it has ruined any possibility of enjoyment. constant anxiety, fear, despair, depression

flopson, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:11 (seven years ago) link

it's funny bc i feel like i'm arguing against apocalypse itt while i'm arguing for it in the other but the other thing that gives me some comfort is that this entire country has been set up to preserve individual freedoms. it's why we have capitalism and not central planning. it's why we have states and not just a federal govt. it's even why we have stupid things like the 2nd amendment. it wouldn't be an easy task for the most brilliant dictator to take full control of the US and Stalin Trump is not. who is going to let him shut down the internet when people are planning protests? facebook? google? who is going to let him shut down the NYT and the WaPost? he can make life miserable in so many ways but i don't think he can destroy american democracy. i think in 4 years or in 8 years we will have a new president. of course i was also like 110% sure that hillary would win so my predictive powers are for shit.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:13 (seven years ago) link

what i heard from my mother who lives in a very pro-trump town (she is terrified rn) is that everybody thinks he doesn't really mean the things he says

i am looking around and trying to figure out what actions to take. one of the things currently worrying me a lot is actions happening without any real organizing or common goals behind them, that will be exploited by him to consolidate even more power. the a.n.s.w.e.r. coalition is doing protests at the inauguration apparently and if something like the anti-WTO protests happens (i participated in those myself!) there is going to be some kind of crackdown. i am also worried about what if there is a major disaster or especially terrorist attack, remembering how bad things already seemed when bush stole the 2000 election and then after 9/11 the pressure was on everyone to stand behind him and support him no matter what.. including the invasion of iraq

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

even if you cant make it all the way to Stalin, the mind reels at plausible damage Trump can do domestically with Republican House and Senate, and in foreign policy. it feels like the end of something, to me. not sure what, but were clearly not just going to resume our previous path before this. and it just feels so unnecessary

flopson, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

When I was a child, my parents moved me from state to state and tiny house and apartment trying to find steady work and keep me and my sisters fed and safe. I didn't know things were bad. We ended up in Texas eventually in an actual owned house with a good school. Reagan came along and made our fragile stability less stable.

I don't know what Trump will do, and it's hard to think about the children living like that now.

Zachary Taylor, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

he can make life miserable in so many ways but i don't think he can destroy american democracy.

more voter suppression laws, stacking the justice system with right wing ideologues.. and worst i really do worry about some kind of unexpected major crisis through which he suspends/ignores the rule of law and the GOP continues to go along with it.. and i mean i worry that if he doesn't get one, he'll create one, tanking the economy, starting another war

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link

even if you cant make it all the way to Stalin, the mind reels at plausible damage Trump can do domestically with Republican House and Senate, and in foreign policy. it feels like the end of something, to me. not sure what, but were clearly not just going to resume our previous path before this. and it just feels so unnecessary

I agree with this 100%. I'm scared and frightened and I feel an immense sense of loss and for nothing. Just emptiness. But I don't want to go crazy - even a somber conservative analysis is bad enough.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:27 (seven years ago) link

I think I am going crazy, like literally as in suffering mental illness. I hope not. but I'm really, deeply terrified

flopson, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

From Sarah Kendzior, If you are thinking about 2020, or even 2018, you are doing it wrong. This is not normal. Checks and balances will be gone. Laws rewritten.

https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/796869863067308032

― mick signals, Thursday, November 10, 2016 7:41 PM (one hour ago)

this woman is a conspiracy theorist and is not to be taken seriously fyi

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

i'm trying hard to keep perspective, but i really don't even know what that means anymore.

like, let's say an extremist ideologue like Pence (since hey he might be running shit day to day anyway) or even god forbid Cruz had been the nominee and somehow some way slipped up and beat Hillary. i guess at the very least the people who would have supported a guy like know exactly what he 'stands' for, and ostensibly would have had traditional reasons for voting for him. but right now it's just weird and frankly watching "conservative" middle America stand arm & arm with a bunch of internet nihilists and who are equally willing to roll the dice on lunatic scumbag. it just seems like we are done for when 65 year old suburban church deacons with decent jobs are just like "fuck it dunno man he's CRAZY, he could do anything lol #MAGA"

like wtf happened to you, guy? serious question. and you can NOT fucking say "but but Obama.."

acerbic (sic)s (will), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:49 (seven years ago) link

*frankly scary

acerbic (sic)s (will), Friday, 11 November 2016 01:50 (seven years ago) link

everybody thinks he doesn't really mean the things he says

Then one thing we maybe need to start doing is remind them that he does, he always has, and it is going to be very bad for them, too, not just city slickers and the blacks.

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

He's on 60 Minutes Sunday, let's see what he says, what tone he takes. If he's the same blustery unsympathetic lack of empathy ass as he was when running even after he had won, I will be even more worried.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:00 (seven years ago) link

Frederik, the election is over, you can cut the crap now. She did not get "bombarded with death threats." A couple of losers left angry messages.
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), 10. november 2016 16:54 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This was from the old thread, but I'm done with this sort of bullshit. We've just seen white supremacy and sexism have it's biggest triumph yet, I'm not gonna let misogynistic harassment and death threats be explained away as 'angry messages' anymore.

Massive TRIGGER WARNING!!! Scroll past this if you don't want to read misogynynistic words and threats of violence. But I need to post a sampling of the hundreds or thousands of messages that Roberta Lange received in the days after Nevada. Each new line is a new voicemail or text message.

Hi Roberta Lange. This is a citizen of the United States of America and I just wanted to let you know that I think people like you should be hung in a public execution to show this world that we won’t stand for this sort of corruption. I don’t know what kind of money they are paying to you, but I don’t know how you sleep at night. You are a sick, twisted piece of shit and I hope you burn for this! You can return my call at xxx-xxx-xxxx. I’d love to go into further detail with you about this, though I am sure you don’t have courage to do so. You cowardless bitch, running off the stage! I hope people find you.
 
You fucking stupid bitch! What the hell are you doing? You’re a fucking corrupt bitch! That is so fucking wrong. You should be ashamed and disgraced. You need to step down from that position because you are bad for America and bad for the Democratic Party. That was fucking bullshit today. You need to step down. You’re a disgrace.
 
Oh Roberta, Roberta, Roberta, you old, old hag. Oh, we watched the whole thing in Nevada. You’re really kinda screwed, lady. Um, yeah. Really stupid. Fuck you.
 
Fuck you, bitch!
 
Roberta, you know thousands of people watched what you did tonight at the convention – if you don’t think that that’s coming back to bite you in the ass, you have got another thing coming.

Hi Roberta, I am pretty sure you’re probably not going to get back to me because you don’t care about the American people, but what you did today, it was corrupt, it was wrong, and the founding fathers of our country would be ashamed of you. You deserve to be in prison, not the chairman for the Democratic Party. Rot in Hell.
 
You’re a cunt. Fuck you!
 
We are having a massive public opposition to your illegal activities. You have demonstrated to be fraudulent and I would pack your bags right now because the shit storm you’ve ensued is coming.

You stupid ass bitch. We’re coming for your ass.

Bitch answer me! How much did the Hilary campaign pay you for that shit? You weren’t a coward yesterday, don’t be one now! Biggest cunt in politics next to Clinton. You’ve just ruined your life!

SHAME ON YOU Roberta Gustave Lange. You are an abomination to the humans race to supress the HUMAN RIGHT to VOTE. May retribution come fully and harshly upon you. I CURSE YOU

Praying to god someone shoots you in the FACE, and blows your democracy-stealing head off!

That's not just a 'couple of losers'. That's horrifying. And that's just a fraction of what she received. And I'm horrified that you're trying to minimize it, man alive. And when I can, I won't let you or anyone minimize this kind of abuse and chicanery.

Frederik B, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:02 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/796859453157031936

a little honesty is refreshing

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 02:03 (seven years ago) link

from the NYRB link upthread - but everyone should go read the whole thing

Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says. Whenever you find yourself thinking, or hear others claiming, that he is exaggerating, that is our innate tendency to reach for a rationalization. ...

Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality. Consider the financial markets this week, which, having tanked overnight, rebounded following the Clinton and Obama speeches.

Rule #3: Institutions will not save you. It took Putin a year to take over the Russian media and four years to dismantle its electoral system; the judiciary collapsed unnoticed.

Rule #4: Be outraged. If you follow Rule #1 and believe what the autocrat-elect is saying, you will not be surprised. But in the face of the impulse to normalize, it is essential to maintain one’s capacity for shock.

Rule #5: Don’t make compromises. Like Ted Cruz, who made the journey from calling Trump “utterly amoral” and a “pathological liar” to endorsing him in late September to praising his win as an “amazing victory for the American worker,” Republican politicians have fallen into line.

Rule #6: Remember the future. Nothing lasts forever. Donald Trump certainly will not, and Trumpism, to the extent that it is centered on Trump’s persona, will not either.

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:04 (seven years ago) link

Oh also can we abandon Twitter and Reddit completely and just let the alt-right have them? They'll go out of business and get bought by Russians, and nobody will care.

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:06 (seven years ago) link

Kendzior is a conspiracy theorist and is not to be taken seriously fyi

Yeah? Do you have sources for that? Not doubting you, I don't know one way or the other.

mick signals, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:08 (seven years ago) link

everybody thinks he doesn't really mean the things he says

Then one thing we maybe need to start doing is remind them that he does, he always has, and it is going to be very bad for them, too, not just city slickers and the blacks.

well, literally none of the people i personally interact with (including what friends i've kept from my conservative hometown) voted for him and they're all varying degrees of horrified now.. only person i know who's happy is one facebook 'friend' who is really a distant acquaintance & is in the military. i spent quite a few weekends in pennsylvania trying to get democrats to turn out and vote against him..

right now i see some "wait and see, the sky isn't falling, we will get through this" lack of urgency plus those who want to organize and take action but lack direction and leadership...

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:12 (seven years ago) link

I can't decide what's more ridiculous, that I'm considering signing a change.org petition in the hopes that it helps overturn the electoral college or that the only reason I haven't yet is because I'm afraid that putting my name and address on it will get me put on Trump's enemies list.

Fetchboy, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:13 (seven years ago) link

i feel like this all happened because from day #1 of obama's first term the GOP leadership decided to obstruct him and stop the government from functioning no matter what. i can see how it resonates in middle america to look at the struggling economy there and poor infrastructure and wages being flat & saying we need change. if only obama had been able to get a big infrastructure and jobs bill done

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:16 (seven years ago) link

"If you succeed, we succeed." HELLLL NO

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:21 (seven years ago) link

Re: the Oval Office picture of Trump-Obama, it's not so much that he looks terrified (although there's a little of that) but that he looks, for the first time, actually ashamed to be sitting there with Obama. It's a mixture of shame and fear. He looks like a 70 year old boy who's done a bad thing and who's embarrassed that the adult in the room is still being civil towards him.

Of course the shame will only have been temporary as I'm sure he switched as soon as he left the building.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:22 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the greatest immediate mitigating factor is that he and his "people" seem to be very lazy and don't know how to do anything. If leading Dems and career officials remember Rule #5, never forget Rule #5, always stick to Rule #5, then we might live through this.

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:29 (seven years ago) link

History implies America will not fall prey to fascism, at least as it has traditionally manifested itself. But if the country was indeed going down the darkest path, what are the first warning signs to look for (other than electing a fascist)? The weakening of the press? Punishing enemies?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

given the general consensus that Trump has little interest in policy or the day to day donkey work of being President, and will delegate most of that side of things to subordinates - do we have an idea of who these people are likely to be, of who is going to be actually making the big decisions? Who does Trump listen to? Is the administration likely to be chaotic as different subordinates fight for dominance in the absence of a strong/engaged president?

soref, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:32 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/796900183955095552

Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:38 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Just had a very open and successful presidential election. Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!

9:19pm · 10 Nov 2016 · Twitter for Android

okay yeah so he's going to have people massacred at his inauguration

comesayhey, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:39 (seven years ago) link

this is gonna be the longest 4 years

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:40 (seven years ago) link

Give him a chance!

LOL

Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:41 (seven years ago) link

there are brief moments when I can cheer up but I'm so depressed, so scared, so sad. my heart goes out to all of you. I love you all. I see no cause for hope anywhere, this is something we can only defend ourselves from, not actively fight for good, just less bad. it's going to be so bad. worse than Reagan 80s.

― flopson, Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:09 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think I am going crazy, like literally as in suffering mental illness. I hope not. but I'm really, deeply terrified

― flopson, Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:30 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i feel this way too flopson. im not doing well

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:42 (seven years ago) link

"Professional protesters." Welcome to Russia.

Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:43 (seven years ago) link

I think the Cabinet is going to be completely off the rails and they're going to ask for crazy things but mostly just not do their actual jobs. They will likely treat all the career civil servants beneath them like shit. It's probably going to be supremely annoying for the SES corps, since those folks can actually be fired - but only if you work at it, and they won't.

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:43 (seven years ago) link

even if you cant make it all the way to Stalin, the mind reels at plausible damage Trump can do domestically with Republican House and Senate, and in foreign policy. it feels like the end of something, to me. not sure what, but were clearly not just going to resume our previous path before this. and it just feels so unnecessary

I agree with this 100%. I'm scared and frightened and I feel an immense sense of loss and for nothing. Just emptiness. But I don't want to go crazy - even a somber conservative analysis is bad enough.

― Mordy, Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:27 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea the "best case scenario" i come up with is an awful but typical republican presidency. reagan & gwb eras. that's pretty bad and depressing enough, honestly right now i feel like we'd be lucky to have that instead of trump. we'll see

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:44 (seven years ago) link

seriously spooked by that DJT tweet :(

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:46 (seven years ago) link

Imagine if Michael "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job" Brown held every cabinet position.

Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:47 (seven years ago) link

I was at the protest last night, where's my money?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:48 (seven years ago) link

OK, so even as president elect he is tweeting umbrage? The fuck does he care, he won. Man, four years, two years, one year, two months ... who knew Trump would destroy time, too.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:50 (seven years ago) link

i feel like this all happened because from day #1 of obama's first term the GOP leadership decided to obstruct him and stop the government from functioning no matter what. i can see how it resonates in middle america to look at the struggling economy there and poor infrastructure and wages being flat & saying we need change. if only obama had been able to get a big infrastructure and jobs bill done

― FREE BRADY (daria-g), Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:16 PM (twenty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea this feels right to me

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:50 (seven years ago) link

instinctive "oh for fuck's sake" when I read that tweet

Wouldn't professional protesters be hired rather than incited?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:52 (seven years ago) link

that tweet, jesus

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

So the tax plan is going to slash revenues by epic numbers - will he follow along with the GOP austerity standards which means zero job growth and no infrastructure projects or does he buck them and push for Huey Long-populism where we just run enormous deficits to fund projects for the Rust Belt he needed?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

this is going to be very bad

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

@tripgabriel
Interviewing Trump voters in Erie, Pa., many don't much like him, voted reluctantly, suggesting he won't get much slack if he can't deliver

It's weird because there was lots of stuff written about how voters found Hillary was "unlikeable", similar to all the articles in 2000 and 2004 about how ppl found Gore and Kerry cold and disatant, and they would "rather share a beer" or whatever with Bush, and I can see that Bush had this laid back frat-boy charm that would appeal to some people. But with Trump, I kind of get impression that *most* of his voters don't "like" him, he's more like an avatar of their ugliest, most shameful feelings. I can't imagine that even his most enthusiastic supporters think that hanging out with Trump would be anything other than unbearable, but I don't think it's necessarily the case that Trump voters may stop supporting him because they don't "like" him as Gabriel suggests, that's not the level he appeals to ppl on.

soref, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

So the tax plan is going to slash revenues by epic numbers - will he follow along with the GOP austerity standards which means zero job growth and no infrastructure projects or does he buck them and push for Huey Long-populism where we just run enormous deficits to fund projects for the Rust Belt he needed?

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:53 PM (seven seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he won't do shit, GOP is just going to run with this, they have the strucutral advantages to keep congress for a long time

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:54 (seven years ago) link

god i am so depressed right now you guys

this morning i woke up from a better sleep and the sun was out today (yesterday it was dark and gloomy as fuck in cleveland) and i had some better moments but ultimately i am just so scared and depressed and angry about this

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:55 (seven years ago) link

His margin was too thin to not offer anything to the [racist/economically anxious/other as you prefer] white working class that turned out for him, if it's a standard GOP budget they won't come out again.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 02:57 (seven years ago) link

gop doesn't give a fuck about vote margins or approval ratings though. you see the glee in paul ryan right now? these guys just view this as their ticket, they weren't expecting it but here it is and they know it

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:59 (seven years ago) link

ahhh idk i just so little faith right now

marcos, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:59 (seven years ago) link

That's how they feel but Trump is desperate for approval and will be second for another term - he might just want to be a figurehead but if that starts to hurt his numbers or threaten his next time around he's still the damn President.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:01 (seven years ago) link

between this and a couple things in my life this is by far the worst week i've had in about 8 years

call all destroyer, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:01 (seven years ago) link

@tripgabriel
Interviewing Trump voters in Erie, Pa., many don't much like him, voted reluctantly, suggesting he won't get much slack if he can't deliver

a trump voter who saw me & canvassing partner out knocking on doors for hillary in a small pennsylvania city literally yelled at us (in a friendly way!), "good luck with that, it's too bad i have to vote for the guy who's mentally retarded"

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:03 (seven years ago) link

i am not even joking. we had to take a moment to unpack because 1) why do you *have* to vote for him?! 2) casual slur against the disabled (i suppose this means he's not 'politically correct') 3) the guy was trying to be nice!

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:07 (seven years ago) link

wow, that is something

call all destroyer, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:15 (seven years ago) link

Sad!

qop (crüt), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:15 (seven years ago) link

this is sickening

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:20 (seven years ago) link

Not really tbh. He lived a full live and left it with highs most artist would be envious of.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link

between this and a couple things in my life this is by far the worst week i've had in about 8 years

― call all destroyer

:-(

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

one upshot of all this is that even though his cabinet is going to be filled with people who suck like Newt Gingrich, he's going to be constantly firing and replacing them

qop (crüt), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:24 (seven years ago) link

reflecting on it more it also makes me wonder how the campaign team could have done better to realize what was happening in the field.. i'm really new at this so i don't know how the whole operation works other years, but in early fall at least when you're still trying to gauge where the voters are at & ask them to commit to vote..

the list of doors to knock should be all democrats but anyplace besides philadelphia it was always coming up with a not insignificant number of "we won't say" (which probably means trump?) or straight up "we're for trump"

i assumed this was normal but i didn't have other years to measure response against. i wonder how many of us sounded alarms about this kind of thing on tally sheets because it really wasn't emphasized to note it down in training

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link

Government Apprentice, coming to CSPAN

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:26 (seven years ago) link

xp daria I found this interesting and possibly related to yr door-to-door experience, have not seen it yet - the Clinton campaign's reliance on a data simulator named ADA:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/11/09/clintons-data-driven-campaign-relied-heavily-on-an-algorithm-named-ada-what-didnt-she-see/

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:28 (seven years ago) link

(I mean, have not seen this mentioned in the election threads so far on ILX)

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:29 (seven years ago) link

Not really tbh. He lived a full live and left it with highs most artist would be envious of.
alink
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:21 (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

RIP Donald Trump :(

glumdalclitch, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:29 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/796900183955095552

― Allen (etaeoe), Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:38 PM (fifty-two minutes ago) Bookmark

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648

, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:31 (seven years ago) link

Guessing at Trump having a slightly elevated heart rate and somewhat high blood pressure along with age and BMI, it still only looks like he has a 3% of chance of dying of congestive heart failure in the next four years

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:32 (seven years ago) link

this guy is a fucking con artist and thug

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:37 (seven years ago) link

obama is trying to reassure people for the sake of the country and is biting his tongue. we should not. no matter what he does in office -- if it turns out he compromises or whatever which seems unlikely -- it doesn't matter. he has already put our country through hell with his racist campaign and no one should forget it.

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

yeah i read that article about the Ada data machine

i don't think you can pin this on any one factor but one thing that tracks with my experience when we were still going after persuadable voters (as opposed to later on GOTV canvassing) was the people who refused to say who they were voting for. how do you handle that in polling? how do you put that into your data model? this is where i feel like there really is a need to be more engaged with these folks because if you are a member of the community and people trust you then maybe you'll actually know who they're voting for and what is happening and be able to persuade them otherwise. intuitively it felt like a cultural thing to me, older white people from rust belt cities/towns who refused to tell you what they thought or who they were voting for, because they didn't know you. i grew up around these people. they voted for trump

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

I may play the banjo, but I'm a Mexican-American. I have no fuckin' idea what I should feel. It's so weird when you realize just how many people hate people who's skin color is the same as mine. I don't feel safe anymore and every white person is now under suspicion in my mind, which is horribly unfair and which I hate. But the worst thing is knowing that there's a part of me that does feel inferior to white people (I'm 61 years old; there was nothing cool about being Mexican when I was growing up) and that now a small part of me will "know" that I am low-class and worthless always. Right now, I want to pull the blankets over my head and sleep forever. I thought I was done with most of this shit, but apparently I'm not. I'm old and I'm tired and now I'm not good enough to live in my own country.

banjoboy, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:46 (seven years ago) link

So is trump going to keep blaming the media for his entire presidency?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:49 (seven years ago) link

unless the Breitbart guy has a better idea

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

I would stand beside you banjo

JacobSanders, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

banjoboy please post more

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:56 (seven years ago) link

you're better than at least half the people who vote in this country, that's for sure, banjoboy. you're not worthless, and you have every right to be suspicious of white people.

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 03:56 (seven years ago) link

xp no i was told that his russian connections were just liberal conspiracy theories

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:01 (seven years ago) link

i have light skin and i feel tremendous shame about it right now even i don't personally identify in any way w/ "white culture" but it doesn't matter i'm horrified by the way i look.

i don't know what it would look like but i feel like i need some kind of kip thread to help get through all this (not just the above which i think is minor compared to a lot of the other stuff i and others are going thru) and it sounds maybe like some other posters could use one too. like i said i'm not sure exactly what it would be? maybe the solution is i just need a break from thinking about politics for a bit bc i know this isn't healthy bc i don't feel healthy i feel sick and constantly frightened and no matter what is reasonable to expect it would be nice to reduce some of the self-inflicted suffering right now. sorry i don't really have any recommendation really i guess. maybe like i remember we made that thread for looking at pictures of trees instead of clusterfucks? what do ppl think about some kind of thread for pictures + video of like natural world stuff - volcanos and exotic animals and beautiful places on earth and maybe beautiful traditions and ppl and communities. ugh i feel so stupid writing this but i'm going to post it anyway bc even tho i think my idea is dumb maybe someone has a better one? i have a pint of ben + jerrys in the freezer and i'm 99% sure that it isn't going to make me feel better.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:03 (seven years ago) link

you know what's awesome for a half hour or so is image searching "manul"

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

i also feel shame walking around (having no job, i've actively avoided it since nov 8 other than walking my dog). i want to wear a "trump is a terrible racist" shirt and somehow exempt myself from association with the vast majority of white people. but as much as i feel that, i know that my anger and shame are not and cannot be on the same level as the real fear that a lot of people of color are feeling. like what banjoboy said, just a few posts up. that's so heartbreaking to read. i can't imagine living it. it makes me so sad and angry.

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

I have to believe Trump will speak out against this hatred and violence his supports are spreading. I know it might seem like wishful thinking, but if the man has any shred of decency in his bones, he has to. The tweet posted above doesn't give me hope but as things get worse and I fear they will, please I have to think he will.

JacobSanders, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:11 (seven years ago) link

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/and-here-we-go--9

Paul Ryan just announced that as part of repealing Obamacare he plans to phase out Medicare and replace it with private insurance for retirees.

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:11 (seven years ago) link

i don't know what it would look like but i feel like i need some kind of kip thread to help get through all this (not just the above which i think is minor compared to a lot of the other stuff i and others are going thru) and it sounds maybe like some other posters could use one too.

Mordy in all seriousness I was thinking that we need a "safe space" thread where people can just freak out and connect and get reassured, leaving the politics talk to this thread and the other ones running.

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:14 (seven years ago) link

I live in Trump country currently. Yesterday morning I was walking down the street and I wanted to get my head inside my best approximation of a Trump supporter I could come up with. I imagined the world where the "right order" was restored with white Christian straight men on top, and people of color, Muslims, immigrants, Jewish people, and women lower, in their right place, no longer ascendant under Obama and the SJWs.

It felt ... good in a way, powerful. "This is our world again." No longer have to deal with people who are different because they're firmly in their place again and we've got a "mandate" to keep them their. Comfortable. Peaceful. I got it out of my mind quickly because it just felt evil, like drinking poison. I watched some vines on Twitter of black kids goofing around and it made me miserable to think about what they're going to have to deal with under Trump. That's not the way I want the world to be.

I also received a fundraising postcard for the law school I went to, and it's parent school is a Jewish university. One of my neighbors (we share a mailbox) is a die-hard Trump supporter and subscribes to some sketchy alt-right shit, and that made me a little nervous to think of this Trump guy assuming I'm Jewish.

My heart goes out to all of you who have to deal with this bullshit for real in day to day life now. I know that's worthless from some random internet weirdo, but I don't know what the hell I can do. I'm definitely not becoming one of these Trump legitimizers, though.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:19 (seven years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clintons-vaunted-gotv-operation-may-have-turned-out-trump-voters_us_582533b1e4b060adb56ddc27?ka603sor

The campaign’s text messaging GOTV effort may have been the worst offender. Volunteers reported as many as 30% of the replies they received from voters they were urging to get out were Trump supporters.

"may have been" is doing a lot of work here without any proof but in general, what was happening in the field wasn't making its way into the data machine. i don't know why - i trusted the process at the time completely, especially because obama 2012 was so successful and david plouffe was consistently reassuring that the structure of the race was unchanged and clinton would win easily

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:21 (seven years ago) link

https://medium.com/@Brocktoon/lexington-c1825d25442e#.qsa7gluua

good read, thanks

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

hillary clinton's approval ratings are going to go back up to like 70% really soon right, and the pundits on cnn will be saying how likable and authentic she is

re: medicare privatization/ryan budget crap, i am HOPING someone like chuck schumer is wise enough to subtly convince trump that paul ryan would get all the credit for this if it passed, the horrible GOP establishment paul ryan who didn't do enough to support his party's nominee

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

The image I can't forget: yesterday morning, waiting for the intercampus shuttle, I saw a student in the class I was about to head to. She said, "Professor, I'm Mexican. My family is all legal and I'm a citizen. But the new president called us rapists and murderers."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

medicare thing is crazy overreach and it will blow up in their face

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

Hillary Clinton was a bad candidate right off the bat and she did nothing to ameliorate her major issues. The last thing she needed was a robot running her campaign.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:31 (seven years ago) link

one upshot of all this is that even though his cabinet is going to be filled with people who suck like Newt Gingrich, he's going to be constantly firing and replacing them

― qop (crüt), Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:24 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm god i hope so

flappy bird, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

well it'll be an interesting early case bc if he can't privatize medicare he certainly isn't taking on supreme dictatorial power xxp

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

I hope to God they decide to try that first, privatize Medicare.

also I'm reposting this because it's really good and important imo

http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/11/10/trump-election-autocracy-rules-for-survival/

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

medicare thing is crazy overreach and it will blow up in their face

wasn't it exactly this that blew up in george w bush's face after the GOP controlled both the WH and congress after the 2004 election? social security i think

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:39 (seven years ago) link

Medicare scheme would make a great chance for a truly diabolical Trump to surprise-veto some deeply unpopular bullshit from Establishment Paul in the name of The People. They sent him there after Obamacare, now it's Medicare?! He makes a big show of defeating the proposal, approval shoots up, Ryan gets primaried and replaced by a Trumpling. Yay.

The next four years are just a wasteland of no-win scenarios. I hope Trump chokes to death on a loose bone from KFC on January 19.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:40 (seven years ago) link

Privatizing Medicare will either break their stranglehold on old white people or they'll all die from lack of care.

OTOH, my mom starts Medicare in December after pay $700/mo for a bronze plan for the last two years so fuck Ryan with a hot poker.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:40 (seven years ago) link

I liked that article tombot, but as an aside I really hate 'love trumps hate' as a protest statement. feel like there's never been a less appropriate time for cute little puns.

xp

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link

Medicare scheme would make a great chance for a truly diabolical Trump to surprise-veto some deeply unpopular bullshit from Establishment Paul in the name of The People. They sent him there after Obamacare, now it's Medicare?! He makes a big show of defeating the proposal, approval shoots up, Ryan gets primaried and replaced by a Trumpling. Yay.

yeah on some level it might be worse than he's not an ideologue and accidentally can do the right thing once in a while

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:44 (seven years ago) link

Fucking hell what a month. Was sick as hell, my parents came to visit and my mom woke me up at 5:30 three weeks ago because my dad was unresponsive, I got to call 911 for the first time, he spent three days in the hospital 70 miles away and ended up with a pacemaker, then I got sick again, and now this. I had the crazy heart beat and four hours of sleep Tuesday night, went to a faculty meeting Wednesday morning that felt like a wake and everyone was crying, and have lived in a haze where I've been cycling through the Kubler-Ross stages since then and have settled on angry for a while.

Today one of my students was losing his shit because somebody spray painted "fag" on his boyfriend's car, and one of my many latino students asked for an deadline extension because of some shit that broke out with Trump supporters. When I got home my friend from Venezuela started texting me in a panic cause he thought he was done with authoritarian bullshit and how fucked we are going to be. Then my kid chucked a block at my head, and the shitty christian band that practices across the street was way louder than usual and I went over and rained hell upon them.

On the plus side all of my students seem outraged, even some of the ones I worried were probably 4chan alt-right assholes, and a bunch of them were protesting on campus. And part of me feels like something like this was inevitable and would probably be bad in a different way had Hilary won, so maybe we can just get it over with now and these assholes will get riled up when they realize high-paying factory jobs won't suddenly appear in Dayton and Youngstown. Assuming everything doesn't end up in smoking ruins or just really really awful first.

Still going to get my son a passport soon just in case; I could make it to the canadian border in a couple hours.

joygoat, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:44 (seven years ago) link

In response to the possibility of the likelihood of Trump dropping dead before his four years are up or getting impeached or quitting before his term even begins, people have been pretty regularly responding that Pence would be worse. But Trump is both malleable and seemingly totally cool with passing the actual president-ing on to Pence anyway, so how exactly would that be worse than Pence as filtered through an unpredictable man baby?

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:46 (seven years ago) link

because Pence is focused

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:48 (seven years ago) link

Trump, in the past, expressed some not-insane opinions. He's malleable but not bright enough to have a coherent ideology of evil. He's Kylo Ren.

Pence, on the other hand, is Darth Vader.

Ted Cruz is old, melted Palpatine.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:51 (seven years ago) link

seriously spooked by that DJT tweet :(

Uh, yeah. So much for dialing back the crazy after you win the election.

On the other hand, lol @ "Melania and Michelle got along very well"

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:51 (seven years ago) link

Who's organizing to keep protests ongoing? We don't need to blow up in an orgy of anger now, protests need to be day-in-day-out for four years to drive him into saying and doing more and more crazy shit. Different city every night, only have to turn out once a month.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 04:55 (seven years ago) link

I liked that article tombot, but as an aside I really hate 'love trumps hate' as a protest statement. feel like there's never been a less appropriate time for cute little puns.

Absolutely. The first two words are "love trump" and I read it often as "love Trump's hate" which...uh yeah, that's kind of what people are getting on board with

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 04:57 (seven years ago) link

In response to the possibility of the likelihood of Trump dropping dead before his four years are up or getting impeached or quitting before his term even begins, people have been pretty regularly responding that Pence would be worse. But Trump is both malleable and seemingly totally cool with passing the actual president-ing on to Pence anyway, so how exactly would that be worse than Pence as filtered through an unpredictable man baby?

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:46 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

because Pence is focused

― sleeve, Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:48 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah.

I mean, Trump's unpredictability (and temperament, and narcissism, etc) is worrisome, but I for one would be more frightened of the people he is likely to surround himself with. I honestly believe that Trump wanted to be president so he will have been president, and will leave all of the policy stuff to Pence, etc. That's scary.

rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:02 (seven years ago) link

*wanted to be president JUST so he will have been president

rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:03 (seven years ago) link

i don't see how the street protests are accomplishing anything! there's no goal, no training, no plan, just show up and then inevitably a handful of people will vandalize things live on cable news and how does this do anything but empower trump and his authoritarian calls for law and order?

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:03 (seven years ago) link

Until Pence upsets him somehow. We see how things worked out with his campaign managers.

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:03 (seven years ago) link

what do you think the protestors should do? they absolutely should be out there right now! just...uh please don't break anything

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:05 (seven years ago) link

My husband thinks Pence will be the first one that Trump throws under the bus the first time there is any kind of disruptive outrage over something that Trump signed that he knew nothing about other than that Pence told him to sign it.

rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

obama's graciousness with trump today seemed like it could have been part of a deep strategy. beyond just basic politeness he also tried to make inside quips with trump, giving him jokey tips on how to deal with reporters etc. hopefully, he is trying to win trump over via flattery and wield some influence over him. trump loves flattery, and what could be more exciting than having a world historic figure like obama as a friend?

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:07 (seven years ago) link

it's also what they have to do - how primed was everyone on the Clinton side to roast Trump if he didn't concede?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:10 (seven years ago) link

by everyone I mean voters/supporters

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:10 (seven years ago) link

this quote from today fucked me up

"We're going to move very strongly on immigration," he said. "We will move very strongly on health care. And we're looking at jobs. Big league jobs."

flappy bird, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:11 (seven years ago) link

i don't see how the street protests are accomplishing anything!

They bother him so much that he stole his Twitter account back and started whining - two days after what should be the pinnacle of anyone's life.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:11 (seven years ago) link

At work I explained it like this, "it feels like we fired our CEO and replaced him with an 8 year old kid, and now all of us are going to spend our careers trying to figure out what he likes on his cheeseburgers and when his nap time should be to best avoid temper tantrums"

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:12 (seven years ago) link

Constant protesting helps keep the media from normalizing Trump and his behavior over the next four years.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

i have a very liberal and sympathetic friend who is nevertheless convinced on principle that street protests, when they involve harm to others—in the technical sense, of any unmerited inconvenience, even—are unjust, i.e. immoral. he thinks, basically, the right to protest in public should always be upheld but that it can't disrupt the flow of life for people who don't want to pay attention to it. and he's ON OUR SIDE.

i've already seen a handful of 'independents' or trump supporters or whomever in the past couple days in my extended network pointing to the protests as if they were morally equivalent to the incidents of harassment and violence this week. people who think like that will only ever be repelled by the constant protests we're in for. : /

j., Friday, 11 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

On the day of the debate, Megyn Kelly writes, she woke up feeling great. Then an overzealous, suspiciously enthusiastic driver picked her up to take her to the convention center. He insisted on getting her coffee, though she’d repeatedly declined his offer. Once it was in her hand, she drank it. And within 15 minutes, she was violently ill, vomiting so uncontrollably that it was unclear if she’d be able to go on and help moderate that evening. It was so bad that she kept a trash pail beneath her desk throughout the debate, just in case.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/books/review-megyn-kelly-tells-tales-out-of-fox-news-in-her-memoir-settle-for-more.html?_r=0

We already live in Russia.

comesayhey, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

I used to be something of a skeptic when it came to claims of “filter bubbles” — the sort of epistemic closure that comes from only seeing material you agree with on social platforms. People tend to click links that align with their existing opinions, sure — but isn’t that just an online analog to the fact that our friends and family tend to share our opinions in the real world too? I ate up studies (from Facebook and others) that argued the site actually encouraged a certain kind of information diversity, because your Facebook friends are likely drawn from a wider group of people (the guy you went to middle school with, your mom’s neighbor, that rando you met that weekend at the beach) than the people you discuss news with in real life.

But I’ve come to think that the rise of fake news — and of the cheap-to-run, ideologically driven aggregator sites that are only a few steps up from fake — has weaponized those filter bubbles. There were just too many people voting in this election because they were infuriated by made-up things they read online.

http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/11/the-forces-that-drove-this-elections-media-failure-are-likely-to-get-worse/

F♯ A♯ (∞), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:14 (seven years ago) link

Organized protests are going to have less violence and fewer negative consequences than an outpouring of grief anyway.

xxp - people who think like that are a lost cause anyway when they have the option to choose a shitty politically incorrect maverick

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:15 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, not that we need to point out the hypocrisy of the GOP any more, but I'd bet dollars to doughnuts you don't hear a fucking word about emails from pearl-clutching Republicans anymore. Keep hearing "Hillary should have won, but in the end she had too much baggage" and it's like....no she really didn't, you just decided to accept this weird story that she was a criminal and possibly a murderer.

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:17 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/books/review-megyn-kelly-tells-tales-out-of-fox-news-in-her-memoir-settle-for-more.html?_r=0

We already live in Russia.

"Next thing I knew, she was bleeding out of her...wherever"

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:18 (seven years ago) link

guys what if the aliens show up while he's in office

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:18 (seven years ago) link

Aliens from where

Evan, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:19 (seven years ago) link

don't know if this was mentioned yet, I've been seeing this pop up on my fb feed from a number of sources. A simple way to show solidarity to any people who are feeling more at risk:

http://www.vox.com/presidential-election/2016/11/10/13586322/trump-brexit-safety-pin

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:20 (seven years ago) link

I think Keith Ellison is a solid dude but why is an endorsement from a non-democrat such a great idea? Is Sanders considering joining the party again? Is he giving out ideas on RNC chairs next?

A bunch of friends have shared Sanders' endorsement and I am just like wtf

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:21 (seven years ago) link

Way to reform from without and not within you fly by night candidate

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:21 (seven years ago) link

Outer space, Evan, duh

El Tomboto, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:22 (seven years ago) link

My parents are on medicare after a decade-plus-long rough patch after my dad lost his job (he worked again and continues to, and a much lower salary, and never had employer insurance again), during which they paid out a huge part of their income to insurance premiums. I breathed such a sigh of relief a couple years ago when they finally got on medicare. I really do hope that's an overreach that blows up in their faces.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:23 (seven years ago) link

seems like bernie sanders has upset you, mh

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 05:23 (seven years ago) link

I think Keith Ellison is a solid dude but why is an endorsement from a non-democrat such a great idea? Is Sanders considering joining the party again? Is he giving out ideas on RNC chairs next?

A bunch of friends have shared Sanders' endorsement and I am just like wtf

― mh 😏, Friday, November 11, 2016 12:21 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Way to reform from without and not within you fly by night candidate

― mh 😏, Friday, November 11, 2016 12:21 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No one gives a shit about this "not a real democrat" shit except the party insiders who lost this election.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:24 (seven years ago) link

He can endorse whatever he wants but someone who joined the democratic to run and then immediately left seems like a weird endorsement to share for an administrative position

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:25 (seven years ago) link

it seems it would be pretty rich for 'actual' democrats to be all 'tyvm but we need to let people committed to our party make these decisions', given that they have no credible leadership

j., Friday, 11 November 2016 05:25 (seven years ago) link

is there any reason he immediately left than for some sort of idealistic purity?

I mean, it's a party, which is a non binding thing in the US but idk wtf

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:27 (seven years ago) link

Missed this one earlier: https://www.buzzfeed.com/aramroston/sources-donald-trump-listened-in-on-phone-lines-at-mar-a-lag

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:29 (seven years ago) link

paintings with eyes that mysteriously follow you

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:29 (seven years ago) link

is there any reason he immediately left than for some sort of idealistic purity?

I mean, it's a party, which is a non binding thing in the US but idk wtf

― mh 😏, Friday, November 11, 2016 12:27 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

All he is now is the Senator from Vermont and that's how his constituency elected him. Only seems right.

comesayhey, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:31 (seven years ago) link

that article oo posted has this insane tidbit:

"...The day before the election, I looked at the Facebook page of the current mayor. Among the items he posted there in the final 48 hours of the campaign: Hillary Clinton Calling for Civil War If Trump Is Elected. Pope Francis Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for President. Barack Obama Admits He Was Born in Kenya. FBI Agent Who Was Suspected Of Leaking Hillary’s Corruption Is Dead.
These are not legit anti-Hillary stories. (There were plenty of those, to be sure, both on his page and in this election cycle.) These are imaginary, made up, frauds. And yet Facebook has built a platform for the active dispersal of these lies — in part because these lies travel really, really well. (The pope’s “endorsement” has over 868,000 Facebook shares. The Snopes piece noting the story is fake has but 33,000.)"

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:32 (seven years ago) link

ok, long post here, this is from a friend of a friend on fb who was canvassing for the election in Ohio:

I wanted to share some illuminating insights on real, actual Trump & Hillary supporters I met while canvassing in Ohio.

I only met a handful of Trump voters. A couple of them were even African American. A few things REALLY surprised me:

- Yes, some folks are really, super racist, homophobic, and awful. I’ve had people scream at me: Hillary is a murderer! She broke the law & is being indicted by the FBI! Perverts can go into girls and boys bathrooms, and you Democrats make me sick! You get the picture. They have swallowed up the alt-right Breitbart lies & this is their reality.

- I met some undecided voters. One very nice, young woman said she didn’t like that Hillary was going to take away all her guns (not true), and she also didn’t like the email thing (no specifics). She didn’t like Trump because he was an asshole, but she was glad he released his taxes (dude, all caps NOT TRUE). I refuted the lies about Clinton & tried to correct her on Trump, but she still didn’t seem to understand. Or maybe she didn’t believe me — after all, I’m campaigning for one side. Clearly, she’s getting a lot of lies & misinformation, and no details — I would guess it’s from cable TV, shares on social media, quick headlines, memes, and her bubble of friends.

- I met one very thoughtful, college educated, African American man, early 30s, who was leaning towards voting for Jill Stein, because he was originally a Bernie supporter. He was staunchly anti-Trump, and liked Hillary, but couldn't decide. He’s married to a white woman who supported Hillary, and they were at home with their toddler. He said to me, “My wife says I’m throwing my vote away!” I said I agreed, because of the Electoral College. He didn’t understand what I meant. As we chatted for 15 min, it became clear to me that this man, living in Ohio, did not understand that we elect a President via the Electoral College. He didn’t understand that his vote was really crucial in determining who would be our next President. And this dude was a journalism major in college! He understood the issues, but before I knocked, he didn’t understand why his Ohio vote mattered so much more than my California vote. Even educated voters are busy — they don’t have the luxury of time to read print journalism. They might watch some TV news. They probably don’t listen NPR. They may not remember their civics lessons, if they even had one at all. Once he understood the impact of his vote, he was 100% behind Hillary.

- A Clinton staging office is usually someone’s house — a wonderful, generous soul who has opened up their home, morning through evening, for weeks. A Clinton operations director is assigned there, to prioritize, delegate and train GOTV volunteers as they come in. The homeowner is there, cheering everyone on. When I arrived at one staging office, I was greeted by the homeowner, who asked where I was from. “California, how wonderful! How’s it looking in California? Do you think Hillary has a chance to win there?” I said yes, Hillary was absolutely going to win CA, because it was very safely a blue state. She beamed, and excitedly told her friend who was visiting, and they cheered. This lovely woman, who was so supportive of Hillary Clinton that she has let complete strangers turn her house upside down for weeks, also did not seem to know basic info about the Electoral College! I get it now — truthful information can be hard to identify & process. There’s a lot out there. How can we do better to educate & inform the voting public?

- I met a young African American woman who voted third party. I met an African American man whose wife voted for Trump. I met a lot of people of color and white voters who voted as though it were a coin toss. I’m not kidding. When asked, they didn’t seem to know a whole lot about Trump — as though the nonstop scandals had just become a jumbled news salad, with nothing really sticking out to define him. Maybe they just recognized him as that flashy businessman on that TV reality show that they liked. They were familiar with the Clinton name, but didn’t know what she really stood for. They were all pretty tuned out.
My main takeaway from canvassing this time was that more than half of our electorate — the folks in the middle, who are neither far right nativists nor lefty progressives — they know little about the candidates. Lots of them do not vote. And if they do show up & vote, they are voting with a critical lack of information or an over abundance of misinformation. It is literally a coin toss for some of them. If you’ve read my previous post, this will sound familiar: I believe that one of the biggest problems is that cable “news" is really just reality TV posing as news, with little to no journalism or investigation of facts. And thanks to the GOP’s decades-long attack of the institution of journalism & the “liberal media," people don’t know who to trust for news anymore. They share memes & news articles without even knowing if what they are sharing is true. They believe conspiracy theories and unfounded rumors. They believe the lies that Trump spews out against Clinton, because TV news reporters don’t dig deep. They just report what people say, and give equal weight to both sides, as though the two candidates and their surrogates were equally reasonable people. For these voters, it’s "he said" versus "she said." They don’t know what or who to believe.

This election is, in part, a reflection of a complete failure of news outlets, and what happens when meaningful journalism is diminished, underfunded or undermined. Without journalism and trust in the free press, democracy is doomed.

Where can we start? I’m still thinking hard about this. For now, if you are an English or history teacher, please teach your students how to be journalists. Teach them how to vet sources of information, how to sift fact from fiction, and how to write a factual news article. It would prepare them well for college, to learn how to research. Have them analyze broadcasts from Fox, CNN, and MSNBC and present their findings. Have them research the whole story, and not just a sound bite. Have them analyze an NPR news report. If you’re a parent, tell your kid’s schools that you want an immersive course about the elections process. Teach students about the history of voter suppression, and how it still exists in many forms today. Teach them about gerrymandering. Insist that the students learn how to be good journalists & good citizens. They’ll be sharing more memes than we can possibly imagine, so let’s get them vetting facts first, so they can share the truth, or knock down a lie when they see one.

I’ll try to end this on a positive note:

While canvassing at dusk, I met a family. I didn’t know if they were pro- or anti-Clinton. Their kids were playing in the driveway. Mid-way through my pitch for Hillary, the husband said, "I have a felony conviction, and I've been told for years I can't vote. Is that true?" I told him the law varies by state; I looked it up on the ACLU website, and he did, in fact, have the right to vote. He nearly cried. This muscular tough guy looked at his wife in disbelief, "Honey, did you hear that? I can vote!" He looked at me and said with real sadness, "If I knew, I would have registered. That's why my wife is registered — she's really voting for me. I want Hillary to win."
Voter suppression, bad journalism, online misinformation & lies really do have an impact on our elections. Please consider the small things you can do locally to help us build a more informed and engaged electorate, one who can base their choices on facts & not lies.

And now… how do we win the Senate and House in 2018, when Democrats usually have record low turnout? I'll need to marinate on that one...

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

obama's graciousness with trump today seemed like it could have been part of a deep strategy. beyond just basic politeness he also tried to make inside quips with trump, giving him jokey tips on how to deal with reporters etc. hopefully, he is trying to win trump over via flattery and wield some influence over him. trump loves flattery, and what could be more exciting than having a world historic figure like obama as a friend?

― Treeship, Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:07 PM (twenty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Ohhh, I thought this, too. Obama knows that flattering Trump wins out over any potential differences, and I'll bet he'd be able to play him like a fiddle were he so inclined.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

I deeply admire that person's reaction to those people because I'd start carrying a flask and drinking heavily after the first one.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

My main takeaway from canvassing this time was that more than half of our electorate — the folks in the middle, who are neither far right nativists nor lefty progressives — they know little about the candidates. Lots of them do not vote. And if they do show up & vote, they are voting with a critical lack of information or an over abundance of misinformation. It is literally a coin toss for some of them.

This is one point that seems both important and, in hindsight, obvious, yet not one I am seeing made by almost anyone

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:40 (seven years ago) link

Good post. I saw a lot of people saying "how the fuck are there still undecideds?" during the last few weeks but that's just the truth, some people do not engage with political shit on any level. Disheartening to find that the late undecideds broke heavy for Trump and that the bullshit email story almost certainly had a lot to do with it.

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:42 (seven years ago) link

Thank you so much for sharing that post, Moodles. That gives me some food for thought, as I'm thinking that education of the electorate has to be one of our main priorities in the coming days and months and years.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:44 (seven years ago) link

And honestly that's why I thought Debate #1 was gonna win it for Hillary - it was hyped up, the undecideds and disengaged were gonna watch, and he was going to get demolished. That all happened and it showed in the polls but.......yeah

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:44 (seven years ago) link

God, education is so important. Here's some crucial information for an under informed voter: "By the way, nearly everything Trump says is a baldfaced lie. You can look it up yourself in real time. When he says 50, the real number could be 3,000, it could be 0. When he claims 'I never said X' there is almost certainly a tape of him saying X. He routinely makes up fake people and recounts fake interactions that the other party cannot corroborate. He once posed as his own publicist so he could brag to newspapers about cheating on his wife."

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:50 (seven years ago) link

American high schools need to return to teaching about the obligations of citizenship. Even my old, highly-regarded high school no longer offers civics classes. When I went there, civics was mandatory for all 9th graders.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 11 November 2016 05:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah, it was interesting to read the shared moodles post just after reading my aunt's comment on facebook: "What part of Hillary's character do th3se people believe makes her any better than Trump? I think everyone should give him, at least a year, before they pass judgement on his ability to turn America around for the better."

i was like "yeah he's a racist, that's one thing"

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 05:53 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sure she did something for another person at least one time in her life

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 06:03 (seven years ago) link

I'm thinking that education of the electorate has to be one of our main priorities in the coming days and months and years.

this would have been tremendously important either way, but it's at least doubly so now. genuinely flabbergasted that the discussion hasn't trended towards the face of trump's ten year old son as he stands at his father's side at 3AM or whatever to accept the presidency.

life is a long game, Leonard Cohen just passed at the age of 82 and we NEED to educate and otherwise take care of the children of this world pronto imo

erudite beach boys fan (sheesh), Friday, 11 November 2016 06:04 (seven years ago) link

https://medium.com/@Brocktoon/lexington-c1825d25442e#.qsa7gluua
Who’s on their side here? The Democrats? The ones who floated NAFTA? Who deregulated the banks? Who gutted unions which might’ve stepped in and mediated these ugly, ugly racial disputes?

Wait, is he talking about the same NAFTA that was negotiated by George Bush? Democrats helped pass it, but I don't see how they "floated" it. And by bank deregulation is he talking about the 1999 Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act which happens to be named after the three Republicans who co-sponsored it? And by what bizarre logic have Democrats been the ones to gut unions?

But sure, it's awfully sad that those racist small town white folks can't work at the non-union furniture factory anymore. Thanks Obama.

wk, Friday, 11 November 2016 06:25 (seven years ago) link

gramm-leach-bliley was passed by a veto-proof majority republican congress, but this never seems to get in the way of the "bill clinton was more republican than the republicans" narrative

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 06:34 (seven years ago) link

One of the things I've noted from my overseas perspective is that a lot of the black rapper FB friends I have in Alabama seem really confused about the Electoral College. I saw a lot of "#RESEARCH
"..although Americans vote directly for their chosen candidate in the presidential election every 4 years, 👉the president is elected by the institution called the Electoral College👈" and "Electoral college picks the pres not us" posts in the weeks leading up to the election, with the subtext that voting did not matter since the establishment would disregard whatever votes they did not like and go for their own candidate anyway.

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Friday, 11 November 2016 08:13 (seven years ago) link

Earlier today, one of the younger ladies I work with asked me if I cried, and after a moment of wondering if it was a serious question, I admitted that "yeah I was furious in the middle of the night and then when i woke up I cried some."

I was encouraging these kids to vote, and they deserve to know that the outcome hurts me.

Zachary Taylor, Friday, 11 November 2016 08:15 (seven years ago) link

fantasies!

http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-election-tie-519696

j., Friday, 11 November 2016 08:28 (seven years ago) link

instinctive "oh for fuck's sake" when I read that tweet

Wouldn't professional protesters be hired rather than incited?

Thanks to improvements in technology we can have tragedy and farce at the same time!

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 11 November 2016 09:13 (seven years ago) link

I'm frustrated by the extent to which the discussions on the Left following Trump's election are all happening within the landscape the right has constructed over the last year. They're not dismissing the narratives of 'corrupt Clinton' vs 'Mr Sanders goes to Washington', or of the 'warmongering dems' vs the 'anti-war Trump', or of 'identity politics' vs 'working people' etc. etc.

In some ways this has all been a victory for the young 'class-only' left who want a socialism without content, without analysis. We've done the class-only thing before - we can't go back to the pre-70s unionism that focused on white men and became an organ of oppression for women and minorities. You can't focus on class and ignore the rest. There is no trickle-down emancipation.

Before focusing on which candidate would have won, if any, imagining that the problem was the options people were presented, we have to ask why people made the wrong choice (and it was the wrong choice) - no matter what would have been better, why did people on the day choose to abandon women and minorities, so mutilate the chances of 'progressive politics' in the future.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 09:17 (seven years ago) link

Trump has given Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, Newt Gingrich, and Mike Rogers the nation's highest security clearances - NBC News

Newt please save our country

comesayhey, Friday, 11 November 2016 09:34 (seven years ago) link

When asked how a system of registering Muslims would be carried out — whether, for instance, mosques would be where people could register — Mr. Trump said: “Different places. You sign up at different places. But it’s all about management. Our country has no management.’’

Asked later, as he signed autographs, how such a database would be different from Jews having to register in Nazi Germany, Mr. Trump repeatedly said, “You tell me,” until he stopped responding to the question.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/11/20/donald-trump-says-hed-absolutely-require-muslims-to-register/

The Trump train really does have no brakes.

comesayhey, Friday, 11 November 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

So for the Right to accept state actions you just have to call them management? You should have been pushing for gun management, damn it.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 09:40 (seven years ago) link

If vast chunks of the working class, blue color, the poor, the isolated and complacent and others truly have no or little idea how voting works, how elections work, how the country works, how the courts work, then they have been failed by almost every institution, on almost too many levels to fix. News. Education. Local politics. National politics.

I have a cousin in Maryland of indeterminate intelligence and political allegiance. I have no idea where she falls on either front, but I know she is very well-off and comfortable. And also, she exercises a lot. This is what she posted the other day:

There have been 6 terms of republican presidents since the Roe vs Wade decision. Over turning that decision was not on any one of those presidents list of things to do during their term. Why do people always assume that decision will be overturned when a republican president is elected?

Like, just try to parse that degree of ignorance, however innocent (or even not) the impetus behind it.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

Chuck Schumer said he endorses Keith Ellison as DNC chair.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

that muslim registration thing is from a year ago. not that it isn't horribly disturbing; but trump has walked it back sicne and also scrubbed all of it from his website. so I think they've realized doing that would be a very, very, very unconstitutional thing to do

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

With my day off, I watched a pretty remarkable -- yes -- "Morning Joe" segment in which for thirty minutes Michael Moore said shit about Trump that you won't hear on any other political gas bag show.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

i'd written moore off but now I feel like that was a mistake this time; he seemed to nail the outcome of this election perfectly in advance (so did van jones back in the summer).

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

I thought a number of sources were accentuating the importance of going and voting to counter the one load of assured/dedicated voters.
Would have thought that the one lesson that could be taken from Brexit would have been the importance of every vote. But I'm not sure how Brexit figures in the US mindscape, other than Trump having put it forward as essentially positive.

Stevolende, Friday, 11 November 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

I'd say with a great deal of certainty that a sizable number of Americans have never heard about Brexit and therefore have no opinion about it whatsoever.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

Do people think that protesting at the moment is a good idea? I won't tell people what to protest about, but...well, I guess I'm going to do that anyway. I really think protesting at the moment is a bad idea - when you're punch drunk and dazed it's good to sit in your corner for a minute.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

Protesting won't do much, but it will raise the picture of some people that are not pleased right now.

This raises the issue - does Trump get these people on side, or slag them off and continue without them?

Mark G, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:06 (seven years ago) link

I was on the fence about the usefulness of protesting the election results until president elect Trump petulantly tweeted about the unfairness of that constitutionally-protected right, so now I think it basically needs to continue every single day for the next four years.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

There are a lot of reasons to protest. I joined the march in NYC a couple nights ago and god, was it reaffirming to just hear this tremendous background roar of voices, be amongst so many other people who were hurting, to have this visible sense of not being alone. It served an important need for a lot of people. Also think there may potentially be something to letting people all over the country who are afraid of what this regime will do to them, that they have allies. Not saying it's the best or final step in that effort but I don't see a strong reason NOT to do it.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

American high schools need to return to teaching about the obligations of citizenship. Even my old, highly-regarded high school no longer offers civics classes. When I went there, civics was mandatory for all 9th graders.

― jane burkini (suzy), Friday, November 11, 2016 5:51 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

We had it too but it made no impression on me whatsoever. It was taught by a cranky old guy, we didn't go out and register to vote or work on a campaign or learn about our local politicians (because in a town of 3000 people, the politicians are your next-door neighbors and the school wouldn't be able to get away with educating ppl about them in case it caused any CONTROVERSY), and afaict it was completely useless. So not that kind of civics, pls.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

This raises the issue - does Trump get these people on side, or slag them off and continue without them?

depends if you believe him last night or in the morning

now that he's not running, watching him bitch and moan about the large swaths of the population who rightfully hate his guts should be rather interesting

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

The idea of showing solidarity is a good one, not quite as good as a higher turn out meaning the vote went the other way.
But since there is the closeness in voting it is good to show taht there are loads of people that do find this result inherently wrong.
JUst hoping that the right to protest doesn't wind up being curtailed over the next 4 years.

Stevolende, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

You guys, I have a full-time Americorps volunteer working with/for me this year, and since that program is federally funded and has to have approval of Congress, there are A LOT of restrictions on what the workers are and aren't allowed to do, like oh, hilariously, they're not allowed to talk to girls about their options in case of unwanted pregnancy. Even when their specific job is to mentor teens for the purpose of getting them ahead in life and not letting them get trapped in their teenaged mistakes, they can't even answer a single question about abortion.

Here's another thing they can't do: THEY CAN'T PARTICIPATE IN ANY ACTIVITY THAT HAS THE EFFECT OF HELPING PEOPLE REGISTER TO VOTE. That's right! Congress wouldn't approve the funding for the national service corps unless they were forbidden from registering citizens to vote.

So I'm thinking register the fuck out of our school community from this point on, what do you think?

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

I think the protests are very good

Just please, please, please, don't get violent or start breaking things, the last thing we need is more "Hillary thugs" headlines on FOX and a cry that we do not live in a "law and order" society anymore

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

people in oakland already started smashing shit up, they always do

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

The civics teachers at my school were great - even if you were not an A student, they got everything across to the class and centred on both our rights and obligations as citizens. There hasn't been a teenager who wasn't at least curious about knowing their rights and they engaged us with their teaching.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

Just please, please, please, don't get violent or start breaking things, the last thing we need is more "Hillary thugs" headlines on FOX and a cry that we do not live in a "law and order" society anymore

― frogbs, Friday, November 11, 2016 9:21 AM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Nothing they do or don't do will change the right wing's notion of their lawlessness and illegitemacy.

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

Holy shit Harry Reid:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw_Oc1lWIAAPz4K.jpg

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

more voter suppression laws, stacking the justice system with right wing ideologues.. and worst i really do worry about some kind of unexpected major crisis through which he suspends/ignores the rule of law and the GOP continues to go along with it.. and i mean i worry that if he doesn't get one, he'll create one, tanking the economy, starting another war

I think daria-G is relentlessly correct in this thread.

So many people I talk to in person and interact with online, who are already volunteering, donating, etc, are saying "I hope someone figures out what more we can do to stop this" and the response is kind of an eerie silence, eh?

mick signals, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

The pope’s “endorsement” has over 868,000 Facebook shares

As if to correct the record:

"I am not sure whether we still can vouch for the faith of American Christians, as they need more wisdom looking at the leader they finally elected", said Pope Francis.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Friday, 11 November 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah I can only hope that rolling back progressive policies just proves to be massively unpopular amongst the public at large which gives a lot of people in Congress pause. There are more people in government than the Christies, the Palins, the Giulianis, the Ryans, etc etc. Trying to rollback marriage equality strikes me as something that would be incredibly unpopular in a way that it would not have been 10 years ago. I would also hope that blowing up the Paris agreement when alarmist climate science has become somewhat mainstreamed would also spark massive backlash. Probably just wishful thinking though (that it would happen, or that it would matter to them)

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

self-xp: Actually, that seems an iffy site. Looking for confirmation from other news sources.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

and YES coolpope is totally OTM with this. even if he didn't actually say it, it would be OTM if he did say it. if you elect Donald Trump, Christian values are simply not that important to you. PERIOD.

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

and not that we need to point this shit out any further but fucking lol @ Newt "What's going to happen to the moral fiber of our country if the president receives a BJ?" Gingrich is going to play a major role in the "Grab her by the pussy" administration

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

the last thing we need is more "Hillary thugs" headlines on FOX and a cry that we do not live in a "law and order" society anymore

these headlines will be written anyway! their truth value for FOX and their viewers is not based on how many protesters actually break anything, as evidenced by trump's repeated and utterly baseless invocation of paid "hillary thugs" at his rallies.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

I mean dude was cheating on his own wife at the time, newt is just a not-rich donald trump xp

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

Harry Reid's whole statement is worth reading.

http://www.reid.senate.gov/press_releases/2016-11-11-reid-statement-on-the-election-of-donald-trump

jmm, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

Obviously mass meetings can be wonderful for morale and comfort - I would just avoid the sense of it being a protest, which just ends up seeming undemocratic. A carnival of like minded people celebrating diversity and community would be a better spin.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

Er, sorry? How are protests undemocratic? If you mean specifically protests somehow challenging the legitimacy of the election that would be one thing to discuss (although it gets tricky if, say, the protest is challenging the electoral college - or, in 2000, Bush V. Gore also - as being undemocratic)... but getting out in the street and saying "I think this leader and what he stands for are both awful bullshit" is a legitimate form of speech in a democratic society.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

the folks who are irritated by protests are not wont to look any more charitably at multi-culti celebrations of diversity

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I've always been skeptical of the effectiveness of a protest to successfully "bring awareness" to an issue but given how many Trump voters apparently were unaware that their vote was legitimizing hate speech and literally making children cry, I totally support it 100%

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

the folks who are irritated by protests are not wont to look any more charitably at multi-culti celebrations of diversity

You are underselling the establishment-focused Democrats who are convinced that protesting Trump now means there will be carte blanche given to the right to protest whomever the next left-leaning person to the win the Presidency is and are afraid that the sentiment will destroy our democracy.

My main response is "America is already dead based on the outcome of this election so I really don't give a shit what this hypothetical future protest you're concerned about is"

¶ (DJP), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

been seeing photos from friends protesting in Chicago and NYC the past few days. im 100% supportive of them. imo they should just do what they gotta do and ignore what the media/establishment thinks of them as a general rule.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

My main response is "America is already dead based on the outcome of this election so I really don't give a shit what this hypothetical future protest you're concerned about is"

essentially this but in both directions. idgaf about ppl concern trolling the protesters and honestly i don't really think the protests matter much either. i think we're fucked either way so if it makes ppl feel better to protest then they might as well bc i have yet to find something that makes me feel better.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

Donal j trump has had our ear for going on two years now, flooding the public sphere with hatred, incitAtion to violence, assaults on the most basic constitutional tenets, and downright treasonous statements. He has not only gotten away with it, bu has been rewarded for it. His supporters have gotten what they wanted. Eh, I think protest is more than called. What happened is unacceptable.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

i keep asking myself if this is how ppl felt in germany in 1933 and i've gotta think that no, they were probably more hopeful bc they hadn't yet seen what the worst could look like yet.

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Or call them anything but "protests" (or worse) regardless.

Trumpers rode in on a wave of propaganda, mudslinging, and full-blown lies. Expect that to continue and to escalate, and never underestimate the power of an outrageous story - no matter how manifestly untrue - to take root in minds primed to believe the worst about any Other.

hardcore dilettante, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

A friend went from the "protests are hurting things, the democratic process has happened and like it or not we have a new president" to half a day later posting "wait, the electoral college could vote against Trump!" to this morning posting something about how he will no longer be posting anything about politics

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

Uh that was in response to this: folks who are irritated by protests are not wont to look any more charitably at multi-culti celebrations of diversity

hardcore dilettante, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

my nice person facade of talking reasonably to people about politics is fading and when I see shit like "protests won't help" coming from presumed democrats I want to yell whatever the equivalent of "CUCK!!!" would be

is it still cuck, can I use that unironically

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

X-post to doc cass - I said they would seem undemocratic. For lots of people, and the media, it just seems like protesting that things didn't go their way.

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

guys, this is how it goes, this is how it always goes.

there are a lot of us, and we're not monolithic, and the vast majority of us say over and over again, no violence, no violence, no violence, but everybody's mad, a lot of people are mad, and we don't have control over people's minds, we can't ensure that nobody who hates trump will ever do anything bad ever again. and when somebody does something like that, we'll say "they don't speak for us", and they'll say "we speak for them", and who do you think the media are going to believe?

we don't have control over the "optics", we don't have formal power structures backing us up, and a lot of people are going to ask us to do the impossible and then blame us when we can't.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

i'm not saying we shouldn't be concerned about these things, but i think the question is for whose benefit we need to be concerned. and we need to be careful and judicious and precise about what we do and how we do it not because of how it will look to others. we need to do it for our own sake. we need to be the best we can be. any form of non-compliance or resistance, whatever form it takes, will be judged, and it will probably not be judged fairly. we need to expect this and build this into our outlook.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

This (protests) is a difficult topic to address adequately via message board posts (esp when you're typing it on cellphone with one thumb). There's a lot of strategic and tactical considerations. Seems corny to say this on ilx but most everyone here has a point. If we were at dinner or a meeting together I'd attempt some grand, nuanced synthesis, and then you'd all see what a pompous blowhard i can be.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

We need a Trump FAP!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

yes!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

set the time and place

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy I'm delegating blowhard duties to you (iow: otm)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

We might need more than one ... It's a big country

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

road trip!

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy I'm delegating blowhard duties to you (iow: otm)

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous)

cool, i've been preparing all my life for this

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

Who fucking cares what fascists think about people exercising their constitutional right of assembly. ??? They are the enemy. We can't win them over unless they totally break with the paradigm that enabled them to elect a racist authoritarian. Fuck them.

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

not interested in trying to win "them" over, but definitely think democrats should try to win over the most reachable of "them." It's not a monolith.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

That's what i always thought but I'm too disgusted now. These people had a year and a half and plenty of evidence to let them know exactly what they were voting for

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

Unproductive attitude imo. As noted above, a lot of people don't pay that much attention politically. And they really disliked the democratic candidate and maybe got some hysterical ideas about her into their heads, although I think some of the underlying mistrust stems from a legit place.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

In some ways this has all been a victory for the young 'class-only' left who want a socialism without content, without analysis. We've done the class-only thing before - we can't go back to the pre-70s unionism that focused on white men and became an organ of oppression for women and minorities. You can't focus on class and ignore the rest. There is no trickle-down emancipation.

― Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Friday, November 11, 2016 4:17 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

uh, you do know that unions are actually disproportionately black, right? and that the american labor movement has a very wide-ranging record that's not all one-sided going back much further? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brotherhood_of_Sleeping_Car_Porters

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

xp Mordy:

Germans in 1933 weren't more "hopeful bc they hadn't yet seen what the worst could look like", the majority just saw Nazis as a counter to another Left/Spartacist revolution like that of 1918-1919.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

Some of them had never been to D.C. before visiting me. They had never made the short drive to see the Constitution in person. They had not seen the Apollo moon lander, nor George Washington’s Revolutionary War uniform. And they certainly have not seen the new National Museum of African American History and Culture. They’ve never seen the extent of American greatness or its messiness.

And they still haven't even tried to get tickets to Hamilton!

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

let's not forget, they were coming off of WWI, and that was pretty catastrophically awful too. So you have to imagine plenty of people knew things could get real bad, but perhaps they didn't realize just how bad.

xp

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

lol sterl

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I have to believe (even if that belief is ultimately revealed to be unfounded) that a lot of the un- and underinformed voting public voted not out of hate but ignorance, and that seeing daily acts of harassment and violence committed against others in the name of their candidate of choice was not something they ever wanted. Many people are completely lost but I have to believe that many people are still reachable, and that there are ultimately more of us who reject hate than who accept it.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

My husband is a 'class-only leftist' who has spent the last couple of days seriously rethinking his position.

rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

let's not forget, they were coming off of WWI, and that was pretty catastrophically awful too. So you have to imagine plenty of people knew things could get real bad, but perhaps they didn't realize just how bad.

xp

― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, November 11, 2016 11:08 AM (five seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Things were actually abysmally bad for Germans post-WWI, far worse than for the majority of Trump supporters, no? I'm not even sure things got worse for them under Hitler, if you weren't Jewish or gay or catholic or disabled or a dissident, etc., possibly better until they were firebombed and then occupied. Just saying it's not a totally analogous situation.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

My husband is a 'class-only leftist' who has spent the last couple of days seriously rethinking his position.

― rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Friday, November 11, 2016 11:09 AM (fifty-two seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

We can't be "class only leftists" but the dominant strain of liberalism has essentially been social "leftism" without class, which isn't really leftism at all.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I hate the flyover/coastal narrative so much. Heartland cities are blue and the rural coasts not an hour from urban metropolises are deep red.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

ok, personally, i have concluded that trump voters, and only trump voters, are an absolute dead loss. could some of them be "won over" to vote democratic in the next election (assuming the continued existence of free and fair elections)? oh, absolutely. i definitely know people who voted for obama and trump.

but i have to ask, what's more important to me, numbers or values, and my conclusion is that it's values. we've had a democratic party that tried to be everything to everyone and wound up being nothing to anybody. we can approach this as a statistical problem and gobble up every word nate silver has to grace us with, or we can learn to lead.

anybody who voted for trump, _particularly_ if they also voted for obama, _particularly_ if they identify themselves as "not racist", has demonstrated a critical inability to live up to the courage of their convictions. and as long as that situation exists, it is a waste of time for us to try to appeal to them knowing that they'll turn on us for the next asshole with a bullshit slogan.

now, if we want to teach them to have values, hell yes, that's worth doing. but the only way we can do that is to have values ourselves.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I thought one of the most significant things in recent history in 1933 was the crash of 1929. Which meant that money was rendered near worthless. So everybody felt a lack of stability.

Stevolende, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

demonstrated a critical inability to live up to the courage of their convictions

idk I don't think their convictions are that strong. mid-term elections still have a huge drop-off, people treat the presidency as some solve-everything position and assign blame or credit to the president, having little idea what they do day-to-day

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

We can't be "class only leftists" but the dominant strain of liberalism has essentially been social "leftism" without class, which isn't really leftism at all.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, November 11, 2016 11:11 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Totally. I feel like this is/should be the left's "We blew it" moment.

rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

Focusing on educating people on the importance of mid-term voting has to be one of our main drives right now, I think. Like starting right now.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

I thought one of the most significant things in recent history in 1933 was the crash of 1929. Which meant that money was rendered near worthless. So everybody felt a lack of stability.

― Stevolende

the biggest weimar hyperinflation crisis was actually in 1923. the depression made things bad- among other things it caused the us to cut off aid to germany- and the effects of sustained economic and political instability, along with partisan street violence, had taken their toll, but 1933 wasn't a particularly low ebb for the country.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

idk the continuing efforts to expand continuing education, expansion of community college programs and availability, and the subsidies to let people join those programs are trickling through rural areas (I met someone on a flight who worked for an org in DC doing this)

it's the ability to blame the government for the loss of your job while you're getting subsidized education to learn a new career... that's gonna get killed off when the federal grants for adult education dry up

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

guys u kno i love talking about early 20th century politics like it's literally one of my favorite things to do but i want to just note that i was being kinda tongue-in-cheek / sardonic in my comment above

Mordy, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

xp Stevolende:
The hyperinflation occurred in 1921-1923, a decade prior, but yes, it forced many to beg, middle class women into prostitution, etc., and yes, it was a strong memory.

Indeed, the memory and consequences of the German hyperinflation carry on to the current day, in German support for austerity measures over extending credit to Portugal/Ireland/Greece/Spain in the recent economic crisis.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

So having concluded my self-assessment of being a completely useless armchair liberal for my entire adult life, I've decided that my first steps away from that will be a) a monthly rotating donation of whatever I can reasonably afford split between ten or so different charitable organizations that directly support the groups Trump et all are seeking to marginalize and b) getting involved in local government on some level. I think it's just going to involve joining a committee of some sort at the moment given my complete inexperience in that regard, but the city manager lives in my building so I'd like to take advantage of that convenience and have a conversation with him about what he'd recommend. I have a lot of other ideas brewing but I need to take this one realistic step at a time.

Guys, I'm basically an asocial shut-in who's stepping way out of his comfort zone here because the time to do so is long past. Anybody can do this shit if I can.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

good luck, OL

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

anybody who voted for trump, _particularly_ if they also voted for obama, _particularly_ if they identify themselves as "not racist", has demonstrated a critical inability to live up to the courage of their convictions. and as long as that situation exists, it is a waste of time for us to try to appeal to them knowing that they'll turn on us for the next asshole with a bullshit slogan.

As I commented above w/r/t some parents at my school, I see this in action all the time.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

piggybacking on old lunch here, and i apologize if i'm out of line but i've been spitting straight fire on facebook since tuesday. nobody's a great judge of their own writing but i think it's good stuff, and the twenty or so people who read it seem to agree. i kind of want to get it out there better, in the hopes that maybe it might help some people come to grips with this shit, but i've got massive social anxiety and don't even know for sure if it's honestly a good idea or not. thoughts?

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

BTW I had a really bizarre conversation with a retired teacher on Facebook, seemed perfectly educated, super pro-union, but felt that Clinton-type democrats didn't really support unions (a sentiment I sort of get) and thus VOTED FOR TRUMP. She was talking about how awful Scott Walker is and I was like "you know he's a big supporter of Trump right? You know we have a GOP congress now that wants what he wants, right?" I do not get it at all, but I'm just saying, don't underestimate how much bad perception of Clinton played into this rather than love of Trump.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

post it here

xp

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

WARNING: I do not agree with ALL or even MOST of the following, from comments on a movie blog. i wonder if any of you have encountered this argument much online or offline.

Here's the thing that makes me laugh at the Dems who quiver in terror at the thought of "Orange Hitler" and all that bullshit: this is Donald Fucking Trump. The man has spent his entire life playing a role, bullshitting everyone, and begging for flattery for his shatterglass ego. Why does anyone expect that to change now?

A lifelong NYC liberal, Trump played the role of loutish alt-Righty in the primaries in order to win. He was not, and is not, a Republican-- all along, he was the Left's *parody* of a Republican, the kind that Wells, Sorkin, Moore, Maher etc. all liked to draw. Again, he was playing a role. You think the guy got all those reality show ratings by accident? HE'S GOOD AT THIS SHIT, PEOPLE.

Now that Trump "caught the car," he can cover the White House in gold in chintz, he's going to play a DIFFERENT role. Trump's not going to want to actually *govern*-- he's going to make Obama's golf games and vacations look like a weekend hobby, that's how much Trump's going to enjoy playing the part of president.

I still marvel at how many people fail to see this.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

I took myself off of Facebook completely as of Wednesday morning. I am angry, and I *know* that people in my family whom I genuinely love, as well as a lot of very close friends, voted for Trump, and I don't want to lash out in anger at them. Given my general temperament and personality, though, I don't think I can avoid it, so I thought it best to just get the hell out altogether.

At least the fogginess I've been feeling since Tuesday night has somewhat lifted (thanks partially to going home from work last night and sleeping for 11 hours), but I still feel like I need to have my SSRI dose doubled. I'm just walking around in a general state of dismotivation and anxiety and fear that's no good for me or anybody.

I did hear back from the Planned Parenthood Ohio volunteer director yesterday. She informed me that there's a rally next Wednesday night at the statehouse in Columbus to protest the proposed 20-week ban, and that we'll talk soon about available volunteer opportunities.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

post it here

xp

― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles)

oh, jeez. i love you guys, but even aside from hitting you with three days of straight logorrhea, i'd feel _very_ vulnerable.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

xp I think I've seen variations of that -- although lord, the idea that he was ever an "NYC liberal," please -- and the people making it don't seem to understand that, given his vice president and his likely cabinet and appointees, that actually makes it several orders of magnitude worse.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy, I feel you, and I don't know what the best answer is but I feel like we have to get away from the internet a little, at least. Your words are going to have so much more impact when they aren't lost among dozens of other Facebook posts or tweets. If you can't stomach public speaking, pass out tracts or post flyers or something. Record a rant and burn that shit to a hundred CDs. My own social anxiety is starting to feel more and more like an ego-driven excuse to avoid doing things that might make me look or feel stupid at the expense of doing something to help people whose lives and well-being are under real threat now.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

xp yeah, well, GW Bush spent a shitload of time back at the ranch but he left Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the gang running the show

I haven't seen much of that argument but it's out there, and it's really dumb. If Trump had a really center-right cabinet and VP pick I might buy it

mh 😏, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

hey guys did I miss anything

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

WARNING: I do not agree with ALL or even MOST of the following, from comments on a movie blog. i wonder if any of you have encountered this argument much online or offline.

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius)

oh yeah, i have friends who react like that. a lot of people think he's still a big tacky joke, a comedic incompetent. their reaction is to sit back and reach for the popcorn. it's not a perception i find it worth my while to push back against. i just wind up saying "gee, i sure hope you're right" and leave it at that. if they're wrong, hopefully i can be there for them to help when it finally hits them.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

morbs there is totally a chance of that and I think the best case scenario is certainly better than the best case scenario if a reliably ideologue got elected.

but trump also has a long history of nixon-style vengeance, unpredictability, willingness to break the law etc. etc. there is little you can actually count out as possible when it comes to worst case scenarios.

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

'as not possible', rather

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

I think Nixon is not a bad touchstone for what a Trump presidency might look like. He also tended to leave the details to others, e.g. Kissinger basically ran the show on foreign policy.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

Except it's Nixon with a rabid right-wing congress. That's the scary part.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

I hate the flyover/coastal narrative so much. Heartland cities are blue and the rural coasts not an hour from urban metropolises are deep red.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z)

yeah, it's kind of shorthand, but people also internalize it in some really dumb ways. like, almost everyone where i work in suburban kansas was super fucking bummed on wednesday.

not really related, but i was really struck by how few trump signs i saw in the run-up to the election compared to the number of signs for local republicans, even after 6 years of brownback. there were a fuckton of people who were too embarrassed to openly support trump but were definitely voting for him anyway.

circles, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

nixon was similarly not much of an ideologue xp

iatee, Friday, 11 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy fwiw I've really appreciated yr posts itt and would love to read more of whatever you're spitting

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

https://itself.wordpress.com/2016/11/11/the-home-front/


What was disturbing to me was her inability to even hear why I would find Trump especially problematic. It was as though it was just another election. She had an answer for everything. I said that part of why I was worried was that The Girlfriend had been sobbing on Wednesday morning; she said some people may well have been crying if Hillary won. I said Trump was a creepy sexual predator; she said Hillary was pathetic for putting up with her creepy sexual predator husband. I said I didn’t want to ask The Girlfriend to come into an environment where people might be gloating about a Trump win; she was well aware of how Democrats felt about this and knew to keep her mouth shut. Is there any greater intrinsic justification for how Democrats feel? Is their fear and shame more significant than her frustration with her Democratic colleagues who made her feel shut down in political debate? The answer to both questions seemed to be no. Everyone has their opinion and has a right to it.

It’s a familiar sophistry that deflects every objection, leaving nothing but an arbitrary choice of the side that makes you feel most comfortable. It was like I was trying to convince someone on moral and intellectual grounds why they should be a White Sox fan rather than a Cubs fan. What was most disturbing, though, was the dawning realization that the sophistry was partly designed to let her cope with me and my potentially abhorrent views.

j., Friday, 11 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

The history of fascist dictators is also a history of flashy dumdums.

Three Word Username, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

Welcome back, Shakey. Rushomancy OTM all over, but especially "learning to lead."

I hold this to be self-evident: that powerful lies can't be as powerful, in the end, as powerful truths. We have to get better at telling the truth in a way that makes it stick. We have to be as shamelessly manipulative about our truths as they are about their lies, and the truths have to be tailored to stick at lots of different layers.

On the one hand there will always be the bottom layer of pure evil fuckers, the unreachably evil. Then there are the nihilists. Nothing to be done about either group. One up from them are the cynical ideologues whose entrenchment would be tough, if not impossible, to break.

But leapfrogging to the top layers, the winnable layers. The stories "Trump is frightening American children" and "Kids really look up to Hilary and are excited to have her as President" might have got through to some of the exurban/suburban swing voters in a way that could have made a serious difference. Something like what this Jezebel story says, but a pre-emptive strike: http://jezebel.com/what-do-i-say-stories-from-the-classroom-after-electi-1788781296

That's one layer. Then there's a layer that's genuinely concerned with personal and economic security but couldn't give a shit about ideology or policy. They need a narrative that lets them know that the best candidate is going to take care of them. I didn't hear a lot out of Hillary that addressed the fear that Trump shamelessly tapped.

(And by the way when they said "SKANKLES U R COMIN FOR CITIZENS' GUNS" the answer shouldn't have been a nuanced rebuttal that detailed her policy approach; the answer should be "That's ridiculous and nothing but a lie. But we'll make sure that criminals and maniacs don't have assault rifles." Or whatever.)

Lots more winnable layers as you dig deeper but I'm not the Communications Officer and you get my drift anyway.

Avoiding the language that the right has turned against us - currently the jargon of political correctness, "safe spaces," etc - is important when fighting an information war. Adjusting tactics to suit the battleground - fighting reason with better reason, simple lies with simpler truths, bad fear-based policy with good hope-based policy that actually addresses the fears - that's the "listening to middle America" that the Dems should have done.

Also needs to be recognized that YUGE charisma is one of the major qualifications for the job.

Commitment to facts is one of the things I admire most about the party, but facts don't matter if they can't be communicated effectively, with emotionally persuasive impact. That's something we just have to get way, way better at if we're going to win enough hearts and minds to stem the coming tide of assholery.

hardcore dilettante, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

j., a lot of the issue I have with that is that it is trying to address different points of view from a purely emotional level. The problem with a Trump presidency is much more the concrete changes that it will bring to all of our lives when the Republican government has a free pass to enact their agenda in all three branches.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

excellent post hd

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

Discussing things with our kids and trying to provide perspective has been helpful, even if I still have my deep, dark doubts. In the 1960s, we had presidents and civil rights leaders assassinated, there was the distinct possibility of nuclear annihilation, abortion was illegal, we had tens of thousands of protesters in the streets, often being assaulted by police or national guard, we had a draft fueling an unjust war, we had a huge segment of the population segregated and treated as second-class citizens - legally! And we slowly made progress. And then we got Nixon. And then we slowly made more progress. And so on. It's been two steps forward, and one step back, but many things are still going in the right direction even when they seem like they're not. It's like climate change deniers pointing to a warm winter as proof that climate change is a myth. Well, look at trends, not today's temperature. For that reason I am hopeful, at least in the abstract. We have fought *and won* a lot of battles, and as I noted many posts back, I can't think of the last time our civil rights were not violated but negated and legally reversed, and I'd like to believe doing so remains more difficult than many understand. It is important to be vigilant, but even with literally everything on the table, it is not a practical or even feasible reaction (at least for me) to respond with an equivalent fear of everything.

P.S. Please don't burst my bubble too bigly, I am trying to cope on a minute to minute basis here. Just off the phone with a good friend of Filipino descent who is freaking out and practically afraid to leave the house, and I've been toying with various contingency plans myself for the coming months and years.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

Having some similar thoughts to Old Lunch in the past 24 hours.

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

people treat the presidency as some solve-everything position and assign blame or credit to the president, having little idea what they do day-to-day

including the future president, lol

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

Josh that notion of two steps forward , one step back was exactly one I shared with my teenage kids the other night.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Been taking some flack from some friends for posting stuff on FB like the "Day 1 of President Trump" thing or reminding them that the Nazis and KKK are celebrating right now - saying I'm "spreading the hate" and "grouping people together" by assuming all Trump voters are racists. I cannot say "Trump voters aren't all racists, but they have shown that they will tolerate it" enough times. And I'm being told "what's wrong with you, you're making it worse, you're giving them what they want." Am I in the wrong here? What do I say to this?

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

like almost nobody voted Trump knowing that it would make minority kids cry and transgenders commit suicide, cuz they really didn't understand the message they were sending, even though so much evidence was out there. and yet here we are.

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

speaking of two steps forward, this Josh Marshall piece provides some comforting perspective. Basically, things may look, and are indeed, bleak, but it's been the rule in American politics for a long time that reversals happen often and very quickly.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/near-differences-big-consequences

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

or to put it a bit differently, Republicans were in much the same place in 2008, facing a newly elected Democratic president and full Democratic control of congress, and look where they are now.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

facts don't matter if they can't be communicated effectively, with emotionally persuasive impact.

it seems important to remember is that the corporate media is massively dominated by conservatives and all attempts to use them to communicate liberal ideas invariably results in massive distortion and the deliberate injection of a negative emotional impact.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

Did Trump really use the phrase Big League again?

JacobSanders, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

he did say we were going to create a lot of "big league jobs" so that's cool

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

this has been very hard to discuss with my daughter (esp in the context of her 80% latino school, where this has definitely engendered a great deal of emotional disturbance). I took her to what I thought was going to be a small vigil/gathering on Wednesday night but actually turned into thousands-strong spontaneous march ("too much yelling" she said), to show her that this is what people like us do when we feel the need to express our commitment to our community and our principles. trying to remind myself that there is a rich progressive tradition in this country that we need to honor and continue and carry forward, because politics is war and the struggle is never over.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

it seems important to remember is that the corporate media is massively dominated by conservatives

while we're on the subject of facts let's remember the DNC outspent Trump almost 2:1 on media

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

they're worser at it, somehow

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

The corporate media is massively dominated by conservatives! The lamestream media is controlled by the liberal elites! WHICH NARRATIVE WILL PREVAIL? Tune in for the next 4 years to find out!

hardcore dilettante, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

yeah if those TV commercials that played the same clips of Trump over and over again persuaded anyone the 15th time they saw them then I'd be pretty fucking surprised

frogbs, Friday, 11 November 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

Based on my experiences watching the ALCS and World Series at bars -- which is the only time I've seen any broadcast television in the last six months -- the Trump campaign and associated PACS WAY outspent the Dems in Ohio for TV. I saw a Trump ad in every single commercial break, plus a bunch for Rob Portman. I don't recall seeing a single Clinton ad.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

Been taking some flack from some friends for posting stuff on FB like the "Day 1 of President Trump" thing or reminding them that the Nazis and KKK are celebrating right now - saying I'm "spreading the hate" and "grouping people together" by assuming all Trump voters are racists. I cannot say "Trump voters aren't all racists, but they have shown that they will tolerate it" enough times. And I'm being told "what's wrong with you, you're making it worse, you're giving them what they want." Am I in the wrong here? What do I say to this?

― frogbs, Friday, November 11, 2016 11:37 AM (twenty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

They can equivocate and make whatever assumptions they need to about your motivations in sharing stories like that, but assuming that your intent is to make people uncomfortable with the baggage of a Trump presidency, it sounds like you're doing it exactly right. Don't relent and make it easy for people to ignore or normalize what's happening. Some people are definitely going to get reactionary in the face of that because the truth sucks and it's difficult to confront. But we have to confront it or it's just going to get worse.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

like almost nobody voted Trump knowing that it would make minority kids cry and transgenders commit suicide

plenty did.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

#notalltrumpvoters

hardcore dilettante, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

At this point, what can you do to make rust belt 'Reagan Democrats' understand that the only reason those middle-class w/ bennies jobs existed in the first place was unions and that they're voting for the party that isn't just kind of meh on unions and wages but actively hostile? It feels impossible.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

it isn't about policies. the majority of people voting in nat'l elections clearly vote based entirely on feels/personalities. Dems need rabble rousers that fire up crowds, they don't need bajillion dollar ad buys and triangulation based on bad polling data.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

that feels like good advice rn

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

like almost nobody voted Trump knowing that it would make minority kids cry and transgenders commit suicide

man what internet are you using

acerbic (sic)s (will), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

the DNC outspent Trump almost 2:1 on media

last time I looked paid advertising was viewed far differently than news and opinion programming, where much effort is expended to establish the news readers as "your trusted source for the truth news".

The corporate media is massively dominated by conservatives! The lamestream media is controlled by the liberal elites! WHICH NARRATIVE WILL PREVAIL?

did you ever notice where people keep hearing that "media is controlled by the liberal elites" meme, ad nauseum?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

One of the ways to adjust and focus, y'all, is to stop using Trumpian malapropisms like "bigly." It not only legitimates him and the way he's corroded the discourse but it gets under my fucking skin.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

I also dont see an army of reagan democrats champing at the bit to get down there in the Trump(tm) Coal Mines to pull themselves up by their bootstraps..

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

I'm just tryin to look ahead, sleeve

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

"Dems need rabble rousers that fire up crowds"

they had one!

scott seward, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

At this point, what can you do to make rust belt 'Reagan Democrats' understand that the only reason those middle-class w/ bennies jobs existed in the first place was unions and that they're voting for the party that isn't just kind of meh on unions and wages but actively hostile? It feels impossible.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, November 11, 2016 1:10 PM (eleven minutes ago)

smug memes about economic anxiety seemed to work pretty well this election, i say we keep up with those

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

I understand the appeal of a Biden to DNC types because he has bad hair and doesn't follow scripts and can improvise on the stump, and I think Sanders would've done better than Clinton in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, but I've trouble thinking he would've survived "Jewish socialist" in September and October. Michael Moore seemed convinced this morning that many of those incoherent and inchoate Trump voters in those states I mentioned were willing to give the Jewish socialist a shot because they were suffering so badly.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

they had one!

they did, and while I don't know if Bernie could have pulled it off against Trump, I clearly misread the electorate so who knows

not trying to look backward cuz what's done is done, just that moving forward that seems like the lesson to learn from a political party/strategizing viewpoint

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

Not for profit so no specific names, but just circulated by the American Academy of Pediatrics (for all my fellow parents):

A Message from AAP CEO/Executive Vice President Karen Remley, MD, MBA, MPH, FAAP

Members of the AAP:

Following the results of this week’s national election, AAP members in communities across the country have reached out to us. They’ve requested advice on how to speak to children and families about the results, how to help each other cope with disturbing rhetoric, and how to explain news reports of protests. They have sought reassurance that our mission remains steadfast to advance policies that protect all children.

Even as we do everything we can as a national organization to represent children’s needs to our newly elected leaders, it is so important that all children feel safe and protected in their day-to-day lives. As pediatricians and pediatric medical and surgical subspecialists, parents and grandparents, we can serve as a source of comfort and safety, reassuring children and supporting families.

Here are some ways you can encourage parents to help their children:

TAKE CARE

Take care of yourself first. Children depend on the adults around them to be and feel safe and secure. If you are anxious or angry, children are likely to be more affected by your emotional state than by your words. Find someone you trust to help with your personal concerns.

TALK

Explain—as simply and directly as possible—the results of the election and what they mean for who is in charge of the country. Start by asking what your child has already heard and what understanding he or she has reached. As your child explains, listen for misinformation, misconceptions, and underlying fears or concerns. The amount of information that will be helpful to a child depends on his or her age. For example, older children generally want and will benefit from more detailed information than younger children. Because every child is different, take cues from your own child as to how much information to provide.
Pay attention to what your children are viewing on television, the internet and social media, especially younger children. When children watch news on television, try to watch with them and use the opportunity to discuss what is being seen and how it makes you and your child feel.
Consider sharing your feelings about the election with your child. This is an opportunity for you to model how to react to the news, especially if you talked openly about the potential results as a family in the weeks leading up to the election. Be sure that you are able to express a positive or hopeful approach about the future and be reassuring.
Share with your child your own values and beliefs, including how you as a family treat others who are different or who may disagree with you. Kindness is important. Teach your child that if you disagree with someone, you can talk with them kindly about the way you feel.

LISTEN

Encourage your child to ask questions, and answer them directly. Question-and-answer exchanges help to ensure ongoing support as your child begins to understand the response to current events. Don’t force the issue with your child. Instead, extend multiple invitations for discussion and then provide an increased physical and emotional presence as you wait for him or her to be ready to accept those invitations.
If your child has seen or experienced discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, either from other children or adults, encourage your child to discuss what he or she has experienced. Observing someone we care about being discriminated against, or experiencing discrimination ourselves, is scary, and reminds us that now more than ever it is important to reassure children that they deserve to feel and be safe in their schools, homes, and communities.
Allow your child to express what he or she is feeling, including fear, anxiety, or anger. Listen as your child talks about it, again and again if necessary. Reassure your child of the steps that are being taken to keep him or her safe. Children should be encouraged to tell a trusted adult, such as a parent or a teacher, if they are bullied or feel threatened.

ACT

Engage in activities with your children that demonstrate your values. Volunteer together at an organization whose mission is dedicated to a cause you care about, give your child ideas about individual actions he or she can take every day to help fight prejudice, and take care to discuss issues of shared concern as a family.
As we turn to our newly elected leaders, the Academy will continue to advocate for and promote healthy children, support secure families, build strong communities and ensure that the United States is a leading nation for children. We will remain constant in our pursuit of health and well-being for all children. We will be steadfast in our approach of using evidence, policy and our passion for children in our dialogue and discussion.

Thank you for all you to do to care for children in your community, and thank you for your partnership as we work together to represent their needs to our new government.

In gratitude,

Karen Remley, MD, MBA, MPH, FAAP
Executive Vice President/CEO, American Academy of Pediatrics

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

i feel this way too flopson. im not doing well

love ya, buddy. I can't honestly say anything optimistic politically or materially but I do know that being together will ease the pain. here for you and all ilxors if u ever need anything

flopson, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

good fuck I haven't felt this bleak about the world since I was a kid in the 80's. even bush winning a second term didn't seem as bleak and awful.

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

My solace has been realizing that it wasn't a close election -- Dems can re-win the districts and states they thought they owned in 2018 and 2020, respectively. But I don't know what the policy change would be. I don't seem to remember Barack Obama having a message in 2007 other than himself.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

Sorry for another long cut and paste, but I find this stuff not to useful for kids but applicable to adults as well, especially since so many of us are a mess (thanks a lot, Leonard Cohen). This was sent from out school superintendent to all parents. Sad that it has come to this, but this makes me less sad:

During the past few days, I have seen and heard varying reactions to the results of the presidential election. As I have poured over the disparate dichotomy in perspectives, ideologies and philosophies about what the future holds for our country, what has emerged for me is a renewed belief in the importance of unity. It is the belief in unity that makes Oak Park such a special place. It is the belief in unity that rallies our community around the virtues of diversity, tolerance and mutual respect. It is also the belief in unity that helps drive our district's vision to create a positive learning environment for all students that is equitable, inclusive and focused on the whole child.

However, a steadfast belief in unity is not the only one we aspire to here in District 97. We also believe in ensuring that every child has access to equal educational opportunities and a nurturing learning environment regardless of color, race, nationality, religion, sex, sexual orientation, ancestry, age, physical or mental disability, gender identity or immigration status. In addition, we believe in helping students understand and embrace each other's differences, while also instilling in them a sense of empathy and a commitment to caring that will guide their efforts and actions throughout their lives.

We are entering an unprecedented period of change where the need for togetherness and the maintenance of a strong and unified belief system will be more critical than ever. Here in District 97, these values will remain at the forefront of everything we say and do both in and out of the classroom. In fact, in the days ahead, I will share examples of collaboration between our students, faculty, staff, families and community members that are helping to fulfill the promise of education. Until then, I encourage each and every one of you to reflect on the powerful and impactful role you play in the growth and development of our students. You are their teachers, their mentors, their coaches, their role models and their friends. It is through your words and actions that they will realize their dreams, face their fears, achieve their greatest victories and overcome their toughest defeats. You are now and always will be the true key to helping them discover not only who they are, but also what they can become when they dedicate their hearts, minds and talents to unlocking their full potential.

I consider it a true honor to be your partner on this incredible journey, and look forward to continuing our work together to help prepare our students for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. In the meantime, I want to thank you for your passionate support of our schools and the children we serve.

I find it heartening to hear from leaders in and of community this measured recognition that this was no run of the mill election.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

("Not just useful for kids," I meant)

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

xxxp - maybe it's self-deception but if there's a sliver of a silver lining here at least the difference between Bush-era neocons and the Father Coughlins of the next four years is that we probably won't get into a new land war in Asia. Maybe. Hopefully. Fuck.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

I've trouble thinking he would've survived "Jewish socialist" in September and October. Michael Moore seemed convinced this morning that many of those incoherent and inchoate Trump voters in those states I mentioned were willing to give the Jewish socialist a shot because they were suffering so badly.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, November 11, 2016 1:23 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

As much as this week has reminded me that pre-Trump, Clinton was clearly a highly risky choice for a post-two terms incumbent party nom, but in second guessing Sanders, it's probably worth considering that we never saw the full Trump rage and hate machine pointed at him.

rob, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

yep

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

Also, as far as some domestic economic policy and foreign policy (whatever it was) goes, Trump and Sanders were not totally at odds. Maybe some Trump voters felt like they were getting what they liked about Sanders in the same package. To the extent that any of the candidates offered clear, comprehensive plans and policies.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

If you'd like to get some LOLs at the deputy Washington editor at the NYT getting his ass handed to him by All Of Twitter, today is your lucky day!!

https://twitter.com/jonathanweisman/status/797120114042793984

Jonathan Weisman

‏@jonathanweisman

Defeated Dems could've tapped Rust Belt populist to head party. Instead, black, Muslim progressive from Minneapolis?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

adam serwer drives me nuts on twitter but he can write, great piece: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/welcome-to-the-second-redemption/507317/

The broad economic devastation [following Reconstruction] wrought by the Redeemers might have been seen by [turn of the 20th-century] Republicans as a political opportunity to forge an interracial coalition. But it was not to be. “The failure to develop an effective long-term appeal to white voters made it increasingly difficult for Republicans to combat the racial politics of the Redeemers,” Foner argued.

Democrats now face a renewed white-identity politics whose appeal will be immensely difficult to neutralize, and the notion that a more vigorous, left wing economics will return the white working class to the Democratic fold is likely a fantasy. The last Democrat to come close to winning the white vote was Bill Clinton, who combined his economic populism with promises to “end welfare as we know it” and advertised his willingness to use state violence against black Americans, turning the execution of Ricky Ray Rector to his political advantage.

The uncomfortable truth is that, whether you’re Donald Trump or Bill Clinton, economic populism is most effective in American politics when it is paired with appeals to racism. Maybe the Democrats can and will find a way to do so without such appeals. By the time they do, it may simply be too late to stop what is coming.

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

many xps to old lunch but otm and i'm with you there

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

CNN sez DT's 'inner circle' urging Priebus as chief of staff

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

NY Times published a few 'how dare you call me a racist' letters from Trump voters today. And this:

Political commentators just don’t get it.

I am a middle-of-the-road Republican. If Joe Biden had been nominated, I would have voted for him. If Bernie Sanders had been nominated, I would have voted for him. If my next-door neighbor had been nominated, I would have voted for her. Hillary Clinton was nominated. I voted for Donald Trump.

JIM PETERSON

San Diego

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

I'm a middle of the road Republican who will absolutely refuse to ever take orders from some woman she must be a criminal or something EMAIL

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

aside from his obvious qualifications and strengths, bernie sanders has a weird pull among low-information voters. my mom, a moderate democrat who for reasons i can't quite discern dislikes hillary (the trust issues and "too liberal", she told me last christmas or so) apparently wrote in bernie for president on tuesday.

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

he'd take orders from his neighbor woman

xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

kev what state did Mom vote in?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

it's because he's smart enough to dumb down his rhetoric to catchy slogans and use them endlessly xxp

global tetrahedron, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

in addition to "bigly," i wonder if we could stop throwing around these "racist" and "fascist" bombs as often as we do, particularly as applied to whole swaths of the population we don't know very well, and whose votes we need.

Thus Sang Freud, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Political commentators just don't get Jim Peterson from San Diego's particular voting preferences.

jmm, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

good fuck I haven't felt this bleak about the world since I was a kid in the 80's. even bush winning a second term didn't seem as bleak and awful.

― akm, Friday, November 11, 2016 10:26 AM (forty-four minutes ago)

yeah. I remember Reagan winning in 1984, and I think that might have been my strongest early memory of feeling like people were delusional and stupid and evil. I remember my best friend (this was 4th grade) saying she liked Reagan because he was so fond of jelly beans.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

NY, morbs

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

All right. Deep breath.

I made a blog. I put a bunch of the stuff I've written over the past few days on it.

I'm terrified.

http://rebuildingeverything.blogspot.com/

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

attaboy

Just linked, rushomancy

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

yeah. I remember Reagan winning in 1984, and I think that might have been my strongest early memory of feeling like people were delusional and stupid and evil. I remember my best friend (this was 4th grade) saying she liked Reagan because he was so fond of jelly beans.

― sarahell,

whereas we can't even say what Hillary was fond of -- the NYT crossword?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

it's because he's smart enough to dumb down his rhetoric to catchy slogans and use them endlessly xxp

― global tetrahedron, Friday, November 11, 2016

this is it -- precisely it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

in addition to "bigly," i wonder if we could stop throwing around these "racist" and "fascist" bombs as often as we do, particularly as applied to whole swaths of the population we don't know very well, and whose votes we need.

not sure this concession is warranted or appropriate at this time, perhaps this perception is simply a failing of mine

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

HuffPo discontinuing, removing Editors' Note from Trump stories about his history of racism and xenophobia:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/11/the-huffington-post-ending-its-editors-note-about-donald-trump-231044

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

THE LIBERAL MEDIA

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

wtf

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

The cute dude who didn't return my OKCupid text? I called him a fascist a month ago. That's when I knew I abused the word.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

in addition to "bigly," i wonder if we could stop throwing around these "racist" and "fascist" bombs as often as we do, particularly as applied to whole swaths of the population we don't know very well, and whose votes we need.

― Thus Sang Freud, Friday, November 11, 2016 7:16 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i don't think we should ignore the fascist and racist tendencies of people who voted for trump, or the tendencies of people to just not care about that issue as long as they aren't the ones affected. but obviously their votes are important and need to be won over with something, particularly since they have these tendencies of fascism and apathy.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

bernie sanders has a weird pull among low-information voters. my mom, a moderate democrat who for reasons i can't quite discern dislikes hillary (the trust issues and "too liberal", she told me last christmas or so)

yeah, I have an unfortunately large number of "low-information" friends that were all about Bernie. Had never seen them enthusiastically support any other political candidate before. My mom is a bit like your mom, though she voted for Hillary anyway. My mom believed a lot of the Clinton conspiracies/issues from when Bill was president.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

attaboy

Just linked, rushomancy

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

thanks

i'm going to take a little break until i stop shaking again :)

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

whereas we can't even say what Hillary was fond of -- the NYT crossword?

bourbon

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

Good news for us this side of the Atlantic is that we are already starting to see fewer obnoxious Republican wankers infesting our TV screens.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

... back to our homegrown Tory wankers.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

also given that Clinton won the popular vote and roughly half the population stayed home, i struggle with the notion that courting the votes of racist misogynists is necessary or even worth the moral compromise required but again im still boiling and keeping this shit largely to myself outside this space

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

come January you will see a lot more of them! They will meet with your elected officials, shake hands with the royal family ... sorry Britain.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

So, what if the things that need to be done to "win over" the votes of people who have racist/fascist tendencies (or, you know, are racist or fascist), or are willing to ignore them, aren't worth doing? What if they're *bad things*?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

yeah some of these arguments about meeting the 'other' halfway makes it seem like trump won a resounding victory. dude barely fucking won and half the population didn't vote.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

the goal should be to make more voters who are not racists/fascists/etc.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

also we should stop generalizing about half the population of the country. that's a lot of people.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/11/trump-got-more-votes-from-people-of-color-than-romney-did-heres-the-data/

Thus Sang Freud, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

NY, morbs

well they didn't count her vote (not that it mattered, Clinton winning the state by 22 points). There were 32 sanctioned write-in candidates in NY. All other prez ballots w/ unapproved choices were disregarded.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Are you really going to do this?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

xp

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

also we should stop generalizing about half the population of the country.

"Half the people who voted in the 2016 election" is not "half the population of the country." This shouldn't even be necessary to point out, but here we are.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

well there's that. half the people who voted i mean. same diff.

Thus Sang Freud, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

that is not same diff

ciderpress, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

also given that Clinton won the popular vote and roughly half the population stayed home, i struggle with the notion that courting the votes of racist misogynists is necessary or even worth the moral compromise required but again im still boiling and keeping this shit largely to myself outside this space

― geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, November 11, 2016 7:27 PM (two seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i was thinking about this too, but then i remembered brexit. there's a world-wide far right movement going on, not just in the US. so it's hard to say whether or not it was just Clinton being terrible as a candidate, or if there's been a significant change in how things work, making it hard to use older examples to fill in the blanks. nearly all of the candidates of one of our major parties had far-right leanings, and Trump was the most radical of them. and he won the primary. so that right there already shoots the odds way up of having one of these far-right guys as president. then among the Democrats your best choices were Clinton and Sanders, and Sanders didn't even win the primary.

Joe Biden? But it's like, all of this radical far-right shit that helped get Trump elected has been bubbling and foaming for years now. I watched how it went from a little blip to growing to this wide-spread movement that helped win the presidency. i don't think ignoring what's going on here is a good idea, because the US isn't the only place this is happening.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

haven't there been studies finding that people who don't vote roughly have the same opinions (proportionally) as ppl who do?

Biden could've been hit over his history of being a credit-card-co Muppet?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

That was so long ago it might not have mattered; all people know is the smiling vice president

This is not an endorsement of the former senator from MBNA

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

probably the only thing that can be said for sure in favor of a different candidate, when evaluating this election in hindsight, is that none of the other potential democratic candidates were the subject of two decades of smear by the right and that perhaps this would have improved their chances

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

well there's that. half the people who voted i mean. same diff.

Given that the Democrats' vote turnout went down by a shit-ton this year I'm not taking that as a given.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

here's an alternative version of "Bernie dumbs it down" and low-information voter stuff - he offered up a vision that centered around economic justice but was also completely and utterly supportive of social justice.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

If you're still intent on making fun of that, I don't know what to say. Veiled accusations of racism against him or the people who supported him is NAGL.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

I don't think anyone is criticizing Bernie for appealing to low-information voters. He had an attractive vision and he/his campaign communicated it well to people.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

hope it was clear i wasn't dissing any bernie voters or bernie himself obviously -- i think he was a great candidate on the merits -- i was just pointing out that in this world we live in where people don't pay attention to politics and vote anyway, being a genuinely nice guy who appeals to those types of voters is a nice bonus

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

The hits continue as Trump a) moves Chris Christie off the transition team to turn it over to Mike Pence, and b) names his three oldest children -- who he earlier said would run his businesses to keep them separate from the government duties -- to the transition team.

http://theslot.jezebel.com/chris-christies-unending-humiliations-continue-as-trump-1788873400

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

pence obviously moving fast to consolidate his cabal

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

Eric Levitz, nymag:

No one has ever used the words 'soul of the Democratic Party' and 'Chuck Schumer' in the same sentence....

27 percent of white voters who backed Trump hope he will pursue “more liberal” policies than Barack Obama did, according to exit polls.

So, there doesn’t seem to be much basis for the idea that Democrats can find political salvation by moving right on fiscal policy. But clearly, they’ve isolated themselves from the silent majority on immigration, right?

Wrong, per CBS News:

Exit poll voters were asked whether most illegal immigrants working in the U.S. should be offered a chance to apply for legal status or deported to the country they came from. Fully 7 of 10 voters said they should be allowed to apply for legal status … Among those who favored giving illegal immigrants a chance to apply for legal status, one in three voted for Trump.
Trump also won 35 percent of voters who believe “international trade creates jobs.”

In the face of these befuddling facts, the only people in the Democratic Party with a coherent narrative of how to move forward — and a national base of support — are Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/is-bernie-sanders-now-the-leader-of-the-democratic-party.html

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

No success like failure, and failure is no success at all.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

just want to lol at "low information voters" for a minute. as if a million echoing polls told us anything or gave us any valuable info besides "She'll win!".

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

buddy i described my own mother as a "low-information voter". it wasn't meant pejoratively

k3vin k., Friday, 11 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

hope it was clear i wasn't dissing any bernie voters or bernie himself obviously -- i think he was a great candidate on the merits -- i was just pointing out that in this world we live in where people don't pay attention to politics and vote anyway, being a genuinely nice guy who appeals to those types of voters is a nice bonus

― k3vin k., Friday, November 11, 2016 7:47 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

totally. yet he didn't win the primary. Sanders didn't get a fair shake by the establishment because they don't give a fuck what these people want, so did nothing to accommodate them. for a while the NYT was giving better coverage to Trump than Sanders, then hoots and hollers that their hated establishment candidate didn't win. the type of alternative that would appeal to more people was squashed by the powers that be, while shoving Hillary in our faces.

it's easy to forget how pissed off people have been for years with how things are going, and how totally disconnected they feel from power over their own fate and lives, because they're being governed by people who don't give a crap about them and try to tell them how they should vote and live, because they aren't listening anyway. i remember how people were like "yup" when a Princeton study came out showing average voters had a 0% impact on the laws passed in Congress. all that news of pharmaceutical price gouging, and the lack of repercussions for that, people remember that shit, it becomes part of their worldview that they're being taken advantage of and there's nothing they can do about it. i wonder if cuck's an insult to the far-right because lots of people feel humiliated and powerless under this, and since the social contract has been broken, there's no reason to hold back socially taboo things like racism anymore.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Howrd Dean throwing his hat in the ring for DNC chair again. I know there are some who dislike him; but he did some good stuff as DNC chair last time.

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

just want to lol at "low information voters" for a minute. as if a million echoing polls told us anything or gave us any valuable info besides "She'll win!".

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, November 11, 2016 11:58 AM (eleven minutes ago)

this sentence makes no sense.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

christie finally got his letter from the FBI telling him he's a suspect in bridgegate?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Howard Dean is good people and his 50 state strategy was otm

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, if all the DNC Chair possibilities are people like Dean and Ellison I won't be mad

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

Howard Dean is now a lobbyist shit; eff him

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

Dean has lobbied for grotesque shit, as most lobbyists do, but I have immense respect for the 50-state strategy and how he forced Dems to think past the enclaves (this sense of entrapment is what I most remember from December 2004-Januarly 2005). He's also much smarter on TV than he let on in 2003.

But I'll take the black congressmen from Milwaukee.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

ha -- I was gonna hyperlink that Thinkprogress story

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

this sentence makes no sense.

what is the counter to low information voters - high information voters? people that pay thorough attention to constant polling? the media and the left just did this obsessively for 6 months and got caught w their pants down. Clinton ditched out of the rest belt cos all that great high information told them they didn't need it.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

rust belt

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

"America died on Nov. 8, 2016, not with a bang or a whimper, but at its own hand via electoral suicide."

http://billmoyers.com/story/farewell-america/#.WCUbk-3V-Md.facebook

scott seward, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

you guys looked like you needed some cheering up.

scott seward, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

opinion polls are not the type of information we were referring to. At least, I wasn't.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

No, that's generally not what *anyone* is referring to with that phrase

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

Pence taking over transition team from Christie

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

All the autopsies seem to reveal to me is that Dems should have run an obnoxious asshole that would get through some very thick skulls.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

I think we all need some smelling salts to wake up from the world we've been living in the past decade or so. Trump is president. That still hasn't sunk in for me yet. Clearly the established way of doing things isn't working out too well. It's over, pack it up, the game has changed.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump’s victory has been followed by a series of racist attacks and instances of vandalism and racist graffiti.

We need your help to track these incidents. If you know of an incident, please #ReportHate here:

https://www.splcenter.org/reporthate

Your involvement will help support our work tracking hate.

If you have been victimized, please first report it to local law enforcement.

In solidarity, Your friends at the SPLC

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

I think 'people planning on Trump being more liberal than Obama' is what most people mean by low-information voter.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

good example, troo

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

In 2012, after Obama was elected to a second term, Trump tweeted: “We can’t let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!”

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

we *should* march on Washington

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

in addition to "bigly," i wonder if we could stop throwing around these "racist" and "fascist" bombs as often as we do, particularly as applied to whole swaths of the population we don't know very well, and whose votes we need.

― Thus Sang Freud, Friday, November 11, 2016 7:16 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark

I'm getting rather tired of this. Not directed at you, but I keep hearing the same argument: "those 50m trump voters can't all be racist right?" Why not? Why can't 50 million people be racist? They voted for a racist! Trump doesn't even hide his racism, he boasts about it. Death penalty for five black men, saying he'll only let a Jew count his money, wanting to ban Muslims only because they are Muslims...

He ís a racist. And all the millions who voted for him are too. There is nothing "impossible" about that. Yes, they can be nice people, they can be your mother or best friend or yr fave sports star. So what? That doesn't make someone nót racist. Voting for a racist makes you a racist, too. An enabler at the very least.

I see a lot of people on the left saying "we should listen to these people's concerns, they can't be all racist", terrified that calling someone who is a racist a racist will backfire. Listen to their concerns we should, but no concerns make it ok to support a racist. If anything the election of notable and proud racist Trump should teach left ánd right that there are a hell of a lot more white racists then they thought there were.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

(Scratch 'white' from 'white racists')

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Trump's rise was fueled by a guy who told people he saw genetically-modified fish people being kept in tubes in a secret government lab, and then cried on air about it. Like what the fuck? It's disturbing how this is being treated as normal, like we should all just go along with it like this is an acceptable course of things. This is still so insane to me.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Re: protests -- I'm less concerned about public perception of civil unrest, and more concerned that cops or military troops will be overly violent in suppressing the standard issue Oakland protest (break a few windows around 8, set a dumpster on fire around 9-ish, occupy the freeway on ramp around 10-ish, go home around midnight) and things will get ugly.

I work near the main assembly point for the protests, and was told to leave work early yesterday.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

90 days to go.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

This is still so insane to me.

the goal is to stay angry and never let this normalize. it's not okay! it's not normal! refusal to accept this as acceptable does not equal sticking your head in the sand; it is, i hope, a motivator to demand the unreasonable not be allowed.

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

They usually take a break for Thanksgiving.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

Local protests on election day are going to be cold.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

Of the many striking thing I've seen in the last couple of days since the election, the most striking to me has been photos of Donald Trump looking truly miserable and slightly scared as he visits the White House and Capitol and it sinks in on him what he's in for. It's hard right now to say which might be worse: a strong but ignorant Trump steering us to disaster, or a weak and disheartened Trump being fought over by the craftier and nastier power-seekers who'll mob around him.

Since I can't decide what road to hell we're taking, I guess I won't try to suss out the future. I'll just try to organize effective opposition to whatever crap starts flowing out of DC.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

i am willing to believe that stupid ppl may not think DT is racist

it's my Pollyanna side

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

LBI otm fuck these people. including my family members.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

this fucking bullshit

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxAkCm1WgAA7C6n.jpg

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

xp - I agree with you Morbz.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

doesn't make them non-racist

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

Is it correct that during Trumps election campaign he largely avoided answering questions from the press? That's going to change now right?

badg, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

I mean, all of American history is less-racist-to-varying-degrees people accommodating racist white people--no word "slavery" in the Constitution, just as a for instance, and consolidating white economic security at the expense of nonwhite actual security and human dignity. Why not just start calling it what it is?

horseshoe, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

I have done/said racist things in my life.

I do not believe I am a racist.

Action(s) and quintessence are not nec the same thing.

Are the POC who voted for Trump racists?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

... of course POC can be racist wtd

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

wtf

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

They're fucking assholes

horseshoe, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

#notallAmericanhistory

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

Is voting against the social and economic security of most PoC inherently racist?

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I mean the word racist means something! Words mean things!

horseshoe, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

words mean different things to different people!

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

It doesnt matter if there were some lost sheep in the clown coalition. Racism was a major part of the movement, a major reason it was popular. It's the only thing that makes this phenomenon intelligible.

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

No one really thought he was going to bring their jobs back come on. He was a vehicle for white revenge by and large.

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

No one really thought he was going to bring their jobs back come on.

they wanted to believe! not saying that race wasn't a factor, but it wasn't the only one, if you're talking about everyone who supported him.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

supporting someone promoting an explicitly racist ideology means one of two things: 1) you agree with that ideology, or 2) you do not find that ideology grounds for rejection. Both = being cool w racism.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

racism-friendly

scott seward, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

and the next time I see my Jewish (!) relatives that voted for him I am going to give them a ton of shit. "first they came for" etc.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

everyone who voted for trump should be called a racist forever. by everyone who didn't vote for trump.

"have you met my cousin cathy? she's a racist and a dental hygienist. cathy, this is bob."

scott seward, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

of course POC can be racist wtd

against themselves?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

that wasn't what you asked initially and is a more complicated question

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

i thought it was inherent, my apologies

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

I grew up in a conservative town with a large Latino population, during the Gulf War, a lot of the guys were as crassly "kill the towelheads" as their white counterparts.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/XcpPVsj.png

speaking of promoting extremist ideologies

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

From a high-school teacher (quoted in http://jezebel.com/what-do-i-say-stories-from-the-classroom-after-electi-1788781296):

My struggle is this: I have been taught and fully embrace that my job is to make a safe space for kids to share their viewpoints. Whether or not I agree is so unimportant that I don’t even take it into consideration. However, a long time ago, this election became no longer a political choice but a moral one. Everyone who voted for Trump is not racist, but everyone who voted for Trump had to decide that racism was not a dealbreaker.

Whether "deciding that racism was not a dealbreaker" is itself equivalent to "racism" is a semantic debate. Either way, though, there is no moral out.

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

secondhand story from L.A.: a friend of ours whose housekeeper is here on a work visa and lives in south L.A., who woke up to find that a dump truck-sized amount of trash had been deposited in the middle of the street outside their house and "TRUMP" had been scrawled on many of the bags.

nomar, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

she is here from Mexico and trying to earn money and earn residency and would like to get her college degree, she arrived that morning in tears and terror.

nomar, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

well yeah duh POC are not a monolithic cohort

xps

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

The one (maybe literally) Muslim woman who wrote a WaPo oped about voting for him said it boiled down to his stance on Islamic extremism, iirc. She didn't think the current gov or Clinton was taking it seriously enough. Don't know if that is racist or self-defeating, necessarily, though of course I'd love to hear her thoughts on the matter if she's forced to register or be rounded up in pursuit of the agenda she supported.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

I mean, Morbz, how long have you lived in NYC? You have never experienced one PoC expressing racist sentiments?

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

yes, and i've seen Spike Lee films. I was asking if a POC voting for Trump is being racist toward blacks, Asians, Latinos, Muslims etc.

btw the "sausage making" of 'ho-hum, just politics' strategies in memos such as the one above always make me want to projectile-vomit

and if this is true, i suggest shooting the B/H/C trio into space as founders of our Mars colony:

https://twitter.com/tinyrevolution/status/797145182642831361

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

I was asking if a POC voting for Trump is being racist toward blacks, Asians, Latinos, Muslims etc.

based on the definition of racist other posters are using, then yes.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

kinda sad that in his litany of racist shit I can't recall if he ever really said anything explicitly racist about Asians (beyond blanket condemnations of China, which is not really the same thing)

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

@tinyrevolution
Saul Alinsky, the Lucifer-worshipper who turned both Clinton & Obama into demons, predicted our current reality in 1971:

https://twitter.com/tinyrevolution/status/793904566651604993

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6zk31iNtHs

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

LBI otm and shakey otm. This continent was developed and this country was built on genocide and the free labor of enslaved people. Tuesday was the flowering of a 240-year-old seed. 50 million racists? psssh, don't sell America short

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

Whether "deciding that racism was not a dealbreaker" is itself equivalent to "racism" is a semantic debate. Either way, though, there is no moral out.

― Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc)

thank you jaymc

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

I don't think they would agree on your definition of "morality" ... this is really a pointless argument, except for catharsis. I'm all for catharsis, I guess. It isn't really a discussion about what people who voted for Trump believe or wanted to believe, but what we believe about them from our moral/ethical standpoint. That's fine. They aren't posting here.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Newsnight had a special on earlier about Trump being President/Immediate aftermath of the election etc.
& managed to have somebody in on their panel who was denying that Trump had said anything racist. Which does make me wonder about how people are defining things possibly including 'saying' and 'racist'.

Also had locals in Terre Haute talking about how Trump said the same things that they said among themselves at home which is one reason why they liked him. Just brings home how normalising having a president who acts like him may be for questionable thought processes.

Stevolende, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

yes

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

what a way to go out

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/obama-approve-dakota-access-pipeline-231255

goole, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

shit

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

ughhh

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

goddammit

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

the oil and gas industry needed some good news

it's been such a rough week for them

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

vindictive

¶ (DJP), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

xp - brb gonna invest my savings in Chevron

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

i've only seen that on politico but if it turns out to be true, that's a true shit stain on his legacy

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

If we haven't mentioned this yet, Daniel Hunter's "Building a Movement to End the New Jim Crow: an organizing guide" is free on kindle today.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00UCF3U0A/ref=cm_sw_r_fa_awdo_t2_rNCjybMJVAMGS

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

I need to find that tweetstorm from earlier today about not letting Trump voters and their apologists use liberal tendencies towards dialogue and understanding as a weapon against them.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

i.e. to let the racist/fascist elements off the hook

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

For such an extreme radical who looks down his nose at ppl who take electoral politics seriously dr morbius has some depressingly typical "moderate" views

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

"On smarm" from gawker has been a useful framework for me w stupid Facebook arguments

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

i contain multitudes, d40

my nose is a short stubby irish one, i do not look down very far

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

as far as taking electoral politics seriously goes, if i lived in a swing state i would likely vote for Dem prez candidates every time and bitch about it til I FUCKIN' DIED, so count those blessings.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

I predict DNC institutional power shenanigans here. Sanders performs strong due to an unexpected upswell of support around the country (unexpected since the media doesn't bother to talk to Average Joe Slob except when a dead body shows up in a river), Hillary wins on bullshit institutional politics (or enough of an appearance of), Bernie supporters boycott the election, and we get ourselves a President Trump/Cruz. I'll throw $20 on that.

― larry appleton, Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:29 AM (nine months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

btw i totally support what sanders is doing and will vote for him as i've said many times but man i cannot wait to collect that $20

― the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:34 AM (nine months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it wasn't just bernie supporters boycotting the election, it was everyone else, too. anyway, i should've bet more money. ahem.

larry appleton, Friday, 11 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

Politico already backing off of the story. Click the same link now.

Three Word Username, Friday, 11 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

story from my mom, who canvassed in rural east tennessee for gloria johnson, a democratic state legislator (a great woman, who ultimately lost by about 200 votes)

most of the houses she went to looked like shit. there were a few mcmansions, but most had porches covered in detritus, rusting things, decaying dog shit, etc. - your typical rural combo of drugs and poverty. single mothers holding it down somehow on their skinny shoulders. about half the people weren't home. the other half had mostly never heard of her candidate. and most said they didn't know how they were voting in the presidential election. one woman she spoke to said she wasn't going to vote for the republican candidate for state legislature because he'd done something or other that wasn't beneficial to veterans, and her husband was a veteran. so they had a good 10 minute convo about gloria. it seemed potentially promising. the woman wasn't sure. but then she said to my mom: "now will YOU do me a favor? will you please vote for donald trump?" and she went on to say that trump was so kind, he was such a kind man, and that he never boasted about himself, he was so humble, and that he was going to make this country strong again and that it was so important that my mom vote for him.

now, whaddya think? racist? maybe. probably. but there's something else at work (many things, i guess). a cult-like need for belief in some authority? someone to project every unfulfilled emotional need onto?

there was some talk upthread about facts, and needing to tell vivid, "sticky" truthful stories with enough verve to crowd out the lies that are told. i'm starting to wonder if, in the context of political persuasion, facts matter at all. are important at all. maybe as reference material for the inside-baseball crowd they are. but for this woman, standing in the busted-out screen door frame of this shitty house in east tennessee? i don't know.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

my partner tells me one of her phd classmates just split with her boyfriend because the guy admitted to voting for trump in wisconsin (he lied initially, said he left the president blank on his ballot)

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 11 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

in the context of political persuasion, facts matter at all.

they don't. we're clearly past that point, rational discourse doesn't matter (if it ever really did). It's about personalities, projection, imagery. that's it.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

That's what I learned from Ronnie Reagan!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

right?

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

Trump projected sloppiness and vulgarity though. Idgi

Treeship, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

someone posted a meme with Trump trying to figure out how to use google, and it's like, Hey, we get to revive all those old Reagan jokes!

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Treesh, no offence, but were you even born when Reagan was president?

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

I had a long talk with a Jill stein-voting couple last night. everything they told me about Clinton was a kind of facebook status misinformation thing. She doesn't believe in the second amendment. She's killed people. She loves Putin (???). Maybe it's because I avoid fb so stridently, idk, I've just been shocked at how common this is. And there is no counter for it.

Clay, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

Trump's personality/ imagery etc is just so fucking disgusting. and i know i'm biased as all hell but this guy is just the most loathsome freakshow.

whatever Reagan ostensibly had that the americans gravitated to is decidedly NOT what Trump is working with

xxposts yep

acerbic (sic)s (will), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

idk, I was born in the Carter administration and the level of the-sky-is-green in Tracer's story is hard for me to wrap my mind around. 'Cult of personality' doesn't make sense when someone believes in Bizarro Trump

rob, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

like how are you aware of Trump's existence at all and believe "he never boasted about himself"

rob, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

Reagan believed trees produce air pollution and said it over and over again. If contradicted, he'd laugh, do that shrug thing at which he became an expert, and change the subject.

I can keep going.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

btw this segment has some gross establishment twaddle but it's worth watching. I'm happy Michael Moore got to say terrible things about Trump on the air.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_rk5rp499Q

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

Have been teetering on the brink of total despair all day, because I think this willful ignorance is probably unfixable. Many of the things his supporters hammered were either conspiracy theories, made-up or non sequiturs (like Anthony Weiner) that lead to a certain cry that Clinton was guilty of ... something. At the same time, Trump's demerits were totally apparent, but his supporters did not recognize them. My wife helped start a Facebook page, intentionally designed to be nonpartisan, to allow kids to send letters to Trump about what they hope he does or does not do. One kid asked, in addition to more hopeful stuff, that he please not tear the country apart, and someone on the group freaked out at such incendiary, hateful language. About a guy who literally wants to build a wall between us and Mexico, kick millions of people out and prevent millions more from coming in, not to mention all the other stuff he said. How could this kid be so hurtful? she asked. Where did the child get such terrible ideas about the new president?

Yes, where.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

Excerpt from Milton Mayer's They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45 (outstanding book, have been re-reading it lately).

"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.

"What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.

"This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.

"You will understand me when I say that my Middle High German was my life. It was all I cared about. I was a scholar, a specialist. Then, suddenly, I was plunged into all the new activity, as the university was drawn into the new situation; meetings, conferences, interviews, ceremonies, and, above all, papers to be filled out, reports, bibliographies, lists, questionnaires. And on top of that were the demands in the community, the things in which one had to, was ‘expected to’ participate that had not been there or had not been important before. It was all rigmarole, of course, but it consumed all one’s energies, coming on top of the work one really wanted to do. You can see how easy it was, then, not to think about fundamental things. One had no time."

"Those," I said, "are the words of my friend the baker. ‘One had no time to think. There was so much going on.’"

"Your friend the baker was right," said my colleague. "The dictatorship, and the whole process of its coming into being, was above all diverting. It provided an excuse not to think for people who did not want to think anyway. I do not speak of your ‘little men,’ your baker and so on; I speak of my colleagues and myself, learned men, mind you. Most of us did not want to think about fundamental things and never had. There was no need to. Nazism gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about—we were decent people—and kept us so busy with continuous changes and ‘crises’ and so fascinated, yes, fascinated, by the machinations of the ‘national enemies,’ without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us. Unconsciously, I suppose, we were grateful. Who wants to think?

"To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it—please try to believe me—unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, ‘regretted,’ that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these ‘little measures’ that no ‘patriotic German’ could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.

...

"You see," my colleague went on, "one doesn’t see exactly where or how to move. Believe me, this is true. Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow. You don’t want to act, or even talk, alone; you don’t want to ‘go out of your way to make trouble.’ Why not?—Well, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine uncertainty.

"Uncertainty is a very important factor, and, instead of decreasing as time goes on, it grows. Outside, in the streets, in the general community, ‘everyone’ is happy. One hears no protest, and certainly sees none. You know, in France or Italy there would be slogans against the government painted on walls and fences; in Germany, outside the great cities, perhaps, there is not even this. In the university community, in your own community, you speak privately to your colleagues, some of whom certainly feel as you do; but what do they say? They say, ‘It’s not so bad’ or ‘You’re seeing things’ or ‘You’re an alarmist.’

"And you are an alarmist. You are saying that this must lead to this, and you can’t prove it. These are the beginnings, yes; but how do you know for sure when you don’t know the end, and how do you know, or even surmise, the end? On the one hand, your enemies, the law, the regime, the Party, intimidate you. On the other, your colleagues pooh-pooh you as pessimistic or even neurotic. You are left with your close friends, who are, naturally, people who have always thought as you have.

"But your friends are fewer now. Some have drifted off somewhere or submerged themselves in their work. You no longer see as many as you did at meetings or gatherings. Informal groups become smaller; attendance drops off in little organizations, and the organizations themselves wither. Now, in small gatherings of your oldest friends, you feel that you are talking to yourselves, that you are isolated from the reality of things. This weakens your confidence still further and serves as a further deterrent to—to what? It is clearer all the time that, if you are going to do anything, you must make an occasion to do it, and then you are obviously a troublemaker. So you wait, and you wait.

"But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D.

"And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self-deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident, in my case my little boy, hardly more than a baby, saying ‘Jewish swine,’ collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in—your nation, your people—is not the world you were born in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way.

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:12 (seven years ago) link

xp
yeah I know, but isn't this like asking someone why they voted for RR and they say "because he understands that air pollution is created by burning fossil fuels"? idk I'm probably making too big a deal out of that one anecdote

rob, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

my dread that trump will turn out to be the antichrist is dissipating somewhat and now I think he's just going to turn out to be your bog standard shithead republican who everyone will learn to hate when he doesn't deliver manufacturing to everyone, and will be done in 4 years.

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

he was Authentic

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

Poppy Bush + Chris Farley + a nine-year-old Berlusconi

bad enough

4 years will fuck us

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

I had a long talk with a Jill stein-voting couple last night. everything they told me about Clinton was a kind of facebook status misinformation thing. She doesn't believe in the second amendment. She's killed people. She loves Putin (???). Maybe it's because I avoid fb so stridently, idk, I've just been shocked at how common this is. And there is no counter for it.

What's so flummoxing to me and so difficult to process is that there were *plenty* of legit criticisms to pin down Clinton, but it was the Above Top Secret narrative that the Greens bought into.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/democratic-debate-milwaukee-2016/2016/02/hillary-clinton-henry-kissinger-219183
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/us/politics/25clinton.html
http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-clinton-honduras-coup-20160501-story.html

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

idk, I was born in the Carter administration and the level of the-sky-is-green in Tracer's story is hard for me to wrap my mind around. 'Cult of personality' doesn't make sense when someone believes in Bizarro Trump

People were the same way about Reagan! My mother voted for Reagan. She didn't tell me until I was older, you know, around the same age one finds out a relative who died when you were a child was probably gay, or that a relative who died before you were born suffered from a serious mental illness.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

so frustrated with my parents. my mom recited a laundry list of reasons not to support clinton (basically just a rundown of breitbart/alex jones/fox views). one of those was that "black people got free cell phones from her tax money thanks to Obama". my sister decided to hone in on that one first, and found a factcheck.org article debunking it. my dad then found an article debunking factcheck.org as an organization: http://www.matchdoctor.com/blog_141905/Factcheck_org_--_A_Fraudulent_Fact_Check_Site_Funded_By_Biased_Political_Group.html

. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do.

...Think about it. Would you rely on any particular Web site to get the "truth?" Anyone honest would tell you that you should NOT rely solely on them to get your facts. You should get them by considering many different and sources, with different points of view and opinions and arrive at what you believe to be the truth by using your own God given senses. Only con artists purport to be the de facto source of truth.

and of course it goes on and on. factcheck.org is partially funded by the Annenburg Foundation, who in turn have ties to...wait for it..BILL AYERS. therefore factcheck.org propaganda.

i don't know how to get anywhere with them. what do you do when they respond to a factchecking website by pointing to an idiotic factbending article hosted by what appears to be the worst dating website of all time? they also think climate change is bunk and that the EPA is a waste of money that should instead go to the military, which particularly hurts coming from them because it's like, what did you think i was doing for the last 7 years? totally pointless work? fuck.

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

but there's something else at work (many things, i guess). a cult-like need for belief in some authority? someone to project every unfulfilled emotional need onto?

The 53% of white women who voted for Trump are simply leaning in to the same toxic, patriarchal, privilege-enforcing system that’s existed for centuries. They think that these white men are going to save them and protect them, and they’re willing to sell out anyone else–but especially Black women–to lock down that protection.

The problem with that, of course, is that the system hates them just as much as it hates everyone else. Donald Trump stated on camera that he takes any woman’s body that he wants. That he wants to “punish” women for controlling their own bodies. He has said in a loud voice that he is not going to protect women. But the women who voted for him have talked themselves into believing that they’re safe, even when they’re told flat out that they aren’t. They think that this is literally a game of Prisoner’s Dilemma. Or a red line system, in which anyone who falls below the red line gets cut, so all they have to do is shove someone else down below them to ensure that they make the cut.

The system as it exists–our financial system, our economy, work culture and policies, social customs, male-female interpersonal relations, education–is hostile to everyone who isn’t a middle class (or higher) educated straight white cisgender man. That means that all the rest of us are simply trying to navigate survival inside this rigged system. The optimal solution to Prisoner’s Dilemma is for both prisoners to protect each other. But for prisoners who have been beaten down by previous encounters with the system, it’s difficult to trust that the other prisoner will protect them, so they act out of self-interest with bad information.

That’s exactly why we can’t play along. We need to detach from what we’ve been conditioned to think is really true, about institutions and about Black women and about ourselves. And we need to work toward choosing other women, Black women, instead of trusting a system that hates us.

http://www.posttrump.help/2016/11/11/a-post-specifically-for-white-women-from-a-white-woman/

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

Geez, I remember taking a handful of media literacy/teaching media literacy classes in grad school that focused on youth. They should really have focused/focus on old(er) people.

sarahell, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:22 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/rilaws/status/797207451238105090

CNN drops its coffee cup as Corey Lewandowski's limp slowly turns into a confident stride

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

here's the fun thing:

both my parents were teachers. my dad taught a criminal justice course and started a police academy. my mom taught english.

don't mind me, i'll just be over here ripping my hair out

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

in orbit and Elvis (and everyone else) thank you for these things to read. the piece about 1933-43 is particularly harrowing

Karl i feel for you man. my parents are right-on but my in-laws, good lord. it makes my wife feel completely crazy and oddly vulnerable and off-balance.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 11 November 2016 23:28 (seven years ago) link

No one really thought he was going to bring their jobs back come on. He was a vehicle for white revenge by and large.

― Treeship

late to this but the #1 reason my 85-year-old father-in law voted for Trump was specifically because he was against NAFTA and promised to bring jobs back to the rust belt.

but hey, feel free to continue making the same stupid, blame-shifting generalizations that liberals keep making...

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

Did he tell you how Trump planned to bring jobs back?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:32 (seven years ago) link

um that's not the point, the point is what people perceived and believed

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

So does that mean when Trump doesn't deliver they may perceive and believe he has?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

my dread that trump will turn out to be the antichrist is dissipating somewhat and now I think he's just going to turn out to be your bog standard shithead republican who everyone will learn to hate when he doesn't deliver manufacturing to everyone, and will be done in 4 years.

I think this is v true tbh

the Hitler comparisons are a bit wide of the mark - Trump doesn't want to invade Mexico or France or whatever and establish global supremacy, and what's more he doesn't have the energy or wherewithal to even plan how to do that. An (admittedly very dangerous) mixture of corruption and ineptitude is much more likely.

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

xp to Josh

no, I think he is skeptical and worried, and will not hesitate to throw him under the bus when midterms arrive

(he also voted for Eisenhower and JFK, btw, he doesn't toe party lines and I respect that)

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

I'm finding that people over the age of 60 seem to have a very difficult time telling what's real and what isn't on the internet.

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

Just want to add that almost everyone I know that voted for Trump has told me it was due to Hilary and Obama's rejection of Keystone XL, Obamacare, cracking down on the enforcement of illegal immigration, and the belief that Clinton would make all of these concerns worse. Today this one guy told me, "I'm sick of people saying I'm sexist because I didn't want Clinton to be president because she's a woman, have Condoleezza Rice run I'll happily vote for her."

JacobSanders, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

like, they not only believe fake news websites, they also allow themselves to get catfished on a regular basis, and share bogus shopping coupons all over the place

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

and then they get awfully upset when they find out something isn't true...my own mother told me she doesn't believe anything from anywhere anymore. my mother in law continually kept talking to some fake dude with an obviously false social media profile even after we showed her proof that he wasn't who he said he was. what the fuck is wrong with old people?

akm, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

There's a reason internet scams target the elderly.

What makes Trump scary is no one knows anything. And that's why many have said we should take him at his word. Per the Times:

“There are two options to how you want to anticipate and prepare for a Trump presidency,” Osnos said. “One is to declare that nothing he says is useful and reliable, and we should do nothing. The other is to invest heavily in trying to understand what the history of the presidency tells us.”

“Even if a president doesn’t intend to follow through on a promise,” he continued, “the nature of the presidency compels him to make a good-faith effort to do so because his credibility once in office rests partly on whether he is showing a serious commitment to follow through on the things he does.”

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

it's not just 60+ year olds, check the long c&p from an HRC canvasser in Ohio upthread for a vivid reminder that even college-educated people in their 30's don't have the time to sort through all this stuff and figure out what's really true.

sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

So the question is, if kicking out Mexicans and Muslims and any other crazy Trump things succeed in making America "great" again to the satisfaction of trump voters, will these people be cool with that? Is that really the price they are willing to pay? If so, then yes, they are every bit the racists they have been painted to be.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

how do we confront racism and sexism if we're not allowed to name it?

the late great, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

Kick in the crotch?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

just grab it by the pussy

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

"he says it like it is"
"he says the things that I think but am afraid to say"

these are the classic key phrases of the trump supporter.

but what could these things be that they're proud of him stating bluntly, except for racist things? aren't they afraid to say them because it might sound a little Hitler-y?

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

serious question. i'm as tired as anybody else of the words. i don't like calling people racist or being called a racist either. i get it. it feels shitty. so what do you do when people vote in favor of, say, racial profiling?

the late great, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

I mean the right uses different words all the time, "law and order" instead of profiling, for example. I do wonder if it would be possible/effective to engage in the same kind of semantic sleight-of-hand.

rob, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:56 (seven years ago) link

wait, what is being proposed here?

if someone is in favor of say, racial profiling, we should say "hmm, that sounds like something a racist person would support."

those things are hard to say. but the solution isn't to shy away from calling it what it is. calling it by different names to avoid social awkwardness is what we ALREADY do.

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

it's possible i'm just missing something here, if so sorry

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:59 (seven years ago) link

yeah there's an obvious answer to my admittedly stupid question. just use different words.

the late great, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

the Hitler comparisons are a bit wide of the mark - Trump doesn't want to invade Mexico or France or whatever and establish global supremacy

if hitler came up in scattergories would you really dash down 'desire for global supremacy' ahead of 'demonisation and persecution of vulnerable minorities'?

conrad, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

it took hitler a good 6 years to invade poland iirc

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

I do think persecution of minorities was secondary to Hitler's goal of Germany dominating Europe/punishing its historical enemies, although the two were def interrelated, obviously.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:06 (seven years ago) link

Collaborators rush in: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/11/silicon-valley-donald-trump-critics-tech-reactions

Under the Trump administration, the argument of contractor v employee falls more on the Uber side than it does under a Clinton administration,” said Tim Wilson, a venture capitalist with Artiman.

Wilson anticipated both opportunity and potential danger under a Trump administration. Trump’s apparent eagerness to set off a trade war with China could be damaging to consumer electronics companies like Apple, which rely on China’s manufacturing infrastructure and workplace, as well as the global supply chain of minerals.

“Apple can’t manufacture a phone overnight in the United States,” he said. “This is a dangerous game to play.”

Still, other Trump promises might create new markets ripe for Silicon Valley’s favorite form of disruptive innovation, such as his plan to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, some of whom form the bulk of the country’s agricultural labor force. That might create opportunity for the “agtech” sector, Wilson said.

“If they really are serious and farm labor gets threatened, then anything that automates labor is something that is going to uptrend,” he said.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

it took hitler a good 6 years to invade poland iirc

The Dachau concentration camp opened up in 1933.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:09 (seven years ago) link

Charlie Brooker just hosted the first post US election edition of Have I got News For you just in case you missed it. & it is talked about a lot in the show.

Stevolende, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

i was specifically responding to the 'global supremacy' and invasion thing but yes you're right many things happened quite quickly

xpost

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:16 (seven years ago) link

Point made upthread about older people struggling to make sense of information from the internet seems very very otm to me - consider so much material just churned out to get clicks, the writers and editors even less accountable than the paper press. And then the self-confidence and savvy it takes to be properly suspicious, then how easy it is to fall into a caricature of reasonable suspicion (so you end up believing in conspiracies).

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link

yes, exactly, thank you

sleeve, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:29 (seven years ago) link

Don't most Silicon Valley companies employee large numbers of H1B tech workers at below market rates? I would assume anything there would vastly outweigh "agtech disruption" possibilities.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:37 (seven years ago) link

NY Times reporter on Keith Ellison pick-

https://twitter.com/jonathanweisman/status/797120114042793984

brownie, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:43 (seven years ago) link

I think he's just going to turn out to be your bog standard shithead republican who everyone will learn to hate when he doesn't deliver manufacturing to everyone, and will be done in 4 years.

yeah maybe his approval ratings will tank once he fucks up the economy.. then again, plenty of scapegoats to go around

thinking maybe he'll have a lot more people (dem pols) talking down to him / screaming directly in his face than he's used to.. not that it matters

brimstead, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:44 (seven years ago) link

That's a grotesque tweet, brownie.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

yep, the comments are otm

brownie, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

Many xpost to Tracer Hand: that's the point, for a large number of people facts don't matter, truth doesn't matter. Image and personality matters, and so do memes in the original sense: viral ideas. Dems don't seem to understand that. What this does not mean is that the left should abandon the truth; it means we need to be better at making truth sticky - as shamelessly manipulative about it as the right is about their lies (and as they are about the truth when they get hold of it once in a while). It's a tough job, yeah, but I think it would make everything a hell of a lot better. And we'd win more often, because truth is stronger than lies and love is stronger than hate.

Being deliberately reductive here for the sake of rhetoric.

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

buried in this puff piece by town and fucking country on hope hicks, the likely new press secretary, are the words "there were early signs that the woman Trump has described as a "beautiful beauty" would climb onto the political stage."

http://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/politics/a7274/hope-hicks-donald-trump/

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:56 (seven years ago) link

But I'll take the black congressmen from Milwaukee.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, November 11, 2016 2:19 PM (four hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

cmon man, milwaukee??

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 12 November 2016 00:57 (seven years ago) link

@hardcore dilettante:

But I would like to hear it from a Trump voter's mouth, or, as I'm typing from the UK, from a Leave voter's mouth, that facts don't matter, truth doesn't matter, to them. Before signing up 100% to the argument that we've moved into a post-fact age.

From what I can gather, most of them think they are in fact in possession of the 'real' facts and the 'real' truth (and are in a dire situation where an evil establishment is always trying to pry this truth out of their hands). That facts don't matter to them, is something that gets said about them.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

The thing about 'truth is stronger than lies' is that it's a lie. The truth is that lies are stronger than truth. And I've been telling people this over and over, but it never takes. Because, well, you know...

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:01 (seven years ago) link

NY Times reporter on Keith Ellison pick-

https://twitter.com/jonathanweisman/status/797120114042793984

― brownie, Friday, November 11, 2016 7:43 PM (sixteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

guessing nyt didn't take too long on picking out the lewandowski picture for that article

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/11/11/us/11transitionbriefing4/11transitionbriefing4-master675.jpg

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

xp to self Obvs it's not likely that someone would outright say 'I don't care about facts' because if you didn't, you wouldn't know it. But it looks to me like the fear comes first, and out of that, a mad rush to what looks like safety, where there's no time to look at all these statistics and facts and figures

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

The thing about 'truth is stronger than lies' is that it's a lie. The truth is that lies are stronger than truth.

Think this is contextual tbh

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

e.g. 'The sky is green' is a weak lie, 'X and Y and Z are coming to get you!' is a strong lie if said to the right people

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:06 (seven years ago) link

Climate-change is a plot by the Chinese, vaccines cause autism, 9/11 is an inside job, etc. etc.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

The wells were poisoned years ago

http://cdn.nexternal.com/mef/images/ToxicSludgeIsGoodForYou250.jpg

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

Many xpost to Tracer Hand: that's the point, for a large number of people facts don't matter, truth doesn't matter. Image and personality matters, and so do memes in the original sense: viral ideas. Dems don't seem to understand that. What this does not mean is that the left should abandon the truth; it means we need to be better at making truth sticky - as shamelessly manipulative about it as the right is about their lies (and as they are about the truth when they get hold of it once in a while). It's a tough job, yeah, but I think it would make everything a hell of a lot better. And we'd win more often, because truth is stronger than lies and love is stronger than hate.

Being deliberately reductive here for the sake of rhetoric.

― hardcore dilettante, Saturday, November 12, 2016 12:52 AM (eighteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

is it the delivery, or is it the Democratic/liberal establishment is so willfully detached from the public they lost the election because of.

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

lena dunham rapping. nothing else needs to be said on that.

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

I hate the counterfactuals but I've decided that while no one can know whether Bernie woulda won (just too much Knightian uncertainty) Martin O'Malley or Joe Biden would be president today if Clinton or Sanders hadn't run. my read of the data is that it was low-enthusiasm for Clinton due to scandals; she ran the best campaign she could have (quibbles aside) and yet still the rep stuck.

flopson, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

is it the delivery, or is it the Democratic/liberal establishment is so willfully detached from the public they lost the election because of.

none of the various establishments expected this

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:18 (seven years ago) link

these various establishment obviously wrong then, because now we have the first Infowars.com president

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:24 (seven years ago) link

it looks to me like the fear comes first, and out of that, a mad rush to what looks like safety, where there's no time to look at all these statistics and facts and figures

― Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, November 11, 2016 6:03 PM


Absolutely. And part of where Clinton's campaign failed is that there was almost no acknowledgement of that fear in Middle America, and no story to tell that said, "If you give us your vote, we'll fix it for you." Facts and statistics are useless If they don't tell a story that people want to believe. When you perceive that the streets are dangerous - when the news and the net are telling you about mass shootings and gang violence, pointing to a statistic that says violent crime is down does nothing to soothe that fear; instead it says "I don't care about your concerns." Trump stepped into that gap with "You're right! Things are fucked! But I can MAGA etc"

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

I go through it over and over in my head, and nothing that the supporters said about Sanders I found unconvincing back then sounds more convincing now. But I return to this: I'm 100% convinced he would have campaigned in the midwest. Hillary did not. He would have done it for the wrong reasons - because he felt comfortable there, because he was doing rallies and west coast + midwest was good turf - but he would have done it none the less. And that would have made the difference. He would have lost Florida, Georgia, Texas, Arizona by much more, it's possible he would have lost in 2020 where Hillary has helped create fertile ground for the next candidate in those states, who knows, but he wouldn't have lost in the Midwest. And the only conclusion I'm able to come to is: Fuck this shit. It would have been SO GOOD if it had worked, but it backfired, and nobody got why. Except Michael Moore.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:32 (seven years ago) link

People who perceive that 'the streets are dangerous' normally knows exactly what story they want to soothe that fear, and no democrat should be willing to offer that bullshit story anymore. But I think the fact that so many BLM stories has happened in the Midwest, and this giant whitelash happened in the Midwest as well, is underacknowledged.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:35 (seven years ago) link

And this is not to attack you, hd, just to point out how difficult it is to appeal to both the people convinced that 'street crime' is out of control, and also the people who will hurt disproportionally by every measure proposed to deal with that - irrational - conviction. Coalition politics is so much harder than just appealing to the basest instincts of the majority.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:38 (seven years ago) link

And the reality is that STORIES are stronger than either truth or lies. The reason lies seem stronger is because they're easier to make good simple stories out of. But good stories made of truth are better than good stories made of lies, because they're true and will remain true when examined, will remain true after the need for the story is gone, whereas false stories eventually dissipate like smoke.

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:39 (seven years ago) link

Agreed in the main, esp on the BLM front, Frederik B

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

People who perceive that 'the streets are dangerous' normally knows exactly what story they want to soothe that fear, and no democrat should be willing to offer that bullshit story anymore. But I think the fact that so many BLM stories has happened in the Midwest, and this giant whitelash happened in the Midwest as well, is underacknowledged.

― Frederik B, Friday, November 11, 2016 8:35 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

seriously everybody I miss the days of receiving backlash over my white belt :-((

PappaWheelie V, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:43 (seven years ago) link

Absolutely. And part of where Clinton's campaign failed is that there was almost no acknowledgement of that fear in Middle America, and no story to tell that said, "If you give us your vote, we'll fix it for you." Facts and statistics are useless If they don't tell a story that people want to believe. When you perceive that the streets are dangerous - when the news and the net are telling you about mass shootings and gang violence, pointing to a statistic that says violent crime is down does nothing to soothe that fear; instead it says "I don't care about your concerns." Trump stepped into that gap with "You're right! Things are fucked! But I can MAGA etc"

― hardcore dilettante, Saturday, November 12, 2016 1:30 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the whole framing of this was a big problem of the campaign. instead of the main concern being messaging, they could've offered something substantive to help people, or at least show them they're still a part of the process of american governance. voter turnout was lowest in 20 years, it's like people didn't see anything at stake in this election despite Trump being an absolutely insane choice. for years people have complained about feeling abandoned by the establishment, and Clinton was the absolute embodiment of this, and how the primaries and media acted about it only confirmed this view. it's hard to blame people for not giving a crap.

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:45 (seven years ago) link

it's hard to blame people for not giving a crap.

it isn't, really

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

so what are you going to do, shame them to death?

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:04 (seven years ago) link

larry, I know we're all playing armchair campaign manager here, but when you, and everyone else for that matter, talk about what could be done, it's not that helpful to say she should have offered 'something substantive' to people. What would that be? And I write this mostly because people like Old Lunch, and all the rest of us, are currently trying to figure out exactly what the path forward should be, in the US, where all of you are, but also in Denmark, where we have many of the same problems. What does anyone think could have been offered to those white rural midwest communities, to make them vote for her?

Here's a bit of what she offered: A 12$ federal minimum wage, up from 8,50 in Michigan and 7,25 in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. A 125 billion $ plan for investment under her 'Breaking Every Barrier' program (talk about bad framing and messaging...) that included 50 billion in investments in youth employment, and 50 billion in infrastructure investments. And that's the bits I could find with two google searches. But instead the midwest voted for loss of Obamacare - including medicaid expansions in both Michigan and Pennsylvania - probably medicare as well, if Ryan gets his way, and tax cuts for the rich.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:05 (seven years ago) link

i'm not trying to be like DAMN YR EYES, DOWNTRODDEN AMERICAN, YOU SHOULD HAVE VOTED!

but one of the candidates was a ridiculous and compulsively lying clown with no experience but a gold-plated bathroom and a reality television show who doesn't respect the rule of law and any number of racist and sexist statements to his credit. and yeah, people should fucking vote against that, whether the opposition is 'inspiring' or not

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:14 (seven years ago) link

Good policy has to be a cornerstone, and those are good policies! But she wasn't hearing what people wanted, which was .. Well, they wanted "not crooked Hillary" for one, but way more than that, they wanted someone to tell them that things were going to change for them for the better. Those numbers are pretty abstract for a lot of folks but she could have told them in Garrison Keillor terms what that was going to do for them.

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

Fred otm.

These Trump voters didn't vote that way because they were serious about improving the lot of working people. They did so because they're assholes.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

Just curious how much do you guys pay for insurance? Is ilx in agreement that Obamacare doesn't need to be fix? Last year when I filed my taxes I was penalized due to not having coverage on myself, a little more than $600. That doesn't sit well with me.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:17 (seven years ago) link

They're not children or morons. They chose to indulge their darkest instincts, embracing blind anger over pragmatism.

Fuck. Them.

Not working people, but Trump voters. Although there is overlap, they're not the same, and the Trump voters have now hurt working people more than Hilary ever could.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:17 (seven years ago) link

premiums would have come down if congress was able to address the issue in good faith. It's a big in the system they don't want to address because they want the system to fail. That's what the Republican party is about

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:19 (seven years ago) link

*bug in the system

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:20 (seven years ago) link

It's interesting that the error that caused many poll aggregators to overstate their confidence is the same mathematical error that caused the rating agencies to give AAA ratings to mortgage CDOs that turned out to be junk, which led directly to the 2008 financial crisis:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161111-election-models-polling-data/

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:20 (seven years ago) link

Is ilx in agreement that Obamacare doesn't need to be fix?

i would imagine that ilx is in agreement that it should have been one-payer to begin with. but yeah changes would have ultimately been necessary (and worthwhile) before sad paul ryan destroys it

i had obamacare for one month after years of paying out of pocket; the plan was considerably cheaper and better than that which i'd previously been paying for, but i live in a state that offered significant choices.

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:23 (seven years ago) link

That's not my issue. I would prefer to pay out of pocket. Hospitals prefer to work with you than wait on insurance companies to pay them. Now I have to have coverage or the government takes my tax return. To cover my family and myself, I pay $1383.57 a month. I use to pay $640 for my wife and child before Obamacare really kick in. I'm willing to admit I'm ill informed about what exactly has happened, but I know it was better before.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

I get a tax credit with my plan. It's affordable and good.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

I don't want a tax credit and I would prefer to not have insurance for myself. But now I have to or I pay the government a fee every year.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:26 (seven years ago) link

i mean yes, healthcare costs are constantly rising; obamacare has kept it below the otherwise prevailing rate. and anyone who thinks that government 'death panels' are going to screw them more than rapacious health insurers is mistaken.

nor does health care offer an opportunity for the magical fucking hand of the market to work -- patients have neither the knowledge nor the time to shop around

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:28 (seven years ago) link

That's part of the way the system was designed. Without the mandate (ie. fines), you can't offer coverage regardless of pre-existing conditions, because otherwise people just wait till their very sick to get coverage. xp

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:29 (seven years ago) link

What does single payer involve?

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:29 (seven years ago) link

government provides health care for everyone (and taxes go up)

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:30 (seven years ago) link

Single-payer doesn't need a mandate because everyone's covered whether they like it or not. xp

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I don't want that.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

Paying taxes and carrying around a health card, at least in Canada.

3xp

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

government provides health care for everyone (and taxes go up)

I think the government actually ends up spending less on health care in Canada than the US, though?

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:32 (seven years ago) link

Clinton was asked about ACA rate increases on Oct. 25, and the tone-deaf statement from her campaign was:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvofTv1XEAAxWdD.jpg

(via https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/790979111602847744/)

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

i suspect you underestimate the actual market cost of insuring the three of you for health care. insurance companies are, after all, trying to make a profit, not necessarily keep you healthy

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

we'll have you all here (actually the uk won't, but london will)

imago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:34 (seven years ago) link

Good policy has to be a cornerstone, and those are good policies! But she wasn't hearing what people wanted, which was .. Well, they wanted "not crooked Hillary" for one, but way more than that, they wanted someone to tell them that things were going to change for them for the better. Those numbers are pretty abstract for a lot of folks but she could have told them in Garrison Keillor terms what that was going to do for them.

― hardcore dilettante, 12. november 2016 03:15 (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I've only written the outlines, but there was a bunch of details on her website. I mean, I agree she should have told them those details, but the reason she never did is because she was never there to begin with. I do think a pay increase from 7,25$ to 12$ an hour should be a pretty substantive improvement - though of course it could backfire, they could be layed off, etc. However, the 'fact sheet' I took this from? That's geared towards an african american audience. This is the headline for the part about investments: I. INVEST $50 BILLION TO CREATE JOBS IN COMMUNITIES BEING LEFT OUT AND LEFT BEHIND—INCLUDING COMMUNITIES OF COLOR And quite honestly, I think that's a pretty big reason why her messaging didn't function in the Midwest. She does mention them, but she says: 'It’s outrageous that so many African American families live in pockets of extreme poverty and that so many families of color with good credit cannot get a mortgage. It’s outrageous that millions of undocumented workers live in the shadows. And we can’t allow rural communities from Coal Country to Indian Country to be further hollowed out by unemployment, abandonment, and addiction.' They come in last. With Trump, they weren't just first, they were the only ones in the race. Messaging to white rural voters would ALWAYS be easier for Trump than Clinton.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:35 (seven years ago) link

sund4r otm in that every developed nation with national health care spends less per capita than the usa

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:36 (seven years ago) link

My problem is when I need health care I can't get the cost up front. I can't compare their price to someones else. I get the bill afterwards. Nothing else works like that.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:37 (seven years ago) link

we'll have you all here (actually the uk won't, but london will)

iirc we're all moving to the hebrides if only nicola will have us

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:38 (seven years ago) link

The shocking thing about the graph though is that there are countries with government health insurance for all in which the government spends less per capita than the government spends in the US. Mainly because costs are higher in the US to begin with and the US has government health care for those with the highest health costs, ie. the elderly.

xxp

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:39 (seven years ago) link

I'm all for insurance companies making money. When I was a union member, I received all of my earnings. I paid my dues and my health care came out of a centralized health care fund. Basically dues covered the cost and the insurance was very good. Now that I work non-union jobs, nearly a third of my earnings goes to health care.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:43 (seven years ago) link

There's no pressure to keep costs low and big pharma has no problems with contributing to both sides of the fence.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-pharmaceuticals-idUSKCN0Z22F1

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has taken more money from employees of America's 15 biggest pharmaceuticals companies than all of the Republicans who attempted a run for the White House this year combined, according to campaign finance disclosures.

The donations, which were nearly double those accepted by Democratic rival Bernie Sanders, came even as the former senator and secretary of state vowed to curb price gouging in the industry if elected.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:44 (seven years ago) link

Ugh. I'm fucking depressed. Have to limit time in this thread.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 02:49 (seven years ago) link

Mr. Trump, a homebody who often flew several hours late at night during the campaign so he could wake up in his own bed in Trump Tower, is talking with his advisers about how many nights a week he will spend in the White House. He has told them he would like to do what he is used to, which is spending time in New York when he can.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/us/politics/trump-president.html

i was joking to my mother on the phone this evening, well, maybe he won't even move here..

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:22 (seven years ago) link

It's interesting that the error that caused many poll aggregators to overstate their confidence is the same mathematical error that caused the rating agencies to give AAA ratings to mortgage CDOs that turned out to be junk, which led directly to the 2008 financial crisis:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161111-election-models-polling-data/

― o. nate, Friday, November 11, 2016 9:20 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

quanta is usually a good mag but that article is bad and misses the point in both cases. "correlation error" had to do with one element of cdo pricing (but it isn't the sort described here, not exactly) -- correlation actually was measured in that case, but using a poor formula (historic-trend-based). the other "error" in cdo pricing was more directly a pure slight-of-hand with repackaging tranched debt. (and there were other things as well).

the poll case is vastly different and correlation of errors is a weird way to look at it -- rather there were systemic biases which aggregators attempted to but did not completely account for, and there were just _pure unknowns_.

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

Sure, there's lots of differences in the details, but both the election prediction models and the CDO rating models underestimated correlation in a way that led to overstating confidence.

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:31 (seven years ago) link

Oh, one more thing, if 1) Clinton should have told the truth and 2) she should have offered them something, here's the truth about what she could offer: Nothing. Because it would have to pass a republican house, which has been gerrymandered into something absurdly undemocratic. That's the truth she could tell them: You'll get nothing. The GOP is fucking you over, so you'll get nothing, until the GOP is defeated. Clinton skipped the math and ran against Trump rather than on empty promises. And lost for lack of enthusiasm.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

The idea was to flip the senate and chip away at the house

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:42 (seven years ago) link

I know hindsight is 20/20 but it seems clear that Clinton erred by letting Trump get to her left on trade. Pointless to speculate now, but one can imagine an alternative reality in which after beating Sanders in the primary, she offered his followers an olive branch by pledging to renegotiate NAFTA or something along those lines. xp

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

Yeah. But that would have taken until 2020, probably. Which is just in time for the next round of gerrymandering, so it did make sense. But there wouldn't have been any higher federal minimum wage, and there wouldn't have been a 275 billion $ investment fund. It's just... You can't say both that Clinton should have run on a positive message, and that she should have figured out to sell the truth, because the truth was always bleak.

And I'll repeat, Sanders would have won, imo, but he wouldn't have run on a truthful message (nobody does) and he wouldn't have been able to deliver. It would still have been fucking bleak.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

that was to treeship.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

And you can't just pledge to renegotiate a trilateral agreement. That's kinda what trilateral means, it would have to include a willing Mexican partner, and they've already said they won't renegotiate NAFTA with Trump.

I mean, you can pledge it, but it's bullshit. It's not truthful.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 03:58 (seven years ago) link

With Mexico, Trump has repeatedly threatened to pull out of NAFTA if Mexico and Canada don't negotiate with the U.S. and offer it more favorable terms. He's also threatened to impose a 35 percent tariff on Mexican imports.

As president, Trump would have the authority to renegotiate NAFTA and withdraw if the terms aren't to his liking. Under the rules of the trade pact, any member can withdraw with six month's written notice, and the American president can call for additional duties if trade terms unfairly advantage Canada or Mexico.

Don't see why Hillary couldn't have threatened the same.

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, she could have threatened to withdraw. But that's not the same as saying that she would negotiate. And if she should also tell the truth about the impact of withdrawing from NAFTA, that wouldn't be a positive story as well.

And btw, Trump won't withdraw from NAFTA, nor get to negotiate it.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:02 (seven years ago) link

This is a very interesting point:

And part of where Clinton's campaign failed is that there was almost no acknowledgement of that fear in Middle America, and no story to tell that said, "If you give us your vote, we'll fix it for you."

I've been wondering about this in the UK context, where there are politicians and policy advisors who know nothing outside of the world they live in. They studied Politics/economics at a good university and then went straight into a political role.

Is it similar in the US?

If so, maybe part of the problem is that we now have a political class who come from a very narrow slice of society. In their ambition to fit in they lack the empathy for other parts of the population.

Jill, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:02 (seven years ago) link

I think it's unfair to say Clinton didn't offer anything to Middle America. She offered tons of things (higher minimum wage, vastly increased education subsidies, better healthcare, etc.) - it's just that all of those things required Congressional approval which no one thought she was going to get. Something that is actually within Presidential prerogative to achieve - torpedoing trade deals - is something Trump promised but Clinton didn't.

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:06 (seven years ago) link

trump merely promised to make corporations bring back jobs to america because he said so and defeat isis in a way the generals wouldn't fathom and build a wall that mexico would pay for

stupid hillary, offering nothing to the working class

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:09 (seven years ago) link

Mr. Trump, a homebody who often flew several hours late at night during the campaign so he could wake up in his own bed in Trump Tower, is talking with his advisers about how many nights a week he will spend in the White House. He has told them he would like to do what he is used to, which is spending time in New York when he can.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/us/politics/trump-president.html

i was joking to my mother on the phone this evening, well, maybe he won't even move here..

this article makes him sound like such a baby.

j., Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:10 (seven years ago) link

That's not my issue. I would prefer to pay out of pocket. Hospitals prefer to work with you than wait on insurance companies to pay them. Now I have to have coverage or the government takes my tax return. To cover my family and myself, I pay $1383.57 a month. I use to pay $640 for my wife and child before Obamacare really kick in. I'm willing to admit I'm ill informed about what exactly has happened, but I know it was better before.

Do you understand why the tax penalty is there? The pre-Obamacare setup may have been better for you, but it was not better for the country as a whole. I've seen many people bemoan Obamacare because their premiums went up (or cause they have to pay tax penalty for going w/o insurance), but I've yet to see any of said people say "I don't care if a kid with leukemia can't get coverage, just lower my premiums". Cause that's the trade off.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:11 (seven years ago) link

Trump could offer a shitton of things, actually, because a win for him would include a republican controlled congress - as it turned out. Hopefully it's also pretty obvious how extreme it would have been if Clinton had pledged to 'torpedo' trade deals. It would have been shocking to do so for Sanders as well, btw, he clearly refused to do it, though he did say 'renegotiate'.

Again. Again. She should have been there in the Midwest. But fuck if I can figure out what she could have offered them. It's really easy to be outflanked on every issue, when you're running against a hypocritical liar who just spouts bullshit without thinking about any reaction.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:21 (seven years ago) link

Sure, there's lots of differences in the details, but both the election prediction models and the CDO rating models underestimated correlation in a way that led to overstating confidence.

― o. nate, Friday, November 11, 2016 10:31 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

with a broad enough brush though (as is used here) all issues at all with any form of probability aggregation can be chalked up to "correlation". it doesn't tell you anything. you might as well say "the election models and the cdo models both had in common one thing: statistics"

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:23 (seven years ago) link

I don't see why threatening to torpedo a bad trade deal that the other side refuses to renegotiate should be shocking. I think if the Democratic party now values free trade above the well-being of working-class Americans, then it's losing touch with its roots. If the Democrats become the party only of the urban professional class, they better get used to losing elections. xp

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:26 (seven years ago) link

I think "correlated error" is something they had in common, which is a bit more specific than "statistics", but if you disagree I won't argue the point.

o. nate, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:28 (seven years ago) link

“Hitler has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all “progressive” thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security, and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flag and loyalty-parades ... Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a grudging way, have said to people “I offer you a good time,” Hitler has said to them “I offer you struggle, danger and death,” and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet” - Orwell

there are some trump voters who thought they were voting for him in order to help ease the economic pain of their communities but i think it is ludicrous to say that was the guiding factor, especially since hillary offered a better plan to people. trump voters liked his vision of america as a blood soaked dystopia, humiliated at every turn, that cries out for redemption. they liked having their prejudices flattered and most of all they liked having a national identity from which others were excluded. if obama's political career was based on the idea that there is "no white america and black america, just one america," trump ran on a platform of undoing that message.

the democrats, moving forward, should try to get a better deal for the american worker who has been left in the lurch of globalization. i've always said this. but they should do that becuase it's the right thing to do, not out of shame because trump somehow did a "better job" of speaking to these people than hillary. trump won with all kinds of whites, not just working ones. he was not talking about trade policy most of the time for the past 18 months!

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

we need to understand what has happened. people are angry all right but not always for righteous reasons.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:31 (seven years ago) link

I don't see why threatening to torpedo a bad trade deal that the other side refuses to renegotiate should be shocking. I think if the Democratic party now values free trade above the well-being of working-class Americans, then it's losing touch with its roots. If the Democrats become the party only of the urban professional class, they better get used to losing elections. xp

― o. nate, 12. november 2016 05:26 (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I don't know what to say if you don't get why this would be shocking. And there are plenty of working class hispanic americans who would be horrified.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:45 (seven years ago) link

The idea of a multilateral agreement is that countries cooperate to make deals that help everyone. It's a give and take. The US just saying that an agreement is 'bad', and torpedoing to pressure a smaller country into better concessions, would be disastrous for the global order. And for what? Why is NAFTA 'bad'?

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:48 (seven years ago) link

good question that i really wanted to discuss months and months ago and did a bunch of reading about it bc it seems like no one really knows and the conclusion from all that reading and consulting w/ ppl who know a lot about trade is - it probably was better for the economy but it also probably cost jobs but it probably gave americans more purchasing power which is a literal quality of life increase but maybe not and probably it's just neutral in the end - or at least that's a convenient conclusion bc it's very confusing.

Mordy, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:51 (seven years ago) link

I think it's unfair to say Clinton didn't offer anything to Middle America. She offered tons of things (higher minimum wage, vastly increased education subsidies, better healthcare, etc.) - it's just that all of those things required Congressional approval which no one thought she was going to get. Something that is actually within Presidential prerogative to achieve - torpedoing trade deals - is something Trump promised but Clinton didn't.

― o. nate,

yes but she couldn't sell these points, i.e talk to tem

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:53 (seven years ago) link

*them

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

Re: NAFTA this links to several reviews from various ends of the spectrum and says it was mostly a wash (imo) but concludes:

So if the U.S. economy did so well after NAFTA, is there any reason to think the trade agreement was harmful? It all depends on where you are in the economic structure. A 2012 review by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development weighed NAFTA’s macroeconomic benefits against the plight of the thousands of largely low-skilled workers who were displaced in its wake. Many of them could not bridge the gap in skills to take the higher-skilled positions that had replaced the jobs they had lost to trade. Retraining and assistance programs didn’t “appreciably” help those workers find new jobs, either, the report said.

The report questioned whether the gains in trade under NAFTA were enough to offset the struggles of displaced workers and recommended that future agreements include stronger provisions to protect U.S. workers exposed to foreign competition.

But it may be too late for those Americans who have already lost their jobs to overseas competition and have been unable to enjoy the fruits of the larger and more efficient economy. Those workers are the ones who may use their votes this November as a referendum on free trade.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/09/28/Was-NAFTA-Really-So-Bad-Economy

sleeve, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:56 (seven years ago) link

I have a simpler question: Is NAFTA bad for the US, or for Canada or the US, or for all three countries? Like, what does the term 'bad trade agreement' mean?

There was an article on VOX - and VOX are never wrong! - explaining that the jobs didn't really go to Mexico, because they were all being outsourced to China. And there was one policy change that caused that to speed of rapidly, but it was a procedural change in WTO, and nobody can figure out an argument as to how to roll it back, because it was obviously unfair before.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:58 (seven years ago) link

so a lot of the stuff i read concluded with "maybe it's a wash" but i wonder if that's bc they crunched the numbers and really yeah it comes out about even or bc it's esoteric and they don't really know how to measure this stuff well so it's a lot of speculation and augury

Mordy, Saturday, 12 November 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

A handful of sources in and around the Trump transition team said there was no evidence that the president-elect had even reviewed any of the binders of policy and personnel proposals produced by the team. Trump’s only contact with the transition staff, the sources said, had come through Christie, the New Jersey governor and transition team chief who was demoted on Friday from transition team chairman to being one of several vice chairs.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/donald-trump-team-rivals-231277

great stuff although you or I could have written this blindly and been 95% correct

comesayhey, Saturday, 12 November 2016 05:20 (seven years ago) link

Trump’s children and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who guided him throughout the campaign, appear to have retained their influence in an official capacity. Kushner’s presence at the White House on Thursday drew notice from Obama’s staff when he asked, as they toured the West Wing, how many of the individuals there would remain into the next administration. Nearly all will depart along with the president.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-transition-20161111-story.html

We're definitely in a bad timeline but it's funny as hell.

comesayhey, Saturday, 12 November 2016 06:04 (seven years ago) link

Why is NAFTA 'bad'?

Not that Trump cares about this but I have concerns about the investor-state dispute mechanism and what it has meant in terms of environmental policy in Canada: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/01/14/canada-sued-investor-state-dispute-ccpa_n_6471460.html

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 12 November 2016 06:11 (seven years ago) link

My 30th birthday was on Wednesday. What a shitty way to start my third decade of life.

monster_xero, Saturday, 12 November 2016 06:52 (seven years ago) link

And then Leonard Cohen died. Like fuck this year.

monster_xero, Saturday, 12 November 2016 06:54 (seven years ago) link

I just learned that my father has lung cancer. What a week, huh?

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Saturday, 12 November 2016 07:01 (seven years ago) link

xps s. clover & o. nate -

How i break it down (leaving out some details but w/e)

HRC was leading between +5% and +1% in just about every every swing state in the polls. if the errors among each swing state were uncorrelated, the probability of a HRC win is one minus the probability that the error in WI is at least as large as her lead multiplied by the probability the error in PA is at least as large as her lead, and so on, summed over every subset of swing states DJT would need to win. under the assumption of independence (and assuming poll sample variance is a good approximation of true underlying variance) that number is close to 1. IIRC this is what the Sam Wang model, which gave her the humiliating 99% probability of winning, assumed. however, if errors are correlated, then MI having a large error means WI has a larger error means FL has a larger error, and so on. rather than summing over the product of a bunch of small numbers, we're summing over the product of larger numbers, as errors now move together (what if all polls are underestimating turnout/enthusiasm/rabid racist Wille zur Macht, etc.) this roughly accounts for the difference between Nate Silver's model, which had her at something like 70%, and Sam Wang's. note that it's almost impossible, given poll data, to build a model that predicted a Trump win. (I previously attempted to make this point to caek in a primary thread after Silver failed to predict Sanders' upset win in MI and leftists all accused him of skewing polls, none of which showed him ahead, but I don't think I expressed myself properly at the time.)

Sam Wang is not an idiot; the reason he made that assumption is because the matrix of correlations that you have to estimate is large relative to available data (50 choose 2 is 1225, and we only have a half dozen elections or so) so you need to make assumptions on the joint distribution of errors, otherwise it's just pure shit noise. Sam Wang thought it would be more fruitful to use the data to more precisely estimate each individual state's variance, while Silver sacrificed some precision on state variance for a more realistic picture of the joint distribution. (but silver still made some stringent assumption!) these are the kind of subjective, intuitive calls every modeler needs to make. they are unavoidable and the only guide re: which assumptions to make are (1)out of sample fit on historical data, which in this case is slim, and (2)your gut feeling.

people pricing CDOs didn't assume uncorrelated errors (at least not all of them, some surely used models closer to Silver's), they just couldn't observe tail risk ('what if all loans are fraudulent and there is a crisis') in historical data, because tail risks by definition are rare. so they underestimated the correlation. it's not clear to me that there is any data-based procedure they could have used to better incorporate this risk. you could follow Nasim Taleb and apply the precautionary principle and assume it is large. he also assumes that the probability of GMOs wiping out life on earth is large by the precautionary principle, amd ignores the fact you still have to subjectively choose when to apply PP and when not to (this is why post-Black Swan Taleb is a raging moron imo), otherwise you should rationally hide under your bed and stockpile a lifetime supply of organic dried goods.

it's not so much about pernicious assumptions made by modelers (although there are obvious incentives in finance to understate risk) as difficult fundamental subjective choices.

sterlz is right that this is a fundamental problem in statistics and not unique to some devious method used in CDO pricing, I think that's what he means by 'you might as well say statistics'

flopson, Saturday, 12 November 2016 07:29 (seven years ago) link

fuck i just read a fb post equating the KKK to "other fringe groups that sow division, like BLM." shit like that makes my head explode, and then i go through the whole "is it worth replying? if so how?" sorry just venting. i'm so pissed.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 07:53 (seven years ago) link

We have to be vigilant and vocal about false equivalency now.

I have friends and relatives who just don't get identity politics (yes, they are all white). My response is that elevating the value of whiteness is identity politics in its original form, and all of what they call 'political correctness' is a response to that original dick move.

jane burkini (suzy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 08:16 (seven years ago) link

thank you suzy. i will indeed reply, but tomorrow. too angry and brain-tired to reply effectively rn

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 08:31 (seven years ago) link

Excerpt from Milton Mayer's They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45 (outstanding book, have been re-reading it lately).

― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 11 November 2016 23:12 (yesterday)

This is great, thanks.

Re: people admitting they don't act on the basis of 'facts' - sample size of 1, obv, but this is exactly what my dad has been doing over the past years (voted Brexit) - his argument was that people, including him, are voting on feelings and that's how it SHOULD be. Presumably because 'facts' are too tiring to discern on the internet so you give up or just believe everything the Daily Mail tells you because why not? One of the big deals for him was that Obama saying UK would be last in the queue in trade negotiations and he was angrily reacting against that - took it as a slight rather than a blindingly obvious statement of what's in the best interests of countries other than the UK.

Re: people turning on Trump when he can't do anything he promised - in the UK, there has been no discernable progress to leaving the EU. Instead of engaging with why this is the case, Brexiters are blaming the Other Side for 'moaning' and creating obstacles. Of course I can't see Trump blaming anyone else for any future shortcomings of his but supporters will do it regardless.

kinder, Saturday, 12 November 2016 09:03 (seven years ago) link

Illegal immigration from Mexico has steadily declined in the US over the last 20 years, largely due to improvements in Mexico's economy, which are largely due to free trade agreements like NAFTA. Trump is a fucking idiot.

qop (crüt), Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

looking more soberly at the figures - trump didn't win this, hillary lost it.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:30 (seven years ago) link

hrc was a lousy candidate. the "deplorables" comment was completely tone-deaf. she carried two decades plus of pernicious anti-clinton narrative baggage (brought about not only by the right, but by mainstream orgs like the times and washington post, pundits like chris matthews, etc.). she couldn't telegraph her own positions. yet...there was no one else. the left is bereft of charismatic leaders who could have done any better than she.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:39 (seven years ago) link

she made tactical errors too -- like assuming those rust belt states were in the bag, and finishing up in the last couple weeks with all-anti-trump rhetoric instead of stressing how her own plans would help his constituency.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:43 (seven years ago) link

That's the most sobering stat from the exit polls (yes, yes, polls) - Clinton appears to have had a 7pt lead amongst those who decided who to vote for back in August or earlier, but it gradually dwindled to almost nothing over the subsequent weeks, taking a particularly bad hit in the wake of the Comey letter (the 6% of the active electorate who made up their minds that week split 50-38 for Trump).

So, yeah, terrible strategy to keep pounding how awful Trump was when his post-convention negatives (Gold Star parents, Access Hollywood) weren't actually helping HRC much, if at all. But I didn't think so at the time.

But how do you even get your genuinely good policy points through the noise of "Trump says unbelievable shit" in the media?

Michael Jones, Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:52 (seven years ago) link

the media is a real big problem that needs to be worked on. focus should be on the mainstream media, because there's not much we can do about the right wing madness.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 11:59 (seven years ago) link

like, a news org that reported truthfully, didn't hue to narratives, and spoke to plain-spoken people. that would be helpful.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 12:01 (seven years ago) link

and that names names. when someone goes on tv and lies or tries to deceive million of people, that should be news.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 12:04 (seven years ago) link

BBC News has Trump announcing that he will keep elements of Obamacare. Not sure how much as yet.
Wonder what else he's going to renege on. Though this sounds like it could be in most people's best interests doesn't it? & somebody up thread was saying taht with a bit of tweaking this did sound like it would be a mostly beneficial program. Just not one seen as part of Obama's legacy.

Do hope people do look back at the Obama years and see him as mainly decent.
Just getting the feeling that it's an experiment in who could be the President,a man with non white ethnicity followed by a woman. Thought that might be overly remifying things

Now seems to have been overly tempting fate for Hilary to be hosting the expected victory party in a building with a glass ceiling.

& wonder when the next attempt to get a woman president will happen. Does taking several steps backwards throw everything off.
I did see that the Republicans had a female Presidential candidate early on, though she dropped out early on and became Cruz's VP candidate.

Stevolende, Saturday, 12 November 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

i like both of those.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

have that fear that people will get tired of talking about trump and it will be like the mass shooting thing where people are outraged for a minute and yell about gun control and then go back to posting pictures of kitty cats a couple of days later. hoping for perpetual outrage and resistance to normalcy.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

hoping for perpetual outrage and resistance to normalcy.

You were alive from 2000-2008. You know that's not happening. This will blow over by Thanksgiving, bubble up again a little at inauguration, and then disappear almost entirely next year. It'll disappear completely as far as the media are concerned; they will long since have normalized him and become court stenographers. Assuming this administration even engages with the press at all - the campaign/transition team is basically totally shutting out their press pool reporter already. I wouldn't be surprised if the White House briefing room was turned into a room for Trump's homunculus of a son to play video games in.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

Don't underestimate his vanity. Iraq beats ISIS in Mosul, and its a Trump victory. Cosmetic changes to the ACA, and its Trumpcare.

Really, my glimmer of hope resolves around his self interest. If Trump backs out of the Paris Accord, I want every country around the world to boycott Trump properties, for legal action against his hotels and golf courses everywhere. Let his children know that his decisions are destroying their own prospects.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

do people think that that jonathan pie guy is a real news person? why do people post those videos on facebook? i'm convinced people think he is real.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

A friend of mine whose thoughts I value on most matters wrote this about health care and trade
"The problem is the drugs. We invent them at tremendous cost but nations like the UK, Canada, etc force us to sell them to them dirt cheap, which raises the cost to our citizens. TPP was going to make it more equitable by allowing governments to offset the cost directly and forcing them to abide by the agreement.
Basically everyone wants our innovations without having to pay. America subsidizes the luxury of cheap healthcare abroad. The cost falls back unfairly on us."

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

Its all about climate for me too. Dont wanna have to tell my kids in 20 years that they have no future thanks to an fbi director and an email server. The idea that Trump's massive conflicts of interest might hsave us all is.....amusing

frogbs, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/12/donald-trump-appears-to-soften-stance-on-range-of-pledges

already 'softening' on Obamacare and such.

piscesx, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

Yeah Sanders, that's not only not true, that's kinda insulting to every medical researcher outside the us, including my brother who does foundational research at a public university, funded by taxpayer money from people like me.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

Dean Baker worth reading:
http://cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/surviving-the-age-of-trump

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

I wasn't agreeing with what he said, I was posting it here to see what you guys thought? I usually like what he post about things not because I agree with him but I like other's opinions.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

I think he's wrong, and I got kinda angry about it because it hits close to home :)

But really, from over here, American pharmaceuticals are insane. Martin Skhreli, OxyContin, that blood-test scam that I can't figure out how to google right now.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

How do all of the non-American companies manage?

Besides, if American drug companies, and by extension American consumers, are in fact being exploited by all these predatory foreign countries with socialized health care programmes, or more heavily regulated drug prices, it seems like it would be an easy problem for the US government to fix. Do you really think Canada could get away with exploitative trading practices against the US? For starters, as my earlier link about NAFTA shows, American corporations have had plenty of success with just flat out suing the Canadian government over legislation that gets in their way.

But, yes, as Frederik points out, a lot of research and innovation, even within the US, is done with public funding at research institutions. In the day and age of Martin Shkreli, it should not be hard to see that the corporations who charge astronomical prices for drugs are i) not always responsible for the innovation and ii) willing to charge whatever the market will bear.

xp

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:07 (seven years ago) link

just skimming the last 12+ hours of posts, have mostly been writing up stuff for my blog, but a couple things that jumped out at me:

"For such an extreme radical who looks down his nose at ppl who take electoral politics seriously dr morbius has some depressingly typical "moderate" views"

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40)

man, you know how much it pisses me off that my bernie or bust/jill stein voter uncle who i had to ignore because he was so strident is now talking about "healing"? it takes some special skill to be wrong so consistently.

"Have been teetering on the brink of total despair all day, because I think this willful ignorance is probably unfixable."

― Josh in Chicago

for what it's worth, i agree that the ignorance is unfixable, but i don't see it as cause for despair. i think the best thing for us to do is to recalibrate our assumptions and find new and different ways of compensating for willful ignorance.

"https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/12/donald-trump-appears-to-soften-stance-on-range-of-pledges

already 'softening' on Obamacare and such."

― piscesx

my wife's response to that: "he's not 'softening', he just parrots back whatever the last person he talked to told him.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

Personally, I think we need to start thinking about healthcare expenditures competing with investments in our future. We can't spend 18% of GDP on healthcare without severe costs to other parts of the economy. Most of this spending is palliative care for chronic, self-inflicted diseases, where the cures are in lifestyle/diet, not medicine. We need to stop believing that drugs and procedures are more effective than they actually are. Many who wouldn't elect for them, if they were informed of the true costs, side-effects and limited benefits. Chemo increases survival rates 2%. Interventional cardiology (from stents to bypasses) reduces angina, less well than diet, and doesn't change outcomes.

There's been a shortage of drug candidates for two decades. The low-hanging fruit among small molecule drug candidates has been found. Patent drug companies have few options. They spend money on marketing, significantly more than on research. They shop the market of biotechs startups for candidates. They do their trials in lower cost developing nations. But basic research won't end if institutional buyers (from Medicare to insurance cos" subject drugs to cost/benefit analysis. And if institutional buyers don't, who will?

If we want more medical breakthroughs, I'd spend more research grants on preventative medicine, and lower the regulatory burden for drug discovery for rare diseases. But I wouldn't reward the marketing firms that happen to sell patent drugs beyond what their products are worth.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

In that earlier Times piece the Trump camp indicated, among other things, that he was interested in continuing to hold rallies. That does not bode well. What does bode well is every early indication that he will literally be unable to govern, due to his short attention span and rampant self-interest and regard. What are the odds that he won't distract himself micromanaging his family and/or fortune? What are the odds, that if a day or two of protests months before he's inaugurated gets under his skin, similar or larger protests down the line don't derail him? What are the odds that when or if he attempts to enact policies that will detrimentally affect tens of millions of people in America it will bring the GOP cold war - or something broader and more acute - to a head? Is he the type of guy to call in the national guard to get his way? He's long seemed to lack the courage of his convictions, whatever they may be, choosing the coward's route of legal harassment to conflict. I guess we'll see.

Anyway, still finding ways to cope, but hearing of a Trump hopeful to retain his rich homebody lifestyle in Trump Tower gives me some comfort. Bush could go clear brush in Texas. Who goes to the heart of Manhattan for peace and quiet? And Trump out of DC might give a clearer indication of the motives of his minions and cohort.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

xpost Rush, please remind us (me) of your blog url.

Also: let's predict how may Trump Year One threads are we going to have.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

Isn't the one drawback with Trump not being up to the job now taht he's been lined up that the job will instead fall on Mike Pence who would be much worse and wouldn't have been in tbe running if he hadn't agreed to the VP role?

Stevolende, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

Dudes, you know how its already been acknowledged that Trump's opinion on something depends on who he's recently discussed it with?

He recently discussed 'ObamaCare' with Barack Obama.

Mark G, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

If that's all it takes, maybe the solution for the next four years is for Bill C to start playing golf with Trump again?

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

Might well be.

Mark G, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

After my kid brother began complaining about all the barriers to effective medical research, I do get that it's more complex than just forcing the drug companies to charge lower prices - though I still think he's wrong on some details, I'm not going to artmajor-splain to him about his chosen field of study. I also remember this one RadioLab about a new wonder drug that was the first time you could cure this one disease, and it was massively expensive, tens of thousands of dollars for a few months of pills. But then you were cured. And you wouldn't need drugs for all the symptoms of the disease for decades, as you used to, and it the long run it would prove quite beneficial, not just for the lifes of the sick, but for the bottom line of the health care system as well. But in the short run, it could almost bankrupt some health care systems.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

Can't there be a balance between government regulation of health care and free market solutions? I don't want health care for myself. I'd rather have a savings account for when I need it. I hate paying money for something I never use.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

Can't there be a balance between government regulation of health care and free market solutions?

Yes. It's called the Affordable Care Act.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

If that's all it takes, maybe the solution for the next four years is for Bill C to start playing golf with Trump again?

― Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r)

shit, no wonder eisenhower was such an effective president.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

i think the exec branch is likely to work the way it did in the reagan years, when the president wanted to be head of state and in front of the tube by seven: a fractious coalition of dead-eyed d.c. republican psychos and wild-eyed breitbart psychos, backstabbing each other and competing to manipulate trump while enduring high turnover. (the difference being that the nihilistic zealot team in reagan's administration is the mainstream adult one in trump's.) meanwhile trump will go on tv and hold rallies and whip up public opinion against anyone who opposes the expansion of his power and perform the role of crisis president while plundering whatever he can plunder for his family.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

xpost Rush, please remind us (me) of your blog url.

― Josh in Chicago

thank you so much for asking! now i can post it again without feeling like an asshole shill. :)

http://rebuildingeverything.blogspot.com/

i just posted a bunch more stuff there. the logorrhea continues unabated. if anything starting a blog has only increased it.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

What happens to the crazy conspiracy theory right now they their guys are in the White House?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

this is going to be the most leak-prone administration in history

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

What happens to the crazy conspiracy theory right now they their guys are in the White House?

― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, November 12, 2016

this or that aide credited as "senior administration official" will leak conspiracies once a week

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

But who will they scapegoat? They can't blame a black guy or woman, they can't cry fraud or cover-up. Or can they?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

But the ACA doesn't allow me to shop for my services, like I would bluejeans. If I need anything at a doctor's office, I have to go to someone within my network, I have to accept their prices which I won't even know until I get the bill. Why aren't companies, hospitals, drug companies forced to compete like other services? Now I can't use my own money to pay for what I think is best for myself.

JacobSanders, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

ACA doesn't have cost control measures.

For cost control, there's no alternative to rationing some care. Death panels, in the GOP parlance.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

JacobSanders do you love free market capitalism and think its potentials limitless if it were only 'truly' free...or are you just trying to deal with the current setup?

conrad, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

xp: The fact that we can't force health care providers and drug companies to publish and charge the same rates to all is one of the biggest failures of the health care market.

Literally the only reason I had high-deductable insurance for some years was to get the insurer price.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-and-aides-hedge-on-major-pledges-including-obamacare-and-the-wall/2016/11/11/9196b364-a82f-11e6-8fc0-7be8f848c492_story.html

So is there any single campaign promise his people have *not* hedged on? This litany pretty much covers ... everything. Which means that everything specific he promised he may not do, and everything people are truly hoping he does - jobs, etc. - never had any specifics to begin with. Welcome to the ad hoc presidency.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

We can judge him from his concrete actions, starting with selection of Pence. Ignore the palaver.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

They will scapegoat their enemies within the administration. They're already goi g at each other trying to divide up the spoils of victory. Trumps management style is to let his subordinates fight it out and fight they will.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

I don't trust that they're going to hedge on all this any more than I trusted that the campaign promises would be kept. Much of this "hedging" talk could simply be a way of pacifying the opposition and protests until post-Inauguration Day.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

Well, it's at least a tacit acknowledgement that his goals are, if even possible, very difficult to achieve.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

The wall won't happen. Further militarisation of the border and roundups of "suspect" immigrants will happen, and people will say "at least he didn't build the wall".

wanderly braggin' (seandalai), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Trump's campaign was based on an implicit promise that he would make minorities know who's really in control. He clearly has done that, people are terrified. So I'd suspect most of his voters think this is working out just fine.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

If he doesn't start building a wall he can blame Dems for stopping him and when he runs again, assuming he does, he can make building the wall a campaign promise.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

I doubt there will be a wall but the border patrol and ICE will get unlimited funding which is why they endorsed trump in the first place

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

"Did I say wall? I meant I was going to build a MALL! A great mall! A mall of America!"

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

at the bong store to buy gatorade - welcome to america - and i asked the owner what they were saying about trump in pakistan - he always has pakistan news on the radio - and he immediately started telling me how long he had been in the states and how his family went to school here and he hadn't been back to pakistan in 17 years.

and i told him that sounded fine and i wouldn't have him rounded up for deportation. okay, i didn't really. i didn't know what to say. i just wanted some insight into what people were saying in pakistan.

so, yeah, people are frightened. in case anyone still wasn't sure about that.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Lol

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

So hope hicks is going to be press secretary? Has she been on tv one fucking time during the election? This could be hilarious or excruciating.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

John Barron should be press secretary.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

If you have "non-racist" friends or family who voted for Trump, there's a handy analogy for them here:

http://whatever.scalzi.com/2016/11/10/the-cinemax-theory-of-racism/

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

Agreed re 'tacit acknowledgment' Josh.

I mean he had already started hedging on the wall before Election Day. I never put much stock in the wall per se, but read it as a shorthand for ramped up enforcement and deportations. The Trump voters I've seen interviewed pretty much read it that way as well.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

My lol was an xp btw

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

i don't have any problem with the mitt romney communist health care that my family enjoys. it has paid for so much stuff. major surgery. all kinds of things. more states should do that. trump can't take it away either i don't think.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

Good on john scalzi

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

I'm not comforted in the slightest, but Trump trying to play the uniter is somewhat comic.

Frederik B, Saturday, 12 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

longneck - i'm really sorry. there's never a good time for that news, but to have it happen this week. oof. :-/

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

re: clinton being a bad candidate

there was a really obvious problem, occasionally stated but apparently ignored by her team: she never gave anyone a reason to vote for her. what would be different about a clinton presidency, what would people have to look forward to? she did have a few initiatives she could have talked about, even if they weren't exactly the most inspiring, like addressing student loan debt. maybe she thought that since the GOP would block everything single thing she wanted to do, it wasn't worth highlighting. and of course, i realize that it's tough to talk about a brand new inspirational vision when you're following 8 years of obama, 4 of which you served in as a cabinet member. but regardless, in the end she effectively stood for nothing, offered nothing to vote for. she could have let her surrogates and the rest of the entire fucking world tear Trump down while offering her alternate future, but since she had nothing else to offer, she joined in as well.

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

yeah, clinton came off as weirdly vague about things. even her sloganeering was in no way memorable.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

"she never gave anyone a reason to vote for her. what would be different about a clinton presidency, what would people have to look forward to?"

it's because trump was so fucking awful and rising in the polls she wasted all her time tearing him down; look at the debates, they were 90% about Trump and Trump's views. She never got around to making a case for herself.

akm, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

like if you asked people what her goals were and what she wanted to do most people would have trouble remembering. i realize that doesn't say much when people don't even know who the vice president is in this country but still....

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

"even her sloganeering was in no way memorable"

you mean you didn't like "Chillary" beer cozies???

akm, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

but it really is the complete opposite of trump. everyone remembers what he said he was gonna do. wall. deport. more jobs. etc.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

what would be different about a clinton presidency

Why should anything be different? Obama has been a great president, is broadly popular, and the economy has pulled back from total collapse. "Four more years of this, basically" is a good reason to vote for somebody.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

yeah, sadly, i'd settle for status quo hillary. obviously.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

she was clearly gonna bomb even more

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

but then the angry people would have just been four years more angry. i don't know. i don't know how to make Indiana a more robust state.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

but eh, foreign kids and future terrorists, fuck em xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

"everyone remembers what he said he was gonna do"

and in that period where Hil just repeated every word Bernie said, all of her words sounded like lies including "and" and "the'

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

anyway KM otm

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

"Four more years of this, basically" is probably a better slogan than "I'm with her", tbh.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

One of many reasons I hope protests continue, at least to some degree, is that Trump is above all else a man who defines himself by his success, and president or not, he's still a private businessman. I can't imagine his properties will seem that appealing with hundreds, or even dozens, of angry protesters out front, or even the threat of same. This might be the first president in eons, if ever, who is *financially* vulnerable if not politically. He may or may not give a shit if people are upset, but he'd sure care if his fortunes started faltering.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

i don't know, i thought it was pretty clear what she was offering, whether via rallies, debates or ads. she's just not a good seller of it. by her own admission. she's a list-maker. during the debates, whenever hrc would speak about her proposals, i could see my friends' eyes glaze over, and their comments would be about her demeanor, about trump's expressions on the split-screen, or about "how she was doing." i don't think we're listening, that's all -- partly because we're watching the "theater" of it all, but compounded in her case because of her rhetorical/charismatic shortcomings.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

I hate paying money for something I never use.

You are using it though. You aren't paying for health care, you are paying to be insured against the chance that you have medical issues that result in large fees. But if you want to look at is as directly paying for "health care you're not using"...you almost definitely will use it at some point. Relying on paying out-of-pocket for med bills is what has caused millions of Americans to go bankrupt. They all didn't see the utility in "paying money for something I never use" either.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

https://www.greatagain.gov/

, Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

i'm sick

, Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

xp:

"Stronger Together" is memorable enough, but most voters simply care little about celebrating diversity. The civil rights struggle doesn't win new voters. Many of the Bernie slogans were just as bad: "Not Me. Us." The slogan should have focused on bread and butter issues that expand the coalition while still addressing the Occupy movement concerns. Something like "A Fair Deal".

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Let’s say you want HBO. So you go to your local cable provider to get HBO and the only way they’ll let you get HBO is to sign up for a premium channel package, which includes HBO but also includes Cinemax. Now, maybe you don’t want Cinemax, and you don’t care about Cinemax, and maybe never personally plan to ever watch Cinemax, but the deal is: If you want HBO, you have to sign on to Cinemax too. You have to be a Cinemax subscriber to get HBO. And you go ahead and sign up for the premium channel package.

finally someone able to explain politics to the economically disadvantaged in a way that everyone can appreciate -- overpaying for subscriptions to premium cable so you can keep up with the latest Girls. "oh, that's what's going on? i hate that" said frank dirt of yatesboro, "paying for those extra cable channels just to get HBO was what kept me from keeping up with mortgage payments after I lost my job."

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

Or "A New Deal"

Sorry bad jk, point taken

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Scalzi's not addressing the disadvantaged. He's addressing literary sci-fi fans.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Clinton underperformed with them as well?! Damn

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

It's an analogy. And the last time I checked most of Trump's voters are middle-class or higher.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

Bigger issue with "Fair Deal" is that its the slogan Harry Truman ran under, TBH. But the point is, slogans based on identity poltics may make Democrats feel good about themselves, but mean nothing to those whose concerns aren't in the identity politics world.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

Replace "HBO" with "premium sports package," then.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

Whose identity ?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Isn't Trump all about identity politics? Just in a (cough cough) veiled fashion?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

I would just say Dems have exhibited tone deafness or discomfort with the kind of identity politics that plays in broad swaths of the white electorate

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

To the bafflement of Democrats in Wisconsin, for instance, the late Clinton push there did not mirror the economic messaging of the local labor unions. One played back Trump's worst remarks about women; another, his mocking of a reporter with a physical disability; the last, a warning from a nuclear technician who worried that a reckless President Trump would start a war.

That decision was backed by data showing that voters reacted most strongly to his controversial comments. But it did little to motivate Clinton's base of supporters, especially when they were faced with questions about her judgment in using a private email server as secretary of state.

Again, in Wisconsin, the results proved the case - a state where Clinton did not make a single stop during the general election.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-hillary-clinton-mistakes-20161111-story.html

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

relying solely on identity politics is what did them in

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

Stronger Together was weak sauce imo. I still don't know what it means outside the specific context of the convention.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

Isn't Trump all about identity politics?

Who read "Stronger Together" as a reminder that Democrats are a coalition of minorities, special interests (from labor unions to trial lawyers), progressives, and pragmatists.

If you're not a minority, don't identify with a special interest, and aren't politically engaged on the Left, "Stronger Together" doesn't have much to offer you.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

I think it's simplistic to call that just identity politics. They were going after his character and suitability for office. The nuclear technician remark is not a pitch to "inclusiveness" or whatever . Now, yes, the prism through which they read character was invariably that of progressivist values (anti sexist, racist etc), but in an ideal freaking world, those are just fundamental traits of decency. The message in those ads need not only be read as "let's celebrate our diversify". They could equally be read as an appeal to old-fashioned decency. Trump insulted a pow, a gold star family, etc.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

Xp right "stronger together" doesn't appeal to those drawn to a different identity politics (white, working class, rural), but an identity politics nonetheless

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Or the campaign looked at Brexit and literally decided to use almost the exact same slogan as the Remain campaign because what could go wrong

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

ok yeah me saying "identity politics" when i meant mudslinging, or whatever the new term for that is

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

Oh ok

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

if we had still lost after putting all our energy into campaign slogans and a louder platform instead of highlighting the fact that donald trump is one of the worst human beings in america, the monday morning quarterbacking would be "hmm maybe we should have spent more time highlighting that donald trump is one of the worst human beings in america." it was never clear that those last undecided voters would just shrug that off and say yolo.

I think clinton would have had to go 'big league' with her campaign platform to even make the slightest impression. promise things that could obviously never happen. 30 million new high paying jobs in the midwest and you get to work from home too and be your own boss.

she wasn't making any big promises because she expected to be held accountable for them.

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

Asked whether the tone of his campaign had gone too far, he said: “No. I won.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/12/donald-trump-appears-to-soften-stance-on-range-of-pledges

this answer is so vague and terrifying. do you think he meant that the tone of his campaign had not gone too far because it was necessary for him to win (in which case he's admitting that being a voice of hatred is part of his appeal)? or is he trying to say that the fact that he won means that whatever he said is now mainstreamed/normalized? something else? it's such a bizarre answer.

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

corporate logic; success justifies new definition of reality by the people at the top of the hierarchy.

j., Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

It worked. I won. So obv it was the right gameplan.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

if we had still lost after putting all our energy into campaign slogans and a louder platform instead of highlighting the fact that donald trump is one of the worst human beings in america, the monday morning quarterbacking would be "hmm maybe we should have spent more time highlighting that donald trump is one of the worst human beings in america."

yeah, but it didn't have to be either/or. and i wouldn't reduce clinton's failures to not having a good "slogan". it's more than that. as i said earlier, literally the entire rest of the world was already playing the role of pointing out the ways that donald trump is a terrible human being. clinton was right to acknowledge his terribleness. but only one person in the entire world could offer something to vote FOR as an alternative, and she didn't do that. she recited lists of what she planned to do, but 90% of her own rhetoric was about donald trump. it's not her fault that the election went trump's way - white people, either eagerly voting for racism or looking the other way , made this happen - but she didn't succeed in convincing people to vote for her as opposed to voting against trump. someone upthread said they were happy voting for her knowing she would be an extension of the obama administration. that kind of argument is fine and it works for a lot of people who were going to vote for her anyway, but it doesn't convince anyone else. everyone else wants to be able to say "if i vote for hillary clinton, X will be different. that's why i'm voting for her and why you should too."

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

A couple of pieces from The Guardian today.
1) women writers on Hillary Clinton's election defeat
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/12/we-are-witnessing-the-politics-of-humiliation-siri-hustvedt-joyce-carol-oates-and-more-on-the-us-election

2) fictional representation of the female president or women in power including some history of who's run over time.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/12/hillary-clinton-we-failed-her-sarah-churchwell

Stevolende, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

in trump's past business deals, once the contract is signed, all that matters is what's in writing and what can be enforced in court. in a political campaign, there's no enforceable contract. people just hand you massive amounts of money and power and they have no rights until the next election. trump obviously felt this was very liberating. he's never governed and if even he's given it much thought (unlikely), his ideas about it have never been tested by experience.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

Trump only likes being a politician and bitch slapping his enemies. He has zero interest in governing.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

https://www.greatagain.gov/

so awful

sleeve, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

someone upthread said they were happy voting for her knowing she would be an extension of the obama administration. that kind of argument is fine and it works for a lot of people who were going to vote for her anyway, but it doesn't convince anyone else. everyone else wants to be able to say "if i vote for hillary clinton, X will be different. that's why i'm voting for her and why you should too."

yet obama is leaving the office w/ fairly high approval ratings. after 2000 the argument was 'why was gore not running as a 3rd clinton term?'

honestly think the damage she took to her character was ultimately more relevant than any not-absurdist promise she could make to america. and I don't know if the clinton campaign itself had much it could have done to turn that around.

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

OK so can "weird twitter" start flooding this please? https://apply.ptt.gov/

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

xps. a bit more likely is that he sees governing as cutting a series of deals, by negotiating with a small number of people in a conference room. he sees himself as an extremely smart negotiator, and therefore quite capable of 'winning' in that situation every time.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

What happens if he gets bored and quits? Pence takes over?

wanderly braggin' (seandalai), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

"He has zero interest in governing."

i'm pretty sure as far as skills go getting other people to do shit for him is way up there. he's been the dictator of his own kingdom for decades.

scott seward, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

xposts KM i see your point, and think it's mostly true, but something that i don't see being written about in the ex-post-facto dissection of the election, here or elsewhere is the fact that a shit-ton of people were not just voting FOR hrc, but were totally stoked about her, and yes, the historic nature of her candidacy. Last night when I brought up this point at a dinner party, a friend of mine, a woman in her late 20s, broke down sobbing. Meanwhile, a 50ish Bernie dude at that point barked (yes) across the table "So what?! So what if she's a woman?! Maggie Thatcher was a woman!." But it's not just that, I told him, she's a feminist. It's not just that she happens to be a woman. Her candidacy means a lot to a whole bunch of people, especially lots of women. So much of the writing now from the left simply ignores that. It's all "low enthusiasm" this, or "Bernie coulda" that, or "the forgotten white working class". What about all the women I met while canvassing in New Hampshire that were super-pumped to vote for, volunteer for, convince-their-friends-about, HRC? "I'm with her", "Nasty women": these slogans stuck, and they mobilized, and represented real passion. They just didn't grab everybody, fine. Speaking of, Samantha Bee was cracking jokes about pussy-grabbing and HRC was defending, with no holds barred, Roe v Wade at the debate podium. Why doesn't this matter? Why are we so worried about what Youngstown thinks and feels (a worthy endeavor, btw, not saying it isn't) but we're not even recognizing that a lot of people saw in Hillary a fierce woman who stood up to bullies throughout her fucking life. Fuck even I can celebrate that and despise her coziness with Henry Kissinger at the same time.

I don't know, I just am hearing too many fellow male progressives who haven't registered this at all, and it feels to me a bit like throwing our sisters under the bus.

Rant over. Feel free to offer counter-examples/arguments. This is very much coming from my experience, so if yours is different, by all means.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:19 (seven years ago) link

^btw last sentence is not specifically addressed at you Karl!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

Xp but there's a difference between governing and tapping a bunch of lunatics to run the asylum while you spend half the time in your gilded tower

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

I can't see him just quitting, but is it likely Trump decides not to run for a second term? Given that he obviously wants to be president for the prestige rather than because he's actually interested in achieving anything in particular, might he prefer to go out as the undefeated champion instead of standing for re-election and risk losing? (sorry if this has already been discussed)

soref, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

I could see bim declaring victory and going home. Especially if his approval rating is in the shitter

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

yeah when crafting the bernie-is-the-candidate theoretical universe people ignore that millions of democratic women would be maybe just a little bit bitter about the most qualified female candidate ever getting passed over (again). warren getting the nomination wouldn't created that same issue, and she likely would have both won the nomination and the presidency.

xp

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

wouldn't *have* created

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

The difference in the Warren scenario vs. Bernie scenario you've created is that only one of them ran for President.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

how much validity is there in this?

https://medium.com/@jackson_cantrell/the-2016-election-isnt-over-yet-f1ea6fc395fe#.1r2gney18

, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

we're talking about theoretical universes and 'bernie wins the nomination' also belongs to one xp

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

and you're stretching a bit to think Democratic women would have been so mad they wouldn't turn out to vote against Trump

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

the whole 'pence would be worse' thing is debatable, not sure pence would be so cavalier about firing nukes or w/e

brimstead, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

Pence would be more likely to start a land war in Asia and I feel confident that the whole oath to protect the Constitution thing would step in if Trump ordered a nuke launch without incredibly good reason.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

well it's less 'mad' and more the enthusiasm gap would still be an issue. only so many bernie bros out there.

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

iatee otm, Clinton lost because of her surname, her campaign was tight. she also did talk about the issues, it's just.. no one really gaf

flopson, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

Sometimes I think Dems, especially Dem candidates, maybe have too many ingrained habits from standing up to bullies their whole lives. I haven't thought hard enough about this to explain much further. But K&P's "anger translator" sketches touch upon it a little bit.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

A president not running for re-election is an extreme rarity, but Trump seems much less likely to run again than almost anyone ever elected who hasn't been president for a single day yet. He's old and the job will wear him down. He's deeply bothered by criticism and opposition, which a president attracts in greater quantities than any person in the world. He's promised his followers an impossible agenda that's doomed to fail. His general inexperience (leading to general incompetence) will probably make him deeply unpopular before his first term ends.

I admit there's a reasonable chance that the party leaders and the Congress may be able to prop him up and run the country for him, and the media can paper over his deficiencies and maintain his popularity, through stupid shit like Reagan's jellybeans, so that he survives to run again. But right now it seems doubtful to me. His ego is bound to keep getting in the way and he'll continually insist on making decisions he knows little or nothing about. He is good at media, as was Reagan, so if anything saves him, it will be his talent for projecting an image.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

The Bernie bros thing is incredibly lazy and stupid at this point, given that in the primaries he was getting 35-40% or more with women and not all that far off from Obama 2008.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

I respect your opinions to the extent I can discern them but just once in a while, Adam, I would really love to see you post more than a one-liner (or image/quote +/ one-liner)

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

above all (well maybe not all) i think bubble dwelling non-dems view dems' outrage as being disingenuous, self righteous, and showy, e.g. the whole SJW pejorative

brimstead, Saturday, 12 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

seems like the bubble didn't work? up above i posted about their failure in Wisconsin, a state she didn't even visit during the general election, where they didn't coordinate w local labor unions on an economically-focused message, choosing instead to serving up more footage of Donald Trump saying bad things. maybe she did talk a lot about the issues, but here's a good example where she didn't.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

this is like a twitter troll bring granted ownership of the account they were trolling

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

Sometimes I think Dems, especially Dem candidates, maybe have too many ingrained habits from standing up to bullies their whole lives

I respect your opinions to the extent I can discern them

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

it's this patronizing bs that just lost the election smarty pants

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

having lost the election we can now take a break from having to flatter people w/ incoherent opinions

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

adam you telling others to lay off with the patronizing bs is pretty rich
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VxOqskUBjf0/hqdefault.jpg

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

I was just thinking back about the Al Smith dinner and how much it felt like Hillary was already elected at that point. Trump completely bombing and sounding like an idiot and getting booed, and then Hillary with an extremely powerful speech at the end of her roast. It's kind of heavy to think back at that now. Inconceivable how things completely went upside down after that.

Evan, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

In a similar vein I think back to all the SNL skits. So much of the humor, and McKinnon's Clinton, felt premised on the notion that she was running clearly ahead and was destined to win (even post-Comey).

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

It's disorienting, actually. Like if you were taking a plane to the Bahamas and someone says "What if we actually land in Detroit" and you go "Haha that's ridiculous, here's all the evidence why that would be an insane outcome". Then sure enough...

Evan, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

i saw from reports on clinton call with some of her top donors today that the campaign's data tells them the election was lost in the last week or so, when the first comey letter hurt them in the polls and consolidated republicans and the second letter actually made things worse by firing up trump voters.

i believe it. i recall getting this sinking feeling when the wash post alert came in on my phone sunday afternoon saying that comey released another letter saying the email case was closed. my fellow canvassers were happy about it but it felt to me like it only accomplished injecting BUT EMAILS into the campaign one more time at a critical moment.

not to mention the NY office ties to giuliani who bragged on television about having something up their sleeve and how he knew how angry the fbi was about clinton! will any action be taken to investigate this?? probably not, right?

among the many unknown unknowns right now regarding trump's business ties and many conflicts of interest which they intend to reveal nothing about to the press.. i really do wonder in a serious way what kind of intelligence russia has on trump. whether there is anything for potential blackmail in there. not joking. we don't know.

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

Still say he is vulnerable, both as a person and as a president, to financial pressure. Maybe it will bring him down legally, maybe it will cause him to reassess the sacrifices he will have to made to hold office, but there is no indication this is a type of guy who could pivot from 100% narcissism and selfishness to public service. He will continue to micromanage his empire, and either make a conflict of interest mistake, for personal gain, and get busted, or watch his net worth decrease until the novelty of the White House fades.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

for all the "Bernie was the only one who could have beaten Trump" stuff going around at the moment, I'm sure I remember quite a few of his supporters arguing during the primaries that he should be the nominee over Hillary because Trump was obviously doomed in the general, so the Dems were free to pick a real left-winger for once, without having to play it safe and be too worried about "electability"

soref, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

does anyone know why on earth obama nominated comey for fbi chief? he had been deputy special counsel for the whitewater committee -- a clinton hater from way back. why on earth? he had to have known that hrc was gonna run.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

Did Madonna keep her BJ promise?

van smack, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Comey bucked dubya once, thats why

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

make a conflict of interest mistake, for personal gain, and get busted

Who is going to bust him in the Republican Congress?

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

Eric Holder was great on Bill Maher last night

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

there's a chance he'll do something so illegal that they'll have no choice

there's also a chance that he'll actually fight w/ congress a lot and republicans will begin to wonder whether they wouldn't prefer president pence

these things sound crazy but so does 'president elect donald trump'

xp

iatee, Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

it's this patronizing bs that just lost the election smarty pants

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau)

hillary clinton's meme stash was just not dank enough :(

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

Sticking your name in huge letters on projects around the world does wonders for branding, but it also makes Trump the person on the planet <i>most</i> vulnerable to boycotts, protests, and outright legal expropriation.

My hope is that the rest of the world pursues this when Trump threatens to harm the planet by leaving or ignoring the Paris Accords.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

For a while I thought the best-case scenario was that Trump would just do all the things a generic 2016 Republican president would do (which I admit is a pretty bad scenario). Now I wonder whether he won't start feuding with Congress based on imagined personal slights, vetoing unpopular bills and getting more and more frustrated that he can't just wave his hand and things happen automatically. Bizarro Obama situation.

(best-case scenario, I'm sure it will be worse than that)

wanderly braggin' (seandalai), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

forget protests, what about terrorism? what would the security issues be for the united states today if the obama family owned/licensed their names to properties around the world with OBAMA on the front in big letters?

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

xp yeah there may be friction not just between factions within a trump admin but between trump himself and the gop congress -- but not on everything, because there are a few points on which trump, the gop, and the people who think trump's their champion agree. one of them is letting the police do what they feel.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

on the one hand it's very possible that the trump people dedicate plenty of time/energy to feuding with the republican establishment (i understand brietbart today has a lead story attacking paul ryan)

on the other hand they are going to be (and are right now!) forging alliances with rightwing nationalists in europe instead

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

i live in indiana, and i hate the fuck out of mike pence, but a pence presidency, or a cruz presidency, or any of those other presidencies don't fill me with the despair and raw fear that the prospect of a trump presidency does. i'd be talking tactics, chewing over the post-mortem, all the stuff that the losing party does after a regular election, instead of waking up every morning and waiting for the shaking to stop.

donald j. trump is, even within the context of his party, a uniquely unqualified individual to hold the office of president of the united states.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

my wife was talking about how rudy giuliani was going to devote the entirety of his job to putting hillary clinton in jail. my reaction to that is "thank god", because i can imagine what he would be doing if he didn't have a meaningless personal vendetta to keep him busy.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

uh South Florida becomes South Toronto in November

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

been thinking about this and i really would prefer a Pence presidency, however it were to come about. i'm pretty concerned about god emperor Trump's cult of personality and his team's unique ability to keep the swarm of assholes engaged in a way that a run of the mill GOP idiot simply can not.

i think one of the fundamental mistakes of the Obama admin and dems in general was not being more aggressive in keeping his voters stoked past the elections (partic w/r/t white rust belt supporters) when his goodwill was still high. some 20/20 hindsight qb'ing there i know.

tbf i don't really know what this would have looked like in execution, or if it wouldn't have just petered out regardless. the psyche of the avg Obama voter and Trump supporter is clearly very different.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

'Pence is so much worse' arguments are both probably true but he also just wants to fight the culture wars that Republicans are losing or have lost so...

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

yep. looks like a one-termer if i ever saw one

acerbic (sic)s (will), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

people were not just voting FOR hrc, but were totally stoked about her, and yes, the historic nature of her candidacy.

maybe so, but not enough of them actually fucking voted.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

also believe that the MSM really dropped the ball on not going all in exposing the alt-right

acerbic (sic)s (will), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

there are very few investigative news shows in America. 60 Minutes. and... 🕸🌾??

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 12 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

also believe that the MSM really dropped the ball on not going all in exposing the alt-right

― acerbic (sic)s (will),

MSM afraid of ad revenue and accusations of bias

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Also: MSN benefited from Trump-related clicks. Pot meets kettle.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

also: msm has hated the clintons since the 1990s.

Thus Sang Freud, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

I think the idea of who the MSM hates or whatever is a bad road to travel down - aside from Fox News and maybe MSNBC, all the media gives a shit about is money. Whichever candidate or side or horserace gives them clicks and highest ratings.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

been thinking about this and i really would prefer a Pence presidency

do you really think that's not what you're getting?

qualx, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

i think one of the fundamental mistakes of the Obama admin and dems in general was not being more aggressive in keeping his voters stoked past the elections (partic w/r/t white rust belt supporters) when his goodwill was still high.

not just keeping enthusiasm - organizing, building the party and devoting time/resources to this at the state and local level, which i feel like has really been neglected thus the GOP taking over state legislatures and gerrymandering districts to entrench themselves in power. the DLCC works on this but they are sort of neglected and underfunded.

it's a long time ago now & i hate to relitigate this, but i recall when i was wrapped up in the long obama/clinton 2007-2008 primary battle, one of the issues some of the diehard clinton partisans (who had been engaged at the local/state level for some time) brought up was that clinton would be working much harder at party building - to a great extent, obama's coalition depended on obama, the person, and much of it wouldn't be doing other work for the party or showing up in the off years and that sort of thing because they really didn't care so much. and here we are

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

MSM afraid of ad revenue and accusations of bias

that's very true.

i just think a lefty analogue (whatever the hell that would look like), particularly one that reveled in violent imagery and aggressive bigotry towards.. white rural christians? small business owners? ppl who send their kids to private school? -- would have gotten coverage non-stop on Fox/ talk/ etc, which would have no doubt drifted to the MSM.

i don't think they would have had any problem getting their clicks.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

been thinking about this and i really would prefer a Pence presidency, however it were to come about. i'm pretty concerned about god emperor Trump's cult of personality and his team's unique ability to keep the swarm of assholes engaged in a way that a run of the mill GOP idiot simply can not.

Just wait until, as floated, Trump keeps up the rallies even through his presidency.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

Pence would legislate my uterus out of my body if it were physically possible to do so,

Preferring Pence is preferring being stabbed over being shot. They're both horrible in unique special ways

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

v interesting daria-g. i guess i was vaguely aware of that argument at the time, but didn't fully appreciate it.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

Ethan Coen takes a shit on some people and it's awesome

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/opinion/sunday/2016-election-thank-you-notes.html

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

'Pence is so much worse' arguments are both probably true but he also just wants to fight the culture wars that Republicans are losing or have lost so...

― Kiarostami bag (milo z)

on a policy level sure pence is nearly cruz-level terrible, but under president pence i would at least assume that the 2018 and 2020 elections will be fair and free elections, and with trump i just don't feel comfortable making that assumption. a trump presidency makes me feel threatened and powerless and makes me feel that i have no legal recourse whatsoever.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

god the tobacco industry must be jerking themselves into a coma over a vp-elect who doesn't "believe" that tobacco causes cancer.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

pence has succeeded in basically making himself invisible this election cycle and serving as the more predictable, less emotional half of the ticket. it's easy for people to look at him as the devil we know. like bush era republicans i guess? but he's still a rabid tea party demagogue. if he were in trump's position getting trump's spotlight, we'd all be just as terrified. now he's tea party dick cheney. people are right to be terrified.

everything is really bad

qualx, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

under president pence i would at least assume that the 2018 and 2020 elections will be fair and free elections

I am trusting you on this bcz you lived in Indiana but my instincts are that the GOP will be running way out in front on new and innovative vote suppression methods; that the National Association of Secretaries of State and related election officials' normal aversion to federal "interference" in elections might very well be in jeopardy; and the Election Assistance Commission (https://www.eac.gov/) could end up with a budget in the low three figures or so

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

I don't think anyone in the upper echelons of the GOP since Ike has ever favored free and fair elections.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

lived / live

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

what was president pence gonna do about voter suppression again?

xp basically

qualx, Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

trump wants to keep holding these rallies so that tons of protesters show up with no goals or plan and one or two people throw a bottle or something and the police freak out and a bunch of people get arrested and it all goes down live on cable news and then trump gets more empowered by calling for LAW AND ORDER

FREE BRADY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

So so so many xps, but re the person upthread who had a friend claiming "socialist" countries FORCE american drug companies to sell their medication dirt cheap.... This is total bullshit. They pay what the companies charge, but then cover most of the cost to their citizens. So in Australia, the government pays the $1500 bill for the course of tablets to the company, and then charges the consumer $25. The drug company still makes their billions.

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Saturday, 12 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

Have we mentioned Ed Meese yet? I feel like all the scary horrible members of the Reagan Administration that are still alive are going to return. The others will be there in spirit.

sarahell, Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

Are the taxpayers going to pay to defend trumps properties? Even the shitty licensed ones?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

Have we mentioned Ed Meese yet? I feel like all the scary horrible members of the Reagan Administration that are still alive are going to return. The others will be there in spirit.

― sarahell,

For anyone who wants a cheer and a laugh, watch this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJFMRYTaJSI

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

"You're a liar, a cheat, and a thief!"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

i'm struggling to express my feelings... i feel like saying that pence or gwb or reagan is "as bad" as trump normalizes and legitimizes trump. i understand where you're coming from, trying to argue for trump as culmination of decades of frequently-subliminally codified institutional oppression and prejudice, but i honestly don't believe the difference is only one of degree. i think there's a categorical difference between trump and historical republican methods of governance.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

are you addressing me?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

no that's an xxxxxp to something further up thread

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

I argued through the campaign whether Trump is an aberration or a culmination. I argued that Clinton, for the sake of courting moderate Republicans, made a mistake by failing to show how Trump was an example of the GOP mind rot since January 1981.

At this moment the point is moot.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

i really have to wonder where the DNC goes from here. i keep catching myself holding onto this silver lining idea that this disaster could be an actual important step in dem institutions at least appearing to take a single step away from abject neoliberalism, and then i scold myself because that's stupid. i've got no hope for them in 2020, even in 2018 (where the bernie schism seems much less important)

unless they really are looking to the electric, disruptive ANDREW CUOMO. who doesn't go nuts off their butts for cuomo? CUO MO YEARS, CUO MO YEARS

qualx, Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

Just curious how much do you guys pay for insurance? Is ilx in agreement that Obamacare doesn't need to be fix? Last year when I filed my taxes I was penalized due to not having coverage on myself, a little more than $600. That doesn't sit well with me.

― JacobSanders, Friday, November 11, 2016 6:17 PM (yesterday)

I pay way too much, considering how little I use it, but I've always had it for "just in case." My rates stayed about the same. I didn't get coverage through the state exchange, so I pay full price, because my income fluctuates from year to year, and I didn't want to have to pay back any subsidy at the end of the year, and there really isn't a mechanism to adjust that during the year like there is tax withholding from a job. For people that are covered by employer plans, I think it doesn't really sink in, because it doesn't affect them.

Half of my income is from income tax preparation, so I get to discuss Obamacare with about 100 people a year and see how it affected them. Most of the people who complained about it are low-middle and middle income men between the ages of 27 and 45. They were previously uninsured. They rarely go to the doctor because they are pretty healthy. They wish it covered dental, because that would be more useful, and getting dental work done is really expensive. Women in that age bracket complained less, and more were appreciative of it because it made it easier to get birth control and other "women things." The people that really appreciated it were the ones who made little enough to go on MediCal, so they got free insurance.

I understand the mechanics of the penalty for economic reasons and to increase participation, however, it doesn't sit well with me either. The only positive thing about it is that it is income-based, in that the amount of the penalty increases with income: someone making $80k a year is going to have a penalty in the thousands, whereas someone making $25k/year is going to have a penalty in the hundreds.

sarahell, Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

At least one LAPD stingray device appears to be operating at the protests this week, so if you're going to any protest - please keep your phone turned off or use a burner phone.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:55 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy: the difference i see between the two is that trump seems more or less for a spokesperson for the type of nut that pence actually is. i've never really believed that trump falls for his own act or that he really has any concrete political views at all. i don't think he entered the race because he wanted to win. but his unpredictability as a president terrifies me. i'm not trying to downplay that. i'm terrified in a mutually assured destruction kind of way. but pence's predictability is just as scary to me, and every time i see a picture of a clueless, bored trump, i worry about a new cheney pulling the strings. on top of the threat of trump going nuclear.

so really, i don't know. what trump represents (as a candidate who relied on fascist-inspired strategy and rhetoric) is a uniquely depressing thing. but i'm really not sure that's any worse than pence, the living embodiment of actual tea party ideology.

qualx, Saturday, 12 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't LAPD use their StingRays for basically everything these days

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

I argued through the campaign whether Trump is an aberration or a culmination. I argued that Clinton, for the sake of courting moderate Republicans, made a mistake by failing to show how Trump was an example of the GOP mind rot since January 1981.

At this moment the point is moot.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

i don't think it's a moot point, i think it's a very hot issue. is the defining characteristic of dissent going to be trump presented as a uniquely anti-democratic figure, or is it going to be everything the republican party has done since 1981, or 1968, or...

and as much as i love history, and as much as on an intellectual level there are really good arguments for both sides, i think dissent that requires altering the historical consciousness of the masses in order to be effective is... a challenge.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

xp to myself that sounds like i don't believe trump really puts any weight behind the ideology, which isn't true. i think they're mostly two sides of the same coin and pence shouldn't get away with his more-stable-and-rational reputation he's built by comparison.

qualx, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

xps
I had a recent period of youtubing loads of vintage Hitchens debates, a very edifying wormhole to go down. Even when his politics sucked shit he was still a fantastic orator/debater.

calzino, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy: the difference i see between the two is that trump seems more or less for a spokesperson for the type of nut that pence actually is. i've never really believed that trump falls for his own act or that he really has any concrete political views at all. i don't think he entered the race because he wanted to win. but his unpredictability as a president terrifies me. i'm not trying to downplay that. i'm terrified in a mutually assured destruction kind of way. but pence's predictability is just as scary to me, and every time i see a picture of a clueless, bored trump, i worry about a new cheney pulling the strings. on top of the threat of trump going nuclear.

so really, i don't know. what trump represents (as a candidate who relied on fascist-inspired strategy and rhetoric) is a uniquely depressing thing. but i'm really not sure that's any worse than pence, the living embodiment of actual tea party ideology.

― qualx

qualx: here in indiana, we've been able to stop pence before. we called his bluff on some anti-gay legislation he passed, and he backed down.

pence is about as intimidating to me as dan quayle is.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

quayle stood behind a president who could stand on his own feet though, while trump apparently promised his prospective VP control of literally "domestic and foreign policy"

qualx, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:09 (seven years ago) link

is the defining characteristic of dissent going to be trump presented as a uniquely anti-democratic figure, or is it going to be everything the republican party has done since 1981, or 1968, or...

I think Trump is/is going to be worse than Reagan, if solely for the fact that it destroys the myth of progress that things will get better. That's a lot of what makes me feel sick about it, that America hasn't intellectually and ethically improved, even though we had a relatively-liberal (compared to the past 30 years of presidents) black president for 8 years, and allowed gay marriage, and saw more visibility given to minorities' issues. It feels like people can't recognize and learn from past mistakes, which is kinda the definition of stupidity.

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:10 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't LAPD use their StingRays for basically everything these days

Well, yeah.

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:12 (seven years ago) link

like, i'm not really focused on getting people to act in accordance with their class interests, i just want to live in a country where most people agree that pogroms are a bad thing.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

who's saying that pogroms are a good thing?

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

my babbling about the alt right upthread is pointless. I have to believe everyone who voted for Trump was aware enough re incitations of violence, punishing women for abortions, judge Curiel, pussy-grabbing. if they didn't care about any of those then they just don't care about anything. except emails I guess.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:25 (seven years ago) link

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link

welp I guess he Right, such as it is in 2016, has finally found a way to connect with 'the kids'

acerbic (sic)s (will), Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:30 (seven years ago) link

Frum going ham: https://storify.com/Noahkgreen/let-s-have-a-fresh-start

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:35 (seven years ago) link

Just wrote the white house asking obama to recess appoint Garland to the SC. Please do this if you agree, folks.

Οὖτις, Sunday, 13 November 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

Not the Onion.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

wait i thought we were going to #draintheswamp

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/305727-bondi-honored-to-serve-trump-in-transition-team

acerbic (sic)s (will), Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

who's saying that pogroms are a good thing?

― sarahell

nobody, yet, and i fucking well want to keep it that way.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

My 30th birthday was on Wednesday. What a shitty way to start my third decade of life.

― monster_xero, Saturday, 12 November 2016 06:52 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hate to be the bearer of bad news but

did we ever get wizz sorted (wins), Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:06 (seven years ago) link

Dude has no friends beyond his inner circle, who else is he going to pick?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

To paraphrase myself: can we have somebody, anybody besides alt-right redditors flood this form, please?

OK so can "weird twitter" start flooding this please? https://apply.ptt.gov/

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:19 (seven years ago) link

hoo boy

Marc Porter Magee
‏@marcportermagee

Democrats now control only 13 state legislatures (26%). If they lose 1 more they fall below the % needed to stop constitutional amendments.

https://twitter.com/marcportermagee/status/797462124788379648

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:45 (seven years ago) link

amendments still require 2/3 of the senate

, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

amendments still require 2/3 of the senate

, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

To paraphrase myself: can we have somebody, anybody besides alt-right redditors flood this form, please?

I threw my name in the bucket. Maybe I'll get a job with the NEA before it's eliminated for good.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

xp thank you

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

Yeah the new DNC's #1 job has to be to start recruiting and campaigning at the state legislator level and below. It's really insane how thin the ranks have been allowed to get

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 01:55 (seven years ago) link

Obama apparently plans to make this his post presidency issue

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Sunday, 13 November 2016 02:37 (seven years ago) link

source?

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 02:38 (seven years ago) link

ty

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 02:38 (seven years ago) link

of course that was before trump won so who knows if it still holds

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Sunday, 13 November 2016 02:39 (seven years ago) link

A good piece on the disconnect between Democrats and the working class, from the Harvard Business Review of all places:

https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class

o. nate, Sunday, 13 November 2016 02:42 (seven years ago) link

Oh no I guarantee that NDRC thing is still on like donkey kong

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 02:42 (seven years ago) link

xp - yeah, a lot of these same points are echoed in that rural vs. urban america piece on cracked that's been making the rounds.

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

and in regards to that one, a lot of my friends laugh when I talk about how my mom refused to let me go to college in NYC because I would get raped and/or murdered, I'd be the next Central Park jogger or Kitty Genovese. Granted, I tell it like a joke, but realizing that many of my friends grew up in cities and that the notion of cities being dangerous places was foreign to them.

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

guys it was Saturday, you shoulda gotten outta the house (all day)

i saw Verhoeven's Total Recall on the big screen. not much of an escape.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 November 2016 03:26 (seven years ago) link

fwiw I watched a documentary about the history of the Einsatzgruppen

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 03:28 (seven years ago) link

I dropped off some knives for sharpening at dc union market

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

From that HBR piece

Massive funding is needed for community college programs linked with local businesses to train workers for well-paying new economy jobs. Clinton mentioned this approach, along with 600,000 other policy suggestions. She did not stress it.

Dead to rights

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 03:46 (seven years ago) link

Massive funding is needed for community college programs linked with local businesses to train workers for well-paying new economy jobs. Clinton mentioned this approach, along with 600,000 other policy suggestions. She did not stress it.

The idea that people in exurban Wisconsin would have totally broken for Clinton if she'd only said more about her plan to increase federal funding for community college-based job training is beyond ridiculous.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 13 November 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

What if she said it was only for white people?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

The questions reflect what Mr. Trump’s advisers described as the president-elect’s coming to grips with the fact that his life is about to change radically. They say that Mr. Trump, who was shocked when he won the election, might spend most of the week in Washington, much like members of Congress, and return to Trump Tower or his golf course in Bedminster, N.J., or his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach on weekends.

god how is this real

k3vin k., Sunday, 13 November 2016 04:46 (seven years ago) link

A good piece on the disconnect between Democrats and the working class, from the Harvard Business Review of all places:

https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class

― o. nate, Saturday, November 12, 2016 6:42 PM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

good article

F♯ A♯ (∞), Sunday, 13 November 2016 04:56 (seven years ago) link

the next four years are gonna be spectacular http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/first-read-what-we-got-wrong-n681956

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Sunday, 13 November 2016 05:12 (seven years ago) link

A good piece on the disconnect between Democrats and the working class, from the Harvard Business Review of all places:

https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class

The idea that people in exurban Wisconsin would have totally broken for Clinton if she'd only said more about her plan to increase federal funding for community college-based job training is beyond ridiculous.


I mean, I do think Sanders was at least speaking to some of the concerns described in the article, but, at the end of the day, if affordable training and education aren't going to win over this demographic, what is the answer? The days when a white man could easily walk into a secure f/t job with a high school education are probably behind us.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Sunday, 13 November 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

"I have to believe everyone who voted for Trump was aware enough re incitations of violence, punishing women for abortions, judge Curiel, pussy-grabbing. if they didn't care about any of those then they just don't care about anything."

you know when i realized that his supporters wouldn't care no matter what he said or did? when it dawned on me that soooooo many southern, middle america, religious right, tea party, republican diehards, etc HATE anything from new york! it's hell to a lot of those people and the people in new york are evil hell-demons. so if they could overlook that, they could overlook anything.

i tell you, these people just don't play fair. their hate doesn't mean much to them apparently. they just dig hating on stuff.

it's possible that donald just translated as "t.v. star". they don't mind their law & order and their stories out there in the woods. those things come from new york.

scott seward, Sunday, 13 November 2016 05:37 (seven years ago) link

xp i think the win-win solution is that all 60 million trump voters immediately uproot + move into america's elite coastal cities and pursue jobs in tech, data + alternative media

yolo mostly (sleepingbag), Sunday, 13 November 2016 05:40 (seven years ago) link

huffpo bloggers imho

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Sunday, 13 November 2016 05:42 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnUqBLez-YU

scott seward, Sunday, 13 November 2016 06:30 (seven years ago) link

Ha

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Sunday, 13 November 2016 06:47 (seven years ago) link

I tell it like a joke, but realizing that many of my friends grew up in cities and that the notion of cities being dangerous places was foreign to them.

I grew up 6 hours from the nearest city over 100,000 people. I never met anyone who had lived in a large American city until I was in college and still can't imagine being a kid growing up in a place like New York or Chicago.

Big cities are absolutely foreign to lots of small town people, scary confusing places where everyone is dangerous and the food is weird and there are too many people around and everything is expensive and it's really hard to get around and you deal with them as little as possible and only when necessary.

joygoat, Sunday, 13 November 2016 07:08 (seven years ago) link

on a policy level sure pence is nearly cruz-level terrible, but under president pence i would at least assume that the 2018 and 2020 elections will be fair and free elections, and with trump i just don't feel comfortable making that assumption. a trump presidency makes me feel threatened and powerless and makes me feel that i have no legal recourse whatsoever.

i'm with rushomancy. the thing that continues to give me deep anxiety over the past few days is the potential for a gradual, unwitting descent into authoritarianism (a la the excerpt elvis telecom posted about 1930s germany). i think there are plenty of reasons to believe that that won't actually happen, but on the other hand, i'm afraid that waving it away as implausible is precisely what *will* allow it to happen. president pence would be awful, but awful in ways that i'm confident we would recognize and be able to fight against.

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Sunday, 13 November 2016 07:12 (seven years ago) link

Parts of that HBR I'm not too sure on - making the classes 30-50-20? I can say from experience that the 31st and the 79th have very little in common and the 31st even the 40th or 50th is closer to the anxieties of the bottom rung. That upper percentile is worried about buying a house in a good neighborhood for schools, the lower is worried about the car breaking down if not keeping the gas on.

Nor do I think you can sell out social issues - the left/liberals didn't make bathrooms an issue, the wingnuts did. Our side just refused to not be assholes about it.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 November 2016 07:17 (seven years ago) link

guys it was Saturday, you shoulda gotten outta the house (all day)

i saw Verhoeven's /Total Recall/ on the big screen. not much of an escape.

I'm going to see Napoleon

did we ever get wizz sorted (wins), Sunday, 13 November 2016 07:57 (seven years ago) link

Neat! did they have the three screen thing going?

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Sunday, 13 November 2016 08:11 (seven years ago) link

The Black Chamber of Commerce building in Beaufort, South Carolina was burned to the ground late Friday/early Saturday. Any national news media reporting this story?

http://www.wyff4.com/article/fire-destroys-beaufort-black-chamber-of-commerce-building/8283393

Josefa, Sunday, 13 November 2016 08:22 (seven years ago) link

xp no, they're not set up for it afaict. They have a ginormous screen tho, should be good

did we ever get wizz sorted (wins), Sunday, 13 November 2016 08:46 (seven years ago) link

Trump seeking quickest way to quit Paris climate agreement, says report

We're not taking a step back to 2015. We're going 24 years back and leaving Rio framework.

Think about how hard it was to arrive at Paris Accords, however imperfect. All the disappointments at Cancún and Copenhagen. All just paper to him.

This moron will be personally responsible for tens millions of deaths, and untold more that could never live due to reduced carrying capacity. Even if he never drops a single bomb.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 12:24 (seven years ago) link

Trump’s popular vote deficit may approach two million\

Evidently, there are up to five million votes mail and provisional ballots still to be counted.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

xp fuck this damn idiot. makes me more upset than anything else about this right now

frogbs, Sunday, 13 November 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

But, emails.

When I step out of the house, I know that more than half my neighbors voted for this. It feels terrible to feel revulsion at your fellow Americans.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

gah, wrong link: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/donald-trump-gov-transition-website-plugs-firm-s-properties-n682401

― the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Sunday, November 13, 2016 12:13 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark

find myself rooting for christie here

, Sunday, 13 November 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

Only one in four Americans voted for him. There were a lot who were content to just get out of the way and let him win though.

Matt DC, Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/797805407179866112

Time to get an NYT subscription yall

frogbs, Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

Occurred to me that a popular GOP tactic has always been to paint the cities as full of poor, urban, drug-addicted, jobless minorities, yet the alleged aggrieved in this election were ... poor, rural, drug-addicted, jobless white folks.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

I can't believe the petty shithead is still tweeting. Is this how it's really going to be, after all that? He's going to be president, and he's still going to hold rallies and tweet about his enemies? Did anyone even tell him he won?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

He hasn't won until everyone says he's the greatest

imago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

Why is trump meeting with farage? Maybe he'll quit after winning too? Jk lol :(

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd5e6bOUCY4

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

Fuck the Times. The paper to watch is the Washington Post; it's a trade journal, and they fucking hate interlopers (remember how much they loathed the Clintons for being not-of-Washington). I think they're the paper that's really gonna have the knives out for Trump - wait and see whether David Farenthold becomes one of the reoccurring Sunday morning talk show faces, or gets demoted to covering dog shows.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 13 November 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

they can start by investigating whether the trump campaign conspired with comey. the whole chronology of trumps's "it's rigged!" and comey's "hey, more emails!" and then comey's "whoops, my bad!" and then trump's "see -- it really is rigged!!!"

Thus Sang Freud, Sunday, 13 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

If newspapers stop treating Trump like he is dangerous then they are done. After all of this past several months of bullshit, if they maintain this illusion of equivalency and false objectivity in the face of truth and the public record, then fuck them forever, because we're all fucked, anyway.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

Yeah wapo has been so much better than the nyt. Im hopeful they'll continue to keep it up....this is kinda journalisms last chance, in a way

frogbs, Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

BREAKING: President-elect Trump says will immediately start deportation or jailing of 2 to 3 million "criminal" immigrants - CBS interview

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

BREAKING: President-elect Trump renews vow to build a border wall on the border with Mexico, says for some portions it may be a fence - CBS

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

Don't do that

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

well that's a nice punch in the gut to start the day. this of course comes right on top of:

(CNN)House Speaker Paul Ryan said Sunday despite Donald Trump's campaign rhetoric, lawmakers are not prepared to form a deportation force to round-up and deport undocumented immigrants.

"We are not planning on erecting a deportation force. Donald Trump's not planning on that," Ryan told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union."

i hope this at least helps us nip in the bud the bullshit line of "well we should all chill for a couple months and see what he actually does now that the election's over!" fucking hell.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I'm just going to say re: WP, Jeff Bezos may deserve a debt of gratitude from all of us before this is over.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

Jeff! 2020

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

this guy doesn't know what the fuck he's going to do or how he's going to do it; ryan and pence are going to call all the shots

akm, Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

So what are you going to do about it, Paul Ryan, you turncoat asshole? Make that frown face when he starts doing it? Fuck all these people.

(tbf Obama's been deporting people like crazy and no one has really said shit.)

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

I'm subscribing to the post this weekend.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

Since apparently all journalism these days only responds to profit

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

sorry i've been kind of checked out of this thread. i'm still doing lots of writing, but i feel like it's too polemical to be appropriate for this thread, so i just keep posting it to that new blog i made. nine new posts today. at some point i'm sure i'll slow down, i'm not really a long-haul writer.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 13 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

Good morning. Giuliani said conflict of interest laws don't apply to the President (true), Conway said Harry Reid should watch out for legal consequences to his words, and Trump had a twitter meltdown about the New York Times and insists he never said a thing he said several times on live television. I think we're done with give him a chance to be presidential already, right?

comesayhey, Sunday, 13 November 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

Wait, is the conflict of interest thing really true?

frogbs, Sunday, 13 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Practical question: if this shit head truly split his time between the White House and Trump Tower, how is that even feasible? Multiple times a day he will disrupt Manhattan with a motorcade? He will have to surround the place and neighborhood with a phalanx of missile-armed security? He will cohabitant with hundreds of civilians? He will have neighbors? All in the center of a dense city where no one likes him and one person could probably mobilize thousands of protesters in a matter of minutes?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

Why would he consider any of that a problem?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Not him. I don't think he considers any of it a problem. But it is a problem for security, New York City, etc.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

Nixon practically lived in Key Biscayne recall.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

And the taxpayer pays for all of it

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

Practical question: if this shit head truly split his time between the White House and Trump Tower, how is that even feasible? Multiple times a day he will disrupt Manhattan with a motorcade? He will have to surround the place and neighborhood with a phalanx of missile-armed security? He will cohabitant with hundreds of civilians? He will have neighbors? All in the center of a dense city where no one likes him and one person could probably mobilize thousands of protesters in a matter of minutes?

― Josh in Chicago

i'm not sure this will ever sink in, not just for liberals but a lot of conservatives, but:

pence is running the day-to-day operations of the federal government. not trump.

Karl Malone, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

ugh, fuck me, i just reacted to the first sentence and didn't read the rest. sorry. i don't know how any of this will work. he will skype with everyone from his penthouse bunker and order delivery.

Karl Malone, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

pence is running the day-to-day operations of the federal government. not trump

god help me but this is what i consider the best-case scenario and i'm consider it unreasonably optimistic to let myself believe it.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

If I lived within 10 blocks of 725 5th Ave, I'd consider now as the top of the market and sell.

Among many ugly things that will transpire over the next 4 years, I wouldn't be surprised if the secret service opens up on some egg-throwers with their motorcade minigun.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

The current head of the USSS is not going to allow them to become a terror organization. He could be replaced, sure, but I consider that pretty unlikely.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

No, but what if there is a gun, one gun, in the crowd.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

he will skype with everyone from his penthouse bunker and order delivery.

make seamless great again

maura, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

xp Their mode of operation is still defense rather than offense - it's kind of central to what they are?

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

imo we have enough to do dealing with "what is" to really bother worrying too much about "what if"

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

Yup

qop (crüt), Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

The USSS haven't had to defend such a divisive character since their foundation in 1901. Most, of course, are conscientious. Some are as partisan as the NY FBI.

If I were an USSS officer, my life would be easier with HRC, a person who would elicit actions from deranged individuals, but not ongoing mass protests that will occur with regularity. If there's benign weather, the inauguration route in DC on January 20 will be thronged with protesters, from any group Trump has insulted, which is close to everyone.

That doesn't end on January 20. When you've alienated everyone but insular white males, and plan policies that harm everyone but insular white males, it creates a lot of anger.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

No, but what if there is a gun, one gun, in the crowd.

― Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, November 13, 2016 6:50 PM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I keep thinking about Conintelpro and other agitator/Agent provocateur stuff. If there isn't one they could very easily place one or say there was one couldn't they?

Or place somebody that looks vaguely like a protestor who is willing to start throwing heavy things or breaking things and goading others into joining in. Has been done before.

Stevolende, Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

make seamless great again

― maura, Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:52 AM (twenty-three minutes ago)

aren't they owned by GrubHub, which was pretty much, "uh, if you support Trump, you probably shouldn't be working here?" Otoh, they are an example of the "gig economy" as far as the drivers go, which is something that Trump's tax plan seems to support.

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

Okay, I'm now a WP subscriber for 52 weeks. Liberal media, you win.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

man I wish we could get the print version of that on the West Coast

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I've been thinking the same thing. WaPo subscription rate is a little high for digital only but I'm probably gonna bite the bullet nonetheless when I can afford to.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

Not exactly the biggest NYT fan at the moment but posted this on FB this morning:

'One tiny bit of regular activism you can engage in: every time Trump petulantly tweets about (and, now in his position as president-elect, attempts to delegitimize) a person or organization or institution, give them money. When he whines that the 1st amendment is unfair, donate $5 to the ACLU. When he criticizes the New York Times, buy a copy or subscribe. Support every entity that opposes him, and strengthen every right to which he is opposed.'

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

ah sarahell i wasn't thinking that deeply (although i feel like their coming together was a merger?). i just associate the part of manhattan where trump tower is located with seamless because that neighborhood was where i first heard about it many years ago.

also: yeah they merged in 2013:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324787004578495411888526172

maura, Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

i just figured he'd opt for more upscale food delivery

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

He's just gonna be ordering room service taco bowls.

Fetchboy, Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

I never cease to be amused that one reason Trump seems to favor fast food is that at least it won't be spit or pissed upon.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

Maybe tombot would have the most insider knowledge on this, but how delusional am I to think that any Russian influence is going to be blunted (or exposed) by intelligence bureaucrats?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

buncha leftists on twitter were performatively announcing that they were unsubcribing from nyt just yesterday. not looking so noble after that Kellyanne Conway tweet

flopson, Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

there is a lot of performativity going on on social media atm

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

IMO, intelligence bureaucrats will brief the President on any Russian shenanigans, as is proper, and if/when he waves them off and tells them they're wrong and dumb, "who knows?"

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

I never cease to be amused that one reason Trump seems to favor fast food is that at least it won't be spit or pissed upon.

the false confidence of a man who has never worked in the fast food industry

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

urgh god.. 3 more Trump debates on tv in 2020.

piscesx, Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

you guys maybe trump cooks when he's at home, maybe he's a doting chef who sources locally and says things like "parboil" when the cameras are off

(sorry just amusing myself imagining this guy has ever done anything caring or positive on a human scale)

Clay, Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

The entire national security apparatus probably looks at Trump as a security risk right now. How many time will "the book" omit sources, how many will it omit unflattering comments from the rest of the world.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

does he have a pet?

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

you guys maybe trump cooks when he's at home, maybe he's a doting chef who sources locally and says things like "parboil" when the cameras are off

(sorry just amusing myself imagining this guy has ever done anything caring or positive on a human scale)

― Clay

god, this is where we're at. we're trying to imagine positive qualities that trump might theoretically have, and the best we can say is "well, maybe he parboils things!"

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

Despite his willingness to physically abuse and objectify them, I think Trump sort of kind of cares about the members of his family, to the extent that his personality disorders allow him to do so.

This is an extremely compromised D- on the positive qualities scale but it is literally all I can come up with.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

well I was joking based on the insistence that he orders in, the impossibility that anyone could imagine he actually cooks for himself and his family seemed somehow, in itself, a kind of vision of his monstrousness to me.

like how could this guy so much as throw some noodles in some boiling water. I'm not looking for something good, I'm seeing that it's not there. xps

Clay, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Linda McMahon for Commerce

Jeff Probst for Secretary of the Interior?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

They're just trolling us at this point.

Fetchboy, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

Some sobering perspective on his destructive plan to immediately deport 2-3 million "criminals:" there are currently 2.2 million people *in jail already.*

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

Deport or imprison, I believe. It's ok, he'll just get the bad ones.

JoeStork, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

bannon will be named senior counselor and this is what really terrifies me

Clay, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

Priebus named as cos

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

Is Bannon a lawyer? I don't see how he can become chief White House Counsel

Fuck the New York Times and Washington Post. I won't ever forget September 16, when Trump called his ridiculous press conference to announce the Clinton had started the birther lie. The New York Times had some repulsive headline, that suggested that he was "setting the record straight". instead of calling him out for the dirtbike he is. It wasn't until readers screamed at them in the comment section is that they change the headline to "unfurling of a lie". I told myself at that moment I would cancel my subscription if he won the election. Now I'm conflicted become a because I do think we need powerful voices of dissent.

Dan S, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

Dirtbag lol

Dan S, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

(sorry for all the dictation typos)

Dan S, Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

Now I'm conflicted because I do think we need powerful voices of dissent.

When you find one, let the rest of us know.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

someone needs to put some ground-up shrooms on Donald Trump's Whopper Jr. right before the inauguration.

qop (crüt), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

would prefer ground up glass, personally

sarahell, Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

I appreciate the quiet NYT joeks:

At times, Mr. Priebus, whose first name rhymes with “pints,”

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

????

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

oh, first name

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

NYT can't beat Charles Pierce's moniker ("Obvious anagram Reince Preibus")

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

uric penis beer

qop (crüt), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

epic brine user

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Sunday, 13 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

Can't see a link anywhere to this Ezra Klein piece--excellent.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/11/13578618/why-did-trump-win

"It's easy to come up with stories where Clinton could have gained 2 points, or to theorize that another candidate could have gained 4. But on the merits, this should have been 60-40, or 50-40-10...I can’t confidently explain his win."

clemenza, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

he won because of the electoral college. he lost the popular vote. can we stop trying to explain something that didn't happen in terms other than the stupid procedural relic that actually led to this?

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

Guys.

This is the worst thing I've read this weekend -- and not unexpected.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/ryan-plans-to-phase-out-medicare-in-2017

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

Can't imagine the AARP and all the other old-people won't melt down at that.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

Seriously

flopson, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

Honestly that's given me more hope than most stories I've read in the last 5 days, if there's anything that sends a message to Trump voters of "this is what these fuckers will do to you if you give them enough power" it's that.

JoeStork, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

He's such a vacant piece of shit

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:28 (seven years ago) link

But this won't affect Trump's voter base. It's the rest of us.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

Democrats however should act as if we're all in danger.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

SS privatization didn't go well for the GOP IIRC

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

yeah there is no surer way to sink trump's first term + the republican congress than attacking medicare. there are *tons* of things they can get away with because they affect people indirectly instead of directly e.g. gutting dodd frank, anything global warming. starting things out by touching medicare is suicidal and only someone who's a true-believer like ryan would attempt it.

and I mean whatever if they succeed they'll probably just end up killing all of their voters anyway.

iatee, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

But this won't affect Trump's voter base. It's the rest of us.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

ALfred's right, they are going to phase it out for anybody who wants to GO on Medicare going forward, not for the people who already have it

i.e. my wife, who plans to retire within 4 years.

sleeve, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

dubya's social security plan was similarly phase in. didn't matter.

iatee, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

If you want to accept the narrative of working-class whites yada yada yada, I'd say that the only government programs most have actually seen and understood clearly were Medicare and Social Security. Phase-in, immediate stop, whatever, most people instinctively know those things as the checks and care that kept grandma and grandpa alive.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

didn't Trump stress that he wouldn't change Medicare? just don't see this happening but hey, anything is possible now

Sharkie, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

Maybe Ryan thinks if they only have a 2-year window then this is his only chance to get that one thing he's always more than anything in the world

El Tomboto, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

can we stop trying to explain something that didn't happen in terms other than the stupid procedural relic that actually led to this?

I think that's an issue separate from what Klein's trying to figure out, which is why it wasn't "60-40, or 50-40-10."

clemenza, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

they are going to phase it out for anybody who wants to GO on Medicare going forward, not for the people who already have it

demographics are really working against this idea.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

The only glimmer of hope in this beyond the obvious overreach: it's possible Ryan wasn't even consulting Trump on this matter, so disorganized and lazy is Trump's transition.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 00:06 (seven years ago) link

It's not below for a President Trump to dismiss in public even someone of his own putative party. I see this a lot in 2017, actually, especially if the polls show that this dissent plays well with his new Wisconsin constituency.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

*it's not below the line, that is

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

good lord that guy even looks like Goebbels!

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 00:16 (seven years ago) link

60 Minutes on now

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 00:29 (seven years ago) link

oh god

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 00:43 (seven years ago) link

would it surprise anyone if ryan is looking at trump like an easily manipulable boy king

qualx, Monday, 14 November 2016 00:47 (seven years ago) link

The police report about Steve Bannon for domestic violence, if anyone is interested: http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000156-c3f8-dd14-abfe-fbfbbe310001

Steve Bannon should be rejected for so many reasons, but that a report like this exists for a special adviser to the president elect is not normal.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 00:49 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump raped his ex wife.

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 00:58 (seven years ago) link

It makes sense that a vicious thug would surround himself with similar types of people.

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 00:59 (seven years ago) link

extravagantly wealthy men who have never heard the word no

Clay, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

Well, yeah, and it's not normal to have a vicious thug in the white house, obviously. But you'd think the media would think the pick of Bannon would be a scandal because of that report. But no.

'New Trump appointee has a history of domestic violence

...yadayadayada....

The president elect himself was accused by his first ex-wife of spousal rape in 1991, and during the election a taped recording showed him bragging about getting away with sexual assault. Later ten women came forth with accusations of sexual assault.

Steve Bannon is expected to start at...'

Like, that's the story. That's why if you've got a history of attacks against women, you don't hire people with a history of attacks against women as your special adviser.

Argh, I'm going insane, why am I writing this to you? As if anyone here disagrees. As if anyone in the media disagrees. And yet they won't write about it.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

Don't worry, the fun cover story on Bannon in next week's People will help us all see what a good choice he is. Look, he's relaxing in a pool, just like regular folks!

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link

P.S. I am melting down and worrying about my long-term physical health and starting to sincerely wonder whether I'm going to survive four years of this.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

it's not normal to have a vicious thug in the white house

Are we sure about this, really? I feel like we're deciding to treat mid-20th Century values (like, say, FDR through LBJ) as the norm. Trump is probably not all that different from politicians of the 19th and early 20th Centuries.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

the office had less power during those periods

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:21 (seven years ago) link

Andrews Jackson and Johnson, Harding, and Nixon are three of the most perfidious Oval Office inhabitants, but at least Harding had a sentimental streak.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:21 (seven years ago) link

No, in the long perspective, a lot of them probably were spousal rapists, and Andrew Jackson straight up killed a guy for insulting him.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:31 (seven years ago) link

i see that 60 minutes has decided to get into the PR business

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:36 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT0Rjc6jKCg

van smack, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:37 (seven years ago) link

I haven't been able to take the media seriously since W's war in Iraq.

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:40 (seven years ago) link

if medicare gets phased out in 2017, my mom will miss getting grandmothered in by one year - she won't be 65 until December 2018. i wonder if she's even vaguely aware of that.

Karl Malone, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:49 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'm trying desperately to hang on to my last shreds of hope, no way am I watching 60 Minutes fawn over him.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:51 (seven years ago) link

Yeah spare yrself OL, it's a soft-focus rimjob

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:54 (seven years ago) link

Btw was saddened to read yr post upthread. I hope things start turning around for you

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 01:56 (seven years ago) link

xps that video is the headline on Drudge rn. it's brutal. i remember watching many of those clips as they aired.

flappy bird, Monday, 14 November 2016 01:59 (seven years ago) link

Yeah spare yrself OL, it's a soft-focus rimjob

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Sunday, November 13, 201

I can recommend a couple gay threads

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 02:08 (seven years ago) link

my Trump induced Depression/Anxiety ended sometime yesterday. big relief. it is still terrible of course but more rationally than emotionally and physically. hope you turn around soon, Old Lunch. also no shame in taking a day or two off twitter/news/ilx to clear the mind

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 02:25 (seven years ago) link

Can't see a link anywhere to this Ezra Klein piece--excellent.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/11/13578618/why-did-trump-win

"It's easy to come up with stories where Clinton could have gained 2 points, or to theorize that another candidate could have gained 4. But on the merits, this should have been 60-40, or 50-40-10...I can’t confidently explain his win."

― clemenza, Sunday, 13 November 2016 23:09 (yesterday) Permalink

This piece "gets it" I think... except when it's time to bring everything home and just say straight up that the GOP won because of its racist politics and there was really nothing else coming close to having such an effect

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 November 2016 02:26 (seven years ago) link

Like he brings that all up, like "2 + 2 isn't 3, and it's not 5. There's some strong evidence it's 4. So what is 2+2? I'm not sure, and that scares me."

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 November 2016 02:27 (seven years ago) link

During their private White House meeting on Thursday, Mr. Obama walked his successor through the duties of running the country, and Mr. Trump seemed surprised by the scope, said people familiar with the meeting. Trump aides were described by those people as unaware that the entire presidential staff working in the West Wing had to be replaced at the end of Mr. Obama’s term.

After meeting with Mr. Trump, the only person to be elected president without having held a government or military position, Mr. Obama realized the Republican needs more guidance. He plans to spend more time with his successor than presidents typically do, people familiar with the matter said.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/leading-contender-for-donald-trump-s-chief-of-staff-is-rnc-chairman-reince-priebus-1479069597

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 02:57 (seven years ago) link

same article: priebus's job is "to make the trains run on time," says member of trump transition team.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:02 (seven years ago) link

Lots of ppl posting this on fb

https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14925634_10153847166116890_6368362774375574730_n.jpg?oh=2016e47e130d552e961aee1bc17b911a&oe=58CBBD50

something that really irks me about this logic. not sure any of these really quite get at it but

- you can help black/muslim/lgbt/latino americans AND indigenous ppl in Canada
- climate change or nuclear war would affect us, too
- "these are all worse conditions than African-Americans experience in the United States" i find this sickening, it's not a contest guys!
- as sick as the 'score-keeping' is, if you're gonna do it at least don't ignore that US also genocided their native population, and treat them like shit!

way I see it Americans are gonna need our help and i'm there for yall. of course being smug is bad but enough of this 'lets fix our own backyard first' bs

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

On the "what is to be done?" front, I want to share an article I just read about how some of the wins on Tuesday (Kamala Harris in CA, Charles Todd Henderson for Jefferson County AL DA) point the way to how local work on criminal justice issues can also help build progressive coalitions and electoral gains.

https://www.thenation.com/article/election-night-saw-victories-in-local-criminal-justice-reform-this-should-be-the-beginning/

An excerpt:

 The election of Donald Trump may send forth global tremors in many areas. But it changes very little on issues related to criminal-justice reform as practiced at the local level. Roughly 50 million people live in just 15 of the counties that Clinton won this week. Some of these counties voted for Clinton by a margin of 2-1. If disheartened citizens and advocates chose to refocus their resources and attention to pushing reforms in these places, they could quickly see significant gains in the battle to end mass incarceration and help secure relief for millions of Americans.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

After meeting with Mr. Trump, the only person to be elected president without having held a government or military position, Mr. Obama realized the Republican needs more guidance. He plans to spend more time with his successor than presidents typically do, people familiar with the matter said.

Obama is truly remarkable and I hope he's able to make a positive impact on Trump.

Mordy, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link

Yeah it's been a bit irritating to see all the articles about "why Trump won" that make it look easy to call in hindsight (especially that Jonathan Pie video...barf). Like...at best, it was a fluke, with Comey's letters arriving at the worst times, voter suppression happening in the worst states, and Trump winning by getting a bunch of rust belt states by a small margin. I don't remember anyone calling the "Trump wins but loses popular vote" scenario as a possibility, besides Nate Silver. Even the people who really did see it coming got it wrong too...Bill Mitchell and Scott Adams both said Trump was going to win by a landslide, and obviously that didn't happen. My prediction that principled Republicans wouldn't vote for such an obviously terrible person and a blatant con man was...very off

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:09 (seven years ago) link

Lol Bill Mitchell and Scott Adams only 'saw it coming' in a Gettier paradox-style "look at a stopped clock at noon but it was actually noon" type of way

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

Lots of ppl posting this on fb

https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14925634_10153847166116890_6368362774375574730_n.jpg?oh=2016e47e130d552e961aee1bc17b911a&oe=58CBBD50

something that really irks me about this logic

Yr points are valid, but I do think there's value in retaining perspective and resisting Canadian complacency/exceptionalism, this is probably not the thread to be having that discussion at length tho

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link

Obama is truly remarkable and I hope he's able to make a positive impact on Trump.

This is all so hilarious and surreal.

El Tomboto, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

i still can't believe they didn't know they had to replace all the white house staff

j., Monday, 14 November 2016 03:29 (seven years ago) link

Bill Mitchell, sure - dude legit thought Trump was going to win by 10

Scott Adams wound up having a few good observations - namely the idea that voters apparently did not care about facts at all this election. Of course his descent into one-eye-shut "hmmm seems to me only the Hillary people are getting violent and hateful here" alt-right idiocy is unforgivable

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:30 (seven years ago) link

Here's the Canadian politics thread for anyone who wants to chime in: Because It's 2016: Canadian Politics in Sunnier Days

hardcore dilettante, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:30 (seven years ago) link

Like Adams did a pretty good job explaining how and why a lot of Trump's "persuasion" wound up working, why he was able to command such a crowd and cult of personality despite knowing nothing and never telling the truth about anything

The fact that he was rooting for him all along despite correctly identifying him as a con man was really gross though

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:35 (seven years ago) link

A thought that occurred to me re stuff like his not knowing they had to replace the white house staff: during the W years it was really, really easy to get lulled into focusing on all the absurdist comedy and boobery of the presidency (just as it had been during the election, when no liberals thought he could really win). While comic relief is sometimes needed, it will be a shame if we waste much energy on "lol drumpf!" jokes as the GOP dismantles the architecture of the liberal federal govt.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:38 (seven years ago) link

It's happening already. The joeks about his terrible taste in sofas and cutlery were old before Nov. 8.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:41 (seven years ago) link

it's not comic relief, i literally just keep thinking obsessively about that fact over and over because it is incredible

j., Monday, 14 November 2016 03:41 (seven years ago) link

a state of emergency
is where I want to be

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

It's happening already. The joeks about his terrible taste in sofas and cutlery were old before Nov. 8.

and the goddamn size of his hands, who gives a fuck

Karl Malone, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

as the GOP dismantles the architecture of the liberal federal govt lol I'm thinking no, that would require a plan

again, please go and tell everyone you know to apply! https://apply.ptt.gov/ (the content of that entire form and the backend it feeds was built long before they knew who would win, just in case that wasn't obvious)

They honestly just learned this week that they need like 3000 people. They did not know they needed to hire 3000 people. They need to hire hundreds of people between now and February. They have no idea who should be doing what. Put your name in the hat!

El Tomboto, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

The problems, as I see them, were:

1.) Hillary's messaging centered too much on personality -- both hers and Trump's -- even though people didn't especially like her. She lacked a unifying, graspable message beyond experience and the glass ceiling. People were unaware that her platform was actually super dope.
2.) The media misrepresented her "scandals" to drive ratings and to create an appearancepf balance in an election that pitted a distinguished stateswoman against a notorious con artist and race baiter. Perhaps more significantly, garbage right wing conspiracy sotrs infilitrated the nation's news feeds. This contributed to the cloud of mistrust surrounding her, which tarnished her image even among non-deplorables.
3.) tens of millions of people in America are truly reckless and would rather have their anger validated than see anything productive happen in their government. Maybe their bitterness is justified, to a point, but their tolerance of racism, misogyny and lying is not acceptable.

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

Hillary didn't count on 3.) especially, hence her ads, which hinged on the idea that people would recognize that Trump's unfitness to lead was self evident

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

Tombot, Paul Ryan and the GOP congress have that plan dude.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:55 (seven years ago) link

The only potential saving grace is that Trump isn't one of them. He may actually turn out to be better than a Cruz or a Rubio if his arrogance and narcissism means he blocks some of their agenda. OTOH he may be too bumbling and lazy and clueless and easy to manipulate for that to be the case.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 03:56 (seven years ago) link

yes and their plan is "Step 1. Burn down the most popular program in the government"

El Tomboto, Monday, 14 November 2016 04:01 (seven years ago) link

I know, and I sure hope the third rail effect works, but I've been burned a lot of times by now thinking "The GOP are stupid and I'm just gonna sit back and watch them play themselves"

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 04:02 (seven years ago) link

still think the media treating this entire election like an episode of WWE Raw contributed a lot to Hillary's loss

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 04:02 (seven years ago) link

take 5 minutes to play around with this.

http://graphics.wsj.com/blue-feed-red-feed/

Karl Malone, Monday, 14 November 2016 04:41 (seven years ago) link

lol, one of the popular conservative outlets is "Western Journalism" (WJ), which chose the exact same font for its logo as Wall Street Journal (WSJ) so that it appears more legitimate

Karl Malone, Monday, 14 November 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link

re: Trump anxiety/depression/fear, the moment it all started to turn on tuesday night around 9:30pm EST, it really felt exactly like the gradual slipping into a nightmare that was the morning of 9/11. i've been listening to "Imagine" a lot, late at night, loud, over and over.

flappy bird, Monday, 14 November 2016 05:32 (seven years ago) link

Maybe their bitterness is justified, to a point, but their tolerance of racism, misogyny and lying is not acceptable.

― Treeship, Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:50 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sorry to pick here, but what is this "not acceptable" refrain. i mean -- how precisely are you (anyone saying this) going to not accept it? people aren't asking for you to accept their views and actions. they're living lives in which you personally play no role. how does one choose not to accept it. is there a form you refuse to sign. does this mean unfriending on facebook, it feels pretty empty as a statement imho. will ppl tell their grandkids "the world went to shit, but i said it was not acceptable so..."

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Monday, 14 November 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

it means before they were ok, but now everything has changed

j., Monday, 14 November 2016 05:47 (seven years ago) link

Internalized racism and self-hatred are real. I

If I lived within 10 blocks of 725 5th Ave, I'd consider now as the top of the market and sell.

Among many ugly things that will transpire over the next 4 years, I wouldn't be surprised if the secret service opens up on some egg-throwers with their motorcade minigun.

. L.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

uh don't know how that happened. sorry guys!

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 10:32 (seven years ago) link

"sorry to pick here, but what is this "not acceptable" refrain. i mean -- how precisely are you (anyone saying this) going to not accept it? people aren't asking for you to accept their views and actions. they're living lives in which you personally play no role. how does one choose not to accept it. is there a form you refuse to sign. does this mean unfriending on facebook, it feels pretty empty as a statement imho. will ppl tell their grandkids "the world went to shit, but i said it was not acceptable so..."

― the klosterman weekend (s.clover)"

i think that contemporary methods of resistance and dissent are pretty well documented by now.

"No, in the long perspective, a lot of them probably were spousal rapists, and Andrew Jackson straight up killed a guy for insulting him.

― Frederik B"

on the other hand about the favorite thing of mine andrew jackson ever did was threatening to have his vice president hanged as a traitor, so...

"P.S. I am melting down and worrying about my long-term physical health and starting to sincerely wonder whether I'm going to survive four years of this.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch)"

how much local support do you have? because we're all going to need lots of it. the internet sure as hell isn't going to do anything to keep us alive and functional.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Monday, 14 November 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

"i think that contemporary methods of resistance and dissent are pretty well documented by now."

sorry, let me be more clear. step one is that when people say shit like that, we call them on it. i've lived in a country where people say horrible things about other people all the time and a lot of us, myself included, have let it pass because we don't want to make trouble. i, and a lot of the people i talk to, are fucking over it. i don't wear a safety pin as a feel-good gesture, but as a sworn oath.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Monday, 14 November 2016 11:37 (seven years ago) link

what guvmint department do you see me in, El Tomboto?

(that's called a softball)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 13:10 (seven years ago) link

rushomancy, I'm keeping it together for the most part, and do have support, but there's some familiar dark existential dread creeping in. I'm doing what I can to keep it at bay.

One of the bitterest ironies that just occurred to me this morning is all the pooh-poohing of the false equivalency between the Brexit referendum and the presidential election. 'Apples and oranges!' Which is true, except that if it had been a straight referendum, Clinton would have won. Hmm.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

re: Trump anxiety/depression/fear, the moment it all started to turn on tuesday night around 9:30pm EST, it really felt exactly like the gradual slipping into a nightmare that was the morning of 9/11. i've been listening to "Imagine" a lot, late at night, loud, over and over.

I remember a few months ago someone like Bill Mitchell put up a mocked-up graphic of Trump winning the presidency on CNN, and just having such a visceral reaction to it. Like it made me sick. But I was relieved to think, ha ha, no way. I mean I was hopeful for a while that the models would bear out - MSNBC was saying "Republicans always get comfortable early on before all the results from the urban cities come in" - but once I saw Trump winning all these rural counties by a 3-to-1 margin I was like...it's not going to be enough

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

It took a couple of days, but I did eventually come around after Tuesday night and started to feel at least okay, trying to be hopeful and constructive and to move forward and take positive action to counteract the effects of this. But every tweet about the unfairness of 1st amendment rights and news story about appointing maniacs to the cabinet and report that Trump obviously had NO FUCKING IDEA what he was getting into because he's exhibited zero curiosity about anything ever has knocked the wind out of me all over again. Every day, I wake up to the reality that we're about to have a president as unimaginable as Ernest P. Worrell, and that he's rushing to fulfill every OTT worst case scenario that's been forecast, that he's learned nothing and will learn nothing and that the very best we can hope for is that people don't piss him off and make him lash out.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

And so it begins: some of our best friends, the family of my younger daughter's best friend, had been considering a move to Malaysia, for work but also just for a change of pace, and I think this election has finally helped them make up their mind. They're black, with two young kids keenly aware of the campaign, and it just broke their heart. I hope they stay, but at the same time I understand, and would probably at least consider a similar move if given the chance.

On a more symbolic level, the towering but diseased hundred-plus foot elm tree in front of our house is currently being chainsawed down to its stump.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

but once I saw Trump winning all these rural counties by a 3-to-1 margin I was like...it's not going to be enough

Something useful about Facebook--you can look back at your messages and track where you started to feel queasy. Sent this to a friend at 9:20 p.m., Tuesday night:

"I know it all has to do with where the outstanding vote is, but surely Democrats are a little panicked with Trump leading in Florida, NC, Virginia, and Ohio."

clemenza, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

not really seeing the usefulness in that tbh

sleeve, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

you can look at your posts in the election day thread too. I remember panicking about Florida and Alfred telling me to relax.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

It's probably useful to remember that Trump wasn't getting its info from CNN, NBC, MSNBC, or any of the other media outlets that people are now criticizing for normalizing or not shouting down Trump enough. They share some blame, for sure, because they fueled his strategy of running on social media reach, and maybe should have done more to get their own viewership concerned and active, but there's something else going on here as well.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

*Trump's BASE

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

At least all the dank Joe Biden memes going around are giving me the few laughs I'm capable of getting right now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxJ2uH2WgAAvfnq.jpg

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

My whole family, kids and all, is heading to DC for the January 21st Women's March on Washington. My mom'll be there, too, as well as my wife's parents.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

Biden: Ideally I'd like to include traps from all of the Home Alone movies, but we've only got two months so the Home Alone 2 plan is fine

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxB4DGhXgAQJ6CW.jpg

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

you can look at your posts in the election day thread too. I remember panicking about Florida and Alfred telling me to relax.

― frogbs, Monday, November 14, 2016 10:03 AM

:(

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

got this notice from the principal at my daughter's school last night:

Dear parents and guardians,
The BVHM community is uniting and participating in a “March Against Fear.” We will show our students and our families that the election of Donald Trump, who has espoused racists, sexist and anti-immigrant hatred, will not instill fear in our community. We will be stronger and more determined than ever to fight for justice for all our BVHM family.

Opening Rally: 9:30-9:50 at the yard
March: 9:50-10:45 (24th to Valencia, Valencia to 18th, 18th to Mission, Mission to 24th)
Closing Rally: 10:45-11:10 at the yard

Tomorrow we will distribute permission slips to participate in the march and you are invited to attend our planning meeting tomorrow at 4pm in room 305. Together we are stronger!

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

nice

guys i'm trying to keep it posi but trump's reaction to the next police shooting :o

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

not sure if you mean the next time a cop gets shot by a crazy white dude or the next time cops shoot an innocent black person

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

The thing that scares the shit out of me is that I'm p sure we'll get a recession in like the next two years. I already thought it was coming anyway. If it's just a mild recession, maybe it favors dems, allows them to clean house, but if it's really, really bad, like a financial crisis, fuck.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

My whole family, kids and all, is heading to DC for the January 21st Women's March on Washington. My mom'll be there, too, as well as my wife's parents.

I had not heard of this, what are the details

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

I don't think trump can use a financial crisis to declare martial law or whatever. a lot of people voted him in on promises of prosperity, and that's the issue he'll be held most accountable on.

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

xp to Shakey

National Event Page: https://www.facebook.com/events/2169332969958991/

California organizing page: https://www.facebook.com/events/214100499025206

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

thx Phil

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

It is such incredible BS that Garland wasn't confirmed. Really resembling the GOP for this one.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

This was one of the "see other popular polls" when I clicked that link:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/ban-song-meet-flockers-public-media-and-investigate-legal-responsibilities-yg

how's life, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

It's probably useful to remember that Trump wasn't getting its info from CNN, NBC, MSNBC, or any of the other media outlets that people are now criticizing for normalizing or not shouting down Trump enough. They share some blame, for sure, because they fueled his strategy of running on social media reach, and maybe should have done more to get their own viewership concerned and active, but there's something else going on here as well.

Yeah I'm not sure how much we should blame the "lamestream media" - after the birther stunt they got quite harsh on Trump, and rightfully so. Of course that all went out the window cuz emails, but whatever. Either way they did make it clear at a certain point that Trump was generally full of shit, and honestly I think among people who actually watched the news Trump fared pretty poorly. The proliferation of fake news on Facebook really affected this election - I was pretty surprised to find out how many people I thought of as rational just accepted that Hillary had several people killed.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

stay focused here

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

The establishment that's currently normalizing Trump, I really don't think they give a crap if there's a recession/depression because of him. It didn't do any real damage to them when the 2008 crash happened, and that's all that matters. These people are so insulated from the consequences of their actions and decisions, and so isolated from average Americans, that we aren't along for the ride with them whatever they decide, and they hold all the reins of power, from the media to the federal government. We mean nothing to these people. White, middle class, working class, black, Jewish, Muslim, women... none of us matter, our concerns don't matter, our lives don't matter at all to these people, and we have almost no power or say in how they lead us or what they do to us. The last thread holding things together is legitimacy of rule, and now that Trump is in, it's starting to unravel into something scary, and not surprisingly, the establishment doesn't really give a crap.

The New York Times preferred Trump over Sanders, if you don't remember that, and I'm sure they still do. To the media, the political establishment, and the business establishment, Trump is better news than someone like Sanders who calls them out. The only way anything decent is going to happen for people is by them acknowledging this and working outside the establishment for each other. Having a sense of learned helplessness is understandable when assuming we have a contract with the powers that be to work together, but we don't. So until people understand that this establishment is actually an adversary at the bargaining table, things aren't going to get better. /rant

larry appleton, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

ex-breitbart ben shapiro on bannon

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8441/i-know-trumps-new-campaign-chairman-steve-bannon-ben-shapiro#

, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

Andrew Breitbart was a piece of fucking shit who the world is better off without, and Ben Shapiro is also a piece of shit, and gets no brownie points from me for whatever internecine garbage has gone on between him and Bannon since the primaries. Fuck him.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

yeah but Breitbart tried to integrate his frat at Tulane!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

uh, so Trump said on 60M last night that the pop-vote winner should be president. In the future.

"I'm not going to change my mind just because I won. But I would rather see it where you went with simple votes. you know, you get 100 million votes and somebody else gets 90 million votes and you win. There's a reason for doing this because it brings all the states into play."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

and he knows from simple votes

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

The other popular petitions are pretty depressing (dualing petitions to declare Pakistan or India terrorist states). It should be mentioned that there are at least three Garland appointment petitions, whether by mistake or intentional right wing signature splitting.

Appoint Garland Now (Senate Has Waived Its Rights)
We the People ask President Obama to immediately appoint Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court
Appoint Merrick Garland to SCOTUS by asserting that the Senate's inaction waived their right to advise and consent.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

fine well I'll just sign all of them

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

jpod blames obama for the failures of the dem party -- lots to take exception with in that article but i do wonder what ppl think - does obama bear responsibility for the epic collapse of democratic political power in the US?

Mordy, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

Newt Gingrich: Steve Bannon Can’t Be Anti-Semitic Because He Worked In Finance And Hollywood

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gingrich-bannon-anti-semitism_us_5829d117e4b02d21bbc99315?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

friend shared a long Dana Gould FB post that bpiled down to "hey guys instead of disagreeing & yelling we should take the time to talk & debate with conservatives they were cool to me & were totes reasonable & willing to exchange ideas"

on one hand i agree
also i like Dana Gould a lot

but also: if he was a POC or a muslim or a woman or all of those things i guarantee it probably wouldn't be a meeting of the minds

it's great that it went well for YOU dude but don't sit here and tell me that that's what the rest of the country should do

fuckin tired of these instructive essays already

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

I'm not interested in assigning blame really (although I willingly accept my own share) just manically trying to think of everything I can do moving forward.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

xp Indeed - look at the shit Kumail Nanjiani is taking on Twitter for sharing his thoughts and experiences.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

tbh debating white liberals as a POC often isn't a meeting of the minds either
xp

droit au butt (Euler), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

the media debate is certainly more complicated when you take into account how fast (mis)information spreads on the internet and that trump is the living personification of an internet comment section

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

This deserves that Jackie Chan "WTF?!" meme face. I know the AP is kind of a joke of an organization these days but ffs.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxPWBjmW8AAq42v.jpg

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

http://www.fostercampbell2016.com/

FYI - US senate seat still open in louisiana

, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Bannon will thrive quite well as one of Trump's close advisors, unless he tries to pull a Sejanus. He has the sort of deeply nasty, bullying personality to play well with Trump.

Whatever position Priebus fills after the inauguration, he'll be discarded as soon as it is convenient to do so. He's only there to teach the real uglies some of the ropes of DC inside politics, give Trump a veneer of respectability and then be tossed overboard ASAP. The day will come, and probably in 2017, when Priebus will wake up and discover he's inserted a monster into the presidency and there's not a fucking thing he can do about it.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

secretary of state milo yiannopoulos

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

Yes, I have already been instructed by a conservative friend to keep an open mind because Trump is "making moves to inject diversity" by finding homes for Ben Carson and Kellyanne Conway. xp

Their all losers and I like associating with loser (Dan Peterson), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

friend shared a long Dana Gould FB post that bpiled down to "hey guys instead of disagreeing & yelling we should take the time to talk & debate with conservatives they were cool to me & were totes reasonable & willing to exchange ideas"

no. fuck this. the people sharing this stuff are the same people who declared Hillary a criminal with no evidence whatsoever. these are the people who HATED Trump because he was a racist, a con man, and treated women awfully, riiiight up until the point where he got the nomination, and suddenly they were cool with everything. these were the people who mocked everyone for believing the "lamestream media" because they spread false information, and decided to support a man who was nothing BUT false information, who apparently didn't think the people voting for him deserved to know a thing about his investments or his business interests. these are the people who cried "rigged" the entire way despite illegal meddling from the FBI and Russia, who only won because of the electoral college. we're not going to forget about all that.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Yes, I have already been instructed by a conservative friend to keep an open mind because Trump is "making moves to inject diversity" by finding homes for Ben Carson and Kellyanne Conway. xp

oh my god I got sent that too - "I THOUGHT HE WAS A BIGOT!!" - also showing a gay man, Peter Thiel, as one of his "first" appointments. it's so dumb. "you say he's a racist, but he's hired black people. are those the actions of a racist?" fuck off. not to mention that Thiel and Carson in the cabinet is fucking terrifying.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

"making moves to inject stupidity."

Their all losers and I like associating with loser (Dan Peterson), Monday, 14 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

I love dana but his FB post was wrong

akm, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

I had a dream about a news story featuring the pictures of Trump's cabinet appointments, which included both Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope and which seems both horrifically on-the-nose but also way off the mark inasmuch as they, unlike most of Trump's cronies, have in the past demonstrated some intellectual curiosity re: magnets and what have you.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

"A woman and an openly gay man...but it's Sarah Palin and Milo Yiannopoulos" #thefrogurtisalsocursed

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

I've mentioned previously my friend/co-worker (whose office is next door to mine) who went from Berniebro to Steinbro, and even the day before the election was posting pro-Green stuff and saying "Vote your conscience, don't let them scare you into thinking Trump can win."

Since last Tuesday he's been posting on FB every critical story about Trump he can find, and just posted the Deadspin piece about Trump's unprepared transition team with this note:

It's all happening... Trump doesn't really want to do the work. He just wants the status. Funny that they're trying now to see how much power they can legally give Mike Pence. And man, that is bad news for the country.
If you're gay, that dude literally wants to arrest you for applying for a marriage license. You may not agree with gay marriage, but that is scary. And a vote for Trump was indifference to these sorts of things, even though you might not be a bad person yourself.

It's all I can do, literally, to keep from getting up from my desk, opening my office door, walking into the hall, opening his office door and beating him to death.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

I admire your self-restraint

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

v progressive of you

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

I LEARNED IT FROM WATCHING YOU, MORBZ

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

This Kurt Eichenwald piece in Newsweek is quite something.

On Friday, I almost assaulted a fan of my work. I was in the Philadelphia International Airport, and a man who recognized me from one of my appearances on a television news show approached. He thanked me for the investigative reporting I had done about Donald Trump before the election, expressed his outrage that the Republican nominee had won, and then told me quite gruffly, “Get back to work.” Something about his arrogance struck me, so I asked, “Who did you vote for?”

He replied, “Well, Stein, but…” I interrupted him, and said, “You’re lucky it’s illegal for me to punch you in the face.” Then, after telling him to have sex with himself—but with a much cruder term—I turned and walked away.

A certain kind of liberal makes me sick. They traffic in false equivalencies, always pretending that both nominees are the same, justifying their apathy and not voting or preening about their narcissistic purity as they cast their ballot for a person they know cannot win. I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump, because they wanted a Trump presidency. I have an enormous problem with anyone who voted for Trump or Stein or Johnson—or who didn’t vote at all—and who now expresses horror about the outcome of this election. If you don’t like the consequences of your own actions, shut the hell up.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

"i want to beat people to the left of me to death, but i have restraint" -- sincerely, a very good liberal

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

yeah, both you blamesters are still disgusting Dem hacks.

http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/09/gary-johnson-jill-stein-voters-clinton

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

"people who wanted trump on the other hand, we're brahs"

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

Morbs now repping for Koch Bros Media, awesome

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump
I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

congrats on knowing who owns everything, pd, it's a full life. now go beat some idealists to death.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

“You’re lucky it’s illegal for me to punch you in the face.”

Putin on the Hitz

salthigh, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

I thought you were banned, you tedious fuckhole.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

when do we get to find out how many people wrote in Harambe?

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

Coming from someone who not only knows the name of Chelsea Clinton's husband but what he does for a living, that's rich.

I think there's an errant comma in that Eichenwald piece, not that it makes it better. It should probably read: I have no problem with anyone who voted for Trump because they wanted a Trump presidency. Otherwise the next sentence makes no sense, since it begins, "I have an enormous problem with anyone who voted for Trump or Stein or Johnson . . ."

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

Yeah seems he means strictly in context of being upset at the outcome.

Evan, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

someone who not only knows the name of Chelsea Clinton's husband but what he does for a living

i dont remember that toad's name. i'm sure you've congealed every anti-Clinton poster into one

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

Eichenwald is possibly my least favorite person in media right now outside of the actual right wing.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

He seems exceedingly stupid and craven, even for a mushy centrist.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

Later I'll find the tweetstorm about how his "tech people" told him it was "not possible" for 600,000 emails to be stored on one laptop.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

speaking of hysterical people, arthur chu has now taken to retweeting peter daou. think it's time to unfollow

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

Peter Daou literally tweeted that it's not the campaign's job to convince people to vote.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

i managed to get blocked by arthur chu without ever interacting with him. still not entirely sure what his deal is

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

lol me too

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

Eichenwald deleted at least some of the tweets about how laptops can't possibly store that many emails locally. https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/795411365569658880

I mean the guy wrote The Informant. He has connections at the FBI, clearly. He's just an imbecile.

comesayhey, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

the posts of his i've seen read like a living satire of performative liberalism

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

*jib

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

I was out to dinner with a friend last night. She has a cousin who voted Trump, and her cousin has been crowing about his victory. The thing is, her cousin entered this country as a child illegally. She knows it, her cousin knows it, but she instead just chose to unfriend her rather than out her. My friend (who is Filipino) also has family in Oklahoma, with two mixed race nephews. Her sister voted Clinton, her brother in law went not-Trump, but she still plans to not visit them for years because she is afraid to travel to a place that, last she visited, was so dense with Trump signs it scared her. Her father, meanwhile, in Michigan, a person of color and a doctor, voted Trump. She's not sure she can ever forgive him.

Another old friend of mine is married to a first generation Chinese wife. My friend grew up in Maine, with conservative parents. His mother didn't vote for president, but his father ... he doesn't know. He and his wife had to have a conversation about how or whether they wanted to raise their kids in his presence. He and his dad are pretty close and in constant communication, but the last time he heard from his dad he texted back "look, I don't know who you voted for but if it was Trump, please don't tell me." Silence. He didn't hear anything back. Eventually he realized he ... hurt his dad's feelings. The best solution he can think of right now is to tell his dad, look, my wife is Chinese, my kids are half Chinese. I don't think you're racist, but if you don't constantly affirm that opinion by fighting against all the racist shit Trump has said and done and will no doubt do, then I will assume you are racist and that I don't want you around my family.

This shit is real.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

yeah Merkely's emerging as an actual opposition voice, also re the supreme court

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Arthus Chu has been outspoken against harassment, and probably uses blocking lists, so if you ironically follow gamergaters or trumpkins, or follow the harassment left, he blocks you.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

For a lot of identity activists, I'd wager something like 90% of first interactions on twitter is harassment, so I don't think anyone can blame them for using strong and wide blocking mechanisms, even when it hits people with no bad intentions.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

"the harassment left" holy fucking shit

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

actual nazi memes and criticism of any kind are pretty much the same thing

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

Well, if you've never heard that term before, you probably don't follow people like Arthur Chu to begin with, lol.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

i think some kind of civil war within the left-liberal world is inevitable. it's a shitty time to do it but i don't think it's possible not to. there's just no agreement yet on what went wrong and who's responsible. there may never be, idk.

i was never much of a bernie supporter but it seems crystal clear to me that the hillary crowed badly misread what was going on (so did a lot of people) but also failed in the most basic political duties of running a democratic presidential campaign. they all have to go. your peter daou types are not going to engage in any kind of self-criticism, are they?

this is alongside any effort to build or strengthen structures to protect the vulnerable and resist what's coming. i'm not very politically involved on a personal level (beyond being a news addict) but i think we all need to start thinking about this stuff.

on a personal and aesthetic level, for fuck's sake all of this security blanket pop culture sharable celebrity meme liberalism has to stop immediately. peace to kate mckinnon but even just the screenshots of her-hillary singing leonard cohen were sickening; couldn't bring myself to watch it. lena dunham harry potter khaleesi yaass kween jedi rebellion, all that shit is so hollowed out and dead. (but yeah i still have plenty of time for chapelle so mileage varies doesn't it)

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

peace to kate mckinnon but even just the screenshots of her-hillary singing leonard cohen were sickening; couldn't bring myself to watch it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^ i just can't

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

yeah, that was some serious bathos

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

I'll never watch SNL again myself

idk if consensus about what went wrong/who's responsible is necessary - what's necessary is immediately moving forward towards shared goals, ie pressuring Dems not to cave/compromise on anything, support the mounting of legal challenges to GOP agenda, grassroots support of community institutions, local Dem candidates, and charitable organizations/lobbying groups

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

*applause* xxxp

i watched it to affirm my certainty that the Clintonmachine lives on sufficiently to run Cuomo in 2020.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

(not because of the McKinnon thing, but because they aided and abetted Trump and should not be forgiven for it)

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

the election was decided by a 1% margin, so everything that could conceivably be responsible *is* responsible

I don't think the left will actually have much in-fighting in the near future. we have more to agree on when we're the opposition. plus bernie and warren are legitimate figureheads in the party now, not part of the fringe.

xps

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

Chappelle was still alright overall. Wish he hadn't thrown in the bullshit at the end about giving Trump a chance.

Speaking of tax break, whatever I get from Trump's tax plan is getting evenly split between my family's emergency leave america fund and donations to anti-Trump/GOP causes.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

yeah Warren and Sanders are clearly going to be leaders moving forward

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

i followed chu during gg because he kept track of all the interlocking controversies happening in nerdworld. but then his politics started to show as sort of one-note so i stopped. defense of thatcher on feminist grounds might have been the last straw. i just checked and i am blocked. i think following any of the chapo set is enough.

a lot of the online left is v rude it's true but we have to start looking to people who see things clearly. you have to be able to draw a distinction between people who, say, tweet someone like jill filipovic "feminism is cancer, the rope is coming" and someone who says "you are a rich tourist with bad ideas"

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

yeah, I mean maybe they take so much of it that they feel a little thin-skinned about randos criticizing them online, but, you know, it's twitter!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

in lieu of presents this year (and because I am broke and have no money of my own to donate) we are going to request that our family members make donations in our name to either the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, NRDC, Southern Poverty Law Center, or MALDEF.

I did sign up to give an (admittedly tiny - but it was what they asked for) monthly amount to moveon.org for the first time

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

"identity activists" is a really dumb turn-of-phrases and i'm pretty glad i haven't encountered it before now.

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Chappelle was still alright overall. Wish he hadn't thrown in the bullshit at the end about giving Trump a chance.

I feel like you didn't actually hear what Chappelle said if you're going to describe the end of his monologue as bullshit.

¶ (DJP), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

Speaking of tax break, whatever I get from Trump's tax plan is getting evenly split between my family's emergency leave america fund and donations to anti-Trump/GOP causes.

i don't know your financial situation, but you might not save money. the top 1% will definitely save money though.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/26/news/economy/trump-tax-plan/

Karl Malone, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

totally identify with Josh here. my Dad voted Trump - he was quite vocal about doing so (he's the sort who believes 9/11 was a hoax and that we never landed on the moon). my wife, who is Mexican, told me on Wednesday, "I love your Dad but I don't know if I'm ready to see him for a while". quite frankly I feel the same.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

Chappelle was still alright overall. Wish he hadn't thrown in the bullshit at the end about giving Trump a chance.

During a set on (Nov. 4) at New York's Cutting Room, according to Observer, Chappelle admitted that he voted for Clinton, but "didn't feel good" about it. “She’s going to be on a coin someday. And her behavior has not been coin-worthy,” he told the crowd. “She’s not right and we all know she’s not right.”

He even speculated that Clinton herself leaked the "Access Hollywood" hot mic tapes to the media.

“What I heard on that tape was gross,” he said. “But the way I got to hear it was even more gross. You know that came directly from Hillary.”

Chappelle continued that what Trump said didn't sound like "sexual assault" to him and that the media "twisted" Trump's words. "He said, ‘And when you’re a star, they let you do it.’ That phrase implies consent. I just don’t like the way the media twisted that whole thing. Nobody questioned it.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/dave-chappelle-media-twisted-trump-words-leaked-tape-article-1.2859806

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

It's all I can do, literally, to keep from getting up from my desk, opening my office door, walking into the hall, opening his office door and beating him to death.

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, November 14, 2016 10:22 AM (twenty-seven minutes ago)

Considering how many pro-Clinton people on these threads were convinced that Clinton would win, this seems a bit hypocritical.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

gwen ifill died. 61. RIP.

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

in lieu of presents this year (and because I am broke and have no money of my own to donate) we are going to request that our family members make donations in our name to either the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, NRDC, Southern Poverty Law Center, or MALDEF.

I did sign up to give an (admittedly tiny - but it was what they asked for) monthly amount to moveon.org for the first time

xp

― Οὖτις, Monday, November 14, 2016 2:14 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Did the same -- asked for Center for Constitutional Rights or ACLU and wife is asking for Planned Parenthood. Offering to do same for family members in return, so effect is multiplied instead of the net zero of gifts. Also donated to Foster Campbell's senate race -- by some weird system they have it's still going on and we can pick up one more Senate seat.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

Well, yes, clearly we all got that wrong. But not so wrong that I felt I could confidently write in Deez Nutz or whatever the hell. If you're going to spend weeks smugly telling everyone not to be "fooled" or "scared" into voting for the lesser of two evils, you can't then act surprised or dismayed when you actually end up with the bigger evil.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

you're also in ohio, aren't you phil?

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

daaaang gwen ifill rip.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

so, it's okay that you were wrong, but not okay that he was wrong?

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

Phil I do understand where that feeling comes from, and I sort of get the anger (and we're all looking for something to be angry at rn). At the same time, I just feel like it's more productive to focus on how a campaign can garner more enthusiasm next time rather than blaming people for being complacent.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

any politics that blames the individual voters is not much of a politics

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

It's OK that he was wrong, it's not OK that he's acting surprised at the consequence of his action. I did what I could to ensure Trump wouldn't win, he didn't.

xp Yes, I am in Ohio.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah 3rd party voters in swing states are extra nutty, going into election day ohio polls were bad

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

Also donated to Foster Campbell's senate race -- by some weird system they have it's still going on and we can pick up one more Senate seat.

I don't understand this at all - can anyone explain what's going on here?

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

yeah that's a headscratcher. I wound up voting Clinton in a heavy blue state, taking nothing for granted.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

man alive, I get that, I do, but as I intimated way upthread, if what it takes to garner more enthusiasm now is playing into this white resentment/white identity politics garbage, I don't want to do it, and I sure as heck don't want the Democratic Party to do it. (e.g. Bernie Sanders' tweet today about being "humiliated" that Democrats don't know how to talk to the white working class.)

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

this anti-3rd party voters schtick is gross, guys.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

there's a few big races still open xp

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/undecided-election-231295

, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

I really don't think class politics has to be white-exclusive or race-based.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

Not like anyone cares about these quislings, but it's been amusing to me to read how quiet NRO has gotten: a couple of daily posts, tired liberal baiting which even the writers, I sense, are bored of. Same goes for Weekly Standard types like Bill Kristol (aka Bannon's "renegade Jew") and Steve Hayes. They lost and they know it. For the first time in a GOP administration they're irrelevant.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

I wound up voting Clinton in a heavy blue state, taking nothing for granted.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, November 14, 2016 2:29 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark

as iatee has pointe dout, voting in a blue state contributes to hillary's popular vote margin of victory - it's accretive.

, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

lol I thought "pointe dout" was a french rhetorical term for a sec

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

this white resentment/white identity politics garbage

it may be "garbage" but it's real.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

while sanders would have done better on that issue and trump will have egg on his face in a few years when all those rust belt factories are still crumbling, I really wonder if we can 'beat' the combination of white identity politics + "I will literally give all of you good jobs" w/ smart folksy sanders socialism or whatever.

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

The way these blockers work is to analyse if the manually blocked accounts has someone in common that they follow, then blacklist followers of those accounts. The reason it works is because people like for instance Lee Fang rile up his followers with falsehoods against people he disagrees with, then throws up his hands when that inevitably results in harassment. Having a blocker puts a roadblock on a main way that online harassment works. It's not about criticism at all, it's about drowning in useless messages, some critical, some harassing, some even threatening, every time the same dude tweets something negative about you.

x-posts.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

Yes, I know it's real. And if you have to pander to it to get votes, I don't want any part of it.

I really don't think class politics has to be white-exclusive or race-based.

I hope not. It seemed that way in 2008 and 2012. I guess we'll see in two years.

BTW: http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/39/47/dtg-trump-attack-bar-tabac-2016-11-18-bk.html

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

while sanders would have done better on that issue and trump will have egg on his face in a few years when all those rust belt factories are still crumbling, I really wonder if we can 'beat' the combination of white identity politics + "I will literally give all of you good jobs" w/ smart folksy sanders socialism or whatever.

― iatee, Monday, November 14, 2016 2:34 PM (one minute ago)

i think at this point it's most important to keep blaming third party voters

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

you can't beat lies with the truth until people care about the truth

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's just the socialism tbh, I think it's also something about the way Sanders just sounds sincere in his concern for working people, backed up at least in some sense by his record and consistency. Some people just respond to a perception of personal integrity. I think it would indeed be a mistake for democrats to think they can just, like, reengineer some standard-issue democrat slightly toward a more class-oriented politics and win. I mean that's sort of what "progressive Clinton" was.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

xp - I'm not saying that Sanders' socialism is even the answer, or the best alternative.

If Trump follows in the footsteps of his "mentor," there will be major infrastructure projects that will employ these rust belt people, and maybe he will create a new American car in his image.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

lolling @ a car that looks like Trump

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

any politics that blames the individual voters is not much of a politics

http://i.imgur.com/Ds8bxYo.gif

who is extremely unqualified to review this pop album (BradNelson), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

GOP hates infrastructure projects, that isn't going to happen

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

it wouldn't look like those dull volkswagons for sure. It would be the best car!

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

the wall is an infrastructure project, right

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

^^

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

IDK, I wouldn't rule it out as part of a deal for slashing other fed spending. plenty of politicians of all stripes still like pork barrel projects don't they?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Sanders didn't have to beat Trump amongst white voters, just chip into it enough to win the extremely close Midwest. And he would probably have at least tried, though probably not for the right reasons.

However, he didn't win the primaries. And it wasn't close. And it wasn't because the DNC conspired to put all the debates on saturdays and leak to Clinton that people in Flint was concerned about Flint. The real question is more that if someone like Sanders could win the election, how will you get them to win the primaries? And Sanders' recent tweets doesn't help with that, sigh.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Don't know much about Peter Daou, but I do recommend the album he produced for his wife Vanessa setting Erica Jong poems to soft jazz.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's just the socialism tbh, I think it's also something about the way Sanders just sounds sincere in his concern for working people, backed up at least in some sense by his record and consistency. Some people just respond to a perception of personal integrity. I think it would indeed be a mistake for democrats to think they can just, like, reengineer some standard-issue democrat slightly toward a more class-oriented politics and win. I mean that's sort of what "progressive Clinton" was.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, November 14, 2016 2:37 PM (three seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

during the primary campaign there was a whole messaging movement, parroted by many on these threads, that anything suggesting clinton was insincere or not a true progressive was simply naked misogyny or an internalization of right-wing talking points. it was repeated and trotted out so often that i think the people making the argument even came to believe it themselves. seems in retrospect like projecting a whole host of positions, beliefs, and virtues on someone like clinton was...a mistake

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

#actually bernie's recent tweets...are fine

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah, that was stifling to say the least xp

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

think it's weird to suggest that this election was actually about issues/policies/positions in any way - it was about competing cults of personality.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

in the end clinton's image was successfully tarnished by those right-wing talking points, so it seems like 'not-not a thing' that the left spent the primary tearing her image down

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

is that same peter daou!!!!? i interviewed him (and vanessa) in the 80s re some dance records they made for nu-groove

i guess that was a very long time ago

mark s, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

who even thought Clinton was a true progressive? I mean, there were plenty of people on the left bringing out right-wing talking points to discredit her, some of them scarily false -- scary, in that I had hoped people on the left would "know better." But she was/is a moderate, and the argument in her favor was pragmatic.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

K3vin get's it. The answer to the election of Donald Trump is obviously to care less about misogyny.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

i see you've been running my posts through google translate again

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

k3v, do you watch the History Channel show, Vikings?

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

a lot of mistakes were made in the democratic primary, the first one being forgetting that the purpose of running a primary is to gauge what your electorate wants, not to confirm that they want what you want them to want

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

I'm not going to sit here and say that progressive concerns about Clinton's closeness to big finance (for example) weren't sincere or warranted, or can just be dismissed as internalized right-wing talking points; but in the cold light of day, SECRET SPEECHES TO GOLDMAN SACHS looks like pretty weak tea next to "Trump may name Jamie Dimon as Sec. of the Treasury."

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

i do not xxp

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

My anecdotal evidence is that the democrats who didn't vote for Bernie in the primary did so in large part because "he can't win the general election". Any stats back this up?

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

idk I voted for Bernie in the primary, even though I didn't think he could win the general election, but I thought that showing that a lot of people were concerned about the issues he was talking about could influence the party platform in the general election.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

looks like pretty weak tea next to "Trump may name Jamie Dimon as Sec. of the Treasury."

admittedly, that is just as scary as "Obama may name Jamie Dimon as Sec. of the Treasury" was 8 years ago.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

k3v: Whatever. If you really think dem women will respond to the election of Donald Trump, a man who bragged about sexual assault, by being less likely to see sexism or misogyny amongst candidates, enjoy losing the next primary as well.

Sanders lost because he lost the black vote, mainly. And he never really cared about outreach and dismissed the south as unimportant, so there was no surprise there.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

xp same here as what sarahell just said

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

k3v: Whatever. If you really think dem women will respond to the election of Donald Trump, a man who bragged about sexual assault, by being less likely to see sexism or misogyny amongst candidates, enjoy losing the next primary as well.

i honestly don't know what this is even in response to

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

bunch of xposts -- trump likely has a better shot at passing a big infrastructure bill than hrc would have. Dems like Sanders/Warren could present him with a plan and say "All Dems will vote for this, now we just to peel off a bunch of Repubs." Trump could then tell Ryan, "look, if you don't go along w/ me on infrastructure, the Dems will be getting credit for it." And then maybe the Repubs do end up backing it. i don't know if Trump has it in him to do this though.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

hearts and minds!

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

i voted for Sanders in the primaries because i thought he had the best chance of winning the election, same as with Obama in 2008

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

My anecdotal evidence is that the democrats who didn't vote for Bernie in the primary did so in large part because "he can't win the general election". Any stats back this up?

― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger),

I'm not sure I can have this argument again.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

xxpost The election was cult of personality vs. cult of no personality. As warm and funny as many close to Clinton claim she is, none of that has ever come across in her public persona.

And not to say that Trump isn't a scumbag (or douchebag or any other type of disreputable bag), but "bragging about sexual assault" struck me as left-wing overreach (no pun intended), the kind of thing that fires up the right. He was talking about the perks of celebrity, that women give men — even ratty 70-year-olds — sexual consent they wouldn't give ordinary people. I mean, Ron Wood just fathered twins for fuck's sake!

dinnerboat, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

GOP hates infrastructure projects, that isn't going to happen

― Οὖτις, Monday, November 14, 2016 2:40 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This means they're definitely going to happen right

badg, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

I'm not going to sit here and say that progressive concerns about Clinton's closeness to big finance (for example) weren't sincere or warranted, or can just be dismissed as internalized right-wing talking points; but in the cold light of day, SECRET SPEECHES TO GOLDMAN SACHS looks like pretty weak tea next to "Trump may name Jamie Dimon as Sec. of the Treasury."

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, November 14, 2016 2:50 PM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Seriously? The current treasury secretary is the former COO of Citigroup

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

sorry, of a Citigroup subsidiary

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

one small silver lining of this election is that I finally feel freed to completely ignore all Frederik B posts about US Politics

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

lolling @ a car that looks like Trump

Assuming the yellowish color is tacky gold leaf it's probably this:

http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/homer_front1.jpg

Their all losers and I like associating with loser (Dan Peterson), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Frederik's posts will from now on pass across my eyes like the reflections of clouds drifting across window panes

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

I hate to use the word "optics" but there's a continuum from "any former C-level banking exec" to "guy whose name is nearly synonymous with the Great Recession and billionaire whining."

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

the "infrastructure projects" about which the MSN is going on about are tax credits to private business, i.e. a bunch of bullshit

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

well Paulson was CEO of Goldman Sachs. Pre crisis, but there's definitely a precedent for big wall street guys as treasury.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

is that same peter daou!!!!? i interviewed him (and vanessa) in the 80s re some dance records they made for nu-groove

i guess that was a very long time ago

― mark s, Monday, November 14, 2016 1:47 PM (eighteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes that's him! i've tried his music and it is lolzy at best.

aaand he was also in (i think) a falangist militia in lebanon as a young man. life takes many turns dunnit.

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, right, man alive. I should be so lucky. You will complain and nag as much as you've always done.

dinnerboat: He said he didn't even wait. There was no consent involved, no time for it, and the many women who came forth and said he'd assaulted them proved that point very well.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Daou went pretty quickly from boasting about fighting terrorists as a falangist to claiming that he was conscripted for military service and didn't harm a fly. The latter seems more probable.

Xp

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

(xps to Alfred)

so it's usaid for the homeland, iow

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Is it tax credits now? I thought the plan was reducing credits and subsidies and lowering the overall business tax rate, as well as major legislation related to offshoring assets.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

Frederik B: But the question of consent is complicated by his wealth and fame and power. Would these assault allegations have stood up in court? Again, not defending him, I just think it wasn't nearly as cut & dried as the "unrepentant rapist" narrative implied, which I think further alienated many voters.

dinnerboat, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

he used to go into dressing rooms to peek at naked 15 year old girls wtf is wrong with you

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

I've been thinking about how Democrats used to own the trade issue. Most free trade deals were opposed by the majority of rank and file Democrats in roll calls, and they were passed only by wide Republican support with a few cross-overs. Every one of them created winners and losers, and the winners were in the financial industry that mediated the flow of American capital to overseas factories, creating greater inequality. Here, Trump adopted what was once a Democratic issue, one we abandoned.

As technocrats, the Clintons and other DLC Democrats could point to the consensus among economists, but 1) much neoliberal economics has the character of religious dogma, where many arguments arrayed in its favor full of unfounded assumptions and logical gaps, and 2) there has always been an undercurrent of heterodox economists willing to poke holes, like Steve Keen and Ian Fletcher.

If Democrats choose to focus on bread and butter issues over the odd policy side dishes of safety nets + identity politics, I hope we start taking what the heterodox economists have been saying seriously. The arguments for neoliberal economics rarely address economic inequality, and I think we've made mistakes assuming that maximizing average standard of living and attempting to address the resultant increasing inequality with policy band-aids offers the same qualitative good as trade policies that ensure American high-employment businesses are competitive. Other countries we compete with aren't nearly so beholden to neoliberal economic dogmas and do intervene in these ways.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

And not to say that Trump isn't a scumbag (or douchebag or any other type of disreputable bag), but "bragging about sexual assault" struck me as left-wing overreach (no pun intended), the kind of thing that fires up the right. He was talking about the perks of celebrity, that women give men — even ratty 70-year-olds — sexual consent they wouldn't give ordinary people. I mean, Ron Wood just fathered twins for fuck's sake!

yeah I've heard a lot of people defending this as "no this is what it's like for celebrities" but there have been stories for years and years about Trump assaulting women. tons of them came out during the campaign. it's not hard to believe Trump having some serious PUA-style beliefs - "every woman wants to sleep with you, even if they say they don't"

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

I thought the plan was reducing credits and subsidies

The plan is whatever somebody last pitched to Trump. Eventually the Congress will come up with something they can pass. Trump's role will be to make contradictory announcements, create a huge hubbub, then take full credit for everything that people like about the new tax plan, plus take extra credit for things that didn't happen, but sound really good.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

not only that but Trump always seemed like the type who would gauge his entire self-worth by the number of attractive women he's slept with, and he definitely assumed that others would see him the same way. hence the whole "John Barron" thing.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

"jpod blames obama for the failures of the dem party -- lots to take exception with in that article but i do wonder what ppl think - does obama bear responsibility for the epic collapse of democratic political power in the US?

― Mordy"

one last time to say "THANKS OBAMA"

"I had a dream about a news story featuring the pictures of Trump's cabinet appointments, which included both Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope and which seems both horrifically on-the-nose but also way off the mark inasmuch as they, unlike most of Trump's cronies, have in the past demonstrated some intellectual curiosity re: magnets and what have you.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch)"

let's be fair compared to trump violent j and shaggy 2 dope are voices of dignity and reason

facebook friend posted this umberto eco article from '95. good read.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

idk I voted for Bernie in the primary, even though I didn't think he could win the general election, but I thought that showing that a lot of people were concerned about the issues he was talking about could influence the party platform in the general election.

― sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 19:52 (twenty-eight minutes ago) Permalink

yep

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

oddly, I was kind of worried about him getting an actual infrastructure plan through, might really boost the economy and gain him support for all kinds of other horrible shit

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

btw, as trump accomplishes little, but makes a lot of noise doing it, the Plain People of America who voted for him will see all the noise and confusion as evidence that trump is hard at work on their behalf to disrupt Business As Usual and to #MAGA.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

Have the odds of Obama pardoning Snowden increased, as a 'signal' to potential whistleblowers in the upcoming era? Seems utterly fantastical given O's historic number of 'blower prosecutions, but I saw someone musing on it...

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

I was wondering about that too

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

it would be a good move if he pardoned Snowden and officially went against the DAPL.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

hey so somebody in another thread told me to shut the fuck up so i wrote an etiquette guide on the topic. i want to paraphrase part ii, "when to tell somebody to shut the fuck up"

there are two circumstances under which it's advisable to tell somebody to shut the fuck up. they are:

1. you are drunk
2. the person you are talking to has grossly insulted you, your loved ones, or your most precious values, and you really never want to talk to them or have to look at their stupid face again

if someone is being an obnoxious prick and really pissing you off, on the other hand, probably better to ignore them and/or walk away.

i wrote this for my own benefit so if you disagree, feel free to tell me to shut the fuck up, and by the guidelines of part i, i will.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

I'd post odds of Snowden pardon at 10 to 1 against. Obama would worry about impairing the effectiveness of the new administration, not seeing trump as irreparably dangerous and illegitimate, and therefore would not see it as his duty to pre-emptively undermine trump's inevitable abuses.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

not seeing trump as irreparably dangerous and illegitimate

idk about that tbh

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

looks like Ed is not counting on Trump giving him clemency

https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/797829492484046852

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

should pardon manning before she successfully kills herself =|

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

xps to shakey. trump is a salesman who is unafraid to lie, conceal his true intentions, say whatever he thinks will gain him credit with the person he is speaking to. I don't doubt he used his innate deceptiveness when he and Obama met for 90 minutes a few days ago, to lead Obama to believe he is nowhere near the poisonous snake he truly is. He's pretty good at it when he wants to be, from what I hear.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

would you say he's a "master persuader"

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

how stupid do you think Obama is. accounts of that meeting make it sound that Obama spent more time explaining things like what the President actually does on the daily than anything else

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

I'm really torn, I think the only way I can survive the next four(ish) years is to laugh and make fun of it all, and yet, I don't find any of this funny.

I read a book once called The Great War and Modern Memory (maybe everyone reads this book?). Anyway, I seem to recall part of its gist is that the chaos and confusion and countless horrors of WWI helped define Britain's default ironic humor. I dunno, maybe WWII destroyed/remade all that a few years later, but anyway, but that's what I'm feeling.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

latest Sec of State rumor: John effing Bolton

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

how stupid do you think Obama is. accounts of that meeting make it sound that Obama spent more time explaining things like what the President actually does on the daily than anything else

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61Dvlqt5gSL._SX405_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

I think I'd be marginally cooler with the entire Trump administration if to the person they all grew a mustache like Bolton's.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

Well-socialized people give the benefit of the doubt to someone at least long enough for their lies to become apparent. exceptional liars are able to extend this grace period repeatedly through additional lies and deceptions. Obama is well-socialized. It wouldn't take much to get on his good side in an initial meeting.

accounts of that meeting make it sound that Obama spent more time explaining things like what the President actually does on the daily than anything else

That would elicit pity and a desire to help more than a conviction that trump is evil and must be stopped by all mean necessary.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

jfc Aimless check your white privilege for once in your life

one small silver lining of this election is that I finally feel freed to completely ignore all Frederik B posts about US Politics

I'm amazed he hasn't gotten to 51 yet

sleeve, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

HuffPost ed:

@ryangrim
Source says John Bolton is close to being named Secretary of State, Corker still a remote possibility, Gingrich is out

Hey sane Republicans who don't want to see world war: sources say John Bolton is not a done deal. Corker still possible. A little help here?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

FWIW, it's interesting (to me) that both the Times and WaPo, who have been burning through headlines as fast as they're being generated, have kept anti-Bannon stuff prominently at the top of their page all day.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

Obama is well-socialized. It wouldn't take much to get on his good side in an initial meeting.

this is the guy who lied for 8 years about Obama being eligible for the presidency

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

"but sure hey, Trump seems like a nice guy!" is not a thing Obama is going to think

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

Obama is well-socialized

are you saying he was a Communist?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

Watching Obama now, he seems a little exhausted from restraining from shouting "good luck, and fuck all of you idiots."

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

I'm just saying O won't pardon Snowden and he'll go ahead and help Trump get started as smoothly as he can, as opposed to O covertly or overtly setting obstacles in his way and showing active mistrust. He does this because his respect for the system is greater than his dislike of Trump's policies. So, explain to me why this opinion, which so far has been borne out by Obama's words and actions, rests on my white privilege? kthxbye

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

He does this because his respect for the system is greater than his dislike of Trump's policies

Obama cares about his legacy. He doesn't want to see everything he worked for undone.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

xp (hears faint sounds of furious typing in ilx land)

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

and, like I said, the personal level of animus between these two is very real

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

like Trump might write off his antics as "just politics", but Obama took that shit about his legitimacy personally

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

obama cares about his legacy and also probably cares a tiny bit about the entire world not falling apart.

obv he is trying to plant ideas in trump's head. the idea that he's been charmed over or whatever is pretty lol.

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

I don't know why it never occurred to me before, but a Trump win completely obviates any illusory need for a Mexican border wall. What non-white person would want to come here now? Maybe...maybe he was the wall the whole time, guys.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I applaud any Dems that want to schmooze Trump and pull some Mother Night shit for the next four years in an attempt to avert the complete disintegration of the country.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

maybe he was the wall the whole time

http://www.pantomusicals.co.uk/dracula/digital/0203_talkingwall_small.jpg

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

I made the mistake of dipping into the Trumpverse fora last night just to see if even one had expressed some horror and disappointment about all the GOP insiders and lobbyists... nope.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

he did get some alarmed tweets for describing same-sex marriage as "settled law" on 60M

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

Trumpverse is a cult. They aren't going to start realizing things. The spin they used to protect him during the campaigns is the same they're going to use to protect themselves from cognitive dissonance.

Evan, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

yeah this is a non-fact-based reality these people operate in

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

re: the ridiculous Sanders counterfactuals: https://twitter.com/FutureBoy/status/798226845070069762

smfh @ the NY Times: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/798136951324995584

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

Bolton's views on how the US should approach Syria seem at odds with the noises Trump has been making about supporting Assad and Putin in fighting ISIS

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/25/opinion/john-bolton-to-defeat-isis-create-a-sunni-state.html?_r=0

soref, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

on first pass this analysis from derek davidson is good:

https://attwiw.com/2016/11/14/things-i-think-first-in-a-series/

I think that it makes much less sense to talk about the 2016 election in terms of how Donald Trump won than it does to talk about it in terms of how Hillary Clinton lost. The numbers are pretty clear: Trump will finish the election with only slightly more votes nationally that Mitt Romney earned in a losing campaign in 2012, while Clinton will finish with a couple of million less than Obama earned...

I think that we need to stop talking about how Democrats have to appeal to the “white working class.” Democrats need to start appealing to the working class, period. Working class minority communities may predominantly vote Democratic for reasons specific to those communities, but the Democratic Party stopped being the part of the working class, broadly speaking, in the run up to the 1992 election...

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

and this, big time -- i don't think it's hard to square this circle! i really don't

I think there’s nothing incongruous about supporting pro-worker economic policies, defending the basic rights and dignities of all at-risk minorities, and fighting for a stronger, less violent, more consistent foreign policy. Since the primary, I’ve frequently seen people advance the argument that leftists want to “throw [insert minority group] under the bus” in order to appeal to those “white working class” voters, who are all assumed to be irredeemable bigots. Well I don’t claim to speak for lefties everywhere, but to me that’s bullshit. I don’t want to appeal to bigots. If an agenda of higher wages, stronger social welfare programs, single payer healthcare, fair–not “free”–trade, and economic justice doesn’t appeal to white voters because they’re too racist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, etc., to appreciate it, then screw them. But I’m willing to bet that a political party that makes protection of minority rights paramount but also embraces, wholeheartedly, an economic agenda that benefits the 99% instead of the 1%, can win elections, big league.

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Obama presser wrapping up right now underscores quietly that Trump has no fucking idea what he is in for.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

re: the ridiculous Sanders counterfactuals: https://twitter.com/FutureBoy/status/798226845070069762

smfh @ the NY Times: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/798136951324995584

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:31 (nine minutes ago) Permalink

um, you realize there's opposition research in every election, right?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

"Sanders would have face attacks, therefore he could not have won an election."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

what is a face attack

¶ (DJP), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

will happily join any planned face attacks imo

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

is that like an involuntary spasm, or does his face literally leap off of his body and attack people

¶ (DJP), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

idk, I think that the Sandinista stuff would have damaged him. Isn't there some old article where he says some vaguely positive stuff about the USSR as well?

soref, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

xp: because normally I'd say that the latter is definitely a campaign killer but after what just happened I guess it's all up in the air

¶ (DJP), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

it's a GS world after all

Former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. partner Steven Mnuchin has been recommended by Donald Trump’s transition team to serve as Treasury secretary, according to two people familiar with the process, and the choice is awaiting the president-elect’s final decision.

Mnuchin, the campaign’s national finance chairman, has been considered the leading candidate for the job. Trump has displayed a pattern of loyalty to his closest campaign allies in early administration selections, and Mnuchin, 53, had signed on at a time when many from Wall Street stayed away.

Before joining Trump, Mnuchin rose through the kind of elite institutions the president-elect spent his campaign vilifying. Mnuchin was tapped into Yale’s Skull and Bones secret society, became a Goldman Sachs partner like his father before him, ran a hedge fund, worked with George Soros, funded Hollywood blockbusters and bought a failed bank, IndyMac, with billionaires including John Paulson. They renamed it OneWest, drew protests for foreclosing on U.S. borrowers, and ultimately generated considerable profits, selling the business last year to CIT Group Inc. for $3.4 billion....

Mnuchin is best known for his 17-year career at Goldman Sachs, although he also served as a Hollywood producer for movies like “American Sniper,” “Mad Max: Fury Road” and “Suicide Squad.” He has also been widely regarded as one of the chief villains of the 2008 financial collapse.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-14/trump-advisers-said-to-recommend-mnuchin-for-treasury-secretary

http://www.salon.com/2016/11/14/draintheswamp-steven-mnuchin-ex-goldman-sachs-banker-tapped-to-run-treasury/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Sounds a lot like the opposition research they had on Obama. "Goddamn America," ties to the radical left, etc.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

um, you realize there's opposition research in every election, right?

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, November 14, 2016 4:42 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sanders really faced basically none in the primary and that gave people an inflated view of how strong he was as a candidate

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

the first thing mentioned in that tweet was widely circulated during the primary

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

What's with old lefties and weird rape apologia in the '60s and '70s (I mean, aside from the usual misogyny) - doesn't the leader of the German Greens have something like that too?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Totally agree with those saying nothing can change the mind of the Trumpverse. My good buddy is a Trump supporter and it seems that he's able to shrug off anything Trump does by saying stuff like "I don't need to approve of all of his behavior". Regarding Trump's followers, he will brush it off with "They're not all like that" or that he's not like that. In summation, seems like my friend is probably angry and dissatisfied with how his life is and Trump keeps that loop going.

Ross, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Voters in Michigan and Wisconsin voted against higher wages, stronger social welfare and stronger healthcare. I have no idea what 'fair trade' entails in concrete policies, and 'economic justice'? Michigan voters rewarded the party that poisoned Flints water supply.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

obama was super charismatic candidate

bullshit controversies sticks to the candidates who aren't e.g. kerry w/ the swiftboat stuff

xp

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

tbh I think all Bernie oppo research stops and starts with "self-described socialist." Much as I respect the guy it's hard to see that not driving away a lot of people who are still scared of the word.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

stick to* xp

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's even just the charisma deficit (though ofc that would be a factor), Obama was patently a fairly centrist democrat, so attempts to paint him as a left wing radical just looked hysterical, Sanders isn't a centrist dem and doesn't come across as one.

soref, Monday, 14 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

Iatee otm

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

what is a face attack

― ¶ (DJP)

ever seen "alien"?

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

on charisma - http://www.paulgraham.com/charisma.html

obviously a super simplistic framework...but the argument certainly doesn't seem worse 3 elections later

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

that sanders opps shit is some weak ass shit

a (waterface), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

this election was overdetermined. so many factors. you can propose just about any explanation and you'd be right.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

"Mnuchin is best known for his 17-year career at Goldman Sachs, although he also served as a Hollywood producer for movies like “American Sniper,” “Mad Max: Fury Road” and “Suicide Squad.” He has also been widely regarded as one of the chief villains of the 2008 financial collapse."

That's... twisted

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

re: the ridiculous Sanders counterfactuals: https://twitter.com/FutureBoy/status/798226845070069762

smfh @ the NY Times: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/798136951324995584

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, November 14, 2016 4:31 PM (thirty-seven minutes ago

yo dawg we heard you liked counterfactuals so we countered your counterfactual with a counterfactual of our own, dawg

fact is we don't know what would have happened if bernie (or warren, or anyone) ran. i agree that people saying bernie or whoever "would have won" are being silly. but he might have. and the fact is, hillary did run and she lost. also lol @ the "environmental racist" thing, that was an attack point in the primary (lol peter daou) and no one cared. i have a hard time believing it would have mattered in the general

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

lol

xp

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

We welcome you to Mnuchin land!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

obama was super charismatic candidate

bullshit controversies sticks to the candidates who aren't e.g. kerry w/ the swiftboat stuff

I think there's a lot to be said about that

Hillary came off as someone who was way too prepared for everything, who constantly rehearsed in front of the mirror and memorized lines from her campaign website. Trump on the other hand had a whole lot of "come on, you know what I mean, right?", y'know, fill in the gaps. I think it was easy for people to believe that Hillary was being disingenuous and dishonest because she was so calculated. We don't know a whole lot of people who regularly talk like that.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

sure we do. and we don't trust them at all.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

Michael Moore lamented how Hillary missed a chance to be cool 'n' loose after her first post-pneumonia public appearance, i.e. responding to one of those shouted "How do you feel?" questions with "Like crap!"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

people wanted a Dionysian Prez

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

the real reason why Sanders counterfactuals are fucked is because it's so far out of the bounds of anything we've ever experienced. same w/ Trump, which is why the polls were so uninformative; the past relationship between polls and turnout were out of wack bc no one knows how polls translate into votes when one candidate is an explicit white supremacist. forecasts, formal or informal, only predict well within the range of history. I admit this goes both ways; he may not have lost! but it's just ridiculous to confidently maintain that a Socialist would have won president over a Racist/Fascist

personally I would have been happy with Clinton or Sanders. I donated money to his campaign but ultimately weakly preferred Clinton, partly because i'm a "Shitlib" who believed that the 'next step' to a just society in the US was through left-neoliberalism rather than somehow leap-frogging to the exact institutions of Denmark via a political revolution by ppl with bumper-stickers, but also I kind of believe u have to give ppl *one* status quo choice, and Obama was a very popular president so why not have one candidate running on 'hey let's do more of the same'. I really hate all the Bernie ppl on twitter, with few exceptions I find them rude, lazy, pseudo-reactionary, and waaayy too addicted to social media and over-obsessed with petty debates with *scornfully* liberals; it's depresses me that they will be a big part of the media far left during the era of President Donald Trump. but we're all gonna die so w/e

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

xxpost: reminded of some sarah vowell piece from like 2001 where she lamented that al gore hadn't tried to come across as more of a lovable, self-deprecating nerd, rather than an uptight awkward nerd

gore did subsequently kind of do this but i was never rly convinced that it would play well in a general election

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

what is a face attack

― ¶ (DJP), Monday, 14 November 2016 21:43 (thirty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fly @ u

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

omfg this connection:

http://www.latimes.com/books/la-et-jc-louise-linton-memoir-20160706-snap-htmlstory.html

Until last week, Louise Linton was a little-known Scottish actress living in California, whose most prominent roles were guest spots in the television shows "CSI: NY" and "Cold Case" and the movies "Intruder" and "Cabin Fever."

Now, thanks to a self-published memoir she wrote about her experiences volunteering in Africa when she was 18, she's become the target of outrage and mockery on social media. On top of her literary missteps, Buzzfeed has discovered that she’s dating Donald Trump’s finance chief.

The trouble began with an article by Linton that appeared in the Telegraph in the UK on July 1 under the headline "How my dream gap year in Africa turned into a nightmare," accompanied by a photo of the blond actress.

The article was meant to promote Linton's book, “In Congo's Shadow: One Girl's Perilous Journey to the Heart of Africa," co-written with author Wendy Holden, which was published via Amazon’s self-publishing platform CreateSpace in the U.S. in April.

In the article, Linton, who was in Zambia, described hiding from armed rebels as a nearby village was being attacked. "As the night ticked interminably by, I tried not to think what the rebels would do to the 'skinny white muzungu with long angel hair’ if they found me," she writes, using a Swahili word for a foreigner of European heritage.

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

I mean this is really dumb but I honestly think "only Rosie O'Donnell!" was a huge moment for Trump

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

xp
this election was overdetermined

this election was over-everything'd. After the second debate, I started noticing the default reaction from people I encountered was "I'm tired of hearing about it, wish we could just get it over with".

And yeah, charisma seems really obvious to me (to use that linked article's terms) -- most of the Hillary supporters conceded her deficiency here, no? For me, it wasn't a matter of me not trusting her, more like being uninspiring. IMO Trump single greatest asset as a candidate was his "charisma".

Dominique, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

bless u dmac

goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

'charisma' could also be defined in part as people knowing why you want the job - Hillary never really gave people an idea WHY she wanted to be President other than she'd wanted to be since 2000 or 2008. Even the historical nature of being the first female President got subsumed with Trump's shittiness about women. I think most people thought the ads of him saying terrible things juxtaposed with young women were a good idea at the time but maybe they should have been her talking about why being the first woman in the White House would be so important.

elections where neither was charismatic: 1988 maybe 2000? I don't remember people thinking Bush was anything special even among supporters

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

Hillary never really gave people an idea WHY she wanted to be President other than she'd wanted to be since 2000 or 2008.

this is bullshit.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

personally I would have been happy with Clinton or Sanders. I donated money to his campaign but ultimately weakly preferred Clinton, partly because i'm a "Shitlib" who believed that the 'next step' to a just society in the US was through left-neoliberalism rather than somehow leap-frogging to the exact institutions of Denmark via a political revolution by ppl with bumper-stickers, but also I kind of believe u have to give ppl *one* status quo choice, and Obama was a very popular president so why not have one candidate running on 'hey let's do more of the same'. I really hate all the Bernie ppl on twitter, with few exceptions I find them rude, lazy, pseudo-reactionary, and waaayy too addicted to social media and over-obsessed with petty debates with *scornfully* liberals; it's depresses me that they will be a big part of the media far left during the era of President Donald Trump. but we're all gonna die so w/e

― flopson, Monday, November 14, 2016

haha "ppl with bumper-stickers" is a little harsh but i love it

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

bless u dmac

― goole, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:27 (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

tryin to stay cheery for yall tbh

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

I totally think that Hillary should've put herself in her ads - why do we need to see the same clips of Trump that the media has been covering nonstop again? What happened to "when they go low, we go high?"

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

Hillary never really gave people an idea WHY she wanted to be President

I'd go along with this -- and other than her general ideology regarding how to take the country in particular directions, I still don't think I know the answer to this. Ambition? You're just that big a patriot? Dunno, to me it doesn't seem like the kind of job to go for unless you REALLY REALLY WANT IT, IN A WAY THAT NO SANE PERSON COULD DOUBT. Whereas with Trump, it was like "well everything's terrible, and I won't apologize for being an asshole because I'm the only guy with balls enough to fix it." We may all die a horrible nuclear death because of it, but dammit that's charisma!

Dominique, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

pretty counterintuitive to not focus on the fact that your opponent is LITERALLY ONE OF THE WORST HUMAN BEINGS IN AMERICA

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

eh one of the worst to run for president yeah sure, one of the worst public figures well probably, but

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, at the time I thought it was a common-sense approach because I still can't grasp anyone finding his blustering narcissism palatable much less his offensiveness acceptable. Even in a light-red area literally everyone I interacted with was horrified by his behavior (or said they were). I made assumptions about how other people would view it.

But I don't go to church and the median age at bars is closer to 30 than 50 and comic book customers don't really talk about politics and even though my county went for him @51%, the urban part I'm in 98% of the time mostly voted for Hillary.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

Hillary never really gave people an idea WHY she wanted to be President

i don't understand this response. she repeatedly said she wanted to serve working families, and in particular, address wealth inequality, improve paid family leave, reform the criminal justice system, safeguard LGBT rights, and a ton of other things. she did not reflect my personal politics in every particular, but she had a very clearly articulated platform. are you saying it was too specific? not broad enough strokes?

also, for serious, she spent a bunch of her early career advocating for children's rights. i feel like her campaign rhetoric grew pretty directly from that.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

like, why did we spend all this time focusing on the fact that this guy is a serial rapist / criminal instead of 'talking about the issues'?

because we assumed most americans had at least a tiny bit of decency and wouldn't let that shit slide, regardless of politics. in retrospect that was a pretty bad thing to assume!

xp

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

that is several dozen words longer than "to make America Great Again"

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

i suspect this will be read as shrill + reactionary on ilx, but if you tell me her campaign wasn't about anything but ambition, i am going to assume that your reaction is in part about her gender.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

I'm not saying she didn't have reasons, I don't think she communicated them effectively. There was no grand MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN narrative to tie into, or Obama/Bill's hope.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

How about 'to break every barrier'? 'To prove we're stronger together'? Yeah, they're bad, but slogans are like that. Anyone on here not actually horrified by 'make America great again'?

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

my wife, who is not American incidentally, watched the first debate with me. a debate Hillary was widely said to have won, and Trump to have lost (badly). after 5 or 10 minutes of seeing them go back and forth she said "he's going to win the election". and i was like whuuuut. she said he had a simple message, and delivered it simply. he knew how shit worked, and he was going to fix what was broken. he knew how to get good deals, and he'd get a good deal for the american people. vote trump. i was like "well don't you think that's a bit reductionist"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

i think she was very detailed whenever asked about her vision for the country. that is not the same thing as not giving people a reason why she wanted to be president.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

it's a good slogan. it's also a total anti-semitic dog whistle.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

also it's hard to get the media to focus on anything you're saying about 'the issues' when trump is sucking up all the air in the room

in order to get any policy/theme through that noise she would have to get it tattooed on her head

xp

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

horseshoe otm. it was clear to me why hillary wanted to be president and i was excited to see what she would do in office. i guess the problem was that she didn't boil it down into a catchphrase that appealed to the people who flipped for trump in the midwest.

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

her campaign was fn tite, she bodied him 3x straight in most-watched debates, ran on a platform building on a president with 60% approval rating's legacy, had brutal attack ads on the worst person to ever run for office plastered across america--the fact that it was even close tells u a lot more about the electorate than whatever vague niggling complaints u can make about her or her campaign

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

misogyny played a bigger role in her defeat than her messaging though, imo. trump's incompetent campaign totally overshadowed his populist "message." people had to work to hear it, and they did, unlike with hillary.

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

xp - thread too fast for me!

are you saying it was too specific? not broad enough strokes?

actually, using your examples, it seemed like the opposite -- she had lots of reasons why she felt it was important to be president, or things she felt she could improve. But a question would be -- "why you, and not some other person who shares the same ideals?" And again, if I asked Trump that question, I'd expect a "because no one else can do what I do" kind of response. Misguided, arrogant...but personal, and leaving no room to wonder why he, of all people, wants the job.

Dominique, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

she did body him tbqh. tracer, i can see your wife's response to that debate making sense if she only watched the first ten minutes. also i find all the talk about soundbites and messaging tiresome. if reality is complicated, political solutions are complicated, and i am not going to criticize politicians who engage with problems in a complex way.

xxp

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

beyond that, individual parts of that could be met with a 'huh' and questioning the authenticity - people rightfully questioned how much Clinton Democrats really care about wealth inequality. They voted for a guy who actively gives zero shits about inequality but he could bluster about jobs to them.

re: family leave stuff, isn't that actually a pretty niche audience - essentially middle-to-upper middle class people hear that and get excited. The working family with blue collar jobs knows it will never and can never apply to them (short of European social democracy).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

hillary's answer to that would be that she had the most experience, and that she had more high level connections at home and abroad than anyone else, which she could leverage to accomplish her goals. xp dom

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

like, if left-wing populists like bernie sanders were willing to race-bait with dw griffith-esque slogans like make america great again, i'm sure they would be more likely to be elected, but thank fuck they're not

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

But a question would be -- "why you, and not some other person who shares the same ideals?" And again, if I asked Trump that question, I'd expect a "because no one else can do what I do" kind of response. Misguided, arrogant...but personal, and leaving no room to wonder why he, of all people, wants the job.

You: why should you, Mr Trump, be president and not someone else
Trump: Because
You: well this leaves no doubt in my mind, thank you. Clinton, same question
Clinton: *long detailed response*
You: hmm... I see that you have a lot of reasons why you feel it is important to be president, but I'm not really seeing a straight answer here

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

re: family leave stuff, isn't that actually a pretty niche audience - essentially middle-to-upper middle class people hear that and get excited. The working family with blue collar jobs knows it will never and can never apply to them (short of European social democracy).

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, November 14, 2016 5:56 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

maybe working class women did not believe her, and maybe it would be impossible given the republican congress, but i believe she planned to work on paid family leave for all. working-class families could sure use it.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

But a question would be -- "why you, and not some other person who shares the same ideals?"

OK but the answer would be "because one person on the stage has those ideals and the other one is an asshole who doesn't give a shit about you or anything but himself" and I feel like that's basically what she said.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 14 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

Tracer Hand, most of the common wisdom was that Trump lost it after 20 minutes, giving the victory to Clinton. There was a big swing in the polls after that, indicating that what she presented really was more popular. I remember watching the first half hour of the second debate and thinking 'she is toast in 2020', though. The whole thing was just so ugly and traumatic at that point, I wanted nothing more to do with it. And I'm an addict.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

Trump boldly promised to turn back time to the 1980's before Trade and Technology killed manufacturing, and to turn back the clock culturally on everything that's transpired since.

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

I'd go along with this -- and other than her general ideology regarding how to take the country in particular directions, I still don't think I know the answer to this. Ambition? You're just that big a patriot? Dunno, to me it doesn't seem like the kind of job to go for unless you REALLY REALLY WANT IT, IN A WAY THAT NO SANE PERSON COULD DOUBT. Whereas with Trump, it was like "well everything's terrible, and I won't apologize for being an asshole because I'm the only guy with balls enough to fix it." We may all die a horrible nuclear death because of it, but dammit that's charisma!

I agree with you about charisma, but to the bolded: something seems a bit "off" to me about how you frame the question, at least with regard to this particular person, Hillary that is. The question "why would you want to be President?" is not really the same for HRC as it is for DJT. Hillary had already (a) lived in the White House (b) been subject to intense, persistent, partisan scrutiny (c) served in the highest levels of the Executive Branch (d) served in the most prestigious chamber of the legislative branch (e) met with foreign heads of state (f) made decisions alongside the Prez (g) I could go on and on. In a sense, she had already, long ago, gone into the kinds of jobs you don't go for unless you "really really want it" and she had already been marinating in that milieu her whole career. Her motivation for seeking the Presidency will unsurprisingly lack the urgency and clarity of purpose i that we can see in Trump, for whom the office represents a new and radical life change. I think "ambition" is a reductive concept, in some ways, not that it's entirely irrelevant. I see it more as a matter of identity. Hillary saw herself as a leader since her days at Wellesley, and has never stopped doing so since. It's just what she does.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

i for one am glad we've had this discussion and all agree that the democrats and clinton did everything right, and it's all [someone else's] fault. can't wait for 2020!

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

Make America Great Again always reminded if that (geographically illiterate and politically inaccurate) phrase beloved of UK tabloids and Tory wankers, "Putting the Great back in to Great Britain".

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

i believe that enthusiasm was lower for hillary than for obama in part because some portion of the country sees her as an evil harpy who killed vince foster and won't bake cookies, but that does not really seem like a legitimate critique. also, what about trump's authenticity for christ's sake?

xp for fuck's sake i'm not saying she's above critique. i am not persuaded by "she didn't have a reason to be running."

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

In 2004 when Bush (barely) won again at the peak of dissatisfaction it seemed fairly apparent that a significant number of Americans want/need the embrace of control and assuredness (ie the usual flip-flopping stuff - because it's unmanly to change your mind), even when that assuredness is obviously wrong.

A lot of this is pointless - there are more of 'us' than there are of 'them,' the side of decency and humanity is just getting continually fucked by a white supremacist system designed to favor the economic elite. Even if Hillary could have run a better campaign, it's academic because with a flawed campaign and poor assumptions about the decency of some of our fellow Americans she would be President in any good and reasonable political system.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

I don't think anyone said she "didn't have a reason to be running."

Even if you're horrified by campaign slogans (like, uh YES WE CAN), seems it would be tough to sum up her why in a job interview sentence.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

So although HRC did have a vision, and many of us saw that, it simply wasn't as emphatically alive on the television screen as was Trump's.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

no. her job interview sentence would be, just like i have done all my life, i want to use the presidency to serve working families.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

to be clear, what I said was "Hillary never really gave people an idea WHY" - which is communication not motivation.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

but she said, i believe in public service and want to serve working families 1 million times.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

pretty counterintuitive to not focus on the fact that your opponent is LITERALLY ONE OF THE WORST HUMAN BEINGS IN AMERICA

if people cared about this she would have won by 50 points

ultimately this election was a harrowing experience for everyone and I think Hillary played into it more than I would've liked. her running nonstop commercials with Trump mocking the disabled reporter or saying "they're rapists" didn't help. it wasn't getting people excited about Hillary, it was making them just wish the whole thing was over.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

i for one am glad we've had this discussion and all agree that the democrats and clinton did everything right, and it's all [someone else's] fault. can't wait for 2020!

― k3vin k., Monday, November 14, 2016 6:01 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I still think the main thing was her surname and reputation. i barely know anyone who has isn't of the belief that she's a criminal/corrupt/etc

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

if you want to say the clinton foundation is skeevy and she should have shut it down years ago when she planned to run for president, that seems like a legit critique. if you want to say her caginess read as untrustworthy, that seems like a legit critique. if you want to say bill clinton is a toad and she should have sloughed him off years ago, AMEN. if you want to say she's terrifyingly hawkish then the 1% of this country that cares about the lives of brown people in other countries agrees with you. but i think the idea that she did not communicate why she wanted to be president is weak sauce.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

<3 u horseshoe. unstintingly.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

"terrifyingly" is hyperbole btw i was trying to get in the head of someone like kevin k.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

it wasn't getting people excited about Hillary, it was making them just wish the whole thing was over.

― frogbs, Monday, November 14, 2016 6:07 PM (fifty seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

now we get 4-8 years of it!

flopson, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

i love you too, in orbit.

btw the "superpredator" thing sucked, for sure. i am not saying she is above critique.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

i think a lot of people just don't really pay attention. Maybe apply the thinking we do about why popular music is popular to why candidates do well in politics, idk.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

y'all should step away for a few minutes, have a drink, watch Marnie.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

For better or worse, she was on the hook for Bill and Obama's administrations and both saw real wage stagnation, economic pain for a lot of people and a scarcity of solutions to the problem. We can rightfully blame Republicans for much of it but the fact that Bernie did so well and Obama beat her should point to people not necessarily buying into the view that she was serving working families. Should she have distanced herself or been more combative? Probably, but then you get shrill and blah blah blah.

I think you're viewing this as anyone on ILX saying she was unfit or unqualified to be President in any way, and that's untrue.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:12 (seven years ago) link

and again, "basket of deplorables". kinda cool how the Trump side managed to totally self-own themselves with that, but...still, you don't insult the electorate

truth is I think a lot of people saw parts of themselves in Trump. they aren't proud of the fact that they've said some racist things or once mocked someone with a handicap, or that they rate women or talk dirty with the dudes. they don't approve of that behavior but seeing Hillary and the Dems condemn him and basically call him a horrible person for doing it may have hit a little close to home for them? like, back off, I'm a good person, these are just words.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

No way this could in any possible way be bad and wrong, right?

Julianna Goldman ‏@juliannagoldman 54m54 minutes ago

.@realDonaldTrump team has asked @WhiteHouse how his children could receive top secret security clearances - details on @CBSEveningNews

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

i'd rather they have clearances than donald himself.

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

back off, I'm a good person, these are just words.

I think it was important to call him out on these things, but yeah, I think that response was common.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

i think a lot of people just don't really pay attention. Maybe apply the thinking we do about why popular music is popular to why candidates do well in politics, idk.

― sarahell, Monday, November 14, 2016 5:10 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is probably what it boils down to, mostly.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

So many many xposts

She did communicate "why you should vote for her/why she wanted to be president", but she didn't project it as forcefully as Sanders or Trump. Her rhetorical skills and habits are simply not enough to penetrate the dense fog of impatient boredom that most have when listening to politicians. The other two spoke in a way that could shake the bleachers, where she struggled for the attention of even the good students in the front row of the classroom. (Exaggeration, but whatever)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

And thing is, she acknowledges this.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

it is possibly without precedent that the national leadership of BOTH major parties campaigned heavily against this result and lost. trump was basically a third-party candidate. i don't see how either party has any credibility left even on a practical level.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

i saw a relative of a friend become very animated in a fb thread this week just because of the use of the word 'deplorables'. she said it changed her vote.

j., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

i think there is something to frogbs comment about how people secretly saw themselves in trump

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

i think i need to stop having drink as a kneejerk response to anxiety about the Trump era :( don't want to slide into a debilitating alcohol habit.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

tired of rehashing the election, it's pointless.

in other news:
“Folks should do what President Obama, Secretary Clinton and others are doing, frankly,” Ms. Conway said. “Bernie Sanders this morning, I heard Senator Sanders this morning, which is to support this new president-elect and his mission to unify the country and to implement his 100-day plan.”

quotes like this are exactly why people like Sanders should not use this "let's give him a chance" rhetoric at all. their words/positions will get misrepresented as supporting Trump outright, it will damage their reputation with Dem supporters, and in turn will feed a media narrative of legitimizing Trump/GOP

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

give em an inch and they will take a fucking mile, every time.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

the deplorables comment was badly calculated and i would see it as a major misstep in any other campaign. it still defies understanding why that was seen as worse than virtually anything trump has said in public over these past eighteen months

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

this is already a ways upthread, but just want to say alfred is otm on ''infrastructure'' - generic word getting thrown around, even Sanders is being needlessly vague on how he will be interested in trump delivering on his windbag promises on this point. if trump has an infrastructure program it'll be giveaways to corporations, on projects that can be nudged in the direction of being profitable for them. that will inevitably mean some jobs, but not equitably distributed and not necessarily serving actual real-world needs. don't count on new water pipes for the flints of the world.

and of course, The Wall is the ultimate b.s. infrastructure scheme. this has been on my mind today, reading the backlash against the unilateral declaration by the head of the american institute of architects that everybody was looking forward to working with president trump on all the great new infrastructure jobs sure to be coming down the pipe. barf.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

xxxp that's kinda the Trump way - see also the NYT's letter "apologizing for their unfair coverage of Trump"

indeed, if he's gonna say stuff like this, don't say anything about him at all.

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

maybe shakey, xpost, but i think they are thinking about the next four years. sanders and warren know they need to minimize the danger of a trump presidency, which means working with him, despite what it might do to their political reputations

Treeship, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:22 (seven years ago) link

"half" might have been inaccurate, but it's not like it wasn't true. (i understand it was impolitic.)

xxp the reason it wasn't seen as as bad as stuff Trump says is basically there's a lot of sympathy in white America for the view that calling someone racist is worse than being racist.

horseshoe, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:22 (seven years ago) link

the deplorables comment was badly calculated and i would see it as a major misstep in any other campaign. it still defies understanding why that was seen as worse than virtually anything trump has said in public over these past eighteen months

part because they have higher standards for Hillary, part because she attacked a large swath of the electorate directly. Trump at least had the "no, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the illegals" cover

frogbs, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:22 (seven years ago) link

really any Dem operatives expressing a willingness to "work with Trump" or whatever would be smart to watch their back. Take a lesson from how GOP leaders who did not adequately defer to Tea Party rage ended up - they got primaried/run out of office. Dems should be working to exploit the rage + fear of the party's membership, not tamp it down. anger motivates.

xxp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

i saw a relative of a friend become very animated in a fb thread this week just because of the use of the word 'deplorables'. she said it changed her vote.

gotta think that most people who are willing to change their vote over something like that are just looking for an excuse

iatee, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

like twenty xps to horseshoe re: drinking - I haven't had a drink or cigarette since election night, pretty much decided it was time to actually start living healthier if I'm going to have to face a future of unchecked white nationalism, unaffordable healthcare and environmental deregulation (and because Trump would inevitably drive me to drink more and more). If I'm not a spry elderly person I'll be fucked.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

sanders and warren know they need to minimize the danger of a trump presidency, which means working with him,

NO it doesn't. It means opposing him tooth and nail, just like the GOP did with Obama. The only way to "work with" him is to exploit and drive wedges between him and the GOP leadership. But that won't be accomplished by publicly stated willingness to go along w him on stuff they happen to agree on. GOP didn't give an inch to Obama on shit they actually wanted, because they didn't want him to get the credit. Why would the Dems want Trump to get credit for doing anything, that will just cement his power.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:25 (seven years ago) link

i agree clinton had v detailed reasons why she'd make a great president (tho possibly not the clear, easy to understand reason she really needed), but ultimately the real problem was running as a continuation of obama. inequality has RISEN. people desperately want to SHAKE OUT OF THIS FUNK. it was a change election and clinton was an establishment candidate running on 'more of the same but better/more'. right? sorry for being all cap'n save-a-conventional-wisdom if that's what i'm being, i am receptive to hot takes, i'll take whatever i can get

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:26 (seven years ago) link

Trump is smart enough to know that if he gets some accomodation out of Sanders or Warren or Schumer or whoever, that he has effectively damaged them politically, he will be co-opting them and claiming the lion's share of the glory, while they will be pilloried by former supporters.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

shakey otm, obstructionism is the way to go

maybe a slight pass for the few Democratic Senators left in deep-red states but I'd think the positioning should be to let the GOP fuck things up royally on their own and make the economic downturn and new deficit balloon centerpieces of 2018.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah, I kinda saw Clinton as similar to LBJ in '68.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

Paul Ryan shoves through the end of Medicare, Trump vetoes it or relies on public accommodation with Sanders or Warren to kill it is a scenario I could easily see used to make him more palatable where he currently isn't

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:28 (seven years ago) link

we're all well aware of how the ability of a legislative minority to gum up the works is deeply embedded in our system (thx slave-owners!), time to exploit it. shoe's on the other foot now.

Trump isn't gonna veto shit.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

Trump doesn't even wanna show up for work

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

You really think Trump would veto a Medicare-end bill? He won't even read the bill.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

first you would have to explain to him what Medicare is, how it works, why Ryan wants to kill it... by that time he's already fallen asleep in his taco bowl

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

I've said repeatedly that Sanders would have won, but the discussion of what Clinton did wrong should take into account that she actually won the popular vote, and it's not really that close. Her mistakes were strategic, not fundamental. If it was a change year, why did the establishment candidate get more votes?

Frederik B, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

It would be all about popularity and approval ratings for him - he doesn't actually need to read the bill or know what it is if he thinks it's going to make people not like him.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

how is he gonna know if people don't like him or not? the polls are all wrong! plus people are so excited at his rallies, they're just amazing! he will never think that any sizable chunk of the population legit does not like him.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

i don't see why total Rs-against-obama-style oposition isn't our #1 priority

who could possibly think we owe Rs any good faith? or that if we gave it they wouldn't abuse it?

j., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

it is our #1 priority, you're not going to see a serious voice on the left advocate working with trump

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Sanders already did!

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

and pvmic, but fuck this "senators in red states get a pass" nonsense. vote with your party

xp no he didn't..........................................................

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

Republicans re Obama: "Our primary goal is to make him a one-term president."
Democrats re Trump: "We need to find ways to work together."

Yeah, it's gonna be an awesome eight years.

multiple xposts obviously

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

sigh.

the norms of american politics and peaceful transitions of power dictate that people say nice things after an election. he's not gonna vote with the republicans xp

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

i'm sure you can find plenty of examples of republicans making nice after obama's 2008 win. it's not binding and doesn't mean shit

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

right - and I am hoping that all this "hey let's give him a chance" bullshit evaporates by January 21st but otoh idk Dems post-Reagan have been really stupid/cowardly when in this position.

i'm sure you can find plenty of examples of republicans making nice after obama's 2008 win.

would be curious what you dig up tbh

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

the norms of american politics and peaceful transitions of power dictate that people Democrats say nice things after an election.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

I do remember more than a couple Republicans in November 2008 muttering about Working Together For the Sake of the Country.

Before the inauguration.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

remember Judd Gregg? He was all set to be appointed to the Cabinet until he got pressure in January 2009.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

Biden says that during the transition, he was warned not to expect any cooperation on many votes. “I spoke to seven different Republican Senators, who said, `Joe, I’m not going to be able to help you on anything,’ he recalls. His informants said [Senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell had demanded unified resistance. “The way it was characterized to me was: `For the next two years, we can’t let you succeed in anything. That’s our ticket to coming back,’” Biden says.

The vice president says he hasn’t even told Obama who his sources were, but Bob Bennett of Utah and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania both confirmed they had conversations with Biden along these lines.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

this feels like bizarro world. Sanders being grown up doing the dirty job of consensus politics while Hillary stans want him to rage against the system.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

ah good old arlen specter

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

^^ I thought I'd seen every kind of sentence

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

the deplorables comment was badly calculated and i would see it as a major misstep in any other campaign. it still defies understanding why that was seen as worse than virtually anything trump has said in public over these past eighteen months

I'm sort of interested in whether that was the first time anyone used "deplorable" as a noun.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

Like, it was remarkable poetic for HRC.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

Aargh, remarkably

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

it was used before, just by snooty 19th century robber barons

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

basket of remarkables

ciderpress, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

deplorables was a fake controversy

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:51 (seven years ago) link

oh come on

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

certainly doesn't make her seem less like a reptilian space alien

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:53 (seven years ago) link

it was a "fake controversy" in the sense that clinton wasn't wrong, but it's still a pretty dumb thing for a politician to say about people who might be voting for her

k3vin k., Monday, 14 November 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

she was saying it about people who explicitly wont vote for her

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

the repurposing of the nasty woman thing was good.

sarahell, Monday, 14 November 2016 23:56 (seven years ago) link

I knew it was a mistake when defenders rushed to say, "But if you read the NEXT paragraph..."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 November 2016 23:56 (seven years ago) link

im just saying there are exactly zero people who weren't already not voting for her who decided not to vote for her when she said it

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

there's not a soul on the planet, including the deplorables themselves, who don't believe there arent some "deplorable people." It's like making fun of Trump's skinny hands but for the right, it's a dumb meme that convinces no one & only exists to assert in group status among conservatives

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

*tiny hands, dunno why i said skinny.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:01 (seven years ago) link

gotta think that most people who are willing to change their vote over something like that are just looking for an excuse

Sure, but that's what happened with the high levels of late-breaking undecided voters - if you've seen 10 minutes of Donald Trump and you're undecided, you're trying to find an excuse for yourself to vote for him when you know it's indefensible. And if you don't find one, you'll still find one.

Obama & Trump - Come on, he's finally found a Republican who will listen to him!

Actually pretty much that - It's obviously uncomfortable to him that here's this idiot who won't have a fraction of the trouble that Obama had getting stuff done, but Obama is def. exactly the kind of dork who will suck it up in the hope of getting some good done.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:14 (seven years ago) link

The excuse for late-breaking voters were given to them by Comey.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:22 (seven years ago) link

xp xp xp

lopk. last sunday i read a piece where west virginians who were already pissed about hillary's stance on coal were literally saying clinton had 10,000+ gullotines ready for her opponents' necks:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/11/05/west-virginia-citizens-paint-dystopian-picture-under-clinton-presidency/jDCbxZ0Dkz8Xd5B2MUdp3O/story.html

this was not a normal election and you can't use normal narratives to explain it away. one side had been demonized extra (because she was already in the hole for being an ambitious woman) by right wing BROADCAST media for a quarter century. there were "impeach hillary" bumper stickers when she was FIRST LADY.

i feel like this race was in some ways a particularly rancid manifestation of nostalgia culture. (which is not to say there weren't other curdled elements, but bear with me.) clinton and trump are both brands that have been molded in the public since the "gosh, 57 channels do seem like a lot" era, and in a lot of ways they were fighting as their avatars from 20 years ago. what up and comers have that sort of name recognition among a mass quotient of the electorate? jeb, maybe. but i don't think he wants to run again. the national parties' benches are alarming to me because i feel like an even worse demagogue could capture the electorate's imagination (if we have a functioning government in four years, which, lol).

(i swear to god if i don't have a stroke before the year ends i'll consider it a success. i've already had two aura migraines in the last week and quitting fb and twitter has yet to help. also anyone who doesn't think sanders would have been strung up by anti-semites is delusional. trump's final campaign ad was a 21st century rewrite of THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION ffs!)

maura, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link

can't believe we're still talking about "deplorables" but imho it felt like an obvious misstatement where she obviously started out intending to say that half of the people in trump's inner circle or half of the people running the media outlets that have been aggressively backing him. i really can't believe any politician means to say half of the guy's supporters or voters, period, and clearly given the timing she was trying to talk about those smaller groups of backers. but the damage was done and it was very hard to convincingly walk back or 'clarify.' but i think if she had said the first thing, clearly, it would not have blown up, and it would have helped maintain a space for surrogates and others to spend the week calling out these specific and repulsive alt-right characters. instead it was a week of clinton surrogates having to say she misspoke, etc.

it was, in other words, your basic, classic, "gaffe," moreso than romney's 47%, where he really DID mean to say 47% of the people voting for obama! no slip of the tongue there. given how close the race was in the states that mattered, every gaffe probably matters so i guess in thirty years the conventional wisdom for kids may be that clinton lost the election because of "deplorables," notwithstanding everything else. so it goes.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

the deplorables thing was bad, bc you never want to insult any segment of the people who are rallying behind your opponent, bc everyone else who's voting for him will take offense to it and rally behind it. the 47 percent thing from romney should have been a cautionary tale to follow but she went and said it anyway, and now anytime i see an anti-trump comment on twitter there are half a dozen replies from, idk, "Deplorable Dave" or others w/similar proud names.

nomar, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

xp!

nomar, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

after Putin talks on phone w/Trump, Kremlin releases statement that says there is mutual hope for "noninterference in the other’s internal affairs”

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:56 (seven years ago) link

worse thing about deplorables is how small a role schwarzenegger had

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:57 (seven years ago) link

That doesn't make any sense though DC - the speech is here, it's pretty clearly what she meant to say: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/sep/11/context-hillary-clinton-basket-deplorables/

I mean one thing we can all agree on is that she's not a spur of the moment improv master - this is the speech intended.

I can see the argument for it as threading a needle between the idea that yeah these people have been screwed and we should do something about that*, without lapsing into the "legitimate concerns about immigration" type of talk that has sprung up all over the UK, which would damage her with the base.

I'm not suggesting it didn't blow up in her face, of course.

*If you're cynical you can consider this similar to Trump making his inner-cities pitch to a room full of white people - they're not going for the black/poor vote, they're going for the "don't want to feel like I'm voting for someone who doesn't give a shit about the black/poor vote" vote.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:57 (seven years ago) link

maura OTM

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

the deplorables thing was bad, bc you never want to insult any segment of the people who are rallying behind your opponent, bc everyone else who's voting for him will take offense to it and rally behind it. the 47 percent thing from romney should have been a cautionary tale to follow but she went and said it anyway, and now anytime i see an anti-trump comment on twitter there are half a dozen replies from, idk, "Deplorable Dave" or others w/similar proud names.

― nomar, Monday, November 14, 2016 6:46 PM (twenty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i just dont see how this results in any more net negative votes against hillary though

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

i mean unless you're counting the trump voters trying to vote twice, lol

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

so trump wants his kids to get security clearances? he can't read, right? thats what this is about?

either way I hope those hellspawn earn a clearance and aren't just given one

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 01:18 (seven years ago) link

Trump the populist: http://qz.com/813976/you-will-never-see-the-populist-donald-trump-in-jeans-or-a-t-shirt/

― Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:04 AM (eighteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there's this photo:

http://static2.politico.com/dims4/default/548b9b2/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2Fe1%2F09%2Fdcc9c1d74408b41b704a01d81df4%2F151014-ivanka-donald-aspen-gty.jpg

it is kind of jarring seeing him in something other than a suit or golf clothes, though

soref, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 01:24 (seven years ago) link

I've been feeling a lot better and more positive today (particularly after a long talk with a coworker who'd been out of the country)...and then I start watching Obama's press conference and I cannot in any reality imagine anything like this occurring again in the next four years. Like, just on a very basic level, an adult who's in charge speaking like an adult to other adults. It's not going to happen. We have a president-elect who is fundamentally incapable of inspiring hope or confidence in anyone but the most broken.

I'm just going to have to focus on doing what I can to make small differences on the local level for the foreseeable future because paying much attention to what's happening at the top will drive me to cirrhosis.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link

I have honestly found getting out to be very healthy, if only to see that I am not alone, that there are many people just like me, or not like me, and coping in their own way. But then, I live in a dense, diverse area that went for Clinton or, otherwise, was never going to go for Trump. If I lived in some other part of the country, I'd probably be even more depressed and dismayed than I am.

I remember (back when I was in a band) playing a gig that was literally in a guitar store in a strip mall in Vacaville, CA. It sucked, the band we played with couldn't have been more different (they had wireless guitars!). It was just the worst. But there was this one high school alterna-girl and her friend who showed up, not really for us but for anyone, anything , that was not them. And I remember thinking how sad it was that she literally had no alternative, nowhere to go, and just wanted something different, whatever that was, someone or anything closer to how she thought of herself.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:08 (seven years ago) link

If we take Obama's words today at face value -- that he can guarantee NATO that the rules will continue -- I suspect that the traditional President-elect's 'Here's What You Can't Do, Motherfucker' lecture from the CIA was moved up to last Wednesday or Thursday.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:09 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, what great timing for my first visit to the UK next week. It will be... good?... to get out of this madhouse for 6 days, into an older, more fatigued one.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link

I think he's been getting a lot of "Here's What You Cant Do," beginning with his request to check out the UFC match.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

have fun morbs - first time I went to london was when ukip smashed the local elections around may 2013. a more innocent time when I had no idea wtf was a ukip.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:17 (seven years ago) link

What lots of people seem to be missing in the debate between mitigation and obstructionism is that, unlike the Republicans and Obama, the Democrats won't control a single lever of power come 2017. How do you obstruct when you are the minority in the House, the Senate and the Supreme Court? It's in this context, and this context only, where mitigation seems like the better political tactic. Trump and the party he leads can accomplish anything they choose to do; with certain issues, it makes lots of sense to try to work with them in the hope that some good can still get done.

sean gramophone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:22 (seven years ago) link

i think we might be able to get some republican allies to block whatever racist policies might be coming from a white house where a chief advisor is neo nazi steve bannon

Treeship, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

i am not optimistic about stopping the traditional republican agenda from getting through unless, for some reason, trump and ryan start feuding or whatever

Treeship, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:34 (seven years ago) link

There's always that hope when monstrous egos are involved.

Forget 'deplorables,' howbout answering the $675,000 Question with a shrug and "That's what they were paying"? Why that didn't create empathy with every single mother knocking her brains out working two jobs, I can't imagine. And there was more where that came from.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:35 (seven years ago) link

sean g otm

can't we filibuster tho?

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

GOP expected to abolish filibuster?

AP sez it's Giuliani at State. ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhfuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:01 (seven years ago) link

GOP expected to abolish filibuster?

lol that would be crazy and super risky/dumb. they would p much have to go fascist, after that.

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:03 (seven years ago) link

the Democrats won't control a single lever of power come 2017

AHEM

https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/gned/lapham_lights96.pdf

The permanent government, a secular oligarchy of which the company at dinner was representative, comprises the
Fortune 500 companies and their attendant lobbyists, the big media and entertainment syndicates, the civil and military
services, the larger research universities and law firms, It is this government that hires the country's politicians and sees
the terms and conditions under which the country's citizens can exercise their right--God-given but increasingly
expensive--to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Obedient to the rule of men, not laws, the permanent
government oversees the production of wealth, builds cities, manufactures goods, raises capital', fixes prices, shapes the
landscape, anti reserves the right to assume debt, poison rivers, cheat the customers, receive the gifts of federal subsidy,
and speak to the American people in the language of low motive and base emotion.

EXCEPT - and this seems important - since Lapham wrote this, in the nineties, we seem to have inverted his concept.
The permanent government is the one that believes in laws, not men. The provisional one, the one elected on a technicality, not by democracy, appears to believe in nothing.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:04 (seven years ago) link

flopson, recall the 'nuclear option' of 2013 that the Dems did not use

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/14/this-is-why-senate-republicans-might-not-go-nuclear/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link

Speaking of thte permanent Washington class:

Michelle Obama has burned off her date-night meals at Washington’s new generation of acclaimed restaurants by pedaling at SoulCycle. President Obama has shopped for Jonathan Franzen novels with his daughters at local independent bookstores. Obama administration staff members, their barhopping chronicled in the gossip pages, have hit the 14th Street hot spots hard.

Decades ago, Washington was broke and run by a mayor best known for smoking crack with a prostitute on a surveillance tape. Neighborhoods had not fully recovered from the 1968 riots, and an aging Georgetown elite still set the tone. The administrations of two Bushes and a Clinton in between hardly had an effect on the city.

But Mr. Obama’s arrival in 2009 coincided with an urban renaissance. Economic development, federal and private investment, and an influx of highly educated young, gay and diverse professionals gentrified neighborhoods, leading to an explosion in restaurants, bars and cafes. And the Obama family — African-American, youthful, attractive and urbane — were archetypes of a modern city on the upswing

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:13 (seven years ago) link

Dems have the Senate filibuster and thats it. in 2008 that was all the GOP had too (well, and the SC)

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:15 (seven years ago) link

Things are moving fast:
https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/798345065571774464

Here's a recent shot of California and Texas separatist leaders meeting in Moscow:

who even are those other cats (Eazy), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

McConnell's recent comment about how "majorities dont last forever" + his past as minority leader would suggest he's not eager to abolish the filibuster. But we'll see.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:18 (seven years ago) link

but didn't Ds have a supermajority in 08?

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

jesus christ

maura, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

The whole point of the senate is basically to allow the minority to grind things to a halt.

Xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:20 (seven years ago) link

Dems never had 2/3rds iirc

Xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link

In the House Pelosi should look for opportunities to exploit the division between Ryan and the Freedom Caucus, and engineer combining votes w the Freedom Caucus to oppose legislation where possible.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

There are looming cracks and schisms in the GOP majority. When yr in the minority, those are yr weapons.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:31 (seven years ago) link

somehow I'm sure they'll all be able to find common ground

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:35 (seven years ago) link

To what extent do the deep blue states gerrymander the hell out of districting like red states?

Dan Savage was advocating figuring out voter suppression for Republican voters which is crazy but if states at least stacked the deck a bit more for the House I wouldn't be mad.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:38 (seven years ago) link

the Dems are going to have to learn tactics that they've been too reluctant to learn out of (a) moral squeamishness (b) collusion

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:41 (seven years ago) link

I think pelosi has it in her. Less confident about Schumer.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

Gerrymandering favors the minority party. In most of the country, Republicans are still the minority party.

scott, I kinda thank you for sharing that, but I read almost all of it last night and it's pretty clear every one of them phoned it in and there was barely any editing at all (because "essays" don't need fact-checking etc); I was especially disappointed by Shteyngart, although I guess I shouldn't have been and he's probably right anyway we all live in hell etc. And I have no idea what point Gawande was trying to make, other than "we need to keep doing our jobs!" thanks I'm glad the medical profession needed to be reminded of that

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:47 (seven years ago) link

"Nancy Pelosi brilliantly exploited tension between Senate Republicans torn apart on whether to starve the poor, hunt them down in the streets, or boil them alive before consuming their flesh."

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:47 (seven years ago) link

"voter suppression for Republicans" = "actual democracy"

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

Pelosi is in the House flopson

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

that was an xp to milo
turnout, turnout, candidates we care about, register, show up, vote the line.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

That too

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

But we have 2 years til next election. In the meantime legislative hardball is required. Sad to see ppl here suggest there should be compromise w GOP.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

aww, i didn't know gwen ifill died. i just heard it from obama. she would have been a better president than trump. r.i.p.

scott seward, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 03:58 (seven years ago) link

xp otm. it's not even so much a political question as a moral one.

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

god, someone shared a Bill Burr-Conan interview on Facebook and I started watching it. I'm glad the rich white guy who screams constantly has nothing to fear from Trump.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:03 (seven years ago) link

lol that would be crazy and super risky/dumb. they would p much have to go fascist, after that.

― flopson, Monday, November 14, 2016 10:03 PM (one hour ago)

it's actually a great idea in terms of fairness and democracy, though it's a shame it'll happen in this context

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:07 (seven years ago) link

but didn't Ds have a supermajority in 08?

― flopson, Monday, November 14, 2016 10:19 PM (forty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Dems never had 2/3rds iirc

Xp

― Οὖτις, Monday, November 14, 2016 10:21 PM (forty-five minutes ago)

need 60, not 2/3, which the dems had for a short time until ted kennedy died. it was all downhill from there

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

Oh right 3/5ths. My bad. I thought they only had 59 even w kennedy tho.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:22 (seven years ago) link

I will be surprised if mcconnell ditches the filibuster tbh. What does he care about democracy, he knows they're likely to be in the minority as soon as Trump fucks up.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:24 (seven years ago) link

Oh right 3/5ths. My bad. I thought they only had 59 even w kennedy tho.

― Οὖτις, Monday, November 14, 2016 11:22 PM (three minutes ago)

depends if you even wanted to count shitbags like evan bayh and joe lieberman

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:26 (seven years ago) link

See my RIP Joe Lieberman thread for reference

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

need 60, not 2/3, which the dems had for a short time until ted kennedy died. it was all downhill from there

― k3vin k., Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:08 AM (twenty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

president scott brown was the end of the honeymoon for the obama administration. obamacare could only pass through reconciliation and it all went to shit from there.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

when does trump appoint that papa johns creep as the official white house chef

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

Is Dave Thomas alive to take the job? Wider variety at Wendy's.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

he knows they're likely to be in the minority as soon as Trump fucks up.

i admire your optimism

qop (crüt), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:34 (seven years ago) link

ditto

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:45 (seven years ago) link

i still don't really understand how US politics works, still trying to read that thing Morbs linked about "cloture" lol

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:45 (seven years ago) link

i've been on a pendulum this week. i haven't noticed it really until today, thinking -gutted and nauseated though i was feeling on the 9th- that i was keeping a level head, but today the Bannon pick has my heart racing, and i'm realizing that i've been holding a certain panic at bay. this sense of the ground slipping out from underneath me, the disorientation and sense of strangeness even, like when you return to your house after a long trip, feels ancient and familiar for me. it dates back to my childhood, which i thought far down the tunnel of memory, and the feelings leading up to the overthrow of Allende, except it's not far down a tunnel after all, it's right here after all, hovering over me, or even right here in the pit of my stomach.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:51 (seven years ago) link

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2016/countycartrb512.png
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2016/countycartpurple512.png

Mark Newman's adjusted-by-population cartograms are back, and even if they seem a bit premature (aren't we still waiting on a large number of votes to be counted?) or incomplete (pity Alaska and Hawaii) they may still be helpful in the ongoing quest to grasp What Happened and What's To Be Done.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:58 (seven years ago) link

I work with a lady that leans conservative (and I won't ask about her vote) that is buying private health insurance, is knowledgeable about politics and medicine (her daughter is a doctor), is not insured at work (part-time with no options in the company for full-time) and she makes too much for a subsidized market place plan (because of alimony and investments and such), but is 7 months away from Medicare. Her current options are $1200 a month for catastrophic care that doesn't cover much of anything at a day to day basis or the unthinkable of going without. She's figuring out how to juggle expenses while she waits for Medicare.

I won't be laughing at her gradual realization that there may not be anything for her in the short or long term future. Maybe she should have made better life choices.

Zachary Taylor, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 06:08 (seven years ago) link

My parents went through a pretty rough ten years after my dad lost his job, and finally getting on Medicare has made a big difference to them. After what happened to my dad, seeing him lose medicare might make me angrier than anything else I can think of right now.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 06:12 (seven years ago) link

Torsten Bell, director of the Resolution Foundation, provided a useful breakdown of voting patterns in last Tuesday’s presidential election. Taken at face value, the results seem to show that Hillary Clinton did well among those voters on the lowest incomes. She led 53%-41% among those earning less than $30,000 a year and by 51%-42% among those earning between $30,000 and $50,000.

But these statistics are misleading. There was actually a 16-point net swing to the Republicans between the 2012 and 2016 elections among those earning less than $30,000 a year and a 6-point swing among those earning $30,000 to $50,000. By contrast, there was a swing to the Democrats among those on higher incomes, and this was particularly pronounced among those earning more than $100,000 a year.

The reasons for Trump were also the reasons for Brexit | John Harris
One interpretation of these numbers would be that Americans on average or below average incomes voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 because they expected fundamental change from which they would benefit. They were still waiting for the change to come in 2016 and thought Trump was more likely to provide it than Clinton. The better off, who have being doing just fine out of business as usual, supported Clinton as the candidate of the status quo. For Wall Street and Silicon Valley she was the safer choice. As in other western countries, the party ostensibly of the left had nothing to say that its traditional base wanted to hear.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2016/nov/13/donald-trump-product-of-new-economic-depression

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 10:03 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/lottelydia/status/798211511915319296

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 11:09 (seven years ago) link

xp this interpretation largely relies on not know what 'numbers' are.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 11:10 (seven years ago) link

Mark Newman's adjusted-by-population cartograms are back, and even if they seem a bit premature (aren't we still waiting on a large number of votes to be counted?) or incomplete (pity Alaska and Hawaii) they may still be helpful in the ongoing quest to grasp What Happened and What's To Be Done.

― dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino)

was this deliberately made to look like a phoenix?

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

Can totally imagine, when the shit settles, the new administration cutting off press access entirely. They did not run a fact-based campaign, many of the knuckleheads being hired are controversial or idiots or both, why would they want to face questioning ever? In some ways our only hope is their arrogance and ego.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 12:42 (seven years ago) link

Hmm, they'll probably want the big news orgs on board to propagandize for forthcoming wars though.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 12:55 (seven years ago) link

Useful idiots, sure. Maybe they will gravitate exclusively to things like this 60 minutes set up. A highly controlled environment.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/lottelydia/status/798211511915319296

― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:09 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That's pretty righteous.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

qrealDonaldTrump: If the election were based on total popular vote I would have campaigned in N.Y. Florida and California and won even bigger and more easily

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

remember when we thought george w bush was simple

maura, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, stick a fork in me etc

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

if the 21st century has taught us anything so far it's that things can always somehow get worse

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:58 (seven years ago) link

This remains surreal, it's like karmic payback for decades of reality shows that snobs dismissed as "not real" so here you go, fuckers, here's your reality show, except this time, it is real and it's your life and you can't turn the show off.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

I can no longer distinguish between the real and parody tweets

frogbs, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

Note that the president-elect of the United States continues to talk about himself and himself and himself and himself and not, like, ANY FUCKING PLAN OR VISION FOR THE COUNTRY AND WHAT HE INTENDS TO DO AS PRESIDENT.

Drop fucking dead, you heap of ochre shit.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

None of this should be at all surprising. He was still publicly nursing wounds about his defeated opponents long after winning the nomination.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link

Twitter is gonna be that dumb motherfucker's downfall, mark my words. Either his handlers have now taken a hands-off approach or he doesn't feel like he needs to listen to their advice anymore. It's just a matter of time until he tweets classified information or something equally stupid and dangerous.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

The Associated Press ‏@AP 55m55 minutes ago

President-elect Donald Trump criticised after tweeting, then deleting, a nude picture of himself.

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

The Associated Press ‏@AP 15m20 minutes ago

America officially the first all-blind nation after accidentally viewing nude picture of president-elect Trump.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

Kinda feeling like, instead of appointing Giuliani or Bolton as Secretary of State, Trump could do away with the position altogether and just have one foreign leader after another come to visit so that he can piss directly into their faces.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

?????

xp

Evan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

Oh, jokes. Sorry just got here.

Evan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

See, we can't even tell!

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

So much of what transpires over the next 2-4 years is going to be decided by whether the GOP displays any backbone whatsoever in opposing the more odious efforts of Trump and his Legion of Doom. After witnessing their spineless equivocation wrt Trump's candidacy, I am not hopeful in that regard.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

I'd been concerned and curious and navigated over to Google News to do a search for something that was sadly right on the front page: Trump Win A 'Public Health Crisis,' Suicide Hotline Calls Spike: Officials. So that's probably a great avenue for volunteer work if you have the stomach for it.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

I have a friend who is a psychotherapist and is offering low-cost post-election counseling.

Personally, I'd have no idea what to say, and might be rather less than helpful. "Yeah it sucks for you, a person who is probably going to be fine. It's going to suck a lot more for those more vulnerable than you. The lives of the downtrodden and the marginalized were already pretty dire and they're likely to get worse. But, um, hey! Cheer up! Go for a walk or something!"

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

How long until Trump hires a foxy security detail and lets cameras follow them 24/7.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

xpost I'm just trying to encourage people to channel their dread into something positive. Volunteer, donate, educate themselves and others about voting rights and voting registration, protest, converse with other people and try to find areas of agreement whether you're on the exact same page or not.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Here's a channel: call AND email your congressmen about Speaker Ryan's Medicare ambitions.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

I had been meaning to post this, maybe it helps some people:
Concrete Suggestions in Preparation

(somber synthesizer music) (doo dah), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

apparently congressmen are starting to earn about it: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/details-trickling-in

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

How long until Trump hires a foxy security detail and lets cameras follow them 24/7.

Charlie's Angels strangely prescient

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

is it ok for suicide hotline counselors to recruit for the resistance

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

what does mike rogers stepping down mean?

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Personally, I'd have no idea what to say, and might be rather less than helpful. "Yeah it sucks for you, a person who is probably going to be fine. It's going to suck a lot more for those more vulnerable than you. The lives of the downtrodden and the marginalized were already pretty dire and they're likely to get worse. But, um, hey! Cheer up! Go for a walk or something!"

Yeah. Trump is an incompetent, corrupt, unstable man if you're a minority, but he all of a sudden becomes an incredibly gifted leader and administrator without an ounce of corruption if you're white. Like magic! Just about everyone is screwed under Trump, just some more than others, unfortunately.

larry appleton, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

xp - if you bleeve this WaPo guy:

@gregpmiller
Reports that Mike Rogers pushed off Trump transition team in purge of Christie allies. Intel officials see Rogers as voice of reason.

not much to do re calling my congressman, he's about as liberal as they come:

https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

It was just dawning on me today how many undocumented immigrants there likely are all around me and how insane it would be if they were all deported. Queens would be a ghost borough. My wife's school would empty out. It's really horrifying.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Mike Rogers stepping down is one more post they don't have a name for, that's it.

This is going to be the longest transition ever.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

hopefully this means his org will be a headless chicken and unable to coordinate with congress on anything

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

also looking forward to all the conflicts of interests stories that these next four years will bring http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/us/politics/donald-trump-holdings-conflict-of-interest.html

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

i mean:

The labor dispute in Nevada represents another potential complication. The president appoints all five members of the National Labor Relations Board. But over the past year, the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas has been in a battle with the culinary workers union, at first challenging an effort by hotel employees to unionize. The labor board ruled against him in July. Then the hotel, which Mr. Trump co-owns, refused to begin negotiations with the new union, and the labor board again ruled against it, in November. Other labor disputes with employees are pending.

“Will he as president of the United States of America use the power he has to interfere — given that he has a financial interest in the outcome of these matters?” said Bethany Khan, a spokeswoman for the 57,000-member Culinary Workers Union Local 226 of Nevada.

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

I briefly took some comfort in thinking that his cabinet was going to resemble the unorganized and constantly rotating clusterfuck of his campaign team but then I remembered the part where the unorganized and constantly rotating clusterfuck carried him to victory.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

“Will he as president of the United States of America use the power he has to interfere — given that he has a financial interest in the outcome of these matters?” said Bethany Khan, a spokeswoman for the 57,000-member Culinary Workers Union Local 226 of Nevada.

Yes. Yes, of course he will.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

He will do nothing that runs counter to his own interests and he will do as much as possible that favors his own interests. This is reflective of the first 70 years of his life and we have no reason to believe the next four years will be any different.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

guys i'm starting to think trump might not make for a good president

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

https://newrepublic.com/article/138757/obama-warning-america-trumps-presidency-listening

some close reading of obama's comments yesterday

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Even if none of the rest of our worst fears are realized over the next four years, I don't see how the US can possibly avoid a recession or worse at the absolute bare minimum.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

this sums up the vibe right now

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/anti-trump-protester-knocked-down-flight-stairs-ohio-state-university

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

circling back to the filibuster question, I read the links posted above and yet I still can't shake the feeling that GOP senators are absolutely going to use the nuclear option. nothing they've done over the past eight years gives me any reason to strongly think otherwise. and learning that the Dems deployed the option for appointments means they already have a convenient "both sides do it" defense. obviously appointments and legislation are two different things, but the GOP knows its voters won't split those hairs (and the media will perhaps only do it half-heartedly). I see the argument that McConnell et. al wouldn't want to open this box because of what will happen when they're deposed, but I'm still not buying it. from their perspective, how often do you get a chance like this, to really have no roadblocks to passing whatever insane shit you can dream up? I hope I'm wrong but I'm just not very confident right now.

evol j, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

"I have a friend who is a psychotherapist and is offering low-cost post-election counseling."

My therapist hates banks and wants to move to Finland.

scott seward, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

Cass Sunstein, ladies and germs

https://twitter.com/tinyrevolution/status/798542032016998400

also
@tinyrevolution
History & science show victory turns men into giddy testosterone monsters capable of anything. Watch for this with Trump & his personnel.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Pelosi and Reid (who won't be around much longer) don't give much cop to cooperation, thankfully.

Schumer though

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

for the filibuster, one consideration Republicans have to make is that they will not have a majority forever. The filibuster was their favorite tool when they were in the minority. They may not want to completely give that away.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Wouldn't getting rid of the filibuster would just clear the path to making sure they're never in the minority again.

Fetchboy, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

Minus would, and it's a question

Fetchboy, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

They probably imagine they can voter suppress their way to remaining a majority for the forseeable.

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

getting rid of the filibuster would make the next few years a real nightmare but also allows for progressive legislation that we could never dream about otherwise

which is my guess why it prob will not happen

iatee, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

It would be high-risk - I can't seem them winning the next presidential election, if there is a next presidential election (I am normally quite sneery about that level of alarm, but Steve Bannon is not normally the chief strategist at the White House).

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

what are the chances of trump mobilizing enough voters to vote in trump surrogate and trump-friendly republicans in 2018?

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I think we have no idea, the most you can say is that midterms tend to go poorly for the party in charge

iatee, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Obama repeatedly touted the fact that Trump will be inheriting many advantages: low unemployment, rising incomes and wages, a historically low uninsurance rate, stable financial systems, a high stock market, strong international alliances, and cheap gasoline.
Is this true? Cheap gasoline isn't a good long term goal or really short term either.

JacobSanders, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

the other thing to consider is that Republicans may be less incentivized to get rid of the filibuster because Democrats are less likely to abuse it. There's no reason to assume that Democrats will take up the policy of filibustering every single bill.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

I think we have no idea, the most you can say is that midterms tend to go poorly for the party in charge

― iatee, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:14 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark

guess i'm thinking back to the tea party voting in a bunch of house reps a few years ago

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

Well:

After exchange w Trump transition team, changed my recommendation: stay away. They’re angry, arrogant, screaming “you LOST!” Will be ugly,’’ tweeted Cohen, who served from 2007 to 2009 as counselor to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. He was a driving force behind an open letter last spring — eventually signed by 122 Republican national security leaders — who opposed Trump’s candidacy.

Cohen, who last week had urged career officials to serve in Trump’s administration, said in an interview that a longtime friend and senior transition team official had asked him to submit names of possible national security appointees. After he suggested several people, Cohen said, his friend emailed him back in terms he described as “very weird, very disturbing.”

“It was accusations that ‘you guys are trying to insinuate yourselves into the administration…all of YOU LOST.’…it became clear to me that they view jobs as lollipops, things you give out to good boys and girls,” said Cohen, who would not identify his friend.

Cohen also said the transition official was “completely dismissive” of concerns raised about Trump’s appointment of former Breitbart News head Stephen K. Bannon as chief White House strategist. Bannon has been denounced by advocacy groups, commentators and congressional Democrats as a proponent of racist, anti-Semitic and misogynistic views, though Trump advisers have strongly defended him.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

Midterms normally go badly for the party in charge, but the senate map looks incredibly bad for democrats, and they would also have to deal with lower turnout. There's 23 dem seats, two independent seats (hi Bernie!) and only 8 republicans. Democrats in the entire midwest is up for reelection...

Dean Heller (R) in Nevada could be defeated, perhaps. The dem machine in Nevada seems like a model to follow. Other than that, it looks bleak, though.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

They’re angry, arrogant, screaming “you LOST!”

finally, common ground

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

and they would also have to deal with lower turnout

we have to work to ensure this is not the case

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

It would be lovely if Trump's cabinet of deporables convinced him not to work with anyone outside of their little hateful circle. Seal yourself up in a little bunker for four years, fuckers. We'll break off the handle.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

Like a lot of folks I'm pretty depressed and fearful about this, but I am also concerned that some of the rhetoric coming out of this mood is a potential tactical error. Lots of talk of Hitler and Stalin and nuclear war and never having an election again: I get it, I get where it's coming from. But it does sort of hand rhetorical ammunition to the Trump reelection campaign, in that all he has to do to prove it false is not be actual Hitler. Then his side has the talking point "they said we were Hitler, and look, we're not herding millions of people into gas chambers, so they lie and they suck and why should you trust their dire predictions any more."

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

worked for obama

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

agree that there's some OTT shit happening right now but the left is essentially traumatized/going through the grief cycle right now.

I do think this level of terror can be leveraged into motivating voter turnout in the midterms - as Karl's post implies, this worked for the GOP, there's no reason it shouldn't work for us.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

hey look our next attorney general

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeff-sessions-racist-comments-derailed-federal-judgeship

Sessions denied being racist, the New Republic reported, and defended himself by citing his children's attendance at integrated schools as well as multiple occasions when he shared a hotel room with a black lawyer.

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

slashfic waiting to happen tbh

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

Just sayin, there's plenty to be said about the actual horrible words and actions of these garbage people. And I'm sure they'll keep giving us more to say.

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

I'm wary (and weary) of the Hitler analogies too. I understand its therapeutic value, but we can't fall into the trap of OMIGOD GUESS WHAT TRUMP SAID TODAY like we did when Bush was president. Two-term presidents have no problem being underrated (Ike, Reagan, Bush II), no problem having their syntax corrected because the press can follow only one story at a time, and a malapropism will get more hits than Trump eliminating COBRA.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

I do think this level of terror can be leveraged into motivating voter turnout in the midterms - as Karl's post implies, this worked for the GOP, there's no reason it shouldn't work for us.

oh, i didn't mean to imply that. it was a poorly formed post but i was just noting that the rightwing apocalyptic fantasies were NOT enough to take down obama, at least not in 2012. i suppose there's an argument to be made that they were the beginnings of trumpism and that they paralyzed obama's administration and led to this current moment. one key difference though is that the amount of complete bullshit on the right seems to overwhelm the what is produced on the left, and that from 2008-16 the right developed an alternate universe of media to take advantage of that. there's no doubt there's a bubble that exists on both the left and right, but the rightwing one, at least in my lifetime, has always been the much bigger and terrifying one.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

the trump lines people can't believe are not "malapropisms"

agree that facebook liberalism doesn't work

agree the nuclear war stuff (the chosen and already almost-shed fear of srs media adults) is an error because to me it seems the least likely of the various utterly bleak forecasts which range imo up to the actually certain

hitler has never been a good comparison but trump and his circle are a genuine and aggressive threat to american democracy in a way not at all mitigated by remembering that nixon or jackson were too (to incarnations of american democracy with sturdier bones)

all this stuff about how the presidency's gonna be brought to a halt when trump realizes how hard the job is and how much reading it requires is written by people who have apparently forgotten not only reagan but dubya

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

I'm wary (and weary) of the Hitler analogies too. I understand its therapeutic value, but we can't fall into the trap of OMIGOD GUESS WHAT TRUMP SAID TODAY like we did when Bush was president. Two-term presidents have no problem being underrated (Ike, Reagan, Bush II), no problem having their syntax corrected because the press can follow only one story at a time, and a malapropism will get more hits than Trump eliminating COBRA.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 16:47 (eighteen minutes ago) Permalink

Think I said almost exactly this upthread. Hi five

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

agreed on all that. Trump's general disengagement and incompetence will be terrible because it will enable those within his party who actually know how to write bills/pass legislation

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

also in the admittedly sprawling and unexclusive pantheon of objects of overreaching hitler analogies trump can at least boast the enthusiastic endorsement of the world's nazis

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

A new horrifying thought every hour. The latest: will James O'Keefe have a role in the White House?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

at this point i've gone through full preemptive kubler-ross over every potential appointee -- except milo

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

all this stuff about how the presidency's gonna be brought to a halt when trump realizes how hard the job is and how much reading it requires is written by people who have apparently forgotten not only reagan but dubya

― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 12:04 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark

i guess my hope here is that having the anti-GOP bannon in his ear constantly may help foment discord

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

One fleeting pleasure is seeing Trump fuck over Chris Christie.

dinnerboat, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

I'm wary (and weary) of the Hitler analogies too. I understand its therapeutic value, but we can't fall into the trap of OMIGOD GUESS WHAT TRUMP SAID TODAY like we did when Bush was president. Two-term presidents have no problem being underrated (Ike, Reagan, Bush II), no problem having their syntax corrected because the press can follow only one story at a time, and a malapropism will get more hits than Trump eliminating COBRA.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

I've been guilty of making some references to 1930's Germany this past week. They're problematic, always, but hardly therapeutic (at least for me). For me it's more about being vigilant, and an attempted antidote to some of the normalization that's taking place. But I agree, these references come at a price.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

Dems should def strategize to encourage GOP in-fighting. they are hardly a unified front, and the level of general incompetence combined with huge egos/lust for power means there could be a lot of internal blood-letting - which would be to our advantage in terms of stopping items of their agenda.

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

at this point i've gone through full preemptive kubler-ross over every potential appointee -- except milo

― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:11 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Have you done Michael Cohen as AG yet?

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

One fleeting pleasure is seeing Trump fuck over Chris Christie.

― dinnerboat, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 12:13 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he knows how to humiliate people, that's for sure

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

lol no but i have done "seeing michael cohen at all ever again" and that was all i really needed

i guess my hope here is that having the anti-GOP bannon in his ear constantly may help foment discord

reagan's staff was a high-turnover (+ high-stakes because the president was so influencable) competition between GOP types and the randian ideologues reagan brought w him from cali -- was imagining trump's admin would be similar (w white supremacists for randian ideologues, and, uh, randian ideologues for GOP types) but i guess it's gonna be starting out, at least, pretty heavy on the breitbartists?

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

wh has all the makings of a toxic workplace atm

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

"Morning" Joe has already started with the Baker vs Californians analogies.

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

ouch

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

Trump's problem is he's got no Mike Deaver

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

Ben Carson turned down an open offer to take an official role in President-elect Donald Trump’s administration, The Hill reported Tuesday.

Carson ally Armstrong Williams told the Hill that the retired pediatric neurosurgeon would serve only as an unofficial adviser. Fox News confirmed the report.

While Carson was floated as a possible appointee to oversee the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of Education, Williams said he never received a formal offer for either post.

"Dr. Carson was never offered a specific position, but everything was open to him," Williams told The Hill.

"Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he's never run a federal agency,” he went on. “The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency."

HE JUST RAN FOR PRESIDENT

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

loool

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

That's disappointing. Carson as secretary of education would have been a lot funnier than four years of drumpf jokes.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

is anyone familiar with Virginia Heffernan? this is maniacal

http://www.lennyletter.com/politics/a613/hillary-clinton-is-more-than-a-president/

When people told me they hated Hillary Clinton or (far worse) that they were "not fans," I wish I had said in no uncertain terms: "I love Hillary Clinton. I am in awe of her. I am set free by her. She will be the finest world leader our galaxy has ever seen."

I wish, in those exchanges, I had not asked gentle, tolerant questions about a hater's ridiculous allergy to her, or Clinton's fictional misdeeds and imagined character flaws. More deeply still, I wish I had not reasoned with anyone, patiently countered their ludicrous emotionalism and psychologically disturbed theories. I wish I had said, flatly, "I love her." As if I had been asked about my mother or daughter. No defensiveness or polemics; not dignifying the crazy allegations with so much as a Snopes link.

...

I want to reverse the usual schedule of things, then. We don't have to wait until she dies to act. Hillary Clinton's name belongs on ships, and airports, and tattoos. She deserves straight-up hagiographies and a sold-out Broadway show called RODHAM. Yes, this cultural canonization is going to come after the chronic, constant, nonstop "On the other hand" sexist hedging around her legacy. But such is the courage of Hillary Clinton and her supporters; we reverse patriarchal orders. Maybe she is more than a president. Maybe she is an idea, a world-historical heroine, light itself. The presidency is too small for her. She belongs to a much more elite class of Americans, the more-than-presidents. Neil Armstrong, Martin Luther King Jr., Alexander Fucking Hamilton.

Hillary Clinton did everything right in this campaign, and she won more votes than her opponent did. She won. She cannot be faulted, criticized, or analyzed for even one more second. Instead, she will be decorated as an epochal heroine far too extraordinary to be contained by the mere White House. Let that revolting president-elect be Millard Fillmore or Herbert Hoover or whatever. Hillary is Athena.

goole, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Alexander Fucking Hamilton

there it is

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Obama said in 2007 that his "number one ambition" was "to be remembered as the new century's Milliard Fillmore" iirc

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

would fund a kickstater, tbh.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

lol

ciderpress, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah, let's deify the woman who voted for the iraq war and then bungled an utterly winnable presidential campaign that allowed donald trump to become the leader of the free world, great idea

honestly the one silver lining to this past week has been the knowledge that clinton people are eating shit right now

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

I wish she had won (duh) but yeah I am not going to mourn the passing of the Clinton family's power

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

it took the Trump administration one week to begin a stalinesque purge.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

Remember when it was going to be Bush vs. Clinton and we all groaned?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

for all my alarmism "stalinesque"'s a bit of a lol there, call me when they shoot christie in the brainstem

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

what's their problem with christie? is he just the weak man at the moment? i mean, lol of course, but i don't really get it.

goole, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

Over the last week, two of the world’s biggest internet companies have faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome.

On Monday, those companies responded by making it clear that they would not tolerate such misinformation by taking pointed aim at fake news sites’ revenue sources.

Google kicked off the action on Monday afternoon when the Silicon Valley search giant said it would ban websites that peddle fake news from using its online advertising service. Hours later, Facebook, the social network, updated the language in its Facebook Audience Network policy, which already says it will not display ads in sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/technology/google-will-ban-websites-that-host-fake-news-from-using-its-ad-service.html

so courageous for them to take this principled stand a week after the election, after being confronted about it from all angles

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

I heard the pope endorsed trump

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

Eerie parallels to the Masha Gessen NYRB piece:

http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/217831/what-to-do-about-trump

I like the closing paragraph a lot, though.

When the levers of power are seized by the small hands of hateful men, you work hard, you stand with those who are most vulnerable, and you don’t give up until it’s morning again. The rest is commentary.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

Darn right.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:04 (seven years ago) link

virginia heffernan is the one who wants to believe in creationism contra science because it's got better stories

j., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

what's their problem with christie? is he just the weak man at the moment? i mean, lol of course, but i don't really get it.

― goole, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:01 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark

in my view it's punishment for christie prosecuting kushner

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

fuckin what

xp

goole, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

what's their problem with christie? is he just the weak man at the moment?

He sent Jared Kushner's father to prison for his crimes. Knifing Christie sends a message that loyalty to Trump means impunity.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

re: bungled - she still won the popular vote and without Comey would likely be President. Getting lost in the shuffle is that 40+% of Americans are cool with a rapist racist President no matter who the Democrats had run or how perfect a campaign.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

call me when they shoot christie in the brainstem

How would you tell?

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

I do kinda wonder if Putin's gonna offer to assassinate Trump's enemies for him

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

otherwise yeah, Hitler/Stalin refs to purges are a little melodramatic. If these guys start actually murdering their enemies let me know

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

christie is also going to get indicted yall

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

my dad just sent me and my sister a 4-page "debunking" of factcheck.org that somehow takes a detour to mention that "ACORN and many other left agencies work closely with them" (them meaning Snopes.com) and offers the sage wisdom "I know, do more than play with your so called smart phone to get facts. Actually read volumes of books as I have to see the truth."

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

christie is also going to get indicted yall

^^^ this is why

in other news, a statement from Mayor San Jose: https://medium.com/@SamLiccardo/weve-got-your-back-4c2fdcb0b915#.6il2rhxtc

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

I heard google is releasing a new search engine that only gets "true" results.

Honestly, if pretty much any of the proper names involved, from Trump on down were indicted in the next few years, who would be shocked?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

If I print out pages of forwarded emails and bind them, does that count as a book?

Evan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

midterms traditionally tend to go poorly for the party in charge. but we are now living in perpetual Anything Can Happen Day.

wasn't Virginia Heffernan's greatest crime til that piece being an awful TV critic for the NYT? omg she got promoted to op writer.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

your precious Waze app won't give you directions to the truth, karl

nomar, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

The Sainted Reagan still holds the record for most corrupt admin, AFAIK and horrifyingly few people ever gave a shit (including Democratic leadership since Bill).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

there's gonna be epic corruption in this admin, the question is who is going to be able to prosecute it

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

Back to that Lapham essay, here's another excerpt from a better distillation of the idea of the provisional vs. permanent government: (plus the "ceaseless war of bureaucratic attrition" line that I love for some reason)

https://fabiusmaximus.com/2009/11/19/lapham-7/

The permanent government —

* the Congress,
* the civil and military services,
* the media,
* the legion of Washington lawyers and expensive lobbyists

occupies the anonymous hierarchies that remain safely in place no matter what the political truths voted in and out of the White House on the trend of a season. It is this government — sly and patient and slow — that writes the briefing papers and the laws, presides over the administrative routine, remembers who bribed whom in the election of 1968 and why President Carter thought it prudent to talk privately to God about the B-1 bomber. Except in the rare moments of jointly opportune interest, the permanent government wages a ceaseless war of bureaucratic attrition against the provisional government that once every 4 or 8 years accompanies a newly elected president to Washington.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

is that meant to be encouraging

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

Latham often tried do sound like dollar edition Gore Vidal didn't he?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

*Lapham

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

I'm mostly seeing "their ideological interests have aligned" fucking us all for decades to come.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

KM, i'm really sorry you and your sis have to field that stuff your folks have bought into. That must be hard.

TNR piece on Obama's subtext seemed chillingly accurate. this is probably the biggest minefield an outgoing prez has had to tiptoe around.

now wait milo, the current Dem Admin certainly gave a shit about prosecuting the thieves and banksters who engineered the '08 bubb -- ohfuckit

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

this is your deep state america, cherish it

xp

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

there's gonna be epic corruption in this admin, the question is who is going to be able to prosecute it

State AGs finding heretofore questionable bases for state charges?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

lapham's institutions of permanent government are real but as recently as the nixon admin a president imo attempted to quietly build shadow institutions, dependent on his person, to usurp or co-opt the functions of that whole list.

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

(That's not very recent)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

i still wonder if trump winning stopped a lot of violence. bombings. race war type insanity. obviously we'll never know. could have been bad though. am i the only person who wonders that? i'm sure there were people waiting for that excuse.

scott seward, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

trump winning stopped a lot of violence that would have happened in that scenario. trump winning will also create a lot of violence, probably much, much more violence. sorry to get all miss cleo but i think it's true

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

you're probably right.

scott seward, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

christie is also going to get indicted yall

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:17 PM (thirty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/11/president-trump-can-thank-paula-jones-his-legal-troubles

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

ha yeah –  I cited that SCOTUS decision a couple days ago upthread

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

this is amazing

https://vimeo.com/190738676

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

can we find a way to drag Pence repeatedly into court though?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Abid_ism/status/798568643009318912

hehe

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

I can't stop thinking about this actual, totally real campaign ad that belongs in the "Things that just have to be Tim & Eric sketches" thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5kfC_VCXeQ

frogbs, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

can we find a way to drag Pence repeatedly into court though?

obviously we don't want Pence president either, we just want the administration crippled/unable to act

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

yeah, agreed on that, whatever works

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

yeah just wait until an unarmed black man gets shot by the cops and blm protests it.. can see that escalating quickly

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

I hope this is good news and not someone even shittier getting the post. who am I kidding thats probably exactly whats happening.

In a surprise development, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani appeared to take himself out of the running for attorney general.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

yeah but the rumor now is that AG could be Kris Kobach

goole, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

dem senators think they have an opening against bannon, looks like

https://twitter.com/BenjySarlin/status/798611435416854528

goole, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

idg why Giuliani would prefer Sec of State tbh. Sitting through complex negotiations doesn't really seem to be a thing he's interested in.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

In a surprising decision, Donald Trump has tapped Ann Coulter as his personal choice for attorney general, with the backing up key members of his inner circle.

nomar, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

I've been expecting way more ''old cronies from back home in the crooked real estate game'' types tbh. Would be totally sensible for Trump to pick an AG who's the equivalent of Harriet Miers. A loyalist, not necessarily a name we've ever heard of, specifically to shield himself from whatever's coming at the office legally.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

is there a different thread where we've been covering Zuckerberg's non-apologies for Facebook's outsized influence on the election & the pile on of angry rejoinders?

http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/11/donald-trump-won-because-of-facebook.html
https://www.wired.com/2016/11/facebook-alone-didnt-create-trump-click-economy/
https://shift.newco.co/im-sorry-mr-zuckerberg-but-you-are-wrong-65dbf8513424#.eqs30faco

Milton Parker, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

nomar, you stop that.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

I'm half-convinced that he's going to start recruiting death row inmates for cabinet positions at this point.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

yeah just wait until an unarmed black man gets shot by the cops and blm protests it.. can see that escalating quickly

Trump will pardon the cops before there can be an investigation, and he'll spike in popularity.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

is that after all the patriot gun squads have come out and shot up the town or before

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

xpost I can't express to you the degree of relief I felt when I hovered over the link and confirmed that it was indeed an Onion article. My critical faculties are completely blown out at this point.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

Funny but we're rapidly approaching Peak LOL Liberals Read Books

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/305920-two-presidential-electors-to-colleagues-dump-trump

thought at first this was a true case of faithless electors but nah it's just two democratic electors

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

oh the pushed down stairs thing looks more complicated. the person who did it was apparently not a trump supporter, but someone who progressives are friendly with and a disabled rights advocate who, due to their condition, freaked out. the person pushed down the stairs is trying to get the message out and control the story and make sure no charges are pressed.

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

You all know I say what I feel without filters and I have to say that I feel the prospect of a Trump presidency looks problematic at best

Evan, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

Funny but we're rapidly approaching Peak LOL Liberals Read Books

― Kiarostami bag (milo z),

Just three weeks ago I was snickering at the number of anti-Bush books groaning on the uni library shelf, most published between 2002-2005.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

Could someone explain the whole "sanctuary cities" thing? I don't think I'd even heard the term until Trump made an issue of it.

sarahell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

usu it's a city that doesn't use municipal $ to enforce immigration laws and where cops don't ask abt immigration status

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

i think hitler coined that term.

scott seward, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

it reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cities_of_Refuge

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

McCain Warns Against Russian Reset

"With the U.S. presidential transition underway, Vladimir Putin has said in recent days that he wants to improve relations with the United States. We should place as much faith in such statements as any other made by a former KGB agent who has plunged his country into tyranny, murdered his political opponents, invaded his neighbors, threatened America's allies, and attempted to undermine America's elections," the Arizona senator said in a statement, without any apparent irony or self-reflection.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

(The last bit added by me for emphasis, just for the sake of clarity and to hopefully forestall the complete collapse of factual reality.)

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

nobody cares what McCain says

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

thx for Caribou Barbie, you "honorable" captured guy

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

It's less about caring what he says and more about the fact that he's halfway describing the dude he endorsed for president, who in turn spent his entire campaign showing clear favor for Putin.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

oh I got that, believe me

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

thx for Caribou Barbie, you "honorable" captured guy

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, November 15, 2016 3:52 PM

haha i loled

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

McCain, Graham and Cruz all on the Armed Services committee, Dems could probably work w them to frustrate any stupid major foreign policy blunders re: Russia

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

Really, how eager is the GOP to make nice with Russia? Maybe if it leads to some bilateral plan to carve up the Middle East?

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'm sure Putin would give them whatever they wanted. He seems like a pretty equitable dude that way.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

xxp:
Could they? What's the likelihood of Congress voting to halt funding for military action already in progress.

The imperial presidency created during Truman's tenure means Congress is reduced to performing policy autopsies.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

obviously they can't stop Trump from putting planes in the air and dropping bombs, but the power of the purse isn't nothing

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

one more data point: the forclosure crisis was the unaddressed drag on obama's tenure and may have cost hillary too

https://mathbabe.org/2016/11/14/guest-post-the-foreclosure-vote/

goole, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

Cue constituent howls of "not supporting the troops".

Under the War Powers Act, the president has 90 days after introducing troops into hostilities to obtain congressional approval of that action. It looks good on paper, but presidents have generally ignored the War Powers Act, citing Article II, Section 2 as their authority to send soldiers into combat.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

I'd figure the numbers on Trump's promises will start to add up quick. You got to figure it would cost probably 2-3 billion to try and deport 2-3 million people. That would only be a cost of legal and logistics of $1000 a case and I would figure that it could cost lots more per case than that.

earlnash, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

Many different things Trump and his admin supposedly want would create absolute chaos. My biggest fear is that they want to create chaos.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

they don't actually want anything except money and respect

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

Like the best case right now is four years of infighting and bufoonery and blustery talk backed up by little action, with some real damage to federal govt and US standing along the way. My mind is playing out so many worse scenarios right now that I'm having a hard time concentrating on anything.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

or rather that's all Trump wants

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

yeah, it's not all Pence wants, and maybe not Bannon either.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure he genuinely wants to reduce taxes for his wealthy friends. dunno if that is part of what you mean by money.

sarahell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

I am aware of the toothlessness of the War Powers Act Sanpaku. Nonetheless, I can see avowed "mavericks" I mentioned doing their best to frustrate Trump military adventures in the service of Russia.

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

dunno if that is part of what you mean by money.

duh, of course it is!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

wasn't sure if you just meant himself and his family.

sarahell, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

well they would benefit from those tax cuts, so yes

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

staffing VA psych patients has been v interesting today

jason waterfalls (gbx), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

huh Congress trying to rally against this Bannon appointment:

BREAKING: Rep Cicilline circulating letter to colleagues asking @realDonaldTrump to rescind Bannon appointment. 120 co-signers so far.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

Οὖτις:

I don't see Trump adventurism, outside of unilateral strikes on Iran, being nearly as great a problem as his signals that the U.S. won't stand behind S.Korea/Taiwan/Baltic States.

What happens if Trump says to Russia: we're not going to interfere with bombing East Aleppo? If he removes specops guys working with the FSA? Not much, really.

And, from the nottheonion file:

Ben Carson declines role in Trump administration because he 'feels he has no government experience'

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

Late on that headline, it seems.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

popular vote deficit passed 1 mill! lol mandate

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

I'd figure the numbers on Trump's promises will start to add up quick. You got to figure it would cost probably 2-3 billion to try and deport 2-3 million people. That would only be a cost of legal and logistics of $1000 a case and I would figure that it could cost lots more per case than that.
― earlnash, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:15 PM (twenty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he could just ask Obama what it cost and then try to get a better deal tbh

sleepingbag, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

being nearly as great a problem as his signals that the U.S. won't stand behind S.Korea/Taiwan/Baltic States.

def a problem. I'm sure he'll back them if they "promise to pay up" sad lol

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

Speaking of thte permanent Washington class:

Michelle Obama has burned off her date-night meals at Washington’s new generation of acclaimed restaurants by pedaling at SoulCycle. President Obama has shopped for Jonathan Franzen novels with his daughters at local independent bookstores. Obama administration staff members, their barhopping chronicled in the gossip pages, have hit the 14th Street hot spots hard.

Decades ago, Washington was broke and run by a mayor best known for smoking crack with a prostitute on a surveillance tape. Neighborhoods had not fully recovered from the 1968 riots, and an aging Georgetown elite still set the tone. The administrations of two Bushes and a Clinton in between hardly had an effect on the city.

But Mr. Obama’s arrival in 2009 coincided with an urban renaissance. Economic development, federal and private investment, and an influx of highly educated young, gay and diverse professionals gentrified neighborhoods, leading to an explosion in restaurants, bars and cafes. And the Obama family — African-American, youthful, attractive and urbane — were archetypes of a modern city on the upswing

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, November 14, 2016 10:13 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

after freaking out for a few days last week, we went to DC to visit some good friends this weekend. my wife and i went to college in DC from 2002-2006, the peak of the GWB years, and we were heavily involved in campus activism (particularly the anti-war movement during that time). we've been back to the city since then for obama's 2008 inauguration and a couple of other trips but we hadn't visited our old neighborhoods or the AU campus, so we made an effort to do that this time. it was very surreal, being reminded of that time, having an idiot president, that empowering feeling of being part of a "resistance" but still feeling helpless to affect things, seeing the traffic circle where we held our first major iraq war protest, driving past the campus buildings where we held our organizing meetings. i left DC by the time obama was elected and i often wished we stayed there during the crazy revitalization of DC during the obama years (which was obviously years in the making -- obama came with it but major DC development and gentrification had been happening for some time)

my friends and i all talked about how it was kind of a fantasy world with the obamas in the white house. some of our radicalism had faded during those years but probably less so bc of age and more that we just felt more comfortable knowing obama was running things? obv there was much to object to and protest against w/ obama but we all have had so much affection for him.

our best friends there are an interracial couple who are godparents to our youngest son. the wife, from a working-class italian-american family in boston, talked about how her father voted for trump while her biracial son (about 10 years old) was in tears when she shared the news that trump had won. she was so frustrated that her father could love his grandkids so much but not see how a trump presidency could affect them at all.

one of the other friends we saw this weekend was the one republican guy in our college group of friends. he's a weird dude. he played in a punk band and almost all his friends are pretty far left. he's an extremely moderate republican - the pro-business but socially liberal kind of moderate republican, and he said he abstained from voting this year. it was interesting to talk to him, over a lot of whiskey, and his view was that trump, until a few years ago, was basically a "manhattan democrat" and that i shouldn't worry so much, that he's probably the most moderate and socially liberal republican president we could get right now. he's not a trump fan by any means but he ultimately felt that he wasn't going to do much damage. i had to counter that this "manhattan democrat" basically started his political career attempting to delegitimize the first black president and among other very obvious (to us) things we should be extremely nervous and vigilant, he acknowledged those things are fucked up. but he mostly said we should just expect incompetence and corruption and that the huge, dangerous, and sweeping changes trump promised would be nearly impossible to achieve, that our system isn't really that tolerant of dramatic actions like that. anyways. just one moderate DC republican's pov, lol

marcos, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

just incompetence and corruption nbd

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

That's in my pile of best-case scenarios for sure. I'm not convinced that it matters what trump "is," which implies that he has some kind of principles.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

hi marcos - been wondering how you were doing

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

hey dude! a little better. but shit this gonna be a rough few years huh

marcos, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

but he mostly said we should just expect incompetence and corruption and that the huge, dangerous, and sweeping changes trump promised would be nearly impossible to achieve

this is exactly what I just told my dad earlier today (lol), altho the difference is I find the likely scale of incompetence and corruption to be truly terrifying. who knows what he is going to fuck up/what crisis he is going to mismanage. This stuff scares me more - partly because it's precisely so unpredictable - than the hand-wringing about unlikely scenarios like mass deportations, Nazi-style deathcamps etc. Dubya looked pretty harmless until 9/11.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

yeah this has really been a bitch with young kids in the mix, the compulsion to "keep it together" for their sake is strong but hard to live up to.

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

totally, i was a wreck last week and our boys definitely noticed

marcos, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

popular vote deficit passed 1 mill! lol mandate

― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, November 15, 2016 9:40 PM (thirty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hopefully the dems can use this as a weapon against mcconnell's bullshit 'the voters need a voice in the new supreme court pick'

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

yeah I feel like I have to confine my anxious freakouts to when the kids aren't around ie @ 2 in the morning

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

ha i did sign earlier today but whoever said it was depressing to see the other "popular petitions" there was otm. eg "We the people ask congress to meet in emergency session about removing George Soros owned voting machines from 16 states. 131,140 SIGNED. 100,000 GOAL"

marcos, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

the internet is a scary place

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

I'd figure the numbers on Trump's promises will start to add up quick. You got to figure it would cost probably 2-3 billion to try and deport 2-3 million people. That would only be a cost of legal and logistics of $1000 a case and I would figure that it could cost lots more per case than that.
― earlnash, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:15 PM (twenty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

In addition to the cost, there's also huge procedural burdens. Many immigrants have limited due process rights. While there's situations where 'expedited removal' is available -- prior removal orders, proximity to the border, length of time in the U.S., many people have the right to see an immigration judge, especially some of the people Trump is talking about i.e. those that have been here for a while but also have a criminal record. Currently there's a little less than 400 immigration judges benched -- 2 million people is a potential caseload of 5000 per judge. It takes years to work through the process.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

popular vote deficit passed 1 mill! lol mandate

― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, November 15, 2016 9:40 PM (thirty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hopefully the dems can use this as a weapon against mcconnell's bullshit 'the voters need a voice in the new supreme court pick'

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries),

really? just like in W's first term?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

interesting stats lion

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

interesting stats lion

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:26 PM (fifty-seven seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It just makes me wonder if he's serious, what they'd plan to do to make removal easier. Obviously any legislative change in that regard is going to draw court challenges. Because I think, with those numbers, you'd have to bench half the immigration lawyers in the U.S. to achieve your goal. And they're not going to do it.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

of course he isn't serious, he never thought any of this shit through

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

signed that Garland petition and then saw this one that is much closer: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/appoint-garland-now-senate-has-waived-its-rights

rob, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

whoah what the hell? that's a reversal from just a couple days ago. I think there are three, I signed them all

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

I've never looked into this process before, does someone at the WH really have to write an email like "Guys, free speech" to that YG one

rob, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

probably

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

that's what interns are for!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

if there's some other avenue to get Obama to take this idea seriously I'd happily pursue it but idk what it is

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

tombot xp except that border patrol guy.. you mad bc the budget's been slashed? pretty sure thats not entirely obama's fault

and the only reason the border patrol endorsed this clown was they'd get unlimited budget money forever. its all they care about.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

i signed the petitions but obama ain't gonna do shit. it's not in his nature

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

if mitt romney or whoever had won this election I would be cool with this but I really don't want to give trump any precedent for pushing the boundaries in the constitution

I mean he's gonna do it regardless but this would make it easier

iatee, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

obama should've bluffed by outright saying "approve MG now, or I appoint someone 2x as liberal as lame-duck"

flopson, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

Have to admit this infighting/purging gives me a little bit of hope

, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

Oh boy

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/11/14/was-election-vote-against-hamilton/HAT5A4m3msG6m8pPORbknL/story.html

OPINION | NIALL FERGUSON
Was the election a vote against ‘Hamilton’?

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

Have we already shared this, from Elizabeth Warren?

http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/2016-11-15-Trump_Letter.pdf

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

Trump: tl/dr

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

We're lucky if Trump becomes the new normal. There's no countervailing force against the direction Trump demonstrates we're heading in, so why on earth it would it get any better. Magic? I get why people want to make themselves feel better about this, but c'mon, this isn't going anywhere good.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

if I was given the opportunity to vote against 'hamilton' I would

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

ugh sen warren's office needs a better scanner

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:09 (seven years ago) link

Even 1 in 12 African-Americans voted Republican this year.

That sounds much better than 8.3%, I guess?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:11 (seven years ago) link

god fuck off niall ferguson you nauseating henry kissinger apologist with your "this is how democracy is meant to work" bullshit

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:12 (seven years ago) link

also, why oh why isn't her column called The Petri Dish?

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:41 (seven years ago) link

Our leaders, political, business, and otherwise, who are telling us to accept this as the new normal are the same people who are trying to gut our salaries, slash even more of our benefits, and have no particular issue with throwing us in the garbage when they're done with us. If they could sell our souls to hell for a couple of dollars, they wouldn't even blink at it. So yeah, let's listen to these guys, they're looking after us, they care.

Washington Post is Amazon owned, and they don't give a fuck that they literally kill people with their work practices. You think these people are gonna share the love with all of you?

larry appleton, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:43 (seven years ago) link

Nevermind, that article was being ironic.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:47 (seven years ago) link

ha, yeah it was.

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

i laughed.

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

Have to admit this infighting/purging gives me a little bit of hope

― 龜, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 6:31 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

part of me thinks this way but the other part of me sees this as an authoritarian purging his staff of all remaining moderates in favor of loyalists

qop (crüt), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

man, the Paul boys might be the most insidious of the white nationalists. So many otherwise decent people think Ron, most of all, is just a happy lil country doctor who doesn't want to interfere with your drugs and guns.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

I played quiz bowl against Alexandra Petri when I was in high school, I just want to mention that somewhere

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:56 (seven years ago) link

I have no doubt that a real racist sexist chauvinist white supremacist will be easy to spot. “I am coming for minorities now,” he will say. “I am an actual racist. I am, literally, Hitler, or at the very least Goebbels.”

I'll take the chuckle anywhere I can get it.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:58 (seven years ago) link

An excellent philosophy to live yr life by imo.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 01:02 (seven years ago) link

As good as any Onion response and even better for being in a msm daily, kiu

imago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

i signed the petitions but obama ain't gonna do shit. it's not in his nature

― k3vin k., Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:57 PM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah obama believes way too much in acting in service of governmental norms, even when the other side is radically violating them

Clay, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 02:27 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/798721142525665280

Donald J. TrumpVerified account
‏@realDonaldTrump
Very organized process taking place as I decide on Cabinet and many other positions. I am the only one who knows who the finalists are!

9:55 PM - 15 Nov 2016

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:04 (seven years ago) link

To be revealed on the next episode of Government Apprentice!

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:05 (seven years ago) link

yeah obama believes way too much in acting in service of governmental norms, even when the other side is radically violating them

it's sad to have beliefs and principles and stuff

j., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:10 (seven years ago) link

i'm not saying it's not, it's just that everyone who is clinging to the idea that he would try to sneakily slip garland while the senate is looking the other way is missing the nature of who obama is imo

Clay, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:15 (seven years ago) link

agreed

j., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:18 (seven years ago) link

One can hope. Maybe he can be convinced that roe v. Wade is that important, these are extraordinary circumstances etc. Idk what do we have to lose by pushing hom on it.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:41 (seven years ago) link

Having been burned, oh, a week or so ago, I take these "Team Trump in disarray!" stories with a serious dash of salt.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/11/15/im-the-trump-supporter-pollsters-missed/?tid=pm_opinions_pop&utm_term=.7e8e341149b0

This article is pretty good. By which I mean that through its floundering irrationality it eloquently demonstrates the exact immunity to logic that caused the Trump win. This is how a large chunk of voters who aren't entrenched with either party moves - that is, the voters who decide elections once the bases have laid down their solid, predictable, zero-sum foundations.

hardcore dilettante, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:45 (seven years ago) link

Dude does not sound like he would be a good hang.

BTW, it just occurred to me that maybe the floundering Team Trump stories are true, and that come January he will have only filled a fraction of the positions needed ... and then he will boast that they were not needed, and look at all the money he is already saving, because he is a smart businessman who knows how to staff a big operation.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:49 (seven years ago) link

They should RapGenius that with footnotes to all the insane shit like Obama not delivering on infrastructure and get him to respond.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:57 (seven years ago) link

How I wish we could have selected someone with Newt Gingrich’s command of the facts, Sen. Marco Rubio’s eloquence, Mike Huckabee’s character, Sen. Ted Cruz’s deep love of the Constitution, Carly Fiorina’s clarity of thought and Ben Carson’s humility and gentleness.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha fuck you dude

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:57 (seven years ago) link

"Secretary of State Giuliani" or "Secretary Bolton" would've been a thing in a Christie or Rubio administration.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 03:59 (seven years ago) link

Steve Vai's guitar skills, Lars Ulrich's acumen, Ted Nugget's diplomacy, the guy from Jackyl's mastery of the chainsaw, Jon Bon Jovi's longevity and Kid Rock's inclusivity.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

Ha, Ted Nugget. Thanks, bourbon!

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

"How would the person seated next to you in a New York City television studio know?"

Like the set of the Apprentice?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

also, why oh why isn't her column called The Petri Dish?

― scott seward, Tuesday, November 15, 2016 6:41 PM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Her Twitter handle is @petridishes.

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:09 (seven years ago) link

i don't feel like i have any way to predict what a trump presidency will be like. forced deportations and impulsive wars sounds outlandish, but i just watched like, 500 days of trump saying something, everyday, that should disqualify him from the presidency, and then be elected president.

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:13 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it's not that he was elected president and more that no one else was elected president.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:16 (seven years ago) link

Quick question: when reports state that Trump asked that top secret briefings be given to his children and son in law, am I to read that as ... top secret briefings are being given to his children and son in law? Because if the president asks for it, can anyone tell him no? Is there any law against who the president OKs for secret briefings? Wonder how long backstage (and back-stabby) stuff starts leaking publicly. The first I saw was this today:

Prominent American allies were in the meantime scrambling to figure out how and when to contact Mr. Trump. At times, they have been patched through to him in his luxury office tower with little warning, according to a Western diplomat who spoke on the condition of anonymity to detail private conversations.

President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt was the first to reach Mr. Trump for such a call last Wednesday, followed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel not long afterward. But that was about 24 hours before Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain got through — a striking break from diplomatic practice given the close alliance between the United States and Britain.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:22 (seven years ago) link

the incompetence and disorganization is really grotesque

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:31 (seven years ago) link

Holy Hell!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:56 (seven years ago) link

Really motherfucker? It should be nothing but organized you shit head!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 04:57 (seven years ago) link

posted upthread :)

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

Fuck idk even know. I'm just is such a rage atm and I hate this fucker so damn much any every idiot that voted for him.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:02 (seven years ago) link

lol at "ted cruz's deep love of the constitution"

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:10 (seven years ago) link

he particularly loves the 2 ply version

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

his go-to when he runs out of athletic socks

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:21 (seven years ago) link

should staff the cabinet with all reality stars

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:28 (seven years ago) link

Trump appoints horse to Secretary of Defense

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:29 (seven years ago) link

Trump appoints Norman Schwarzkopf to Secretary of Treasury

(one week later)

Trump team learns Cabinet appointees must be living, learns Schwarzkopf has been dead for 4 yrs

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 05:44 (seven years ago) link

bahahahahaha

augh (Control Z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 06:14 (seven years ago) link

Fuck idk even know. I'm just is such a rage atm and I hate this fucker so damn much any every idiot that voted for him.

― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:02 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^

augh (Control Z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 06:14 (seven years ago) link

I like to imagine Trump realizing just how far out of his depth he is, panicking, and feigning a health crisis that forces him to resign, disappearing from public view swiftly thereafter, retreating to Mar-a-Lago to live out his days as a semi-invalid suffering from dementia, leaving the republic in even greater disarray but safe at least from his special brand of depredations.

augh (Control Z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 06:40 (seven years ago) link

the meetings have got to be a total shitshow

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 06:41 (seven years ago) link

I finally had the talk with my mom on facetime today (she lives near Bham, Al). I had been hoping that her disdain for disgusting men like Trump would overrule her disdain for corporate elitists like Hillary enough for her to write in Ben Carson or something but the right wing talking point bubble that she lives in has fully taken hold of her. She's usually able to articulate her thoughts about things well (she's an accountant and has been known to talk my ear off about credit union profit equity laws or w/e) but when she started talking about Hillary she wasn't even forming complete sentences, just stuttering shards of talking points like a 12 year-old trying to justify why he had to throw a rock at the other kid. It was sad and disappointing and she straight up shocked me in an exchange when I asked her what Obama had done that was so horrible and she said "Obamacare" and I said "yeah, I wish we just had a socialist single-payer system" and she said "well that's what we have, a socialist system, that's why it's so expensive" and I had to use wikipedia to prove to her that all the top insurance companies are for-profit. She's usually the first to admit it when she's totally ignorant of a subject matter but when it comes to right-wing media topics she completely falls into that stupid "skeptical=smart" trap and argues for ridiculous falsehood until she says "well you believe what you believe and I believe what I believe" like there's no such thing as facts.

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 06:51 (seven years ago) link

I dunno; I've tried to resist directly attacking people head on, and try to shift them by a few degrees at a time.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 07:15 (seven years ago) link

That's mainly the route that I took today. I wasn't even the one who brought up the election but she seemed compelled to defend her vote (she knows where I stand politically). I'm hoping that by asking a few non-pointed questions and rebutting them with a fact here and there I can slowly whittle away at her certainty about these foolish positions but I don't talk to her as much as local Bham morning DJs do on her commute so I'm not sure if it's wasted effort. I've tried prodding her about climate change over the years, hoping that as studies and evidence and international consensus continue to pile up she'll start to believe it's real and man-made but she still brings up that one time those scientist emails leaked about maybe skewing the results of one study.

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 07:29 (seven years ago) link

Jeb Lund posted this fun timeline today, wondering if the fuckery would be reported on by media types with the same zeal as "the Obamacare website doesn't work!1" but wasn't holding his breath

http://i.imgur.com/2JCUAjN.jpg

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 07:32 (seven years ago) link

Climate Change is one of those things that is a perfect storm(sorry) of falling into the cracks of human risk perception.

David Roberts writes about this kinda thing, that it won't becomes tenable for them until it slowly or quietly becomes an acceptable idea for members of consertivate tribal identity.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 07:35 (seven years ago) link

How long before Trump goes "You're fired" (preferably before cameras) on a cabinet member?

Diana Fire (j.lu), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:16 (seven years ago) link

it's sad to have beliefs and principles and stuff

Yeah, too bad his "I'm against stupid wars" one didn't stick.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

and presumably the things he taught in constitutional law class

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, to hell with Obama and his stupid wars in Syria, Ukraine and Bulgaria. And what about his invasion of Barbados, huh? How stupid was that? Not to mention the war in Samoa, I mean, it'll take years to make up for that blunder. And also, we all know he orchestrated a secret invasion in Honduras, but did you know the real purpose of that was to create a bridgehead to conquer Guatemala and Belize? It's true.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 11:56 (seven years ago) link

The Guardian asked 10 people to read "the other side's" Facebook news feeds for a month:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/16/facebook-bias-bubble-us-election-conservative-liberal-news-feed

Warning: found it interesting but not making me feel any more hopeful about anything.

(Prob not the best thread, do we have a "media bubble" thread?)

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

Fred, you still are an embarrassment

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:06 (seven years ago) link

"We're lucky if Trump becomes the new normal. There's no countervailing force against the direction Trump demonstrates we're heading in, so why on earth it would it get any better. Magic? I get why people want to make themselves feel better about this, but c'mon, this isn't going anywhere good.

― larry appleton"

larry, we're the countervailing force. and yes, that's fucking terrifying.

"I dunno; I've tried to resist directly attacking people head on, and try to shift them by a few degrees at a time.

― (rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish)"

seriously god bless anybody who has the fortitude and the patience for incrementalism. i don't. there's no polite way for me to say the things i feel like i need to say.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:10 (seven years ago) link

also, fred, morbz, get a room

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:10 (seven years ago) link

"seriously god bless anybody who has the fortitude and the patience for incrementalism. i don't. there's no polite way for me to say the things i feel like i need to say."

whoops didn't c&p the second paragraph:

yes, i worry that i'm sending my friends and relatives right into the arms of steve bannon, that if i make them choose that's what they'll choose. but i'm more afraid of continuing to give people the luxury of pretending not to choose.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:15 (seven years ago) link

hey so somebody in another thread told me to shut the fuck up so i wrote an etiquette guide on the topic.

I'm kind of curious if I'm being sub-ilxed here, as that's not really what I was saying.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:27 (seven years ago) link

For advice on building Mr. Trump’s national security team, his inner circle has been relying on three hawkish current and former American officials: Representative Devin Nunes, Republican of California, who is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee; Peter Hoekstra, a former Republican congressman and former chairman of the Intelligence Committee; and Frank Gaffney, a Pentagon official during the Reagan administration and a founder of the Center for Security Policy.

Mr. Gaffney has long advanced baseless conspiracy theories, including that President Obama might be a closet Muslim. The Southern Poverty Law Center described him as “one of America’s most notorious Islamophobes.”

cool

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

she still brings up that one time those scientist emails leaked about maybe skewing the results of one study.

feel the need to point out here that the actual number of times this happened was zero

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:42 (seven years ago) link

This morning I told my wife about his "Only I know the finalists!" tweet, and she laughed harder than I'd heard in days. I think that may be the secret to survival. I (we? everyone?) needs to go full "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb" with this administration, because shit is going to get dark and stupid and ridiculous, but I'm going to stay relatively powerless, and I've got to be able to just laugh at it all. I'll protest, and I'll donate, and I'll stay engaged and involved, and obviously if any of his most horrid mouth shits in the tub truly float to the surface I'll be angry, but for the sake of personal sanity I have to just be able to look at the insanity of it all and recognize it for what it is. It's like getting a history book where someone has doodled dicks on ever page that animate when you flip the corners. It's bad, but you've also got to chuckle at such dedication to the wrong thing.

I mean, come on, "only I know the finalists!" That's where we're at. That's dada. That's selling gold-plated poop.

Anyway, no one answered me: does this mean that Trump's kids and whoever else he wants have the same top security clearance that he has? I assume he asked for this so that they can read things for him, but does this mean he got what he asked for and they have clearance? (gtfo Giuliani, "what else are they going to do for 4 years, be employed?" get real).

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

wow

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 23m23 minutes ago
Australia, New Zealand, and more. I am always available to them. @nytimes is just upset that they looked like fools in their coverage of me.
0 replies 2,672 retweets 8,423 likes
Reply Retweet 2.7K
Like 8.4K
More

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 32m32 minutes ago
I have recieved and taken calls from many foreign leaders despite what the failing @nytimes said. Russia, U.K., China, Saudi Arabia, Japan,
0 replies 3,651 retweets 10,001 likes
Reply Retweet 3.7K
Like 10K
More

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 36m36 minutes ago
The failing @nytimes story is so totally wrong on transition. It is going so smoothly. Also, I have spoken to many foreign leaders.

0 replies 3,440 retweets 10,278 likes
Reply Retweet 3.4K
Like 10K
More

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 1h1 hour ago
I am not trying to get "top level security clearance" for my children. This was a typically false news story.

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

I hope he stays petulant and infantile for four years.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Last November, for instance, Trump said he was concerned that foreign students attending Ivy League schools have to return home because of U.S. immigration laws.

“We have to be careful of that, Steve. You know, we have to keep our talented people in this country,” Trump said. He paused. Bannon said, “Um.”

“I think you agree with that,” Trump said. “Do you agree with that?”

Bannon was hesitant.

“When two-thirds or three-quarters of the CEOs in Silicon Valley are from South Asia or from Asia, I think . . . ” Bannon said, not finishing the sentence. “A country is more than an economy. We’re a civic society.”

maura, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

also bannon uses "hombres" at one point. glad to see talk radio is around to not only be its own swampy morass, but to reveal this turd's truer colors

maura, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

Seriously, why even bother having press conferences with some spokesperson lying or obfuscating? I'd much rather Dear Leader do it himself over twitter. Just wait until the stakes get higher and it gets more surreal.

"My administration did not approve the low-interest loan from China to open a new casino on the moon. But it is such a great casino, you should all go. All American visitors on July 4th get 10% off their first night and a free drink coupon!"

"I welcome Russia's maneuvers in the Atlantic, having them closer to us makes them easier to watch, and saves money on long distance phone calls. Smart!"

"Don't believe what you read about Aleppo, there were not nearly as many dead children as the failing nytimes claimed, and they were bad children!"

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

Seeing Bannon use the phrase 'civic society' just made me barf in my lap.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

TS: trump marking distinction between "talented people" and unworthy working class immigrants who deserve immediate deportation vs. steve bannon's white suprematist social engineering.

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

i'll give the point to trump here but i am still grossed out by the carelessness with which he talks about millions of immigrants. "they're not sending their best people."

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

is it just me or does bannon look like he has a serious booze problem

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

I hope he stays petulant and infantile for four years.

Trump believes that being a giant manbaby on Twitter is what won him the election, why stop now?

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

am i the only one shocked by how few retweets/likes he gets? he's arguably the most famous person in the world right now but he gets twitter love on the level of, a, say, pete wentz

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

xxpost Yeah, he looks like he's moments away from dropping his XXX bottle and rubbing his eyes in disbelief in the midst of incessant hiccupping.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

Trump believes that being a giant manbaby on Twitter is what won him the election, why stop now?

yep and approx half the country either loves him for it or just wants everybody to be calm and give him a chance you guys!!

I cannot fathom how bad things will get before these millions of pig-headed adult babies recognize that this is an unmitigated disaster.
actually, it probably doesn't matter what actually happens any more. they'll rationalize it away and embed themselves ever deeper in the bubble idiocy.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:45 (seven years ago) link

*of idiocy

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

am i the only one shocked by how few retweets/likes he gets? he's arguably the most famous person in the world right now but he gets twitter love on the level of, a, say, pete wentz

He's only at 15m followers which is...nearly the same amount as Kevin Durant. He's currently being beaten by: Jim Carrey, Ricky Martin, Christina Aguilera, Leonardo DiCaprio, Chris Brown, Blake Shelton, Coldplay, Ashton Kutcher, Avril Lavigne, Eminem, Conan O' Brien, Pitbull, Daniel Tosh, Neil Patrick Harris, Pink, Bill Gates, J-Lo, and every single Kardashian/Jenner and member of One Direction. (Barack Obama is at 79.4 million)

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:48 (seven years ago) link

I really think the only thing that could change the tide is if Fox became hyper-critical of him, like Obama levels.

but god knows something just as bad or worse would spring up in its wake.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

has Robert Redford been cast as Bannon in the Trump biopic?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

I read that Pizza the Hutt just beat him out.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

he looks definitely unhealthy.

(somber synthesizer music) (doo dah), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:06 (seven years ago) link

The bright side of this nightmare is that half of the Trump administration is probably like one good scare away from cardiac arrest.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

trump's thin skin is just remarkable. he's a one-man rapid response team. could he be disabled by the press equivalent of a DDOS attack??

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

despite trump's doctor's memorably ringing endorsement to the contrary, i'm honestly not sure trump has the physical fortitude to make it through four years as president

i'm calling it now - dead of a coronary by 2018

not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

could he be disabled by the press equivalent of a DDOS attack??

Forget the press, I can imagine some independent DDOS doing it. Hell, I can imagine him becoming the first president felled by a phishing scam. That's why he wants to bring his kids on board, to help him get on the internet and check his email.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

This is a man who has had the freedom to do exactly what he wants to do and live however he wants to live for his entire adult life, and because of his fundamental incuriosity, I'm sure he never considered that that level of freedom simply doesn't apply to the most powerful office in the country. And because he gets bent out of shape over the tiniest slight, yeah, I can see this being a huge source of stress for him. And that's before you even take into consideration the awesome weight of responsibility and the massive workload, etc. I can see him keeling over from an aneurysm from a tantrum over not being allowed to sleep in his own gold-plated bed every night.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

kind of a Shakespeareian tragedy, isn't it?

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

Can't knock the hustle

more like dork enlightenment lol (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

Frederik is actually a pretty good spokesman for the elite liberal ratfuck that just got their asses handed to them--quadruple down on the stupid, folks, it worked so well for y'all in the general. But be honest, Frederik, you wrote that Lenny Letter, didn't you?

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

This is a man who has had the freedom to do exactly what he wants to do and live however he wants to live for his entire adult life, and because of his fundamental incuriosity, I'm sure he never considered that that level of freedom simply doesn't apply to the most powerful office in the country. And because he gets bent out of shape over the tiniest slight, yeah, I can see this being a huge source of stress for him. And that's before you even take into consideration the awesome weight of responsibility and the massive workload, etc. I can see him keeling over from an aneurysm from a tantrum over not being allowed to sleep in his own gold-plated bed every night.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 9:27 AM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

again i'm not sure why we would think trump would take any of the demands of the role seriously. if he wants to just go to mar-a-lago or trump tower every night he will, he doesn't really give a shit

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

Frederik is actually a pretty good spokesman for the elite liberal ratfuck that just got their asses handed to them

― Iago Galdston, 16. november 2016 15:40 (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Glad you think so, then at least I'm informative. You, on the other hand, are a piss poor spokesman for anything, your cowardice keeps you from putting forth anything but troll messages to others. You're worthless.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

I've said before that I'd be more than happy to see some dissenting voices that were actually willing to engage in a discussion about this stuff, but Iago has done nothing but troll throughout this election and he clearly intends to continue that trend. I heartily support the mods threadbanning him from every political thread.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

For the umpty-leventh time, the threadban function does not work.

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

i think it's >60% likely Trump will not serve the full 4 years, for voluntary reasons or not

but then he's not the whole problem

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/15/mike-pence-will-be-the-most-powerful-christian-supremacist-in-us-history/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

The obvious bright thing is that he's alienating a generation of future voters, and hastening the end of GOP dominated state/local politics.

The only bright thing this week is Zuckerberg deciding to block the Macedonian sites spreading calumnies on Facebook. If social media recognizes they have a responsibility, then
it might force a lot of well-meaning aunts and grandmothers out of their bubble.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

been seeing this go around as well, it's a start at least:

False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical “News” Sources

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

i'm currently terrified that trump is going to mobilize his people to vote in trump surrogates in the midterms, and we'll get repeats of events like david brat taking down eric cantor

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

hey so somebody in another thread told me to shut the fuck up so i wrote an etiquette guide on the topic.

I'm kind of curious if I'm being sub-ilxed here, as that's not really what I was saying.

― Andrew Farrell

eh i don't know what "being sub-ilxed" means but whatever you said it's not a problem. :)

the good thing about being a reasonably tightly-knit community like this place is that we all pretty much know how who to ignore. far as i can tell the main result of iago's constant shit-stirring is occasional reminders from other posters that folks should ignore him.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

i'm currently terrified that trump is going to mobilize his people to vote in trump surrogates in the midterms, and we'll get repeats of events like david brat taking down eric cantor

― 龜, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:23 AM (six minutes ago) Bookmark

in conjunction with

https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/the-far-right-is-a-meme

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

People need to be less terrified by that prospect and be more active in mobilizing their own folks. Like now. I keep walking by the empty Dem office in my city and thinking, do they need me to take this shit over?

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

Low-information voters, an example, via digby:

There are a ton of numbers floating around right now about everything but this one actually made me laugh out loud. From Gallup:

Just 16% of Republicans said the economy was getting better in the week before the election, while 81% said it was getting worse. Since the election, 49% say it is getting better and 44% worse.

It's a miracle! He's not even in office and it's already getting better! 33% better!

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

Keith Ellison just endorsed by Elizabeth Warren for DNC chair!

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

i thought he was running himself?

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

seriously god bless anybody who has the fortitude and the patience for incrementalism. i don't. there's no polite way for me to say the things i feel like i need to say.

I think "deep canvassing" is increasingly going to become an established thing. It works here and there, but it does work.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

if the Dem's response to this is to install Dean and Schumer, i think it's reasonable to abandon hope

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

Read more carefully: Ellison is running!

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

2018 looks p bad for Dems iirc. it'd be nice to have a comprehensive list of at-risk seats, as well as seats that *could* potentially flip our way, given an adequate infusion of cash & volunteering.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

can someone give me the summary on why ppl are so excited by keith ellison? everything i've read about him is either identity politics or controversial statements (comparing gwb to hitler or being pro nation of islam). does he have bonafide left-wing economic acheivements that i can read about somewhere?

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

My fave quote of the week may be from the otherwise polite Trump supporter in the Times article about this election tearing families apart, cancelling Thanksgiving/weddings etc.:

As for racism and Mr. Trump, she said, “I don’t think there’s any proof of that.” She added: “I will say that, in his generation, those old guys, most of them kind of lean towards,” and then she paused. “It was a white world.”

I don't think he's racist, it's just that he comes from a generation when everyone was totally racist, so it's not really racism, it's just how it was, I mean come on.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

Phil D., a lot of that change can be attributed to that question being a stand in for just whether you think things in general are going well or not. The answer probably swings because they feel more optimistic now that their candidate won. The disturbing part about this is that the economy is continuing to improve and is looking quite good at the moment, and probably Trump will get all the credit for that.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Maybe getting Trump elected was just all it took.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

xp re: Josh's Thanksgiving comment

my 85-year old Trump-supporting father-in-law is seriously considering moving out of the house after I lost it on Sunday night when he said people "don't have the right to protest" :(

of course, the person this hurts most is my wife, so fucked. Thanksgiving is gonna be rough, if I even go.

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

I know Ellison is running, but i'm conditioned to expect the worst right now, aren't we all?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

Don't waste your time expecting the worst, because there's always the possibility of something much worse than you'd expect happening instead.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

Phil D., a lot of that change can be attributed to that question being a stand in for just whether you think things in general are going well or not. The answer probably swings because they feel more optimistic now that their candidate won. The disturbing part about this is that the economy is continuing to improve and is looking quite good at the moment, and probably Trump will get all the credit for that.

chances of unemployment being lower than it is now in a few years are very very low

iatee, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

That will be the next guy's fault

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

Maybe getting Trump elected was just all it took.

we should not be at all surprised when this becomes the official story

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

That will be the next guy's fault

it will still be Obama's fault, just like 9/11 and the 2008 economic collapse were both Clinton's fault. (but also time traveling Obama's fault)

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

xpost Seriously, unemployment is so relatively low that there literally is not much room for improvement. Trump is fucked on that front, especially, because lack of employment was not the driving election force, it was lack of good jobs, which is another matter and even harder to fix, especially when lack of movement on that front is compounded by lack of health, retirement, union benefits. And people will be all, huh, things have gotten markedly worse, where is my socialized everything that I hated because it was socialism but now want back because it was still not socialism but it definitely made my life better.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

Been having some really good conversations with this secretary in my office who got involved in her local dem party and became a county legislator in a majority republican NY county. Dominican from the Bronx originally and I think maybe lesbian and in any case just really knows what's going on on the ground in the local and state party, good insights. She supported Sanders and def thinks the party needs to go in a more progressive direction but also thinks full-time chair is better for DNC and that the party might not be "ready" for Ellison being a Muslim, and I sincerely don't think she meant that out of any personal mistrust.

She also said some disheartening things about the NY State party (though not totally surprising) and says that they pretty much just rely on NYC and don't do much else, and that the Working Families Party does much more at the grass roots level to actually develop local candidates, train legislators etc.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, inspiring to talk to someone who just got the fuck in there and started working on things from the ground level. Made me want to do a lot more.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Awesome

flopson, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

2018 looks p bad for Dems iirc. it'd be nice to have a comprehensive list of at-risk seats, as well as seats that *could* potentially flip our way, given an adequate infusion of cash & volunteering.

― acerbic (sic)s (will), 16. november 2016 16:46 (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I began this upthread. Seems to me only Nevada could be flipped to Dems, most at-risk seats are in the Midwest. But really, to everyone on here, if you want something really easily doable to do to help, do this: Begin with the list of elections in 2012: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2012 Check out the close ones, check which incumbents are old and might want to step down. Really, there's only 33 races to watch, and many of them are decided already, it's not that hard for anyone to educate yourself, even if vox and 538 won't do it yet.

I know everyone is sick of elections, but perhaps a new thread for organizing before 2018? Perhaps it won't seems so shitty if everyone is ahead of the curve?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

Perhaps Jeff Flake could be defeated in Arizona as well?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

I'm for that, even if it means I have to keep reading Frederik B posts xp

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

I sort of like the idea of surprise attacking someone just slightly within the margin of "safe," like an unexpected flood of resources into the race. Don't know if that's possible in practice, but it seems like it might be a good addition to just grinding it out in the close races and hoping for the best. Also have to shore up anyone close to that "safe" margin on our side, because they can do the same.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

I'm for that, even if it means I have to keep reading Frederik B posts

^

also interested in House races as well.

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

Problem with house races is there's a shitton of them... I mean, you all know this, but I have no idea where to even begin in getting a grasp on these, not until the field starts narrowing down, candidates are chosen in primaries, etc. But a senate thread, that should be doable, and I'd wager conversations on there could help with figuring out a bunch of stuff about state organizations, local elections, etc, a lot of stuff that influences every election as well.

Tried to copy-paste the list from wikipedia to a new question, but nope, looked awful, lol. Somebody will have to make a list themselves, of incumbents and winning margins I guess. Clean it up. I can't do it today, have to review a Danish film on the murder of Kitty Genovese.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

What is this about Mike Pence going to court to seal some private emails? The irony is disgusting.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

I think there's going to need to be a lot of independent GOTV mobilization in the lead up to 2018, and a lot of emphasis on how important midterm voting in particular will be.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, the map is just brutal. How do you defend a dem incumbent in Montana, North Dakota or West Virginia?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Might be easy if the economy shits the bed or the Trump Administration is underwater with scandals or if the Republicans actually try to murder Medicare - all of which are somewhere between likely and certain

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

we definitely do not need a thread about the 2018 elections yet. wait until 2018

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

can someone give me the summary on why ppl are so excited by keith ellison?

not sure if ppl missed this or the answer is just no - no one here knows

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

xpost I kind of disagree. Maybe we don't need a thread about 2018 specifically but I have been thinking that a separate thread specifically about strategies for going forward (leaving the grousing and grieving and despairing itt) would be useful. And the earlier the better.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

the clip of him saying Trump might win the primary and the white tv news hosts cackling at him is pretty funny

flopson, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

i hope i'm wrong, but if/when paul ryan slips in a medicare phaseout into the budget, i think it might pass. the phaseout has been part of the ryan budget which has been proposed in the house every year since 2011. last year, the house passed it, 219-208. it'll surely be in there again this year, as ryan is already indicating. this time, it's not just a symbolic gesture because obama won't be there to veto.

the most important counterweight to privatizing medicare/social security has always been the fact that republican constituents don't support doing so. medicare/social security are very popular programs, everyone knows that. "but this year is different" (<<blllleggggh, already a cliche to say that but it's true). half of the voters are ok with anything trump does, as long as he does it in an entertaining way. all he has to do is say that he's going to change medicare for the better, obamacare bankrupted the country and this is the only way to fix it, and that the replacement is going to be so much better, it will be beautiful, etc. it's complete bullshit, but it might just work during the first two months of his administration when he can get away with just about ANYTHING with his supporters.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

i agree with that karl. it blows. media has already indicated that it's going to normalize all this shit

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

K3v, you can just not read it?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

xp I think you're overestimating the percentage of Trump voters and red-staters who'd be okay with anything. It was still a close election, the only people buying into the idea of a mandate are partisans, and a significant percentage (say 5-8%) of Trump's coalition weren't that far off from voting against him

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

if fred isnt going to save america who will

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

fred i don't mean harm by this but you are so weird (have to admit though i gave you a bunch of FPs last wednesday bc i felt powerless and flagging a middling dane was the best i could do). can you direct me to a post you've made in the past about why you are so fascinated by US politics to this level?

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

tbf it's not unusual for someone from outside the US to be interested in the politics of the world superpower since it'll likely impact them much more than say danish politics will impact US citizens

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

xpost I kind of disagree. Maybe we don't need a thread about 2018 specifically but I have been thinking that a separate thread specifically about strategies for going forward (leaving the grousing and grieving and despairing itt) would be useful. And the earlier the better.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 11:47 AM (eight minutes ago)

what are we going to do, brainstorm and send our best ideas to the DCCC? it's just going to be a bunch of us posting articles about the elections that we could do in any other politics thread. but go ahead, knock yourselves out

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

marcos: US is the most important country in the world, I've lived in the US for a year, my co-worker is from the US, most of the culture I consume is from the US, I've a degree in history and most history today is decided in the US. Like, what's weird about it? And it's not as if I want to start a thread on the 2018 elections, it would be extremely weird, but sic asked if anyone knew, and apparently I'm the only one willing to copy-paste and clean up the information from wikipedia...

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, I really need to not do get drawn into US history and research Kitty Genovese instead.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

sorry fred i realize my comment was dickish

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, I really need to not do get drawn into US history and research Kitty Genovese instead.

yeah best not to get involved

did we ever get wizz sorted (wins), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

holy shit not your actual bygod coworker shit u shouldve said sooner

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

what would it take for this to happen?

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/11/14/state-sanctuary-cities-risk-losing-federal-funds/FdQaxUq0SsxFIVVSVr6zmI/story.html

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

"have to admit though i gave you a bunch of FPs last wednesday bc i felt powerless and flagging a middling dane was the best i could do"

new board description....

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

xp I think you're overestimating the percentage of Trump voters and red-staters who'd be okay with anything. It was still a close election, the only people buying into the idea of a mandate are partisans, and a significant percentage (say 5-8%) of Trump's coalition weren't that far off from voting against him

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:54 AM (fifty-eight seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Beyond this, one of the things I'm trying to comfort myself with is that (some) people respond differently to rhetoric than they do to action. It's exciting to talk about burning everything down but it's a different situation once the flames start encroaching on your property.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

what would it take for this to happen?

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/11/14/state-sanctuary-cities-risk-losing-federal-funds/FdQaxUq0SsxFIVVSVr6zmI/story.html

― 龜, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 12:26 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i asked this last week and someone (gbx i think) looked into it a little and it seems like it would be very difficult since federal funding comes in through a variety of complex ways

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

still obv v alarming

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

what are we going to do, brainstorm and send our best ideas to the DCCC? it's just going to be a bunch of us posting articles about the elections that we could do in any other politics thread. but go ahead, knock yourselves out

― k3vin k., Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:59 AM (twenty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I'm not talking about posting articles about elections, I'm talking about a thread for on-the-ground strategy, real steps that people can take to effect change. Bitching is fun and cathartic but I for one am sick of that being my only outlet because its net real-world effect is precisely dick.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

btw Schumer voted leader, Bernie and Baldwin on the team of 10

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

The GOP assuming a mandate in an election where they lost the popular vote can burn them. They did it with Dubya and he would have lost to a terrible candidate in 2004 had we not still been actively at war still only squeaking out a victory by a hair.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

(if you want to travel down the path of 'well, if there's another 9/11 they'll just blame Obama and everyone will believe them' then you should probably just give up on politics altogether and wall yourself off - whether or not that's true, if you can't maintain some kind of faith in the people then what's the point? you'll just be slamming your head against the wall for the rest of your life.)

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

There's some truth to the idea that the DNC chair shouldn't also be working in Congress, campaigning and so on - how many successful RNC Chairs were in Congress at the same time?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

why Ellison?

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/why_the_democrats_need_keith_ellison.html

https://thinkprogress.org/the-growing-smear-campaign-against-keith-ellison-233e16fab864#.i10d8x7s5

i read both of those - neither detail his economic policies / positions. i mean look if the reason ppl like him is bc he's a black muslim that's not nothing. but i thought that sanders/warren were endorsing him bc of his economic policies since that seems to be their primary interest (and would seem to be the right way forward after an election that seemed to be a referendum on economic policy).

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

Patty Murray is assistant leader: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/senate-democrats-settle-on-leadership-team-sanders-elevated-231481

Schumer has not yet landed someone to lead the party's campaign arm at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Senator-elect Chris Van Hollen of Maryland has emerged as a leading choice. The opening was left unfilled even as the rest of the leadership team was formed.

Meanwhile, Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) have joined the lower rungs of the caucus' brass, as has Manchin (D-W.Va.). They join Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Mark Warner of Virginia in a caucus structure so large that rank-and-file Democrats struggled to explain the structure.

“I can’t remember past that. Truthfully I can’t," said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), after naming the top four Democratic leaders.

“There are new members. And I’m not sure I get them straight," added Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

plus for Ellison: the Israel lobby and Alan Dershowitz think he's an antisemite.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Ellison#Political_positions

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

Not to be a Berniebro but that Slate article about Ellison is pretty dumb or at least seriously slanted. I'm not pleased with Sanders's accomodationist phrases but they're treated here in a vacuum-, where Sanders's actual argument was ''i sure hope Donald Trump comes through on these two or maybe three items where we agree but if he instead continues his pattern of demagoguery I will be his worst enemy.'' And he's already issued a statement joining Warren in condemning Trump's transition team as evidence that he's already breaking promises to working people etc etc.

See also the UAW being smeared as ''pro-Trump'' because the president said sth to the effect of ''well we're against him on a million things and he doesn't share our values, but if he wants to coopt the anti-NAFTA platform we've been fighting for for decades, we're there so long as it's about good american jobs and not demonizing immigrants.''

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

it's michelle goldberg

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

plus for Ellison: the Israel lobby and Alan Dershowitz think he's an antisemite.

glad this continues to be of great significance to you. still does not answer my specific question though.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

@DougHenwood
They’ve suffered a world-historic defeat and can’t face it. Centrist Dem politics is dead outside the liberal elite.

The only ways to fight Trump now are popular protest and civil disobedience, things that make liberals uncomfy. It’s up to the left.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

Yes, all those "liberal elite" blacks and Latinos making less than $30,000 per year who voted for Clinton.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Any turn of the DNC is important for future strategy on lower levels but for fuck's sake, we'd have President Clinton if not for like 40k people in three states who heard the FBI director mention the fucking email server again

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

so that political positions thing on his wiki literally has nothing to say about his economic positions. i don't think dems need to abandon the identity politics stuff entirely but it seems crazy that in light of this election they're going to move forward on someone who doesn't have economic stuff as the center of their political ideology.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

like we decisively lost our stronghold rust belt states partly on the back of white supremacism and neglect (maybe, or at the least the appearance of) middle class economic needs and the collapse of manufacturing. so the solution is to get a black muslim guy who will likely exacerbate the identity politics divide that alienated said voters and who doesn't do anything to shore up the appearance of economic weakness. it feels a lot like doubling down on the hillary campaign strategy that failed.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

Here you go Mordy http://m.startribune.com/ellison-focuses-on-the-economy/209719011/

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

Yes, all those "liberal elite" blacks and Latinos making less than $30,000 per year who voted for Clinton.

You think they were all happy about it? Trump got 26% of the Latina vote.

@ggreenwald
This is the choice groups like AIPAC seem to be making: to overlook the anti-semitic claims because of how much this will free up Israel:

“AIPAC has a long-standing policy of not taking positions on presidential appointments,” the group’s spokesman, Marshall Wittmann, said.

Whitman denied reports that the group was privately “apoplectic” about Bannon’s appointment.

But the dovish J Street slammed Bannon as a hate-monger who would be bad for the Jews — and Israel.

“He and his website have a history of aggressively targeting individuals and organizations, including J Street, with vicious attacks that show no regard for basic decency and tolerance, or for the truth,” it said.

J Street accused Trump of “fanning the flames of hatred” by appointing Bannon.

The ADL and other anti-hate groups have blasted Bannon’s appointment, but analyst say pro-Israel groups are by definition more concerned about foreign policy not his views, which critics call racist and anti-Semitic.

The right wing Zionist Organization of America praised Bannon effusively.

“We wish Mr. Bannon every success in his new position,” said ZOA chief Mort Klein.

http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/354458/pro-israel-groups-j-street-and-aipac-split-on-steve-bannon-appointment/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

but he freaks out pro-Israel voters so that's a plus bc we should definitely try to alienate more parts of the democratic constituency.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

Yes, all those "liberal elite" blacks and Latinos making less than $30,000 per year who voted for Clinton.

You think they were all happy about it? Trump got 26% of the Latina vote.

So Clinton only got 74% of that demographic? What a disaster for Latinas.

Why don't you go ask all of them, individually, if they were happy about it. That seems like a productive use of your time.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

it was a mistake to come back to these threads

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

serious question - what do you get out of posting about israel? do you really gaf what the ZOA has to say about Bannon or are you just trying to troll me?

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

ellison's going to "exacerbate the identity politics divide"? accepting that formulation, how, exactly? by being black?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

Does the vote percentage differ greatly if you exclude Cubans?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Days before the election Henwood was touting that some publishing house was releasing a book of Clinton's Goldman Sachs speeches with (surely obnoxious) forwards written by both him and Assange. I love these guys who literally for months argued that HRC was worse then Trump now are like "here's what the libs should have done to have prevented that obviously worse outcome we are now stuck with". Such pieces of shit who honestly should be apologizing acting so smug now.

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

by being a black muslim? like i said, it might be the right thing to ignore the potential consequences of that but if you're looking to get back into power it might be worth noting that trump ran his campaign heavily on anti-muslim sentiment. you shouldn't join along but it seems likely counterproductive to entirely ignore it. nb i understand while writing this that ppl on ilx will be horrified by the suggestion that it might not be the smartest political move to appoint him bc fuck anyone who wouldn't vote democratic bc of a black muslim dnc head and tbh i agree in my heart so there's no need to start a flame war. i just wonder in my head if it's a great move politically. xxp

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

If anyone can push back at Islamophobia, it's Keith Ellison. He builds coalitions and he's public-facing. There are about 40k Jewish people in his/my district, and most of them are his voters too.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

good - i don't really know much about him. that article deej linked about him studying up on economic issues sounds promising.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

urban left-wing american jews don't typically need to be convinced that islamophobia is bad

anyway I mostly agree w/ mordy's sentiment but also think that most people don't know who the DNC chair is anyway so it probably won't matter

iatee, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

this article pierce posted the other day blew my mind

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a50668/muslim-jewish-groups-team-up/

muslim and jewish associations getting together because they both face persecution in the US-fucking-A

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

also not unuseful he's in minnesota presumably, since that's somewhere dems just lost?

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

the right wing webrags are already saying he's in the "muslim brotherhood" which is fucking hilarious and also sad

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

omfg omfg omfg omfg

Jon McNaughton
‏@McNaughtonArt

@seanhannity just purchase my painting The Forgotten Man to give to President Trump to hang in the White House.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw2b5s_UAAASff3.jpg

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

no Mordy, i am not trying to troll you. Just highlighting GG's point that lobbyists are hedging on Bannon-critiquing cuz hey, no more anti-settlement rhetoric (and that's the limit of it) from the US.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

AIPAC didn't comment on Hagel either whose appt if you remember was also controversial for far-right pro-Zionist voters. Their position has always been [radical] bipartisanship (which tbh makes a lot of sense for a lobbying org). ZOA's position is not surprising at all and neither is J-Street's.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

tbf it's not unusual for someone from outside the US to be interested in the politics of the world superpower since it'll likely impact them much more than say danish politics will impact US citizens

There's being interested and there's being interested though.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

Also just to point out that it's not just about no more anti-settlement rhetoric. It's also about knowing that US will veto any security council resolutions (that are often not limited to settlement issues) and moving the embassy to Jerusalem (which let's see - GWB promised the same thing). I discussed this on I think the Israel & US interest thread but there are reasons for pro-Likud voters to be concerned about Trump too. He seems totally ready to cede Syria to Assad/Iran which is def not in the Bibi playbook.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:43 (seven years ago) link

tbf it's not unusual for someone from outside the US to be interested in the politics of the world superpower since it'll likely impact them much more than say danish politics will impact US citizens

There's being interested and there's being interested though.

― The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:42 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

and there's being interested and there's being the truth-teller and great representative of racial minorities and women while being a northern european man

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

fucking hell that painting.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

It's nice to see so many presidents sticking up for Jason Segel though

Evan, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

If anyone can push back at Islamophobia, it's Keith Ellison. He builds coalitions and he's public-facing. There are about 40k Jewish people in his/my district, and most of them are his voters too.

― jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:26 PM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You folks crack me up...Keith Ellison, riiiiiiight (wtf is "public-facing", by the way?). I love your kumbaya shout out for a Reid/Schumer-approved prowar, party lapdog with a big ole PAC of his own, though

Don't change, you guys, you got it all figured out. PS, Senate Dems "new" lineup lookin' good! LOL

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

in a perfect world, what would iago galdston like to see happen?

blonde redheads have more fun (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Why is Forgotten Man not collecting any of the money littering the ground? Maybe that would solve his problem.

jmm, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

What good is money when you have no pride?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

Being followed around by all of the nation's presidents was kinda cool at first but it's really starting to bum him out at this point.

Evan, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Forgotten Man is enormous.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

welp dude you've got like three choices: go blow some shit up, emigrate, or self-immolate.

xxposts

acerbic (sic)s (will), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Re: Muslims and Jews, this interfaith outreach has been happening increasingly for the last couple of years at our temple, as well as outreach to the west side of Chicago. It's a little tricky to mobilize, because of tax issues, but community building and especially the reunification of formerly very close allies benefits everyone.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

^^ can we vote on which one?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

xp

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

The Forgotten Manspread

jmm, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

xp to mark s - Clinton won Minnesota on a 74 per cent turnout, possibly the highest participation level in the US.

Iago, you know what? Keith Ellison is my congressman, he is a worthy progressive candidate with a huge majority in his district and he won't be cowed by the alt-wrong.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

there is a piece on Giuliani's client list from the last decade or so in the NYT today and man, the run of Russian oligarchs and 'shadowy' Iranians is borderline hilarious. If his purported nomination can't be swatted down it's a disgrace.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

yes sorry suzy (and everyone), i was watching the election by reading ilx in bed on my phone at 5 in the morning so my analysis is as useless as my memory

mark s, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

Wouldn't want to be New Balance these days. They can't win.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

by being a black muslim? like i said, it might be the right thing to ignore the potential consequences of that but if you're looking to get back into power it might be worth noting that trump ran his campaign heavily on anti-muslim sentiment. you shouldn't join along but it seems likely counterproductive to entirely ignore it. nb i understand while writing this that ppl on ilx will be horrified by the suggestion that it might not be the smartest political move to appoint him bc fuck anyone who wouldn't vote democratic bc of a black muslim dnc head and tbh i agree in my heart so there's no need to start a flame war. i just wonder in my head if it's a great move politically. xxp

― Mordy, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 12:19 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah not to be predictable but I think this post is fucked up. You combat anti Muslim sentiment by embracing Muslim allies not by pushing them to the side

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

This is the same logic I heard from dems afraid Obama couldn't win in 2008

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Maybe if they pick a Muslim his opponents with think he's a secret not Muslim and leave him alone.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

(Will think, that is)

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

Gary Younge of the Guardian: How Trump took Middle America (specifically, Muncie)

For the white working class, says Jamie Walsh, who voted for Trump, the benefits of being white aren’t obvious. “People are afraid that they’re stupid. This whole PC thing – racism, sexism. All this stuff is being stupid. All these isms are ignorance. People don’t feel racist, they don’t feel sexist … They feel marginalised because of their ignorance. You don’t want to offend people.”

Trump’s victory cannot be explained by racism alone. He won several states that Obama took easily in 2008 and 2012
It is in the precise place where race and class merge that a section of white America finds itself both bereft and beleaguered. “White privilege is like a blessing and a curse if you’re poor,” Walsh says. “White privilege pisses poor white people off because they’ve never experienced it on a level that they understand. You hear ‘privilege’ and you think money and opportunity and they don’t have it. There’s protected women, minorities – they have advocates. But there’s no advocates for poor people.”

...People are, of course, many things – male, white, straight, rural, college-educated and so on – and just one thing: themselves. It is that whole person, not a segment of it, that goes to the polls and that we need to understand. Hillary Clinton won women – but Trump won white women and older women.

This, despite the fact that his campaign was steeped in misogyny, lambasting women for their looks, dismissing women who accused him of sexual harassment as gold-digging liars, and excusing his own boasts of assault as “locker room talk”. He even passed judgment on Clinton’s looks, telling a crowd in North Carolina: “She walked in front of me, believe me, I wasn’t impressed.”

Bea Sousa, the former spokesperson for the League of Women Voters of Muncie-Delaware County, said a higher bar was set for Clinton than her male counterparts of the past. “I’ve met a lot of women who detest her intensely,” said Sousa, who said she was not a “rabid Hillary fan” herself. “I can’t take credit for this statement but I heard someone say, ‘We’ve gotten used to voting for males we don’t like. We’ve held our nose and we’ve voted for them for whatever reason. But we aren’t used to doing that with a woman.’ Our culture holds women to a higher standard.”

But once again, to isolate misogyny as the central factor in Clinton’s defeat would ignore the fact that 94% of black women went for Clinton – and black men were nearly twice as likely to vote Clinton as white women. Just as race alone cannot sufficiently explain the choices of Trump voters, looking at only class, or only gender, in the absence of race, cannot make sense of these disparities.

https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2016/nov/16/how-trump-took-middletown-muncie-election

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

Trump’s victory cannot be explained by racism alone. He won several states that Obama took easily in 2008 and 2012

this seems like a dangerous assumption..."you can't be a racist if you voted Obama"??

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

you don't get it, d-40. it's a jujitsu move - "we" push smart black leaders aside before the republicans can start trolling them. NOW what's up

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

Lol wow another article arguing it wasn't about race because some people voted for Obama

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

that in fact is not what the black British journalist is arguing; maybe read the whole thing

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

but i get it, economic disenfranchisement had NOTHING to do with Trump voters' delusions.

enjoy Chuck Schumer, he's perfect for you. why do you think HOOS and other leftists stopped posting here?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

Re: that Guardian article, Muncie is prime breeding ground for someone like Trump. All of the industry is gone (the university is basically the only thing still standing there), it's segregated as hell, and it's surrounded on all sides by rural wasteland. The newspaper is maybe twenty pages and most of it is, like, USA Today content and feel-good shit interspersed among stories of drug addicts savaging one another (the last time I read it sometime over the summer, the front page story was about a dude who bit off and swallowed another dude's ear during a fight). I understand people in an environment like that voting for Trump but I'll happily toss any and all Trump voters from the Chicago metro area into the lake.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

enjoy Chuck Schumer, he's perfect for you. why do you think HOOS and other leftists stopped posting here?

I highly doubt this is true.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

xpost (NB: Muncie and the surrounding area is sadly one of the few areas where you can have some faith in my knowledge and expertise.)

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

Lol wow another article arguing it wasn't about race because some people voted for Obama

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 11:49 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

16% swing of poor whites from dem to republican when a white woman is the candidate rather than a black man, as well as trump performing better with latinos than romney. if your analysis is simply "because racism" then it's beyond overly-simplistic.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

anyway I mostly agree w/ mordy's sentiment but also think that most people don't know who the DNC chair is anyway so it probably won't matter

― iatee, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:32 PM (one hour ago)

yeah this, people don't vote based on who the chairs of the parties are. michael steele being the RNC chairman didn't siphon any of the black vote from the dems. ellison is a reliable liberal who has held various leadership positions in the party (currently chairs the progressive caucus and iirc sits on a couple of committees) and seems well-qualified for the job. being a black muslim probably doesn't matter but is a nice bonus imo

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

It's probably worth remembering that no amount of hate from liberals seems to have stopped the GOP from picking anyone for anything lately, and now they control our government.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

why do you think HOOS and other leftists stopped posting here?

Because they got sick of your empty-headed, one-note bullshit?

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

There was a useful distinction made in a Harvard Business Review essay:

The terminology here can be confusing. When progressives talk about the working class, typically they mean the poor. But the poor, in the bottom 30% of American families, are very different from Americans who are literally in the middle: the middle 50% of families whose median income was $64,000 in 2008. That is the true “middle class,” and they call themselves either “middle class” or “working class.”

Hence the relatively high income of Trump supporters, compared to blacks or Latinos, who I guess get broadly categorized as "the poor." Are the white working class more economically disenfranchised than the black working class, or the Latino working class? Of course not. Their problems of disenfranchisement, economic or otherwise, greatly supersede those of the "white working class," for dozens of obvious reasons. But the white working class, understandably but selfishly, doesn't see it that way, and lashed out.

https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class?utm_campaign=HBR&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

the fact that "Trump’s victory cannot be explained by racism alone" is apparently a controversial statement on the center-left is pretty harrowing considering we're supposed to be the side of nuance and complex explanations

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

white libs just looking to impress with their 200% wokeness.

ahhh, the many notes of van Gorp.

How about Ellison's two opponents for DNC chairman being lobbyist whores? good nuff?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Of course it's not racism alone. Comey also played a role.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

;)

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

But a 16% swing among poor whites when the candidate is a white supremacist instead of a mealy mouthed mormon? Racism sounds like a good explanation.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

I just wish we could stop talking about "racist" as something you either are or you aren't. This idea that whites are being victimized (yet again!) because us whiney liberals are calling all Trump voters "racist" is getting us nowhere.

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

DeBlasio basically telling President Trump to get tae fuck:

In the coming days, the mayor said, his administration will address questions about whether federal officials enforcing a heightened Trump deportation effort will be given access to the city’s IDNYC database, a municipal ID program designed for people with limited documentation. Nearly half a million New Yorkers are undocumented immigrants, and many have participated in the program. In the wake of Trump’s election, de Blasio is reportedly considering eliminating the program and destroying the database of New Yorkers’ personal information, rather than being forced to turn that information over to federal law enforcement or immigration authorities.

De Blasio also addressed questions about the logistical issues presented by housing a president elect in midtown Manhattan, saying that NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill would be meeting with the Secret Service this week to find a less disruptive solution. (Several cross-streets around Trump Tower and lanes on the adjacent avenues have been closed.)

Some of the high-end retailers have been complaining about a drop in foot traffic since last Tuesday, even as they enjoy the added security of NYPD in riot gear and Secret Service. “I will not tell you that Gucci and Tiffany’s are my central concerns in life,” the mayor said. “But I will say the traffic situation is a very real problem.”

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

Of course it's not racism alone. Comey also played a role.

― Frederik B, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 12:15 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

how could the dems have predicted that the candidate under investigation by the fbi would be investigated by the fbi?

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

But a 16% swing among poor whites when the candidate is a white supremacist instead of a mealy mouthed mormon? Racism sounds like a good explanation.

― Frederik B, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 12:16 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

basically nonsensical to act like the repubs 4 years ago were not a racist, white supremacist party but are now. trump is more vulgar and crass with it, but it's all the same shite, just a different pile

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

But a 16% swing among poor whites when the candidate is a white supremacist instead of a mealy mouthed mormon? Racism sounds like a good explanation.

― Frederik B, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:16 PM (forty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

even i don't think this is an easy enough explanation

a whole lot of people in this country are racist. it's not localized to the poor; i don't even think it's more prevalent among the poor. the internet fascists seem pretty well fed frankly.

a whole lot of obama's share of the WWC just stayed home. they were persuadable but hillary didn't get them out the door.

the "47%" tape hurt romney pretty badly. he sounded like (and was) a stiff jackass boss. trump made a lot of promises to working people; his promise was to be a corrupt rich asshole on their behalf.

goole, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

DJP said it best last week: racists voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012 because they were hurting and thought he had the answers.

Now the right candidate with the right dog whistle ran for president.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

This conversation reminds me of the argument b/w a cousin and me who said Strom Thurmond wasn't a racist because he was one of the first congressman to hire a black legislative aide.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

how could the dems have predicted that the candidate under investigation by the fbi would be investigated by the fbi?

c'mon the way this played out was shitty and massively unfair to the Dems

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

But a 16% swing among poor whites when the candidate is a white supremacist instead of a mealy mouthed mormon? Racism sounds like a good explanation.

Does it 'sound good' because it makes you feel better, or because it's simple enough that you don't have to tax your brain figuring out that people vote for numerous (even self-contradictory) reasons, one of which has traditionally been a desire to place faith in leaders who position themselves as saviors?

I have no doubt that many Trump voters support policies at a macro level (deportation of immigrants; increased 'law and order' measures) that are racist, and also see themselves, in their day-to-day lives as NOT racist.

I think one of the reasons beating the 'you're racist, all of you' drum is shortsighted is because I'll die if I have to read another post mortem and also because when you tell someone that, they think 'I don't hate my Latino neighbor' not 'I'm contributing to the systemic marginalization of my Latino neighbor through my vote.'

The alt-right, otoh, should die painfully.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

"Ugh, I really need to not do get drawn into US history and research Kitty Genovese instead.

― Frederik B"

people didn't actually ignore her cries for help, they just didn't hear them.

"so that political positions thing on his wiki literally has nothing to say about his economic positions. i don't think dems need to abandon the identity politics stuff entirely but it seems crazy that in light of this election they're going to move forward on someone who doesn't have economic stuff as the center of their political ideology.

― Mordy"

america just elected a president who has been literally making every single thing he said up as he was going along. i don't think we need to set the bar too high for a fucking dnc chair.

"enjoy Chuck Schumer, he's perfect for you. why do you think HOOS and other leftists stopped posting here?

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius)"

morbz, much love, but on the list of withering put-downs, "_You're_ the reason certain leftists have stopped posting here!" is not one of your all-time greatest hits.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

basically nonsensical to act like the repubs 4 years ago were not a racist, white supremacist party but are now. trump is more vulgar and crass with it, but it's all the same shite, just a different pile

― harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:25 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bullshit. His entire campaign was launched alleging our first black president was a Muslim and that we needed to build a wall to keep out Mexicans. He made explicit racist appeals from day -500 of his campaign. He explicitly stoked white supremacist feelings in voters, and yes lots of white people have feelings of racism who also are ok with voting for a black man for president. That's how racism works

And fuck morbius I'm making an ideological argument here this isn't trying to seem more "woke". But considering you're the one suggesting an article can't be wrong because of the race of its author maybe you should think a little more about that sort of thing

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

So many "radicals" argue so much moderate limp DLC style bullshit once anything touches outside of class conflict

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

goole otm

i need to get away from all you whitesplainers

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

see ya soon

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

ok see you in a few minutes xp

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

all of this can be true:

- a large chunk of trump's voters are openly racist or are on some level attracted to his race-baiting
- some of these people still voted for obama
- there were additional reasons people voted for trump beyond just race-baiting

iatee, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

--people didn't want to vote for clinton b/c sexism

a (waterface), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

Of course there are many factors that led to the democrats losing by a small margin in a small portion of swing states. ffs an Election Day butterfly wing flap may have caused hillary's loss for all we know. The question that should be argued here isn't the kinds of small fries micro constituencies that could have given the Democratic Party a slight edge but the kinds of things that give the GOP such a heavy bulwark against the left that even an incompetent narcissistic demagogue has a shot at the office. And in creating that possibility I think there is basically one major issue, represented in the polling: white racial grievance

Then of course there are the mechanisms by which white racial grievance was perpetuated (Facebook, media etc)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

I just wish we could stop talking about "racist" as something you either are or you aren't.

Seems more valuable to think of "racist" as something you think, do, or say, rather than something you are. Most white Americans are not ideologically committed to white supremacy as a consistent political philosophy, but rather mix together a variety of ideas about race, including a number of racist ideas, like "minorities are unfairly stealing jobs from whites".

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

d40 otm

marcos, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I mean, there are deeply, explicitly racist aspects to Trump's presidency

all of this can be true:

- a large chunk of trump's voters are openly racist or are on some level attracted to his race-baiting
- some of these people still voted for obama
- there were additional reasons people voted for trump beyond just race-baiting

I think that's why it's so hard for me to see the efficacy of branding 50 million people as a racist block. Polling, for example, suggests that most people don't support the kind of deportations Trump is talking about. Attack the regime and the people that continue to advocate for its worst policies. Retrospectively telling all Trump they've already condemned themselves in your eyes is pointless, except in the sense of scoring (a largely true) ideological point.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

The distinction that needs to be made (not necessarily here but when discussing these issues with the general populace) is between racism and, like, hate speech and KKK rallies and what have you. People rankle at the idea of being told that their words or actions are racist in part because they feel that they're being associated with the most extreme manifestations of racism, and they need to understand that racism can be as simple as making any kind of distinction between people on the basis of race and that it doesn't need to be OTT and virulent to have a negative impact.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

i agree that racism played a major role in HRC's loss, and if racism didn't exist, she probably would have won. i also think racism does not exist or arise in a vacuum, and i'm not sure how simply laying the blame on racism takes steps toward solving this structural electoral problem we seem to have

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

Retrospectively telling all Trump (voters) they've already condemned themselves in your eyes is pointless, except in the sense of scoring (a largely true) ideological point.

Thank you

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

Retrospectively telling all Trump (voters) they've already condemned themselves in your eyes is pointless, except in the sense of scoring (a largely true) ideological point.

This is, IMO, a much easier argument to make if you are white or can pass.

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

I disagree that hammering on racism is counterproductive. Of course there are ways it can be; consigning a bunch of people as *unredeemable* racists is probably not winning many hearts and minds. But I think the cognitive dissonance among *people who don't consider themselves racist* and *votig for an openly racist candidate who wants to register muslims and break up immigrant families via deportation* is a HUGE huge opportunity to create a wedge in the right wing. Point out that he's a racist over and over! There's a reason so many conservatives are mad at Van Jones' statement that this was a "whitelash"--because even though they voted for a racist, they don't want to be associated with racism. Compare that with how many conservatives protest when some liberal clunkily suggests Donald trump isn't even a REAL billionaire or that he has small hands...imo we need to stop paying attention to what arguments resonate with liberals and start looking at which ones also piss of conservatives

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

i agree that racism played a major role in HRC's loss, and if racism didn't exist, she probably would have won. i also think racism does not exist or arise in a vacuum, and i'm not sure how simply laying the blame on racism takes steps toward solving this structural electoral problem we seem to have

― k3vin k., Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:49 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

But k3v... the electoral problem is enabling racism not the other way around

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

If the GOP wins the argument that "actually some republicans aren't racist" in the public eye that's a huge whitewashing of what just occurred and a major loss for our ability to convey the degree to which trump is an extremist

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

consigning a bunch of people as *unredeemable* racists is probably not winning many hearts and minds.

this is what I was trying to say, ftr, DJP otm but maybe he disagrees with this as well for some other good reasons

agree with D-40 here as well

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

If racist is something people are instead of a specific type of idea and action, then the corollary is that in order to eliminate racism, it becomes necessary to eliminate those people. That kind of thinking either leads nowhere, or leads to a pogrom against those people, such as the one Trump is proposing against undocumented immigrants. This seems wrongheaded to me, even if, in one's anger at Trump's voters embrace of a pogrom, it seems justified.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

The other thing is, that being honest about racism might be motivating to minority voters, which might lead to a higher turnout. Not everything should be catered to appeal to white voters.

Apparantly, demonizing your opponent worked like wonders for the GOP. So I don't see the point in not doing it if it also happens to be true.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

xp Aimless, c'mon. How about option (b) people change?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

imo we need to stop paying attention to what arguments resonate with liberals and start looking at which ones also piss of conservatives

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:55 PM (four minutes ago)

is there any evidence that arguments that "piss off conservatives" actually get them to change or moderate their views, as opposed to cause them to become further entrenched and increasingly motivated to vote for republicans? because the latter seems more likely to me

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

i definitely plead guilty to bubble thinking. lots of people were guilty of it during obama's presidency. wow, gay marriage and a black president and...oh shit half the country has been holding their breath for 8 years! and in my bubble world i didn't see it. because i don't listen to white-wing radio and i live in a magical world of progressive pot farming.

it felt like attitudes were changing all over. but i was wrong. i mean i have never trusted most of the country, but i guess i just wanted to believe...

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

In social media where so many of these wars are now waged there's an effect where people's opinions are shaped and they forget about their earlier actions because one persuasive person reshapes their way of thinking. It's an effect of peer pressure; a charismatic or persuasive person tells them this is the way things are, and they quietly agree and become soldiers for that POV. I don't think people who voted for trump are irredeemable but I do think they voted for a racist candidate which is a racist thing to do, and pointing out how it is racist can force them to either double down on it or reconsider who they want to be.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

The other thing is, that being honest about racism might be motivating to minority voters, which might lead to a higher turnout. Not everything should be catered to appeal to white voters.

Apparantly, demonizing your opponent worked like wonders for the GOP. So I don't see the point in not doing it if it also happens to be true.

― Frederik B, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:01 PM (forty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Because the presidency, house and senate are run by white people right now. I have a very good reason not to want to see half the electorate demonized. I work with an unusually sympathetic group of immigrants -- Dreamers -- and I'd rather people be given the space to say, nah, let's not destroy DACA and ruin hundreds of thousands of young lives. I need some subtlety, even if it doesn't really exist.

If it's a last gasp -- completely naive on my part, fine. But I'm sure that relentlessly describing people as 'irredeemable' won't end up doing my clients any favors.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

is there any evidence that arguments that "piss off conservatives" actually get them to change or moderate their views, as opposed to cause them to become further entrenched and increasingly motivated to vote for republicans? because the latter seems more likely to me

― k3vin k., Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:02 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It just seems like basic logic to me that they're afraid that in pointing out trump is a racist they will lose supporters who don't want to be seen as racist. I'm sure this applies to many many trump voters

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

xxxp one of my wife's coworkers (looks like her whole office full of medical professional white women voted for Trump except for her) quietly whispered "it's been EIGHT YEARS" when this issue came up last week

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

So I agree overall. Demonize the hell out of the regime. Make it look as bad as it is. But offer people a chance to for some reflection. Weren't they having Coco Rosie 'Kill Whitey' parties in Brooklyn ten years ago?

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

And getting people to change requires attacking the ideas that stand behind their racist thoughts, words or actions. Attacking the person elicits an immediate and strenuous defense. Explicitly dividing off the ideas from the person allows the person to listen instead of react. This way doesn't always work, but the first way almost never does.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

If it's a last gasp -- completely naive on my part, fine. But I'm sure that relentlessly describing people as 'irredeemable' won't end up doing my clients any favors.

― soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:06 PM (twenty seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

who has actually said "irredeemable racist"? If you have to put that word in front of racist to make your argument maybe you're not actually in disagreement

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

i also live in a bubble, scott. montgomery county went for Hillary by 21 points and almost 100,000 votes. there are still tons of hillary/kaine signs still up throughout my neighborhood. as did most of the counties next to us - lehigh, bucks, chester, philadelphia (duh), delaware county, as did NJ, MD and NY. she still lost PA. i feel like pauline kael. xpz

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

Weren't they having Coco Rosie 'Kill Whitey' parties in Brooklyn ten years ago?

not a good example, see Coco Rosie thread

sleeve, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

I don't think people who voted for trump are irredeemable but I do think they voted for a racist candidate which is a racist thing to do, and pointing out how it is racist can force them to either double down on it or reconsider who they want to be.

I agree with this totally, but most people consider themselves to be fairly fixed, so the difference between "that thing you did was racist" and "you're racist" is enormous in getting them to that consideration.

(I know, I know, this is Jay Smooth 101)

xp Aimless OTM

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Based on my few conservative acquaintances on Facebook, I don't know that conservatives are concerned with being seen as racist. They just say "nuh-uh," point out that Obama promoted all of the racial divisiveness, and handwave it away.

Devastatin' Dan the Suggest Ban Man (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

Well who are we talking to? If I'm talking to you guys (mostly leftist, aspiring non racist if not fully anti racist Hillary voters) then I think we should be comfortable saying that the trump voters were by and large a racist constituency. Including those "persuadables." Because a vote for trump was imo driven mainly by white racial grievance. If we can't call a spade a spade then what's the point? Tip toe around it w talk of "economic anxiety" for fear of seeming like we think our racist uncle is "irredeemable"? Fuck that. It's one thing having a conversation with your racist uncle but let's be real about what happened here

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

If you're ok with voting for a racist you may be a racist /Jeff foxworthy voice

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

has this vox thing been here yet?

http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/11/15/13595508/racism-trump-research-study

while i'm really, really unwilling to continue to give people a free pass on their shit, at the same time my approach is not to call people racist _to their face_. like, say you have a friend who is always talking about wanting to fuck fifteen year old girls. that person is completely, totally a pedophile, no matter how many times they tell you they're "just kidding, but seriously, look at how hot she is". but if you call them a "pedophile", and mean it, they'll get deeply offended.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

completely unrelated, I took the morning off from work to help out with a student march organized by my daughter's school: https://twitter.com/MLNow/status/798949007254908929

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

Most of the Trump voters I work with and talk about the racist issue seem to feel that it's possible to be isolationist and not be a racist. They didn't vote for Clinton because they largely view the left's call for diversity as putting immigrants needs before the needs of americans. They don't think of this as racist because they have no problem with people who work and are a productive member's of society, as long as they pay the same taxes and keep their money here. Anyone who falls outside of this, "they deserve nothing from America." And they feel like Liberals fuel racism by always talking about it.

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

Who in here is saying these people are irredeemable?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

while i'm really, really unwilling to continue to give people a free pass on their shit, at the same time my approach is not to call people racist _to their face_. like, say you have a friend who is always talking about wanting to fuck fifteen year old girls. that person is completely, totally a pedophile, no matter how many times they tell you they're "just kidding, but seriously, look at how hot she is". but if you call them a "pedophile", and mean it, they'll get deeply offended.

― xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:17 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

maybe it's his economic anxiety

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

That's rad, Shakey. :-) xp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

they have no problem with people who work and are a productive member's of society, as long as they pay the same taxes

so not trump

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

the "economic anxiety" meme is really unfortunate because its purveyors know full well that the plebes who spread it won't really grasp the irony

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

If I'm talking to you guys (mostly leftist, aspiring non racist if not fully anti racist Hillary voters) then I think we should be comfortable saying that the trump voters were by and large a racist constituency.

One of the talking points used by conservatives is that, even if liberals speak semi-respectfully to voters who hold conservative views when seeking their votes, they privately hold those voters in utter contempt when they are talking among themselves. Because liberals are elitist pigs who will lie to your face about what they really think or want. Draw your own conclusion about whether your advice reinforces this caricature.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

Apparantly, demonizing your opponent worked like wonders for the GOP. So I don't see the point in not doing it if it also happens to be true.

While that might feel good, how does it work as a strategy? Democrats already win 95% of the African-American vote and significant majorities of every other minority group. Can you squeak out an extra 2%? Does that change anything on the state level anywhere?

Being combative, yes - hammer Trump on ballooning deficits with no benefit to the people, hammer him when racist policies actually start getting made. Backing off from social progressivism? No, not at all.
Demonizing works because a large percentage of the vote that Republicans need to capture are primed for it, whether that's godless liberals or the homosexual lobby or whatever. Those people are a lost cause.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

layers + layers of irony - k3v when u say "economic anxiety" you mean to deride ppl who make light of economic anxiety, right? and when deej uses it above he means it to make light of ppl who claim it's economic and not racist? xxp

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

I can't tell you the number of times I've heard "If I could cheat the system like Trump does I would."

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

One of the talking points used by conservatives is that, even if liberals speak semi-respectfully to voters who hold conservative views when seeking their votes, they privately hold those voters in utter contempt when they are talking among themselves. Because liberals are elitist pigs who will lie to your face about what they really think or want. Draw your own conclusion about whether your advice reinforces this caricature.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:23 PM (fifty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Have you even thought about what you're arguing here? We shouldn't call racists racist because then the racists will think we look down on them?

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

A lot of that grievance came from white petit bourgeois people who still have money/jobs but also a feeling of status decline because inequality is widening for them too, but they don't blame it on business leaders who actually form a consensus on reforming employment terms etc (many of these people are also underemployed after the crash). They blame it on the people they see as a rung or two below them on the ladder, or they blame it on the other kind of middle-class person who is more liberal, better educated, or just that bit wealthier. But if you point out the corruption of the 1per cent, to them you're just jealous.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

"Who in here is saying these people are irredeemable?

― Frederik B"

i didn't say "irredeemable", but last week i said that i can never trust or respect anybody who voted for trump again, and declared all my relatives who voted trump dead to me. i stand by that.

"One of the talking points used by conservatives is that, even if liberals speak semi-respectfully to voters who hold conservative views when seeking their votes, they privately hold those voters in utter contempt when they are talking among themselves. Because liberals are elitist pigs who will lie to your face about what they really think or want. Draw your own conclusion about whether your advice reinforces this caricature.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless)"

i got no reason not to hold them in contempt. we are talking about some deeply contemptible motherfuckers here.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

That's rad, Shakey. :-) xp

thx - 600+ kids! it seemed well received by the neighborhood

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

D-40 and Aimless arguing ... popcorn .gif

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

nice that someone can enjoy it

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

Going away to talk shit about political opponents behind their backs is GOP 101, as well as basic human nature to some extent - so much projection here it hurts.

jane burkini (suzy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

I can't tell you the number of times I've heard "If I could cheat the system like Trump does I would."

My one in-person argument with a Trump fan in the last week didn't have a response when I flipped that to all the dastardly 'welfare cheats' and etc..

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

If you've got an issue w one of my posts feel free to address it, I don't think I'm being unclear or s thing

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump voters make a difference between being a successful rich person and an elite. Elite's are overeducated and useless in their view, "they couldn't hang drywall." Someone who is rich has made the system work for them to arrive at the place many working class trump voters aspire to. Yes there are numerous holes in this logic.

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

the idea of Donald Trump hanging drywall is getting close to giving me a lethal giggle fit

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

i got no reason not to hold them in contempt. we are talking about some deeply contemptible motherfuckers here.

OK. If you accept that each and every vote for trump came from a deeply contemptible motherfucker, then I guess the only way to win future elections will be to mobilize more voters who agree with you, so they'll outnumber the mfs in swing states. That's fine. You realize Clinton just tried that. We might want to win back a few of the contemptible mfs who voted Obama in 2008 and 2012, just to be on the safe side.

Also, given the roughly 59,000,000 deeply contemptible mfs out there who voted for trump, I guess we are all going to live in a deeply contemptible society for the foreseeable. Seems to me changing that is going to take something other than twiddling thumbs until they all die. Or we could try that. Hasn't really worked well I the past.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

I kinda feel that senate 2018 thread would be more constructive than rehashing this debate again...

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump voters make a difference between being a successful rich person and an elite. Elite's are overeducated and useless in their view, "they couldn't hang drywall." Someone who is rich has made the system work for them to arrive at the place many working class trump voters aspire to. Yes there are numerous holes in this logic.

― JacobSanders, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:30 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark

hillary didn't do enough to emphasize that trump got his start with a million dollar "loan" from his father

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

we just need to find something for those contemptible motherfuckers to do. maybe we really do need to mine more coal. throw them in the pit!

okay, just venting...

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

OK. If you accept that each and every vote for trump came from a deeply contemptible motherfucker, then I guess the only way to win future elections will be to mobilize more voters who agree with you, so they'll outnumber the mfs in swing states. That's fine. You realize Clinton just tried that. We might want to win back a few of the contemptible mfs who voted Obama in 2008 and 2012, just to be on the safe side.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless)

fyi, i'm not responding to this atrocity by seeing if we can re-run the numbers and maybe win one more election before the next openly racist demagogue comes along. however, if you think we can build a stable anti-racist coalition on the backs of people who have clearly demonstrated themselves to have no principles, go for it.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

Also, given the roughly 59,000,000 deeply contemptible mfs out there who voted for trump, I guess we are all going to live in a deeply contemptible society for the foreseeable. Seems to me changing that is going to take something other than twiddling thumbs until they all die. Or we could try that. Hasn't really worked well I the past.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:37 PM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think the discussion has to be about the best strategies to fight the implementation of Trump's stated agenda. That's where real lives are at stake.

I keep seeing this on my FB wall http://www.popsugar.com/news/Donald-Trump-Supporters-Racist-42705977 and wondering what the point is, trying to imagine a single Trump supporter who read it and was like, 'damn. That changes everything.' Also safety pins, I see a lot of people arguing about safety pins.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

We have a while to go, but if Trump keeps dumping the press pool or shutting out the press entirely, I can easily imagine all those idle hands needing something to do diving in and doing the job that few of them seemed to do during the campaign. I just wonder how long they'll be content being evaded or lied to.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/11/15/13595508/racism-trump-research-study

This is so very Vox-y and my gut reaction is not so kind to people like the woman who had a panic attack for being told she said racist shit... but it does line up with the things we know about urban populations and bigotry (harder to be one when you see people different from you on a regular basis).

Not sure about the path forward, though - are we supposed to send out teams of facilitators across the hinterlands? Pods of diverse people to colonize the red states? Just accept that it's going to happen eventually as people urbanize, with young people already our least racist cohort in history?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

re: the media, kind of hard to say there wasn't enough information out there about his business practices, personal life, etc that they can start hitting now. - giving him so much attention was a problem but that will always be a problem with a capitalist media. They'll pay the most attention to whomever gets the declining number of daily paper readers and cable news watchers to tune in.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

Not sure about the path forward, though - are we supposed to send out teams of facilitators across the hinterlands? Pods of diverse people to colonize the red states? Just accept that it's going to happen eventually as people urbanize, with young people already our least racist cohort in history?

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:53 PM (forty-nine seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Obama and Holder's proposed legal challenges to gerrymandering are a start. In fact, a lot of legal challenges will be important: keeping federal funding for sanctuary cities, for example. Sending another Washington Post reporter to interview unhinged people in West Virginia probably won't do anyone any good.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

disappointed but not surprised by mainstream Dems calls to put "country ahead of party" and not just use the Senate to block everything the GOP proposes. as if the GOP ever put country ahead of party. when your opponent has a machine gun, it's kind of stupid to stick with your pocketknife.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

like the Senate gives a fuck what the House tells it to do. I don't think McConnell will do it tbh.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

OK. If you accept that each and every vote for trump came from a deeply contemptible motherfucker, then I guess the only way to win future elections will be to mobilize more voters who agree with you, so they'll outnumber the mfs in swing states. That's fine. You realize Clinton just tried that. We might want to win back a few of the contemptible mfs who voted Obama in 2008 and 2012, just to be on the safe side.

Also, giving up on racists who might vote for you means giving up on swing states where minorities and queer citizens live, and, no, I'm not ready for that leap.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

Who in this thread said anything about "giving up" on anyone? Calling racism racism is not "giving up" or saying ppl are "irredeemable" or consigning them to being unreachable deplorable.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

I'm responding to got no reason not to hold them in contempt. we are talking about some deeply contemptible motherfuckers here, whose meaning I may've misinterpreted.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

"We have to lie about what happened or it might be mean to sensitive white people who voted for a racist and we'll never lure them into our trap"

I guess we shouldn't be surprised that a board w members arguing a Muslim shouldn't lead the party have about as little interest in being anti racist as the "deplorables" they oppose

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

I'm responding to got no reason not to hold them in contempt. we are talking about some deeply contemptible motherfuckers here, whose meaning I may've misinterpreted.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:15 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Oh yeah that pov is dumb self righteousness I agree there

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

"We have to lie about what happened or it might be mean to sensitive white people who voted for a racist and we'll never lure them into our trap"

I guess we shouldn't be surprised that a board w members arguing a Muslim shouldn't lead the party have about as little interest in being anti racist as the "deplorables" they oppose

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 5:16 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Nobody has said that. I've said that referring to 50 million odd people as uniformly racist is both a back-patting strategy meant to absolve the speaker of their associations with Trump voters and a terrible idea politically if you actually want to build support in opposition to the blatantly racist aspects of Trump's platform.

Nor have I said that building support will necessarily work. But I'm hard-pressed to think up alternatives that go beyond dice-rolling in the courts.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

I think whether or not we call them racist in messaging (fwiw I think there are effective ways to do this that will hemmorage support from the right, as well as ineffective ways) is a different question from whether or not they actually are racist, and it feels like the resistance to simply calling them racist has a lot to do w people's back patting ideology

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

Cf "I understand the working classes better than you"

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

I misused cf. I think I mean ie

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

They don't think of this as racist because they have no problem with people who work and are a productive member's of society,

yes. I forget which of the "real talk about rural whites" thinkpieces addressed this, but a lot of these Trump voters have this cognitive dissonance/split view of race and racism. The concept of "the good ones" is definitely present, but they make this distinction (I'm not defending it) between those we know, who live in places like we do, who have similar lifestyles as we do, and the ones who live in scary cities. The latter category is where the textbook racism really comes into play.

And also the idea of work and being productive is something that I feel tends to sway people towards Republicanism and conservatism. Like if you simplified the appeals of Bernie and Trump, on the Bernie side, a lot of people were stoked by the idea of getting things for free: education, health care, dismissal of student loan debt, whereas the Trump appeal was, I will give you something valuable to work for.

sarahell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

GOP, the party of officials who don't want to do their jobs

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

So Trump's going to continue to live in Trump Tower? That's fucking nuts, imagine the constant security detail

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

which is why things like a New WPA would probably be immensely popular if there was a non-nil chance of getting through Congress (or the financial interests behind parts of the Dems)

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

that was an xp to the appeal of work

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

re: staying in Manhattan - definitely stay in the media capital of the world where only 10% of the population voted for you who all live nearby and the mayor and governor hate you. Definitely won't be a 24/7 protest situation.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

xp to D40. sure, but that argument is located way deeper in the left (i.e. white Marxist grad student gets on department listerv and excoriates his female, poc colleagues for downplaying class struggle in favor of identity politics) than the mainstream huffpo-esque articles i keep seeing bluntly equating racism with voting for trump (or those that make the opposite argument).

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

i would pay people 20 dollars an hour to pick up garbage if i were president. full health benefits. retirement package. the whole nine yards. The People's Beautification Army.

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

and i would make Wal-Mart pay for it.

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

If a persuadable can't handle the argument that a vote for trump was racist they probably aren't actually that persuadable

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

i would pay people 20 dollars an hour to pick up garbage if i were president. full health benefits. retirement package. the whole nine yards. The People's Beautification Army.

https://i.imgur.com/AnlTIDp.jpg

larry appleton, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

dollar an hour raise every year for full-time beauty workers.

scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

I just think it's about decoupling the concept of racism from the concept of "a racist." The important thing isn't whether a person is a racist or not-a-racist. That focus on individual character and intent is a red herring. The focus should be on racist action (including inaction) and racist speech. It's about consequences, it's about complicity in maintenance of a regime. People can be held accountable for their speech and action without needing to determine whether these emanate from some essential attribute.

Somehow we need to convey this through messages that pack a punch. It would also help if high -profile figures (white) on "both sides of the aisle" would stand up and acknowledge their own racism.

But of course, yeah, that's not magically going to convert everyone.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/2i7OlbR.png

heh

, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

i think we have a philosophical problem right now re: the legitimacy of corporate/business rights over the public good, all that great stuff. so far this is the culmination of decades of this belief system. i think that's gotta change before a lot of this gets better... draining the poison Milton Friedman and his ilk gave us doesn't necessarily mean hard communism, either, just you know, being a little more sensible about the long-term consequences of these beliefs. not that the wealthy or the dead really give a damn, this is our issue here we have to fight for, "our" being the non-wealthy and still-living.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

we've been in this exact spot before re: capitalists/corporations vs. the public good, roughly 100 years ago

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

xp - Jacob's post about isolationism and racism -- I think isolationism is a broad idea that has support from both the left and the right and different aspects have different appeals.

sarahell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

I just think it's about decoupling the concept of racism from the concept of "a racist." The important thing isn't whether a person is a racist or not-a-racist. That focus on individual character and intent is a red herring. The focus should be on racist action (including inaction) and racist speech. It's about consequences, it's about complicity in maintenance of a regime.

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 5:50 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Agreed. I'd much rather the people writing 'you're a racist, accept it' pieces wrote 'a muslim registry isn't just racist, it's a harbinger of actual fascism: ten historical facts you need to know now' instead.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I think the majority of people who voted for Trump hate Hitler more than Hillary. Those that prefer Hitler are the lost causes that should be executed.

sarahell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

yeah but they share two letters

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

What do you do with those who call her Hitlery then? indefinite detention ?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

maybe they get electroshock therapy like Pence.

sarahell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

People can be held accountable for their speech and action without needing to determine whether these emanate from some essential attribute.

they can, but people also appear to be remarkably resistant to letting themselves be held accountable in ways uncoupled from their conceptions of their essential attributes

j., Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

trying to come to a calculation in millifucks how much effort it's worth decoupling racist speech from the people who enunciate it

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

what about the ones who mumble it?

sarahell, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:12 (seven years ago) link

i just heard of this talk of the new potential 'muslim registry' and that resulted in significant google'ing and now i know about the NSEERS list which sure seems like a decade long, pretty gross, and still existing until 2011 'muslim registry' so thanks, internet, for that

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

That Muslim registry thing has been sort of misreported. It said they were mulling a registry of people immigrating from "Muslim countries." But as immigrants, wouldn't they be registered already? I'm still not sure what more they're talking about at all, especially since I guess this has been a thing since Bush (whatever this thing is).

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

Non-white nationalists voted for an authoritarian fascist this election out of 1.) impish curiosity 2.) because he promised to "make america great again" 3.) because they are terrified of a country that is changing rapidly at the same time they feel they are losing power 4.) because real wages have been stagnant under obama yet hillary said "america's already great" 5.) because they think it's fun to be racist, especially now that the powers that be are finally starting to tell them that racism is not ok and most importantly 6.) they have been subjected to a decades long misinformation campaign that has taught them to hate and fear democrats, and hillary specifically. Their latent racism and misogyny made them more susceptible to 1-6 then they would have been otherwise. Still, i feel that there has been a profound communication breakdown between ordinary Americans and the conditions of their own society, which can only be broken through via a grass roots kind of politics that gets people involved in their communities. This sideline spectator stuff led to a catastrophe. The dems and republicans (mostly the dems) wanted a rule of "experts" and technocrats and now we've got the opposite.

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

it was abandoned because it was redundant and was mostly just a panicky islamophobic PR move. as usual, Team Trump has no idea what they are actually doing/talking about.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

This is about confusion breeding recklessness imo

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Keith Ellison has got it right. Dems need to be talking to people on the ground, starting locally. Federal politics is apparently so opaque that people didn't know any better than to elect a wannabe autocrat. It defies belief but it happened. If they knew what they were watching they couldn't possibly have liked Trump more than Hillary.

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

Despite all those mitigating factors, though, and my sincere hope that people in rural america get a fair shake now that the democrats are doing some soul searching, I still consider all Trump voters to be ignorant racists. It's offensive to all people who managed not to vote for him to say otherwise. I believe in redemption but I also think a high degree of indifference, recklessness or malice was necessary for them to do what they did. How we move forward without "alienating" them requires some sidestepping I guess -- I believe in redemption -- but the struggles of the rural poor are not more noble now that they have done this horrible thing. They could have made their point another way.

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

I don't know if this has been posted here, but this is one of the most harrowing interviews I have read https://www.revealnews.org/episodes/a-frank-conversation-with-a-white-nationalist/

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:53 (seven years ago) link

Why do republicans/conservatives have to be such dicks? I've always thought if there were a liberal branch of the republican party I would be happy to sign up. Like get rid of the conservative ideals, accept people in their differences but keep a lot of the economic ideas, great! But I'm beginning to think there is something inherent about the platform that attracts vile and mean people.

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 16 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

Yeah gutting the government to punish poor people -- their economic idea -- is inherently vile and mean

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:01 (seven years ago) link

and in the united states inherently racist

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

The only big "economic idea" the Republican party has had in the last half century is supply-side and it's been an unmitigated disaster for everyone but the very richest people in America. So, you know, there's pretty much nothing to recommend it.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

any sensible economic idea the republican party ever has gets adopted by the democratic party

iatee, Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861?mfnm5yh9t7bhjjor

holy shit:

In politics, much like anything else, victory has a thousand fathers and defeat is an orphan. A senior official from Clinton’s campaign noted that they did have a large staff presence in Michigan and Wisconsin (200 and 180 people respectively) while also stressing that one of the reasons they didn’t do more was, in part, because of psychological games they were playing with the Trump campaign. They recognized that Michigan, for example, was a vulnerable state and felt that if they could keep Trump away ― by acting overly confident about their chances ― they would win it by a small margin and with a marginal resource allocation.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

Where was Howard Dean when we needed him.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:29 (seven years ago) link

Why do republicans/conservatives have to be such dicks? I've always thought if there were a liberal branch of the republican party I would be happy to sign up. Like get rid of the conservative ideals, accept people in their differences but keep a lot of the economic ideas, great! But I'm beginning to think there is something inherent about the platform that attracts vile and mean people.

Because the party was completely taken over by reactionaries, authoritarians, bathroom warriors, etc. You can do great things if you stoke the ressentiments in any group of people who already fill victimized by modernity, for example.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

when was the last time the party wasn't primarily reactionaries and authoritarians? 1874 or so?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:41 (seven years ago) link

Not that Nixon was the only one you could blame, but you can definitely blame Nixon.

sarahell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

when was the last time the party wasn't primarily reactionaries and authoritarians? 1874 or so?

― Kiarostami bag (milo z),

I would've been fine with Dewey winning in 1948. Ike was fine too. Who knows how Nixon in '60 would've governed.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

So has the republican party always been people of a certain class who wanted to hold on to their land/status/jobs going all the way back to Edmund Burke?

JacobSanders, Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

when was the last time the party wasn't primarily reactionaries and authoritarians? 1874 or so?

Reactionaries have been around since the French Revolution, Authoritarians the 20th Century.

They didn't dominate the Republican Party, however, til after Goldwater.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

xp - it was still the party of Taft and McCarthy at that time - there was no shortage of reactionaries and authoritarians in its ranks

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:51 (seven years ago) link

GOP before Goldwater was East Coast-dominated elites: power brokers, entrepreneurs, landed gentry, moderately liberal on race and economic policy.

The policy shifted to the so-called Sun Belt with Goldwater and assumed its gorgeous racist mien starting with the Voting Rights and Civil Rights Acts, accelerated under Nixon, and coalesced around Reagan.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

Republicans and Democrats sorta flipped with each other in the 20s.

Culture War over the Soul of America has been going on since the Adams/Jefferson election, however.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

people on FB were pining for Teddy Roosevelt today - fuck, at least Trump hasn't committed any war crimes (yet)

Whatever 'good Republicans' there have been, they've been met in equal force by reactionaries and vile people. The party has been the disease for quite some time.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

guys, I'm pretty good with the history of our political parties - the point is that they've still mostly been awful even when large numbers of Democrats were awful in a different way. It's not like there was some magical golden era for the 20th Century GOP

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:54 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, the geographic and generational changes are viscerally demonstrated in the diff between Georges Bush HW and W.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:54 (seven years ago) link

one of the less-remarked on reasons (I wonder why...) why Nixon lost in 1960: he didn't call Coretta Scott King after MLK was jailed; JFK did. It cost him hundreds of thousands of black votes that had gone Republican in 1956.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:55 (seven years ago) link

Yep -- Poppy Bush was the last gasp for that kind of Eastern dilettante.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:56 (seven years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861?mfnm5yh9t7bhjjor

holy shit:

In politics, much like anything else, victory has a thousand fathers and defeat is an orphan. A senior official from Clinton’s campaign noted that they did have a large staff presence in Michigan and Wisconsin (200 and 180 people respectively) while also stressing that one of the reasons they didn’t do more was, in part, because of psychological games they were playing with the Trump campaign. They recognized that Michigan, for example, was a vulnerable state and felt that if they could keep Trump away ― by acting overly confident about their chances ― they would win it by a small margin and with a marginal resource allocation.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), 17. november 2016 01:15 (forty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, that article also points to why I think Sanders would have won. Based on the same data, he would have been in the Midwest anyway. The problem isn't just what Clinton did wrong, the problem is that nobody knew she was doing anything wrong until it was too late.

I've thought at bit about it and have another idea: Her staff was probably too old. Her loyalty meant that she relied on the same people she's relied on for decades, with Podesta, chief of staff to Bill, as the biggest example. They did rely on old ideas, failed to account for the uncertainty in the Midwest, thought they knew. It's worth noting that Trump went through three campaign managers until he found a team that worked, they ironically ended up finding something that worked because their early failures were so spectacular.

Frederik B, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

were they though? i mean he did get through the primaries with the earlier ones

Nhex, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:04 (seven years ago) link

I guess the reason I said I would join a liberal republican party is because I do believe in a free market and competition of business, the role of government being to ensure business is not discriminatory or abusive. The moral majority type republican party is what has kept me from ever voting right. Gay marriage, equal rights, choices are a given and shouldn't be a problem for anyone. Happy people and a happy society benefits business and overall market forces. Which is why I get baffled by republicans and have to think they are just mean.

JacobSanders, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

the democratic party isn't about to dismantle capitalism or the free market though

ciderpress, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:08 (seven years ago) link

And if you take away the mild government restraints on the market the result is unmitigated brutality and horror

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

one of the less-remarked on reasons (I wonder why...) why Nixon lost in 1960: he didn't call Coretta Scott King after MLK was jailed; JFK did. It cost him hundreds of thousands of black votes that had gone Republican in 1956.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:55 AM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there's some interesting stuff about that in this article on Jackie Robinson's relationship with Nixon:

Anything might have happened to Dr. King while in the hands of the Georgia penal system, but it was an election year, and the nation was on notice as to how the two major candidates responded to issues affecting minorities and civil rights. Senator Kennedy called King's wife to express his support. Subsequently, when Judge Mitchell told Vandiver that he would release King if the Kennedys provided him with political cover, Robert Kennedy telephoned and asked him to release King. The judge acceded to the request, freeing King on $2000 bail.

Nixon did nothing -- not for Robinson's lack of trying. He begged Nixon to call King. Nixon refused. "He thinks calling Martin would be ‘grandstanding,'" Robinson told Nixon speechwriter William Safire, "Nixon doesn't deserve to win." In his autobiography, Robinson said that he came close to quitting the campaign and denouncing Nixon on several occasions. He did not, perhaps because of his antipathy for the Kennedy-Johnson ticket. Robinson himself had a hard time explaining why he stayed. "It has something to do with stubbornness," he wrote, "about continuing to want to believe in people even when everything indicates they are no longer worthy of support."

After King was released, his father, the Reverend Martin Luther King, Sr. announced he would vote for Kennedy "because the Democratic nominee had called his son's wife to express sympathy on his imprisonment. The elder Mr. King, a Baptist, said he had planned to vote against Kennedy because of his religion." Said Governor Vandiver, "It is a sad commentary on the year 1960 when the Democratic nominee for the presidency makes a phone call to the home of the foremost racial agitator in the country."

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2013/4/15/4225534/jackie-robinson-richard-nixon-42-movie-civil-rights

soref, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link

I guess this is an xxxxxxp to deej.

Binary thinking is endemic to humans and while it always results in clarity, which makes it enduringly popular, it rarely results in an accurate perception of reality, so that when you act upon conclusions derived from binaries you end up with a plenty of certainty, which feels great, but usually get crappy results.

I'll probably get grief for pointing this out, but the same bullshit thinking that gave us the "having one drop of black blood makes you black" is strangely mirrored by the bullshit thinking that "having participated in one thought, word or action with racist content makes you a racist". It appeals to our innate desire for and worship of purity, but applying purity as the standard to be met by verifiable human beings is only ever going to be good as a stick to beat them with.

Beating all Trump voters with that stick is a feel good move, because they have all participated in an action with undeniable racist content, so you can easily justify the beating. But, as a strategy to deal with this reality, it sucks.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:15 (seven years ago) link

JacobSanders the Republican economic ideology is rooted in the idea that people who are useless to the market as wage earners/lanorers are truly useless and they should just die already to decrease the surplus population. That's why they want to destroy medicare.

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:15 (seven years ago) link

Hillary is talking rn on msnbc

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:35 (seven years ago) link

man she has aged in a week -- and I don't mean it as a pejorative. Reminds me of how Poppy Bush suddenly looked 80 two days after losing.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:37 (seven years ago) link

I learned to like her over the course of the campaign, having before just admired her tenacity and endurance. It is so fucked up to me that she is not the president right now.

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:39 (seven years ago) link

well, Obama is right now

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:41 (seven years ago) link

Hopefully i'll die before january for some reason

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

I guess we'll just have to throw your body onto the barricade and carry on.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:44 (seven years ago) link

it's sad that if people had been behind her and liked her more she wouldn't have had to work so hard and have so much tenacity. i got weary just hearing about her tenacity for months. but that is mostly because as a woman she had to work harder to be taken seriously. also, people just tended to not like her much...for various reasons. it was a double whammy.

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link

*Trample the weak, Hurdle the dead* - Trump/Pence 2016

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

i don't understand these arguments about whether trump supporters are racist or not. i don't think accusations of racism carry any moral force with trump supporters.

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:50 (seven years ago) link

there are definitely some old-fashioned economic conservatives in the GOP, but most of them seem p bloodthirsty to me ya

flopson, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

i don't know how many times i've heard over the past week some variation of "racism is just something to liberals bring up when they can't win an argument honestly". why even bother arguing about it if hearing about it just gives people an excuse to stop listening?

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 01:56 (seven years ago) link

Because it's wrong?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:07 (seven years ago) link

we don't get extra votes for being right

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:16 (seven years ago) link

has this been covered yet? I didn't see it but thread moves fast

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/11/16/report-3-nba-teams-won-t-stay-at-trump-hotels.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

i don't know how many times i've heard over the past week some variation of "racism is just something to liberals bring up when they can't win an argument honestly". why even bother arguing about it if hearing about it just gives people an excuse to stop listening?

― the late great, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:56 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well even the left can't agree that it *is* racism & contra the ... implications of your point? which i don't think you believe. being able to observably identify things as "racist" is discursively valuable

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

i also just ... disagree. i have relatives in OH who work at Ford plants & are comfortably that middle-working class & they sometimes vote D & sometimes (more often) vote R but they are definitely racist. And in conversation with them, I'm not going to soft-pedal that I think their actions are racist, because I'm not sure what kind of purpose that evasion would serve. I see the evidence of it in the articles they share & the way they rationalize their votes; they don't *consider* themselves racist, but they do racist things. I am not sure how to address that while tip-toeing around the notion that they are being racist, and it feels fundamentally dishonest to pretend otherwise. This doesn't mean I just do drive-by facebook comments saying "You're just racist!!!" and uhh "consigning them to racism forever"—as much as its possible I'd like to engage them in some kind of constructive conversation bc if I don't let them know where I stand I feel like I'm letting them have a kind of power over me. They can agree to disagree but they're not going to be let off the hook

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:45 (seven years ago) link

Like, they exist in bubbles where sharing these kinds of ideas is "OK" and "acceptable" & there should be some social cost, IMO, to sharing shit that is offensive to me, and that will include me saying, "I know you think it isn't, but what you just did is racist, and here's why." I don't see any other way out of that

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:47 (seven years ago) link

honestly that seems like the best possible response

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

(& FWIW I think voting for Trump qualifies.)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

include me saying, "I know you think it isn't, but what you just did is racist, and here's why."

sleeve otm. This is x100 better than your simply announcing that because of what they did they are racists and leaving it at that.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 17 November 2016 03:57 (seven years ago) link

"and that's OK"

“a tub of horses” (Myonga Vön Bontee), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

sleeve otm. This is x100 better than your simply announcing that because of what they did they are racists and leaving it at that.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, November 16, 2016 9:57 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

OK but I wasn't talking about interpersonal strategies for addressing racism amongst persuadables, i was just stating the facts: voting for trump is racist, and we need to be able to say that. This was met w/ a bunch of "the liberals will never win pointing out that things are racist!" which is ridiculous

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:03 (seven years ago) link

"Sorry your humanity is a negotiable virtue because we're more likely to win if we only talk about economics" is a shitty ideological position, IMHO, and makes the whole effort of "winning" kind of ... pointless

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:04 (seven years ago) link

This was met w/ a bunch of "the liberals will never win pointing out that things are racist!" which is ridiculous

Uh. I'm pretty sure this was your reaction to the content, not the content. Putting it in quote marks when you are not actually quoting anyone on the thread kind of implies you are quoting yourself.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

discursively valuable

not sure what this means ... not saying it's meaningless just that I am pretty dense and don't get what it means

"the liberals will never win pointing out that things are racist!" which is ridiculous

is it? i don't know about that. as you know, i work with children. one of the things i have learned from working with children is that children don't respond well to abstract concepts. for example, if a kid is talking when i am talking, and i want them to stop, i don't say "please stop, that is rude". because kids don't understand social niceties the way adults do. they don't understand rude (well, it's closer to the truth to say they have different standards for rude from 40 year. olds). instead i say "if you talk while i talk, you will miss what i am saying, and if you miss what i am saying, you will not understand how to do the assignment, and then you will get a bad grade, and your parents won't buy you the playstation you want for christmas, etc". they understand consequences better than they understand abstractions. i can only assume racists are the same way, in as much as they don't understand or respond to abstract concepts like "social justice"

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm not going to soft-pedal that I think their actions are racist, because I'm not sure what kind of purpose that evasion would serve. I see the evidence of it in the articles they share & the way they rationalize their votes; they don't *consider* themselves racist, but they do racist things. I am not sure how to address that while tip-toeing around the notion that they are being racist, and it feels fundamentally dishonest to pretend otherwise.

i have super-racist relatives too, so i sympathize. i don't tell my racist relatives they are racist, because they don't respond to that. they get defensive and dismissive. serious qn: do your relatives respond thoughtfully to "what you just did is racist, and here's why"? does it work?

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:28 (seven years ago) link

No they get super defensive, of course. Because they don't want to be racist. They think that's a bad thing to be.

Obviously it depends on the nature of the conversation: how we ease into the conversation, or if it starts in person or on facebook (sometimes easier on facebook), or who kicked off the topic. But it's still a useful rhetorical tool at a certain point: "That's a racist statement. This article is designed to dehumanize people." "Do you really think its cool to wish the death penalty on someone for punching someone else? [they answer] Does that not seem racist to you?" I mean these things can go a million different ways, it's not like im indiscriminately just saying "that's racist" like the GIF. But it still feels like a useful way of making a point: many times it just says "You wouldn't say this if this person was white."

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:33 (seven years ago) link

we don't need to cure racism in each individual mind in order to defeat it as a political force. you just need to emphasize shared interests across race lines. make people hate the koch brothers so much they forget about minorities when they go into the voting booth.

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:36 (seven years ago) link

i know that is crude. i think people should get yelled at for being racist as much as possible and the fact that the taboo against racism was shattered this year is one of the most horrifying developments i've seen in this country in my lifetime. however, the democrats are just not going to win by scolding people.

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:41 (seven years ago) link

i think treeship and i are on the same page

i consider myself lucky to live in a tolerant state, but i don't think we are especially tolerant because the civics classes in our public schools are super great or because our college students are super woke or whatever. i think we are lucky to have a strong economy and its totally obvious to most people here that that economy depends in large part on immigrants, people on visas, etc. and that makes it easier for people not to be racist, because it's in their self-interest not to be.

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:46 (seven years ago) link

i mean i honestly don't know much about the economy of the rust belt or the south or the bible belt, so i don't know if it's possible to convince people there that immigration and diversity will benefit them.

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:50 (seven years ago) link

however, the democrats are just not going to win by scolding people.

― Treeship, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 11:41 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Forget winning for now. There's a president-elect proposing brutally racist policies while in control of both houses. Getting people to recognize *that* racism seems to me a far greater priority than having them do some serious soul-searching atm about their own.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

ok well i'm not pro ... scolding people (except people on ilx, obv)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

i get what you're saying BUT if i had trump's ear (which i don't) i would probably advocate against a muslim registry (for example) by arguing that it will make muslims less likely to cooperate with the govt in counterterrorism efforts rather than arguing that it's an affront on human decency and fairness or whatever (which it certainly is!)

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

xp to lion in winter

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

make people hate the koch brothers so much they forget about minorities when they go into the voting booth.

― Treeship, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:36 PM (twenty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

not sure this works when a candidate actively churns up this level radioactivity, i mean half the country believes that inner cities are hell holes and that all muslims want to destroy them so....why would they buy that the koch brothers are a bigger threat? speaking of things that seem abstract

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

xp to the late great - it's not really his ear i'd want. a lot of his proposed policies -- mass deportation, daca repeal -- aren't actually popular with a majority of americans. i can't imagine sinking social security or medicare is either. i'd like to keep them that way.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:16 (seven years ago) link

deej otm throughout the thread

I don't know what causes racism but it's sure as hell not economics. way deeper than that. economics does not cure, or even paper over, racism. and economics is not a problem with a <<solution>>, where we just make The Good Economy and then all other problems melt away because that's of some base superstructure or somesuch stoner Marxist shit. the state economy itself will always be in contention, under socialism capitalism whatever; and as long as race is a salient dimension people will contest it along those lines, too. it's just wishing the problem away to say, let's just solve the economics

also I disagree with vahids economic reason for saying california is non-racist. I highly double Californians can all form a chain of arguments starting with "lots of immigrants and black people in my state" and ending with "more money in my pocket". maybe it's not civics class either but it's not that imo

flopson, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:21 (seven years ago) link

*the state of the economy itself

flopson, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:22 (seven years ago) link

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:27 (seven years ago) link

dominant form of racism in trump's campaign was xenophobia/nationalism, which has been on the upswing across the world because 'economics' (/other disruptive aspects of globalization)

iatee, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:42 (seven years ago) link

racism isn't something people just have when they're poor & forget when they prosper.

seriously sometimes ppl itt sound like musty elitist academics and i know you all are like, living out in the world, it's weird to read this thread

imo "california" is not a haven of enlightenment. don't get it twisted. your *city* might be. maybe your neighborhood. but drive a ways & there's plenty of folks who talk & think like that middle-america part people keep hammering about.

it's not OTHER PLACES. it's near you. closer than you think. no-one goes to those places except people who live there and then it's just decades of feedback loop. that's how "this" happens.

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:54 (seven years ago) link

xpost to iatee: yeah but at the same time, trump's campaign and success is unthinkable without his career as the leader of the birther smear campaign. which i guess you can try and link back to xenophobia, and from there suggest a primarily economic-disruption root, but it wouldn't be my first explanation.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:56 (seven years ago) link

xp- i think my point is, there is always winners/losers in economics, whether the losers blame race or not seems like a separate question, and the winners are often just as racist as the losers

flopson, Thursday, 17 November 2016 05:58 (seven years ago) link

no-one goes to those places except people who live there and then it's just decades of feedback loop. that's how "this" happens.

― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:54 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this hits hard

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:01 (seven years ago) link

yeah nice post VG

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:06 (seven years ago) link

Racism and prejudice have more motives than just being an economic loser and wanting to feel better about yourself. Some people just enjoy the thrill of power in dehumanizing and brutalizing others, and holding a position of superiority to that extreme degree. The current ideology in the US isn't really that far off from the ideology of the SS, so the Trump really shouldn't be a surprise here. I remember worrying something like this was going to happen even 6 years ago.

Over the past few years, what have we experienced here ... demonizing Muslims and Middle Easterners, demonizing the poor, condoning torture, wide-spread private prison labor drawn along racial lines, justifying brutality and a culture of violence, might makes right, etc. Open those doors, and out comes Trump and his boys.

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:17 (seven years ago) link

The winners need racism: it's how they distract the losers, so the losers don't notice who is really robbing them and/or blame the little guy instead.

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:20 (seven years ago) link

The winners in this game, in my experience, are people who have a lust for power and aren't really known for the existence of empathy in their personalities. In the past they used to shoot people on sight for demanding 14 hour work weeks instead of 16.

We have a lot of people who were given a raw deal in this economy. People who aren't guaranteed vacation time or benefits by federal law, people who aren't guaranteed affordable health care, people who aren't guaranteed much rights of anything that they enjoy everywhere else in the civilized world. Then you have the people totally screwed in this economy.

For the most part we've all been abandoned by the people running the show here, studies have shown we have 0% say in how things are governed, and a lot of people have gotten royally screwed over. We're also in a culture that's been stewing in demonizing the other/exploiting others as objects/worshiping the powerful, as an intentionally-constructed belief system that's been promoted on our main media outlets and by our two major political parties (Republicans more than Democrats, obviously, but Democrats aren't blameless here, either, because they get the checks from the same people).

And now we've got a neo-Nazi with the ear of the president-elect. Color me surprised.

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:30 (seven years ago) link

i think i need to go back to detaching from ilx political threads for a minute. not a jab at any posters here, honest. just feel like i can't take another thousand or three thousand posts trying to suss out the relationship between race and class in america, like thank god this election came along so we can finally crack open this never-before-discussed question. that really sounds pettier than i mean it to because the conversation about such things around here is definitely like many leagues more nuanced and intelligent than i get in most other daily venues but it's really not helping me keep my head in the game or do anything useful. i mean i'm sure i'll still end up posting stuff anyway but it'll just be low-grade one-liners, i hereby swear not to contribute anything to the conversation or anybody's day.

as a swan song for the moment: to the guy looking for a "socially liberal, economically conservative party" type deal: first of all, if you are sincere in your posts, welcome to these threads, i don't think i've seen you around before and we always say we are interested in more of a dialogue with conservatives since the boards skew left. that said, i've been struggling to make sense of some of your posts tbh since they seem kinda detached from the reality i live in or reflect some baseline assumptions i just don't share, or maybe experiences of yours that i don't know about.

that might be a statement more about me than it is you, but my eyebrows do go up with some of your comments about health care (i think this was you) and also about immigration, where you invoke a narrative around 'americans' who are 'working and paying taxes' - - - - you do realize this this 100% describes immigrants, documented and undocumented alike? sorry, i should dig up the specific post, it was just this morning i think, but the thread flew by and i was on my phone and i couldn't really get into it. this is not a really great answer i know. i was at a rally/walk-out in the name of undocumented college students today, there were some really powerful and brave speakers taking the megaphone. i heard so much courage, so much determination and righteous indignation, and so much pain in the dehumanizing circumstances they've lived under for the majority of their lives. we really really have to unmake mental habits that divide the world up into populations that do or don't deserve our consideration, our recognition of them as being as human as we are. i don't think this is what you set out to post about, but to me, where i'm coming from, at least today, it is what you are posting about.

anyway on the 'economic conservative but not racist' tip i stand by my comments in this post here HIRALLY CLIMPS FOR PRESIDETN • US presidential elections part VII and in conclusion i would like to say i have been otm in this thread, except for the five hundred times i thought and acted as if trump had no chance of victory. very few of my jokes from the preceding months strike me as very funny now.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:54 (seven years ago) link

wanted to cosign re: vg's excellent post

Clay, Thursday, 17 November 2016 07:01 (seven years ago) link

i know you all are like, living out in the world

no, this is wrong, i am not

j., Thursday, 17 November 2016 07:31 (seven years ago) link

anyway on the 'economic conservative but not racist' tip i stand by my comments in this post here HIRALLY CLIMPS FOR PRESIDETN • US presidential elections part VII and in conclusion i would like to say i have been otm in this thread, except for the five hundred times i thought and acted as if trump had no chance of victory. very few of my jokes from the preceding months strike me as very funny now.

― dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:54 AM (thirty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this was a good post

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 07:32 (seven years ago) link

the linked one i mean. the post in this thread was alright though, too

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 07:33 (seven years ago) link

This is being shared on facebook
"Mitch McConnell, KY senator (202)-244-2541or (502)-582-6304
Ben Sasse, NE senator (202)-224-4224 or (308)-233-3677
Jeff Flake, AZ senator 520-575-8633 or (602)-840-1891
John McCain, AZ senator (602)-952-2410 or (928)-445-0833 or (202)-224-2235
Lindsey Graham, SC senator (202)-224-5972 or (864)-250-1417
Susan Collins, ME senator (207)-622-8414 or (207) 780-3575
Rand Paul, KY senator (270)-782-8303 or (202)-224-4343
Pat Toomey, PA Senator (610) 434-1444 or (202) 224-4254
Paul Ryan 202-225-3031

just in case you need to vent."

So thought I'd pass it on

Stevolende, Thursday, 17 November 2016 08:18 (seven years ago) link

imo "california" is not a haven of enlightenment. don't get it twisted. your *city* might be. maybe your neighborhood. but drive a ways & there's plenty of folks who talk & think like that middle-america part people keep hammering about.

uh yeah, i'm pretty sure I posted upthread about growing up in one of "those" places. On the other hand, I looked up the election results in my home town, which was solidly republican for decades, and a significant majority voted for Clinton. Granted they voted to keep the death penalty and expedite executions like the town I knew and left. But I think the economy was a large reason for this shift from red to blue. I think either a lot of the middle-american people got gentrified out, or the population increase has been significantly more urbane liberal people who are willing to commute longer distances in exchange for bigger and cheaper houses.

sarahell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 10:10 (seven years ago) link

(Doctor Casino) I've been posing here for more than a decade now, on and off. I think you misunderstood my posts. I have never been a republican, ever! Though I do agree with some of the core principles, same with the democrats. As time passes I find less and less to agree with republicans on but I still can't completely side with the democratic party. And I haven't said anything about immigrants. I mentioned what many of my co workers have said to me because they voted for trump. I've never posted on political threads before, because I usually don't like talking about politics.

JacobSanders, Thursday, 17 November 2016 12:31 (seven years ago) link

a fairer economic system is not a cure for racism. however, it could help alleviate one particularly noxious form that racism has taken this campaign: scapegoating minorities.

Treeship, Thursday, 17 November 2016 12:36 (seven years ago) link

There's been a lot of talk of bubbles. My bubble - which is to say, my inner-burb block of 20 houses and an apartment complex or so - features Jewish families, Indian immigrant families, Irish immigrant families, Spanish speakers, a gay couple, blue collar workers, academics, artists, professionals, the unemployed, stay at home parents, retirees, teachers, section 8 housing, families with kids in college, families with newborns, tiny 100 year old homes, bigger new construction homes ... and that's just my block, off the top of the head. If I am in a bubble, and what my bubble is missing is asshole Trump voters, then I think my bubble is doing ok and their bubble is the one that needs to burst. In fact, this election was partly a response against having their bubble burst. Oh, poor (middle class) white working class, it's not the 1950s anymore, what to do?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

Has this been posted? https://twitter.com/williamjordann/status/798876695629545473

Jordan tries to take a look at polling, and changes in poll results, pre- and post-Comey Letter to see how much it contributed to what we saw.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

I'm responding to got no reason not to hold them in contempt. we are talking about some deeply contemptible motherfuckers here, whose meaning I may've misinterpreted.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

aight since i've been called dumb and self-righteous on this thread (not by al tho) i guess it's up to me to prove it.

when i look at trump voters, i don't think most of them are actively racist. i see people who care so little about values, have so little commitment to their personal beliefs, that they will without hesitation vote for a racist because, i don't know, "lesser evil" or "email server" or "he doesn't mean it" or whatever festering load of shit they've swallowed to justify their actions. i just don't see any way that i can ever trust or respect somebody like that.

i'll take any judgment people want to put on me. i don't care about the "optics", i'm not running for president, i'm not so much as running for dogcatcher, i'm probably not even a good person deep down. i'm not going to go out and confront trump voters on this to their face, but neither can i swallow the hurt, anger, betrayal, and hatred i feel towards what people who voted for trump have done.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

I mean the guy is almost certainly overstating his effect on anything besides his own pocketbook, but $10,000 a month for propagating fake news to eager idiots is scary. My mother-in-law, my aunt, and several of my first and second cousins were among the people eating that stuff up. All of them Trump vogers.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

Re: factors that won the election for Trump, concurrent with the Comey bullshit was someone on Trump's staff finally duct taping oven mitts to his hands for a week+. If he'd still been crowing on Twitter he probably would've sunk himself, but the American public's inability to remember anything saved the day.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

One thing about what Late Great writes, which I've seen written many places, is this idea that racists should be treated like children. Explicitly. What happened to treating people with respect, like an adult human being? Aren't we condemning them as too dumb to function as adults, if we're basically saying they have the abilities of five year olds?

Thing is, of course, in society in general, and this is true in the US, but also extremely common in debates about immigrants in DK, minorities are never treated like kids. Even 12 year olds are treated like adults. Whenever the discussion becomes about something bad that happens in immigrant neighborhoods - honor killings, misogyny, unemployment - and side goes 'well perhaps with investments and more education, they could...' it gets cut off: 'no, they need to take responsibility for themselves!' But when white people fuck up society much more severely than any terrorist has ever managed to do, the immediate response becomes 'right, what can we all do for them to make sure they don't do it again'

It might be true, though, many many Trump voters have the cognitive ability of a small child. And as the baby boomer generation will get even older, that won't get better. And there's another truth in here, which is that we simply can't write off the white people, not yet, while minorities, as the name indicates, don't matter enough politically to get their wishes taken seriously. But in the end, that's a question of power, not rights. We're treating stupid white people with kid gloves, because they've just shown they have the power to fuck things up if they don't get their will, no matter how unfair and stupid that will is. And they don't hesitate to use it.

In the end, it will change. The boomer generation will die off, and they will be thought off as the worst people ever. That is the main light in the tunnel, at some point the Clinton coalition will become stronger than this. How to get their earlier, how to get some of the deplorables to abandon ship, that I don't know.

Frederik B, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

American public's inability to remember anything saved the day.

yeah this was for sure deflating. the number of people who stamped their feet in the ground after the Access Hollywood tape and shouted, "holy shit, this guy is horrible", watched as a dozen women accused him of doing exactly the thing he bragged about doing, and then two weeks later were like....well that's all in the past

frogbs, Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:09 (seven years ago) link

can't remember if ilx thinks Yglesias is an asshole or not but he's otm here

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/17/13626514/trump-systemic-corruption?utm_campaign=mattyglesias&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

cucky ramen-o (will), Thursday, 17 November 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

hey sorry for the long drunken late night post. to jacobsanders, i should go back and actually find the posts if i'm going to call you out on details - mea culpa.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

Regime-friendly banks receive a light regulatory touch while their rivals are crushed.

This would be a more terrifying prospect if there was a bank that the mainstream Republican or Democratic party ever met that they didn't like. Now banks who like the Preident-Elect, that's another matter.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

speaking of vox, this article seems relevant to our ongoing discussion:

http://www.vox.com/first-person/2016/11/17/13642864/trump-election-empathy-baratunde-thurston

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

Did Republicans really cry over Romney's loss? Pics or it didn't happen.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

a tear-streaked binder of women

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump made racial attitudes more important in the general election, too. I showed earlier that racial resentment, unfavorable opinions of African-Americans and ethnocentrism were significantly stronger predictors of whites’ preferences for Trump or Clinton than they were in hypothetical match-ups between Clinton and Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio.

Many of these same racial attitudes are also heavily influenced by education. College-educated whites and whites who live in highly educated areas of the country have long been much more racially tolerant than other white Americans.

It turns out that this relationship between education and racial attitudes explains a very large portion of the education gap in white support for Trump. Indeed, the graphs below show that the negative effects of education on white support for Trump vanishes after accounting for attitudes about both African Americans and immigrants.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/16/the-education-gap-among-whites-this-year-wasnt-about-education-it-was-about-race/

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

"The boomer generation will die off, and they will be thought off as the worst people ever."

sadly, they are all trying to live to be 200 years old. i keep waiting for them to start getting daily fetal cell injections or something in order to keep the reaper at bay.

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

covered by the medicare they don't want to pay for

cucky ramen-o (will), Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

Basically he finds a lot of evidence that if education affected your attitudes about race generally, that has an extremely close parallel with trump support, to the extent that if you control for education affecting your attitudes about race, the effect of education on trump support disappears

(Maybe this is obvious but I had to read it twice to get it)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

xpost i can vouch that JacobSanders has an impeccably progressive attitude toward otherwise underrepresented private-press LPs.

Thus Sang Freud, Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

JacobSanders do you love free market capitalism and think its potentials limitless if it were only 'truly' free...or are you just trying to deal with the current setup?

― conrad, Saturday, 12 November 2016 14:48 (five days ago) Permalink

conrad, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

i like that the republican governor of massachusetts didn't vote for trump (or anyone) but did go to the voting booth to vote no on pot legalization. he still had to look a LITTLE republican.

he also said he was going to take obama's wait and see attitude with trump. he doesn't like that alt-right guy at all. or trump for that matter.

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

still, fuck charlie baker imo

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

To conrad I would say it's a little of both. What frustrates me is our two party system. I know wanting other options is not looking squarely at reality.

JacobSanders, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

Actually, if anyone of you live in Maine, they passed the ranked choice voting amendment, so third parties should do much better there!

Frederik B, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

would not 'truly free' capitalism allow for monopolies? eliminate child labor laws? absolve environmental disasters? where is the line drawn? who draws it and who would 'interpret' it?

cucky ramen-o (will), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

itt: EVERYTHING

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

I never said I'm for a free market without regulation! I'm pro-union, labor laws, anti-discrimination laws, EPA, DOT, FERC, etc. I thought I said that upthread, maybe not, I'm very poor at explaining myself when it comes to politics. I was mainly talking about health care. When I talk about free market I'm mainly talking about healthy competition. Like when the EpiPen skyrocketed in price. As I understand it there was one company producing it so they could charge whatever they wanted? If I'm failing to understand something, please let me know.

JacobSanders, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

I can't keep up with this thread, but given you guys seem to touching on all of the nations current and hypothetical problems...

https://img.pandawhale.com/post-58335-good-luck-were-all-counting-on-ClLw.gif

Evan, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Having thought everything over, I think it comes down to blaming Le Tigre for that awful, terrible pro-Clinton song.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

word. sorry JacobSanders for jumping to the wrong conclusions!

cucky ramen-o (will), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah i haven't been reading this really.all i know is that I fucking hate people that voted for this shithead more and more everyday.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

"I'm pro-union, labor laws, anti-discrimination laws, EPA, DOT, FERC, etc."

maybe you should move to france, ya commie!

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

we have to embrace trump supporters. hug them. take them to our breast. they know not what they do. suffer their annoying children...i mean suffer the children and forbid them not. all that. show them what real christians look like. even though you aren't a christian.

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

lol scott

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 17 November 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

I agree with this piece

me too

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

And also the idea of work and being productive is something that I feel tends to sway people towards Republicanism and conservatism. Like if you simplified the appeals of Bernie and Trump, on the Bernie side, a lot of people were stoked by the idea of getting things for free: education, health care, dismissal of student loan debt, whereas the Trump appeal was, I will give you something valuable to work for.

A little late, and I know we're on the same side wrt the issue, but I feel like something often gets missed in the discourse around education policy: education IS something valuable that you have to work for, even if you don't pay tuition. It's not a consumer good that can be acquired for free when the financial cost is eliminated or socialized.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

I agree with the Bouie piece up to a point, but I find it simplistic and useless in terms of actually crafting any kind of winning political strategy. And I also think it's a bit of a strawman to cast Sanders, Warren and Ellison as people who think we should just pretend bigotry doesn't exist and court the Trump base.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

I mean the plan this time around was to shout "The people over there are racist and terrible" for the entire campaign and hope it scared the base enough to come out. It failed. So we should double down?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

i dunno, he does point to reid's response as a better alternative for how to address the bigotry:

"I have personally been on the ballot in Nevada for 26 elections and I have never seen anything like the reaction to the election completed last Tuesday. The election of Donald Trump has emboldened the forces of hate and bigotry in America."

Reid continues:

"We as a nation must find a way to move forward without consigning those who Trump has threatened to the shadows. Their fear is entirely rational, because Donald Trump has talked openly about doing terrible things to them. …
If this is going to be a time of healing, we must first put the responsibility for healing where it belongs: at the feet of Donald Trump, a sexual predator who lost the popular vote and fueled his campaign with bigotry and hate. Winning the electoral college does not absolve Trump of the grave sins he committed against millions of Americans. Donald Trump may not possess the capacity to assuage those fears, but he owes it to this nation to try."

Reid doesn’t preclude cooperation; this isn’t a call for blockade. What the Nevada senator does, however, is center the fears and concerns of nonwhite Americans. He essentially offers conditional terms: If you work to reduce and repudiate the fear and hate of your campaign, then there is a chance to “move forward.” Otherwise, there are no deals to make. Reid’s statement has all the room you need for a populist message to working-class whites. But it makes that message contingent on buy-in for an inclusive agenda, attuned to the concerns of marginalized Americans. In this vision, the concerns of those Americans are correctly understood as populist concerns, indispensable to the whole.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

idk about "crying" over romney's loss but let us never forget the post-election mega-rant youtube woman, discussion beginning here: The Choice of a New Denigration: the US Election Day 2012 Thread

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

And I also think it's a bit of a strawman to cast Sanders, Warren and Ellison as people who think we should just pretend bigotry doesn't exist and court the Trump base.

also i don't think he portrays them in this way. he writes

"Both Warren and Sanders emphasize that bigotry was part of Trump’s message. But they want to separate the “deplorables” from the larger group of more ordinary Americans who just wanted a change of pace. .... But there’s a problem here, and it’s found in the cast given to Trump’s campaign and Trump’s voters. Both Warren and Sanders describe Trump’s effort as a populist campaign with an almost incidental use of racial prejudice."

he doesn't describe sanders/warren as pretending bigotry doesn't exist. he disagrees with the lack of emphasis that they place on bigotry.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

idk about "crying" over romney's loss but let us never forget the post-election mega-rant youtube woman, discussion beginning here: The Choice of a New Denigration: the US Election Day 2012 Thread

― dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino),

how in hell could you look at that thread and not weep

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

winter is coming. and after that, something even worse

Rep. Tom Price (R-GA), the chairman of the budget committee, told reporters on Thursday that Republicans are eyeing major changes to Medicare in 2017.

Price, who is being floated as a possible Health and Human Services Secretary in the next administration, said that he expects Republican in the House to move on Medicare reforms "six to eight months" into the Trump administration.

He also noted that Republicans are eyeing using a tactic known as budget reconciliation to make the change. That process allows Republicans to pass bills with a simple majority in the U.S. Senate.

When asked by TPM about timing for changes to Medicare, Price said "I think that is probably in the second phase of reconciliation, which would have to be in the FY 18 budget resolution in the first 6-8 months."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/tom-price-reveals-republicans-eyeing-medicare-overhaul-in-2017

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

bouie's point is sound but frankly i don't think warren-sanders-ellison expect trump to govern like a working class populist at all. when they meet the reality of what's likely to happen i don't think their position and reid's are going to be different.

goole, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

one thing to think about: the senate runoff in louisiana

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-16/democrats-can-t-write-off-the-last-senate-race-in-louisiana

goole, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

I agree with this piece

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/the_democrats_are_already_screwing_up_the_trump_resistance.html

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:59 AM (fifty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i read that yesterday. love bouie and he makes a good academic point that voting with trump or republicans in a sense legitimizes the tactics he used to win the election. however, i'd say unfortunately that that horse has already left the barn -- the tactics were legitimized when the electoral votes came in. and i'm not sure what the implication for lawmakers is realistically supposed to be -- there are going to be plenty of pieces of minor legislation that come along that genuinely are going to help people. are democrats supposed to just refuse to vote for them out of principle?

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

how do you cut something as popular as medicare without immediately losing the next election?

ciderpress, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

And also the idea of work and being productive is something that I feel tends to sway people towards Republicanism and conservatism. Like if you simplified the appeals of Bernie and Trump, on the Bernie side, a lot of people were stoked by the idea of getting things for free: education, health care, dismissal of student loan debt, whereas the Trump appeal was, I will give you something valuable to work for.

The idea behind this, what you're calling "Republicanism", came from think tanks and were broadcast over corporate-owned media. This isn't a belief inherent in human nature or the spirit of America. At the dawn of the century Americans joined together and died for better rights and benefits for themselves. During the Great Depression people got their skulls bashed in for what Republicans call the "welfare state" for moochers and takers.

It's a matter of governing philosophy and what people believe. Right now what most Americans believe as being natural was created intentionally over the past few decades, and since corporate interests control just about all of the media in this country, it's the only message that's broadcasted.

Nothing is going to change until these beliefs are challenged and replaced with an alternate governing philosophy, and can somehow reach people (and in this environment, I have no fucking idea how that would happen). So there's really no point in debating this issue until that's dealt with. It'll probably take some kind-of collapse or breakdown in the current order, and Trump definitely isn't that, he exemplifies the current order.

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

also goole otm. common sense

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

how do you cut something as popular as medicare without immediately losing the next election?

― ciderpress, Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:58 (twenty-one seconds ago) Permalink

And in the middle of 2018 election season? They won't even get a simple majority. I'm scratching my head at this, unless it's some kind of bargaining strategy or I don't know what the fuck, it makes no sense.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Like I know they are ideologues but they can't be that fucking dumb, but I'm sitting here trying to figure out what the devious plan behind that move is and so far I'm not seeing it. There has to be one, right?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

idk, at some point the purpose of being in government has to be getting done the shit you want to get done, not about winning future elections. if they really want to gut medicare, now's the time

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

it seems like a tough sell to me as does axing ACA, but voters seem more than willing to swallow a bucket of lies, so I wouldn't count on there being consequences if this comes to pass.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

I'm counting on nothing, but how do you lie about "we cut medicare"? It's pretty straightforward.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

idk, at some point the purpose of being in government has to be getting done the shit you want to get done, not about winning future elections. if they really want to gut medicare, now's the time

― k3vin k., Thursday, November 17, 2016 1:03 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"gutting" it symbolically right before you get swept out of congress and overruled isn't really getting shit done

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

they won't "cut" it, they'll "strengthen" it

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

blame the cut on ACA overreach and half the country is like "yep"

cucky ramen-o (will), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

@man alive voters bought into a whole suite of absolutely ridiculous lies during the election season, the right wing merely needs to start spreading rumors that cutting medicare was the last gasp of desperation by an outgoing Obama administration or some such absurd lie and people will eat that shit up too.

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

if I were Paul Ryan, I'd gut Medicare too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

right, didn't you realize that ACA fatally hurt medicare and now they need to shoot the patient? Plus, look at how much money they can save, how much taxes they can cut, how much less dependent on government socialism all those old people are, how much this has improved the business of providing health insurance, etc.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

hey won't "cut" it, they'll "strengthen" it

exactly. from paul ryan's website:

Medicare is the cornerstone on which all other government health care programs rest. Unfortunately, the deteriorating financial conditions of this program are threatening beneficiary access to its benefits. In their most recent report, the Medicare Trustees projected that the account that funds Medicare’s hospital benefit will be exhausted in 2028. Reports like this illustrate that we can no longer let politicians in Washington deny the danger to Medicare – it is all too real, and the health of our nation’s seniors is far too important. We have to save Medicare to avoid disruptions in benefits for current seniors and to strengthen the program for future generations. - See more at: http://paulryan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=9969#sthash.Q9GkFX7a.dpuf

they're not cutting it, and they won't stop at merely strengthening it - they are SAVING it!

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

All of them Trump vogers.

I know what is meant here but my head automatically went to this:

http://cdn.funcheap.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/VOGUE.jpg

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

they are euthanizing it, along with all those elderly moochers who used it

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

If the GOP is some kind of brilliant diabolical lie-spreading machine that can convince literally anyone anything then why not just fucking give up? I think that's pretty clearly not the case. Old people vote, they love medicare, and they're not reading Breitbart for news. And "they're cutting your medicare" is a much easier sell than "Well actually we're going to save it due to...*long wonky paragraph*"

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

bouie's point is sound but frankly i don't think warren-sanders-ellison expect trump to govern like a working class populist at all. when they meet the reality of what's likely to happen i don't think their position and reid's are going to be different.

― goole, Thursday, November 17, 2016

otm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

can someone photoshop Jason Chaffetz's face on Madonna

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

If the GOP is some kind of brilliant diabolical lie-spreading machine that can convince literally anyone anything then why not just fucking give up?

that's not a reason to give up, it's a reason to pay attention to what they're clearly telegraphing ahead of time, fight it, and not assume that people will make what seems to be the very obvious correct decision to punish the GOP for taking this course of action.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

man alive, I'm not saying you're wrong, I hope you are right. But I also just witnessed the wholesale acceptance of a raft of lies and hatred by a large portion of the country, so who knows?

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

Trump voters weren't voting out of racism. They did it because they care deeply about non-white people and know that the hardship of living in an even more overtly racist nation will help build their character and make them better people.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

Trump likes giving the NY Times a little shot in the arm every fifteen minutes because he wants them to try harder and to succeed.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

if we learned anything from the trump debacle, i hope it's to not take anything for granted. dismissing any attempt to cut medicare out of hand sounds a lot like August 2015-Nov 2016 when the idea of trump winning was so ridiculous that it was beyond discussion for a lot of people

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

at least on the topic of the ACA, there's a large portion of the country that wants to kill it for some reason. One of the benefits of ACA is that it strengthened (not destroyed) the budget for medicare. It also provided health insurance to a lot of people that previously couldn't pay for it. People seem to really hate all of this for some reason.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

Just as they are going to spin their Medicare plan, they are going to do the same for their infrastructure rebuilding plan, but how will Schumer and other Dem senators respond to it...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/11/17/why-democrats-need-to-fight-donald-trump-from-the-moment-he-takes-office/

As a general matter, there are two reasons that Democrats might support a Republican effort on something like infrastructure. The first is that their support produces something good for the country that wouldn’t have happened otherwise. The second is that it provides some political advantage for them. And it’s hard to see either of those things happening.

On the first point, from what we can tell, Trump’s infrastructure plan consists mostly of tax breaks for private companies to build roads and bridges that they can then charge tolls on. This leaves out enormous needs, particularly the maintenance and repair that are vitally important and will return great benefits but that aren’t as easy for private companies to monetize.

It’s possible that by joining the effort, Democrats might be able to persuade Republicans to make their infrastructure bill more effective. But the truth is that Republicans don’t need Democratic votes and are just as likely to say, “Thanks for your input, but we’re going to do it our way.”

If that’s true and Democrats can’t extract major substantive concessions, do they get political benefit from joining Republicans on this bill? That brings us to what Republicans did eight years ago. You may remember that literally on the day Barack Obama was inaugurated, Republican leaders got together for dinner and decided on a strategy of total opposition: Don’t work with him on anything, fight to make every initiative fail, and generally make his life miserable in the hope they could take back Congress and keep him from winning reelection. Though Obama got reelected, otherwise the strategy was a tremendous success.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

Paul Ryan just wants to bring Medicare into the 21st century by making it work with the market to provide more competitive and efficient services for the people who helped build the backbone of America.

What will happen is the same thing with private insurance, lots of people who go bankrupt or can't afford care and die anonymous deaths, and are ignored or demonized by the media and politicians as being losers or entitled to something they didn't earn, wash, rinse, repeat.

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

racist old ppl are the gop golden goose, seems like a big risk for them no matter how they spin it

ciderpress, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

km otm

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

if anyone learns anything from this election i hope it's to throw out any and all premises about american politics.

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

racist old ppl are the gop golden goose, seems like a big risk for them no matter how they spin it

Demonizing people and calling them losers certainly hasn't hurt the GOP, these people just found targets for their self-loathing.

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

at least on the topic of the ACA, there's a large portion of the country that wants to kill it for some reason. One of the benefits of ACA is that it strengthened (not destroyed) the budget for medicare. It also provided health insurance to a lot of people that previously couldn't pay for it. People seem to really hate all of this for some reason.

― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, November 17, 2016 1:16 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

There are a lot of reasons people dislike ACA that have nothing to do with A) the reasons people LOVE Medicare or B) "lies" although they certainly may be magnified by damage the GOP has done to the ACA on purpose. I really think it would be useful for Democrats to try to understand some of this rather than just say "Oh, we gave people this great program but they hate it so what can we do."

I'm as concerned as anyone that the GOP will find some way to cut medicare, but this "oh they can sell anything to anyone" attitude is defeatist.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

I mean yeah, if they campaign on fixing medicare and we don't fucking do anything about it, then yes people will believe them. But they're handing us a cudgel to beat them with. We still have to swing it.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

also, if the medicare cutting plan is so foolish that it has not chance of passing, it's still a great time to promote the fact that the GOP is pushing it right now, even if they don't end going through with it. let all of the old white people that just voted for Trump know that they just voted for a party that is actively trying to cut their medicare. they won't believe you, probably, but it could be the first of a death by 1000 cuts

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

The first lie to combat is Ryan's bullshit about the ACA bankrupting Medicare. It's a perfect way to undercut the legitimacy of the ACA while providing a reason to gut Medicare under the second lie of "saving it."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

please note, I am all in favor of fighting Republicans on Medicare and ACA repeal, and if either comes to pass there absolutely needs to be strong messaging to convey how this is hurting people. I am only saying that I'm not convinced Republicans will end up being particularly punished for any of this.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

I'm as concerned as anyone that the GOP will find some way to cut medicare, but this "oh they can sell anything to anyone" attitude is defeatist.

The Democrats aren't innocent in this, either. Both parties have worked to dismantle public benefits. The line of thinking that allows the public to accept this is broadcast over our beloved corporate-controlled media, and it's always eerie hearing people repeat copy word for word that was written up by some flack and played over TV, and believing it to be the truth, despite being unable to explain what the hell they're talking about.

Figure this, our political system works on providing benefits to campaign donors and patrons, and elections are really just built around what politician gets in to provide services for these donors and patrons. So for this Medicare thing to be successfully fought, you'd have to find politicians who have donors whose interests outweigh the interests of the donors who want Medicare privatized/cut, as in, is this project worth the risk of losing out on other projects for other patrons.

Voters are just a means into getting into this position, and they're pretty well worked over at this point, so they're not a big deal, they vote for shit that hurts them all the time because they sincerely believe the opposite of reality at this point.

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

also, if the medicare cutting plan is so foolish that it has not chance of passing, it's still a great time to promote the fact that the GOP is pushing it right now, even if they don't end going through with it. let all of the old white people that just voted for Trump know that they just voted for a party that is actively trying to cut their medicare. they won't believe you, probably, but it could be the first of a death by 1000 cuts

― Karl Malone, Thursday, November 17, 2016 1:22 PM (sixteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Absolutely, we should start spreading word about this immediately, maybe quietly at first and increasing in volume as we get closer to 2018.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

I agree with this piece

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/the_democrats_are_already_screwing_up_the_trump_resistance.html

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40)

i... get where bouie is coming from, but i'm not sure how supporting a black muslim as dnc chair serves to "obscure the fundamental tribalism of trump's appeal".

i like the notion of a "good cop/bad cop" approach. and if warren and sanders want to be the good cops and say "we understand your economic anxieties", i think there's a place for that. i just don't think that should, or will, be the be-all and end-all of responding to trump.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

please note, I am all in favor of fighting Republicans on Medicare and ACA repeal, and if either comes to pass there absolutely needs to be strong messaging to convey how this is hurting people. I am only saying that I'm not convinced Republicans will end up being particularly punished for any of this.

― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles),

There's a history of wins, as I wrote about here. One of the reasons why Reagan lost operational control of the House in the 1982 midterm elections was the relentlessness with which Speaker Tip O’Neill framed the stakes with the starkness of a telegram: the Republicans want to gut Social Security, the Democrats want to save it. In the end Reagan, reeling, acquiesced, signing a bill in 1983 that in effect repudiated every thing he’d ever said about it. And don't forget Dubya's Social Security accounts. How far did that get?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

Yes, that. Simple effective message.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

90% of people do not even understand the lie that Paul Ryan is trying to tell them.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

how do you cut something as popular as medicare without immediately losing the next election?

Maybe his supporters will be cool with it, burn it all down, give it a chance, we've tried absolutely everything short of shutting it down, so let's try that! I know on paper it will hurt me and my family, but my heart says, what the hell.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

I agree with this piece

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/the_democrats_are_already_screwing_up_the_trump_resistance.html

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40)

i... get where bouie is coming from, but i'm not sure how supporting a black muslim as dnc chair serves to "obscure the fundamental tribalism of trump's appeal".

i like the notion of a "good cop/bad cop" approach. and if warren and sanders want to be the good cops and say "we understand your economic anxieties", i think there's a place for that. i just don't think that should, or will, be the be-all and end-all of responding to trump.

― xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:40 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

1. No one said supporting a black Muslim as dnc chair obscures the fundamental tribalism of trump's appeal, they said that that politician's particular argument does at this moment. For future reference, conflating a person's identity with the quality of their arguments is dumb. "I don't know how racists could vote for Obama"-level dumb

2. It's not about "good cop/bad cop" its hyper cynical dishonesty

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

how do you cut something as popular as medicare without immediately losing the next election?

Have faith that your candidate's ability to resist the tides of history and defy gravity will hold out over the old rules

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

if anyone is interested in a provocative argument by scott alexander about trump and racism they should check out his website. i won't link to it bc i think it's the kind of thing that would outrage ilx but it's certainly a perspective.

Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

on further reflection, i think that perhaps the bouie article is a little bit symptomatic of some of the widespread media problems that may have contributed to trump's election. the whole notion of the "clickbait media", and i think of slate as a prime example of this, is built on the notion of provocation rather than contemplation. bouie makes his case thoughtfully and considerately, but the context in which it is presented undermines that case, emphasizing instead an immediate and rabid emotional response, either confirmatory or hostile. i don't think that internet media necessarily _creates_ upset, but it has this way of derailing legitimate anger and upset into things like demanding that every single member of the dnc resign effective immediately.

my feeling is that probably not a lot of good is going to come from online sources, and that organizing offline and locally is going to wind up being more productive and decisive.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

Don't be a punk if you're gonna bring it up link to the thing http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/11/16/you-are-still-crying-wolf/

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

1. No one said supporting a black Muslim as dnc chair obscures the fundamental tribalism of trump's appeal, they said that that politician's particular argument does at this moment. For future reference, conflating a person's identity with the quality of their arguments is dumb.

2. It's not about "good cop/bad cop" its hyper cynical dishonesty

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40)

for future reference, the american electorate is also dumb. perhaps i am a living breathing example of "hyper cynical dishonesty", but i do not think the democrats are going to win elections by appealing to humanity's better qualities. thinking we can or should be trying to turn the human race into a living embodiment of plato's "republic" may not be cynical or dishonest, but it is utterly, utterly delusional. :)

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

Fwiw, I don't think trump is "more racist" than candidates past I think that he made race his signature issue more than past candidates. Obviously there's a permanent consistent structure to how white people vote in the U.S. but that does not mean that Trump isn't a new candidate stoking explicit racial appeals, nor that there aren't black or Latino voters who buy into conservative arguments, including race-related ones

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

idg what you guys think the utility is of this post-electoral hand-wringing about campaigns/voter appeals/role of racism etc. there's work to be done, look ahead. Alfred is correct that things like the upcoming battle over Medicare need to be the focus.

In other news re: the filibuster -

Asked by The Huffington Post about ending the filibuster, Sen. Orrin Hatch was blunt.

“Are you kidding?” he said with some vehemence. “I’m one of the biggest advocates for the filibuster. It’s the only way to protect the minority, and we’ve been in the minority a lot more than we’ve been in the majority. It’s just a great, great protection for the minority.”

Hatch, the most senior member of the GOP, presides over the Senate every morning as the president pro tempore, making him third in the line of succession to the White House. He’s also chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

I don't think it's going to happen. They don't need to do it, since the Democrats don't look likely to adopt McConnell's anti-Obama strategy (even though they v much should imo)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

That's re: the dumb Scott Alexander piece

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

idg what you guys think the utility is of this post-electoral hand-wringing about campaigns/voter appeals/role of racism etc. there's work to be done, look ahead. Alfred is correct that things like the upcoming battle over Medicare need to be the focus.

The current debate is about a Slate article addressing the forward facing positioning of the Democratic Party stupid of course it has utility

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

yeah I wasn't referring to that as much as the prior 500 posts or so

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

That Scott Alexander close-reading of Trump ignores the fact that he couldn't be bothered to say any of those things about African-Americans or Mexicans or whomever in the communities he was talking about, which I think is a really, really important thing to elide if you're going to try close reading.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

per the Slate piece, goole is correct imo

bouie's point is sound but frankly i don't think warren-sanders-ellison expect trump to govern like a working class populist at all. when they meet the reality of what's likely to happen i don't think their position and reid's are going to be different.

― goole, Thursday, November 17, 2016

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

or re: the Slate piece, I mean

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

yep

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

There are about 5000 problems with the Scott Alexander piece including data cherrypicking and treating his blatant pandering ("the hispanics") as his actual platform

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

bouie's point is sound but frankly i don't think warren-sanders-ellison expect trump to govern like a working class populist at all. when they meet the reality of what's likely to happen i don't think their position and reid's are going to be different.

― goole, Thursday, November 17, 2016

No of course they don't, they're just pivoting to make sure a bunch of white people who voted for trump don't feel bad about having voted for a racist & want their guilt assuaged, and they're just giving them a dishonest rationalization at the expense of the people who actually did vote for them

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

eh you really think there were that many Trump voters that listen to/read angry letters by Sanders/Warren? That's some small potatoes, I suspect.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

forget it shakes

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Can something as simple and corny as 'more paid holidays' work as a way to cater to workin' folks?

Im thinking about Al Franken's book where he wins the presidency by promising to abolish atm fees.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

Don't be a punk if you're gonna bring it up link to the thing http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/11/16/you-are-still-crying-wolf/

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:58 (ten minutes ago) Permalink

Mordy, this piece makes the case that Trump made "gains" among minority voters, but minority turnout was much lower than 2012 as I understand it, so I'm not convinced there were gains in absolute numbers. He merely got a higher share of the minorities (than Romney) that did vote.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

let's not forget all the minorities purged from the voter rolls in the last 4 years, as per Greg Palast

so yeah, % is up but overall #s are way down, at least based on my half assed analysis

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Can something as simple and corny as 'more paid holidays' work as a way to cater to workin' folks?

Americans don't want this because they prefer to work than take vacations, unlike lazy Europeans. Anyway, it's not the job of business to provide vacations for people. Why should they have to pay for free stuff for you?

larry appleton, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

Mordy, this piece makes the case that Trump made "gains" among minority voters, but minority turnout was much lower than 2012 as I understand it, so I'm not convinced there were gains in absolute numbers. He merely got a higher share of the minorities (than Romney) that did vote.

Not that % of minority voters or raw numbers would prove one way or another that he is or isn't racist (this is just the flipside of the 'how could racists vote for Obama' inquiry). But I felt that he made a strong case that Trump's racism was at the very least overstated even if I personally attribute a greater role to it in his campaign than maybe Alexander does.

Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

to crank up the hyper cynical dishonesty, one of my takeaways from this election is that, at minimum, a decisive minority of the american electorate cannot be trusted to make wise or moral decisions regarding governance. if you're a politician accountable to that electorate, what the hell is your path forward?

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

In lighter news, The Onion is going to ride this out to the end: Biden Forges President’s Signature On Executive Order To Make December Dokken History Month

In other lighter news, check out the thread I started on the kittens we're fostering to help relieve the stress and anger.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

here's a draft if you want to help blow up Chuck's inbox

Sir,

It will not do any good for the health of this country if you cooperate with Donald Trump and the GOP. It will tear apart the Democratic Party, it will embolden Mr. Trump and his deeply bigoted, deeply corrupt hangers-on, while doing nothing to help working Americans and their families.

If you cooperate with Donald Trump on any legislative activity other than fully funding the federal executive branch, or passing an amendment to reform or eliminate the Electoral College, you will be doing a great disservice to Americans who voted in the majority to see a Democrat in the office of President.

Do not cooperate with Donald Trump. Do not "work with" the GOP. If you do, it will set back the Democratic party by over a decade, and it will make 2018 even more difficult for our incumbents.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

sure, I'll send that

brb!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

So apparently neither Trump nor anyone from his transition team has had any contact with -- or briefings from -- the State Dept. prior to phone calls he's making to world leaders (presumably on unsecured phone lines) or his in-person meeting with Shinzo Abe.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

The issue I have with that Scott Alexander piece is that it defines the idea of a "racist" the same way people on the right seem to - people who wear white hoods, who would never have a black friend or listen to rap music, who believe that whites are genetically superior, etc. etc. In reality I think a lot of white people consider racism as a thing of the past and generally feel like the media is beating the drum a little too hard when it comes to, say, black people getting shot by police. That they are, at worst, split-second decisions where someone felt threatened, and by the way, don't white people get shot all the time? We let BET slide, so why BLM? etc. etc.

If anything, the most important point in that article is that Trump is just a singularly weird dude, but more than that he has a middle schooler's understanding of racism. And I mean that literally. I remember being 12 and saying to a black guy at school, "Sup, my man?" and feeling really embarrassed about it. Truth is I just wanted to make him comfortable and had no idea how patronizing I was being. Ditto for Trump and the taco bowl tweet, or that incredibly bizarre ad he did courting Indian Americans - it's a deliberate attempt to say, "If I was a bigot, would I be doing this??" To say Trump is "openly white supremecist" seems a little extreme to me, more than that, he's just an idiot.

This of course is a problem when you're running for FUCKING PRESIDENT, because if your message is so ambigious and devoid of nuance, it invites people to read between the lines and see things you're not really intending. Alexander saying, "what's the difference between a wall and a fence really" misses the point. Neither of these things are going to be effective at combatting illegal immigration, but the wall carries so much more power, amounting to essentially a big "FUCK YOU!" to Mexico - it comes off as a racist idea to me because the costs associated with it would be so much better spent elsewhere, if indeed crime and the economy were your real concerns.

frogbs, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

I think the biggest takeaway from that piece imo is that calling him an "open racist" or using language to that effect, while his campaign takes and took pains to at least make their explicit language + rhetoric inclusive (even hamfistedly, or even if not delivered correctly) is corrosive. if ppl were only making the case that his campaign was implicitly racist (much like we have made similar claims about other republican campaigns) or suggestive, that would be one thing. but he links to plenty of msm pieces to thoroughly demonstrate that "openly" is the word of the day.

Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

one thing maybe he's missing is that the "open" in "open white supremacist" might be operating like the word "literally"

Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if there's any way to signal that you're going to work with Trump just to get in the door, then spin him up on shit on whatever you can come up with that puts him at odds with GOP leadership(to the extent he believes anything at all).

Is there utility to exacerbating his own dysfunctional personality against the dysfunctional personalities in the Congress? You have a clueless dyspeptic asshole who tends to listen to the last person who talks to him, what do you do with him to burn up time/energy/money for months?

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if there's any way to signal that you're going to work with Trump just to get in the door, then spin him up on shit on whatever you can come up with that puts him at odds with GOP leadership(to the extent he believes anything at all).

given what credulous cretin Trump is (and that he seems to believe whoever spoke to him last at any given moment) this would be a good strategy. doubt this is what Schmuckie has in mind though.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, that's the thing. We're stuck with backed up sewage pipes filling the Oval Office at the present moment, so what can you do to make sure that outflow starts befouling Congressional chambers, if you will, and force them into dealing with it?

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

Also, I think the claim that "yeah, there are some hate crimes, but that's just a negligible percentage of the country" is ignoring the bigger point, that these are being done IN THE NAME OF Donald Trump. The claim that "Hillary supporters are committing acts of violence too" ignores the fact that Trump himself encouraged that sort of violence against protestors at his rallies.

frogbs, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

Not that % of minority voters or raw numbers would prove one way or another that he is or isn't racist (this is just the flipside of the 'how could racists vote for Obama' inquiry). But I felt that he made a strong case that Trump's racism was at the very least overstated even if I personally attribute a greater role to it in his campaign than maybe Alexander does.

― Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:22 (thirty-one minutes ago) Permalink

The racism didn't just come out of nowhere for this campaign
http://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/donald-trump-and-the-central-park-five (piece from 2014, noting his highly visible commentary on the case in 1989).

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

Although I read another piece I'll try to find that made the very good point that his *appeal* wasn't as much dominated by racism as liberals thought, that if you really followed his speeches the wall and deportations and muslim registries were a lot smaller in his overall scheme than made out to be.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

I think the biggest takeaway from that piece imo is that calling him an "open racist" or using language to that effect, while his campaign takes and took pains to at least make their explicit language + rhetoric inclusive (even hamfistedly, or even if not delivered correctly) is corrosive. if ppl were only making the case that his campaign was implicitly racist (much like we have made similar claims about other republican campaigns) or suggestive, that would be one thing. but he links to plenty of msm pieces to thoroughly demonstrate that "openly" is the word of the day.

― Mordy, Thursday, November 17, 2016 1:49 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Where does he make the case it's corrosive? Is this just "non racist whites voted for the implicit racist because they're tired of being called racist" in pseudo intellectual clothes?

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

Although I read another piece I'll try to find that made the very good point that his *appeal* wasn't as much dominated by racism as liberals thought, that if you really followed his speeches the wall and deportations and muslim registries were a lot smaller in his overall scheme than made out to be.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, November 17, 2016 1:58 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is absurd. People were fucking chanting "build the wall" at his rallies

You guys are contorting into fact-denying logic pretzels to argue race wasn't a central tension in the campaign

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

xp D-40 - what are Thanksgiving conversations like with your family?

sarahell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

I'm not denying race was a central tension in the campaign. But look, white democrats are racist too. Plenty of racist white Clinton voters. I'm talking about ways the Democrats could have gotten more votes and can in the future.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

Like you know "Trump voters" aren't just this racist blob that lives in a trailer park on top of a coal mine. They have a variety of respective motivations and interests. Some of them are reachable. Sort of feel like a broken record.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

BTW, Bill Clinton also appealed to racism on the campaign trail. He dog-whistled too. I don't think that's a good approach, but it's certainly not something the Hillary campaign has EVER been above. cf 2008.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

Yes we just disagree radically on how to reach them, and I think pandering to them for a slight edge in the years the GOP doesn't run an explicitly white supremacist campaign is herding cats as electoral strategy

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

Scott Alexander piece loses me by not so much as mentioning Trump's role in the birther movement and how that prepped his run at the White House. No amount of taco bowls and rainbow flag waving can blind ppl to that fundamentally racist act and speech, so central to his appeal. You can't accuse ppl of crying wolf when you ignore the fact that red riding hood's granny has in fact bared fangs.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Scott Alexander piece loses me by not so much as mentioning Trump's role in the birther movement and how that prepped his run at the White House. No amount of taco bowls and rainbow flag waving can blind ppl to that fundamentally racist act and speech, so central to his appeal. You can't accuse ppl of crying wolf when you ignore the fact that red riding hood's granny has in fact bared fangs.

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:11 PM (twenty-four seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea that's how i felt about the piece too.

the birther shit is how trump entered the political sphere and built up his base of followers

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

i know i (and others, esp deej) keep mentioning that but i really can't believe how often that fact is glossed over or ignored

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

http://nonsite.org/editorial/listening-to-trump

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:04 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Haven't gotten through the whole thing but it's largely reasserting a thing that I'd been saying all along: Trump is like a horoscope. People who are so inclined are going to parse the vagaries for those bits that seem to apply to them favorably and ignore the rest.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Like why does the notion of not appealing to their worst instincts never seem like an option? Trump got away with breaking a lot of "electability" rules...just like Obama did. But we always go back to the well of condescendingly assuming these voters are unreachable unless we treat them like caricatures. (Rather ironically, I feel like I'm arguing for the humanity of the white racist swing voter more than those trying to pander to them.) they can be reached the same way white liberals are reached re: race, tbh. Like you said, lots of democrats are racist after all. Stop treating them like idiots and treat them like well meaning racists because that's what they are

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

"Should blind" rather (to myself)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

Yes we just disagree radically on how to reach them, and I think pandering to them for a slight edge in the years the GOP doesn't run an explicitly white supremacist campaign is herding cats as electoral strategy

― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:10 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the same economic issues that could "pander" to them might also improve turnout among the democrats' minority base

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

Like you know "Trump voters" aren't just this racist blob that lives in a trailer park on top of a coal mine.

iirc this is the logline for "Squidbillies"

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

scott alexander is one of those guys who seems be very smart and reasonable without knowing anything, anything at all, about the world. like every day is a blank slate, and the deep connotations that history attaches to this or that phrase or action is completely invisible to him.

trump posing with a shitty taco bowl from the cafe in his own building is seen as real outreach and not this hamfisted half-insult, what can you even do with that? at such immense length too, jesus.

"if you take trump with complete wall-eyed literalism, he sounds fine" yeah ok, i'm not going to that.

goole, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

i'm not sure who has argued for "pandering to" racist white voters. that seems like a pretty crucial strawman

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

The same logic we're currently applying to the white working class could just as easily have applied in the primary when it came to leaning Hillary vs Obama. "Working class whites will never elect a black man!" they said condescendingly. (I definitely remember hearing these arguments from well-meaning liberals). Now those same people (probably, it doesn't matter if this is true lol) are arguing these same working class whites need kid gloves when talking about race. Meanwhile the left avoids addressing it leaving conservatives with the only answers. D's are like "actually this will help all Americans" and this "colorblind" strategy fools no conservatives (who think undeserving people are getting those benefits) nor the liberal base (who feel that they're being ignored to pander to racists)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

i'm not sure who has argued for "pandering to" racist white voters. that seems like a pretty crucial strawman

― k3vin k., Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:20 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

What is "your vote for an explicitly racist candidate was not racist" if not pandering

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Again you're quoting yourself, not anyone here. Lazy.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

god this is tiresome

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

Again you're quoting yourself, not anyone here. Lazy.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:24 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No, I'm paraphrasing the democratic platform as articulated by Bernie sanders.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

merrygoround.gif

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah i'm done. deej will wear himself out in a couple of days and we won't see him again until the next election, thankfully

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

What is "your vote for an explicitly racist candidate was not racist" if not pandering

i personally wouldn't suggest the dems push that message

at the same time pushing the message "your vote for an explicitly racist candidate is racist" seems like a dead end

that's all i was getting at upthread

the late great, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

god this is tiresome

― Οὖτις, Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:25 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is a lazier music message board version of one of the most important arguments happening on the left atm sorry it bores you

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Jon Schwarz from 2007: Democrats And The Iron Law Of Institutions

Read this if you're driven insane by the Democrats....

1. The voting booth is by no means "the only place that Democrats care about what you do." In fact, from their perspective, by the time you get to the general election much of the game is over. Withholding your November vote from candidates they like but you don't will, at most, make them a little sad. Often they'd prefer it, if that's the price of keeping you out of their hair the rest of the time. That's why they don't try to appeal to the ~50% of Americans who don't vote.

2. If you want to motivate powerful Democrats, attempt to threaten their power within the party, not the well-being of the party overall. Of course, this is easier said than done, particularly because much of the power within the party is (as Karp would put it) an unelected Democratic oligarchy. For instance, Pelosi's status as Speaker can be challenged straightforwardly. Getting at the source of the party oligarchy's power, which is money and institutions outside of electoral politics, is much more difficult.

3. Any serious attempt to transform the Democratic party would include a conscious attempt to change its culture, into one that celebrates different people: organizers rather than elected officials and donors. Culture only seems like a weak reed. It's in fact the most powerful motivation people have. If people are celebrated for acting for the good of the whole rather than just themselves, they'll act for the good of the whole. Likewise, a better culture would humble the "leaders," to discourage those with individualistic motivations from seeking the positions. A Democratic party that worked would require Charles Schumer and Steny Hoyer and anyone who donated over $5000 a year to clean the Capitol toilets.

4. If you don't believe the Democratic party is redeemable, don't get your hopes up that another party would end up being much better. Any other party would also be subject to the Iron Law of Institutions. It thus would be quickly just as dreadful as the Democrats...unless people put in the same amount of work as would be required to clean out the Democrats' Augean stables.

5. Generally speaking, don't expect too much from political parties, and certainly don't expect them to change much in less than a generation. And in any case, keep in mind much of the power in society lies elsewhere.

http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/001705.html

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

yeah i'm done. deej will wear himself out in a couple of days and we won't see him again until the next election, thankfully

― k3vin k., Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:27 PM (twenty-nine seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You act like I'm making some insane out there argument but this is actually an issue being debated all across the left right now & lots of people are more or less in my camp about this, you can dismissively handwave them but I'd recommend thinking harder about this stuff personally

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

no i understand that. we follow the same people on twitter

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

at the same time pushing the message "your vote for an explicitly racist candidate is racist" seems like a dead end

that's all i was getting at upthread

― the late great, Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:27 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It does have the benefit of being true & while I'm not saying that should be our primary message I think it would help if people who are on the left wouldn't deny it

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

no i understand that. we follow the same people on twitter

― k3vin k., Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:32 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I unfollowed most of chapotraphouse months ago

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

thankfully i have no idea who that is

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

Stop calling Democrats the left. Pretty please.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

Ok well, anyway, I think one thing we can hopefully agree on is that Democrats didn't do enough of a good job turning out black and hispanic voters and the young who should be in their base, and that stemmed from a lack of enthusiasm about or dislike for Clinton as well as some real tactical failures by the Clinton campaign -- taking states for granted and not investing enough in turnout in key places (in spite of all the hype about "ground game"). So I really hope they (1) pick a more liked candidate in 2020 and (2) focus like hell on registration and turnout for 2018.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

^^^

all that shit is way more important than whatever messaging argument deej wants to have

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

@jeremyscahill
Gen. Mike Flynn reportedly named National Security Advisor. The post does not require Senate Confirmation.

July:

https://theintercept.com/2016/07/13/an-interview-with-lt-gen-michael-flynn/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

Like, we probably could have won *this* election against an ultimately very unpopular GOP candidate just by doing those things better, without one more white working class vote. Of course we will need more white working class voters to win back congressional seats regardless, but as far as the presidency, if you don't like "pandering" then let's look at those other things I mentioned.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

^^^

all that shit is way more important than whatever messaging argument deej wants to have

― Οὖτις, Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:39 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

If you think that shit isn't 100% related to the messaging argument I'm making you've probably talked exclusively to white people about electoral politics over the past year

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

Like, we probably could have won *this* election against an ultimately very unpopular GOP candidate just by doing those things better, without one more white working class vote. Of course we will need more white working class voters to win back congressional seats regardless, but as far as the presidency, if you don't like "pandering" then let's look at those other things I mentioned.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:42 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Don't disagree with this

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

the portion of the electorate that decides elections is post-rational - policies, positions, how racist something is/isn't, these things don't matter (or at least they don't matter to as many people as they should). Obama and Trump both won largely because of the image they projected and the way they made their audiences *feel*. I wish it weren't this way, but it is. At the national level the Democrats need STARS, not carefully designed messages.

xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

probably would help if the presidential nominee in 2020 (if there is an election) is someone besides the most hated candidate at that time.

hey, Andrew Cuomo! star star

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

you've probably talked exclusively to white people about electoral politics over the past year

deej I am not a guy who throws around insults on here casually (as I think my posting history bears out) but you can go fuck yourself. I live in a heavily latino neighborhood, my kid goes to a school that is 80% latino. I spent yesterday morning providing security/logistical support for a march organized by the latino principal, a latino 4th grade teacher and activist organizer, and the latino music teacher. The other parents I am in regular contact with in the community are asian, latino, african american, Jewish, and of course rich (and not so rich) white liberals. If you want to check my credentials there you are.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

Another log for the eternal flame! https://newrepublic.com/article/138717/jd-vance-false-prophet-blue-america

If the system worked for you, you’re not likely to blame it for the plight of poor whites. Far easier instead to believe that poor whites are poor because they deserve to be.

But now we see the consequences of this class blindness. The media and the establishment figures who run the Democratic Party both had a responsibility to properly identify and indict the system’s failures. They abdicated that responsibility. Donald Trump took it up—if not always in the form of policy, then in his burn-it-all-down posture.

No analysis of Trumpism is complete without a reckoning of its white supremacy and misogyny. Appalachia is, like so many other places, a deeply racist and sexist place. It is not a coincidence that Trumpist bastions, from Buchanan County to Staten Island, are predominately white, or that Trump rode a tide of xenophobia to power. Economic hardship isn’t unique to white members of the working class, either. Blacks, Latinos, and Natives occupy a far more precarious economic position overall. White supremacy is indeed the overarching theme of Trumpism.

But that doesn’t mean we should repeat the establishment failures of this election cycle and minimize the influence of economic precarity. Trump is a racist and a sexist, but his victory is not due only to racism or sexism any more than it is due only to classism: He still won white women and a number of counties that had voted for Obama twice. This is not a simple story, and it never really has been.

We don’t need to normalize Trumpism or empathize with white supremacy to reach these voters. They weren’t destined to vote for Trump; many were Democratic voters. They aren’t destined to stay loyal to him in the future. To win them back, we must address their material concerns, and we can do that without coddling their prejudices. After all, America’s most famous progressive populist—Bernie Sanders—won many of the counties Clinton lost to Trump.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

probably would help if the presidential nominee in 2020 (if there is an election) is someone besides the most hated candidate at that time.

no doubt

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

probably would help if the 2020 nominee were under a hundred. why can't younger people become politicans? the average age of house and senate is about 60. where's the freshness? it can't be my generation though because we have government-recognized slacker status. will have to be younger people.

i mean if if a non-politican with no experience can become president than a 35 or 40 year old progressive braniac should be able to win a house or senate seat. sweep the oldsters out!

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

and then Aunt Carol comes in and says, "Dinner's ready! Grab your plates and get some turkey!"

sarahell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

:rmde: shakey it wasn't a "cred check" i just think you're deluding yourself if you think all those people you talk to don't think sacrificing their humanity at the alter of "white working class economic anxiety" is a worthy exchange

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

I have that backwards but you should get what im saying

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

that's funny cuz that isn't what you said but I get that you think you are saying something else and oh fuck it

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

the portion of the electorate that decides elections is post-rational - policies, positions, how racist something is/isn't, these things don't matter (or at least they don't matter to as many people as they should). Obama and Trump both won largely because of the image they projected and the way they made their audiences *feel*. I wish it weren't this way, but it is. At the national level the Democrats need STARS, not carefully designed messages.

xp

― Οὖτις, Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:45 PM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

they do matter as far as principles, but i kind of agree w/ you here (& actually this is pretty much my own argument): the right candidate who knows that politics is about performance not pandering can hew much more closely to principles & not have to compromise

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

that's funny cuz that isn't what you said but I get that you think you are saying something else and oh fuck it

― Οὖτις, Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:57 PM (twenty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it was a simple typo but ok

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

i do actually have faith in younger folks. they are engaged and media/web savvy. they don't owe anyone anything. they just have to turn off the netflix and run for something. they are very smart. you can't wait for all this dead weight to die of natural causes. they never die.

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

without medicare they might die!

ciderpress, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

http://www.mtv.com/news/2955021/shirtless-trump-saves-drowning-kitten/

One of the stories of this election season is that the American right has now fully postmodernized itself. This would have been hard to imagine even 20 years ago. There was a time, not all that long ago, when conservative Republicans considered themselves the party of virtue, a word they used not only in the evangelical sense but also to conjure a loose tradition of European and American moral philosophy. They championed Locke as well as Leviticus. I remember, as a teenager in Oklahoma, the proliferation of books by William J. Bennett on my friends' fathers' shelves: parchment-colored behemoths full of phrases like "Aristotle would have loved this poem" and "the treasure house of human wisdom."

Virtue was church, but it was more than that. It was an intellectual formation, or at least a gesture toward one. It was a sense that great things had been thought and written in past centuries and that whether one chose to familiarize oneself with those great things personally, by reading them, respectable people would still regard them with respect.

Often the battleground for this idea was the integrity of language itself. The conservative idea, at that time, was that liberalism had gone insane for political correctness and continental theory, and that the way to resist the encroachment of Derrida was through fortifying summaries of Emerson. Great Books. Great Ideas. Ideas have consequences. Words mean things. Remember the Clinton-era furor over "it depends upon the meaning of what the word 'is' is"?

What had really happened was that the left had become sensitized to the ways in which conventional moral language tended to shore up existing privilege and power, and had embarked on a critique of this tendency that the right interpreted, with some justification, as an attack on the very concept of meaning. But what would we have without meaning? Isolation and chaos, conditions in which it would presumably be easy to raise the capital gains tax. So if the left found itself in the strange position of supporting science on the one hand while insisting that truth was a cultural construct on the other, the right found itself in the even stranger position of investing in meaning even as it dissociated itself from fact. Evolution was a myth and climate change was a hoax, but philosophers still had access to objective truth, provided they had worn curly wigs and died enough centuries ago.

I don't know when it happened. Maybe with intelligent design? Maybe Colin Powell's WMD testimony? Maybe it was already under way, with Fox News and Rush Limbaugh? But at some point, the American right — starting with the non-alt version, the one before the one we just elected — took another look at the postmodern critique of the linguistic basis of virtue and tumbled absolutely spinning into love with it. It turned out that postmodernism also contained the seeds of a system that would shore up existing privilege and power. All you had to do was take the insights of subversion and repurpose them for the needs of authority.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

I think this actually relates to what shakey & i were just talking abt w/r/t politics as performance & truth value as being important but also as much about how something is conveyed as that it is conveyed

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

probably would help if the 2020 nominee were under a hundred. why can't younger people become politicans? the average age of house and senate is about 60. where's the freshness? it can't be my generation though because we have government-recognized slacker status. will have to be younger people.

Prior to this, we had three at least relatively young Presidents. The Democrats problem this time was that there was no rising star on the bench because they've done so badly on the state level. Most Presidents come from the pool of governors and Senators and there aren't that many Democratic governors and the Senate Dems average age is above 60 I think.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

In other news I see that Cruz is already sucking up to Trump now too, awesome

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

milo otm

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

The Democrats problem this time was that there was no rising star on the bench because they've done so badly on the state level.

also i think it was widely perceived in the party that this was clinton's "turn" this time too

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

In other news I see that Cruz is already sucking up to Trump now too, awesome

― Οὖτις, Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:06 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

TBF, if it wasn't Trump, he'd be sucking up to a dock post or the underside of a boat. Sucking up to things is just what aquatic mollusks do.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

the president i get as far as not being TOO young. obama, dubya, and bubba in the comfortably not-too-young range. people don't want to vote for a kid. but there is no law that says congress and senate people have to be old white lawyers. it isn't in any rule book. i just think people should give it a go. pressure the morons anyway. i think some smart little grass roots attacks - even if its a losing campaign you get to bring up all the things wrong with your old corrupt opponent and the system in general - could actually be more useful than tons of public protests. you gotta bring the fight to them. they don't care about protests.

scott seward, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

found another!

http://i.imgur.com/GzZ3dXe.jpg

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

That MTV piece I really enjoyed.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/TheAngryFangirl/status/799352770742616064

i just chose this because it happened to pop up on my TL, but to me this is why rhetorical carelessness in these sorts of arguments is so pernicious. guys like matt yglesias or even deej don't actually think racism "explains", completely on it own, virtually every ill in our society or the outcome of the election, but they make essentially that argument for purposes of economy (no pun intended) and clearness of message. but then you get well-meaning dumb people who actually take the message to heart

i guess this is really just the danger of having what should probably be a nuanced, academic discussion on the platform of twitter for anyone to see

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

Not sure if you all hate Jon Stewart or not but he talks about things that have been talked about in this thread.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jon-stewart-the-daily-show-former-host-election-2016-donald-trump-republicans/

Evan, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-romney-idUSKBN13C2L0

btw lol @ this, gotta hand it to these guys for not holding a grudge i guess

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

in other words Romney becomes as powerful and world historic as Colin Powell and William Rogers.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

romney as SOS would be less disastrous than some alternatives i guess?

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

So I really hope they (1) pick a more liked candidate in 2020

Don't worry, the chances of anyone running a candidate that isn't a while male in the next 20 years are pretty much zero so that should sort itself out.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/TheAngryFangirl/status/799352770742616064

i just chose this because it happened to pop up on my TL, but to me this is why rhetorical carelessness in these sorts of arguments is so pernicious. guys like matt yglesias or even deej don't actually think racism "explains", completely on it own, virtually every ill in our society or the outcome of the election, but they make essentially that argument for purposes of economy (no pun intended) and clearness of message. but then you get well-meaning dumb people who actually take the message to heart

i guess this is really just the danger of having what should probably be a nuanced, academic discussion on the platform of twitter for anyone to see

― k3vin k., Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:19 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

not sure i see the problem w/ this tweet but if the truth is dangerous maybe the lie isn't a platform worth standing on?

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

romney as SOS would be less disastrous than some alternatives i guess?

― k3vin k.

in another time it would be a sigh of relief. I get the feeling Mittens will talk to foreign leaders, recount the chat with Trump in the Oval Office, and Trump will fart in his face.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

lol

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

still id be relieved w/ romney as opposed to giuliani (who i guess was floated for both sos and ag?)

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

I can't see the Senate confirming Giuliani to anything tbh

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Romney would sail through

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Romney is by far the least awful name floated.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

he's certainly a less odious option than any that has been floated for almost any position in the trump wh thus far

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

arg sry for the redundancy

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

Romney would be a perfectly fine SoS. If anything, his inability to fully convince conservatives he is crazy probably cost him in the election.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

If things are still being floated, I'd be cool with Romney for president, vice president, counsel, secretary of anything, too, at this point.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

I don't know how Romney's much vaunted pride would deal with his sitting with those grifters, charlatans, and thugs, but then again he's a Republican.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

yeah that's an interesting needle to thread ... Trump prizes loyalty above all else, I can't really see Romney being convincing on that level. but idk, he's probably pretty good at being a toadying lickspittle tbf

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

He won't pick Romney - he was calling Russia the #1 threat to the US just 4 years ago.

Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

what happened to Newtie...? He seems oddly absent. Maybe he will get to head NASA, I'd be cool with that.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

He won't pick Romney - he was calling Russia the #1 threat to the US just 4 years ago.

yeah but now that Russia helps the GOP win elections (something I still can't fathom as being anything other than treason, btw) he's probably cool w it

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Newt will be Bannon's body double.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

idk what trump's doing here with the romney float but it's definitely not actually nominating him for state. he's messing with someone.

Clay, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

If things are still being floated, I'd be cool with Romney for president, vice president, counsel, secretary of anything, too, at this point.

― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 17, 2016 4:42 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

at this point yea

marcos, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

idk what trump's doing here with the romney float but it's definitely not actually nominating him for state. he's messing with someone.

again with the 4-dimensional chess suspicions

Trump is a moron

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

the neoliberal consensus seems awesome this week basically xp

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

the team is casting about for anybody that a) is willing to work for them, b) will swear total fealty to Our Fearless Leader and c) won't immediately start a firefight with congress

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

in other news

https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/799323021341097984

99 problems but a bitch ain't one amirite

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

i volunteer as tribute xp

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

Gingrich out

Clay, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

Brave of him

Evan, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

damn

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

this is like musical chairs

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

probably would help if the presidential nominee in 2020 (if there is an election) is someone besides the most hated candidate at that time.

hey, Andrew Cuomo! star star

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius)

yeah two words for you morbz "president-elect trump"

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Obama looks 95 years old in that Twitter video.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

was gonna say the same thing but i think the lighting is just funny, there seems to be a light directly above his head that brings out the grey in his hair

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

Gingrich out

― Clay, Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:00 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Can't wait to see which somehow-even-worse dude he finds instead

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

G. Gordon Liddy?

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

Oliver North?

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

not sure why he hasn't tapped hannity honestly

Clay, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

None of these people want to do these jobs. A radio show is about a 40 hour work week, maybe less? Cabinet Secretaries do 10-12 hour days and usually work weekends. For under $200K a year.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

None of these people want to do these jobs

including Trump!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

and 14+ hour days for SOS, AG, DHS, SECDEF, etc.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

maybe they can outsource it to hillary i think she really wants to do the job

Mordy, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

admit I am kinda bummed about Newtie though. I wouldn't say that I like him exactly, but I do have this sort of attitude similar to one would have for a misbehaving puppy that thinks it's people. Like aw isn't that cute he has an IDEA! And then sometimes he brings you your slippers. But mostly he just chews up the carpet and shits in your shoes.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

this dog will eat your baby and insist on your patting its head for the bright idea

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

fuck, i was taking solace in the hope that Gingrich was going to be murdered in Newt of the Long Knives

qop (crüt), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

have we covered this thinkpiece yet?
http://www.stereogum.com/1910381/moby-writes-letter-to-america-what-the-fuck-is-wrong-with-you/

sarahell, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

well, very few of us are vegans, for starters

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

can we get eminem to write a dissenting opinion just for lols?

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

maybe I'm just sympathetic to Newt because he seems to actually believe in science

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

some good news

http://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/218185540-story

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

Digby located the hottest of takes from a PUA/MRA fuckface who basically thinks anything goes now. Can't wait to see these dudes get maced, stabbed in the dick, or both. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/controversial-pick-up-artist-roosh-v-celebrates-donald-trump-s-victory-if-the-president-can-say-it-a7421161.html

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

funny how "the best" people don't actually want to work for Trump

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

a couple days ago there was this video of a totally unhinged trumpist woman losing her shit, uncut, at an msnbc reporter:

https://twitter.com/nick_ramsey/status/796908208241643520

seemed pretty embarassing to me! but now i see she's become a minor culture hero

https://twitter.com/HarshObserver1/status/799162593910759425

gonna be a long 4 years

goole, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

is the Kurt Cobain quote ironic or

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

blue collar middle america has en masse helped elect a trust-fund baby who has, over-time, inherited over $600,000,000.00 from his father.

is that actually true cuz if so lol

frogbs, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

But mostly he just chews up the carpet and shits in your shoes.

Shitting out Amazon reviews, no less

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

at the risk of sounding like a broken record, how come more isn't being made of the louisiana senate race? https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-16/democrats-can-t-write-off-the-last-senate-race-in-louisiana

, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

cuz Democrats are a bunch of pussies? you'd think the party would be expending resources to bolster turnout in New Orleans at least

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

just shared that fwiw

Shakey otm

sleeve, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

right wing co-option so far includes:

pepe
cuckolding
new balances
postmodernism

what's next?

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

Lady Lindsay cool w either Giuliani or Bolton at State, or Cruz on the Supreme Court...

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/17/politics/lindsey-graham-rand-paul-donald-trump-confirmations/index.html

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

a couple days ago there was this video of a totally unhinged trumpist woman losing her shit, uncut, at an msnbc reporter:

https://twitter.com/nick_ramsey/status/796908208241643520

seemed pretty embarassing to me! but now i see she's become a minor culture hero

https://twitter.com/HarshObserver1/status/799162593910759425

gonna be a long 4 years

― goole, Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:37 PM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Oh wow, the Girl Who I Shouldn't Have Started a Conversation With at a Party really let herself go

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

I wonder if the washington times is all pissed off about doing the hard right news outlet thing first

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

Re: the Louisiana race, when I looked into it there was every indication that run-off or no, he was going to get trounced. I guess you never know, though.

More interesting, North Carolina still has not decided its gov race.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

entirely possible, but turnout in runoff elections is notoriously low + unpredictable. you'd think some anti-Trump anger might be channeled effectively

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:25 (seven years ago) link

israel's ambassador shouts out bannon? http://www.politico.com/blogs/donald-trump-administration/2016/11/ron-dermer-israeli-ambassador-praises-trump-bannon-231578

, Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

I don't find that surprising. Breitbart Jerusalem, etc

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

Sorry for the shorthand reply (in a rush)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

Penzey's Spices guy is angry

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cxfw5NYVQAAEhK7.jpg

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

the us ambassador from israel is a fucking gop humping scumbag

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

good on him tbh xp

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

David Remnick talks to Obama.

The official line at the White House was that the hour-and-a-half meeting with Trump went well and that Trump was solicitous. Later, when I asked Obama how things had really gone, he smiled thinly and said, “I think I can’t characterize it without . . . ” Then he stopped himself and said that he would tell me, “at some point over a beer—off the record.”

I wasn’t counting on that beer anytime soon. But after the sitdown with Trump, Obama told staff members that he had talked Trump through the rudiments of forming a cabinet and policies, including the Iran nuclear deal, counter-terrorism policy, health care—and that the President-elect’s grasp of such matters was, as the debates had made plain, modest at best. Trump, despite his habitual bluster, seemed awed by what he was being told and about to encounter.

Denis McDonough strolled by with some friends and family. The day before, the person Trump sent to debrief him about how to staff and run a White House was his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. They had taken a walk on the South Lawn.

I asked McDonough how it was going, and he gave me a death-skull grin. “Everything’s great!” he said. He clenched his teeth and grinned harder in self-mockery. McDonough is the picture of rectitude: the ramrod posture, the trimmed white hair, the ashen mien of a bishop who has missed two meals in a row. “I guess if you keep repeating it, it’s like a mantra, and it will be O.K. ‘Everything will be O.K., everything will be O.K.’ ”

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:56 (seven years ago) link

n the Oval Office, the President was quick to comfort the young members of his staff, but he was, an aide told me, even more concerned about the wounding effect the election would have on the categories of Americans who had been routinely insulted and humiliated by the President-elect. At a social occasion earlier this year, someone asked Michelle Obama how it was possible for her husband to maintain his equipoise amid so much hatred. “You have no idea how bad it is,” she said. His practiced calm is beyond reckoning.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

If they both take faculty positions at a law school somewhere I might have to apply to law school

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Friday, 18 November 2016 00:11 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile, for those curious, here's a breakdown of what happened in Florida, specifically the famous I-4 corridor:

http://steveschale.squarespace.com/blog/2016/11/14/florida-2016-in-the-rearview-mirror.html

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

man, must be heartbreaking for Obama to pass the baton to this doofus

flopson, Friday, 18 November 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/surlyurbanist/status/799414446959435776 (via jamelle bouie)

this seems like the sort of nuanced take on the intersection of race and class (and possibly the implications on electoral politics, though i like that the tweeter didn't force himself into a definitive conclusion) that i'd like to read more of, rather than the binary-minded, blame-laying type of thinking that is much more prevalent all over the net

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

definitely have that remnick article tabbed for later tonight

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 01:15 (seven years ago) link

it's a great article. you're touched, again, by Obama's depth and resolve. And I'm dying to know what he really thought, which he says is 'off the record'

akm, Friday, 18 November 2016 01:15 (seven years ago) link

Remnick article is heartbreaking

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:21 (seven years ago) link

Maybe the only president in 40 years I'd have a martini with and ask wtf drones

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:23 (seven years ago) link

yeah i think many of us had issues with the president early in his tenure, and still do, but he's a fundamentally decent man and i think all the abuse he's taken and obnoxious opposition he's had to face has softened me toward him a considerable deal

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 01:25 (seven years ago) link

probably the only president since Truman to emerge from the presidency with his humanity intact too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:27 (seven years ago) link

It may not survive the next two months.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:31 (seven years ago) link

yeahhhhh, i'm not gonna take another ban this soon.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:32 (seven years ago) link

Good morning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:34 (seven years ago) link

you use that whenever you're "in the mood," eh

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:36 (seven years ago) link

Good mourning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:37 (seven years ago) link

On The Pulse Of Mourning

scott seward, Friday, 18 November 2016 01:43 (seven years ago) link

maya angelou humor never really a crowd pleaser...

scott seward, Friday, 18 November 2016 01:45 (seven years ago) link

that poem was a cowl, yeah

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 01:48 (seven years ago) link

The Associated PressVerified account
‏@AP
BREAKING: Senior official: Trump has offered retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn job as national security adviser.

, Friday, 18 November 2016 02:04 (seven years ago) link

...better than secretary of defense... i suppose... ?

, Friday, 18 November 2016 02:05 (seven years ago) link

he can have an incompetence-off with condi

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 02:17 (seven years ago) link

One of the articles about how really Trumps win was about the economy told the story that he went to Michigan and said that he would demand the Ford factory kept it's carmaking in Michigan, otherwise he'd levy a 35% tariff on imported Ford cars. How the fuck would he keep that promise? Well, he just tweeted that Ford won't move it's carmaking to Mexico. From Kentucky.

The Kentucky production was never getting moved to Mexico to begin with. Trump's known this for weeks. The Michigan cars will still move to Mexico. And none of this matters at all...

Frederik B, Friday, 18 November 2016 02:50 (seven years ago) link

read that as "officially retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn's job as national security adviser" at first

“a tub of horses” (Myonga Vön Bontee), Friday, 18 November 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link

So uh flynn's son

http://cnn.it/2g15qZ6

, Friday, 18 November 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link

notably that position doesn't require a Senate confirmation

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 18 November 2016 03:51 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/us/politics/rudolph-giuliani-possible-cabinet-pick-faces-scrutiny-over-finances.html

In 2006, Rudolph W. Giuliani, a former New York City mayor, made $10 million from 108 speeches he delivered around the world, and more money from other projects.

Mordy, Friday, 18 November 2016 04:04 (seven years ago) link

flynn got his ass fired for being a douche

akm, Friday, 18 November 2016 04:05 (seven years ago) link

couldn't make it through that Remnick Obama piece, too sad

flopson, Friday, 18 November 2016 04:17 (seven years ago) link

last paragraph is really good

iatee, Friday, 18 November 2016 04:58 (seven years ago) link

The Richard Rorty excerpt (from 1998) in that Reminick piece is incredible:

"Something will crack," he wrote: "The nonsuburban electorate will decide that the system has failed and start looking around for a strongman to vote for--someone willing to assure them that, once he is elected, the smug bureaucrats, tricky lawyers, overpaid bond salesmen, and postmodernist professors will no longer be calling the shots. . . . One thing that is very likely to happen is that the gains made in the past forty years by black and brown Americans, and by homosexuals, will be wiped out. Jocular contempt for women will come back into fashion. . . . All the resentment which badly educated Americans feel about having their manners dictated to them by college graduates will find an outlet."

clemenza, Friday, 18 November 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

morelike David Rimlick

hunangarage, Friday, 18 November 2016 06:41 (seven years ago) link

So Flynn is a complete shithead:
https://twitter.com/genflynn/status/703387702998278144

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 18 November 2016 07:16 (seven years ago) link

Breh

https://twitter.com/genflynn/status/753772080471179264

The more shit like this happens the less I can understand giving people a pass for voting for him on the grounds they didn't realize he was a racist

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 18 November 2016 08:46 (seven years ago) link

No no deej, you're crying wolf. If you're calling Flynn an islamophobe now, what will you then call a guy called who won't subsequently lie about having said those things, and then share a picture of himself eating a dürüm? Huh? And what will you do then?

Frederik B, Friday, 18 November 2016 09:16 (seven years ago) link

can't believe how badly the liberal lamestream media dropped the ball on these guys prior to 11/9.

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/17/502476139/were-not-going-away-alt-right-leader-on-voice-in-trump-administration?sc=17&f=2

cucky ramen-o (will), Friday, 18 November 2016 12:05 (seven years ago) link

i was all over the Flynn stuff yesterday while the Shakey-Deej Revue was in center ring. Sad!


john r stanton
‏@dcbigjohn

Key Clinton fundraiser Heather Podesta touts connections to Trump transition in email to corporate clients

https://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanton/lobbyists-have-no-clue-how-theyre-going-to-work-under-a-trum?utm_term=.ivAAgmjD9P#.dqdvnzYZOe

@ggreenwald 2h2 hours ago

Glenn Greenwald Retweeted john r stanton

How can you not love the bipartisan DC lobbyist class?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

Sessions for AG (NYT)

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Friday, 18 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

Who knew Trump's job plan would mean giving jobs to all these unemployable losers.

Meanwhile, the interview with Mark Warner on the radio this morning about the intelligence community's checks on Trump was chilling. Not that they necessarily couldn't do it, but there was such a dark tone in his voice every time he had to say "let's hope that hypothetic does not come to pass" when asked how to would respond to an order to bring back something illegal, like torture

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 12:43 (seven years ago) link

Nytimes (and other) editorials have been working overtime, but this brings up yet another issue with his inchoate policy:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/opinion/donald-trumps-plan-to-purge-the-nation.html

Observations in the piece:

Start with the fact that the target number is made up. There simply aren’t as many criminal immigrants as he imagines. According to rough estimates by the Migration Policy Institute, of the country’s 11 million unauthorized immigrants, about 820,000 have criminal records. About 300,000 of those have felony convictions and are presumably the bad people Mr. Trump is talking about. If he deports those and only those, it will be a remarkable display of law-enforcement discretion, since he said that there were lots of “terrific people” among the unauthorized who might be allowed to stay, “after the border is secured and after everything gets normalized.”

And yet he also said that two million to three million would go, a population about the size of Chicago’s. He would have to haul away a lot of terrific people, and terrorize many more, to hit that mark. This would require a vast conscription of state and local law enforcement against people who pose no threat. It would mean a surge in home and workplace raids, investigations and traffic stops.

It took the Obama administration eight years to deport 2.5 million immigrants. The threat of Mr. Trump chasing that number right off the bat is the reason immigrant communities are so terrified. But the damage won’t be immediate: He can’t just load two million people onto buses and planes and ship them out. He’ll first have to stuff them into the bottleneck of the immigration courts, where there are too few judges and lawyers for a swollen caseload, and fill detention cells to bursting. Mr. Trump may be unaware of due process, or in denial about it, but it exists.

Scalzi/TPM "Trump's Razor" remains in full effect, that when in doubt, stupid prevails. Which obviously does not mean Trump can't continue to fail forward, but short of changing laws just getting anything done legal takes time once he's in office. It is just inconceivable that a man whose selfish life has been about nothing but paying for shortcuts and finding ways to hide and move money to get his way will be able to tolerate true bureaucracy. I can't even see how Trump will smoothly make the transition from private figure to public servant.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 12:50 (seven years ago) link

Jeff Sessions is AG.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Times bullet-points:

President-elect Donald J. Trump has offered Jeff Sessions the post of attorney general, according to officials close to the transition.
Mr. Sessions was denied a federal judgeship by the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1986 because of racially charged comments.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 12:58 (seven years ago) link

He is no doubt a piece of shit.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

On CBS News this morning, they said the Secret Service is working on making the glass in the Trump Tower penthouse bulletproof. That's right, folks...the glass in Trump Tower is currently not bulletproof. And this was announced on the news.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:42 (seven years ago) link

jeff sessions is bad news for marijuana legalization. This is a guy that said “Good People Don’t Smoke Marijuana” and that the only problem with the KKK was that they smoked weed.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

"racially charged"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:49 (seven years ago) link

he's a firebrand!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:51 (seven years ago) link

controversial too!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

The bulletproof glass thing got me thinking. Apart from the problem of having tons of branded properties all over the world that are now suddenly juicy targets for nefarious baddies, isn't Trump probably one of the most blackmailable people on earth? All the stuff that HASN'T come out.. All the financial shenanigans, all the hookers, all the sexual assault victims. People like that don't get security clearances right? Except he will.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

In a sense yes, otoh he may be the least blackmailable in an effective sense, in that he ends up getting a pass on everything

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 13:58 (seven years ago) link

yeah a tape is going to come out with him and two underage hookers and I'm sure we'll all just laugh it off

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

The American public won't even blink when Trump's spirit cooking tapes are released.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 18 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

Hm. Guys, I'm beginning to think Trump might not make such a good president after all?

Frederik B, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

I wonder when the post-Brexit buyer's remorse will start to kick in on this one.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 18 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

The bulletproof glass thing got me thinking. Apart from the problem of having tons of branded properties all over the world that are now suddenly juicy targets for nefarious baddies, isn't Trump probably one of the most blackmailable people on earth? All the stuff that HASN'T come out.. All the financial shenanigans, all the hookers, all the sexual assault victims. People like that don't get security clearances right? Except he will.

actually he's kinda unblackmailable since he's impervious to scandals!

iatee, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

The American public won't even blink when Trump's spirit cooking tapes are released.

just a healthy display of his alpha male dominance

cucky ramen-o (will), Friday, 18 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

xp err looks like everyone else pointed that out

iatee, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

Jeff Sessions is AG.

I don't really understand why people take these cabinet positions. is being AG a better gig than being a senator? it's not more prestigious, it doesn't make it easier to run for another office and it's a job with a fixed end date. being a senator in a safe state seems like a pretty good job.

iatee, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

Depends on what you want to achieve, I guess. AG has the power to get things done alone that a Senator can't do.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 18 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

It's a safe bet Kanye will win the presidency in 2020.

Evan, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

I wonder when the post-Brexit buyer's remorse will start to kick in on this one.

kinda getting irritated by all the people praising him for doing some not-horrible things - meeting with Romney, for example. just saw a surrogate say something like "he doesn't care about personal grudges, he just wants the best person for the job" like...oh really?

now this lobbyist ban actually looks like something useful, though I'm sure Trump himself won't abide by it, and I think that goodwill is undone by his position on campaign finance laws, which would essentially let one filthy rich person bankroll a campaign by themselves

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

I mean, seriously

“It goes back to Trump’s goal to make sure people aren’t using government to enrich themselves,” transition spokesman Sean Spicer said on a call with reporters.

are we not talking about the guy who funneled a ton of donor money through his own businesses? the guy who jacked up his own campaign office's rent fivefold?

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

They guy who charged the Secret Service $1.6 million to fly on his private 747.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

I think we should look to Brazil as instructive -- when corruption is endemic, it's very easy for a corrupt party in power to use it against a corrupt party not in power. I don't think democrats are exactly free of corruption, and it will make them vulnerable.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

btw if you follow him on Twitter he's been talking about "saving" a Ford plant which uh...wasn't going anywhere

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/us/politics/donald-trump-takes-credit-for-helping-to-save-a-ford-plant-that-wasnt-closing.html?_r=0

This is one of his strangest and most disgusting qualities - how many times during the debates did he say "nobody talked about this before I brought it up"? Same mentality which sees the birther crusade as a favor to Barack Obama. Dude is nuts.

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

he's just shameless. his supporters are certifiable though.

cucky ramen-o (will), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

A useful thing in general that I'm trying to remind myself: Trump, his campaign and his supporters rely heavily on trolling. They may or may not believe what they/he says at all times. But they definitely want to rile us up to the point of paralysis and unclear thinking, and I'm trying to avoid that.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

kanye is so fucking dumb

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

Like when Trump just said RBG should resign, my first reaction was fear, but once I got a grip I felt the right response is more "eat a dick."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

the ford plant lie is infuriating. he's been the "PEOTUS" for a week and a half. we're going to have to learn to marshal our stores of disgust.

Jeff Sessions is AG.

I don't really understand why people take these cabinet positions. is being AG a better gig than being a senator? it's not more prestigious, it doesn't make it easier to run for another office and it's a job with a fixed end date. being a senator in a safe state seems like a pretty good job.

― iatee, Friday, November 18, 2016 8:36 AM (forty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

congresspeople, even senators, i'm given to understand, spend the majority of their time fundraising. the rest of the time is listening to people beg you for a line item in a bill somewhere. a cabinet post is like, you get to actually command something, have a budget, hire and fire.

goole, Friday, 18 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

A useful thing in general that I'm trying to remind myself: Trump, his campaign and his supporters rely heavily on trolling. They may or may not believe what they/he says at all times. But they definitely want to rile us up to the point of paralysis and unclear thinking, and I'm trying to avoid that.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, November 18, 2016 9:19 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes, they want to provoke a particular response (fear, despair, resignation, capitulation) and it's incumbent upon us to not respond according to their wishes. But beyond even that, I'm trying to remind myself and others to more generally not allow a handful of elected officials and appointees dictate the tone of an entire country.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

A useful thing in general that I'm trying to remind myself: Trump, his campaign and his supporters rely heavily on trolling. They may or may not believe what they/he says at all times.

yeah something I'm hearing a lot from Trump supporters in response to all the "he's not doing what he said he was gonna do" stories - "lol we knew he didn't mean any of that". feels a lot like Scott Adams-style "everything that happens fits my narrative because I'm on a different level than you" garbage.

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

"PEOTUS" - some people call him Maurice

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 November 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

remnick piece on obama was incredible

marcos, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

I really would like everyone saying "this is not normal" would go back and actually read through the history of the United States and what this country has done to practically every marginalized group it has ever encountered.

It's helpful to say that the path we are currently on is dangerous; saying it's not "normal" is to glibly ignore all of the horrendous things that have happened in this country's history and to falsely conflate "normal" with "good" and "desireable". The problem is much deeper and much more insidious than that. This is, after all, the same country that lynched members of my family less than 100 years ago; in the global scale of history, that was yesterday.

¶ (DJP), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

DJP otm history is always instructive

altho tbf having a totally unqualified/unprepared moron as chief executive is def not normal

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

re: that Kendizor link "The days of Free Speech may soon end." I'm getting kinda sick of proclamations like this. We're basically building such a bogeyman that if Trump doesn't end up actually having journalists gunned down in the street he'll look moderate against expectations.

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

Trump’s appointees need to get confirmed. Attorney General-designee Jeff Sessions, whose nomination to a federal judgeship was blocked in the 1980s by a bipartisan group of senators because of alleged racist comments he had made as U.S. attorney, will not be able to coast through the Judiciary Committee, despite the fact he is a member. (In fact, that actually hurts his prospects – because he cannot vote for himself.)

lol totally forgot about this. confirmation hearings will be fun (I bet he gets in tho)

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

I'm getting kinda sick of proclamations like this.

agreed that hysteria is not a good look. basically the flipside of "they're comin for our guns!"/FEMA camps/we're at WAR WITH ISLAM stuff

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

xpost Senators voting down another Senator is not going to happen

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

true, but imagine the grandstanding

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

the thrilling empty threats, the blatant lies, the partisan bickering

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

agreed that hysteria is not a good look. basically the flipside of "they're comin for our guns!"/FEMA camps/we're at WAR WITH ISLAM stuff

^alas, that hysteria proved to be effective

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

on the subject of leftist steps moving forward, just wanted to take a moment to note the two middle-aged glassy-eyed crank socialist white guys who spent their evening last night outside of a town hall for columbia grad workers contemplating our upcoming union election, trying to berate students (who are already being swayed by an aggressive anti-union campaign from their bosses) into voting 'no' because the UAW ''supports trump'' and anyway because unions are a reformist tool of capitalism and only revolutionary politics represent true solidarity with other workers. not the actual workers in front of them, telling them that they personally, desperately, needed this union in order to get paid on time and secure protections against the depradations of trump as well as columbia, but some other workers somewhere else. to be fair they spent most of this argument convinced they were talking to barnard contingent faculty at a barnard event, so maybe those are the workers they were thinking of. suggestions that they leave and find the people they were actually looking for were viewed with evident suspicion --- a classic reformist trick of the economic nationalists at UAW headquarters, no doubt!

mostly i focused on trying to shepherd students up the stairs in good cheer, and making it clear that the intensive loud men shoving flyers at them were not affiliated with our union. i would have rather been helping set up the refreshment tables but so it goes.

at one point, after they switched to calling us the ''columbia faculty'' and waxing on about how it took the bolsheviks (he struggled to get the name right) to bring revolution in russia, i pointed out that i don't stand outside their meetings telling people the communists or some other group that is not the World Socialist Web (or whatever their flyers said they were) are inside, and they accused me of red-baiting. a student felt so harassed by them that she went to get campus security; they said ''the UAW is calling the police on protesters!'' and started filming her (and her six-month-old baby) on their cellphones. solidarity!

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

Er ''intense'' not ''intensive''

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

re: that Kendizor link "The days of Free Speech may soon end." I'm getting kinda sick of proclamations like this. We're basically building such a bogeyman that if Trump doesn't end up actually having journalists gunned down in the street he'll look moderate against expectations.

exactly, not trying to underestimate the awfulness here but we're going to slip into this same pattern where Trump gets praised for any little baby steps he takes towards being "presidential"

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

^alas, that hysteria proved to be effective

yeah but I would prefer our side to be somewhat fact-based

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

things are gonna be bad enough, no need to go full-blown makin-shit-up-to-be-scary

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

i completely agree shakey. just making a minor "btw" point.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

Things will be bad, things will probably not be as bad as the worst predictions, and the worst predictions would ideally be framed in terms of 'this is how bad it COULD get and why, and here's what you can do to help forestall the malignity' rather than 'TRUMP WILL LITERALLY EAT YOUR CHILDREN IN FRONT OF YOU, BE VERY AFRAID' (which is not at all what I'm suggesting Kendzior's piece does).

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

The emphasis should be on skepticism, pragmatism, vigilance, and practical positive action.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

otm

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

I really would like everyone saying "this is not normal" would go back and actually read through the history of the United States and what this country has done to practically every marginalized group it has ever encountered.

It's helpful to say that the path we are currently on is dangerous; saying it's not "normal" is to glibly ignore all of the horrendous things that have happened in this country's history and to falsely conflate "normal" with "good" and "desireable". The problem is much deeper and much more insidious than that. This is, after all, the same country that lynched members of my family less than 100 years ago; in the global scale of history, that was yesterday.

― ¶ (DJP), Friday, 18 November 2016 16:19 (forty minutes ago) Permalink

Yes. This is why I hated the "normal" language during the campaign. "Normal" is not the goal here. "Normal" is a false security blanket. Liberal cocooning with grubhub and prestige television. Trump didn't make Jeff Sessions out of clay, he is in the fucking US Senate.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

he is made of clay tho

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

the "normal" language may not be accurate re: history but I think a lot of the intent is motivational - these people having power should not be just another administration, don't become indifferent to the consequences (esp if you don't face any yourself), stay pissed off rather than depressed and hopeless.

JoeStork, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

isn't this also about the notion of "normalization"—of accepting false frameworks that do violence as inevitable or acceptable

obviously, lots of bullshit is already normalized—black lives matter was largely a push against the normalization of something terrifying & real & violent. I think the push against normalization is OK if it's done w/out acting as if its an exclusively new thing.

it's a bit of a fine needle to thread, to point out that trump is uniquely bad but also teh systems that have rewarded him are just one data point in a long line of structural violence

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

You can achieve the same effect with "This is not right".

¶ (DJP), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

on npr this morning they interviewed a woman who worked with gen flynn in afghanistan.. she said some nice things but also said he was as organized as pigpen from the peanuts. when asked what her reaction to his appointment was, "my heart sank"

awesome!

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

I prefer that these ideologues be incompetent tbh. incompetence will wreak its own damage/havoc, but I'm inclined to say the situation would be worse if Trump had a team of people who really knew how to get shit done and had terrible ideas, rather than a team that doesn't know how to do a goddamn thing and has terrible ideas.

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

at the risk of bringing up the Nazi comparisons again, one of the things that made them so awful was that they were so competent and bureaucratic

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

srs question: was J Edgar Hoover competent?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

with these clowns the worst crimes are going to be lack of oversight i.e., what they enable more competent ideologues (like Ryan, local law enforcement, intelligence operatives, etc.) to execute

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

dude Hoover was a master

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

at keeping his job for almost 50 years, at least. xxp

it's possible this 'team' will have a hard time eclipsing the batshit thuggery of the Reaganauts, but records were made to be broken

also, the stakes are higher now

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-identity-liberalism.html
this is maybe the worst piece I've read since the election

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

he published that the day trump announced his third racist cabinet member...

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

"Liberal cocooning with grubhub and prestige television"

this is most of the country forever though. not just now and not just liberals. as a people just really good at not thinking about what the government does and what people in power do. or they just figure they can't do anything about it. i dunno. iraq is a distant memory to a lot of people here. they couldn't tell you what has happened there in the last however many years. how many people could?

scott seward, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

You can achieve the same effect with "This is not right".

― ¶ (DJP), Friday, November 18, 2016 11:20 AM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah i agree obv, i didn't mean to defend the specific phrase "this is not normal" so much as reflect on the notion of "normalization"—where we are worn down to accept what's wrong as the status quo, & the debilitating, traumatizing effects of that. I think there's value in talking about that effect, and fighting it by continually reminding yourself "this is not right."

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

it's never been right. but yeah i guess this is the new improved even worse now.

scott seward, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

liberal cocooning with grubhub and prestige television is the modern day equivalent of middle class folk cocooning with their color tv and tract housing in the burbs

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

shit coming home, they think, to people who have been insulated from most forms of oppression heretofore

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/14/chuck-schumer-the-worst-possible-democratic-leader-at-the-worst-possible-time/

So we have to count on this guy to lead the opposition?

curmudgeon, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

it's a country based on dominance. built and based on it. and that's the bargain everyone who lives here makes in order to have all the crap that we have. not to question too much how we get it. we all do it.

scott seward, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

sorry, need more coffee didn't mean to go all chomsky! gonna go listen to blue cheer.

scott seward, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

no, Schumer v likely to be useless. end run around him

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

I prefer that these ideologues be incompetent tbh. incompetence will wreak its own damage/havoc, but I'm inclined to say the situation would be worse if Trump had a team of people who really knew how to get shit done and had terrible ideas, rather than a team that doesn't know how to do a goddamn thing and has terrible ideas.

indeed. someone (Eichenwald?) had a good piece about how Trump is kind of blowing his political capital early on for no reason. at the very least it's gonna be fun to watch this all unfold.

frogbs, Friday, 18 November 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

I do not think this will be fun

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

from the intercept article - this shit is definitely going to happen imo

Schumer has long been the Democrats’ point man in efforts to craft a bipartisan deal to slash taxes on multinational corporations.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

yes, he reiterated his intention on this a couple weeks before Clinton's inevitable victory

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

yeah I don't foresee any concerted resistance to a tax cut that vastly benefits the wealthy, unless Warren or Sanders mount a lonely filibuster or something

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

so what do we know about pompeo?

, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

Benghazi dude, Koch puppet, this Zerohedge piece is actually decent:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-18/meet-mike-pompeo-new-director-cia

sleeve, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/us/intensified-by-climate-change-king-tides-change-ways-of-life-in-florida.html

would mar a lagos be prone to flooding? maybe nothing will convince trump of global warming except trying to get coverage under his insurance policies

, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

nah he'd claim the flooding was due to water displaced by all those refugees cramming into boats

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

after visiting gitmo pompeo said of the hunger strikers that a lot of them looked like they had put on weight

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

with these clowns the worst crimes are going to be lack of oversight i.e., what they enable more competent ideologues (like Ryan, local law enforcement, intelligence operatives, etc.) to execute

yeah, I imagine the Trump scandals will be like Reagan's, where underlings' actions spring from the climate set by the President's rhetoric, even when he gives no specific orders.

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

Steve Bannon is not a nice guy: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/11/stephen-bannon-facebook-group-racist-material-obama-death-threats

Frederik B, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/surlyurbanist/status/799414446959435776 (via jamelle bouie)

this seems like the sort of nuanced take on the intersection of race and class

I read the stratification economics piece. The fact that Trump wants to eliminate the estate tax is now something else that can be added to the list of racist things.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

iatee made a post years back about the estate tax that has stuck with me. paraphrasing: "basically the most defensible tax ever. money doesn't come out of the economy and you didn't do anything to deserve it other than being born. should be 100%."

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

anybody here in/near Louisiana?

http://theslot.jezebel.com/a-runoff-election-in-louisiana-could-help-democrats-in-1788959475

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

Yes, in contact with Campbell's cousin via reddit. Expect to phone bank in N.O.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

*high five*

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

money doesn't come out of the economy and you didn't do anything to deserve it other than being born. should be 100%

the 100% part is either trolling and/or stupid, unless you prefer "government" to "people," but I think the estate tax is important to keep and the current rate is good. It applies to so few as it is.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

“The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years.

o rly

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

From THR:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”

goole, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

It is clear when we return to our conversation that it is not just the liberal establishment that Bannon feels he has triumphed over, but the conservative one too — not least of all Fox News and its owners, the Murdochs. “They got it more wrong than anybody,” he says. “Rupert is a globalist and never understood Trump. To him, Trump is a radical. Now they’ll go centrist and build the network around Megyn Kelly.”

goole, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

The estate tax could be used as a tool to effectively redistribute wealth, but any change to the estate tax that upset the current class structure would never be passed, because the current class structure would never allow itself to be disturbed.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

I'm all for Bannon's aggressive gov't spending on infrastructure plan, what a weird thing to try and get the GOP to do tho

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

“He gets it, he gets it intuitively,” says Bannon, perhaps still surprised he has found such an ideal vessel. “You have probably the greatest orator since William Jennings Bryan, coupled with an economic populist message and two political parties that are so owned by the donors that they don’t speak to their audience. But he speaks in a non-political vernacular, he communicates with these people in a very visceral way. Nobody in the Democratic party listened to his speeches, so they had no idea he was delivering such a compelling and powerful economic message. He shows up 3.5 hours late in Michigan at 1 in the morning and has 35,000 people waiting in the cold. When they got [Clinton] off the donor circuit she went to Temple University and they drew 300 or 400 kids.”

Indeed, during the worst days of the campaign, even down to the last day when most in Trumpland thought only a miracle would save them, “I knew that she couldn’t close. They out-spent us ten to one, had ten times more people and had all the media with them, but I kept saying it doesn’t matter, they got it all wrong, we’ve got this locked.”

...

“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”

goole, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

I can't read it, did the THR reporter at least have the guts to ask how massive tax cuts for the .01% favor the little guy he's going to use to dominate politics forevermore?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

The estate tax could be used as a tool to effectively redistribute wealth, but any change to the estate tax that upset the current class structure would never be passed, because the current class structure would never allow itself to be disturbed.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, November 18, 2016 11:53 AM (fifty-seven seconds ago)

what are you even saying here?

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

Let's be clear: "infrastructure spending" in Trumpspeak is "tax breaks for private companies investing in highways near rich suburbs, and I believe Democrats are stupid enough to fall for it.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up.

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

yeah good luck passing your trillion dollar infrastructure bill through dems and gop senators you fucking despise

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

what an arrogant asshole

global tetrahedron, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

"asshole" is too kind because you can do pleasurable things to assholes

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

bannon is clearly v v smart

Mordy, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

im sure this prick is part of the 'FUCK YOU CUCKS WE WON' attitude coming out of trump tower

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

but assholes largely do only two rather unpleasurable things to their surroundings xxp

jingo unchained (Will M.), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

cultivate assholes, Will

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

Does he think this (rebuild heavy industry whilst cutting taxes everywhere) is going to work or is it all a front

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

define "work" ?

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

I mean does he sincerely believe in rebuilding these industries and creating jobs, and that this is possible even though they're obviously going to cut taxes and privatise everything they can?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

that is def not clear

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

Thomas Cromwell got his head chopped off...

Frederik B, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

xp - he definitely believes in Reagan's trickle down economics, or at least that is the theory being tested here.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

trying to guess his motivations is basically a coin flip of "stupid or evil" but that's same as it ever was with the GOP

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

it's that kind of binary thinking that's destroying this country and this thread. We need to accept "Yes And" ... it can be stupid AND evil.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Thomas Cromwell got his head chopped off...

shhh don't spoil it for him

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

I chuckled at that an hour ago, thanks for reminding me. I will chortle now.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

"It will be as exciting as the 1930s"

(somber synthesizer music) (doo dah), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

It will be as exciting as the 1930s

what no

NO

j., Friday, 18 November 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure he was thinking of AMERICA in the 1930s and not GERMANY

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

well I wouldn't say the 30s were boring!

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

xps

Yeah. Reading about Trump's various horrifying appointments, it seems pretty clear that they're all anti-union, anti-regulation. Without unions and regulations you can't stop the global market dictating whether a steel mill in a given town stays open or shuts down? So I'm trying to parse what this new infrastructure build (with none of these protections in place) would actually look like.

I mean, I suppose it could be that they bring back regulation but just not the good kind - no to worker's rights, yes to selectively rewarding companies if they keep a plant open somewhere so that Trump can claim credit for it?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

they have no fucking idea what they're doing, it's a frankenstein monster of mismatched policy ideas that will not achieve their purported goals. they *will* make Bannon's "donor class" phenomenally richer though.

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

Trump fiscal policy is going to be the most costly, distortionary and regressive shit imaginable

flopson, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

xps Those TVA projects were far-out man

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

what isn't clear to me is if it's a scam or if Trump really is dumb enough to think massive tax cuts for the wealthy create jobs/benefit Bannon's "working class"

he probably is that dumb now that I think about it

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Or he thinks his fans are that dumb.

nickn, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

Trump is a real-estate dude so instead of fixing roads or building schools his stimulus is gonna be a tax-cut to developers

flopson, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

That, and the Autobahns + draining of Italian marshes comes to mind.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

i don't think bannon is pushing for tax cuts?

, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

“You have probably the greatest orator since William Jennings Bryan"

surely he meant a noun other than "orator". Maybe "patio chair."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

xp Pence and Nicol are all about that though?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

trump got to where he is because of the gop. he owes them. all they care about is tax cuts for rich people. they'll get what they want.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

Trump is a real-estate dude so instead of fixing roads or building schools his stimulus is gonna be a tax-cut to developers

― flopson, Friday, November 18, 2016 12:26 PM (three minutes ago)

Exactly. If you read his tax plan in this context it is very consistent.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

He also has this major plan for returning offshore income to this country. I'm not entirely sure how that works.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

He also has this major plan for returning offshore income to this country. I'm not entirely sure how that works.

― sarahell, Friday, November 18, 2016 3:33 PM (twenty-six seconds ago) Bookmark

cut the income repatriation tax, or put in a year long tax holiday

, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

There's no contradiction between Bannon's "ideas" for massive infrastructure investment and the right-wingness of everything else if you look at it as fascism. That is what the fascists did. More and more the political fight of the moment looks like it's between neoliberal globalism and a kind of vulgar ethnic nationalism - and either way the right wing wins

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

guys im starting to freak the fuck out again

marcos, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

any stated goal to bring jobs to the US and improve the lives of working class Americans is not going to happen, and that is by design. That is not what Trump or any Republican is interested in. They are only trying to find ways to put more money in the pockets of rich people and corporations, period. If you are confused about this, you are as gullible as the people that voted for Trump.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

seeing (somewhat specious) reports that huckabee will be ambassador the Israel & move the embassy to jerusalem?

Clay, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

bannon's comment about "it'll be as exciting as the 30s" brings up for me something i've been mulling

i've come to the conclusion that a massive portion of the electorate voted for trump because they're bored to death, full-stop. i guess i've read versions of this elsewhere, but not stated flat-out. i'd like to see studies of this. like, how many ppl voted for trump not bc they especially thought he'd succeed at doing anything beneficial, but simply because it would be a kick to see what happens. something insane, and wildly entertaining, is bound to happen, no? isn't that, ultimately, the only *promise* of his campaign? isn't that the only thing anyone can count on? he even bragged about it, "i'm going to keep you in suspense."

the places where trump gained the most traction are by and large boring places, and they've become even more boring in recent decades, as Main Street has been replaced by box stores, and young people by old. terminal boredom.

to echo sarahell (iirc) upthread a bit, it's a YES AND thing. Duh I'm not saying the 39,000 other factors don't count, but this one counts for more than has been acknowledged.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/donald-trump-voters-pennsylvania-blue-collar-214466

“I can take you out there,” he said, nodding in the direction of the factory floor, “and introduce you to my black friends. I’ve called them the N-word, and they’ve called me the N-word. It’s reality.”

He asked me if anybody had ever called me that. I’m 39 and white. I told him no. He seemed surprised. “You ever heard them on a rap song?”

I was not expecting our conversation to have gone this way, and my facial expression must have suggested as much. Byich tried again.

“Ever pick up a dictionary?” he said. “Read the definition of a N-word. It’s an object that does work for another thing. Google it.”

So I Googled the word, and up onto my screen popped the definition: “Noun. Offensive. A contemptuous term for a black or dark-skinned person.” I slid my phone across the table.

Byich put on his industrial-strength safety glasses.

“Really?” he said. “Are you serious?”

iatee, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

any stated goal to bring jobs to the US and improve the lives of working class Americans is not going to happen, and that is by design. That is not what Trump or any Republican is interested in.

Just to say - yeah I wasn't taken in by it/don't think anyone itt is taken in.

There is an opportunity here though right, where the big claim to make all these jobs ends up in total failure? If the people who voted Trump aren't any richer or any better employed at the end of his term?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

any stated goal to bring jobs to the US and improve the lives of working class Americans is not going to happen, and that is by design. That is not what Trump or any Republican is interested in. They are only trying to find ways to put more money in the pockets of rich people and corporations, period. If you are confused about this, you are as gullible as the people that voted for Trump.

― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, November 18, 2016 3:38 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark

idk - it seems trump/bannon's brand of economic populism is at odds with the GOP. it's a puzzle to me how they're going to push through both tax cuts (favored by GOP) and large scale infrastructure (favored by bannon).

, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

He also has this major plan for returning offshore income to this country. I'm not entirely sure how that works.

― sarahell, Friday, November 18, 2016 8:33 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is a scam. it basically is amnesty for tax evasion.. just pay the corruption tax and all is forgiven. and yeah this is what I was referring to upthread about shit schumer is totally into.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

any stated goal to bring jobs to the US and improve the lives of working class Americans is not going to happen, and that is by design.

I think they want to bring jobs to the US, the issue is whether those jobs will be permanent or temporary (like the infrastructure plan which does refer to the New Deal, but also to Hitler's hearts and minds strategy). Will they have a secondary goal of dismantling unions? Will the generous profit margins these contracts would give be earmarked for Trump cronies or will there be a fair bidding process? Will the processes for these infrastructure developments lead to test cases that will dismantle legal protections that have been in place for half a century or more? I feel like your oversimplification is ignoring how much more insidious this is capable of being.

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

xxp

they are not at all at odds, they are complementary. Here's how Vox describes Trump's infrastructure plan:

What Trump has right now is an idiosyncratic proposal for Congress to offer some $137 billion in tax breaks to private investors who want to finance toll roads, toll bridges, or other projects that generate their own revenue streams. But this private financing scheme, experts across the political spectrum say, wouldn’t address many of America’s most pressing infrastructure needs — like repairing existing roads or replacing leaky water mains in poorer communities like Flint. It’s a narrow, inadequate policy.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

Yeah. Reading about Trump's various horrifying appointments, it seems pretty clear that they're all anti-union, anti-regulation. Without unions and regulations you can't stop the global market dictating whether a steel mill in a given town stays open or shuts down? So I'm trying to parse what this new infrastructure build (with none of these protections in place) would actually look like.

Industry is given freedom so long as they serve the volk?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 18 November 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

xp milo - ja wohl

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

holy fuckin shit @ that politico story

goole, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

this is a scam. it basically is amnesty for tax evasion.. just pay the corruption tax and all is forgiven. and yeah this is what I was referring to upthread about shit schumer is totally into.

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, November 18, 2016 12:49 PM (four minutes ago)

my surface impression is that they would pay a modest penalty, that's like pennies on the dollar. On the other hand, would they have paid anything under current law?

sarahell, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

moodles - those are tax breaks for developers, not the wholesale rewriting of the federal income tax code and the corporate tax code for individuals that the GOP wants

, Friday, 18 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

how many online petitions do ppl feel like signing

http://act.weareultraviolet.org/sign/stop_sessions/?aktmid=tm2855373.s2oBvE&t=1&source=conf

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

also that whitehouse.gov appoint Garland petition hit its goal so now let's gird ourselves for the "thanks but nah" answer

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump Agrees to Pay $25 Million in Trump University Settlement
By STEVE EDER

Donald J. Trump has reversed course and agreed to pay $25 million to settle a series of lawsuits stemming from his defunct for-profit education venture, Trump University, finally putting to rest fraud allegations by former students, which have dogged him for years and hampered his presidential campaign.

The settlement was announced by the New York attorney general on Friday, just 10 days before one of the cases, a federal class-action lawsuit in San Diego, was set to be heard by a jury. The deal, if approved, averts a potentially embarrassing and highly unusual predicament: a president-elect on trial, and possibly even taking the stand in his own defense, while scrambling to build his incoming administration.

It was a remarkable concession from a real estate mogul who derides legal settlements and has mocked fellow businessmen who agree to them....

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/us/politics/trump-university.html

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/us/politics/trump-university.html
Donald Trump Agrees to Pay $25 Million in Trump University Settlement

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 18 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

haha

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 18 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

does this surprise anybody

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

"I don't settle"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

he's settled tons of times

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

well that's why he said that

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

ha yes

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

@becket
Trump is driving to New Jersey and Lincoln Tunnel is shut down for his motorcade at 5 p.m. on a Friday.

this guy

mookieproof, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

Quick question for people: does calling Congress and signing petitions accomplish anything substantial, or is it mostly a means to blow off steam? Like, does anyone but Trump have the power to rescind the offer to Bannon? Sessions? Etc? What is the hope in writing letters and leaving messages?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

Bannon no, but Sessions needs congressional approval

rob, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

sorry, senate not all congress

rob, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

But what does calling achieve? He is already a senator, he already has a history of being rebuked for racial insensitivity. Why would they change their mind now?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile, Vince Neil signed up to play the inauguration. This is like the ultimate snobs versus slobs comedy, except not funny.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

axl rose denounced jeff sessions

mookieproof, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/SalenaZito/status/799732646695686144

dem senator joe manchin says he supports sessions

, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

see you back home in 2018, fucknut

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

senators are always gonna protect their own, plus manchin is up for re-election in 2 years in what is iirc the reddest state in the country (at least in terms of presidential voting)

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

Trump is driving to New Jersey and Lincoln Tunnel is shut down for his motorcade at 5 p.m. on a Friday.

Christie: This fuckin' guy...

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Friday, 18 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

one upside to appointing a bunch of senators to these posts is there's a chance we could steal a seat in the special elections that follow their appointments

k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

Quick question for people: does calling Congress and signing petitions accomplish anything substantial, or is it mostly a means to blow off steam?

calling congress - definitely, those ppl listen to their constituents
signing petitions - eh, who knows and I kind of doubt it otoh it is super-easy so why not, what do I have to lose

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

But calling someone who is not my congressman, in another state ... ?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

Sessions and Pompeo will both get confirmed (unless someone filibusters Sessions, which I guess is possible but idk who it would be - not Ted Cruz lol)

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

But calling someone who is not my congressman, in another state ... ?

this accomplishes nothing, unless they are the Majority/Minority Leader of their party, in which case they have broader responsibilities to the party

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

ie Schumer has to listen to his party on some level, or he will lose his leadership position (as he should, imo because he is worse than useless)

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

"
Scott Goldsmith for Politico Magazine
THE FRIDAY COVER
What Trump Voters Want Now
The blue-collar workers who put Donald Trump in the White House are ready for him to deliver. How much time will they give him?
By MICHAEL KRUSE November 18, 2016
Facebook
Twitter
Google +
Email
Comment
Print

MOST POPULAR
The nation’s cartoonists on the week in politics
Trump's appointment of son-in-law could rest on Clinton precedent
Trump names Mike Flynn national security adviser
David Brock gathering donors to ‘kick Donald Trump’s ass’
Kanye West: If I voted, I would have voted for Trump

JOHNSTOWN, Pa.—The night of the election, in this dying little city stuck in the hills of mostly rural, depressed western Pennsylvania, Joey Del Signore dozed off in his recliner. The 60-year-old catering company owner and lifelong resident woke up around 3 a.m., opened his eyes and focused on the words stripped across his television screen: President Donald Trump. “My dream come true,” Del Signore said the other day.

In Portage, 20 miles outside of town, Pam Schilling, 59, a retired grocery store meat wrapper whose son died in April of a heroin overdose, sat in her living room, alone except for her tiny Yorkie named Rudy, glued to the news. She stayed up all night. “I was so excited,” she said.

And at his house half an hour north, Tim Byich, a 57-year-old technician and manager at a manufacturing plant, watched the coverage “like it was a football game,” he said, wired by the surprise reversal and a few too many Genesee Lights. “I got toasted,” he admitted.

They had earned the right to celebrate. There are, easy to say now, many reasons Trump won, but high on the list are people like Del Signore and Schilling and Byich. Trump’s road to the White House ran through Cambria County, where once steel and coal let people with high school educations buy houses and take vacations and lead relatively want-not middle-class lives—and where it doesn’t work that way anymore. In this Rust Belt notch, where peeling paint, vacant storefronts and the dark hulks of shuttered mills are reminders of all that’s been lost, Trump’s mantra of Make America Great Again sounded not like a ball-cap slogan but a last-ditch chance—to reverse an economic decline that has been choking this region for decades.

“Your government betrayed you, and I’m going to make it right,” Trump told a boisterous crowd at the Cambria County War Memorial Arena less than three weeks before Election Day. “Your jobs will come back under a Trump administration,” he said. “Your steel will come back,” he said. “We’re putting your miners back to work,” he said.

The people here who voted for Trump want all that. They want him to loosen environmental regulations. They want their taxes to go down and their incomes to go up. They want to see fewer drugs on their streets and more control of the Mexican border. They want him to “run the country like a business.” And they want this fast. So now comes the hard part for Trump—turning rhetoric into results. Four years ago, the largely Democratic voters in Cambria County flipped on President Obama, disgusted that he had not made good on his promise of change. What’s clear from a series of interviews with Trump supporters here is that they will turn on Trump, too, if he doesn’t deliver.

Donald Trump rallies supporters at the Cambria County War Memorial Arena in Johnstown in October 2016. | AP Photo
Donald Trump rallies supporters at the Cambria County War Memorial Arena in Johnstown in October 2016. | AP Photo
All the talk about the “white working class” creates an impression of a monolithic and homogenous base of support. But in one conversation after another, voters revealed meaningful distinctions about what issues they most want solved. Some might want a wall sturdy enough to stop the drug traffickers, but others are paying much closer attention to whether there’s a bump in the payroll at the last coal mine. And that variation—plus the urgency expressed by those who swung so passionately for Trump—suggests less a permanent bloc than an anxious and impatient coalition that could fracture as quickly as it formed. It’s only 10 days after this oft-overlooked, tucked-away part of Pennsylvania helped put Trump in the Oval Office—and the clock is ticking.

“I think you’ll start seeing improvements in six months,” Bill Polacek said in his corner office at JWF Industries, where he’s one of the owners of one of Johnstown’s last manufacturing plants.

Dave Kirsch stood in the parking lot of Himmel’s Coal Yard in Carrolltown, where he drives a truck, and expressed optimism and preached patience—not, though, that much patience. “My boss, he’s a pretty smart man,” Kirsch told me, “and he said it can’t change overnight, but he said give it six months to a year.”"

Huh

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 18 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

Sorry guys, this is what I meant to post

"All the talk about the “white working class” creates an impression of a monolithic and homogenous base of support. But in one conversation after another, voters revealed meaningful distinctions about what issues they most want solved. Some might want a wall sturdy enough to stop the drug traffickers, but others are paying much closer attention to whether there’s a bump in the payroll at the last coal mine. And that variation—plus the urgency expressed by those who swung so passionately for Trump—suggests less a permanent bloc than an anxious and impatient coalition that could fracture as quickly as it formed. It’s only 10 days after this oft-overlooked, tucked-away part of Pennsylvania helped put Trump in the Oval Office—and the clock is ticking.

“I think you’ll start seeing improvements in six months,” Bill Polacek said in his corner office at JWF Industries, where he’s one of the owners of one of Johnstown’s last manufacturing plants.

Dave Kirsch stood in the parking lot of Himmel’s Coal Yard in Carrolltown, where he drives a truck, and expressed optimism and preached patience—not, though, that much patience. “My boss, he’s a pretty smart man,” Kirsch told me, “and he said it can’t change overnight, but he said give it six months to a year.”"

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 18 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

A major market crash in 6 mos seems more likely

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

i wouldn't expect short term economic disaster.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/inside-the-market/market-updates/premarket-us-dollar-charges-to-14-year-high-bonds-in-full-swing/article32922878/

def expect unpredictability tho, which obv could mean disaster.

there were long-range forecasts i read a while back that expected a u.s. recession during the term of the next president (assumed at the time to be clinton). so there's that too.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Saturday, 19 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

While there are ways Trump is already betraying the voters who elected him, particularly with his eager embrace of lobbyists and Wall Street tycoons, when it comes to race they don’t have much to fear. Trump’s victory demonstrated the staggering power of a white nationalist appeal, and not because it drew in so many voters (let’s not forget that Hillary Clinton got more votes than Trump, by 1.4 million and rising as of the latest count). The power of that appeal can be seen in what Trump voters were willing to overlook in order to vote for the white nationalist candidate. It’s why, every time Trump said something awful or some new scandal was revealed, everyone who said “Surely his candidacy is finished now” was wrong. It’s what kept him going strong when he questioned John McCain’s service (the first thing people said would destroy him), when we learned about the scam that was Trump University, when we found out that he didn’t pay federal taxes, and when we heard him on tape bragging about sexually assaulting women and then a dozen women came forward to say that he done what he said he did.

In every case, his supporters laughed it off. Trump’s unapologetic embrace of white identity politics, coming after decades of Republicans who would only promote it through dog-whistles and implication, was so thrilling and empowering to them that there was almost nothing they couldn’t accommodate themselves to, twisting the latest controversy around in their minds until it became evidence of Trump’s virtue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/11/18/when-you-elect-a-white-nationalist-president-you-get-a-white-nationalist-presidency/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.a90cfe1abade

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Saturday, 19 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

Sessions is getting confirmed. Senate courtesy.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 November 2016 00:25 (seven years ago) link

jackoff sesh

velko, Saturday, 19 November 2016 00:37 (seven years ago) link

this is like watching your house burn down in slow motion

sleeve, Saturday, 19 November 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/jasonfebery/status/799273256138076160

We're going to perpetually be stunned by his principle-free hypocrisy until we acknowledge the real reason he's politically bulletproof (you know where I'm going with this)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Saturday, 19 November 2016 01:31 (seven years ago) link

One small amusement - the Twitter people who retweet and rush to praise the remaining NeverTrumpers but get real quiet when those people praise Sessions. The party itself is a cancer.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 19 November 2016 02:07 (seven years ago) link

Is Trump going to rule as a vicious authoritarian or will he just bullshit and equivocate over the next four years, causing harm by enacting Republican policies but nothing so wild in terms of immigration, trade policy, or the military?

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

probably the former

the late great, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:24 (seven years ago) link

neither

mookieproof, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link

He sure is appointing some scary people to his cabinet...

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link

he will bullshit and equivocate while the ppl he appoints rule as vicious authoritarians

mookieproof, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:26 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/799798508673003520

The bootlicking is in full effect at the NYT between deej's link and this .

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

Yeah that sounds right to me too. The Reagan or Bush II method

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

xp

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

Is there any pence slashfic out there

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:36 (seven years ago) link

Pence's head and face always remind me of what a latex Halloween mask of Pence would undoubtedly look like.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:41 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjodxBrB9eI

scott seward, Saturday, 19 November 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

I liked this

https://twitter.com/KateAurthur/status/799822616890478592

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 04:05 (seven years ago) link

this cabinet is a fucking nightmare

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 19 November 2016 04:45 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/799798508673003520

The bootlicking is in full effect at the NYT between deej's link and this .

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, November 18, 2016 10:27 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

seriously? like someone said upthread, the hysteria is getting really tiresome. trump is not going to be an authoritarian. he won. we're going to have another election in 4 years. as far as pence getting booed at Hamilton, it just makes me sad

flappy bird, Saturday, 19 November 2016 04:47 (seven years ago) link

seriously? It makes you sad? Because people are uncivil?

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 04:49 (seven years ago) link

a reality tv star w/ no political experience just got elected leader of the free world

if anything the hysteria is way, way below where it needs to be

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 04:55 (seven years ago) link

we're going to have another election in 4 years.

the question is who will get to vote, once Trump's voter suppression experts have their way

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 19 November 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

yea even when we really try to be optimistic, is there anything we've learned about donald trump (or any of the people in his entourage) that bodes well, at all? I really don't think there is

marcos, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

xp to iatee

marcos, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

a reality tv star w/ no political experience with extremely poor self-control and an easily bruised ego, who spouts racist gibberish, while making weird hand gestures that mimic Byzantine icons.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:03 (seven years ago) link

xp no, sorry, there isn't. at this point some are looking at sheer incompetence as a mitigating factor which is, er, not comforting

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:04 (seven years ago) link

lol Aimless

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:05 (seven years ago) link

This is an obedience test to those who support his party. How much will his enemies within it put up?

https://storify.com/miniver/how-fascism-accumulates-power-by-testing-people

sleeve, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

yeah that's not especially helpful or lucid

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:10 (seven years ago) link

sure it's a twitter rant but the idea of testing, pushing people def resonates w/me

sleeve, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

(the idea of Trump & co. doing so, that is)

sleeve, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:14 (seven years ago) link

I underestimated what Trump could get away with and how much support he'd get during the campaign, I'd rather not underestimate what he'll do now that he's got massive amounts of power.

JoeStork, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:14 (seven years ago) link

doesn't seem like gender and/or ethnic diversity is much of a consideration in trump's staffing

rip van wanko, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:22 (seven years ago) link

seriously? like someone said upthread, the hysteria is getting really tiresome. trump is not going to be an authoritarian. he won. we're going to have another election in 4 years. as far as pence getting booed at Hamilton, it just makes me sad

For one thing idk how good your memory is but people booed the current President during his own fucking state of the union address. For another Mike Pence would happily and with a beaming smile would send half the cast and audience of Hamilton to "gay conversion therapy" so he can choke on a bag of fucking elephant dicks. Nobody in that room or on that stage owes him anything but scorn.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:38 (seven years ago) link

xp he has four white men named Mike and zero women or nonwhite people.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

was this linked yet?

throughout the elections i've enjoyed reading Bouie more than anyone. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/the_democrats_are_already_screwing_up_the_trump_resistance.html

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

oh ok yeah, it was all over the place. thought i had all the messages opened.

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 19 November 2016 05:41 (seven years ago) link

my partner, who teaches art in NYC schools through support programs, is telling me that administrations and teachers are openly freaking the fuck out at the possibility of Trump trying to shut down the dept of education. meanwhile, kids are sensing the madness and acting out; she's seen multiple fist fights in classes. sounds dire in classrooms right now. any other teachers want to weigh in? Abbs?

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:16 (seven years ago) link

it's been mentioned before, but that remnick/nyer articler is something else. this quote alone:

“In ’08, they saw me coming, but I was a guy named Barack Hussein Obama coming up against the Clinton machine, so no way! So they weren’t focussed on me, and I established a connection. Then came the stuff: Ayers and Reverend Wright and all the rest. What I’m suggesting is that the lens through which people understand politics and politicians is extraordinarily powerful. And Trump understands the new ecosystem, in which facts and truth don’t matter. You attract attention, rouse emotions, and then move on. You can surf those emotions. I’ve said it before, but if I watched Fox I wouldn’t vote for me!”

Karl Malone, Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:22 (seven years ago) link

also, this is maybe where I think I might be able to be useful doing immediate volunteer work with computer classes and tutoring ESOL. Anybody supported Make the Road in the past? My experience with people engaging with them has been positive.
http://www.maketheroad.org/participate_jobs.php

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:25 (seven years ago) link

there are these heartbreaking moments of realism, things you knew everyone was thinking but wondered if he thought himself. and then, alongside it, stuff like

"Obama’s final appearance, on the eve of Election Day, was at an outdoor rally next to Independence Hall, in Philadelphia, alongside Jon Bon Jovi, Bruce Springsteen, and the Clintons.", switchbacks into the fugue state

Karl Malone, Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:26 (seven years ago) link

way down the list i'd like us to retire "leader of the free world"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:53 (seven years ago) link

Texas Republicans filed a bill to force educators to narc on LGBTQ kids to their parents. Pretty much ready to just start burning shit down.

I do wonder what the backlash to Christian Coalition 2: Electric Boogaloo might look like, I feel like a lot of people got used to the progress that had seemingly been made since 2008 unless they lived in a pit like Indiana (and even then there was a DOJ fighting some of the worst of it).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:55 (seven years ago) link

Nation link courtesy of a 72-year-old friend, from 2004 but still inspiring:

Looking at this catalogue of huge surprises, it’s clear that the struggle for justice should never be abandoned because of the apparent overwhelming power of those who have the guns and the money and who seem invincible in their determination to hold on to it. That apparent power has, again and again, proved vulnerable to human qualities less measurable than bombs and dollars: moral fervor, determination, unity, organization, sacrifice, wit, ingenuity, courage, patience–whether by blacks in Alabama and South Africa, peasants in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Vietnam, or workers and intellectuals in Poland, Hungary and the Soviet Union itself. No cold calculation of the balance of power need deter people who are persuaded that their cause is just.

https://www.thenation.com/article/optimism-uncertainty/

sleeve, Saturday, 19 November 2016 07:56 (seven years ago) link

as far as pence getting booed at Hamilton, it just makes me sad

wtf??!??!

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 08:10 (seven years ago) link

@jeremyscahill
Look folks, he's the Vice President and deserves the respect of all the gay people and Muslims and women he despises. We are America!

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 November 2016 08:31 (seven years ago) link

There is not nearly enough booing in that clip -- way, way too much cheering.

the pinefox, Saturday, 19 November 2016 08:54 (seven years ago) link

far too few buckets of urine being dumped on his head

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 19 November 2016 08:56 (seven years ago) link

The Hamilton guy read a statement to Pence after the musical and Pence was still there. It's om their Facebook page.

scott seward, Saturday, 19 November 2016 13:03 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/HamiltonMusical/status/799828567941120000?lang=en

scott seward, Saturday, 19 November 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

Alex Q. Arbuckle‏@alexqarbuckle
Mike Pence getting booed at Hamilton is the worst thing to ever happen to a politician at a play

[...]

Alex Q. Arbuckle ‏@alexqarbuckle
Please stop tweeting at me about Abraham Lincoln. I don't know who that is and I don't care

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 November 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Some of you may think the equity markets demonstrate the 1% are content with the election results. The bond markets are many times larger, its participants generally smarter.

Global Bonds Post Biggest Two-Week Loss in Quarter Century

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Omg lol

(•̪●) (carne asada), Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

so much for the pivot to the center

, Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

"Apologize, Hamilton! I demand you apologize! And if you have an extra pair of tickets, I'll pay face. But first ... apologize!!!"

http://katherineclark.house.gov/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=FE5B2F16-7591-41DC-9846-25FEA4D1CFA1

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

(Sorry, that link is not Hamilton related, it's a bill proposed to no longer exempt president and VP from conflict of interest.)

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

So has the Tyrant in Chief elect been heard from publicly since he was elected? Hope he's getting his vitamin D.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

if that was harassment, he's gonna have a long six months

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 November 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

what do you guys think of trump having candidates for cabinet positions meet him at the tower, where they have to push past camera crews and ride a gold elevator to the 58th floor? sort of like the apprentice. pretty coooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllll

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2m5qgfPzws

scott seward, Saturday, 19 November 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

Ethan Lawrence ‏@EthanDLawrence 2h
@realDonaldTrump TRIGGERED! SOMEONE FIND A SAFE SPACE FOR THE SNOWFLAKE!

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 19 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

omg FUCK THESE FUCKING FUCKERS
i keep vacillating between paranoia and anger and fury and disbelief and hysterical laughter
but then i remember that things go in cycles that need fixing, way that donnie trump is just amping like nixon
but cotdamm this shit is making me jumpy

(nice find scott)

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Saturday, 19 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

i'm having a hard time turning my focus away from this shit and toward the things i want to accomplish in my personal life, which range in seriousness from finishing this health insurance application to finding a new career

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

Just thinking that things act on precedents and the parameter shifts current activity may allow are horifying.
Also that human rights fought for for decades aren't static.
& the idea of alt-right nominations for national security at a time when there's still need for Black Lives Matter protest can only lead to negative places.

If human rights for those that need them reinforced are deemed negligible are the next 4 years going to be filled with Cointelpro like attempts to undermine protest?

Stevolende, Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

Has the Bannon Hollywood Reporter article been discussed?

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747

timellison, Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

right. healthcare.

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

IUD bookings up 900% from October:

http://www.vocativ.com/376404/iuds-reproductive-rights-trump-pence/

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

The juxtaposition with the collapse in gun sales is ...not funny

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

are the next 4 years going to be filled with Cointelpro like attempts to undermine protest?

yes

j., Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

Maybe trump can get sharpton to help out

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/bostonsboy87/status/800024575551696896

j., Saturday, 19 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Wow. Maybe he should have told the guy earlier not to wear the t-shirts and talk about politics.

Bannon in that Hollywood Reporter insane article, which was discussed upthread, never did address how he rationalizes Trump's tax plans as being populist. He doesn't mention them at all.

curmudgeon, Saturday, 19 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

^these dudes are getting a nice fat fucking check from me this year.

cucky ramen-o (will), Saturday, 19 November 2016 18:57 (seven years ago) link

white people in mississippi are still gonna think it's an official Trump ad though. probably brings a smile to their face as they drive by.

scott seward, Saturday, 19 November 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Drank way too much last night & ended up of course in a huge circular discussion abou US politics. My guests - bless em - had to endure me basically interrogating them about their perceptions. 2 white guys fwiw (British & Canadian, I'm a Canadian white guy myself). It fascinated me that they in principle supported Trump over Clinton precisely because he was 100% untrustworthy "so at least you know where you stand - with her you don't know if you can trust her or not!" In terms of results orientation this makes absolutely no sense - you'd rather know you're throwing your bet away with no chance of winning than to take a gamble on a perceived random outcome with some chance of success? - but in their mindset, the honest liar is preferable to the potentially dishonest person who claims to be telling the truth. Bizarre. Parsing it further, they acknowledged that with Clinton you'd get "more of the same" whereas with Trump, outcomes were unclear... and this was also a selling point! They preferred perfect certainty of a known crook with an unpredictable outcome over someone who was unpredictably crooked but who would produce a predictable outcome. This topsy-turvy-world thinking is what got him elected. Heaven help us all.

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 19 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

Pricks.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 19 November 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

So this basically

http://www.marxisthumanistinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Trump-wolf-and-sheep.jpg

frogbs, Saturday, 19 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

^OTMFM

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

"Sheeple" is what I call people like that, it's actually a word I made up

sleepingbag, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

It's the egotism of it I think - ha, smart guy me, I know what's going on, I'm not gonna be fooled by how one of them is a politician and the other one is a racist politician that rapes people

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 7h7 hours ago
I settled the Trump University lawsuit for a small fraction of the potential award because as President I have to focus on our country.

This is an interesting attempt at saving face, insisting that he actually got off easy compared to what he might have had to pay. It's like he's more worried about being perceived as a loser over having settled a lawsuit than he is about being perceived as a fraudster and swindler.

jmm, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

The Hamilton "Apologize!" tweet horrified me at first, then I realized it was a cunning political move to bury the Trump University settlement, which was already dumped on a Friday afternoon. The tweet itself is perfectly formulated for max outrage- hypocrisy of "safe spaces," harassment, elementary school level language, threatening freedom of expression.

flappy bird, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

I really don't think anything Trump does is 'cunning'. Even now, nothing he has done seems particularly smart. The great masterstroke of the campaign was to confiscate his iPhone for the last two weeks...

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

The man who publically and repeatedly abused and disrespected a Gold Star family just a couple of months ago is shocked that his VP-elect was not given the full measure of respect he thought he deserved. Yup.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

His hypocrisy is perfectly consistent - when he does something, its ok. When someone else does something, its wrong. Principles dont come into it.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

He literally can't think about anything besides himself. It's almost impressive.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

JUst wondering how widely what is seen to be acceptable when he gets away with it feeds into the next attempted outrage and if it is going to continually mark out wider territory. & if it's gotten away with now to the extent it is, if taht will show in time to come that you can get away with this much, so why not try to get away with more.
Scary shit.
& the whole idea of a 'norm' as something that is fixed not an archetype that things are based around in a shifting field.
So the idea that something thought of as normal is in any way concrete is false.
Beacons become normative and you don't want Trump a person apparently without morals to be seen as a normative beacon.

But wonder how much elasticity there si in how far things can be stretched and what happens when the limits of that elasticity are transcended.

I'm also just thinking that a lot of marginalised people are just arriving at a point of apparent liberty that has taken them ages to get to and that there is going to be a concerted effort to roll back the rights that have been so hard fought for.
Also just wondering if that is possible. & hoping that the limits of power are reached before anything can be lastingly undone.

Stevolende, Saturday, 19 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

He literally can't think about anything besides himself. It's almost impressive.

I honestly barely consider him a human being, like he just seems like a zombie incapable of shame or self-reflection. because of that, I find it hard to feel anger towards him on a personal level. how mad can you be at someone w/ a genuine mental disorder?

but the people around him - his extended family, the leftover garbage politicians who are going to make up his admin, even mike pence - these people are still humans and I feel like they all know deep down that they're participating in something deeply wrong.

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

would need gbx to back me up on this but he seems textbook NPD to me

k3vin k., Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, his family all made the decision a long time ago to put up with him and stand by him for the money. At least one of his kids didn't even talk to him when he was bankrupt, right? Pence saw a way to get out of his failing governorship in Indiana, where he is reviled. They all know exactly what they're doing.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

I mean if trump isn't textbook narcissistic personality disorder then...who would be?

and now someone who already doesn't have a soul because he's been sucked into a narcissistic black hole is *literally the most important human being in the world*. things can only get worse!

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

Oh, smart place to spend time and money organizing: For the governor post in Indinana. Or is it out of reach?

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Dems should compete everywhere imo

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

should? sure. but all the dems have right now in red states is motivation.

within two years I think the dems might have the ability to win races in places we could never dream of. trump admin is gonna be a disaster on a level not comparable to anything in recent history.

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

Seems likely yes

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

progressives thought GW bush was a dumbo who would quickly fail, but it wasn't until he'd served a full eight years of disasters that he was finally repudiated by the broader public.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

GW had a team of ppl way more experienced w the levers of federal power supporting him. Trump does not.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

Painse to say this but Dubya also marginally more humane

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

Pains me

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

damning with faint praise but George W. Bush has a likability and moral authority and thoughtfulness that Trump lacks, which is how he got a full eight years.

nomar, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

Trump beyond mere dumbo, way way beyond

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

it's easy to look back and compare but look at how Bush dealt w/american muslims in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, at least publicly, and compare his speech at the memorial service for the Dallas PD officers a few months ago, vs anything Trump would say in any situation.

nomar, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

If Pence is already loathed, and the Trump transition continues to be a clusterfuck, with the media no longer compelled by fake objectivity to focus half of their intention on fake Clinton controversies out for blood, perhaps it could be pushed as an indictment of the administration. The Indiana election, that is.

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

W. also was not vindictive in the least

flappy bird, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Except when it came to guys that tried to kill his dad amirite

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

he is a totally different type of figure in all ways.

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

with the media no longer compelled by fake objectivity

This is cloud cuckooland stuff. The NYT and WaPo are already rolling over like the compliant little bootlickers they are, going out of their way to avoid using the word "racist" to describe Bannon and Sessions, just like they wouldn't use "torture" to describe waterboarding and fake executions. These outlets -- all mainstream media outlets -- in the long run, care only about continued access to the corridors of power and will do what's necessary to maintain it. Trump showed himself more than willing as a primary candidate, then as the nominee, to deny them that access and they will not risk losing it now that he's President.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

Hopefully he cuts them off then, incurs their ire.

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

Trump somehow more incompetent and more of a schemer than W the incompetent schemer

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

oh no are we normalizing Bush too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

The 'Mission Accomplished' moment on the aircraft carrier was very Trump

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Phil, I think you're missing my point. The media wants scandals, and with Clinton out of the picture, now they only have Trump to focus on. I agree, they're rubbish in general, and their inability to tell between what just looked cloudy and what was actually fraudulent helped Trump a lot - they should all feel bad at how much energy they spent on the Clinton Foundation when Trump had a lawsuit going he would have to settle for 20 million less than two weeks after the election - but their willingness to turn everything into a 'breaking news' scandal harms the crook with no self-control when there's nobody else to go after.

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

bush was an political ideologue and a devout christian. I think was easier for a lot of people to justify his mistakes in those contexts. trump has no real beliefs on any subject that isn't 'donald trump' and sold people on some prosperity gospel shit. most of his voters don't even think he's a good human being. in 3 years when their shitty rural town continues to be filled w/ methheads and abandoned buildings I don't think they will be as forgiving as they would be to the guy who talked to god and tried his best. course, we might have president pence by then...

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

How, exactly, does it harm him? The media can't impeach him, or arrest him, or charge him with a crime, or anything of that nature. And with access cut off, they'll barely be able to report on him at all unless the White House is staffed with a plethora of people willing to talk anonymously, which seems unlikely. And his base has demonstrated extremely effectively that they are ready, willing and able to be lied to and swallow every utterance as if it were the truth. In regards to the recent Ford plant story, they're willing to believe Trump more than they believe the CEO of Ford.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Dubya barely squeaked out a victory as a wartime incumbent against a terrible candidate, I wouldn't say repudiation took eight years.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

they'll barely be able to report on him at all unless the White House is staffed with a plethora of people willing to talk anonymously, which seems unlikely

1. the White House? He doesn't want to staff the White House at all! You mean Trump Tower.
2. lol re: plethora of anonymous sources; he already had this problem during the campaign, when he had NDAs to threaten staffers with. You think that gets better for him now?

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

x-post: That's a weird question to answer, because Trump literally only has one thing that could harm him: Losing reelection in 2020. But remember Clinton won the popular vote by 1,7 million votes (and counting) so Trump probably has to surprise positively to win reelection, and the things he has promised his voters goes against what his party wants. So he needs clout. And if his administration gets branded as corrupt and incompetent early on, the incentive to compromise with Trump goes away.

That doesn't really hurt him anyway, it'll mean no jobs for the poor but tax cuts for rich developers like himself, so...

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

Reddit and the God Emperor of the Internet: NYT profiles r/The_Donald...

flappy bird, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

oh there are more things than just that could harm him.

sarahell, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

1. the White House? He doesn't want to staff the White House at all! You mean Trump Tower.
2. lol re: plethora of anonymous sources; he already had this problem during the campaign, when he had NDAs to threaten staffers with. You think that gets better for him now?

1. True, I'll just say I was going for metonym here.
2. Yes, and none of that harmed him even a tiny bit.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

xxp that assumes that Trump cares at all about re-election, when he barely cared about election. We keep treating him like a politician, when that's not what he is.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

oh no are we normalizing Bush too

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, November 19, 2016 5:21 PM (thirty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

just wait until we elect that disembodied evil spirit from the novel It. we'll be yearning for the days of trump.

Treeship, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

bush normalized himself to an extent by painting goofy portraits and making friends with michelle and dancing awkwardly at funerals

the late great, Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

Trumps admin will leak like a sieve. He rules by conflict. People are gonna dime on their enemies via leak.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

"I didn't come to this administration to make friends"

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

Also this Hamilton flap is probably giving bannon a raging hard on. Nothing says snobby librul elites like broadway.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

xp my hope with this sort of crowd, Trump, also Putin, is that ruthless assholes make enemies of other assholes they work with, and through these conflicts they get weakened

Never changed username before (cardamon), Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

The media wants scandals, and with Clinton out of the picture, now they only have Trump to focus on

You don't understand the US political press. General rule of thumb: suck up to Republicans, nitpick Democrats to death.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

axl rose repeatedly going after trump is a new favorite development

, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

damning with faint praise but George W. Bush has a likability and moral authority and thoughtfulness that Trump lacks, which is how he got a full eight years.

― nomar, Saturday, November 19, 2016 4:41 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark

W also way way more integrated into his party

, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

xp i honestly am a little miffed that his twitter handle is not @waxlrose

j., Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:22 (seven years ago) link

You don't understand the US political press. General rule of thumb: suck up to Republicans, nitpick Democrats to death.

I don't think the press under trump will be anything like it was under bush. I don't think we have to worry about the normal sycophancy / 'let's just trust what the admin says' journalism as much as we have to worry about reality tv journalism. there will be very few slow news days w/ these clowns. but the clickbait stories and the important ones are not going to always overlap. 'eric trump gives a monkey a tour of the white house' will get more press than some concurrent money scandal etc.

iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

If dude doesn't back down and apologize, and Republicans end up boycotting Hamilton, it will be much easier for everyone else to get tickets.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

within two years I think the dems might have the ability to win races in places we could never dream of. trump admin is gonna be a disaster on a level not comparable to anything in recent history.

― iatee, Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:33 PM (one hour ago)

He'll be blaming every failure on others: Dems, immigrants, whichever bogeyman is imagined to be under the public bed at the time. And they'll believe him instead of believing their own eyes, ears, and brains. He'll be floating above it all in a rickety Chinese-made gold-lamé hot-air balloon (buoyed by he hot air from his mouth) as his enemies are churned against rocky cliffs in the roiling surf below & his supporters dump boiling oil on anyone who manages to get safely ashore.

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

eric trump gives a monkey a tour of the white house' will get more press than some concurrent money scandal etc.
LOL OTM.

hardcore dilettante, Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

Gunna post this here, since I think this is a great podcast ep of "Delete Your Acct," serving as an OpSec 101, or what any of us can do with our communications in the modern surveillance state.

It's an interview with Freddy Martinez, who did great work exposing shit like the cops using Stingray technology as well as what horseshit the Chicago PD has been up to.

I personally use my phone a lot without always remembering that every single mobile phone is effectively a tracking device.

https://deleteyouraccount.libsyn.com/dont-get-caught

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Sunday, 20 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

i think there are too many dissenters for them to go after us like that.

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

This is a bit worrisome.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pentagon-and-intelligence-community-chiefs-have-urged-obama-to-remove-the-head-of-the-nsa/2016/11/19/44de6ea6-adff-11e6-977a-1030f822fc35_story.html?tid=pm_pop

Now, in my experience, the DIRNSA is always a dickhead who is mainly in charge of taking hundreds of millions of your dollars and setting them on fire while looking for the next big thing that will precognitively ID the threats to America so he can look better than his peers at FBI, CIA, etc. So IMHO it doesn't matter that much which 4-star thinks he runs the shop, since the Deputy DIRNSA is always a career civilian who rose up from a GS-11 or so and is a nerd and understands how the actual mission operates, etc. But we really don't need every single one of the spy agencies being political from the top down.

And given that a few days before this, Rogers went in front of the press to clarify that Russians deliberately interfered in our political process, it's just fishy as all hell.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link

sucking up to power, D or R, is the only duty of the press

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 November 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

NY Times piece on Jared Kushner. Apparently hosted a fundraiser at his house for Cory Booker several years ago.

timellison, Sunday, 20 November 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

i walked past Trump Tower tonight (other side of Fifth). The NYPD overtime looks phenomenal... I wonder if that Starbucks on the 2nd floor you can see from the street is doing hot walk-in business.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 November 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

Michelle Rhee & Kevin Johnson met with Trump today. Biting down on cyanide capsule in 3 2 1

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 20 November 2016 07:44 (seven years ago) link

trump admin is gonna be a disaster on a level not comparable to anything in recent history.

― iatee, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:33 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Seems likely yes

― Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 November 2016 21:34 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Sadly the economy could (could) rebound enough in the next couple of years to make up for this, at least if Trump's deficit spending comes to fruition:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/the-long-haul

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/19/trump-economic-policies-growth-us-economy

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 09:36 (seven years ago) link

I met someone yesterday living in the UK but with a vote in the US - SC maybe?

She was horrified by Trump in a standard way.
She also didn't vote for HRC, nor a third party, but wrote in some kind of insult.

She said: 'We need a woman President - but NOT THIS ONE. Not with her emails, etc'.

I think she added: 'We needed a black President - but not Barack Obama'.

I assume she would have said 'We need a Catholic President - but NEVER JFK'
and: 'We need a reforming, progressive Democratic President - but I can't bring myself to vote for FDR'.

the pinefox, Sunday, 20 November 2016 09:39 (seven years ago) link

We need a tall President - but not this "Abe" Lincoln

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 09:41 (seven years ago) link

'We need a talking horse, but not Mr Ed"

Mark G, Sunday, 20 November 2016 10:01 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/us/politics/jared-kushner-donald-trump.html

doesn't mention how he is a notorious slumlord in NYC

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Sadly the economy could (could) rebound enough in the next couple of years to make up for this, at least if Trump's deficit spending comes to fruition:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/the-long-haul

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/19/trump-economic-policies-growth-us-economy

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, November 20, 2016 4:36 AM (four hours ago) Bookmark

isn't deficit against the GOP's principles though - they've hammered so long at the bogeyman of the NATIONAL DEBT how are they going to go along with this? i guess the answer is obvious - defund medicare, medicaid, social security, and ACA

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

http://gothamist.com/2016/03/30/jared_kushner_not_good.php

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

the editor of Kushner's Observer was a coworker of mine in the '90s (also a Chicago indie-rock bandleader)

maybe i should try to get in as film critic for the New Regime

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

It's only a deficit because the economy isn't growing fast enough, because the 1% pay more than 20%.

Krugman's wrong here. Fiscal stimulus won't help much when interest rates are skyrocketing.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

Republicans are fine with national debt as long as they get a new war to play with (e.g., the gwb era).

Karl Malone, Sunday, 20 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

xpost Ken Kurson, right?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

yes JiC

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

“Melania is extremely close to Barron, and they have become closer during the campaign,” said a source close to Trump’s transition team.

i like the phrasing of this, which all but tells you that donald isn't all that close to his ten year old child. they just don't have much in common. no bigs

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

what do we think of these conspiracy theories?

https://medium.com/@DaleBeran/a-truly-fancy-bear-2384f413df1c#.n0ymt2dj6
http://gothamist.com/2016/11/17/russia_hackers_election_trump.php

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

Read Barron as Bannon for a second there.

how's life, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

lol

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

i hope he pulls a luke skywalker

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

Xp: lol. The author of the first one is a friend from college. Didn't realize that had gotten so much traction. Iirc, someone poked holes some pretty big holes in that on his initial FB post, but I also really have a hard time evaluating what is real anymore.

how's life, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

http://gothamist.com/2016/11/17/russia_hackers_election_trump.php

― Treeship, Sunday, November 20, 2016 10:52 AM (five minutes ago) Bookmark

i want to believe the russian hacker theory too but pieces like the one that alfred linked to for florida show a more plausible explanation - rural white voters came out in force for trump

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

Treeship, you gotta keep up, man:

http://theslot.jezebel.com/nsa-head-openly-accuses-russia-of-using-wikileaks-to-ge-1789051302

Now back up and read my last post and have a good time

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

https://gop.com/100-day-plan-action-survey/

i voted

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Oh wait the Gothamist piece is much more specific. No, a hack of the integrity of the vote count itself unequivocally did not happen.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

kinda amazing to imagine four years of the White House basically gathering dust as far as its role as a functioning residence is concerned. You get so used to all the puff-piece stuff, kids books giving you a tour, wow, it even has a bowling alley! Being President must be the funnest job in the world! and the Trumps are basically like fuck it we already have a bowling alley and all the pins are gold-plated. Thank God I don't live on the UWS anymore, the security detail covering Barron Trump's daily school attendance sounds like it'd be a major headache.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

https://gop.com/100-day-plan-action-survey/

i voted

I did too! That list is really sad and dumb. Like every 3rd question was HOW MUCH DRILL BABY?

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Read it, but since there was no "ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?" option for any of the questions, i found myself unable to vote.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

^ in a nutshell

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

What if Russia hacked the election by increasing turnout of white rural voters!

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile, Trump is still going on Hamilton! Last night he tweeted, then shortly deleted: "Very rude and insulting of Hamilton cast member to treat our great future V.P. Mike Pence to a theater lecture. Couldn’t even memorize lines!" Then at 3:22 this morning: "The cast and producers of Hamilton, which I hear is highly overrated, should immediately apologize to Mike Pence for their terrible behavior" - I mean I get that we can easily get sucked into this as a distraction from the TrumpU settlement and all the noxious people he's putting on his team, but seriously, this fucking guy.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

They should remove Hamilton from all money and replace him with our great future VP Mike Pence. It's the right thing to do.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

So are we basically at the point where Trump is essentially merging with the government, just sucking it up like a hostile takeover business venture? GOP has been craving a president that runs the country like a CEO, and I guess now they got one.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

Couldn’t even memorize lines!

Ha, what? Does he mean the speech? Like, this proves that Brandon Victor Dixon must be a poor actor?

jmm, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

Here's all the dumb shit from the first 100 days survey, I categorized it because I have issues

Immigration:
* Begin constructing the wall along the Southern border.
* End all federal funding to sanctuary cities that circumvent the law in order to provide protection to illegal immigrants.
* Begin removing the more than two million criminal illegal immigrants.
* Suspend immigration from regions compromised by terrorism and where vetting cannot safely occur.

Healthcare & Education:
* Repeal and replace ObamaCare.
* Allow Americans to deduct childcare and eldercare from their taxes.
* Reform the Department of Veterans Affairs in order to provide proper treatment to America’s forgotten heroes.
* Let veterans receive public VA treatment or attend the private doctor of their choice.
* End Common Core and bring education supervision to local communities.
* Pass school-choice measures that redirect education dollars to give parents the right to send their kids to the public, private, charter, magnet, religious, or home school of their choice.

Judiciary Appointments:
* Appoint a strong constitutionalist to the Supreme Court in the mold of the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Rich get richer:
* Introduce an infrastructure package to modernize our country.
* Unleash the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act, which will cut taxes for middle-class families and simplify the tax brackets in order to streamline the process.

Especially oil companies:
* Lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars worth of American energy, including shale, oil, natural gas, and clean coal.
* End bans on offshore drilling in order to end our dependence on Middle East oil and make America energy independent.
* Sign into law the Senate’s existing bill to build the Keystone Pipeline.
* Cancel billions of dollars in payments to U.N. climate change programs, and use that money to fix our own country.

Foreign Policy / Defense:
* Introduce plan to defeat ISIS.
* Set the standard for an “America First” foreign policy that ends regime-change, nation-building, and instead focuses on a motto of peace through strength.
* Direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator.
* End the defense sequester in order to rebuild our depleted military.
* Announce our official withdrawal from the TPP.
* Renegotiate NAFTA into terms that protect the American worker.

"Blue Lives Matter":
* Pass the Restoring Community Safety Act in order to reduce crime, drugs, and violence in our cities, and provide funding for programs that train and assist local police.

"Federal Government. BAD!":
* Cut the government regulations that lead businesses to leave our country in the first place.
* Cancel every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum, and order issued by Obama.
* Propose a constitutional amendment to impose terms limits on all members of Congress.
* Enact a five-year ban on White House and congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service.
* Pass the Clean Up Corruption in Washington Act in order to “drain the swamp” that has polluted our capital for decades.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

Impressively there's nothing in there about flushing NATO down the toilet and recognizing the Crimea as belonging to my good friend, Putin.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 4h4 hours ago
I watched parts of @nbcsnl Saturday Night Live last night. It is a totally one-sided, biased show - nothing funny at all. Equal time for us?
0 replies 7,866 retweets 30,265 likes
Reply Retweet 7.9K
Like 30K
More

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

xps I think it's just more Trump-making-shit-up. At this point, for most of the Internet Right, I would guess that Hamilton is best known as a failing musical that denigrates the Founding Fathers (and maybe Honest Abe also, who knows), where nobody remembers their lines and they boo any white or straight people who walk in the door, before turning the stage over to Spirit Cooking. Of course all of that is just a publicity stunt, like their desperate ticket giveaways, to get SJWs to show up now that a boycott by Trump supporters is putting the nail in the coffin of this unpopular and un-American celebration of New York Values.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

tombot, that falls under this


* Set the standard for an “America First” foreign policy that ends regime-change, nation-building, and instead focuses on a motto of peace through strength.

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

i like the idea of trump criticizing hamilton for being a high school-level production, full of miscues and interruptions. an interesting twist.

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

"Unleash the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act"

Interesting verb choice

jmm, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

i want him to ride through new york city on a float shooting out dollar bills like the joker in the first batman movie

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

that would be his version of the bush rebate

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

Guys I think what we should be spending our energy on is working on drafting an Act that spells out TRUMP in its title and does all the stuff that we want.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

Have great ideas that Washington should vote for! Taxes, Real-Estate, Urban Management. Proposal!

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

The Tax Reform Unleashing Massive Peace Act of 2017

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

wait no Tax Reform Unleashing Maximum Prosperity

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

Temperatures Reduced Under (environmental) Management and Protection

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

I think the TRUMP acronym still needs to use Trump as the T

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Trump Resorts Ultimate Maximum Prosperity Act

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

He reminds me of the divorced dad of a friend of mine and my friend would only see him on the weekends and he was always on the phone and he had a younger girlfriend and we'd go to his big empty house and he would ignore us or say a few awkward words to my friend and you never knew what he did for a living and there were always file folders everywhere and he would take off with his girlfriend and me and my friend would just watch cinemax buy ourselves and the gunfire from the action movies we watched would just echo off the walls.

scott seward, Sunday, 20 November 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

"by ourselves"

scott seward, Sunday, 20 November 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

lol

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

what do we think of these conspiracy theories?

https://medium.com/@DaleBeran/a-truly-fancy-bear-2384f413df1c#.n0ymt2dj6
http://gothamist.com/2016/11/17/russia_hackers_election_trump.php

― Treeship, Sunday, November 20, 2016 10:52 AM (two hours ago)

stopped reading after the first sentence of the first one because

Why were our internal and public polls so unprecedentedly off the mark?

they weren't.

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

although our poll aggregators were unprecedentedly off the mark

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

Fresh wave of anxiety coming on again. oh joy

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

wait until inauguration day. the only way to ward off despair will be to take to the streets and yell at him from afar.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

canada will be fine

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm stressed about other life stuff atm, but then looking at twitter (or this thread) compounds it. Woke up paralyzed by fear this morning :'(

May be moving to the USA next August :-(

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

i like zuckerberg's honesty here https://twitter.com/ftrain/status/800416102333513729

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

haha that's great

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

knew that was fake when he mentioned wegmans

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

he's arrogant as hell in that, but with a nice touch of humor

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

knew that was fake when he mentioned wegmans

― k3vin k., Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:41 PM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark

? it's not fake

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

this outrage over someone not liking a Broadway play is sure to win Dems back the rust belt in 2020

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

on further thought, it has to be fake

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Both the US and the Soviet Union had nuclear missiles that could those things in the 80s.

darling you were wonderful you really were quite good (snoball), Sunday, 20 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

i thought we still did

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

GOP has been craving a president that runs the country like a CEO

Only, he doesn't.
What Does Donald Trump Really Want? (Fortune, April 3, 2000)

Among Trump’s theoretical peers, which is to say other rich business people, the situation is different. When Fortune asked several thousand of them to rank 469 companies for its 1999 list of Most Admired Companies, they put Trump’s casino company dead last. More specifically, they ranked it worst in quality of management, use of corporate assets, employee talent, long-term investment value, and social responsibility.

Frankly, I'd take a successful CEO any day over this trust fund narcissist.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Sunday, 20 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

No one said he would run America like a good CEO, whatever that even is.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

this outrage over someone not liking a Broadway play is sure to win Dems back the rust belt in 2020

The fuck are you talking about?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

although our poll aggregators were unprecedentedly off the mark

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), 20. november 2016 20:15 (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No they weren't. Just a couple of points, completely normal.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

this outrage over someone not liking a Broadway play is sure to win Dems back the rust belt in 2020

The fuck are you talking about?

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, November 20, 2016 4:14 PM (sixteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the cast of a fey broadway musical giving a lecture to the VP-elect cements every bias and preconceived notion moderates & conservatives have about liberals: they are contemptuous of you, hypocritical, and arrogant beyond belief. the booing is one thing- but man, what a stupid fucking move on behalf of Lin Manuel-Miranda to write that speech directed at Pence.

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

everyone needs to quit pearl clutching and think about this strategically. the deeper the left delves into its bubble and panics and prepares for the Trump admin like it'll be an autocracy is so ridiculous. there will be another election in 4 years!! for the first time since 1992, there will be a primary challenger for incumbent Trump!

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

^amending that fucked up sentence... the deeper the left delves into its own bubble, two terms of Trump are all but guaranteed...

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

xp yes, I'm aware of what actually *happened*, since I posted about it. None of it can be characterized as "outrage over someone not liking a Broadway play" which is so close to idiotic as to be indistinguishable.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

the speech itself was fairly respectful tbf

we're getting two terms of Trump because lol USA

Nhex, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

the content of the speech doesn't matter. it's bad optics.

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

xp
Lol Dems, more to the point. I'm not 100% convinced that Hillary won't try running again in 202.

nickn, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

I agree that I got bored when the 567th person on my Facebook feed commented on the story yesterday, but the counterarguments -- "While we were laughing at Mike Pence, some REAL NEWS was happening...like Trump U!" -- bore me too. We're already in a bubble, flappy bird -- all of us. Trump supports will neither read nor care about Trump U settlement, Hamilton, or Putin.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

And I love the idea that this, which constitutes the cast's statement IN ITS ENTIRETY, constitutes a "lecture."

“We, sir, we are the diverse America, who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights, sir. But we truly hope that this show has inspired you to uphold our American values and to work on behalf of all of us.”

WOW SUCH LECTURE SO STRIDENT WOW

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

I ain't gonna hear about "bad optics" re: people who spent the last six months yelling TRUMP THAT BITCH and LOCK HER UP.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

is flappy bird Chuck Todd?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

the deeper the left delves into its bubble and panics and prepares for the Trump admin like it'll be an autocracy is so ridiculous.

worked for the right, may as well try it. sure, there were two terms of obama, but 8 years later they control everything

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

OOF alfred that hurts... Chuck Todd has the worst hair i've ever seen on any human. i can't stand him, BUT it has helped me in the past week and a half to anesthetize my morality & beliefs and focus entirely on strategy, just to stay sane...

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

being half facetious of course, but the thing that has shocked me the most about the last 8 years is the total lack of punishment for wanton obstructionism, and i think the left should probably learn that lesson.

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

"What did you do in the war, dad?"

"Well son, I certainly didn't delve into my bubble - bad optics"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

OOF alfred that hurts... Chuck Todd has the worst hair i've ever seen on any human. i can't stand him, BUT it has helped me in the past week and a half to anesthetize my morality & beliefs and focus entirely on strategy, just to stay sane...

― flappy bird,

worse than Hewitt's?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

hugh hewitt? never noticed his hair... Chuck Todd looks like he had a Prince Valiant going on then went to Super Cuts and now it's growing back in.

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

Wait, Lin-Manuel Miranda wrote the speech?

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

according to the Times

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

Can we please stop pretending that 59 words constitutes a speech?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

it's not clear to me what "good optics" or strategy would be. i guess the dems should strengthen the economic parts of their message, show some of that bernie sanders outrage at inequality. (i've always felt that way). but all this talk about how clinton's campaign lost due to "identity politics" makes me uncomfortable. if identity politics is clinton talking about her own glass ceiling then fine, ditch it. but if it means protecting abortion rights, marriage equality, and fighting for criminal justice reform and equal pay then i am not ready to abandon identity politics.

i say this as someone who complains, all the time, about stuff like the yale halloween controversy.

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

there are definitely illiberal tendencies among portions of the identitarian left, especially on campus. but there is still such a thing as institutional racism and sexism, which manifest in ways that require policy solutions. we still need the democrats for that.

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

When the cast of "Hamilton" is making policy for the DNC somebody send me a telegram plz

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

The Hamilton statement cheered me up a little, that someone was saying that to Mike Pence to his face. I assume many other people felt the same. It was worth doing even if that was the only effect.

jmm, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

xp phil D., well, they are an avatar of multiculturalism and so the right will assimilate them into its "culture war" narrative. i disagree with flappy bird in that i don't think we can win that one way or the other because they're not playing fair. any overture the left makes toward white rural america needs to be on its own terms. you need to wrench them away from the propaganda with a vigorous economic message... there is no benefit to the dems in forsaking the cultural/identity side of their platform, which the right misrepresents anyway

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

The story would have still been news. The crowd was booing at Pence, and the musical itself is pretty fucking political. The audience was laughing at Pence during What Comes Next:

What comes next?
You’ve been freed
Do you know how hard it is to lead?

You’re on your own
Awesome. Wow
Do you have a clue what happens now?

Oceans rise
Empires fall
It’s much harder when it’s all your call

All alone, across the sea
When your people say they hate you
Don’t come crawling back to me

Or rather, it could very possibly have become a story. Trump turned it into one when he started harassing the cast and producers for using their first amendment protected free speech. You can't 'strategize' around an irrational lying scumbag racist sexist homophobe with thin skin and no self-control. Not having that turn into yet another clusterfuck would entail everyone just shutting up about what's happening all the time, and, not to sound all Westworld, but Pence isn't normal. He is a gay-conversion loving extremist who became vice-president elect on a campaign of hatred against hispanics in particular, and who now thinks he can go to a play made by a hispanic man about the benefits of Caribbean immigrants, acted by many gay actors, as if nothing has happened. That's not normal.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

yeah, mike pence is a fuckface. i wish they threw cabbages at him honestly.

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

there are definitely illiberal tendencies among portions of the identitarian left, especially on campus. but there is still such a thing as institutional racism and sexism, which manifest in ways that require policy solutions. we still need the democrats for that.

― Treeship, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:04 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there's a way to address those without falling into the methodological trap of identitarianism: point out that they're systemic injustices that ruin individual lives. i'll never fully understand why so much time is spent on 'how' to combat these things.

i know lewis lapham is a contrarian self-promoter, but: "The universities chose to amuse themselves with the crossword puzzles of French literary theory, and in the New York media salons the standard-bearers of America's political conscience were content to rest upon what they took to be their laurels ... and the messengers bringing the good news of conservative reaction moved their gospel-singing tent show into an all but deserted public square," is a quote that always amused me.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

you need to wrench them away from the propaganda with a vigorous economic message...

otm, i don't think the dems should ditch social progress & equality by any means, but the approach this time was unbalanced and probably abrasive to a lot of moderate/rust belt voters... and the smug condescension & arrogance of clinton's campaign cannot be overstated as a factor in making ppl stay home and others switch sides... check this out for the latter: http://thefederalist.com/2016/11/18/liberals-should-stop-ranting-and-seek-out-silent-trump-voters-like-me/#.WC8XB7tr5Ht.twitter i mean i think she's a fucking idiot but this is what we're dealing with

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

also who gives a fuck about the optics, do we think the right won through laser-focused discipline on messaging? iirc they spent the last 8 years focused on sideshows of a far more noxious variety

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

I don't think the dems should ditch social progress & equality by any means, but the approach this time was unbalanced and probably abrasive to a lot of moderate/rust belt voters...

the approach was offering those voters Hillary Rodham Clinton

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

yeah, shit like hamilton has fuck-all to do with it. being a punching bag for edgy socialists is not the same thing as being a real factor

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

did anyone research why half of eligible voters didn't vote?

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

were at musical

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

also who gives a fuck about the optics, do we think the right won through laser-focused discipline on messaging? iirc they spent the last 8 years focused on sideshows of a far more noxious variety

― intheblanks, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:20 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i just want everyone to be able to get along well enough that they can have a conversation. i understand it but it really makes me sad that the left has started mirroring the right post-Obama's election. like i think anyone that abhors Trump should do their best to dispel with the fiction (lol) that all progressives are contemptuous of them and are intolerant of their beliefs (even if that it is the case...)

flappy bird, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

i emphatically *don't care* about the hamilton controversy or whatever but unless you're being dense for the sake of it it's not hard to see why a useless speech, whose sole purpose was to generate attention and controversy, at a freaking BROADWAY PLAY so exclusive and expensive that ordinary americans can't see it, might be poor tactics considering the anti-cosmopolitan sentiment that contributed to our losing the election

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

kev otm

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

also who gives a fuck about the optics, do we think the right won through laser-focused discipline on messaging? iirc they spent the last 8 years focused on sideshows of a far more noxious variety

they kinda did, actually. despite the mess of a campaign, donald trump hammered down his message pretty well.

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

From what i'm hearing about Hamilton it seems like a strange show for somebody like Pence to want to go and see apart from it being the current hit musical that everybody needs to see.
But the comments from the stage seem to be an articulate representation of how the cast felt and gibven the opportunityy to say something remaining silent might have been as strange.

Stevolende, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

xxp - no one on the left, even an actor in a play who is not a politician, should not do or say anything without considering the "tactical" implications? What a shit country.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

yeah seriously, guys the cast of hamilton is not an arm of the democratic party

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

right answer but yr workings idk xp

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

xxp - no one on the left, even an actor in a play who is not a politician, should not do or say anything without considering the "tactical" implications? What a shit country.

― sarahell, Sunday, November 20, 2016 3:29 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

exactly the type of overly cautious thinking that led to such electoral success for the clinton campaign

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

Flappy Bird, wouldn't that woman agree with the Hamilton cast? She says this: Let people say what they will. Shame them publicly for cruel, offensive statements that are inconsistent with American values.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

if yr still pretending that it matters whether or not the liberals being scoffed at amongst the majority of american voters are official dem cru or not well

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

not calling you out, sarahell, agreeing with your general in case it's unclear

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

i understand it but it really makes me sad that the left has started mirroring the right post-Obama's election.

This shit is driving me nuts. The right's post-Obama antics were based entirely on fantasy and fiction.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

xp sarahel like i said i don't care, say whatever you want, more power to you. but if you're going to do a publicity stunt, which this was, that's probably something to consider

but hey who knows maybe when the trump administration is debating whether to privatize medicare or deport a million undocumented immigrants mike pence will remember when he saw that guy at the play call him "sir" twice and rethink denying people their inalienable rights

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

they kinda did, actually. despite the mess of a campaign, donald trump hammered down his message pretty well.

― iatee, Sunday, November 20, 2016 3:26 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i totally agree with that, i just mean the whole "this is why 'real america' hates us, the dems are dropping the ball again" narrative around a pointless weekend sideshow has nothing to do with electoral politics.

intheblanks, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

kev emphatically not otm, and his baseless speculation about why a group of black and hispanic actors, some of them lgbt, might want to say something to Mike Pence, is really nagl.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

nobody talking about how trump endorsed schumer? lol https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/800339165829283840

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

did anyone research why half of eligible voters didn't vote?

― sarahell, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:24 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark

they need to make election day a national holiday

also voter suppression

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

the idea of letting people say what they will and then shaming them, whoever said it originally, seems like the issue. people should argue with each other, back and forth, even if they might not reach common ground in the end. clinton wasn't frank enough and so the phantasm of her the right had created had more substantive reality to voters than the actual person

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

I suspect that 'donald trump declares war on snobby cast of hamilton' won't play as well when donald trump has actual responsibilities / shitty rural towns continue to be shitty rural towns in 2 years etc. etc.

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

hamilton doesn't matter and what the hamilton people say doesn't matter, the speech was fine

don't worry about broadway musicals, worry abt whether or not the opposition party plans to pick up any weapons anytime soon

i haven't read a single actual leftist suggesting that in reminding themselves they are allegedly a workers' party the dems should decide racism's not so bad, but i sure have read a lot of clintonites insisting that's what the left wants and that the party is totally fine and noble

obviously no left deserving of the name is anything less than militantly antiracist

obviously a genuine class politics in the u.s. requires militant antiracism at its center just to make any sense

half the country couldn't bring itself to vote; if you think the evil in america's bosom means the only way anyone can do better than hillary is by snarling about muslims you might as well start rehearsing your heils right now

only socialism kills fascism; anyone who says otherwise is selling something

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

anyone got a good thing I can read on the awfulness of Schumes?

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

I think, at this point, it's like Florence Reece asked:

Which side are you on?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

(in other words dlh otm) xpost

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

or dlh rather

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

only socialism kills fascism; anyone who says otherwise is selling something

― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:38 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

didn't the capitalists win last time though? i don't get this

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

as someone who has emphatically not followed politics until it nov. 9 even i have always had an impression of chuck schumer as being in the pockets of wall street - think i might have picked that up from the financial crisis / following OWS

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

only socialism kills fascism; anyone who says otherwise is selling something

― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:38 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

onky x can y: sounds like the language of someone with a truckload of x tbh

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

dmac, what are the immigration laws of ireland like

, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

i mean, "america is already great" wasn't so inspiring to people. the democrats at least need to make a claim to improve the conditions of the people who want to vote for them. this wasn't as much of an issue when their opponents were conservatives who just wanted to shrink the government and could maybe promise a tax cut, but up against fascists promising the moon u get the picture

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

obviously no left deserving of the name is anything less than militantly antiracist

I don't think this is obvious, given that ppl seem to want to recreate The Jungle

¶ (DJP), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

flopson: eventually, yes, a coalition of mostly capitalist countries defeated the fascists in the most destructive war in history, nationalizing industry in the process and w a lil help from 25 million dead communists. was hoping we could nip it in something closer to the bud this time tho

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

djp if it's not obvious by all means let's work to make it obviouser

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

only socialism kills fascism; anyone who says otherwise is selling something

― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:38 PM (five minutes ago)

i think bombs and guns and war crimes tribunals have done so in the past.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

but the conflation of working-class politics w white supremacy (and the working class w the "white working class") and committed trump voters with the millions upon millions of stayhomes is an error xxps

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

dmac, what are the immigration laws of ireland like

no blacks, dogs or irish

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

lol ok so you guys are strapping in for ww3 then? xxp

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

who's on our side again?

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

Trump, in all his ignorant bullshit, did v v well to make the single dominating headlines this weekend abt Hamilton instead of his multi-million settlement.

Good luck USA, good luck with your new president. For you are truly, truly screwed. And the rest of "the west" will be dragged along in this magnificent downfall. Thanks, thanks again. You fucking imbeciles.

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

but the conflation of working-class politics w white supremacy (and the working class w the "white working class") and committed trump voters with the millions upon millions of stayhomes is an error xxps

― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:47 PM (twenty-six seconds ago)

this is otm

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

lol ok so you guys are strapping in for ww3 then? xxp

― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:48 PM (thirty-seven seconds ago)

uh, we were pointing out basic historical facts that disprove your "challenging opinion" -- I agree with the rest of your post, but the only socialism bit was absurd.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

dmac, what are the immigration laws of ireland like

― 龜, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"nothin we havent done ourselves please lads"

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

We need militant antiracism! But just not in the theater, because that is impolite, and really, think of the optics.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

Socialism is not gonna beat fascism IMO (the only people I see saying so are, uh, socialists) and our best bet is to step back from the ledge and revert course to the previous status quo

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

Only white guy farmers and plumbers should speak for the left from now on. Great optics on those dudes - the best

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

are you defending neoliberalism or ...?

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

Socialism beat fascism before and it can do it again

And before you say it'll never happen in this country, look at who's president

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

Also, our antiracism must never be seen as 'smug' or 'arrogant' and it must never be seen as inconvenient to white people, because they might find that abrasive. And while militant, it should of course always be tolerant of racism, because otherwise it's hypocritical. And also, it should never be overplayed because economics is the way to go.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

fred i'm not sure whom yr arguing with but if it's me it needs some work

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

i think he's arguing with flappy bird

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

fred u cant even get the ppl who agree with u to agree with u maybe youre not the guy to come up the strategies for the nonvoters

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

I don't know what anyone's arguing anymore. But could we stop seriously using the term "optics" because it is redolent of smug tv commentators that should be reassigned to valuable occupations like managing wastewater treatment plants.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

also stop using "our" and "we" ya damned dane, you can't vote here

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

this is a dumb conversation

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

^^ new board description

who is extremely unqualified to review this pop album (BradNelson), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

treeship otm

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

anyway my wife and I just booked spots on one of the Cleveland buses for the Million Women March on Jan. 21 so if anyone else is going we will see you there

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

are you defending neoliberalism or ...?

― sarahell, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:53 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

u asking me? I was just saying I don't think we should interpret Trump win as a fundamental break with the past, where the only choice is now to chart a course to Socialism or stay in fascism. the easiest choice is still to elect a centre-left liberal Democrat in four years (maybe someone more Bernie than Hillary, whatever). we don't need to have a socialist revolution just cuz we elected a moron who is courted by the alt-right

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

I have tentative plans to go to DC for whatever protests end up happening

I think they will be big, yuuge even

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

i'm probably going to be there too

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

yes flopson, i was asking you, and thanks for clarifying and not responding in the form of a ridic challop

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

flopson asks a good question, which is what do we mean by "socialism"? what would a revolutionary program look like in an era where the bargaining power of labor has been totally liquidated?

Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

and on another subject:
https://www.fastcompany.com/3065777/inside-gab-the-new-twitter-alternative-championed-by-the-alt-right

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

It's entirely possible that many political philosophies can defeat fascism, and probably a combination of them will be required - OF COURSE - but what I took from dlh's post, or what i wanted to take, was that only stiff opposition will work. we can't JD Vance it.

xpost maybe the first thing to recognize is that the bargaining power of labour has NOT been totally liquidated. the US has legal structures that ensure freedoms to organize and to strike that 100 years ago were pipe dreams

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

too bad all those union dudes love trump

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

labor in the USA is going to be reduced to smithereens by the time four years is up

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

they won't love trump when he ends up not delivering.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

I do think we should be as obstructionist to Trump as Republicans were to Obama (if not more), but we all know that's not going to happen.

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

flopson, i'm confused, I thought you were Canadian.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

lol ya I am Canadian, sry I keep using "we" to mean 'the US left'

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

ie canada

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

it's just "weird" idk that today's discussion has been 1/2 foreigners and ex-pats.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Anglophones in Quebec have a particularly strong identification with Americans, imo (we don't feel Québecois, but also buy enough into the idea that Québec isn't part of Canada to not feel Canadian). my francophone girlfriend has no idea why I'm so torn up about the election of Donald Trump lol

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

also US Politics is just a topic of universal interest and no one needs a justification to care about it (imo)

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

Hamilton is global!

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

us politics is not just a topic of universal interest, it's also a topic of universal relevance

the rest of the world should get some token rest of the world state to vote in

iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

And also, the discussion between an 'identitarian' approach and a strictly economist approach to the ascendant populist right is important all over the world. In Denmark the Danish Peoples Party became the main support for the right-wing government back in 2001. We've had the same discussion you're having now for fifteen years at this point.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

us politics is not a topic of universal interest btw

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

great article about identity politics Treeship.

posted in THE ECHO CHAMBER.

Van Horn Street, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

us politics is not a topic of universal interest btw

same for danish politics imo

Van Horn Street, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

Most of the time it's of no interest whatsoever to anyone outside the USA other than Fred.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

i understand it is not the same as 'nebb posting restaurant recommendations and other valuable knowledge in the San Francisco threads, but it ticks (hehehe) some of the same boxes.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

You know who's weird? ShariVari! Why is that dude so interested in Russian politics? What's wrong with him?!?

(sorry mate. you can't always protect everyone)

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

For a start, no-one knows who anyone is, other than Obama, Hilary and Trump. Bernie registered for about a milisecond. Probably because of that bird landing when he was giving that speech.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

but yeah to come back to identity politics, I think it's also fair to admit that it was shaped as a response to the racist, homophobic and sexist policies found throughout US history (same for other western nations, I think this discussion concerns most of the Occident right now). so while I think it's important for a head of government to be as inclusive as possible, media reporting on trans people fighting for bathrooms is obviously healthy for democracy.

Van Horn Street, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

we literally covered this exact same fucking ground only a few hundred posts ago. why this entertains you all so much to argue about who should be posting here and why is fucking beyond me.

What seems to be getting lost in the atomization of left/progressive strategies and causes is that the planet is about to get completely fucked. Whether that's because everybody has given up on climate change, assumes Elon Musk is going to solve it for us with self-aware electric everything, or because it's something we can all actually AGREE ON isn't clear. But back to Trump & the GOP's stated first 100 days plans for the environment:

* Lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars worth of American energy, including shale, oil, natural gas, and clean coal.
* End bans on offshore drilling in order to end our dependence on Middle East oil and make America energy independent.
* Sign into law the Senate’s existing bill to build the Keystone Pipeline.
* Cancel billions of dollars in payments to U.N. climate change programs, and use that money to fix our own country.

Shall we try to do anything about this?

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

not arguing who should and shouldn't be posting here, just that people who don't live here and/or have never lived here -- that relationship of poster to topic is sometimes taken into account.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

it's not unusual for canadians to be better informed on american politics than americans

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

I know a fellow in NZ who follows US politics better than most Americans I work with. ANYWAY!!!!

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

it's like the opinions of people who have never lived anywhere remotely like middle america feeling oh so knowledgeable about "those people," or mansplaining or ... you get the pattern.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

it's not unusual for canadians to be better informed on american politics than americans

― iatee, Sunday, November 20, 2016

what about American optics

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

just that there is a difference between facts and data and reading the best thinkpieces vs. lived experience

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

Danesplaining?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

it's not unusual for canadians to be better informed on american politics than americans

― iatee, 21. november 2016 01:00 (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Nor for Danes!

I lived a year in the US with a roommate from Pittsburgh, for what it's worth.

Frederik B, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

it's like the opinions of people who have never lived anywhere remotely like middle america feeling oh so knowledgeable about "those people," or mansplaining or ... you get the pattern.

there are lots of canadians who have lived in places more like middle america than I have!

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

I am a british on this thread, because it's partly our fault

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:06 (seven years ago) link

I haven't noticed Fred trying to talk down lived experience with think-pieces?

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:06 (seven years ago) link

as one of the "worst offenders" in that department, that says very little

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

I lived a year in the US with a roommate from Pittsburgh, for what it's worth.

we should literally start a separate thread just to talk about how much that is worth

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

that was an xp to iatee

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

I'm getting bored with posters in this thread and Facebook telling a gay man of Cuban descent how, where, when, and why I should or should not be upset about.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

I'm all for tactics and strategy but this election wasn't lost because thousands of colliers in Pennsylvania thought Hamilton a repulsive example of anti-American political correctness, therefore we liberals have to "tamp down" identity politics.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:09 (seven years ago) link

Also we have a thread about the MENA region and, with a few exceptions ...

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:09 (seven years ago) link

ugh sorry I derailed a dumb discussion into an even dumber discussion ...

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:10 (seven years ago) link

It's not unusual to have fun with canadians
But when I see you hanging about with canadians
It's not unusual to see me cry

xp:
Until something is done about the demand side (psst, carbon tax), supply side measures don't matter a great deal. For Bakken shale, its $6-7 cheaper to ship by pipe than by rail, but rail suffices.

Nobody is drilling for oil domestically with $46/bbl. Emissions will continue to slowly decline due to NG being so much cheaper than coal in electricity generation.

The big issue with Trump and climate is the international agreements. Getting to Paris was so hard fought that I fear a unilateral exit of Paris and Rio framework will set the whole endeavor back by a decade.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:11 (seven years ago) link

@Alfred: yeah the left-vs-left blame game is something I also see going on and doesn't seem much use unless it's blaming very specific historical instances and blaming actions NOT people

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:11 (seven years ago) link

I mean maybe a few people but like, particular, powerful people who actually need holding to account, not just 'feminists', etc.

Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

it's just "weird" idk that today's discussion has been 1/2 foreigners and ex-pats.

― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:37 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this evening's discussion, tbf. i figure its time related

also, the us election killed the rest of ilx. srsly.

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:16 (seven years ago) link

Sanpaku that all seems just a tad sanguine to me. Why should we allow this administration to get away with any of their petroleum-first ideas?

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:17 (seven years ago) link

whenever ppl mention "optics" it's always worth asking whose gaze is at issue and honestly anybody who cares enough to follow the slam-bam media trifecta of pence going to hamilton, the cast reading out a high-minded plea, and trump following up publicly with a truly improbable level of petty hostility and comes away thinking that trump really stuck it to those liberal assholes, well, they can go kick rocks. i'm not on their side. they don't just need to be called out, they need to lose, all their candidates and their stupid issues, and lose so badly that no one ever wants to be like them again.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

the environmental issues are really scary because I can't see what anyone can actually do. The offshore oil drilling was a major accomplishment (at least where i live) in the 80s. It's frightening to think, as you mentioned, how many decades of work this is gonna roll back.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

whenever ppl mention "optics" it's always worth asking whose gaze is at issue and honestly anybody who cares enough to follow the slam-bam media trifecta of pence going to hamilton, the cast reading out a high-minded plea, and trump following up publicly with a truly improbable level of petty hostility and comes away thinking that trump really stuck it to those liberal assholes, well, they can go kick rocks. i'm not on their side. they don't just need to be called out, they need to lose, all their candidates and their stupid issues, and lose so badly that no one ever wants to be like them aga

Those of us most destroyed by the Trump victory watched the Chuck Todds and read Talking Points Memo and paid attention to the daily scrim while men and women who used dial-up to log onto AOL in rural Wisconsin read an email forward sent by a cousin with the subject line HILLARY -- BENGHAZI AND THE TRUTH. Following this shit every day brings one no mental health and doesn't even guarantee the results we want.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:23 (seven years ago) link

sorry -- I pasted Tracer Hand in the first graf.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:23 (seven years ago) link

yeowch!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 00:38 (seven years ago) link

Where were you when Alfred pasted Tracer

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

@El Tomboto,

What this administration can do domestically in 4 years is host a bunch more poorly bidded lease auctions.

It can't force private industry to produce fossil fuels from them.
Rig count is catastrophic now for any petroleum drillers.
No one is drilling in the U.S. if they aren't required to by lease provisions.
Nearly every coal operator is in bankruptcy. Even low cost operators in the Powder River basin are losing money.

However, we on the environmental side should be mindful of what this means.
By 2019-20, there will be another oil crunch as in 2007-8. When gas is back at $5/gal there won't be popular support for the demand side measures that are necessary.
2016 was a chance to impose painless (at current prices) carbon taxes, or politicians favorable to them.

Green causes could have won in 2016, but won't in 2020 when actual resource shortages start to bite.

I watched I-732 in Washington state. Here was a campaign in a green state that could have set a model for appropriately pricing in externalities, without intersecting with other debates about the size of government.

That was our chance for sane policy this year. I supported it from a distant state. It only got 42%, because morons from the Sierra Club to Van Jones thought they might in the future come up with a better idea.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 21 November 2016 01:13 (seven years ago) link

Otm

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 01:23 (seven years ago) link

In a state with a regressive tax base and a criminally underfunded public school system, writing 732 as a revenue-neutral measure was a mistake. (In fact the fiscal analysis in the voter's guide posited that it would be revenue-negative.) Whatever the other problems with 732, I would've voted for it if it had been revenue-positive.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

Being Canadian is like living in the apartment next door to a really loud extrovert, who's good friends with your roommates. Even if you want to ignore him, the way he lives his life has a significant, material impact on the way you live yours. Last week I came home and he was on my couch & wouldn't leave even after I told him I had stuff to do. "You go ahead and do your stuff. By the way, I've been talking with your roommates and we all agree there's gonna be some changes around here."

hardcore dilettante, Monday, 21 November 2016 01:33 (seven years ago) link

canada is acoustic, while the us is plugged into a Marshall stack.

on another note:

trump - everything he does, the sheer ridiculousness of it all - is such an infuriating mind-fuck. i'm finding it u+k to not ruminate on this shit, not let it fuck with me. trying to find that fine equipoise where i stay aware and alert, but not gripped or panicked by the whole thing. four more years of this; we need some mental/spiritual tools.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 21 November 2016 01:41 (seven years ago) link

^

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

Those of us most destroyed by the Trump victory watched the Chuck Todds and read Talking Points Memo and paid attention to the daily scrim while men and women who used dial-up to log onto AOL in rural Wisconsin read an email forward sent by a cousin with the subject line HILLARY -- BENGHAZI AND THE TRUTH. Following this shit every day brings one no mental health and doesn't even guarantee the results we want.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:23 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This feels otm to me. Since the election, I know I've altered the sources/amounts of news media I consume, as well as the way I consume it (obviously while still trying to remain an informed person). The whole thing felt like one of those moments where I realized that for all the time and mental energy I was spending on reading the news, I wasn't actually better informed about the world at all and in some ways was less informed the more I spent my reading hours on it.

intheblanks, Monday, 21 November 2016 01:48 (seven years ago) link

Whatever else your local issues, getting emissions down should take precedence.

Period.

I don't expect the U.S. dollar to exist in any remotely familiar form in 2100. Its a useful collective fiction.

On the contrary, our greenhouse emissions will be present in the atmosphere for tens of thousands of years. Tens of thousands of years where the Earth's carrying capacity is markedly reduced. Billions who will never live, because of our generation.

I've followed the climate issue since 1989, and frankly at this point, I think I'd vote in favor on pandemic plague wiping out half the population (including myself) as that would 1) extend the timeline for solutions, and 2) make the endless droughts/famines later this century less destructive. Just be glad I'm too damaged by knowledge to be electable.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 21 November 2016 01:51 (seven years ago) link

Harsh truths

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

In a state with a regressive tax base and a criminally underfunded public school system, writing 732 as a revenue-neutral measure was a mistake. (In fact the fiscal analysis in the voter's guide posited that it would be revenue-negative.) Whatever the other problems with 732, I would've voted for it if it had been revenue-positive.

― slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, November 20, 2016 8:30 PM (thirty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I thought the WA Carbon tax would have made the overall tax code more progressive? idg why it has to be revenue positive

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:08 (seven years ago) link

Washington state has the most regressive state tax system in the entire country

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:10 (seven years ago) link

Sorry to state the obvious. I mean that I sort of see silby's point. Of course I also see Sanpaku's as well.

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link

the Carbon tax would have made it less regressive, because it had a big low income tax credit in it

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link

no Silby's point as stated doesn't make sense. Saying, well, let's not do this thing that saves the environment and makes the tax code more progressive unless it increases revenue, because the tax code we're starting out from is regressive. IDGI

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:12 (seven years ago) link

Moreover, the low-income tax credits would help prevent I-732 from hurting Washington state’s neediest households. Critics of carbon taxes often argue that they are regressive, pointing to the fact that lower-income Americans spend a high fraction of their income on energy. With these tax credits, however, I-732 would be sharply progressive, making low-income households significantly better off.

http://www.salon.com/2016/11/01/why-are-environmentalists-denouncing-a-carbon-tax-in-washington-state/

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:13 (seven years ago) link

increasing revenue in a regressive tax code is more painful for the poor than holding revenue constant and making it more progressive...

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:14 (seven years ago) link

should have also quoted the following para in that slate piece

This is an important point, not just for I-732, but for carbon policy more generally. In a recent paper, Maryland economist Rob Williams and coauthors examined a national carbon tax for which revenue would be returned in equal, lump-sum payments to all households. They showed that these lump-sum payments would exceed average expenditure on the tax for households earning less than $70,000 per year, so these households would be net winners. I-732 is potentially even more progressive because the tax credits would be targeted to low-income households.

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

The cut in the business tax for manufacturing that was also part of it also made the whole thing seem like a Trojan horse.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 02:16 (seven years ago) link

All missing the point. Pricing emissions now is far, far more important than whether its slightly progressive or regressive.

From the outside, it appeared the opposition was largely from groups that would have preferred a say in how revenues should be spent. Pricing emissions puts solar EV, wind, replacing coal generation, household efficiency/conservation etc. on an equal playing field for all, rather than just benefiting grant applicants.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 21 November 2016 02:19 (seven years ago) link

that's just isolating substitution effect stuff; you don't want to use the tax to kill manufacturing, you want to shift within manufacturing to lower carbon intensity... idk, from an outside pov it was a shitty thing for the enviro left to do..

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:19 (seven years ago) link

(xp to Silby)

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:20 (seven years ago) link

The backstory on the initiative seemed to be, a coalition of orgs were working on an initiative, it went slowly, because progressive coalitions lol, some other policy shop went it alone to put something on the ballot, everyone in the coalition working on the other bill opposed 732.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 02:23 (seven years ago) link

here's the story I read before voting

http://grist.org/election-2016/washington-carbon-tax-732/

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 02:26 (seven years ago) link

i'm pretty much resigned to global warming being inevitable. see you in 100,000 years

, Monday, 21 November 2016 02:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah I mean I also assume that people who don't yet exist would prefer not to so their never coming into existence is the silver lining of the everybody now alive dies cloud

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 02:46 (seven years ago) link

Has anybody encountered any thinkpieces on why the Left is more prone to "perfect enemy of the good" factionalism than the Right?

On the Right, they can pursue more restrictions on reproductive rights at late-term, then 20 weeks, then closer to conception, etc. They're willing to accept the grind towards achieving whatever dystopia they're after.

On the Left, if a climate crisis solution doesn't perfectly meet everyone's needs, some environmental groups will actively oppose it rather than seek to correct its faults at a later date.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 21 November 2016 02:56 (seven years ago) link

i'm pretty much resigned to global warming being inevitable. see you in 100,000 years

― 龜, Sunday, November 20, 2016 6:44 PM (twenty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^^this

get real yall

a but (brimstead), Monday, 21 November 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link

better to focus on poverty/civil liberties, planet earth about to be recycled

a but (brimstead), Monday, 21 November 2016 03:09 (seven years ago) link

one reason i find the 'russians hacking the election' theories not that believable is what happened in my parents county in south NJ

it's a pretty white, middle-class county - not upper middle class/upper class like cherry hill - the house next to theirs flies a blue lives matter flag, a cop lives in the neighborhood, there's not really any markers of upper middle class in the area (closest apple store, whole foods, nordstroms, ll bean, etc. are all half an hour away by car)...

the county went for obama 55% / 44% for romney in 2012

however, in 2016, trump is winning by .5% so far http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NJ/Gloucester/64655/181484/Web01/en/summary.html

to my mind, definitely fits in with the narrative that white middle class voters flipped for trump this election

, Monday, 21 November 2016 03:29 (seven years ago) link

Pretty much all social justice goes out the window when the poor are outbid for food. It's happening between nations, but I hope it doesn't become a huge issue withing the U.S. in my lifetime. It's probably inevitable.

Distribution of all possible outcomes (Sanpaku), Monday, 21 November 2016 03:31 (seven years ago) link

also: thinking if the line of attack for dems this election shouldn't have been 'trump is racist/sexist/misogynistic/xenophobic/islamophobic' - all qualities that immediately offend us educated city slickers but code very different depending on which side of the culture wars you find yourself on

instead, should have focused on trump as a con man - trump U allegations, but also as someone who doesn't pay his workers, takes advantage of tax loopholes, etc. - seems like this is a much more 'universal' message - if there's one thing all americans hate, it's getting conned / fits into a 'fight fire with fire' strategy vis a vis hillary's 'corruption' charges re: emails and clinton foundation

, Monday, 21 November 2016 03:35 (seven years ago) link

otm

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

otm x2

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

caveat that her strategy did work for the majority of voters (brutal to win pop vote by 1.5 million, which was the tally last I saw) but to eke out rust-belt swing states def agree

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 03:54 (seven years ago) link

the more I think about it the less I think any given way of attacking trump would have done much. I mean his whole thing was 'of course I cheat, now I'm cheating 4 u'

what I do think could have helped was attacking him in ways that built clinton's own character / made her come across as more of a human being. e.g. had she taken control of her own twitter account and gone off script more in the debates. they were playing it safe and that seemed like a pretty sensible strategy at the time, let donald trump be the one who goes off script and non-donald trumps who go off script and say something like 'deplorables' get disproportionately punished for it.

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:16 (seven years ago) link

trump got hit with plenty of that stuff in both the primaries and in the general and it just didn't stick

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 04:20 (seven years ago) link

I read someone on her campaign compare it to an athletic competition where the other guy gets to be on steroids, which seemed like a pretty apt comparison.

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:20 (seven years ago) link

caveat that her strategy did work for the majority of voters (brutal to win pop vote by 1.5 million, which was the tally last I saw) but to eke out rust-belt swing states def agree

― flopson, Sunday, November 20, 2016 10:54 PM (twenty-six minutes ago

the strategy "didn't work" because the election isn't decided by the popular vote. the reason the lost the electoral college is precisely because her strategy failed to appeal to the voters she most needed to reach

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

there was no precedent, really, in facing a candidate like this. it still makes absolutely no sense to me why people were willing to vote for a known liar who doesn't honor his contracts and has shady ties to russia -- among his other, many faults. in the future i think democrats should strive to seem less strategic, if possible: just try to be clear about their agenda in a way that connects with the concerns of average people. polls show that most people lean progressive on the issues, anyway, even if they don't think they do

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

like, trump was literally going to these states and talking to people, often doing two stops per day. clinton didn't do anything like that.

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:26 (seven years ago) link

or find a reality tv star

xp

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:26 (seven years ago) link

Going into the election I rated the chances of the respective candidates doing anything whatsoever about global warming at about 0% for Trump vs 0.5% for Clinton

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

Clinton also couldn't draw when she did rallies. She should have gone to those states more anyway, but I'm just saying she was never going to be Trump.

Another big mistake I thought was the shying away from attacking the entire GOP and refusing to conflate Trump with their agenda (indeed, even trying and failing to peel off "moderate republicans" as a focus). How hard is it to campaign on "these people are going to take your fucking medicaid/medicare away"?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

But anyway I was already so pessimistic about what the future looked like under a CLINTON presidency -- no action on global warming, a continued slow march toward privatizing everything, a terrible political landscape for the Democrats going forward, likelihood of one term, etc. And now this is so much worse. Every day is like a fever of nightmare scenarios racing through my head before the fever finally breaks at some point in the evening.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

Today my mind was playing out these, for example:

GOP holds up federal funding for sanctuary cities. NYC and other cities litigate. In most cases they probably win, but it takes time, GOP appeals, continues to hold up federal funding pending appeal even if court orders otherwise. Existing SCOTUS precedent favors the cities, but the GOP doesn't care, cities struggle to meet funding gaps for key programs with federal funding, many of which affect the poorest. Meanwhile GOP gets impatient, mass-hires fed immigration police, starts raiding the cities, whole neighborhoods of the boroughs lose 10%, 20%, 30% of their population.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:36 (seven years ago) link

I went further with it too: fed funding loss forces either large budget cuts or tax increases, city services suffer, homelessness on streets increases, track pickup reduced, things start to look more like the 80s, etc. The only reason I think this might not really happen to NYC is that Trump and his family are so invested here.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:37 (seven years ago) link

Every day is like a fever of nightmare scenarios racing through my head before the fever finally breaks at some point in the evening.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, November 20, 2016 11:32 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ha otm

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the Pences of the world would love to fuck NYC and either don't grasp or don't care about the larger consequences.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:47 (seven years ago) link

i also don't think trump wants to disturb the status quo, despite screaming the exact opposite every day for the past 18 months. he likes his life. becoming president is a severe step down for him - white house, air force one, no more android phone, no more women on the side. i just don't see mass deportations happening under him. too much of a hassle.

(trying to be optimistic here)

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:50 (seven years ago) link

Ok if I had to place a bet on most likely scenario, I'd say he does some kind of showy but statistically underwhelming "mass" deportation and acts like it's the biggest deportation of criminal illegals ever.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 04:53 (seven years ago) link

the fact that a man who led such a life of privilege, a man who found great success in the world's most diverse city, is now going to "go after" helpless immigrants for no reason except they were a convenient scapegoat in his campaign is so nauseating it's hard to contemplate

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

trump has very few real beliefs of any sort but he obviously loves nyc more than most people who live here

I'm mostly just concerned about 4 years of 5th avenue being a circus / constant midtown street closures etc.

I mean I honestly haven't noticed anything yet, though I don't spend much time north of 42nd st

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:55 (seven years ago) link

i went to trump tower out of curiosity a few days ago. only 1 block was closed off but there was police everywhere. the protesters were marching somewhere else.

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:57 (seven years ago) link

*there were police everywhere

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:58 (seven years ago) link

the sad little downstairs food court at trump tower used to be my go to bathroom in the area. can't imagine I'll ever step foot in that building again.

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

you could just poop in the lobby

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

good optics

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:04 (seven years ago) link

can't believe the president lives in a tower named after himself btw. it's like a wookiepedia entry.

difficult listening hour, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

yeah, all of this is really stupid

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:08 (seven years ago) link

*in unison* I DIDN'T RE-A-LIZE ID-I-OC-RA-CY WAS A DOC-U-MEN-TAR-Y!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 05:12 (seven years ago) link

just grim, feudal

difficult listening hour, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:14 (seven years ago) link

this thread is worth it just for the links

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:23 (seven years ago) link

otm xp (+ not xp)

difficult listening hour, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:24 (seven years ago) link

America must not waste time asking ourselves how this could have happened. It happened because it is a habit written deep in our public memory. If we are willing to see ourselves as we are and have been, we will also see our potential for prophetic resistance, even in times like these.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 05:27 (seven years ago) link

I'm mostly just concerned about 4 years of 5th avenue being a circus / constant midtown street closures etc.

who are you and what have you done with iatee

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 06:41 (seven years ago) link

the fact that a man who led such a life of privilege, a man who found great success in the world's most diverse city, is now going to "go after" helpless immigrants for no reason except they were a convenient scapegoat in his campaign is so nauseating it's hard to contemplate

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 08:39 (seven years ago) link

iatee = Tiffanys regular

im fine w/ staying out of midtown except for MoMA (which is 4 blocks from TT but is better approached from the west anyway)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

/I'm mostly just concerned about 4 years of 5th avenue being a circus / constant midtown street closures etc./

who are you and what have you done with iatee

it's not just car traffic! they block off large chunks of the city from pedestrians when the president's around

iatee, Monday, 21 November 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

instead, should have focused on trump as a con man - trump U allegations, but also as someone who doesn't pay his workers, takes advantage of tax loopholes, etc. - seems like this is a much more 'universal' message - if there's one thing all americans hate, it's getting conned / fits into a 'fight fire with fire' strategy vis a vis hillary's 'corruption' charges re: emails and clinton foundation

what really sucks about this is that Hillary was pretty much an open book on this, all the information about her and the foundation was out there, along with thousands and thousands of hacked emails - meanwhile Trump volunteered effectively nothing about himself, we know essentially nothing about him or his business dealings, in fact the only thing we really know is through Fahrenthold who found that Trump has given essentially nothing to charity (despite his frequent claims otherwise) and that his foundation engaged in some blatantly illegal behavior. and yet Clinton gets the image of being "corrupt". so like....why bother volunteering information about yourself anymore? apparently people don't care.

frogbs, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

Yeah. There was too much confusion and misinformation this election so people weren't able to see the candidates clearly. From an objective standpoint Trump is much less transparent and much more dishonest but the deluge of bad info, I guess, obscured this for people

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

Good mourning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

My parents tell me their friends said things like, "both are corrupt," as if that settled it

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

giant meteor 2016 amirite

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 14:16 (seven years ago) link

Holy shit, has Trump said which church he has joined yet? Because he better do that really fucking soon before people start to think he's a Muslim.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

Nasty thing is if behaviour during this campaign now allows future candidates to be as unforthcoming about important details. I really don't like the idea of precedents being set for the ability to do wrong and get away with it.

How's he going to drain the swamp if he's the main seepage?

Stevolende, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

I was really irritated with anyone who said "lesser of two evils". your evil detector is seriously broken if one of these candidates didn't register off the charts for you.

frogbs, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

The militantly anti-labor direction this is heading is just so predictable.

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

On Saturday evening, fans of Broadway’s smash hit “Hamilton” poured into downtown Chicago’s PrivateBank Theatre for a showing put on by the musical’s traveling cast.

...

Presumably, everyone was excited to see the show — tickets, after all, soared to more than $600 for some seats.

John Palmer, 56, was presumably not in this number, though.

In the song “Yorktown (The World Turned Upside Down),” the cast sings “Immigrants / We get the job done.” When the cast reached this line at the Chicago show, the crowd cheered, as has become commonplace.

Palmer, by contrast, stood and yelled profanities, audience member Brea Hayes told the Chicago Tribune. He continued ranting for two songs, according to Chicago Tribune reporter Jodi Cohen, who happened to be in attendance.

During the song “Dear Theodosia,” Palmer allegedly yelled, “We won. You Lost. Get over it. F— you.” He was escorted from the theater with little incident, although he allegedly initially resisted.

“He started raising his voice and throwing up middle fingers at anyone who looked at him, including me and my best friend,” audience member Ken Keacher told pop culture website Pajiba.

Kate Hoyt, who was with Keacher, said, “He was saying things like, ‘We won. Trump is president. Get over it.’ At some point Ken (Keacher) leaned into the aisle to try and tell him to leave and the guy then put up both his fists and said, ‘Let’s go, Democrats. I’ll kill you all.’ ”

Venue staff members told Broadway World that he was intoxicated. Palmer was charged with one misdemeanor count of criminal trespass to land after causing a disturbance at the performance and refusing to leave and has an initial court date set for Jan. 9, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

(Worth noting that this, the WaPo account, was better reported than the Trib account ... even though a Trib writer was in attendance! And also, fuck you, WaPo, this is no traveling cast, this is our very own stationary 'Hamilton,' you dummies.)

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

Perhaps my memory is failing me, but I don't recall regularly reading stories about Obama supporters being such sore winners in '08 or '12. I guess electing someone with an untreated profound personality disorder to the office of president kinda upends the notion that public demonstrations of psychological imbalance are socially unacceptable, huh. The near future is gonna be a blast!

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Republicans inevitably cite Obama turning to McCain sometime in 2009 during a contentious meeting to remind him, "John, remember I won."

What they miss is that the GOP had denied his legitimacy since November 2008.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

The militantly anti-labor direction this is heading is just so predictable.

― Treeship, Monday, November 21, 2016 9:30 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I'm sorry to say but our choices have been quietly vs militantly anti-labor for some time now. That's part of our problem.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

aka Dems v Repugs

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

Companies are going to flee out of the city

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Monday, 21 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

USFL : Trump's insistence upon moving to a fall schedule :: NYC : Trump's insistence upon continuing to reside in Trump Tower

Trump doesn't give a fuck about anyone and will stubbornly wreck anything and everything to ensure he gets what he wants, no matter how stupid the thing he wants may be.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 November 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

Maybe the wall was a metaphor and Trump was trying to tell everyone that because of him, "America" ends here.

Evan, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

maybe it's the modern security state that is dumb and if trump wants to run his presidency in NYC he should be allowed to with minimum fuss and if he's assassinated bc of lax security so be it.

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

Definitely a great argument for lax security.

Evan, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

I'm sort of surprised to hear anyone actually buys anything in those Fifth Ave stores -- I thought they were mostly there as brand-establishers/advertisements.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

fifth avenue is incredibly busy this time of year

, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

Any attempt to "reform" the federal civil service without support of the unions AND management (yes there's a civil service management association - because in government, management is a just another layer of labor, because lol hueg) will die in court just like everything they attempted under Dubya

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

Even Newt Gingrich's comment seemed to subtly acknowledge that they wouldn't be able to just jump in there and gut it.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Who says Trump even has to do any of the things he said he's going to do? He could do nothing and say he succeeded and a huge percentage of the population would either believe him or just yawn. And anything that goes wrong he could just blame on Obama and Clinton and the cast of Hamilton.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

I don't think the blaming-your-predecessor stuff is gonna work so well tbh

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

there's gonna be some kind of crisis/calamity/unforeseen event, he's going to totally fuck it up, and his numbers will tank

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

a scenario I find much more likely than him successfully implementing any of his half-formed "ideas" and experiencing blowback

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

Don't like to think about it, but first mass shooting... how will he manage that?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

"Hate to say I predicted this but this is why you need to elect me as--- wait what? Uh. Oh fuck."

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

mass shootings, protests against police brutality, hurricane disasters - - - basically anything calamitous that comes along is an invitation for him to say a spree of incredibly stupid things on Twitter, complaining about how the media keeps focusing on these negative things while he's making america great again without fanfare. iow exactly the same as the election but one has to imagine it might play SLIGHTLY differently coming from a sitting president who people expect to be solving the problems. dunno though.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Monday, 21 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

he'll make some dumb comment about how a vigilant gunholder could've saved the day and that will be that unti the next mass shooting. mass shootings occur regardless of what the president says as we've learned

I'm more concerned about what terrorist attack or mass shooting w/ an Islamist shooter will provoke from him

marcos, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

fallows is okay with mattis as defense secretary fwiw https://twitter.com/JamesFallows/status/800737961943953408

take yr comforts where you can find em i guess

, Monday, 21 November 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

that politico piece about PA voters made it pretty clear Trump's on the clock. Batter up, Donnie

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

I think him taking credit for the Ford plant not moving to Mexico is a good preview of how his presidency is going to go

I really cannot imagine a scenario which doesn't result in him having historically low approval ratings - Dems are absolutely not going to turn around on this guy, and I can't imagine conservatives giving him too many chances, he's already blowing his political capital by hiring some of the absolute dumbest people he can find. He promised too much and insulted too many and has thus far shown zero indication that he's up for the job. I mean already he's talking about living part time at Trump Tower which is so fucking dumb. I predict that the honeymoon is gonna be over real quick.

frogbs, Monday, 21 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

Mattis has a good reputation with the ForeignPolicy.com crowd AFAIK.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

tbh I don't get the stuff that pops up occasionally now among liberals that's already anointing Trump as teflon and everything he says or does will be greeted with a yawn and/or support.

Hillary is going to clear the popular vote by almost 2 million with terrible unfavorables and would be the President if not for James Comey - be afraid of what the GOP can do with all three branches of government but why start acting like public opinion is lost and people are primed to follow Trump into the abyss?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

would be the President if not for James Comey

KEEP A-GOIN'

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

During congratulatory phone call, Trump asks Argentine president to expedite permits on some building projects: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1958082-revelan-que-trump-le-pidio-permiso-a-macri-para-hacer-una-torre

(NB I am relying on TPM's characterization and the rather clunky Google Translate version of this article)

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

man sure glad we spent weeks gauging Clinton's potential conflicts of interest when Trump's were so much more blatant and widespread, especially since we know he's not gonna make a good faith effort to resolve any of it

frogbs, Monday, 21 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

lol @ us learning about all this in foreign papers

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/138888/no-bernie-sanders-didnt-ask-supporters-ditch-identity-politics

looking forward to more bad-faith engagements with this sort of stuff for the next...forever

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

Trump is meeting with that congresswoman from hawaii who was on the bernie train early on... good luck with that bipartisanship don

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

She is a Republican darling anyway, tbh.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

i imagine this election has discouraged a lot of great people from ever entering politics, let alone running for president

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

I imagine this election has encouraged a lot of great people to enter local politics with no intention of ever moving beyond that point.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

What was Dubya's lowest approval number? If Bob Altemeyer is right, Nixon's never sunk below 19%, even the day he flew away from the Rose Garden.

In other words, any possible outcome will never drop him before that floor of 1/5th min support.

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Below, not before

(rocketcat) 🚀🐱 👑🐟 (kingfish), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Didn't know those things about Tulsi Gabbard. Sad.

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

I heard anti-Gabbard rumblings among Bernie supporters during the primary.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

whoa it just hit me, Donald Trump will be the President

rip van wanko, Monday, 21 November 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

I imagine this election has encouraged a lot of great people to enter local politics with no intention of ever moving beyond that point.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, November 21, 2016 1:17 PM (twenty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm... i was really enthusiastic about our green party candidate for Mayor, and he got an impressive amount of the vote (22,000 to the winner's 128,000).

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

i imagine this election has discouraged a lot of great people from ever entering politics, let alone running for president

― flappy bird, Monday, November 21, 2016 6:14 PM (thirty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

while also encouraging world record holding narcissists to run like kanye

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

Donald, Imma let you finish, but Grover Cleveland was the best president of all time. OF ALL TIME!

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

I actually think this election will lead to a huge number of people considering running for office as democrats with an eye to moving beyond local. I predict a candidate "baby boom" of sorts.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/B34TOIa.png

the last time white women voted for a democrat was 1996

, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

that bad boy charm

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

yeah uh what's up with that?

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

seriously- why???

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

Graph strongly suggests it helps if you kill a Democratic president.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

some analysis here http://fusion.net/story/370440/white-women-racism-donald-trump/

, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

xp - for the same reasons white men generally vote Republican?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

I asked the question on the pre-election thread. I haven't read anything convincing.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

Rs are the Daddy party.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

I don't know why anyone is surprised anymore when white people do stupid and unexplainable things.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

It's kind of our thing.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

restrict my rights, daddy

¶ (DJP), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

I don't see it as particularly unexplainable? Stupid, sure, but logical. White women are subject to the same cultural forces that push white men toward the GOP - religious fundamentalism, rural cultural isolation, various fears of other people.

I don't know the polling on it but even on 'women's issues' it's not like there's a shortage of anti-choice women or women eager to blame or ignore victims of sexual assault.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

at least thru '60s most women felt obligated to follow their husbands' lead; not an apparent big change perhaps, aside from less universal coupling

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

When Patricia Arquette caused the mini-uproar at the Oscars (gay men and people of color need to start supporting women, etc.), a friend just refused to believe there was any reason that was controversial. As a progressive white woman who associated with other progressive women socially and politically, she had zero idea of the levels of opposition to marriage equality and anti-racism among women/white women.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/3W0SuSJ.jpg

, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

there's been a lot of finger-pointing by men of all races at "white women" over the past couple of months and i always find it a bit uncomfortable, even if i get what they're saying

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

well, yeah

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

I don't know why anyone is surprised anymore when white people do stupid and unexplainable things.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, November 21, 2016 11:21 AM (nineteen minutes ago)

see also: that thing white ppl do when they disparage white ppl

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

sympathy level for white people feeling uncomfortable that people are pointing out that the majority of them who participated in this election voted for white supremacy is currently hovering at zero

¶ (DJP), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah that's not what i was saying. men singling women out implicitly because they should have "known better" or whatever is kind of nagl imo

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

i feel like it's another way for white people who are used to being the center of attention to remain the center of attention.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

Press Releases
Gabbard Statement on Meeting with President-Elect Donald Trump
November 21, 2016
New York, NY—U.S. Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) today released the following statement on her meeting with President-elect Donald Trump regarding Syria:

"President-elect Trump asked me to meet with him about our current policies regarding Syria, our fight against terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS, as well as other foreign policy challenges we face. I felt it important to take the opportunity to meet with the President-elect now before the drumbeats of war that neocons have been beating drag us into an escalation of the war to overthrow the Syrian government—a war which has already cost hundreds of thousands of lives and forced millions of refugees to flee their homes in search of safety for themselves and their families.

“While the rules of political expediency would say I should have refused to meet with President-elect Trump, I never have and never will play politics with American and Syrian lives.

“Serving the people of Hawaiʻi and our nation is an honor and responsibility that I do not take lightly. Representing the aloha spirit and diversity of the people of Hawaiʻi, I will continue to seek common ground to deliver results that best serve all Americans, as I have tried to do during my time in Congress.

“Where I disagree with President-elect Trump on issues, I will not hesitate to express that disagreement. However, I believe we can disagree, even strongly, but still come together on issues that matter to the American people and affect their daily lives. We cannot allow continued divisiveness to destroy our country.

“President-elect Trump and I had a frank and positive conversation in which we discussed a variety of foreign policy issues in depth. I shared with him my grave concerns that escalating the war in Syria by implementing a so-called no fly/safe zone would be disastrous for the Syrian people, our country, and the world. It would lead to more death and suffering, exacerbate the refugee crisis, strengthen ISIS and al-Qaeda, and bring us into a direct conflict with Russia which could result in a nuclear war. We discussed my bill to end our country’s illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government, and the need to focus our precious resources on rebuilding our own country, and on defeating al-Qaeda, ISIS, and other terrorist groups who pose a threat to the American people.

“For years, the issue of ending interventionist, regime change warfare has been one of my top priorities. This was the major reason I ran for Congress—I saw firsthand the cost of war, and the lives lost due to the interventionist warmongering policies our country has pursued for far too long.

“Let me be clear, I will never allow partisanship to undermine our national security when the lives of countless people lay in the balance."

(•̪●) (carne asada), Monday, 21 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

i mean yeah white people deserve most of the blame for the outcome of this election obviously. deciding to focus on white women kind of makes me believe the speaker has certain ideas or assumptions about how women should be voting based on their gender xp

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Gross

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

Not what kev said. What tulsi gabbard said.

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

I haven't really seen focusing blame on white women so much as surprise that the potential first woman President didn't move the needle more than it did. 'Blame' as such should be reserved for rural voters (predominately white as a class, obv) and the hypocrisy and insanity of evangelical/fundie Christians.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

would think a candidate who routinely rates woman on a scale of 10 would've moved the needle some too

frogbs, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

yeah i was just curious- i don't get it

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

You can't guess someone's beliefs and values based on their gender. It doesn't break down that cleanly.

Treeship, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

it's just that when DT said gross things about women and Latinos the 'cw' [sic] was "obviously he's going to get historically low % of women and Latino vote." Let's not say these things again.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

fantasizing about alternate reality where Dems hammer GOPers for unwilling to utter the phrase "radical white terrorists"

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

eh, gabbard is like an old school democrat; she was opposed to same sex marriage for a long time too, and her dad is a republican. but she has some evolving views and there are thingsa bout her that are good. I have little doubt that she and trump actually agree on anything re: syria though, because Trump doesn't have any actual real thoughts on Syria.

akm, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

and over 30% of hispanic men voted for Trump even though he accused Mexican immigrants of being rapists. Identity politics are sometimes complicated!

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

and how racist it is to group people of Cuban, Mexico, Central American, etc. descent into a monolithic demographic and make expectations of that group.

Trump's numbers are much worse when you eliminate Cubans - so while there are major differences in attitudes among other groups, they're much closer to expectations.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

would think a candidate who routinely rates woman on a scale of 10 would've moved the needle some too

― frogbs, Monday, November 21, 2016 3:05 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i think the more vulgar aspects of trump's misogyny (grab em by the pussy etc) while obv offensive to a whole lot of people just don't really faze many others. we previously had some standards about what is acceptable for a presidential candidate to say but ultimately americans are kind of a vulgar people. we watch a TON of porn, view counts in the billions, this shit is like the most popular content on the web among both men and women right? trump's "locker room talk" i think probably sounded pretty tame to a lot of people

marcos, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

i think that's right and the "when you're famous they let you" sounded close enough to establishing consent that ppl who wanted an excuse to dismiss it as more msm hysteria had one

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah I have seen that explanation from facebook commenters and such. There's also still a pretty ingrained idea of "oh well powerful men are always going to be like that."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

which is true, and maybe why ppl should have voted for the woman

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

and over 30% of hispanic men voted for Trump even though he accused Mexican immigrants of being rapists. Identity politics are sometimes complicated!

― sarahell, Monday, November 21, 2016 2:15 PM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the numbers for hispanic turnout seen from exit polls have been put into question. i don't think we know these numbers with perfect accuracy and my not for a while

with overall turnout depressed from '12 and certainly from '08 (right? even accting for pop growth?), one way to look at it is that only the hardcore committed turned out, and the less politically-motivated, that obama had success in bringing out, stayed home this time.

any way you cut it i think this idea of trump "increasing share" among people of color needs to be taken with some skepticism

it is certainly possible tho.

goole, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

Trump looking into fixed elections is going to be like OJ looking for the real killer.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

apparently gabbard is under consideration for UN ambassador, which would be pretty great considering the alternatives and also i'm sure hawaii could elect someone with more orthodox progressive views to take her place

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

idk if watching a lot of porn is the best example of how Americans are vulgar and tolerate vulgarity, because that's something people tend to do in private. Mainstream television is a better indicator.

any way you cut it i think this idea of trump "increasing share" among people of color needs to be taken with some skepticism

I'm definitely not saying he increased his share among people of color, just that people would "expect" that the support would be much much lower than it was.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2016/11/how-the-vote-broke-in-historical-perspective/508352/


I work in the election industry—on the counting side, not the political side. When I went to sleep on election night, Trump’s lead was a million votes and climbing. This was not my preferred outcome, but I accepted the selection of the people—only it wasn’t, as it turns out.

My calculation today gives Clinton a 2.5 million vote margin when everything is counted. (Vote-by-mail states count slowly—more paper handling for mail-ins. California has three million uncounted ballots, one million in LA County (3 to 1 for Clinton) and another half-million in San Diego County (3 to 2 for Clinton).) She may also pick up more votes in other vote-by-mail states out west—think Oregon, Washington, Colorado.

...

The narrative on election night was all how Clinton turned victory to defeat, her campaign overconfident, her voters staying home, and her herself unable to best perhaps the least capable candidate ever nominated by a major party.

The numbers in Florida and California just do not support that evaluation. In both places, turnout was up over 8 percent. She pulled a 930K vote lead in counties covering 58 percent of the state’s voters, counties where Obama ran up a 770K margin that enabled him to win a 70K victory in 2012. Her lead failed because Trump himself ran up a million vote margin in the remaining rural counties, beating Romney’s numbers by 350K. Hilary lost Florida, but she and Trump engaged the voters.

In California, she will nearly double Trump's tally, and out-poll Obama (the 2008 and 2012 version) by about three percentage points. She will receive nine million plus votes in California. These are the votes pushing her national total two million and more votes past that of the President-elect.

She will not be inaugurated two months hence, not in virtue of a pitiful campaign. She wasn’t perfect, and sometimes not very good, but she received support from enough of the republic to win the office in any universe not governed by an 18th century compromise with the slave-owning aristocrats of the Carolinas and Virginia.

She has 2.5 million more votes than the person who will be inaugurated. That is not a close margin.

This is what a democratic crisis looks like.

, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

i think that's right and the "when you're famous they let you" sounded close enough to establishing consent that ppl who wanted an excuse to dismiss it as more msm hysteria had one

yeah I guess I was in the "this is gross but he's probably right" camp, we've all heard groupie stories and Trump seems like the type willing to do 'favors' to anyone in the biz willing to sleep with him, then a bunch of women came up and said uh no, what he's doing is textbook sexual assault and we didn't consent to it

the fact that so many people jumped out to say "all these women are liars" is the worst part of this, IMO. and we wonder why sexual assault goes unreported so often.

frogbs, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

I figure that people who aligned with trump politically and emotionally either aligned well with trump's misogyny, too, or else rationalized it as not nearly bad enough to overcome their stronger feelings of approval for and kinship with him (e.g. their feeling threatened by Muslims / Mexicans / gay marriage / trade deals / etc.)

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

at least thru '60s most women felt obligated to follow their husbands' lead; not an apparent big change perhaps, aside from less universal coupling

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, November 21, 2016 2:26 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

er... you want to walk that back? i don't like my republican family members any more than anybody else, but women are more than capable of being republicans on their own two feet and denying them any agency in their votes isn't cool.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

yeah, someone on fb posted the other day showing that a California voter had some pathetically small percentage of influence compared to a voter in Wyoming.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

I work in the election industry—on the counting side, not the political side. When I went to sleep on election night, Trump’s lead was a million votes and climbing. This was not my preferred outcome, but I accepted the selection of the people—only it wasn’t, as it turns out.

kinda a bad look to start an article with this sort of claim of authority when it was clear from pretty early in the night that even if hillary were going to lose the EC she was going to win the popular vote. but yes, the electoral college is bad

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

that's not an article, k3v

, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

is there anyone here who likes the way votes are distributed in the electoral college?

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

like the filibuster, people only like the electoral college when it directly benefits their side

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

few here are from Wyoming or Alaska. but then, few people are from there period.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

people's opinions on the EC seem to be outcome-dependent. since it tends to advantage white rural voters, democrats don't like it and republicans do

xp shakey otm

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

Doc C, of course, i just meant that eg married couples probably more likely to vote the same way than not.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

When was the last time it benefited the "left"?

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

(didn't mean a matter of them slavishly following their mate) xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

insofar as the "left" has always been urban = never

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/11/donald-trump-election-hillary-clinton-election-night-inequality-republicans-trumpism/

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, November 18, 2016 12:44 PM (three days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^ glad to see this is already here, i thought it was excellent. ugly but still hopeful.

i thought this was good too, and shorter :)

https://medium.com/@rortybomb/preparing-for-the-worst-how-conservatives-will-govern-in-2017-3889bcb4bb48#.h6t914p57

They aren’t ready with a replacement for Obamacare. They aren’t ready for the heat of privatizing Medicare, or weakening Medicaid. There are constituencies for both, and town halls can be flooded and people organized. Those who desperately wanted a change towards economic security are going to be surprised that the factories aren’t coming back and that they signed up for a libertarian kleptocracy instead. But we should also be clear on the challenges of their policy agenda, and that the cracks won’t appear by themselves.

i'm seeing that one of Ryan/Trump's first plans out the gate is rescinding obama's overtime rules that cover anyone making less than $47k. so several million people just voted to cut their own pay.

goole, Monday, 21 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

god americans are so dumb

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

So Clinton's majority was, according to the analysis above, decently sized but excessively clustered in already-blue states and regions.

Urban/coastal/blue-state liberals in wanting to be in cities/near coasts/predominantly liberal areas shockah!

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 21 November 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

otoh that will be a relief to many non-profits and small businesses.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

a significant number of arts non-profits were/are having to consider significant changes because of those laws and the fact that a lot of work in the arts isn't the standard 5 days a week/8 hrs a day, and that it is seasonal/temporary.

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

kris kobach commits rookie mistake, gets caught in front of cameras with an important paper showing:

https://twitter.com/amnesty/status/800806633865674752

and what's on the paper is bad.

goole, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

i kinda feel that may have been intentional - a dog whistle to the alt-right

, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

i'm trying not to let 'chess game psyops' type ideas take up too much brainspace tbh

goole, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

few here are from Wyoming or Alaska. but then, few people are from there period.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, November 21, 2016 8:44 PM (twenty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Was it those 2 states that came up on University Challenge tonight as having less population than Leeds but greater size than the UK. I think it was definitely Wyoming and one other.

Stevolende, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

3d election map!

http://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/

goole, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile, in north carolina:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2016/11/21/pat_mccrory_is_trying_to_steal_the_north_carolina_governorship.html

, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

the Mike Conczal piece goole linked is great. one of my favourite writers

flopson, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

3d election map!

http://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/

― goole, Monday, November 21, 2016 4:29 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

3d is cool but the cartograms mentioned are just so meaningless to me, idgi

http://i1.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/election-2016-cartogram-purple.png
http://i0.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/538-hexagon-cartogram.png

538 had a bunch of other stupid visualizations too. idk maybe they are extremely useful to other people but i really don't have a hard time looking at a regular map and knowing that some states/counties are more populous than others

marcos, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

(obv the warped one on the left is what im talking about among the first two)

marcos, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

some states are hard to see on a regular map because they are very small

sarahell, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

i was talking with my gf the other night about how every country pays so much attention to the USA and we pay absolutely no attention to any of them. this quote in the times in a piece about 'voters that didn't vote and don't regret it in milwaukee' threw me for a loop:

As for Mrs. Clinton, “other countries probably wouldn’t have respected us because we had a woman running the country,” he said.

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/eca5b3f03be168c6b3e6ec526067fd90ae7bcfe3/r=x408&c=540x405/local/-/media/USATODAY/GenericImages/2013/04/08/gty-2628488-4_3.jpg

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

(obv the warped one on the left is what im talking about among the first two)

― marcos, Monday, November 21, 2016 4:38 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

baahh i mean right not left

marcos, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

John Manoogian III, who did that great chart categorizing cognitive biases, design this election map that I like better:

https://medium.com/@jm3/the-2016-election-map-1c437fe4fd2a#.6ca0el4xo

https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/2000/1*Z5bbBDKOls8gqUiJ2VjglQ.png

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Monday, 21 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/richard-spencer-speech-npi/508379/

Trumpland goes full neo-nazi...

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

i mean yeah white people deserve most of the blame for the outcome of this election obviously. deciding to focus on white women kind of makes me believe the speaker has certain ideas or assumptions about how women should be voting based on their gender xp

― k3vin k., Monday, November 21, 2016 1:58 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i agree with this & don't: I think there's an important point to be made abt whiteness trumping (no pun) gender that a lot of people didn't even *realize* was true. Even though white women have voted this way in tons of elections.

I'll admit to having to check myself when I saw these results a bit for a gender based / buried misogynist response to an extent, in part b/c this felt kind of like a repudiation of that "kill all men" twitter misogynist-troll meme that went around for awhile, like, we need to think constellationally about this stuff. (Nothing like a good "kill men" meme in the background of a bunch of racist police shootings....) There's definitely a strain of white feminism which makes it seem as if women vote in a bloc as consistently as black people, and they don't; they buy into the system as a majority. & I think that does force ppl to think constellationally, systemically, about identity as a political organizing principle & how it functions idk

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

Point being, while there's always going to be a misogynist strain when any group of women is singled out (I mean, they're only really being singled out against the backdrop of white men being the actual worst) but I think there are some very good reasons why people are pointing at this and saying, "we need to think about it."

Also this is literally the first election cycle I've ever seen anyone talk about it before, even though it's been happening for years and years!

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

I think my actual take-away from this election is that people who don't live in cities need to be forced to move to cities

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

living in small town america or the middle of nowhere is psychically damaging to people

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

that's already happening, it's called gentrification and it has lots of negative consequences

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

I haven't really seen focusing blame on white women so much as surprise that the potential first woman President didn't move the needle more than it did. 'Blame' as such should be reserved for rural voters (predominately white as a class, obv) and the hypocrisy and insanity of evangelical/fundie Christians.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, November 21, 2016 2:02 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

cf this milo post, which inverts "race" and "ruralism"—blame should be reserved for white voters (predominantly rural—as in, distant from black people)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

living anywhere is psychically damaging

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

probably best to live in an apartment with Melville novels.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

i think you find whenever you try to single out a demographic that doesn't revolve around "whiteness" it's actually sleight of hand (often subconscious) to disguise "whiteness" as the source

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

has anyone looked into #pizzagate?

speaking of bubbles

goole, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/21/news/protecting-donald-trump/index.html

it's gonna cost $1 million a day for trump & family to continue to live in NYC

, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

i seriously doubt trump is going to continue to live in NYC and i'm sure his wife and kid will move to DC, if not by january then definitely by the end of the school year. michelle obama seriously considered staying with the girls in chicago after obama won in 08 as well

k3vin k., Monday, 21 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

somehow imo this is the most offensive thing Trump has done since election day- yeah right you love new york, get fucked

flappy bird, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

as a rural southerner this election disappointed the fuck out of me on a number of levels, and one of them - maybe not the most important yet almost debilitatingly depressing to think about - is the status of the country black person. and my own guaranteed dead cert advantage in life, passed down to me generationally, in the theft of their labor and denial of basic personhood. and now the category basically doesn't exist because why would it, fuck these hicks i'm going to chicago. before he died about 20 years ago my great-uncle herben told me about his childhood, and how one of his best friends was an old former slave who taught him how to shoot and how to fish in southern georgia. he told me about the gullah geechees and their stories and music. i never knew these people and never would. we make such a big goddamn deal in this country about 'COUNTRY!!!" and big pickup trucks and "the heartland" and haybales and shit and it's a story that A) shuts black people out of it completely yet B) would not be possible without the massive generational work of literally millions of black people out in the country, working the land, being the ones who knew how shit worked. and now i look at these maps where the countryside is just red red red and it's like OK you got your genocide guys what more do you fucking want.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

that "kill all men" twitter misogynist-troll meme that went around for awhile

I would be interested in hearing about this, or what you think this is.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

i think it prob served a few difft purposes: therapeutic venting, trolling misogynists (as i tried to imply glibly), forcing men to recognize their level of complicity in patriarchy, etc. But i suspect people didn't consider the insensitivity of its viral potential against a backdrop of police shootings of black men. xp

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

fwiw i'm not the first person to make that argument or something, i saw numerous ppl bring up the poor timing of the meme

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

Trump just had a meeting with press figures in Trump Tower:

"he executives and news personalities spotted entering Trump Tower included NBC's Deborah Turness and Lester Holt; MSNBC’s Chuck Todd; CNN's Jeff Zucker and Wolf Blitzer; Fox News' Bill Shine, Jack Abernethy, Jay Wallace and Suzanne Scott; CBS' John Dickerson, Charlie Rose, Gayle King and Norah O'Donnell; and ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, David Muir and Martha Raddatz."

timellison, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

Clarence Thomas' memoir, of all places, has one of the few evocations of Geechee life I've found.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

few here are from Wyoming or Alaska. but then, few people are from there period.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, November 21, 2016 3:44 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

There are more people in my county of Ohio then there are in those two states combined, frankly they shouldn't get any EV at all.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

(That's a joke just in case The Usual Suspects decide to say something stupid)

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump's media summit was "a fucking firing squad," according to the New York Post

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

omg

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

sac up you idiots

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

is this real???????? are we all living the same goddamn dream????

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

huck Todd asked some pretty pointed questions. David Muir asked how are you going to cope living in DC while your family is in NYC?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

David Muir asked a pretty pointed question

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

Jesus christ

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

gonna be a long goddamn four years

cucky ramen-o (will), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

we already knew the media was completely worthless and yet it's still somehow disconcerting to read that

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

those pictures esp at the bottom. wolf blitzer.

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

It is completely beyond me why any self respecting journalist would wiggle his way up to Trump's lair to be shouted down.

This is not happening, right?

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

y'all don't think it made them bind together

a (waterface), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that we're all probably better served by an adversarial media right now

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

i mean they thought they were going for access and they got yelled at

a (waterface), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

i hope so but they seem a lot more like chastened puppies than bold professionals atm

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

No, I get you now - I misread you as suggesting that it was invented by misogynist trolls.

I'd struggle to criticise the sign though - the murder rate among black trans women, for example is much higher than black cis men, but they don't get to be the backdrop. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing but respect for Black Lives Matters, and I'm well aware that it has a higher rate of female leadership than any non-gender-focussed organisation - but I don't know that it lives in a gender-free vacuum.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

i'm going to be breathing into this paper bag for 4 years, arent I

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

And you people with the "four years". Make that eight, if not more...

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

not helping

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

fuck off with that "if not more"

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

A moment of clarity: none of these people has reported much less done anything remotely investigative in, what, twenty years?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

Wolf Blitzer's job is to gesture at screens

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

for many of them ever

Mordy, Monday, 21 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

These are the men and women Trump worries about!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

if none of them have reported then they can hardly be liars

j., Monday, 21 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

Make that eight, if not more...

― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, November 21, 2016 5:54 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fuck off with that "if not more"

― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, November 21, 2016 5:55 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

guys donald trump is seven million years old and he lives off burger king and four hours of sleep a night. he's not going to live eight more years.

qop (crüt), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Keep in mind that an "unnamed source" reporting this to the Trump-friendly NY Post means it probably came from "John Barron" and that may not be the most truthful recap of what went down.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

The fact that all these people, journalists who consider themselves journalists, showed up is bad enough tbh

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

i don't like my republican family members any more than anybody else, but women are more than capable of being republicans on their own two feet and denying them any agency in their votes isn't cool.

many x-posts: FWIW, the first person who ever said "Donald Trump should run for president" was my mom back in 2008. If she were still alive now I believe she would be really happy.

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

To wit:

Paul Szoldra Verified account
‏@PaulSzoldra

Two @CNN sources say that basically, the @nypost retelling of Trump/media meeting is bullshit

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

There's a Trump hotel two blocks from the White House that one assumes has been sufficiently coated with gilded diarrhea to satisfy anyone in that family; why stress over the actual accommodations in the House of Whiteness?

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

but for 45% of the country this will be one of the best parts in the Trump section of real american patriot rock flag and eagle folklore

cucky ramen-o (will), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:12 (seven years ago) link

can't wait for when Breitbart launches a cable TV news network next year and is granted exclusive access to President Trump

, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:12 (seven years ago) link

The doublespeak from his spokesperson on the radio is completely maddening.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/7xX_KaStFT8

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

https://youtu.be/7xX_KaStFT8

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

(Trump on TPPexit and a gazillion other 'hilarious' dumb plans)

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

hearing trump speaking in anything other than trump-cadence is pretty jarring

, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

trump's gonna end the visa programs that allow him to stock his hotels with cheap immigrant labor every summer, is that right

, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

There will be college grads vying to clean his toilets.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

my god he could barely make it through that ("So important")

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:25 (seven years ago) link

If he's going to hide in Trump Tower and communicate via youtube clips and twitter, then I guess we can expect full on Big Brother. This is going to be a rough four years.

Incidentally, per vitriol and sore winners, every interview with a Trump supporter I've read has either been gloating or cynical, either "you lost, get over it" or "I don't really expect much, let's see what he does." Add in that piece on also-cynical Milwaukee non-voters and it's just so completely broken down I can't imagine things getting better in less than a generation. So maybe it will!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

is the post story supposed to be "trump friendly"? i guess the idea is that people will love their guy dressing down a bunch of big wigs?? cause it just sounds pathetic and absurd to me

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

Imagine the mind of a person who gets his jollies from picking on Lester Holt.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

xp good call, breitb@rt is playing up this very angle

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

tbh i don't really believe the post version of events. unless trump is literally losing his mind he doesn't have anything to gain from pissing off those ppl behind closed doors, without any of his fans to cheer him on. otoh he has a lot to gain from sweet-talking them and then "leaking" to a friendly newspaper that he really told off those liars at cnn, he really showed them.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

or, after hesitantly clicking in, they basically just rehash and link to the ny post but seems like that's the angle theyre supporting thus far
Xp to self

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

david muir is a nimrod

a but (brimstead), Monday, 21 November 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

No, I get you now - I misread you as suggesting that it was invented by misogynist trolls.

I'd struggle to criticise the sign though - the murder rate among black trans women, for example is much higher than black cis men, but they don't get to be the backdrop. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing but respect for Black Lives Matters, and I'm well aware that it has a higher rate of female leadership than any non-gender-focussed organisation - but I don't know that it lives in a gender-free vacuum.

― Andrew Farrell, Monday, November 21, 2016 4:51 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Absolutely but I'm not saying "no more gender critique" I'm arguing for a re-prioritzation that remembers "women" as a voting bloc are not actually against white patriarchy & should probably enhance/grow the demographic group /priorities of those who are.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

At the bottom of the surreal post article was an ad that said "schizophrenia? Learn more."

I wanted to believe that was why I was under the impression that Donald Trump was president elect

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:12 (seven years ago) link

My view on the identity/class divide is that both sides are equally planks that complement each other and the left should try, as much as possible, to unite.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:14 (seven years ago) link

I think I cracked the case and we can move on

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

Everyone agrees with that they just disagree with how that should be done

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

Idk ppl on both sides often have axes to grind and lose sight of the fact that we elected a bunch of gangsters to the white house

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

Cf "We are the Left"

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:21 (seven years ago) link

I can only speak anecdotally that I don't think a lot of scholars of class conflict are really familiar w the current ideological arguments happening around race & tend to dismiss them as emotional reactive responses instead of, like, actual ideologies. It's a common characterization of "identity politics." Which sometimes might be fair but anyone i see who's like, super class oriented /jacobin published tends to not even consider the possibility that they have ideological opposition on the left, it's always dismissed as a mix of "emotional" reactions and virtue signaling from allies.

I'm not even arguing the race oriented ideology can wholly explain things (though I think the left has been very underresponsive to it), I just think ppl don't even realize there's, like, a historically-based, rational argument that goes beyond "please pay lip service to black issues before pursuing your class critique"

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:23 (seven years ago) link

it certainly doesn't help that most people on either side seem to insist that race or class do wholly explain things

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:25 (seven years ago) link

does*

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:27 (seven years ago) link

Idk i think people can form a strategic coalition even if they have different worldviews as long as they share some core values. That's what I want to hear about now.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:27 (seven years ago) link

Well I'd argue that the status quo on the left is race seen through economics but the argument w/in black studies etc is that the truth is the reverse; race is a deeper, more deeply rooted issue w/in western philosophy that pre dates capitalism as currently constituted. The argument wd be that class is "conflict" & can be addressed through regulation and reform, but race is an antagonism, unresolvable w/in the current paradigm

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:29 (seven years ago) link

xp deej.

Kev otm though. People can have different accounts of the origins of inequality and then still join forces to fight inequality. It's not like Jeff Sessions is planning to unleash a bunch of microaggressions -- he is going to pursue policies that hurt minorities, things we can all agree are bad.

Abstract discussions, even vigorous debates, over core values enriches the left but we can't let it get in the way of resisting fascism.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:30 (seven years ago) link

Treeship's post is a good example of economic oriented myopia; racial concerns are reduced to white ppl being rude ( "microaggressions") instead of a status quo of state sponsored racialized violence.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:34 (seven years ago) link

I'm not even trying to argue racial concerns should take precedence (also not *not* saying that) just pointing out that one *side* acknowledging that race and class is important and the other side saying actually race still matters more than you think ...are not in agreement

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:36 (seven years ago) link

No thats not what i am saying. I am saying that the economic left should be able to oppose mass incarceration and state sponsored racialized violence even if they can't get on board with every nuance of antiracist politics. Iwas arguing in favor of solidarity, not saying that one or the other side of the left is more legitimate

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:36 (seven years ago) link

I don't think anyone is arguing for legislatikn that targets microaggressions, though 🤔

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:38 (seven years ago) link

I am not at all dismissive of critiques rooted in microaggression theory/the social reproduction of race and its attendant trauma. But people are about to get their civil rights violated -- more than usual. Everyone - jacobin writers, rap critcs, me - should be able to join together to oppose that

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:39 (seven years ago) link

Sure and tactically I think if u don't at least acknowledge or try to understand the philosophical basis of your potential ally there will continue to be these conflicts that spiral into race v class clusterfucks (this might happen anyway but at least an effort to stop treating these critiques as emotional/virtue signaling would be an improvement; a signal that ppl had considered the underlying philosophy of their allies. They might even find they agree w them more than they thought at first.)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:44 (seven years ago) link

I am mostly arguing against the anti identity politics arguments i have been seeing this week, which unfairly blame certain pockets of activists for hillary's loss. This is stupid and unhelpful, in a similar way to we are the left, which attacked the "class" people in this really broad, unclear, tendentious way. Strategically it seems like a bad conversation to be having all the time all over the pages of every left leaning newspaper and magazine

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

Common ground is important, is all I am saying, in a year that saw all the norms of our political culture evaporate into orange dust.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

Oh cool this again

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

"For every new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated."

That sounds like a very carefully worked-out strategy.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:06 (seven years ago) link

The class/race divide really is complicated, and Treeship is 100% right that people should look for common ground. But then on the other hand you've got Bernie Sanders up on stage saying 'The working class of this country is being decimated. That's why Donald Trump won.' Not even lip service to race in the explanation of why a white supremacist won the election. How to find common ground in that?

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:28 (seven years ago) link

smfh

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism_of_small_differences

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:36 (seven years ago) link

Trolling according to you is discussing actual quotes from an actual speech without going through the speakers twitter-history?

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:45 (seven years ago) link

your implicit point that sanders is supposedly unable to cultivate common ground based on a cherry-picked excerpt from one speech is belied by the rest of his messaging. it's hard enough to get people to agree on anything without useless performative white europeans constantly concern trolling every few hours. stop fucking posting here

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:47 (seven years ago) link

So the greatest trepidation for me about working under this administration is the sheer amount of endemic stupidity. Hateful ideas can be fought with, argued against, beaten back, shown for the cowardly retrograde shit that they are. I really believe that. But stupid people drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

I just keep imagining a briefing where we lay out all the facts on why it's a bad and unreasonable idea to require backdoors in every smartphone sold in America only to be told there's no other way to keep us safe from terror so just make it happen, nerds!

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:51 (seven years ago) link

xps - I don't think the part you quoted (or paraphrased) was difficult to find common ground with. Your assertion that he does not even pay lip service to race as an explanation for Trump's victory could definitely be considered trolling.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:51 (seven years ago) link

It's a shitty speech - and I'm using the actual quotes, I know it was misquoted originally. A huge problem with structural white supremacy is that it constantly makes itself invisible. When Bernie Sanders says 'life expectancy for many workers has gone down' he doesn't mention that those statistics are about white workers, because the whiteness is invisible. He is talking about specific white problems, but they're 'beyond identity politics' because white identity is the normal identity.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

with the Yam issuing policy videos, I think all my pub drinking in London this week will be Orwell haunts.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 02:56 (seven years ago) link

And k3v, fuck no you're not gonna make me stop posting. I don't care if you think I'm concern trolling, you also said about hispanics asking Mike Pence to think of them, that the 'sole purpose was to generate attention and controversy'. And fuck no it isn't 'belied' by the rest of his messaging, it fits with his campaign all too well, unfortunately. Which doesn't mean he's a bad person. It's not easy to combine identity and class, but it doesn't get easier when people like you are constantly doing personal attacks and attacks on motivation instead of discussing what's being said. You stop posting.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:00 (seven years ago) link

I feel your despair, El Tomboto.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:03 (seven years ago) link

xp kev and me and 49 others will tho u tiresome lecturey tonedeaf child

i bet when they check the records even trump voters will have gpd u

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:04 (seven years ago) link

A huge problem with structural white supremacy is that it constantly makes itself invisible. When Bernie Sanders says 'life expectancy for many workers has gone down' he doesn't mention that those statistics are about white workers, because the whiteness is invisible. He is talking about specific white problems, but they're 'beyond identity politics' because white identity is the normal identity.

― Frederik B, Monday, November 21, 2016 9:53 PM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i'm not sure you understand how much economic misery there is in this country.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:07 (seven years ago) link

God, people threatening to fp posters they disagree with must be so childish, insecure and pathetic. I get it for threats or personal attacks, but ffs, grow up darragh.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link

you dont understand what fp is for

its for irritant posters who fuck evryone off without the outright bannable behaviours you listed.

you are textbook.

the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:10 (seven years ago) link

Treeship: The statistics that started the whole debate about life expectancy were always about white people. Black people, as a group, are living longer and longer, though still shorter than white people. If he wanted to talk about general economic misery, he could say 'life expectancy is too low for many groups', but he took a statistic that was true for one race, and made race invisible. Which, again, does not make him a bad person, but it's indicative of how easy it is to turn a white identity into the de facto identity when speaking of class.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

darragh, you just threatened that you'd help get me 51'd. You are a pathetic coward.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link

i would never disagree with you that black people in america face tons of obstacles that whites don't. the discrepancies in our criminal justice system alone are unspeakable and that's just the start of it. our neighborhoods and schools are segregated. but i think that it is worth pointing out that black, white, latino and all other workers are subject to the same brutal economic forces, the same heartless privatization and union busting policies. white and black residents of flint michigan are drinking the same poison water. if we keep arguing about how to frame this reality i don't think we'll ever address it. i also think things like criminal justice reform go hand in hand with addressing poverty and empowering labor organizations.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link

Fred could you remind us again how you know so much about racial politics in America and how to undo the centuries-spanning injustice of the country's foundational sin, over which a devastating civil war was fought, with one weird trick

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates.

Also, you are currently repeating a debate we've had for fifteen years in Denmark, since our populists became the foundation for the right-wing government in 2001. The US is not the only country in the world where the left is dealing with an identity/class conflict of emphasis.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

i agree with fred that we shouldn't go for a kind of race blind new dealism that would overwhelmingly benefit whites. i just also don't think sanders was advocating that. he was more criticizing the kind of identity politics rooted in tokenism, like clinton's glass ceiling rhetoric, or the idea that inequality is fine as long as the people on the top include representatives from various genders and races. while the success of anti-discrimination legislation is important, and must continue and go much further, there are other problems to address too -- problems that affect people of all races and prevent them from leading healthy, fulfilling lives

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:22 (seven years ago) link

thanks for new hi-concept dn tris

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link

can y'all, like, grab a smoke, a drink, or listen to the Tribe album? Some of you have been writing words that may or may not turn into sentences since early this morning.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link

did u really hate nocturnal animals, im missing the spurs game tonight to go see it ffs

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:26 (seven years ago) link

yeah go watch it (I hated it)

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:28 (seven years ago) link

otm, everyone take a thread break, listen to Tribe

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:30 (seven years ago) link

I'm just going to stop to try to figure things out because smarter people have already done so and I'm going to follow their trail ie. Rev. Barber.

Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:39 (seven years ago) link

Fred could you remind us again how you know so much about racial politics in America and how to undo the centuries-spanning injustice of the country's foundational sin, over which a devastating civil war was fought, with one weird trick

― slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, November 21, 2016 10:14 PM (thirty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates.

― Frederik B, Monday, November 21, 2016 10:19 PM (twenty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

too good. i had to take it, first time I've ever used a display name

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:51 (seven years ago) link

lol

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

Alexis de Wokeville

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:54 (seven years ago) link

haha

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:55 (seven years ago) link

A+

sleeve, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:55 (seven years ago) link

pretty good

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:58 (seven years ago) link

i don't even remember what i was thinking when i came up with my ugly ilx name (collardio etc)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 03:59 (seven years ago) link

Frederik Douglas... xpost to Treeship 'if we keep arguing about how to frame this reality i don't think we'll ever address it.' It scares me, with guys like Kobach possibly going to lead DHS that people aren't solely focused on the possible damage to so many lives. forget theory for a second. it'll still be there.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:23 (seven years ago) link

Man, Kobach is such good evidence for the theory that sinister motherfuckers actually look sinister.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:23 (seven years ago) link

like most of middle school was spent kicking the shit of people

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:26 (seven years ago) link

yeah, exactly lion in winter. and it's hard for me bc i love a good theoretical argument. but right now i feel like, i know who my enemies are. and they aren't the other people on the left who perhaps have a different understanding of the mechanisms of inequality than i do.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

yes, that exactly. He has the face of a locker-stuffer.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/business/media/trump-summons-tv-figures-for-private-meeting-and-lets-them-have-it.html

so apparently this actually happened?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

yeah, i heard katy tur and some bro from the washington post talk about it on msnbc

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVg2EJvvlF8

flappy bird, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:48 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/800914868039655425

Republican Congressman from Michigan, speaking out against Trump

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:49 (seven years ago) link

Ok, "speaking out" is a bit strong. "Is critical of Trump" probably makes more sense

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:50 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/business/media/trump-summons-tv-figures-for-private-meeting-and-lets-them-have-it.html

so apparently this actually happened?

― k3vin k., Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:29 AM (twenty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

his awful twitter fans seem absolutely cock-a-hoop about this, all those people who leave aggro comments below online articles can't believe they have a president who can actually say this stuff to journalists faces

soref, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

i thought that everyone in america knew they were at least supposed to pretend to believe that the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, should be inviolable.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 05:07 (seven years ago) link

i really need to stop paying attention to this stuff

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 05:10 (seven years ago) link

(didn't mean a matter of them slavishly following their mate) xp

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, November 21, 2016 3:47 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

okay cool - sorry for jumping on you. just read very oddly to me in that moment.

to Tracer, re: rural black culture in the south - FWIW not that this captures even 10% of what you're trying to get at, but the cartograms linked up thread, or any map that breaks out results by county/district rather than state, still registers profoundly the black belt. depending what counts as 'country' there is good reason to point up as you do that black rural life, in the here and now (and not just before the great migration) exists and is severely underrepresented in areas like "country music"...

finally, let me just say holy shit at "Alexis de Wokeville"

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 05:43 (seven years ago) link

truly let it not be slept on

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 05:45 (seven years ago) link

^ nice turn of phrase

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 05:52 (seven years ago) link

Have we mentioned that the weirdness of 2016 is never-ending, and Green Day popped up on everybody's FB feeds because they worked in a modified _MDC_ lyric of all bands into their network TV appearance?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiC9ofpzVZw

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 07:55 (seven years ago) link

weird, i went to see MDC last month and they sang the "no trump" version of that song. really felt pretty cathartic to jump around and sing along to that.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 08:09 (seven years ago) link

no Casino you're right, there IS black country life but it is so thin on the ground, and so completely unrepresented.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 08:26 (seven years ago) link

LOL @ Fred running amok itt

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:16 (seven years ago) link

FP is a bullshit move and always has been, i don't do it anymore even for dolts/tragedians

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

https://www.bclm.co.uk

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

the argument w/in black studies etc is that the truth is the reverse; race is a deeper, more deeply rooted issue w/in western philosophy that pre dates capitalism as currently constituted. The argument wd be that class is "conflict" & can be addressed through regulation and reform, but race is an antagonism, unresolvable w/in the current paradigm

D-40 do you have any recommendations for people/pieces addressing this? I've been reading a lot of colonial & imperial history recently but have not come across anything quite like this

ogmor, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:17 (seven years ago) link

To see how almost a century ago Progressive (and progressive) writers elided race, check out Matthew Josephson's The Politicos.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:21 (seven years ago) link

ogmor, IANAD-40, but he did post this link last year: http://www.incognegro.org/afro_pessimism.html

(and a quick Google provided a longer and deeper one: http://www.rhizomes.net/issue29/sexton.html)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:41 (seven years ago) link

Apparently New York Times refused to see Trump to be yelled at. He cancelled the meeting after he accused them of changing the conditions.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:46 (seven years ago) link

the argument w/in black studies etc is that the truth is the reverse; race is a deeper, more deeply rooted issue w/in western philosophy that pre dates capitalism as currently constituted.

not sure this is right? surely race, and hierarchical ideologies around race, were a foundation stone of capitalism as practiced by the western european nations that colonized the new world and exploited it on the backs of slaves and subjugated peoples? this was the precise moment that capitalism emerged from feudalism. it couldn't have happened without an ideology of race.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:29 (seven years ago) link

benedict anderson to thread

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

I think you're agreeing there?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

ha ok good!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

scene

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

so Trump pretty much admitting he's going to run the presidency for financial gain? cool

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/HvT8lGv.jpg

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

lol this is too much . what a nightmare

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:57 (seven years ago) link

Not nice
nasty tone!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:58 (seven years ago) link

"the New York Times just announced complaints about them are at a 15-year high"...what is he talking about here??

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

but why announce?

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

.what is he talking about hereever??

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

The number of complaints coming into the public editor’s office is five times the normal level, and the pace has only just recently tapered off.

My colleague Thomas Feyer, who oversees the letters to the editor, says the influx from readers is one of the largest since Sept. 11.

think this is what he means

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

Would "failing" not have fit in the second tweet there, or is he slipping?

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

I vaguely remember W Bush negging the liberal press a lot too. Does this seem orders of magnitude worse or just worse?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump is a genuine threat to the 1st Amendment, which I don't remember ever thinking about Bush.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

i wonder if perhaps there could be a link between trump's constant berating of the nyt on twitter, a medium noted for its ability to quickly and easily co-ordinate witch-hunts, and a spike in complaints to the public editor

itisamystery.gif

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

Y'all don't remember how vigorously the American press opposed the run-up to the Iraq War in fall '02?

Neither do I.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump is a genuine threat to the 1st Amendment, which I don't remember ever thinking about Bush.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:37 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Ironically he loves taking advantage of it personally

Evan, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

I like this confidence!!

Donald J. Trump Verified account

‏@realDonaldTrump

Great meetings will take place today at Trump Tower concerning the formation of the people who will run our government for the next 8 years.

6:46 AM - 22 Nov 2016

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

the argument w/in black studies etc is that the truth is the reverse; race is a deeper, more deeply rooted issue w/in western philosophy that pre dates capitalism as currently constituted. The argument wd be that class is "conflict" & can be addressed through regulation and reform, but race is an antagonism, unresolvable w/in the current paradigm

D-40 do you have any recommendations for people/pieces addressing this? I've been reading a lot of colonial & imperial history recently but have not come across anything quite like this

― ogmor, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 7:17 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

charles mills the racial contract is a pretty important work wrt this argument i think

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Racial_Contract

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

But there was definitely a lot of stuff about Bush denying access to those he didn't like. I remember people raising a big stink about it at the time. I've also read that Nixon did the same. Just trying to keep some historical perspective here to not completely freak out.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

yea i dont think trump is actually going to "rewrite libel laws" to destroy 1st amendment but it is pretty clear that he will strive to fully delegitimize any press that is critical of him (and kind of already has at least in the minds of half the country)

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump is a genuine threat to the 1st Amendment, which I don't remember ever thinking about Bush.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:37 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Ironically he loves taking advantage of it personally

― Evan, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:41 AM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well, yes, he is of that contingent that engages in the cognitive dissonance of berating certain "liberal" values that they then whine about not being allowed to enjoy themselves ("Safe spaces are for cucks! But it's unfair that I don't have a safe space to complain about safe spaces!").

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

Nixon had an enemy's list. He declared open war against the press.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

If Donald Trump lives to be 78, I can at least content myself with the knowledge that it wasn't because I didn't pray every day for him to pass away peacefully in his sleep.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump is a genuine threat to the 1st Amendment, which I don't remember ever thinking about Bush.

well Bush's press secretary said that people should "watch what they say" right after 9/11. It was a bit of a concern for some people.

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

Josh Marshall:

I talked to a number of people in a position to shed light on the meeting. What I was able to gather was that to a significant extent the Post account is accurate - to the extent of Trump's remarks about the lying press, the deceitful, dishonest press and the like, calling out individuals. But from what I can gather the tone of the encounter was significantly different.

Trump wasn't a on rage bender. He didn't yell. His face wasn't red. It was more razzing and taunting than an angry tirade. This wasn't a different Trump, rising to or chastened by the realities of the presidential office. It was exactly the same Trump we've seen for the last 18 months and perhaps the last 40 years: I won. You lost. Now I call the shots. You're all liars and dishonest and it's terrible. So you need to fall in line.

The key thing that came out to me from multiple conversations is one basic message from Trump. To Trump, the fact that most of the news media missed his surprise win (thinking until early election night that Clinton was a strong favorite to win) means that all their pre-election coverage is therefore discredited. It was bad and it was wrong. To be clear, not the horse race or polling coverage which certainly took a real hit - but all the non-horse race reporting. And because all their coverage is discredited - Katy Tur's, CNN's, everybody's - that the news media owes him an apology moving forward.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Bill Clinton talking about punching a journalist who called Hillary a liar seems to have fallen out of common memory

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

Trump has no power over libel laws, it's a state law issue.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

not even close to the same thing

a (waterface), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

xpost to keyes

a (waterface), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Also worth noting that the NYTimes already doesn't have credibility with the Trump electorate. It was never popular there and the right has been waging a campaign to further discredit it for decades. It is to them what Fox News is to us.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

yea i dont think trump is actually going to "rewrite libel laws" to destroy 1st amendment but it is pretty clear that he will strive to fully delegitimize any press that is critical of him (and kind of already has at least in the minds of half the country)

― I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:47 AM

so what he will legitimize them and freeze them out all while giving full access to breitbart and legitimizing their crap. fuck this shit !

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

Remnick has a different account:

nother participant at the meeting said that Trump’s behavior was “totally inappropriate” and “fucking outrageous.” The television people thought that they were being summoned to ask questions; Trump has not held a press conference since late July. Instead, they were subjected to a stream of insults and complaints—and not everyone absorbed it with pleasure.

“I have to tell you, I am emotionally fucking pissed,” another participant said. “How can this not influence coverage? I am being totally honest with you. Toward the end of the campaign, it got to a point where I thought that the coverage was all about [Trump’s] flaws and problems. And that’s legit. But, I thought, O.K., let’s give them the benefit of the doubt. After the meeting today, though—and I am being human with you here—I think, Fuck him! I know I am being emotional about it. And I know I will get over it in a couple of days after Thanksgiving. But I really am offended. This was unprecedented. Outrageous!”

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

And I know I will get over it i

please don't

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

Seriously. Take it as fucking personally as it was intended and rake his ass over the coals.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

yea i dont think trump is actually going to "rewrite libel laws" to destroy 1st amendment but it is pretty clear that he will strive to fully delegitimize any press that is critical of him (and kind of already has at least in the minds of half the country)

― I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:47 AM

so what he will legitimize them and freeze them out all while giving full access to breitbart and legitimizing their crap. fuck this shit !

― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:00 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It's hard for me to imagine a world where Breitbart becomes a news source for anyone but the loyal unless it drops all of its misogyny, racism, etc., and that seems unlikely to happen. However maybe they find some other outlets that have a slightly more legitimate patina, or their cronies start one.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

Like I don't think a lot of people not in Trump's base are going to be scrolling through "Why Women Are Happier in the Kitchen" articles by Milo just so they can get exciting white house coverage.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

That's nuts, I can totally see it! One, all Trump has to do is give exclusive interviews/access to Breitbart. And two, clearly no one cares about the misogyny, racism, etc, or Trump wouldn't be president.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Trump has to do is give exclusive interviews/access to Breitbar

that's what i was thinking

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

Let's not get carried away. Even RT tries to present itself as a legit news source, and sometimes presents accurate coverage of things that don't negatively impact Putin. Right now it's a much more sophisticated operation than Breitbart imo. Breitbart would really have to massively change for that to work. Not saying it can't happen, just not in its current form.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

BTW, guess who doesn't have a problem calling the "alt-right" neo-nazis, unlike the craven American press:
https://www.rt.com/viral/367766-cnn-jews-people-reaction/

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

It's alarming to me how much I've let myself forget about the W presidency, which spakred near-daily frustration and rage and anxiety at various levels for basically the entire eight years. At first, regarding the press, all I could remember was the disgusting embedded-journalist scam for good coverage (basically an extension of the carefully-managed press pools of Gulf War I) and Bush and Cheney being caught on a hot mic calling Adam Clymer a ''major league asshole from the New York Times'' or whatever it was.

Still I think what Trump is doing is much more broadly corrosive to democracy and civic discourse. It's not *new* - as others have pointed out, it just extends the dismissal of fact-based reporting that we've long become accustomed to from the right-wing media sphere - but coming from the soon-to-be President.... like, there are huge swaths of this country that have spent years handwaving away any contrary evidence with ''oh well, the New York TIMES, that's just a liberal tabloid'' and now that's to be even more permanently cemented.... ughghghghghghhghgg. I mean there is so much to be anxious and enraged about with where things are headed, but this is the one tensing my shoulders and stomach today. Fuck, four years of this!

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

yea it is bad

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

Correction, EIGHT years. Didn't you see Trumps's tweet?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has had a strained relationship with the U.S. since taking office in June, mainly because of U.S. criticism of his controversial — and often brutal — war on drugs. But he says he's hoping to get along with President-elect Trump.

Toward that end, he's appointed real estate magnate Jose E.B. Antonio as a special trade envoy to the U.S. — and he just so happens to be the man building Trump Tower Manila.

http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/11/22/502895797/whos-the-new-philippine-envoy-the-man-building-trump-tower-manila

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

I think nearly the entire media being owned by 3 conglomerates is a genuine threat to the 1st Amendment

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

and he just so happens to be the man building Trump Tower Manila.

the stark, horrific reality of a trump presidency is going to far outstrip the creative efforts of all the people who've imagined 'lol president trump' scenarios over the years, isn't it

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

too bad the Dems ran some awful Senate candidates (eg Evan Bayh) so can't impeach, right?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

xxpost These are by no means mutually exclusive threats.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Worst, when we emerge from this daily disaster, the tendrils of Trump will be everywhere, from the top down, from the government to private sector, from media to the courts. He and his family will be richer, more powerful, more pervasive, and installed in the fucking Hall of Presidents at Disneyworld.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

the stark, horrific reality of a trump presidency is going to far outstrip the creative efforts of all the people who've imagined 'lol president trump' scenarios over the years, isn't it

― trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:28 AM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

On the plus side, the man's ego has ensured that every one of his properties is clearly labeled when shit gets real and people are weighing their property damage options.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

The attraction will close on January 17, 2017 for refurbishment and the addition of Donald Trump as a new audio-animatronic figure. It will reopen on June 30, 2017.

Yeah, he'll probably make that. In order for him to leave office early he'd need:

  • Something that offends the Democrats enough to start impeachment proceedings.
  • Something that offends enough Republicans enough to join impeachment proceedings.
  • Something where it would be of more benefit to the Republican party to have President Mike Pence.
  • Something that drops his popularity with his base enough that neither side is worried about re-election.
You can read 'offends' as 'imperils re-election' as you wish.

I can't see him not hitting that combo some time in the first four years.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Democrats can't start impeachment proceedings unless they control the House

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

I think reelection is the only reason most Republicans would think twice about preferring a President Pence.

With great reservation, I'd prefer a President Pence too -- less of a wild card and easier to defeat in 2020.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

But I guess this is all going to depend on how Trump plays ball with the GOP.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

yea it would have to be something truly toxic for it to be mutually beneficial to have impeachment proceedings xps

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Pence is a known quantity within the standard GOP party structure, in that sense he represents a preferable opponent

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/C09oz2A.png

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

breitbart not going easy on thier guy!

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

no one knows what can happen next year, let alone 2020.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

Pence is a known quantity within the standard GOP party structure, in that sense he represents a preferable opponent

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:55 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Pence would probably have zero appeal outside the predictable GOP base, which IMO means he probably loses. Trump is a walking question mark. So I don't know who the GOP prefers but I know who I'd rather face. Ever actually listen to Pence speak? He has this timeless creepiness in affect and diction, like it could just as easily be the 1950s.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

i think pence is pretty dangerous actually, that VP debate when he lied about basically everything w/ smooth confidence is cheney-esque

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

Democrats can't start impeachment proceedings unless they control the House

Anyone can start impeachment proceedings - they have to clear the House, but it's a safe bet that they'll get a majority of Democrats, no?

I think reelection is the only reason most Republicans would think twice about preferring a President Pence.

This is probably true - but they don't need most Republicans.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Bah, misread that last one, sorry man alive.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

Yeah he is dangerous, but I also don't see him having the appeal of a Trump. Neither are great, just saying I think Pence is easier to beat in an election because his record is clear, it matches the way he looks and speaks, and he's not the kind of galvanizer Trump is. You're not going to see 30K people showing up for Pence rallies.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

otm

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

I guess his biggest threat is big turnout among the evangelical base. He was probably a smart pick for the Trump ticket in that regard. He'd be very strong with the old republican coalition but no crossover appeal imo. My guess is that's not enough to win presidential elections anymore, granted I don't want to sound too sure of anything right now. He's certainly slick and polished and intelligent and has some amount of charisma, I just think there are a lot of Trump voters who wouldn't go for him.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

But I guess this is all going to depend on how Trump plays ball with the GOP.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:54 AM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

He's going to start behaving presidentially any day now, I just know it.

In an election season chock full of things that defy belief, I think the most shocking thing to me is that people still harbor any illusions that Trump is anything other than the narcissistic black hole that he's nakedly presented himself as for years.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Someone posted a short video he made about his transition effort, very bland and underwhelming. He talked a little about his first 100 days and the blustery stuff about muslims and building a wall wasn't in there, the nonsensical line about "deleting two regulations for every new one" was in there. Wasn't sure if it spoke to a moderation in policy direction or just an attempt to quiet things down or what.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

could just be that he hasn't got a fucking clue what he's going to do

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

He's definitely a narcissistic black hole but he still has to operate within the existing structures, so long as they still exist.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

according to David Remnick Trump's telling journalists that he "loves" Obama now

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

black holes tend to be pretty destructive iirc

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

and he's had two (TWO!) whole phone calls with obama in the last fortnight! an amazing relationship, just terrific xp

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

the nonsensical line about "deleting two regulations for every new one" was in there

I keep coming back to this because it is so hilariously nonsensical - it's not what's *in* the regulation that's important to him, it's how many there are! Should just write one giant sweeping regulation for everything and tell him that that all the other regulations have been eliminated. Magic!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

Yeah they're going to start naming all brand new regulations "3b" "35f" etc. as a loophole

Evan, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

On day one, every government employee named Walter will be shown the door. Walter is a terrible name, so so bad.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

Like I read regulations all the time in my job and I don't even know what he really means by "a regulation." An entire section of federal code? A subsection?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump is not a person to whom words mean things

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

he doesn't mean anything he doesn't understand anything

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

regulators mount up

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

yeah it's about as vague and meaningful as his "5 year lobbying ban...unless they sign a piece of paper" plan

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

odds on trump quickly getting fed up with all the hassle of being president and just abdicating?

conrad, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

I don't think he'd resign, just stop coming to the office

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

our greatest hope

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

maybe Ivanka will be our Edith Wilson

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

more like our Edith Bunker

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

lol

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

Tried to compose a Trumpian update of 'Those Were the Days', lost my will fifteen seconds in.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

re: eliminating regulations, it's been done before.

http://www.npr.org/2015/05/26/409671996/canada-cuts-down-on-red-tape-could-it-work-in-the-u-s

BERLINER: So the incoming administration in British Columbia said enough is enough. For every new rule that becomes law, two existing ones would have to go. And Laura Jones says it's worked. In British Columbia, regulation has been reduced by 40 percent. She says small business has benefited.

JONES: And there's been very little to no outcry about cutting into rules that are important to protect human health, safety and the environment.

BERLINER: Eventually, British Columbia dialed it back to one for one, and that became the model for the entire country. For two years, one for one has been a federal policy, part of a broader attack on red tape. To give the effort credibility, the savings from eliminating regulations couldn't just be assumed. They had to be quantified. Tony Clement is a cabinet minister with Canada's ruling Conservative Party.

TONY CLEMENT: We're trying to measure and benchmark our success. And in that way, it's a serious exercise, not just a - you know, a jingoistic political exercise.

BERLINER: Clement says small businesses are logging less time on paperwork - a reduction of hundreds of thousands of hours so far. Nineteen federal regulations have been eliminated, but the law won't allow cuts to protections for health, safety and the environment. That took any ideological edge off the act. When Canada's House of Commons voted to make the policy an actual law, the bill passed overwhelmingly.

somehow i doubt that trump's version will NOT include a provision that "the law won't allow cuts to protections for health, safety and the environment."

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

I'd been thinking throughout the course of the election that Trump was going to go out with the grace of Col. Rhodes at the end of Day of the Dead. It just occurred to me that, even though he won, my assessment still stands.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

trump is gonna ban officials from lobbying for foreign governments his own NSA advisor lobbied for businesses connected to turkey

https://www.yahoo.com/news/michael-flynn-key-trump-aide-sat-in-on-intel-briefings-while-advising-foreign-clients-004512931.html

Flynn’s relationship with his overseas clients is coming in for new scrutiny amid recent disclosures that two months ago, during the height of the presidential campaign, his consulting firm, the Flynn Intel Group, registered to lobby for a Dutch company owned by a wealthy Turkish businessman close to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey.

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/800877825037312000

hillary on pace to win the popular vote by 2.5 million

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

california should allow itself to be split into 3 states as a noble gesture to help a country in need

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

the BC government's policies have been a disaster for unions, renters, students, and working people, just for the record

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

and there are still many dumb regulations

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

look at the voting totals spreadsheet linked to on that tweet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/133Eb4qQmOxNvtesw2hdVns073R68EZx4SfCnP4IGQf8/htmlview?sle=true#gid=19Hillary

i hadn't realized what a massive swing Maine had. obama won it in 2012 by a 15.3% margin. in 2016 clinton only carried it by 2.7% - a 12.6% swing toward republicans over 4 years.

there are a few states that had larger 4-year swings toward republicans - iowa at 15.2%, north dakota at 16.1%, west virginia at 15.4% - but Maine is really surprising to me because they've been led by a trump for 4 years, paul lepage. i was under the impression that he was a terrible fucking buffoon and an embarrassment to everyone connected to maine. apparently i was wrong. a lot of maine voters got a taste of lepage since 2011 and decided to vote for the presidential equivalent. fuuuuuuck

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

i didn't realize trump owned a football team in the 80s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Jersey_Generals

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

Trump's plan is total nonsense but I do like the idea of taking inventory of existing regulations, subsidies, and laws that are over 20 years old and determining which still apply to the modern world.

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

there's a good 30 for 30 about the USFL xp

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

The 2 for 1 thing is banal GOP base crap - really not novel at all, just part of the long, long, big lie that the US is overregulated, that all they do in Washington is think of red tape with which to harry the little guy, etc. etc. The emphasis on quantity is very old in this sense.

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

it's not what's *in* the regulation that's important to him, it's how many there are!

i'm etaching bizniss ethics rn and 'so much regulation' is literally the extent of untutored student thinking about this topic, the left's messaging on it is nowhere

j., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

of course the vast majority of the regulations that really annoy people don't come from dc anyway

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

re "you'd be in jaiul"

@Morning_Joe
Source tells @Morning_Joe @realDonaldTrump won't pursue investigations into @HillaryClinton for private email server use/Clinton Foundation.

@ggreenwald
U.S. Presidents have an obvious interest in upholding the precedent that officials from prior administrations are not prosecuted.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

I have been telling people nonstop to watch that 30 For 30 episode about the USFL since Trump announced he was running. It's such a perfect encapsulation of his pathologies and his willingness to wreak havoc in the pursuit of a stupid and self-defeating goal simply because his desires take precedence over every single other thing.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

the BC government's policies have been a disaster for unions, renters, students, and working people, just for the record

― lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:06 (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

and there are still many dumb regulations

― lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 12:07 (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The Red Tape Reduction Act seems pretty silly to me, for the reasons man alive and Shakey give, and I don't really know why the NDP voted for it, but, yeah, the protections for "public health, public safety, and the Canadian economy" are a huge weasel clause, as well as that no action may be brought against the Crown on grounds pertaining to the act.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

the left's messaging on it is nowhere

I mean it's a complicated subject and there's not a snappy one line 'message' to sell

'regulations are sometimes good, sometimes bad, also really depends on what you even mean by 'regulation'

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

This is one somewhat amusing criticism of possible consequences: http://ipolitics.ca/2016/04/13/conservatives-one-for-one-rule-could-be-hindering-regulatory-cooperation-report/
xp

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

isn't greenwalds whole beat involve taking the government to task for classifying the shit out of everything and wrongfully prosecuting people for violating it? shouldn't he want them not to charge HC?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

Idk how many regulations the federal government passes that could not be justified in terms of "public health, public safety, or the Canadian economy".

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

The supreme religion of the U.S. press corps is reverence for power; the more Trump exhibits, the more submissive they will get. “I know I will get over it in a couple of days after Thanksgiving.” We believe you.

Finally, after everything Trump has said — about immigrants, Muslims, women, etc. — this is what upsets these journalists: that he criticized them to their faces using a mean tone. Remnick writes that “Trump whined” in the meeting and showed how “vain” he is. That may be true, but the same is true of his anonymous friends for whose petty grievances he is crusading. There is much oppression in the world and many serious concerns as Trump heads to the Oval Office; how Trump speaks to Chuck Todd and Jeff Zucker is not on that list.

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/media-stars-agree-to-off-the-record-meeting-with-trump-break-agreement-whine-about-mistreatment/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

The divide is economic, and it is massive. According to the Brookings analysis, the less-than-500 counties that Clinton won nationwide combined to generate 64 percent of America's economic activity in 2015. The more-than-2,600 counties that Trump won combined to generate 36 percent of the country's economic activity last year.

Clinton, in other words, carried nearly two-thirds of the American economy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/22/donald-trump-lost-most-of-the-american-economy-in-this-election/

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

There is much oppression in the world and many serious concerns as Trump heads to the Oval Office; how Trump speaks to Chuck Todd and Jeff Zucker is not on that list so that is why I wrote this article about Chuck Todd and Jeff Zucker.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

know your serfs

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

and yeah GG was the only one who wrote about it; kudos

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

I agree with the main point of the Intercept article but, at the same time, maybe media bigwigs getting shook on a personal level is what it takes for some shit to change.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/801110690387857408
I am seriously considering Dr. Ben Carson as the head of HUD. I've gotten to know him well--he's a greatly talented person who loves people!

wtf! either appoint this idiot or don't . fuck your idiotic thought process

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

to up their level of sycophancy, likely xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

media bigwigs do not go on the air. those ppl are sideshow hustlers.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

xp His thought processes are largely reality show-based.

https://www.inman.com/2016/11/21/whos-in-the-running-to-be-trumps-new-hud-secretary/

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

The divide is economic, and it is massive. According to the Brookings analysis, the less-than-500 counties that Clinton won nationwide combined to generate 64 percent of America's economic activity in 2015. The more-than-2,600 counties that Trump won combined to generate 36 percent of the country's economic activity last year.
Clinton, in other words, carried nearly two-thirds of the American economy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/22/donald-trump-lost-most-of-the-american-economy-in-this-election/

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 17:47 (thirteen minutes ago) Permalink

Thinking about these precise facts in different terms might help the Democrats understand why they lost.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

I really wish the people that voted for Trump overwhelmingly voted for him with the economy in mind, rather than Build the Wall, Benghazi, emails, crooked Hillary, Muslims and oh yeah, the economy, I guess.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

the left's messaging on it is nowhere

I mean it's a complicated subject and there's not a snappy one line 'message' to sell

'regulations are sometimes good, sometimes bad, also really depends on what you even mean by 'regulation'

― iatee, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 12:31 PM (thirty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The reality is "regulation" is not the top talking point in either direction with the lower end of the electorate economically. It's mostly the kind of thing that *small business owners* care about. Ugh all this red tape have to get all these permits! And sometimes it's true, it can be a real pain in the ass and it isn't always for any real purpose.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

The divide is economic, and it is massive. According to the Brookings analysis, the less-than-500 counties that Clinton won nationwide combined to generate 64 percent of America's economic activity in 2015. The more-than-2,600 counties that Trump won combined to generate 36 percent of the country's economic activity last year.
Clinton, in other words, carried nearly two-thirds of the American economy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/22/donald-trump-lost-most-of-the-american-economy-in-this-election/

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:47 AM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this kind of thing is comforting but misleading

the dense, urban, highly developed counties where most work is done have a) millions of liberal-oriented people living in them, but also b) most of rich owners and managers who aren't.

like, steve bannon is an LA dude. trump is, you may have heard, a new yorker.

goole, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

old news maybe bc when i woke up he cancelled but Trump is currently giving on record interview w/ NYT and it's being tweeted: http://www.nytimes.com/live/trump-at-the-new-york-times-the-tweets/?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=b-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

flappy bird, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

xp - misleading how? All it is saying is that more people in these counties voted for Clinton, not that they unanimously preferred Clinton. And some of these counties aren't all that dense, they are just large.

sarahell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

old news maybe bc when i woke up he cancelled but Trump is currently giving on record interview w/ NYT and it's being tweeted: http://www.nytimes.com/live/trump-at-the-new-york-times-the-tweets/?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=b-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

― flappy bird, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:18 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Vibe of this very much seems like trying to calm liberals down. Taking that with massive amounts of salt.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Mike Grynbaum ✔ @grynbaum
Salmon, beef tenderloin, squash, cupcakes on the menu here at NYT. But no one in the room is bothering to eat.

wow...not even the squash...

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it's my particular part of the small business spectrum but I have never encountered onerous regulation. The fire department makes me get new extinguishers once a year.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

squash owns

qop (crüt), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

i deal with a lot of regulations in my company. some of them are annoying but they all mostly make sense. you need a permit if you're going to block traffic with a crane. you need a permit if you're going to freight an oversized haul. you need to keep to EPA regulations if you're going to liquidate freon from a system or handle wet cell batteries. you need to post insurances for your labor teams. you need to post environmental insurances.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

squash is on the menu because they are trying to squash beef

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

Does Trump think human activity is linked to climate change? “I think there is some connectivity. Some, something. It depends on how much."

cool answer

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Breitbart is just a publication, guys. It's just a publication.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it's my particular part of the small business spectrum but I have never encountered onerous regulation. The fire department makes me get new extinguishers once a year.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:26 AM (nine minutes ago)

you have to buy new ones? We'd just have to take ours to a place and have them re-tested and re-certified. Generally we only had to get new ones every 5 years or so?

sarahell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

But Trump's dislike of regulations sure reminds me that he is a real estate developer. The regulations for real estate development in cities are really voluminous.

sarahell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

Friends who have a cafe in NYC have had trouble with city permitting stuff and somewhat meaningless fines. I mean they're doing fine and it doesn't seem overwhelming, just sort of shitty to deal with.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

On Bannon:"If I thought he was a racist or alt-right or any of the things, the terms we could use, I wouldn't even think about hiring him."

piscesx, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

xp - they are lucky.

sarahell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

I don't get a sense that trump cares more about 'regulations' than any other random republican.

his style of business might even benefit overall from nyc being heavily regulated - he's the guy w/ the lawyers, taking advantage of loopholes etc.

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

The thing is, the regulations all "make sense," but a lot of the time, they are ass-covering on behalf of the government. It's basically, "we don't want anyone to have cause to sue us for anything ever," so we are going to make citizens and businesses jump through all the hoops the city attorney et al. say we should. Also the permitting process is often exceptionally time-consuming and the people involved at the government level are not terribly concerned with providing "excellent customer service," especially if you aren't "connected." It's like having to go to the least efficient Post Office, over and over and over again.

sarahell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

Elisabeth Bumiller @BumillerNYT
Trump: Jared Kushner could help make peace between the Israelis and Palestinians.

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

He's Jewish, do you see?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

@grynbaum
Trump: “I would love to be the one who made peace with Israel and the Palestinians, that would be such a great achievement."

wellll goooood!

flappy bird, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

If people are serious about wanting to "run government like a business", then making all kinds of crazy rules to manage liability and ward off civil suits is exactly what they are asking for. Every business big enough to have a legal staff of its own is deeply into covering their asses as one of their main business goals.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801139968374546432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

"You know I hadn't thought of that" will probably replace "Make America Great Again" as the Trump mantra

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

this dude still has no clue what a blind trust is and is openly bragging about profiting from the presidency

lol America

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

america: the poochie years

iatee, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

meme makes me sad because I realize I've known who Donald Trump is longer than I've known about Homer Simpson

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

‏@grynbaum
Thomas Friedman asks, “What do you think is America’s role in the world?” Trump laughs: “That’s such a big question!"

Gun, meet mouth.

soma's little yelpers (lion in winter), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

can the joke be over now?

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

it's insane to think how being pop culture effluvia for so long cemented his reputation as "smart rich guy" in the American subconsciousness. It's not just the Apprentice, he's been namedropped for decades in rap songs, TV shows, etc. I was watching some old Always Sunny ep last night and there was a Trump ref. Our stupid culture...

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

speaking of effluvia how bout Tom Friedman

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

"Rae's a heavy generator but yo, guess who's the black Trump" xpost

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

Trump has reached his "smart rich guy" Peter Principle moment

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

thank god he's not the president or anything

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

Watching Obama give out Presidential Medal of Freedom awards, gonna miss this guy.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

The Community ep where Abed gives Trump as his reference when applying for the cafeteria fry chef job is a little bit less funny.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

ugh just imagining Trump doing any of these type of things makes me so depressed xp

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

Trump's not going to do this, and if he does, it'll be for bullshit reasons, to, like, his family and friends.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

NRO: Don't worry about these people!.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

i don't disagree entirely with that analysis.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

Or are we witnessing a confluence of media eager to spotlight something that horrifies them and white nationalists eager to believe they’re on the verge of taking over?

yes and yes the media is still in the business of selling advertising

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

i don't disagree entirely with that analysis.

Basically why I decided against sharing that clip.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

Sonia Kay otm

Sonia Kay
Nope, 200 isn't many. But I've got to say I've been thrown for a loop by some of the nastier comment threads right here at NRO, where white nationalist types post with total matter-of-factness about how the "unproductive" races are soon to outnumber the "productive" races in America and how interracial marriage is tantamount to declaring war on "white babies." The way they talk, it's clear there are circles where this stuff is considered fact. They even seem to believe they're saying what most conservatives think and are afraid to say out loud.

I think we should be careful about downplaying this crowd. They exist, and in greater numbers than I realized before Trump seems to have captured their imagination. We should ackowledge and forcefully oppose them, or else too many people (not least the white nationalist types themselves) will be all too happy to assume we're on their side.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

We should ackowledge and forcefully oppose them, or else too many people (not least the white nationalist types themselves) will be all too happy to assume we're on their side.

I'm waiting

sleeve, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

Don't Worry about these people and the unearned rage that we here at the NRO (among others) have been stoking

cucky ramen-o (will), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

NRO has been dispirited if not deflated lately, a consequence of picking a losing horse.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

Mordy otm

idk if this is better suited for the anti-semitism thread or not but I'm just gonna put this here. My wife has been terrified over the last week that no one in the press is calling Bannon a Nazi, about the "heil trump" video, the "Are Jews People?" CNN tagline, about the swastikas popping up etc. But my response has m/l been that Trump didn't create these people, they were *already* here and they have been for a long time, there aren't actually that many of them, there's no state apparatus in place to perform any ethnic cleansing of Jews or anyone else, our country has a rich and deep history of white supremacists and anti-semites (some of whom even occupied the presidency! Imagine!) - and that while these people are both scary and idiotic, it's important to maintain some perspective and respond with cold, clear-eyed pragmatism rather than hysteria. None of this talk about fleeing the country or whatever (lol, where would we go - Israel? No thx) I think it's clear that the real threat isn't from a Nazi state, it's from much more common and mundane sources that are ever-present in our society - lone nuts w/guns and overzealous law enforcement. Racists and anti-semites are currently emboldened and the media is hyping them up because they are sensationalistic and they fit into the current narrative about Trump's rise. These people should be resisted, called out, humiliated, ostracized from public discourse, and legally prosecuted where necessary. But this is not Berlin in the 30s. Nazis, the Klan, racist cops - these people have always been here, and they will always need to be fought against, it's the American way.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

The alt-right is definitely not the nazi party in 1933, and if it's the Nazi party in 1922, Spencer is no Hitler. When it comes to Bannon, I'm less certain what's going on -- I'm not convinced he's literally of them, but he's certainly nihilistic enough to be willing to court them, and certainly fueled by resentment. Maybe he thinks it's all just part of his psy-op circus, but not about to let my guard down.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

Bannon seems more like an opportunist to me. Doesn't make it any better but yeah I don't get TRUE BELIEVER vibes from him.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

Nazis don't use the term Judeo-Christian ime

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

thanks for that post Outic, I needed an alternate perspective here

sleeve, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

you bet!
https://youtu.be/CcPqFqqqGj0

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

moreover, with the caveat that richard spencer seems like a real unredeemable piece of shit, from the clip it doesn't even appear like his "are they even people" comment was about Jews but about the media. the "soulless golem" reference could certainly be a nod towards Jews but CNN is engaging in some pretty flagrant sensationalism. like i've seen ppl say that CNN was irresponsible to run that chyron without noting that they were just summing up Spencer's comments (and made it appear that they themselves were debating the humanness of Jews), but the very summation itself appears to be a fabrication designed to freak people out. i don't doubt that spencer would call Jews all kinds of things but why make up what he didn't say to scare ppl who are already afraid? it seems extremely irresponsible to me.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

NRO missing the fact that several of the nazi convention dudes actually run a nazi pony panel at BronyCon

mh 😏, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

fwiw I've been thinking a lot about the Bannon "darkness is good" quote:

“Darkness is good,” he said. “Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That’s power. It only helps us when they get it wrong. When they’re blind to who we are and what we’re doing.”

Remarkably, this quote is getting used exactly the way he's admitting he wants it to be used -- people are sharing it as proof he's evil. Which he may in fact be, but it's just interesting that if you read it carefully he's really saying that he likes people to get hysterical about him so they can't see straight. And people are getting hysterical about him.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

"If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him."

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/dansolomon/status/801119923577569280

Interesting - looks like Outgamie county had 1126 more votes counted than ballots cast, and all 1126 were for Trump. Guess the GOP had a GOTV effort after all!

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

i saw something about this last night. feel a bit stupid getting conspiratorial but ...hm

akm, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

I also feel v wary about getting sucked into conspiracy theories especially when they tell me what I want to hear but I've been thinking since the election that Trump projected every one of his vices onto Clinton and spent a last months of the election saying the vote would be rigged.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

exactly, he's telegraphed all this so blatantly that, geez, I dunno. I can see us looking back like, "I can't believe all you idiots actually thought 61 million people voted for Donald 'Grab her by the pussy' Trump"

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

whoa @ that Twitter thread

so HRC needs to ask for a recount? good luck with that.

sleeve, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

I'm very skeptical about all of this. If there were a conspiracy to inflate Trump votes spanning multiple states, then it should definitely be investigated and prosecuted, but I don't think that Clinton requesting a recount spanning those states because of messed up results in one county is really the most constructive thing to do at this point.

I'm getting pretty tired of all these people holding out hope that electors will switch their votes or other crazy things will happen to magically change the result of the election. What in the world good would that do other than further undermining what little democracy still remains here? It's time to accept that Trump won and determine how to stop his agenda rather than hoping for a bizarre miracle.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

Nazis don't use the term Judeo-Christian ime

― Mordy, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:06 PM (fifty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well, neither do Jews, but neither here nor there

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

no one has accused bannon of being jewish tho!

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

maybe we should just to confuse matters!

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

sorry I just loathe "Judeo-Christian" as an idea, I decline to be co-opted by Christian hegemony especially in service of islamophobia

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

I realize that's not your point I am just prickly about it

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

lol Shep going ham

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/shepard-smith-trump-news-you-can-choose

cucky ramen-o (will), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

I'm with ya Moodles, just irritated that Trump spent an entire month whining about how the vote was rigged, only to find out that virtually every instance of rigging or suppression happened in his favor, not to mention the electoral college giving him the victory despite losing by a projected 2.5 million

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

http://www.snopes.com/audit-the-vote/

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

for the record this "It's not a conflict of interest if I do it" bullshit is so damn infuriating. If Clinton said that they'd already be starting the impeachment proceedings.

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

i feel like what could actually get the vote overturned is if there were pretty clear and convincing evidence that russian hackery or something did inflate trump vote count

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

but anything less than that is just not going to fly

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

i'm sure the director of the NSA is doing everything he can to validate the results

http://www.wsj.com/articles/adm-michael-rogers-leading-candidate-to-be-trumps-director-of-national-intelligence-1479495306

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

is it weird or wrong that i can't completely dismiss the idea that that might have happened? (russian hackery) i mean it seems super-unlikely, but i feel like i'm living in a basically insane universe now

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

for the record this "It's not a conflict of interest if I do it" bullshit is so damn infuriating. If Clinton said that they'd already be starting the impeachment proceedings.

― frogbs, Tuesday, November 22, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz49AVqsFnE

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking last week about Trump's continual reiteration about the election being rigged possibly being an admission. Always best to hide in plain sight or redirect attention or whatever.

Stevolende, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

is it weird or wrong that i can't completely dismiss the idea that that might have happened? (russian hackery) i mean it seems super-unlikely, but i feel like i'm living in a basically insane universe now

lol ditto, I remember thinking Tuesday night "I'm going to wake up and there's going to be a massive story about how the voting machines were all compromised, because there's no way in hell this many people actually voted for Donald Trump"

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

it's not crazy - just a month ago, a bunch of toasters connected to wi-fi took down the internet

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

If the Russians were capable of tweaking the actual votes, would they have done all the other stuff (hacking DNC emails, etc)? I mean, would people even be talking about the Russians now if that stuff had never happened?

otoh, maybe they did do that stuff to produce arguments just like mine here. It's all about . . . levels.

nickn, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Maybe they did all the other stuff to make the election close enough to steal.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Maybe they were only capable of hacking a few select locations without detecting suspicion and they knew that that alone wouldn't be enough to tip it. The system is totally decentralized.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

Or mordy otm - didnt see your post

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

i still think non-hackery explanations are more plausible though - gains for trump over romney were present in p much all the states, not just in the swing states. i think trump is going to end up with 1-2 million more votes than romney had in 2012.

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

i want to rule it out because i hate conspiracy theories but somehow it seems possible to me

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:32 (seven years ago) link

whatever happened to oppo dump

akm, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

xpost

that, and actually makes me start wondering about brexit

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

Not convinced by any conspiracy talk so far, but it did occur to me in the last few days before the election that if there were indeed plans to somehow rig the election, Trump's repeatedly hinting that he might dispute the results thus forcing Democrats to strongly defend the democratic process and the legitimacy of the results would have been a pretty smart move.

.robin., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

never attribute to malice what can be explained by systemic racism and the electoral college

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

my faith is democracy is already pretty rocked by the loser of this election getting 2.5 million more votes than the winner

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html

Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

i'm not an expert in the field but apparently halderman is a serious person whose opinion should have weight

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:57 (seven years ago) link

each election should be independently verified imo.

Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

i'm pretty sure any attempt to audit the vote would be a total shitshow - immediately politicized, trump voters claiming "they're trying to steal the election" -- there's already such a void of legitimacy in the govt (for v good reasons) that it would be impossible to reach a conclusion that would not leave a substantial portion of the country feeling cheated

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

the only way this would succeed without, ah, conflict is if it triggered any constitutional reconsiderations, but that ain't happening. This is one of the few shoe-is-on-the-the-other foot scenarios: according to the rules, Clinton lost, and I sure as hell wouldn't want Trump contesting results if he had won the popular vote.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:10 (seven years ago) link

otm

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:11 (seven years ago) link

there'd have to be some kind of smoking gun. supposedly WI is already doing its own recount. if they announced that they found evidence of tampering - like let's say after inauguration day - that would presumably trigger a huge crisis

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

ghosts in the data is not enough - you need a smoking gun

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

though i would have thought digital only counties would be urban counties given the higher cost, and urban counties would have skewed blue, not the other way around

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:14 (seven years ago) link

there's no good solution to this mess apart from maybe going back in time and stopping donald trump from existing

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

or going back in time and grabbing Madison, Hamilton, and Morris by the lapels.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

She won't do it

flopson, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:21 (seven years ago) link

sad

flappy bird, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:21 (seven years ago) link

!

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:23 (seven years ago) link

fwiw 538 crew thinks fraud claims are spurious cf nate's twitter feed

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 01:01 (seven years ago) link

there's already such a void of legitimacy in the govt (for v good reasons) that it would be impossible to reach a conclusion that would not leave a substantial portion of the country feeling cheated

― Mordy, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:04 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The electoral college system does this already, also only having two parties

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link

is it better to have the republic destroyed by constitutional crisis or nazis

ein Sexmonster (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

Reichstag firesale

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 01:38 (seven years ago) link

Ana Navarro going off on Kayleigh McEnany

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link

Lawmakers in Erie, PA have introduced a bill to ban "conversion therapy." http://www.wkbw.com/news/law-introduced-to-ban-conversion-therapy-in-erie-county

In a demonstration of A+ trolling, check out the acronym:

Erie County Legislator Patrick Burke introduced "Prevention of Emotional Neglect and Childhood Endangerment," which will be debated in December and into the New Year.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

@mitchellvii
When Trump looks at an apple, he doesn't just see the apple, he sees the soil and the tree and the farmer and the rain.

Trust him.

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 02:55 (seven years ago) link

Bill Mitchell is the drummer in Gay Dad.

Andy K, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

The only curiosity he has about that apple is what it might've said about him behind his back.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link

we don't even know who these apples are, in some cases

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 03:30 (seven years ago) link

Trump is Mao now

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 04:03 (seven years ago) link

In a demonstration of A+ trolling, check out the acronym:

This is a good start.

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 04:12 (seven years ago) link

not gonna happen

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 November 2016 04:17 (seven years ago) link

well yeah

Evan, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 04:19 (seven years ago) link

talked about upthread a bit

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 November 2016 04:31 (seven years ago) link

oh!

Evan, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 04:34 (seven years ago) link

so have all the votes been counted yet or is that something we have to wait till 2017 for

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 09:27 (seven years ago) link

reading this thing make my head hurt

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html?smid=tw-share

akm, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

his tendency to just be an empty vessel repeating random things people said to him is so pronounced there. 4 years of the big lebowski.

iatee, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:44 (seven years ago) link

there was a Dubya advisor on NPR this morning saying there should be no presidential press conferences for the first 6 months; the risk of spontaneity is too great.

there should be no presidential press conferences for the first 6 months; the risk of spontaneity is too great.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

it was speechwriter Mike Gerson, actaully:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/23/503108932/former-bush-speechwriter-weighs-in-trumps-message-post-election

also, supershit Leon Panetta has a nice chuckle here over our possible Defense Secretary:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/23/503108883/leon-panetta-weighs-in-on-the-shaping-of-trumps-security-team

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

lol @ him attempting to appoint Ben Carson to *something* (despite Carson's insistence that he doesn't have the experience) just to have a black guy in his Cabinet

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-waterboarding-change-mind

now thinks waterboarding is "not going to make the kind of a difference that a lot of people are thinking."

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

got to the climate change part of that NYT transcript and almost threw my phone across the room. also fuck everyone in that room for apparently just chuckling and moving on at his vapid handwaving around the alt-right and why they might seem energized by his candidacy.

rrrrrgggggh. fuck everybody because hey, we are all fucked anyway.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

the NY Times leadership needs to save their phoney-baloney jobs

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

harrumph

“a tub of horses” (Myonga Vön Bontee), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

So much money, so little oversight, we're going to get stuff like this every day, and he's not even president yet:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/trump-adviser-received-salary-from-charity-while-steering-breitbart-news/2016/11/22/75340778-af8a-11e6-8616-52b15787add0_story.html

Donald Trump’s chief White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon accepted $376,000 in pay over four years for working 30 hours a week at a tiny tax-exempt charity in Tallahassee while also serving as the hands-on executive chairman of Breitbart News Network.

During the same four-year period, the charity paid about $1.3 million in salaries to two other journalists who said they put in 40 hours a week there while also working for the politically conservative news outlet, according to publicly available documents filed with the Internal Revenue Service.

The salary payments are one part of a close relationship between the nonprofit Government Accountability Institute, a conservative investigative research organization, and for-profit Breitbart News.

Under Bannon’s leadership, Breitbart has become the clarion of the alt-right, a term embraced by conservatives estranged from mainstream Republicans and decried by those on the left as racist and xenophobic.

The news site has produced a torrent of incendiary articles about race, immigration, liberals and moderate Republicans. It has been one of the most prominent supporters of Trump and a leading critic of Hillary Clinton.

“We think of ourselves as virulently anti-establishment, particularly ‘anti-’ the permanent political class,” Bannon told The Washington Post in January.

Trump’s selection of Bannon as a senior adviser has drawn widespread criticism from Democrats and others.

The ties between the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) and Breitbart call into question the assertions the institute made in filings to the IRS that it is an independent, nonpartisan operation, according to philanthropic specialists and former IRS officials.

Bannon launched the institute in 2012, shortly after taking the helm of Breitbart. He sought tax-exempt status from the IRS by describing the institute as an education group to help the United States and other countries maintain a “higher quality of life” through “promotion of economic freedom,” according to IRS filings.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

yeah it is seriously insane the amount of corruption and conflicts of interest that apparently are just going to go unchecked

double lol that Hillary lost because people had doubts about her "ethics"

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

her ethics sucked

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

hillary's ethics were just a sop to justify not voting for her - no one who voted for trump really gaf about corruption obv

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Only someone as corrupt as he is has the skills to navigate Washington's corruption.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

Only someone as corrupt as he is has the skills to navigate further entrench Washington's corruption.

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

like they're not even fucking trying to hide it at all. it's beyond brazen.

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/aLSUmUy.jpg

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

I really hate to be arguing this position right now, but the flipside is that Clinton supporters were completely dismissive of the same kinds of bad ethical optics wrt the Clintons that they now are angry at Trump about. The legality defense was raised a lot, and I'm not sure there's anything potentially illegal about Bannon receiving a salary from a non-profit while also running a media company. Also many of the issues with Clinton arose out of activity during her tenure as secretary of state and/or when she was known to be preparing a presidential run, not just working in the private sector. Yes the concerns may have been exaggerated, but everyone's insistence on "nothing to see here" was a bit flabbergasting. It felt as though we were all supposed to just trust that the Clintons are good people and have the right intentions, which is exactly how the right now views Trump.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

I'm curious about what the NYT's strategy is when he next tweets about the terrible failing @nytimes.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

promise to do better, probably

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

more on pompeo

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/23/mike-pompeo-religious-war/

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Everyone ready for red scare 2.0?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

https://newrepublic.com/article/138897/democrats-biggest-disaster

dang

Look past the GOP takeover of Washington, however, and the outlook for Democrats is even more alarming. In November, the party lost control of state legislatures in Iowa, Minnesota, and Kentucky. The state senate in Connecticut, which had been firmly blue, is now evenly split. Republicans ousted Democratic governors in Missouri, New Hampshire, and Vermont. All told, Democrats surrendered about 30 seats in state legislatures. They now hold majorities in just 31 of the country’s 98 legislative bodies, and only 15 of the nation’s governors are Democrats.

The losses in November are part of a sharp and unprecedented decline for the party at the state level. Since Obama took office eight years ago, Democrats have lost over 800 seats in state legislatures. For the first time in history, they do not control a single legislative chamber in the South. Overall, the party is now at its weakest point at the state level since 1920.

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

I really hate to be arguing this position right now, but the flipside is that Clinton supporters were completely dismissive of the same kinds of bad ethical optics wrt the Clintons that they now are angry at Trump about. The legality defense was raised a lot, and I'm not sure there's anything potentially illegal about Bannon receiving a salary from a non-profit while also running a media company. Also many of the issues with Clinton arose out of activity during her tenure as secretary of state and/or when she was known to be preparing a presidential run, not just working in the private sector. Yes the concerns may have been exaggerated, but everyone's insistence on "nothing to see here" was a bit flabbergasting. It felt as though we were all supposed to just trust that the Clintons are good people and have the right intentions, which is exactly how the right now views Trump.

unless you count the demons who live in morbs' head as site users, there is literally nobody here who actually believes "we were all supposed to just trust that the Clintons are good people and have the right intentions"

iatee, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

he's approximating

happy holidays from my demons to yours!

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

so did nikki haley just commit political suicide? un ambassador can be kinda above the fray but never forget

http://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/imce-images/colin-powell-makes-his-pr-007.jpg

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

Obama executive order on overtime pay blocked by Federal judge in TX, effective 12/1.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/get-there/wp/2016/11/22/judge-halts-federal-rule-that-would-have-expanded-overtime-pay-to-millions-of-workers/

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

judge just stealing trump's thunder what an asshole

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

Colin Powell was never UN Ambassador, though!

Don't suppose there's even the slightest hope of Haley's replacement in the SC statehouse being any kind of improvement.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

yeah I forgot that he wasnt the ambassador per se, but shit goes down at the un that can destroy a political career is my poorly expressed point

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

xp
read earlier that the SC Lt Gov was "an early Trump supporter"

rob, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

It felt as though we were all supposed to just trust that the Clintons are good people and have the right intentions, which is exactly how the right now views Trump.

its frustrating because there is ultimately about zero actual evidence that Trump does have the right intentions, unless you're literally just taking him at his word which is absolutely worthless. by no means do I think the Clintons are beyond criticism but the evidence of their public works and the money they've given to charity is all right there.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

Look past the GOP takeover of Washington, however, and the outlook for Democrats is even more alarming.

it's been pointed out that republicans are nearing the level of state legislature control necessary to pass federal constitutional amendments

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

xpost Yeah, this is another straight-up false equivalence. There's plenty to criticize about Clinton but there's no evidence, from his decades in the public eye, that Trump is anything other than a venal con man who operates purely out of self-gratification and gives zero shits about anyone else.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

i don't think anyone here disagrees

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

It's a false equivalence two different directions though -- Trump is more of a straight-up con man, but Trump was neither in public office nor known to be a likely future president during any of it.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

it's been pointed out that republicans are nearing the level of state legislature control necessary to pass federal constitutional amendments

― mookieproof, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:55 AM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark

republicans don't have the 2/3 of the senate necessary though

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

it's been pointed out that republicans are nearing the level of state legislature control necessary to pass federal constitutional amendments

Amendments need a 2/3 majority in the House and Senate. Ain't gonna happen.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

Has anyone written a really clear explainer on the constitutional amendment issue, because I'm a lawyer and I don't understand it. Is it state legislature convention OR 2/3 in house and senate, or do you need both?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

passing amendments through congress is one method authorized by article V of the constitution.

the other way to pass amendments, which has never been used, doesn't require the senate.

"The other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states."

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

So they are close to the number to call a convention, but not to actually approve amendments?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

xpost my understanding was that a constitutional convention involved only the state legislatures.

apologies if i'm failing US Civics here and making an ass out of myself!

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

from wikipedia

http://i.imgur.com/wDK62Yw.png

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

they need 34 states to call it, 38 states to ratify.

currently there are 32 republican-controlled states legislatures. however, only 26 of those 32 have a republican governor. i'm not sure if a governor would have to consent to calling a constitutional convention or if they could just be over-run by their republican legislature hordes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_state_legislatures

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxEnkmbXAAAqTTW.jpg

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

dems now control 13 state legislatures (26%)

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

yikes why is this so bleak

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

how did this happen

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

i mean havent we been reading obituaries for the republican party for the past 8 years due to demographic shifts

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

gerrymandering

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

the obituaries were for the office of president

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Anyone who’s had doubts over Donald Trump’s claims that he’s fighting to better the lives of ordinary Americans can put their suspicions to rest, because the president-elect just put his money where his mouth is. Over the weekend, Trump generously paid out $25 million of his own money to help out thousands of people who’d been defrauded of their life savings through a vicious bait-and-switch scheme.

http://www.clickhole.com/article/faith-humanity-restored-after-these-students-were--5180

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

democratic party is not good at their jobs (getting elected)

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

@JamesSurowiecki
Look at Wisconsin. Dems got 168,000 more votes in State Assembly races in '12, but GOP won 60 of 99 seats.

Natural to say: both parties do it. But it's just objectively false. GOP has been far more ruthless about gerrymandering to cement its power

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile, nate silver finds voting correlated much more with education level than income http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/education-not-income-predicted-who-would-vote-for-trump/

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

i'd like to think that the left will spend the next 2 to 4 years focusing on election reform (appointing a non-partisan group to assign districts, or JUST USING A GODDAMN COMPUTER TO DO IT, FUCK!, getting rid of electoral collage, campaign finance reform, etc), but i have the feeling we'll just be reacting to whatever disasters trump dumps on us, inbetween making fucking stupid jokes about his hands

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

sorry, i'm hungry. i'm stepping away

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

gerrymandering is definitely a huge part of how we got here, but it's also worth noting that the GOP strategically focused on state legislatures in a way that I don't believe the Democratic party did. The only way to push back (aside from hoping to god that that recent Wisconsin court decision overturning gerrymandered districts gets upheld and becomes precedent) is to strengthen local and state-level parties. And to not get blindsided again, which I understand they did in 2010. I really think the party should have a lot of people wargaming all the worst things the GOP could possibly do and how to counter, because I'm pretty sure the GOP will do anything it can get away with.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

Like if the Democrats had just woken up and realized, back in the years leading up to 2010, that a census year presented a great opportunity for the GOP to strike at the state level, they might have shored up key seats in state legislatures that were vulnerable. The party has been way too focused on a top-down approach, thinking the presidency will deliver everything else.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Also I kind of think that's the right way to do politics anyway, at the ground level. No amount of focus grouping and think tanking is going to be a complete substitute for strong local parties with a feel for their communities.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was able to get in touch with Trump by cold-calling his personal cell phone through a number provided by champion Australian golfer Greg Norman.

dark lols

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

Democrats just need to take a page from Trump's book and start running as republicans. The tribalism is so facile and entrenched that they'll get scores of votes based on nothing but that '-R' next to their name.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

^^^

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

I mean, it's a deeply cynical move, but when in Rome you might as well learn how to fiddle.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

I think that's a cheat code you can only use if you're rich/famous (bloomberg, schwarzenegger etc.) - since you get free entry to the club and don't have to work your way up via local party politics

iatee, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

but like we could totally have bruce springsteen 'decade to become a republican' and run for president, that would 100% work

iatee, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

Someone in Ohio did that recently -- she was as member of the Cuyahoga County Republican Committee and ran for the Ohio House as a Republican. She lost to the incumbent Democrat, then resigned and revealed that she herself is actually a Democrat. Not that incumbents generally have any trouble getting re-elected, but see if you can locate a reason why Republicans may not have been running to vote for her in droves:

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/11/cuyahoga_county_gop_central_co.html

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

i really kinda think the lesson of the election is that real celebrity trumps political celebrity and basically any famous enough* actor could beat pretty much any politician. *thus why fred thompson doesn't qualify for this rule

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/videos/10155136713370725/

I think I figured out who Donald Trump reminds me of, it's Tommy Wiseau

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

that and being dead xp

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

yeah the 'maybe these idiots just voted for him because he's famous' narrative should get at least as much play as the 'he truly connected with a wounded wwc' narrative currently does

iatee, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:06 (seven years ago) link

'these idiots want to be entertained while the ship goes down'

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

betsy devos for secretary of education

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

That is fucking GROSS

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

rip public schools

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

god FUCK these people

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

my office manager's kid goes to a charter school - it went bust literally two weeks into the school year and the kid had to find a new high school in september. ridic.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

creationist, married to amway heir, brother of blackwater founder

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

brother is, rather

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

ugh gross

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

On behalf of all of Michigan I apologize for the entire DeVos family and their hideous partners in evil the VanAndels, Calvinism, Amway, the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, ALEC, Eric Prince, and all the hellspawn that we have vomited out over the years thanks to our Dutch Calvinist forebears and the religious right.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

lol xposted to mookie but yeah he hit the high points.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

And by high points I mean just give us to Canada.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

this is useful:

http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/us/2016/11/22/what-a-betsy-devos-appointment-would-tell-us-about-donald-trumps-education-plans/

Sounds like not even a charter advocate so much as an out-and-out voucher and full privatization advocate. There are of course nowhere near the number of necessary private schools anywhere to accommodate the demand that would be created by a massive voucher program, so you're going to wind up with a lot of shitty fly-by-night operations popping up.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

vomit, just a steady stream of vomit every day

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

and here I was worried last week that Michelle Rhee might get the nod

spin the garbage wheel wheeee

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

Bernie should really get his staff in check. Look at this terrible messaging:
https://twitter.com/sensanders/status/801253188821250048

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

"but"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

you're going to wind up with a lot of shitty fly-by-night operations popping up...

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, November 23, 2016

hmm who can we think of knows a lil sum'm about that business...

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

So basically they'll do this with income tax credits, right? Like a huge income tax credit for private schooling. If they make it large enough to actually cover private school tuition in most places, it will gut public schools. If they don't, it's just a big giveaway to people already wealthy enough for private school. Either way, disgusting.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

Well, that just quadruples my determination to get involved in tutoring and after school programs and who even knows what the fuck all educational initiatives. If Captain Evil and his band of merry dipshits are dead set upon dismantling this country, it feels like everybody needs to do what they can to fortify their communities and shore up the deprivation.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

It's intended to make the state pay for families who send their children to private Christian schools btw. That's the whole point of the entire decades-long scheme.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

isn't she a Common Core booster? if so, lol

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

They want complete isolation of their children, schools, communities, and government from everyone who's even slightly different from them. I wish I were exaggerating. Small town evangelicals are pretty weird but their very weirdness sometimes makes them kind of charming/human, if flawed. Betsy DeVos and all her scheming cronies are simply the richest ppl with the most power to make Calvinist Christianity the norm and turn the course of public policy to fund it.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

She's Erik Prince's sister

badg, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

Yes, and then she married into one of Michigan's two Families Of The Apocalypse so that's double the "Does Grand Rapids really need to exist?"

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

t's intended to make the state pay for families who send their children to private Christian schools btw. That's the whole point of the entire decades-long scheme.

^this

cucky ramen-o (will), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

http://www.avclub.com/article/david-cross-donating-100-percent-album-sales-aclu--246392

this is really cool.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

And...again Bernie addressing class politics by using a strawman identity politics position to pivot to white voters. i don't think anyone disagrees with this point of view, one which does not actually address the nature of the identity politics / class "divide" in democratic politics. But it is a cynical way of trivializing serious concerns:

https://twitter.com/KyleClauss/status/800724251192004608

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

http://www.avclub.com/article/david-cross-donating-100-percent-album-sales-aclu--246392

imo this is what the left should be focusing on. channeling this turmoil and energy into resources and tools. we will need it with all the de-funding that is sure to happen. not the petty infighting that lost them the election.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

its sad to me that the left channels their political frustration by donating to causes they support and the right just buys a fuckton of guns

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

Bernie seems to be saying there, it doesn't matter if you are a black, white, purple ceo shipping jobs overseas, you are not helping. maybe you read it differently. i'm sure people are freaking out about the way he speaks rather than the content of what he is talking about. that's sort of a running them this year.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Similar to how it was the IRS declassifying white segregationist schools in the 70s that reallly flared up the right wing/moral majority types, as guys like Paul Weyrich who were there have attested to

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

Xp

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

its sad to me that the left channels their political frustration by donating to causes they support and the right just buys a fuckton of guns

Yeah, but how do you think the fuckheads who got us into this mess like the Koch Foundation or the Heritage Foundation et al got started?

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

Flag Post Permalink

but like we could totally have bruce springsteen 'decade to become a republican' and run for president, that would 100% work

― iatee, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:53 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark

the rock for president 2020

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

Just like we're repeating much of the trauma of the '04 election, we're having to relearn the lessons of it, too. There were a few attempts to get progressive organizations up & running back then, but this sorta fizzled out maybe, and Obama showed up so brightly that he overshown? overshadowed? the drive and the need for this.

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

unfortunately he polls weak w/ the key jabroni demographic

xp

iatee, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

Springsteen or Oprah. both of them on the same ticket.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

the rock for president 2020

Pretty sure the Rock is an actual Republican.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

imo this is what the left should be focusing on. channeling this turmoil and energy into resources and tools. we will need it with all the de-funding that is sure to happen. not the petty infighting that lost them the election.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:10 PM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bernie seems to be saying there, it doesn't matter if you are a black, white, purple ceo shipping jobs overseas, you are not helping. maybe you read it differently. i'm sure people are freaking out about the way he speaks rather than the content of what he is talking about. that's sort of a running them this year.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:14 PM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

first off, i dont think 'petty infighting' lost the election

You are also aware that the ilx meme about "black, white, purple" is ... critical of that line of inquiry/thought?

I didn't read it differently, I said that it's right & everyone agrees with it, but that he's using it to set himself up as the guy who sees "past" identity politics which is just encouraging more infighting because he's essentially reduced an entire wing of the party to asking for representation in an effort to convince white ppl he's still going to fight for them. it's really bad politics!

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

lol @ the accusation of tone policing though

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

this kind of stuff, btw, is why lots of people skeptical of bernie were skeptical: he's more right on ideologically than any other candidate, but also seems surprisingly tone deaf & dumb sometimes

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

One of the things I keep coming back to is that the inchoate groupings of American progressive/lefty/liberal-types haven't really grasped on to the need for having this kind of mass organization as a country or a culture.

I attribute some of it reservations about actually persuading people, or that you should have to even persuade people at all. You should just point out the facts, right? Other dude is hella racist or dumb or whatever and that's all you need to do. It's like the cultural baggage of the 60s's pose to reject everything stamped "corporate" led to not even addressing how or why this shit works when it works.

Like, since PR, advertising, and marketing firms are the most tangibly immediate displays of persuasive communication, every sort of attempt at this is coated and too icky to even approach, so a clueless cynicism takes it place. Why should we even have or need a communications manager?

It's like not being able to distinguish aggression from assertiveness, so one can only contract into the meekest ball possible and hope to not get noticed. All persuasion must be manipulation, then, and manipulation is something only evil people do, and we're not evil so that's that.

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure the Rock is an actual Republican.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUepX_AAmuw

his speech is pretty hilarious, I'll be honest here

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

this kind of stuff, btw, is why lots of people skeptical of bernie were skeptical: he's more right on ideologically than any other candidate, but also seems surprisingly tone deaf & dumb sometimes

Yeah, this is part of what I'm saying. The focus is all on being morally or ideologically right and inadvertently assuming that being right means being effective. You can be the most righteous soul on the planet and that don't mean shit if you can't promote that to others.

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

i see how u could get that impression if this was the only thing you read of him. it simply proves that he means what he says. he has stated that he will even work with Trump on the issue of economic justice. on the issues of social justice, he will not compromise with Trump. he has been very clear on that. he is not saying social justice is not important to him. maybe he doesn't address the other stuff here, but hey we are going off a screenshot of two pages of a transcript, this isn't exactly a primary source.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

... a transcript is the definition of a primary source

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

not sure i buy the idea that by focusing on economics the social element is excluded. aren't economic and legal justice also essential to greater racial and social justice? in every instance where Bernie has talked about social justice he has been very supportive of it, unwaveringly so.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

it should have been ", *and*" instead of ",but" but doesn't make Bernie any less of a god-send imo

flopson, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

i know this a dumb thing to say but i kind of wish clinton picked bernie as her running mate, maybe couldve helped, who the fuck knows though and this point eehhh

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

should he have done more? you bet. everybody should have. the election seems to have been pretty close, if they made more of an effort to work w activist groups, to reach out to the more energizing elements, to actually visit all the states they wanted to win. it was pride that did them in, not empathy.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

if Clinton had picked Sanders as a running mate and still lost, the party would've seen the loss as a repudiation of him and he'd be powerless.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

it should have been ", *and*" instead of ",but" but doesn't make Bernie any less of a god-send imo

― flopson, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 2:02 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

did you see the second tweet transcript?

The point isn't that he's wrong, but that he's accepting the framework of this being about "identity politics vs. the actually important work of class" when that's the framework dividing these portions of the party. he's using identity politics as a scapegoat to get traction

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

if he was interested in incorporating identity politics as a critique he wouldn't be fighting them!

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

i didn't think we were doomed until this "and/but" argument

goole, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

there is a complete absence of self-criticism from any of the partisans in the democratic world

everyone lost and nobody did anything wrong, it's incredible.

goole, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

Politics aside, I'm not sure you could have a ticket with the combined age of 140.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

Tbf to deej, the media has been interpreting sanders' comments as an attack on identity politcs, despite the more nuanced reality. To be real with deej he is a US senator not an ilx poster. He is saying he will fight Trump "tooth and nail" on any policy he proposes that is at all discriminatory or that will hurt minority communities. It seems crazy to me that he would be a special object of critique in a senate full of racists.

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

its hard to wrap your head around the fact that we had the most popular dem president in a long time and he left the party with jack fucking shit. he better get to work when he moves out of the white house.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

Here, play with this: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/poll-obama-approval-rating-231789

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

sanders has a p shaky grasp on how to speak to the consituencies that make up the dem party of today. "identity" isn't going anywhere

meanwhile nikki haley and ben carson are going to be in the next cabinet so yeah diversity in itself isn't enough

goole, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

President Barack Obama’s approval rating is at a seven-year high, according to a CNN/ORC national poll released Wednesday.

Obama enjoys a post-election approval rating of 57 percent, his highest mark since September 2009, when his approval rating sat at 58 percent.

The president also has a favorability rating of almost 60 percent, his highest since October 2009. Obama has a net favorability of +21 percent (59 percent favorable, 38 percent unfavorable), far outpacing Americans’ views of the Democratic (-15 percent) and Republican (-11 percent) parties.

Fifty-four percent have an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party, 9 percentage points higher than where it stood around this time last month. The 54 percent mark is the highest unfavorable opinion of the party since 1992.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

Obama approval seems more about personality than party.

dinnerboat, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

xp — As the stats above make obvious.

dinnerboat, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

a pessimistic reading of obama's approvals just occurred to me. you know old saw about how politicians out of the game are remembered fondly? obama is, as far as the country is concerned, already gone. he's been a second carter for the last year. maybe.

there was no last minute push to, idk, close gitmo, or force merrick garland thru, or any other in-the-dirt political thing that might have looked 'in the arena'

goole, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

will trump pardon a turkey next year y/n

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile nikki haley and ben carson are going to be in the next cabinet so yeah diversity in itself isn't enough

― goole, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 2:35 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

but literally no one on the left would argue it is ...

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

hes setting up a fake strawman democrat to fight against for no discernable reason

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

I think the reason is that he believes that in order to win elections you need to offer something for everyone. The republicans convince whites that they have divergent interests with minorities. Sanders thinks the party needs to break through this by showing whites that progressive policies help them too, and do this without giving an inch on their antiracist, pro lgbt, feminist etc convictions

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

ok ffs obv some ppl say prioritize one thing and some ppl say prioritize the other that's literally what the whole fucking argument is about + leftists who get more joy having the same argument over and over again than they do being in political power.

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

The point is there's a third way which is prioritize class in a way that doesn't set itself up as an enemy of identity politics, or doesn't see identity politics as an obstacle to your focus on class??

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

this is about how he's framing the problem in a way that aggravates rather than soothes their compatibility

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Ben Carson accepts Department of Housing and Urban Development secretary nomination, spokesman says - WSJ https://t.co/kxbchvi3Gw

Wrong!

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

Ben Carson, one week ago:

Business manager and close friend Armstrong Williams said Carson won't join the incoming Trump administration and would only serve as an unofficial adviser...."Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he's never run a federal agency. The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency."

Ben Carson today, asked about his qualifications after being offered a position as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development:

"I know that I grew up in the inner city," Carson said. "And have spent a lot of time there. And have dealt with a lot of patients from that area. And recognize that we cannot have a strong nation if we have weak inner cities. And we have to get beyond the promises and start really doing something."

In other words, he has no qualifications at all. I suppose Trump finally found the one thing Carson wouldn't mind crippling.


http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/11/ben-carson-suddenly-thinks-he-can-run-federal-agency

mindboggling

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

Apparently there's a full-on Satanic Panic going on about Comet Ping Pong Pizza

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/307404-jill-stein-to-file-for-recount-in-three-states

https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount

so if jill stein asks for a recount is it just of the green party votes?

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

aren't economic and legal justice also essential to greater racial and social justice?

That's a terrific question. Why don't you go back in time to the 50s through the 70s and ask all the black and Latino men who were pushed aside by the labor unions that made a successful middle class possible? Or ask every minority ethnic group who was left out of the gains that occurred doing the boom of the 90s while still suffering all the shit of racism?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

ben carson is a total joke obv, but is in all likelihood not appreciably more incopentent than alphonso jackson, the sec'y gwb appointed to hud

johnny crunch, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

Apparently there's a full-on Satanic Panic going on about Comet Ping Pong Pizza

― (rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:15 PM (twenty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That's a pretty good article that makes it pretty clear it's *not* a legit satanic panic, just a full-blown harassment campaign. That jibes with my impressions - I've seen the stuff on the internet and it's pretty clear 99% of these people are trolls. Potentially both politically and homophobically motivated though -- the owner has some sort of connection to the Clintons and was once in a relationship with David Brock.

IDK, it seems like the law and law enforcement hasn't evolved to address this. I almost feel like you need a RICO-like deterrent but it's really difficult to figure out how to craft one that wouldn't rope in all kinds of relatively innocuous activity.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

aren't economic and legal justice also essential to greater racial and social justice?

That's a terrific question. Why don't you go back in time to the 50s through the 70s and ask all the black and Latino men who were pushed aside by the labor unions that made a successful middle class possible? Or ask every minority ethnic group who was left out of the gains that occurred doing the boom of the 90s while still suffering all the shit of racism?

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:40 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So...your answer is yes?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

this is an amnesiac's answer

"I know that I grew up in the inner city," Carson said. "And have spent a lot of time there. And have dealt with a lot of patients from that area. And recognize that we cannot have a strong nation if we have weak inner cities. And we have to get beyond the promises and start really doing something."

nomar, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

Let's ensure people of all races remain poor and desperate and without adequate access to basic resources like health care in order to punish dead white union leaders who practiced discrimination half a century ago.

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

hoo boy

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

It will disproportionately hurt minorities anyway. The most inportant thing is to grandstand on their behalf.

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

who are you arguing with

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Phil

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

Actually you're being a moron who is inadvertently championing a "how can the Democratic party prioritize the needs of white people" argument

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

this is an amnesiac's answer

"I know that I grew up in the inner city," Carson said. "And have spent a lot of time there. And have dealt with a lot of patients from that area. And recognize that we cannot have a strong nation if we have weak inner cities. And we have to get beyond the promises and start really doing something."
― nomar, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:46 PM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"In closing, I know my name is Simon, and I like to do drawerings. God bless America"

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

If Sanders had said, "let's move our focus away from criminal justice reform, let's play down our support of affirmative action, let's winkingly pander to xenophobia like the right, or let's downplay racial and gender inequality," i'd vehemently denounce his statements. He wasn't saying that. He was saying that Clinton's virtue signalling wasn't enough. She should have ran a campaign that focused more on how her policies would help the voters she was trying to get to vote for her.

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

Treesh, buddy, you are misunderstanding my argument, which is that *prioritizing* the economic justice argument without also putting the social justice/minority rights arguments front and center tends to make all the gains accrue to white people.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

IOW, reread my last post

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

So we're probably more in agreement than not. I think Sanders is being clumsy with his words, and I also thing Clinton did a lot more than virtue signalling, but nobody reported on it.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

Trump will pardon a turkey over Snowden i'd say, so there's that

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

come around me with the phrase "virtue signalling" in your mouth and you're going to get pushed down some stairs

goole, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

If we were in an alternate ALTERNATE universe, 2016 would be the timeframe where the human race would throw up its collective hands and yell, "you know, fuck this shit, let's build a Multivac and let it handle all the leadership appointment decisions we're too fractured, divided, and distractions to make now."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivac

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

so should I donate to a Jill Stein recount or not?

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

Maybe that term has a right wing valence i forget. My point was that at the end her loudest campaign message was "trump is unacceptable." More than enough for me to happily vote for her and make sure all my family members got to the polls. Not enough to win this election. Maybe it was because that many voters truly were bigots -- i think this is possible -- but i think it was also because these swing state voters didn't understand what she was offering and how they could benefit. I don't think she focused "too much" on race or gender, i think she lacked focus overall and her message didn't break through. Tie policies to people's day to day lives imo, whenever possible.

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

I didn't realize this before, mind you, and hindsight's 20/20. I just think democrats need to be serious and critical when they look at why so many voters preferred a serial liar, con artist and misogynist to them

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

I thought that "virtue signaling" was a term that started off being used by left-wing activists and then migrated to the right, but apparently it was coined either by someone at the Spectator or LessWrong blog, so I guess not?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue_signalling#cite_note-Religious-4

though I'm sure that the first few times I encountered the phrase it was being used by social justice types as a synonym for "thirsty allies" or whatever

soref, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Idk i apologize to secretary clinton for using it. Still think her campaign - which at the time i thought was slaying - needs to be ruthlessly analyzed. I feel sick that people like jeff sessions are going to the white house now

Treeship, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

i feel sick in general

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

so carson is going to gut the ability to fight redlining?

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

Good response to the bullshit coverage of the protests here in Portland:

https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/11/scenes-from-the-portland-protests.html

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

so should I donate to a Jill Stein recount or not?

― 龜, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:15 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I did.

That effort is accruing donations at an astonishing rate.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 23 November 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

people seem to think nikki haley will be eaten alive at the UN

, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

how so?

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 23:28 (seven years ago) link

UN not exactly at peak relevance right now

the late great, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

yeah... i mean UN generally doesn't seem like the kind of place where anyone is eating anyone alive but especially not the representative from the US probably no matter who it is

Mordy, Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

Even more amusing than Bookchin's shots at Bernie is liberal Twitter pretending they know who Murray Bookchin was.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

If anyone else thinks we might already have touched on how difficult it is to combine class and identity politics, perhaps it might be of interest to see how the democratic party did this year. The party platform is here: https://www.demconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Democratic-Party-Platform-7.21.16-no-lines.pdf But be warned, they can't even find common ground on finding common ground:

As Democrats, we respect differences of perspective and belief, and pledge to work together to move this country forward, even when we disagree. With this platform, we do not merely seek common ground—we strive to reach higher ground.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

That is to say, almost anything is more interesting to read than the same argument we've been having every night for the last two weeks...

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

Fave twitter response is "omg Bookchin expressed my problems with Bernie when I was still a child," since the actual article is basically 'he's not a REAL socialist" and too business friendly.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:24 (seven years ago) link

on this race vs class thing I think the real question is 'is it still better to put such a public emphasis on race/gender/etc. issues even if it proves to be a strategy that loses elections outside of ca/ny?'

and 'we could find a way to make poor rural white people care' is just skirting the question. it's ~conceivable~ that poor white people just don't care about policy that doesn't benefit them. and they're the voting bloc that gets to pick our government.

iatee, Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:26 (seven years ago) link

otm

the late great, Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link

that said I think there's a decent chance that trump's white nationalist populist government is such an obvious failure that in 2 years technocrat democrats who talk about diversity a lot might seem more attractive to voters than any candidate who runs a trump-esque populist campaign. maybe. xp

iatee, Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:30 (seven years ago) link

I don't see a need for a dichotomy there - the Democrats don't have to run a Trump-y populist (Bernie or otherwise) to speak to the disenfranchised or demotivated. The Chapo Trap House people had a good point about Clinton's "America Already Is Great" line - coming from an identity angle or a class angle, who actually believes that other than the minority of people who've benefitted economically from Clinton onward AND aren't prey to any of the standard bigotries of American life?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

^

Treeship, Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:06 (seven years ago) link

does ignoring racial stuff in the heartland not immediately make the heartland vulnerable to someone like Trump?

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

im not saying because i know, I'm just saying I think it's more complicated than simply choosing to ignore or embrace progressive language around race & gender, there's an obviously bad way (cf "america is already great") but I think it's a lot more complicated & simply *abandoning* discussions of these issues, ie police shootings, is not a tenable position period.

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

(& the GOP will continually try to bait these issues if the democrats try to skirt them, anyway)

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:17 (seven years ago) link

how easy is it to deemphasize discussion of racial issues when innocent people are shot in ferguson, MO? It's not convenient for electoral politics but it's not like the choice is between "have no position" and "lecture small town americans about trigger warnings." you have to come up with something that addresses the issue

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:19 (seven years ago) link

I have never seen that suggested

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

Seen what suggested? I'm trying to reframe the debate from iatee's binary because I don't think what he's suggesting is a very viable position

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

The abandonment of discussing police shootings etc

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:25 (seven years ago) link

on this race vs class thing I think the real question is 'is it still better to put such a public emphasis on race/gender/etc. issues even if it proves to be a strategy that loses elections outside of ca/ny?'

― iatee, Wednesday, November 23, 2016 6:30 PM (fifty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:28 (seven years ago) link

I feel like 'deemphasize discussion of racial issues" isn't a thing on the plate for anyone but a few people pining for blue dog Democrats - you can ramp up an economic message without backing off for a second from the need to talk about race and gender and gay rights and etc..

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:28 (seven years ago) link

Exactly

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:29 (seven years ago) link

I grew up in Toronto, live in New York. I went the Toronto Stars homepage today and the headline was 'Peel police board chair accused of ‘uncomfortable’ hug'' There's currently Canadian politicians aping Trumps rhetoric. I don't think journalism like that helps. I also think the discussion about courts and sexual assault trials that arose around Jian Ghomeshi was extremely important

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:33 (seven years ago) link

you can ramp up an economic message without backing off for a second from the need to talk about race and gender and gay rights and etc..

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:28 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes i mean i basically agree 100% this is what needs to be done, maybe a little more emphasis on creating smart ways to talk about race & gender & gay rights instead of whether or not we should

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:37 (seven years ago) link

Someone in Ohio did that recently -- she was as member of the Cuyahoga County Republican Committee and ran for the Ohio House as a Republican. She lost to the incumbent Democrat, then resigned and revealed that she herself is actually a Democrat. Not that incumbents generally have any trouble getting re-elected, but see if you can locate a reason why Republicans may not have been running to vote for her in droves:

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/11/cuyahoga_county_gop_central_co.html

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:54 PM (seven hours ago)

this story is freaking crazy btw!

k3vin k., Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

im not saying because i know, I'm just saying I think it's more complicated than simply choosing to ignore or embrace progressive language around race & gender, there's an obviously bad way (cf "america is already great") but I think it's a lot more complicated & simply *abandoning* discussions of these issues, ie police shootings, is not a tenable position period.

I'm not suggesting abandoning anything. I am saying we may live in a world where there are trade-offs and certain issues that we choose to focus on could ultimately cost us votes/elections. that doesn't necessarily mean it's the wrong thing to do. maybe there aren't trade-offs and we can have it all with some perfect messaging. I don't think that's obviously true.

iatee, Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:49 (seven years ago) link

I think Obama's election was a perfect example of how that could work. I mean, the argument in '08 was that only Hillary could get that disenfranchised rust belt vote that was Obama's "weak spot." If he'd lost, we'd be telling ourselves a different story about it right now

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

I dunno if any of Obama's campaigns had clear messages, like if someone had to describe 'what he ran on' in retrospect it's kinda fuzzy / not much different from Clinton's campaign messages. but he was a magnetic figure in a lot of ways she wasn't.

so maybe we should stop caring about the message and just find more charismatic leaders. like I said upthread...Bruce Springsteen.

iatee, Thursday, 24 November 2016 02:02 (seven years ago) link

Care about the message inasumuch as id like the candidate to broadly stand for what is important to me but yes I agree that focusing on the performance of campaigning is essential

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 02:26 (seven years ago) link

(I meant people said no one would elect a black president bc of the same dynamic you're concerned with now, but as was proven by both Obama and trump campaigns it's very easy to over determine what ppl will or won't vote for )

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 02:28 (seven years ago) link

Psyched on this skynews doc "TRUMP: Making America Great Again?" In depth doc on the last two weeks. Illuminating interviews w Trump voters.

flappy bird, Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

On police shootings, I'm not sure it's a coincidence that so many of the worst police shootings has happened in the Midwest, that's where the focus and the battles have been most intense, and that's also where Trump did surprisingly well. There's a very real chance that BLM is costing the democrats important votes. But what to do about it, less focus on BLM, and the party base won't turn out to vote. It's a conundrum. However, everyone should remember the changing demographics, the US is becoming more and more diverse each day, so hopefully it will be less and less of a dilemma. Already Hillary Clinton won the popular vote with 2,5 million votes, and everyone seems to agree she was the worst candidate ever who ran the worst campaign with the worst messaging and she did absolutely nothing right. So hey, there's hope for 2020!

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link

Good points (ymmv):

-electing him was achievement enough, like Michael Moore said, it was the biggest Fuck You in recorded history.
-mother: "I wouldn't want him to be my kids' Sunday School teacher...but I trust him to be President.
-treating millions of people as a monolith, whether it's trump voters or women or minorities, is wrong and misguided
-people focus on the white working class rust belt voters bc they're the ones that decided the election
-father of cop (voted Obama 08) crying talking about BLM "putting targets on officers' heads", and Obama and HRC "being OK with that"

flappy bird, Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:20 (seven years ago) link

Good insight, I should say. Bits I don't agree with in there obv...

flappy bird, Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:20 (seven years ago) link

https://newrepublic.com/article/138955/happens-trumps-populism-collides-ryans-austerity

What Happens When Trump’s Populism Collides with Ryan’s Austerity?
A battle over infrastructure could be the start of a big, bloody, intraparty war.

is there going to be "a big, bloody, intraparty war" y/n

soref, Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:42 (seven years ago) link

Republicans never give a damn about deficits under Republican Presidents and what passes for infrastructure will be for-profit deals that benefit Republican suburbanites and rich donors, so no.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:49 (seven years ago) link

this is impressively shameless

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/307462-trump-adviser-tells-house-republicans-youre-no-longer-reagans-party#.WDZK2iSZXRh.twitter

Moore has spent much of his career advocating for huge tax and spending cuts and free trade. He’s been as close to a purist ideological conservative as they come, but he says the experience of traveling around Rust Belt states to support Trump has altered his politics.

After such a transformative experience — and after witnessing Trump’s stunning victory — Moore now believes Republican House members should be less ideologically pure and instead help Trump give the voters what he promised them.

“He wants to spend all this money on infrastructure,” Moore said, referring to Trump’s potentially trillion-dollar infrastructure package.

It’s a massive spending bill that naturally appeals far more to Democrats than Republicans. Moore, who has worked for the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, is not a fan of the stimulus package, but he is prepared to support it.

“I don’t want to spend all that money on infrastructure,” Moore said. “I think it’s mostly a waste of money. But if the voters want it, they should get it.”

soref, Thursday, 24 November 2016 03:54 (seven years ago) link

I dunno. The entire GOP at this point is a game where wingnut grifters try to outdo each other in performative displays of outrage; never forget that.

I was genuinely surprised when there was right wing backlash against the comments that he wouldn't pursue criminal charges against Hillary, because I had got my "dumbasses who don't really care about anything" Trump voters mixed up with the actual political right.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

this seems impressively shameless

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/307462-trump-adviser-tells-house-republicans-youre-no-longer-reagans-party#.WDZK2iSZXRh.twitter

Moore has spent much of his career advocating for huge tax and spending cuts and free trade. He’s been as close to a purist ideological conservative as they come, but he says the experience of traveling around Rust Belt states to support Trump has altered his politics.

After such a transformative experience — and after witnessing Trump’s stunning victory — Moore now believes Republican House members should be less ideologically pure and instead help Trump give the voters what he promised them.

“He wants to spend all this money on infrastructure,” Moore said, referring to Trump’s potentially trillion-dollar infrastructure package.

It’s a massive spending bill that naturally appeals far more to Democrats than Republicans. Moore, who has worked for the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, is not a fan of the stimulus package, but he is prepared to support it.

“I don’t want to spend all that money on infrastructure,” Moore said. “I think it’s mostly a waste of money. But if the voters want it, they should get it.”

soref, Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:02 (seven years ago) link

The only way a trillion dollars of federal infrastructure spending would be a waste of money is if it were all siphoned off by graft and profiteering…oh wait

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:12 (seven years ago) link

is there going to be "a big, bloody, intraparty war" y/n

imo this will depend on whether anyone gets in the driver's seat of trump's enormous, but delicate, ego. if no one person figures out how to consistently steer trump's ego, like a mahout steers his elephant or Rasputin steered the Czarina, then trump's erratic moods are going to cause a massive amount of turbulence and turmoil in Washington. Whether this sparks a big, bloody intraparty war will depend on how much the party leaders fear Trump.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:14 (seven years ago) link

this article assumes that the Trump team and Republicans are at odds in any meaningful way. Trump will propose a giant infrastructure bill that will be a bunch of kickbacks to developers and construction companies and massive privatization of public land, and the Republican Congress will happily make it a reality. They do not care about the cost as long as it enriches their patrons. The only question is how willing Democrats will be to play ball too.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

If the bill looks like that i doubt the progressive dems who are talking about maybe cooperating will go for it. I think they're calling his bluff.

Treeship, Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:40 (seven years ago) link

it rules so much

El Tomboto, Thursday, 24 November 2016 05:08 (seven years ago) link

I think that's my favorite column of the year

El Tomboto, Thursday, 24 November 2016 05:08 (seven years ago) link

by anyone

El Tomboto, Thursday, 24 November 2016 05:08 (seven years ago) link

This kinda throws it into sharp relief:

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-identity-politics-trump-election-20161123-story.html

"You can blame us self-absorbed Berkeley liberals for the election results — but not our identity politics"

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Thursday, 24 November 2016 05:25 (seven years ago) link

charles blow otm xp.

even if trump decides to govern as a moderate -- he won't -- that wouldn't excuse what he has already done by running a campaign based on hatred, exclusion, paranoia and lies

Treeship, Thursday, 24 November 2016 05:46 (seven years ago) link

Can someone C&P the best bits from that Times column? Have reached the end of my NYT allowance for the month....

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 24 November 2016 06:52 (seven years ago) link

Stein is closing in on the full $2.5mn goal for three recounts. This should be an epic shitshow.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 07:05 (seven years ago) link

Here's the Blow column in full:

Donald Trump schlepped across town on Tuesday to meet with the publisher of The New York Times and some editors, columnists and reporters at the paper.

As The Times reported, Trump actually seemed to soften some of his positions:

He seemed to indicate that he wouldn’t seek to prosecute Hillary Clinton. But he should never have said that he was going to do that in the first place.

He seemed to indicate that he wouldn’t encourage the military to use torture. But he should never have said that he would do that in the first place.

He said that he would have an “open mind” on climate change. But that should always have been his position.

You don’t get a pat on the back for ratcheting down from rabid after exploiting that very radicalism to your advantage. Unrepentant opportunism belies a staggering lack of character and caring that can’t simply be vanquished from memory. You did real harm to this country and many of its citizens, and I will never — never — forget that.

As I read the transcript and then listened to the audio, the slime factor was overwhelming.

After a campaign of bashing The Times relentlessly, in the face of the actual journalists, he tempered his whining with flattery.

At one point he said:

“I just appreciate the meeting and I have great respect for The New York Times. Tremendous respect. It’s very special. Always has been very special.”

He ended the meeting by saying:

“I will say, The Times is, it’s a great, great American jewel. A world jewel. And I hope we can all get along well.”

I will say proudly and happily that I was not present at this meeting. The very idea of sitting across the table from a demagogue who preyed on racial, ethnic and religious hostilities and treating him with decorum and social grace fills me with disgust, to the point of overflowing. Let me tell you here where I stand on your “I hope we can all get along” plea: Never.

You are an aberration and abomination who is willing to do and say anything — no matter whom it aligns you with and whom it hurts — to satisfy your ambitions.

I don’t believe you care much at all about this country or your party or the American people. I believe that the only thing you care about is self-aggrandizement and self-enrichment. Your strongest allegiance is to your own cupidity.

I also believe that much of your campaign was an act of psychological projection, as we are now learning that many of the things you slammed Clinton for are things of which you may actually be guilty.

You slammed Clinton for destroying emails, then Newsweek reported last month that your companies “destroyed emails in defiance of court orders.” You slammed Clinton and the Clinton Foundation for paid speeches and conflicts of interest, then it turned out that, as BuzzFeed reported, the Trump Foundation received a $150,000 donation in exchange for your giving a 2015 speech made by video to a conference in Ukraine. You slammed Clinton about conflicts of interest while she was secretary of state, and now your possible conflicts of interest are popping up like mushrooms in a marsh.

You are a fraud and a charlatan. Yes, you will be president, but you will not get any breaks just because one branch of your forked tongue is silver.

I am not easily duped by dopes.

I have not only an ethical and professional duty to call out how obscene your very existence is at the top of American government; I have a moral obligation to do so.

I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything, but rather to speak up for truth and honor and inclusion. This isn’t just about you, but also about the moral compass of those who see you for who and what you are, and know the darkness you herald is only held at bay by the lights of truth.

It’s not that I don’t believe that people can change and grow. They can. But real growth comes from the accepting of responsibility and repenting of culpability. Expedient reversal isn’t growth; it’s gross.

So let me say this on Thanksgiving: I’m thankful to have this platform because as long as there are ink and pixels, you will be the focus of my withering gaze.

I’m thankful that I have the endurance and can assume a posture that will never allow what you represent to ever be seen as everyday and ordinary.

No, Mr. Trump, we will not all just get along. For as long as a threat to the state is the head of state, all citizens of good faith and national fidelity — and certainly this columnist — have an absolute obligation to meet you and your agenda with resistance at every turn.

I know this in my bones, and for that I am thankful.

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Thursday, 24 November 2016 07:29 (seven years ago) link

who is donating thousands of dollars to jill stein's recount campaign in the middle of the night?

the late great, Thursday, 24 November 2016 07:49 (seven years ago) link

putin

hunangarage, Thursday, 24 November 2016 07:50 (seven years ago) link

VLADIMIR putin 🎶

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 November 2016 07:59 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure Breitbart will say it was a direct deposit from the Clinton Foundation or something

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 07:59 (seven years ago) link

I feel like this is an utterly terrible idea. It's not going to change anything and will probably make Trump look somehow more sane and reasonable to people.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 08:00 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/pwthornton/status/801259401902338048

oh for fuck's sake

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 08:10 (seven years ago) link

actually i agree. tired of being held hostage by a bunch of cousin-fuckers who won't 'pull themselves up by their bootstraps' and move to where the jobs are

will, Thursday, 24 November 2016 09:21 (seven years ago) link

I'm just so DONE with being nice to the crackers and petit-bourgeois basics who make up the current iteration of America's overseer class. My mother - who raised me not to be racist and to call it out whenever I could, but now watches bad cable news every waking hour - voted for (redacted) because she hated Hillary Clinton. She has the most incredible disconnect between her friends who get stopped for DWB, and the people BLM are trying to support. I have white school friends whose oblique FB posts about 'healing' indicate a GOP vote and an unwillingness to face even the most polite criticism from peers for voting for a racist, nationalist menace.

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

They voted for Trump because he 'says it like it is' but they can't handle any criticism themselves.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 11:08 (seven years ago) link

Saw a talk by Jenna Lowenstein (HRC campaign Digital Director) today - in addition to screening the intro video the campaign made for HRC's entrance, had she won on the night - spooky and sad alt history - in the Q&A she was asked "what would you have done differently?" Her reply - they should have risen to Trump's bait less often, and that he is clearly a master of the troll (not her exact words but the sense thereof), by which he manoeuvres his power.

attention vampire (MatthewK), Thursday, 24 November 2016 12:26 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLSveRGmpIE

jamiesummerz, Thursday, 24 November 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

So what are the arguments against the audit, again? Even if there isn't any foul play things could hardly get much worse, right? And Stein is kind of perfect for this - she won't lose face if she cries wolf like Clinton would and the environmentalists have a lot to lose in the following years.

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Thursday, 24 November 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

who is donating thousands of dollars to jill stein's recount campaign in the middle of the night?

Can't decide if this is just Jill being Jill or did the Clintons make her an offer she couldn't refuse...anyone with any sense had to realize they wouldn't go quietly into that good night. Remember when everyone jumped down Trump's throat for saying he'd wait and see what he'd do if he lost?

Anyway, Happy Thanksgiving. "First they came for the Native Americans and I didn't speak up", indeed...

Iago Galdston, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

There's a thing with DC liberals not wanting to be seen as 'unseemly' which prevents many of them from attacking things everybody knows are criminal, dodgy or unfair. Pretty sure it would be considered unseemly for HRC or her campaign chiefs to advocate on behalf of herself in this situation.

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

Liberals have morals, conservatives do not, is basically what it boils down to at this point.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:17 (seven years ago) link

So how many actual billionaires has this chord appointed so far? Two? Three?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

President-elect Donald Trump has received two classified intelligence briefings since his surprise election victory earlier this month, a frequency that is notably lower — at least so far — than that of his predecessors, current and former U.S. officials said.

A team of intelligence analysts has been prepared to deliver daily briefings on global developments and security threats to Trump in the two weeks since he won. Vice President-elect Mike Pence, by contrast, has set aside time for intelligence briefings almost every day since the election, officials said.

Officials involved in the Trump transition team cautioned against assigning any significance to the briefing schedule that the president-elect has set so far, noting that he has been immersed in the work of forming his administration, and has made filling key national security posts his top priority.

But others have interpreted Trump’s limited engagement with his briefing team as an additional sign of indifference from a president-elect who has no meaningful experience on national security issues and was dismissive of U.S. intelligence agencies’ capabilities and findings during the campaign.

A senior U.S. official who receives the same briefing delivered to President Obama each day said that devoting time to such sessions would help Trump get up to speed on world events.

“Trump has a lot of catching up to do,” the official said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-turning-away-intelligence-briefers-since-election-win/2016/11/23/5cc643c4-b1ae-11e6-be1c-8cec35b1ad25_story.html

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

his ineptitude plus the buyer's remorse that is likely to show itself in six months is the only silver lining, if it even is that.

mid-terms are going to be tough too, gotta put a lot of effort into getting at least one branch of Congress back.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

xxp:
Needs to be mentioned (again and again), the Voting Rights Act, and in particular the 1982 amendments to it passed by a Democratic congress, were the best thing to happen to the Republican party. A legal mandate to create 50% minority districts gave a lot of minority legislators job security, but wiped out Democratic representation in the 'burbs. Add in the benefits of incumbency, and the general election hasn't been competitive in most of the country's legislative races for the past 26 years.

There's been discussions in the voting rights legal literature of that reducing the mandate (I've seen 30% minority), would expand the effective political power of minorities, but its up to the Federal judiciary, and that means we're screwed.

Surrounded by 62,212,752 fools + 7,143,756 morons (Sanpaku), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

Yep. Read Ari Berman's Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

There is no chance the Dems is getting any branch of government back. Not unless they win the Louisiana runoff now. There are eight GOP seats up, and while Nevada should be doable, and perhaps Arizona with a lot of effort, which one out of Mississippi, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, Utah or Wyoming is even remotely plausible?

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

The Dems should mount a challenge against Ted Cruz, if only to build up a Democrat base in Texas for the future. There's also a distinct possibility that the longer the people of Texas get to know Ted Cruz, the more repulsed they are of him, like anyone else who has ever spent time with the guy.

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

Would Cecile Richards be interested?

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

x-post: I also imagine Orrin Hatch has to retire this time? If so, Utah should be without an incumbent, and should definitely be ripe for at least a stronger democratic state party building on distaste for Trump. So there's a lot to do, and a shitload of seats to be defended against, but realistically no hope of a senate takeover.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

Cecile Richards would be a disaster and discouraging.

If anything, the Castro Twins should be looked at it.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

as far as Democrats have no shot in 2018 yada yada yada - there's no telling what might befall the country before then. This is shaping up to be the most corrupt administration in history - two months before inauguration.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

strike the 'it'

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

It will be a great test of our country, that is for sure. Like the commercial that determines whether a suitcase can survive being thrown around by a gorilla.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

Cecile unfortunately would spend the entire campaign being called a racist baby-killer only to have her ass handed to her by the most hated man in DC

will, Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

jill stein recount up to 3.3 mil.

Mordy, Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

what if she's doing this bc she knows that there will be evidence of russian vote tampering. even one smoking gun, even if there was no evidence that it changed the results, would throw the entire system into disarray.

Mordy, Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

milo, yeah, anything can happen, but again, the map is that D has 25 seats and R has 8 up for election in 2018, and D has to get three more, so... And the house... How to get over the gerrymandering? Perhaps state elections is the best way to go, if anyone wanted to do something useful, put a calendar together for the next state elections.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

Most of those Dem seats are pretty safe unless the country has somehow gone full Triumph of the Will, in which case we're all painfully fucked anyway.

It looks bad but it's not as bad 25 to 8.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

It's literally 25 to 8.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

The popular vote total is going to wind up with about 2.5 million more for Clinton.

This is a Constitutional crisis. The electoral college should not vote Trump in.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

And yet, if they don't, we will have a constitutional crisis.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Tbh neither scenario presents a constitutional crisis since in both cases the EC would be acting within its constitutional bounds. Getting faithless electors to throw the election to the House (which would be extremely extremely unlikely, tho easier if Stein's recounts ended up flipping a state or two) would maybe put a lot of congresspeople in awkward no-win positions politically, but constitutionally it's all accounted for. Whether disgruntled partisans see it that way is another story, obv.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

Only state elections in 2017 are in Virginia and New Jersey. Can't imagine any R following Christie, but if anyone wants to prepare for midterms, there must be some seats in the Virginia house up for grabs. And D governor is term limited.

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

and mayor of Seattle! Our current democrat is pretty weaksauce, hopefully we'll elect a better democrat

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Thursday, 24 November 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

This seems like a good place to start:

https://www.flippable.org

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 November 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

at least we have a president who understands the face is everything guide to the internet ! am i right

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 24 November 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

https://www.flippable.org/

can't hurt

and there's this guy
http://www.vice.com/read/house-of-cards-beau-willimon-call-to-action

will, Thursday, 24 November 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

Also, anyone joined that Sanders thing, Our Revolution? Does it do anything?

Frederik B, Thursday, 24 November 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

It sates my liberal self-satisfaction!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

Saw a talk by Jenna Lowenstein (HRC campaign Digital Director) today - in addition to screening the intro video the campaign made for HRC's entrance, had she won on the night - spooky and sad alt history - [...]

― attention vampire (MatthewK), Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:26 AM (ten hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

whoa, i would love to see this - any chance it'll go public?

flappy bird, Thursday, 24 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

xp no idea - although she said we were the first to see it and it'll probably never be seen, I can't imagine they would release it. It was a mood piece tracking people going to vote, expressions of hope and excitement, leading to a statement about doing it together. Major emphasis was on diversity. Entirely predictable in mood / content, but I found it very poignant as you might expect. It was shown at a campaigner / organiser conference in Sydney, Australia and Lowenstein was here to speak in person. It visibly affected her to watch it as well.

attention vampire (MatthewK), Friday, 25 November 2016 04:56 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCkmOCsI-hc

Treeship, Friday, 25 November 2016 05:23 (seven years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/russian-propaganda-effort-helped-spread-fake-news-during-election-experts-say/2016/11/24/793903b6-8a40-4ca9-b712-716af66098fe_story.html

this is a little light on evidence (the report comes out tomorrow) but is pretty scary

k3vin k., Friday, 25 November 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

I guess the Chechen-backed Clinton fake news machine just didn't stand a chance.

hardcore dilettante, Friday, 25 November 2016 06:25 (seven years ago) link

I thought this was interesting, examining how stupid it would be to build an even bigger US Navy when the CIC doesn't care for the things that having near-total control of 71% of the Earth's surface is supposed to be good for:

http://thediplomat.com/2016/11/a-us-navy-with-350-ships-but-what-for/

But basically if you've had enough of pieces explaining why Trump's positions make no sense and are stupid, you can skip it

El Tomboto, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

Basically at this point this is largely a phoney war - the people we can't get reliable information from about what Donald Trump will do are a)anyone who isn't him and b) anyone who is.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 25 November 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

RT stories are really abundant through google searches. I've also seen high profile figures interviewed there, and it generally looks very official. Is that a propaganda outlet?

Treeship, Friday, 25 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

black lols on a black friday: http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/25/news/trump-black-friday-sale/index.html

, Friday, 25 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

RT stories are really abundant through google searches. I've also seen high profile figures interviewed there, and it generally looks very official. Is that a propaganda outlet?

― Treeship, Friday, November 25, 2016 8:49 AM (yesterday)

AHAHAHAH

sarahell, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:14 (seven years ago) link

tbf it's probably too sophisticated to be called a "propaganda outlet" and some of its reporting is good, but it is 100% state-run media.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

So anyone else feeling like recount is a massive waste of time and resources right now? Anything that doesn't have "2018" in it, other than maybe Foster Campbell's senate run, is not of interest to me.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

This kinda throws it into sharp relief:

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-identity-politics-trump-election-20161123-story.html

"You can blame us self-absorbed Berkeley liberals for the election results — but not our identity politics"

― (rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:25 PM (three days ago)

I have no idea where she's getting the things the left weren't saying to the "far left" because for over a month leading up to the election my fb feed was 75% back and forth arguing between people on the left and "far left" saying the things she says they weren't saying. Granted there were plenty of people that just avoided social media because they didn't want to deal with their friends having these arguments. But it's very WTF that this writer is saying that these arguments weren't happening.

sarahell, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

So anyone else feeling like recount is a massive waste of time and resources right now? Anything that doesn't have "2018" in it, other than maybe Foster Campbell's senate run, is not of interest to me.

Are you kidding? The Clinton Coup has begun right on time. They've been gaming this since Team Hillary cancelled the fireworks 3 days before election night. With the recount, Jill gets her 5% and Hillary gets installed somehow. You think I'm wrong? Remember, I told y'all Hillary would lose. The only questions now are, how does Podesta pull it off and will we have a Civil War? Hope you're happy.

Iago Galdston, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

xx-post: Virginia state legislature. New Jersey gubernatorial election. Plenty more stuff to do before 2018!

Also, how the fuck did 'gubernatorial' become a word?

Frederik B, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

lmao Iago the recount will change nothing you massive idiot

That's when I fired off my 2 Tweets to Dr. Phil (crüt), Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

Iago, the conspiracy theory my leftists have been circulating is that Stein called for the recount because she knows from Putin that there will for sure be a smoking gun that will demonstrate hacking and between trump voters protesting and hillary voters protesting and the massive discrediting of our electoral system it'll bring down american democracy

Mordy, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

One of the major revelations of social media is how unintelligent a lot of people are.

sarahell, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

honestly can't even tell if iago is just messing with us now

k3vin k., Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

also, supershit Leon Panetta has a nice chuckle here over our possible Defense Secretary:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/23/503108883/leon-panetta-weighs-in-on-the-shaping-of-trumps-security-team

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, November 23, 2016 6:48 AM (three days ago)

I wish Leon would have told them what he actually thought as opposed to being a professional politician about it. He shares that flaw with Obama. Decent, intelligent people that are corrupted by the system.

sarahell, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

professionalism surely which is a virtue in non-revolutionary times

Mordy, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

I don't think I got around to finishing his book, but the part where he writes about how Nixon gamed the system re federal laws about school desegregation, and how a lot of his election strategy was based on these backroom deals and promises, was really illuminating. It was one of the things I was thinking about during this election.

sarahell, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

Whose book -- Perlstein's?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

Leon Panetta's autobiography

sarahell, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

One of the major revelations of social media is how unintelligent a lot of people are.

― sarahell, Saturday, November 26, 2016 10:39 PM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I have written, then deleted, so many comments on Facebook and Twitter.

Camaraderie at Arms Length, Saturday, 26 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

Wait so now Iago thinks hillary is actually going to win? I am confused.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 26 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Tbf, it all gets really confusing, because every time Marty goes back, the Butterfly Effect kicks in.

https://cbskhitschicago.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/biff.jpg?w=628&h=352&crop=1

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 26 November 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

i hope jill stein fulfills her destiny and saves the republic

Treeship, Saturday, 26 November 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

With the recount, Jill gets her 5% and Hillary gets installed somehow. You think I'm wrong?

Yes. Yes I do. Since there is obviously no number of recounts in any combination of states that can possibly increase Stein's vote share by a factor of four.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Saturday, 26 November 2016 23:57 (seven years ago) link

i think he means she will get 5% of the profits. idk where those are coming from though.

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

No he means the 5% for federal funds. God knows what the fuck he's talking about, either crazy or trolling poorly.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 27 November 2016 00:55 (seven years ago) link

The biggest problem with the recount is Hillary's quick concession, completely plays into 'liberal sore loser' narratives no matter how reasonable the recounts might be.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 27 November 2016 00:56 (seven years ago) link

Wait so now Iago thinks hillary is actually going to win? I am confused.

― Οὖτις, Saturday, November 26, 2016 5:37 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No, no. Like Trump, Iago has spent this election season showcasing both his idiocy and the extent to which the words he uses are meaningless and in no way reflective of actual, substantive belief. In short: they trolling you. Way more surprised at and disappointed in Iago than in Trump.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 27 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

Iago's selection of a diehard torture proponent for his attorney general was the last straw

El Tomboto, Sunday, 27 November 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/802628319422320640

i think the explanation for all this is that jill stein is legit a lunatic

Mordy, Sunday, 27 November 2016 02:40 (seven years ago) link

Dr. Jill Stein Verified account
‏@DrJillStein

Fidel Castro was a symbol of the struggle for justice in the shadow of empire. Presente!

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 27 November 2016 02:44 (seven years ago) link

idk why ppl are still down on my girl jill

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 02:51 (seven years ago) link

not looking more carefully at this data -- knowing what we know not just about what the russians have been doing, but about stuff like the "crosscheck" program -- would be electoral malpractice

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 02:54 (seven years ago) link

What does a recount have to do with either of those things though? Actual voting machines are not connected to the internet, so they are not being hacked by "the russians." And if crosscheck had an impact it was on the voter rolls, i.e. who was registered, so a recount wouldn't capture it.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 27 November 2016 03:00 (seven years ago) link

i thought recounts were more like an audit, where they would catch strange gaps in the data or evidence of tampering

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 03:02 (seven years ago) link

afaict there are a few possibilities in descending order of probability:
a. jill stein is a maniac who has no idea what she's doing
b. jill stein is running a con to earn some dough and publicity
c. jill stein knows that any kind of audit will turn up inconsistencies and questions because of the size of the system and she wants to undermine faith in the electoral system even further.
d. jill stein knows that there is a smoking gun bc putin told her he would leave one bc once that shows up all hell breaks loose and there's a civil war on the streets

Mordy, Sunday, 27 November 2016 03:07 (seven years ago) link

^^ can we poll

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 November 2016 03:10 (seven years ago) link

Dr. Jill Stein Verified account
‏@DrJillStein

Fidel Castro was a symbol of the struggle for justice in the shadow of empire. Presente!

go fuck yourself

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 November 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

(The first sentence is empirically true though)

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 November 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

https://www.reddit.com/r/jillstein/comments/4evd5f/jill_stein_is_sexy/

salthigh, Sunday, 27 November 2016 04:19 (seven years ago) link

"Jill Stein is sexy" - 7 results (0.32 seconds)

"Hillary Clinton is sexy" - About 17,000 results (0.24 seconds)

"Donald Trump is sexy" - About 20,800 results (0.25 seconds)

No results found for "Gary Johnson is sexy".

soref, Sunday, 27 November 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

"Mike Pence is sexy" - 1 result (0.26 seconds)

soref, Sunday, 27 November 2016 05:07 (seven years ago) link

In the sore winners category, my wife's cousin in California just posted this:

So, this just happened...

I was walking through a parking lot to meet up with my husband and son. I was walking about 2 feet from an older gentlemen, because of our close proximity, I turned my head and smiled at him. He looked at me and angrily said "I would much rather be wearing my shirt then yours." Confused, I looked down at what I was wearing... oh yeah, my cozy old fleece with an Obama/Biden logo. Then I looked at what he was wearing. Duck Dynasty.
I ignored his comment, kept my head down and continued walking, quickening my pace. He called after me "you better watch out, someone will try and run over you with that on."

Why do old men suddenly think it's okay to speak so aggressively to women half their age?
#TrumpsAmerica #Ithoughtitwassafeincalifornia

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 27 November 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump is far and away the least sexy candidate. Those google results reflect a sick, misguided nation and/or fox news.

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

*fake news

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

Fucking duck dynasty

Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 27 November 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

1) I really wish the paper would stop every single one of this asshole's tweets. Haven't they learned their lesson? (Answer: no)

2) Wow, the WaPo and NYTimes really stepping up investigations into Trump's conflicts. Where was this reporting months ago? And hey, did this guy really get away with not releasing his tax returns? How did that happen?

3) Even if Trump/Pence is above conflict of interest, legally, what about Trump's kids? Putting aside Trump legal intervention/reprieve, could they be liable for sketchy stuff (not far) down the line, when conflicts start appearing? They are still subject to US law, right? They can be fined/sued, etc.? If a government body fails to take action against actionable crimes, can that organization be sued? How about if they show that Trump intervened on their behalf and prevented a government body from acting? Because I don't see how any/all of this will not happen. It seemed inevitable, even assuming the best of intentions on the part of Trump et al. And he does not have the best of intentions.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

Wow, the WaPo and NYTimes really stepping up investigations into Trump's conflicts. Where was this reporting months ago?

This was happening late summer and early fall; it doesn't matter.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

The federal government could be sued, the Trumps themselves could be prosecuted by state AGs, the states could go after the federal government, the Trumps could be sued, etc. etc. There is recourse as long as we remain a nation that abides the rule of law. And hey, David Boies fired his client in the Theranos case so his firm is probably looking for stuff to do!

El Tomboto, Sunday, 27 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

xpost I never saw anything as extensive and specific as the multiple-bylined Times piece that ran yesterday.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

i'm not sure there were that many times and wapo subscribers who voted for trump. every day during the election, the times would show up in my driveway filled with articles on how unethical, untrustworthy trump is. the mind reels imaging a voter carefully reading all of that and then casting a vote for him.

on the other hand, re. sexiness discussion from above

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/11/27/opinion/sunday/27sestanovich/27sestanovich-master768.jpg

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

If there is anything this election has demonstrated to me, it's that plenty of people read accounts of his conflicts and corruption and crimes and still voted for him anyway, saying what the hell, better than the alternative!

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

yeah, i was really stunned by the extent of the hillaryphobia in the nation. like, she's got her flaws, but trump is nothing but flaws. he is a blight on the face of humanity. the world is a much worse place because he is in it, regardless of whether or not he is president. now that he is, well,

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

Trump is shaping up to be the least powerful President since before FDR remade the executive branch, which isn't exactly great if it means the country is pretty much governed by the Ryan agenda. Then again Ryan is probably loathed by a third of his caucus.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 27 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

they'll stop loathing him once he can just ship radical GOP legislation straight to a friendly White House and buy everybody a round.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 27 November 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

The extent of Hillary disdain isn't really surprising - the right and center-right were still mad at "Hill and Billary" from 1992 and have never let it go, the left of the Democrats still doesn't like or trust the Clintons politically (cf. what happened with Bill's VP).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 27 November 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

hm, seems like maybe it was a bad idea for the DNC to decide like 5 years ago that she would be the nominee come hell or high water

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

thanks for your insight at this important moment

El Tomboto, Sunday, 27 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

ha sorry i'll take your lead and post paranoid articles about how we're slipping into autocracy

https://twitter.com/amjoyshow/status/802910629816172544

i do secretly enjoy following sarah kendzior's apocalyptics tbh

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

i feel like she presents a valuable perspective. i don't things will go down like she says but i think it's possible. trump is being entirely unclear about his intentions.

Treeship, Sunday, 27 November 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

the left of the Democrats still doesn't like or trust the Clintons politically (cf. what happened with Bill's VP).

Ironically, both Al Gore and HRC won the popular vote quite handily.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

I hope the USA turns into a country of 500 independent city-states sometime soon

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

I've been off twitter since the election I'm just using ilx for my stupid quips

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

yo who gets the nukes in that scenario

imago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

every state gets 1 nuke lol

imago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

I assume an executive council of mayors gets to do the nukes

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

It kinda sorta feels like Trump, to the extent that his feeble synapses have any ability to generate an actual strategy, may still be perpetuating a Producers gambit. He wanted to win but never actually wanted the job. He can't quit without looking like a loser, so he figures that by doing everything in his power to visibly demonstrate how unfit he is for the job (hiring unqualified maniacs to cabinet positions, indicating a total lack of interest in security briefings, pooh-poohing qualms about his audacious conflicts of interest, etc.) before he's even sworn in, he can get somebody to chuck him out before he ever has to do anything. And then he would be able to more legitimately nurse the perpetual state of aggrievement that clearly gives his life meaning. But like The Producers, the thing he didn't want to happen is exactly what happened and will continue to happen, but in this case Bialystock is going to make us all suffer for being stupid enough to fall for his con and forcing him to live in some dumb house in DC.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

Like, I wholeheartedly acknowledge how profoundly stupid and incurious Trump is, but it honestly seems like he's going out of his way to demonstrate how shitty a president he's going to be. The problem being that the people were already convinced don't need convincing and the people who backed him will double down on their support regardless of how many foreign dignitaries he waggles his shriveled penis at.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

Don't you mean "waggles his small hands at"?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

Ironically, both Al Gore and HRC won the popular vote quite handily.

handily is... rather strong. .5% and less than 2% would either be the third and fourth-smallest or third and fifth (if Hillary surpasses Carter in the end) since 1900.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 27 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

this article makes a pretty convincing (and beautifully written case) against using 'realist' political calculations vis-a-vis Trump (which informs the discussion about whether to stress 'identity' politics or not) http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/11/27/trump-realism-vs-moral-politics-choice-we-face/

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Sunday, 27 November 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

handily is... rather strong. .5% and less than 2% would either be the third and fourth-smallest or third and fifth (if Hillary surpasses Carter in the end) since 1900.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z)

Hm. I thought as of last week Clinton was at Tilden levels.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 November 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

is this nuts or otm?

https://twitter.com/summerbrennan/status/802302536761810944

stevie, Sunday, 27 November 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

While she's tweeting about cyberwar, the prez-elect is tweeting:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/802972944532209664

In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally

curmudgeon, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

Just about to post re: that. If the president elect, the guy who won, is alleging millions of fraudulent votes ...

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

care to share with the rest of the class mr trump

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

So he cried fraud before the election, he cried fraud after the election, but he's dismissing recounts as a waste of time?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Politico says in part:

To bolster his claims, Trump has cited a 2014 blog post in The Washington Post by the authors of a disputed study that estimated that "6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010." That study has faced intense scrutiny from election experts, with one analyst telling factcheck.org earlier this year, “Their finding is entirely due to measurement error."

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-illegal-voting-clinton-231860

curmudgeon, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

He's the president, he should appoint people to look into this.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

we haven't even started yet

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

He should also look into how many of his voters host illegal off-highway tiger zoos.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

i have been to to the tiger truck stop in louisiana and can confirm that there is one sad tiger in a concerte box there. also the jambalaya sucked

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

i don't think congress has the constitutional authority to pass a nationwide voter ID law, thank god

, Sunday, 27 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

i don't think congress has the constitutional authority to pass a nationwide voter ID law, thank god

OTOH, proposals for national ID cards have been kicking around for awhile - especially in the 9/11 fallout. I certainly expect to see them again.

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 27 November 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

If there was a national ID (realizing the issues with hassle, threat of authoritarian rule, etc) that was enacted and in force years before an election, could it prevent some of the voter supression that has been a regular issue for a couple of decades?

In other words, we've had the issue of Republican secretaries of state disenfranchising hundreds of thousands in the weeks immediately preceding every election. An ID mandate, if issued a year or two before the next election, would be an equal hassle to all, but would prevent thousands from being turned away as they reached the ballot box.

Frankly, I don't have strongly informed opinions on the issue. I just want a way to prevent the sorts of voter list manipulation that has become the norm, especially in swing states, to stop. I understand voter/citizen ID is intended to disenfranchise, but perhaps if effectively countered at the local level it could backfire. We have the GOTV volunteers, they don't.

Sanpaku, Sunday, 27 November 2016 23:25 (seven years ago) link

Imagine the uproar if senior citizens who got their news from racist nephews on Facebook were turned away, while people of all ethnicities who duly wasted an hour or two to get their national ID walked past to cast their vote. This is the sort of poetic justice I seek.

Sanpaku, Sunday, 27 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link

There would be no more than one office in every MSA unless you pay a fee to skip the line or something equally disenfranchising, but rural gas stations would be able to process the paperwork.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 27 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

Again, we have the GOTV volunteers. They're shitheads relying upon Facebook for their worldview.

Sanpaku, Sunday, 27 November 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

how would theoretical national id laws play out in vote by mail only states (which imo the entire country should be vote by mail bc it works and is easy)

Clay, Monday, 28 November 2016 00:24 (seven years ago) link

Sanpaku wouldn't you just be offsetting the disenfranchisement from the weeks before the election to whenever it is that people are supposed to get these IDs?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 28 November 2016 00:37 (seven years ago) link

No one can respond to the late period disenfranchisement. I just think there's ample opportunity for these measures to backfire, especially if they're in law for many months before a vote.

I trust that we are smarter and more committed. If some neo-nazi thinks posting Pepe memes is more important than getting their fucking diabetic uncle out to vote, too bad.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 00:43 (seven years ago) link

Sorry about that, but I've got a lot of contempt issues around the electorate, right now.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

I guess I'm not following your argument completely, Sanpaku, since state-level voter ID is a device of disenfranchisement, and the arguments you're putting forward for how people would have plenty of time to get it taken care of in advance, are the same as those put forward by defenders of state voter ID measures. It leads rapidly to "If you can't be bothered to fill out a form you have no business voting!" in defiance of how things actually play out in reality, vis-a-vis disproportionate effects on certain populations. And yeah, unless a whole new federal voter-registration bureaucracy sprung into existence, with outposts and offices and sign-up vans in ever town, the actual implementation would fall to state-level agencies so it'd be the same old shit, as milo z suggests.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Monday, 28 November 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

how would theoretical national id laws play out in vote by mail only states (which imo the entire country should be vote by mail bc it works and is easy)

― Clay, Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:24 PM (twenty-five minutes ago)

There are states that require you to vote by mail? That seems like it has more opportunity for fraud, as well as disenfranchising people that move.

sarahell, Monday, 28 November 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

overview here, I am in the "pro" camp:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vote-by-mail_in_Oregon

sleeve, Monday, 28 November 2016 01:02 (seven years ago) link

i don't think congress has the constitutional authority to pass a nationwide voter ID law, thank god

actually looks like congress can under the elections clause

so trump is gonna use this recount effort to lie about voter fraud, setting the stage for a nationwide voter ID law

, Monday, 28 November 2016 01:11 (seven years ago) link

Frankly, I'd be pretty happy to have a multiple choice test on the effects of climate change sponsored by the NSF be part of voter registration.

Our problem now is we're playing by the rules, and Republican secretaries of state are disenfranchising voters in the weeks just prior to elections. The problem isn't rules, its changing them before anyone has a chance to react.

They enact voter ID in early 2017, and we can react. In fact, we can win this contest of disenfranchisement, because we are smarter and have more grassroots support. I'll drive people from my neighborhood, but maybe not the Trump worshippers from the nursing home. If they enact voter ID in late 2018, then we're fucked.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

^selectively disenfranching

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

Frankly, I'd be pretty happy to have a multiple choice test on the effects of climate change sponsored by the NSF be part of voter registration.

yeah no

Fundamental rights don't get tested

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 01:39 (seven years ago) link

everything about that post is ridiculous

k3vin k., Monday, 28 November 2016 01:41 (seven years ago) link

i saw a person with a bumper sticker today reading "TYSON/NYE 2016". basically made me want to become a trump supporter. i suspect it was on sanpaku's car???

global tetrahedron, Monday, 28 November 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link

xp:

Obv my post was in jest.

That said, while voting tests served to disenfranchise, they also mostly kept demagogues out. How many of us would pray for a Romney right now...

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

?

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 28 November 2016 02:32 (seven years ago) link

you know Andrew Jackson right

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 28 November 2016 02:32 (seven years ago) link

Also, there's no issue that matters as much to me as climate change, as there's no other issue as likely to kill billions by the end of the century. I'd vote for Satan if he had a better green energy plan. Sorry, that's where I am.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/washington-post-disgracefully-promotes-a-mccarthyite-blacklist-from-a-new-hidden-and-very-shady-group/

seems like my suspicions about that wapo article were warranted and that this propornot site lacks any credibility

k3vin k., Monday, 28 November 2016 02:43 (seven years ago) link

reading their twitter account i actually think fred is their leader

k3vin k., Monday, 28 November 2016 02:44 (seven years ago) link

Glenn Greenwald also lacks credibility

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 28 November 2016 02:47 (seven years ago) link

i see

k3vin k., Monday, 28 November 2016 02:49 (seven years ago) link

I mean like I also lack credibility, who am I, what is true

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 28 November 2016 02:49 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/8xOhIqO.png

Clay, Monday, 28 November 2016 02:56 (seven years ago) link

Romney would be no different on climate change than Trump will be.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 28 November 2016 02:58 (seven years ago) link

why the need to clown on glenn greenwald and thom yorke? honest question

global tetrahedron, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:00 (seven years ago) link

bored tbh

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:02 (seven years ago) link

i was just riffing on "what is true" in the previous post idk

Clay, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:03 (seven years ago) link

I mean that Thom Yorke tweet's very good

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:03 (seven years ago) link

why the need to clown on glenn greenwald and thom yorke? honest question

Greenwald's a posturing shit and every bit as much a hysteric as Andrew Sullivan, albeit on different issues; Yorke is a dumb rock star who thinks he's smart.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

Greenwald's a better reporter.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

Greenwald's a better reporter.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:07 (seven years ago) link

radiohead plays a key role in neoliberal globalisation

sarahell, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

There are few prominent Republicans in I'd consider in the "sane" camp re: climate change. Jon Huntsman was the last gasp for the party, really. Romney is smart enough to understand the science, and maybe persuade other moderates to join with the Dem caucus on minor measures. A Romney presidency would have been mostly a hiatus in progress.

This Trump presidency threatens to overturn 30 years of climate change diplomacy. I won't be surprised if the US leaves the Rio framework. This election was a fucking disaster for anyone who knows the score on how awful climate change impacts will be. A handful of votes turn this election., and if Paris falls apart, that reduces the Earth's carrying capacity for human life by hundreds of millions, for the next 2-7 thousand years.

It doesn't inspire respect in democracy, frankly. Like I said above, Satan, bring on the windmills.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

lol john huntsman made no apologies for trump. sorry

global tetrahedron, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:16 (seven years ago) link

Jon Huntsman -- Sane? Romney -- smart?

Reagan won.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:16 (seven years ago) link

a Romney presidency would've been the Ryan budget four years before Trump; the best we can say about 2016 is averting disaster by four years.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

Can anyone make the case to me that anything substantively positive would have happened on climate change under a Clinton presidency?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:18 (seven years ago) link

I think we can all make the case that voting is stupid and a waste of time right fellas?

El Tomboto, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:18 (seven years ago) link

Sanpaku doing a good job reminding me why being a single-issue voter is untenable

El Tomboto, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

her CC policy seemed to be basically, 'everything I can without Congress'

flopson, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

that's p much all anyone could say tbh

flopson, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:28 (seven years ago) link

Please, permit me have my drunken angry tirade against the self destructive stupidity of humanity.

Yes, they're all delusional, including Obama who favored Gingrichcare over renewable energy as his first term finite political capital expenditure.

If people knew the facts, if we could communicate clearly to them that 1) we're on a track where all will be hungry, in 30-60 years, 2) coal and gas guzzlers will shorten this timeframe, 3) your children will prematurely die if you don't do something, you stupid fucks, to prevent us going above 2 °C, 4) Oh god: you morons are committing us to the 4-5 °C path: about 2 billion humans survive this you know, and its probably not your kids..., well, it would be a different politics.

Right now, I'm in favor of all media outlets telling their listeners they're all stupid morons, all the time. We deserve to be berated for our collective choice.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:31 (seven years ago) link

Even I'm amused by permit me have my drunken...

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link

her CC policy seemed to be basically, 'everything I can without Congress'

― flopson, Sunday, November 27, 2016 10:23 PM (eighteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

what would she have done with a democratic congress?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 28 November 2016 03:42 (seven years ago) link

xp: Also, please note that I'm writing from a red suburb of a red state. Everyone around me is a climate moron. No exceptions, in my experience. I've tried to be gentle with them, but most still don't know their houses will be under about 3-4 m of water by 2150.

Sanpaku, Monday, 28 November 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

i genuinely don't think people would care about "their" houses being underwater in 135 years. i'm not even sure i would if you framed it that way.

as an aside: that the response to the article i posted about fake news sites and russian propaganda outlets consisted entirely of ad-hominem attacks on one of it co-authors probably speaks to a lot to why we find ourselves in a situation where donald trump is president-elect, btw

k3vin k., Monday, 28 November 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

I don't think many people cared about the original propornot piece in the wapo, frankly. It was dumb and immediately called out as such in multiple venues, many of which don't require me to spend time in the presence of Glenn Greenwald's infinite self-regard. There's a few other things to be concerned with at the moment.

El Tomboto, Monday, 28 November 2016 04:03 (seven years ago) link

Can anyone make the case to me that anything substantively positive would have happened on climate change under a Clinton presidency?

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, November 28, 2016 3:18 AM (one hour ago)

She would have maintained Obama EPA regs instead of getting rid of them. She would not withdraw from existing climate change accords

curmudgeon, Monday, 28 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

Senator Ted Cruz has introduced legislation to require proof of citizenship such as a passport or a birth certificate to vote in federal elections. Mandating a government-issued photo ID for federal elections — which disproportionately burdens low-income voters and minorities — is another top conservative priority. Kevin D. Williamson of National Review has called on Congress to repeal the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which allows voters to register at the Department of Motor Vehicles and other public agencies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/opinion/voting-rights-in-the-age-of-trump.html

curmudgeon, Monday, 28 November 2016 05:40 (seven years ago) link

Don't only 25 percent of Americans have a passport? And aren't most of the 75 percent who don't have one more... red statey, shall we say?

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 28 November 2016 07:01 (seven years ago) link

passport or a birth certificate or a concealed handgun license or a laundry list of ID that certain people will have, undoubtedly

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 28 November 2016 09:01 (seven years ago) link

Can anyone make the case to me that anything substantively positive would have happened on climate change under a Clinton presidency?

On climate change, perhaps little or nothing. Hell, we may be past the point of hope unless Elon Musk saves the world or something.

On everything else: at minimum a 5-4 somewhat liberal Supreme Court, perhaps 6-3 or even 7-2 (along with 20 of 24+ years of lower court appointments).

Still considering myself essentially an anarchist, there are no "there's no difference" or "Hillary was bad on X" arguments when you factor in the courts.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 28 November 2016 10:07 (seven years ago) link

Don't only 25 percent of Americans have a passport? And aren't most of the 75 percent who don't have one more... red statey, shall we say?

― jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, November 27, 2016 11:01 PM (yesterday)

my state is quite blue and I don't have a passport.

sarahell, Monday, 28 November 2016 11:07 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, PropOrNot sounds like idiots. Bad reporting on WaPo's part. It would still be seemly for Greenwald to at some point acknowledge that more and more official government agencies are saying the Russians interfered, something he kept on denying while his website peddled bullshit fake news cobbled together from Russian hacks. In other words, he was pretty much a useful idiot himself, who now doesn't inform the reader that he very much has a personal interest in discrediting what he calls 'McCarthyism'. In other words, this useful idiot is defending himself from accusations while pretending not to. In other words, this useful idiot keeps on doubling down and course correcting without ever being honest about what he does.

Also, he says 'in other words' way too much while using the same words over and over...

Frederik B, Monday, 28 November 2016 11:10 (seven years ago) link

I use my driver's license as voter ID like a normal person

sarahell, Monday, 28 November 2016 11:11 (seven years ago) link

I use my driver's license as voter ID like a normal person

I have no problem with showing my driver's license when I vote. But in the last year I've seen articles about various states' voter ID laws, focusing on people who don't have driver's licenses/state photo IDs for various reason (e.g., expense, difficulty getting to the nearest DMV, not having a birth certificate or other ID to establish identity). The more these states drone on about voter fraud, the more I assume that voter suppression is the real agenda.

Also, there's a long-standing American attitude that being expected to carry ID at all times, and to show this ID to law enforcement on demand, is overreach on the state's part. Has the Overton Window opened to the point that "Papers please" is acceptable?

Diana Fire (j.lu), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:22 (seven years ago) link

G&T:

American conservatives gave up long ago on defending our institutions. If the Supreme Court makes a decision they don't like, they shit all over the Supreme Court. If the president is not a Republican, they slander him as illegitimate. Any law they do not author is a direct attack on the Republic and its humble, freedom-loving citizens. If they do not win an election, then the election was rigged. Is any of this sounding familiar? Somehow the American left became better at the traditional role of conservatives than conservatives themselves. Al Gore had to be the one to go on TV in 2000 and tell the country that we are obligated to respect decisions of our institutions even when they are obviously riddled with problems.

http://www.ginandtacos.com/2016/11/27/how-am-i-better-at-this-than-you-are/

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 28 November 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

gin and tacos – ew

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

xxpost I've been trying to get my IL drivers license for the first time (my valid out-of-state license having just expired) and, because I have neither a copy of my birth certificate or a passport (which I'm sure is true for many people), it's been a ridiculous hassle. If voter ID laws get changed, I'm of half a mind to start a nonprofit solely dedicated to helping people cut through whatever red tape is necessary to make voting as easy as possible for them.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:46 (seven years ago) link

Also, there's a long-standing American attitude that being expected to carry ID at all times, and to show this ID to law enforcement on demand, is overreach on the state's part. Has the Overton Window opened to the point that "Papers please" is acceptable?

I can't get into any bar in America without a driver's license so I don't know what you're talking about

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

not to mention one of the strongest methods of suppression has been ensuring that DMVs in relevant districts are open as rarely as possible

tons of people don't have a state ID and they're mostly going to live in cities or they're poor families who share a single car or get picked up by a carpool for work. and young people have apparently been waiting longer and longer to get theirs.

qualx, Monday, 28 November 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Yeahhhhh, I've been denied service at bars for not having state ID, despite having a passport with me. I am not a driver, nor do I live in the state where it happened.

jane burkini (suzy), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Getting an official copy of my birth certificate was weirdly easy. Just had a to answer some personal questions online about my parents, where I've lived etc and pay a some money (I think it was around 30 or 40 dollars). "Vital Chek" was the company that does it. It was a relief to finally get an embossed birth certificate.

brownie, Monday, 28 November 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

Yeahhhhh, I've been denied service at bars for not having state ID, despite having a passport with me. I am not a driver, nor do I live in the state where it happened.

― jane burkini (suzy), Monday, November 28, 2016 1:54 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol yes I've almost been denied the purchase of a bottle of wine because I didn't have a DL and the cashier had never seen a passport before and didn't believe me that it counted as ID.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Monday, 28 November 2016 13:58 (seven years ago) link

xpost I think the difficulty differs by state. I'm currently engaged in the exact same process with the exact same company except that they require either a valid state ID (which I don't have because I need a birth certificate to procure a state ID) or two forms of ID from a different list of insane things like boat registry or professional licensure or like a parole letter or something.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 28 November 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

I can't get into any bar in America without a driver's license so I don't know what you're talking about.

Bars are places of business, and apart from laws requiring them to not serve alcohol to the underaged, they are within their rights to demand that patrons show ID before letting them inside or serving them.

The "Papers please" question imagines John Q. Citizen on a sidewalk or in another public place. In the absence of any indication that JQC is associated with any crime, do the police have the right to demand that JQC produce his identification? There's a long-standing notion that this scenario would violate U.S. citizens' rights to move freely in public places.

Diana Fire (j.lu), Monday, 28 November 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

o a long standing notion

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Monday, 28 November 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

did i wander onto the wrong message board? are we really seriously entertaining pros and cons of voter ID and whether an ID requirement presents a major hassle and obstacle to voting (not to mention massive opportunities for systematic disenfranchisement based on how the process is deployed and managed)? this shit is kind of settled background research and in some circuits it's settled case law: requiring ID to vote is discriminatory, suppresses turnout, and has no rational basis in any event. imho you would need to overcome those points before launching into off-topic observations about showing ID at bars, or how your personal experience getting replacement documents was by your standards no big hassle.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

https://www.thenation.com/article/voter-suppression-is-a-much-bigger-problem-than-voter-fraud/

https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Monday, 28 November 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

eh, my post was some just advice. It's pretty clear that it's not easy for a lot of people to obtain the necessary documents.

brownie, Monday, 28 November 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

There's a long-standing notion that this scenario would violate U.S. citizens' rights to move freely in public places.

Sure, I'm just saying that I have been asked for official state driver's license in any number of scenarios (bars, clubs, etc) (and ok fine I peed on a tree and was seen by a police officer once SUE ME) and I'm certainly not defending the practice - just saying that for practical purposes it seems like you get asked for official ID A LOT in the United States. In many other countries, i.e. Europe, it's extremely rare. America isn't some paragon of freedom in this respect.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 28 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

I use my driver's license as voter ID like a normal person

― sarahell, Monday, November 28, 2016

Hoping there was humor or something intended in that. I have a driver's license too, but some old, old people do not, and maybe some younger folks as well

curmudgeon, Monday, 28 November 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

these idiots are already attacking each other through leaks

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/morning-joe-kellyanne-conway-sexist-reporting

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 28 November 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

really cannot stand to see this woman on TV anymore

frogbs, Monday, 28 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

so, david clarke for department of homeland security??

, Monday, 28 November 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

you should probably be carrying an i.d. if you plan to use a credit card. or drive a car. if you die on the street it's a good idea to have i.d. with you.

scott seward, Monday, 28 November 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

these idiots are already attacking each other through leaks

I think circular-firing-squad stuff is going to be a constant feature -- within Trump's circle (which will probably keep changing, who's in and who's out), between them and Congress and the GOP leadership, it's going to be endless drama and namecalling and Tweeting and leaking and god knows what.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Monday, 28 November 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

man the early Reagan years were exactly like this: one senior administration aide after another whispering to the WaPo about who was in and out.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

One of the biggest and most important question marks for me right now is the extent to which Trump will display any conviction about any of his policy "ideas" in the face of opposition of the GOP -- is he content to be the figurehead for the GOP agenda, to wear the crown? Or will his need to make them all kiss the ring play out in the policy realm?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 28 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Don't know what to make of this, but just learned/heard that that crazy tax dodge Trump enlisted only works if you spend at least 50% of your time running your business. So either Trump will continue to run his company, leaving the other gov't stuff to his staff and appointees and VP, or he won't, and therefore make himself liable to big taxes in the near future.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

I'm assuming there is a good chance that a low income Trump supporter might be compelled to passionately rebut how Trump would use his "genius" to figure out a way around paying taxes anyway.

Wouldn't that be interesting to witness?

Evan, Monday, 28 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

One of the biggest and most important question marks for me right now is the extent to which Trump will display any conviction about any of his policy "ideas" in the face of opposition of the GOP -- is he content to be the figurehead for the GOP agenda, to wear the crown? Or will his need to make them all kiss the ring play out in the policy realm?

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, November 28, 2016 3:38 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

my guess is the former. he seems genuinely bored by politics, has a total lack of conviction in his beliefs, which are themselves inconsistent. I suspect he'll wear the crown but cough up enough 'wins' like those plants that didn't move to Mexico because of his phone calls, to continue to play the same role

flopson, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

obvs not a KO argument or anything but still worth noting

Interestingly enough, in two of those crucial Midwestern states that flipped to Trump, Democratic Senate candidates campaigned on economically populist platforms — but they did notably worse than Hillary Clinton. Russ Feingold underperformed Clinton by 2.4 points in Wisconsin, and Ted Strickland underperformed her by 12.8 points in Ohio. Feingold amassed a populist record of challenging big money and special interests when he was in the Senate, and Strickland harshly condemned trade deals during his campaign against Rob Portman (who served as George W. Bush’s US trade representative).

Meanwhile, the two Democratic Senate candidates in competitive races who outperformed Clinton the most both self-consciously presented a moderate image rather than running as liberal firebrands. In Missouri, Jason Kander overperformed Clinton by 15.9 points, and in Indiana, Evan Bayh did 9.6 points better than her (though they both lost).

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/27/13716060/senate-democrats-economic-populism

flopson, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

worth noting, but you'd need a lot more information about those particular races to draw any conclusions from it

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 28 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

If Trump has a tax debt of $50K or more, his passport could be revoked under the FAST Act:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/19/irs-back-taxes-may-mean-really-getting-grounded.html

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

So I guess it's a thing for defensive Trump supporters to have public freak outs? Who knows what the holidays were like for all these people.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

xpost That would be hilarious, but I have a hunch the president can go wherever he wants.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

yeah who's in charge of the state dept

Οὖτις, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

I bet the president does not even travel with a passport.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

I take it back, he does! Standard issue diplomatic passport. But someone handles that stuff for him.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 November 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

Re strickland, for example, nothing mentioned here about him being perceived as to the left of Clinton:

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/09/heres_why_ted_strickland_is_lo.html

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 28 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

yeah that article even says the AFL-CIO prez wanted him to be more 'agressive'

global tetrahedron, Monday, 28 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

Strickland and Feingold also presumably represent 'the establishment' or 'the old ways of doing things aren't working' or whatever. I don't think either had anything like the fire and 'movement' feeling that bolstered Sanders's message.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Monday, 28 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

not sure where to put this but what the fuck

http://deadspin.com/liberty-hires-ex-baylor-athletic-director-ian-mccaw-1789441102

liberty university is the worst

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 28 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

I don't think either had anything like the fire and 'movement' feeling that bolstered Sanders's message.

People here in Wisconsin who loved Bernie were definitely way more excited about Russ than about HRC.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 00:40 (seven years ago) link

So are we gonna have 4 years of tweets like this from Monday:

"@sdcritic: @HighonHillcrest @jeffzeleny @CNN There is NO QUESTION THAT #voterfraud did take place, and in favor of #CorruptHillary !"

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 4h4 hours ago

"@FiIibuster: @jeffzeleny Pathetic - you have no sufficient evidence that Donald Trump did not suffer from voter fraud, shame! Bad reporter.

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 4h4 hours ago
"@JoeBowman12: @jeffzeleny just another generic CNN part time wannabe journalist !" @CNN still doesn't get it. They will never learn!

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 4h4 hours ago
"@HighonHillcrest: @jeffzeleny what PROOF do u have DonaldTrump did not suffer from millions of FRAUD votes? Journalist? Do your job! @CNN"

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 06:24 (seven years ago) link

is perhaps the worst meme of all time that "do not share this photo of trump. he does NOT like it" current thing or no?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 06:25 (seven years ago) link

yes. and i've seen like a dozen photos that are supposedly THE ONE PHOTO he hates!!

Wozniak on Kimye's Baby (jaymc), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 06:36 (seven years ago) link

We never the to directly president guy with fuck guy @donaldsucks #screwthisguy , this new paradigm.

yay amer. I to twitter account flame president. nobody cares I type on internet, but wait i type at fat asshole.

Zachary Taylor, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 07:06 (seven years ago) link

We never the!

Mark G, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 07:45 (seven years ago) link

no sufficient evidence that Donald Trump did not

this is so agonizing to read

j., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 07:48 (seven years ago) link

i don't usually give a fuck about this sort of thing but having such an obviously batshit president weakens america's hand in all sorts of foreign policy areas doesn't it?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 07:56 (seven years ago) link

^most half-full aspect of it

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 08:05 (seven years ago) link

(xp) You mean the fact that the entire rest of the world is pointing and laughing?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 10:18 (seven years ago) link

Feeling all Morbs about this, because this seems like the way to get the Big Brother machine going. Trump tweets something stupid/insane every early morning, everyone reports on it, gets us into the habit of tuning in to Radio Trump first thing every morning for our daily missive.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:32 (seven years ago) link

I guess, rather than engage with the insane things he's saying, I can start every morning by reiterating my sincere wish that tonight is the night that Trump passes away in his sleep.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:02 (seven years ago) link

Maybe he'll pull a Python and pass away in his tweet.

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 4h4 hours ago
"@JoeBowman12: @jeffzeleny I am so mad, I could just blow something up! I just can't ... agh, my heart! My heart! It's the big one! Oh ...."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

Jesus Christ, flag burning? Are we doomed to relive all of the '90s culture wars?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Flag burning's been a fairly constant hum of outrage.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

Not that it changes the results of Ohio, but after final counting, Lorain County (just to the west of Cuyahoga County, which contains Cleveland) went for Clinton by a mere 131 votes. It had originally been counted for Trump, but the final vote count after provisionals and absentees were accounted for flipped it.

http://www.chroniclet.com/Local-News/2016/11/29/Official-results-switch-county-to-Clinton.html

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

xpost It's not like we have anything more important to focus on.

In a sane and rational world, anyone who voted for Trump would be asking WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU TWEETING ABOUT THE FLAG INSTEAD OF PREPARING TO BE OUR FUCKING PRESIDENT? I wonder sometimes how things are going in that world.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:04 (seven years ago) link

Remember, the bit of the job that he didn't want to hive off to the Vice President was "Making America Great Again" - I suspect whatever pointless culture war bullshit lets him punch hippies will be a fairly important part of his presidency, he's preparing as well as he can for that.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile this Obamacare hating guy could be at HHS:

http://www.vox.com/2016/11/28/13772342/trump-tom-price-obamacare

It would replace the law with a plan that does more to benefit the young, healthy, and rich — and disadvantages the sick, old, and poor. Price’s plan provides significantly less help to those with preexisting conditions than other Republican proposals, particularly the replacement plan offered by House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI).

The biggest cut to the poor in Price’s plan is the full repeal of the Medicaid expansion, a program that currently covers millions of low-income Americans, which Price replaces with, well, nothing.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

Not that it changes the results of Ohio, but after final counting, Lorain County (just to the west of Cuyahoga County, which contains Cleveland) went for Clinton by a mere 131 votes. It had originally been counted for Trump, but the final vote count after provisionals and absentees were accounted for flipped it.

http://www.chroniclet.com/Local-News/2016/11/29/Official-results-switch-county-to-Clinton.html🔗

131 Oberlin professors.

dan selzer, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

dancing on the end of a tenure committee

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

Does flipping a county really matter other than making a new tiny blue spot on the map? I mean Ohio doesn't award electors by county right?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

Not that it changes the results of Ohio,

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

coming out of self-imposed ilxretirement to post something insightful i read on another message board. bye again!


Nothing like whiny winners...or folks absolutely terrified that they may actually have to deliver on the sh*t that they've been promising that they KNOW in their heart of hearts isn't just bad for the country, but bad for their posterity. It's a yawning chasm that WE the voters were supposed to snatch them away from.

The GOP just did a huge trust fall, and America didn't catch them. This was supposed to be ginned up drama, it was supposed to be Hillary's election, they had their scripts ready, they had their talking points queued up, they had the ads ready to roll out, and then...Trump won. They lost some seats in Congress, but overall, thing are technically looking rosy. And they weren't ready for that. The public was supposed to stop this, because intrinsically, the GOP fears the Presidency. They fear the results of having to actually make the hard decisions. They fear the responsibility that can't be diluted amongst Senators and Representatives. They absolutely fear the consequences of the trainwreck that they've been promoting, because they've seen first hand the damage that Reagan's economic plan ACTUALLY created. And it cost George Bush a second term when someone had to mitigate that mess, and then it cost them the White House for two terms with Bubba, and it was THERE that the modern GOP found its groove. As the opposition party. As the party that says "NO!" to the President. And these are NOT young men in office, and these are NOT mentally flexible humans, so trying to switch gears is not pretty. GW was supposed to be a triumph, and the intransigence to listen to the previous President, and ignoring the Clarke report was very much partly responsible for 9/11. And THAT level of fumbling...terrifies the GOP. They managed to get into crisis mode, and turn and blunt things, but in the end, every member of Congress and every member of the leadership that was attached to GW's team KNOWS that they screwed up, not just a little, and the lashing out and the less than focused approach AFTER 9/11 was nothing but trying to compensate for that.

But for all that, they were happy as heck to hand the whole mess to a Democrat. Because it let them off the hook. And the Congresscritters who are deep in halls today? They loved having a President to blame for their mistakes. They loved having an axiomatic bad guy to pin all their own mistakes on, every policy kerfuffle, every misstep, everything that ever went wrong, Obama was the man to blame it on. And that was supposed to continue.

And now, the ball's firmly on their side of the court, and for all their trash talk, now they have to actually put the damn ball in the bucket, and even Paulie Ryan isn't exactly up to the task. Not for a three pointer, not even from the foul line. They've got Donnie to "lead" them, and YEAH they're going to whine, because now they have a job to do, and NONE of them was expecting to actually be required to deliver on ANYTHING that they've been talking about for the last 8 years. Hells, they're terrified of where that might lead, and they have only themselves to blame for it, because when you base your policy platform AGAINST whatever the OTHER side is doing, and the OTHER side is making policy decisions based on actual issues, and you are just shouting NUH-UNH! it makes it somewhat difficult to actually deliver on that. Because you KNOW that there is a nuanced and balanced position to lay out, that might achieve similar goals, but you've bet the farm on STIGGINIT!

So, yeah. It's gonna be a whiny f*cking Christmas and miserable New Year, because these jackanapes got what they wanted, good and hard. And now it's time for them to figure out how to ride this damn tiger...

reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

I don't buy this. I think it's much easier to see this as both political parties being more interested in consolidating their own power than in governing the country, with the side-effects being that the Democrats' power grabs tend toward the direction of helping more people and the Republicans' power grabs tend toward the direction of hurting more people, with neither being 100% good or bad. (Current Republican policy is probably 90% bad, however.)

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking a lot during the election about whether the Democrats have a clear idea of what they'd do if they ever actually took the presidency and both houses again, not sure they do.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

If people actually pay attention, the spectacle of the GOP completely fucking up their opportunity at total control will effectively sink the party. It's a big if that will never transpire, but it's lovely to dream.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

That's a weird equivalency. I'm not sure that a broad enough Democratic coalition to win both houses could pass the basic agenda (bc it would likely be composed of blue dog types) but I think it's pretty clear what the party would like to accomplish. Raising the minimum wage? Expanding social programming? Increasing funding to alternative energy? Law enforcement and prison reform? I'm sure there are like 2 dozen issues that have broad consensus in the party. xp

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

the spectacle of the GOP completely fucking up their opportunity at total control will effectively sink the party. I

We saw this spectacle in 2001-2008. We're watching another spectacle now. As usual the obits are premature.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

That's a weird equivalency. I'm not sure that a broad enough Democratic coalition to win both houses could pass the basic agenda (bc it would likely be composed of blue dog types) but I think it's pretty clear what the party would like to accomplish. Raising the minimum wage? Expanding social programming? Increasing funding to alternative energy? Law enforcement and prison reform? I'm sure there are like 2 dozen issues that have broad consensus in the party. xp

― Mordy, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:50 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I mean that I'm less than convinced of the current party leadership's commitments to these things.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

xpost It's the paying attention which is key and won't happen.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

You mean the fact that the entire rest of the world is pointing and laughing?

as someone in the rest of the world, who has many friends in further flung out places – no one seems to be laughing about this. this is a tragedy on an international level for many reasons.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

I mean that I'm less than convinced of the current party leadership's commitments to these things.

you know who is convinced of their commitment though? GOP voters. and who can blame them - the last time the Dems controlled both houses and the Presidency they passed a brand new healthcare entitlement.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

I don't see any reason to believe that the GOP is scared of leading or of the consequences of their policies. They seem to be pretty eager to tear things up as much as possible.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

moodles otm, i get the feeling that whatever reservations they have about trump they are still seeing this as a golden ticket, i mean within days of the election happening they started talking about phasing out medicare

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking a lot during the election about whether the Democrats have a clear idea of what they'd do if they ever actually took the presidency and both houses again, not sure they do.

eh that's crazy. there was tons of unfinished business after obama's first 2 years. and those 2 years were very productive.

I don't buy that they 'fear the consequences of the trainwreck that they've been promoting' but I think if congressional republicans could all press a button to replace trump w/ clinton, the vast majority would. a clinton in office would make their future elections go a lot smoother + it is better to both hold power and have a way to deflect all responsibility.

iatee, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

The cause for hope, in so much as there is one, is that the GOP is (like the Democrats) a coalition of different interests and several of them are very activist in very different directions. AND they're now yoked to someone who talks an activist game in directions that lie largely outside of the generally agreed common ground, and who is supposed to be repulsive to some of those coalitions.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

Just a few weeks ago, pretty much every smart smartypants person who thought they knew stuff about politics (myself included) turned out to be heartbreakingly, tragically wrong. All the smart people who spoke smartly about ground game and advertising and endorsements and poll aggregation... it was all wrong. Wrong in the only way that matters: who wins and who gets power. The people who we thought were dumb deluded hick-ass cousin-fucker dummies turned out to be glowingly, gloat-worthily right.

So I personally am still mentally downvoting every statement of the form "here's what I think is going to happen" said by a smartypants leftyperson, myself included.

But I do think the Democratic Party is the a better direction, if only because they still tend to believe in government as a potential force for good and have less desire to tear it down.

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

most deluded hick-ass cousin-fucker dummies also did not think trump would win the election. they did turn out to vote in high numbers however.

iatee, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

Lots of GOP voters told friends/family/pollsters they were going to skip the presidential vote and just vote down-ticket but when it came to it, they voted for the top of the ticket as well.

jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

Alas, that is so. Personally I think that the base was already plenty Deplorable before trompe showed up, because I believe an anti-government politics (as practiced by Gingrich/Contract crowd, Tea Party doodz, militia/prepper doodz, and the obstructionist Ryan crowd) is already implicitly racist. Trompe added the explicit racists and it turned out to be a winning coalition.

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

it feels useless/pointless but it is kind of weird that we now live in a world where you can directly, personally insult the president via the internet

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

The only thing I can say with any certainty re: going forward is that we desperately need to GOTV and to do everything we can to ease that process for as many people as possible.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

Hear hear on voter access, OL.

Otherwise I'm coming down to an opinion voiced above by man alive/lord Alfred: the buffoonish and cartoonish aspects of trump are now like fiftieth through seventieth on my list of objections.

I've been as guilty as anyone of mocking the man's hair and hands and taste. His brazen lying and shit personality. But RN I'm a lot more concerned about the societal shitstorms the campaign's already unleashed, and the policy shitstorms his administration are likely to unleash.

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

is likely, gah

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

most deluded hick-ass cousin-fucker dummies also did not think trump would win the election. they did turn out to vote in high numbers however.

― iatee, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:34 AM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^^

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 AM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Lots of GOP voters told friends/family/pollsters they were going to skip the presidential vote and just vote down-ticket but when it came to it, they voted for the top of the ticket as well.

― jane burkini (suzy), Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 AM (seven minutes ago)

this seems like bubble talk to me. lots of trump voters genuinely believed he would win/that the polls were wrong. and they were right!

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

idk if Suzy's otm but iatee is - it was clear Trump didn't even expect to win. GOP pollsters didn't expect to win. But turnout carried the day.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

see Bill Mitchell tweeting stuff like "I 100% GUARANTEE Trump will win!!" with his comic book looking visage grinning back @ you

xp

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

trump voters didn't think he would lose the popular vote by 2% but win because he managed to swing a few midwestern states by 1%. trump voters thought he would win big, which was not even close to being true. final polls weren't off by much, they were just off by a little bit + in a unfortunate way geographically. this was a close election that was won on what most people consider a technicality, the only one bringing up that possibility was nate silver.

iatee, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

...and nate silver was regarded as a wackily overcautious outlier, here and elsewhere. The nyt upshot showed other aggregators at 99% certainty.

Has Sam Wang eaten a bug yet?

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

xp - my thoughts exactly. everyone patting themselves on the back right now for "predicting" Trump are not quite understanding the reality - outside of Nate I don't think any of them predicted a result like this. not that they care, Scott Adams is still braying "landslide" over and over (even though his EC victory is only 42nd out of 52 historically), but for us rational folk, it's the same as predicting the Cubs were gonna win it for sure even when they were down 3-1...sure, it happened, but it was so damn close, and so many factors had to fall their way for it to happen

frogbs, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

It's a landslide only in the sense that it's a disaster.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

idk if Suzy's otm but iatee is - it was clear Trump didn't even expect to win. GOP pollsters didn't expect to win. But turnout carried the day.

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:56 AM (nineteen minutes ago)

you're right about the trump campaign's honest assessment of its chances, but trump publicly questioned the polls numerous times and i don't doubt that many of his supporters bought it

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

Silver's issue is that his readership was almost unanimously terrified of a Trump presidency (as I imagine anyone visiting a website big on statistical analysis would be) and didn't understand why his model seemed to inject so much uncertainty into it, especially when all the "intangibles" seemed to favor Clinton.

frogbs, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

If the world ended around the same time some homeless guys happened to have been predicting, it doesn't mean that we should have listened to them. I feel like the confidence of the Trump voters was independent of any inside knowledge they had, they are just very loyal. Trump won due to how energized his supporters were for whatever reasons they had to vote for him. Hillary supporters were not energized enough in the places that mattered to offset it. But we don't have to treat all of his surrogates like "they were right" the whole time in hindsight... it's still true that they were talking out of their asses and navigating Trump's messes with unprecedented levels of spin, delusion and defensive aggression.

Evan, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Has Sam Wang eaten a bug yet?

Takes him forever, but:

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/11/12/pollster-eats-bug-after-trump-win-smerconish.cnn

clemenza, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

On the subject of landslides, from last night--ludicrous:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YcZtzVvI-0

clemenza, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

god, i want to tear my eyeballs and ears off

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

Mr. Landslide reminds me of the cop in this clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HktV2yGtLv8

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

how much of a craven shitbag to you have to be to get schooled by don fucking lemon of all people smdh

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

this feels pretty otm to me:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/29/opinions/trump-the-sore-winner-sklar/index.html

frogbs, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

how likely is it the GOP will try to defund Planned Parenthood via Medicare/Title X? Trump has seemed to waffle on that and the election wasn't driven by that as much as it usually is but I suppose Ryan/etc see this as their chance

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

and Pence is basically a psycho on the issue

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

Trump suggests loss of citizenship or jail for those who burn U.S. flags

ok so dude is now more or less encouraging people who protest him to burn flags. awesome. is this bannon at work?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

this is an obvious provocation, just like all his tweets. dnftt

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

Someone pointed out that Fox News had a report on flag burning right before Trump tweeted. He's not a provocateur, nor a machiavellian genius who uses social media to distract from his true agenda. He's an idiot with no attention span.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

One thing I'm definitely not wasting a lot of time or energy on in the next four years is overanalyzing Trump's tweets. Deliberate distraction, telegraphing his plans, 11-dimensional chess or stupid childish outburst -- what difference does any of this make to organizing against his agenda?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah I just saw this. he's a moron. trump's razor strikes again.

Katherine Faulders (KFaulders)
Timing of Trump's tweet lines up w/ Fox segment at 6:25AM on students burning the flag foxnews.com/us/2016/11/28/… twitter.com/realDonaldTrum…

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

that is pretty funny though

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Sabrina Siddiqui Verified account

‏@SabrinaSiddiqui

A testy John McCain to reporters: "I will not speak about Donald Trump, and I do not want to be asked again."

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PTX-uLKMqV8/Ubt_sOSKTjI/AAAAAAAAMWs/ZPfoSvq54rs/s1600/respond-to-it.gif

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

that is hilarious xp

iatee, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

it almost seemss like he's a right-wing chauncey gardner, speaking from the heart with childlike simplicity and having everyone read in deep strategizing

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

obviously ben carson is the right wing chauncey gardner

iatee, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 8m 8 minutes ago
New Rogue One Trailer has Darth Vader. Thought he died in Return of the Jedi. Confusing!

nomar, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

If Dan Quayle is coming back to Washington, we need Candice Bergen back on TV posthaste. And with more than a voice cameo on Bojack Horseman.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold, adding 132,000, after Trump's win

This is heartening (our household just became NYT and WaPo subscribers this weekend), and it's something I'd love to see happen wrt every entity that opposes the Trump administration or that the Trump administration opposes. Like, expect the worst (e.g. Planned Parenthood being totally defunded) and put your money toward offsetting the worst. When the holidays are over and I can budget for it, I'm setting up automatic monthly donations for PP (among others).

And maybe everyone can just, like, refuse to pay federal taxes for the next four years, as well? That'd be cool.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

no need to refuse when they're gonna be slashed in half anyway

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 8m 8 minutes ago
New Rogue One Trailer has Darth Vader. Thought he died in Return of the Jedi. Confusing!

― nomar, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:30 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Donald Trump just telegraphed a terrifying plan to rebuild the Death Star. --Vox

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

ACLU, PP, WaPo, NYT have been my focus also. also thinking about contributing to the LA senate race- anybody see that as viable? xxp

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

TBF 132,000 is really not a lot of people.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

I gave to the LA senate race. While it is seen as a longshot by "typical" election standards, this is not a typical election at all. And past LA senate runoff elections have been won with fewer votes than Hillary lost LA with.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

I gave too.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

xxpost I would assume, relatively speaking wrt getting people to pay for digital or print content that isn't super cheap, that that probably is a lot of people. Particularly over just a couple of weeks.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

Oh I think it's a ton of people by "paid subscription" standards, I just don't think it's a ton of people by "meaningful political action" standards.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

xp you can also see it as money that will help build the party in Louisiana even if he loses

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

In re Trump's filters and sources of information, I'm sure plenty of other people have noted this, but it's instructive to look at which 40 Twitter accounts he officially follows.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

NYT was pretty much the worst major newspaper offender during this election idk why anyone would think they're suddenly going to be the righteous opposition

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

the hicks who voted for trump don't read the NYT

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

NYT is a thought leader in the media tho and drove a lot of the never ending email coverage and equivocation. and it wasn't just hicks that voted for trump.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

Mordy otm

I am kinda pissed at the NYT these days. WaPo was way more aggressive w Trump.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

I've been pissed at the NYT since Ferguson, they are bootlickers

sleeve, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

they seem all too happy to let Trump completely control the media narrative. Their headline today is about this flag-burning nonsense.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

the hicks who voted for trump don't read the NYT

― k3vin k., Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:17 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Obviously we need some strategy beyond coastal media to reach people in swing states. Maybe papers in florida, ohio, michigan, wisconsin, PA etc. are better targets of support. There's also obviously a need for some kind of non-traditional media that can reach non-newspaper readers. I feel like there must be some possibility of a "left Breitbart" (which should not by any means actually be modeled on Breitbart, since that wouldn't work for the left).

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

have we mentioned yet that the popular vote is now the largest margin in 140 years?

what the fuck

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

huh? no it's not

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

I feel like there must be some possibility of a "left Breitbart"

isn't that what Huffpo is

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

I'm a stan of Chapo Trap House, which obviously has a highly limited appeal, but I think there might be something to learn from their approach, which dispenses with some of the high seriousness of a lot of left internet media.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

high seriousness and also reaction gifs

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

in any case we need a counter to john oliver/john stewart 'buhhhh REALLY'??/mugging at the camera kind of humor

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

'republican said/did a thing'

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

re NYT - I feel like the biggest stories they had in the campaign were due to the fact that they were the ones who got the leaked pages from trumps tax return in the 90s. its not because they had reporters grinding it out.

the times were also the most egregious of posting news 'stories' that were posted and written in advance that didn't even accurately reflect what the fuck actually happened at the event/speech/whatever they were covering.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

We just subscribed to the NYT even though I was not thrilled with them during the election. Feel like there's a potential onslaught coming and they're better than nothing.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

xpz yr right, a friend misstated a maddow argument i should've double checked but it had an msnbc link. maddow is making a different argument [that confused my fb friend]
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/long-reach-to-find-precedent-for-2016-popular-vote-gap-in-us-past-816737347527?cid=sm_fb_msnbc

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

btw i think NYT did a terrible job and also i've had a sub to them for about a decade so i mean their reporting is really the without comparison most of the time they just stunk this election cycle. esp their foreign coverage is worth subbing for.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

It pains me to think a penny of my money is going to David Brooks, Thomas Friedman or Ross Douthat

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

I think the nyt is 'okay' but I think the story of this election was that the nytimes matters less than patriotnewsrepublic.info and deplorableyorktimes.org and it has less control over the news narrative than it ever has.

pestering mark zuckerberg to push the nytimes harder on peoples' news feeds ultimately matters more than # of subscriptions.

iatee, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

NYT just hired a friend of mine who won a Pulitzer this year and she just had a baby, please don't take food away from my friend's baby

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

One thing I'm definitely not wasting a lot of time or energy on in the next four years is overanalyzing Trump's tweets. Deliberate distraction, telegraphing his plans, 11-dimensional chess or stupid childish outburst -- what difference does any of this make to organizing against his agenda?

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:27 (one hour ago) Permalink

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

Obviously we need some strategy beyond coastal media to reach people in swing states. Maybe papers in florida, ohio, michigan, wisconsin, PA etc. are better targets of support.

I agree that buying newspaper subscriptions won't turn the tide.

IMO it's just one of those gestural defiance things. Like right-wingers' support of Chik-Fil-A and Yeungling and Duck Dynasty. Or lefties' spending at Penzey's (which is entirely justified BTW, no one else has sumac). Or the do-si-do recently where Land's End had Gloria Steinem in the catalog and right-wingers howled they'd boycott the company... until the company reversed course, which meant that all the lefties were suddenly NEVER AGAIN going to buy their quite sensible clothing etc. etc. We went through this with Domino's as well.

The traditional print media (of which I am an extremely sentimental veteran) have been mercilessly targeted as both out of touch (lamestream) and economically doomed. If this is a shot in the arm for that particular terminal patient, okay. It won't make much difference but it's a tiny avenue of resistance.

That said, I don't think there are all that many nonsyndicated "papers in florida, ohio, michigan, wisconsin, PA." Even the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, with its rich Pulitzer history, is a watered-down clone of a thousand other faux-local papers. Most small-market newspapers are about as local as Clear Channel radio stations where all the programming comes from a central computer but they slightly alter the traffic reports and requests so as to "localize" the content and make it sound homegrown.

105.3 in Tampa says "here's the latest from Maroon 5, going out to Katie from Tarpon Springs!" Meanwhile 106.3 in Richmond is playing the same song, only they introduce it with "here's the latest from Maroon 5, going out to Katie from Northside!"

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

I spent way too long going "... Tampon Springs?"

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

as many problems as I had with the way the MSM would cover certain things they were put in a tough position. your job is to report the facts and to do so in a neutral, unbiased manner. that becomes much more difficult when one candidate is so much objectively worse than the other. if you do nothing but report negative Trump stories then you get picked apart for being biased or partisan...but then again, how do you handle a candidate like this?

at the end of the day I suspect people who subscribe to the NYT or watch CNN overwhelmingly voted for Hillary, but what do I know?

frogbs, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

I wish someone had figured out (or will figure out) how to do fresher and more interesting local content in the internet era. Like if someone had taken the alt weeklies and actually figured out how to keep them local and exciting rather than blanding them into the ground, for example.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

but idk, maybe there's something about the financials that just doesn't work out that well for local internet content, like you benefit much more from the national network effect kind of thing

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

Ever since our Penzeys closed I can't find sumac anywhere, though fortunately I rarely need it.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

your job is to report the facts and to do so in a neutral, unbiased manner.

By this argument, it is completely legitimate for MSM to run an article titled "Donald Trump Claims, 2+2=5; Others Disagree" and call it a day.

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

your job is to report the facts and to do so in a neutral, unbiased manner.

this is the trouble: too many political reporters think this is their job.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

oh yeah, never been happier for the existence of Rand Paul than right now.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

And it's not just the reporters' fault. A buddy who works for an international newspaper gets resistance from editors who wonder why he's getting "political" for offering refutations of lies in stories.

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

By this argument, it is completely legitimate for MSM to run an article titled "Donald Trump Claims, 2+2=5; Others Disagree" and call it a day.

up until Trump's hotel/birther stunt this is pretty much how they were treating him isn't it? they kept writing that his claims were "controversial" or were "stretching the truth" instead of what they really were: baldfaced, easily disprovable lies

frogbs, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

I remember getting really irritated at a person who had voted Trump and part of the reason why was that he just didn't trust Hillary, quoting that "we were under sniper fire" line as proof of her being untrustworthy. I was like..."you do realize that this is how Trump talks all the time, like all day every day? Half the things he says are literally made up". And he said..."well, that's what the media wants you to believe". How do you even argue with that?

frogbs, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

you don't

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

you find two voters to render that guy's vote irrelevant, is what you do

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

otm

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

trying to sway voters who won't hear facts that contradict their worldview is a waste of time

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

The NYT is inarguably problematic, and supporting it by subscribing may be more symbolic than anything else, but I've made a personal pledge to do what I can to support the institutions that are so intrinsic to the fiber of this country that we mostly take them for granted and that our president-elect casually attempts to delegitimize. So if, for instance, he chooses to target particular outlets in his perpetual demonstration of contempt towards the 1st Amendment, I'll happily throw some money to those outlets. It's a gesture for its own sake but I'll continue to grudgingly hope that the influx of support spurs some quid pro quo in the form of actual journalism with a minimum of compromise.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Some people's idea of "fair" (or neutral, or unbiased, or whatever) means you have to spend exactly half your time being nice to Party A and mean to Party B, and the other half being nice to Party B and mean to Party A.

Because if the populace is roughly divided in half, then surely the truth is as well. I guess.

This is the "on the other hand, Mr. Hitler contends..." phenomenon.

It is, and has always been, a stupid way of evaluating media fairness.

marzipandemonium (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

Dude has definitely inspired a strain of crazy, drunk and stupid to act like it is ok to publicly freak out in his name. You could probably do a running thread of Trumpers gone Wild. It seems like there is someone daily in the news freaking out in restaurants, airplanes, stores on a daily basis with people capturing it on video.

In casual conversation over the past few months around here I have heard so much hearsay and lunacy passed off as fact, I kind of feel like I am living in "They Live". It was so pervasive around here, I sadly wasn't as surprised he won in many ways.

earlnash, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile news happened:

In an unexpected sighting Tuesday, former Vice President Dan Quayle showed up at Trump Tower to offer his "personal congratulations" to President-elect Donald Trump, who has been meeting with potential Cabinet picks this afternoon.

"I was in the area and I stopped by to see the president-elect to offer personal congratulations to him. I talked to him recently on the phone," Quayle told reporters following his meeting. "Things are in good hands. He's moving forward and he's going to make America great again."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

oh man

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

cabinet post in 3...2...1...

sleeve, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:26 (seven years ago) link

once a dirtbag, always a dirtbag

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:26 (seven years ago) link

he looks super old, but its the flip side of looking super young in the late 80s..

I guess the company he works for pumped money into the trump campaign so he gets to kiss the ring.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:26 (seven years ago) link

The best thing about a trump presidency is that in all likelihood at some point in the not-too-distant future he will not be president. I look forward to him being an ex-president.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

I look forward to him rotting in an unmarked grave

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

and Trump too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

If he were savvier he'd be more dangerous, but as it is I dislike Dan Quayle more than most surviving politicos: a cynical, hungry little chiseler with a brain smaller than a sauropod's.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

I'm so glad the children of today can experience the 80's just like we did; ghostbusters, dan quayle. maybe crack will make a big comeback

akm, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:29 (seven years ago) link

hell Reagan never went away. Neither did Duran Duran

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:34 (seven years ago) link

Can someone start making quaaludes again? Kind of sad I missed out on those.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:38 (seven years ago) link

Jesus Christ, flag burning? Are we doomed to relive all of the '90s culture wars?

Absolutely, get 2Live Crew on tour again

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:39 (seven years ago) link

i sort of hope the republicans waste a lot of time on flag burning legislation tbh. something useless and time consuming that won't hold up in court

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:43 (seven years ago) link

continuing in my "greatest hits of hyperbolic numbered lists of shit to watch out for"

https://medium.com/@nziehl/coping-with-chaos-in-the-white-house-697fa2ca3ddf#.7rios21qa

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:44 (seven years ago) link

I love that "flying monkeys" is a technical term from "the literature" on NPD

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:48 (seven years ago) link

i sort of hope the republicans waste a lot of time on flag burning legislation tbh. something useless and time consuming that won't hold up in court

― k3vin k.

For a couple more months, anyway.

nickn, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

i sort of hope the republicans waste a lot of time on flag burning legislation tbh. something useless and time consuming that won't hold up in court

― k3vin k., Tuesday, November 29, 2016 7:43 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol otm

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:01 (seven years ago) link

OT re: sumac or other odd ingredients, try vitacost.com. Things I've had endless headaches finding elsewhere (like the veggie better than boullion) are there for about 2/3 of what they cost on Amz. eg, 12 oz sumac for $4.49.

Sanpaku, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

My first reaction upon reading of the flag burning tweet: What other gaffe is he trying to hide today?

I'm kinda hoping my usual inputs stop reporting on Trump tweets. Yes, we all know he's a knuckle dragger, but its not news, and its being used to distract from actual perils.

Sanpaku, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:17 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyeU0lVVEAEOQQu.jpg

something Lynchian about this

soref, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:43 (seven years ago) link

trump looks like he's about to eat mitt

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:44 (seven years ago) link

only in America would two plutocratic teetotalers eat an exquisite meal.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link

how is it possible they can eat a meal without a glass of wine?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

Mitt's caption: how can I excuse myself before becoming the 3rd course.

Sanpaku, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

Blink twice if you're there against your will, Mitt.

nickn, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:57 (seven years ago) link

Mitt, I'm sure we can find 19 electors.

Sanpaku, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 01:58 (seven years ago) link

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/laura-ingraham-lifezette/

did u guys talk about this article yet?

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:15 (seven years ago) link

But a closer look reveals that some of the biggest fake news providers were run by experienced political operators well within the orbit of Donald Trump’s political advisers and consultants.

Laura Ingraham, a close Trump ally currently under consideration to be Trump’s White House press secretary, owns an online publisher called Ingraham Media Group that runs a number of sites, including LifeZette, a news site that frequently posts articles of dubious veracity. One video produced by LifeZette this summer, ominously titled “Clinton Body Count,” promoted a conspiracy theory that the Clinton family had some role in the plane crash death of John F. Kennedy, Jr., as well as the deaths of various friends and Democrats.

...

But LifeZette, for all its influence, pales in comparison to the sites run by Floyd Brown, a Republican consultant close to Trump’s inner circle of advisers. Brown gained notoriety nearly three decades ago for his role in helping to produce the “Willie Horton” campaign advertisement, a spot criticized for its use of racial messaging to derail Michael Dukakis’s presidential bid. Brown is also the political mentor of David Bossie, an operative who went to work for Trump’s presidential campaign this year after founding the Citizens United group. In an interview this year, Brown called Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway a “longtime friend.”

Brown now produces a flow of reliably pro-Trump Internet content through a company he co-owns with his family called Liftable Media Inc., which operates a number of high-impact, tabloid-style news outlets that exploded in size over the course of the election. One of Brown’s sites, Western Journalism, is the 81st largest site in the U.S. with 13 million monthly unique monthly visitors, according to rankings maintained by the site Alexa. Another, called Conservative Tribune, is the 50th largest site with over 19 million monthly unique visitors. Liftable Media is run on a day to day basis by Brown’s son, Patrick, who is the president of Liftable Media.

But LifeZette, for all its influence, pales in comparison to the sites run by Floyd Brown, a Republican consultant close to Trump’s inner circle of advisers. Brown gained notoriety nearly three decades ago for his role in helping to produce the “Willie Horton” campaign advertisement, a spot criticized for its use of racial messaging to derail Michael Dukakis’s presidential bid. Brown is also the political mentor of David Bossie, an operative who went to work for Trump’s presidential campaign this year after founding the Citizens United group. In an interview this year, Brown called Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway a “longtime friend.”

Brown now produces a flow of reliably pro-Trump Internet content through a company he co-owns with his family called Liftable Media Inc., which operates a number of high-impact, tabloid-style news outlets that exploded in size over the course of the election. One of Brown’s sites, Western Journalism, is the 81st largest site in the U.S. with 13 million monthly unique monthly visitors, according to rankings maintained by the site Alexa. Another, called Conservative Tribune, is the 50th largest site with over 19 million monthly unique visitors. Liftable Media is run on a day to day basis by Brown’s son, Patrick, who is the president of Liftable Media.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

this sort of willful spreading of misinformation, fear and confusion is a kind of terrorism.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:18 (seven years ago) link

hey all you have to do is google James Conway, Kellyanne's husband, whom I first learned about in the late '90s.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:32 (seven years ago) link

well Mitt totally caved, because of course he did

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:32 (seven years ago) link

republicans are cowards, degenerates, and perverts

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:37 (seven years ago) link

why are we using the term "fake news" to describe propaganda?

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:38 (seven years ago) link

Was talking to a friend about this today -- facebook has no need to "play censor" or fact-check every article, it should just ban egregious websites.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

hey all you have to do is google James Conway, Kellyanne's husband, whom I first learned about in the late '90s.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:32 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i assume you mean George T. Conway III unless she's a serial conway-marrier

the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 04:22 (seven years ago) link

friends just call him jimmy or sometimes jim bam bojangles

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 04:50 (seven years ago) link

slimy jim aka george

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 04:53 (seven years ago) link

Just had a heated phone conversation with my dad (I made a friends-only Facebook post advocating burning the flag and tweeting it at Trump; he freaked the absolute fuck out and is convinced I will never have a job), tried talking him down by mentioning the importance of not normalizing THE PRESIDENT-ELECT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, who will appoint 2-3 Supreme Court justices, talking about stripping citizenship from people for exercising their most basic First Amendment rights, talked about local actions like delivering recount affidavits to city hall yesterday and volunteering for Planned Parenthood, when some fucking south Philly lowlife came up behind me and starting smacking me in the mouth and chest. Knocked my glasses off, I have a little bit of a fat lip, otherwise fine, but THIS IS NOT FUCKING OKAY. I don't know if this is because I was talking loudly about PP or if it was just because south Philly is full of shitheads, but I'm not taking any chances.

You guys are caterpillar (Telephone thing), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 04:57 (seven years ago) link

ugh I'm sorry that happened to you.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

Bradd Jaffy ‏@BraddJaffy 1h1 hour ago
Romney on Trump in March vs. Romney on Trump tonight. Breathtaking.

http://i.imgur.com/DA7wNM6.png
http://i.imgur.com/tvXTVMh.png

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 05:20 (seven years ago) link

buncha cucks amirite

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 05:25 (seven years ago) link

I like the Trumpian "By the way" - nice touch Mitt

Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 05:47 (seven years ago) link

i feel like his anti-poetry is going to infect us all in the end

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 05:51 (seven years ago) link

that ship had sailed man. people can't help imitating him

flappy bird, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 06:12 (seven years ago) link

it's a compulsion

flappy bird, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 06:13 (seven years ago) link

jesus, telephone thing that's awful!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 06:49 (seven years ago) link

baldwin as trump telling himself 2 weeks ago "don't worry, hillary's still ahead in the polls."

flappy bird, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 06:49 (seven years ago) link

I sort of want to see the_donald's reaction to Mitt (laughing at victory over the cuck, presumably - but not so much swamp-draining) but I'd rather have my IP logged spying on Stormfront at this point.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 07:37 (seven years ago) link

How does one create an ongoing culture of active engagement and resistance? how does one create any sort of culture? Should I start a new thread for this?

(rocketcat) (kingfish), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 08:02 (seven years ago) link

If we give a damn about the constitution, Donald Trump has to sell off his empire and place his assets in a blind trust, just like every other president has done for the last half century. If he chooses not to do this, then Trump is constitutionally unable to be president, just as if he was born in Kenya. It's that simple.

http://cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/andrew-ross-sorkin-s-joke-letter-to-trump-he-has-to-sell-the-stuff

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 09:39 (seven years ago) link

hey all you have to do is google James Conway, Kellyanne's husband, whom I first learned about in the late '90s.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:32 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i assume you mean George T. Conway III unless she's a serial conway-marrier

― the klosterman weekend (s.clover), Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:22 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

friends just call him jimmy or sometimes jim bam bojangles

― Treeship, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:50 PM

eh call him ishmael

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 11:22 (seven years ago) link

it feels useless/pointless but it is kind of weird that we now live in a world where you can directly, personally insult the president via the internet

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:48 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

If you were a racist you would have learned this 8 years ago tbf

stevie, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 12:02 (seven years ago) link

How does one create an ongoing culture of active engagement and resistance? how does one create any sort of culture? Should I start a new thread for this?

― (rocketcat) (kingfish)

on the one hand i can see people not wanting this entire board to be all trump, all the time, but on the other hand this stuff is important, and it's too big for one thread, which we can't all keep up with anyway.

the most effective forms of resistance, i feel, will be off-internet, but at the same time i don't think we can or should just say "ok we'll abandon the internet entirely", it's not practical.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

I know this was commented on even before the election, but I was just jarred by the realization that, regardless of what he actually does or even if he drops dead before his inauguration, the office of POTUS may have been fundamentally altered and tainted by the simple fact that Trump won. How many presidential election cycles are going to be (even more) fucked up circuses of nakedly sociopathic adult babies unleashing their ids first upon one another and then subsequently upon the nation that voted them into office? How do we come back from a president who doesn't care at all about the foundations of the country he's been appointed to run?

All rhetorical questions. Just needed to vent my fresh horror.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

A less rhetorical question: how do we get the citizenry to reinvest in a basic knowledge and understanding of civics? How do we sexy up shit like the social contract? Because it's becoming increasingly clear that, if we don't all choose to actively invest in some common core principles, this shit is in danger of unraveling.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

Well, a Trotskyite view might be that the worse things get the better.

On that view, people will see how shitty it is when garbage voters elect a shitty president whose administration is full of garbage and whose policies turn out to be made entirely of shit. Perhaps they will recoil from the shit/garbage sandwich and start caring about electing quality humans again.

Public education is already shrilly lambasted for being a liberal indoctrination process. Schools are largely staffed by well-meaning liberal white female Democrats; I'm not sure you can make them even moreso. Kids go to college and reportedly spend all their time cataloging microaggressions, apologizing for their privilege, and seeking safe spaces ringed about by trigger warnings. I'm not sure you can make it even moreso.

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

On that view, people will see how shitty it is when garbage voters elect a shitty president whose administration is full of garbage and whose policies turn out to be made entirely of shit. Perhaps they will recoil from the shit/garbage sandwich and start caring about electing quality humans again.

It never works this way and no one anywhere on the left side should assume as much, he only gets unseated by active effort.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

At this point, I feel like this stuff needs to happen outside of school. I didn't give a shit about government when it was being described in a dry monotone by a teacher who clearly gave an equal amount of shit. But how do you educate people or convince people to seek out education when it isn't compulsory?

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

I also have no idea whether it's actually true that public schools in red states are staffed by democrats. Not convinced of that.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

xxp: Agreed. There's plenty of active effort out there though. Plenty of resistance in the 60+ million people who voted against him and will presumably do so again.

But to put the current anti-Trump coalition over the edge to victory, you need some of his current support to drain away. I don't personally much care whether that's because he turns out to be a hideous shitmonster and people recoil from that, or - contrariwise - because the torches/pitchforks crowd concludes he's not doing ENOUGH.

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:37 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, I think it's a mistake to assume that "education" is all we need here. Plenty of educated people become conservative!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

the extent to which this guy has already betrayed 90% of the people who voted for him is incredible, really

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

anyway so what is this deal he supposedly made with Carrier? when did this happen? All I keep hearing is "he's saving jobs already!" but...how??

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

It's a pretty clever political move that, according to people in the know, is (duh) not as good as it seems. I'll try to find a link.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

we're going to be subject to four years of this, huh. "1000 jobs are staying here!!!!" meanwhile everything else is going to shit

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

labor-involved guy I am fb friends with:

So state of Indiana takes money from public schools to keep Carrier jobs; undisclosed inflated Defense contract payoffs offered. For progressives thinking this is any kind of a good thing, I refer you to a whole organization Good Jobs First (www.goodjobsfirst.org) which has been debunking these kinds of deals for decades. It is the idiot version of industrial policy that saves a few jobs while undermining them for every other worker.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

Also they totally went around the union and didn't notify them, but found some rube to say "GEE THAYUNKS MISTER TRUMP" on fox news.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, I think it's a mistake to assume that "education" is all we need here. Plenty of educated people become conservative!

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:39 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I'd never suggest that our current problems will be solved by education alone. This is going to have to be a steady assault on a number of fronts. But wrt your latter concerned, I'm less concerned with educated people becoming conservative than I am with uneducated people being played, in the same way that I'm less concerned with how people choose to cast their vote than I am with whether their ability to vote is being actively hindered.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

'latter concern'

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

yeah with no specifics it's hard to tell wtf is going on. especially since the president has no executive power whatsoever at this point. from what I can discern they're still shipping 1000 jobs to Mexico and now most likely getting a big tax break so win/win for them I guess.

amazing how different the headlines look today than what they did when Obama "saved" 1.5 million jobs in the auto industry, but hey

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

xp also I think Indiana (Gov Pence) offered Carrier some state tax breaks. I don't know how easy it will be to keep pulling off the same move, but I'm sure he'll find some cooperative governors and companies. Maybe even "save" some jobs that were never really going to move.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

Of course I wish more people's ideology aligned with mine but ungaming the system so that people can form their own informed opinions and act accordingly is much more important to me.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

oh yeah, I'm fully prepared for four years of Trump taking credit for every little thing that goes right between now and 2020, then maybe finding a way to still blame Hillary when the price of gas goes up in a couple years

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

Anyway, I think it's a mistake to assume that "education" is all we need here. Plenty of educated people become conservative!

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:39 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I'd never suggest that our current problems will be solved by education alone. This is going to have to be a steady assault on a number of fronts. But wrt your latter concerned, I'm less concerned with educated people becoming conservative than I am with uneducated people being played, in the same way that I'm less concerned with how people choose to cast their vote than I am with whether their ability to vote is being actively hindered.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:48 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well that's more a matter of get-out-the-vote operations, helping people get ID in states where necessary, fighting bad legislation, etc. than education.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

I spend a lot of time reading Trump forums and comments sections, and these people totally cut themselves off from "MSM". So they just edit out anything critical of Trump. We're always going to have to deal with this problem unless something is done about this refusal to engage in critical thinking. Trump knows damn well he got elected by pandering to people who hate and people who refuse to believe anything they read in the news. If a news story is unfavorable to him, he just says they are biased. There has to be massive pressure on Trump to answer to the idiocy and hate of those who elected him.

This shit needs to be rubbed in his face, whether through massive protests, or mass confrontation on places like Twitter:

https://www.splcenter.org/20161129/ten-days-after-harassment-and-intimidation-aftermath-election

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

A less rhetorical question: how do we get the citizenry to reinvest in a basic knowledge and understanding of civics? How do we sexy up shit like the social contract? Because it's becoming increasingly clear that, if we don't all choose to actively invest in some common core principles, this shit is in danger of unraveling.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch)

my answer is that we don't, not in any of our lifetimes, that first we need to recognize that at least one of the core principles underlying democratic governance has already unravelled.

the basic principle behind voting is that the will of the people, as expressed through elections, is the ultimate defense against tyranny. this principle has failed recently in a number of elections around the globe, most recently and definitively in the united states. we must recognize that elections are not, in fact, an ultimate defense against tyranny, and we must design and implement new systemic defenses against it.

your goal of elevating the level of civic consciousness is a worthy and noble one, but my personal opinion is that the necessary preconditions for this effort to be successful on the required scale do not exist in america, or, to the best of my knowledge, anywhere in the world right now.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

I'm less concerned with educated people becoming conservative than I am with uneducated people being played

god, absolutely. it's so alarming how many people out there were so willing to believe stories that had no factual basis whatsoever - as much as everyone blasts the MSM these days they at least have editorial standards

I was talking about this with a (similarly gutted) friend the other day; it's not so much the rise of bigotry that bothers me, it's that people apparently have no standards for fact checking whatsoever, that the snarky "I reject your reality and replace it with my own!" comeback is now apparently a legitimate worldview. cuz one leads to the other, when you follow a site like Breitbart which details every single violent crime committed by a black person or a refugee but stays silent when white people do it, it leads to people holding some pretty internalized racist views. simple really.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

to man alive, no disagreement on voter access, GOTV, etc.

FWIW millions more people voted against the clown than for - they just didn't do it in exactly the right places.

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

god, absolutely. it's so alarming how many people out there were so willing to believe stories that had no factual basis whatsoever - as much as everyone blasts the MSM these days they at least have editorial standards

I was talking about this with a (similarly gutted) friend the other day; it's not so much the rise of bigotry that bothers me, it's that people apparently have no standards for fact checking whatsoever, that the snarky "I reject your reality and replace it with my own!" comeback is now apparently a legitimate worldview. cuz one leads to the other, when you follow a site like Breitbart which details every single violent crime committed by a black person or a refugee but stays silent when white people do it, it leads to people holding some pretty internalized racist views. simple really.

― frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:59 (seven minutes ago) Permalink

Sure, but the left is susceptible to believing things contradicted by facts too. Politics is emotional. People go to Breitbart because it taps into something they already feel. Maybe those feelings can be redirected differently, but we have to understand that.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

otm man alive.

this shit being so emotional and viscerally tribal is why trompe "betraying" the constituencies that electing him is unlikely to make a bit of difference. They got their emotional release from his election; they're not going to turn on him now because they have already gotten the cookie they sought. The middle-finger rush of validation from that giant cosmic "fuck you" is beyond policy and appointments.

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

I mean democratic politics is emotional too. For a lot of Hillary's she represented something beyond just policy as well -- breaking the glass ceiling, being empowered, etc. Trump's campaign was based on anger, frustration, resentment at feeling left behind and condescended to, fear of rapid cultural change. I do sort of get it, there's something about both Obama and Clinton that can read as aloof to people who are really struggling, Clinton moreso than Obama. This was a vessel for people's anger vs a very closed, walled-off kind of person.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

Everyone remembers Bill Clinton for "I feel your pain" -- it's the butt of jokes but everyone who met him at the time said that he made them feel important.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile: http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a51099/trump-romney-dinner/

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:06 AM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this was good. and depressing

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

That's also why I think Bernie was underestimated as a candidate btw -- people focused on "facts -- he uses the word socialist, he's jewish, etc. But he came across as a tough, sincere and caring guy who voiced people's anger and wanted to make things better, and people responded to that. Counterfactuals are dumb but it would have been interesting to see what he could have done with the party behind him.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:21 (seven years ago) link

the fact that he brought up climate change unprompted over and over again was what made me like him

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

I was won over to him even though I was almost sure he could never accomplish what he said he wanted to - free college, single-payer healthcare, etc.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

Even the appeal to "facts" has an emotional component -- security, familiarity, etc. Professionals are used to dealing with "facts" and "statistics" in certain ways and feel comfortable with people who seem to do the same, even when there is manipulation going on.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

"WHEN! WE'RE! under attack! what do we do! / STAND UP! FIGHT BACK!"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/29/fight-for-15-protest-minimum-wage-fast-food-airport-workers

this is an example of how you keep the pressure on

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

Fight for 15 is a great development

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

An excellent essay on the electoral college by Scott Lemieux.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

people called FF15 crazy but look where they've gotten. 15 is actually less than the average min. wage in the 1960s adjusted for inflation iirc

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

It's beautifully simple too. Fight for 15, sounds awesome. That's why I had such a problem with Clinton on "I also support a $15 [um REGIONAL] national minimum wage [except some places will have $12]" Wonkily overcomplicating things and sounding two-faced when even $15/hr isn't much, and why not campaign on a pure and simple $15/hr min wage and negotiate later?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

it's almost as if she were a centrist technocrat with no idea how to connect w voters

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

BUT I'M JUST AN UNFROZEN CAVEMAN WITH PIN-SHARP HINDSIGHT

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/803964275756830721

"If Trump did a Carrier-style deal every week for the next 4 years, he could bring back 4% of the manufacturing jobs lost since 2000."

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

yeah but it would be almost 20% of the jobs obama saved singlehandedly by bailing out the auto industry

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

there's no greater free market principle than having the president intervene to incentivize specific market decisions

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

the invisible hand vs trump's tiny baby hands

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

Oh I don't think he ever campaigned as being free market. He espoused a lot of protectionist policies that go against GOP orthodoxy -- probably moreso than he'll actually back them. I expect a lot of symbolic acts like this with more of the same underneath the surface.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

oh for sure, it's just another in a long series of acts by a nominally republican law maker that further confirms the chiefest platform position is "whatever is most politically expedient"

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

gop platform*

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

good news everybody:
http://www.wral.com/federal-court-orders-new-nc-legislative-elections-in-2017/16289906/

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

it's a booming opinion

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

On Thursday, Mr. Trump and Mike Pence, Indiana’s governor and the vice president-elect, plan to appear at Carrier’s Indianapolis factory to announce a deal with the company to keep roughly 1,000 jobs in the state, according to officials with the transition team as well as Carrier.

Mr. Trump will be hard-pressed to alter the economic forces that have hammered the Rust Belt for decades, but forcing Carrier and its parent company, United Technologies, to reverse course is a powerful tactical strike that will hearten his followers even before he takes office.

“I’m ready for him to come,” said Robin Maynard, a 24-year veteran of Carrier who builds high-efficiency furnaces and earns almost $24 an hour. “Now I can put my daughter through college without having to look for another job.”

It also signals that Mr. Trump is a different kind of Republican, willing to take on big business, at least in individual cases.

And just as only a confirmed anti-Communist like Richard Nixon could go to China, so only a businessman like Mr. Trump could take on corporate America without being called a Bernie Sanders-style socialist. If Barack Obama had tried the same maneuver, he’d probably have drawn criticism for intervening in the free market.

jfc http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/business/trump-to-announce-carrier-plant-will-keep-jobs-in-us.html

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out Obama called up Mitt and more or less told him to go all in for the State job.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

hey lets all subscribe to the nytimes right

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

'only this billionaire can help correct the system that enriched him!' xxp

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

there is going to be 100,000 "mission accomplished" moments aren't there

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

how do you even write this article without any specifics of the deal in question. especially given that Trump technically has no power to do anything yet. this is so strange.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

for sure, and undoubtedly they'll be every bit as truthful as the original xp

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

this kind of shit scares me. they will gut medicare, affordable care act, public schools, all of our social programs but a saving a fucking factory w/ a relatively minuscule amount of jobs will have people saying he is helping struggling americans

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

I wrote to the NYTimes after that article, pasted the link, and basically said "Enjoy being part of the Trump propaganda arm with no remaining readers and the right wing continuing to bash you anyway."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

xp how do you write this article and describe "giving taxpayer money to corporations to entice them to keep a few jobs around" as "taking on big business?!?!?!?!"

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

good news everybody:
http://www.wral.com/federal-court-orders-new-nc-legislative-elections-in-2017/16289906/

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:32 AM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it's a booming opinion

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:35 AM (six minutes ago)

yeah can we get 49 more of those?

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

fuck the NYT btw

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

based off of this:

While the standoff loomed large in the lives of its employees in Indiana, for United Technologies the forgone savings is tiny — equivalent to about 2 cents per share in earnings.

...While Carrier will forfeit some $65 million a year in savings the move was supposed to generate, that’s a small price to pay to avoid the public relations damage from moving the jobs as well as a possible threat to United Technologies’ far-larger military contracting business.

Roughly 10 percent of United Technologies’ $56 billion in revenue comes from the federal government; the Pentagon is its single largest customer. With $4 billion in profit last year, the company has the flexibility to find the savings elsewhere.

i think carrier will be just fine. 10% of their revenue is from contracting with the federal government, or $5.6 billion. if they wiggle their tongues just the right way as trump twitches his asshole, even increasing their fed contracting revenue by 1-2% will overtake the savings they would have gotten from moving to Mexico.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

if we want to keep carrier in the US we should just threaten their federal contracts

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:55 (seven years ago) link

It also signals that Mr. Trump is a different kind of Republican

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

in case we weren't sure yet

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

It also signals that Mr. Trump is a different kind of Republican

you mean a racist demagogue who apparently has no problem with socialism, as long as the only beneficiaries are corporations and white rural "christians"?

will, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

FWIW i get the argument that focusing on kooky fox-inspired Trump tweets is taking our eyes of the ball, but the thing about the flag-burning tweet that genuinely turns my blood to ice water is the very very casual tossing-around the idea of stripping people of citizenship and turning them into stateless persons. IIRC this has come up before but it is arguably the strongest case of all for Is Donald Trump A Fascist. like not even that he's proposing it but that he treats it so fucking lightly just like he's at a bar and saying "they should lock those graffiti guys up for life, that's what I think!"

it's a fucking terrifying thing and IMHO very very close on the authoritarian continuum to "flag-burning should be punishable by death" or "flag burning should be punishable by deportation to a forced labor camp." i don't mean for that to sound hyperbolic but i guess a couple readings of arendt and agamben on statelessness and 'bare life' have really sharpened the meaning of this concept to me.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

meant to scare quote "socialism"

xpost

will, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/nymag/status/803982668153110528

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

FWIW i get the argument that focusing on kooky fox-inspired Trump tweets is taking our eyes of the ball, but the thing about the flag-burning tweet that genuinely turns my blood to ice water is the very very casual tossing-around the idea of stripping people of citizenship and turning them into stateless persons. IIRC this has come up before but it is arguably the strongest case of all for Is Donald Trump A Fascist. like not even that he's proposing it but that he treats it so fucking lightly just like he's at a bar and saying "they should lock those graffiti guys up for life, that's what I think!"

it's a fucking terrifying thing and IMHO very very close on the authoritarian continuum to "flag-burning should be punishable by death" or "flag burning should be punishable by deportation to a forced labor camp." i don't mean for that to sound hyperbolic but i guess a couple readings of arendt and agamben on statelessness and 'bare life' have really sharpened the meaning of this concept to me.

― walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 12:05 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea this is how i feel too. it is fucking awful. we've been so used to trump saying stupid crazy shit but he's going to be the president of the united states. it is supremely fucked up.

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

i agree dr casino.

i'm assuming those are the kinds of "tell it like it is" things that his supporters like. he's already able to get away with casually threatening 1st amendment rights and decades of legal rulings in the weeks after he "won" the election by negative 2.3 million votes. it does frighten me to think of what he will be able to do if the country is perceived to be directly threatened by ISIS or other terrorists.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Michael Sebastian ‏@msebastian 6m6 minutes ago

9 years ago Obama was mocked for eating arugula. Today our populist president enjoys "young garlic soup with thyme"

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a8383120/heres-everything-trump-and-romney-ate-during-their-very-fancy-dinner/

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

Xpost DC Yeah, Agamben definitely has things to say about the current state of affairs -- DACA recipients, for one.

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

pelosi reelected as a house minority leader

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

That one's a week old. Schumer said yesterday he vowed to fight. "Make my day" or some bullshit.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

ha thanks, greg sargent's link just showed up in my twitter feed a couple minutes ago

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

That's also why I think Bernie was underestimated as a candidate btw -- people focused on "facts -- he uses the word socialist, he's jewish, etc. But he came across as a tough, sincere and caring guy who voiced people's anger and wanted to make things better, and people responded to that

Loved Bernie. Though obviously I didn't pay as much attention as you lot did - what am I, Danish?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

I wish we had a Bernie over here. His older brother doesn't quite cut it.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

listen, only a businessman like Mr. Trump could take on corporate America without being called a Bernie Sanders-style socialist. if bernie sanders won and then tried to take on corporate america, just imagine what he would be called right now

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

seriously f this country right now, holy shit

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

More news:

Nancy Pelosi won her eighth term, easily toppling Rep. Tim Ryan, who launched an upstart bid to replace her in response to the party's disappointing November election results.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

I love her but I do wonder who she is planning on grooming as a successor

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

did you guys post that chris hedges thing that someone posted on my facebook? i kept expecting to hear the star wars theme at the end of that. the rebels will be our hope!

long story short: the renegade sculptors will save us in the future.

scott seward, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Doc Casino totally otm. Saying dumb reactionary bullshit is fine when you're a cartoon reality star but this dude is going to be president and that's seriously terrifying. Like hearing your dad say, "when I was your age I used to fuck broads like that all the time!!"

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

The combined age of Pelosi and Hoyer is bigger than Yoda's.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

Doc Casino totally otm. Saying dumb reactionary bullshit is fine when you're a cartoon reality star but this dude is going to be president and that's seriously terrifying. Like hearing your dad say, "when I was your age I used to fuck broads like that all the time!!"

I guess legislation that has a reasonable chance of passage and ending on the president's desk for signature scares me more than our moron president sharing an opinion on Twitter.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

apropos of nothing - how long before Alex Jones turns on Trump? Dude's whole schtick is built on being the opposition, I can't see him carrying water for an actual regime

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

I guess legislation that has a reasonable chance of passage and ending on the president's desk for signature scares me more than our moron president sharing an opinion on Twitter.

yup. keep yr eye on the ball here people, it's policy that matters most of all.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

apropos of nothing - how long before Alex Jones turns on Trump? Dude's whole schtick is built on being the opposition, I can't see him carrying water for an actual regime

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 30, 2016 12:38 PM (thirty-seven seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there are enough scapegoats for people like him to oppose

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

but they aren't in power

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

like, his whole bit is about secret conspiracies at the highest echelons of power - things "they don't want you to know" - that dynamic kinda doesn't work if you're tacitly supporting the most powerful person on the planet.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

alex jones can just spend more time on things like planet x and the treasonous liberal opposition, who made a deal with the reptilians

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

did you guys post that chris hedges thing that someone posted on my facebook? i kept expecting to hear the star wars theme at the end of that. the rebels will be our hope!

long story short: the renegade sculptors will save us in the future.

― scott seward, Wednesday, November 30, 2016 12:35 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I haven't read it, but I find Chris Hedges to be a complete waste of time. Depressive and demoralizing harpers mag bullshit.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

And just as only a confirmed anti-Communist like Richard Nixon could go to China

was expecting exactly this line from exactly this newspaper but not before the inauguration :(

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

"these are the buoys in the shipyard of flavortown"

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

hahaha

sleeve, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

I'll repeat: they're not drinking wine, that's a bottle of sparkling water in the wine bucket. Ugh.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

How much did he pay the photographer for that shot?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

amuse-douche

scott seward, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

p sure those are Romney's own balls on that plate

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

the abject public humiliation of really rich people is so much more bearable than any other style. look at sad ol' mitt romney, eating a really nice dinner at fancy restaurant in manhattan. then he's going to have to figure out how to accept some cabinet level position in a way that doesn't make him feel like such a hypocrite. poor guy, hope he comes through this ok.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

I hope they both die in a fire

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

I do have to wonder what motivates him -- he's rich as shit, has been a governor, and is probably never again going to be positioned to be president no matter what, so what does he get out of this? Surely he could refuse and live out his horse-dancing days in peace?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

it is a pretty incredible photo

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

Drinking water out of wine glasses looks fucken stupid

badg, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

there's your friggin' banality of evil right there too. those schmucks are gonna end the world? doesn't seem fair really.

scott seward, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

so what does he get out of this?

he gets to go farther than his father

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

it's Tic Tac time

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Drinking water out of wine glasses looks fucken stupid

that's no ordinary water.

that's Kona Nigari Water, served neat

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Idk I think the president-elect spouting off nakedly fascist ideas about how to deal with political dissidents and enemies is seriously concerning even if it's not ''legislation'' or ''policy.'' Insert argument about normalization here. I spent a year hoping we were shifting the window leftwards on what things can be said, discussed, bandied about as viable and familiar solutions - by dads in the street, by newscasters, by sitting politicians at whatever level. Now we look ahead to a fascist turn in all areas. It will take decades to even begin to undo the damage to common understanding of what is beyond the pale in a free society. High school debate topic: okay, y'all argue ''pro'' on sending people to Gitmo for criticizing the troops. Tonight on Crossfire: felony punishment for protestors who use profanity when discussing the president, good or bad idea? Placing BLM on the terrorist watch list: well-intentioned but overreaching, or necessary evil?

Like between this and the Muslim registry idea it's just.... fuck. Obviously much of this is not exactly new (see: Patriot Act, etc etc) but these words matter and are not just a distraction from the other terrifying things Trump is doing elsewhere.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

i guess the diff is people kinda liked his dad(?)

who has a non-negative opinion on mitt romney other than "eh"

will, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

idk romney taking state means Giuliani or Bolton or petraeus don't get the job which is maybe the strongest public service he's done in his career.

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:04 (seven years ago) link

Idk I think the president-elect spouting off nakedly fascist ideas about how to deal with political dissidents and enemies is seriously concerning even if it's not ''legislation'' or ''policy.'' Insert argument about normalization here. I spent a year hoping we were shifting the window leftwards on what things can be said, discussed, bandied about as viable and familiar solutions - by dads in the street, by newscasters, by sitting politicians at whatever level. Now we look ahead to a fascist turn in all areas. It will take decades to even begin to undo the damage to common understanding of what is beyond the pale in a free society. High school debate topic: okay, y'all argue ''pro'' on sending people to Gitmo for criticizing the troops. Tonight on Crossfire: felony punishment for protestors who use profanity when discussing the president, good or bad idea? Placing BLM on the terrorist watch list: well-intentioned but overreaching, or necessary evil?

Like between this and the Muslim registry idea it's just.... fuck. Obviously much of this is not exactly new (see: Patriot Act, etc etc) but these words matter and are not just a distraction from the other terrifying things Trump is doing elsewhere.

― walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:03 PM (twenty-eight seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i agree w/ this

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

its.... so fucked up

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

High school debate topic: okay, y'all argue ''pro'' on sending people to Gitmo for criticizing the troops. Tonight on Crossfire: felony punishment for protestors who use profanity when discussing the president, good or bad idea? Placing BLM on the terrorist watch list: well-intentioned but overreaching, or necessary evil?

tbf these all seem p much in the rich tradition of American high school debate topics, going back as far one cares to look. I'm not saying that's a good thing, and this is def a step back in the national discourse, but it's not like there's some golden age where dissent was uniformly respected and the threat of the gov't killing you was remote.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

Japanese internment camps, COINTELPRO, previous Muslim registry - there's precedents for all that stuff. the discourse normalizing extreme and ridiculous "solutions" is bad, no doubt, but it's not unprecedented.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

Xpost photo was referred to upthread as Lynchian, and it certainly is, and then I get back from lunch and open up my newsfeed to this horrifying pic of Giuliani, which looks like Robert Blake in Lost Highway.

http://s259.photobucket.com/user/yodelagogo/media/giuliani.png.html
https://media2.giphy.com/media/2zOEcqG4EuvF6/200_s.gif

Devastatin' Dan the Suggest Ban Man (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

Having a president and his cronies wilfully spread confusion and paranoia via hundreds of thousands of viral "fake news" articles, however, is a new ripple in the history of American authoritarianism: it shows his naked disregard for the principles of constitutional governance.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

that is a new one yeah

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure Nixon would've done it if he could have

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

You don't need to whitewash American history to recognize that Trump's rise is a remarkably fucked up developmeng that threatens to undermine everything worth preserving in our society.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

Yeah Nixon was a nefarious dirtbag. He at least felt the need to try to hide it though. Trump just makes up his own script and scorns any sort of accountability, Big Brother style

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

that's all true. I just don't feel compelled to spend a lot of time worrying about what he's tweeting or whatever. I don't want to be complicit in ceding power to the medium or his use of it. The sooner a skepticism about shit people see on twitter/facebook/etc. is adopted as a cultural norm the better imo. So I'll treat it as what it is: noise designed to distract.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/RjNN4uu.jpg

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

mitt with the "i picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue" face

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

mitt's all like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

I think Trump is doing something under the table to Mitt, the kind of thing only stars can get away with

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

That lighting makes it look like they're eating little stacks of gold coins.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

wow, incisive tweet

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

Get someone who can do both

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

I guess legislation that has a reasonable chance of passage and ending on the president's desk for signature scares me more than our moron president sharing an opinion on Twitter.

probably would happen with any ol' Republican president though

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

i know we're already past it but that fucking NYT waving the white flag economics article is the worst and most depressing thing I've seen today and I saw a pigeon get run over in the street

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

typical mammalian bias

mint challop (Will M.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:15 (seven years ago) link

"I think what he's done so far shows two things. Number one: He has picked people that know how the system works and are willing to make the commitment to him and his policies to make sure the trains run on time and the train stays on the track, and I think that's very important, particularly for someone who ran as an outsider," Chambliss said.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

Making sure the trains run on time, hmmmmm.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

O_O

ian, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

People who are completely ignorant about history, or people who are way too knowledgeable about particular aspects of history?

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

lol unreal

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

wow, incisive tweet

― k3vin k., Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:55 PM (forty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

How bout this one?

https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/804038449300959232

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

I totally misread 'felicitated' as 'fellated.' I need to step away from the internet.

Devastatin' Dan the Suggest Ban Man (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

Mike Cernovich posted a similar tweet and then deleted it. It has of course been screenshotted and RT'd.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

fellated Navidad
prospero año y felicidad

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

don't know why I got curious and hopped over to this dummy's blog again but my god the delusion here is so palpable

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/153865618451/the-idea-you-are-least-likely-to-believe

When Trump was running for election, facts and reasons and policy details didn’t matter to the outcome. He knew that. I knew that. Every trained persuader knew it. But the general public did not, and that is the realization that is beginning to dawn on the world.

this is just so stupid - Trump DID have "facts" and "reasons" and "policy details" but that facts were wrong, the reasons were dumb, and the policy details were impossible or completely vague, and yet this is a good thing? fuck off.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

wow, that press release.

that is unbelievable.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

Everything is believable now.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

The irony would be if Trump did manage to make America great again strictly through empty flattery.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

Nobody tell Trump that Pakistan is like 98% Muslim.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

I wanna see the look on his face.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

Wait, what does Trump have against Muslims? They're terrific.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

Reminds me so much of this which is my favorite Trump-related thing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5kfC_VCXeQ

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

i think it's a mistake to think that he gaf about muslims outside how he can use them to get support - i don't think he cares about anything really if being nice to muslims made his bank account larger he'd do a 180.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

I hate the Times as much as you guys, but they were an all but official arm of Hillary's campaign. So your preferred candidate benefited from their corruption before she lost, right?

I'd be interested to know how many of the thread regulars supported Bernie during the primary. From a distance it seems like most here supported her in the primary. Is that correct?

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

No

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

clinton+email site:nytimes.com

About 6,700,000 results (0.85 seconds)

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

no ilx was pretty evenly split and if the NYT was an arm of the Hillary campaign why did her bogus email story get front page headlines every day?

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

NYT def not an "arm" of HRC's campaign gtfo w that. WaPo went way harder against Trump.

Xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

lol Iago that is so mindboggingly wrong, unless you spelt "WaPo" wrong in which case, yeah I guess

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

From a distance it seems like most here supported her in the primary. Is that correct?

What, in terms of active, regular posters? I would say this is decidedly not correct

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

Iago, you've clearly been mainlining some Trumpist news sources throughout this election. Facts are generally pretty easy to discern when you exercise a little skepticism wrt the things that loud, crazy people are telling you.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile, ILX alum Mr Read was on the cspan today, talking about fake news and taking calls.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?418867-5/washington-journal-max-read-internet-fake-news-democracy

I'd like to thank Cspan's auto-transcriber for the new display name.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

I guess one of the major factors that separate Trump supporters from everybody else is that everybody else can say, "I support these sources from which I get my news to varying degrees, but I have my issues with them and they're often full of shit and I still feel compelled to go over their reportage with a fine-toothed comb" instead of "YOU TELL ME THING IN LOUD VOICE LIKE MY DADDY, THING MUST BE TRUE, E-MAIL SERVERS AND MURDERED FBI MEN!"

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

We need like a whole crew of Jerky Boys-style pranksters calling up Trump Tower professing to be the heads of state of Freedonia, Equestria, Agrabah, Zembla, etc.

"@realdonaldtrump - Received a great congratulatory phone call today from the king of Narnia. I assured him that we would work together to make great, great deals that would benefit both people and fauns bigly. Glad!"

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

@realdonaldtrump - Got great congratulatory call from the Westeros ambassador today. Plan to meet soon over Trump Tower Tacos to discuss future of Westeros trade policy!

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

@realdonaldtrump - Just had a great conversation with the Lilliputian Prime Minister! Lilliputian people are terrific, just terrific.

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

@realdonaldtrump - Great, friendly people in Westeros. Got invited to the kings wedding next month, wouldn't take no for an answer!

Frederik B, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

This just in, Trump appointing Herman Cain as ambassador to Becky-becky-becky-stan

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

They have good hair there. The best hair.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

this was not a one-post joke lads

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

Trump is apparently going to be like two blocks from my work for the rest of the week. Which should make getting around a huge pain the ass. I hope I can contribute to making his stay a huge pain in his ass.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

We need like a whole crew of Jerky Boys-style pranksters calling up Trump Tower professing to be the heads of state of Freedonia, Equestria, Agrabah, Zembla, etc.

"@realdonaldtrump - Received a great congratulatory phone call today from the king of Narnia. I assured him that we would work together to make great, great deals that would benefit both people and fauns bigly. Glad!"

― pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:27 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

@realdonaldtrump - Got great congratulatory call from the Westeros ambassador today. Plan to meet soon over Trump Tower Tacos to discuss future of Westeros trade policy!

― pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:29 PM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

@realdonaldtrump - Just had a great conversation with the Lilliputian Prime Minister! Lilliputian people are terrific, just terrific.

― pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:33 PM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

@realdonaldtrump - Great, friendly people in Westeros. Got invited to the kings wedding next month, wouldn't take no for an answer!

― Frederik B, Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:35 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This just in, Trump appointing Herman Cain as ambassador to Becky-becky-becky-stan

― pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:36 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

They have good hair there. The best hair.

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:37 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

can mods delete all of this please

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

this is the best one of these. so much laughing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyEXshBOwEU

scott seward, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

x-post: Meh. Seemed more constructive than arguing with Iago...

Frederik B, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

that is brutal to watch xp

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

yeah, it kinda is. oh how we laughed and laughed...

scott seward, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

does anyone remember laughter

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

i think back to the weekend after the grab em by the pussy tape when his campaign was in free fall and i cannot believe we are here now

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

like on a daily basis i still think HOW THE FUCK DID THIS HAPPEN

i know many of you have moved on and are now in pragmatic resistance mode but i still feel like im in a bad nightmare most of the time. everyday i have at least one moment of absolute panic tihnking about this

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

staying in pragmatic resistance mode is a constant effort for me tbh, rest assured we are in the same general mental space

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

xp yeah i hear you. for me it's been a wakeup call to reassess what being a citizen means and to take my time and my voice more seriously. It's not that I have that much power, it's that we all do and we need to start using it intelligently to roll this fucking boulder back up the mountain before the next one starts coming down.

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I mean I just got an "Emergency Call" from my school district reassuring me that all immigrants are welcome at the District and they will not cooperate with deportation efforts etc

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

Pragmatic resistance is the conscious choice for moving forward, and I'm trying to keep things on the positive and constructive tip, but a day hasn't passed where I don't feel like we've been shunted into the most sinister timeline imaginable. I've been having stress nightmares like you wouldn't believe.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

I was 12 and living under 2 miles from the Pentagon on 9/11 and I trained myself then to wall myself off emotionally from major world events, I've been basically fine since the 10th. Don't know if that's healthy exactly.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

My first thoughts in the days after the election were about finishing my history degree and becoming a teacher, maybe have some tiny impact on the world... but that looks increasingly futile.

Any billionaires want to sponsor a secular humanist private school?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's futile at all, man. I've been thinking similar thoughts. If small, positive changes are all that any one of us is capable of, it's enough. And doing something has to be better than doing nothing.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

i think back to the weekend after the grab em by the pussy tape when his campaign was in free fall and i cannot believe we are here now

yeah I remember getting a call the day after from the Dem office here asking if I wanted to canvass - already had plans so I couldn't but I told the guy, "I'm not really all that worried anymore, but I'll help Feingold out if I can"

I mean, even before that, the week after the DNC where he was just going nuts in general, backstabbing his own campaign people and attacking the Khans, I thought "surely this is over"

fast forward to now and I still hear people all the time saying "it's just unfortunate it came down to...these...two" and I guess I kind of understand

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

I think it's wise to limit the amount of psychic space you give Trump as much as you can -- stay aware, focus on where you can have an impact, and live your life.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

if everybody goes out and kills one Trump voter each i'm sure it'll add up to something positive

brex yourself before you wrex yourself (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

yeah in general I am limiting my news consumption tbh, it just isn't productive for me to fixate on, I'm trying to stay focused on the small pleasures and just generally being willing to contribute to/participate in whatever actions are open to me (donating money, volunteering, showing up at meetings + protests, signing petitions etc.)

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it's futile at all, man. I've been thinking similar thoughts. If small, positive changes are all that any one of us is capable of, it's enough. And doing something has to be better than doing nothing.

The thing that opened my eyes was when I found out that the dude who was the rising star of St*rmfr*t had his worldview challenged not only by his college social circle but by his medieval history classes, one of which was taught by a friend from college that I sang with. You really never know who you're going to impact, or how.

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

regarding news, subscribing to news, and avoiding news: I paid for TPM Prime so I don't have to read it, is basically what happened

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

I think it's wise to limit the amount of psychic space you give Trump as much as you can -- stay aware, focus on where you can have an impact, and live your life.
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:24 PM (twenty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is fantastic advice and something i've been ignoring a little. thank you.

The thing that opened my eyes was when I found out that the dude who was the rising star of St*rmfr*t had his worldview challenged not only by his college social circle but by his medieval history classes, one of which was taught by a friend from college that I sang with. You really never know who you're going to impact, or how.

― ¶ (DJP), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:45 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That WaPo article was a fantastic read-

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/the-white-flight-of-derek-black/2016/10/15/ed5f906a-8f3b-11e6-a6a3-d50061aa9fae_story.html

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

my wife watches CNN in the morning before work so when I turn on the TV after work it's on. usually Anderson Cooper. but I can't physically stomach it anymore - that one loudmouth blonde Trump surrogate (not Kellyanne, the other one) is always on and yesterday they were all fellating Trump over "saving 1000 American jobs"...like, wow, he's doing it already!! were we WRONG about Donald Trump????

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

clinton+email site:nytimes.com
About 6,700,000 results (0.85 seconds)

― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:57 PM (twenty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

clinton+iraq war site:nytimes.com
About 31,200 results (0.43 seconds)

clinton+bailout site:nytimes.com
About 12,000 results (0.33 seconds)

NYT focused so much on emails bc its a huge pressing issue requiring 200 times the attention compared to the 21st century's defining international conflict and 500 times the attention given to the US financial industry recklessly ODing on our retirement money then given another crack rock wrapped in a Get Out of Jail Free Card.

the emails were the useful scandal - already old news, needlessly complicated, confusing, unsexy, and seemed like looking for a needle in a haystack. the emails are a great way to silence leftist dissent ("What do you mean they weren't critical, they talked about emails!").

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

Or, you know, perhaps Clinton wasn't actually at fault for the Iraq war and the bailout?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

Does the person who released the access hollywood tape in October blame themselves for all of this, given what may have happened if it were released the week before the election instead?

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

it would be fun to mail that post back to a person living in 1993, in a "hey this is what 2016 is like, pretty fucked up, right" way

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

much more egregious was the three weeks of nonstop reporting on the Clinton Foundation, "asking questions" but never finding any real evidence of wrongdoing or corruption, while AT THE SAME TIME a single reporter from the Post was uncovering unethical and blatantly illegal shit from the Trump Foundation on a daily basis, and yet total silence from the media

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

I said it at the time- secret corruption is exciting, blatant corruption is boring.

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

Does the person who released the access hollywood tape in October blame themselves for all of this, given what may have happened if it were released the week before the election instead?

or the '95 tax returns? god who knows. I truly feel awful for Huma's role in all this, I can't imagine how she feels right now

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

Looking for clues and reading between the lines and putting puzzle pieces together is fun. That shit goes viral and gets upvotes and generates conversations and sharing. It resembles the kind of fun one has with characters in movies or HBO shows.

xpost to self

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

Trump's dirt isn't very exciting in that regard. It's all just there. So much so that it's exhausting to sift through and the impact of any particular scandal is dulled in context.

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

Blatant corruption makes you feel hopeless--like it's already RIGHT THERE and nothing happened to it, fighting it now is probably a losing battle. Whereas SECRETS make you feel like you can be powerful just by TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING that *someone* doesn't want talked about. Way easier lift.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

And with secret corruption, who knows how big it could be?!

jmm, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

yeah good point. the email "scandal" was fascinating in that everyone could look into it and find their own opinions of Hillary reflected right back at them. those 33,000 deleted emails could be ANYTHING! plans to sell off gov't secrets, MURDER PLOTS PERHAPS??

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

but I disagree with Evan on one thing, Trump's dirt almost certainly isn't all "out there"...yes, there's a lot out there, but given how basically everyone who ever worked for him or was married to him had to sign a massive NDA, who knows?

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

clinton deserved the criticism she got for her iraq vote but seems odd that joe biden basically never got any for his

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

biden wasn't running, and it became clear that in the obama WH clinton pushed for more hawkish policy while biden was more of a dove. showing that you've learned from your mistakes is a nice quality

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

And you would have to pin a bunch of pictures up on a board with lines drawn between them in order to visualize the web of deception/lies/corruption with Hillary's face right in the middle. And if you found something revealing you could write a post on reddit with the title "Guys, I think I just found something big. This goes higher than you think." So much fun!

xposts

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

Also: it was widely reported he held rosary beads during Bin Laden raid

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

biden wasn't running, and it became clear that in the obama WH clinton pushed for more hawkish policy while biden was more of a dove. showing that you've learned from your mistakes is a nice quality

― k3vin k., Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:21 PM (one minute ago)

yeah no argument here

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

but I disagree with Evan on one thing, Trump's dirt almost certainly isn't all "out there"...yes, there's a lot out there, but given how basically everyone who ever worked for him or was married to him had to sign a massive NDA, who knows?

― frogbs, Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:19 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well, to varying degrees. I mean, there's a lot of it.

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

I was speaking relatively.

Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

Trump's big advantage was that his corruption didn't matter as much, if you're in a crap situation in life you don't blame Donald Trump (unless you're one of the thousands of contractors or investors that he dicked over), you blame politicians like Hillary Clinton.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

and yeah - there certainly is a ton out there and by all rational measures it should have shot him down ten times over. even the argument that Hillary's scandals were more "mysterious" and/or "secret" doesn't feel right - Trump turned over basically nothing about himself, we know nothing about his business interests, who he owes money to, or what's in his tax returns, while Hillary volunteered basically everything.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

I would feel better if we stopped it with the post-mortems tbh. The only real lesson from the election is one that's been in place since idk at least Reagan - the only thing that matters to the voters that decide elections is a believable illusion of authenticity. Everything else is secondary.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

Yeah. If I take any comfort from the election, it's that it was no presidential election was no “referendum” on liberalism; forty-five percent of voters said in exit polls that they wanted the next president to be as or more liberal than Barack Obama.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

Basically the voter that swings elections literally is that guy who's thought processes re: politics go no farther than "does that guy seem believable to me? does he seem like an actual person/does he fit a recognizable archetype I find appealing?" That's it. There is nothing else involved. No principles, no policies, no positions, no facts, nothing.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

Whereas 55% ...

Mark G, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

were not distributed in the necessary proportions

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

"does that guy seem believable to me? does he seem like an actual person/does he fit a recognizable archetype I find appealing?"

yeah this is a big part of it and IMO why I still feel Bernie would've had a shot, a lotta people turned away from Clinton because she felt so robotic and focus-grouped.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

they turned away from her because she was Hillary Rodham Clinton, the band they've known all these years.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

And still 'they' preferred her by the millions. Except where it mattered most. (And where Sanders would probably have done better. anyway)

Frederik B, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

Welcome to ILX's favorite bullshit authenticity argument, late 2016 flavor.

rb (soda), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

many xps but Derek Black's op-ed in the Times this weekend was pretty heartening i thought
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/opinion/sunday/why-i-left-white-nationalism.html?_r=0

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

And you would have to pin a bunch of pictures up on a board with lines drawn between them in order to visualize the web of deception/lies/corruption with Hillary's face right in the middle. And if you found something revealing you could write a post on reddit with the title "Guys, I think I just found something big. This goes higher than you think." So much fun!

xposts

― Evan, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 22:21 (one hour ago) Permalink

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buzzXclC5vA

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link

remember oppo dump? I just remembered it. now I think there is no oppo dump in the world that would matter

akm, Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

oppo dump is basically Santa Claus

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I realize now that Trump's behavior needs to have a direct impact on some people in order for it to matter. You can be sure those former contractors and ex-wives and assault victims didn't vote for him. He'll need to engage in some highly-visible shady shit that has a negative material impact on some people before they'll turn on him.

I wonder when he's planning to have us sign our NDAs.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

Vicious cycle: Trump elected, doesn't fix anything in 4 years, re-elect to give his shit time to work (plus he's a guy I'd get a beer with, you know?), doesn't work, either another GOP or Dem gets elected, spends all their time (a la Obama) fixing previous mistakes. Repeat. See also: obstructionist congress claims gov not working, president uses executive action for results, new president elected, reverses executive actions, repeat forever.

Oh, and the Supreme Court implodes.

Our country is fucked. There is no more hope in the next decade than there is in blinding chucking a basketball from half-court in hopes of getting a basket.

I wonder, what would happen if things got really bad, in terms of corruption and crime, and nothing was done about it? What recourse is there? What if the Dems just ... walked off the job?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:01 (seven years ago) link

It's hard for me to predict what will happen because Trump was such a curveball. Maybe we'll have a peaceful communist revolution and all Americans will voluntarily turn in their guns. Who knows.

Treeship, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

I could have maybe predicted the possibility of an authoritarian demagogue, maybe even one with an entertainment background, but the insanity of the past 17 months flies in the face of everything I thought I knew about the American electorate.

Treeship, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:06 (seven years ago) link

What recourse is there? What if the Dems just ... walked off the job?

Either they get replaced by assholes or dragged back in for quorum. This happened in Texas when the state GOP wanted to gerrymander the place in the late 90s

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:21 (seven years ago) link

I like the idea of the dems proposing a 50 state "atlas shrugged" strategy

Treeship, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:25 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure the odds of another global financial meltdown caused by some fucked up derivatives are pretty high in the next 4-8 years

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:41 (seven years ago) link

yeah. this election felt a little bit like having a relative who just got a liver transplant take up drinking again.

Treeship, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:47 (seven years ago) link

Xpost 4-8 years? Try, like, 10-14, so the next guy takes the fall, and Trump will probably be dead anyway.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:49 (seven years ago) link

A bit off topic, but this is what we're up against (I don't think the edit distorts too much):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnaSvvSqY-8

The most vulgar, godless character to win a major party's nomination in several lifetimes, and here he's being treated as the hand of Jesus. There's an alternate reality out there, and there's no way any of us can effectively effectively confront it. They have their own media, their own collective delusions, and they're all members of a nihilist apocalyptic faith.

Sanpaku, Thursday, 1 December 2016 03:38 (seven years ago) link

I wouldn't overestimate the size of the constituency of Jim Bakker -- it's a slice of Trumps base but it's not Trump's base.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 03:40 (seven years ago) link

He's a longtime televangelist con man and his current thing is selling grossly overpriced survival food.

That video is amazing though and dark as fuck.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 03:41 (seven years ago) link

xp: Obviously, there's quite a few groups contributing to Trump's 38% approval ratings. The kooky pentacostals, the white nationalists, the coal rollers, the diehard 'R' cheerleaders, the internet nihilists, the moneyed opportunists, etc

On a purely technical basis, how does one get through to any of these? They're immune to factual reporting, science, any emotions resembling empathy or compassion.

Sanpaku, Thursday, 1 December 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you need to get through to his hardcore supporters. He probably only squeaked by in this election with the help of unenthusiastic supporters who either disliked Clinton more or just didn't know much. Those are the only ones I'd bother trying to reach.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 04:02 (seven years ago) link

Right. The Christianists, the white supremacists, the money men, the anti-environmentalists .... those people weren't voting for Obama either. There are a lot of pretty normal people who are not locked in a crazed epistemic loop who voted for Trump and who next time will be perfectly open for voting for somebody else.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 1 December 2016 04:09 (seven years ago) link

That WaPo article was a fantastic read-

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/the-white-flight-of-derek-black/2016/10/15/ed5f906a-8f3b-11e6-a6a3-d50061aa9fae_story.html

That is a fascinating story.

jmm, Thursday, 1 December 2016 04:16 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/therealbradg/status/804048624615198720

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 December 2016 04:16 (seven years ago) link

wapo piece on derek black was outstanding and gave me a little hope

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 1 December 2016 04:32 (seven years ago) link

I assume something none of us can foresee will happen "next"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 05:56 (seven years ago) link

The only real lesson from the election is one that's been in place since idk at least Reagan - the only thing that matters to the voters that decide elections is a believable illusion of authenticity.

Give Clinton credit, she tried faking it as many ways as she could come up with.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 06:03 (seven years ago) link

5k posts in under a month and, again, I'm compelled to point out we still haven't started yet.
This is gonna get unwieldy.
Do we reboot monthly maybe?

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Thursday, 1 December 2016 07:20 (seven years ago) link

That high vs. low output divide has been the focus of critical geographers for a while. You could read Sassen's 'Global City' now and much of it match up with current realities. It's only going to get worse, I think.

I don't really want to live in a city state though...

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 1 December 2016 07:25 (seven years ago) link

It seems like there has to be some opportunity to fight back economically on some level though, right? I'm a little dense in this area, but I feel there must be some way we could leverage our wits/economic advantages to fuck up the right for the next 4 years.

Darin, Thursday, 1 December 2016 07:35 (seven years ago) link

ya, move operations to ireland

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Thursday, 1 December 2016 09:32 (seven years ago) link

I'll repeat: they're not drinking wine, that's a bottle of sparkling water in the wine bucket. Ugh.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:47 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

As someone who started drinking late, and had a lot of excellent food before that, I might have to ask you to go fuck yourself here? And I suspect some of ILX's recovering alcoholics might have similar views.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 1 December 2016 10:55 (seven years ago) link

I apologize. Neither is a recovering alcoholic though.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:00 (seven years ago) link

I understand that, but there is no moral imperative to drink alcohol with food?

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

"Who eats a meal without wine?!" is obv daft fronting but hardly offensive

diary of a mod how's life (wins), Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:46 (seven years ago) link

Beer is ok as well, but putting sparkling water in a wine cooler? Monsters!

Frederik B, Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:51 (seven years ago) link

in the eighties this was called a "spritzer."

It was also called "gross."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

While we're talking about it, on the occasion where we dine fine and get some sort of epic tasting menu, it's the alcohol that messes things up, especially for my wife. By course 15 or whatever she/we're pretty drunk, and she's already full, and adding alcohol further pumps the final price up to levels insane enough that she'd rather stick with water or even stay home. So wine with dinner? Sure. Beer, cocktails, whatever. But I can't begrudge these assholes for going with water, even if, in a sad turn of irony, they're already responsible for millions of people drinking more.

But yeah, sparkling water in a wine bucket? That's pretty lame. Fancy restaurant protocol I thought is to bring the bottled water out as needed? I don't think it's to leave the bottle on the table, at least. Maybe Trump asked, because ... he's the boss! (Cue trombone).

One of the few chuckles I've gotten over this knucklehead the last few weeks is the Office of Government Ethics apparently counter-trolling Trump via Twitter yesterday. But Trump for once has a good point. How do you practically divest of real estate, let alone real estate with your name smeared all over it? You can sell stocks and put money and other investments in a blind trust, but you can't do that with big ugly buildings.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:33 (seven years ago) link

that's not anyone's problem but his iirc

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

Well, yeah.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:45 (seven years ago) link

Drumpf is a lifelong teetotaller; Romney is a practicing Mormon.

Bnad, Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

I'm as critical of Bernie Sanders as anyone, but holy fuck is he otm right here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/01/bernie-sanders-carrier-just-showed-corporations-how-to-beat-donald-trump/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.03c09c218ebf

Trump has endangered the jobs of workers who were previously safe in the United States. Why? Because he has signaled to every corporation in America that they can threaten to offshore jobs in exchange for business-friendly tax benefits and incentives. Even corporations that weren’t thinking of offshoring jobs will most probably be re-evaluating their stance this morning. And who would pay for the high cost for tax cuts that go to the richest businessmen in America? The working class of America.

...

I said I would work with Trump if he was serious about the promises he made to members of the working class. But after running a campaign pledging to be tough on corporate America, Trump has hypocritically decided to do the exact opposite. He wants to treat corporate irresponsibility with kid gloves. The problem with our rigged economy is not that our policies have been too tough on corporations; it’s that we haven’t been tough enough.

...

If United Technologies or any other company wants to keep outsourcing decent-paying American jobs, those companies must pay an outsourcing tax equal to the amount of money it expects to save by moving factories to Mexico or other low-wage countries. They should not receive federal contracts or other forms of corporate welfare. They must pay back all of the tax breaks and other corporate welfare they have received from the federal government. And they must not be allowed to reward their executives with stock options, bonuses or golden parachutes for outsourcing jobs to low-wage countries. I will soon be introducing the Outsourcing Prevention Act, which will address exactly that.

That's the way to be a Dem economic populist, I suppose. For all the unfortunate talk he has done lately - and I still dislike a lot of what he said about identity politics, many more places than we have talked/yelled about - he walks the walk, and that's far more important.

Frederik B, Thursday, 1 December 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

I'm not for the record rageous about this - I'm happy to admit that being teetotal in Ireland put a considerable chip on my shoulder, though the offense appears to be Alfred's.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 1 December 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

It's true you did equivocate about telling him to go fuck himself

badg, Thursday, 1 December 2016 13:11 (seven years ago) link

in the eighties this was called a "spritzer."

It was also called "gross."

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, December 1, 2016 7:29 AM (thirty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

spritzer / on ice in new york city / isn't it a pity / you never had anything to mix with that

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

xp, that is true, yes.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 1 December 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

man, we just had the big Kohler strike here where the Kohlers were sorta but not really seriously considering outsourcing a ton of factory jobs. if only they'd waited a year.

frogbs, Thursday, 1 December 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link

Our grad worker union election is less than a week away and the two or possibly three anti-union student organizers that exist on campus have recently taken to telling people on the fence to vote no, on the premise that there could be another, more pleasing union on the docket at some point in the next few years. To my knowledge they do not seem to have an answer to ''er, you do know that our even being permitted to have this election is due to a decision by the NLRB, which will soon be controlled by Donald Trump, right?'' But then they have not really had answers to a lot of things for ages now so I'm not really surprised.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 1 December 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/RonWyden/status/804086396113797121

Trench & Snook (doo dah), Thursday, 1 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

I guess the big question is whether or not the media is going to continue to let Trump have the first word instead of doing their due diligence, since as we all suspected the Carrier deal is straight garbage

frogbs, Thursday, 1 December 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

the good news is that the continued booming financial success of newspapers, and the attendant swelling of the ranks of dedicated, capable investigative reporters at newsdesks across the usa, means that trump will have his feet held to the fire over every trangression, no matter how minor

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 1 December 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

Just a reminder: if you want democrats in office, support unions. Don't fall for anti-teachers-union/pro-charter-school bullshit. Norquist agrees:

https://twitter.com/GroverNorquist/status/803680084292997120

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

i see what you did there, gazzara

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/JonathanMerritt/status/804310057424928768

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

jesus fucking christ i want off this planet

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

"THE MEDIA SAID IT"

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

"google it"

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

even Fox News is calling the Carrier deal BS all the way 'round

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/30/hundreds-could-still-lose-jobs-at-carriers-indianapolis-plant-despite-trump-deal.html

In persuading Carrier to keep hundreds of jobs in Indiana, President-elect Donald Trump is claiming victory on behalf of factory workers whose positions were bound for Mexico. But the scant details that have emerged so far raise doubts about the extent of the victory.

By enabling Carrier's Indianapolis plant to stay open, the deal spares about 800 union workers whose jobs were going to be outsourced to Mexico, according to federal officials who were briefed by the heating and air conditioning company. This suggests that hundreds will still lose their jobs at the factory, where roughly 1,400 workers were slated to be laid off.

Also, neither Trump nor Carrier has yet to say what the workers might have to give up or precisely what threats or incentives were used to get the manufacturer to change its mind.

...

Carrier said in a statement that more than 1,000 jobs were saved, though that figure includes headquarters and engineering staff that were likely to stay in Indiana.

frogbs, Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

@iaivanova
The guy who'll be running Treasury foreclosed on a 90-yo woman's home over a 27-cent error

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-treasury-foreclosed-homes-mnuchin-232038

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

well at least Trump didn't get payed to make speeches at this guy's banks

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

well, trump said he'd run the country like a business - looks like he's committed to delivering on that promise!

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

While consumer advocates fight OneWest in the trenches, some inside the Beltway see a glimmer of hope in Mnuchin, an expert in mortgage bonds and structured finance. They say he has the technical know-how to fix mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a job Congress and the Obama administration have avoided.

i.e. the fix is in

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/JonathanMerritt/status/804310057424928768

― k3vin k.

this is my mom's book club, minus the person there who tries to explain that they believe in an an unsubstantiated lie

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

sorry if this has been mentioned already but lost in the chaos of the last few days is that trump apparently offered fucking jerry falwell jr the secretary of education position

http://religionnews.com/2016/11/28/why-jerry-falwell-jr-says-he-turned-down-trumps-cabinet-position/

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

No mentions of Elaine Chao being tapped for Transportation?

@MarkHalperin
Why is it Elaine Chao's spouse is mentioned in many news stories abt her, but she is almost never mentioned in stories abt her spouse?

@dick_nixon
It is almost as though the press knows something about their private life.

hehehe

(much as i don't like Open Secret McConnell images it conjures up)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

I find it hard to believe that Trump actually extended him an offer, I figured discussions with him were more of a signal to the evangelicals than a serious consideration.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

xp the much more obvious answer is that women, even famous and powerful ones, are more often defined by their relationships to the men in their lives than vice versa. (cf. Greenspan and Mitchell)

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

shadow president pence

maura, Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

and also that she's a beard

xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

Both of these things can be true.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

I'm worried about most of his picks so far, should I be concerned about Chao? Like should I be telling my senators to oppose her? I know she was secretary of labor under bush and previously deputy secretary of transportation. I know she's from some huge shipping family. She probably sucks as much as any republican, trying to figure out whether she sucks in some special way beyond that.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

The mine disaster.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

has anyone made the 'the invisible hand of the market has tiny fingers' joke yet bc I did

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 December 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

YES

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

https://www.balloon-juice.com/2016/12/01/thursday-morning-open-thread-peotus-trump-fraud-in-chief/

Our system isn't one.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Update: Since someone on Twitter asked, the other four people to get under 50 percent in each contest were John McCain (2008), Michael Dukakis (1988), Walter Mondale (1984) and George McGovern (1972).

El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

"Looks like the Washington Post may have decided the nation needs a Paper of Opposition, since the NYTimes is determined to control the Kneepads Brigade."

oh ffs

flappy bird, Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

balloon juice is a great name for anything though

flappy bird, Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

some peoples shoulders are v prone to chipping huh

identity politics rooted in tolkienism (darraghmac), Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

The Shoulderchips Brigade

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

josh marshall has been writing a lot about the possibility of medicare phaseout, this post was interesting and highlights some of the difficulties the GOP will encounter in trying to phase out both medicare and ACA: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/why-are-gops-now-asking-dems-for-helping-killing-obamacare-and-medicare

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 1 December 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

i have trouble understanding their motivations for wanting to kill medicare and social security, even at great political cost. clearly a subset of republicans want to do it. but why? is it just pure ideology - they oppose the idea of a federal govt, SS/medicare are successful and popular federal programs and contribute to a perception that the federal government can provide basic essential services, therefore they have to go?

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

they want to kill poor people

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

no point in sugar coating things imo

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Esp. black ones (xp)

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Alan Grayson tom

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

otm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

eh it's just that they want more business for the private sector. making peoples lives worse is incidental but not a dealbreaker

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

That's the economic motivation; the rest is psychological. I've heard it said too many times from conservative relatives that it's your fault if you don't find a job w/insurance.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

The underlying assumption seems to be that a private-sector thing is always and everywhere better than a public-sector thing.

Government employees never do anything right, you see! And they have no incentive to do anything right because they're impossible to fire. People who work for _real_ businesses have to be competent, because if they aren't, they get fired.

Never mind that none of the above is correct - I've seen plenty of mind-boggling inefficiency, redundancy, and petty tyranny in private-sector companies of all sizes. Government employees abolished slavery, defeated Hitler, built the Interstates, and landed on the motherfucking moon. Then there's everything they've done to safeguard your health, beat diseases, ensure you have safer food, cleaner air and water...

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

Government employees abolished slavery, defeated Hitler, built the Interstates, and landed on the motherfucking moon. Then there's everything they've done to safeguard your health, beat diseases, ensure you have safer food, cleaner air and water...

yeah, but imagine if the employees of GloboCorp could have taken those things on instead. the civil war would have been finished in 2 years, at a quarter of the cost, Stalin and Mao would have perished along with Hitler after issuing public apologies, the interstates would have extra lanes, and the moon would be a gas station on the way to alpha centauri.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

Government employees never do anything right, you see! And they have no incentive to do anything right because they're impossible to fire. People who work for _real_ businesses have to be competent, because if they aren't, they get fired. omg heard a guy on the train this morning say the same exact thing becasue the train was running about 10 mins late. must have been all those government workers just taking their breaks on the tracks .

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

tbf i heard many government employees make the same argument themselves.

if only amtrak was run like model corporation megabus, where the buses are always on time and there's always someone on hand to let you know which line to stand in.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

The only thing that makes the private sector good at ANYTHING is competition. Government services that are monopolies anyway are not going to be run better just because they're suddenly in the hands of someone taking a profit.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

The biggest problem with that standpoint isn't 'private corps will do it more efficiently' it's whether efficiency is the proper metric, especially when it's code for 'profitability.' I don't want prisons or transit or Medicare to be judged by efficiency; they should be evaluated by their contribution to the public good.

I know it's a trenchant argument, but I'm surprised how often it's overlooked.

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

Like I don't think there's a single profitable public transit system in the world. Hence the name.

the ilx meme is critical of that line of thought (lion in winter), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

The only thing that makes the private sector good at ANYTHING is competition. Government services that are monopolies anyway are not going to be run better just because they're suddenly in the hands of someone taking a profit.

Did Thatcher and Reagan fight and die in vain?

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

we can only hope

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

oops: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXWVpcypf0w

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

Like I think you see some of the worst imaginable abuses in situations where the govt just takes some monopoly service (e.g. prisons) and hands it over to one or two corporations. You still have the monopoly and the lack of incentive to do anything well, but with less oversight or concern.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

The private sector often does *efficiency* better than the government, because that's one of the ways it earns profit. But the benefit of every service can't be boiled down to *efficiency.* Sometimes efficiency is even antithetical to the benefit.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump
‏@realdonaldtrump
McCartney is responsible for something like 5,000 suicides every Christmas due to "Wonderful Christmastime." Ask him about it.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 December 2016 19:56 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/804407177368715265

just posting this to get it out of the way

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

it feels exhausting to blame jill stein or other third party candidates at this point

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

the blamefest in general is exhausting

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

mhm

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

people who still vote 3rd party in swing states are probably beyond reasoning w/ anyway

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, as I've been saying on that point -- she had a pretty bad showing as a third-party candidate, you're not going to get a much weaker one than that. So, assuming this is all her fault, your options are:
1) Ban third party candidates
2) browbeat the candidates and or their supporters even harder, hoping you will finally make it so that no one runs and/or no one votes for them
3) Come up with a better campaign strategy so that someone with like 20k votes in a swing state doesn't cause you to lose

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah and what iatee said. If you want to bang your head against a wall, spend it on the registered dem trump supporter -- they're worth twice as much as the stein supporter!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

(a vote lost for Trump plus a vote gained for Clinton)

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

sry for weird metaphor, spending banging your head makes no sense

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

banning 3rd party candidates wouldn't be a terrible idea. the problem is that we have what is in practice a runoff voting system, but a few people just don't understand that and given room to pretend otherwise. bernie and trump were the real '3rd party candidates', sanders and johnson were just ways to express that you decided not to vote.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

and *are given room

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

and ugh 'sanders and johnson' should be 'stein and johnson'

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

fwiw, the one thing I liked in the Stein interview I listened to was that she advocated ranked or instant runoff voting.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

jill stein advocates changes to help save us from jill stein, basically

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

lol true

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

obvs you still have the problem of how many of those people would have gone Clinton. PA in particular seems pretty unlikely - you'd need nearly all of her voters to go Clinton rather than another candidate or stay home.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

the weird thing about this election is that similar to brexit I think, if you had a repeat election 3 days later, I think the outcome would have been reversed. not all of those stein voters would go clinton, but many would and more importantly I imagine a lot of lethargic voters would have shown up. plus I bet there were some trump voters who were just trying to make a statement.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

people love to have someone or something concrete and simple to blame, particularly when it can be tied into a moral failure on the part of voters (an extension of the "personal responsibility" ethos they've internalized from conservative talking points) xp

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

yeah. I think Brexit helped convince me to vote Clinton in a solidly blue state. Did not want to contribute to a "surprise." It also helped that the greens seem so flaky and useless.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

people love to have someone or something concrete and simple to blame, particularly when it can be tied into a moral failure on the part of voters (an extension of the "personal responsibility" ethos they've internalized from conservative talking points) xp

― k3vin k., Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:45 PM (forty-eight seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sure, and it also means you don't have to do the hard work of thinking about what to do differently

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

banning 3rd party candidates wouldn't be a terrible idea

Dem blamefesters are seldom this forthright!

They will never give up on Nadercursing, and that's been 16 years. Wait til they insist All Good People vote for Cuomo or Booker in 2020.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

my my, how can any citizen of a democracy possibly find fault with either of our diametrically-opposed-in-all-things parties

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

Banning third party would have had the opposite effect in this election and would have given Trump a bigger win; Gary Johnson with 1.4M votes peeled way more votes off Trump than Stein with 0.4M did off Clinton, even under very conservative assumptions about how many Libertarian would not have voted for Trump (in which case you would have to make the opposite assumption about Stein: that every Stein voter would have voted for Clinton)

flopson, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

In complete befuddlement I find myself agreeing with Morbius. Banning third parties because your team lost is not only nagl, it's undemocratic. Have your team do better next time.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

The good news is that we may not have much longer to worry about whether something is undemocratic:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/americas/western-liberal-democracy.html

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

the weird thing about this election is that similar to brexit I think, if you had a repeat election 3 days later, I think the outcome would have been reversed. not all of those stein voters would go clinton, but many would and more importantly I imagine a lot of lethargic voters would have shown up. plus I bet there were some trump voters who were just trying to make a statement.

― iatee, Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:42 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, I think making a big spectacle of how much she was owning him in the polls may have hurt turnout. if it had seemed closer, people would have had to more seriously consider what Trump POTUS would feel like, rather than having it both ways (cozy in moral superiority for not having had to vote for Crooked Hillary but also not having to live under Trump)

flopson, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

Venezuela, for instance, enjoyed the highest possible scores on Freedom House’s measures of political rights and democracy in the 1980s.

Ok, sorry, disqualified.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

my my, how can any citizen of a democracy possibly find fault with either of our diametrically-opposed-in-all-things parties

the point is that our parties are very weak structures. they don't mean anything, they certainly don't believe in anything, and they barely control anything. they are just brand names that help voters figure out which candidate is more right wing and which candidate is more left wing. jill stein, the human being, could have ran as a democrat. nobody would have stopped her. and if her message were popular enough, she would have got the nomination, similar to trump. sanders came close.

instead she decided to pretend like our political system is actually a different country's political system. we give her, and people like you, the option to play make believe. I'm not sure that really benefits anyone.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

In complete befuddlement I find myself agreeing with Morbius. Banning third parties because your team lost is not only nagl, it's undemocratic. Have your team do better next time.

plenty of places have runoff voting. they are not 'undemocratic' just because they prevent all the other guys from running in the 2nd round. we have what is in practice runoff voting, it just isn't formally structured that way.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

Clinton voters engaged in all sorts of Make Believe.

You know what all my post-Mondale prez votes have been? This: "FUCK YOUUUUU." Nothing more or less.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

the Mondale vote was "FUCK MEEEEE"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

A large chunk of the electorate in this country don't vote "wings," they just eat em. They vote "Time to shake things up or not."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

Banning third party would have had the opposite effect in this election and would have given Trump a bigger win; Gary Johnson with 1.4M votes peeled way more votes off Trump than Stein with 0.4M did off Clinton, even under very conservative assumptions about how many Libertarian would not have voted for Trump (in which case you would have to make the opposite assumption about Stein: that every Stein voter would have voted for Clinton)

idk it seems conceivable that a lot of johnson voters were disgusted by trump and johnson offered them a way to not actually have to vote for clinton, despite preferring that outcome. and it's not like trump appealed to the 'true libertarian' crowd either, he's pushing the party wildly in the opposite direction. I haven't seen any numbers on this though.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

lol stop, the most plausible explanation is clearly flopson's

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

The good news is that we may not have much longer to worry about whether something is undemocratic:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/americas/western-liberal-democracy.html

oh i have the perfect thread to bump w this

Mordy, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

plenty of places have runoff voting. they are not 'undemocratic' just because they prevent all the other guys from running in the 2nd round. we have what is in practice runoff voting, it just isn't formally structured that way.

― iatee, Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:58 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Not the same though. If in a first round this would have been the result, many Stein voters could have changed their vote in the second round. People who didn't vote could have voted anyway in the second round if they wanted to prevent Trump becoming president. Completely different dynamic in the race.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

xps iatee- some of the Libertarians would have voted for Clinton, others would have not voted, still others would have voted for Trump. And not all Stein voters would have voted for Clinton. It's not impossible but difficult to split all those up in a way that gives Clinton more votes

Having said that I still don't think they should let third parties run in what's essentially a run-off election. It's like a tax on the votes of the innumerate

flopson, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

lol stop, the most plausible explanation is clearly flopson's

not seeing any post-election numbers, but:
http://www.people-press.org/2016/08/18/1-voters-general-election-preferences/

Gary Johnson is currently backed by 10% of all registered voters in a four-way race. When asked their preference in a two-way race, Johnson backers split evenly: 43% say they would support Clinton in a two-way contest, while 42% would favor Trump.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

"We're losing a lot of people because of the Internet," Trump said. "We have to go see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that Internet up in some way. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people. We have a lot of foolish people."

this stupid fuck

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

The Electoral College, the over/under-representation of some states seem like much bigger issues with the American system than third parties running, too. The fact that Clinton got 2.5m more votes, to me (abroad) that seems bonkers. But presto, that's your system. I'd be more worried about that though. That not every vote counts as equal.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

Not the same though. If in a first round this would have been the result, many Stein voters could have changed their vote in the second round. People who didn't vote could have voted anyway in the second round if they wanted to prevent Trump becoming president. Completely different dynamic in the race.

no, the dynamic is exactly the same. there was a first round election that included sanders, clinton, trump and multiple right-wing candidates. clinton and trump won that first round. the general election *is* the second round, and anyone who wanted to prevent trump from being president was given that option.

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

"We're losing a lot of people because of the Internet," Trump said. "We have to go see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that Internet up in some way. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people. We have a lot of foolish people."
this stupid fuck

― I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, December 1, 2016 4:12 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

where did that quote come from?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

unless you live in a solid red or blue state where yer vote don't mean shit

xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

ugh sorry i really have to get better about checking dates on things that show up in my feeds, he said it a year ago http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/08/technology/donald-trump-internet/index.html

still it is an astonishingly stupid statement

xp

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

some speech he did around this time last year xp

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

no, the dynamic is exactly the same. there was a first round election that included sanders, clinton, trump and multiple right-wing candidates. clinton and trump won that first round. the general election *is* the second round, and anyone who wanted to prevent trump from being president was given that option.

― iatee, Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:13 PM (forty-two seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That 'first round' was an already established Dem candidate with a multitude or Gop candidates. That's not a 'first round'. Compare it to France: everyone (dems, gop, yr nazi part, greens etc) enters in the first round. The biggest two go to round two. If you'd have that system youd have seen how much support Trump actually got, shocking the nation, but with still a second round to come.
It doesn't matter, you don't have that system, but because the results of the first round are made public, that creates a different dynamic for the second, final round (i.e. In France socialists voting for a conservative because the far right candidate is even worse etc)

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

Wait til they insist All Good People vote for Cuomo or Booker in 2020.

I know this is gonna piss Morbz off but I would welcome the election of Cuomo, Booker, Sanders, Warren, Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, or Hillary Clinton as President with unmixed enthusiasm

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

If Trump was talking about closing the propaganda sites that helped him get elected and the foolish people who voted for him, I couldn't agree more!

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

yes, eephus, the race to the bottom.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

were all of the candidates to run in a first round, trump's win % would be a soft plurality. it would not be any more of a signal to the nation of how much support he would garner than a signal such as 'THE DUDE WON THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION' xp

iatee, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

I'll grant you that

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

Trevor Noah sucks. Smug fuck. This is why I hate the daily show

flappy bird, Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

People are politically illiterate and don't know what they want in a candidate. This, more than the primary process, is why we ended up with two people who were widely hated.

Treeship, Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

some americans are also functionally illiterate

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

NYTimes in fine both sides do it mode

Trump’s Carrier Deal: Giveaway or New Model to Save Jobs?
By NELSON D. SCHWARTZ 1:13 PM ET

Since the deal to save 1,000 jobs was disclosed, critics have pounced on Carrier’s receipt of $700,000 a year in incentives from the state of Indiana.

Others called Donald J. Trump’s effort a new path to economic growth.

'Others' being trump administration officials and their various water carriers?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:26 (seven years ago) link

All the electoral reform in the world won't make up for the fact that people were dumb enough to believe clinton was mixed up in some sort of pizza sex ring of
whatever the fuck that was. The most promising idea now is keith ellison's emphasis on local politics, building civic engagement in communities. Anomie is the main reason Trump won.

Treeship, Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

it's going to be pretty tiring if we pounce on every little phrase from the NYT for the next 8 years that's not sufficiently critical of trump

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:32 (seven years ago) link

FYI, Nelson Schwartz was the name on the byline of the asslicking NYT article about Trump from the other day. Don't know the dude but looks like he's a schmuck worth keeping an eye on.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

I kinda don't care if this has already been posted because it can't possibly be posted enough

https://trumpgrets.tumblr.com/?og=1

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

at least they're paying attention

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

Are those generated by AI?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

Not this one, at least, Josh.

https://twitter.com/rpachevurova/status/801490280671281152

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 1 December 2016 23:51 (seven years ago) link

i'm honestly a little confused about this whole carrier thing. how can trump, the president-elect (i.e., he does not hold political office) make a deal with a company that saves several hundred jobs in exchange for state tax breaks? like, what power does he (or anyone?) have to bring that about?

k3vin k., Friday, 2 December 2016 00:17 (seven years ago) link

Pence made the deal. Theyre in indiana, hes still governor

Treeship, Friday, 2 December 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

i guess i know very little about how state politics works. the governor can unilaterally lower taxes on a particular company? that doesn't like, require the legislature?

k3vin k., Friday, 2 December 2016 00:20 (seven years ago) link

like pence had previously done earlier and carrier told him to fuck off..

what I dont get is the threat of withholding contracts from carrier's parent company wasnt enough to 'save the jobs' alone? had to throw in some corporate welfare in exchange for good pr? art of the deal indeed.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 December 2016 00:57 (seven years ago) link

there you go

https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/804407177368715265

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 December 2016 01:04 (seven years ago) link

read the 60 posts above yours, shakes

k3vin k., Friday, 2 December 2016 01:11 (seven years ago) link

fucking hell i wish i could unsee that jim bakker video

a but (brimstead), Friday, 2 December 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

Haha oops

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 December 2016 01:21 (seven years ago) link

so can Jill gift her votes to HRC? That seems likely

El Tomboto, Friday, 2 December 2016 02:10 (seven years ago) link

omg the ultimate Dem wet dream, appropriation of all votes to the left of the Wall St Journal ed page

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 03:51 (seven years ago) link

Carrier is still shipping most of their jobs away. They just compromised because 1.) they were paid and 2.) the attention this circus brought to them made them lool bad

Treeship, Friday, 2 December 2016 03:59 (seven years ago) link

It's so meaningless

Treeship, Friday, 2 December 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

smoke n' mirrors, special effects

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 04:01 (seven years ago) link

briefly unretiring from lurking again to post something else potentially insightful conveyed elsewhere on the intertubes. ta ta!

Anyway as someone living in the festering 7th district of MO, I can tell you there is no reason to try to appeal to the Trumpers who were chanting "Lock her up" for the last six months. Trump was right about one thing: he really could have shot someone on 5th Avenue and not lost any votes. I think Hillary could have gone to bumfuck, Alabama, and said "Fuck all you sister-fuckers" and it wouldn't have lost her any votes either. This country has just about hit peak polarization; the only difference is which side is going to turn out more to "stick it" to the other. Clearly the Bernie or Busters/Jill Steiners of the liberal base made their decision, or maybe it was people not showing up to vote because they thought the demographic shift made it a sure thing, or maybe because it wasn't the first black president running for office. Whatever, all we know is the only voters that matter are the ones that turn out. It's a hard lesson, but after four years of Republicans dismantling everything Obama accomplished maybe it will sink in. Sucks for us; really sucks for Obama, but maybe we can turn it around and focus on getting out the vote for 2018? Or maybe just go back to protesting and bitching on Facebook instead...

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 2 December 2016 05:26 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you should confuse the 40% of worst savages we knew were going to vote for him no matter what with the other 6.5% who decided because of Comey/etc. or the significant percentage vs. 2008/12 who just didn't turn out.

Given that we fought an actual Civil War over chattel slavery, not sure we can talk about peak polarization. Even compared to other modern elections, I would guess that the percentage of party-hopping voters isn't all that different, it's just that most of them were white and there are relatively fewer white people now.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 2 December 2016 05:37 (seven years ago) link

As hard as the GOP will work to violate voting rights, this isn't the first time they've had all three branches to undermine them - Bush had four and a half years of it. Obama still won in 2008.

Clearly the Bernie or Busters/Jill Steiners of the liberal base made their decision, or maybe it was people not showing up to vote because they thought the demographic shift made it a sure thing, or maybe because it wasn't the first black president running for office.

Trump is sitting at ~1.7mn more votes than Romney 2012, with Johnson taking 3.2mn more than he did in 2012. That's a far larger swing than Stein 2012/16 (1mn).

I'm pretty sure 99% of ILX who didn't back her from the start voted for her (I did, even in a state where it didn't matter), but maybe instead of complaining about people who voted for Stein or stayed home it's time to accept that she was a deeply flawed candidate who lost once as the anointed favorite and had a strong challenge from an elderly Jewish socialist who sounds like one of the interviews from 'Reds.'

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 2 December 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

or the significant percentage vs. 2008/12 who just didn't turn out.

135.5 million votes have been counted for 2016, vs 129 million in 2012

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/133Eb4qQmOxNvtesw2hdVns073R68EZx4SfCnP4IGQf8/htmlview?sle=true#gid=19

Karl Malone, Friday, 2 December 2016 05:51 (seven years ago) link

friend sent me some minor schadenfreude:
https://www.reddit.com/user/coolguy_420

The way he's trying to convince himself that Trump isn't going to fuck with his weed is hilarious.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 2 December 2016 06:08 (seven years ago) link

also https://trumpgrets.tumblr.com/

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 2 December 2016 06:11 (seven years ago) link

this made the rounds yet?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/01/us/politics/trumps-off-the-cuff-remarks-to-world-leaders-leave-diplomats-aghast.html

Mr. Trump’s conversation with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan has generated the most angst, because, as Mr. Earnest put it, the relationship between Mr. Sharif’s country and the United States is “quite complicated,” with disputes over issues ranging from counterterrorism to nuclear proliferation. In a remarkably candid readout of the phone call, the Pakistani government said Mr. Trump had told Mr. Sharif that he was “a terrific guy” who made him feel as though “I’m talking to a person I have known for long.” He described Pakistanis as “one of the most intelligent people.” When Mr. Sharif invited him to visit Pakistan, the president-elect replied that he would “love to come to a fantastic country, fantastic place of fantastic people.”

The Trump transition office, in its more circumspect readout, said only that Mr. Trump and Mr. Sharif “had a productive conversation about how the United States and Pakistan will have a strong working relationship in the future.” It did not confirm or deny the Pakistani account of Mr. Trump’s remarks.

The breezy tone of the readout left diplomats in Washington slack-jawed, with some initially assuming it was a parody. In particular, they zeroed in on Mr. Trump’s offer to Mr. Sharif “to play any role you want me to play to address and find solutions to the country’s problems.” That was interpreted by some in India as an offer by the United States to mediate Pakistan’s border dispute with India in Kashmir, something that the Pakistanis have long sought and that India has long resisted.

“By taking such a cavalier attitude to these calls, he’s encouraging people not to take him seriously,” said Daniel F. Feldman, a former special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan. “He’s made himself not only a bull in a china shop, but a bull in a nuclear china shop.”

Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistani ambassador to Washington, said his government’s decision to release a rough transcript of Mr. Trump’s remarks was a breach of protocol that demonstrated how easily Pakistani leaders misread signals from their American counterparts. “Pakistan is one country where knowing history and details matters most,” Mr. Haqqani said, “and where the U.S. cannot afford to give wrong signals, given the history of misunderstandings.”

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Friday, 2 December 2016 06:35 (seven years ago) link

And still well over a month until he even takes office! Git r dun!

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

The bumbling boy king schtick is an act.

Treeship, Friday, 2 December 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

He speaks carelessly and debases the integrity of words - his own and others - bc it lets him get away with stuff. He didnt talk to the prime minister like that bc he is naive and thinks pakistanis are "terrific." There was some other reason. His aims cannot be assumed to coincide with US national interest.

Treeship, Friday, 2 December 2016 14:06 (seven years ago) link

also https://trumpgrets.tumblr.com/

seriously fuck everyone who ends up on this site, you idiots knew this "master persuader" was constantly lying and bullshitting about literally everything, anyone who feels "betrayed" by Trump has zero critical thinking skills whatsoever

frogbs, Friday, 2 December 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

I take some small comfort in that site, I hope there are a lot of those people and they stay mad/disenchanted.

Not all of those are from Trump voters. See, for example, Carl Reiner's tweet.

how's life, Friday, 2 December 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

I feel so betrayed that this guy is continuing to be the same person he's publicly shown himself to be for his entire adult life. I thought for sure giving more power to a power-hungry narcissist would humble him, where did we go wrong.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

In my more pessimistic moments, I see the rising tide of populism as the collective unconsciousness acknowledging that humankind has pretty much run its course and needs to do what it can to hasten its own end.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

she was a deeply flawed candidate

So Republicans largely unite for their deeply flawed candidate, but Dems(broadly defined) do not

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

Honestly it seems like democrats did unite behind their flawed candidate. Vote totals are increasingly suggesting that the "low turnout" story was exaggerated based on early results. Third party showing was not that impressive. And Trump's margin in the states that won him the election was TINY.

republicans were just motivated after 8 years of democratic WH to come out and vote for their guy - that's why it's so hard to win 3 terms in a row

Mordy, Friday, 2 December 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

I have to say, when I predicted that Trump would continue to hold rallies after the election, the context I had in mind was a little more laughable and easy to dismiss.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

xp not so sure about that Mordy. Don't think you'd see the same electoral map with a Rubio or Cruz, regardless of who would have won.

Trump brought out a lot of non-regular voters and probably turned off some regular voting republicans.

so Trump is sitting at ~1.7mn more votes than Romney 2012 according to Milo Z, and Clinton how many less than Obama-- 5 million?

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

x-post-- is there data that supports that Man Alive... I keep reading that regular voting Republicans all came home or stayed there and voted for him (turned off or not)

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

lol

johnny crunch, Friday, 2 December 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

Have done that before, on more than one occasion. I mean fuck wearing neckties imo, but if you do, you will have to do that at some point.

how's life, Friday, 2 December 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

they make these things called tie clips/bars.

evol j, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

I think local elections are going to become more and more important, especially given the GOP creep at governor level. Even here, one of the bluest of the blue states and the only state it seems to successfully replace a sitting GOP senator with a dem, we somehow still have an asshole GOP governor who is fucking with everyone. But of course, if you think turnout is terrible or disappointing on a national level, things look ever worse locally.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

Third party showing was not that impressive--man alive

Stein's votes (no matter how few) in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania exceed the margins that Trump won by in those states.

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

He wouldn't have to do that if he'd stop wearing his tie so that it hangs all the way down to his balls.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 2 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

they make these things called tie clips/bars.

^^^

scotch tape is just some cheap slipshod shit

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

Trump tie tapegate = perfect liberal bait. Don't take the bait.

assuming that all of those Stein votes would have gone to HRC seems like a fundamental misunderstanding of 3rd party voter psychology.

sleeve, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

Stein's votes (no matter how few) in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania exceed the margins that Trump won by in those states.

― curmudgeon, Friday, December 2, 2016 11:20 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Double-check the math on Pennsylvania?

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Friday, 2 December 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

latest data I saw showed T winning by only 46 thou there in PA, with Stein getting 49 thousand votes. Early counts showed him with a much larger margin

Its hard to know which voting total data is accurate, as they are still counting votes

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

yes, but did the Stein votes outnumber those from pale Hillary voter-slugs grown from stem cells in basement of Solyndra offices?

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 2 December 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

still thinking about that Gawker article about Trump's hair and how he basically moved the clinic maintaining it right next door to him at Trump Tower

somehow I suspect THAT is the true reason he seems so reluctant to live in the White House full time? I mean that's the dumbest possible explanation but wasting tens of millions of taxpayer dollars so he can maintain his clownish haircut is totally a Trump move

frogbs, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

come on now, the White House is a dump

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 2 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

Trump probably doesn't want to live where black people lived, honestly

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

so you do not believe he "really really liked" Obama then

even tho he's leaving him a great Perpetual War machine

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

I don't believe anything he says

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

OTM. Trump's words have value only to the extent that they reveal his pathology.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

Billy Bush tape is the only time he's ever sounded genuine to me

frogbs, Friday, 2 December 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

i thought to the degree that Obama told him at the WH meeting something like "i will try to keep you from shitting the bed the day you get here," he was grateful.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

I'll never forget about a week ago I was watching the nightly news—I won't say which one because I don't want to give them credit because I don't like them much. I'll be honest, I don't like them, not even a little bit. But they were doing a story on Carrier and I say, “Wow, that's something, I want to see that.” And they had a gentleman worker, great guy, handsome guy, he was on, and it was like he didn't even know they were leaving. He said something to the effect, “No, we're not leaving because Donald Trump promised us that we're not leaving.” And I never thought I made that promise; not with Carrier—I made it for everybody else. I didn't make it really for Carrier, and I said, “What's he saying?”

He was such a believer, he was such a great guy. He said, “I've been with Donald Trump from the beginning and he made the statement that Carrier's not going anywhere, they're not leaving.” And I'm saying to myself, man. And then they played my statement, and I said, “Carrier will never leave.” But that was a euphemism. I was talking about Carrier like all other companies from here on in because they made the decision a year and a half ago. But he believed that that was—and I could understand it; I actually said [it]—when they played that I said I did make it but I didn't mean it quite that way. So now because of him, whoever that guy was, is he in the room, by any chance? That's your son? Stand up, you did a good job. … Well, your son is great.

Mordy, Friday, 2 December 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

I...don't know what to do with that. Except hope that there's a clip of Trump promising to commit suicide which one of his supporters will remind him of in a CNN interview.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:18 (seven years ago) link

I hope he dies of a euphemism.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 December 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

that's a really good graph.

i wish there were versions for the 2012/08/04/00 elections, just for comparison

Karl Malone, Friday, 2 December 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

the articles about the failed gop candidates screaming at jeff zucker for cnn's garbage ass coverage at the first day of the harvard election post mortem conference are kinda awesome

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

That graph is an accurate representation of my endorphin levels since Nov. 8.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

i don't get the news coverage 'issue'. We all know the freakshow gets the attention in postliterate America. The election threads here all spring and summer were 95% about Trump.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

I felt zero feelings for CNN when I heard about them getting yelled at by Trump in a room. Such a worthless network.

seriously fuck everyone who ends up on this site, you idiots knew this "master persuader" was constantly lying and bullshitting about literally everything, anyone who feels "betrayed" by Trump has zero critical thinking skills whatsoever

― frogbs

clinton decisively lost the "amoral idiot" vote. now, in one sense it is depressing, though slightly obvious, to realize that the majority of "undecided" voters are in fact amoral idiots. on the other hand, this makes recovery, in an electoral sense, reasonably straightforward. quit nominating profoundly uncharismatic candidates for president, quit pretending that you can possibly engage these voters on things like "the issues" and "the economy", realize that the people on your side of the fence will vote for your candidate _no matter what_, and the democratic party should theoretically be able to reliably put their candidate in the white house.

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 2 December 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

Millenials, you're supposedly less nihilist and faith addled than past generations. We're depending on you.

Sanpaku, Friday, 2 December 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

But can they find the perfect charismatic candidate...

Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook also acknowledged that her operation had made a number of mistakes and miscalculations, while being buffeted by what he repeatedly described as a “head wind” of being an establishment candidate in a season where voters were eager for change.

He noted, for example, that younger voters, perhaps assuming that Clinton was going to win, migrated to third-party candidates in the final days of the race.

Where the campaign needed to win upward of 60 percent of young voters, it was able to garner something “in the high 50s at the end of the day,” Mook said. “That’s why we lost.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/shouting-match-erupts-between-clinton-and-trump-aides/2016/12/01/7ac4398e-b7ea-11e6-b8df-600bd9d38a02_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_election750p%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.abdd02344e61

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Evan_McMullin/status/804743163663552513

Part of me thinks that Trump actually doesn't remember McMullin's name, or never learned it.

Anyway, I'm not sure if McMullin has done anything other than tweet criticism since the election, but if he's the most prominent conservative opposition voice, we are in trouble.

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Friday, 2 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

barf

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 2 December 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

I hope Mook is getting laid.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 December 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

I wouldn't be upset if really bad things happened to Kellyanne Conway

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 December 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

yeah 4 years of dealing w/ his scumbag opportunist crew and family is almost as dreadful as 4 years of dealing with the man himself

iatee, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

“This is the problem with the media. You guys took everything that Donald Trump said so literally,” Lewandowski said. “The American people didn’t. They understood it. They understood that sometimes — when you have a conversation with people, whether it’s around the dinner table or at a bar — you’re going to say things, and sometimes you don’t have all the facts to back it up.”

jmm, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

yes yes now imagine all those people at the bar are your boss and are making decisions that will impact you and your family's livelihood

frogbs, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

^^ most wtf part of that wtf story xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

nah I get what he means -- Trump is blustery and a lot of his supporters get that he's blustery. They enjoy it. It's pro-wrestling.

yeah I get it too, like he didn't *really* implore Russia to hack Hillary Clinton, even if he *literally* did

what I don't get is why people thought this was acceptable from a future President, one of the few people on the planet whose decisions and words actually do matter

frogbs, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

nothing really matters to nihilists

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Very koan-esque 'eats shoots & leaves' sentence there, Shakey.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

i was talking to a friend yesterday and said "i can't believe we elected a reality tv personality to be president" and he said "really? i do. it makes total sense." none of this stuff is surprising. and yes bernie would've won because politics is always about character & language

flappy bird, Friday, 2 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

Kinda begs the 'would you kill baby Hitler?' question wrt Mark Burnett.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

trump would also pull shit like say something nuts ("obama founded isis"), media reports it, then deny it ("I was just kidding!") then repeat the same fucking nonsense again and say no, he meant it literally ("no I literally meant obama founded isis")

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

the whole "OMG postmodern president" thing is a little bit ahistorical. President of the United States has been a television role for a long time now, not to mention that we had Reagan over 30 years ago.

1940s Warner Bros vs Wrestlemania

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

So that Newsweek writer whose name I forget, keeps harping on the primary votes where
Clinton won 16.8 million votes to 13.2 million for Sanders, to assert that it is not so clear that Bernie would have done better than Clinton in the general election. He seems to be overlooking various factors for that.

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:22 (seven years ago) link

there were also other good candidates that got 0 votes because they were told not to run so that clinton could get her turn

ciderpress, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

1940s Warner Bros vs Wrestlemania

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, December 2, 2016 3:20 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, I mean if anything is truly "postmodern" it's that we have multiple generations of people now completely engulfed by television and movies to the point that our competing ideas of "normal" are just based on different eras/types of movies and tv.

Foghorn Leghorn and Yosemite Sam fit in both.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

nobody even remembers senator claghorn anymore

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

i say, i say, son

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

(i know who Fred Allen was)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

"there were also other good candidates that got 0 votes because they were told not to run so that clinton could get her turn"

such as? seriously, I'm curious what other contenders the Dems even had this time out. I can't think of any aside from Warren and Biden.

akm, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

I still think is the best election overview, if I haven't posted it.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 2 December 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

xp it was Warren, according to someone I know who worked w/her on the TARP bailout

sleeve, Friday, 2 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

i think it's probably OK that Elizabeth Warren remains in the Senate for the time being. she might make a fine candidate at some point but having strong dem voices in the legislature is important

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

if warren would have run, she likely would have won the nomination and would now be president

she didn't not run 'so that clinton could get her turn', she didn't run because *that was definitely not apparent at the time*

iatee, Friday, 2 December 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

hey all I'm saying is that someone who worked on her staff told me that Warren was specifically told not to run, whether by HRC or DNC I dunno, not verified, just hearsay

sleeve, Friday, 2 December 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

'told' is probably the wrong verb here - she doesn't have a boss. I am sure lots of high level democrats individually advised her against running because it seemed at the time like it would be a lost cause.

iatee, Friday, 2 December 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

yeah "asked" is prob better - friend also pointed out that she's not as much of a rogue element as Sanders, and heeded the requests out of courtesy

sleeve, Friday, 2 December 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

there's no way of knowing what kind of national-campaign politician EW would have been. P4reene made this point in the spring.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

winning elections are not a slamdunk just bcz you're smart and coherent

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

morbz otm here

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

who the fuck knows what wouldve happened

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

I'm a big Warren fan but after Dukakis and Kerry (and Romney), a Massachusetts politician did not seem like a slam dunk winner at all.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

she might make a fine candidate at some point

she is going to be 71 at the time of the next circus.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

can we get Elizabeth II to run

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

warren's from oklahoma. she might have been adopted by the state and is a MA senator, but she's nowhere comparable to being a native like kerry or dukakis. she grew up in the realest of 'real america'.

iatee, Friday, 2 December 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

Trump wd've yelled "Pocahontas" for 6 months and perhaps won

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

not sure if anyone posted this P4reene devil's-advocate piece that shoots down the Dem laments

http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-to-talk-to-your-shithead-liberal-nephew-over-the-ho-1789319216

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

WI judge rejects stoppage of recount

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

I saw reports of people working the recount griping that this was taking place 'during the holidays' yet the recount has to be done and the vote certified by 12/13

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 December 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

So why is Trump, Inc., trying to stop the recounts? Gotta admit, not a good look to claim the election is rigged, win anyway, re-insist it's rigged and that there was fraud, and then sue to stop recounts.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 December 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

Trump does and says what he wants without any regard to consistency, logic or common sense. Get used to it, I guess.

Trump doesn't care about nagl.

silverfish, Friday, 2 December 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

"there were also other good candidates that got 0 votes because they were told not to run so that clinton could get her turn"

such as? seriously, I'm curious what other contenders the Dems even had this time out. I can't think of any aside from Warren and Biden.

― akm, Friday, December 2, 2016 3:43 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

those are the 2 i had in mind

ciderpress, Friday, 2 December 2016 22:21 (seven years ago) link

so, Exxon for Sec of State?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-anderson/trump-may-tap-overpaid-oi_b_13375562.html

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

Raymond retired from ExxonMobil at the end of 2005, and his near $70 million in compensation for the year seemed, at the time, a more than ample reward for his career of service to company shareholders. Company directors disagreed. This past April, news reports revealed that Raymond walked off into the retirement sunset with a going-away pay package that sets a staggeringly new golden parachute standard.

This retirement package — a grab-bag of stock options, restricted stock awards from previous years, retirement-independent salary, and bonuses, plus a $1 million consulting contract, security services, a car and driver, access to the company corporate jet, and $210,800 in country club fees — would add up to nearly $400 million.

“He is a porker of the first order,” executive pay expert Graef Crystal told Bloomberg after the news of Raymond’s good fortune broke. “Those CEOs out there who are doing better at the trough must be thrilled he’s flying fighter cover for them.”

If he had to liquidate his stock options like Hank Paulson did he wont take a loss. Exxon's stock in 2005 was around 50. Today its trading at $87

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

"yeah "asked" is prob better - friend also pointed out that she's not as much of a rogue element as Sanders, and heeded the requests out of courtesy"

well yeah, she's actually a democrat and Sanders was/is not.

akm, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

and yet Schumer named him to the leadership team. cuuuuurious

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 December 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

Kinda lol but mostly sad

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Trump 'll say ppl are FANTASTIC, GOOD PEOPLE to literally anyone who dials him on his My First Phone now won't he?

Good luck world.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

Ugh this fucking guy!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 2 December 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

my spouse is mad at me now because i refuse to be treated by doctors who are members of the ama. i understand the concern, but if we only object when it is convenient for us, we're not going to ever accomplish anything, will we?

xiphoid beetlebum (rushomancy), Friday, 2 December 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

i want to see his official ranking of countries with the most intelligent people

Karl Malone, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

we have a child as president (and commander in chief of armed forces)

splendor in the ASS (rip van wanko), Friday, 2 December 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

this seems like it is a bad idea

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/02/politics/donald-trump-taiwan/index.html?adkey=bn

akm, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:53 (seven years ago) link

was just coming here to comment on that, terrifying

sleeve, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:55 (seven years ago) link

trump's been quite open about wanting a fucking trade war with china so I guess he'll get it

akm, Friday, 2 December 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

tbf who else is China gonna sell all their crap to

(not that I am looking forward to this, just joeks bruv)

Οὖτις, Saturday, 3 December 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

I was listening to some Black Metal (Coven, or Evil Ways Instead of Love by Cultes des Ghoules ) while opening the CNN link, not realizing it would have Wolf talking right away - creepy indeed!

BlackIronPrison, Saturday, 3 December 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

Going to (trade?/currency?) war with China, just so that Trump Org can get a new hotel licensee.

Trump wants to expand business empire to Taiwan, creating another potential conflict of interest

Sanpaku, Saturday, 3 December 2016 01:36 (seven years ago) link

through the looking glass

sleeve, Saturday, 3 December 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

On the bright side, this may mean no Secretary Palin.

Sanpaku, Saturday, 3 December 2016 01:49 (seven years ago) link

which one's the heel?

will, Saturday, 3 December 2016 02:28 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pD2eKdQ1gqI

euphenism yo. new word for lie.

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 05:53 (seven years ago) link

Somehow didn't realize until now that Trump actually tweets back at people in his threads, both supporters and detractors.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 3 December 2016 06:06 (seven years ago) link

The Taiwan phone call seems overblown in the context of the US selling close to $2bn of weapons to Taipei over the last two years alone, though it is symbolic . The bigger issue will be Trump's aggressive stance on the valuation of the Yuan and whether additional tariffs will be brought in to try to force them to change it. It's easy to say when you want to boost the prospects for US manufacturing but less easy to do when China holds such a large proportion of US debt.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 3 December 2016 08:26 (seven years ago) link

I think you've already thought this out far more than he has.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 December 2016 13:29 (seven years ago) link

He's got hotel interests in Taiwan. The end.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 3 December 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

I assume he's got hotel interests almost everywhere there are people, not least because "his" hotels are often just licensing his name, which gets slapped on front.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 December 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

Duterte: Trump says Philippines tackling drug problem 'the right way'

Our president elect just endorsed police murdering suspects; death squads murdering informants, human rights activists, and journalists; and fathomless police corruption.

Sanpaku, Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:32 (seven years ago) link

tbf there's no evidence trump actually said this, and if he did say it it there's no evidence he has any idea what's going on in the phillippines

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

There is no evidence Trump understands anything. That's not a defense of all the dumb shit he does. He took a job.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

No defense, just saying the issue is "Trump has no clue" not "Trump loves murder"

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

The Duerte thing is troubling, but I think there's a better than decent chance that Trump never said anything and Duerte made it up completely

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

The Taiwan phone call seems overblown in the context of the US selling close to $2bn of weapons to Taipei over the last two years alone, though it is symbolic

The weapons trade with Taiwan has been going on for decades as well as the constant USN and USAF presence in key parts of the Pacific. It's not like we hide all that, or the existence of the AIT and TECRO. In fact, hey look it's all right here: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35855.htm

The phone call is symbolic of our President-Elect is a dipshit.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

The Duterte thing is approximately as troubling and nominating an AG who cast a symbolic vote to allow the US armed forces to torture people. So whether he said anything about Filipino law enforcement techniques or not, he's been pretty clear.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

I've had arguments with Trumpeters about Duterte on other forums. In their media echo chamber, Duterte has made the Davao City and the Phillipines safer places, which is pretty much the opposite of the facts on the ground. We know that the PEOTUS seems to pay attention to the same echo chamber, rather than ethical journalists or even his own intelligence briefings.

Given the Argentina, Pakistan, and Taiwanese phone call gaffes, Duterte's description of his phone call seems par for course.

Sanpaku, Saturday, 3 December 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

The weapons trade with Taiwan has been going on for decades as well as the constant USN and USAF presence in key parts of the Pacific. It's not like we hide all that, or the existence of the AIT and TECRO. In fact, hey look it's all right here: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35855.htm

The phone call is symbolic of our President-Elect is a dipshit.

US policy on Taiwan has been to edge closer to treating it as a de facto state, while maintaining the official 'one China' policy and the idea that a phone call from a president elect is a huge change of course seems a bit of a stretch. As president elect, Obama was in direct contact with Ma Ying-Jeou, albeit via letter, to congratulate him on his election win - which came shortly after Obama's own and has pushed for Taiwan to be included in a number of international federations (in addition to the billions of dollars of defensive weapons sold).

It's a fairly easy bit of symbolism for Trump - cutting through the fiction that the US does not have contact with senior Taiwanese politicians, showing his base that he's not afraid of China and giving a domestic message that diplomacy will not be business as usual. Actually breaking with the 'one China' policy would be massive, Trump meeting with Tsai face to face as president would be big, but there's still a question mark over whether he would ever actually do either of those things.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 3 December 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

The Duterte praise is pretty disconcerting to me, because I've already had a lot of images in my head of paramilitary/death squad type forces arising under Trump. Lots of armed right-wingers in parts of the country, could also involve Blackwater which has massive ties to the administration (Pence is a friend of Prince and DeVos is Prince's brother). A little cooperation/head-turning from sympathetic police departments, a justice dept that refuses to deal with it, it all seems plausible to me. As the brilliant Matt Stoller pointed out in a podcast I listened to the other night, it's not like it hasn't happened before in the US.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 3 December 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

yes let's not forget the widespread FEMA camps and Obamacare Death Panels

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 3 December 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-real-risk-behind-trumps-taiwan-call

this is pretty harrowing

k3vin k., Saturday, 3 December 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

Would be great if China took it out on Trump and his family, personally.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

No way that anyone who voted for Trump or the minority of #NeverTrump people are going to give a a damn about the "foreign policy establishment" being "appalled." That's why they voted for him.

And guess who approves?

https://www.cotton.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=547

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 3 December 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/12/former_pow_bowe_bergdahl_asks.html

whoa, some of the shit trump has said about this

President-elect Donald Trump was particularly critical of the prisoner deal during the presidential campaign, describing Bergdahl as a "no-good traitor, who should have been executed." Trump has at times held up an imaginary rifle as if he were taking aim at Bergdahl and declared at a Las Vegas rally in October that "30 years ago, he would have been shot."

k3vin k., Saturday, 3 December 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

so obscene. as if trump could have withstood the psychological pressure of being a solider deployed in a combat zone.

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

A metaphor for the year to come.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh4jm0aYUPM

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Saturday, 3 December 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

holy shit, that was a disturbingly moving video to watch on mute while listening to tim hecker's whitecaps of whitenoise II. thanks!

Karl Malone, Saturday, 3 December 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

It's a fairly easy bit of symbolism for Trump - cutting through the fiction that the US does not have contact with senior Taiwanese politicians, showing his base that he's not afraid of China and giving a domestic message that diplomacy will not be business as usual.

You appear to be talking about a completely different person named Trump than the one who is currently the nominal US President-elect.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

Also this, from the NYer piece linked above, is completely OTM

If you work in foreign affairs, you learn that a highly unexpected event is often the result of intent or incompetence. (You also learn that what looks, at first, like intent often turns out to be incompetence.)

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

I assume by now he knows what he's in for when he's actually the president, though I suppose it's possible that ... he doesn't.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

i think he is consciously trying to act in a chaotic, unpredictable manner in order to evade accountability

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

steve bannon: "darkness is good"

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:26 (seven years ago) link

Anybody suspecting Donald Trump of deliberately trying to produce something beyond the immediate first order effects of his actions is crazy.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

A 140 character limit plumbs the depths of Trump's thoughts.

Sanpaku, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

i strongly disagree with the idea that trump is not using lies, conspiracies, and gaslighting to manipulate the media and by extension public consciousness. people who are simply idiots don't end up being elected president.

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

he is certainly ignorant but he knows how to use language to suit his own purposes.

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

people who are simply idiots don't end up being elected president

I'm sure there's a modicum of reassurance in believing this, but history begs to differ.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

Trump barely knows how to use language to get his point across. I direct you to Trump, explaining why he "saved" the Carrier jobs that he told people he would save.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 3 December 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

idk bros. dissimulation starts to feel like a strategy when someones uses it to marshawn lynch his way through countless scandals all the way to the presidency

Treeship, Saturday, 3 December 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

unsettling thought:

Her culpability prevented her from condemning the status quo, and her ideology prevented her from proposing a big fix. Unfortunately, much of the progressive movement also seems to be only vaguely aware of the concerns of, let alone the specific thoughts of, Americans who are suffering in the decline. And because of that, if Trump figures out how to lead his movement while governing—as Obama inexplicably decided not to do—then we’re in deep, deep trouble because we will be utterly defenseless against it.

http://inthesetimes.com/features/left_organizing_donald_trump_zack_exley.html

Karl Malone, Saturday, 3 December 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

Coulter and Palin already getting ahead of the curve on former supporters criticizing Trump from the right - who else is up to bat?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 4 December 2016 00:40 (seven years ago) link

idk, this is good stuff though. i was also a big fan of glenn beck's swerve to the center.

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:07 (seven years ago) link

i strongly disagree with the idea that trump is not using lies, conspiracies, and gaslighting to manipulate the media and by extension public consciousness. people who are simply idiots don't end up being elected president.

― Treeship, Saturday, December 3, 2016 5:40 PM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

serious question: If everything we've seen so far is not enough to convince you that Trump is genuinely dumb, what would it take?

flopson, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

like, what are some things he would have to do/say that would make you reconsider?

flopson, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:10 (seven years ago) link

i think he is genuinely ignorant and incurious but that he knows how to fuck with people to get what he wants.

my grandfather called people like this "dumb as a fox."

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:11 (seven years ago) link

like, i don't think he has some grand, sophisticated diplomatic scheme, but i do think he knows how to use spectacle to distract people while he does stuff like leverage his new political power for profit

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link

Trump believes what he says (he lacks conviction and consistency, but at the moment something comes out of his lips believes it) and is not intentionally gaslighting, imo

flopson, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

i think it just seems like he believes what he is saying because he is utterly shameless and comfortable with lying to an extent none of us can really comprehend

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

i don't think, for instance, that he ever thought millions of people voted illegally, or that ted cruz's father killed jfk, or that hillary clinton misplaced 6 billion dollars, or any of this infowars bullshit.

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:19 (seven years ago) link

idk the former would be easier for him to force himself to believe considering the implications of him accepting a popular vote loss of 2.5 mill makes him partially a loser, and a hypocrite for saying such a scenario should lead people to 'take to the streets' in 2012. if it makes him look/feel better, he probably believes it.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

tbh it doesn't matter what he "actually thinks"

Οὖτις, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:20 (seven years ago) link

otm

Neanderthal, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

it kind of matters. if he literally believes everything he hears on infowars that will lead him to pursue different policies than if he just understood that stuff to be useful as propaganda.

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking today that the one weird trick to his success is that he's a fake everything. He's a fake politician, fake conservative, fake Republican, fake businessman, probably a fake billionaire, there is literally nothing there but the con, moving from one realm to the next, real estate to publishing to mass merchandising to tv to politics, every bit of it a sham that consistently benefits nobody but himself. It's not that he has no compunction about lying, it's that anything he says is as honest as anything else he says, it's all just keeping balls in the air. That stuff about facts-have-no-meaning is exactly how he has always operated. And our institutions of government, media, civic society, etc are just not set up to deal with someone like that. I know an auditor who used to work for PWC, and she told me candidly that all of their auditing procedures are set up to catch people who are sloppy or careless, but they're not very good at catching people who just straight-up lie and make things up. Same thing we're dealing with now.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

real, fake, con, or not, he's going to sign Paul Ryan's legislation. That's what matters.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:25 (seven years ago) link

sadly also otm

Neanderthal, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link

tipsy mothra otm

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link

Yeah Treesh this isn't a person who has beliefs. He has one, deeply held, which is "I am the greatest and I am entitled to everything!" Everything else in his mind is arbitrary drivel and nonsense jumbled from daytime TV and the last conversation he had.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:31 (seven years ago) link

the NYT public editor on the preoccupation with the use of "alt-right"

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/03/public-editor/alt-right-stephen-bannon-liz-spayd-public-editor.html?smid=tw-share

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

Trump just lives moment to moment, speaks word to word, breathes in, breathes out, and hopes that a thought pops into his brain in time. He's basically an automaton. Sure he'll plunder the government and enrich himself, yet I don't even get the impression he's thought that stuff through; he's just acting opportunistically without thinking too much, situation to situation. All his justifications and rationalizations are post-hoc. There were moments in the debates when you could see the fear in his eyes, just grasping for something coherent to say but coming up empty.

flopson, Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking today that the one weird trick to his success is that he's a fake everything. He's a fake politician, fake conservative, fake Republican, fake businessman, probably a fake billionaire, there is literally nothing there but the con, moving from one realm to the next, real estate to publishing to mass merchandising to tv to politics, every bit of it a sham that consistently benefits nobody but himself

Yeah, seeing how every other sort of jackass figures out a way to get air time as a commentator nowadays, I sorta want multiple ex-/convicted grifters to start being interviewed as an ongoing deconstruction of how this shit works from here on out. There's a full coterie of thinktank/public policy talking heads already, why not talk to someone actually experiences at how the game works

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:55 (seven years ago) link

Politics and language have been riding in the same passenger car for decades. And The Times, like most news outlets, is well-practiced in negotiating the linguistic land mines.

and in metaphorical pillows smothering faces.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 4 December 2016 01:55 (seven years ago) link

Listening to Baratunde Thurston's podcast today, one of the media types mentioned that dude seems to value family over everything else. ("This is what cronyism looks like when you don't have any friends.") and I'm wondering if the most effecting way to influence the most suggestible guy on the planet is to work on Kushner & Ivanka for a while, so that their voices whispering in the ear of the throne can alter the ship's course in a slightly better direction, to torture a mixed-metaphors.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Sunday, 4 December 2016 02:00 (seven years ago) link

to work on Kushner & Ivanka for a while, so that their voices whispering in the ear of the throne can alter the ship's course in a slightly better direction

Nothing I know about those two suggests that their choice of direction would be any better. OK, it does seem like Ivanka maybe believes in climate change, I guess that's something. Kushner is irredeemable though, and plainly aspires to be the National Wormtongue.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 4 December 2016 02:03 (seven years ago) link

efits nobody but himself

Yeah, seeing how every other sort of jackass figures out a way to get air time as a commentator nowadays, I sorta want multiple ex-/convicted grifters to start being interviewed as an ongoing deconstruction of how this shit works from here on out. There's a full coterie of thinktank/public policy talking heads already, why not talk to someone actually experiences at how the game works

― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Saturday, December 3, 2016 8:55 PM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is a good idea. bernie madoff could be a good starting place.

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 02:10 (seven years ago) link

liz spayd is so bad

maura, Sunday, 4 December 2016 02:23 (seven years ago) link

xxp:

Trump doesn't have intellect. He has audacity.

This can have the power to stun opponents into inaction. Think Herman Cortez v. Montezuma.

Audacity is terrible for sensible governance but powerful for dislocating opposition.

In warfare, the best counter to audacity is well-prepared traps. Static warfare. Logistic troubles. Patient traps.

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the political parallels.

Sanpaku, Sunday, 4 December 2016 02:35 (seven years ago) link

I just feel like most Trump voters are basically this person

https://twitter.com/TaylorMcCrory

like, she's not enthusiastic about racism, but she does retweet somebody else who posted a little bouquet of "white people should all die" tweets and said "what if they said that about BLACK PEOPLE!?!"

she's in college and asking people to do her online quiz for her for money because she just needs to get a 7/10 so she can get her math credit, and she probably feels like college (a branch campus of U Alabama I think) is making her jump through meaningless hoops for no reason and she's probably right

she's super into how much she loves her boyfriend and how hard he works and how she can't wait to have a baby

she likes laying out and going to falcons games and going to vegas

during the rnc she posts #rnc with a little flag

just saying, this is 80-90% of who's voting for trump, not the freaks who are trolling twitter all day and reading the daily caller, just deeply apolitical people in the suburbs who are probably perfectly nice in real life but who would find someone like me totally culturally alien. and will vote for someone who seems sympathetic to "our kind of people."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 4 December 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

don't be fooled. taylor mccrory is a hipster, just one that has embraced a burgeoning, little understood fad called "deep normcore"

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 04:06 (seven years ago) link

i apologize in advance if lolhueg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyhpO-GXcAIuibA.jpg

flopson, Sunday, 4 December 2016 04:19 (seven years ago) link

actually it makes more sense to look at vote share on the vertical axis. less of an outlier, only 1876 is worse. not sure what happend in 1824

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyiHa8RVQAAmVq4.jpg:large

flopson, Sunday, 4 December 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

1824...four candidates get significant vote share, andrew jackson won a plurality, but lack of electoral college majority meant it went to house of reps where jq adams was selected

6 god none the richer (m bison), Sunday, 4 December 2016 04:49 (seven years ago) link

As it seems that we're trying to parse Trump again, I'll reiterate my previous thoughts on the matter: Trump is a con man, full stop. He is good at nothing but the con. Like literally nothing. He has no other skills whatsoever. But he's great at the con. I mean, he just pulled off the biggest con ever. He's King Con, man. Beyond the con and whatever feeds the con, though, he is a void. He is not crafty, he is not clever, he is not intelligent or strategic or in anyway curious or concerned about the world around him beyond how he can manipulate that world in favor of the con. He got control of the country and he will milk his position for everything it's worth (to the limits set by his diminished intellectual capacity) and he will leave the country a dried-out husk and move on to another con. People will try to color in his seemingly-inscrutable actions and ascribe loftier intentions to his maneuvering, but everything he does is fueled by at least one of two questions (posed here with more acuity than the questions formed in his mind): 1) Will this action gain me material favor?, and 2) Will this action or person who persuaded he into taking this action make me feel good about me, Donald Trump? If you stumble upon a thing he did that seems to have a more complex motivation than one of the two I suggested, please let me know. Otherwise, I'll continue asserting that he's basically a dumb, sick animal.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 4 December 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

'or the person who persuaded me'

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 4 December 2016 05:01 (seven years ago) link

US policy on Taiwan has been to edge closer to treating it as a de facto state, while maintaining the official 'one China' policy and the idea that a phone call from a president elect is a huge change of course seems a bit of a stretch.

China has lodged a formal complaint. It would seem they think differently than you do.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 4 December 2016 05:12 (seven years ago) link

Formal complaint was entirely predictable. They are ultra-serious about this shit. Their enormous holdings of US Treasury bonds may not mean much to Trump, but if they dumped a big batch of them on the market, surely the market would react badly.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 4 December 2016 05:16 (seven years ago) link

They are ultra-serious about this shit.

otm, SV not so much this time around, I'm sticking with my previous "terrifying" assessment

sleeve, Sunday, 4 December 2016 05:37 (seven years ago) link

Remind me of how they reacted to the warship deal.

iirc, they lodged a formal complaint, called the US ambassador in for a bollocking - saying it threatened permanent damage to Sino-US relations and promised a wave of retaliatory sanctions against any US business involved in any aspect of the agreement. The reaction to this has been relatively mild so far.

Assuming there is any strategic thinking going on at all, the call is a perfect way to very visibly put China's nose out of joint without actually incurring any direct consequences. It will inevitably contribute to starting his relationship with them on the wrong foot but his plan to formally brand the country a "currency manipulator" probably indicates he's not bothered by that. It's a piece of domestic theatre and, as such, i think will probably be quite successful.

Trump may not have thought deeply about any of it but Feulner, Bolton and Bannon seem to be the ones pulling the strings and are not incapable of (admittedly terrible) strategic thinking.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 4 December 2016 07:37 (seven years ago) link

...He's King Con, man. Beyond the con and whatever feeds the con, though, he is a void. He is not crafty, he is not clever, he is not intelligent or strategic...

King Con just got himself elected POTUS, you have to grant that he is at least crafty, with some strategic ability.

nickn, Sunday, 4 December 2016 09:19 (seven years ago) link

They had to confiscate his twitter feed. What kind of strategic mastermind can't handle twitter?

Frederik B, Sunday, 4 December 2016 10:01 (seven years ago) link

Nobody conned the media into both-sides equivocation. Nobody conned republican governors into passing voting restrictions. Nobody conned Comey into torpedoing Clinton in the final weeks. There's been an assault on every societal institution from the right, and Trump to s a result of that breakdown.

Frederik B, Sunday, 4 December 2016 10:17 (seven years ago) link

I'm not sure you saw the same election as the rest of us - a crucial factor in the run-up was that his aides took his twitter account away from him.

hah xp!

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 4 December 2016 10:25 (seven years ago) link

>>I just feel like most Trump voters are basically this person

>>https://twitter.com/TaylorMcCrory

>>like, she's not enthusiastic about racism, but she does retweet somebody else who posted a >>little bouquet of "white people should all die" tweets and said "what if they said that about >>BLACK PEOPLE!?!"

I tried to think that, but I have old school friends who voted for Trump, and
they're all on this FB group "Americans for Trump", which posts stuff like this.
They can't deny the role of racism when they see it on FB every day. I wonder
if they are ashamed. There's no excuse for subscribing to this shit without
saying anything about it.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cy04QGeVEAA344Y.jpg:large

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Sunday, 4 December 2016 11:13 (seven years ago) link

Question of diplomacy: Trump is going goofy with his world leader greetings, but he is not president yet. So doesn't that mean current US leaders/diplomats/grown-ups have likely been making reassuring follow-up calls and whatnot, cleaning up after his messes? Or does everyone in the current administration have senioritis and is just waiting it out until Christmas break?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 4 December 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

i don't think, for instance, that he ever thought millions of people voted illegally, or that ted cruz's father killed jfk, or that hillary clinton misplaced 6 billion dollars, or any of this infowars bullshit.

there's a bunch of media analysis on him being a bullshitter vs a liar

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 4 December 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

I dont know how this holds up throughout history but in my lifetime it seems like we always just go for the more charismatic guy

frogbs, Sunday, 4 December 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

Yeah but johnny cash won the popular vote

Karl Malone, Sunday, 4 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

a world in which donald trump is seen as charismatic is a broken broken world

maura, Sunday, 4 December 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Carrotmastic.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you can say he's not charismatic. He's a TV star! His charisma might not work on you personally, but objectively he obviously has star power.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

(His status as a TV star is something that I think got seriously underplayed and underevaluated during the campaign. He's not a businessman -- he plays one on TV.)

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

he's definitely a businessman

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

can everyone on this thread posting crisp declarative statements on aspects of trump's personality and how he is perceived by "america" please refer back to their own posts from July 2015-November 7 2016

Karl Malone, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

i mean you're probably all correct about everything and were right from the start but sometimes it's good to reevaluate and adjust the confidence dial

Karl Malone, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

sorry, i've been grumpy for several months

Karl Malone, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

the republican race is arbitrary. none of those losers is going to be president.

― Treeship, Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10:22 PM (seven months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That is lovely wishful thinking the Huffington Treesh, but in sober reality what is actually going to happen is that more republican voters are going to vote than democrat voters, and they are going to elect president Donald whatever Trump

― • (sleepingbag), Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:26 PM (seven months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Truly impressed that you both know exactly what is going to happen in the future

― Sean, let me be clear (silby), Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:36 PM (seven months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

no only me

― • (sleepingbag), Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:37 PM (seven months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sleepingbag, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

I have adjusted my view of America after November 8th, but I don't think Trump ever did anything surprising during the whole campaign, nor this transition period?

Frederik B, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

Sorry, sleepingbag, but April 27 clearly falls outside the "July 2015-November 7 2016" time frame Karl referenced above.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

adjust yr bifocals and try again

sleepingbag, Sunday, 4 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

sorry i just... this is fun

kinda surprised everyone is freaking out so hard about PRESIDENT TRUMP, calm down you guys

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, February 24, 2016 2:28 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it's going to happen. dems have been bigger idiots than reps this election by like a million miles. they've talked themselves into believing that 'old white guy with empty promises' represents a real political revolution, and on the other hand have managed to paint their own 'potential first woman president in us history' as worse than hitler. meanwhile every time trump says something that you think should end his candidacy... really, where do y'all think this is going?

― • (sleepingbag), Wednesday, February 24, 2016 2:48 PM (nine months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

really, where do y'all think this is going?

Trump needs huge chunks of a population that currently hates him to vote for him. how is that going to happen. There are just not enough angry white guys to win the office anymore, that is a demographic fact.

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, February 24, 2016 2:55 PM (nine months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sleepingbag, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

taylor swift look like a lorax

― • (sleepingbag), Sunday, January 31, 2016 3:42 PM (ten months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Go fuck yourself.

― markers, Sunday, January 31, 2016 3:43 PM (ten months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sleepingbag, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

Hahaha

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

He must have realized that even Palin was mad about the Carrier deal, back to tariffs and protectionism... on Twitter... in the middle of the night.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

I don't think you can say he's not charismatic. He's a TV star! His charisma might not work on you personally, but objectively he obviously has star power.

― birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Sunday, December 4, 2016 8:32 PM (thirty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

There's a diff between being charismatic and being on TV a lot, as if simple repetition generates charisma.

His charisma is, like, the reassuring appeal of your barista or your mechanic being dumber than you are.

Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

i mean he's just a blustering asshole, which i understand has charismatic appeal for a lot of people. plus he's very good at making himself the news (cf. john barron)! but i have been sick of his shit for like three plus decades now :\

maura, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

He's not charismatic, but people find sociopathic bluster and insensitivity alluring for some stupid reason. Cf. When people admire someone for "not giving a fuck"

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

he's got a certain new yorker playboy flair. he's been on TV shows and in rap songs for decades

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 December 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

“Trump was a businessman and an entrepreneur,” Putin said in the interview, which also touched on international affairs, including the war in Syria. “Now he’s a government official, now he’s the head of the United States of America, one of the leading countries of the world, one of the world’s leading economies, one of the world’s leading military states. To the extent that he was able to achieve success in business, this shows that he’s a smart person. And if he’s a smart person, that means that he will totally and quite quickly understand the different level of his responsibility. We presume that he will act based on this position.”

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 4 December 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

Remind me of how they reacted to the warship deal.

iirc, they lodged a formal complaint, called the US ambassador in for a bollocking - saying it threatened permanent damage to Sino-US relations and promised a wave of retaliatory sanctions against any US business involved in any aspect of the agreement. The reaction to this has been relatively mild so far.

Yes, well, the warship deal was a, how do I put this, an agreement under which the US would sell Taiwan warships, whereas the topic in question this week is an idiot taking a phone call he shouldn't have. But as long as apples = oranges supports your theorem of how Trump is totally being strategic, hey, who am I

El Tomboto, Sunday, 4 December 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

xpost At least Putin knows he's spouting complete bullshit, as opposed to most of the people who affirm Trump's intelligence and ever-impending maturation.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Sunday, 4 December 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

I liked this bit of detail:

Putin called Trump “talented” and “colorful” during the U.S. election campaign (Trump said Putin had called him “a genius,” thanks to a mistranslation)

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 4 December 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

excited to see trump doubling down on china

, Monday, 5 December 2016 00:44 (seven years ago) link

The restaurant’s owner and employees were threatened on social media in the days before the election after fake news stories circulated claiming that then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and her campaign chief were running a child sex ring from the restaurant’s back rooms. Even Michael Flynn, a retired general who President-elect Trump has tapped to advise him on national security, shared the stories.

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

So Joe Lieberman is still alive, I assumed he had crawled under a rock and died
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/joe-lieberman-democrats-left-taking-over/2016/12/04/id/762064/

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 5 December 2016 01:50 (seven years ago) link

Fucking idiot

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

Imagine the voice, trembling with outrage.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 01:54 (seven years ago) link

Not you milo, lieberman.

"To me, both parties better watch out not to go back to the extremes —— left and right —— and not working with each other," he said.

What extremism are we seeing in the democratic party that goes beyond basic new deal ideology? Meanwhile the republicans are gleefully inspiring attempted mass shooters by convincing them that democratic politicians are pedophiles.

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 01:55 (seven years ago) link

And tweeting a bunch of provocative, insulting shit about China in the middle of the day as if China was some sort of celebrity rival

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 01:56 (seven years ago) link

"Even Michael Flynn, a retired general who President-elect Trump has tapped to advise him on national security, shared the stories."

This is terrifying

jmm, Monday, 5 December 2016 02:17 (seven years ago) link

Yeah that guy is a fucking lunatic

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 02:18 (seven years ago) link

DC Police has confirmed the assault was PizzaGate related.

Frederik B, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:02 (seven years ago) link

Wait, not assault, he had an assault weapon - I think - didn't assault anyone. Sorry.

Frederik B, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:03 (seven years ago) link

posted above

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 03:22 (seven years ago) link

Fucking rube loons are convinced this is an "inside job"-type incident: a left-wing elite conspiracy to discredit pizzagate so Democrats can continue doing what the most love: ruining the lives of innocent children. I can't even.

hardcore dilettante, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link

*they most love

hardcore dilettante, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:35 (seven years ago) link

i honestly can't even bring myself to read about "pizzagate"

k3vin k., Monday, 5 December 2016 03:42 (seven years ago) link

not the shooting, but the whole controversy. there's no way i don't come out of that a little dumber

k3vin k., Monday, 5 December 2016 03:42 (seven years ago) link

Jet fuel can't melt real cheese

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

A+

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Monday, 5 December 2016 04:06 (seven years ago) link

It's about ethics in pizza journalism

jmm, Monday, 5 December 2016 04:10 (seven years ago) link

I really want this to be more funny dumb online shit, but gunman showing up plus Mike Flynn's son tweeting about it is not sitting well with me. Apparently Mike Flynn himself also made some reference to unspecified "pedophilia investigations" in discussing Clinton-related stuff on Fox News

xpost the story above is the shit I find myself most terrified in the "post-fact" landscape. I might not bat an eyelid if some idiot wants to post some Snopes-debunked horseshit on FB, but when they're shooting outside a Planned Parenthood or bringing a deadly assault weapon to a pizza parlor....that's terrifying, and it can happen pretty much fucking anywhere.

Neanderthal, Monday, 5 December 2016 04:15 (seven years ago) link

replace can with will and welcome to the next four years

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Monday, 5 December 2016 04:21 (seven years ago) link

I'm trying to repress these feelings, see...

Neanderthal, Monday, 5 December 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

I'm still thinking about that woman whose Twitter feed I posted. Like, what if you asked her, would you support abortion being illegal throughout the country? Would she be into that? Opposed to that? She didn't come off as religious.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 5 December 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

she'd probably be down with that ban. a lot of pro-life people don't take any kind of larger view of the issue of abortion -- how it relates to women's autonomy over their own health decisions, how before abortion's legalization it happened anyway but was dangerous, etc. they just look at the issue in itself and decide they are uncomfortable with the idea so it shouldn't happen.

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 05:01 (seven years ago) link

I think the vast majority of people involved in "pizzagating" don't really believe it, it's total 4chan schtick. The hard part is figuring out who if anyone actually does, it's like a turing test for basement-dwelling losers.

Well it was banned from /r/the_donald, then it was banned from /r/conspiracy to /r/pizzagate, then it was banned from Rediit in it's entirety, so by this stage if you've followed it to voat.co (which is running rife with 'false flag' and 'the Oregonian ran an article about this 10 hours before it happened') then you're either a true believer or you're pretty dedicated to exoteric lols.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 5 December 2016 06:49 (seven years ago) link

wtf is voat.co ?

flappy bird, Monday, 5 December 2016 06:51 (seven years ago) link

Well I don't know what it was a fortnight ago, but now it's mostly "the Reddit clone tha pizzagate moved to"

https://voat.co/v/all/top

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 5 December 2016 07:10 (seven years ago) link

Ben Carson, u got a job despite yr protestations

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 13:25 (seven years ago) link

i guess trump can now cross 'diversity?' off the to-do list he scrawled on the back of an envelope on nov 9

the criss angel's death song (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 5 December 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

I'm still thinking about that woman whose Twitter feed I posted. Like, what if you asked her, would you support abortion being illegal throughout the country? Would she be into that? Opposed to that? She didn't come off as religious.

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, December 4, 2016 11:54 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

she'd probably be down with that ban. a lot of pro-life people don't take any kind of larger view of the issue of abortion -- how it relates to women's autonomy over their own health decisions, how before abortion's legalization it happened anyway but was dangerous, etc. they just look at the issue in itself and decide they are uncomfortable with the idea so it shouldn't happen.

― Treeship, Monday, December 5, 2016 12:01 AM (nine hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

im sorry but who the fuck knows? i kind of get your point a little bit in posting that twitter profile to highlight how prob most trump voters are somewhat apolitical and not outwardly enthusiastic about their racism but the amount to which you are zeroing in on such personal details about this person is kind of strange eephus. she's some random 19-year-old college girl in the south, she supports trump but im not sure what else about her politics you can surmise from her tweets? do you know her or something?

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Monday, 5 December 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

based on a quick glance i knew a lot of people like her in the almost exclusively white ohio suburb i grew up in... and i think some of them are democrats and some of them are republican. a white bread apolitical blandness doesn't necessitate wanting abortion to banned and trump in office even if it might entail other regressive politics

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Monday, 5 December 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

Idk if I'm following this...whatever...correctly but I think it's a good point to say that it's the people you wouldn't expect and not really the KKK kind of open stuff that we should be newly, unpleasantly aware of. I saw an article the other day about how protestors came out to disrupt the planned KKK march in some city and the article was like "See, our people of this region are good! We don't support hate speech!" but the real story to me is how many people stayed home bc from BOTH the Klan parade and the counter protests because they don't explicitly align with either but they're more comfortable with the rhetoric based on white supremacy and catering to race-based manufactured insecurity just the same.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Monday, 5 December 2016 14:51 (seven years ago) link

IMO one of the most important things is direct governmental checks on Trump's power. That mostly means getting more Democrats (or I guess anti-Trump republicans if it's the only option) into congressional seats and senate seats, and also into state legislatures, governorships, pretty much any office at any level right now. There are local elections in many places in 2017. There are congressional elections in 2018. Volunteer for a campaign in a "flippable" area. Donate money. Go to your local democratic committee meetings. Run for local office if you're so inclined, even something that seems rinky-dink like a county position.

Also, there are still a few days left to phone bank for or donate to Foster Campbell, a dem senate upstart who is currently in a runoff election in Louisiana. Getting a democrat there means we have 49-51 in the Senate, which means we are much closer to being able to block people like Jeff Sessions, Betsy DeVos, whatever nightmare Trump nominates to the Supreme Court, etc.

I think the vast majority of people involved in "pizzagating" don't really believe it, it's total 4chan schtick. The hard part is figuring out who if anyone actually does, it's like a turing test for basement-dwelling losers.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive),

General Flynn, the next National Security advisor, previously tweeted about it, and his son doubled-down on it yesterday in a tweet

curmudgeon, Monday, 5 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

^^^^^^ this is exactly what's so scary about the whole thing. As much as I dislike sites like Breitbart it was at least comforting in the past to know that they were just on the sidelines. Now the dude who ran the site has the ear of the dumbest and most gullible president in history. So, that sucks

frogbs, Monday, 5 December 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Exactly. I realized with dread during a discussion yesterday that we're witnessing the Fred Phelpsification of America. Fringe garbage people who are beyond reason or decency are moving from the fringe and into the mainstream. It remains to be seen if this is the disease's last desperate attempt to overtake its host or if it's just straight-up metastasis. But we need to chemo the shit out of these fuckers.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

the amount to which you are zeroing in on such personal details about this person is kind of strange eephus. she's some random 19-year-old college girl in the south, she supports trump but im not sure what else about her politics you can surmise from her tweets? do you know her or something?

sorry, she was just somebody i came across while searching twitter for pat mccrory news, i have no personal knowledge of her, she just seemed somehow emblematic to me and a useful corrective to my reflexive notions of "who voted for this guy?" i guess what i'm saying is that if i want to understand how we win next time, i have to not be locked into the idea that trump voter = "joe lunchpail in ohio" or "dapper twitter nazi", not to deny these are important demos for him

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

also? i could see her voting for obama tbh

global tetrahedron, Monday, 5 December 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

ok yea makes sense xp

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

oh man yes – I hope it's true

Senate Democrats are preparing to put Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks through a grinding confirmation process, weighing delay tactics that could eat up weeks of the Senate calendar and hamper his first 100 days in office.

Multiple Democratic senators told POLITICO in interviews last week that after watching Republicans sit on Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court for nearly a year, they’re in no mood to fast-track Trump’s selections.

But it’s not just about exacting revenge.

Democrats argue that some of the president-elect’s more controversial Cabinet picks — such as Jeff Sessions for attorney general and Steven Mnuchin for treasury secretary — demand a thorough public airing.

“They’ve been rewarded for stealing a Supreme Court justice. We’re going to help them confirm their nominees, many of whom are disqualified?” fumed Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). “It’s not obstruction, it’s not partisan, it’s just a duty to find out what they’d do in these jobs.”

Senate Democrats can’t block Trump’s appointments, which in all but one case need only 51 votes for confirmation. But they can turn the confirmation process into a slog.

Any individual senator can force Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to hold procedural votes on nominees. Senior Democrats said a series of such votes are likely for many of Trump’s picks.

Democrats could conceivably force up to 30 hours of debate for each Cabinet nominee, which would be highly disruptive for a GOP Senate that usually works limited hours but has big ambitions for next year. The minority could also stymie lower-level nominees and potentially keep the Senate focused on executive confirmations for weeks as Trump assumes the presidency and congressional Republicans try to capitalize on their political momentum.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

but fuck this guy:

Not all Democrats are on board with a strategy of delay.

Informed that Democrats might hold up Sessions and other nominations past Jan. 20, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia responded: “That’s just bullshit.”

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

I am 100% in support of this even though I hate this style of governing, the GOP already started this "we're going to refuse Hillary's Supreme Court nominee for 4 years" bullshit, turnabout is fair play

frogbs, Monday, 5 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

Generally pretty fed up with governmental intransigence but riding the brakes on confirming Trump's cabinet of deplorables is the kind of noble intransigence I can get behind.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

oh i hope this is true xxxp

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

which in all but one case need only 51 votes for confirmation

two weeks ago:

"I generally oppose the filibuster and I'm going to vote my conscience on these nominees, particularly when it comes to conflict of interest and qualifications for the position," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut. "But my feeling generally is that the president should have the opportunity to select his team, and if he makes mistakes, he will be held accountable and so will they."

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pennsylvania, agreed.

"I think you start with the premise that presidents should have the right to name their cabinet. It's our job to do the oversight and scrutiny and review that's appropriate," he said.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/18/politics/democrats-nuclear-option-donald-trump/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

So there are no potential no votes on the GOP side for any of these nominees?

Rand Paul's been making plenty of noise about the noms he doesn't like

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

i think i read that Susan Collins is already on board for Sessions et al.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

particularly the names floated so far for Sec. of State

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Senators won't reject a colleague. That's why I wonder why presidents have shied from nominating SCOTUS justices from the Senate.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

@tinyrevolution
When you ponder the strategy behind Donald Trump's tweeting, etc., consider this wisdom from Egypt's Gamal Nasser

"The genius of you Americans is that you never made clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves which makes us wonder at the possibility that there may be something to them we are missing."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

i'm p confident Rand Paul opposition will be outweighed by the Dem "give the prez his Cabinet" shitheads.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

when it comes down to votes? I don't doubt it. Delays are good though. Gum up the works, delay delay delay

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

not Tom DeLay though

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

Sure, the republicans wouldn't let Obama go to the bathroom for the last 6 years, but let's make sure to give the corrupt autocrat a chance to govern.

btw a thousand times this

@DougHenwood
you’re not going to win the political battle by fact-checking Trump - people did it with Reagan and it went nowhere

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

yeah I've stopped bothering w that angle

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

The Sad Truth: The Cost Of Stein/Clinton's #Wisconsin Vote Recount Could Have Saved At Least 5,000 Children's Lives https://t.co/sMNQJDfppt

— Eric Trump (@EricTrump) December 4, 2016

somehow Trump's offspring are even worse than he is

frogbs, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

btw a thousand times this

@DougHenwood
you’re not going to win the political battle by fact-checking Trump - people did it with Reagan and it went nowhere

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, December 5, 2016 12:23 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah I've stopped bothering w that angle

― Οὖτις, Monday, December 5, 2016 1

been saying it since October

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

i wonder how many lives the trump family could save by giving all their money away and never appearing in public ever again

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

I made fun of all the "fact checking" a lot during the elections. I still think it should be done, but no one should have the illusion that if we just do enough work to get *the facts* out there it will fix things, or that this election could have been won if only *the facts* were put out even more.


@tinyrevolution
When you ponder the strategy behind Donald Trump's tweeting, etc., consider this wisdom from Egypt's Gamal Nasser

"The genius of you Americans is that you never made clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves which makes us wonder at the possibility that there may be something to them we are missing."

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, December 5, 2016 11:15 AM (sixteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes. Some people want to ascribe a clever and inscrutable strategy to Trump's moves because they have an inherent need to leap great distances in resolving cognitive dissonance. It's this need rather than his nonexistent cleverness which has helped him to succeed against all odds. You aren't engaging with an incurious dullard, you see, but rather peeling away the layers of illusory crass self-involvement that obscure the enigmatic sage at the core of his being.

I'm starting a nonprofit to ensure that every household in America receives a complimentary copy of Being There.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

has this been shared yet?

http://www.injusticeboycott.com/

Darin, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

yeah there's a thread about it

I'm really disappointed in how dumb it is already

El Tomboto, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

I am sort of ambivalent about it

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

I mean yes the SFPD is fucked up and should be held accountable/change policies etc. but ... idk there seem like way bigger problems on the nat'l level that aren't going to be helped by boycotting SF. I dunno how I would even begin to boycott my own city.

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

boycott all corporations headquartered in SF and NYC, lol

like Twitter

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

don't go to the bank, don't use the internet, don't partake in any entertainment or media

Shaun King seems like a well-meaning but non-brilliant guy.

p much

keep tabs on the boycott via carrier pigeon

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

i am currently boycotting civilization, except for comcast

join me until any remaining savings are gone, and then we will move forward from there

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

They aren't recommending any direct boycott activity at the moment beyond Defund DAPL. Today was just a warning shot to NY and SF indicating a 43-day countdown until specific boycott recommendations will be disseminated. It remains to be seen how it all plays out but I don't have any issues as of yet. We'll see how it all plays out, I guess.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

I'm generally disinclined to pick it apart too much because, however dubious you may find this particular messenger or message, it's a concerted effort to corral people into doing something in hopes of effecting positive change.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah I'm not begrudging the motivation

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

yeah, I'm all about any attempts at motivating people at this point.

what do you guys think about this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/12/04/democrats-can-look-forward-to-the-coming-republican-era-being-a-disaster-for-republican-voters/?utm_term=.76f40ce3196b

Darin, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

p smart imo

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

you really think a post-fact republican electorate is somehow going to realise that the reason their lives have gotten worse after trump takes power is because of the people they voted for and not democrat interference / immigrants / a vengeful god / whatever bullshit their Facebook feed tells them?

the criss angel's death song (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

no but from a policy level it makes sense to preserve things where possible

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

even if it falls on deaf ears/preaching to the choir, still necessary (if far from sufficient) to 'fact-check' Trump IMO

flopson, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

For blue state Democrats, this is obviously a second-best, half-a-loaf solution that still leaves half the country — alas, along with the federally dependent blue states of Maryland and Virginia and the District — to experience the full impact of the Trump Revolution. Care would also have to be taken to assure that the higher tax rates in blue states don’t prompt too many companies and wealthy taxpayers to flee.

Also, though Virginia voted blue, and has a Democratic governor, it has a Republican led legislature, so all of those things formerly done by the Feds that the writer says blue states can now do themselves if Republican health care plans, etc pass, will not get passed in Virginia. I don't think its going to be so simple for blue Dem states to pick up the ball, or for Dems to get a message out to those in red states that things are now worse because of the new Washington administration.

curmudgeon, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

I'm not going to give King shit over the idea of a boycott, but I don't think this is a productive or realistic way to go about one.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

even if it falls on deaf ears/preaching to the choir, still necessary (if far from sufficient) to 'fact-check' Trump IMO

― flopson, Monday, December 5, 2016 1:22 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

just seems depressing to think that the POTUS would spread false information, and no one would fact-check him, because strategically we don't think it's going to work.

flopson, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

my take away from King and the WP article is that there ARE ways to fight back, but as curmudgeon says it won't be simple and will involve lots of resourcefulness and cooperations. I'm getting tired of all the sky is falling/hopelessness and want to start looking for solutions, personally.

Darin, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:30 (seven years ago) link

you really think a post-fact republican electorate is somehow going to realise that the reason their lives have gotten worse after trump takes power is because of the people they voted for

maybe not 100% of them, but if 20% of them do that could be enough to swing the swing states back in the right direction

the late great, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

not saying he shouldn't be fact-checked -- how often does he tell the truth per day? -- but don't expect it to be his downfall

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

http://blueamerica.crooksandliars.com/howie-klein/why-its-not-all-gloom-and-doom-around

Howie Klein's Blue America pac funds left-wing candidates in the house.

On his blog and twitter he is doom and gloom though, grumbling about Republicans, corporate Dems, rural centrist Dems, the House Dem progressive caucus for including a Silicon valley Dem rep who he says is not progressive, Pelosi, etc.

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/

curmudgeon, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

xp- I don't think anyone's expecting that

flopson, Monday, 5 December 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

When I was a kid and "political twitter" was called Usenet, I was in a group with Klein that argued with conservatives in the waning days of the Clinton era. He seemed like a good dude if pretty high-strung, especially about Israel IIRC.
Somewhere I have a mix CD he sent to everyone with a lewd electronic song that samples Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing "Sex With Your Parents."

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

^^ said in the voice of Linda Hamilton voice-over in Terminator 2.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing "Sex With Your Parents."

best duet of all time imo

the criss angel's death song (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

also ty for new screenname

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing Sex With Your Parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

thank god for quotation marks

¶ (DJP), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

bizarro, your second post predictably acted on the idea planted in my head by your first post. Bravo.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/kalebhorton/status/805855988263698432

um

frogbs, Monday, 5 December 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

nothing on pat mcrory losing (and finally conceding?)

liked this article:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/12/why-pat-mccrory-lost-and-what-it-means-in-trumps-america.html

global tetrahedron, Monday, 5 December 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

I'm embarrassed to say this is the first I've heard of Moral Mondays. But when I googled and a Redstate article started off with "North Carolina's icon of rotund pomposity, “Reverend” William Barber, has lumbered forth to lead another “Moral Monday” protest in Raleigh..." I figured if it pisses them off it must be good. Sign me up.

Devastatin' Dan the Suggest Ban Man (Dan Peterson), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Still would love to know how McCrory lost when Trump won in NC.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

McCrory pissed off a lot of Republican voters with his I-77 highway toll plan, as dumb as that sounds. He lost at least 15,000 votes in solidly Republican areas of northern Mecklenburg County, which was enough to account for the margin of victory and more. Pundits are going to act like it was HB2 that did it, but nope, highways. Nothing to see here.

http://wfae.org/post/mccrory-loses-home-turf-blame-i-77-tolls-hb2-shifting-vote-patterns

Gatemouth, Monday, 5 December 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

So people are actually *worse* than I thought. Good to know!

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

i put McCrory in the other thread, what i think of for non-federal non-WH news

American politics 2016: Lawyers, Guns, and D-Money

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

now Dana Rohrabacher is the possible State appointee? are they trying to see who can induce the most puking?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

hahaha waaaaaht

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

he was my district rep growing up, have hated him literally all my life

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I joked about it before but my ability to laugh about the idea of a President Luthor assembling his Legion of Doom has diminished as that comparison has become more scarily accurate (minus the superpowers, thankfully).

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

for those of you unfamiliar w/ Dana

https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/805806949644333056

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

btw Gore did get face time w/ the Yam himself, said it was "an extremely interesting conversation"

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38211695

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 December 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

not sure what to make of that

global tetrahedron, Monday, 5 December 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

"It was like speaking to a nascent form of artificial intelligence that's in the process of understanding sentence structure and what words mean. Fascinating."

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 December 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

bizarre

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

maybe heartening because i've read that the people closest to his ears are his kids and he basically just seems to think whatever the last person told him to think

global tetrahedron, Monday, 5 December 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

if I was in his cabinet my immediate strategy would be to make sure I was always the last one to talk to Chump

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

that was the strategy observed by Reagan-Bush II advisors

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 December 2016 21:17 (seven years ago) link

I love the anecdotal tale of his advisers influencing him by appearing on TV and introducing their ideas via that conduit.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 5 December 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

There are going to be a lot of oval office meetings that involve someone accidentally dropping their pen on the way out the door, searching for it until everyone else has left, and then getting the last word in with trump

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 December 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

http://www.xe.com/en/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=CNY

looks like Trump just took out the Chinese economy with a couple of tweets

frogbs, Monday, 5 December 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

if you want a vision of the future, imagine a room full of people on their hands and knees scouring the carpet for their 'lost' pens / phones / contact lenses which none of them ever find, while an oblivious president trump tweets the nuclear codes xp

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 5 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

That is the opposite of the direction he wanted their currency to go in, tbf.

xp

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 5 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

that BBC image of gore on the elevator makes it look like he's about to be encased in carbonite

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Monday, 5 December 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

well, it *would* be a carbon sink

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

He is going to vote for kasich or something dumb like that. We need these traitors to be traitors for us. They need to vote for Clinton.

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

this is not going to matter

Οὖτις, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

Yeah that too

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

I want Trump's transition to be resisted at all turns though. This way when he does something egregious no one can say they are surprised. He shouldn't be treated like a normal president.

Treeship, Monday, 5 December 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

i guess trump can now cross 'diversity?' off the to-do list he scrawled on the back of an envelope on nov 9

― the criss angel's death song (bizarro gazzara), Monday, December 5, 2016

see, this is where contemporary identity politics falls apart. there is nothing diverse about a cabinet of 100% assholes.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 02:26 (seven years ago) link

imagine if a bunch of electors don't vote for trump, somehow he doesn't get the office, but he still knows all these huge secrets he's been briefed on (at least the ones he's bothered to listen to). his twitter feed would be pretty funny next year

k3vin k., Tuesday, 6 December 2016 04:15 (seven years ago) link

Then he could go into exile as Snowden's roommate!

Apparently Bob Dole helped arrange the phone call to Taiwan. That rascally scamp!

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 11:54 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump's call with Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen was organized by Bob Dole, a former Republican senator and one-time presidential nominee, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Dole told the Journal that the law firm he is affiliated with does work with the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the U.S.
“It’s fair to say that we may have had some influence,” he said.

People in DC are going to stop wearing pants when it gets warm again. Just let it breathe. Discretion is for nerds.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 12:18 (seven years ago) link

Weird.

Treeship, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 12:23 (seven years ago) link

Well.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) has "reservations" about privatizing Medicare, she told the Portland Press Herald.

“Suffice it to say I have a number of reservations,” Collins told the newspaper. “A complete upending of a program (Medicare) that by and large serves seniors well is not something that appeals to me.”

Collins' comments signals an early and significant departure from GOP unity on the issue, which will be needed to overhaul something like Medicare and will be essential to repealing and replacing Obamacare. If Republicans lose too many lawmakers on these topics, they won't be able to follow through with promises to gut Obamacare.

Collins said she had voted against similar proposals to voucherize Medicare in the past.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/susan-collins-has-reservations-about-privatizing-medicare

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

Would be amusing if after all this handwringing at the imminent horrors of the Trump administration, what bogs them down and ties them up is reimagining US health care. Talk about a quagmire ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

afaict they have literally no idea what to replace the current system with, right? seems like they'll basically be in the same nightmare as the uk government over brexit, where a promise no-one ever expected to have to deliver on is now an urgent priority and no-one has the faintest fucking clue about what to do

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

the main problem (well, one of a few) is that there are too many loopholes where people still have to buy plans they can't afford

the right approach would be to track down those groups, legislate a subsidy or determine why they're missing the current ones

the wrong approach would be to reintroduce cheaper plans that are completely worthless in reality and allow people to buy them again

mh 😏, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

afaict they have literally no idea what to replace the current system with, right? seems like they'll basically be in the same nightmare as the uk government over brexit, where a promise no-one ever expected to have to deliver on is now an urgent priority and no-one has the faintest fucking clue about what to do

― Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, December 6, 2016 10:26 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

CVS coupon book

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

no-one has the faintest fucking clue about what to do

Oh, I disagree, there are some people like Paul Ryan who know exactly what to do. Catch-22.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

Given that a few states went Trump by only a few thousand votes, it's increasingly bonkers that Clinton's popular vote lead has crept up over 2.6 million. And it's still climbing.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

"increasingly bonkers" to replace "in god we trust" on all US currency

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

Did this Evan McMullin piece get linked above?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/opinion/trumps-threat-to-the-constitution.html?_r=0

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

Countdown to McMullin being seen in the lobby of Trump Tower...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Given that a few states went Trump by only a few thousand votes, it's increasingly bonkers that Clinton's popular vote lead has crept up over 2.6 million. And it's still climbing.

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, December 6, 2016 10:42 AM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So what are we gonna do about that in 2020? Guessing electoral college is still gonna be in place by then and mostly blue states are going to go NPV, so we have to keep playing the game as it exists, not a different game we wish we were playing.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Per that other thread, focus on getting governors to go blue.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

xp Well, that split is incredibly unlikely, right? Even Nate Silver only had it at 10-15% iirc, though obviously no-one's clowning him on why he 'called it' wrong.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

"increasingly bonkers" to replace "in god we trust" on all US currency

― El Tomboto

or at least to replace "xiphoid beetlebum" in my display name

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

this is one of those days where everything feels like it's spinning too fast and i'm gonna be sick

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

Norm Eisen, who served as ethics counselor to President Obama and has criticized Trump over his conflicts, said it would be “absolutely a step in the right direction” if Trump had sold his stock holdings in June, divesting himself of ownership in companies whose fates could be tied to his policies. But he added that it is now important to know how Trump spent the money he earned from the sale.

“We need to know, has he put them in conflict free assets ... or has he bought other stocks or assets that would create new conflicts?” he asked. “It’s all the more reason that we need a prompt and full disclosure financial disclosure. If he did liquidate all his stocks, what did he do with the money? What bank is the money in? What did he buy? It’s a lot of money.”

He called this the latest example of the tension between Trump’s promise to drain the swamp and how he has managed his own business conflicts. “The swamp draining should begin with Trump’s own wetlands,” Eisen said.

Trump's own wetlands ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

the wettest lands, really

pattypandemic (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

Very odd. If he really did cash out i imagine he would have disclosed this earlier because it addresses some of these conflict of interest concerns.

Treeship, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

trump not a big fan of financial disclosure iirc

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Probably how he paid for his campaign contributions and hats.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

he also doesn't like disclosing shit

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Oh, to put a finer point on what I was trying to say, beyond Trump's general avoidance of financial disclosure, the hypothetical revelation that he cashed in his stocks to pay for his campaign might demonstrate how illiquid (and totally not a billionaire) he is and might explain why he held back this information in particular.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

btw Gore did get face time w/ the Yam himself, said it was "an extremely interesting conversation"

Trump appears to be quite canny at saying whatever the person he's talking to wants to hear and making a favorable first impression. But words are just words to him and he only uses them to manipulate others. His actions will speak x1000 louder.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

it would be great if someone like gore struck the right ego notes and convinced trump that being the republican who turned the party around on global warming would be a pretty easy way to go down in history as a heroic figure who saved the world etc. etc. but given what his picks so far suggest about the direction of the admin, it seems like that's a pipe dream and he's not going to go against the grain.

iatee, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

Trump understands which horse he's riding. As long as he could ride it into the white house, he doesn't care that the whole world is riding it straight to hell.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

Oh, to put a finer point on what I was trying to say, beyond Trump's general avoidance of financial disclosure, the hypothetical revelation that he cashed in his stocks to pay for his campaign might demonstrate how illiquid (and totally not a billionaire) he is and might explain why he held back this information in particular.

that's kinda what I thought too, the most likely "bombshell" in his tax returns is that he's not all that rich

frogbs, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

the richest people in the world don't care about global warming or the world tearing itself apart. they know that they can always retreat to their properties with their private security force and be just fine, sort of like an apocalyptic version of atlas shrugged.

i know that sounds bonkers but i think it's true. even on a minor rich person scale, you can see evidence of this line of thinking. my uncle is a $$$$ guy and he takes great pride in showing off his elaborate apocalypse shelter in his basement, decked out in paranoia luxury and security gadgets

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

it would be great if someone like gore struck the right ego notes and convinced trump that being the republican who turned the party around on global warming would be a pretty easy way to go down in history as a heroic figure who saved the world etc. etc. but given what his picks so far suggest about the direction of the admin, it seems like that's a pipe dream and he's not going to go against the grain.

― iatee, Tuesday, December 6, 2016 1:50 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea it makes some sense when people talk about how unpredictable trump is and how he might buck the GOP in certain ways (i recall my moderate republican friend who tried to reassure me by saying how trump was a "manhattan liberal" until a few years ago) but so far all his appointments/words/actions have indicated this is going to be a hardline right wing administration

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

it's totally true

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

no doubt he doesn't care about global warming and the short-term effects will maybe make a few of his golf courses worse or something

but my hope would be that someone could convince him that this would be a great way to go down as one of the most heroic figures of all time, without really doing much work. god knows he cares about his image. maybe a series of targeted SNL sketches could do it.

xp

iatee, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

it actually is a lot of work, and at a bare minimum, he would need to align his thought with literally EVERY OTHER WORLD LEADER that climate change is real, which doesn't seem very heroic.

much more likely is trump finally acknowledging that climate change is real while simultaneously championing geoengineering, conveniently implemented by the corporations of his friends and family, while telling his mouthbreathing horde of racist fucks that spewing up clouds of sulfuric acid into the atmosphere was inevitable

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:08 (seven years ago) link

xp Trump still has to work with the Republican Congress, so making great strides forward on climate change would require quite a lot of work on his part. Instead, one would have to appeal to his need to show strength and be the most important, the indispensable person. Plus, you must convince him he couldn't actually lose if he chooses to fight. He'd WIN! BIG TIME!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

ps I am not saying he would actually be one of the most heroic figures of all time

xp

and I don't know if we know how much leverage he has on moving the party in any direction - but unlike say, abortion, I don't think this is an issue that most lower education republican voters have particularly strong beliefs on. were he to just say 'we're the trump party, this is the trump party's view on the issue now' he would sway a lot of people. that's the thing that isn't a lot of work. probably could change millions of peoples minds w/ like 4 tweets, because his fans are more attached to him than to the issues.

iatee, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Gore: Global warming is real. Here's why (gives three-hour presentation).
Trump: Wow, big league presentation. I'm having a yuge rethink about global warming.
(Gore leaves, Bannon enters)
Bannon: Global warming is not real.
Trump: Oh. Okay. Sounds good, Steve-o.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

Xpost To be fair to Trump for once, I bet many billionaires don't have billions of dollars liquid in cash or easily made liquid.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

This can't be right: at the uni library's CNN feed the crawl said "Ben Carnon the Ghostface Killah of Cabinet picks"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

he's clearly the u-god

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

ok stop it lol

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

please

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

he's an ol' dirty bastard

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

"Ben Carnon the Ghostface Killah of Cabinet picks"

okay fuck this

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

are you being serious al? i kinda assumed that was a gag. What would that even mean?

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/06/politics/panel-goes-off-the-rails-a-pundit-compares-carson-to-wu-tang-clans-ghostface-killah-cnntv/

who the hell considers Ghostface the leader of the Wu-Tang Clan?

evol j, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

Times has changed and life is strange

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

unless you are in an airport bar or on a treadmill, watching CNN is just the worst option

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

are you being serious al? i kinda assumed that was a gag. What would that even mean?

― A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses)

I had to check my contact lenses after seeing it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

i'm not sure what satire would even look like anymore

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

A thought I've had numerous times in the past month.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

We live in a post-satire era. Come January, Trump will officially begin eating children.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

@realDonaldTrump
Boeing is building a brand new 747 Air Force One for future presidents, but costs are out of control, more than $4 billion. Cancel order!

Donald Trump's Tuesday morning criticism of Boeing closely followed the publishing of a story in which the aerospace giant's CEO expressed concerns about the trade agenda Trump has backed.

The Chicago Tribune published a column Tuesday morning which included Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg's recent comments arguing that free trade is a crucial part of the U.S. economy. Boeing has a lucrative jet business in China.

Boeing Statement on Air Force One

CHICAGO, Dec. 6, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Boeing (NYSE: BA) today issued the following statement regarding the Air Force One program:

"We are currently under contract for $170 million to help determine the capabilities of these complex military aircraft that serve the unique requirements of the President of the United States. We look forward to working with the U.S. Air Force on subsequent phases of the program allowing us to deliver the best planes for the President at the best value for the American taxpayer."

Contact:

Todd Blecher
Communications

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

look at the replies to this tweet

https://twitter.com/carparkrecords/status/781559306961293312

look at them

goole, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

I don't get it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

they think all ages shows are pedo rings

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

that's what I thought after staring at those colors for a few minutes.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

look i was gone all last week, did you guys not do pizzagate

goole, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

@carparkrecords @cometpingpong @MADEIRA_MUSIC I bind you in the name of JESUS

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

no I know about #pizzagate. I couldn't understand the Tweets at first.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

In fairness, that's a good thing visa vis your mental health.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

xpost Probably because they're the incomprehensible ravings of people that somehow shit through their fingers onto keyboards.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

I had PizzaGate explained to me at a baby shower.

btw Gore did get face time w/ the Yam himself, said it was "an extremely interesting conversation"

Trump appears to be quite canny at saying whatever the person he's talking to wants to hear and making a favorable first impression

I should've been clearer: Gore's words were so deliberately opaque they might just as well be translated as "We're fucked."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

Pizzagate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pizzagate may refer to:

Pizzagate, pizza thrown at former football manager and player Sir Alex Ferguson by an Arsenal Football Club player in the 2004 "Battle of the Buffet"
Pizzagate, a 2016 conspiracy theory falsely claiming the existence of a child trafficking ring involving the Washington, D.C. restaurant Comet Ping Pong

jmm, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

for my money this is the best one:

Chris R. Baxter ‏@ChrisRBax Nov 26
@carparkrecords @MADEIRA_MUSIC @cometpingpong Change your posters, entertainment & themes to a normalized less perverse manner.

goole, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

@FixtheDebt
Leon Panetta warns Trump to address the national deficit and debt

@tinyrevolution
Glad to see top Democrats are rolling out their "Lose Every State in 2020" initiative

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. TrumpVerified account
‏@realDonaldTrump
Departing New York with General James 'Mad Dog' Mattis for tonight's rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina! See you soon! #ThankYouTour2016

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/dem-rep-thinks-trump-selected-james-mattis-for-defense-secretary-because-of-mad-dog-nickname/

reading the twitter leaves I had literally the exact thought as this guy

iatee, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

@blakehounshell
Trump Tower is advertising Secret Service protection as a hot new amenity —>

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-tower-secret-service-amenities-232216

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

unreal

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

running the country like a business

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

thats what we need

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

so is hope hicks going to the be press secretary? i still have never seen her on tv.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

The New York Observer, a newspaper owned by Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, published an opinion piece Friday calling for the FBI to launch a coordinated crackdown on nationwide anti-Trump protests, mobilizations and recount efforts.

Titled “Comey’s FBI Needs to Investigate Violent Democratic Tantrums,” the article was written by Austin Bay, a retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and adjunct professor at the University of Texas in Austin.

Kushner, who is married to Ivanka Trump, purchased a majority stake in the New York Observer in 2006 for roughly $10 million and currently operates as the outlet’s publisher.

Bay’s opinion piece appeals to FBI director James Comey to “conduct a detailed investigation into the violence and political thuggery that continue to mar the presidential election’s aftermath,” including a “thorough probe of the protests—to include possible ties to organizations demanding vote recounts.”

“The hard left’s violent reaction to Donald Trump’s election is vile and dangerous,” writes Bay. “Peaceful protests? No, the demonstrators vandalize and destroy. They have two goals: intimidating people and sustaining the mainstream media lie that Donald Trump is dangerous.”

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

these fucking fucks

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

people who teach at business schools shouldn't get to call themselves professor, that lends far too much respectability

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

lol America doesn't respect professors, get real

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

at least we found the one adjunct who deserves their shitty contingent labor status

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

for my money this is the best one:

Chris R. Baxter ‏@ChrisRBax Nov 26
@carparkrecords @MADEIRA_MUSIC @cometpingpong Change your posters, entertainment & themes to a normalized less perverse manner.

I may mean the same thing, but I thought this was the worst one, the most "We are the 80s, and we're coming to town*" - a lot of the language used is very reminiscent of what I remember from then, particularly around Marina Abramović - she's an artist and she works with symbols, wake up sheeple - and the shot of Alefantis watching a Jeff Koons picture - Is this Child Porn?, okay maybe it's not, but should it be on the Instagram of the owner of a child-friendly restaurant?

*(Beep, beep)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

This new van jones show is fucking stupid. His big theme today is reaching out for common ground via conceding false equivalencies.

Treeship, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

reaching out for common ground via conceding false equivalencies.

I can see this on the crawl

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 03:29 (seven years ago) link

I thought Dole was senile

Former Senator Bob Dole, acting as a foreign agent for the government of Taiwan, worked behind the scenes over the past six months to establish high-level contact between Taiwanese officials and President-elect Donald J. Trump’s staff, an outreach effort that culminated last week in an unorthodox telephone call between Mr. Trump and Taiwan’s president.

Mr. Dole, a lobbyist with the Washington law firm Alston & Bird, coordinated with Mr. Trump’s campaign and the transition team to set up a series of meetings between Mr. Trump’s advisers and officials in Taiwan, according to disclosure documents filed last week with the Justice Department. Mr. Dole also assisted in successful efforts by Taiwan to include language favorable to it in the Republican Party platform, according to the documents.

Mr. Dole’s firm received $140,000 from May to October for the work, the forms said.

The disclosures suggest that President-elect Trump’s decision to take a call from the president of Taiwan, Tsai Ing-wen, was less a ham-handed diplomatic gaffe and more the result of a well-orchestrated plan by Taiwan to use the election of a new president to deepen its relationship with the United States — with an assist from a seasoned lobbyist well versed in the machinery of Washington.

“They’re very optimistic,” Mr. Dole said of the Taiwanese in an interview on Tuesday. “They see a new president, a Republican, and they’d like to develop a closer relationship.”

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 11:29 (seven years ago) link

people with dementia making high-level decisions about government is a time-honoured american tradition

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 12:57 (seven years ago) link

Bob battling RED CHINA even after he's technically dead

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

only Dole could go to Taiwan

brownie, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

- Bob Dole

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

i bet Twitter Nixon is not happy

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

I don't understand anyone who's surprised. It should have been part of the news coverage pre-election: "Whoever wins 270 electoral votes will be elected President, and named TIME Magazine's Person of the Year."

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

As has been the case since '96, with slightly more justification this time - first female President vs first President to shave Vince McMahon's head on pay-per-view.

Much more surprising that Farage was in the running, but that's for another thread.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

farage is the most influential figure in 21st-century british politics - there's every reason to consider him person of the year

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

Must read Perlstein: https://washingtonspectator.org/press-trump-perlstein/

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

xp after Gillian Duffy!

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

tbf the window for gillian duffy to be named time's person of the year clsoed a wee while ago

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

yeah no one in the US talked about anything but Trump this year, i'm so shocked he's Person of the Year

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

my money was on eleven from stranger things

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

farage is the most influential figure in 21st-century british politics - there's every reason to consider him person of the year

― Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, December 7, 2016 9:45 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I hear that the Gatlinburg Chamber of Commerce is floating Dakota Tucker's name for Tenneseean of the Year for his similarly-impactful contribution.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

Annihilation is a form of influence.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

Legit think this is a bigger deal in Trump's mind than winning presidency.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

if he is unaware of TIME's diminished "importance," as seems likely

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

The source of the attention doesn't matter. It's all just fuel for the ego of the most powerful narcissist in the world.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

It's pathetic how easy it is to imagine his twitter tirade against Time if he wasn't selected

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

Technically speaking, Trump has already previously been named Time's Person of the Year along with all of the rest of us.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

The person of the year is you, the trump voter, forwarding along an infowars clip about Hillary Clinton melting off the face of a slain Benghazi hero and stirring it into her mac and cheese, which she didn't cook very well in the first place I bet

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

i do appreciate that time have selected an image of trump which makes him look like he's turning to greet a manacled james bond and explain his plan to destroy the world's hydrogen

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

max made the same joke on twitter! it's true.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

I assumed the cameraman surprised him while he was taking a shit on his upholstered toilet.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

(Which is actually just a La-Z-Boy that he shits on and forces his people to clean daily.)

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

Trump is only going to live a couple more years if he's lucky, the fuck does he care if NYC is underwater sometime after he eats it?

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

I dug this "On the Media" bit with George Lakoff:

http://www.wnyc.org/story/george-lakoff/

BROOKE GLADSTONE: For the next four years, what would your advice to working journalists be?

GEORGE LAKOFF: If you're reporting, you’re reporting on what he says. Now, however, when you report on what he says and it's a lie, you can give a positive background. For example, he says, you know, he’s saved a thousand jobs – not exactly. Carrier Air Conditioning is going to send to Mexico 1,300 jobs of their 2,000, so two-thirds of the jobs are going to Mexico. That could be your lead. He got Mike Pence to pay $700,000 a year from the Indiana state budget directly to Carrier, part of the deal. So the taxpayers are paying the owners of Carrier to keep some of those jobs, one-third of them, when two-thirds of them are going. Now, that’s very, very different from the reporting that says he saved a thousand jobs. And The New York, Times, in their reporting, started by pointing out that all the companies near Carrier, even within a mile, are going to Mexico and nothing is being saved. So that part of the truth isn't being reported, if you report just on what he says.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

I fucking love on the media

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

that's the only NPR show i listen to every week

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

the bright spot of escalating tensions with china is maybe we'll see some chinese hacks of RNC/trump emails

, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

Basically, write a story about what Trump actually does and the impact it has and in your concluding paragraph write something like, "Mr. Trump addressed the aforementioned thermonuclear destruction of Sacramento in a tweet stating '(blank)'"

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

Reuters U.S. NewsVerified account
‏@ReutersUS
JUST IN: Trump chooses pro wrestling magnate Linda McMahon to head Small Business Administration - transition team.

, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

https://flavorwire.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/camacho.jpg

So close. We're so, so close.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

i was 50% sure that was another troll headline, but lol it's true

Nhex, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

I really think the Trump = idiot government meme is dangerous and misleading, there are plenty of people behind him who know what they are doing and have plans to achieve specific and dangerous goals.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

If Trump wasn't rich and didn't know public figures, his cabinet would literally be composed of, like, his next-door-neighbor Deborah for Secretary of Labor and the guy at the newsstand who compliments his ties for Secretary of State.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzGoYqFVEAAb_qT.jpg

circa1916, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

from that time article

For both conservative and liberal ideologues, including Sarah Palin and Bernie Sanders, the deal Trump struck with Carrier was an abomination, an example of government using taxpayer money to pick winners and losers. But as Trump told the story in his tower, ideology had nothing to do with it. This was just another tale of a little guy getting his voice heard.

“So the other night, I’m watching the news,” Trump began. NBC’s Lester Holt had introduced a segment on the Carrier plant featuring a union representative and a plant worker talking in a bar. The man looked at the camera and spoke to Trump, saying, “We want you to do what you said you were going to do.” Trump claimed this shocked him: “I said, I never said they weren’t going to move, to myself.”

But of course he had, as the news segment demonstrated. So Trump says he had no choice. He had to listen to his people. “He energized me, that man,” the President-elect explained. “And I called up the head of United Technologies.”

Shortly after he spoke those words, Reince Priebus, the next White House chief of staff, walked into the room. With the tape recorders rolling, Trump began to issue new instructions. “Hey, Reince, I want to get a list of companies that have announced they’re leaving,” he called out. “I can call them myself. Five minutes apiece. They won’t be leaving. O.K.?”

He was talking as if he had just realized—at that moment, in the middle of an interview—that he had the power to do what he promised to do on the campaign trail. But it was just a show. At that point, Trump had already had a similar talk with Bill Ford of Ford Motor Co., and he boasted of putting out three other calls out to corporations with outsourcing plans.

This is the presidency as improv, as performance art, with good guys, bad guys and suspense. It’s a new thing for the United States of America. The reporters in the room, the voters who will read this article, the nation, the world—we are the audience. A quick study who grew up in Kenosha, Wis., Priebus is far too Midwestern to be mistaken for a showman. But he got what Trump was trying to do, and smiled. “It worked for you last time,” he told the boss.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

gross

goole, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

interesting:

http://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/12/07/keith-ellison-to-leave-us-house-if-elected-dnc-chair

goole, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

if you beamed today's news into the election thread even just a few months ago, no one would ever believe you

blob:http://imgur.com/c1fc218f-c5dc-418c-a2e6-28d2dc0875f7

this is a fucking nightmare

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/ofV18V5.png

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

Newt GingrichVerified account
‏@newtgingrich
75 years ago the Japanese displayed professional brilliance and technological power launching surprises from Hawaii to the Philippines

iatee, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Somewhat off topic and inspired by the Ohio bill above, but is anyone familiar with the literature/public discourse of the reproductive rights movement from before Roe v. Wade in the 50s and 60s. Did they have their own version of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring? Right now, my mind is a blank. I imagine pulp novels where loose women "got their due" at a hack abortionist, but to me, there's like a big cultural void in discussing this outside of law courts and narrow confines of reproductive rights feminism before the early 70s.

Brace for impact (Sanpaku), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

it just feels like this whole transition has been run by a clutch of dipshit rich kid villains from a savage steve holland movie, guys who don't care about anything except being dicks

maura, Thursday, 8 December 2016 01:08 (seven years ago) link

Anyone listening to Robert Reich trying to talk sense to Jeffrey Lord on CNN? It's stupefying.

clemenza, Thursday, 8 December 2016 01:41 (seven years ago) link

It all just keeps getting worse and worse

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 8 December 2016 02:03 (seven years ago) link

yeah running out of small things to be hopeful for

iatee, Thursday, 8 December 2016 02:18 (seven years ago) link

i realize you can all puncture my argument for hope intellectually here but what is the point of that? i am probably younger than most in this thread (or on ILX) and my generation makes me hopeful. and i worked in ed and the kids younger than i give me even more hope. they're smart and informed and capable. you should root for them, and subsquently yourselves

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:16 (seven years ago) link

just the settling on accepting all things fucking dire gets really exhausting and i've only personally managed to break out of that, i think logically you are all correct but how does that help anyone, let's get absurd and not agree to this. the worst that can happen is that we die and that's bound to happen sooner or later

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:19 (seven years ago) link

Counterpoint: young ppl make me sick

sleepingbag, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:20 (seven years ago) link

we could die slowly

j., Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:21 (seven years ago) link

when I feel despair I try to remember just how many times before America has gone through horrifying shit. We had slavery, we had a civil war, we had jim crow, we had all kinds of restoration-era mayhem, the depression, mccarthy, nixon etc. I mean I try not to get into that "well fuck this is going to ruin america now!" mindset because that implies that America was ok until now, but it only had relatively short periods of okayness, and never for everyone.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:24 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the deep government might kick in and restrain Trump

Treeship, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:25 (seven years ago) link

More specifically i think people in the intelligence community might know he is going to get impeached due to the conflict of interest stuff. That gives us pence which sucks but might be a "safer"adversary now. I think this bc i cant imagine the head of the fbi really wanted trump, as it now appears

Treeship, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:30 (seven years ago) link

Counterpoint: young ppl make me sick
― sleepingbag, Wednesday, December 7, 2016 11:20 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

tell me more

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:31 (seven years ago) link

what's the last population of young people you've encountered and where and who were they? i'm confronting you on this because i'm probably gonna have to deal with more of the fallout (no pun intended i hope) from this bullshit than you will, so i definitely fucking scorn your cynicism

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

yeah, go young people, but also they didn't fucking show up to vote in 2016 (4th lowest turnout since 1972), and the white young hopeful people voted for trump 48-43

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:48 (seven years ago) link

Jesus, seriously? Do you know the age range for that? Is it under 30 or under 40

Treeship, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:50 (seven years ago) link

18-29

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-09/what-this-election-taught-us-about-millennial-voters

(based on exit polls so apologies if i'm spreading total bullshit)

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:54 (seven years ago) link

when I feel despair I try to remember just how many times before America has gone through horrifying shit. We had slavery, we had a civil war, we had jim crow, we had all kinds of restoration-era mayhem, the depression, mccarthy, nixon etc. I mean I try not to get into that "well fuck this is going to ruin america now!" mindset because that implies that America was ok until now, but it only had relatively short periods of okayness, and never for everyone.

not picking on your post in particular - lots of people have expressed very similar attitude, and it's probably a healthy attitude! i wish i could have that attitude and whistle on my way to work, if i had a job - but my initial reaction is that while the country/ imagined community of the united states survived these terrible things before and remained intact, that doesn't negate the suffering of all the people whose lives whose lives were shattered. yeah, the idea of the country carried on but it fucking BLEW for a lot of people. that makes me feel despair. if there was some sort of deal to prevent the suffering of non-white men over the next 4 years in exchange for a miraculously peaceful dissolution of the united states, i'd take it in a heartbeat. yes, we will suffer through trump and we will see horrifying shit and life will continue, horribly, for millions of people. the rug is on fire and it's spreading to the curtains and the fire department is 25 miles away, but yes, we will take our vital possessions or our hamsters with us and find a new place to live

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 05:55 (seven years ago) link

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-12-07/trump-team-is-said-to-consider-thiel-associate-o-neill-for-fda
https://www.statnews.com/2016/12/07/trump-fda-oneill/

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald Trump is weighing naming as Food and Drug Administration commissioner a staunch libertarian who has called for eliminating the agency’s mandate to determine whether new medicines are effective before approving them for sale.

“Let people start using them, at their own risk,” the candidate, Jim O’Neill, said in a 2014 speech to a biotech group.

O’Neill, has also called for paying organ donors and setting up libertarian societies at sea — and has said he was surprised to discover that FDA regulators actually enjoy science and like working to fight disease.

A source close to the Trump transition team told STAT that Peter Thiel, the billionaire Trump donor who is helping shape the new administration, is pushing for the FDA appointment for O’Neill, his managing director at Mithril Capital Management.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 06:03 (seven years ago) link

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 06:05 (seven years ago) link

i wonder if i should make appoint jeffrey dahmer as my babysitter

i don't know there are lots of opinions out there but his handshake is firm and my pal dave berkowitz speaks very highly of him

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 06:06 (seven years ago) link

plus you want to kill your children

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 8 December 2016 06:07 (seven years ago) link

slightly worse than donald trump, who wants to have sex with his children. and melania, who also loves her children very much

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cy93oDzVQAAvU9A.jpg

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 06:12 (seven years ago) link

I've battled on the hopefulness/hopelessness front of not wanting to exaggerate the horrible possibilities of the future - in part knowing I'm part of the most privileged class to ever exist as a straight, white American male and not wanting to overstate the ways it might effect me and how we (as in people, not the country, fuck the country) have made it through worse.

At the same time, I'm economically precarious. A lower-middle class small business owner who has to keep the balls in the air or else my life is ruined and the lives of other people I care about and my options for rebuilding afterward are basically warehouse temp work for $12 an hour if I'm lucky.

I can't even really conceive of a 'future'- I don't have any hope that this gets better. Even if technology cushioned a blow from climate change, it's going to cushion the economically advantaged. That same technology and automation are just going to make it harder and harder for the average person to maintain any semblance of a reasonable life and the few ideas that exist to offset that - minimum basic incomes and comprehensive social safety nets - are never going to happen here. All I fall back on is at least I don't have dependents. My parents are aging (65 and 71 as of January) and have no savings or 401Ks or anything because they've always been working/lower-middle class people who prioritized immediate comfort (which I have no problem with) and that's terrifying but not in the same way I'd be in a constant state of anxiety if I had kids.

A libertarian acquaintance posted on FB about how American industry is doing fine it's just that technology is making jobs redundant etc. and how instead of pining for the old days you have to re-train people... but his 'solution' was 'now instead of manning the machines you have to learn to place ads on Facebook' and I don't know how anyone can reasonably think the low-end of tech jobs are in any way secure (in terms of existence or simply providing income to live on).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 8 December 2016 09:16 (seven years ago) link

Man, given that so many cabinet positions are being filled by people opposed to the very departments they oversee, whether the EPA or the Department of Education or whatever, I am really not sure what there is to be hopeful about.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 8 December 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

global tetrahedron, I think the social activism thread is a good place to go for the positive and constructive vibes you're looking for. This thread seems to focus more on the mind-wrenchingly horrifying things that necessitate constructive positivity as an alternative to biting through the cyanide capsule.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

I think any writer of fiction who was crafting a villainous character would probably pull back the reins before they got to Trump's level of OTT unbelievability. I honestly feel like he's working to exceed everyone's vision of how bad he could be. And we're still over a month away from him even taking office.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:26 (seven years ago) link

i may have said this elsewhere on ilx, but i'm now almost certain that the world did in fact end in december 2012 with the running-out of the mayan calendar and we're now living a half-real netherworld existence being controlled by a cruel and capricious god

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

it's almost more comforting to believe that tbh

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

Trump could privatize the nation's air traffic controllers

http://reut.rs/2gFiD9z

This is the type of shit that seems so unnecessary, expensive, and dangerous that I am shocked anyone would come up with it. What possible benefit could this have?

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

profit

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:37 (seven years ago) link

Ah yes, the only important thing. How could I forget?

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

feels like there'll be plenty of opportunities to be reminded between now and 2020

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:39 (seven years ago) link

Well, you see, Donald Trump is basically cancer. There's no reason why it spreads malignance and destruction. That's just what it does.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump insulted a union leader on Twitter. Then the phone started to ring.

This idiot is sending the alt-right army after individuals and doesn't feel any responsibility. But surely he'll unify the country soon amirite?

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

once the unrighteous are cleansed all that will be left is unity

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:49 (seven years ago) link

i may have said this elsewhere on ilx, but i'm now almost certain that the world did in fact end in december 2012 with the running-out of the mayan calendar and we're now living a half-real netherworld existence being controlled by a cruel and capricious god

― Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 13:31 (fifty minutes ago) Permalink

does this mean leicester city winning premier league is not canon

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

It's the leicest timeline

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

I feel like starting a separate thread on the fourth estate's slow collapse in the face of Trump, fake news and clickbait / ratings worship, but I'm sure we already have one somewhere.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link

does this mean leicester city winning premier league is not canon

we're living in a post-fact world so everything's up for grabs imo

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

cool. Pardew never did that touchline dance at the FA Cup final.

We still lost, I'm cool with that. But the dance definitely never happened.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

er, possible tangent.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

nothing is real, everything is permitted

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:39 (seven years ago) link

grasshopper

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump insulted a union leader on Twitter. Then the phone started to ring.

This idiot is sending the alt-right army after individuals and doesn't feel any responsibility. But surely he'll unify the country soon amirite?

this is an attack on a normal private citizen not some media elite or political opponent . With one tweet the fucking president-elect can ruin some guys life just because he called him out on his lies. This is scary as shit !!!!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

when I feel despair I try to remember just how many times before America has gone through horrifying shit. We had slavery, we had a civil war, we had jim crow, we had all kinds of restoration-era mayhem, the depression, mccarthy, nixon etc. I mean I try not to get into that "well fuck this is going to ruin america now!" mindset because that implies that America was ok until now, but it only had relatively short periods of okayness, and never for everyone.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, December 8, 2016 12:24 AM (nine hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

not picking on your post in particular - lots of people have expressed very similar attitude, and it's probably a healthy attitude! i wish i could have that attitude and whistle on my way to work, if i had a job - but my initial reaction is that while the country/ imagined community of the united states survived these terrible things before and remained intact, that doesn't negate the suffering of all the people whose lives whose lives were shattered. yeah, the idea of the country carried on but it fucking BLEW for a lot of people. that makes me feel despair. if there was some sort of deal to prevent the suffering of non-white men over the next 4 years in exchange for a miraculously peaceful dissolution of the united states, i'd take it in a heartbeat. yes, we will suffer through trump and we will see horrifying shit and life will continue, horribly, for millions of people. the rug is on fire and it's spreading to the curtains and the fire department is 25 miles away, but yes, we will take our vital possessions or our hamsters with us and find a new place to live

― Karl Malone, Thursday, December 8, 2016 12:55 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ive been trying to have the attitude that man alive has. this is not the first time we've had a white supremacist monster running the country, it won't be the last either. this is not the first time we've had appointees who hate the very departments they've been appointed to run. we've been through worse.

it could be much worse too, i just read that nytimes thing about duterte murdering people in the philippines and bragging about it and it is so gruesome. but still ultimately things will get very bad here, i have little doubts about that, and this is a major, major step back for us. who knows what will happen in 2020 or 2018 but nonetheless it is easy to imagine this presidency inflicting significant, lasting damage that extends far beyond trump's term in office

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

I would love to have that attitude, but none of those previous eras of suckitude occurred after we had made so much progress that could be rolled back.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

this is an attack on a normal private citizen not some media elite or political opponent . With one tweet the fucking president-elect can ruin some guys life just because he called him out on his lies. This is scary as shit !!!!

It is. Basically taking the weaponization potential of 4chan, GamerGate, etc. and putting the power of the presidency behind it. You don't need actual brownshirts to terrorize people when you have a troll army.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

https://www.yahoo.com/news/i-just-wanted-to-do-some-good-d-c-pizzeria-gunman-speaks-out-132745428.html?ref=gs

he was just trying to do some good, guys. with his gun.

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

I feel like starting a separate thread on the fourth estate's slow collapse in the face of Trump, fake news and clickbait / ratings worship, but I'm sure we already have one somewhere.

i'd like to talk about this too - how about this thread: Is there a thread for the rapid death of the newspaper industry?

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

xp i really love the phrase 'self-investigate' for some reason

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

It is. Basically taking the weaponization potential of 4chan, GamerGate, etc. and putting the power of the presidency behind it. You don't need actual brownshirts to terrorize people when you have a troll army.

The troll army is going to be spread so thin they won't be able to spend more than 48 hours or so on any given target, and veterans of GG and prior campaigns (i.e. Graeme Frost) have plenty of advice I'm sure they'll be happy to share. It's the normalization of trolling intruding into real life. Edgar Welch is just the beginning, obviously.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

They may be spread thin, but you won't need more than a few highly publicized cases of people's lives being wrecked to start to make just about anyone nervous about speaking out. Which is obviously how authoritarianism works in general -- and in this model, it's using freedom of speech protections (which make it hard to police or protect against trolls) as a weapon against dissent.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

There are effective ways to fight back, obviously. But it's still some very bad stuff.

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

The press (broadly speaking) capitulating and normalizing Trump/Trumpism is a distressing prospect.

On the other hand, the press overtly presenting itself as an opposition entity (or counterweight) also has its problems.

Not least that it will sound (to lots and lots of people) like a nakedly partisan stance. It also makes lots of people kneejerkily question the press's ostensible commitment to the mushy and troublesome concepts that usually get called objectivity/fairness/balance/equal time.

I've said this often enough but "we say nice things about each party exactly half the time, and mean things about each party exactly half the time" is a very stupid criterion of fairness. But a lot of people seem to think that's what it means. Changing that perception is not simple.

If roughly half the people think being "objective" means only being mean to the president half the time, then we have a long ways to go before there can be an active fourth estate that has any legitimacy in the eyes of the public and any ability to inform/educate the persuadable public.

As long as there are tens of millions of people saying things like: Snopes is an Obama mouthpiece owned by Soros; why should I trust the obviously partisan Washington Post/New York Times; of COURSE Politifact and Glenn Kessler are biased leftists... The media's just preaching to the converted and it won't change any of the minds that need to change.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

I posted this yesterday: https://washingtonspectator.org/press-trump-perlstein/

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

As long as there are tens of millions of people saying things like: Snopes is an Obama mouthpiece owned by Soros; why should I trust the obviously partisan Washington Post/New York Times; of COURSE Politifact and Glenn Kessler are biased leftists... The media's just preaching to the converted and it won't change any of the minds that need to change.

The GWB years showed that what changes people's minds is actual experience -- once it became clear that GWB had created disaster after disaster, people became much more open to the media reports that detailed why and how. Something similar is likely with Trump. People won't start thinking the press is less biased, but some number of them will find their own biases aligning with the media's. Probably. But who knows?

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

less social media-oriented media during the bush years though. none, really

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

Good point, tipsy: the drumbeat of sleaze from the Bush years eventually took on enough weight to tip public consciousness against that crowd: Heckuva job, Brownie. Wide stance Craig. Duke Cunningham. Cheney shooting that lawyer.

But if I understand the liberal consensus correctly, "let it play out" isn't an acceptable stance in 2016. We (I hear) can't just let the Trompoids make their inevitable mistakes and let the public turn against them in the normal manner of pendulums swinging.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

They showed us the playbook. Schumer, Pelosi and Ellison better follow it. Total obstruction, all day every day.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

any writer of fiction who was crafting a villainous character would probably pull back the reins before they got to Trump's level of OTT unbelievability

The New Yorker Radio Hour did a sketch w/ the election as a script pitch a month-plus ago. "Nobody talks like this..."

The Fourth Estate has been declining (defunded, really) for 35 years, it's just moved into full slapstick mode.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

xxpost It absolutely isn't an acceptable stance imo. Everything Trump has said and done has clearly been in bad faith, he's demonstrated no curiosity or desire to learn or grow into the job, he's nominated nothing but overt garbage to his cabinet positions. Christ knows as fucking awful as he is I WANT him to do a good or at least passable or at the very least not actively destructive job as president. I WANT to be able to find things that he does or that he supports that I can get behind. But there's literally nothing there. He wants to ruin a thing just because he can. So, yeah, we have to go in swinging and keep swinging until he's knocked the fuck down.

And Tombot OTM.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

Snopes is an Obama mouthpiece owned by Soros; why should I trust the obviously partisan Washington Post/New York Times...

^^^ this whole mindset is extremely troubling to me, and I don't have any answers. I need to completely remove myself from online comment sites, because the ubiquity of this shit is really causing me to lose it:

FRINGE? You mean the entire net, the majority of peoples who seek their news online is Fringe? Hey mainstream media, you are in the minority now, and you are fringe! When you hear the mainstream saying things such as "Fringe" or "Fake" there is a very good chance it is real!!

Snorting and all (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

I think some of that is a demoralization tactic, and we also don't know how many people really think that way. I wouldn't despair at it, but it's also clear that we need media sources that reach people who don't read the washington post or nytimes.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

I think a good thing to keep in mind about Breitbart is that it succeeds because (1) it is entertaining to its audience to read and (2) it expressed repressed or unpopular views and feelings that a lot of its readers already have

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

But also don't despair, we *do* have lots of liberal media sources that get wide readership, it's just hard to penetrate to the other side, people who are diametrically opposed to your world view. And we even have our own fake news and/or shitty reporting and/or distorted/biased media.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the delegitimization of vociferousness needs to be a key point of attack. These people make waves not because there are so many of them or because their arguments hold any water but because they know that volume (or the textual equivalent thereof) gets attention.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

worth mentioning that it's a lot easier to write attention-grabbing stories when you're not interested in providing a verifiable account of reality. just make up some shit!

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

reality is boring and no-one really wants to read about the tedious process of government. but hell yeah i'll read a story about a kid-fucking ring run out of a pizza place!

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

It makes me feel a little better to realize that in order to flip some seats, we only need to reach the 15% of Trump voters who don't believe Hillary deserves to be in jail

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

Obviously, fake news is a problem, but there are certainly plenty of Trump voters who don't base their point-of-view around conspiracy theories.

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the delegitimization of vociferousness needs to be a key point of attack. These people make waves not because there are so many of them or because their arguments hold any water but because they know that volume (or the textual equivalent thereof) gets attention.

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:00 AM (eighteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah, they are good at manipulating twitter and other social media to their advantage in order to amplify themselves

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

Obviously, fake news is a problem, but there are certainly plenty of Trump voters who don't base their point-of-view around conspiracy theories.

― I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:17 AM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Maybe not, but I kind of feel like the majority catch wind of all the negative stuff the minority actively believes in and come away with a general sense of mistrust towards those that the minority is actively against. Like not everyone believed the craziest of the Hillary rumors but it was brute forced to a degree that I believe it made the less active/lower info majority say "gee I've been hearing a lot of terrible stuff" based on cumulative over the top headlines etc. constantly in their peripherals.

Evan, Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

less social media-oriented media during the bush years though. none, really

― global tetrahedron, Thursday, December 8, 2016 10:25 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the bullshit still got pushed. never forget "mission accomplished", swiftboat etc

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

Trump's EPA pick has gutted me more than the others, I gotta say. I'm barely old enough to remember Ann Gorsuch, Reagan's pick. My slim hope is that the world economy has shifted too much in eight years to return to turning West Virginia into a fracking site.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

I think it would be a mistake to abandon fact-checking and whatnot, but it's also a mistake to think "Oh the voters are just misinformed and if only we could get them the right facts..."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

that guy is fucking terrible! his only experience in the field whatsoever is being critical of the EPA in defence of oil companies. It's insane xp

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

as AG of Ok he tried to sue colorado for legalized weed

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

xxxp yeah that pick really stings, the idea that you could nominate someone who spent their career fighting the EPA as the god damn head of the agency is just mind-blowingly evil

frogbs, Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

In other news, I just hired the guy who's robbed my bodega eight times as my new cashier.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:49 (seven years ago) link

I mean, fuck it, we have a president elect who pretty demonstrably doesn't understand or give a fuck about governing or the country he's soon to be in charge of. Maybe up really should've been down this whole time!

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

betsy devos hurt badly too. so depressing.

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

I dug this "On the Media" bit with George Lakoff:

http://www.wnyc.org/story/george-lakoff/

BROOKE GLADSTONE: For the next four years, what would your advice to working journalists be?
GEORGE LAKOFF: If you're reporting, you’re reporting on what he says. Now, however, when you report on what he says and it's a lie, you can give a positive background. For example, he says, you know, he’s saved a thousand jobs – not exactly. Carrier Air Conditioning is going to send to Mexico 1,300 jobs of their 2,000, so two-thirds of the jobs are going to Mexico. That could be your lead. He got Mike Pence to pay $700,000 a year from the Indiana state budget directly to Carrier, part of the deal. So the taxpayers are paying the owners of Carrier to keep some of those jobs, one-third of them, when two-thirds of them are going. Now, that’s very, very different from the reporting that says he saved a thousand jobs. And The New York, Times, in their reporting, started by pointing out that all the companies near Carrier, even within a mile, are going to Mexico and nothing is being saved. So that part of the truth isn't being reported, if you report just on what he says.

― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, December 7, 2016 3:03 PM (yesterday)

i know this is not the party line on this but...all this guy seems to be calling for is spin. which, ok, if you're a linguist (as this guy is) and not a journalist, i can see why that would be attractive

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

Trump was considering Harold Hamm for EPA, then one-upped that and said "what if I just hired Hamm's LAWYER!"

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/07/22/three-things-media-should-know-about-harold-hamm-trump-s-leading-pick-energy-secretary/211836

Snorting and all (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

and fucking ben carson for hud too hurts. goddamn it

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

Yeah almost like how a whole party is anti-government and pro-freedom yet strives to run the government so they can restrict freedoms.

xposts

Evan, Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

otm man alive

I think it would be a mistake to abandon fact-checking and whatnot, but it's also a mistake to think "Oh the voters are just misinformed and if only we could get them the right facts..."

As long as 50+ million people think your facts are merely YOURS, and they have THEIRS (which they are perfectly happy with), the effort may be depressingly futile.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

xxxp yeah that pick really stings, the idea that you could nominate someone who spent their career fighting the EPA as the god damn head of the agency is just mind-blowingly evil

― frogs

check this out: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3418-2004Jul21.html

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

As long as 50+ million people think your facts are merely YOURS, and they have THEIRS (which they are perfectly happy with), the effort may be depressingly futile.

― troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:52 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

And while I don't want to draw false equivalencies, I see plenty of people on the democrat side running with unverified stories that *feel* right to them, e.g. a lot of the stuff that went around about russian interference with the election. Not saying this didn't happen, but some of the stories were pretty shaky and people just ran with them.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

the idea that you could nominate someone who spent their career fighting the EPA as the god damn head of the agency is just mind-blowingly evil

Pretty sure I've told the story before of how I was working for the HHS Office on Women's Health in 2001? Most Feds in most departments soldier on and do the jobs they set out to do; others get sidelined by wacky changed priorities from above.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

re: agency heads opposed to the agencies, here's another one: http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-expected-to-name-fast-food-executive-andy-puzder-as-labor-secretary-1481210445

stomach-turning.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

check this out: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3418-2004Jul21.html

lol I did not know about this

frogbs, Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

Normally Linda McMahon would probably the most "lol, you're surely just trolling now" pick so far. Yet I know actual people who are likely going to have to struggle under the very real consequences, so I'm not yukking it up anymore.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

xxxp yeah that pick really stings, the idea that you could nominate someone who spent their career fighting the EPA as the god damn head of the agency is just mind-blowingly evil

― frogs

check this out: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3418-2004Jul21.html

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:52 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

thanks for posting that -- it is hardly comforting in any way but apart from the truly wacko general flynn and ben carson are there any appointees that wouldn't be just be typical shitty GOP ones?

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

betsy devos sounds like someone GWB would nominate

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

xposts
yeah, she was obviously kind of legendary among the old school at EPA. when i first started i would ask about how shitty it was under stephen johnson, and often the answer would eventually turn to something like "well of course it was nothing compared to Gorsuch". it's interesting that even reagan was human enough to put William Ruckelshaus (the first EPA administrator, back in 70-73) back in charge after the Gorsuch debacle. he was actually pretty good. it's strange to think of a time when republicans weren't necessarily enemies of human health and the environment

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

Debilitating brain drain from the federal government is still probably a couple of years off; as YMP states, people soldier on for the most part. The non-political leadership positions, like career folks in policy offices and career staff positions close to the appointees, and executives who directly report to the appointees - those will probably turn over fast.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

i know this is not the party line on this but...all this guy seems to be calling for is spin. which, ok, if you're a linguist (as this guy is) and not a journalist, i can see why that would be attractive

I don't think so; spin operates at a more superficial level than the deeper idea architecture

His response seems more an effort to change how your bog-standard reporter reports this stuff, to change it from the lazy-ass received wisdom practitces they get from their colleagues

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

a thought from overseas: Americans abroad are frequently thought of by locals as big and bumbling, rich but undiscerning, easily taken advantage of, in short, marks. "Not all Americans abroad": but enough. They're easy money.

the US president-elect and his advisors all seem to be tangled in various foreign intrigues presumably in order to get rich quick. With Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Taiwan, etc. Are they marks too? does the US government become a mark?

droit au butt (Euler), Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

Throwing the entire preamble about expats out as being goofy and a little offensive, you are OTM on the second part hoo boy and how.

Three Word Username, Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Trump is sitting pretty now because he's indisputably King Con of the US but I can see him (and by extension us) getting played pretty hard by confidence men of other nations, yep.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

i thought the preamble was common knowledge or at least a very widely held view

xpost

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

The aforementioned liberal civil servants should become well versed in intentional incompetence and foot-dragging. Maybe just by doing a bad job they can keep Trump from doing a worse job.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

they've been doing it since January 1981

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

the problem is that incompetence and foot-dragging in the federal government is the goal of the trump administration, and really just republicans in general. their vision is realized by federal employees doing less, not by them doing more.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

xpost

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

it's not like january 21 is going to be filled with grand sweeping initiatives in every little program office across all the federal agencies. most feds are mired in the day-to-day slog of implementing statutes that are decades old and long forgotten by nearly everyone that isn't directly working on them. trump's cronies won't infiltrate all these offices and give them orders to go murder innocent people. they'll just sit in the basement with the lights off like the guy in Office Space, hoping that they'll continue to get a minimally viable budget. or they'll just be asked to produce fact sheets. and then revise those fact sheets. and then update the website. redesigning the website takes YEARS.

the truly vile shit isn't implemented at the lowly staff level, it comes from a combo of endless meaningless timewasting directives to occupy the vast majority of feds on one hand, and the intentional surgical wrecking of more prominent policy shops (e.g., climate change regulations) on the other.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

Karl otm

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 8 December 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

ive got to assume alot of the spy agencies out there have a decent sized file on trump already..

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 8 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

remember Russia has a sex tape of him with underaged prostitutes

frogbs, Thursday, 8 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

i do wonder what kind of things might come up once people start breaking NDAs but sitting around waiting for that to happen was ultimately a waste of time during the election

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Thursday, 8 December 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

no fucking way you can enforce an nda once the transition begins. theyre government employees now where they want to be or not.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 8 December 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

opportunity dumps any day now

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 8 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

The aforementioned liberal civil servants should become well versed in intentional incompetence and foot-dragging. Maybe just by doing a bad job they can keep Trump from doing a worse job.

― Josh in Chicago

i'm assuming the declassified '44 oss sabotage manual has gotten around pretty thoroughly by now, right?

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 8 December 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link

Yes but it's always worth another block quote or three

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

the thing that fascinates me about that manual is that to me it seems like a dual propaganda purpose, that it was written under the assumption that it would be confiscated and read and that doing so would further spread paranoia. leaders of the regime would start suspecting anybody who advocated for due diligence or quality control as possible saboteurs. you start cracking down on people you think are "foot-draggers" and all of a sudden your bombs start blowing up in the faces of your soldiers.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 8 December 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

colbert did a pizzagate segment last night

the youtube landed today. it has 6,650 comments

goole, Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

i don't want to imagine the shit that would be found in that comment section .

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

It's not very imaginative

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

glad to see Colbert getting more righteous tbh

Nhex, Friday, 9 December 2016 01:21 (seven years ago) link

Imagine running a wildly profitable fast food chain. Every morning your dozens of franchises open up run smoothly; workers come in, keep things neat, provide quality customer service, keep the profits rolling in. Imagine this system allows you to become a multi millionaire.

Now imagine lobbying in order to repeal overtime pay provisions for these same employees, so that they can work 50, 60 hours a week without getting time and a half. Imagine penning an op ed for the walll street journal against any minimum wage increase, even though most of your franchises are in california, which has a high cost of living.

Imagine championing automation as a way to save money by putting your workers out of a job -- the same workers whose labor allows you to be a millionaire. Imagine making smug jokes on camera about how they machines are never rude and don't talk back and things to that effect.

Now imagine being named secretary of labor by a president elect who ran on a "populist" message.

Treeship, Friday, 9 December 2016 04:45 (seven years ago) link

This is too grotesque to even comprehend. Feels like Trump is going out of his way to spit in the faces of the working class people who voted for him. His appointees have long track records of trying to destroy these voters' livelihoods.

Treeship, Friday, 9 December 2016 04:47 (seven years ago) link

duh

sleeve, Friday, 9 December 2016 04:53 (seven years ago) link

time honored tradition going back to Reagan or maybe Nixon

sleeve, Friday, 9 December 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

now imagine none of trumps supporters actually giving a fuck about how this guy is terrible for them or why. they have no interest in lifting their heads out of their echo chambers, and no interest in ever considering that they might be wrong.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 9 December 2016 05:02 (seven years ago) link

Also remember that a lot of Trump's voters -- most -- aren't working class. A lot of them live in the suburbs and when they go to fast-food restaurants it's to eat, not to clock in. They're people like the guy I heard today -- a guy who works in a profession that prides itself on being blue-collar, but still has health benefits and a pension -- talking dismissively about people who "think you should get paid 15 bucks an hour to flip burgers."

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2016 05:09 (seven years ago) link

Now imagine that everything you imagined is real! Especially the flying piranha demons

Karl Malone, Friday, 9 December 2016 05:42 (seven years ago) link

That's true tipsy, but a good amount of trump's supporters still seemed to be under the impression that he's stick up for ordinary people against entrenched interests. The head of carl's jr is an enemy of ordinary people.

Treeship, Friday, 9 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

*he'd

Treeship, Friday, 9 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

Republican voters do not recognize fast food workers, or minimum-wage employees in general, as ''ordinary people'' though.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

LOL what First Amendment?

The Lincoln Memorial has been the site for many of the United States’ most historic rallies, from the civil rights and anti-Vietnam protests of the 1960s to the Million Man March in 1995. However, for the thousands of women planning to march on Washington following Donald Trump’s inauguration, the D.C, landmark won’t be available for rallying.

According to The Guardian, the National Park Service, on behalf of the Presidential Inauguration Committee, has blocked access to the landmark by filing a “massive omnibus blocking permit.” This will bar protesters from most of the National Mall, Pennsylvania Avenue, the Washington Monument, and of course, the Lincoln Memorial for days and weeks before, during, and after the inauguration, which will take place on Jan. 20, 2017.

The Women’s March on Washington was organized for January 21, the day following the inauguration and was set to be held at the Lincoln Memorial. According to a Facebook event, over 136,000 people are due to attend. Now, with the blocking of access to many of the spaces commonly used to protest, participants will have to find space elsewhere—no easy feat considering how few public spaces to gather will be free during the time period surrounding the inauguration.

Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, said in a press conference for the Answer (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) Coalition, said that she’s worked on court battles for protest access on inauguration before, but this instance is “extremely unique” in that it banned access to public land (which Answer Coalition’s press release notes, are “historic spaces for dissent”) for protesters days after the inauguration.

“It hasn’t come up in any way previously, where you’ve had a groundswell of people trying to have access on the Saturday, January 21, and thousands of people want to come, and the government is saying we won’t give you a permit,” she said. “What they’ve done is take all of these spaces out of action.”

Mark Litters, a Park Service spokesman, told The Guardian that the blocked-off spaces are “construction zones, effectively.”

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

mark litters of the park service? c'mon that can't be a real person, it's too perfect

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:38 (seven years ago) link

That's fucking disgusting. But, well, if y'all are looking to quell lawful demonstration, I suppose there are other kinds of demonstration we could start engaging in.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 13:55 (seven years ago) link

trump needs a safe space

maura, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:00 (seven years ago) link

Literally true.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 9 December 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

People (Treeship, lots of people IRL, etc) should stop painting this straw man Trump supporter who believes in this fanciful intersection on the political Venn diagram that we can all agree upon.

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Like this morning my friend was thinking out loud how surely Trump's base would be at least a little bit underwhelmed by his decision to stay on as an executive producer for a reality television show, and then realized no, of course not, they don't fucking care. Save yourself the round trip! The answer is always no, they don't care.

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

I've been watching the Leah Remini Scientology show, and the parallels between that shit and this Trumpist/alt-right shit underscores my long-held and increasingly-strong belief that we're basically handing the reins over to a cult leader.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

(I'm sure you history and political theory buffs will be able to frame that in a broader context of fascism and demagoguery throughout history, but I'm less smart than you.)

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 14:23 (seven years ago) link

exec producer is often a no-showup job i think

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 December 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

....

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

Yeah it's congruent with his fundamental beliefs about getting paid.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link

I don't think this is a huge deal but of course he's on the record saying that he would absolutely give it up because he lies about literally everything

frogbs, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link

The backhandedness of that Putin quote posted here some days ago was kinda delicious. Boldface mine:

“Trump was a businessman and an entrepreneur,” Putin said in the interview, which also touched on international affairs, including the war in Syria. “Now he’s a government official, now he’s the head of the United States of America, one of the leading countries of the world, one of the world’s leading economies, one of the world’s leading military states. To the extent that he was able to achieve success in business, this shows that he’s a smart person. And if he’s a smart person, that means that he will totally and quite quickly understand the different level of his responsibility. We presume that he will act based on this position.”

anatol_merklich, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politicsnc.com/an-open-letter-to-america-from-north-carolina/

An open letter to America from North Carolina
December 7, 2016 | by Thomas Mills | Editor's Blog | 103 Comments

Dear America,

North Carolina here. You’re in for a rough ride for the next few years. We should know.

Just a few years ago, we were the moderately progressive state known for great beaches, mountain vistas, a world-class university system, and a welcoming environment. Then, in 2012, Republicans took control of both houses of the legislature, the Governor’s Mansion and the Supreme Court. (Sound familiar?) Now, we’re known for HB2, voter suppression laws, and extreme gerrymandering.

The Republicans in Congress are about to get brutal. Everything you think they wouldn’t dare do, they will do. They will strike quickly and broadly. By the time you understand the breadth of their destruction, they’ll be rolling and you’ll be trying to figure out how to respond.

Nothing is sacred. Expect attacks on the social safety net, including Social Security and Medicare. The third rail of American politics now has a short in it. The social contract that we built in the New Deal and Great Society is in tatters.

These aren’t Ronald Reagan Republicans. They’re Cal Coolidge folks. We’re going back to the Roaring Twenties, complete with Robber Barons and massive income inequality.

They’ll flatten the tax rate and shift the burden from the wealthy to the middle class. They’ll cut corporate taxes to almost nothing and eliminate protections that keep workers out of poverty in tough economic times.

Deregulation will be the cry of the day. Forget climate change. They’ll trade hurricanes and droughts for gas and oil profits in a New York minute. Unregulated financial industries will make bankers even richer while costing you more in fees, penalties, and interest.

Proposed social legislation will send tremors through organizations that defend women’s health, equality, and social justice. Various religious freedom bills will defend the rights of socially conservative Christians to discriminate against LGBT people. The rights of fetuses will supersede those of the adults who created them.

Expect an all-out assault on public education. They’ll force some sort of voucher program on public schools across the nation. Religious schools will get a bunch of tax dollars while poor schools will get the shaft. Privatization of our public education system is the end game here.

They’ll try to protect their gains by disenfranchising voters who disagree with them. Look for federal legislation to make voting more difficult, especially for people of color and young folks. They’ll force states to bend to their will on voting restrictions.

Oh, you thought they believe in limited government? How quaint.

No, they want power. And they’ll do what it takes to keep it. The only Amendment that counts for much anymore is the second one.

If you want a hint of what they’ll do, look at the various components of their base. Everybody will get something.

The free-marketeers will get their supply-side tax cuts and deregulation that increases environmental destruction while stripping away workers’ rights. The social conservatives will get restrictions on abortions and anti-LGBT legislation. The populists will get a crackdown on undocumented immigrants that pushes the Fourth Amendment to the breaking point.

Sure, some of their overreach will fail. In North Carolina, two guys tried to institute a state religion. Another one submitted a bill to mint our own currency. They just made us a laughingstock. They won’t be able to kill the Federal Reserve System, though somebody like Louie Gohmert will certainly suggest it.

So, what can you do? Well, you can organize. Look at the Moral Monday protests that energized the base in North Carolina. Build a campaign infrastructure that recruits candidates and supports them. And sue. Much of their legislation will be unconstitutional. Even if the GOP controls the Supreme Court, judicial consciences will come into play. A few judges will surprise you.

Be loud. They’ve empowered racists and they’ll look the other way at religious intolerance. Call them out and shame them. Our Muslim brothers and sisters will likely have an especially difficult time. Stand with them. The world needs to know that there are still people in America who won’t abide bigotry.

And, hey, if all that fails, we’re probably only six or eight years away from another economic collapse. That’s what’s happened the last two times the GOP controlled all three branches of government. Their policies caused the Great Depression in 1929 and the Great Recession in 2008. Lack of oversight and regulation encourages unsustainable corruption and greed.

After that, if you’ve held off authoritarianism, you can elect a responsible government that believes in mitigating the impact of economic hardship on the most vulnerable people in a capitalist society, protects the environment from the most egregious polluters, and stands up for the rights of minorities.

But for now, buckle up. It’s gonna be a rough ride. Welcome to the fray.

Sincerely,

North Carolina

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

That's pretty much what I've been thinking all written out in one place. Except I think the economic collapse will come sooner.

It's true, Tom! Showbiz is a big scam mostly. xxxxp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

puzder sounds like an awful pos but this mark krikorian post from NR indicates that immigration hardliners might not be happy with him? http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442884/trump-labor-secretary-immigration

Trump’s pick for Labor secretary is perhaps the worst person imaginable for that role: Andrew Puzder, CEO of CKE Restaurants, the parent company of fast-food chains Carl’s Jr., Hardee’s, and others. He is one of the nation’s most outspoken business voices for Gang of Eight-style immigration policies. He didn’t just sign an open letter once as a favor to a friend; he’s been a high-profile champion of amnesty and huge increases in immigration and guestworkers. This op-ed in Politico, timed to coincide with the launch of the Gang of Eight effort in 2013, could have been written by Jeb Bush. Here he is at AEI in 2013 making the case for importing more low-skilled workers. Here he joins with the Bloomberg-Murdoch Billionaires for Open Borders outfit and Grover Norquist in an effort to “push 2016 presidential candidates and congressional Republican leaders to support immigration reform this year.” There’s plenty more.

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

I had a feeling the admin wouldn't really go as hard as they said on immigration -- it's shaping up to be more of a hard right pro-business admin with some gifts here and there for the social conservative base. Business loves immigrants.

business loves cheap non-union labor that they can demonize and demoralize when opportune

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

looks like they're going to purge the EPA https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-09/trump-team-s-memo-hints-at-broad-shake-up-of-u-s-energy-policy

, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

Dear deity or deities, is there something I'm doing wrong when I implore you daily to allow Donald Trump to peacefully pass away in his sleep? Please let me know because we really need to rush this thing along. Thanks!

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

specifically targeting everyone who worked on Obama's climate "agenda" is a special kind of evil, I hope there is a hell and all these dumb fuckers have to live there, since they'll all be dead when Earth becomes Hell incarnate

(seriously though fuck any news org or politician who calls "trying in vain to save this dumb planet" an "agenda")

frogbs, Friday, 9 December 2016 15:57 (seven years ago) link

It's like how fighting for clean air and water is just part of libtards' stupid "trying not to die" agenda.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

They'll suddenly remember who was involved in the manufacture of their air filtration systems and gas masks when that shit starts to fail.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

was just hoping there's a hell this morning after reading about some of these picks xxp

global tetrahedron, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

('They' being GOP fucks who think they can comfortably ride out mass extinction in the safety of their fortified McMansions.)

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-spokeswoman-says-he-will-produce-the-apprentice-in-his-spare-time-c810df41dff4#.9j3ffpitn

trump has time to produce the apprentice but not to take daily intelligence briefings

, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

priorities

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

I didn't even know North Carolina could read. Good job, North Carolina!

(I kid, I was born there, and I'm up to chapter books.)

We'll be in DC for the march in January. In fact, I know several people from my corner of the city alone who are going. I wonder if estimates of 130,000 or whatever are actually low? Anyway, how the fuck can they close public spaces from protesting? If Fugazi can play a free show at the base of the monument, surely my family and I can march to the Lincoln Memorial.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

They played a show at the base of the Washington Monument because they got a permit

a (waterface), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

Dear deity or deities, is there something I'm doing wrong when I implore you daily to allow Donald Trump to peacefully pass away in his sleep? Please let me know because we really need to rush this thing along. Thanks!

― i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch)

i suggest praying for an apology. we all deserve one.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

Fine. If Fugazi can get a permit to play a free show at the base of the Washington Monument, surely my family and I can march to the Lincoln Memorial, per historical march precedent.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

They played a show at the base of the Washington Monument because they got a permit

― a (waterface)

ok, there's our answer. fugazi needs to ask for another permit and then when they get one, bam! hundreds of thousands of women at the free show.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

@CNBCnow
BREAKING: President-elect Trump picks Goldman Sachs president & COO Gary Cohn to be National Economic Council Director

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

that swamp is really drainin'

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

there is so much winning i can't even take it

Karl Malone, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

xpost Park dude unfortunately named Mike Litterst, not Mark Litters.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

otoh, maybe the first appointment Thrillary would've made too (cept perhaps she'd have been skittish about looking quid pro quo)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

@CNBCnow
BREAKING: President-elect Trump picks Goldman Sachs president & COO Gary Cohn to be National Economic Council Director

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, December 9, 2016 11:42 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that swamp is really drainin'

you can appoint them all you want you just cant get paid to make speech to them .

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure "draining the swamp" means creating a situation where civil servants in major government agencies are driven to quit because their leadership is actively trying to ruin their organizations

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 9 December 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

That's what they did to FEMA under Dubya. There's flippin' management school case studies on it now. Then they got to replace the entire New Orleans public school system with charters. Creative destruction! Move fast and break things!

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

we actually do need fugazi at this moment in time

a (waterface), Friday, 9 December 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

No, "draining the swamp" means having runny, anxiety induced diarrhea

Evan, Friday, 9 December 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

we actually do need fugazi at this moment in time

http://www.huckmagazine.com/art-and-culture/pep-talk-ian-mackaye-eve-us-elections/

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

the trump/apprentice thing seems like more of an ethical issue on NBC's side than trump's

k3vin k., Friday, 9 December 2016 17:27 (seven years ago) link

if you can't have Billy Bush at your network because he was involved in a dirty conversation with Trump, then I dunno how you can keep Trump himself

frogbs, Friday, 9 December 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

the apprentice thing is so far down my list of things to give a shit about right now, are we going to waste this administration complaining about how unclassy and tacky and "reality tv" he is or pay attention to what his admin actually does?

sadly, yeah

it's gonna be 4 years of coverage of him tweeting insults at comedy shows while his administration fucks over the planet and the working class every which way

frogbs, Friday, 9 December 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

I'd argue that the Apprentice thing is more about the incredibly uncomfortable conflict of interest of a standing president producing a television series on a major network than it is about Trump being tacky. It's not of paramount concern but it's nonetheless very concerning.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Accruing media mouthpieces while expressing general contempt for any exercise of the 1st amendment that's at all critical of him or his administration is a thing he's actually doing.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

the conflict seems to be with NBC paying him a salary while also paying its journalists to write critically about him

k3vin k., Friday, 9 December 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Well

Outside of the Capitol Thursday night, a group of red state Democrats gathered to speak out about an upcoming must-pass spending bill they argue doesn't do enough for miners.

With the Capitol lit behind them, Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Bob Casey (D-PA) – all up for re-election in 2018 in states Trump won– literally stood with the miners they were fighting for. It was a photo op for sure and the first opportunity red state Dems have had since the election to make an overt play for the white working class voters they lost to President-elect Trump.

Here's the issue.

Congress has paved the way for a must-pass spending bill. Without it, the government runs out of money at midnight. The legislation easily passed in the House of Representatives, but in the Senate, there is a problem. Tucked in the legislation is a provision to extend health care benefits for miners and their widows, but it only funds the care for four months. Democrats want the benefits extended for a full year. And they want another measure to be added that requires all government-funded projects to be required to use American products like steel.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 December 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

This came out a few months before the election, re plan to purge Obama admin people from civil service:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-purge-exclusive-idUSKCN10003A

Maybe it's wishful thinking for me, but it could turn out to be a mistake. A de-baathification of washington.

drain the baath

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

If he wins the presidency, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump would seek to purge the federal government of officials appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama and could ask Congress to pass legislation making it easier to fire public workers, Trump ally, Chris Christie, said on Tuesday.

oh the irony of chris christie, widely reviled hated public worker, delivering this message

Karl Malone, Friday, 9 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

I'd argue that the Apprentice thing is more about the incredibly uncomfortable conflict of interest of a standing president producing a television series on a major network than it is about Trump being tacky. It's not of paramount concern but it's nonetheless very concerning.

and yet the most infuriating thing was hearing all the shrieks from Trump supporters (and Trump himself) that Obama PLAYED GOLF!!! a couple times when so-and-so was happening

frogbs, Friday, 9 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

Are you all familiar with the handy acronym IOKIYAR*?

*It's OK If You're A Republican

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 9 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

BTW, while it's quite true that you can march/protest without a permit, it's frustrating to show up and just have lots of people milling about with no focal point and shouting hey hey ho ho.

If you want stuff like a podium on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial for your speakers, or jumbotrons for those too distant to see, permits are useful. Not to mention porta-potties and trash collection and and and.

Permits may be fascist, maaaan. But Martin Luther King had microphones in front of him when he told people he had a dream. The reason is because he had a fucking permit.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 9 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

ExxonMobil Chairman Rex Tillerson’s with ties to Vladimir Putin stock is rising in Donald Trump’s ever-expanding search for a secretary of state nominee

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

Given his tenuous grasp on reality, I'm a little surprised that Trump has yet to nominate a fictional villain to a cabinet position.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

Bobby Valentine floated as ambassador to Japan

you could not. make. it up.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:10 (seven years ago) link

...What the actual fuck is wrong with this man? And what the actual fucking fuck is wrong with anyone who has the power to stop this shit and fails to do so?

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

sadly my first thought was that it made slightly more sense than his last 10+ announced appointees

Karl Malone, Friday, 9 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

like, bobby valentine has at least BEEN to Japan, and is known there in the baseball community at least. and more importantly, unlike the education, EPA, labor, HUD, etc, picks, he doesn't completely hate and oppose the idea of Japan as an entity

Karl Malone, Friday, 9 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

hm, i thought i wouldn't be surprised by any further appointments but it turns out i was wrong

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

so this is kind of obvious but isnt the gop basically telling the youth to go fuck themselves?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/gop-plan-major-social-security-cuts

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

no no, they're "saving" social security don't you see?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

his fucking idiotic rally is on in the background here right now. It's mind boggling what this shit head is babbling on about. I want to cry!!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

I refuse to listen to him at this point. The very sound of his voice makes me sick.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

sadly my first thought was that it made slightly more sense than his last 10+ announced appointees

― Karl Malone, Friday, December 9, 2016 3:12 PM (twenty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

like, bobby valentine has at least BEEN to Japan, and is known there in the baseball community at least. and more importantly, unlike the education, EPA, labor, HUD, etc, picks, he doesn't completely hate and oppose the idea of Japan as an entity

― Karl Malone, Friday, December 9, 2016 3:13 PM (twenty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sadly otm

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

yea i can't watch videos or listen to his voice either xps

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

just watching him gesticulating is ridiculous and infuriating.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

I genuinely (and blessedly) don't think I've heard Trump speak or seen any video of him since he was elected.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

Oh no wait, I saw that fucking first 100 days video but I think that's it.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

I genuinely (and blessedly) don't think I've heard Trump speak or seen any video of him since he was elected.

― The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, December 9, 2016 2:46 PM (thirty-eight seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

possibly the worst part of being in the inauguration protests is the risk of that
well and it's going to be cold as fuckin balls

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

you'd also be able to avoid people with signs calling him like 'orange' and 'a cheeto' like okay we get it

global tetrahedron, Friday, 9 December 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

oh god, sitting through that cold was interminable when it was a president I was enthusiastic about, I can't imagine being in that environment for Trump

¶ (DJP), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

yea i was there in 08 and it was unbelievably cold

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 9 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

anger warms the heart more than pride though
it also lasts longer

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

Anger is an energy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zN-GGeNPQEg

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it will rain, and Trump ends up pulling a William Henry Harrison.

a full playlist of presidential apocalypse jams (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

Predictions feel like a fool's game at this point, but 'Trump dies in office' feels like a pretty safe one to me.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

Dead to me, tbh.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 December 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

id personally prefer "trump first president removed from office" but either way works

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

Even if it isn't by natural causes, you figure he will at some point tweet something nasty about the Secret Service and they'll start being all 'oh hey look at those pretty flowers over there, aren't they something' at all of his public appearances.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

not sure if this article has been posted but i know a number of you have said the same thing: https://newrepublic.com/article/139245/trumps-distractions-will-provide-republican-cover-rip-apart-safety-net "Trump’s Distractions Will Provide Republican Cover to Rip Apart the Safety Net"

On a daily basis, Trump has proven able to divert media attention away from the plutocratic government he is assembling and on to a variety of shiny objects. His meetings with Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio received far more coverage, for instance, than the fact that his designated Environmental Protection Agency director worked hand in glove with polluters as Oklahoma’s attorney general. He has not tweeted about Obamacare or turning Medicare over to private insurers, but he did appoint one of the most fiercely dedicated foes of both programs to run the Department of Health and Human Services.

In 2005, when Democrats wanted the GOP’s plan to privatize Social Security to drive news coverage, Bush played into their hands. In a way, he did so consistent with the best liberal traditions of public debate. Likewise, when President Barack Obama asked Congress to pass health care reform, Congress undertook a major public legislating process, while Obama quarterbacked. He gave a prime-time health care reform address to a joint session of Congress, and participated in a televised negotiation with congressional Republicans at the Blair House—a final gesture for cross-over support—before Democrats passed it on their own.

In all likelihood, Trump isn’t going to do any of this.

And in a very intentional way, he won’t really have to. House Speaker Paul Ryan has been priming Republicans in Congress to streamline Obamacare repeal and Medicare privatization for years. Unifying control of government so Congress can set the agenda, and the president can sit back and sign bills, has been the party’s long-game for years. The difference is that instead of keeping drama at bay, the GOP president will be creating routine distractions from the hard work of crafting unpopular legislation.

For the press, the temptation will be hard to resist. Covering major legislation is grueling, complicated work that doesn’t generate a return-to-clicks in the way a Trump rally or a Trump tweet does. Many dedicated, hardworking reporters will work insane hours covering the GOP’s decision-making and legislative maneuvers, but much of that hard work will end up below the fold, where much of the public won’t see it. This will insulate the party from blowback while the process is underway, which is precisely when blowback is most needed.

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

i.e. trump's tweets may be reprehensible and disturbing but keep your eye on the ball re: shitty and dangerous GOP legislation

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

oh god, sitting through that cold was interminable when it was a president I was enthusiastic about, I can't imagine being in that environment for Trump

― ¶ (DJP), Friday, December 9, 2016 3:51 PM (twenty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It's OK there should be plenty of hot air

Evan, Friday, 9 December 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

Isn't part of the problem that people already don't pay attention to or understand enough the machinations of government? I mean why does this work as a "distraction" technique in the first place? Why are more people clicking the tweet story than the medicare story?

I feel like I said this somewhere before, but Trump tweets (and, by extension, any words he types or utters) only have utility as a window into the complex of mental illnesses from which he suffers. None of it represents his true intentions or reflects his actions or means a goddamn thing so, yes, focus your attention on what he actually does.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

Are you all familiar with the handy acronym IOKIYAR*?

*It's OK If You're A Republican

― jane burkini (suzy), Friday, December 9, 2016 2:51 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

thats some fucked up acronym algebra my dude

flappy bird, Friday, 9 December 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

By that logic wouldn't most of Trump supporters also be mentally ill?

xp

Evan, Friday, 9 December 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

I can't take credit/blame for the acronym algebra! It's been in use for 15 years.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

yeah I have to look it up about every 3 months or so thanks to Balloon Juice

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

I was looking at it, trying to somehow make it about Steve Aoki

¶ (DJP), Friday, 9 December 2016 21:59 (seven years ago) link

I feel like I said this somewhere before, but Trump tweets (and, by extension, any words he types or utters) only have utility as a window into the complex of mental illnesses from which he suffers. None of it represents his true intentions or reflects his actions or means a goddamn thing so, yes, focus your attention on what he actually does.

― The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Friday, December 9, 2016 4:22 PM (thirty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, I mean all this decoding and shit, I don't want to completely write it off but at the end of the day we know who he's putting in his cabinet, we know what bills the GOP want to pass, we'll presumably be able to find out what executive orders he signs. So I'm not sure if it matters why he tweets a tweet.

i still think about the video of him talking about harambe- it's jarring because you can tell he put some critical thinking skills to work and also expresses himself coherently

global tetrahedron, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

In response to somebody posting a vid of Trump complaining that the cover title is not "Man of the Year:"

https://mobile.twitter.com/Mobute/status/807056385577861120

Big Xmas Jeb Lund – ‏@Mobute

everyone's going to have to get used to the fact that he is always going to use everyone else's ability to be a human being against them

https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/807050319289061376

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 9 December 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/JXW05hd.jpg

, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

dave itzkoff has a good tweet about that one

El Tomboto, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

in more evidence of his corruption, donald trump arranged to win the brian eno lookalike competition

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 9 December 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

The blue man group shifting to normal desk jobs

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 9 December 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

Josh RoginVerified account
‏@joshrogin
The rumor I heard was that Rudy fell asleep in a meeting & Trump decided he just wasn't up for the SecState travel schedule & workload.

, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

Giuliani voluntarily withdrew. I know this because he said so. He wants to spend more time with Chris Christie.

clemenza, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

wow at trump literally surrounding himself with dickheads

rob, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it will rain, and Trump ends up pulling a William Henry Harrison.

― a full playlist of presidential apocalypse jams (C. Grisso/McCain)

i would just like to point out what a profoundly, profoundly awful president john tyler was.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 9 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

If you shit talk Trump on Twitter to the point where he strokes out, would that count as an assassination?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 9 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

wow at trump literally surrounding himself with dickheads

― rob

if herr starr isn't nommed for a cabinet-level post i'll be deeply disappointed

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 9 December 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

Bobby Valentine floated as ambassador to Japan

as someone pointed out, at least he speaks Japanese

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

i would just like to point out what a profoundly, profoundly awful president john tyler was.

― increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, December 9, 2016 5:45 PM (

but executive power! Treaties annexing sovereign nations! There's a lesson in Tyler for Trump.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

cia report says russia intervened to get trump elected

welp,

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

...

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:51 (seven years ago) link

How could that be possible? What were the hacks then?

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:51 (seven years ago) link

Ohhhh

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

I misread your post.

Yeah, glad they admit it

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:52 (seven years ago) link

hopefully that link works, wapo actively pasting it on top of the one about obama calling for an inquiry

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Saturday, 10 December 2016 00:53 (seven years ago) link

Kellyanne Conway sees no difference between Trump executive-producing a network TV show and Obama playing golf: "Presidents have a right to do things in their spare time."

clemenza, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:06 (seven years ago) link

She strikes me as a bad person.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:08 (seven years ago) link

CIA is good to have around so they can corroborate the stuff Josh Marshall figures out during his coffee time

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link

the needle slipped and botoxed her conscience xp

estela, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:13 (seven years ago) link

(xposts) I can't figure her out. I think she had a relatively okay reputation prior to this election, she'll occasionally say something dryly amusing, and the new SNL running joke is that she's as embarrassed by Trump as the other side is. She doesn't give any indication of that, though.

clemenza, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:17 (seven years ago) link

she's a garbage human being who sucks

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

that didn't take long to calculate

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

el tomboto otm

estela, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:30 (seven years ago) link

i wouldn't take the running SNL joke as proof of anything. they're giving her more credit than is due. you are correct, she is a garbage person

akm, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:34 (seven years ago) link

Kate McKinnon is an American treasure but she makes all her caricature subjects endearing, which is a problem when it comes to Kellyanne, who is a gaslighting propagandist

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:41 (seven years ago) link

Do y'all know who Kellyanne Conway's husband is? If you followed the Clinton impeachment hearings, George Conway was one of Santa's elves, i.e. Paula Jones' advisor. She's married to a GOP troll/ratfucker.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:48 (seven years ago) link

WaPo not fucking around with drawing inferences:

In a secure room in the Capitol used for briefings involving classified information, administration officials broadly laid out the evidence U.S. spy agencies had collected, showing Russia’s role in cyber-intrusions in at least two states and in hacking the emails of the Democratic organizations and individuals.

And they made a case for a united, bipartisan front in response to what one official described as “the threat posed by unprecedented meddling by a foreign power in our election process.”

The Democratic leaders in the room unanimously agreed on the need to take the threat seriously. Republicans, however, were divided, with at least two GOP lawmakers reluctant to accede to the White House requests.

According to several officials, McConnell raised doubts about the underlying intelligence and made clear to the administration that he would consider any effort by the White House to challenge the Russians publicly an act of partisan politics.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:49 (seven years ago) link

McConnell’s office did not respond to a request for comment. After the election, Trump chose McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, as his nominee for transportation secretary.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:49 (seven years ago) link

Mitch McConnell is the diarrhea on the seat.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:52 (seven years ago) link

(xposts) I can't figure her out

she's a terrible person who wanted a white supremacist to win

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 02:54 (seven years ago) link

GOP has no sense of actual patriotism

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:10 (seven years ago) link

mcconnell's actions would be astonishing if they weren't so in character.

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:16 (seven years ago) link

Curious this comes out on Friday night.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

CIA is good to have around so they can corroborate the stuff Josh Marshall figures out during his coffee time

― El Tomboto, Friday, December 9, 2016 9:11 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:20 (seven years ago) link

wapo article article was thrilling to read

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link

and mcconnell....... ugh what else is there to say

mcconnell's actions would be astonishing if they weren't so in character.

― geometry-stabilized craft (art), Friday, December 9, 2016 10:16 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:22 (seven years ago) link

mitch mconnell everyone

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:22 (seven years ago) link

motherfucker

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

I can't think of anything productive that can be done w this info from the CIA tbh. GOP's not gonna prosecute the guy that brought them to power.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:36 (seven years ago) link

And I'm not sure there's anything he could be prosecuted on to begin with

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:37 (seven years ago) link

#neverpudzer trending among MAGAs now. interesting/sad/funny/? to see how many people took his pro-worker claims at face value.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

The words i'd use are fucked up and ridiculousz

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

This was the most obviously telegraphed con in the history of cons.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

Words that come to my mind are "dumb" and "hicks"

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:55 (seven years ago) link

Kate McKinnon is an American treasure but she makes all her caricature subjects endearing, which is a problem when it comes to Kellyanne, who is a gaslighting propagandist

― Treeship, Saturday, December 10, 2016 2:41 AM (one hour ago)

SNL has a long tradition of making politicians look more lovable and human than they really are

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 10 December 2016 03:59 (seven years ago) link

everything about the fuckin' guy is an obviously telegraphed con! Anyone who watches the asshole talk and doesn't realize he's a sloppy hustler who just makes shit up and only ever says things that are true by accident is a goddamned moron. It's always been clear as day to anybody with a lick of fucking sense.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

If he's such a con and so sloppy and an asshole, then why is he super rich and you are not? Huh? Didn't think so. And now he will make us all rich, except you, loser. Enjoy your off brand steaks, I'll be sitting sweet in the NBC/WWF/FBI suite.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 December 2016 05:11 (seven years ago) link

And of course, right on schedule, this CIA report is what Trump supporters are dismissing as fake news, the rhetorical equivalent of "no, you're the puppet!"

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 December 2016 05:16 (seven years ago) link

yeah, there's nothing "treasurable" about Lorne Michaels' minions making people think the shit they do is satire.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 December 2016 07:22 (seven years ago) link

"Among the political figures Conway has worked for are Congressman Jack Kemp; Senator Fred Thompson; former Vice President Dan Quayle; Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich; and Congressman (now Indiana Governor and Vice President-elect) Mike Pence."

In light of this, suggesting she's bad because she married bad is off in a number of ways.

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 10 December 2016 11:21 (seven years ago) link

Idk man if I was married to someone who led organizations that spread vile fake news -- as george conway does -- i would fucking divorce them

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:01 (seven years ago) link

Just like if i had a spouse who turned out to be a serial killer on the side

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

Luckily with KC you don't need to look to her husband to criticize her. She helped elect a fascist to the white house

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

Between Russian hacking and the nearly 3 million popular vote deficit, isnt this like exactly the situation the EC was designed to prevent?

frogbs, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

i'm thinking the EC is there in part to preserve "states' rights"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

I can't think of anything productive that can be done w this info from the CIA tbh. GOP's not gonna prosecute the guy that brought them to power.

― Οὖτις, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:36 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

And I'm not sure there's anything he could be prosecuted on to begin with

― Οὖτις, Friday, 9 December 2016 22:37 (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Also, if this is mostly about the Podesta/Wikileaks dump, which is what I gather from the Post story, is there much evidence that this hurt Clinton? I don't see a significant shift, looking at her poll numbers. Or is there more to it, e.g. sharing Dem oppo research with the GOP?

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

yeah, you sorta have to read between the lines of federalist nos. 5 and 68 but russian hacking is defnitely in there. madison, though, assumed that ad hoc committees of counter-hackers assembled by the congress would suffice in times of emergency. a fatal flaw, perhaps- or another reminder that our constitution is a living document.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

(Not defending Russian interference obv)

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

xp

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

NYT reporting that GOP servers were also hacked - but info not released

, Saturday, 10 December 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

Maybe the US can hack the next Russian election and make Clinton president there.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 December 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

LOL @ American treasure. and i liked the new Ghostbusters movie

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 10 December 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

Between Russian hacking and the nearly 3 million popular vote deficit, isnt this like exactly the situation the EC was designed to prevent?

iirc, the EC was designed for two basic reasons. The unbalanced distribution of electoral votes was designed to favor the small states against large states and the interpolation of electors between the voters and the presidency was designed so that 'the best men' (i.e. people like the delegates to the constitutional convention) would be able to thwart the passions of the voters, who might choose a demagogue with unsuitable ideas.

Undue foreign influence on an election would certainly been seen as a good reason, too, but I don't think it got much air during the constitutional debates compared to the reasons I cited.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 10 December 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

spooks gettin' pissed:

John Schindler with a look at Donald Trump's war with the intelligence community

sleeve, Saturday, 10 December 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

Dag. That's probably mostly bluster, but still pretty intense.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 December 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

It's a small point, but in addition to the demagoguery thing, the "elector" method had some kind of common sense logic to it in an era before mass media: most voters, the Framers thought, would have no idea who to pick for President! Not because they were under the sway of demagogues but because they lived on farms or in small towns and villages, hadn't necessarily traveled farther than the next hill, etc. Maybe they wouldn't have heard of any of the people offering themselves as candidates - but they would know and trust, perhaps, a roving circuit court judge or somebody like that, and trust them to be informed and make a good choice. District-level contests for electors would be a matter (they ostensibly believed) of good character and judgement, not particular matters of politics. This is elitist too, in a different kind of way, and doesn't mean that the system isn't democratic - but it's another part of the picture.

The main thing though is the power of slave-holding planter elites (such as Madison, Jefferson, and Washington) to maintain a disproportionate hold on the government, since the "three-fifths compromise" that topped up Congressional numbers for slave states did the same for electors. The Fourteenth Amendment did away with that but in a sense a great deal of the history of American politics since 1788 has been about elites in some states trying to disenfranchise black voters while still hanging onto the representative numbers they yield. Today's assholes are the descendants of the Southern bloc who used these numbers to stave off federal interference in Jim Crow for decades, who in turn were the descendants of those who used these numbers to make the nation's pre-Civil-War politics revolve around their slave-owning order.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

Tillerman new SoS - wow.

BlackIronPrison, Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:04 (seven years ago) link

Tillerson oops

BlackIronPrison, Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:04 (seven years ago) link

so a SoS that was the CEO of ExxonMobil, and a president that says we should have seized Iraq's oil fields (“You’re not stealing anything,” Trump said. “We’re reimbursing ourselves … at a minimum, and I say more. We’re taking back $1.5tn to reimburse ourselves.”)

this will be really fun when we inevitably find ourselves invading a country that coincidentally has a bunch of oil

Karl Malone, Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

"Between Russian hacking and the nearly 3 million popular vote deficit, isnt this like exactly the situation the EC was designed to prevent?"

not getting my hopes up but I wouldn't be surprised if the EC wound up not electing him. (I don't think this is going to happen, but if it did, I don't know that I'd be that surprised at this point)

akm, Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

I would be surprised.

the pinefox, Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

I both feel it is absolutely the electors responsibility not to allow him to take office and that they will fail to live up to that responsibility. That said, I will not be fully accepting that this nightmare is happening until after they meet.

ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

i'm not getting my hopes up

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

This exxon sos "top choice" is too ridiculous. Why did he even flirt with the idea of semi-normal choices then?

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

I don't know how I'd convinced myself that the actual election of Donald Trump was the most fucked up thing I would ever experience when said election was really nothing more than the catalyst for an entire cluster of fucked up things that were sure to follow.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

The NYT article on Tillerson is good. It's pretty much just 'yeah, dude has ties to Russia, and here's how Trump can help his Russian business dealings flourish'. It's all so nakedly fucking evil.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

If enough electors were to revolt and fail to elect Trump the great irony would be that one anti-democratic aspect of the electoral college would be negated by another, even more anti-democratic aspect of the electoral college.

But it won't happen. If there were as many as five "faithless electors" it would be genuinely shocking. It has been more than a century since there was more than one in any election.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 10 December 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah it's just not gonna happen

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

swift impeachment seems more likely, tbh, and that's not gonna happen either

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

yup

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:10 (seven years ago) link

yup :/

That's when I fired off my 2 Tweets to Dr. Phil (crüt), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

Impeachment will happen -- along with some sort of criminal trial down the line for something -- but it will be too late

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

He's going to get bolder and bolder and do more and more fucked up things until eventually it can't be ignored

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

keep dreaming

sleeve, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

i just saw that he spent a good amount of time complaining that it was "person of the year" instead of "man of the year"

i know this is the kind of distraction that specializes in but uuuuuuuugh stfu

Karl Malone, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

Time should change it to Woman of the Year just for him.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

Not enough people are picking on him. It should be happening all of the time until he has a stroke. I want him to have a stroke so bad.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

He was going on about that in yesterday's rally, repeatedly declaring that the women in the crowd all agreed with him that it should be "man of the year".

jmm, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

I hate America

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

Trump's approval rating would have to stay under 30% a while before the Republican congress would dream of impeaching Trump. And even then they'd only do it because they could count on Pence to continue signing off on their radical right agenda.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

from FB:

"I'm starting to think that the GOP's master plan this election was to get behind Trump just to get into the White House, then when the time is right, use their majorities in the House and Senate to impeach him and put GOP hardliner Pence in the hot seat. Either Trump will do something illegal (colluding with Russia, conflict of interest with his businesses, etc.), or they already have dirt on him they're just waiting to use when he's in office. It would explain the about-face the GOP leadership has taken in dealing with Trump, if ultimately, they know they're just biding their time until they give him the boot."

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

that would be a dumb plan. i'd imagine people would just become disgusted with republicans after that sort of ordeal. (that said, i don't trust my powers of interpreting how the american people think anymore.)

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah actually sort of fine with that scenario. Pence is an unpopular christo-crat and would be beaten like a rug in 2020. Trump? who the fuck even knows.

will, Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

There are tens of millions of racists, sexists, homophobes and other xenophobes who would be okay with that. As long as the guy on top isn't taking away the nobility of people's misery, they don't care who it is.

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

pence is a pretty textbook shithead republican and id wager the legislature might prefer working with one of their kind as opposed to legit wildcard in trump. also if trump goes so goes bannon and kushner and the competing narratives of power are replaced by a unified gop vision

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

preibus obviously has trump's ear and is an instrument of the party but the other advisors are motivated by different things and won't, i would assume, be easy to control

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Saturday, 10 December 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

those idiots in the republican leadership are in over their heads, reince included

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

i don't think they have any sort of plot, they are just all about trump bc he is going to cooperate with their radical antigovernment agenda. but he is a legitimate psychopath with criminal intention and the wolves he has brought into the whitehouse are going to make karl rove look like atticus finch.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

lol

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

*is bringing. it hasn't happened yet.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

starting to think that the GOP's master plan

I'm not buying it. Everything keys off Trump's popularity with the base. Conflict of interest with his businesses won't cause even a blip in that. Not even colluding with Russia. At this point, I suspect even a video of him in bed with a 13 year old probably wouldn't kill him off. He just needs to keep up flattering the worst prejudices of the base and symbolically pissing on the heads of people they hate.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

I don't see it happening. While I'm certain the GOP leadership, i.e. McConnell would actually breathe a sigh of relief should Pence become elevated to the presidency, leadership is too frightened of the base to actually scheme to get rid of Trump. Plus, that's not how politics works.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

I'm reminded of what I've read of the Harding years: a decent moron of a man, condescended to by his former Senate colleagues, presides over worst corruption since the Grant years, dies in office, elevates Calvin Coolidge, who is much more the GOP's man.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

except Trump is not decent

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Plus, that's not how politics works.

Everything I thought I knew about how politics works went out the window last month.

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

they're not going to get away with this. this administration of thieves and extremists he is putting together is going to do something that will discredit the GOP for good. i don't know what. and as sleepingbag has pointed out my prognostications are not so reliable. but it will be something and it will be bad.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

i could be wrong... stuff could just slide into shittiness while the media and larger society re-calibrates its expectations. he could trash the country and leave office without fanfare, with a 30% approval or something. but that's not what i think will happen.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

I'm just going to expect that everything I don't want to happen will, and the more I fantasize about something going horribly wrong for him/them, the more they'll succeed. Just basing that on the trajectory since he announced his candidacy.

Evan, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

Defeatism is not useful

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

you say that, but give it a shot, you never do know

though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

Sorry! Just venting. I would love for a scenario Treeship is describing to play out. It's really amazing though how immune he is to every disaster that seems to be lined up for him. Like Mr. Magoo.

Evan, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

he is putting together is going to do something that will discredit the GOP for good.

My ears are deaf from the death knells rung for the GOP since 2006, 1974, 1964...at best we can hope for smaller GOP congressional minorities and a Dem president in 2020.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

this guy is like a cartoon mobster though. we never had a gop president like that before.

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

treeship you need to lie down, bud, i say this sincerely

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

if anyone is going to "stroke out" it is going to be you. relax.

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

Bolton apparently deputy SoS?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

old lunch was the one praying for a trump stroke ftr.

but yeah, i am trying to devote less energy to thinking about this. xp

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

I know there are much more insane things to focus on, but has there been any commentary about how gross it is that Trump is doing a victory lap in states that he won instead of making even the tiniest effort to acknowledge the rest of the country? I mean, y'know, totally in character and unsurprising as hell, but still.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

he's a fuckhead that's how he's going to act

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

To be clear, I haven't been praying for a Trump stroke per se. I'm praying for his imminent death by natural causes. A stroke would be fine but really any ailment that takes him quickly and painlessly is a-ok in my book.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

i hope the fake tan stuff he's been using turns out to be highly toxic

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

I've made it a habit in my life to never actively wish another person ill, and certainly to never wish that someone die. But, well, you know.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvXxAGPOB4I

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

" I'm praying for his imminent death by natural causes" I'd be happy with an unnatural cause too

akm, Saturday, 10 December 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

I suppose that means the secret service is going to visit me now

akm, Saturday, 10 December 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

I hope the great leader lives 1,000 centuries

Treeship, Saturday, 10 December 2016 22:06 (seven years ago) link

Let me tell you guys I really can't WAIT to find out how the Sunday Shows handle this Russian shit

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

most likely they'll handle it with kid gloves. the topic will be raised. the trump surrogates will deny and decry and shout "lies! all lies!" and then the host will move on to the next topic.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

Tomasky kind of otm - http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/12/10/world-war-iii-democrats-and-america-vs-trump-and-russia.html

I know I often say “imagine if Hillary had done this,” but in this case, it’s not a mere hypothetical. Imagine the situation were reversed, and this lurid right-wing dystopic fantasy were playing out before our eyes—remembering, I should note, that Trump earlier in the campaign encouraged Russia to do more hacking of Clinton! What would the Republicans be doing? A few things, I think:

  • They’d certainly be calling the election illegitimate and would declare Clinton an illegitimate president.
  • They’d call on the electors to seat Trump, citing—and properly, by the way—the Founders’ view that electors existed for precisely this purpose.
  • Noting that Clinton had (in this hypothetical) earlier egged Russia on, they would be accusing Clinton of being an agent of a foreign government; that is, of treason.
  • They’d be so legally brilliant and diabolical that it’s far beyond my capacity even to imagine.
And what would rank-and-file conservatives be doing? Hard-shell Trumpists? Richard Spencer? The good folks at Stormfront?

I have no idea, frankly, why we continue to eschew disruptive tactics such as the above, other than maybe that the ~80% of this country that didn't vote for Trump is still mostly waiting for Obama to lead us out of this mess (hint: he doesn't know what to do either)

El Tomboto, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:18 (seven years ago) link

yeah the dems need to go hard on this, i have zero faith that they will do anything

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

it makes me wonder what portion of the country thinks favorably about Putin and Russia. I can't imagine it's a lot.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

Make no mistake, yesterday’s Washington Post revelation that the CIA has concluded that Russia was actively trying to elect Donald Trump as opposed to just “meddling with” the election, is a nuclear bombshell.

i'm all for more attention on this issue, but as josh marshall pointed out yesterday, it's weird to read all the coverage pretending that we didn't already know all of this. the news that russia was involved came out months ago. of COURSE they wanted Trump to win.

Karl Malone, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

Yeah this is kinda like the Snowden "revelations" - just confirming officially shit I thought everybody already knew

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

3 months ago, news came out that a high-ranking official was meddling with the admission committee at Yale

*crickets*

yesterday, it was confirmed that the high-ranking official was meddling with the admission committee...on BEHALF OF HER DAUGHTER'S ACCEPTANCE AT YALE

DEFCON11111111

Karl Malone, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

Sad lol

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

Countdown to Trump tweeting some dumb shit to push this out of the headlines...

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

also it's something that everyone responds to with silence or eyerolling, but

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-us-has-been-meddling-in-other-countries-elections-for-a-century-it-doesnt-feel-good_us_57983b85e4b02d5d5ed382bd

anyone who mentioned clinton's involvement in the 2009 honduras election was treated like a berniebro, but maybe that's part of why she decided not to press the russian/trump connection too hard back in september? i mean, obviously her campaign did take note of it and mention on it on occasion but you'd think it'd be a bombshell story

Karl Malone, Saturday, 10 December 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

democrats aren't going to do a goddamn thing. bet on it.

will, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

explain "treated like a berniebro" - you mean argued with?

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:06 (seven years ago) link

the Clinton campaign allowed surrogates to point out the fact that Putin was obviously in the tank for Trump, she brought it up at the debate, and made as big a deal out of it as they did anything else - then went on to win the popular vote by over 2%

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

xpost I assume it means "treated like their objections were insincere and based only in their opposition to Clinton," but I can't check because you could not get me to re-open the relevant thread(s) for less than five hundred dollars.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:10 (seven years ago) link

yep, although i didn't mean just ILX, i meant pretty much everywhere, at least left leaning circles

Karl Malone, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:13 (seven years ago) link

The Obama administration's approach to addressing our numerous longstanding issues with LAC nations hasn't been spotless or perfect but I would definitely not characterize it as silence and eyerolling

The fact that the big election fucking-with that people can point to most recently is from 2009, after a military coup, when we called for new elections in an attempt to head off a protracted civil war, is actually a pretty good vindication of this administration's foreign policy, but again, what do I know

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

CNN giving trump/russia gaslighters an open forum rn. Host is giving these evil clowns stern looks but it might not be enough to save the republic.

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:17 (seven years ago) link

I want to bet against will but I have zero confidence in current Dem leadership to try anything crazy. What happens when you have to fight crazy with crazy and you only have Very Serious People?

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:18 (seven years ago) link

Asked and answered

Οὖτις, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:19 (seven years ago) link

GOP shuts down the govt, outright fucking steals a SCOTUS nom, goes to the mat on BHENGHAZII!!1 and all they do is get rewarded. fucking unbelievable.

will, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:23 (seven years ago) link

oh, and tries to hush up evidence that Russia meddled in our election.

but hey, there are two sides to this, right MSM?

will, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:24 (seven years ago) link

maybe Trump will pivot and become Real Presidetnnal!

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

Tomasky kind of otm - http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/12/10/world-war-iii-democrats-and-america-vs-trump-and-russia.html

I know I often say “imagine if Hillary had done this,” but in this case, it’s not a mere hypothetical. Imagine the situation were reversed, and this lurid right-wing dystopic fantasy were playing out before our eyes—remembering, I should note, that Trump earlier in the campaign encouraged Russia to do more hacking of Clinton! What would the Republicans be doing? A few things, I think:
They’d certainly be calling the election illegitimate and would declare Clinton an illegitimate president.
They’d call on the electors to seat Trump, citing—and properly, by the way—the Founders’ view that electors existed for precisely this purpose.
Noting that Clinton had (in this hypothetical) earlier egged Russia on, they would be accusing Clinton of being an agent of a foreign government; that is, of treason.
They’d be so legally brilliant and diabolical that it’s far beyond my capacity even to imagine.
And what would rank-and-file conservatives be doing? Hard-shell Trumpists? Richard Spencer? The good folks at Stormfront?
I have no idea, frankly, why we continue to eschew disruptive tactics such as the above, other than maybe that the ~80% of this country that didn't vote for Trump is still mostly waiting for Obama to lead us out of this mess (hint: he doesn't know what to do either)

― El Tomboto, Saturday, December 10, 2016 6:18 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

isn't this literally what the left is doing right now?

k3vin k., Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:01 (seven years ago) link

i mean the people with the real power probably have to wait for some hard evidence to *do* anything but every left leaning person and journalist seems to be making a big deal out of this afaict. and rightfully so

k3vin k., Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

guess someone has to say it but...also...the CIA has been known to be wrong from time to time too.

k3vin k., Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:08 (seven years ago) link

Yes. I am.....uneasy praising the credibility of the CIA.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:29 (seven years ago) link

Don't reject an ally.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:31 (seven years ago) link

friend of mine framed this to me as FBI vs CIA/NSA infighting, which I think is a useful lens to view it through

FBI already pissed Dems off, so the CIA/NSA has a lot to gain by currying favor with Dems w/an eye towards midterms or 2020

sleeve, Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:35 (seven years ago) link

i feel really queasy about midterms and 2020

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:37 (seven years ago) link

there has been much already written about the FBI being 'trumpland' and the CIA presumably being...not. Which I can see, since I'd imagine the CIA have a more wide-ranging view of the world and Trump seems to be fundamentally against that.

I'm concerned there is going to be a massive, unprecedented terrorist attack while he's in office that we're not going to catch because he will have gutted or destroyed the CIA out of petulance, and that in turn will lead to an even bigger powergrab on his part.

akm, Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:45 (seven years ago) link

I'm talking dirty bomb or some shit in the middle of america

akm, Sunday, 11 December 2016 01:45 (seven years ago) link

that's very specific

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:00 (seven years ago) link

but maybe it will happen

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:00 (seven years ago) link

FBI already pissed Dems off, so the CIA/NSA has a lot to gain by currying favor with Dems w/an eye towards midterms or 2020

it is unwise to presume that these institutions give two shits about which party anybody belongs to, or who is "in charge"
they sure don't like being fucked with, though

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:05 (seven years ago) link

also "infighting" between the FBI and other three-letter agencies is really more like that kid on the playground who was always trying to start shit and would have gotten pummelled if anybody ever lowered themselves to the occasion, but isn't worth getting in trouble for and besides we all know nothing will ever shut them up

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:09 (seven years ago) link

I appreciate your perspective here, thanks

sleeve, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:13 (seven years ago) link

gallows lols at this meme making the rounds

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzWEvIYXgAIHLyb.jpg

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:24 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUe4sFKvJUY

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2016/12/john_kennedy_louisianas_next_u.html

foster campbell just got beat handily in lousiana guess we shouldn't have expected anything different

, Sunday, 11 December 2016 03:36 (seven years ago) link

no, we should not have

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 03:38 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn8-4tjPxD8

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

It was a super longshot. Early polls actually had a lot of Clinton voters likely to switch to Kennedy -- guessing maybe that means moderate republicans or conservative democrats who weren't keen on trump. Kennedy is apparently relatively moderate.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 11 December 2016 04:23 (seven years ago) link

not sure why stevie is there but i'll take it

akm, Sunday, 11 December 2016 04:36 (seven years ago) link

Lot of people right now claiming the russia hack thing somehow "invalidates" the election. I really don't get how a foreign power leaking some emails invalidates an election. Not saying it isn't a concern, shouldn't be investigated etc., but think people are grasping at straws with this. No evidence that they actually tampered with the vote so far afaik.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 11 December 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link

yup

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Sunday, 11 December 2016 04:51 (seven years ago) link

Eh, it further invalidates Trump's suitability for the office. It corroborates and emphasizes the accusations that he's a Kremlin water carrier who takes policy advice from a foreign adversary, and all the useful idiots he's suggesting for cabinet slots will do the same, as some of them have already made clear in public appearances.

The election seems valid to me, the better candidate won by 2.83M votes and counting,

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:11 (seven years ago) link

thing that has struck out the most to me about the russian thing- and it probably shouldn't - is mcconnell's brazen partisanship and opportunism

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:15 (seven years ago) link

but yeah talk of the vote being hacked somehow is like if your stereo cassette walkman craps out and eats your mixtape halfway through and you go googling for "walkman malfunction" and read about some dudes at MIT wiping out recordings wirelessly with magnetrons and EMP and so you whip out your Galaxy S7 Edge and Tweet MY WALKMAN: HACKED?!?!?

xp cf. my arresting metaphor for Mitch McConnell upthread.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:22 (seven years ago) link

omg we need fucking revolution in the streets. we're not gonna survive 4 years of this.

splendor in the ASS (rip van wanko), Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:28 (seven years ago) link

Time should cave to his whingeing and take back his Person of the Year, give him Man of the Year ... in the back pages of the same issue that they give Person of the Year to a deserving woman.

hardcore dilettante, Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

sorry for the flip and irrelevant post, I'm days behind and in total denial that any of this is real.

hardcore dilettante, Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:37 (seven years ago) link

I like your idea though

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:43 (seven years ago) link

ultimate troll move: give POTY to hillary throwing two middle fingers up on the cover

6 god none the richer (m bison), Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

this week i showed my government students the ava duvernay doc "13TH" and we read a chapter from the new jim crow. they're doing self-directed projects next year. the cool thing about teaching government is that its not a state-tested subject and also my school more or less lets me do whatever i want bc they have bigger fish to fry.

6 god none the richer (m bison), Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:59 (seven years ago) link

liberals becoming huge CIA fans... takin' my yuks where i can get em

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 December 2016 06:07 (seven years ago) link

it's certainly weird

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Sunday, 11 December 2016 06:08 (seven years ago) link

strange bedfellows

6 god none the richer (m bison), Sunday, 11 December 2016 06:13 (seven years ago) link

foster campbell just got beat handily in lousiana guess we shouldn't have expected anything different

― 龜, Sunday, December 11, 2016 3:36 AM (two hours ago)

it's depressing that literally every single straw we've grasped at over the last month has turned out to be a bust. we lost almost every important election, the recounts won't change anything, the cabinet appointments are terrifying, trump hasn't toned down his message and if anything seems more insane and unqualified than he did before the election. now ppl are clinging to the shred of hope that an electoral college largely composed of people who are fanatically loyal to a party that values its own power over everything will somehow do the right thing and throw the election to the person most hated by the party base. and i'm still hoping for that too! when you're in a situation this dangerous you try every strategem you can think of, no matter how ridiculous it is. maybe they'll impeach him, i keep thinking. but if republicans don't give a shit that a hostile foreign power intervened to help elect their guy, they're not going to care about anything he does in office enough to impeach him. maybe they'd impeach him if he raised taxes.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, 11 December 2016 06:49 (seven years ago) link

Should we blame Nelly The Elephant for hyping up the Trump, Trump, Trump?

& now i guess it's all one great big circus.
So run away.

Innit?

Stevolende, Sunday, 11 December 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

good mourning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 December 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

strange bedfellows

Is it really so strange? Given the Dem element that was actually gung ho for The Most Qualified Hawk Ever?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 December 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

I'll take the Most Qualified Hawk Ever over the Least Qualified Anything Ever any election.

Given we still have several weeks to go, I don't see how this daily drip/deluge of agitation can sustain itself, honestly. He's done absolutely nothing to mend wounds and no doubt will be even more inflammatory during his interview today, further embolden by his bubble of supporters/enablers. Meanwhile, the same rage and frustration that helped him get barely elected is out there and real, and I think generally hopeful but hardly reassured by his election. Meanwhile, the rest of those invested in American politics seem at the least pretty unsettled, from career politicians to plebes like us, and the best the most optimistic have to offer is, hey, maybe it won't be as terrible as we all expect.

I was out to dinner with friends last night, and my banker pal, who is prone to devil's advocating, kept coming back to Trump as a distraction, and the GOP as possible solvers of a few real fiscal problems America is facing at a federal and state level. But I kept pushing back that Trump is more than a distraction, he is a fulcrum, and that nothing good, from GOP piggy bank shaking to dem services, will come of the US government as long as he is in office and emboldened. The more I think about it, the more I think there's something endemically sour about the state of things, from the audacious stonewalling over Scalia's replacement on the federal level, to the fact that Illinois' GOP governor has refused to sign a state budget into law for about a year. Both those tactics preceded Trump, and I have a feeling things like that will only get worse and worse while he dicks around with our country's very fundamentals and foundations. So yeah, he is a distraction, but the worse kind of destructive distraction who has to be faced or dealt with on several levels before we can even get around to addressing all the other ways the country is broken and fucked up.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 11 December 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

I'm not talking about "taking," Josh, but the cheerleading Isn't She Great crowd.

The inflation of Russian chicanery to "PUTIN INSTALLED TRUMP" strikes me as the kind of whingeing that indicates the Dems will run 33 shitty Senate candidates in two years, and likely nominate someone as vile as Andy Cuomo in four (if there's an election).

Also, Trump describes Sec of State-designate Exxon Tillerson as "a player" in his fuxNews interview. Just think, if Yam was a man of the left, we could be looking at Warren Beatty in the Cabinet.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 December 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

The inflation of Russian chicanery to "PUTIN INSTALLED TRUMP" strikes me as the kind of whingeing that indicates the Dems will run 33 shitty Senate candidates in two years, and likely nominate someone as vile as Andy Cuomo in four (if there's an election).

"The straw men shrieking in my head confirmed my biases, again!"

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

xps

GOP as possible solvers of a few real fiscal problems America is facing at a federal and state level.

the gop is really adept at convincing people they're the party of fiscal responsibility without ever having earned that title with actions when in power. in theory it'd be great if this widely held belief were confronted more strenuously but it's so much harder to engage in a substantive discussion of the nuances of fiscal issues than it is to say "party of small government" and "shrink the deficit" even when neither of these things are true on any level

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Sunday, 11 December 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/8rEEYrW.jpg

lol

, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

I think my friend's argument - and he votes dem -is that at least the GOP talks about it, even if for myriad reasons they don't deliver. Like, he's sees much of the world on the precipice of systemic financial failure, and the US in particular vulnerable to collapse, due to borrowing, pensions, that sort of thing. That's the problem in Illinois, but internationally he thinks Europe (he's Croatian) is a mess, and that no one is offering real solutions, just delaying and dithering. We were arguing about Carrier, and how Trump really accomplished nothing, so he asked, well, what would you do to keep Carrier from moving jobs to Mexico? What can you do? It's not like Dems have offered solutions, however unlikely, which helped them lose.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:08 (seven years ago) link

I took a call.
I heard the call.
This was a call.
I didn't make the call.
And it was a call.
Very short call.
It was a very nice call.
I can't take a call.

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

Tax the rich, universal basic income, single payer. Dems could run on that imo.

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

I'm so glad i'm the only one with biases

christ, apparatchiks, huh?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/0rxLi2Q.jpg

, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

who can ask for anything more?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

It might be fun to have a fresh nullification crisis, maybe someone can viciously beat Mitch McConnel on the senate floor

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

Tillerson at State brings some clarity/madness to my mind.

the US and Russia together go to war with Iran in order to split Iran's oil reserves amongst themselves. There are pretexts, including Iran's nuclear program and its alleged threat to Israel. Europe howls and is left out of the spoils. I don't know what China does, probably nothing directly. Brazil and India sit this one out, there's too much trouble at home to be worth the bother.

I'm not a betting man but if I were, I'd put money on it.

droit au butt (Euler), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

yeah, i'll be protesting that one when it's appropriate

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Russia and Iran have very good relations - economically, politically and militarily. Russia is building Iran's nuclear reactors, for a start. xp

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

There's no reason Russia can't continue to build those reactors after "regime change".

but I am happy to be talked out of this nutty idea.

droit au butt (Euler), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

It would make the ongoing collaboration of Russian and Iranian troops in Syria pretty awkward and it would potentially destabilise Russian allies including Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Armenia. John Bolton is definitely up for it but i think it's practically unimaginable Russia would be.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

^^ Let alone all those legitimate reasons, Putin nationally has far more to gain by being a hardman towards the US instead of making up and being friends.

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 11 December 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

now seems like an appropriate time to know the difference between hamas and hezbollah

Karl Malone, Sunday, 11 December 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUe4sFKvJUY

Treeship, Sunday, 11 December 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

the hamas/hezbollah thing was from september 2015

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Sunday, 11 December 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

And I'm sure, now that the time is appropriate, Trump can totally tell the difference now.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Sunday, 11 December 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

it's depressing that literally every single straw we've grasped at over the last month has turned out to be a bust. we lost almost every important election, the recounts won't change anything, the cabinet appointments are terrifying, trump hasn't toned down his message and if anything seems more insane and unqualified than he did before the election. now ppl are clinging to the shred of hope that an electoral college largely composed of people who are fanatically loyal to a party that values its own power over everything will somehow do the right thing and throw the election to the person most hated by the party base. and i'm still hoping for that too! when you're in a situation this dangerous you try every strategem you can think of, no matter how ridiculous it is. maybe they'll impeach him, i keep thinking. but if republicans don't give a shit that a hostile foreign power intervened to help elect their guy, they're not going to care about anything he does in office enough to impeach him. maybe they'd impeach him if he raised taxes.

― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, December 11, 2016 1:49 AM (ten hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think it's really, really important to get dug in for a long, challenging fight right now and not grasp at straws. Bc yeah, Campbell, recount, investigation of Russia changing things, these are all extreme longshots/hail maries. Even impeachment, which seems slightly more probable than the others, is kind of out of our hands and only going to happen if he displeases the GOP establishment.

So I think we have to think about how to protect our own, obstruct, win seats in 2017 and 2018 elections or at least hold ground, shift public opinion, etc. I'm not going to completely knock any approach people are trying, but I'm a little concerned about desperation and unstrategic flailing around and screaming playing into their hands.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 11 December 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

Aside from the arguments over what might and might not have happened, the whole election campaign exposed Eichenwald as a fantasist who knows nothing about Russia. Take anything he has written with massive emphasis handfuls of salt.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 11 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

Not sure why my phone added emphasis there!

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 11 December 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

I took a call.
I heard the call.
This was a call.
I didn't make the call.
And it was a call.
Very short call.
It was a very nice call.
I can't take a call.

― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, December 11, 2016 11:11 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Could only read this in Seinfeld's voice.

Evan, Sunday, 11 December 2016 18:43 (seven years ago) link

:)

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 11 December 2016 19:06 (seven years ago) link

US and Russia together go to war with Iran in order to split Iran's oil reserves

This would be a much bigger fiasco than the Soviets in Afghanistan or US in Iraq. It just plain would not work irl.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 11 December 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

I imagine "emphasis handfuls" to be the technical term for that gesture conductors make during crescendos like they're deadlifting the planet by her bazooms

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

Lol

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Sunday, 11 December 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

Did not know! Thanks - it's written in a tone of such authority.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

It's pretty insane to watch Joe Walsh slowly grow a conscience in the wake of all this Russia information.

https://twitter.com/walshfreedom/status/807703919069630464

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

i wonder how many more of those that supported trump in the election are already coming to terms with having been swindled

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

3?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

yeah none

k3vin k., Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

oh OK thx

geometry-stabilized craft (art), Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:40 (seven years ago) link

There's a whole tumblr for it y'all

El Tomboto, Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

sorry, an insignificant number of people

k3vin k., Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

stop the straw-grasping. quit looking for silver linings. get ready for a fight

k3vin k., Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

yeah, after 17 months of campaigning it isn't like people didn't know who they voted for

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

quit looking for silver linings. get ready for a fight

― k3vin k., Sunday, December 11, 2016 2:49 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm

jason waterfalls (gbx), Sunday, 11 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

Don't worry about Trump voters with buyer's remorse. Fight for your sick aunt's Medicaid benefits.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 December 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

Despite their 60-seat deficit heading into 2016, the Democrats didn’t appear to do much candidate recruiting except in the most competitive districts. In Texas, Hillary Clinton won in a congressional district where Democrats didn’t even field a challenger. Numbers, not potential, guided the DCCC efforts. Instead of looking for possibilities, or trying to create them, the committee only paid attention to the districts that looked viable on spreadsheets.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/12/how-the-democratic-party-lost-its-way-214514

curmudgeon, Monday, 12 December 2016 04:33 (seven years ago) link

Thanks, Obama

El Tomboto, Monday, 12 December 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

Thanks Pelosi

curmudgeon, Monday, 12 December 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

More like thx wasserman-schulz

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 05:47 (seven years ago) link

yeah, i realize the article was about the DCCC but it was weird to CTRL+F schulz and come up with 0 results

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 05:50 (seven years ago) link

thanks... ben ray luján?

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Monday, 12 December 2016 05:54 (seven years ago) link

i should have moved there and run

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 05:57 (seven years ago) link

freaking out about the weakness of the current democratic party is... it's a thing, i guess, but it's so remediable. some vanishingly small proportion of the electorate votes in the primaries. americans have given tremendous amounts of cash to a candidate as terrible as dr. jill stein, way more than during the election, because she's doing something the democratic party refuse to do. if the democratic party continues to refuse to listen to what we're saying, there's pretty good evidence that we have the power to change that. there's less evidence, but still decent evidence, that making that change will give us a better shot against the republicans. the biggest problem will be just fucking surviving the next two years.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, 12 December 2016 13:05 (seven years ago) link

I realized this morning why Trump thinks the daily intelligence briefings are stale from day to day. It's because they're ordered on topic area and mostly focused on specific regions of interest- and his attention span can't get past the heading. "I heard about the South China Sea yesterday."

El Tomboto, Monday, 12 December 2016 13:12 (seven years ago) link

given that his objection to the daily intelligence briefing is that 'he's, like, a smart person' i genuinely suspect that he thinks it's an actual test of his intelligence every day rather than, y'know, information which might help govern the country

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

'they want me to take these iq tests every morning rather than letting me get on with making america great again!'

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

i hate to do the internecine bitching but man the violent and revolutionary rhetoric sucks. i'm not gonna say i don't sympathize or haven't had moments of "TEAR IT ALL DOWN" but you know talk to a therapist about it, don't post it on the public internet. even if you don't wind up getting busted for it, stuff like that can and will be used against us pretty easily.

sorry for getting all boring but i think a lot about the roman revolution, which octavian succeeded at by bringing about significant reforms which were _not_ portrayed as "revolutionary" but as a restoration of the ancient system. i'm not saying that the reforms we should be after are the same as octavian's (not super jazzed about the prospect of an American Empire), but strategically i feel like we should try to model ourselves after the winners like octavian, not the losers like marc antony.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, 12 December 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

reforms which were _not_ portrayed as "revolutionary" but as a restoration of the ancient system

so...make rome great again?

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 12 December 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

It's a strange world we live in...never thought I'd see Establishment Dems go all HUAC, let alone Infowars! When Joy Reid and Joe Walsh are on the same page, we are in truly batshit territory.

Iago Galdston, Monday, 12 December 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

So China flew that plane before the Taiwan call?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 December 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

"Treason" is not a word I would've imagined trending among Portlandia types a year ago.

I wonder if Trump's boredom with repetition will extend to "Hail to the Chief," saluting the Marine detail, etc.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

Whatever the deal is with Russian interference, I can't really argue with it being investigated, and I hope the investigation does some damage to Trump and GOP credibility.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

"Treason" is not a word I would've imagined trending among Portlandia types a year ago.

this is such a weird claim, as if basic matters of state were something one leaves behind past a certain lefterly point on the political spectrum

though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

LOL but its Morbs, what do you expect?

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

the real villain always has to be dems or popular modern comedy

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

reforms which were _not_ portrayed as "revolutionary" but as a restoration of the ancient system

so...make rome great again?

― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.)

hahaha, augustus was a deeply charismatic political genius who put in place a system that survived close to 200 years of blatant misrule. i doubt history will judge a certain d. trump as favorably.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

this is such a weird claim, as if basic matters of state were something one leaves behind past a certain lefterly point on the political spectrum

― though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi)

oh, it's the whole post-truth thing. "the center-left and the right are doing the SAME THING!". like all that matters is tactics and strategy, not facts.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

so this 'Russian interference,' so far as we know, amounted to uncovering the Podesta & Co emails, as far as we know? Which were read only by political junkies and TP types who wouldn't vote for Clinton in a million years. They didn't reveal much besides Camp Clinton struggling to make it look like their candidate believed in something/anything, which about half the ppl who voted for her knew was a problem.

the real villain is the rich, who need to be boiled and eaten.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:40 (seven years ago) link

hahaha, augustus was a deeply charismatic political genius who put in place a system that survived close to 200 years of blatant misrule. i doubt history will judge a certain d. trump as favorably.

― increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, December 12, 2016 1

was he? Gibbon and SPQR posited Augustus as a kind of anti-charismatic ruler – a man who subsumed his personality for the sake of an idea of Rome.

Either way, not Trump.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:42 (seven years ago) link

well, it's arguable (as is most of ancient history), but i'd say that you don't get augustan levels of auctoritas without charisma. but yeah. most definitely not trump.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

the real villain is the rich, who need to be boiled and eaten

no fuckin' way boiling is a waste of good meat. they need to be marinated then slow-cooked, i really wanna relish the taste of their flesh

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

A point that has definitely been made already but not nearly enough is that, AFAICT, Trump doesn't have a bad word to say about Putin or Russia. This is someone who has insulted almost everyone, even his allies, over the smallest slight, who has lambasted his own party and told us all for months how broken and fucked up America is, but who also deflects any and all criticism of Russia and who insists that the election he won was rigged but pooh-poohs overwhelming evidence that Russia was a prime suspect in any rigging that's been uncovered.

Shame on everyone who has the power to stop this fucker and fails to use it.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

see ya at the Clinton donor soiree, hope you have a kitchen pass. xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

it's almost like russia has some kind of power over the man, some might say xp

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Trump called for Russian planes to be shot out of the sky if they buzzed US warships again, fwiw.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

as if basic matters of state were something one leaves behind past a certain lefterly point

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIhVR2OolWk

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

FOR YEARS, members of Congress have fumed about what they regard as ineffective U.S. public diplomacy, including the failure of broadcasting operations such as the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty to match the reach and apparent influence of networks such as Russia’s RT and Qatar’s al Jazeera. A frequent and arguably fair focus of criticism has been the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the body created to supervise government-funded media outlets while serving as a firewall between them and the political administration of the day.

A radical change to that system is now coming — and it looks like one that Vladi­mir Putin and Qatar’s emir might well admire. An amendment quietly inserted into the annual National Defense Authorization Act by Republican House leaders would abolish the broadcasting board and place VOA, RFE/RL and other international news and information operations under the direct control of a chief executive appointed by the president. The new executive would hire and fire senior media personnel and manage their budgets.

With a confirming vote by the GOP-controlled Senate, President-elect Donald Trump will be able to install the editor of Breitbart News or another propagandist of his choice to direct how the United States is presented to the world by VOA, or how Russia is covered by RL. If Congress’s intention was for U.S. broadcasting to rival the Kremlin’s, it may well get its wish.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/a-big-change-to-us-broadcasting-is-coming--and-its-one-putin-might-admire/2016/12/09/6c6d5786-bcb7-11e6-91ee-1adddfe36cbe_story.html?utm_term=.ce496f9b3f5c

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

fuck that's genuinely chilling

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

Amazing that it only takes a month for a 240-year-old country to unravel.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Dang xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 12 December 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

Wrong to lump in Al Jazeera w/ pure propaganda channels like RT, but that's beside the point here. This is some scary shit.

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 12 December 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

I feel so distant from these changes as opposed to the risk that, like, people who I know might be deported, that I can mentally grasp that it's a bad thing but I can't comprehend what it means really.

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

Like, I've never heard of Voice of America. Does anyone listen to it? Who cares?

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

well, i guess it means that you might see footage of your friends being deported as part of a go-get-em rah-rah report on state that looks like a bulletin out of starship troopers xp

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

*on state tv

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

No worries, it'll be blasting from loudspeakers on the street soon enough.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

I might've previously hesitated in positing any seemingly-OTT fascist undertakings during Trump's presidency but then that thing happened where all of my sense organs have been functioning since he was elected.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

Like, I don't think there's any percentage in predicting how bad things will get, but I don't really see any bottom limit on how bad things could get.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

Like, I've never heard of Voice of America. Does anyone listen to it? Who cares?

VOA is the official US broadcaster everywhere from Serbia to South Sudan. It's not really intended for a US audience.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

I figured, and I'm not trying to be dismissive, I'm just saying do you think most Americans (of whatever demographic?) are going to understand the significance of that Republican-sponsored amendment sufficiently to have any idea what it means or care about it?

If authoritarianism is Romania's ironing board, then (in orbit), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

no, which is what makes it particularly evil imo

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link


VOA is the official US broadcaster everywhere from Serbia to South Sudan. It's not really intended for a US audience.

― Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, December 12, 2016 10:30 AM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Under § 501 of the Smith–Mundt Act of 1948, Voice of America was forbidden to broadcast directly to American citizens until July 2013[3] when it was repealed in the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act provision of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013.[4] The intent of the legislation in 1948 was to protect the American public from propaganda actions by its own government.[35]

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

Isn't VOA already a propaganda operation?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

yes, and one that until recently was explicitly forbidden from broadcasting to american citizens, and insulated from direct executive control

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

i have no idea how many people around the world pay any attn to RFE/VOA

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

http://www.voanews.com/z/1456.html

Hey folks, in recent years I have listened to this on occasion here:

Music Time in Africa is VOA’s longest running English language program. Since 1965, this award-winning program has featured pan African music that spans all genres and generations. Ethnomusicologist and Host Heather Maxwell keeps you up to date on what’s happening in African music with exclusive interviews, cultural information, and of course, great music -- including rare recordings from the Leo Sarkisian Library of African Music.

curmudgeon, Monday, 12 December 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

the insanity of the reaction to the wapo CIA/putin story is really not encouraging.

(if you still think sam wang has any cred) it looks like the comey announcements about hillary's lingering server issue had an effect on opinion:

http://election.princeton.edu/2016/12/10/the-comey-effect/#more-18959

but did wikileaks dump of podesta/DNC emails? these two things keep getting run together. it's a much more gradual drip-effect if so. it's important to figure out if russia was trying to tip public opinion in an election -- i just don't know if they actually did.

and no, nude spock, it's not "red baiting" to pin blame on putin, the autocratic nationalist

it's also not putin's fault that hillary left herself in striking distance across the midwest

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

enjoying all these headlines talking about a risk of war with china!

, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

never thought I would be thankful for Marco fucking Rubio but if he, McCain and Graham (and I would suspect Paul, as well?) come out against Tillerson that's his nomination sunk

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

Paul opposes him and Bolton:

During an interview on ABC's "This Week," Paul said that he would oppose Bolton's nomination to serve under Tillerson.

"I do know that John Bolton doesn’t get it. He still believes in regime change. He’s still a big cheerleader for the Iraq war. He’s promoted a nuclear attack by Israel on Iran. He wants to do regime change in Iran," he said. "So, I think John Bolton is so far out of it and has such a naive understanding of the world. If he were to be the assistant or the undersecretary for Tillerson, I’m an out automatic no on Bolton. He should get nowhere close to the State Department if anybody with the same worldview is in charge."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

oh shit iago is nude spock? that makes so much sense

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

@tinyrevolution
It's an emergency if Russia interfered with the election or if the CIA's making bogus claims it did. Obama must declassify everything.

I hope at this point we can all acknowledge that America has a deep state and its game is on point

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

Feel like there are a lot of surprising 'enemy of my enemy' moments to come over the next several years.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

hey it happened during the New Deal

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

oh shit iago is nude spock? that makes so much sense

haha wow I hadn't put this together either

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

:O

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

@DougHenwood
This is just too damn funny

Ex-CIA operative Robert Baer made headlines on CNN insisting that the breach was grounds for a new election in the United States. "But I'll tell you, having worked in the CIA, if we had been caught in interfering in European elections or Asian elections or anywhere in the world, those countries would call for new elections,"

https://twitter.com/DougHenwood/status/807952268918226944

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

oh ffs

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

what you mean like Chile

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

oh I guess that's not Asia or Europe lol

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

"... if we had been caught in interfering in European elections or Asian elections or anywhere in the world..."

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

that said i'm not with all of the leftist chortling about this. our own domestic nationalism is nuts enough without the russian version getting into the act.

steve bannon talked glowingly about alexander dugin in an interview -- why would russian intelligence even need to warp american opinion? that had already happened willingly

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, these people engaging in 'but what about all of the governments/elections the US has meddled with, hmmmmmm?' smugness needs to fuck off. You can have qualms about how our government has historically operated AND call out Russian interference as unacceptable. I mean, were you sagely nodding your head on 9/11 and smarmily declaring that we totally asked for it? You get that the actions of governments are separate from the populations who are adversely affected by those actions, yes?

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

twitter rumor: carly fiorina for DNI

lol

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 17:41 (seven years ago) link

were you sagely nodding your head on 9/11 and smarmily declaring that we totally asked for it?

actually i was kinda screaming it as i was choking on the cloud of WTC dust that might've given me cancer.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

anyway, this seems like the salient point

@tinyrevolution
A good lesson for Americans to take away from this is that it feels like shit to wonder if another country's influencing who governs you

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

Too true. I'm already rethinking the coup some of my buddies and I had planned.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure the fiorina thing is just trump trolling his adversaries but ughhhhhh. sadly if you fail as DNI your prize isnt a golden parachute and a job on fox. its a bunch of dead americans.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 12 December 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure the Fiorina thing everything he says or does is just trump trolling his adversaries

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, these people engaging in 'but what about all of the governments/elections the US has meddled with, hmmmmmm?' smugness needs to fuck off.

Maybe it's not smugness but the hope that Democrats in the future will take a more skeptical view of the US's actions around the world... but nah, nobody actually believes they will.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 12 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

these people engaging in 'but what about all of the governments/elections the US has meddled with, hmmmmmm?' smugness needs to fuck off. You can have qualms about how our government has historically operated AND call out Russian interference as unacceptable.

i agree with the second part. so how can you voice qualms about how our government has historically operated WITHOUT saying "but what about all of the governments/elections the US has meddled with?" the knowledge that the US/CIA has repeatedly fucked with internal affairs of other countries has out there for a long time, and i'm preeeeeetty much no one here cares outside of the usual leftist circles. either the information doesn't get through somehow, or it does and we don't care. now we get a taste of election-fuckery in the U.S. - and just a taste, because it's hard to pinpoint the actual loss of the election on the wikileaks stuff, and as others have mentioned, Clinton, you know, won the election by 2.5+ million votes - and it draws comparisons to hiroshima and nagasaki. that's great! it's great that people are really, really pissed off about it. they should be. since it has opened up a brief, rarely-seen-IRL "national conversation" about it, a term that usually makes me puke in my mouth a little, maybe it might be a good time to mention the united states' historical acts. as far as i can see, that whole historical angle has taken up maybe 0.1% of the conversation about the russian hacking, so i don't think it's a zero sum game situation.

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

when would be the more appropriate and effective time to mention such things, other than now? is it better to wait 3 years for errol morris or someone to make a really kickass documentary about it, after the election-hacking prime has been pumped, but enough time has passed to let things settle down a little? hey, maybe it would be, i don't know, but from just a regular old non-famous filmmaker standpoint, now seems like a good time

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

i liked when hillary put bernie on blast for having been anti-contra in his wild youth

difficult listening hour, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:35 (seven years ago) link

anyway, i completely agree with this - You can have qualms about how our government has historically operated AND call out Russian interference as unacceptable .

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

xpost or the henry kissinger moment during the debate. i was so glad he mentioned that and stood his fucking ground

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

last thing from me on this because i know it's annoying - now is a great time to talk about the voter ID bullshit, too

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

at least we might be able to actually DO something about that

Karl Malone, Monday, 12 December 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

The Republican sponsors of a so-called "religious freedom" bill plan on re-introducing the legislation next year in the hopes that Donald Trump's election will boost chances for the bill to be signed into law, Buzzfeed News reported.

The bill, the First Amendment Defense Act, would ban the federal government from revoking tax exemptions from or denying grants to individuals or corporations with religious or "moral" beliefs opposing same-sex marriage.

Couldn't you argue neglecting to prosecute someone for their religious beliefs could result in de facto SHARIA LAW???????????????????

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 12 December 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

Nah, 'cuz the Mohammedan religion is not a real religion.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

How many posts are we at here? At this rate this should get a weekly reboot.

Heard most of the daily briefing from Josh Earnest (who eerily mimics Obama's halting speech cadences). A reporter asked him if he was directly claiming on behalf of the White House that the hacks/leaks/cyber-meddling were explicitly done to help Trump, at the expense of Clinton, or if this latest news undermines his incoming presidency. and while he wouldn't exactly say yes, he did go on at length with a litany of all of Trump's (familiar to us) connections to Russia, emphasizing, repeatedly (and I paraphrase), that all this stuff was out there and reported on for months, how none of it was secret or stemmed from the intelligence community, that none of it had yet to be disputed, and that all of Trump's supporters in the GOP who backed him knowing full well his ample connections to Russia now have to justify that support in the face of belatedly acknowledging this suspicious at the least and damning at worst stuff.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:11 (seven years ago) link

as alarming as this all is---and deserving of investigation---nothing even suggested would actually make trump's electoral win illegitimate in a legal sense, right? the russians didn't hack the voting machines, and they didn't invent the electoral college. short of demonstrated and provable-in-court collusion with moscow, i don't see how a trump presidency is avoidable. and somehow i doubt that the FSB would be dumb enough to actually work with trump directly---he's just a useful idiot

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

I'm wondering if McConnell approving the investigation is just a tactic to blame Obama for Russia's meddling

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

i wouldn't doubt it! if he had taken a firmer stance w russia this never would have happened, etc

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

I'd assume gamesmanship to work on keeping Trump in line with Congress's designs.

Don't want him acting like a populist again if his poll numbers dive when they start trying to privatize Medicare.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

what's the point of blaming obama more at this point

global tetrahedron, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

KM, I would love if we (the people) could both talk about how fucked US foreign policy has been AND acknowledge the bullshit game Russia is playing, but attention is in short supply as always and I would hate to see the latter get subsumed by a thoughtful exegesis of the former. I've seen just a few too many responses that were quick to dismiss the situation which is happening right now and which seems the most important in terms of immediate scrutiny.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

what's the point of blaming obama more at this point

obviously because it shifts blame away from Trump

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:32 (seven years ago) link

acknowledging that our foreign policy was bad and wrong does, you know, shore up the morality of the point yr trying to make w/r/t russia

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

The nonsensical Fox News headline: 'Sore loser Obama turns to Russian hacking to delegitimize Trump's triumph'

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

I actually have no idea what the accusations even fully comprise, or at least if there is anything more to them than just the Podesta/DNC stuff. Like, clearly there is classified info that the public is not privy to. But hearing a summation of all the Russian connections laid out as they were by Earnest was pretty surreal, just so many individually bad sounding things in a row, all related to Russia, none contradicted, all having preceded the election by months, topped by more recent news (however redundant) that Russia had a direct role, to some extent, in influencing the election, consensus revelations which came within days of Trump floating a guy for SoS who has full-on Russian ties and considers Putin a friend. It's just all too much.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

or at least if there is anything more to them than just the Podesta/DNC stuff

the info that they hacked GOP servers too is new, afaict

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link

what could be more embarrassing in GOP emails than the shit the candidate said openly, is the question

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

the info that they hacked GOP servers too is new, afaict

― Οὖτις, Monday, December 12, 2016 7:37 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I haven't seen this confirmed yet.. I dont think the RNC would cop to it either, if it actually happened.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

Given the relatively unprecedented CIA announcement, I wonder if there's anything more serious than the Podesta/DNC stuff going on to justify the agency coming forward and putting that much pressure on pols.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

And RNC stuff, if accurate.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

as alarming as this all is---and deserving of investigation---nothing even suggested would actually make trump's electoral win illegitimate in a legal sense, right? the russians didn't hack the voting machines, and they didn't invent the electoral college. short of demonstrated and provable-in-court collusion with moscow, i don't see how a trump presidency is avoidable. and somehow i doubt that the FSB would be dumb enough to actually work with trump directly---he's just a useful idiot

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, December 12, 2016 1:23 PM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there's a really dumb tendency among liberals at work here: this attraction to silly, sorkin-esque long shots. jill stein and her recounts aren't going to prevent what's coming. leaning on the appointed state electors isn't either.

again, russian hacking of american state entities, and publishing that material to move public opinion, is bad! but i don't think it was *determinant* of our election more than a dozen other things. it's not even the top thing that brands the election as crooked or rigged or suspect. i don't think revealing that putin did what he could to help trump and damage HRC is enough to void the election, not hardly

also, let's be real, if the EC pulled any last minute games and didn't ratify trump, there would be blood in the streets instantly and it really would be some kind of crumbling republic pre-caesar moment for us

THAT SAID: legitimacy isn't just a legal technicality. it's not totally quantifiable. DJT is going to be the president, constitutionally. he won the states to give him the electoral votes. but is he legitimate? we're stuck with him, but anything that makes his time appear tenuous and unearned is GOOD imo

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

yeah would def agree w that

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

For sure. Even if the recount, for instance, didn't have much immediate material impact, it drew the president-elect into declaring the election that he won rigged. Hell, when in doubt, set him up to undermine his own legitimacy.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

goole otm, all of that

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

Distraction works both ways. Anything that gets under his skin is probably a good thing, too.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

yup goole otm

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

xpost I've thought for a while that people should only be responding to his tweets with unflattering caricatures.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

The bill, the First Amendment Defense Act, would ban the federal government from revoking tax exemptions from or denying grants to individuals or corporations with religious or "moral" beliefs opposing same-sex marriage.

Oh fucking great, we're back to the Carter years. The whole starting point for the Moral Majority was thrashing back for the Carter-era IRS for pulling tax-exemption from white evangelical schools like Liberty Univ or Bob Jones that maaaaaaybe didn't like black students all that much.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

I don't really blame liberals for the wing and a prayer hopes right now - it's a fallow period without concrete actions from Trump and the GOP to oppose. It's the dread of knowing something terrible is around the corner but you're not sure if it's Cthulhu or Freddie Krueger.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

silly, sorkin-esque long shots.

I'm wondering at what point is Sorkin is a symptom or a cause

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

one of a very long list, but I say the latter

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

i hate him so i'll credit him with too much probably

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

what's new guys ?

(•̪●) (carne asada), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

under the circs i'd classify this as Not Helping, especially from this guy

https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/808398457140609024

ps. what is the "elector's letter" he's referring to here?

goole, Monday, 12 December 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

china's english propaganda media arm calls Trump 'ignorant as a child' - this can only end well

Many people might be surprised at how the new U.S. leader is truly a 'businessman' through and through. But in the field of diplomacy, he is as ignorant as a child.

, Monday, 12 December 2016 20:30 (seven years ago) link

What an insult to children.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

it's a fallow period without concrete actions from Trump and the GOP to oppose

^^^ this. my wife is in a constant state of "why isn't anybody DOING anything to stop Trump?!" and I'm like well technically he hasn't done anything we can actually do anything about yet

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

ps. what is the "elector's letter" he's referring to here?

― goole, Monday, December 12, 2016 2:29 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Electors demand intelligence briefing before Electoral College vote

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

love how the majority of those are Democratic electors who don't want to vote for Hillary rmde

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

^^^ this. my wife is in a constant state of "why isn't anybody DOING anything to stop Trump?!" and I'm like well technically he hasn't done anything we can actually do anything about yet

― Οὖτις, Monday, December 12, 2016 3:39 PM

do town halls take place over December? I'm wondering if Schumer's bold words are translating to backroom scheming to bring down the Ryan-McConnell agenda.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 December 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/AmichaiStein1/status/808407221616918528

SEC/NYAG should see if anybody shorted lockheed stock prior to trump's tweet

, Monday, 12 December 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

Does 'the president elect is going to make a snarky tweet in six minutes' count as actionable insider information?

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 12 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

my wife is in a constant state of "why isn't anybody DOING anything to stop Trump?!" and I'm like well technically he hasn't done anything we can actually do anything about yet

lol, otm. the extent to which are chomping at the bit is encouraging though

flopson, Monday, 12 December 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

“Dear Donald,” the bizarrely prescient correspondence from Nixon, dated Dec. 21, 1987, reads. “I did not see the program, but Mrs. Nixon told me that you were great on the Donahue Show. As you can imagine, she is an expert on politics and she predicts that whenever you decide to run for office you will be a winner!”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/donald-trump-administration/2016/12/richard-nixon-letter-oval-office-wall-232517

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 December 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Do we think Trump and his people coordinated with Russia or not? His defensive aversion to a "probe" into Russia's interference looks... bad

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

Why not say, "if Russia intervened in any way I condemn them. I don't have any idea why Putin would think a Trump presidency would be in his interest but I can assure him, right now, that nothing is more important to me than the integrity of our electoral process. If it turns out his government undermined this, even to my benefit, there will be consequences."

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

A friend of mine pointed out that he can spin this as "All they did was release the DNC's emails. If they were so bad that it made people not want to vote for Hillary, that's not my fault."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 12 December 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

Yeah. But instead he tries to deny there was any Russian interference at all. It's weird.

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

I suspect people in his campaign were in touch with wikileaks and Russian state actors, yeah

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

It sounds crazy but the evidence points that way

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/12/12/donald-trump-interviewed-mitt-romney-to-torture-him-roger-stone-says.html

explains trump's creepier-than-usual smile in that photo

, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

i mean, it was obvious from the start

, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

Yeah. I have no love for Romney, but that was painful to watch.

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

I reiterate the point I made during the campaign: I wouldn't want a next-door neighbor who behaved like that. Why the fuck would anyone want such a leering goblin to be in charge of the country?

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/intlspectator/status/808434536962924544

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, Trump is truly a ghoul xp

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

That Lockheed thing is odd.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 12 December 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

it makes sense insofar as Trump thinks his job as president is to bully companies/manipulate the stock market/"make deals"

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

What I don't understand is how Romney wouldn't have understood from the beginning that he wasn't really in the running and that the whole thing was to fuck with him. Maybe he figured he had nothing to lose playing along?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 12 December 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

being a toadying lickspittle comes naturally to him

Οὖτις, Monday, 12 December 2016 23:13 (seven years ago) link

I think he was being punished for having faith in the system, Charlie Brown style.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 December 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

Yes, probably yet another who believes the presidential election to be a process wherein the wisdom and gravity of one's forebears is mystically passed into the winner's soul. It could still happen, though. Let's give him a chance, folks.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 December 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

That Lockheed thing is odd.

Simply calling it odd, instead of what it is (probable cause for an insider trading investigation implicating the President-Elect), already feels like normalization.

El Tomboto, Monday, 12 December 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

the 2020 election will involve ingesting the water of life and inheriting the memories of all past presnits

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WAmjkr4RISU/hqdefault.jpg

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 12 December 2016 23:43 (seven years ago) link

Lol @ "presnits"

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 23:44 (seven years ago) link

A friend of mine pointed out that he can spin this as "All they did was release the DNC's emails. If they were so bad that it made people not want to vote for Hillary, that's not my fault."

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, December 12, 2016 4:39 PM (thirty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is 100% the line being taken by folks at, eg, r/The_Donald

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 12 December 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

The big tip off for me of the guy in the photo being a racist is that he's roger stone

Treeship, Monday, 12 December 2016 23:59 (seven years ago) link

That Lockheed thing is odd.

Simply calling it odd, instead of what it is (probable cause for an insider trading investigation implicating the President-Elect), already feels like normalization.

― El Tomboto, Monday, December 12, 2016 5:41 PM (twenty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

AFAIC, I just want to know from people who actually understand these things if there's any innocuous way to read the data (like maybe the timestamp is off somehow?), if only because I want to be sure that every scorched earth crusade against Trump is watertight. There's no need for reckless straw grabbing with someone this deeply venal, so I hope the appropriate people are dotting i's and crossing t's on this one.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 00:15 (seven years ago) link

The former Texas governor, Rick Perry, who wanted to eliminate the Department of Energy but could not remember its name on live television, has emerged as a leading candidate for energy secretary.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/us/politics/donald-trump-transition.html

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

Huh. Have we had a president who was a complete nihilist before?

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 00:59 (seven years ago) link

Calvin Coolidge?

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

The comments on the Lockheed twitter seem to say it was a small amount of shares (700) and that the money saved by selling early only would only amount to about $4000. And that it's common for shares to have pre-market activity.

nickn, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

Chris Hayes is hosting a fascinating segment with Bernie Sanders in Kenosha, Wisconsin talking to Trump voters.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link

Watching it now but eh

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:29 (seven years ago) link

H8 this person who doesnt think "people working at mcdonalds" should make a living wage because then "everything would go up"

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

Feeling rage at these Trump voters tbh, especially dumb mustache man and racist blue scarf woman.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:49 (seven years ago) link

I like the white streak in her hair.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link

I can't imagine HRC sitting on a stool talking to them as comfortably as Sanders tbh

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 01:54 (seven years ago) link

hillary's too woke

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 02:03 (seven years ago) link

say it was a small amount of shares (700) and that the money saved by selling early only would only amount to about $4000.

how many shares of lockheed did Kushner own yesterday lol

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 02:06 (seven years ago) link

Chris Hayes is hosting a fascinating segment with Bernie Sanders in Kenosha, Wisconsin talking to Trump voters.

Why didn't they go someplace Trump won? He got killed in Kenosha.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 02:08 (seven years ago) link

He won by 200 votes, according to Hayes.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link

Why was Jennifer Palmieri the communications director of the Clinton campaign? She is so lame

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 02:35 (seven years ago) link

It's rex tillerson confirmed

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:00 (seven years ago) link

Tillz

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:00 (seven years ago) link

Gonna be a fun confirmation fight

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:05 (seven years ago) link

H8 this person who doesnt think "people working at mcdonalds" should make a living wage because then "everything would go up"

Capitalism's ability to pit the poor vs. the working poor never ceases to amaze.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:05 (seven years ago) link

Crazy how he's going to start his administration under a cloud of scandal right out the gate.

Xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

HOW YOU GONNA AFFORD THE BIG MAC WHEN IT GETS MORE EXPENSIVE BC YOU'RE GETTING PAID MORE OH WAIT

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

These fucking people don't care about improving their lives -- they just want to know that someone's beneath them. Vile attitude.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/michaelpielocik/status/808507027567874048

, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:33 (seven years ago) link

Shades of Cruz at the campaign call center

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:42 (seven years ago) link

it pains me to think of that joyous moment, that cruz call photo

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

the good old days when this campaign was in free fall

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

ctrl-f "game theory"?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:49 (seven years ago) link

i know gawker et al clown this guy but i found this is some bleak (and less unhinged than "game theory") reading https://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/807994501977505792

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

is it customary for a contemporary GOPer to mention "peace" as romney does in that post? does that seem unusual to anyone else?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:52 (seven years ago) link

Jay Rosen Verified account
‏@jayrosen_nyu

19/ The problem is not at the level "how to cover Trump," but how to recover conditions in which anything journalists do makes a difference.

otm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:54 (seven years ago) link

also otm on twitter dot com

Rusty Foster
‏@rustyk5
"Rex Tillerson" is a Philip K Dick character name if I ever saw one

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 03:57 (seven years ago) link

has anyone thoroughly clowned that stupid game theory thing yet in column form cause some normally smart folks were RTing that today and it drove me nuts

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:04 (seven years ago) link

I just think "Guys, it's time for some game theory" is a classic
I'm going to start using that at parties

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:17 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/808445203694682112

flopson, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't know who jay rosen is what his thoughts on game theory are but that series of tweets about press in the trump era were chilling

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:21 (seven years ago) link

“We struggled to find voices that could advocate for Donald Trump’s ideas,” said James Bennet, the Times’ editorial-page editor.

from a link from that jay rosen tweetstorm. i can picture the aneurysm the times' standards editor just had

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:22 (seven years ago) link

jay rosen is not thought highly of by actual journalists afaict (e.g. http://gawker.com/do-not-listen-to-the-crazy-man-telling-you-to-quit-your-1674046932) but yeah that's a dark thread. also actual journalists think the game theory thread is good writing https://storify.com/jbordeaux/a-patriot-game-theory

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

past a certain point I wonder if the NYT is going to tell its staff to stop talking about internals to WP colleagues

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

obv hamilton nolan is not an actual journalist, but that captures media twitter consensus.

anyway good thread, and i want to live.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

re: game theory, glad someone finally has the balls to defend the surveillance state, that's really been lacking in the public discourse

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

God, I didn't get to his stirring Bill Paxton fighting the aliens speech when I read it before.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:37 (seven years ago) link

I think I'm just getting sick of reading tweetstorms about this shit
it seems like all these edumacated dudes on twitter are just having manic episodes or drunk in the middle of the day or both

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:37 (seven years ago) link

This Bernie town hall in trump country thing is a pretty clever bit of political theater

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:41 (seven years ago) link

Twitter should be reserved for links to cool shit to read and things to look at.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:43 (seven years ago) link

He won by 200 votes, according to Hayes.

It was very close in Kenosha County overall, which includes a lot of exurb. Clinton won the city of Kenosha going away.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:49 (seven years ago) link

The jay rosen twitter thread. The game theory one made me claw my eyes out and now i am just dictating this post to an associate

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

*jay rosen thread was good.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

so glad y'all are mocking that terrible game theory twitter rant

sleeve, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:19 (seven years ago) link

seeing stuff like this is so disheartening:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzgkO07VQAEVxDt.jpg:large

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:43 (seven years ago) link

(editor of Mother Jones)

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:43 (seven years ago) link

I don't understand how that thread is "game theory." It is just a recap of the history of the past decade and a half done in an infantile snark voice.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:46 (seven years ago) link

There aren't any new insights. It's clear that the Russian regime is interested in weakening states and alliances that stand in the way of its ambitions

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:47 (seven years ago) link

@KeithOlbermann
It's an attack by Russia. It's a coup. It's war. Those supporting it are TRAITORS. Brief the Electoral College NOW

WASHINGTON ― The former acting director of the CIA said Sunday that Russia’s interference in the 2016 elections constituted a significant attack on the United States, calling it “the political equivalent of 9/11.”

“It is an attack on our very democracy. It’s an attack on who we are as a people,” Mike Morell told The Cipher Brief.

idk where the hype goes from here.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

The original 9/11 was, of course, not political at all.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

Yeah like what is the plan here? Do they have a plan with this or do they think they're just going to hyperventilate him out of office?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 06:02 (seven years ago) link

is it customary for a contemporary GOPer to mention "peace" as romney does in that post? does that seem unusual to anyone else?

Well, considering the job is Secretary of State..

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 09:44 (seven years ago) link

Ta-Nehisi Coates's has a new, huge longread out in the Atlantic. Saving this for after work.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

's

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

Yeah like what is the plan here? Do they have a plan with this or do they think they're just going to hyperventilate him out of office?

I believe the technical term for the distal end of this trajectory is coup d'etat

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:13 (seven years ago) link

It's remarkable how, with all of his shennanigans, Trump hasn't run afoul of the law in a way that could land him in jail (or at least hasn't been caught.)

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

what has he done that's illegal?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:16 (seven years ago) link

Nothing I guess but he does a lot of obnoxious, sneaky things, and runs his business/life in a way that had gotten him sued thousands of times. What's remarkable is that he hasn't crossed that line.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

Trump is as clear a refutation of the concept of justice as one is likely to encounter. Would love to see him finally face the consequences of something while in office but I'm not holding my breath.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:28 (seven years ago) link

Alternately, his life is an equally-solid confirmation that it's totally possible to be endlessly rewarded for being the living embodiment of a diarrhea torrent.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:33 (seven years ago) link

what has he done that's illegal?

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:16 AM (thirty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sexually assault some folks iirc (allegedly, i know)

p sure he raped his first wife

i understand he won't be charged with those crimes because he's a bully but.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

the trump university stuff looked pretty out-and-out damning, although obviously it never made it to trial

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

He also paid a bunch of workers less than minimum wage and threatened to have them deported when they challenged it iirc

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

That was actually how Trump Tower was built. Through the labor of a bunch of undocumented Polish workers he treated abusively.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

Aren't most of his legal troubles civil suits though (hence the faultless settlements), rather than criminal prosecutions?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

That he's completely lacking a moral center is inarguable. As is, I believe, the assertion that he's done something (probably many somethings) for which he would have done jail time for in a just world. There are very few crimes that I can't imagine him committing, frankly, and who knows what he'll get up to now that he's emboldened by holding the most powerful office in the country.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

"Cannibalism? Sure, I'll try it."

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

Xp Yeah -- that was my point about how its remarkable for him to be such a flagrant rule violator but never risk prison. In my view withholding wages is stealing.

Also he is totally a rapist but he was never charged unfortunately. Ivana's charges did show up in a deposition. His awfulness has brought him trouble in court but bizarrely not in a way that would prevent him from becoming the fucking president.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:14 (seven years ago) link

i believe he's dead-set on abolishing incest law xp

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

It's a 'fun' (read: really scary) game. Knowing what we know about him, imagine Trump being presented with the opportunity to commit a consequence-free crime of any nature and turning down the opportunity.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:15 (seven years ago) link

But anyway pizza.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:17 (seven years ago) link

I happen to believe he raped a bunch of people at Jeffrey Epstein's house. If only the nominee was anyone other than a family member of Bill Clinton, that could have been a real scandal.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:19 (seven years ago) link

I dont understand why pizzagate is a thing but the epstein stuff isnt, both for trump and william jefferson clinton

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:20 (seven years ago) link

Because this is a fallen world, is why.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

Rick Perry for Energy Dept...

Kanye for Minister of Arts and Culture?

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

the trump university stuff looked pretty out-and-out damning, although obviously it never made it to trial

― Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:05 AM (thirty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea i just had that thought trying to fall asleep last night -- remember when our president-elect had to settle a $25 million fraud lawsuit 10 days after he was elected and then everyone promptly forgot about it when he called a bunch of theater folks "rude" and "overrated"?

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

Trying to remember: are there any serial post office arsonists that Trump can nominate for Postmaster General? I mean, since his administration is just going to be one long troll on the people who dared oppose him.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

Unabomer?

“a tub of horses” (Myonga Vön Bontee), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link

he should nominate an Amazon drone

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

yea i just had that thought trying to fall asleep last night -- remember when our president-elect had to settle a $25 million fraud lawsuit 10 days after he was elected and then everyone promptly forgot about it when he called a bunch of theater folks "rude" and "overrated"?

there's been so much of this shit that most people have just shrugged over and instantly forgotten about that i'm starting to wonder whether scott adams was actually speaking literally when he talked about trump being a master hypnotist

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

xpost Sure, why not. Confirmation hearings would be pretty breezy for a machine without sentience. Which is why I expect most of his cabinet to be cleared with a minimum of friction.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

everyone chill, Bob Gates says Tillerson is a great pick

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/310116-gates-endorses-tillerson

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

Rick Perry ... now, see, that's just funny. It's one thing to pick the anti-EPA guy to run the EPA, it's another to pick the anti-Department of Energy guy most famous for forgetting he wanted to abolish the Department of Energy.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

hmmm xp

ExxonMobil is a client of Gates' consulting firm, RiceHadleyGates LLC.

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

LOL:

Remember, Exxon is a company so famously awful that it's been the basis of a Marvel villain group for more than 40 years!

https://twitter.com/Wheeler/status/808687198262403072

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

Between the plutocrats and oligarchs and the yellow journalism, feels like we are at the dawn of the wrong century. Let me know when monocles make a comeback.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

psyched for the 'make america great again' stovepipe hats

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:45 (seven years ago) link

http://www.vox.com/2016/12/13/13901874/obamacare-trump-voter-health-insurance-repeal

Sarah Kliff
Did you feel like you heard them talking about Obamacare repeal in the campaign?

Debbie Mills
Well, we did hear him talking about it some, that he was going to, but like I said, I always just thought that he was, if he changed it, it would be that it would be some other form of health insurance that he would have.

Sarah Kliff
No, I totally understand. During the debates, Trump was the one saying, “I'm going to cover everybody.”

Debbie Mills
I don't know. I guess the next four years is going to be different. I don't know what to look for. 

You're scaring me now, on the insurance part.

’Cause I have been in a panic, so I'm afraid now that the insurance is going to go away and we're going to be up a creek.

i imagine there are a lot of people coming to this realization

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

DT is basically like WC Fields running a "medicine show" con in his movies, only w/out the likability and drunkenness.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

"Don't drink that poison, it'll kill you."
"Fuck you! Water's the thing that'll kill you! I read it on Facebook!"
"Look, here's a list of proven things that will happen if you drink that poison."
"You don't tell me what to drink, motherfucker! Bottoms up!"
"So, well, now that you drank the poison, here's that list again."
"Oh, huh. Now that I'm seizing up and slowly dying, your list of reasons to not drink the poison make a lot of sense. Tell me it's going to be okay!"

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

has anyone thoroughly clowned that stupid game theory thing yet in column form cause some normally smart folks were RTing that today and it drove me nuts

http://gizmodo.com/men-please-stop-manthreading-1790036387

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

majority of the Energy Department's time/budget is devoted to moving around nuclear waste. sounds like a good job for a certified moron.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

i suggest they move it all to Perry's underwear drawer

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:35 (seven years ago) link

xps thanks tombot

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

perry's nuclear waste plans in full

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DqwS0Ew77WE/hqdefault.jpg

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

dammit beaten to the punch by phil d

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

petulant manchildren: pick only one

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

manthreading

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

man.......threading

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

a thing that men do

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

that manthreading piece didn't seem to know what the word "prolific" means

Herpes Bizarre (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

yeah that was not the takedown I was hoping for

sleeve, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

so glad we all canceled our NYT subscriptions but still have thoughtful pieces like that to click on. where else would i find my portmanteau neologisms to keep up with the kids?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

portmanteau neologisms

the next Parquet Courts album title

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

k3vin is so sad that I canceled my NYT subscription in 2010

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link

I liked Jeet Heer's thread about representations of ppl having sex with animals and vegetables in Canadian fiction, more twitter threads like that please

soref, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Yeah I got no beef w Jeet

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

From that Vox bit:

Do you think if it does go away, you'll regret your vote in any way? Thinking, “I voted for this person who took away my health insurance.” Or … it's like, that's one of so many things, like you said, jobs, the economy?

Two things:

1) endless journos are still continually reinforcing the "trump voter" = "working class" = "rural white folks" connection, as if you have to drive a coupla hours west of the Acela corridor into deep coal country to talk to Trump voters and not, say, Staten Island

2) journos(and all of us, pretty much) do not understand how to talk to victims of a con

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:38 (seven years ago) link

What should they have said?

Evan, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Trump voters are for sure varied, but working class/rural white folks, especially in red states, seem to vote as more of a bloc than, say, rich white educated people.

Some of these Trump supporters, they remind me of this guy I saw on the news once. There was a huge rainstorm, and a lot of the viaducts had flooding beneath them. A few feet of standing water. There was one guy being interviewed on the side of the road, and the newscaster motioned to his car, which was mostly submerged. "Didn't you see all the other cars stuck?" she asked. "Yeah," said the guy. "Then why did you think your car could make it?" He shrugs. "I don't know."

Where was it I read the observation that Americans deep down probably do want socialism, and that it's neoliberalism that turned them off this time around? I can sort of see that in the breakdown of recipients of government aid, how the red states (Trump people) get something like twice as much from the government despite contributing much less in taxes, vs. the blue states, who contribute more in taxes but get less in spending and projects and whatnot. Which in a way probably goes back to education, how little people really understand about the government, laws, civics, the things that affect them. When I read that interview with the woman in the Vox piece just upthread, I thought, huh, this is a person that seems like they'd really benefit from the security of liberal Federal aid, of a government safety net, but for myriad reasons is aligning herself with the party that's not just against that, but has worked for decades to prevent democrats from implementing policies that might help her.

It's pretty tragic, just a fundamental failure to understand the abstract and concrete roles and nuance of government, and the intricacies of contrasting/complementary policy. I can only hope (I guess?) that given Trump, etc. seems like the worst of every possible scenario across the board, that his failures will be much more obvious than Obama's perhaps more subtle successes.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

I think choosing someone from Kentucky legitimizes the person in the eyes of Trump supporters that may be reading. Imagine the spin "Well that was a Trump supporter from Staten Island, hardly someone from 'real America' therefore not exactly coming from the same place as most of us in the red states... I commend them for voting Trump, but still. Rural America is a different place."

xxp

Evan, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

http://gizmodo.com/men-please-stop-manthreading-1790036387

― El Tomboto, Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:29 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

gizmodo post manages to be dumber than the tweetstorm that inspired it

iatee, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

Well that's the strength of the marketing and messaging of the right. People in economic situations voting red when most of the things republican platforms push unquestionably directly disadvantage them- that's been the case for awhile now.

xxp

Evan, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

http://deadspin.com/triple-h-donald-trump-is-unclear-on-whether-wrestling-1790037536

Back in 2007, WWE ran a storyline that culminated with CEO Vince McMahon being blown up in a limo. You don’t need me to tell you that McMahon is still alive and was not actually blown to pieces, because you aren’t a moron who thinks wrestling is real. Apparently, the same cannot be said for our future president.

Last night, a 2008 clip from the Opie and Anthony Show began recirculating. In the clip, WWE wrestler/McMahon son-in-law Triple H briefly mentions the limo-explosion storyline, and then reveals that Donald Trump—a longtime pro wrestling performer, mind you—called McMahon’s office to find out if he had really died after the explosion aired.

nomar, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

ugh Kanye and trump meeting and the fact that it's being reported on like it's big news is so depressing. what a shit time to be alive

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

lol Trump frantically calling McMahon's office !! xp

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

the gizmodo post was at least readable

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

A lot of people think of democratic policies as an effort to redistribute wealth from the middle and working classes to the lumpenproletariat. People at the Sanders/Trump voters summit last night were convinced that if the minimum wage were raised, they'd end up paying for it via higher costs for goods and services. Xp

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

ugh Kanye and trump meeting and the fact that it's being reported on like it's big news is so depressing. what a shit time to be alive

journos continue to fall for Trump's schtick hook line and sinker. had to get those pesky Russians out of the headlines somehow!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, yeah, Trump's dumb as shit and incapable of discerning reality from fiction. Is the sky still blue, too?

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

(xpost to WWE 'revelation')

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

That gizmodo post felt very 2013.

Treeship, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 17:58 (seven years ago) link

But I think the selection continually reinforcing the connection over and over again, and given how political campaign planners are always fighting the last war, this myopic reading of "average voter" will facilitate the targeting next time round. Yeah, it establishes the bona fides of the person interviewed or readers who might be Trump voters, but for every _media_ type reading it, it yet again makes them think "yeah, this is the representative voice we need to talk to."

For all the bubble talk lately, everything around this just reinforces the pundit bubble, if you will. "Real America is Elsewhere," to paraphrase Kundera.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:00 (seven years ago) link

Last night, a 2008 clip from the Opie and Anthony Show began recirculating. In the clip, WWE wrestler/McMahon son-in-law Triple H briefly mentions the limo-explosion storyline, and then reveals that Donald Trump—a longtime pro wrestling performer, mind you—called McMahon’s office to find out if he had really died after the explosion aired.

― nomar, Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:52 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The whole scene had such great pacing and believable human emotion it's understandable that he was confused

Evan, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

so did trump have a baked in advantage as a man whos knowledge and perception of the world hasnt evolved since 1988?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

You're being awfully generous with that '1988' there.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

Considering he ran on turning the clock back to the 1950s ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

1950s in what country

Evan, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:21 (seven years ago) link

Some of his supporters would prefer the 1850s, it's true.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:23 (seven years ago) link

As satire (I suppose), I thought this was funny: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/new-york-should-seize-trump-tower/2016/12/12/6dfdfc50-c0b2-11e6-897f-918837dae0ae_story.html

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Kos ain't exactly helping things here with shit like this:

Be happy for coal miners losing their health insurance. They're getting exactly what they voted for

The idea that people deserve suffering for not voting correctly seems a bullshit holdover from dumber times, like how your kids only going to learn if you beat them repeatedly. Feeds into the Accelerationist thing. Can tribal groups or societies even "learn" like that?

Petty vindictiveness is a human reaction, but one don't do shit 'cept make everything worse.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

OTMFM

sleeve, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

manthreading

― k3vin k., Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:02 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I hate this phrase, not the least because it will forever remind me of this:

https://vimeo.com/40608388

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:27 (seven years ago) link

I liked Jeet Heer's thread about representations of ppl having sex with animals and vegetables in Canadian fiction, more twitter threads like that please

― soref, Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:14 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm, this ruled

goole, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

The ongoing anachronistic focus on the coal industry is yet another thing that seems very dawn of the 20th century. It's like blaming Brexit on disgruntled chimney sweeps.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

yeah and its not like mother coal held its beautiful employees tight to its bosom or anything like that. it was all child labor, black lung and murdering people at the picket lines

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

all fine upstanding american traditions, sir

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

Thanks to a random reference I stumbled across the other day, I learned about Harry Caudill and his book Night Falls on the Cumberlands, which by all accounts essentially started the modern focus on Appalachia, with special reference to the coal industry, as a problem to be solved/ignored/pondered at, take your pick. A couple of years ago, the Lexington Herald Leader did a multistory look back at the book, its and his impact and numerous other points of history up to the present, under the overall title Fifty Years of Night. There's an ebook, but the individual stories can be read here:

http://www.kentucky.com/news/special-reports/fifty-years-of-night/

I highly recommend it -- among other things, it functions as a snapshot up to a pre-Trump candidacy, as well as allowing for the sheer amount of ambivalence threading through so much of what has happened there among those interviewed -- regrets, realizations, internal resignation. Not to mention a deeply ambivalent take on Caudill as he aged; he could almost be an American model for Ibsen's Enemy of the People, and some of what he eventually espoused is no-joke bad.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

You'll never watch your life slide out of view, and dance and drink and screw
Because there's nothing else to do.

Bnad, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

for all your FB friends swooning over Obama's Christmas card.

"In the summer of 2009, less than a year after President Obama took office, one of the first orders of business for the newly empaneled Senate Judiciary Committee was passing a long-stalled federal ‘media shield’ bill, which would finally provide a uniform level of protection to reporters who get subpoenaed to testify against their sources in court....

But just as it looked like the bill would sail through Congress and make its way to the president’s desk, it was stopped in its tracks. President Obama suddenly reversed course from his previous position and announced he would oppose the bill if the Senate didn’t carve out a giant national security exception that would make the important protections within it all but meaningless....

Sadly, this incident was only the first of several moves by the Obama administration that laid the groundwork for a potentially unprecedented crackdown on the press by the incoming Trump administration...."

https://freedom.press/news/how-obama-administration-laid-groundwork-trumps-coming-crackdown-press/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

Cool, was wondering what I should use my time machine to fix today.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

who has grounds to sue over this kind of thing? state attorney generals? the justice department?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/13/donald-trump-will-still-be-violating-the-constitution-as-soon-as-hes-sworn-in/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-d%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.53e931381f5f

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

any citizen?

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

this new act is worse than the old one, OL; consider that a "note"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

Thx, I'll deliver your "note" to my past self but my act is probably a more futile problem to tackle.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 19:53 (seven years ago) link

perhaps you let the White House know you didn't approve of Obama's abuse of the Espionage Act in the past?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

andy borowitz "joeks"
convince the electors to vote against trump
watch this brutal trevor noah takedown
john oliver
samantha bee
jill stein recount petition

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

^^ half of my FB feed, plus OMG RUSSIA

sleeve, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:08 (seven years ago) link

me too it is bad

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

Keep up, Morbz, I've spent the past month wearing the armchair liberal hairshirt. But time, like one's FB timeline, moves forward.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

you need more trump-loving soviet emigres on your feed, then you will learn all about how george soros is bussing fake protestors all around the country ("here's proof -- I LOOK A PICTURE OF A BUS")

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

ok maybe you don't need more, i've only got 3 and they provide me with all i need of this stuff

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

you need more trump-loving soviet emigres on your feed, then you will learn all about how george soros is bussing fake protestors all around the country ("here's proof -- I LOOK A PICTURE OF A BUS")

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:14 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ha i do have an uncle giving me that shit

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

lots of infowars/breitbart stuff although a lot that is even way less respectable than those :/

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

The most recent Borowitz appearance on my timeline was my wife posting one of his pieces and effectively saying "what the fuck is this shit"

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

"Your office cut-up getting paid for his political insight" is basically what the fuck that shit is.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Borowitz cited for identifying Russian-hack-obsessives as PATRIOTS! his funniest yet....

@glcarlstrom
Netanyahu: Israel needs to govern more like Trump, with more political appointees picked by the PM.

also

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.758821

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

this is a start. http://neveragain.tech/

ctrl-f "facebook" (who literally have a muslim database) = not found.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

there's also this thing https://sfbay.techsolidarity.org/2016/11/28/meeting_notes.htm (nyc, boston, etc. coming soon although a lot of the surveillance culture tech is in sf for now)

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

lmfao that their sole volunteer link is SURJ

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

(Re: neveragain.tech)

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

andy borowitz "joeks"
convince the electors to vote against trump
watch this brutal trevor noah takedown
john oliver
samantha bee
jill stein recount petition

― I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:07 (two hours ago) Permalink

^^ half of my FB feed, plus OMG RUSSIA

― sleeve, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:08 (two hours ago) Permalink

The B&W rant by some actress basically saying "Hey Trump voters, you're stupid." for ten minutes.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

Honestly it's very disheartening, these things all bespeak denial and a lack of real political tools.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

i really am going to have to block the new yorker from my feed. they have some decent journalism but all that ever gets shared from it is borowitz crap.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

Perhaps explains his continued employment

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

We never discussed one of my favorite NRO columns, and it's about Rick Perry.

Perry’s roof-raising speech Friday, which was festooned with ten-dollar words and an emphasis on state governance as a mechanism for crowd-sourcing solutions, broke through in part because it came in a new package: Perry the collected-but-not-cool thinking man, wearing a muted tie, a bespectacled elder statesman whose long tenure as chief executive of the Lone Star state bestowed wisdom on him while showering prosperity on Texans.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Honestly it's very disheartening, these things all bespeak denial and a lack of real political tools.

It's almost as if the President is the most powerful person in America, and individuals and even groups and even millions and millions of people are pretty ineffectual when it comes to countering said power. Even in the '60s, with far worse, far more egregious shit going on than is going on now, it took years and years of hundreds of thousands of agitated people pushing back against the government before the most basic of concessions happened. And then, over the hump on a lot of fronts, we rewarded ourselves by voting for Nixon.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

the political apex of modern America was 8/10/74, and juvenile me thought such pleasures were going to be a regular occurrence.

mostly downhill ever since

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

the political apex of modern America was 8/10/74

that's when my mom realized I was gonna be a boy!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:11 (seven years ago) link

t was Saturday, under the sign of Leo. The US president was Gerald Ford (Republican). In that special week of August people in US were listening to Feel Like Makin' Love by Roberta Flack. In UK She by Charles Aznavour was in the top 5 hits. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia, directed by Sam Peckinpah, was one of the most viewed movies released in 1974 while Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy by John le Carré was one of the best selling books.
But much more happened that day ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link

^^^^ IS this Lefsetz?

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

Lefsetz would've dropped some cunnilingus refs in there

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 December 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

did anyone see the Bernie Talks to Trumpists thing on MSNBC? The Manic Pixie Dream Editor at work was over the moon.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

We discussed it here last night.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 02:54 (seven years ago) link

lol @ Manic Pixie Dream Editor

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 02:58 (seven years ago) link

I have to say I've enjoyed following young socialist dems on Twitter

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:01 (seven years ago) link

of course, 600 posts ago. Help me out, how many I'm With Her posters recanted their primary votes? xxp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link

Are you talking about us? I don't regret my vote one bit.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

oh good let's relitigate this shit

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

this is not a court, unless it's the one at the end of Bananas

but yeah, i have no interest. Da Bernie Bros on Twitter, never forget

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link

In Trump's America we might as well all become psychopaths. Just follow the course the US has been going to its end conclusion.

I kind-of like the idea, the entire country becoming one giant fist fight and looting spree. Nothing means anything anymore, so why the hell not.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:46 (seven years ago) link

hm

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:48 (seven years ago) link

are you drinking again?

sleeve, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:49 (seven years ago) link

me or lawrence appleton?

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

sorry that was an xp

sleeve, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:50 (seven years ago) link

are you drinking again?

Yes

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:58 (seven years ago) link

i'm drinking sprite

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 03:59 (seven years ago) link

I'm not drinking now, but I'm starting to understand why alcoholism is such a big problem in Russia.

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

Tell me about it (and yes, I've had some Four Roses single barrel). It's been a struggle not to just embrace some sort of wtf nihilism, like America has had its chance and it's all going to shit now in the worst, most aggressive way, and there's nothing to be done about it. The irony is we're nowhere near as bad as Russia, and so much better than we were, say, 60 years ago. And yet, I find our national embrace of anti-intellectualism, tacit and explicit racism, and just all around mediocrity just so dispiriting.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:04 (seven years ago) link

I despise Donald Trump and everything he represents with a fury you cannot imagine. He's like an allegorical figure of evil, it's mind boggling how this guy has become the leader of the US.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:13 (seven years ago) link

i'm not fond of him either

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:17 (seven years ago) link

def don't like the donald

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:18 (seven years ago) link

it's all going to shit now in the worst, most aggressive way

great scott! don't you realize the world has been going straight to hell for centuries now? but somehow some measurable fraction of humanity manages to pull themselves together, find a few good things to do with their lives, and their collective efforts, small as they might seem at the time, divert the whole shebang from plunging over a cliff. just don't go crazy like some disgruntled postal employee and keep your eye on whatever's right there for you to do.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:47 (seven years ago) link

fist to the back of the head, spitting out a tooth Yeah, gotta look at the bright side!

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:50 (seven years ago) link

OK. You're right. Give up now. It'll save time.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:54 (seven years ago) link

I'm talking the exact opposite of giving up. I'm perfectly happy making this guy out to be the personification of evil, because he's pretty fucking close to it. I know it means holding onto an ambient ill ease his entire tenure, but that's the cost. I don't want to become comfortable with this shit.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

OK. You're right. I'll stop pointing out that responding to evil by seeking out positive actions might prevent the worst. No good can come of that.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 05:03 (seven years ago) link

What I said was a luxury! Cripes, there are a lot of people on the radar of this guy's crazed supporters. What was it, a week or two ago some looney tune Trump supporter raided a pizza place with a loaded gun because he thought it was a child sex dungeon? Hate crimes are spiking, and as Trump trashes the country and people begin to really suffer under it, who do you think these guys are gonna blame, Trump??? They think a pizza parlor is a child sex dungeon.

C'mon. This guy needs tales told for a hundred years about what a piece of shit he is, and I'm fine starting now.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

Don't let me stop you.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 05:07 (seven years ago) link

the political apex of modern America was 8/10/74, and juvenile me thought such pleasures were going to be a regular occurrence.

mostly downhill ever since

This is intensely and painfully true.

My first political memory is Nixon's resignation. When as a 6-year-old I saw all the hoopla on TV I asked my dad, "Daddy, what's going on?" My dad said verbatim, "the President is quitting his job because he lied to everyone." Thanks for telling me the truth, Dad. And it's all been downhill since then.

Josefa, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 06:37 (seven years ago) link

that's amazing

flappy bird, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 07:06 (seven years ago) link

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/310309-harvard-professor-says-gop-electors-are-close-to-blocking-trump

Several liberal friends shared this tonight. Beyond the delusion of thinking it's possible, I truly don't understand how they think a Kasich or Romney Presidency would be 'better' than Trump.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 07:38 (seven years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/12/13/scientists-are-frantically-copying-u-s-climate-data-fearing-it-might-vanish-under-trump/

"Scientists are frantically copying U.S. climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump"

(stolen from the appropriate thread, but literally the next page I opened had an answer to milo's astonishing statement - I'm sure half of the pages I open today will as well)

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 09:04 (seven years ago) link

Help me out, how many I'm With Her posters recanted their primary votes? xxp

be honest, you didn't write any material for trump because you didn't think he would win and now you're just burning off all this hillary material you'd stored up for the expected outcome

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 10:14 (seven years ago) link

i'm not fond of him either

"This guy, this is not my kind of guy"

Eallach mhór an duine leisg (dowd), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 10:19 (seven years ago) link

i'm sick of seeing my liberal friends go down the PutinPutin path.

it's mind boggling how this guy has become the leader of the US.

It's not, now. Punch the people in the face for 40 years and they might rebel in unappetizing ways.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 12:09 (seven years ago) link

i'm sick of seeing my liberal friends go down the PutinPutin path.

i know he seems like a really good guy

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 12:19 (seven years ago) link

in this case you know what i mean, dear, so stifle. The asshole lost her election.

I don't believe the GOP elector/House election thing either, but I'm agnostic about whether a Devil You Know is worse than a kook-toddler-goon.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 12:22 (seven years ago) link

True, and you'll never know. But the guy we got has already dedicated himself to unraveling government as we know it, at the expense of everybody helped by it. It would be ironic if this is what it took to shake Congress out of its complacency, but I am certainly not hopeful on that front.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 12:43 (seven years ago) link

I'm agnostic about whether a Devil You Know is worse than a kook-toddler-goon.

the kook-toddler-goon is going to sign legislation proposed by the blue-eyed fraud who is Speaker of the House.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

I almost want to argue that Trump is among the least dangerous elements in the incoming government. He's appointed Cabinet secretaries who are arguably better at their private sector jobs than Trump was in his and have a lifetime's experience fighting the departments they're going to head. Paul Ryan is the Speaker. These people terrify me more than Trump.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

wouldn't Kasich sign it too?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

I should say "most easily caricatured" and "most capable of squirting clouds of ink" than "among the least dangerous," I suppose.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:21 (seven years ago) link

altho Kasich just rejected the "heartbeat abortions" bill in Ohio

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/13/505457437/ohio-gov-kasich-signs-20-week-abortion-limit-rejects-heartbeat-bill

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

I almost want to argue that Trump is among the least dangerous elements in the incoming government. He's appointed Cabinet secretaries who are arguably better at their private sector jobs than Trump was in his and have a lifetime's experience fighting the departments they're going to head. Paul Ryan is the Speaker. These people terrify me more than Trump.

This is some interesting mental alchemy here. Trump's the guy putting these terrifying people into power in the first place, so it starts with him.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

i'm sick of seeing my liberal friends go down the PutinPutin path.

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius)

ehhh. tactics. i know the natural impulse is to go on facebook and do peer review, but it's not appropriate and, honestly, not my responsibility

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 13:59 (seven years ago) link

" I truly don't understand how they think a Kasich or Romney Presidency would be 'better' than Trump."

really? I disagree with a lot of Kasich's stances, and a lot of Romney's beliefs, but they are not unpredictable psychopath narcissists.

akm, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:03 (seven years ago) link

like America has had its chance and it's all going to shit now

when was this chance? after killing the native population? after freeing the slaves? after interring Japanese citizens? after nuking Japan? after the civil rights act? after getting rid of the draft?

almost feel like "make America great again" switched axis when Trump got elected and the left has been idolizing some mythical America that is even less real than the right's myth. "it's all gone to shit now" compared to a flawless imaginary 240 years.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

as "president with terrible policies" romney and kasich might be as bad as trump, but neither of them are what i would classify as a systemic threat. which trump's presidency is. in fact i'd say it's beyond a threat, i'd say he has directly destroyed our political system.

i understand that a lot of people wanted to see the system destroyed in any case, so in that case he might not seem as bad.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

It's only a few weeks until Inauguration Day, gang. Veremos.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:10 (seven years ago) link

Several liberal friends shared this tonight. Beyond the delusion of thinking it's possible, I truly don't understand how they think a Kasich or Romney Presidency would be 'better' than Trump.

A moderate republican would likely not have the authoritarian tendencies or hostility towards criticism or the press that Trump has, not to mention the admiration for people like Putin or Duterte.

Anyway, none of this would fly because the people who voted on November 8 didn't vote for a republican, they voted for Trump. I remember there was a report from the first victory rally where the reporter said, "these aren't republican voters, they are Trump voters." A lot of people, not everyone, but a lot of people, knew exactly what was coming and did not care.

I know hoes that know Ali Farka Toure (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:21 (seven years ago) link

^^^ I agree with this. They think our school system is fucked, and that vouchers are the answer, so why not Betsy Devos? They WANT drilling is pristine wilderness areas, so gutting the EPA is a win. Trump is their raging id manifested, in a way Kacich and Romney are not.

Snorting and all (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

Taking their mindset to its logical extreme, you have to wonder why we never see Trump supporters savagely disemboweling themselves on street corners.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

who will be the next trump? guy's only got another 10 years to live max.

akm, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:02 (seven years ago) link

ivanka

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

good morning

can we just share warm reminiscences about Nixon resigning for a brief respite from the horror? I was eight, in a roomful of cheering hippies. my sister, who was six, asked my dad "if he knew he was making those tapes then why did he say all those things?" my dad said "I have no idea."

sleeve, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

lol

marcos, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

on that warm August morning I was a zygote in my mother's eye.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

who will be the next trump? guy's only got another 10 years to live max.

It chills me to the bone to say it but the guy who I think somehow has the nihilist "nothing matters but destroying my enemies but stick with me and you'll be fine" vibe down best, next to trump himself, is the vile milwaukee co. sheriff david clarke

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:06 (seven years ago) link

A sane GOP asshole would probably take his intel briefings and might even do something with the information

Then again the last one didn't, he just ignored what he didn't understand and ordered the IC to cook the books on the rest, so basically hope is for suckers. the mendacity of hope.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

It occurs to me that, given the shitstorm of revelations that would've sunk another candidate but that have bounced harmlessly off of his leathery hide, Trump's presidency could be a note-for-note replica of Nixon's and he would be just fine. That's where we're at.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

Aw man y'all are making me wish I'd asked my parents more questions about their experiences of the 60s/70s. I have a few anecdotes committed to memory but man, how did I never ask them about Watergate? OTOH my brother was born in January of '74 and they may not have followed it all that closely... still.

walk back to the halftime long, billy lynn, billy lynn (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

who will be the next trump? guy's only got another 10 years to live max.

― akm, Wednesday, December 14, 2016 10:02 AM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Oh great, now he's going to live forever. Thanks a lot.

Evan, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

i am reading nixonland right now. it is weirdly comforting

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

i feel hopeless and despondent a lot esp considering his appointments but i think it is also somewhat easy to expect that the worst effects of a trump presidency will be severely hampered by scandal and controversy. impeachment/resignation is a long shot but that doesn't mean constant obstruction and demands for investigation won't have some positive effect over the next four years. trump already has abysmally low approval ratings and while he is claiming a "landslide victory" and a mandate, people's patience easily gets worn down

marcos, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Speaking of appointments, looks like Rick Perry is officially selected as Secretary of Energy

Evan, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm just gonna go ahead and call Shkreli for Commissioner of Food and Drugs, I guess.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

Although I'm unsure whether the presidential seal is going to be replaced with an image of a hand flipping the bird or of Trump auto-erotically asphyxiating himself with the flag while fucking a bald eagle.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

smiling poop emoji ftw

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

That does reflect unserious vulgarity but it doesn't project nearly enough sneering contempt imo.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

i am reading nixonland right now. it is weirdly comforting
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek)

I'm hoping Perlstein is at work on a Reagan-to-Trump book.

clemenza, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

i am reading nixonland right now. it is weirdly comforting

I'm reading the Invisible Bridge. It is, in the same way, profoundly unsettling.

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:38 (seven years ago) link

My dad said verbatim, "the President is quitting his job because he lied to everyone."

God bless Dad, but this reminds me just a little of the "No president will ever lie to us again" line in the Watergate spoof Dick.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

Aw man y'all are making me wish I'd asked my parents more questions about their experiences of the 60s/70s.

my folks knew people that were killed at Kent state. at the time when there was a national draft and students were shot and killed at a peaceful protest. rmde to see people freaking out over him saying dumb things on twitter or being critical of the NYT thus the world is ending.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

http://crossover.bureau42.com/supeskennedy.jpg

cross-referenced from the 'real people in comic books' thread

Darcy Sarto (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

in 2016 no innocent unarmed people are murdered by law-enforcers, of course xp

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:48 (seven years ago) link

or inspired to take up arms by ludicrous fictions shared on social media

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

xp my dad's experience of the 60s and 70s was "being in the Army, with most of 1966-1971 in Vietnam." My mom's was "sitting on Army bases and shitty civilian apartments raising two kids." Exciting. I know that 1972 was the last time my dad ever voted for a Republican president, since doing so got him promptly sent back into combat.

altho Kasich just rejected the "heartbeat abortions" bill in Ohio

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/13/505457437/ohio-gov-kasich-signs-20-week-abortion-limit-rejects-heartbeat-bill

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, December 14, 2016 8:24 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The fact that both bills reached his desk the same day is not a coincidence. The one was presented as a distraction so he could veto it and sign the other while looking "reasonable." A 20 week ban is still complete bullshit. Kasich has signed 18 - 18!!! - anti-abortion laws during his term in office and been on the anti-PP bandwagon since day one. He's no more reasonable than any of these other fucksticks.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

I'd posit that, under Trump, the likelihood that you'll be sharing your parents' experience is sadly quite high, Adam.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

Comparing Kasich to Trump is meaningless at this point, especially because establishment conservatives deserve no leeway due to their apparent willingness to support Trump. (I know Kasich himself is a notable exception to this, although, importantly, not notable enough to endorse Hillary.)

But being serious, Trump is a unique threat to the Republic in ways that go far beyond policy. He is supporting all the horrible, anti-woman, anti-government stuff the Republicans always support but as a bonus he is also literally a malignant narcissist with authoritarian aims and absolutely no ability to make discerning choices when it comes to issues of national security, the environment, etc.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

but is he dangerous?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

Idk. I wouldn't hire him as my dogwalker.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

If John Kasich wanted to be my dogwalker he might make it past the first round of interviews.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

when was this chance?

xpost In so far as no country lacks blood on its hands for many of the same reasons, I'd suggest it's been in the slow march toward acknowledging mistakes in the past and trying to solve them, however haphazardly. The election of Trump is a direct affront to any movement in this direction, from civil rights to the environment to education to diplomacy, the reactionary drumbeat of "anti-PC" basically an aggressive fuck you to empathy, which is key to progress. I've noted it earlier, but for all this country's faults going forward, we've really yet to go backwards.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

it is true that life is in many (but not all) ways better for people of color, women, and queers than it was in 1974, but let's see what the future holds fight the future.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

he election of Trump is a direct affront to any movement in this direction, from civil rights to the environment to education to diplomacy, the reactionary drumbeat of "anti-PC" basically an aggressive fuck you to empathy, which is key to progress. I've noted it earlier, but for all this country's faults going forward, we've really yet to go backwards.

Look at 1964 and 1968. At the height of achievement you can see the abyss below you. That's history, man. It's a bitch.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

it's not a straight line, etc

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

are you saying that the arc of the moral universe is more of a scribble

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

it's more of a Mad Libs.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

the arc of the moral universe bends toward Kanye

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

I've noted it earlier, but for all this country's faults going forward, we've really yet to go backwards.

http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/031208/031208_reaganobit_hmedium.grid-6x2.jpg

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

("this facial expression" there, dragged into optimism+triumph by sheer will)

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

I'm one of those minorities that has benefitted from the constitutional advances of the last 20 years but, no, I don't think history evolves unceasingly.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

No one answered my question about who has grounds to sue the president for violating the Emoluments Clause.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

xxp DLH otm

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

I'm hoping Perlstein is at work on a Reagan-to-Trump book.

― clemenza, Wednesday, December 14, 2016 10:37 AM (fifty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

did you see https://washingtonspectator.org/press-trump-perlstein/ (posted previously)?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

man do I love Ronnie's hair

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

If John Kasich wanted to be my dogwalker he might make it past the first round of interviews.

Romney wouldn't.

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

you're saying you don't want your dog strapped to the top of the car and driven cross country for 14 hours?

, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

No one answered my question about who has grounds to sue the president for violating the Emoluments Clause.

It's not who has grounds, it's who has standing, and so far nobody seems to have a good answer. The prohibition of generalized grievances seems like it would apply here, so Adler's WaPo blog on the topic is probably an accurate take: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/11/21/the-emoluments-clause-is-donald-trump-violating-its-letter-or-spirit/

Whether or not one concludes that Trump’s business dealings violate the letter or the spirit of the Emoluments Clause, the underlying controversy is almost certainly non-justiciable. It is difficult to conceive of a scenario in which someone would have standing to challenge Trump’s arrangements, and even harder to think what sort of remedy could be ordered by a court. In other words, if there are concerns about how President Trump handles his various investments, the only remedies will be political.

non-justiciable, son

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

Didnt know that was a word

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

You'll probably have ample opportunity to familiarize yourself with its usage in the coming years.

The Pleasure Principal (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/michigan-hillary-clinton-trump-232547

In results that narrow, Clinton’s loss could be attributed to any number of factors — FBI Director Jim Comey’s letter shifting late deciders, the lack of a compelling economic message, the apparent Russian hacking. But heartbroken and frustrated in-state battleground operatives worry that a lesson being missed is a simple one: Get the basics of campaigning right.

Clinton never even stopped by a United Auto Workers union hall in Michigan, though a person involved with the campaign noted bitterly that the UAW flaked on GOTV commitments in the final days, and that AFSCME never even made any, despite months of appeals.

The anecdotes are different but the narrative is the same across battlegrounds, where Democratic operatives lament a one-size-fits-all approach drawn entirely from pre-selected data — operatives spit out “the model, the model,” as they complain about it — guiding Mook’s decisions on field, television, everything else. That’s the same data operation, of course, that predicted Clinton would win the Iowa caucuses by 6 percentage points (she scraped by with two-tenths of a point), and that predicted she’d beat Bernie Sanders in Michigan (he won by 1.5 points).

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

yup. The story I read about the computer in the back office behind the locked door - Ada, wasn't it called? is way worse than any email server bullshit. It's bad sci-fi.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

You have to wonder if Clinton's health and endurance was partly also why they didn't do more of those smaller directed outreach in some states.

earlnash, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

you don't have to, really

jason waterfalls (gbx), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

the fact that in the last 24 hours i've read that politico article plus an article that claimed - with quotes from campaign workers -that podesta got hacked because he asked the tech dude whether an obvious phishing email asking him to change his password was a phishing scam or not and the tech dude answered back via email "this is a legitimate email" when he meant to write "this is an illegitimate email" are really boggling my mind

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

smaller directed outreach

fwiw they just didn't even go to some states at all, like Wisconsin and Michigan. i don't know about the health/endurance line, they still found time to fly home to NY every day to catch the evening news.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

this quote from that politico article:

But there also were millions approved for transfer from Clinton’s campaign for use by the DNC — which, under a plan devised by Brazile to drum up urban turnout out of fear that Trump would win the popular vote while losing the electoral vote, got dumped into Chicago and New Orleans, far from anywhere that would have made a difference in the election.

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

iirc the big GOTV insight of the obama campaign was that direct and repeated contact between prospective voters and canvassers was by far the most effective method of ensuring turnout. that the hrc campaign went in a totally different direction is just mind-boggling.

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

the best fuckups money can buy

see also

https://twitter.com/gatorgoat/status/809064589715456000

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

It's not who has grounds, it's who has standing, and so far nobody seems to have a good answer.

If nothing else, I should think that members of the Congress would have standing, as representatives of a coequal branch of government under the Constitution.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:17 (seven years ago) link

well the House can initiate impeachment proceedings (I'm sure) for violations of the Emoluments Clause, how likely do you think Paul Ryan is to allow that

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

iirc the big GOTV insight of the obama campaign was that direct and repeated contact between prospective voters and canvassers was by far the most effective method of ensuring turnout. that the hrc campaign went in a totally different direction is just mind-boggling.

Which reminded me of something brought up earlier this year, that the reason Wasserman-Schulz was still head of the DNC was that the 2008/2008 Obama For America orgs disbanded after victory, whereas one group probably should have replaced the other.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

those are good tweets. I knew there was a reason we brought you back

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

not sure how enamored I am with obama for america when they spent their last days pimping the goddamn TPP

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html?_r=0

the depth and breadth of incompetence is truly astounding

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

i don't really buy kevin drum's curiously fatalistic take on the election but it's worth considering

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/12/stop-it-there-are-no-big-lessons-2016-election

goole, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

elite/well-connected/hillary-partisan dems really are trying to settle on a CW that everything was great except for comey and putin and the damned 'white working class'

we're just going to have an endless retread of the primary instead of any kind of honest self-examination from the party, aren't we.

goole, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

p much

jason waterfalls (gbx), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

I dunno, blame game + zero self-examination seems to be working pretty well for the other side.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

elite/well-connected/hillary-partisan dems really are trying to settle on a CW that everything was great except for comey and putin and the damned 'white working class'

we're just going to have an endless retread of the primary instead of any kind of honest self-examination from the party, aren't we.

― goole

until the 2016 dem primary when they get pounded to dust, yes.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

yea it sucks but drum's not entirely wrong imo, in a few even very slightly different scenarios this would've been the clinton victory everybody predicted. a few more visits to WI, MI, PA, whatever, and that could've been that. doesn't change the picture for democrats in state governments though

marcos, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

elite/well-connected/___________ always are trying to settle on a CW that everything is great except for the boring and dumb 'working class'

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

that's not really how I read that, or the Levy piece that he references, at all. his endnote and his PS make the point pretty clear:

OK, fine, you want a big lesson? Here it is: our country is now so polarized at a partisan level that it almost literally doesn't matter who runs. Republicans will vote for the Republican and Democrats will vote for the Democrat. There's probably not much more than 3-4 percent of the population that's truly persuadable anymore.

POSTSCRIPT: This is all about national-level politics. I don't think there's any question that Democrats took a huge beating at the state and local level, where they were already weak. If you want to write a smart piece about what's wrong with Democrats, that's the place to start. Forget Hillary Clinton. Tell me instead why Democrats have such dismal prospects at the state level.

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

yea it sucks but drum's not entirely wrong imo, in a few even very slightly different scenarios this would've been the clinton victory everybody predicted. a few more visits to WI, MI, PA, whatever, and that could've been that. doesn't change the picture for democrats in state governments though

― marcos

the problem with basing your party around clintonian pragmatism is that it requires you to actually win in order to sustain it.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

but I agree more with the twitter account Morbius linked to above (holy shit we're through the looking glass here people): treat poor people with actual respect by getting them programs that work and that they can use. Make it absolutely clear the reason we can't have nice things is all about the GOP still trying to drown government in the bathtub.

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Twitter was told it was "bounced" from Wednesday's meeting between tech executives and President-elect Donald Trump in retribution for refusing during the campaign to allow an emoji version of the hashtag #CrookedHillary, according to a source close to the situation.

...

According to Coby, Dorsey personally intervened to block the Trump operation from deploying — as part of a $5 million deal between the social media company and the campaign — an emoji showing, in various renderings, small bags of money being given away or stolen. That emoji would have been offered to users as a replacement for the hashtag #CrookedHillary, a preferred Trump insult for his Democratic opponent.

, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

please define "honest self-examination" because most of the iterations I've seen so far have all pivoted around "how can we make this white supremacy train work in our favor"

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:42 (seven years ago) link

lmfao xp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

pls trump destroy twitter somehow im begging you

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

holy shit at that twitter story

jason waterfalls (gbx), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

the thing that's wrong about the Drum analysis (it was so close that there are a million different reasons it could have gone clinton's way, therefore nothing fundamental needs to be re-examined) is that it shouldn't have been close in the first place. in 2012, romney talking about binders full of women and the 47 percent thing were the major scandals. trump said much worse things on a daily basis and had/has dozens of scandals swirling around him at any given moment. clinton was right when she openly wondered why she wasn't beating trump by 50 points. a sack of bloodstained shit should have been able to beat trump by a landslide. so it's not that the two candidates were evenly matched and that a couple things happened to go the wrong way and aw shucks we ended up with this living nightmare. it's more like there were a range of possible outcomes, and the one where trump even came close to winning was waaaaaaaaay off on the side of the bell curve. the fact that it happened suggests that it wasn't mere chance or bad luck, it was something more fundamental. whether those fundamentals (racism, economic inequality, the fact that democratic voters have pretty much zero direct participation in the party other than being asked to vote for them every 2/4 years) are something that can be effectively addressed by this particular crew of democrats is a different question.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

Tell me instead why Democrats have such dismal prospects at the state level.

gerrymandering?

sleeve, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

goddamn the 2010 midterms for real

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

honest self-examination.

ok: most white people behave with depraved indifference towards black lives. this includes not only all the trump voters who are not overt white nationalists, but most clinton voters, who supported her primarily out of tribal loyalty and only secondarily, if at all, out of concern for black lives.

how do we react to this understanding?

not by changing our policy proposals to the detriment of minority groups. this election was not lost on policy.

not by abandoning a political commitment to black lives. why abandon our values and principles when so much of the opposition to the democratic party centers on the perception that we are valueless and opportunistic?

maybe we should examine our tactics. maybe, just maybe, self-rightously huffing that we "don't imprison our political opponents" is not the best approach to take when your chief political opponent is a genuine criminal. maybe, while affirming that basically everything the republicans, trump supporting or no, believe is wrong, we should consider that effective tactics can be used in the service of sound principles as easily as they can be used in the service of unsound principles.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

Karl Malone tom

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

otm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

the fact that it happened suggests that it wasn't mere chance or bad luck, it was something more fundamental.

it was the power of celebrity

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

there is no potential mutual interest, no comity, between the democratic party and the american right. the right's goal is absolute unquestioned rule, and they will not deviate from that goal. all dealings with the american right and its representatives must be undertaken with that truth foremost in the mind.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

please define "honest self-examination"

how about self-examination that goes beyond looking at internal polls

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

KM and rushomancy OTM. I have no idea what impact it'll have in the short-term (particularly in 2020) but the left needs to focus on GOTV efforts (including going in hard on helping people maneuver state voting laws), and the white people who aren't already joyously slavering over the fact need to fully recognize the extent to which they've been complicit beneficiaries of white supremacy and figure out what they can do to help chip away at that behemoth.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

the left needs to focus on GOTV efforts

Michigan operatives relay stories like one about an older woman in Flint who showed up at a Clinton campaign office, asking for a lawn sign and offering to canvass, being told these were not “scientifically” significant ways of increasing the vote, and leaving, never to return. A crew of building trade workers showed up at another office looking to canvass, but, confused after being told there was no literature to hand out like in most campaigns, also left and never looked back.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, kinda thinking there's gonna have to be a lot of independent effort on that front. Clearly, expecting the party or the candidates to get their shit together is often a losing proposition.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

What was General Yellowcake saying about HRC and hubris?

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

So Clinton loses to Obama in '08 thanks to her complacency and her organization's arrogance, and she loses the gen election in 2016 thanks to her complacency and her organization's arrogance.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

the silver lining is that at this rate in 2020 she'll lose the new world order global election due to her complacency and her organization's arrogance

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

Pretty much. Kevin Drum is an idiot for arguing that it was somehow acceptable for Clinton to totally ignore the people she most needed to vote for her. Xp

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

it's as if the Dems could see this coming

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

so I thought we'd read articles last fall and early spring about the Clinton campaign taking the Obama mode and improving it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

Except for James Comey. Feel free to blame him all you want. Unfortunately, there aren't really any lessons to be drawn from that.

there's one pretty obvious lesson about appointments...

iatee, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

well, Henry Stimson's dead.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

A lot of her campaign, at the end, was about emphasizing how dumb and uncouth Trump was. This was a good way to motivate people who might be on the fence about trump but HATE being talked down to to vote for Trump.

Frankly, a lot of the opposition to her -- the sense that she was a "scold" -- was due to sexism. But with the fate of civilization hanging in the balance you think she could have tried to counteract this, maybe by making her message about the voters instead of about her and Trump. Idk. Easy to say in hindsight I guess. I also think she could have been more aggressive in defending herself on the idiotic scandals instead of rolling her eyes, secure in the knowledge that All Good People knew they were idiotic.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

She was true to who she was and that actually made her earn my affection in the end -- I liked that she maintained her dignity and didn't get in the muck of a real head to head with the Beast. But I was not the one she needed on her side.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

i've said it before, but she had the entire rest of the world to rely on to deliver the "here's why trump is a fucking psychopath" message. only she could deliver a concise "vote for me because ____" message, and she never did

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

it wasn't about message (messages don't matter to people who don't read messages) god why are we still arguing about this

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

This was a good way to motivate people who might be on the fence about trump but HATE being talked down to to vote for Trump.

there's ne evidence that it worked other than make people already voting for her go "Hmm you know right"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure what they say about Michigan is true but I can tell you from firsthand experience there was tons of door-drop literature in Wisconsin and repeated knocking on doors and encouraging people to vote face to face. There was no visible difference between campaigning for HRC and campaigning for Obama.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

vote for me because in 78% of simulations, my presidency leads to better results overall for the average voter, given the usual assumptions (see footnotes below) about economic and technological conditions

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

it wasn't about message (messages don't matter to people who don't read messages) god why are we still arguing about this

effective messages manage to break through to people who don't care about messages

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

still arguing about this because what the candidate says matters. i suppose democrats could run a picture of a hot dog in 2020 and win if they step up their GOTV game, but it'll help if the hot dog offers a compelling vision of why people should vote for it

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

I think she needed to fight back against the de-humanizing personal attacks more than 'deliver a concise message'. she could have done more to show some character e.g. talk off script, deliver her own zings on twitter instead of letting a team of 200 run the account, idk.

only problem is that politicians who aren't donald trump and stumble even a little bit when they do the above get punished pretty hard.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

still arguing about this because what the candidate says matters.

lol it obviously doesn't

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

what matters is who the candidate is and how well they reflect/reinforce voters' preconceived notions

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

There wasn't enough effort going toward addressing what Trump was actually saying and why it was wrong -- rather than just "illegitimate." She didn't make the case that the solutions he was proposing was unworkable. She instead emphasized that he was a monster who only monsters could vote for.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

The only thing not worthless that's come out of Joe Scarborough's mouth in the last few months was when he wondered why Hillary couldn't have responded to the first public "How do you feel?" question after her pneumonia with, "Like crap!" and laughed.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

one minute she was parroting Sanders' populism, the next she was calling him a Communist, and shrugging that 675G was what Goldman Sachs was paying for speeches.

as Twitter Dick Nixon said, she'd take a poll before saying what her favorite color was. She often sounded like the phoniest phony that ever phonied, except for her opponent.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

There wasn't enough effort going toward addressing what Trump was actually saying and why it was wrong -- rather than just "illegitimate."

Treeship, she did this over and over again, especially in October.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

candidates' party affiliation + race/ethnicity + gender = majority of voters' preferences predicted

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

and the nonmajority is where the election's decided

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

still arguing about this because what the candidate says matters.

lol it obviously doesn't

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:34 PM (fifty-seven seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes we can vs i'm with her

which one of these is a far, far better political slogan?

harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

one is an inspirational call to all americans, the other is a facebook status

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

it's practically a selfie in slogan form

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

Eduardo Porter of the NYT drills down into the metro/nonmetro economics of the vote:

There are almost nine million more jobs than there were at the previous peak in November 2007, just before the economy tumbled into recession. But the gains have not been evenly distributed.

Despite accounting for less than 15 percent of the labor force, Hispanics got more than half of the net additional jobs. Blacks and Asians also gained millions more jobs than they lost. But whites, who account for 78 percent of the labor force, lost more than 700,000 net jobs over the nine years.

The racial and ethnic divide is starker among workers in their prime. Whites ages 25 to 54 lost some 6.5 million jobs more than they gained over the period. Hispanics in their prime, by contrast, gained some three million jobs net, Asians 1.5 million and blacks one million....

Only 472 counties voted for Hillary Clinton on Election Day. But according to Mark Muro of the Brookings Institution, they account for 64 percent of the nation’s economic activity. The 2,584 counties where Mr. Trump won, by contrast, generated only 36 percent of America’s prosperity.

The political divide between high-output and low-output parts of the country also meshes with the cleavage between urban America — largely won by Mrs. Clinton — and the vast, less-populous rural stretches where Mr. Trump racked up large numbers of votes.

“It has been a good decade for metropolitan America,” said Mr. Muro, who heads the Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings. By contrast, “you can’t underestimate the economic and social pain across the rural tier.”

Given such clear divisions — less-educated whites living in depressed rural areas, on one side, and minorities living in more vigorous big-city economies on the other — the social and racial animosity manifest during the election campaign is hardly a surprise.

So there is a clear economic argument for Mr. Trump’s angry voters to have bucked the establishment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/business/economy/jobs-economy-voters.html?_r=0

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

the interpretation that what the candidate says is meaningless and that instead elections are decided by predetermined measurable factors is, somewhat ironically, something the clinton campaign would probably agree with. no reason to motivate voters with a compelling vision for their country, instead increase allocation of resource X to sector Y by 15%, assuming that it is correct that sector Y's historical trend of voting on issue Z continues to increase by 5% per annum, an assumption based upon a number of factors tha

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

Aye

Mark G, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

there's a reason that the only left-leaning people i knew that were PUMPED TO VOTE this year were bernie sanders voters during the primary, because he was actually saying cool stuff and, even though everyone knew the GOP would stonewall any ideas he had, when you listened to him you could easily visualize the country that he wanted to build and understand how it would be different and better than the status quo

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

the winning candidate spewed a never-ending stream of false, contradictory, inflammatory garbage and won handily. it's clear the content of what he said didn't matter as much as *how* he said it (belligerently and provocatively) and *who* said it (a celebrity whose main identifying factors are "rich", "obnoxious" and "white male")

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

That's called messaging

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

most privileged people behave with depraved indifference towards disadvantaged lives. it's not just a color or gender thing. ignore that and keep losing elections, gerrymandered democrats

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

The only thing not worthless that's come out of Joe Scarborough's mouth in the last few months was when he wondered why Hillary couldn't have responded to the first public "How do you feel?" question after her pneumonia with, "Like crap!" and laughed.

this was michael moore; no need to soften our posture on joe.

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:55 (seven years ago) link

i know we've been litigating this forever but clearly there were some GOTV and campaigning mistakes made in MI, WI, PA, assuming the vote there was locked up when it wasn't. i don't think HRC actually did a bad job with messaging, it is clearly a reasonable thing when running against a monster to highlight how much that person is a monster, i don't think one should fault her campaign for that

marcos, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

clearly there were some GOTV and campaigning mistakes made in MI, WI, PA

yeah, I'm not denying this. My comments are more big-picture, "what is the big lesson" type stuff

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

yes we can vs i'm with her

which one of these is a far, far better political slogan?

Do you think the answer to this is supposed to be obvious?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

idk about "far, far" but yeah obviously obama's was better

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

the only left-leaning people i knew that were PUMPED TO VOTE this year were bernie sanders voters during the primary

they could have easily given him a VP position and pocketed that sweet enthusiasm. instead they used the DNC to mock his supporters! incredible

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

I mean, that's what drives me nuts, people keep saying "Clinton never said exactly what she was going to deliver, she just rolled out vague platitudes about national unity and pride and let people talk about the historic nature of her run, no wonder she lost" when the last two elections were won by large margins by a dude who did exactly that. What were Obama's campaign promises? Besides that we should feel hope and do change? I guess "close Guantanamo." But what else? In 2008 I guess there was some reasonable argument that Obama would draw down the war more quickly than McCain, but in 2012?

Elections are won by people with vague meaningless slogans and no concrete proposals except for "doesn't it feel good to vote for me" ALL THE TIME.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

2008 Obama was a huge critic of the Iraq War.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

the only left-leaning people i knew that were PUMPED TO VOTE this year were bernie sanders voters during the primary

also I don't know what kind of weird bubble you have to live in to not know people who were pumped to vote for hillary. or people who cried when she lost, not because they're scared of trump but because they were super psyched about hrc being president and then it all slipped away at the last moment.

were people as pumped as they were for obama? no, but it's not because of her slogan, it's because obama is better at this than she is, but obama is better at this than ANYBODY is.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

obama benefited from not being hillary clinton, for starters. also uh healthcare xxp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

I don't remember health care being a significant issue in 2008. Clinton had a plan too.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

eephus otm

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

no, but it's not because of her slogan, it's because obama is better at this than she is

hence him coming up w a better slogan.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

did you listen to many HRC speeches? i didn't hear all that many, but she openly admitted to being a rather uninspiring pol/speaker.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't remember health care being a significant issue in 2008. Clinton had a plan too.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:15 PM (four minutes ago)

thought we were talking about the general election

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

eephus otm

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:16 PM (three minutes ago)

guy from san francisco agrees that people were super excited about clinton this year, lmao

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

sorry

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

I live in Cleveland and knew plenty of people -- mostly women, all ethnicities -- who were insanely excited about voting for Clinton, and openly wept when she lost, so don't make this into some "lol COASTAL ELITES" thing.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

well that just about proves it

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

so we agree, hillary clinton was a good candidate

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

I was referring more to this stuff k3vin

Elections are won by people with vague meaningless slogans and no concrete proposals except for "doesn't it feel good to vote for me" ALL THE TIME.

were people as pumped as they were for obama? no, but it's not because of her slogan, it's because obama is better at this than she is, but obama is better at this than ANYBODY is.

personally most people I knew were pumped for Bernie

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

I live in Wisconsin. Surrounded by people who were pumped for Bernie and then subsequently pumped for Hillary. It's not some kind of computer-killing paradox, we're talking about two people who are just not very far from each other in their vision of governance

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

so we agree, hillary clinton was a good candidate

as good as obama? hell no

as good as bernie sanders or joe biden or martin o'malley would have been? yes

as good as john kerry? substantially better

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

hence him coming up w a better slogan

why do you think obama "came up with" that slogan? i would be shocked if it weren't generated by the same dem party pros who came up with "i'm with her" and "stronger together." that's their job. "yes we can" is borrowed from chavez of course and axelrod says obama didn't even like it

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/11414185/Barack-Obama-thought-Yes-We-Can-slogan-was-too-corny.html

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

Lake Erie coastal elites

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

as good as bernie sanders or joe biden or martin o'malley would have been? yes

could we stop this, bcz it seems we simply have different definitions/views of reality

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

Just heard someone posit that perhaps Trump doesn't even know what the department of energy does - nuclear arsenal and all that - and that is why he picked Rick Perry, thinking it was about drilling and oil and stuff like that.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

it wouldn't surprise me

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

as good as bernie sanders or joe biden or martin o'malley would have been? yes

yes, very likely that bernie would have also lost michigan, wisconsin, and pennsylvania

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

entirely possible

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

hypotheticals can't be proven

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

#stillwithher

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

as I've said many times on this very thread already, post-mortems and straw-grasping are of next to no interest to me, would prefer we were talking about Trump's presidency

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

Bernie won WI 56 to 43 BTW

a (waterface), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

xp: why do that when we could spend time talking shit about Clinton

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

god you guys are fucking tiresome. primary /= general election, Bernie was never really attacked w negative ads/Trump tweets/GOP noise machine yadda yadda yadda why are we having this argument you already know are the counter-arguments

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

all the counter-arguments

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

one definitive way that we can fight against the things we dislike about Trump's administration is to spend as much time as we possibly can bitching about how Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate and human being

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

well that just about proves it

― k3vin k., Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:25 PM (twenty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Don't be a fucking weasel.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

The election's over. I thought we all knew.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

(don't want to seem above it tho, bernie woulda won)

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

getting back on topic: steve bannon should be skinned alive

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

instead increase allocation of resource X to sector Y by 15%, assuming that it is correct that sector Y's historical trend of voting on issue Z continues to increase by 5% per annum, an assumption based upon a number of factors

This reminds me of the one professor who got plenty of the press this for "predicting every Presidential outcome since 1984! (...except 2000)"

Which had some sorta weird calculus like Marx trying to throw out how to figure the value of a thing thru algebra or something; This weird mechanicism historicism that doesn't nec. take into effect the multi-variable random dumbness of all human affairs at all levels.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

It's not some kind of computer-killing paradox, we're talking about two people who are just not very far from each other in their vision of governance

That is pretty clearly nonsense.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

iirc, bernie just wanted to do it all but hillary understood that change is incremental

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

next four years are gonna be a hell of an increment

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

crut otm

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

Increment weather a-comin'

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure Hillary herself would admit she played this wrong.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

http://www.thewrap.com/insiders-trump-team-dangles-ambassadorships-to-lure-a-list-inauguration-singers-exclusive/

President-elect Donald Trump’s team is struggling so hard to book A-list performers for his inaugural festivities that it offered ambassadorships to at least two talent bookers if they could deliver marquee names, the bookers told TheWrap.

, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

Why doesn't he invite the Sage of Atlanta?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

if it's kanye i quit

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

honestly hope kanye performs

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

it is going to be kanye

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

then they'll bring Kim out and Trump will grab her by the pussy

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

remember when Beyoncé played George W. Bush's inauguration?

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

yes

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:51 (seven years ago) link

they can't get ted nugent and kid rock and prob a bunch of country singers??

marcos, Thursday, 15 December 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link

I prefer this:

http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/ap/ny11302161339.grid-6x2.jpg

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 December 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

never forget

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6WSfEWvxNQ

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Thursday, 15 December 2016 00:03 (seven years ago) link

Trump could get R Kelly.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

Screwdriver would probably [goose]step up to the challenge.

nickn, Thursday, 15 December 2016 01:27 (seven years ago) link

Skrewdriver, obv

nickn, Thursday, 15 December 2016 01:29 (seven years ago) link

Trump could get R Kelly.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, December 14, 2016 6:03 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

when yr a star they'll let you do whatever

sleepingbag, Thursday, 15 December 2016 02:45 (seven years ago) link

fukcing kanye. george bush doesn't care about black people. but this guy trump! this fuckin' guy right here!!

will, Thursday, 15 December 2016 03:01 (seven years ago) link

maybe Kanye will go off on Trump during his performance, seriously i'm not putting it past him to be playing the long con here

nomar, Thursday, 15 December 2016 03:05 (seven years ago) link

hillary understood that change is incremental

yeah, just like winter melts in the Arctic, very incremental

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 03:14 (seven years ago) link

ah Kanye is the new Obama, playing Vulcan 9-dimensional chess

maybe he will pardon Snowden and Manning

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

Very disappointed in Kanye.

Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it would have been better for Hillary to have had a slogan that she herself could have said in speeches

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Thursday, 15 December 2016 05:01 (seven years ago) link

"you're with me"

Karl Malone, Thursday, 15 December 2016 05:04 (seven years ago) link

"please clap... for me"

Karl Malone, Thursday, 15 December 2016 05:04 (seven years ago) link

fukcing kanye. george bush doesn't care about black people. but this guy trump! this fuckin' guy right here!!

I mean, he does care about black people, he cares about keeping them out of his places of business and about preventing them from voting, how can you accuse him of apathy in this matter

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 15 December 2016 05:05 (seven years ago) link

"If John Kasich wanted to be my dogwalker he might make it past the first round of interviews."

Romney wouldn't.

― ¶ (DJP), Wednesday, December 14, 2016 4:47 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

actually laughed out loud at this

.robin., Thursday, 15 December 2016 05:23 (seven years ago) link

so shocked kanye is drawn to this powerful narcissist...what could be the attraction...hmm

k3vin k., Thursday, 15 December 2016 05:58 (seven years ago) link

i mean i'd like to think this is what he was doing:

KANYE WEST ‏@kanyewest Dec 13
I wanted to meet with Trump today to discuss multicultural issues.

KANYE WEST ‏@kanyewest Dec 13
These issues included bullying, supporting teachers, modernizing curriculums, and violence in Chicago.

KANYE WEST ‏@kanyewest Dec 13
I feel it is important to have a direct line of communication with our future President if we truly want change.

Long post, yet important. (crüt), Thursday, 15 December 2016 06:52 (seven years ago) link

Kanye is not a narcissist in the way Trump is a narcissist. I reject this line of thinking totally xp.

Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 07:00 (seven years ago) link

Kanye is not a moral paragon but he doesn't appear to derive his joy in life from dominating or humiliating others. He wants to create things and to be remembered as an innovator.

Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 07:02 (seven years ago) link

not dominating and humiliating others doesn't mean someone's not a narcissist

k3vin k., Thursday, 15 December 2016 07:20 (seven years ago) link

Very long piece from (wait for it) Popbitch, linking up superinjunctions against the British press to Gawker to the coming of Il Douché (and his many unsavoury apparatchiks): http://popbitch.com/home/2016/12/08/pressing-on/

In a nutshell, OHHHH SHIIIIIIIIIIIIII-

jane burkini (suzy), Thursday, 15 December 2016 08:35 (seven years ago) link

not dominating and humiliating others doesn't mean someone's not a narcissist

― k3vin k., Thursday, 15 December 2016 07:20 (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Kanye is not a narcissist in the way Trump is a narcissist. I reject this line of thinking totally xp.

― Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 07:00 (four hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Kanye is not a moral paragon but he doesn't appear to derive his joy in life from dominating or humiliating others. He wants to create things and to be remembered as an innovator.

― Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 07:02 (four hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Thursday, 15 December 2016 11:17 (seven years ago) link

I appreciate the dollar book Freud I'm reading about Kanye's motives

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 December 2016 11:38 (seven years ago) link

Kanye looked like a hostage in the video of his meeting w/Trump

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Thursday, 15 December 2016 11:41 (seven years ago) link

no he didn't

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Thursday, 15 December 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

So some - NBC? - reporting that Putin was directly involved in and personally oversaw the hack.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 12:30 (seven years ago) link

So what is the end game with this, Syria, etc? Just chaos that it can take advantage of?

Even further underscores Trump's consistently insidious fascination with Russia. The litany, even if innocuous, goes so deep. Beginning with his son's admission that Russian interests comprise a disproportionate amount of his business, likely as loans.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 12:48 (seven years ago) link

I appreciate the dollar book Freud I'm reading about Kanye's motives

I'm not psychoanalyzing him. I'm looking at the things he has been saying about himself throughout his career.

Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Putin: No, write the file with Esc-wq! Dammit comrade!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 15 December 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

Donald, Imma let you finish but Millard Fillmore was the greatest president of ALL TIME

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 15 December 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

“If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House waite [REALLY?] so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?”

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 15 December 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

what a fucking child

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

No, people just aren't being fair. It isn't fair! Everybody's so mean!

I just realized that we're all trapped in that Twilight Zone episode with the kid who controls reality and punishes people he doesn't like.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

It's a nice Cabinet, Donny -- REAL nice.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

"If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, then why did people only report on it, in increasing detail and specificity, for the past 8 months, repeatedly bringing it up in the news and during the debates, both in regards to hacking as well as to real conflicts of interest and pro-Russia figures within my circle, again and again, to the extent that Russia stuff far exceeded any discussion of domestic policy, right up to the very edge of the election and beyond, leading me to repeatedly and publicly discount said reports and disregard any intelligence to the contrary? Tragic!"

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

OL that's my fave showbiz metaphor thus far, good work

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

I'll take a bow once I'm sure it won't anger little Donnie.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

There was a debate where Trump was blurping on about how important "cybers" were, right? I'm sure we mocked it? PRESCIENT, imo.

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Thursday, 15 December 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

No, people just aren't being fair. It isn't fair! Everybody's so mean!

― My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:09 AM (fifty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

More like Vanity Unfair

altony rightano (voodoo chili), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

See, I could at least toss Trump a few points if he'd employed that zing but I legitimately believe it's a formulation that lies outside of his cognitive abilities.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

Mock me if you think this is ridiculous, but having dealt with narcissists in my life before, I think there might be some relationship psychology that is also applicable to how to deal with Trump. I think there's a danger of getting into an "anger dance" with him, where people equate taking random shots at him with resistance and then he takes shots back and people freak the fuck out about it and lose their cool. That's how I feel about all this furious tweeting, it just feels like a pointless anger dance. The real "resistance" is going to be thwarting his political objectives, slowing down his power grabs, and, ultimately, organizing people to vote him out of office, and that's best done via targeting congress and local and state governments.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

Is there anyone here actually claiming that @ing realDonaldTrump is the true face of resistance or progress or activism, though?

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

That makes a lot of sense to me. Will require a lot of discipline on our side to make it happen. xp

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Is there anyone here actually claiming that @ing realDonaldTrump is the true face of resistance or progress or activism, though?

― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, December 15, 2016 11:38 AM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No, but I don't literally mean just tweeting, I mean all of the kind of aimless rage and panic that I see flying around.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

This is a good doc on how to get Congresspeople to listen, btw. Even with a GOP majority, congresspeople still want to get reelected:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DzOz3Y6D8g_MNXHNMJYAz1b41_cn535aU5UsN7Lj8X8/preview#heading=h.fwfuc1708kuz

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

good link

Οὖτις, Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

Can't read it at my stupid job but I'll repost it in the social activism thread.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:51 (seven years ago) link

@GaryMiles_DN
BREAKING: State launches audit after voting discrepancies leave 60 percent of Detroit precincts unrecountable.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/vote-audit/95358702/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

feel like that's bad news since detroit probably voted hillary - republicans will seize upon it as evidence of voter fraud? xp

, Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

I figured that was why Dr. Schadenfreude posted it.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

I feel like the Detroit polling places being fucked up and the FP column I just linked are of a piece
Since nobody cares to even defend our institutions anymore, why bother doing your job if you work for one? It's hard to tell whether it's apathy, incompetence, corruption or enemy action at this point

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

We Americans may not be subjected to shakedowns by the police, the judge, or the county clerk.

was inclined to stop reading here tbh

Οὖτις, Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

as in Goldfinger, i opt for enemy action

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

i made no presumptions about who did what in Detroit fwiw

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

from ft

When 2 million American adults are behind bars for trivial offenses, their lives permanently derailed, while no legal institution has punished any executive for bringing about the collapse of the world economy?

here here. obama got a pass because he 'fixed' the mess. he failed in the end because nobody was held accountable.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

Trump 2016: You Asked For One Thing But You'll Wrap Your Lips Around Whatever The Fuck I Give You

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Is the Naked Cowboy a permanent fixture at Trump Tower Bar? I had some family visiting in september and we walked into the lobby for kicks on a weekday afternoon. The place was dead but the cowboy was standing at the bar taking tequila shots and since then i've him in the background a lot in news broadcast.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 15 December 2016 19:17 (seven years ago) link

that wine glass martini probably cost $18

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 15 December 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

Trump doesn't give a fuck what you want to drink, why should he

Οὖτις, Thursday, 15 December 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

alcohol's for losers!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 15 December 2016 19:27 (seven years ago) link

i'd probably hate him a little less if he were a drunk tbh

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 15 December 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

lmao

marcos, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

weird shouldn't he be appointing someone who hates the arts/wants to abolish the NEA

Οὖτις, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

you have got to be shitting me

nomar, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

the funny thing is that i bet we are going to see yearly turnaround in these positions, it will be a spectacle

marcos, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

i guess america might as well stop pretending and just go full idiot cliche

nomar, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

I bet we see Donald in a future installment of The Expendables.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

The first step in getting people to understand trump is pointing out how he uses rapid-fire spectacles to divert attention, like a three-card monte dealer.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

The second step is that his rapid-fire spectacles consist of hiring lunatics and incompetents to run the country.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

That's just the opening salvo.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 15 December 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

I guess Sly won't be smart enough to let Creed be his swan song

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

There's always president!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

To his (screen?)credit, at least Stallone wrote/directed/produced a lot of his flicks, morseso than anyone else in the American 80s pantheon.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

And out of the positions announced in the last 6 weeks, dude's done some least damage to American society, Planet Hollywood franchising included.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

I think you're forgetting Rhinestone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4raj5m575M

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

Oh I'm _including_ Rhinestone. And the Estelle Getty movie. And that weird period gangster comedy in the late 70s. And everything after Demolition Man.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

And come to think of it, the _other_ period gangster comedy, too

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

I first rolled my eyes and said to myself, well, he'd be the least objectionable of Trump's appointees. And then it fully sank in that Sylvester Stallone would be the least objectionable appointee of the incoming president, so now I'm just typing this real quick as I plummet from the top of a very tall buildi

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Thursday, 15 December 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

isn't Sylvester Stallone actually an active & well-known collector of fine art?

though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

youre thinking of frank surely

loudmouth darraghmac ween (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

Sylvester Stallone is artsier than people tend to think. This cabinet post is also less important than the Secretary of State or Department of Ed positions so I'm not going to worry about it to much

Treeship, Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

(Quick cheap plug for the drunken podcast convo I recorded about Stallone movies with some folks a couple months back)

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:10 (seven years ago) link

xp, yes a collector and a painter - though a fairly terrible one. He must have pretty good contacts to get shows at MoMA and the Russian Museum.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

RIP Old Lunch

a full playlist of presidential apocalypse jams (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

Stallone wrote/directed/produced a lot of his flicks, morseso than anyone else in the American 80s pantheon.

Moreso than Woody Allen?

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 16 December 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link

I hope woody allen gets a cabinet position

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 00:38 (seven years ago) link

Lena Dunham, too. They could hang out in Comet Ping Pong and talk policy and life, that'd make a movie I'm sure

larry appleton, Friday, 16 December 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

Director of the Office of Head Start

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 16 December 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

so...what's up with this guy

http://i.imgur.com/cfucouD.png

https://twitter.com/ObamaMalik

Karl Malone, Friday, 16 December 2016 00:55 (seven years ago) link

He seems less impressive than his relative, Barack.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

Best guess: he's trying to cash in.
Second best guess: he's mentally unbalanced.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 16 December 2016 01:03 (seven years ago) link

I think it's a lil bit of both.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 01:04 (seven years ago) link

full credit for biding his time

don't take my kindness for wokeness (seandalai), Friday, 16 December 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

One of the shitlords (Ch4rles J0hnson) is maintaining his account.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Friday, 16 December 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link

"shitlords"? not gonna Google that

sleeve, Friday, 16 December 2016 01:15 (seven years ago) link

I hate the world.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

Moreso than Woody Allen?

American action pantheon, should have specified

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 16 December 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

hopefully there's an alternative universe somewhere where a roid-fuelled woody allen spent the 80s enacting reaganite justice against terrorists in a string of highly successful action movies

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 16 December 2016 09:37 (seven years ago) link

Co-stars in Antz

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 16 December 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

I bet a lot of not-voters are having not-buyers remorse.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 13:19 (seven years ago) link

So just the usual insult added to injury for the thousands of Midwestern POC whose attempts to register and/or vote on the day were rebuffed.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 16 December 2016 13:23 (seven years ago) link

i think we all know what needs to happen to this pile of shit. not putting it here.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 16 December 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

I agree that he needs a stern talking-to.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 16 December 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

At the very least, he needs a pie thrown in his face

zchyrs, Friday, 16 December 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

i agree the ghosts of past, present and future need to visit him on christmas eve to show him the error of his ways and encourage him to reform

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/hack-cyberwar-security-email/2016/12/15/id/764263/

so the reason they sat on this for a year is...

wait for it...

...they thought they were gong to win!

smdh it's like the mantra at the root of every fuckup.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

"They thought she was going to win, so they were willing to kick the can down the road," NBC quoted one government official familiar with the situation.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

Damned if you, damned if you don't tbh. If he'd brought it up he'd be 'un-presidential', meddling in the election and all right?

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

is "newsmax" actually a real news source?!

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

if you really trash yr definition.

may i ask again: who read the Podesta emails and had their minds CHANGED by them? I don't think the ppl who found satanic rituals and pederasty in them count.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

is "newsmax" "nbc" actually a real news source?!

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

things the public needs to know, things they don't.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 December 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

The issue with the hacks and emails is that they created conditions for vague innuendo. It was a totally substance free scandal, which is why she couldn't exculpate herself. How can you prove your innocence it you never hear the charges? Xp

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

Trump could have pulled something like that off regardless, but the frequent leaks just led to a slow bleed of "scandal," even though in this case she was a victim of a crime not a perpetrator. The power of the "emails" was that no one was sure why they should be upset about them.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

I might need to sit with that Newsmax story for a little bit and really let it sink in, but at the moment it's making me angrier than almost anything else that's happened wrt the presidential election.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it would have made much of a difference tbh

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 16 December 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

I might need to sit with that Newsmax story for a little bit and really let it sink in
I might need to sit with that Newsmax story for a little bit and really let it sink in
I might need to sit with that Newsmax story for a little bit and really let it sink in
I might need to sit with that Newsmax story for a little bit and really let it sink in

think about what you are saying

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

xpost It's less about whether it would've made a difference and more about the administration making that determination themselves on our behalf.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

marcos, fwiw, it's an NBC News story reposted by whatever the hell Newsmax is. If I get what you are saying.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

is "newsmax" actually a real news source?!

― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall),

the NBC News story to which it linked is real

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

sorry about the newmax links guys. i know in this time of fake news we can only trust certain sources

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/why-didnt-obama-do-more-about-russian-election-hack-n696701

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 December 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

I bet Trump is asking his people if the US can just give Taiwan to China.

Man, I hope he does not start a war with China before he becomes president.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

I have a question, does he have or is he trying to build hotels or other holdings in Mainland China?

combat wombat (doo dah), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

Dalai Lama named US ambassador to China.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

That second one seems a lot less consequential. Just some sort of aquatic science thing. Reportedly.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

And this is only a month since the election... great.

jmm, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

I have a feeling in years back we will look at Russian interference in the election the same way we look at the Supreme Court case that gave us George Bush.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

Speaking of the Supreme Court, who is the worst possible choice Trump could make? Because we will probably get that person.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

o btw I'm finding postmortems quite unpleasant now rn, but for people whose alternative vision of history suggests that HRC ran a campaign of "vote for me instead of the BAD MAN," please see this Vox piece.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/16/13972394/most-common-words-hillary-clinton-speech

The issue she talked about more than any other was jobs.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

Judge Judy is crazy about trump, anyone know her political leanings?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

im trying to remember the circumstances under which bush withdrew his nomination of harriet miers and i wonder whether the same type of thing would happen w/ the current GOP and a dumb trump nomination

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

Newsmax, Daily Mail... Some great news sources today, guys.

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Chronology:

Sandra Day O'Connor announces retirement.
Bush nominates John Roberts to take her spot.
Rehnquist dies.
Bush movies Roberts to fill his spot.
Bush nominates Harriet Miers
The Western world has a fit; Miers pulls out of nomination.
Bush nominates Sam Alito

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

xpost Bruh. As has been mentioned at least three times, the Newsmax thing is directly quoting an NBC News story.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

Michael Cohen for SC justice, surely?

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:39 (seven years ago) link

o btw I'm finding postmortems quite unpleasant now rn, but for people whose alternative vision of history suggests that HRC ran a campaign of "vote for me instead of the BAD MAN," please see this Vox piece.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/16/13972394/most-common-words-hillary-clinton-speech

The issue she talked about more than any other was jobs.

― troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, December 16, 2016 12:31 PM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No, the word "job" was the most common word. For example, this speech has it three times, zero of them having anything to do with "jobs."
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/transcript-hillary-clinton-alt-right-reno-227419

We all remember when Trump said a distinguished federal judge born in Indiana couldn’t be trusted to do his job because, quote, “He’s a Mexican.”

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Looks Like A Lot Of China To Me. Shit.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/16/china-seizes-us-underwater-drone-south-china-sea

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

sorry missed the post upthread

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/16/13972394/most-common-words-hillary-clinton-speech

according to this she never even talked about Trump at all!

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

i bet he'll nominate peter thiel

global tetrahedron, Friday, 16 December 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

It's also so classically Vox to be like "Her loss clearly didn't relate to economic issues, she said the word economy a lot!"

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

Thiel for press secretary, maybe? I dunno. It would be a perverse nomination, no doubt, but does it hit the sweet spot of maximum possible perversity wrt that particular position? With metrics like this, it's no wonder it's taken him so much time to iron out his cabinet!

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

Like, if there was a Department of Vegetarians, would you nominate a man wolfing down a bloody T-bone or the steak itself?

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:01 (seven years ago) link

doubtful thiel would move to dc and give up his fawned over his sf tech billionaire life

iatee, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

Eh, he can just Skype in.

My Lunch Is Older Than Your Lunch (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

Trump has joked about nominating his sister to the SC, so maybe he'll do that.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:18 (seven years ago) link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryanne_Trump_Barry

Been a while since we had a Marion/Maryanne Barry in DC.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

Clinton's ads and the stuff her surrogates said was more noticeable than her speeches.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:25 (seven years ago) link

I dont't dislike Secretary Clinton but I also don't get this urge to protect her, or to say she somehow ran an acceptable campaign. She lost to a cartoon villain.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

Michael Cohen for SC justice, surely?

Argh, my head just exploded.

Snorting and all (Dan Peterson), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Ghost of Roy Cohn

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:34 (seven years ago) link

GHOST OF BORK

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

Holy shit, Cohen went to Cooley Law School?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_D._Cohen_(lawyer)

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

I mean I normally avoid *elitist* credentialism, but that law school is literally a running joke.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

uh, scratch that "literally", I don't think the joke is on foot

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

Ranking way down in I believe the fourth tier of US News law school rankings, Thomas Cooley famously created its own ranking system that places Cooley in the top ten in the country, largely by giving outsized weight to library square footage, iirc.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

I dont't dislike Secretary Clinton but I also don't get this urge to protect her, or to say she somehow ran an acceptable campaign.

Basic human defensive reaction, innit, just to lessen the pain of being wrong. "When Prophecy Fails" and all that.

The campaign was so emotionally wrought that a lot of people wound up deeply tied-in to it, and those emotional connections ain't detached too easily, esp. due to the shock & trauma of the loss.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

All of this only makes a nomination feel more likely. xp

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

I'm less inclined to blame Clinton herself than the Democratic Party as a whole. The had 4/6 Presidencies and a lot of Congressional control and real wages/inequality/etc. have not been strongly combatted. "But Republicans obstruct" is a lousy slogan and difficult for people to comprehend, particularly when your own party has played a part in killing things that would help.

Democrats have not shown themselves inclined to support even vaguely radical solutions, the kind of things on which they might get beaten but can point to real ideas - die on the hill of a public option/single-payer, living wage fights, minimum basic incomes, fighting for unionization. Bernie's low level social democracy struck a chord and seemed wild because our 'left' party hasn't been on board with things even right-wing European parties generally accept.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:50 (seven years ago) link

otm

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

No one here talking about the shit that's going down in North Carolina (is it on another thread)? It looks like a pattern that we're going to be seeing more of, both at the national level and in Republican-controlled state legislatures.

I know it's obvious by now, but this is what it looks like when fascists consolidate power using legal fig leaves, in the period before they can afford to ignore the law completely.

Dan I., Friday, 16 December 2016 18:53 (seven years ago) link

Except on whether to blame Clinton. I mean so far we've seen her win a virtually unlosable senate seat, lose a presidential primary where she was originally the heavy favorite, and then lose a presidential election she absolutely should not have lost. It's hardly a slam dunk, but it makes you wonder if there's an issue with her management style or what kinds of people she chooses to run her campaigns. Some of her associates have started to seem like absolute dingbats.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

I'm less inclined to blame Clinton herself than the Democratic Party as a whole. The had 4/6 Presidencies and a lot of Congressional control and real wages/inequality/etc. have not been strongly combatted. "But Republicans obstruct" is a lousy slogan and difficult for people to comprehend, particularly when your own party has played a part in killing things that would help.

Democrats have not shown themselves inclined to support even vaguely radical solutions, the kind of things on which they might get beaten but can point to real ideas - die on the hill of a public option/single-payer, living wage fights, minimum basic incomes, fighting for unionization. Bernie's low level social democracy struck a chord and seemed wild because our 'left' party hasn't been on board with things even right-wing European parties generally accept.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, December 16, 2016 1:50 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

agreed

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

Dan -- I think there was some talk of that in the U.S. Politics thread.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

man alive xp that is also very true

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

I mean David Brock who thinks ShareBlue is going to become a "Breitbart of the Left", Donna Brazile with her "we need to increase the popular vote in Chicago" strategy, I'm not sure unlimited money in these people's hands would win an election.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

And I do want to be really circumspect here. I was absolutely a Bernie supporter, but I don't want to fall into a trap of just thinking "Oh since they lost it means doing things my way is right." I'm not convinced throwing everything away and starting over gets us closer to winning elections. Just because their mealy-mouthed centrist candidate didn't win doesn't mean any left candidate would win. Bernie might have under these unique circumstances, but I don't know if he'd beat a reasonably likeable, moderate Republican tbqh.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

i was bummed that people like david plouffe and axelrod didn't join her campaign in an official capacity but then i guess plouffe was wrong like everybody else

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 19:02 (seven years ago) link

Were they asked to? I sometimes get the feeling there's still beef there, at least with Axelrod.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

I occasionally listen to Axelrod's podcast, and I thought he sounded a little smug about Clinton's loss, although he always sounds so smug it's hard to tell.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

Axelrod brought up Hillary being a cold public figure in every episode of his podcast

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

cool

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

wapo now saying that the fbi and the cia agree that the hacks were intended to benefit trump

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

It's also so classically Vox to be like "Her loss clearly didn't relate to economic issues, she said the word economy a lot!"

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, December 16, 2016 12:55 PM (forty-nine minutes ago)

data journalism, baby!

k3vin k., Friday, 16 December 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

lol

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

also is anyone watching the press conference, I am sitting in a doctor's office

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

With every day this Russia stuff just gets worse and worse. It is hard to comprehend the FBI and CIA agreeing that Russia intervened to assist Donald Trump, and nothing coming of that. This seems major. It seems paramount that team Trump be investigated to see if they had any connections to the leak or leaker. Cooperate in any way with the Russians to hack the DNC is akin to Watergate.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

"well actually, according to this ngram..."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

It would be much worse than Watergate imo

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

still i feel like not much is going to come of this..... if it benefits the GOP and they are the dominant party then what the fuck is gonna happen?

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

yeah nothing will come of this

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

I'm less inclined to blame Clinton herself than the Democratic Party as a whole. The had 4/6 Presidencies and a lot of Congressional control and real wages/inequality/etc. have not been strongly combatted. "But Republicans obstruct" is a lousy slogan and difficult for people to comprehend, particularly when your own party has played a part in killing things that would help.

Democrats have not shown themselves inclined to support even vaguely radical solutions, the kind of things on which they might get beaten but can point to real ideas - die on the hill of a public option/single-payer, living wage fights, minimum basic incomes, fighting for unionization. Bernie's low level social democracy struck a chord and seemed wild because our 'left' party hasn't been on board with things even right-wing European parties generally accept.

'dying on the hill' of public option/single-payer not actually so useful for people who couldn't get health care. what people seem to forget is that passing obamacare was a die on the hill moment - and most of his presidency was us dealing with the fallout after 2 fairly progressive and productive years of american government.

iatee, Friday, 16 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

also is anyone watching the press conference, I am sitting in a doctor's office

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, December 16, 2016 2:44 PM (six minutes ago

aren't you always sitting in a doctor's office

k3vin k., Friday, 16 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

today I am a patient!!

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 16 December 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

Did someone just faint? Why are they calling for a doctor?

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:23 (seven years ago) link

Nevermind. Sorted.

(Even with stuff like that I can't help but think Trump would turn this into a disaster).

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

still i feel like not much is going to come of this..... if it benefits the GOP and they are the dominant party then what the fuck is gonna happen?

― marcos

you mean beyond the collapse of democracy as a viable political system?

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

like he said: if it benefits the gop,

difficult listening hour, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

didn't watch obama's address but the reaction from liberal twitter is not good

k3vin k., Friday, 16 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Obama being the wrong kind of don't give a fuck.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

guess he doesn't care about his legacy after all

Οὖτις, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

he does come across a tad defeatist, but I can't really blame him tbh. All these q's of journalists basically begging him to tell this and that to Trump in the transition. He can say it, but no chance in hell Trump is gonna listen.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:35 (seven years ago) link

O hay I see Hannity (and surely many others) are calling out a mythical 'alt-left' now. These fuckers play the 'rubber, meet glue' game like they've been eight-years-old forever.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

I assume this 'alt left' is BLM and their legions of inspired cop killing followers

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

good for obama for not helping anyone pretend this isn't happening.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

i was pretty let down by his press conference. he just seemed... low. defeated.

homosexual II, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

Per Corey Robin, reactionary assholes have had no problem in parroting & perverting reformer or progressive language for like 4+ decades now.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

I'm watching it now. He's being extra careful, more "uhs" than usual

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

But he was firm about Putin's involvement and condemning the right for propagating fake news and for loving Putin

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

Given the context and the weight of this transition, I'm somewhat impressed that Obama is able to hold a press conference at all without going full Budd Dwyer.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

He sounded very much done with all this shit, and maybe a little resentful that people are abandoning him for literally the worst alternative.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

Kinda curious what Joe Biden's last press conference would sound like

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 16 December 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

Just a long sigh.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Still watching this btw, press q's now. Earlier he said something about how it's wrong to see democrats as 'latte sipping pc people'. Just now he took a sip of what I think was... a latte.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

He should've very pointedly and exaggeratedly sipped his latte while making a jerking off motion with the other hand.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

Lol.

Suppose this moment had to come to throw out the cliche that despite this lackluster appearance, I too will miss this great Kenian.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

according to lester holt there at the end, that was the longest obama press conference

Karl Malone, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I went to the loo twice during it. Presidential bladder tbh.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Haven't seen the press conference to judge the tone for myself, but if I had to guess why he seems defeated, I would assume that a month of trying to ease his successor's transition and ultimately coming to the same conclusion as everyone else who's dealt with the douche that he doesn't give a fuck about learning or understanding anything probably has a little something to do with it.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 December 2016 21:13 (seven years ago) link

He sounded very much done with all this shit, and maybe a little resentful that people are abandoning him for literally the worst alternative.

― Josh in Chicago, Friday, December 16, 2016 8:54 PM (eighteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

imagine dealing with the cognitive dissonance between what trump ran and won on and the current state of the economy and obama's approval rating. I would want to get out and move the fuck on too.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

Old Lunch otm

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:16 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/us/politics/donald-trump-david-friedman-israel-ambassador.html?smid=tw-bna

― 龜, Friday, December 16, 2016 7:58 AM (five hours ago)

uh have we discussed the fact that this dude is literally Trump's bankruptcy lawyer (or at least one of them)?

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/16/505805411/trumps-pick-for-ambassador-to-israel-end-the-2-state-narrative

photo:
Attorney David Friedman (left) exits U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Camden, N.J., with Donald Trump and Trump's daughter Ivanka in a 2010 case involving Atlantic City casinos. The president-elect plans to nominate Friedman as U.S. ambassador to Israel.

sleeve, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

I don't get what people were expecting Obama to do. He doesn't have a magical lever that can stop Trump from being president. I'd love a deus ex machina now as much as anyone, but I really doubt it's coming, whether in the form of the electoral college, Russia investigation, etc., so best prepare for a long, drawn out fight. And if one does come, it will be due to GOP-infighting and leave us with some other marginally more tolerable GOP shitbag and the same GOP shitbag congress, in which case we will still have to prepare for a long, drawn out fight.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

i don't know anything about friedman, but josh marshall isn't a fan:

Friedman represents the extremes of the most vicious and destructive elements of rightist Zionism and the indeed the most radical elements of American Jewry.

Chemi Shalev captures the essence here.
By Israeli standards, Donald Trump’s designated Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, is an extreme right-winger. He might find a place in the settler movement or with Naftali Bennett’s Habayit Hayehudi Party, but only on its right-wing fringes. He makes Benjamin Netanyahu seem like a left-wing defeatist. From where Friedman stands, most Israelis, never mind most American Jews, are more or less traitors.

Friedman has repeatedly attacked J Street, the pro-Israel, pro-Peace group, and its members as worse than the Jewish collaborators who served the Nazis during the Holocaust.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-worst-of-the-worst

Karl Malone, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

I wasn't expecting a deus ex machina, just more... spirit? it was his energy that threw me off.

homosexual II, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

is "American Jewry" a good term to use?

akm, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

man alive otm

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 16 December 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

is "American Jewry" a good term to use?

― akm, Friday, December 16, 2016 4:34 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

josh marshall is jewish

k3vin k., Friday, 16 December 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

it is a standard accepted term yes

Οὖτις, Friday, 16 December 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

So Obama did not make a bigger stink about Russian meddling before the election because he didn't want to seem like he was meddling. And now that there is more and more consensus about the extent of the Russian meddling, he doesn't want to meddle.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

another chess move! that's our obama

k3vin k., Friday, 16 December 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

I don't get what people were expecting Obama to do. He doesn't have a magical lever that can stop Trump from being president. I'd love a deus ex machina now as much as anyone, but I really doubt it's coming, whether in the form of the electoral college, Russia investigation, etc., so best prepare for a long, drawn out fight. And if one does come, it will be due to GOP-infighting and leave us with some other marginally more tolerable GOP shitbag and the same GOP shitbag congress, in which case we will still have to prepare for a long, drawn out fight.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, December 16, 2016 4:22 PM (forty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yup

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

i do wish obama was more aggressive in his last couple years of a two-term presidency but hey i guess that is not him

marcos, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

So Obama did not make a bigger stink about Russian meddling before the election because he didn't want to seem like he was meddling. And now that there is more and more consensus about the extent of the Russian meddling, he doesn't want to meddle.

― Josh in Chicago, Friday, December 16, 2016 5:07 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

What sort of meddling would you like him to do?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

Not a rhetorical question, necessarily, I just don't really understand the gameplan with this whole panic about Russia thing. How do you strategically use this other than just raising it and trying to tarnish Trump?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 16 December 2016 22:17 (seven years ago) link

There needs to be a way to establish that members of the Trump campaign were in contact with Putin's government during the election. There is no other plausible explanation for some of Trump's moves, especially revising the Republican party platform to make room for Russian aggression and saying, during a debate, that the Syrian opposition forces were "worse" than Assad. He was inconsistent on nearly everything, but consistent on this. It can't just be a series of coincidences.

This isn't to say Trump or his campaign condoned of the hacking or knew of it directly from Putin, but their secret collaboration with a regime carrying out a cyber war on his behalf has to come to something. You can't just do that.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

That wasn't eloquent or advancing the conversation in any way, I realize. But come on Democrats. Find a way to nail him on this.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

Well, that's the catch: there is no way to pursue it without tarnishing Trump. Pretty much by definition, since his legitimacy is at stake. But Obama is still president for a few more weeks, and won't be after that, ever again. So if these claims are truly serious, treat them as such. Don't just punt it to the press, say this is a serious, serious infraction, and the fate of our democracy hinges on it. And then keep at it. And if it's not serious, then say so and we can move on. I would be happy if Obama, directly and forcefully, told the American people (who like him!) to keep pressure on their legislators, because this is going to happen again in future elections, whether they like the candidate or not, and that it's vital that Americans regain some lost trust through closure. He's a good speaker. He's a great speaker. He could make a case that this case needs to be closed. Call for a special commission. Do something conspicuous whose undoing would be even more conspicuous.

Same with Garland, by the way. Just appoint the fucker by any means necessary, and make the new government sue to undo the appointment. Why do their work for them by doing nothing? Do what is within your rights, whether its pushing the Russia stuff or the SC or whatever, and let them deal with it. Because as it is we all are going to have to deal with the dick elected.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

xpost Like, there are so many things still floating out there that are just starting to float further away. Manafort, Roger Stone ... Sean Hannity had Assange (who is partly employed by Russia's RT) on to insist he did not get the leak from Russia but from someone else. Who was this someone else? And were they connected to Russia? It's all very conspiracy-y, but there seems to be as much going on here as there was in Watergate. Except it involves state sponsored election meddling, too. I dunno, a lot of threads to pull on or tie together.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

It feels like they are making it as blatant as possible, daring us to draw the obvious conclusion. Maybe that's the trap -- draw the left into a conspiratorial scrum fight, kick them off the high ground they occupy for still believing in constitutional governance.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

Well, that's the catch: there is no way to pursue it without tarnishing Trump. Pretty much by definition, since his legitimacy is at stake. But Obama is still president for a few more weeks, and won't be after that, ever again. So if these claims are truly serious, treat them as such. Don't just punt it to the press, say this is a serious, serious infraction, and the fate of our democracy hinges on it. And then keep at it. And if it's not serious, then say so and we can move on. I would be happy if Obama, directly and forcefully, told the American people (who like him!) to keep pressure on their legislators, because this is going to happen again in future elections, whether they like the candidate or not, and that it's vital that Americans regain some lost trust through closure. He's a good speaker. He's a great speaker. He could make a case that this case needs to be closed. Call for a special commission. Do something conspicuous whose undoing would be even more conspicuous.

ta-nehisi coates (im sure I spelled this wrong) was on the slate politics gabfest and he expressed frustration with obama both saying that trump was an 'existential threat' and ultimately not so bad.. you cant say both and have both be true. one is true and one is not.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

its also frustrating to see obama not go hard after his rivals when the gop wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire..

well they probably would piss on him, but not enough to extinguish the fire

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

Obama is a man of principle. He believes in our system of government. He also believes in doing the right thing -- he sees the risks of a narrow consequentialism that would erode norms. I admire him so much but you're right, it has been frustrating to watch the Republicans exploit his strength of character as if it were a weakness these past eight years. Now it's something more than frustrating.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

He's going to Hawaii for the next two weeks so it doesn't look like he is going to make a major stand now. It's tragic.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link

Well, that's the catch: there is no way to pursue it without tarnishing Trump. Pretty much by definition, since his legitimacy is at stake. But Obama is still president for a few more weeks, and won't be after that, ever again. So if these claims are truly serious, treat them as such. Don't just punt it to the press, say this is a serious, serious infraction, and the fate of our democracy hinges on it. And then keep at it. And if it's not serious, then say so and we can move on. I would be happy if Obama, directly and forcefully, told the American people (who like him!) to keep pressure on their legislators, because this is going to happen again in future elections, whether they like the candidate or not, and that it's vital that Americans regain some lost trust through closure. He's a good speaker. He's a great speaker. He could make a case that this case needs to be closed. Call for a special commission. Do something conspicuous whose undoing would be even more conspicuous.

― Josh in Chicago,

Just like how Obama whiffed going HAM on the banks in 2008.

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 16 December 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

I agree with him that the Garland tweets are garbage and that Trump's victory wasn't the result of a grand conspiracy. But I don't think you can just dismiss every "Russia-Trump" claim out of hand so easily. His international conflicts of interest are a serious problem.

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link

"Him"= sam kriss

Treeship, Friday, 16 December 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link

obama knows better than anyone what the extent of the russian involvement in the election was, ftr

k3vin k., Friday, 16 December 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

that brookings article has some false ass hope in the final footnotes about how electors shouldnt vote for him. I fucking wish.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 23:54 (seven years ago) link

sorry not a footnote technically. this is in the 'what can we do about it' section.

First, given that Mr. Trump would arrive in office as a walking, talking violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, the Electoral College would be justified in concluding that he is unqualified for the Office of the Presidency. For that reason, among others, individual electors must be considered free to decline to cast votes for Mr. Trump.

fn: We are aware of the debate over so-called “faithless electors,” a term that in our view is a misnomer and fails to account for the role of the Electoral College in our constitutional system. We do not address that debate here, other than to note that strong arguments have been made for the proposition that electors are free to vote their conscience without fear of legal sanctions. See, e.g., David Pozen, Why G.O.P. Electoral College members Can Vote Against Trump, N.Y. Times (Dec. 15, 2016).

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 December 2016 23:55 (seven years ago) link

If I was an elector I'd be like WTF this is that part of the job description nobody even reads please stop trying to make this hard

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Saturday, 17 December 2016 00:45 (seven years ago) link

GOP Electors are all that guy in the movie who doesn't want to jump out of the airplane screaming about how he didn't sign up for this

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Saturday, 17 December 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link

imagine dealing with the cognitive dissonance between what trump ran and won on and the current state of the economy

Josh, would you be including decades-long stagnant wages in this formulation? (w/out any expecs that this will change under the coming regime)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 17 December 2016 01:36 (seven years ago) link

i read a little about the ineligibility clause and have concluded that it's kind of dumb

k3vin k., Saturday, 17 December 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

correction i guess there are 2 emoluments clauses?

k3vin k., Saturday, 17 December 2016 01:59 (seven years ago) link

xpost

imagine dealing with the cognitive dissonance between what trump ran and won on and the current state of the economy

I didn't write this, Morbs. But yeah, I'd say the economy is currently at least stable, which it wasn't less than 10 years ago, when we were on the brink of some sort of economic collapse, and while there is a lot of work to do in terms of wages and whatnot, I'm not sure what more Obama could have done in less than 8 years, especially with an obstructionist congress. So yeah, he didn't singlehandedly raise the standard of living for all Americans great and small, but there is no doubt the country is better off now than it was in 2008. But people want results faster, bigger, which is perhaps in part what drew so many to the bluster of Trump. "I can do it. I can fix it. Only I can solve it. America will be the best EVER." Vs. grown up Obama who told the truth re: the economy, and did the best he could, imo, especially if you factor in the ACA and what that did for millions of people with decades-long stagnant wages *and* struggles with health care.

But hey, that's all in the past, because what little progress we made, what few steps toward stability and problem-solving we made and Obama nurtured, re: health care, employment, national debt, all of that is going backwards or bye-bye. So yeah, if I were the guy, I'd be pretty bummed at Trump's reactionary repudiation of progress. Obama's a two-term president leaving the office with the dejected countenance of a single-termer.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 17 December 2016 02:16 (seven years ago) link

This Jerusalem embassy shit will end up with lots of dead people

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Saturday, 17 December 2016 03:10 (seven years ago) link

I'm starting to think we might need a separate thread specifically for Trump's foreign policy disasters

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Saturday, 17 December 2016 03:16 (seven years ago) link

Can't wait to see how he bitches out of NATO and what he does to fuck up India / Pakistan

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Saturday, 17 December 2016 03:17 (seven years ago) link

i saw some of the press conference. feel like he's probably just tired? it's an election year and he just served for 8 years as president. yes he slows down a bit at the end but try talking for an hour, straight giving an oral pop quiz on the entire world, and see if you don't get tired. he's gotten older but we all have in 8 years.

tbh he sounds composed as ever. Obama has never failed to impress me, always effortlessly professional and dignified.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 17 December 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

Don't know what he's trying to accomplish with this tactic, but I guess I agree?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-says-supporters-were-vicious-violent-nasty-mean

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Saturday, 17 December 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

The full WaPo take on that event was that Trump supporters are *still* chanting "lock her up."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/12/16/trump-tries-to-calm-his-vicious-violent-screaming-supporters/

I glanced at the comments and someone actually criticized the paper for calling his supports "vicious" and "violent," even though they were quoting Trump *directly* in the article being commented on.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 17 December 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

On the less serious end of his offenses, his lecturn placard designs are the ugliest

Karl Malone, Saturday, 17 December 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

i wonder if autocorrect changed it to unprecedented and then he changed it back

Karl Malone, Saturday, 17 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

The full WaPo take on that event was that Trump supporters are *still* chanting "lock her up."

can't believe the worst president ever got elected and it's the person who lost whose physical safety I have to worry about

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 17 December 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

"unpresidented" - fuck, if this was in a novel I'd say it was too on the nose

jmm, Saturday, 17 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Perhaps it will be a biography title someday.

jmm, Saturday, 17 December 2016 20:15 (seven years ago) link

I didn't write this, Morbs. But yeah, I'd say the economy is currently at least stable, which it wasn't less than 10 years ago, when we were on the brink of some sort of economic collapse, and while there is a lot of work to do in terms of wages and whatnot, I'm not sure what more Obama could have done in less than 8 years, especially with an obstructionist congress. So yeah, he didn't singlehandedly raise the standard of living for all Americans great and small, but there is no doubt the country is better off now than it was in 2008. But people want results faster, bigger, which is perhaps in part what drew so many to the bluster of Trump. "I can do it. I can fix it. Only I can solve it. America will be the best EVER." Vs. grown up Obama who told the truth re: the economy, and did the best he could, imo, especially if you factor in the ACA and what that did for millions of people with decades-long stagnant wages *and* struggles with health care.

But hey, that's all in the past, because what little progress we made, what few steps toward stability and problem-solving we made and Obama nurtured, re: health care, employment, national debt, all of that is going backwards or bye-bye. So yeah, if I were the guy, I'd be pretty bummed at Trump's reactionary repudiation of progress. Obama's a two-term president leaving the office with the dejected countenance of a single-termer.

― Josh in Chicago, Friday, December 16, 2016 9:16 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Josh "the economy" doesn't feel "stable" if the last home you owned was foreclosed and you're working for minimum wage or on SSDI. I feel like that level of 10k feet liberal abstraction about "the economy" is part of what got us here.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 04:45 (seven years ago) link

well actually the electoral college is what got us here

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 04:50 (seven years ago) link

I meant stable as in there is no sign of imminent collapse (unless Trump *is* the collapse). It's like a frozen pond. Is it liquid? No. Can it support your weight? Sure. But would you go jumping around on it?? Hell no. That's the economy. Stable but not *strong* which is a big distinction, imo. I don't think it's liberal abstraction to say the economy is stable when it clearly could be much, much worse for *everybody," especially the people whose last home was foreclosed, working for minimum wage or on SSDI. Because that could all still be the case *and* they could not have health care, could not have access to an OK public school, would have to worry if their drinking water is safe, and so on, all sorts of things simmering and festering below that frozen surface that are very real but were at least slightly being held in check by or being worked on through government policies on the brink of extinction.

That's the liberal abstraction of "economy" in effect, as far as I'm concerned, the inability to convey basics of civics or the fundamental methods of government operation to those who stand the benefit the most. The people on SSI/SS/SSDI who are anti-government handouts, or the people insured by the ACA who are anti-Obamacare, or the people struggling on minimum wage who are anti-wage-hikes, or the people who are constantly hit by regressive taxes who are pro-tax breaks (that will never reach them). Just a fundamental misunderstanding that the things that have made their lives even a tiny bit easier are things that were fought for, voted for, and which are currently on the chopping block. So I suppose the way forward for Democrats is to make that stuff less abstract and instead present it as specifics. Campaign in the places where people are hurting the worst and bring numbers, show them they know how they're hurting but also how they're being helped. Then explain to them in no uncertain terms what would happen if the government programs they rely on are cut. And then, if you're feeling cocky, throw in some truly abstract big picture stuff, like climate change or human/civil rights, or global initiatives, but I think that stuff won't sway elections.

Anyway, that's a ramble. I had a friend over for dinner who specializes in constitutional law and specifically just presented something to congress recently about state AGs and their powers (or lack there of), and boy is she not hopeful about anything. Like, really pessimistic to the extreme, as in she's noting a pervasive failure of our entire system, and predicting years and years of setbacks, fueled on the federal and state level, and an inability of anyone to counter it. I told her, hey, worst case scenario, in 4 or 8 years, Trump won't t be president, and she was doubtful that would even make a difference, the GOP has such a firm and pervasive hold on power. And she predicted that Ivanka could very well be president in 8 years.

But hey, good morning, everyone!

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:41 (seven years ago) link

On the Media has good CIA/FBI stuff this week btw

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 18 December 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

Thanks Morbs, listening now. Sounds like it covers a lot of the same ground as the Times story, but I always like how the show is put together.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 18 December 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. TrumpVerified account
‏@realDonaldTrump
We should tell China that we don't want the drone they stole back.- let them keep it!

That'll show 'em!

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 18 December 2016 16:46 (seven years ago) link

my boss met with tim kaine and others last week in DC (he is a big Dem fundraiser). Takeaways were: Clinton campaign did not follow the same strategy that Obama did, staying in Detroit and other places, and as a result lost minority voters; white uneducated middle aged men are a shrinking demographic and probably do NOT need to be targeted by the party, as they turned out in fewer numbers for Trump than they did for McCain and Romney, the party absolutely needs to focus on minority out reach in those geographic areas; and, they are going for impeachment ASAP. Bombard congress with calls for investigations on Trump, which means not just sympathetic Dem congresspeople, but Rubio, McCain, people in the Republican establishment who are not going to stand for the extent of the corruption once is starts becoming more public after the inauguration.

akm, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

Sounds promising

Οὖτις, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

smh

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:07 (seven years ago) link

got any better ideas?

sleeve, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

So what you're saying, akm, is the Dems still have not a clue. Mind boggling

Iago Galdston, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

What clue?

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

lol great takeaway. yeah, fuck trying to appeal to more people, what a dumb strategy.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

I think they should stop looking at the US population as a series of focus groups and start crafting a message that appeals to everyone. We need to fight racism in the criminal justice system, for instance, because it is the right thing to do, not because it "appeals to blacks." It should appeal to everyone.

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

They are just playing into the hands of the Republicans who want to tell white people their interests are at odds with other groups. They're not. Their interests are at odds with the capitalists, not their fellow wage earners. It's a con.

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:49 (seven years ago) link

I agree, but it's a long and deep con that's difficult to unseat from people's minds. I mean I favor the socialist, class-uniting approach as much as anyone but it may not be easy to convince people out of their resentments ("those people" don't work, while I do and pay for their social programs, etc.)

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

Would be nice if maybe, idk, the media did more to emphasize that black and hispanic people are "working class" too.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

^^^

One of the most pernicious things about post-election commentary has been the ongoing discounting of minority voters (except for occasionally and unfairly blaming them for not doing enough to support Clinton).

birthday party, cheesecake, jelly beans, boom (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:11 (seven years ago) link

my boss met with tim kaine and others last week in DC (he is a big Dem fundraiser). Takeaways were: Clinton campaign did not follow the same strategy that Obama did, staying in Detroit and other places, and as a result lost minority voters; white uneducated middle aged men are a shrinking demographic and probably do NOT need to be targeted by the party, as they turned out in fewer numbers for Trump than they did for McCain and Romney, the party absolutely needs to focus on minority out reach in those geographic areas; and, they are going for impeachment ASAP. Bombard congress with calls for investigations on Trump, which means not just sympathetic Dem congresspeople, but Rubio, McCain, people in the Republican establishment who are not going to stand for the extent of the corruption once is starts becoming more public after the inauguration.

― akm, Sunday, December 18, 2016 12:03 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I don't think he's *totally* wrong, but you can't rely on just "demographics," you've got to figure out how to actually make sure those people can get registered and turn them out if your plan is to rely on them. I agree that focusing too hard on turning the least likely demographics to vote democrat can be a waste of resources, but there are also negative consequences from sending the message "we don't need you."

As far as impeachment, I mean I kind of don't see how you can avoid that tack with a Trump. I just hope they don't forget to also hammer the rest of the GOP, because impeached Trump probably = President Pence and we're going to have just as hard a fight as ever at the national, state and local levels if we do manage to get Trump out of there.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

xps Not to mention there are plenty - millions - of whites in red states who understand social equality benefits all. Shouldn't give up on them too.
This idea that Dems should not have "leaned so hard" on this issue doesn't smell right to me at all, but what do I know, I'm just a clueless minority

Nhex, Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

got any better ideas?

― sleeve, Sunday, December 18, 2016 12:08 PM (one hour ago)

i guess "do everything exactly the same, except with a better candidate" isn't the WORST idea. (akm, is your boss donna brazile?)

the impeachment shit is a pipe dream. dems are in the minority

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

start crafting a message that appeals to everyone

lol like what

this whole idea that there's all these people who voted for Trump that the Dems can "win back" is hilarious

Democratic Party: Dear white midwestern people, did you know you get free stuff under our plan? You do!

GOP: they won't tell you this but the blacks and browns and gays get that free stuff TOO

Milwaukee suburbs: well fuck that noise! MAGA

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:33 (seven years ago) link

as a mere observer I'm inclined to think they're fucked if they don't go for some variant of the Ellison/Sanders/Warren route, no more milquetoast "centrist" "bipartisan" nonsense

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

this whole idea that there's all these people who voted for Trump that the Dems can "win back" is hilarious

except it's not. many of those people voted for Obama. and Hillary was a unpopular candidate even in her own party.

pretending all Trump voters voted for the same convenient reason seems like a dead end. people don't solely vote based on this "free stuff" dogwhistles.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

pretending that they are untouchables we can never win back is "deplorables" part two

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

Would be nice if maybe, idk, the media did more to emphasize that black and hispanic people are "working class" too.

The category is misleading, because as a few pieces have pointed out, "working class" means "middle class" now. Black and hispanic just remain "poor," I guess.

I still think Trump voters were largely incoherent, as a macro bloc and as micro blocs. I'm still not sure what specifically they even wanted beyond making American great, and as far as meaningless, amorphous generalities go, they felt Trump was more likely to deliver that. If anything, perhaps it means Democrats should offer even fewer specifics next time around and stick to emotion-targeting generalities, too. "A Better Future." "Giving You What You Deserve." "Something to Be Proud Of." "All You Can Eat Special." "A Buy One, Get One Free Economy."

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

It is maddening to me that after all the polls and research got wrong, they would turn to polls and research for future strategy. Rather than, you know, Obama's inclusive 50-state strategy.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 18 December 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link

pretending all Trump voters voted for the same convenient reason seems like a dead end. people don't solely vote based on this "free stuff" dogwhistles.

Well Adam the job before you is clear: "start crafting a message that appeals to everyone"

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

I mean here's your argument as I read it, you and the inimitable (and always right, don't forget!) Iago Galdston:

akm says that some Democratic leaders said, secondhand: white uneducated middle aged men are a shrinking demographic and probably do NOT need to be targeted by the party, as they turned out in fewer numbers for Trump than they did for McCain and Romney, the party absolutely needs to focus on minority out reach in those geographic areas;

you say "yeah, fuck trying to appeal to more people, what a dumb strategy."

The Democratic candidate won by 3 million votes nationwide, over 2 points, a relatively comfortable margin if we lived in a functioning democracy. You seem to be saying that the right thing for the country is to focus on a hundred thousand or so white folks in the Rust Belt, since they decided the election (and god forbid anybody try to reform our election system, apparently). You really think another 500 field studies on counties that have a Cracker Barrel are what we need to take back the Senate and the White House?

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

Trump won the White House by winning 76 percent of counties with a Cracker Barrel Old Country Store and 22 percent of counties with a Whole Foods Market. This 54-percent gap is the widest ever recorded. When Bill Clinton was elected in 1992, it was 19 percent; when George W. Bush was elected in 2000, it was 31 percent; and when Barack Obama was elected in 2008, it was 43 percent.

If the dems don't address this growing disparity they've clearly learned NOTHING

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

It's not rocket science and it's not about free stuff. Democrats need to emphasize that they believe a solid, stable society starts with strong civic institutions that protect people from economic precarcity, and regulations that prevent them and the environment from being exploited and abused. The idea that white men just won't be into this stuff is so senselessly cynical. It needs to be messaged better.

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

People are racist but that isnt the main and only thing about them. We should fight the Republican propaganda not hand people over to it.

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

I feel like there has to be an easily-digested way of telling voters 'you either support some sort of cooperative society where we work towards raising all ships or you support a handful of oligarchs exploiting and oppressing everyone else, and yes that includes you'.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

uh yeah seems like focusing (relatively more) on the people who actually decide the election might be...a good idea

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

fucking genius over here

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

no instead let's "reform our election system", a totally not vague and achievable goal

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

I think the solution is to burn down all the Cracker Barrels.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:31 (seven years ago) link

looking forward to k3vin k.'s big plan to win over the rust belt burbs - the only Americans that matter

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:33 (seven years ago) link

anybody who talks about reforming the electoral college on a state-by-state basis clearly a fuckin' clown

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

k3vin have you seen any good articles about the people who supported Trump? I don't know of any, I'd really like to learn more about the priorities and worldviews of Real Americans and perhaps something of the milieu in which they live. I'm sure none of the coastal elite publications I read sent any reporters to red counties, much less any actual Trump rallies, so if you could hook me up with some links that'd be great

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

as long as they're inside the cracker barrels

will, Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

Maybe it's not either/or

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:43 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure none of the coastal elite publications I read sent any reporters to red counties, much less any actual Trump rallies, so if you could hook me up with some links that'd be great

here u go

http://www.mtv.com/news/2937584/how-i-spent-my-summer-vacation/

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

tom, the good news is that in 4 years the "election system" is going to be reformed and we won't need any of their votes. and if we lose again, we can at least hold onto our sense of superiority that we won the popular vote!

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

that IS good news! thanks buddy

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

the impeachment shit is a pipe dream. dems are in the minority

― k3vin k.

_everything_ is a pipe dream for the dems right now. they can do _nothing_. stoking the fires of distrust and hatred against somebody who, honestly, quite deserves the distrust and hatred of pretty much everybody in the world doesn't strike me as "same old shit".

i think you and adam are wrong to think that the people who voted trump, by and large, be won back by democrats on a _policy_ level - at least, not by any policy the democrats could in good conscience endorse. kaine & co are correct to conclude this election was not decided on policy issues.

those of us who disagree with their policy approach can and should push through sandersite ideology in the primaries, but just because we disagree with their policies does not make those policies the primary reason for the democrats' failure.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

The idea that Trump voters can't be won back is fundamentally wrong, even moreso in the Rust Belt areas that matter - it's self-defeating and pointless to do anything if you're going to assume that Trump's support is rock-steady and unchanging. The number don't show that - without Comey's letter, Hillary wins. With a candidate who doesn't have historically bad unfavorables, the Democrats win. Even with the Electoral College, which is never, ever going to go away.

Jumping straight from saying that to "oh so you think we should just focus on white suburbanites" is bullshit.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

I'd say that without Hillary, Hillary wins.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

Democrats need to emphasize that they believe a solid, stable society starts with strong civic institutions that protect people from economic precarcity, and regulations that prevent them and the environment from being exploited and abused. The idea that white men just won't be into this stuff is so senselessly cynical. It needs to be messaged better.

― Treeship, Sunday, December 18, 2016 2:22 PM (forty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is like David Brooks from the left

flopson, Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Well, all this focus on embittered rust belt voters is a distraction because it conveniently ignores the well-off exurbans who always vote GOP and didn't GAF about the candidate's racism and misogyny because IOKIYAR.

Useful class guide: anyone with a mortgage is some kind of middle class.

jane burkini (suzy), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

xp

i.e, you're just describing Clinton's campaign. as she lost, it's not hopelessly cynical to think that wouldn't work

flopson, Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Democratic Party: Dear white midwestern people, did you know you get free stuff under our plan? You do!

GOP: they won't tell you this but the blacks and browns and gays get that free stuff TOO

Milwaukee suburbs: well fuck that noise! MAGA

Guh, hi from WIsconsin, where this could not be more wrong.

Wisconsin voters went for Tammy Baldwin, a lesbian and an outspoken liberal from Madison, in large numbers. They voted for Obama twice, again in large numbers.

The Milwaukee suburbs? Yeah, those places aren't going to vote Republican ever, any more than Madison and Dane County generally are gonna vote Republican. But those are movement Republicans, wealthy suburbs defined by white flight from "scary" Milwaukee. They are not swing districts and they are not that big. When Democrats win Wisconsin, which they often do, they win without those places.

If you want to know who voted for Obama and Trump, it's rural voters and to some extent voters in the smaller metro areas like Green Bay. They've voted for Democrats before and they'll vote for Democrats again -- possibly as soon as they realize the Medicare they love is about to turn into a clone of the Obamacare they hate. I doubt many of them go to Trump rallies. I think they're voting on some general vague sense of "throw the bums out" and I think the steady hammer of "Clinton is a crook Clinton is a crook Clinton is a crook" gained some purchase there.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:14 (seven years ago) link

the electoral college isn't going to last another decade

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

kaine & co are correct

and yet they lost, almost as if winning elections is not about being correct.

look, i don't know what kind of midwesterns you guys have met. on the whole they seem like nice people with a reputation for being overly polite.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:19 (seven years ago) link

so suzy, milo z and eephus all seem to be making a similar point which is that there are Obama/Trump voters and then there are movement conservatives and the Obama/Trump voters can be probably won back by not having EMAILS win the headlines almost daily - which is to say, there's not much from a policy perspective that Dems need to change

rushomancy puts it best but got there too soon, should have sat on that post imho

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:20 (seven years ago) link

That forks into two conversations, though. A better candidate can squeak out what we expected of Hillary without much changing, but if Democrats want to use future demographic changes to win big (in Congress and the states) the same old same old isn't going to do that.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

the steady hammer of "Clinton is a crook Clinton is a crook Clinton is a crook" gained some purchase there

fwiw there is a compilation of Norm MacDonald trashing the Clintons on Weekend Update on youtube. half the jokes are about how much she lies, and this was in 1996.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Democrats relying on "demographics" need to start telling me what their plan is for winning gerrymandered congressional districts and state legislatures.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:33 (seven years ago) link

And how they're going to improve turnout among poor black and hispanic voters in an environment where it's only going to get harder for them to vote.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

the gerrymandering isn't going to last another decade

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

Do the democrats have a good plan for 2020, and how do we know the Republicans don't have some even more devious shit up their sleeves?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

1.No, and 2. a lot of people are assuming there won't be elections

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

By what mechanism are the 20 states with the populations of small metro areas going to consent to ending the only thing making them politically relevant?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

u mean the electoral college or the senate?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

Why would democrats not try to fight gerrymandering/the electoral college *and* sharpen their message to combat right wing propaganda?

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:05 (seven years ago) link

fwiw there is a compilation of Norm MacDonald trashing the Clintons on Weekend Update on youtube. half the jokes are about how much she lies, and this was in 1996.

I'm not sure this proves what you think this proves, unless you meant to highlight that she was fighting a 20-year wall of bullshit.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:11 (seven years ago) link

Where are you going to get the 85 additional electoral votes you still need for the national popular vote thing to mean anything at all, and how are you going to get any states with red state legislatures to pass it?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

it proves she was a risky candidate. its not like Trump just came up with this strategy and EMAILS are what did them in. she has 20 years of bad press and instead of countering it they relied on the media hyping up Trump's worst qualities.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

I don't know, man alive. Still waiting on k3vin and Adam to turn in their proposals on how to bring the Real American voters back into the fold, then none of the electoral college reform ideas or counter-gerrymandering stuff is even necessary

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

Have you guys figured out why Trump won yet

Οὖτις, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:19 (seven years ago) link

we didn't listen to Iago Galdston

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

i don't have any "ideas", and neither does anyone itt. i'm pretty pessimistic about the future and i just find the straw-grasping ("trump will be impeached, just watch", "the electoral college will be gone in 10 years", etc) laughable. finding humor in our shared doom is merely an ego defense

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

all the same people who were supremely confident in everything that went wrong a month and a half ago are now also optimistic about the future because of these far-fetched escape hatches, one weird tricks, etc. we're fucked.

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:22 (seven years ago) link

you and larry appleton should go on a date

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

You're kind of being a dick in this thread el tomboto

Treeship, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

America will be radically transformed & possibly decimated under Pres. Trump but the electoral college and gerrymandering will endure for centuries

Long post, yet important. (crüt), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

i don't have any "ideas", and neither does anyone itt. i'm pretty pessimistic about the future and i just find the straw-grasping ("trump will be impeached, just watch", "the electoral college will be gone in 10 years", etc) laughable.

otm

Long post, yet important. (crüt), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:28 (seven years ago) link

u mean the electoral college or the senate?

Both or either. "Abolishing the EC" would have to be tied pretty heavily into Senate reform.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:30 (seven years ago) link

Neither of which will happen until global thermonuclear war breaks into a dozen rump states ruled by warlords.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

i don't have any "ideas", and neither does anyone itt. i'm pretty pessimistic about the future and i just find the straw-grasping ("trump will be impeached, just watch", "the electoral college will be gone in 10 years", etc) laughable. finding humor in our shared doom is merely an ego defense

― k3vin k., Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:21 PM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yup

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

yeah I need to gtfo this thread

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

all the same people who were supremely confident in everything that went wrong a month and a half ago are now also optimistic about the future because of these far-fetched escape hatches, one weird tricks, etc.

straws would be one thing as we are early in the coping process; what i could do without, and certainly not just itt, is the accompanying contemptuous sneering at any suggestion that america's antifascist party failed to win the support of america's now very perilously enfranchised antifascist majority for any reasons that were at all within their control

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

or that could have been brought within their control by any technique besides racism

+ my own far-fetched straw is that people who think like that can be dislodged from their power soon and the party can be reorganized from the bottom. that's all

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

failed to win the support of

stick "sufficient" in here before someone explains the electoral college to me; would that someone had explained it to the dems.

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

I think it's good to have passionate disagreements about this stuff, not sure it can be separated from the process of "uniting" to defeat our common enemy

a but (brimstead), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

i def think what people call "relitigating the past" is important to the future!

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

(not that you can't do it too much or in circles)

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

I think we can keep having these arguments even as we are "building the party from the ground up" so to speak. It's more important that we rebuild than that it gets rebuilt on a single model.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:52 (seven years ago) link

Like I'm not worried about people thinking "Let's just tweak the Clinton coalition" vs "Let's use the Sanders model." I'm worried about people thinking we can just keep doing top-down messaging with no local parties, and I'm worried about people who say "we need to purge all of the x from the party."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

Hey just a super-quick suggestion if you're worried about getting back some marginal votes, stop referring to large swaths of the country as "the rust belt." It's bullshit condescension, and since the scale of manufacturing whose departure heralded the nickname is not coming back any time ever, defining a large-ish region of the country by what it lacks is maybe not helpful?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

is anyone in the rust belt actually offended by "rust belt"? Serious question.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

yes

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure the dems already got the votes of everyone in america offended by stuff like that

iatee, Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

Impeachment is good because Trump should be impeached, by even the most charitable reading of the law. They shouldn't do it to be successful, they should do it to be on the right side of history.. What is there to lose?

sleeve, Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

Reporting from St. Louis, seriously fkn stop using basically any term that lumps half the country together, our probs are wildly different from Wisconsin whose probs are very different from Ohio's. Deindustrialization is a thing but so are a hundred little issues that basically make it stupid as fuck to talk about these places as the same and that thinking is exactly the top down nonsense that has weakened the local parties. No one is offended by you using them, per se, but they make you think about these places in an incredibly dumb way.

ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

Have you guys figured out why Trump won yet

― Οὖτις, Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:19 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

they believed their own hype so they didn't work as hard. people are making fun of Trump for doing thank you rallies in states Clinton didn't even go to.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 18 December 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

the only reason we're even talking about the midwest right now is because trump swung a lot of midwest voters and thus the election by talking about manufacturing jobs / using these same lazy stereotypes, so it seems like a particularly weird time to be suggesting that we don't do that.

iatee, Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

iatee, the electoral college is going to be gone in a decade. forget about the midwest

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link

I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or sincere. Why in the world would it be gone?

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

guys, Florida is going to be gone in a decade.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or sincere. Why in the world would it be gone?

stainer's assault will bring it under control

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

steiner, sigh

k3vin k., Sunday, 18 December 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

If we can step back from the "trees" to the "forest" of the whole direction of the party debate, I think it's important to look at not just how do democrats win, but what is the purpose of the democratic party, and what is its vision. I think the GOP has a pretty clear vision: be the party of captial and the wealthy. Of course that alone doesn't give you much of an electoral base, which is where social and religious conservatism come in -- appeal to the non-economic motivations of people with personalities that tend to prefer order, structure, authority. And this, of course, suits the GOP vision very well -- they generally believe in a hierarchical and ordered society ruled by the wealthy.

I don't find the contemporary democratic vision as coherent, and I think that's reflected in this debate. It doesn't feel so much like a party of labor as counterbalancing force against capital, as a party of certain niches of the wealthy, buttressed by vulnerable groups who vote in part out of fear of the other option being worse. It's the party of the creative professional and the tech entrepreneur (sometimes), and of tolerance, but I feel like it has drifted away from a coherent vision of society and the role of government. The party is schizophrenic on public schools, and on unions (once a stronghold of its own power!). It pushes all kinds of confusing public-private solutions and nibble-around-the-edges programs. Parts of the party feel like GOP lite, or GOP policy in NPR language.

It's not that I specifically want the Democratic party to go after "white working class men" it's that I want it to return to coherently and clearly representing the working class of all races, because I want it to be the party of labor and of the 99%, because that's what's right and because that's the logical role for it to play -- a counterweight to the party of capital, not a smartened-up, urban version of the same thing with more diversity.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 03:57 (seven years ago) link

if you have ears and any kind of bullshit detector, you were always able to tell that Hillary Clinton p much didn't believe a fucking word she ever said in public.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 04:01 (seven years ago) link

I want it to return to coherently and clearly representing the working class of all races, because I want it to be the party of labor and of the 99%

i think the political party you're looking for exists, but as a faction within the democratic party, which seems to me more like a coalition rather than a distinct party with internally coherent views. it's the sanders/warren wing, right? the GOP has nailed down the desires of socially conservative religious rich assholes, but that leaves a huge political space. in our two-party system, the democrats try to address all the people and issues that the GOP doesn't care about, but sacrifice a consistent message.

Karl Malone, Monday, 19 December 2016 04:17 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, that's true. But I feel like that's a relatively new phenomenon and still underrepresented in the party. And there's still so much underhandedly ANTI-labor stuff in the party, like widespread support for charter schools.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

Also there are still clearly factions of the party that don't just disagree with that wing but want to squelch it.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

I want someone to run for Congress in one of these midwestern Trump districts with "kill all rich people" as their campaign slogan as a kind of test balloon.If anti elitism is what the people crave the Left shouldn't have a problem leveraging that. They invented it.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 04:36 (seven years ago) link

A crudely anti-elitist party that correctly identifies who the elites actually are might be able to make inroads in these places. Rush Limbaugh's talking points shouldn't be hard to overturn with a loud enough megaphone. I think the Democrats are too polite and they never really engage in the muck of this right wing propaganda --- they should try to force their way into these markets and shout, loudly and clearly, that the right wing's radical antigovernment agenda only benefits elites. Coastal elites even if you'd like. Breaking public unions hurts all workers. Etc

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link

It shouldn't just be the party either. Efforts need to be made to break the spell of the right wing media machine. The danger of accepting hyperpartisanship is it means we are resigned to having half the population breathing in that filth.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 04:46 (seven years ago) link

I want someone to run for Congress in one of these midwestern Trump districts with "kill all rich people" as their campaign slogan as a kind of test balloon.If anti elitism is what the people crave the Left shouldn't have a problem leveraging that. They invented it.

― Treeship, Sunday, December 18, 2016 10:36 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

have had half a mind to register to run for the state rep seat in my v conservative district (in tx) which went unopposed to do just this. but then i remembered that my govt name is on ilx from years back and i get too embarrassed by my 18 year old self.

6 god none the richer (m bison), Monday, 19 December 2016 06:22 (seven years ago) link

I've often thought of making a thread 'does your ilx posting history ensure that you can never run for public office'

iatee, Monday, 19 December 2016 06:48 (seven years ago) link

I'd say an ILX publishing history is exactly what you need to win.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 11:35 (seven years ago) link

I used to worry about this but everyone has twitter accounts and participated in other social media nonsense now.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 12:54 (seven years ago) link

oh -- good mourning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 12:59 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, you just gotta own that shit nowadays. Include your dick pic with all your mailings.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 13:04 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-security-force-232797

cool

, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link

Aside from the obvious downsides (to protesters and the general public), I honestly do think it's kinda cool that Trump seems determined to make it difficult for the Secret Service to protect him.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

really?

a (waterface), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:26 (seven years ago) link

Yeah! I'm all for Trump being the first president to win a Darwin Award.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:31 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sure that he's smart enough that this is the one group of employees he doesn't try to trick and cheat.

Well, pretty sure...

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sure that he's smart enough to feed himself without choking to death but that's about as far as I'd go.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link

That story is one of the scariest I've seen btw

a (waterface), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

It makes me simultaneously very scared and kinda hopeful, tbh. He's so determined to be a maverick wrt being president and incurious enough to never wonder why certain systems are in place that it's likely that he winds up doing at least as much harm to himself as he does to the country-at-large.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:52 (seven years ago) link

But then he Mr. Magoos his way through all kinds of shit that would definitively end most people's careers or livelihoods so who even fuckin knows with this guy.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

Eh, I think if you asked me to fill out the headline "Firefight at..." "...Trump rally" would be the least worst option.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 December 2016 14:57 (seven years ago) link

yeah why is that scary idgi. dude's an idiot and for once his idiocy mostly results in harm to himself

global tetrahedron, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:01 (seven years ago) link

just keeps taking the dead zone parallels further. private security force has all kinds of potential for abuse - imagining them beating up protestors or cheering on/standing by as a larger force of trump-fan brownshirts does worse, and trump trying to shroud them all under some presidential immunity bullshit. versions of that basically happened all year, so it's not SO farfetched especially as he has done nothing else to suggest that "oh, those were just campaign shenanigans, now i'm gonna act like a grownup" or whatever.

i continue to hope trump chokes on a Hardees cheeseburger before inauguration day. i really don't go around wishing death on people but this fascist fuck is pure evil. someone assassinating him would not necessarily lead us to a safer calmer healed nation.

mega pegasus for reindeer (Doctor Casino), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:07 (seven years ago) link

the scariest part to me is if local police forces were to basically side with/work with all the 'minutemen' gun nut ppl. they kinda exist on the same spectrum as it is

global tetrahedron, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

I don't get how this doesn't come off as scary. The guys with guns surrounding the President at public events are supposed to be officers of the law. These guys are loyal to Trump -- not as the holder of an office, but as a person -- and they're accountable to no one. Who's going to stop these guys from beating down a protestor and saying "he made a move towards the President?"

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

^^^

mega pegasus for reindeer (Doctor Casino), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

xxp And other people, some of whom may not be appalling and some of whom might definitely be there to protest. But least worst.

The line about his private bodyman approaching the stage 3 seconds too late through the space that the secret service would have used to evacuate Trump produced some dark lols - there hasn't been a properly slapstick world leader death since I guess Franz Ferdinand.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

Assault is still illegal, right? Of the two groups, it's not the security force that's actually able to go "It was necessary" and that's that.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

the scariest part to me is if local police forces were to basically side with/work with all the 'minutemen' gun nut ppl. they kinda exist on the same spectrum as it is

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/heres-what-biggest-police-union-wants-trump-his-first-100-days

The policy ideas, released through the union's official website with little fanfare, includes more than a dozen proposals. Many involve aggressively dismantling the modest reforms suggested by the Obama administration in a 2015 plan called President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing, such as increasing the use of body cameras nationwide and implementing a national database on police use of force. The FOP also wants Trump to bring back racial profiling in federal agencies by lifting or changing the 2003 ban put in place by the Bush administration. The union suggests he should cut off some or all federal aid to "sanctuary cities" and bring an end to Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), using its database to deport the individuals who had been protected by being included in it. Using police officers to participate in the deportation of undocumented immigrants was an idea Trump suggested in his immigration speech in Phoenix, Arizona, last August. Several large cities have indicated they will not use police officers or relinquish their status as sanctuary cities to help deport immigrants.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I don't mean to underplay the extent to which this is terrifying. It's kind of a race at this point to see whether Trump or any semblance of democracy in the US dies first.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

Very proud to live in a city that just strengthened its sanctuary city ordinance.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:15 (seven years ago) link

The police union thing was reported incorrectly -- the police union circulated a memo listing what the trump campaign had proposed. It was not a list of requests.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

The fact that it includes cops participating in deportations should underscore that -- most cops do NOT want to do that.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

I assume one reason he's loyal to his personal security is that they've signed NDAs. Does Secret Service sign NDAs?

I wonder what the liability of personal security is, vs secret service. I assume secret service shooting someone vs. private security doing it would offer distinct legal challenges.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I'm sure I'm overstating their ability to just shoot someone - as you say they're just very different contexts.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

Now, secret service shooting one of his private security goons ...

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Don't know if I'm just being overly-cynical, but every time someone brings up some legal obstacle that would prevent Trump from doing whatever he wants, I wonder why anyone assumes he gives a shit about 'laws'.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

Where we're going, we don't need ... laws.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

I don't get how this doesn't come off as scary. The guys with guns surrounding the President at public events are supposed to be officers of the law. These guys are loyal to Trump -- not as the holder of an office, but as a person -- and they're accountable to no one. Who's going to stop these guys from beating down a protestor and saying "he made a move towards the President?"

x1000

a (waterface), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

I assume secret service shooting someone vs. private security doing it would offer distinct legal challenges.

And now you hit on the main point. Trump's attitude towards the law is "make me." Ask yourself this: if Trump's guys beat the hell out of a peaceful protestor in public, and the city cops try to arrest them, and Trump's people refuse to comply, who backs down?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:34 (seven years ago) link

‏@nytimes
Sylvester Stallone suggested that he was not interested in taking an arts-related job in the Trump administration

@DougHenwood
Maybe Ted Nugent is available

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

This is his opportunity to cross the aisle and see if Tipper's interested.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

It's not too late
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/81/BruceWillis_-_ReturnOfBruno.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

Today's electoral college vote is forcing me to recognize that I perhaps quite seriously have some PTSD from election night that is now being triggered. Feeling flashes of that same intense dread.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 17:14 (seven years ago) link

I was going to post about the shooting in Turkey. the photos are ... striking

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/19/europe/turkey-russian-ambassador-shot/index.html

akm, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

I assume secret service shooting someone vs. private security doing it would offer distinct legal challenges.

And now you hit on the main point. Trump's attitude towards the law is "make me." Ask yourself this: if Trump's guys beat the hell out of a peaceful protestor in public, and the city cops try to arrest them, and Trump's people refuse to comply, who backs down?

This seems like the run up to a coup. A president whose own security team has a rivalrous relationship with national security forces? Come on

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

This also ties into his antagonizing of the CIA. He is trying to create factions within the government and bully different agencies into proving their loyalty to him. He may be illiterate but he knows how to exploit an advantage.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

Really dont understand how this has gotten this far. This guy is an obvious gangster.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

I was going to post about the shooting in Turkey. the photos are ... striking

he really dressed sharp

j., Monday, 19 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

Ask yourself this: if Trump's guys beat the hell out of a peaceful protestor in public, and the city cops try to arrest them, and Trump's people refuse to comply, who backs down?

i don't see the cops arresting anyone in the president's security team tbh.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

If Trump is smart he'll try to stay tight with police unions. FOP endorsed him. That's one reason why I question whether he'll really go through with his deportation and sanctuary city defunding plans -- police rely on a lot of federal funding, and also generally don't want to spend their time assisting with deportations rather than focusing on local crime.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:39 (seven years ago) link

i don't see the cops arresting anyone in the president's security team tbh.

Exactly. And once that's seen not to happen, how does that affect people's ability to dissent visibly?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:40 (seven years ago) link

More like 'do they assist in the cover-up, suppression of on-site media, etc., or do they just maintain a respectful silence about the whole affair'?

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

Although if I were to make a prediction, I'll bet he tries to find an equivalent of the carrier deal in deportations -- something showy and headline grabbing that will please the base but not move the needle much.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

I think every time Trump does something that presidents have not previously done, or doesn't do something that previous presidents have done, why those things have typically not been done or done becomes pretty obvious.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:00 (seven years ago) link

@ZaidJilani
Chuck Schumer congratulates Trump's pick for Secretary of the Army, who is also a Schumer donor

https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/810914918409048068

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

lolol

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

the kinda guy who gets Chuck's respect

"Viola joined the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1982 and was its chairman from 2001 to 2004. But he owes his fortune to Virtu Financial, the electronic-trading outfit he founded in 2008. The company — which uses powerful computers to make large numbers of transactions at very high speeds — turned a profit on 1,484 of its first 1,485 days in operation. Michael Lewis, in 2014 his book “Flash Boys,” pointed to Virtu’s winning streak as evidence that high-frequency traders have a huge informational advantage over other investors. Viola took the company public in April 2015."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2016/12/19/five-things-to-know-about-vincent-viola-trumps-billionaire-pick-for-army-secretary/#5eefd44f6547

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

ty Morbs for the new display name

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

that is a good one

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

Should I start a thread that is just like "put your direst predictions/conjectures for the Trump years here"? Because I have a million of em but I don't want to just gum up this thread with my panicky mental chess game.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

keep it in here imo

marcos, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

we already have a lot of dire trump/right wing emergence/facism threads

marcos, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Ok, here's my newest fear: Executive branch, via chamber of commerce, controls the Census Bureau. I'm sure there are currently some safeguards/layers of independence in place, but wouldn't it be nice if the GOP could further entrench its gerrymandered majority by fucking with the census itself?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

BTW GOP raised fears about Obama doing the same when he tried to take more control of the census in 2009, so it's on their radar.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

Then after that the GOP will rid our drinking water of fluoride.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

yeah that or a "what is your religion" question xxp

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:29 (seven years ago) link

The Census is always a political football under best of circumstances -- historic tendency to undercount minorities, immigrants, urban populations in general. Not that anyone would want to do that on purpose for electoral advantage...

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

so, faithless electors are defecting on...Hillary? what the hell is going on here?

frogbs, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

of course they are

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

Link?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

ugh smh

k3vin k., Monday, 19 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

i just see one elector doing that - in maine, switching from clinton to sanders

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/12/19/maine-elector-says-vote-for-sanders-maine-elector-says-vote-for-sanders/rzVD3ijtgKObvn5dbvzddN/story.html

Karl Malone, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:55 (seven years ago) link

I mean the idea of defecting is dumb and dangerous but Trump's complete failure to divest himself or even divulge ANYTHING about his businesses or investments is (IMO) sort of the exact reason this system exists? So dumb.

frogbs, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:56 (seven years ago) link

http://komonews.com/news/local/wash-states-electoral-college-prepares-to-vote-as-protesters-gather-in-olympia

OLYMPIA, Wash. - Members of the Electoral College in Washington state cast their votes for president as protesters gathered at the Capitol on Monday.

Eight of the 12 members voted for Hillary Clinton, three voted for former Secretary of State Colin Powell, and one voted for Faith Spotted Eagle, a Native-American elder from South Dakota.

frogbs, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

eh no it's not

i've seen reports from washington and minnesota too but i can't c/p right now

k3vin k., Monday, 19 December 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

xpost
then his vote was ruled out of order and he switched his vote to clinton.
i guess there was a similar situation in minnesota, too:

Update: 2:55 p.m. ET: Another elector in Minnesota tried to defect from Clinton. Muhammad Abdurrahman, a former Sanders DNC delegate, cast a ballot for the Vermont senator but was removed from his office and replaced by an alternate who voted for Clinton as per Minnesota law before the state’s official totals were submitted.

http://www.salon.com/2016/12/19/maine-electoral-college-voter-defects-from-hillary-clinton-to-bernie-sanders/

Karl Malone, Monday, 19 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

so, faithless electors are defecting on...Hillary? what the hell is going on here?

Ha ha

Iago Galdston, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:14 (seven years ago) link

this owns

ciderpress, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

someone was chaning from clinton to kasich

whatever, fuck all those people. looks like WW3 is breaking out. do we choose erdogan or putin? why not just eat a cyanide tablet

akm, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

The people defecting from Clinton to Colin Powell or Kasich are doing so under the misguided belief that there are Republican electors with enough moxie to dump Trump, throwing the election to the House, and giving them a moderate Republican in third electoral place they can vote for. It's like throwing a bunch of laterals as time runs out. Everybody who thinks this situation is funny can fuck right off btw.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

Why why why why

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

tbf most of them announced their attentions ahead of time, this is not surprising

Οὖτις, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:40 (seven years ago) link

@newtgingrich
Watch the alligators lose today as the electors vote. Draining the swamp begins in January.

@jeremyscahill
I feel like this is a coded message to some sleeper cell

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link

the sharks are in the jacuzzi

Οὖτις, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

the silver lining of this electoral college news is that at least the EC will be irrelevant within a decade

k3vin k., Monday, 19 December 2016 21:47 (seven years ago) link

kev can you explain (or are u zinging tombot)

marcos, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:48 (seven years ago) link

pave the electoral college put up a parking lot

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:50 (seven years ago) link

Hendrik Hertzberg has been proselytizing for several plans since 2001.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/03/06/count-em-2

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:51 (seven years ago) link

it's time the electoral college

( •_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

went on spring break

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CR8eagnU8AAuYFm.jpg

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:57 (seven years ago) link

"several plans?" imho Hertzberg is a NPVIC convert like yours truly

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

in unimportant correction news I meant iirc not imho

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

I'm thinking the scenarios he used to which he used to devote early '00s New Yorker columns before settling on the NPVIC.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

if the EC continues to benefit republicans and republican states is there any reason to believe something like the NPVIC will succeed?

marcos, Monday, 19 December 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

Fuck these stupid electors.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 22:13 (seven years ago) link

Sometimes i feel like I must be hallucinating. The Trump I am seeing cannot be the same guy who was elected president.

Treeship, Monday, 19 December 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

i keep seeing 'npvic' and thinking it means 'new posts very much in character'

damn ilx

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

geez it's almost as if there oughta be something in the Constitution saying you aren't allowed to do that

frogbs, Monday, 19 December 2016 22:30 (seven years ago) link

"look, i don't know what kind of midwesterns you guys have met. on the whole they seem like nice people with a reputation for being overly polite.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau)"

lol

i may possibly have met one or two midwesterners in my life :)

"rushomancy puts it best but got there too soon, should have sat on that post imho

― a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto)"

oh, god, i can't time my zings, i have no life and even i can't keep up with this fucking thread :)

"i don't have any "ideas", and neither does anyone itt. i'm pretty pessimistic about the future and i just find the straw-grasping ("trump will be impeached, just watch", "the electoral college will be gone in 10 years", etc) laughable. finding humor in our shared doom is merely an ego defense

― k3vin k."

great, thanks for sharing, it's not like any of us are dealing with deep existential depression/dread ourselves, so it's really good to have somebody like you here to stan for nihilism.

"I want someone to run for Congress in one of these midwestern Trump districts with "kill all rich people" as their campaign slogan as a kind of test balloon.If anti elitism is what the people crave the Left shouldn't have a problem leveraging that. They invented it.

― Treeship"

'eat the rich' is catchier

"I've often thought of making a thread 'does your ilx posting history ensure that you can never run for public office'

― iatee"

i destroyed my prospects for public office way back in the usenet days. and also by not being born rich.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:33 (seven years ago) link

I think the extent to which people become fundamentally unserious about acting in a way that at least trends toward the common good is a fairly good barometer for the extent to which 'civilization' becomes a word with no meaningful referent. So, y'now, thanks, electors, for doing your part in nudging us just that little bit closer to the precipice.

(None of this is really unexpected by me, btw. I maintain a stupid flicker of hope even though I'm pretty sure I can see where the maniacal minority is steering this bus.)

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

eephus, i recommend developing respect for gallows humor as a survival mechanism, now more than ever as Hollywood usta say.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

HK makin' the rounds

https://twitter.com/DougHenwood/status/810961622072197120

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link

http://www.al.com/news/mobile/index.ssf/2016/12/mobile_chief_of_staff_apologiz.html

The chief of staff to Mobile Mayor Sandy Stimpson issued a public apology Sunday for his responsibility in having a cedar tree cut down at Public Safety Memorial Park Friday and transported to Ladd-Peebles Stadium as a prop during President-elect Donald Trump's rally on Saturday.

Colby Cooper, who has been Stimpson's chief of staff since 2013, said he became "overzealous" in making sure "every detail was covered and the expectations" of Trump's team were exceeded ahead of Saturday's televised rally.

"I now know that there are citizens who are upset and offended that a tree from a city park was used as part of the decorations for the event," Cooper said in a statement sent out to the local media. "I accept full responsibility for having this done. For this, I sincerely apologize. Going forward, I will be more sensitive to the spectrum of concerns regarding trees."

Cooper had been charged with working with Trump's advance team last week in preparation for the rally, which was the final one during Trump's post-election "Thank You" tour. The president-elect spoke more than an hour before a large crowd at Ladd-Peebles Stadium and the large tree decorated with Christmas ornaments served as a back drop, blocking the stadium's scoreboard.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile, Matt Yglesias trips over his own dick: https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/810945081943457792

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link

https://thinkprogress.org/under-political-pressure-kuwait-cancels-major-event-at-four-seasons-switches-to-trumps-d-c-1f204315d513#.th4grt63c

― 龜, Monday, December 19, 2016 10:23 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A source tells ThinkProgress that the Kuwaiti embassy, which has regularly held the event at the Four Seasons in Georgetown, abruptly canceled its reservation after members of the Trump Organization pressured the ambassador to hold the event at the hotel owned by the president-elect.

isn't this finally illegal? please?

Milton Parker, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:01 (seven years ago) link

Yglesias is an asshole, wow.

akm, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

"isn't this finally illegal? please?

― Milton Parker,"

yes, but they've already shown that they don't believe the law pertains to Trump so don't expect much to come of it

akm, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:08 (seven years ago) link

xp to phil

dude's default mode has been cynical, unfunny sacrasm since the election (before even?). It was a matter of time before he said something stupid.

altony rightano (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:10 (seven years ago) link

like, who needs this?

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/810810830216433664

altony rightano (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:12 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0E1IWxXcAA-HgF.jpg

Good god... Good luck USA/Earth... :'-(

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:41 (seven years ago) link

now that trump has finally called them 'radical islamic terrorists' we won right? its over?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:59 (seven years ago) link

ok, so one of my other scary/nightmare scenario predictions is this: Trump, Sessions at all use the "terrorist" label more loosely than ever and start going after organizations like ACLU, using federal civil asset forfeiture to kneecap their operations even when nothing is proven.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

sry et al not at all

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

German officials haven't even released details about this yet, right? So we don't even know for certain that this was ISIS or any other Islamist group?

Has the Trump team said anything about the unknown assailant in Zurich who shot up an Islamic center? (Don't answer, it's rhetorical.)

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 01:04 (seven years ago) link

I feel like W occasionally verged on sounding like that but it felt like someone was behind him whispering to tone it down. Not anymore!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 01:05 (seven years ago) link

it was a christmas market, why would non christians shop there amirite?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

So Ron Paul got a fucking electoral vote

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 02:48 (seven years ago) link

That statement is almost as terrible and dread-inducing as I could've possibly feared. I don't know how we get through four years of this.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 02:54 (seven years ago) link

A source tells ThinkProgress that the Kuwaiti embassy, which has regularly held the event at the Four Seasons in Georgetown, abruptly canceled its reservation after members of the Trump Organization pressured the ambassador to hold the event at the hotel owned by the president-elect.

isn't this finally illegal? please?

if people call it kuwait-gate then something like this has an outside chance of being noticed, otherwise no

chinavision!, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 03:11 (seven years ago) link

the only possible scandals in this country can reasonably have -gate tacked on the end

chinavision!, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

Kuwaitigate is viable, push that

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 03:28 (seven years ago) link

So Ron Paul got a fucking electoral vote

A white nationalist hipster - Trump is too popular.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 04:16 (seven years ago) link

I am confused about how Trump learned to manipulate the media so adeptly. There were negative stories about him every day but by maintaining his ground and deflecting he somehow turned each egregious scandal into a he said/she said. Even that grim debate -- that awful night -- when he brought the Bill Clinton rape accusers to the debate, everyone who saw it seemed horrified at Trump, not Bill, but the discourse was suddenly murky. On the sexual assault front, Hillary was now tarnished too.

I think his alt right cyber brownshirts were used to his advantage and some of them might have been on some kind of Trump or Putin payroll. Whenever journalists or Hillary tried to tag him with them, with their racist intimidation tactics, they sounded like conspiracy theorists. Just like Trump. Now Trump wasn't the only conspiracy theorist in the race.

Over and over again he dragged people down to his level. And even when Hillary refused to engage, he would use that to make her seem haughty and superior. Not a straight talker. Hiding something.

The email scandal was perfect for Trump's strategy of confusion. A slow drip of substance-less "scandal" related to Hillary, that the press would dutifully report on. Even when they said there was nothing in the emails, people half-listening still heard "emails." It was like some sort of mass hypnosis.

None of this trickery worked on people who were paying attention but it wasn't aimed at them. Trump knew he could incur tons of awful press and still make it look like an ugly race on "both sides" to the average voter. How? How did he learn to do all of this?

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 04:59 (seven years ago) link

Roy Cohn?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:00 (seven years ago) link

Yeah he was a key influence. I want to know what he taught him specifically, how Trump refined these lessons for the age of the internet and, most importantly, how to break through with a clear oppositional message when he is polluting the airwaves with misdirection.

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:05 (seven years ago) link

Some scandal has got to stick. In some way he needs to be made accountable for his actions even though he seems to have a bag of tricks for avoiding accountability:

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:06 (seven years ago) link

Short of everything Rick Wilson promised in October, nothing will stick. Nothing. He won after Access Hollywood.

flappy bird, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:12 (seven years ago) link

He must have done things to weasel out of it, things that can be identified and confronted. Like he knew how to twist it around on Hillary. At the time the way he did this seemed idiotic and desperate but it worked somehow, whereas no Democratic politician had weathered a similar scandal as successfully.

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:15 (seven years ago) link

You have to factor in the Hillary hatred that has been nurtured for decades as the complement to Trump's evasions, distractions, and wildly inflated promises. He was fortunate in his opponent.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:18 (seven years ago) link

Last I checked (right before the election), Putin was blackmailing Trump with a video of him having sex with (possibly underage) prostitutes in Russia. Presumably this tape can be employed at Putin's convenience. Or it's total bullshit.

flappy bird, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:18 (seven years ago) link

I'm not hopeful about the tape's existence. And I am not confident that Trump couldn't have beaten another Democrat too. Hillary was a unique candidate, with particular strengths and weaknesses, but the manner in which Trump (and Putin) exploited her baggage was a thing to behold. The insinuations were there before but they became radioactive. I think he could do it again to someone else.

At this point we are all so used to this asshole, he is like a chronic illness we are all living with. But beating this illness will take a new treatment approach. We need to see him with fresh eyes, understand what game exactly it is that he is playing, and then nail him to the fucking wall. This is all going to start on ilx and spread outwards.

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:25 (seven years ago) link

xp I'm not sure how being blackmailed makes one more media-savvy and able to evade scandal. But lets all hope Putin shits out his compromising video on Trump asap. C'mon Donnie, take one for the team!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:26 (seven years ago) link

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tom-arnold-claims-vulgar-donald-trump-apprentice-tapes-article-1.2916614

if he really has this he should release it, not that it fucking matters at this point, and he should have done it months ago.

akm, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:30 (seven years ago) link

Yeah wtf tom arnold

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:34 (seven years ago) link

a question we've all been asking for 25+ years

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

maybe he's just doing this to piss of Rosanne

akm, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

off. OFF

akm, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:39 (seven years ago) link

Again, don't make the mistake of assuming that Trump has hidden reserves of savvy. It just turned out that circumstances favor someone like him more than most people could've imagined. Reality television has gone a long way toward legitimizing crass and useless people as aspirational models. The devaluation of critical thinking skills in public education has done a marvelous job of ensuring that many people are drawn to whoever's the shoutiest. It turns out that Trump's one real skill, conning people, was just the skill needed to take advantage of a confluence of really gross tendencies in American life today. Add to that decades of name recognition and everything just fell into place. I think everyone (including Donnie) was surprised to learn that all he had to do was show up and take advantage of the confluence in order to win.

TL;DR: There's nothing special about the turd that finally clogs the toilet. Being in the right place at the right time doesn't make it any less of a standard-issue turd.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

i somewhat agree with that but still think the turd has some sentience

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:53 (seven years ago) link

OL my bro you say yourself he is good at conning people. What are his techniques? Just outrageous promises couples with dark insinuations about his opponents? Why did these insinuations stick to them and nothing ever stuck to him?

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 05:55 (seven years ago) link

It's just that he doesn't care. Ppl admire that attitude, and also assume there isn't anything to worry about if the guy being accused of wgatever so obviously doesn't give a shit.

albvivertine, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 06:04 (seven years ago) link

I think it's really as simple as people just being unequipped to deal with someone like him. Generally speaking but also specifically in the context of someone running for and ultimately becoming president. He's a being of pure id. Some find that seductive, some find it repulsive and terrifying, but relatively few non-psychologists have the tools to reckon with someone like that. If you try to interface with him as if he were in possession of a healthy mind, he'd run right over you.

It seems like most of his con man skill involves mirroring. He knows how to read a mark and fumble out a response that approximates what the mark wants to hear. What he says has no relation to anything other than whether it facilitates him getting his way. On the flipside, he seems equally adept at 'dark mirroring', AKA trolling people who don't buy into his shit and pissing them off. All of which lends credence to the idea that everyone should ignore everything he says (since his glossolalic manipulation is his main strength) and focus entirely on what he does.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 06:18 (seven years ago) link

he is a celebrity with 40 years experience, with way more media savvy than Clinton, and a far longer time in the public eye as a non-controversial figure.

Clinton was a risky candidate, and Trump was standing on the shoulders of 20 years right wing talk radio. thinking that he fooled people into mistrusting her is ignoring the fact that many people mistrusted her well before he entered.

some of his "scandals" the media were screaming about as "disqualifying" were actually not at all. like him losing a billion dollars, or being a misogynist prick behind the scenes of Access Hollywood. how did these things never stick to him? maybe some of these things aren't disqualifying at all.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:06 (seven years ago) link

he is like a chronic illness we are all living with. But beating this illness will take a new treatment approach

democrats need to run candidates that aren't just corporate establishment robots but that actually stand for something

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:12 (seven years ago) link

i get the desire to want to think Trump has this magical mojo or whatever but imo Clinton was just a horrible candidate who was literally turning people away from helping her get elected

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:23 (seven years ago) link

she got almost 3 million more voters that Trump

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:28 (seven years ago) link

I mean, I know she lost, and she definitely wasn't a perfect candidate, but this does bear being noted, while you're saying she's horrible and that misogyny isn't disqualifying trait in a candidate

There shouldn't be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets (stevie), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

Adam has had an axe to grind for months and thanks to our obsolete system of democracy he has apparently earned the right to hone it to a razor edge, everyone else but him and Iago was wrong, lol fuck America

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 12:36 (seven years ago) link

Treeship, you'r going to keep your sanity if you channel the energy you spent worrying about how Trump has befouled America into helping whoever your local candidates are. We need local people in 2018 and 2020.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:00 (seven years ago) link

I am confused about how Trump learned to manipulate the media so adeptly.

― Treeship

look let's not make Trump into some unconquerable superhero here. he had lots of money, and he got _lucky_. osama bin laden is not one of the great geniuses of the 21st century because he successfully masterminded a plan to fly planes into the world trade center. it was a stupid idea that somehow happened to work anyway.

the media was a pitifully weak institution, a paper tiger, after years of corporate buyouts neutering the power of old media and, especially, the cravenness of new media, which was in the hands of chronically irresponsible burning man attendees who spent the whole campaign denying that they had any power over anything whatsoever, which in turn led to the normalization of incitement of racial hatred and the legitimization of outright lies.

he was also running against a democratic candidate who was widely hated and feared, and he also benefited from an election had, over the past decade, been carefully rigged in his favor by his political party, and which the opposing political party did little or nothing to meaningfully oppose.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

Hillary was a unique candidate, with particular strengths and weaknesses, but the manner in which Trump (and Putin) exploited her baggage was a thing to behold.

As a candidate, Hillary didn't have any "particular strengths." She brought no one to the table that wouldn't have lined up for the Generic Democrat they use in early polls.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 13:52 (seven years ago) link

think its a mistake to assume "nothing stuck" to the guy - he was the most unpopular nominee in modern history, has an abysmal approval rating for a first term president elect, and lost the popular vote by 3 million. if not for the EC we'd probably still be laughing at the GOP for running such an awful candidate. but it turns out the old adage "a duck would get 45% of the vote if it had an (R) next to its name" is absolutely true - most of those I know who voted for him were disgusted by him but talked themselves into it anyway. maybe like 10% of GOP voters showed some backbone and stayed home or voted Hillary, but that's made up for by the 4chan/the_donald/Infowars crowd that typically don't vote.

Trump's strength as a candidate is that he essentially broke the media - how do you cover a candidate with so many scandals, who knows so little, whose word is provably worthless, without giving off the impression of bias? Viola - weeks upon weeks of discussion about email and Clinton Foundation non-issues.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:03 (seven years ago) link

Have you guys figured out why trump won yet

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

Yes, it's because he's a winner.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

Who became a doggy's dinner.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

Nothing flusters him. Americans like an overconfident douche.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Plenty flusters him! Any expression that isn't overtly flattering and deferential is an affront to his fragile ego.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

i don't think trump is invincible or "teflon" even though he won, he has very loyal supporters obv and many struggling people were willing to give him a chance bc he is "different" and a "change" candidate but as we work to undermine & resist him over the next four years we should not forget that he is still wildly unpopular and even many people who voted for him are skeptical. some poll i remember seeing recently (i have to dig it up) had like a sizable portion of his own voters who think he is going to be a terrible president

marcos, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Everything flusters him, which is fairly similar to nothing.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Sorry you're right, I meant nothing flusters him out of his alpha posturing. When he is flustered he maintains that at least.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

Trump pissed off a lot of his "culture-war/Merry Christmas" base when he referred to same-sex marriage as "settled law." But surely AG Sessions and Shadow President Pence would like a crack at reversing it; is Trump going to forbid it?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:27 (seven years ago) link

Not sure what you mean by AG/VP taking a "crack at reversing it." That's not something they can do, it would be the Supreme Court.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

and we know that could become a distinct possibility

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:29 (seven years ago) link

Even all of the 80s bullies that have perfectly mirrored him had that moment where the hero sends them away with their tail between their legs and it seems impossible to do that to Trump. When he's cornered he employs some fifth grade "no puppet no puppet YOU'RE the puppet" shit but does not ever allow himself to appear defeated.

xpost to self

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

i'm not sure if that list of SC candidates he put out last summer had any anti-abortion/pro-gay-marriage advocates. xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:31 (seven years ago) link

I don't know if it was something inherent to him that made him weather these controversies and succeed in manipulating the media to present a false equivalency picture, at least to un-discerning citizens. I think it was things he did. I think he said things that seemed horrible, but which had the effect of reframing issues to his benefit. I think he was involved in the false news disinformation campaign. The idea that he just won because "45 percent of the electorate always goes Republican" would only make sense if he didn't also win the Republican primary.

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

He seems to know the down the line ripple effect of certain words, actions and postures. I don't think he is a pure id or whatever.

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

I promise that all it takes (or, y'know, would have taken before he became the most powerful person in the country) to chip away at Trump's alpha shit is standing up to him. Having been raised by someone not terribly dissimilar in temperament (feel free to armchair psychoanalyze to your heart's content), I can tell you that refusing to be cowed and learning to tell people like Trump to just shut the fuck up goes a long way towards taking the bluster out of their sails. But everyone has been mystifyingly deferential to him for decades so he'll continue to throw his weight around.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

Hillary Clinton treated him like the contemptible toad he is during the debates, I thought

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

xxp - Primary was a different phenomenon, and one I think he genuinely had some (accidental) political skill at - he got four times as much media coverage as every other candidate combined, and his "platform" was more extreme in a way that pandered hard to the GOP base - "it's not politically correct to say this, but...". Kinda similar to how Bernie was really far left, but Trump benefitted in that there was no Hillary on the GOP side - most all of his GOP competitors were awful in their own way and they all split votes, and the ones who were decent (like say Kasich or Rubio) couldn't compete because the media and the debate moderators let Trump dictate the rules, all the time

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

There have been disinformation campaigns in every election in history. I really don't think "fake news" is this new thing Trump discovered and that's why he won.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:44 (seven years ago) link

and I hate to say it but Trump's strategy of revoking credentials or refusing to do debates when he felt attacked absolutely worked. the media softballed him all the way to the presidency in part because they were hurting and Trump was nearly singlehandedly saving the industry.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:47 (seven years ago) link

Great for Ratings

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

This disinformation campaign seemed more insidious than ones in the past. Also Trump's penchant for lying straight to people's faces while knowing they know he is lying felt new to me.

Treeship, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

OK so at what point do I print our findings here and fax (for obvious reasons) this thread to Podesta?

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

maybe y'all can meet for pizza

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:09 (seven years ago) link

It's worth noting that, since 1900, up until yesterday, there had been a total of five faithless Democratic electors. There were six yesterday. Six Democratic electors thought it terribly important to cast their votes against their party's candidate, who had already lost the election on paper. More than in the previous 116 years combined.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link

nothing about the EC charade is "terribly important"

i bet Bill Clinton loved making the trip to Albany for the losing cause

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

(yes, that's right, Bubba was a fuckin' elector)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

trump's good fortune in november has much less to do with his supposed 'strengths' (however we define them) and more to do with the fact that roughly half the voting public in america is human garbage.

xxposts

will, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

holy fuck you guys isn't it possible for something to have a long list of causes that can't be pithily summarized

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

sure. but in this case i'll stand by my assertion.

will, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

Great. I'm glad y'all have solved our problems.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:31 (seven years ago) link

Lock thread

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

It's worth noting that, since 1900, up until yesterday, there had been a total of five faithless Democratic electors. There were six yesterday. Six Democratic electors thought it terribly important to cast their votes against their party's candidate, who had already lost the election on paper. More than in the previous 116 years combined.

― Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.)

it's almost as if the left's spending the past month and a half saying that people in the electoral college ought to vote their conscience instead of listening to their party had some effect

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

"German officials haven't even released details about this yet, right? So we don't even know for certain that this was ISIS or any other Islamist group?"
it is not even sure that it was a terrorist attack in berlin. the suspect the police has arrested does not seem to be the driver of the truck.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

it's almost as if the left's spending the past month and a half saying that people in the electoral college ought to vote their conscience instead of listening to their party had some effect

― increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, December 20, 2016 11:32 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

How is this "the left"? The people I know pushing the faithless elector thing are all mainstream democrats. The lefties I know are rolling their eyes at people for seeking deus ex machina solutions.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link

the left's spending the past month and a half saying that people in the electoral college ought to vote their conscience instead of listening to their party

this was the center, just like it's the center that's now screaming that the election was scripted in the kremlin. in their grief they seem determined to stamp out the last embers of public faith in democratic institutions at the precise moment all of them have been seized by fascists. i don't know what they think they doing. xp.

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

they don't, and it fills me with SUCH confidence about the coming Resistance.

a nation turns its lonely eyes to HOOS

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

second "they" supposed to be "they're" xp

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

afaict HOOS is unceasingly cultivating disciples

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

How is this "the left"? The people I know pushing the faithless elector thing are all mainstream democrats. The lefties I know are rolling their eyes at people for seeking deus ex machina solutions.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive)

ok, if it's important for you to draw sharp distinctions between the democratic party and the left, substitute "mainstream democrats" if you like. my experience is that the differences on this issue aren't necessarily drawn around how far left you are, and i was using "left" as a big tent term. it wasn't the main point in any event. i'm profoundly disinterested in assigning blame for perceived "failures" that in reality make no difference to anyone.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

this was the center, just like it's the center that's now screaming that the election was scripted in the kremlin. in their grief they seem determined to stamp out the last embers of public faith in democratic institutions at the precise moment all of them have been seized by fascists. i don't know what they think they doing. xp.

― difficult listening hour

well, it's either that or spend a great deal of effort trying to salvage basically unsalvageable institutions. come on, people, are we really going to spend the next four years doing nothing but complaining about the rump of the democratic party while trump gets to do whatever the fuck he wants?

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

who has said that?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

most of us are saying that subverting the anachronistic but constitutionally empowered Electoral College plays into the general decay of institutions that would delight the Grover Norquists and Koch Brothers.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

The people I know pushing the faithless elector thing are all mainstream democrats.

the people i know pushing the faithless elector thing are all people who have been (understandably) tremendously psychically damaged by this election, they aren't necessarily "mainstream democrats"

Long post, yet important. (crüt), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:50 (seven years ago) link

Our institutions are not "unsalvageable" at all, that's silly. I mean Trump may damage them a lot further, maybe they'll get there, but acting like they're already there is pathetic defeatism.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:52 (seven years ago) link

most of us are saying that subverting the anachronistic but constitutionally empowered Electoral College plays into the general decay of institutions that would delight the Grover Norquists and Koch Brothers.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, December 20, 2016 11:50 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is also extremely silly. Hillary lost the states she needed to win the electoral college by very small margins. There is really no reason why Democrats can't win in the electoral college. The system is irretrievably broken because we don't like the result.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

i'm profoundly disinterested in assigning blame for perceived "failures" that in reality make no difference to anyone.

i don't know what to tell you. there are different political factions in this country and they have different ideas about what is happening and what to do about it. in my own experience the people who spent the last couple weeks crossing their fingers republicans would inexplicably vote themselves out of power have not been marxists. i think the next four years look worse for us if those are the sorts of schemes we can expect from our leaders.

spend a great deal of effort trying to salvage basically unsalvageable institutions

the creepingly general idea that america's institutions are "unsalvagable" is terrifying in this climate.

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:54 (seven years ago) link

This is also extremely silly. Hillary lost the states she needed to win the electoral college by very small margins. There is really no reason why Democrats can't win in the electoral college. The system is irretrievably broken because we don't like the result.

Yes yes yes

a (waterface), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

I agree with that! 2016 was not 1984 or 1988.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

OMB Director is an anti-Fed Bircher. Should go well.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

If we want to eliminate the electoral college, then work to generate enthusiasm for an amendment. People still too psychically damaged by the election should get a hobby if they don't intend to help .

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

don't think abolishing the EC is going to do much, but enforcing the actual Constitution might. we're about to bestow the highest office in the land to a known con man who has disclosed nothing about his many businesses, investments, or debts, who has no real plan to divest himself of any of it, and who is already using the office for self-enrichment.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

Our institutions are not "unsalvageable" at all, that's silly. I mean Trump may damage them a lot further, maybe they'll get there, but acting like they're already there is pathetic defeatism.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive)

defeatism! i'm proposing the opposite of defeatism. i'm proposing that we let go of the delusion that our institutions are going to save us. i'm proposing that we look at what happened in north carolina, look at the fact that we live in a country where a police officer can shoot a black man in the back anywhere, at any time, for any reason, and not have to answer to the law for it.

the american system was designed, in large part, to prevent a fascist demagogue from taking office. that system hasn't failed since 1828, and the last time it failed it led to civil war. fixing the problems requiring acknowledging the full extent of those problems.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

Has the imperial presidency (and its attendant undeclared wars of the last 70 years, with the Forever War bill of Sept 2001 as the cherry on top) officially ascended to "institution"?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

most of us are saying that subverting the anachronistic but constitutionally empowered Electoral College plays into the general decay of institutions that would delight the Grover Norquists and Koch Brothers.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, December 20, 2016 11:50 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is also extremely silly. Hillary lost the states she needed to win the electoral college by very small margins. There is really no reason why Democrats can't win in the electoral college. The system is irretrievably broken because we don't like the result.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, December 20, 2016 11:53 AM (twenty-six minutes ago)

eh gotta split with you here -- the system is broken because the EC is dumb and fundamentally unjust

k3vin k., Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

dlh otm upthread tho

k3vin k., Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

don't think abolishing the EC is going to do much

uh, you're aware that all the republican presidents of the past 25 years have won precisely because the EC exists?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

Dems gotta be willing to fight fire with fire if they want anything to happen. Obama played nice and reached across the aisle and look where he wound up, with Republican FBI Director James Comey. They need to confirm Garland NOW - I'm glad they're trying to respect our institutions but those institutions reward those who are nasty. They can no longer assume good intentions out of anyone in the GOP.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:28 (seven years ago) link

it's not just bad luck that it happened to hurt us the last two times it's been an issue. the EC as constructed specifically hurts the democrats, and it will continue to do so for as long as we remain a predominantly urban party

k3vin k., Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:29 (seven years ago) link

Dems could also improve their messaging to the "flyover states" which consistently vote against their own self-interest, I suppose

don't get me wrong the EC is dumb but we all knew the game going in. complaining about it afterwards is the sort of thing Trump would do.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

well yeah not getting out the vote in states like WI/MI/PA is specifically clinton's fault for sure

k3vin k., Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:33 (seven years ago) link

electoral college is obv dumb and while it looks like we lost 00 and 16 because of it mostly due to unhappy accident, if the midwest keeps turning red we could be in a position where it's actually kinda fixed against us for an extended period.

but getting rid of it is not in the realm of the possible, especially not anytime soon. the only way I see it going away is if both dems and republicans feel like they're getting burned by it, like if the gop loses the next 2 elections in a row while winning the popular vote we could be in a place where *everyone* kinda resents the electoral college and small states / swing states might overlook the fact that they actually benefit from it.

iatee, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link

EC is dumb and fundamentally unjust i agree but i'm skeptical of attempts to end it or undermine it by NPVIC, they seem somewhat futile when one party that happens to have overwhelming political power in both federal and state govts continues to benefit from it. i mean NPVIC is a start but what happens when red states don't care about it? what do you suggest doing about the EC?

marcos, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

iatee otm

marcos, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link

yup, correct

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

I mean how about we petition to end the senate too, it's even more unjust!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

You think the EC gives disproportionate power? Wyoming gets the same number of senators as California!

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link

Next time we have congress we should really make DC a state. Maybe split California in two while we're at it.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

yeah the electoral college gets things right most of the time anyway, whereas the senate (and even the house) are democratically unrepresentative 100% of the time

iatee, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

smashing the so-called leadership of the Democratic Party would work better, thankyaverymuch

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/mhfMarg.jpg

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Can't top that today. I think we're done here.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:44 (seven years ago) link

reserved for moments when someone gets irritated because what went wrong during the 2016 U.S. election is being debated in the 2016 U.S. election thread

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:46 (seven years ago) link

i found its applicability broader :(

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:47 (seven years ago) link

lol

maybe, in some ways, we are all scheduled to be next week's leader of the discussion at the Thompson County Book Club

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:48 (seven years ago) link

This is maybe a small point but nothing about asking electors to be faithless is subverting the Constitution - tho it may well be a futile expenditure of energy. For better or worse the intended model was that the electors would make individual decisions - that's what people elected them for. The Framers were hoping they could actually escape from political parties altogether and would have been surprised to find them enshrined by state law as part of the EC system. Obv the Constitution is a living document etc etc but while the EC not living up to the election-night expectations might provoke a political shitstorm it really would not be doing something outside of its institutional or constitutional bounds.

mega pegasus for reindeer (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

Can we close this thread? Too long and psychically damaging.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

well yeah not getting out the vote in states like WI/MI/PA is specifically clinton's fault for sure

― k3vin k., Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:33 PM (fifteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Losing Michigan by like 25% of a sold-out Detroit Tigers game is pretty inexcusable. Hell, the PA/MI/WI margin was one (1) Ohio State football game's worth of people.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

It didn't take long for the Framers to figure out that the electors weren't being the independent critical thinkers the Constitution purportedly envisioned though

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:52 (seven years ago) link

well now that we know the electors aren't going to defect on someone who is in clear violation of the Constitution it's probably a good time to have the discussion of why we need the EC anymore. even though it's somewhat fair and usually gets it right, a system that incentivizes candidates to campaign in and tailor their platform for 6-7 states, and effectively prevents 80% of the country's vote from "mattering" is kinda flawed, no?

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

everyone here agrees it's unfair

k3vin k., Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

The counterargument you'll get from that though is that it will simply reverse the situation and candidates will campaign mostly in CA, NY, FL, TX and a few other urban enclaves, ignoring the rest of the country. It's an argument I don't happen to buy for a variety of reasons, but it's one opponents of eliminating the EC will make while relying heavily on "baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet" imagery that still sells.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

electoral college is obv dumb and while it looks like we lost 00 and 16 because of it mostly due to unhappy accident, if the midwest keeps turning red we could be in a position where it's actually kinda fixed against us for an extended period.

but getting rid of it is not in the realm of the possible

― iatee

all right, let's hold it there.

one, "unhappy accident" is garbage, there has been a concerted effort by the republican party for the past 16 years to undermine democracy, suppress voter turnout, etc. not the main point, though.

two, we want to increase engagement in the democratic system? we just had an election where the two leading candidates were the most hated man in america and the most hated woman in america. the most hated man in america, a self-confessed serial sexual abuser, lost by several million votes and won the election.

and now people are saying "well maybe we shouldn't have a system where someone who loses the popular vote by several million votes doesn't wind up winning the election", and our response is to what, say, how naive, and start educating them about realpolitik?

how is this not the politics of futility in action? should we perhaps consider basing our politics first off in what is right, and using that appeal to galvanize involvement?

yeah, it's not going to be accomplished immediately, and if we set it out as an immediate objective you're going to generate tons of disillusion and failure, but this, i would say, makes a really great galvanizing long-term goal. it has an immediate and broad appeal to say that the president should be the person who wins the most votes. why on earth, when faced with people speaking out about what they want, is our first reaction to tell them why it's not _possible_?

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

there are no long-term goals.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:02 (seven years ago) link

Focusing on a hard to achieve long term goal is one thing. Doing that with no mechanism in mind for achieving it is another. The only remotely feasible way to change the electoral college is to win back enough state legislatures to pass NPV in states totaling 270 electoral votes (or the even harder road of winning back enough state legislatures to amend the constitution).

If you think you can use the electoral college as an issue to organize people to turn out in off-year elections to vote out republican state legislators, I'm all for it. What concerns me is vague ideas about what should change with no strategy.

BUT, caveat, you're talking about a massive effort to change what seems unfair to us "right now" because it just produced a result we don't like, when there's nothing stopping us from just fighting a better fight under the current rules, and when, if we do change the rules, the GOP will change their strategy to match anyway. Hillary Clinton's campaign practically acted as though national popular vote was already a reality and the electoral college was already gone.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

I mean, yeah, maybe midterm campaigns could focus on that. Maybe prospective state legislators could campaign on promising to introduce "fair elections" legislation that would make sure presidential votes "reflect the will of the people" or something.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:08 (seven years ago) link

yeah, it's not going to be accomplished immediately, and if we set it out as an immediate objective you're going to generate tons of disillusion and failure, but this, i would say, makes a really great galvanizing long-term goal. it has an immediate and broad appeal to say that the president should be the person who wins the most votes. why on earth, when faced with people speaking out about what they want, is our first reaction to tell them why it's not _possible_?

because you have to get people who currently are winning elections off this system and states that greatly benefit from its existence on board, not just people who are pissed off and disillusioned

iatee, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

I guess my point here is, to anyone frustrated with Trump's win, we already have much more immediate and achievable political tools to fight him with than changing the rules by which he won the election -- they are called congress and state governments, and they would put a big check on Trump's power. And we have an uphill but non-impossible fight to retake congress or at least decrease their majorities only two years from now, or at very least god forbid keep the GOP from widening their majority. In the face of that very immediate and huge and important task, focusing on the electoral college feels a little like yelling at the gods, unless you think you can use it to turn people out to vote in red/purple states in 2018.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

yeah, it's not going to be accomplished immediately, and if we set it out as an immediate objective you're going to generate tons of disillusion and failure, but this, i would say, makes a really great galvanizing long-term goal. it has an immediate and broad appeal to say that the president should be the person who wins the most votes. why on earth, when faced with people speaking out about what they want, is our first reaction to tell them why it's not _possible_?

because you have to get people who currently are winning elections off this system and states that greatly benefit from its existence on board, not just people who are pissed off and disillusioned

― iatee, Tuesday, December 20, 2016 1:10 PM (forty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^

marcos, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

man alive otm too

marcos, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

Hillary Clinton's campaign practically acted as though national popular vote was already a reality and the electoral college was already gone.

I wasn't in her inner circle, but this strategy would make much more sense if she thought she already had the electoral college win nailed down, which may have looked true in mid-October when final media buys were being made. During the final week or so she was doing the vast majority of her campaigning in states she narrowly lost, so she apparently understood the situation by then. That Comey shit was a very late development.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:09 (seven years ago) link

the adage of 'whoever is in the headlines is currently losing the election' came true imo.. trump was almost invisible during the last week of the campaign just sitting back ranting bs about draining the swamp.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

meanwhile it was all comey and wikileaks over and over and over

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

Nate Silver's analysis on late breaking voters going 2:1 for Trump definitely supports that. It's not unreasonable to say Comey singlehandedly swung the election.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Oh good, so we should do everything exactly the same next time because nothing unexpected will happen at the last minute in future elections.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

stopppppppppppppppppppppp

xp

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

In the Louisiana runoff, when Kennedy led Campbell by 14-16 points and was considered a lock, the GOP opened ten field offices and sent in Pence and Trump to campaign for Kennedy to make sure the democratic surge couldn't succeed. They were virtually assured victory and they cemented it. The Clinton campaign saw 5-7 point leads in battleground states and directed resources elsewhere.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:22 (seven years ago) link

One more iteration of "It's not unreasonable to say ______ singlehandedly swung the election" will convince me we need to destroy the donkey party FIRST.

Total turnout in that La. Senate race: 29%. It's hard to believe the Dems could do worse if they were intentionally tanking.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:23 (seven years ago) link

Generals are notorious for entering each new war fully prepared to fight the previous one. Obviously, we should follow their example, evaluate the Clinton campaign in exhaustive detail and follow strategies in 2020 crafted to counteract each mistake she made in 2016. Because we'll need to know how to win in 2016.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:26 (seven years ago) link

It's not unreasonable to say that hyperbolic reductionism singlehandedly swung the election.

Froyo On My Slacks (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:35 (seven years ago) link

I've got Podesta on the line now. Should I tell him we're almost there? He's got an otm ready to wire us for the most succinct and devastating rewording of the issues yet.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

what do you suggest we do, Evan?

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

I'm just poking fun. Only trying to echo sentiments that the analysis phase is a bit done to death at this point. I'm more interested in the posts with exactly that- the suggestions of what to do now.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

Anything but this shit (my name is also Evan as it happens)

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

This is truly a question for all Evans out there.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

agree (also an evan)

jason waterfalls (gbx), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

frogbs I have some bad news. Every other poster on this board is just yet another alt account of mine. Just you and me, buddy. Sorry.

Evan, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link

In times of strife, we look to the Evans for guidance.

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

The Clinton campaign saw 5-7 point leads in battleground states and directed resources elsewhere.

this always seemed like a confusing strategy to me. you don't get bonus points for winning georgia and arizona. you either win or you lose.

iatee, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:49 (seven years ago) link

kinda trying to approach this like a fan of a football team - the teams that regularly lose key games and go on a rampage of sacking everyone and rewiring everything from the ground up are the ones generally doomed to a decade of mediocrity.

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:54 (seven years ago) link

you don't get bonus points for winning georgia and arizona. you either win or you lose.

iirc, you do get bonus points, in the form of more EC votes, and running up your EC vote and your popular vote totals strengthens your argument for that mysterious 'mandate' thing when dealing with a hostile Congress. A senator from Georgia or Arizona is going to be easier to persuade your way if you won their state, and a Representative, too, if you won their district, or even came damn close.

But this is more to explain the possible basis for their thinking than to endorse it, since they obv failed to win the main prize.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

They also tried to run up the popular vote by sending resources to places like Chicago.

Still not clear on how the mandate magic is supposed to work, did it help in the last six years?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

above logic makes sense in theory, just has very little relation to reality, where republican congresspeople are way more concerned w/ being primaried than they are w/ demonstrating that they're a moderate

iatee, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

mandate magic is a bit like consumer confidence, or the bandwagon effect. it's about creating a widespread feeling that the balance of power has shifted to the winner.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

you don't get bonus points for winning georgia and arizona. you either win or you lose.

iirc, you do get bonus points, in the form of more EC votes, and running up your EC vote and your popular vote totals strengthens your argument for that mysterious 'mandate' thing when dealing with a hostile Congress. A senator from Georgia or Arizona is going to be easier to persuade your way if you won their state, and a Representative, too, if you won their district, or even came damn close.

also some downballot effects, in theory

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 20:28 (seven years ago) link

mandate magic is a bit like consumer confidence, or the bandwagon effect. it's about creating a widespread feeling that the balance of power has shifted to the winner.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:05 PM (forty-four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

and it can evaporate the second an opposition party decides to obstruct everything

marcos, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

I mean they clearly did all this stuff because they thought they were going to win those states and didn't need to do anymore, and that was clearly overconfident of them. I don't think "avoid hubris" is fighting the last war.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

From TPM:

The following is from a former federal prosecutor with deep experience in public corruption investigations and prosecutions.

"I've reviewed the redacted search warrant that the Court unsealed today.

It confirms what we assumed all along: (1) prior to seeking the warrant and to Comey issuing his letter, the FBI had no idea whether these were new emails, or duplicates of emails they previously reviewed--all they could see was non-content header information (to and from); (2) the FBI had no information to suggest that the emails were improperly withheld from them previously; and (3) the FBI had no facts to justify the urgency in seeking a review of the emails prior to the election. This latter point is key. Generally, DOJ policy commands that prosecutors and agents refrain from taking investigative steps (even non-public steps like seeking search warrants) within 60 days of an election in a politically sensitive matter.
Bottom line: nothing new, no urgency, no obstruction, no reason to defy longstanding DOJ policy and risk affecting the election. And there was simply no basis for Comey's decision to make matters worse by issuing a public letter to Congress.

If the prospect of a Trump-appointed FBI chief weren't so scary, there is no question that Comey should be unemployed right now.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm as prone to panic as anyone, but ... until Trump won people were writing obituaries for the GOP (as they are wont to do). And then suddenly ... people were writing obituaries for the Democrats. Which is to say, as bad as things seem it's not inconceivable that things can flip again in the next fews years, depending.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:46 (seven years ago) link

yes for all the "most polarized parties" ever stuff (except on surveillance, perpetual war etc), national elections turn on "Let's give Row A a chance..."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

there was a good article about that after the election - both parties went through some dire times in the last 15 years, both bounced back rather quickly

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:02 (seven years ago) link

that said the GOP does seem pretty sinister this go-round with respect to rigging things, dropping their standards, and abusing their power, so we'll see

frogbs, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:03 (seven years ago) link

yes expect the worst, especially given two generations of Dem 'centrism'

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

I read the fbi warrant and got pissed. Confirmed my suspicions that they didn't do a de-dupe across document collections. All they did was eyeball the metadata then sent their letter to our boy Chaffetz, who then leaked the fucking shit out of it to the media.

I dont know the details for what docs they have collected and what resources they have but I'm a paralegal who deals with this kind of shit every day. I know how easy it is to reduce emails, etc to an MD5 hash value and cross reference them against each other to de-dupe. the warrant says they have fornesic images of all this shit. if they had access to litigation support software you could run a hash dedupe in about a day.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

Vanity Fair sez "impeach"

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/12/donald-trump-conflicts-of-interest-impeach

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

article is a joke, makes no mention of how impeachment actually works or the political maneuvering that would be necessary

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

fair enough but I thought you were in favor of impeachment proceedings?

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

(also I think anything hammering on Kuwaitigate is good at this point)

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

I am but that article's mostly just "gosh, sure looks like Trump is already doing things that are grounds for impeachment" which is sort of well duh

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

I mean unlike the GOP with Obama, I don't think we're going to be at a loss for grounds for impeachment. There's gonna be shit from day 1.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:23 (seven years ago) link

the real problem is leveraging the necessary political capital/driving wedges in the GOP to turn on Trump

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

or alternatively just loudly clamoring for impeachment/highlighting all the illegal shit so that Dems take back the House in 2018 mid-terms

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

agreed, for sure, I see it as a rallying point rather than the one path to victory

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:25 (seven years ago) link

Xpost Amazingly, we might get shit well before that!

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:25 (seven years ago) link

I probably said this already but it's unpresidented to have someone entering office with a) this low an approval rating and b) already beset with scandals. this is political capital and we need to pressure Dems to use it.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

i know we cant/shouldnt jump on every inane thing he says on twitter but this is really something, almost self-parody

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 8m8 minutes ago
I would have done even better in the election, if that is possible, if the winner was based on popular vote - but would campaign differently

jason waterfalls (gbx), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:34 (seven years ago) link

good mourning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:36 (seven years ago) link

they thought they were going to win those states and didn't need to do anymore, and that was clearly overconfident of them

Well, perhaps they merely did precisely what almost everyone else who follows politics was doing, which was to look at polls and aggregators and 538 and RCP and the Upshot and PEC. I know I was. And while 538 saw more uncertainty than other aggregators (and were roundly mocked as an outlier), they still were confidently predicting comfortable Clinton wins in exactly "those" states.

"I tend to believe in the indicators everybody else appears to believe in" looks like overconfidence in retrospect, because the indicators were wrong.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

they raised a record amount of money, over a billion dollars, why not spend it? especially if it is to defeat a "existential threat"? hard to believe that line when the one campaign that could've prevented it stops at "good enough".

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:06 (seven years ago) link

I would have done even better in the election, if that is possible

lol

frogbs, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

How many people are there in the US? 300 million or so? I could've gotten at least 350 million votes if I really wanted to.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:43 (seven years ago) link

i heard miNewt on NPR this morning, again advocating his novel advanced-planning recommendation on pardons.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a51696/newt-gingrich-trump-pardons/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

That's going to go over well

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

I dont know the details for what docs they have collected and what resources they have but I'm a paralegal who deals with this kind of shit every day. I know how easy it is to reduce emails, etc to an MD5 hash value and cross reference them against each other to de-dupe. the warrant says they have fornesic images of all this shit. if they had access to litigation support software you could run a hash dedupe in about a day.

I write litigation support software and this is 100% OTM.

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

i was asked to solve the same problem with the enron email dataset for a prescreen with a tech company and did it on my creaky laptop in about an hour and a half.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

there was also an interesting subquestion: who replies to emails the quickest? turns out there was a crazy guy at enron who replied in like 90 seconds to emails he sent to himself.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

My :15 of fame was working on the Enron trial

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/04/13/a-dash-of-goth-in-a-sea-of-rep-ties/

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

Focusing on a hard to achieve long term goal is one thing. Doing that with no mechanism in mind for achieving it is another. The only remotely feasible way to change the electoral college is to win back enough state legislatures to pass NPV in states totaling 270 electoral votes (or the even harder road of winning back enough state legislatures to amend the constitution).

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive)

Ah! Now that looks like a strategy. Moreover, it's a strategy that, if successful, would have significant and tangible benefits well beyond simply repealing the electoral college, a strategy we honestly NEED to pursue because if we don't take the state legislatures the system is going to become more and more rigged.

My thinking on this is that populism is a major, major force in America today, and it's a politically non-aligned force. To achieve anything, anything at all, an anti-Trump coalition is going to need to appeal to populists. Saying that the electoral college is rigged and we need to get rid of it is going to have a lot of appeal to people with little to no knowledge or understanding of politics, people who have been conditioned to value direct democracy and the power of the individual vote above all else.

Am I saying that people should focus on it, even as a primary motive? No, absolutely not. The first priority should be opposing Trump. But man, I don't really see a lot of downside to saying "We need to fix our corrupt system by getting rid of the electoral college".

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

i know we cant/shouldnt jump on every inane thing he says on twitter but this is really something, almost self-parody

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 8m8 minutes ago
I would have done even better in the election, if that is possible, if the winner was based on popular vote - but would campaign differently

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Wednesday, December 21, 2016 8:34 AM (three hours ago) Bookmark

he's biting his own tweet here

, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 17:30 (seven years ago) link

i really believe the dude is suffering from a mental disorder.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

He is addicted to validation that he is a winner and keeps perpetually chasing the dragon. Nothing is good enough anymore.

Evan, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 17:43 (seven years ago) link

Even many of his supporters seem to have voted for him because or in spite of his issues. I can't imagine there are many people who don't think he's mentally ill.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 17:59 (seven years ago) link

Newt Gingrich said Wednesday that Donald Trump’s “drain the swamp” catch phrase was “cute” but that the President-elect now disclaims it.

During an interview with NPR’s “Morning Edition” Wednesday, host Rachel Martin asked if the former House speaker had been “working in the swamp, to use Donald Trump’s language.”

“I’m told he now just disclaims that. He now says it was cute, but he doesn't want to use it anymore,” Gingrich said, referring to the phrase. “I'd written what I thought was a very cute tweet about ‘the alligators are complaining,’ and somebody wrote back and said they were tired of hearing this stuff.”

it was clear he didn't believe it in, but kind of surprised to see him get rid of the catchphrase a month before inauguration. better now than later, i guess.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:12 (seven years ago) link

newts love swamps iirc

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link

Lefty Blue America fundraiser and blogger Howie Klein is not optimistic for Dems re 2018

The Senate is a lost cause. Ignore the DSCC, Chuck Schumer and the Senate elections in general. We'd be better off if they choke on their own vomit after shoveling their crap, loser candidates like Patrick Murphy, Katie McGinty, Ann Kirkpatrick, Patty Judge and Ted Strickland down everyone's throats. They'll lose more seats in 2018. Don't worry about it and don't put a nickel into anything but helping defend (directly, never through the DSCC) Tammy Baldwin (WI) and Sherrod Brown (OH). The action for 2018 is all in the House. The Democrats have to come out with a net gain 24 seats to put a brake on Trumpism. (In reality they need more than 24 seats because of so many Democratic collaborators among the New Dems and Blue Dogs, but let's call it 24 seats for the sake of argument.)

How to win back the House? Offer a more attractive alternative to the destruction Trump and Ryan are promising. Sounds simple, right? Yet when people on Twitter started buzzing Monday how the Republicans had stabbed American workers in the back by excising Buy American provisions out of a water infrastructure bill, I felt the obligation of explaining to them that so many Democrats voted for it that it was completely negated as a campaign issue. https://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2016/12/how-much-pain-do-republicans-have-to.html

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link


My thinking on this is that populism is a major, major force in America today, and it's a politically non-aligned force. To achieve anything, anything at all, an anti-Trump coalition is going to need to appeal to populists. Saying that the electoral college is rigged and we need to get rid of it is going to have a lot of appeal to people with little to no knowledge or understanding of politics, people who have been conditioned to value direct democracy and the power of the individual vote above all else.

Am I saying that people should focus on it, even as a primary motive? No, absolutely not. The first priority should be opposing Trump. But man, I don't really see a lot of downside to saying "We need to fix our corrupt system by getting rid of the electoral college"

the electoral college is neither rigged nor corrupt. it's just dumb.

middle american populist rage is probably not going to be channeled towards tearing down an voting system that gives disproportionate voting power to middle american populist rage.

iatee, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

'an voting system' = 'a voting system'

iatee, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

Klein quotes are great

i'd be willing to supply my own vomit to Schumer

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

More on the issues Howie Klein writes about---

Can the 2/3 progressive Dems in the House win over this 1/3, plus voters

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/229291-stephanie-murphy-joining-blue-dogs-new-democrats

The combined membership of the New Democrat Coalition and the Blue Dog Coalition represents more than one-third of the Democratic caucus.

Both coalitions have strong bipartisan reputations and a history of working with Republicans. Murphy said she will work with her New Dem colleagues to advocate legislation that strengthens our nation’s middle class and will work with her Blue Dog colleagues to help introduce No Budget, No Pay, which says Members of Congress must pass a budget and appropriations bills on time or they don’t get paid.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:41 (seven years ago) link

Ugh to wasting time on Blue Dog ideas

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:42 (seven years ago) link

But I do worry about losing more seats in the Senate unlike sometimes nihilist purist Howie Klein

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

LOL, fucking idiot.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-38397644

The Doug Walters of Crime (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:47 (seven years ago) link

I know Alan Grayson makes pepole wretch, but the link to this interview in Klein's post is a good one:

“Unless there is substantial structural change, the Blue Dogs will continue to make the argument that a populist Democrat, or for that matter a progressive Democrat, which is not exactly the same thing, has no chance of winning – because that’s the way they continue to dominate the statewide machinery,” Grayson said. “Even though they’ve been proved wrong in every single race except for Alex Sink’s race for CFO, every single race for a quarter century.”

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/229174-alan-grayson-florida-democrats-need-someone-message

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

he seems like an interesting choice for 'people to go to for advice about winning elections'

iatee, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

Thought that was good despite who said it. Too bad Grayson's faults and loss will hurt the reception of that message.

Meanwhile in a related issue --

Garland is not the only judge, who won't get a vote

https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/dozens-of-obamas-judicial-nominees-including-historic-picks?utm_term=.rfXKrNbjY#.vqBVY1Xwr

Abid Qureshi, nominated to the federal bench by President Obama in the fall, would have been the nation’s first Muslim federal judge had the Senate confirmed him. But nominated late in a presidential election year, when traditionally few nominees get a vote, time — and politics — were always against him.
With the US Senate gone for the rest of the year, Qureshi is one of 52 nominees for federal district and appeals courts and the US Supreme Court who won’t make it onto the bench, at least for now. That group includes more than a dozen nominees who, like Qureshi, would have broken racial, gender, and religious barriers....

...The Senate confirmed 20 judges to federal district and appeals courts during Obama’s final two years in office, and left for the holiday recess with 99 court vacancies. More seats are expected to open up by the time Trump takes office in January. Of the vacant seats, 38 are considered “emergencies” by the judiciary because of the caseload. Those numbers don’t include the US Court of International Trade and the US Court of Federal Claims, where there are also open seats.
By comparison, the Senate confirmed 68 federal judges during President George W. Bush’s last two years, according to the judiciary. By the end of December 2008, there were 26 nominees pending and 53 vacancies.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

middle american populist rage is probably not going to be channeled towards tearing down an voting system that gives disproportionate voting power to middle american populist rage.

― iatee

because these people have never voted against their own interests before, right? :)

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:24 (seven years ago) link

Those people are not going to willingly give more representative power to Ny and cali come on

Treeship, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

Even many of his supporters seem to have voted for him because or in spite of his issues. I can't imagine there are many people who don't think he's mentally ill.

― what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:59 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I don't know I'm having a really hard time imagining this comment not resulting in a giant cartoonish eye roll from 90% of his supporters...

Evan, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:28 (seven years ago) link

Those people are not going to willingly give more representative power to Ny and cali come on

― Treeship

sigh. y'all are such despair bears! you think it's not possible to sell this by pinning it all on those horrible undemocratic assholes in, i don't know, wyoming?

really, i'm not totally sure what the long-term plan is here. to win back the congress by building a coalition of people whose first priority is to shoot down any idea they personally think is stupid? because "stupid but popular" will beat "considered and nuanced" every damn time.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:41 (seven years ago) link

@dick_nixon
Half the Hill is run by kids who watch "West Wing," the other the American "House of Cards." It's no wonder we're going to hell.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:44 (seven years ago) link

such a shame vaughn meader didn't live long enough to get a twitter account

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

JFK is nuthin w/out the accent

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't using the popular vote give *less* representative power to the big lefty states? The righty votes from these states would now matter, rather than the entire state tally going to the Dem.

nickn, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't using the popular vote give *less* representative power to the big lefty states? The righty votes from these states would now matter, rather than the entire state tally going to the Dem.

― nickn

i don't know, but your argument is plausible, and i will definitely use it with the next populist i'm still on speaking terms with.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

sigh. y'all are such despair bears! you think it's not possible to sell this by pinning it all on those horrible undemocratic assholes in, i don't know, wyoming?

dude it's just really fucking annoying to see someone be super optimistic when things look as bleak as they do. just wallow with the rest of us and drop the act

k3vin k., Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:58 (seven years ago) link

i mean it's clear you haven't even given any thought to these dumb pipe dreams you're selling. what's the point?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 21 December 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

really, i'm not totally sure what the long-term plan is here. to win back the congress by building a coalition of people whose first priority is to shoot down any idea they personally think is stupid? because "stupid but popular" will beat "considered and nuanced" every damn time.

'are you interested in joining our movement to subvert the electoral college using something called the national popular vote interstate compact' probably falls under 'considered and nuanced'

iatee, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

Making the popular vote count would help to engage a lot of people who otherwise abstain from voting, I'm sure. When I lived in IN, there was usually no point in voting D ('08 was SHOCKING), so most people I knew didn't even bother.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

A reporter asked Trump about his Muslim ban in the context of the attack on a Christmas market in Berlin that left 12 dead. The suspected perpetrator is Anis Amri, a Tunisian who German authorities say was known to be in touch with radical Islamist groups.
“Has the attack caused you to rethink or reevaluate your plans to create a Muslim registry or ban Muslim immigration in the United States?” the reporter asked.
“Hey, you’ve known my plans all along and it’s, they’ve proven to be right. 100 percent correct. What’s happening is disgraceful,” he replied.
Indeed, the December 2015 statement in which Trump called “for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on” is still on Trump’s website.

Trump then had to be reminded by another reporter that his own statement about the Berlin attack characterized it as an example of “ISIS and other Islamist terrorists continually slaughtering Christians in their communities and places of worship as part of their global jihad.”
The reporter asked him, “Your comments about the attack in Berlin being against Christians, do you think that might —”
“Who said that, when did, when was that said?” Trump replied.
“I believe you said it in a press release,” the reporter reminded him.
“It’s an attack on humanity. That’s what it is, it’s an attack on humanity and it’s got to be stopped. Thank you.” Trump replied, ending the availability.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't using the popular vote give *less* representative power to the big lefty states? The righty votes from these states would now matter, rather than the entire state tally going to the Dem.

there are lots of republicans in california, but the opposite of this is also true - there are more democrats in texas than in massachusetts and their votes aren't doing much at the moment. it's usually close to a wash. it's not inconceivable that the electoral college map could actually be structurally favorable to dems at some point in the near future. in 2004 we would have won the election despite losing the popular vote if something like 60,000 people in ohio had switched their vote.

the real constant is that the system benefits small states (who get 3 votes no matter how few people live there) and swing states (where voters have disproportionate ability to actually turn the election). with a popular vote, population centers would all become vastly more important in the campaign, so urban california and new york, but texas too. I suspect that ultimately the dems would benefit overall from a popular vote in ways that aren't reflected in current numbers cause massive gotv operations in LA and NYC would lead to turnout in those places being a lot higher than it is today.

iatee, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:32 (seven years ago) link

Doesn't using the popular vote give *less* representative power to the big lefty states?

A glance at the past few elections shows the Dems winning the popular vote in presidential elections 4 of the past 5, but winning the presidency only 2 of the past 5. Seems like that answers your question.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:36 (seven years ago) link

Making the popular vote count would help to engage a lot of people who otherwise abstain from voting, I'm sure. When I lived in IN, there was usually no point in voting D ('08 was SHOCKING), so most people I knew didn't even bother.

exactly - I do wonder how switching over would affect turnout. If I lived in NY or AL I dunno if I'd take time off work to vote, honestly

frogbs, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure you could solve voter suppression/id, turnout issues, etc by making voting mandatory and agreeing on a system of implementation and enforcement by small fines, etc.

then again someone dickhead will argue its 'unamerican'.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

or having it on a Sunday?

frogbs, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:47 (seven years ago) link

'are you interested in joining our movement to subvert the electoral college using something called the national popular vote interstate compact' probably falls under 'considered and nuanced'

― iatee

wow is that your idea of a sales pitch? i was thinking more like "one person, one vote" myself but if your proposed slogan tests better with focus groups i'm certainly open to amending it

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

xpost everyone knows we can't hold a vote on a sunday. how will the farmers get back to their crops on time for the workweek?

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:50 (seven years ago) link

dude it's just really fucking annoying to see someone be super optimistic when things look as bleak as they do. just wallow with the rest of us and drop the act

― k3vin k.

ok, i guess i need to establish some bona fides. yes, i confront despair on a daily basis. i see no practical cause for optimism, no practical cause to believe that things will get better in my lifetime.

but i decided not to kill myself. and if i'm not going to kill myself, i have to do _something_ to pass the time, even if the odds are against it, even if in all likelihood it's futile. and in the past months, all of my trust in human nature, all of my assumptions about humanity have fallen away. i have lost pretty much everything of worth this year except for my values and beliefs. that's the only purpose to my existence right now. i don't see any reason _anybody_ should continue living right now except to advocate for and defend their values and beliefs.

so no, i'm not going to accept futility, i'm not going to accept a permanent state of despair, not while i'm still breathing. if it helps you to visualize my dead eyes when reading my posts, go ahead and do so.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

xpost everyone knows we can't hold a vote on a sunday. how will the farmers get back to their crops on time for the workweek?

― Karl Malone, Wednesday, December 21, 2016 8:50 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

or get in the way of people's designated time for worshiping christ

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

or watching the nfl, which is the same

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

it's important for us to go down guns blazin' like Butch & Sundance

that means the womenfolk (Katharine Ross) can go home

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

pretty sure you could solve voter suppression/id, turnout issues, etc by making voting mandatory and agreeing on a system of implementation and enforcement by small fines, etc.

then again someone dickhead will argue its 'unamerican'.

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, December 21, 2016 8:45 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is not unamerican, it's just silly. Belgium has this system, where its mandatory. In theory you can get fined about $30 if you don't vote (voting 'blanco' ie. nothing is allowed), abstaining four times could get your voting right revoked. But the administrative hassle too big for the state to actually act up on fines etc.

In principle I think everyone has the right to not vote, not care. Trying to make every vote count in your country seems like a better idea than forcing people to vote.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 20:58 (seven years ago) link

so no, i'm not going to accept futility, i'm not going to accept a permanent state of despair, not while i'm still breathing. if it helps you to visualize my dead eyes when reading my posts, go ahead and do so.

you don't have to accept futility, but putting mental or emotional energy into anything that requires republican cooperation is a pretty bad plan. we all agree the electoral college is just the worst. (okay, second worst, after the senate.) but overhauling our system of electing presidents isn't something that can happen until most of the country is on board. it is not inconceivable that one day republicans will decide that the electoral college is bad and they too oppose it. it is likely that that will be the day after it costs them an election and not immediately after it wins them one. until then we have to work within the system we're stuck with.

iatee, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

President-elect Donald Trump's doctor recently gave an interview to a health publication and then threatened to end the reporter's career if he published it.

STAT News sat down with Trump's doctor, Harold Bornstein, for three hours earlier this month for his first interview since the election.

Bornstein seemed unconcerned about the effect the stress of the presidency could have on Trump, who is in line to be the oldest any US president has been on Inauguration Day.

"If something happens to him, then it happens to him," Bornstein told STAT News. "It's like all the rest of us, no? That's why we have a vice president and a speaker of the House and a whole line of people. They can just keep dying."

Five days after the interview, STAT reported, Bornstein told the publication he didn't want any photos or an article from the interview to be published.

"I happen to have known the Sulzbergers for 50 years," Bornstein told STAT, referring to the family that publishes The New York Times. "I'm going to make sure you don't ever work again if you do this."

Needless to say, the story was published: http://www.businessinsider.com/stat-interview-harold-bornstein-donald-trump-doctor-2016-12

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

where have I heard the "if he dies, he dies" line before

frogbs, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

The back of his business cards are written in Italian, with the phrase "dottore molto famoso," or "very famous doctor," below his name. (For 10 years, he took private Italian lessons from women he found through Craigslist postings, paying them about $60 an hour for weekly sessions, he said.)

Uh-huh.

JoeStork, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

Mods can we change thread title to "wallowing in..."

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

sorry for having made the No Ideas Gang feel like pale imitations of larry appleton

If I said stuff with hope or ideas in it please feel free to FP

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

...Mulvaney is one of them. In June, he conceded there had been surprisingly little conservative opposition to Trump but promised that Freedom Caucus members would hold the Republican nominee to the same standard as they did to Obama — particularly on the issue of executive power. “I’m not concerned about Donald Trump shredding the Constitution, because I know the people who stand in the House between him and the Constitution,” Mulvaney told me at the time. “We’ve been fighting against an imperial presidency for five and a half years. Every time we go to the floor and push back against an overreaching president, we get accused of being partisan at best and racist at worst. When we do it against a Republican president, maybe people will see that it was a principled objection in the first place. So we actually welcome that opportunity. It might actually be fun, being a strict-constitutionalist congressman doing battle with a non-strict-constitutionalist Republican president.” Instead, he’s joining Trump’s administration. Mulvaney was recently named director of the Office of Management and Budget, the powerful agency that supervises and coordinates the government’s financial planning.

one of many fun little tidbits in http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443236/donald-trump-conservatism-right-wing-future

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 00:32 (seven years ago) link

These dueling outlooks frame an essential and defining question for Republicans entering the era of Trump: With unified control of government and a president who bullied his way into the White House, will Congress dare to flout recent history and serve as a principled check on the executive?

aaaaahh!
aaah haahaha! hahahahahaha!!! aaaahhaahaaahahahaaAAAA! HA!!!! HAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!! AAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
AAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAYES YES YES YAHAHAHAHHAHAHA AOHHAHAHHWOOOOOAAAAAAAAAhttp://i.giphy.com/FYnYcQoFmlPeU.gif
http://i.giphy.com/4EAsUT8kcgIta.gif

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 00:41 (seven years ago) link

I'm definitely getting the feeling that WH staff are trying to give it their best shot heading into January but are also so ready to take a nice 2+ month vacation very far away

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 00:44 (seven years ago) link

sorry for having made the No Ideas Gang feel like pale imitations of larry appleton

If I said stuff with hope or ideas in it please feel free to FP

― a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, December 21, 2016 11:50 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Don't let my doom and gloom influence or persuade you to any degree, I have my own idiosyncratic reasons for reacting like that, and they're short-term reactions anyway. Doing something's better than doing nothing, I just hope people do things differently than the ways that got us here in the first place.

larry appleton, Thursday, 22 December 2016 00:54 (seven years ago) link

Lol chris hayes's segment on Trump's doctor

Treeship, Thursday, 22 December 2016 01:35 (seven years ago) link

well FWIW probably shouldn't take my bitter rage at the wallowers and pessimists as anything more than sour grapes because we're all doomed

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 01:47 (seven years ago) link

zackly

I just hope people do things differently than the ways that got us here in the first place.

may i introduce you to the Democratic party?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

what is the point of this withering fatalism about the democrats, morbs?

Treeship, Thursday, 22 December 2016 01:58 (seven years ago) link

sisyphean effort to teach you dang whippersnappers a thing or two

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 01:59 (seven years ago) link

I'm just kind of hung up on their signature achievement of the last 25 years being dismantling the New Deal.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:11 (seven years ago) link

I'm just kind of hung up on their signature achievement of the last 25 years being dismantling the New Deal.
and all signs point to the great lesson they learned from this-next time, don't get caught

Iago Galdston, Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:13 (seven years ago) link

Morbs wants a Democratic Party that actively fights for the poor, minorities and working class. He is constantly disappointed because there are only a smattering of Democrats who meet his demanding criteria, not nearly enough to produce the results he craves. He's an embittered idealist. There are worse things to be, but his bitterness (on ilx at least) has very little sweetness to temper it.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:14 (seven years ago) link

well, as Bea Arthur once said to Rufus Wainwright, "I'm not your fucking grandmother."

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:19 (seven years ago) link

thread moves fast (and painfully); has this shown up yet
http://www.allamericanball.com/entertainment/

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:27 (seven years ago) link

Get ready to party like never before!!!

Get ready for a magical night of music, fun and excitement. The All American Inaugural Ball is a toast to American culture, featuring a stellar list of special guests, plus multiple areas of entertainment and attractions, which represent the diversity, energy and promise of America.

There are FIVE large party zones, featuring NINE amazing acts and FOUR dance floors, plus several strolling entertainers, celebrity speakers and interactive attractions.

Non-stop Entertainment – Five Party Zones:
American Hero Ball Room: (Live music & DJs playing mix of popular dance music; American Hero Award Ceremony)
New York, New York Lounge: (Smooth tunes from the Rat Pack and others)
Decades Dance Club: (All hits from the `70, ’80s, ’90s and 2000s)
Red Elephant Dance Club: (Modern club dance music)
eNaugural Webcast Studio: (Filming a live webcast of the ball)

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:28 (seven years ago) link

featuring buzz aldrin, oliver north, a fox contributor, DJ Freedom and 80's cover band The Reagan Years
tapas plates and sliders with crudite!
also featuring a $250 presale cover!

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:30 (seven years ago) link

beyonce singing "at last" it ain't

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:31 (seven years ago) link

FWIW the Virginia GOP puts that thing on every four years regardless

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:34 (seven years ago) link

i'm just luxuriating in whatever schadenfreude i can get away with tbh

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:36 (seven years ago) link

listening to Barack and Michelle on CBS from a few days ago and realizing how huge the gap is between what "the country needs" i.e. calm resolve from the sitting POTUS - and what the country needs in terms of a vibrant and electrifying leader of the opposition i.e. not calm resolve at all more like verbal molotov chucking and angry disgust at the spineless GOP and shameful, embarrassing, insulting joke of a PE they're lining up behind

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 02:54 (seven years ago) link

FWIW the Virginia GOP puts that thing on every four years regardless

― a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Wednesday, December 21, 2016 9:34 PM (fifty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

looool

marcos, Thursday, 22 December 2016 03:27 (seven years ago) link

actually I have to redact that - it looks like it gets put on by a local company (http://gocityevents.com/) and they got, like, Ashley Judd for the 2013 one

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 03:36 (seven years ago) link

This article about the Trump cabal's inability to book anyone to sing for Il Douche is hilarious.

"If anyone does do it, I hope that the check that they get is in the nine figures. Because it’s probably the last check they’re ever going to get,” Dixie Chicks manager Simon Renshaw told TheWrap on Friday.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

$80,000,000, not enough. 100 million, now you're talking

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:09 (seven years ago) link

Maybe ABBA will do it.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:19 (seven years ago) link

arent there a ton of country singers who will do it

k3vin k., Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:27 (seven years ago) link

i will do it

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

even if it's the last check i ever get

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

it's called LIVING

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

i would do it for 100 million dollars tbh

k3vin k., Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link

but what if you agreed to do it and even signed a contract promising you wouldn't say something mean about trump, and then you got them to pay you in advance and then you sang this wild song that begins in a generically patriotic fashion before leaning into some of the more negative-sounding trump campaign language, then abruptly country-rocks so hard about how terrible trump is and how we will all regret the day, then busts into an impossibly catchy chorus indicting everyone in his entire cabinet, and soon it's a #1 hit single and everyone in the US knows the names of all the terrible cabinet members and why they suck so bad, so it becomes an educational political and revolutionary triumph as well, and then you use all the 9-figure inauguration money you got to launch a presidential challenge in 2020 and you easily win but as you're rolling into DC at the helm of your platoon of Revolution X tanks you find out that trump won't accept it and is retweeting a bunch of shit about how you're the false prophet that triggers the apocalypse and it makes you so mad that you go ahead and try to make the apocalpyse happen and it's really violent but also you write a song about it that rocks so hard that it almost seems like the whole thing was worth ithttp://i.imgur.com/5uiAe7J.png

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 04:46 (seven years ago) link

kudos

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Thursday, 22 December 2016 06:15 (seven years ago) link

hahaaaaa

Nhex, Thursday, 22 December 2016 07:01 (seven years ago) link

in an otherwise bad article on vice there is this disturbing nugget:

The best-performing stock in the S&P 500 since Trump’s election has been none other than Transocean, the offshore driller that operated the Deepwater Horizon rig.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 07:32 (seven years ago) link

sorry for having made the No Ideas Gang feel like pale imitations of larry appleton

I dunno, I don't see much difference between embittered fatalism and pipe dreams about the abolition of the Electoral College. Not a single person here is in a position to effect the change that would matter (ie not losing every race other than President).

I have a negative net worth, live in a one-party state and I'm a former Wobblie who probably has some stone age social media lurking where I advocated the assassination of Dubya - I can't push the Democrats to have ideas or take a lead. Why don't Democrats get behind a popular issue like ending weed prohibition? It polls well, particularly with young people, it's fundamentally a social justice issue effecting one of the major Democratic constituencies most heavily, it's an economic boon... but the closest the party can get is Hillary saying she'd only make it the same as oxycontin legally.

They're afraid of getting labeled soft on crime or the GOP being meanies, I suppose... I'm not sure how much longer a party afraid of being labelled can pretend to be relevant. It was terrible and craven when they caved to Dubya after 9/11, it will be worse this time.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 22 December 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

I'm no entirely certain that forcing people who don't want to vote, to vote, will combat the actual celebrity.

LOL, fucking idiot.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-38397644

On the positive side, 50% chance that Nicola Sturgeon can get Scotland recognised by the US for the price of a wind farm.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 22 December 2016 10:14 (seven years ago) link

I love you Karl Malone.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 December 2016 10:29 (seven years ago) link

but what if you agreed to do it and even signed a contract promising you wouldn't say something mean about trump, and then you got them to pay you in advance and then you sang this wild song that begins in a generically patriotic fashion before leaning into some of the more negative-sounding trump campaign language, then abruptly country-rocks so hard about how terrible trump is and how we will all regret the day, then busts into an impossibly catchy chorus indicting everyone in his entire cabinet, and soon it's a #1 hit single and everyone in the US knows the names of all the terrible cabinet members and why they suck so bad, so it becomes an educational political and revolutionary triumph as well, and then you use all the 9-figure inauguration money you got to launch a presidential challenge in 2020 and you easily win but as you're rolling into DC at the helm of your platoon of Revolution X tanks you find out that trump won't accept it and is retweeting a bunch of shit about how you're the false prophet that triggers the apocalypse and it makes you so mad that you go ahead and try to make the apocalpyse happen and it's really violent but also you write a song about it that rocks so hard that it almost seems like the whole thing was worth it

and first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and yes I said yes I will Yes.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 December 2016 12:24 (seven years ago) link

That scenario is impossible, Trump would never pay. Otherwise, spot on!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 December 2016 12:51 (seven years ago) link

One of the teensy scraps of hopeful thinking I cling to is the fact that Trump still hasn't really made any big public appearances before anyone but his supporters. The inauguration is going to open his eyes, I believe.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 13:15 (seven years ago) link

Not 'open his eyes' in the sense of inspiring self-reflection or thought but I mean actually forcing his little lizard slits to widen when he's face-to-face with the extent to which he's reviled.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 13:17 (seven years ago) link

It just better not be windy is all I'm saying

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 13:18 (seven years ago) link

given that he's spent more time since the election taunting Hillary Clinton than attending intelligence briefings, I really have no clue how that's going to go

frogbs, Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

you don't have to accept futility, but putting mental or emotional energy into anything that requires republican cooperation is a pretty bad plan. we all agree the electoral college is just the worst. (okay, second worst, after the senate.) but overhauling our system of electing presidents isn't something that can happen until most of the country is on board. it is not inconceivable that one day republicans will decide that the electoral college is bad and they too oppose it. it is likely that that will be the day after it costs them an election and not immediately after it wins them one. until then we have to work within the system we're stuck with.

― iatee

but this plan _doesn't_ require republican cooperation. all it requires is for democrats to gain control of the state governmental apparatus of states totalling 270 electoral votes, and promising to deliver popular things people want is a pretty good way of getting that control.

"we have to work within the system we're stuck with" feels to me like one of the worst things you can tell anybody right now if your goal is to improve things.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

"all it requires"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

I have a negative net worth, live in a one-party state and I'm a former Wobblie who probably has some stone age social media lurking where I advocated the assassination of Dubya - I can't push the Democrats to have ideas or take a lead. Why don't Democrats get behind a popular issue like ending weed prohibition? It polls well, particularly with young people, it's fundamentally a social justice issue effecting one of the major Democratic constituencies most heavily, it's an economic boon... but the closest the party can get is Hillary saying she'd only make it the same as oxycontin legally.

They're afraid of getting labeled soft on crime or the GOP being meanies, I suppose... I'm not sure how much longer a party afraid of being labelled can pretend to be relevant. It was terrible and craven when they caved to Dubya after 9/11, it will be worse this time.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z)

here's what i don't get about morbs-style embittered futility. the "mainstream democratic party" has never been weaker. their entire ideology has just failed disastrously. rather than ranting about how terrible donna brazile or whoever is, we should be moving in and taking over. nobody votes in primaries. if we just run candidates who inspire people to show up and send out counter-programming flyers against the Official Approved Party Candidates, the party will be ours.

seriously, all we have to do is start showing up to meetings every once in a while. this is not some insurmountable obstacle.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:34 (seven years ago) link

"all it requires"

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

it's _necessary_. if we don't do this, we are completely and totally fucked.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:35 (seven years ago) link

xp

absolutely. The Tea Party proved it's not as hard as people think to change the direction of a party with a relatively small group of committed activists. I don't think you'll see quite the same degree of focus on the left, but I think you'll see larger numbers of people getting involved.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:36 (seven years ago) link

I'm not doubting you! But it's a herculean task for which the Dems have shown no interest.

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:40 (seven years ago) link

"the Dems" are whoever pushes there way into the party. It's not some fixed institution with its members only appointed from the top. Show up at local party meetings, run for local office as a democrat, you're a democrat. A lot of county dem organizations are barely functional and could easily be taken over.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:42 (seven years ago) link

it's _necessary_. if we don't do this, we are completely and totally fucked.

or we just do a better job campaigning in swing states. the electoral college is pretty annoying but overhauling it doesn't actually guarantee us anything in the future. even if the dems found themselves in a spot where they could make this happen via controlling 270 state electoral votes, that plan only works until exactly one of those states gets a republican government, which does actually happen once in a while. real change is only going to happen once there's broad consensus, not via some loophole. and there's no *worse* time to be looking for broad consensus on the subject, because republicans who probably didn't have a strong opinion on the electoral college a year ago now believe that it is a very good and necessary thing.

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

I had this realization this election cycle, when I was also feeling frustrated with the Democratic party and how terrible it seems to have gotten -- I thought back to my college years, and remembered who the campus democrats were, and how annoying and corny they seemed. Student government dorks, etc. And suddenly I thought "those people are the people moving into power positions in the democratic party now, them and their counterparts on other campuses -- why? Because they bothered to get involved. And I didn't." Like, you can complain all you want about the democratic party, but the democratic party is just made up of the people who involve themselves in it (although obviously money plays a huge role and that's a different issue). And I've never involved myself in it before. So I feel like I need to start involving myself, rather than just complaining about its direction.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:47 (seven years ago) link

Also, iatee OTMFM -- it's one thing to have a long-term moonshot vision, it's another to completely avoid thinking strategically in doing so.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link

The Democratic Party is still ruled by politics, even at the local level, no matter how corny the people involved seem. A friend of mine in college graduated and got involved in Democratic campaigning, and worked on the successful Hoboken mayor's campaign. She seemed corny as fuck on the outside, total student government dork, but if you knew her she was a complete sociopath. Not malicious or anything, but still a total sociopath.

On the national level, just look the Clinton/Sanders dynamic.

larry appleton, Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:52 (seven years ago) link

was there a coherent thought somewhere in that post that I missed?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:53 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, it's called having actual experience in what you're talking about.

larry appleton, Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

I have more direct examples, but I don't want talk about that. It's not magical fairyland where you can just waltz into an established power structure with tons of money and ruthlessly ambitious people involved.

larry appleton, Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:55 (seven years ago) link

if we just run candidates who inspire people to show up and send out counter-programming flyers against the Official Approved Party Candidates, the party will be ours

no it won't - the DNC will just have Sarah Silverman call us ridiculous again for not towing the party line

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

we need a long-term strategic plan for dealing with the threat of sarah silverman being mean to us

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:58 (seven years ago) link

Right, not saying you can just walk into your local dem office and determine the direction of the DNC tomorrow, but you can only start in that direction by being involved.

Also stuff like this does happen:

http://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/09/sanders-coalition-takes-over-brevard-democratic-leadership/95105028/

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

And suddenly I thought "those people are the people moving into power positions in the democratic party now, them and their counterparts on other campuses -- why? Because they bothered to get involved. And I didn't." Like, you can complain all you want about the democratic party, but the democratic party is just made up of the people who involve themselves in it (although obviously money plays a huge role and that's a different issue). And I've never involved myself in it before. So I feel like I need to start involving myself, rather than just complaining about its direction.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:47 AM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Suuuuuper OTMFM.

larry, I've noticed that your imagination has a tendency to run wild when you start making assumptions about the perspectives and motives of other people. Since no one itt suggested in any way that taking over a major political party was going to be a cakewalk, you probably can stop yelling at the strawmen that did.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

the defeatist attitude is functionally identical to "normalizing" Trump and the GOP

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:08 (seven years ago) link

Yes. The end result is precisely the same. I totally get the wailing and the gnashing of teeth and the dread and despair but throwing your hands up with a 'whattayagonnado?' is kinda morally indefensible, imo.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

I can't take part in partisan politics but I could work the phones for something like NPVIC, which btw is supported by a majority of Americans regardless of affiliation.

NPVIC doesn't disempower GOP voters any more than they already are. It does the opposite for single-party states because all of a sudden their issues start to matter where before they couldn't hold a candle to New Hampshire. It makes every vote count. Except the territories, but that's a separate piece of legislation I want to work on at some point.

But don't listen to me, go read the Hertzberg piece Alfred linked to.

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Even if all you can muster up is the self-control to not add your voice to the defeatism crusade, that's a plus.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

or we just do a better job campaigning in swing states. the electoral college is pretty annoying but overhauling it doesn't actually guarantee us anything in the future. even if the dems found themselves in a spot where they could make this happen via controlling 270 state electoral votes, that plan only works until exactly one of those states gets a republican government, which does actually happen once in a while. real change is only going to happen once there's broad consensus, not via some loophole. and there's no *worse* time to be looking for broad consensus on the subject, because republicans who probably didn't have a strong opinion on the electoral college a year ago now believe that it is a very good and necessary thing.

― iatee

whoof. this is dangerously short-sighed, imo.

the democratic party has spent the last 25 years pissing on tip o'neill's grave, which is exceptionally rude given that i don't think he's even been dead that long, and alienating major sections of their base, not on a policy level but on the strategic and tactical levels.

if the pattern of the last 50 years hold, can the democrats take the white house again? yeah, it's probable that if not in four years, then in eight the democrats can win even if the best they can come up with is somebody like tim kaine. but this is ignoring the bigger picture.

the republicans are the "break shit" party. the democrats try to be the "fix shit" party. it is much, much easier to break shit than it is to fix shit, and correspondingly political momentum in my lifetime has strongly favored the republicans.

president obama spent the last eight years trying to build a broad consensus, and we see what it accomplished. you can't build a policy consensus, a compromise, between "break shit" and "fix shit".

i would argue that building a broad and stable policy consensus among the electorate is much harder than you make it out to be, is in fact probably impossible, because a significant portion of the american electorate simply does not give a fuck about anything policy-related.

furthermore, the notion that we can just retake the white house in four or eight years and start building a consensus again is highly questionable, given that the republican long-term strategy for their party is to ensure, by any means necessary, unquestioned and unbroken rule for their party. they are rigging the game in their favor, and they don't really give a shit how obvious they make the rigging. look at north carolina.

now, if building bridges still sells, sure, keep trying to sell it, but the republican party right now is a pretty overtly fascist institution, the american equivalent of the greek "golden dawn", and my conclusion is that implementing any long-term positive change at all requires fascism to be crushed.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

The Democratic Party is still ruled by politics, even at the local level, no matter how corny the people involved seem.

― larry appleton

political party infested with politicians shocker

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, no shit, you're saying the same exact thing I am. That was my point in response to man alive.

larry appleton, Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

Rush I think you're totally misunderstanding iatee's argument.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

The point is that doing slightly better campaigning in swing states is MUCH easier than trying to get the nation united around getting rid of the electoral college. I mean I feel like you are purposefully ignoring what it would take, legislatively, to either get rid of the electoral college entirely or get enough states to pass NPVIC (the latter of which would be not only difficult to achieve but easily undone).

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:22 (seven years ago) link

the "broad consensus" he's referring to = broad consensus on the electoral college

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

i will agree that one of our biggest failures is the inability to get liberals to the polls or in anyway involved on a large scale between POTUS elections (duh).

my very conservative aunt used to make this really shitty - and frankly racist - comment about the dirty libruls' superior ability to push their agenda because they were a bunch of lazy bums living off the government who had all the time in the world to organize, demonstrate, strike, etc (*this was the 80s so i really don't even know what the actual fuck she was talking about), and how all the hardworking jesus-loving republicans had to actually go to work and keep the ship afloat.

kinda wondering is we're seeing the actual real-life inverse of her paranoid fever dream: a bunch of retired olds and angry un- and underemployed red staters, many who are heavily or completely subsidized by the govt, with nothing much to do but go to tea parties, politicized "bible studies", noe-confederate shindigs, threaten their congress-idiots and badger everyone in their real life and online communities into making America White Again.

will, Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:25 (seven years ago) link

NPVIC doesn't disempower GOP voters any more than they already are. It does the opposite for single-party states because all of a sudden their issues start to matter where before they couldn't hold a candle to New Hampshire. It makes every vote count. Except the territories, but that's a separate piece of legislation I want to work on at some point.

if you are a wyoming republican voter your marginal vote might not have any effect on the election, but your state still gets disproportionate say in the end result. the votes might be baked in but they're still helping to determine the winner, so it's deceiving to say they don't count - they count more. wyoming makes up 0.18% of the american population and gets ~.5% of the electoral votes.

and in a popular vote world, wyoming voter issues obviously don't get any attention because they're 0.18% of the population.

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

(and yes i appreciate that in a sense i'm trading my aunt's racism for some degree of classism/ cultural bigotry. but it doesn't change what i see "on the ground")

will, Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

XP thanks for the pro tip I'll take Wyoming off the top of my list - do you think the Dakotas might feel the same way?

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:36 (seven years ago) link

The EC, in many cases, detracts both from a constituency's ability to effect meaningful change and their impetus to even try. The US might not care about WY's particular issues in a popular vote world but the current framework doesn't give them any reason to make the rest of the country care or to, y'know, just gtfo of WY.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

To an extent, maintaining the EC is not that dissimilar to promising to revitalize dead or dying industries.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

XP thanks for the pro tip I'll take Wyoming off the top of my list - do you think the Dakotas might feel the same way?

really the only red state republicans voters that have a lot to gain from a popular vote are in texas. regardless, my other point is probably more important than calculating peoples' voting power - which people might be able to overlook because it's kinda murky and confusing. even those texas republicans who might have marginally less influence in the election than they would otherwise are going to be pretty happy w/ the electoral college as long as they believe its existence is politically advantageous for republicans. which they definitely do at the moment.

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

Most importantly it's unjust. A few thousand people get to be the Real Americans who tell millions of other people that they don't count. It must be destroyed.

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:50 (seven years ago) link

Please continue to waste your time trying to win a moral argument with pragmatism.

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Isn't the pre-emptive "that will never work" faux savviness exactly what we all hate about the current Democratic Party? To the extent we can agree on anything besides that we're all doomed

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-secretary-of-state-reject-john-bolton-moustache-transition-president-elect-cabinet-a7489576.html

did we talk abuot this yet

tbh it's refreshing to at least know there's some kind of logic behind his picks outside of "what's going to benefit me personally"

frogbs, Thursday, 22 December 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

I'm not disagreeing that the electoral college is shitty and undemocratic. it's also morally unjust that DC doesn't get any national representation despite having more people than wyoming. honestly that might be more unjust than 'we use this system of weighted voting to pick the president for archaic reasons'. but the reason why it currently doesn't have representation is the exact same reason we can't change the electoral college in the short-term - you can't separate the moral issues from the fact that the end result of these changes would be a transfer of political power in our direction and republicans know this.

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

the reason why it currently doesn't have representation is the exact same reason we can't change the electoral college in the short-term - you can't separate the moral issues from the fact that the end result of these changes would be a transfer of political power in our direction and republicans know this

Yes and the same dynamic underpins every discussion of voting rights / voting access / voter id.

You can make the argument in the abstract, as an issue of basic civil rights, but everyone knows that the people who we want to be enabled to vote are presumed to be Democratic-leaning.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

one of the reasons why you could hope for change *one day* is that unlike dc statehood / voter id stuff / giving felons voting rights, the electoral college is not *so* directly correlated to 'well, now democrats just get more voters. forever.' honestly probably is overall due to turnout stuff, but there are potential maps where the electoral college benefits dems, and it's not inconceivable that it costs the republicans an election one day. again, people forget that it actually came super close to happening in 2004.

it could be an issue becomes a moral and practical issue and maybe small/swing state voters actually end up willing to give up their advantage just so we have a voting system that they actually understand. but that's going to happen when it feels like a politically neutral institution, not right after it cost the democrats an election.

and also it's just a weird thing to spend any political energy on because in the long-term, 'winning the presidency' is one of the few things dems are actually kinda good at and well set up to do in the future.

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

@dick_nixon
It is always a tragedy if the president dies in office. If the next one should die I fear it would be much worse than that.

I feel I can say this given the crap being peddled by Trump's doctor.

At present someone is nominally in charge. If Trump should die, no one is obviously in charge. No one likes or is loyal to Pence.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

in the long-term, 'winning the presidency' is one of the few things dems are actually kinda good at and well set up to do in the future.

True. Even in this sorrowful time, Democrats came a lot closer to winning the presidency vs. winning a majority of governorships, state legislatures, the U.S. House, etc.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

dem pres won 4 out of the last 10 elections last so they do about as good as a coin toss

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 22 December 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump – Verified account ‏@realDonaldTrump

The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes
8:50 am - 22 Dec 2016

wtf is this supposed to mean

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

@realDonaldTrump: The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes

http://pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-9/256/thinking-face.png

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

Xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

He's going for a Reagan-esque koan and wrote a moron-esque scribble

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

channeling the spirit of general buck turgidson

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

absolutely. The Tea Party proved it's not as hard as people think to change the direction of a party with a relatively small group of committed activists. I don't think you'll see quite the same degree of focus on the left, but I think you'll see larger numbers of people getting involved.

The Tea Party was astroturfed fully formed from the heads of the Koch Brothers!

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:21 (seven years ago) link

This was Putin yesterday:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0S7_gNUoAEOiNR.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:22 (seven years ago) link

I must furiously masturbate in public until the scourge of public masturbation has at last been curbed.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

It's an obvious Commie trick, Mr. President. We are wasting valuable time! Look at the big board, they're getting ready to clobber us!

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 22 December 2016 17:36 (seven years ago) link

Newt backtracks on "draining the swamp," on video!

https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/811986402099527680

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:09 (seven years ago) link

lap it up, lapdog

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:10 (seven years ago) link

Trump HIMSELF has already pointedly said, on video, at one of his own rallies, within the past week or so, that 'drain the swamp' was foisted upon him and that he thought it was stupid and that he never believed it. The fuck is even going on.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

But I'm sure if asked, he would deny ever saying the thing he was filmed saying.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:29 (seven years ago) link

I'm like 90% sure he's exhibiting signs of dementia

frogbs, Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:36 (seven years ago) link

I can think of no other reason for the shot that is going on with him.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

Shit*

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

That seems like one of Trump's weird tics, to go on those ex tempo asides during his speeches about whether some campaign phrase worked, whether he liked it, etc. I always find it jarring to hear.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

It's very, idk, solipsistic? Does it actually excite his base?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:46 (seven years ago) link

The campaign was the greatest event of his life. He's savoring it. From Janurary 20th on out it will all be downhill and he knows it.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

remembering that trump cares only about himself explains that pretty well xp

k3vin k., Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

Trump being Trump is what got Trump elected.

regarding electoral college -- thing is, I always figured it existed to keep guys like Trump from winning every time. Can't always work, but without it, surely we end up with many more demagogues, no?

Dominique, Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

one is plenty

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

the electoral college may have originated as a way to protect from demagogues or foreign influence, but now it's merely a formality and giant gerrymander, and nothing more

k3vin k., Thursday, 22 December 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

p much

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:01 (seven years ago) link

The campaign was the greatest event of his life. He's savoring it. From Janurary 20th on out it will all be downhill and he knows it.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:48 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah. i think that if there were a way for him to resign gracefull and in a way that doesnt admit fault/frailty/weakness he would do it

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:07 (seven years ago) link

On Tuesday, TechCrunch obtained Cook’s response on Apple’s internal network to a question from an employee about the Trump meeting.

Cook first described how it was critical for Apple to “engage” with governments on what he called “our key areas of focus.” According to Cook, these include “privacy and security, education,” “advocating for human rights for everyone,” “the environment and really combating climate change” and “creating jobs” — i.e., nothing as mundane as money.

But in the third paragraph, Cook acknowledged, “We have other things that are more business-centric — like tax reform.”

Here’s what Cook’s vague description meant: Apple wants a huge tax cut, and Trump has promised to deliver one that would save the company about $40 billion to $50 billion....

https://theintercept.com/2016/12/22/apple-ceo-tim-cook-met-with-trump-to-engage-on-gigantic-corporate-tax-cut/

https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/19/tim-cook-explains-to-apple-employees-why-he-met-with-president-elect-trump/?ncid=rss

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

good ol' disruption

Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:14 (seven years ago) link

the electoral college may have originated as a way to protect from demagogues or foreign influence, but now it's merely a formality and giant gerrymander, and nothing more

― k3vin k., Thursday, December 22, 2016 1:58 PM (twenty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It most certainly did not originate as a way to protect from demagogues or foreign influence.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:20 (seven years ago) link

well yeah it actually was to increase the political power of slave states, which it still does, but that was the high-minded rationale at least iirc

k3vin k., Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

President-elect Donald Trump named the senior staff of the communications department for his administration on Thursday, including Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer as press secretary.

Trump's transition team announced that in addition to Spicer, Hope Hicks will serve as director of strategic communications; Jason Miller will serve as director of communications; and Dan Scavino will serve as social media director.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:25 (seven years ago) link

Hope Hicks seems like one of the very first Trump hires who seemed out of her element on day 1.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:36 (seven years ago) link

she's like some innocent child they stole from a mall and brainwashed

iatee, Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:39 (seven years ago) link

im sure she was in no way hired for her looks either

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

ok hold up

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

Read that as John Miller at first
xxxxpost

“a tub of horses” (Myonga Vön Bontee), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

folks if i announce i'm taking a break from this thread do you promise to make fun of me if i post here again in the next ~week? because good god do i need a break from this thread.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 22 December 2016 19:51 (seven years ago) link

everyone needs a break. it'll probably slow down soon anyway due to christmas and NYE and whatnot

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 22 December 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

Has there been a single day in the past six+ months when Trump did not say or do something stupid or alarming?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 December 2016 20:49 (seven years ago) link

It was definitely stupid and alarming the day he won the presidency

Evan, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

he was pretty good at it during the last 10 days of the campaign, when his handlers took his phone away from him (lol)

frogbs, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

If no phone is around to write a tweet, does it make a sound?

Evan, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

As much as I am enjoying these anonymously sourced stories in a single publication (more or less) about Trump's inability to book any act of consequence for his inauguration, I've been disappointed by the way so few of these imminent humiliations have panned out. Which will make it extra wonderful should this imminent humiliation pan out.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

i don't see why kid rock wouldn't do it. he is already selling shirts calling red states 'the united states of america' and blue states 'dumbfuckistan'. maybe he's not an act of consequence these days

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

Would be even better if a desperate Trump still bumps Kid Rock because you know... it's Kid Rock.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure Kid Rock and Ted Nugent are on board, the question is whether the stuffy GOP people want them for their fancy balls. Maybe Trump will open up the White House to the public a la Andrew Jackson, because the only ones who would be excited about Rock and the Nuge would be riffraff walking in off the streets.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 December 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

that kind of elitism is a dead end, JiC

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

btw "dumbfuckistan" started as a snobby liberal thing to say during the W years

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 22 December 2016 22:05 (seven years ago) link

If you can't be elitist about Nugent and his fans, the war is already lost.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 December 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

If you can't be elitist about Nugent and his fans, the war is already lost.

To paraphrase Emma Goldman, if I can't air guitar to "Stranglehold," I don't want to be part of your revolution.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 23 December 2016 00:50 (seven years ago) link

I make an exception for "Stranglehold." I was just talking to a friend yesterday how I would be cool with that played at the inauguration for, like, 30 hours. From there to his other "hits" it's a pretty steep drop.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 00:51 (seven years ago) link

OK, so "Dumbfuckistan" is the country that was attacked on 9/11??

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Friday, 23 December 2016 00:58 (seven years ago) link

I think you're confusing it with Redneckistan.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 01:09 (seven years ago) link

Not to be confused with Cucksembourg

"I must believe that my charm was not in my ass." (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 23 December 2016 01:13 (seven years ago) link

Sorry if this has been posted already, thread moves too quickly for me. Anyway, this piece is great and very useful, esp in relation to recent conversation itt.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/12/bad-ways-to-criticize-trump

I want to change my display name (dan m), Friday, 23 December 2016 01:24 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump
Verified account
‏@realDonaldTrump
The so-called "A" list celebrities are all wanting tixs to the inauguration, but look what they did for Hillary, NOTHING. I want the PEOPLE

Poor guy, no one wants to be his friend :(

frogbs, Friday, 23 December 2016 03:38 (seven years ago) link

Get your Andrew Jackson on and open up the White House for the party

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 23 December 2016 03:39 (seven years ago) link

I want the PEOPLE
Their tears are DELICIOUS

aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Friday, 23 December 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

i can't identify a single Nugent track, that's how cool i am

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 23 December 2016 03:46 (seven years ago) link

Sorry if this has been posted already, thread moves too quickly for me. Anyway, this piece is great and very useful, esp in relation to recent conversation itt.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/12/bad-ways-to-criticize-trump

going after John Oilver seems a bit misguided. he does a half-hour comedy show, I dunno what you want from him (for the record, he HAS gone after all the things mentioned in this article). but Hillary's campaign not using the ads with the contractors will always be baffling to me...people have shown time and time again they don't really give a shit about Trump's misogyny and "oh no what will the children think!", but showing the electorate straight up that Trump is a literal con man who bilks anyone dumb enough to believe in him might've been useful

frogbs, Friday, 23 December 2016 03:58 (seven years ago) link

sorry the 'drumpf' thing was dumb as fuck, end of story

global tetrahedron, Friday, 23 December 2016 04:04 (seven years ago) link

that's why you go after john oliver

global tetrahedron, Friday, 23 December 2016 04:04 (seven years ago) link

'drumpf' was the last minute of a 22-minute segment that covered most of the awful shit mentioned in that article

frogbs, Friday, 23 December 2016 04:06 (seven years ago) link

Oliver is so feeble

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 23 December 2016 04:07 (seven years ago) link

The first time I heard the phrase "fake news" was when Jon Stewart used it in 2004 as a pejorative to describe himself. Blowback really does have that "reap what you sow" element doesn't it?

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 23 December 2016 04:25 (seven years ago) link

Get your Andrew Jackson on and open up the White House for the party
― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, December 22, 2016 5:39 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

already got the giant block of cheese right

difficult listening hour, Friday, 23 December 2016 05:13 (seven years ago) link

^^^ difficult listening hour EVISCERATES trump

difficult listening hour, Friday, 23 December 2016 05:14 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0VyQZ0UUAA6Kvq.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 23 December 2016 10:21 (seven years ago) link

Wow.

re: Oliver, I enjoyed his show much better back in the days when he flatly refused to cover Trump at all tbh

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 23 December 2016 12:56 (seven years ago) link

Something (well, there are a lot of things, but this is one) that I can't figure out. Again and again, Trump tweets or says something insane, or confusing, or dangerous, or otherwise hard to parse, but he never clarifies himself, it's always one of his surrogates or employees. "This is what he meant," that sort of thing. But these surrogates et al. have proven themselves to be just as confusing, contradictory, disingenuous, and dishonest. So are they winging it, buying time and stalling by pretending to clarify what Trump has said, or is there someone in between actually sending out talking point missives correcting/clarifying Trump statements? And is *that* person actually consulting with Trump, or just stalling for time themselves? Or is it Trump that's simply mangling the policies and statements being fed to him?

Like, Trump tweets about nuclear weapons, then that doofus Jason Miller comes out with a gentle clarification. Did he have to go to Trump first to get clarification, or his he just doing it on the fly while Don't-Look-Back Dear Leader barrels forward at full speed? Is it Trump with policies that Team Trump is struggling to understand, or is it Team Trump policies that Trump is struggling to understand? I suspect the latter, and that Trump himself doesn't always understand what his Team is devising, but I have no idea.

Or take the "drain the swamp" stuff. You get Trump saying "drain the swamp" at rallies. He didn't come up with the phrase, don't know who did, but used it plenty. Then you've got Newt saying "nah, he told me he doesn't like the phrase and isn't going to use it anymore." Then immediately backtracking: "I mean he does like it" So who intervened? Trump? Or Team Trump covering for Trump?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 13:31 (seven years ago) link

Trump is making the stuff up as he goes. The flying monkeys are trying to make themselves seem useful, feel better, or give themselves a better position to argue from, or some mixture of all three. I don't see any reason to believe it goes deeper than that.

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Friday, 23 December 2016 13:41 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure this was already posted. It here it is again: http://qz.com/852187/coping-with-chaos-in-the-white-house/

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Friday, 23 December 2016 13:42 (seven years ago) link

Forgive the Reddit link but this is a great post on Trumps F-18 tweet from a pilot.
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5jtocu/trump_asks_boeing_for_f18_pitch_citing_tremendous/dbixlo6

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 23 December 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

Well I'm sure the generals know more about this than that guy, and Trump knows more than the generals, so... checkmate?

Evan, Friday, 23 December 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Trump's simplistic "I can get a good deal" theater is mostly for the hardcore base I think.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 23 December 2016 15:56 (seven years ago) link

is there someone in between actually sending out talking point missives correcting/clarifying Trump statements?

how strange would it be if there actually was? I imagine it's just as strange and unorganized as it appears - his surrogates are flailing to keep up with someone who may be literally mentally ill

btw can I just say how much I hate that Peter Thiel quote, "his supporters are taking him figuratively not literally, while the media is taking him literally not figuratively". ignoring for a second that many of his supporters very much do take him literally, the fact that Trump HIMSELF seems to alternate between "I can't believe you idiots thought I actually meant that" and "no, I really meant that in a literal sense" is just deeply fucking strange

frogbs, Friday, 23 December 2016 16:10 (seven years ago) link

It's "seriously, but not literally."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 23 December 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

"may be"

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Friday, 23 December 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

Trump's simplistic "I can get a good deal" theater is mostly for the hardcore base I think.

"I can get it for you wholesale," the mantra of New York

maura, Friday, 23 December 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

Trump: "I know a guy..."

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

this love affair with Putin is ridiculous

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 23 December 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

they should just whip em out and have a dick-measuring contest and get it over with

Οὖτις, Friday, 23 December 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

live on cspan hardcore

maura, Friday, 23 December 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

not sure a dick measuring contest is what trump would be hoping for in that situation

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 23 December 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/2qZBM7l.jpg

A very nice letter from Vladimir Putin; his thoughts are so correct," Trump said in a statement. "I hope both sides are able to live up to these thoughts, and we do not have to travel an alternate path."

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 23 December 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

His Excellency?

Οὖτις, Friday, 23 December 2016 17:25 (seven years ago) link

Putin working this guy like a knock off Stradivarius

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 23 December 2016 17:26 (seven years ago) link

His Excellency?

So excellent, believe me.

Snorting and all (Dan Peterson), Friday, 23 December 2016 17:34 (seven years ago) link

everybody be cool. Both Side Do It.

The Buffalo real estate developer who served as New York co-chair for Donald Trump’s campaign said his greatest hopes for 2017 are that President Barack Obama “dies” and that his wife Michelle is “set loose in the outback of Zimbabwe.”

True to form, Carl Paladino isn’t backing down from the deeply offensive comments he made to alt-weekly newspaper Artvoice for their year-end survey of 42 locals about their wish lists for the coming year.

“Of course I did,” he told the Buffalo News when asked for confirmation that he made the remarks about the president catching “mad cow disease after being caught having relations with a Herford” and Michelle Obama returning to “being a male.”

“Tell them all to go f*** themselves,” Paladino added in reference to the News’ editors who put in the request for confirmation. "Tell that Rod Watson I made that comment just for him," he continued, referring to a News editor who is black.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/carl-paladino-offensive-2017-wish-list-obama-dies

will, Friday, 23 December 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

rand paul is a douche but I thought this was p funny

Senator Rand Paul ✔ @RandPaul
New administration is lookin good. Haven't seen this many billionaires in 1 place since I staked out Bilderbergs w/ Alex Jones. Good times.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 23 December 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

idgi

Οὖτις, Friday, 23 December 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

figured Objectivists would fully support clandestine gatherings of elite "wealth creators", isn't that John Galt's whole schtick

Οὖτις, Friday, 23 December 2016 19:48 (seven years ago) link

projecting logical consistency on to wingnuts never gets old

a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:00 (seven years ago) link

sorry my sarcasm detector is broken. he was being sarcastic, right?

Οὖτις, Friday, 23 December 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

His attempt at snark, I guess? Maybe useful to cultivate Admin-directed snark by GOP officeholders?

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:09 (seven years ago) link

wtf

sleeve, Friday, 23 December 2016 20:16 (seven years ago) link

I expect Jimmy will be deeply disappointed when Trump fails to write that big Trump Foundation check to Habitat for Humanity that he promised.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:17 (seven years ago) link

on the scale of things to get outraged about a former president going to an inauguration seems fairly low

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:24 (seven years ago) link

Someone has to go!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:25 (seven years ago) link

they could wheel in the coffins of some other ex-presidents

maybe just throw the bones of andrew jackson at his feet after every couple paragraphs of his address

Karl Malone, Friday, 23 December 2016 20:31 (seven years ago) link

Beach Boys Confirm They're Considering Playing Trump's Inauguration.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:34 (seven years ago) link

would be cool if they do kokomo with stamos

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:37 (seven years ago) link

it'll provide plenty of new material for the evergreen 'can we be shown weirdos + mike love' thread at least

Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 23 December 2016 20:48 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjwCqASUgAA_Tv3.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjwCqASUgAA_Tv3.jpg

― Josh in Chicago

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 23 December 2016 22:04 (seven years ago) link

So did you guys here who's playing at the Trump inauguration?

Mike Love, not War.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 23 December 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

*hear

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 23 December 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

so wtf does this mean, exactly

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/812390964740427776

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 23 December 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

It means he's going to blow up the UN building.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 23 December 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

Maybe he's going to declare war on the UN? We got the nukes.

More like he's going to do his dance and demand they pay their fair share of rent or whatever.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 22:38 (seven years ago) link

xpost Ha! Great minds, like Trump's ...

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 December 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

in reference to the US not vetoing the UN resolution against Israeli settlements, yes?

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 24 December 2016 00:35 (seven years ago) link

maybe he'll just make their traffic even worse

maura, Saturday, 24 December 2016 03:12 (seven years ago) link

yes, Merdeyeux, w/ the total support of Chuck Schumer and the rest of Netanyahu's waterboys among the Dems. Unity!

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 24 December 2016 06:49 (seven years ago) link

Trump has now fed TMZ the line that he didn't want any stupid celebrities coming to his inauguration anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umu07u5DPpc

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 28 December 2016 01:04 (seven years ago) link

@Atrios
weird how i already see the trump era bringing back liberal blog culture. where have all you slackers been

@ggreenwald
It was hibernating with the anti-war and pro-civil-liberties sentiments that took a long, peaceful nap starting right around 1/20/2009.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 December 2016 03:32 (seven years ago) link

Deep

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Wednesday, 28 December 2016 03:37 (seven years ago) link

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 34m34 minutes ago
The U.S. Consumer Confidence Index for December surged nearly four points to 113.7, THE HIGHEST LEVEL IN MORE THAN 15 YEARS! Thanks Donald!

Thanks Donald!!

frogbs, Wednesday, 28 December 2016 03:44 (seven years ago) link

Completely crazy how it shot up from its lowest point ever just a few weeks ago under Obama!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 28 December 2016 03:49 (seven years ago) link

Idk completely withdrawing socially seems stupid and counterproductive to me

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 28 December 2016 05:44 (seven years ago) link

i was being sarcastic obv

k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 December 2016 05:45 (seven years ago) link

i have no idea how that's not a clickhole article

k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 December 2016 05:45 (seven years ago) link

it's a shame because he seems like he'd be a LOT of fun at parties

k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 December 2016 05:46 (seven years ago) link

can't stop loling at this:

"In fact, I went further. I told my tennis group..."

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 28 December 2016 05:49 (seven years ago) link

You can join the revolution for 2 cents a word.

https://knoxville.craigslist.org/wri/5925876980.html

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 29 December 2016 14:25 (seven years ago) link

Us retaliation, as such, for Russian hacking puts Trump in a very funny position, especially if the Kremlin counter retaliates. If Trump reverses sanctions or punishment, then it makes him look even more like he is in the pocket of the Russians. If he reverses sanctions and Punishment after the Kremlin counter retaliates, it makes it look even worse. If he reverses sanctions and punishments and then the Kremlin retaliates anyway, he looks just as bad.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:10 (seven years ago) link

Haha yeah he's p much cornered here.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:20 (seven years ago) link

Odds are on the first option, i think.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

well that's the position you put yourself in when you decide to go against your own intelligence agencies and just go, "naaaaah"

frogbs, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:23 (seven years ago) link

ya but trump voters wont rly care will they

loudmouth darraghmac ween (darraghmac), Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:24 (seven years ago) link

that said he's already made his Russian connection look really blatant and has faced no consequences for it, so does it really matter

frogbs, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:25 (seven years ago) link

The new sanctions are virtually meaningless - the key actions are that US companies won't be allowed to do business with the Russian security services (which they presumably either aren't or don't know they are doing), the expulsion of 35 replaceable diplomats and a new round of allegations against two people who are already on the FBI's most-wanted list for commercial hacking crimes. Russia might expel some diplomats in return - or even sanction the CIA if it can be bothered - but it's barely worth doing with one working week until Obama leaves. There is nothing much for Trump to overturn so he's not boxed in - probably only access to the two diplomatic compounds mentioned in the report. It's all very minor compared to the bigger question of the continuation of sanctions over Ukraine.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:39 (seven years ago) link

otm throughout

difficult listening hour, Friday, 30 December 2016 02:12 (seven years ago) link

nah she thinks the electoral college should be abolished, clearly somebody needs to bring that space cadet back down to earth

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 02:27 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/ericgarland/status/814584522230628352

tombot i think you'd like this guy if you're looking for more delusional optimism

k3vin k., Friday, 30 December 2016 04:15 (seven years ago) link

every single post you make is predictable, sniveling, cowardly and dull all at the same time. I can't figure out the point of you at all

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

other than to push my buttons, I guess

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 04:29 (seven years ago) link

tom i'm just messing with you bud come on lighten up a bit

k3vin k., Friday, 30 December 2016 04:42 (seven years ago) link

that game theory guy is srsly unhinged funny stuff tho

k3vin k., Friday, 30 December 2016 04:43 (seven years ago) link

I hate nerds in every form and fashion and the game theory guy fits the bill.

Treeship, Friday, 30 December 2016 05:54 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure everyone here agrees that the EC should be abolished.

Issue is that no one has offered up a pathway to it happening. Small states aren't willing going to acquiesce power and if it became possible that would be because the math has started working for Democrats again and they're never going to change it when that's the case.

Calling everyone defeatist ninnies because they can't see how it's going to happen is ridiculous.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 30 December 2016 06:04 (seven years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/rampage/wp/2016/12/28/americans-especially-but-not-exclusively-trump-voters-believe-crazy-wrong-things/

The headline to this is absurd. Exactly one question where Clinton voters are more gullible than Trumpies but "both sides do it."

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 30 December 2016 06:33 (seven years ago) link

No, that's a fair headline - as you say Trump supporters are more wrong ("especially") but the findings are still 19% of Clinton voters believe vaccines cause Autism, 21% believe the number of medically uninsured has gone up.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 30 December 2016 08:10 (seven years ago) link

#doomed

Treeship, Friday, 30 December 2016 12:34 (seven years ago) link

If there's one thing we've learned to trust in all this, it's polls

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 13:24 (seven years ago) link

Fascinating Russian Judo, Putin says he will not deport American diplomats in order to cultivate Trump relationship. You go, no overt retaliation. Which allows Trump to save face. Whether there is truly something there or not, there must be more to the relationship between the two of them that we do not yet know. Unless Trump is a moron and Putin is just messing with us, with Occam's razor says is the right answer.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 December 2016 13:47 (seven years ago) link

good mourning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 December 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

Trump is a moron.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 December 2016 13:54 (seven years ago) link

I don't know whether to blame the phone or voice-to-text - likely both - but apologies for my jumbled posts these days. They're like dada sound poems.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 December 2016 13:56 (seven years ago) link

TPM:

One of the most interesting explanations I ever read of the CIA's behavior after the Kennedy assassination came from, of all people, Norman Mailer.

Mailer thought that the CIA resisted any probing of its possible role in the assassination not because they were involved but because they couldn't be certain they weren't. In the early 1960s, the CIA was tied up with so many sketchy players and bad guys (certainly in the swirl of the mob, anti-Castro emigres, the Texas far-right and left-wing moles) that they couldn't be totally sure it didn't somehow connect back up to them. They didn't want to find out. Certainly they didn't want anyone else to find out.

Whether this was true as a factual matter or not I don't know. But as a theory it provided a plausible explanation of odd behavior, a shrewd take on human and bureaucratic nature, all while making no outlandish factual assumptions.

An interesting 'innocent' explanation of Trump's behaviors with regards to the Russian hacking is similar.

Say you're Trump. You have nothing to do with this. You know nothing about it. But think about all the crooks and gamers and sleazeballs around your campaign. There's Manafort, Stone, Page ... all their associates, not to mention your business associates with ties to Russian organized crime. (Stone publicly said he had some sort of a backchannel to Wikileaks.)

If you're Trump, how confident are you that a real investigation wouldn't turn up anything weird? Probably not very.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 December 2016 14:00 (seven years ago) link

I do love how months and months later, Trump's concession is, fine, I'll sit down for an intelligence briefing. It's all very
http://www.liveforfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/they-live.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 December 2016 14:02 (seven years ago) link

"We will not expel anyone," Putin said in a statement on Friday. "While keeping the right for retaliatory measures, we will not descend to the level of 'kitchen', irresponsible diplomacy."

He even invited the children of U.S. diplomats to a party in the Kremlin.

https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2016/01/23/17/putin-boy-kiss.jpg

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 30 December 2016 14:52 (seven years ago) link

Vladimir Putin kissed child like little girl

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 December 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

The diplomatic children thing is because CNN reported that the school most of them go to was being closed by the government in retaliation, incorrectly as it happens.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 30 December 2016 14:59 (seven years ago) link

So THAT's how he sucks out the souls of children.

troops in djibouti (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 30 December 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

so a number of prominent republicans (Ryan, McConnell, McCain, Graham) have responded critically to the Russia sanctions, saying that Obama did not act quickly enough or harshly enough. I think this response is interesting because it seems like these criticisms may be aimed at Trump as much as at Obama. In other words, rather than attacking Trump's position on the topic directly, it's almost as if they are using Obama as a stand in to let Trump know he's on notice if he doesn't take the Russian issue seriously.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Friday, 30 December 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

I feel like whatever happens to go wrong in the coming years, the spin will be relying on speaking about what wasn't done during the Obama presidency until whoever is asking just gives up and drops it.

Evan, Friday, 30 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

tom i'm just messing with you bud come on lighten up a bit

yeah when I find myself getting the Morbs on these threads I need to remind myself to learn how to use the "second thought" thread

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

yesterday was indeed a very long day though

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

What merit does Putin even have when he says they won't retaliate? The country that did secret hacking spy stuff and was discovered promises not to do any more top secret hacking spy stuff?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 December 2016 17:02 (seven years ago) link

I feel like whatever happens to go wrong in the coming years, the spin will be relying on speaking about what wasn't done during the Obama presidency until whoever is asking just gives up and drops it.

this is what Cameron and Osborne did in the UK for 6 years and sadly it worked like a dream

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 30 December 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

An interesting 'innocent' explanation of Trump's behaviors with regards to the Russian hacking is similar.

Say you're Trump. You have nothing to do with this. You know nothing about it. But think about all the crooks and gamers and sleazeballs around your campaign. There's Manafort, Stone, Page ... all their associates, not to mention your business associates with ties to Russian organized crime. (Stone publicly said he had some sort of a backchannel to Wikileaks.)

If you're Trump, how confident are you that a real investigation wouldn't turn up anything weird? Probably not very.

This is why he isnt taking briefings imo. He doesn't want to inadvertently say something incriminating. Helluva way to kick off a presidency.

Treeship, Friday, 30 December 2016 18:32 (seven years ago) link

I think it has more to do with the fact that he can't concentrate for more than 30 seconds at a time. Hasn't he already said things that would be incriminating if they weren't made up?

frogbs, Friday, 30 December 2016 18:48 (seven years ago) link

Woodja lookit these two BFFs

I was waiting for this moment to reveal itself.

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 30 December 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

Lol trumps tweet today. Openly praising Putin for his response to the sanctions.

Treeship, Friday, 30 December 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

We'll all be speaking Russian this time next year.

"I must believe that my charm was not in my ass." (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 30 December 2016 21:29 (seven years ago) link

This has been a pretty good prank on America, you have to admit.

Treeship, Friday, 30 December 2016 21:31 (seven years ago) link

actually, I think you'll find that YOU'RE the puppet

frogbs, Friday, 30 December 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

fucking lol, he even pinned the tweet so people see it right away

frogbs, Friday, 30 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

I believe matryoshka is the preferred metaphor.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 December 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

the likelihood that Trump has massive financial interests in Russia OR he's being blackmailed has got to be approaching 100% at this point, there's no other explanation is there?

frogbs, Friday, 30 December 2016 22:01 (seven years ago) link

Maybe he just thinks it's funny to give off an impression of grotesque impropriety and watch people's heads spin. Who knows

Treeship, Friday, 30 December 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

There's no decent explanation for any of this shit tbf

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 22:11 (seven years ago) link

The man doesn't laugh! He doesn't believe in it

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Friday, 30 December 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

this is what Cameron and Osborne did in the UK for 6 years and sadly it worked like a dream

Though, tbf, it worked like a dream because the opposition never challenged them whenever they blamed everything on Labour's 'overspending'

Also the entire media repeated the Cameron and Osborne line and trotted it out at every opportunity like it was fucking gospel.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 30 December 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link

... which I hope, and assume, will not happen in the US.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 30 December 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

aye i'm sure the american media will maintain its impeccable track record of tenacious, interrogative reporting

MY MUTANT BRAIN WILL DETECT TREACHERY! (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 30 December 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

i've lost the thread on all of this shit. greenwald and tiabbi saying the evidence put out is weak and calling out the left for scapegoating Russia; blah blah. who has read it here? I will trust whatever you guys say

akm, Friday, 30 December 2016 23:57 (seven years ago) link

trust Dennis Perrin's Tweets, akm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 December 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

What we know, for certain, is that the Democrats lost the election that they won by 3 million votes because everyone hates them, and they are liars, who are wrong, and unAmerica in their beliefs, which they do not possess, being wholly mercenary.

Trump will be a good Presidetn, because he has embraced the Russian leadership, and he got more Real Americans (white people living within a few hours of the Great Lakes) to vote for him, by several thousand.

The case against Clevinger was open and shut. The only thing missing was something to charge him with.

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 02:36 (seven years ago) link

Also, the only guy on the Democratic team who knows how to throw a punch just figured out, as he's retiring, that the youngest person on his bench is 70.

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 02:41 (seven years ago) link

The Year Liberals Fell In Love With the CIA All Over Again

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

(ie why i will always hate liberals more than right-wing lunatics)

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

yeah I think we figured that out, you big brave courage man of true progress

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:20 (seven years ago) link

you know it

kill America

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:22 (seven years ago) link

the Intel Gangster God first obv

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:23 (seven years ago) link

Can you help kill America from San Angelo, TX? I would like to start a fundraiser to relocate you there, it's a perfect location from which you can help us plan the resistance

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:35 (seven years ago) link

come on Morbs when has the CIA ever let us down

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

i don't do TX aside from Austin

(and never during SXSW)

I gave up my part in the Resistance in '84 when our doom became apparent

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:45 (seven years ago) link

Like you ever had a part in anything

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:53 (seven years ago) link

i was a gay activist, fyi, until they made me vomit all the time.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:54 (seven years ago) link

ban marriage

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:55 (seven years ago) link

The Year Liberals Fell In Love With the CIA All Over Again

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, December 31, 2016 3:19 AM (eighteen minutes ago)

this line is ridiculous, man.

the evidence that putin's government interfered with our election to some degree is pretty strong, but apparently i'm supposed to doubt it because...it would mean agreeing with the cia, and liberals aren't supposed to do that, even when they're right?

from my pov this is an example of the cia actually doing something in keeping with its original charter and purpose: gathering intelligence from hostile foreign powers. i admit i didn't realize that for some leftists the analysis doesn't go any deeper than "cia bad."

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 31 December 2016 03:56 (seven years ago) link

I'm still dubious, as per this Taibbi article:

This report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

At one point we learn that the code name the U.S. intelligence community has given to Russian cyber shenanigans is GRIZZLY STEPPE, a sexy enough detail.

But we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.

The problem with this story is that, like the Iraq-WMD mess, it takes place in the middle of a highly politicized environment during which the motives of all the relevant actors are suspect. Nothing quite adds up.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/something-about-this-russia-story-stinks-w458439

sleeve, Saturday, 31 December 2016 04:03 (seven years ago) link

the evidence that putin's government interfered with our election to some degree is pretty strong

I'd love to see it. But the board pro would chortle at my "naivete."

That's some catch, that Catch-22.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2016 04:08 (seven years ago) link

Absent evidence, how about the pretty clearly pro-Trump FBI eventually coming around to the CIA's take on the situation?

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Saturday, 31 December 2016 05:21 (seven years ago) link

This Leonid Bershidsky piece is also useful on the lack of evidence:

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-12-22/why-i-still-don-t-buy-the-russian-hacking-story

The gist of his, Greenwald and Taibbi's positions is that it is entirely plausible that there was state-directed hacking but that the evidence released, which is largely from third-party commercial organisations and none of it slam-dunk, is not strong enough to support reporting it as fact. There is the separate question of whether, if there was state directed hacking, that was the breach that led to to Wikileaks having the info - which again is plausible but not proven. Bershidsky also believes, if the US has evidence, the response from Obama has been incredibly weak - both in not showing more of it and in the inept handling of the new sanctions.

The media throwing this into the mix with a bunch of stuff that is neither proven nor particularly plausible - Manafort worked for Russia! Russia hacked the voting machines (which Taibbi points out about half of Clinton voters believe, according to one poll)! Wikileaks is feeding info to Roger Stone!, etc, to strengthen the case is not helpful.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 31 December 2016 07:38 (seven years ago) link

The problem with this story is that, like the Iraq-WMD mess, it takes place in the middle of a highly politicized environment during which the motives of all the relevant actors are suspect. Nothing quite adds up.

the iraq-wmd mess happened under an administration that was eager for an excuse to go to war in iraq. i don't see a clearcut motive for manipulating the evidence here -- who benefits? not obama, who was reluctant to even bring any of this up. not the fbi, whose director intervened in the election to hurt clinton. and, imo, not the cia -- trump's about to become their boss. it's not even clear what making up evidence about a trump-putin connection would really accomplish -- it's not going to stop him from taking office, and it doesn't seem to have changed the minds of anyone who voted for him. taibbi speculates that the whole thing might be "a cynical ass-covering campaign" by the democrats -- so the democrats somehow got the cia to do this? all of the objections strike me as really airy and way more speculative and grasping-at-straws than the actual allegations are.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 31 December 2016 09:42 (seven years ago) link

The most common argument seems to be that the CIA / broader foreign policy establishment has a longstanding antipathy towards Russia (justifiably or otherwise) and wants to constrain Trump before he takes office in the belief that he will either be too weak or too favourable to deal with them strongly unless backed into a corner

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 31 December 2016 09:52 (seven years ago) link

i find it more than plausible that russian intelligence was behind the DNC/podesta leaks -- i've seen and will see no actual evidence but this is a mundane enough proposition for me to believe even from the dreaded cia, the motive is there on the surface, it didn't exactly take a neuromancer to accomplish (they won't believe "i meant to type illegitimate" when they read about it in the future, when they can read again; i don't even believe it now), etc

as far as i can tell that's all that's officially been alleged? yet there are these whispers everywhere, i can hear them even all the way out here, that something much more serious has happened, as the statistic SV quotes from taibbi makes clear -- there is not only no evidence for this but no real accusation at all right? yet everyone is talking about it -- friends both flesh and not tell me they're sure Something will Happen, that obama has put Things In Motion, behind the Scenes --

in the meantime the washington post -- which a moment ago i was actually looking forward to making a devil's bargain with, totally down w idea of dickens villain jeff bezos as khodorovskian opposition -- publishes a guide to Fake News from which we learn that content-farmed trump propaganda is exactly as Fake as just about anything to the left of the wapo? they've since walked this back a lil and admitted that they essentially just saw the list on their facebook feed and thought it was interesting -- but basically medialand this holiday season when not talking about russia has been talking about how you just Can't Trust anything you read outside of a small number of fragile and (in the grey lady's case) congenitally obsequious organs -- and at the same time it's true, every time i go to the supermarket for more pie i stand in the checkout line reading about the 500 muslim spies in obama's cia -- everything on all sides is confusion and paranoia and juicy signifiers and hints of some kind of occult interagency struggle, and meanwhile fascists are moving into the white house --

it's impossible for me not to think of the Russia Thing -- the fixation on the email leaks as the thing that brought trump, glommed quietly onto this weird amorphous but incredibly serious other suspicion nobody has any actual details about -- as a coping mechanism, and a dangerous one, because it so neatly extracts the single part of this disaster that's potentially not america's fault and blows it up into an unprecedented emergency that if real would have to immediately consume all the nation's attention and energy and render all other lenses thru which to view the election secondary yet would also be impossible to do anything about except click and stay informed

assuming trump takes office and nothing immediately comes of this stuff, i fear a nightmare mediascape where fact-light nationalist paranoia maneuvers the mainstream opposition into playing a weird kind of role in whatever fucked-up symbolic national psychodrama trump is about to try and replace reality with -- and anti-trumpists who don't play that role but instead blame america for what is happening will be portrayed as useful idiots if not actual traitors (cf the game theory guy on snowden, manning, every notable american dissident of the last decade: they're all kremlin assets whether they know it or not)--

the only thing that stops people from bewilderment in the next four years is organizing right? aside from its other virtues i mean. getting some collective sense of ground under yr feet. a localized sense that you can also extrapolate in2 a broader 1. because the national infosphere is going to be endless chaos.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 31 December 2016 10:15 (seven years ago) link

as for the electoral college i guess others covered it but what received skepticism was not that america would be juster without the thing but the idea that this would be the issue to unite the country against fascism.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 31 December 2016 10:24 (seven years ago) link

(when i say "blame america" i mean holistically, as a giant failing system, recognizing the dem party and bipartisan administrative/media class' contribution to this thru hubris and political decay and yes corruption, in addition to midwestern voters' thru succumbing to hate and the dang millennials thru not showing up and the gop thru being a nihilist death cult for 50odd years)

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 31 December 2016 10:42 (seven years ago) link

I'm sorry but your fugue appears to be full of straw men

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 13:27 (seven years ago) link

i find it more than plausible that russian intelligence was behind the DNC/podesta leaks -- i've seen and will see no actual evidence but this is a mundane enough proposition for me to believe even from the dreaded cia, the motive is there on the surface, it didn't exactly take a neuromancer to accomplish (they won't believe "i meant to type illegitimate" when they read about it in the future, when they can read again; i don't even believe it now), etc

as far as i can tell that's all that's officially been alleged? yet there are these whispers everywhere, i can hear them even all the way out here, that something much more serious has happened, as the statistic SV quotes from taibbi makes clear -- there is not only no evidence for this but no real accusation at all right? yet everyone is talking about it -- friends both flesh and not tell me they're sure Something will Happen, that obama has put Things In Motion, behind the Scenes --

yeah i have to say i'm a bit confused about all this too -- maybe i've missed some reporting over the holidays when i haven't been paying as much attention but to my knowledge this was the extent of the accusations as well -- that they were behind the wikileaks stuff and the intention was to hurt HRC and help trump. and sure, if true that would be very bad, but that's not....hacking the election. people seem to be making all sorts of inferences that are not only not supported by evidence but not even supported by any reporting i've seen

k3vin k., Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

Did any of you see the report that Russia for some reason hacked into Vermont's energy grid? https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html

What's up with that?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:18 (seven years ago) link

wow leave vermont alone

k3vin k., Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:24 (seven years ago) link

dlh, the conclusion that many have come to is that it wasn't so much Russian hacking that got Trump elected as much as it was the presence of an extreme, tribal divisiveness in this country that has turned many people into credulous drones who happily slurp up whatever garbage they read or hear that buttresses their pre-existing worldview. I mean, da doy, but at least people are more seem to be appraising the situation more seriously now (even if it's maybe too little too late).

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:27 (seven years ago) link

are more

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:28 (seven years ago) link

The broader conclusion being that garbage news and propaganda/innuendo doesn't have to change the mind of millions, just a hundred thousand or so, to affect the outcome of our particular political system.

Anyway, this story is far from transparent. There could very well be more that Russia did than just propagate the wikileaks stuff, just like there could be more the US is doing in retaliation, or just like Russia could very well be retaliating despite claims to the contrary, plus ongoing cyber and counter cyber stuff, all stuff we may never know. The Vermont thing I found interesting, because it intimates Russian cyber interference has been going much deeper than just leaking emails. I wonder what else they've been up to.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

they want to shut down kombucha production in the united states

tried Blue Apron and we died (Sufjan Grafton), Saturday, 31 December 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

The reporting in the Vermont thing hasn't been good (the original story was the grid had been hacked, which Burlington has denied) but it would be interesting to know what 'malware associated with Russia' means in practice. At least some of the tools supposedly used by 'Fancy Bear' are more or less in the public domain now afaict.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 31 December 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

Happy New Year to all, including to my many enemies and those who have fought me and lost so badly they just don't know what to do. Love!

Love! Trumps Sad!

frogbs, Saturday, 31 December 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

yeah "malware associated with Russia" is, like, most malware

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 15:59 (seven years ago) link

Dlh makes good points. The focus on Russia is definitely being used as a way for Democrats to cope with their loss without having to grapple both with why their message failed and what it means about the health of the Republican that someone was able to bullshit his way to the presidency while behaving in a crude, thuggish manner. It's a way to depict Trump as a foreign invader rather than just a particularly toxic example of how our politics has worked forever. (Never forget: Rove convinced the nation that John Kerry willingly put troops in his battalion in danger in order to win a medal.)

So Russia as a meme is definitely a way of evading this stuff and Democrats are using it to champion a memory of a grand Republic that has been betrayed, a country that doesn't exist. But at the same time Trump's connections to the Kremlin seem obvious and bizarre. Whether it is that he has business ties there, or they are blackmailing him, or he wants to team up with Putin in order to form a grand alliance to mount a global conflict with Islam, idk, but I want answers on this.

Treeship, Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

*health of the Republic

Treeship, Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

I feel like I live on a different planet than you people

The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

yeah "malware associated with Russia" is, like, most malware

also "malware found on a laptop that wasn't connected to the utility grid" is pretty far from "hacking"

sleeve, Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

no u wrong they hacked using 2 coordinated accounts pu✧✧✧@rus✧✧✧.c✧✧ and russiahacksthe✧✧✧@rus✧✧✧.r✧

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

anyone want to sum that article up? obviously i love great journalism but im not paying to read about some idiot giving his login password to a hacker pretending to be Comcast

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

I can cut back and paste.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

nvmd, so yeah the laptop was not even connected. fake news

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — President-elect Donald J. Trump, expressing lingering skepticism about intelligence assessments of Russian interference in the election, said on Saturday evening that he knew “things that other people don’t know” about the hacking, and that the information would be revealed “on Tuesday or Wednesday.”

Speaking to a handful of reporters outside his Palm Beach, Fla., club, Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump cast his declarations of doubt as an effort to seek the truth.

“I just want them to be sure because it’s a pretty serious charge,” Mr. Trump said of the intelligence agencies. “If you look at the weapons of mass destruction, that was a disaster, and they were wrong,” he added, referring to intelligence cited by the George W. Bush administration to support its march to war in 2003. “So I want them to be sure,” the president-elect said. “I think it’s unfair if they don’t know.”

He added: “And I know a lot about hacking. And hacking is a very hard thing to prove. So it could be somebody else. And I also know things that other people don’t know, and so they cannot be sure of the situation.”

When asked what he knew that others did not, Mr. Trump demurred, saying only, “You’ll find out on Tuesday or Wednesday.”

Mr. Trump, who does not use email, also advised people to avoid computers when dealing with delicate material. “It’s very important, if you have something really important, write it out and have it delivered by courier, the old-fashioned way, because I’ll tell you what, no computer is safe,” Mr. Trump said.

“I don’t care what they say, no computer is safe,” he added. “I have a boy who’s 10 years old; he can do anything with a computer. You want something to really go without detection, write it out and have it sent by courier.”

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 January 2017 20:23 (seven years ago) link

I also know things that other people don’t know

Classic. No one can see inside this black box, so no one can contradict any assertions made about it.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 1 January 2017 20:30 (seven years ago) link

It's like a variation on his favorite phrase: believe me!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 1 January 2017 20:31 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/mlcalderone/status/815597707733716993

it's amazing we're going through this again. waterboarding/"torture" all over again. like they never learn

k3vin k., Sunday, 1 January 2017 20:32 (seven years ago) link

that's what you get for dying and going to hell, which appears to be what happened to all of us.

Treeship, Sunday, 1 January 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link

He's seizing power in just under three weeks - let the fellatio begin!

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 1 January 2017 21:39 (seven years ago) link

Speaking of fellatio, Josh Marshall accidentally copied the URL of the lesbian porn he was watching instead of something else he meant to Tweet.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 1 January 2017 23:51 (seven years ago) link

hahaha sorry I love when that happens

a but (brimstead), Monday, 2 January 2017 00:07 (seven years ago) link

He didn't delete it for a long time, either!

his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Monday, 2 January 2017 01:01 (seven years ago) link

He hasn't deleted it.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 2 January 2017 01:02 (seven years ago) link

He did post this tho

https://www.twitter.com/joshtpm/status/815295971915694080

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 2 January 2017 01:02 (seven years ago) link

from the replies to that:

Eric Garland ‏@ericgarland 31 Dec 2016
@joshtpm Been reading you for 16 years since you were writing two blocks from my place on Q St, and looking forward to 16 more.

Ian Miller ‏@teen_archer 31 Dec 2016
@ericgarland @joshtpm it's time for some "i came" theory

soref, Monday, 2 January 2017 01:05 (seven years ago) link

hahaha

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 2 January 2017 01:34 (seven years ago) link

Well, the super-rich think these recessions are pretty great. After all, they get to pick up a lot of cheap deals during the crash and come out smelling like a rose when, in order to "stimulate the economy and promote job growth" the Republicans will cut their taxes even more, while slashing safety net programs, and the Fed keeps interest rates at zero. Hand them another Great Recession and life's a bowl of cherries!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 2 January 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link

less "a great recession" and more "direct corporate rule", maintaining general prosperity is for regimes that think there should be restraints on the cops

difficult listening hour, Monday, 2 January 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link

amazing to be capable of surprise abt how cynical ppl can be right now but the ethics office bill is just luminously craven

schlump, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 11:51 (seven years ago) link

it's stunning, yes

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 16:35 (seven years ago) link

OCE gutting proposal withdrawn following public outcry

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:17 (seven years ago) link

surprised tbh

marcos, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

it's important to remember that many of the things this congress is pursuing are deeply unpopular. Making sure that the public understands exactly what they are attempting to do may work as a powerful deterrent.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:21 (seven years ago) link

one hopes

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:25 (seven years ago) link

OCE gutting proposal withdrawn following public outcry

Will be re-submitted, and pass overwhelmingly, over inauguration weekend, while press is busy talking about who did and didn't attend parties.

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:38 (seven years ago) link

out of all the things to kick off the new session with

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:40 (seven years ago) link

yeah people are seriously dense if they think this is going away...

but speaking of seriously dense how fucking dumb do you have to be to do this in the middle of the night when they should just do what the honorable mr van gorp is suggesting upthread.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:46 (seven years ago) link

also important to remember that trump is unbelievably unpopular for an incoming president

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201158/skeptical-trump-handle-presidential-duties.aspx

would love to see this repeated in every single article about him

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:47 (seven years ago) link

wow, 20-30 points behind Obama & GWB in every category, impressive.

great Canadian prog-psych debut from 1969 (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:52 (seven years ago) link

too bad all the people who aren't skeptical are the ones whose votes matter

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:53 (seven years ago) link

thread is almost at 7800 posts, we could use a fresh start.
America under Trump - Year One: January 2017 to

A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 18:07 (seven years ago) link

three years pass...

taylor swift look like a lorax

― • (sleepingbag), Sunday, January 31, 2016 3:42 PM (ten months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Go fuck yourself.

― markers, Sunday, January 31, 2016 3:43 PM (ten months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

― sleepingbag, Sunday, December 4, 2016 2:04 PM (three years ago) bookmarkflaglink

lumen (esby), Thursday, 21 May 2020 19:33 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.